Bridge 知识库
知识体系系统运维@aleabitoreddit timeline

2026年6月

📝 原创
ASIC research report from Jan that I found interesting.

I don’t really mention AlChip much but there’s a lot of tam expansion opportunities if they want to M&A like Marvell. https://t.co/oaSMBgO72C
❤️ 538 🔁 13 💬 33
打开原推
📝 原创
$TSM COUPE supplier idea:

Another is Xintech (3374) that I have exposure to.

This is $TSM’s testing subsidiary, currently trading at 255 ~$2.1B MC.

Biggest wonder was if they were linked to COUPE… otherwise I wouldn’t take positions.

But some report recently confirmed TSM’s vertical integration plans:

“TSMC is building a Silicon Photonics empire, aggressively pursuing Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) opportunities with subsidiaries **Xintec** and VisEra citing unnamed supply chain sources…

TSMC is expected to talk up its SiPho plans, including its COUPE platform May 14 (Thursday) at its Technology Symposium in Hsinchu, Taiwan.”

So that kinda seals the deal for me if they’re “aggressively pursuit opportunities”.

Derisked long anyway given $TSM owns it. Upside from COUPE?

Thought it was an interesting idea personally.
❤️ 297 🔁 7 💬 38
打开原推
💬 引用
Okay yeah should have trusted Jensen more on $MRVL after what he did with $NBIS.

He actually gave a $1T price target this time with Marvell.

Marvell up 35% with one remark… https://t.co/Evv6QF8oMO
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$NVDA Jensen Huang:

$MRVL the next $1T company ladies and gentlemen “.

Marvell is currently trading at $191B.

I have positions in Marvell… but how much faith do we have in Jensen for the 5x? https://t.co/II4DTZ5Z9D
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2061671824388403368
❤️ 1,108 🔁 52 💬 218
打开原推
📝 原创
$LITE rode the first optical wave from $3B to $75B in 2 years time with EML and pluggables.

My thesis is $SIVE can do the same from $3B, with CPO/Pluggables and CW.

Sivers + GFS SiPH reference laser news, alongside the +54% increase today.

Is just one step of the way. https://t.co/Hfth69ZnYm
❤️ 2,170 🔁 156 💬 276
打开原推
📝 原创
Tbh $XFAB lowkey reminds me of early $TSEM.

Just sub <$2B MC.

You basically never find a company with $NVDA and $NOK actively validating your pre-commercial silicon photonics foundry… (photonixFAB)

While getting CHIPS act/Gov grants to subsidize capex.

While leading the Europe’s effort to build a photonics supply chain.

Feels like that alone would justify valuations… but you get the power semi SiC/GaN operations for free too and all its assets.

CHIPS act 2 is coming out tomorrow, and $XFAB is listed in the photonics blueprints.

Did I miss something?

Or did markets miss something?
❤️ 1,510 🔁 101 💬 241
打开原推
💬 引用
DID YOU LISTEN ANON?

Reuters: New Sivers x GFS strategic collaboration.

$SIVE has now announced its lasers will be integrated into reference designs built on Globalfoundries Silicon Photonics Platform.

For pluggable optical transcivers, CPO, and SiPH.

This is fundamentally the most groundbreaking news for Sivers in history.

As Broadcom, Nvidia, Marvell, AMD, and anyone who goes through GFS silicon photonics has Sivers embedded as a default laser route.

I personally think this news alone should easily 2x or 3x Sivers market cap over the medium term, given how fundamental this is to their revenue.

To have Sivers be the standard laser route for the many hyperscalers that use the world's leading photonics foundry.
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The most consequential event of an entire company’s history.

Got released today with a photonics player.

Making them the functional standard laser for CPO, Pluggables, and SiPH.

For companies like $NVDA, $AVGO, $AMD, to $MRVL using the foundry.

Does anyone know the name?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2061704502076747781
❤️ 3,558 🔁 299 💬 462
打开原推
📝 原创
The most consequential event of an entire company’s history.

Got released today with a photonics player.

Making them the functional standard laser for CPO, Pluggables, and SiPH.

For companies like $NVDA, $AVGO, $AMD, to $MRVL using the foundry.

Does anyone know the name?
❤️ 2,373 🔁 100 💬 263
打开原推
📝 原创
$NVDA Jensen Huang:

$MRVL the next $1T company ladies and gentlemen “.

Marvell is currently trading at $191B.

I have positions in Marvell… but how much faith do we have in Jensen for the 5x? https://t.co/II4DTZ5Z9D
❤️ 3,426 🔁 212 💬 258
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a heads up, I've uncovered a bot farm with dozens of accounts used to spread disinformation about $SIVE in the past few days.

This illegal campaign likely stems geographically from Asia.

As these accounts were used to do marketing for the same Asian projects like Alchemy Pay. Or bought brand new bought X accounts.

All of which have no activity, but have an abrupt shift in timeline to repeating false claims about selling $SIVE positions and telling others to sell.

With some getting caught using AI prompts to create a negative reply.

This will be passed along to the SEC for investigation given there's certain traceability logs available.

While the regulators investigate, maybe not a good idea follow along false bot farm advice.
❤️ 1,558 🔁 91 💬 164
打开原推
📝 原创
I never thought I’d see the day where $GOOGL needs to raise $80b for AI capex…

Then Warren Buffet’s $BRK.A is funding the hyperscaler AI buildout.

- $40B ATM, $30B offerings, Berkshire $10B

Upstream ecosystem from $LITE to $AVGO to Mediatek to $TSM to $MU should go brrr.

Not sure if the Google holders are though, given this massive capex scale isn’t as funded by FCF.
❤️ 1,978 🔁 132 💬 178
打开原推
💬 引用
Macron announces that $NBIS invests €8B to build out AI Cloud Infrastructure in France.

This was my favorite comment:

“What about the Water” https://t.co/nlTb37BgE3
引用原推@EmmanuelMacron
Nebius choisit la France.

L’acteur du Cloud IA dévoile un projet de plus de 8 milliards d’euros d’investissement pour déployer des infrastructures et des services de cloud, avec une capacité cible de 240 MW, positionnant le site parmi les plus puissants du continent.

Bedankt!
https://x.com/EmmanuelMacron/status/2061518139280810192
❤️ 1,257 🔁 37 💬 131
打开原推
💬 引用
-> IP acquisition
-> Just waiting for CPO to take off

$SIVE is a laser chokepoint for photonics and are publicly validated by:

- $GFS (1 of 2 public laser suppliers with $LITE for CPO per presentation)

- $JBL (“Relatively dramatic moat” for pluggables built with Sivers)

- CHIPS ACT for the overall company

For highest visibility:

-> Ayar is the largest CPO player that primary sources $SIVE and are expected to ramp in 2027.

-> $POET is another near term CPO volume player that’s heavily visible with Sivers.

For OSINT mapping:

$MRVL Celestial (direct, not through Poet), Lightmatter, Lightelligence, were all high confidence customers of Sivers.

$SIVE is also developing/qualifying with multiple more optical transceiver players following Jabil.

It feels like they’re going to end up everywhere.

I’m not sure people realize how special that many qualifications is coming from a <$2B MC laser company is… right before 2027 volume ramp.

Especially while all the other laser companies trade at $15B-$70B valuations.

Just need pluggables to bridge revenue gap into H2 2027 (CPO Scale up)

Then making every laser they sell more valuable following the $LITE playbook, to capture more TAM of both markets.

- In the overarching optical $141B TAM (10x) in the next 1 1/2 years. (Goldman Sachs)

- and CPO TAM going from 0 to $81B in the next 1 1/2 years.

So, easily multiply revenue opportunity overnight doing IP acquisition downstream.

It’s more of just a waiting game, I think $SIVE is very undervalued relative to forward revenue potential.

If it were a private Silicon Valley startup it would probably be worth $4-6B today.

Just needs to get listed on NASDAQ for premiums to bridge that gap.
引用原推@RibeyeGPU
@aleabitoreddit If your Sivers thesis goes tits up, what do you think the most likely reason would be?
https://x.com/RibeyeGPU/status/2061528933842210998
❤️ 1,213 🔁 96 💬 10
打开原推
💬 引用
I did say $AAOI was my favorite US optical long...

+20.1% today.

If you want the next $SNDK, you're looking at it.

I think H1 entering H2 2027 will likely be that massive inflection point for photonics players.

We're just a tad early entering H2 2026 while everyone is building up capacity.

Just a general rule of thumb in general if your name isnt space or quantum, markets are forward looking round 8 months.

That revenue ramp inflection point is coming, more of a matter of when, waiting for it, and embracing volatility in the meantime.
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AAOI is actually my favorite photonics exposure in the US market right now.

I went long last year with low sizing at $28, back when I guessed they were qualifying with $AMZN and $MSFT.

High conviction post earnings at ~$70, when they announced 1.6T and other volume orders with hyperscalers.

Capacity projections at $90 for 2027 timelines were bullish.

Now at $150, the story from 2025 is coming together with all the laser fab bottlenecks, GS optical TAM projections, Made in America efforts, $NVDA / $AMD discussion rumors.

The only thing holding them back is ATM after ATM, and now another $600m ATM…

I personally think it easily rerates once the mechanical selling pressure stops.

And personally think it could be a 4-5x return in 12-24M.

Also I don’t know who calculates those forward p/e’s on the screener websites but they’re all extremely off.
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2061252644195504239
❤️ 2,729 🔁 260 💬 341
打开原推
💬 引用
$ARM is just ridiculous.

$134 straight to $413 in just 2 1/2 months.

Should have went options, would have been up thousands of percent instead of only 3x. https://t.co/tF335Qp656
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$ARM expects $15B in annual revenue from the the AGI CPU:

"The company projects that the new chip business will generate over $15 billion in annual revenue" within the next 5 years.

5 times current revenues (~$25B revenue)...

Arm probably deserves to be up more than 5% on this news if they're multiplying their revenue with a new product overnight?
$ARM 预计 AGI CPU 每年能带来 $15B 收入:

“The company projects that the new chip business will generate over $15 billion in annual revenue” within the next 5 years.

这是当前收入(~$25B revenue)的 5 倍……

如果 Arm 凭一个新产品一夜之间把收入翻倍式提升,这条新闻下它大概不该只涨 5%?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036543096817852663
❤️ 1,523 🔁 60 💬 158
打开原推
💬 引用
Holy sht, plot armor confirmed with $NBIS https://t.co/1QwwKSRxSt
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$NBIS has anime plot armor!

Happy to hear Weebius has been outperforming the market and Neocloud basket ( $IREN / $CIFR ).

Last year post MSFT earnings, I gave a prediction after Q4 earnings, Nebius would reach a $100B MC.

We’re currently sitting at $60B MC, getting close! https://t.co/e96TirkJT8
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2061425895307608561
❤️ 1,188 🔁 54 💬 94
打开原推
💬 引用
And a few months later... my $EWY leaps are now up 485%.

From IV expansion and directional memory longs.

Unfortunately I did see a lot of people sell during the Iran volatility, due to doomposting everywhere on X.

But returns going long on the memory sector from Samsing SK Hynix / $MU have been absolutely disgusting to watch.

If you can model Samsung / SK Hynix becoming the most profitable companies in the world in 2028...

Maybe it's a good idea to just embrace the volatility and let that thesis play out.
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Feels like everyone is doom-posting KOSPI saying:

> “Look at the chart, it can’t keep going up like this!”

> Memory is a black hole for demand ( $SNDK taking 3Y preorders )

> $EWY is basically just two stocks, Samsung and SK Hynix, not a representation of the Korean economy

> Like saying Taiwan Index is a bubble because the index that tracks $TSM and Mediatek goes up.

> Memory demand/AI doesn’t just disappear because of a War in Iran, but it does get more expensive.

> Increased energy from crude/LNG get passed down to hyperscalers, not eaten up in opex.

It’s looks to be fear selling and deleveraging (3x ETFs and 10x likely got wiped out today) rather than materially operational (slight bearish headwind, but not enough for -30%).

SK Hynix futures is now trading in the high $300B MC-low $400B range.

If MS and updated analyst projections are even slightly right, SK Hynix’s operating profits for example would be ~$300B.

They’ll be sitting on too much money by 2028 as a cushion if memory prices drops. (and not even considering demand becomes structural).

Looks to be another DeepSeek-Nvidia type fear selling situation, especially as nand/dram prices get hiked again recently. More of a question of timing the bottom.

It’s times like these logic matter more than irrational headline selling.
感觉所有人都在 doom-post KOSPI,说:

> “看图表,它不可能这样一直涨!”

> Memory 是需求黑洞($SNDK 接 3 年预订单)

> $EWY 基本就是 Samsung 和 SK Hynix 两只股票,不代表韩国经济

> 这就像说 Taiwan Index 是泡沫,因为追踪 $TSM 和 Mediatek 的指数上涨。

> Memory demand/AI 不会因为伊朗战争就消失,但它会变得更贵。

> 原油/LNG 带来的能源成本上升会传导给 hyperscalers,不会被 opex 吃掉。

这看起来更像恐慌卖出和去杠杆(3x ETFs 和 10x 今天可能被清掉了),而不是运营层面发生实质变化(轻微偏空逆风,但不足以 -30%)。

SK Hynix futures 现在交易在 $300B 高位到 $400B 低位市值区间。

如果 MS 和更新后的分析师预测哪怕稍微正确,SK Hynix 的经营利润例如会达到约 $300B。

到 2028 年,如果 memory prices 下跌,他们会坐拥太多现金作为缓冲。(还没考虑需求变成结构性)

这看起来又像 DeepSeek-Nvidia 类型的恐慌卖出,尤其最近 nand/dram 价格又被上调。更多只是抄底时点问题。

这种时候,逻辑比非理性标题卖出更重要。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2029088341258584454
❤️ 649 🔁 43 💬 125
打开原推
💬 引用
A special thank you to the only European stock green today: $IQE.

Up to $54, from when I went long at $12-13, 4 months ago.

Unfortunately lot of volatility with the other ones from $LPK, $SOI, $XFAB, and $ALRIB. https://t.co/FysZyHk5OK
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Not exactly! I'm just a tad more familiar with photonic supply chains than I am with energy so I like picking potential winners.

Just wanted to introduce $IQE into the equation like i did with $AXTI, so I could do a "Did you Listen Anon?" post 3 months later if it turns out well.
不完全是!我只是比起能源,对光子供应链稍微更熟一点,所以喜欢在这里挑潜在赢家。

只是想像之前提 $AXTI 一样,把 $IQE 也放进讨论里,这样如果结果不错,3 个月后我就能发一条“你当时听了吗,Anon?”的帖子。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026647347237966298
❤️ 679 🔁 40 💬 229
打开原推
📝 原创
There's a new $SIVE short seller with 0 clue what they're talking about.

1. $MRVL Celestial is likely buying lasers directly with $SIVE as the laser supplier, not through $POET.

As they've been identified as a likely direct customer since 2023.

An analogy is if O-Net / Enablence / Sivers, and O-Net worked directly with $SIVE (which they have) but vertically integrated away Enablence.

They're still likely buying $SIVE lasers.

2. $SIVE is clearly the likely $AAPL supplier for lasers. I use the term likely, because although markets are 99% sure, the BOM is confidential.

The short seller is claiming it's TASC, which I've already identified multiple times as an Apple supplier.

But falsely they're conflating two different generations of Apple Watches with photodiodes and lasers for glucose monitoring to say $SIVE is not a supplier.

3. US NASDAQ listing is likely incoming soon after the new board meeting and shareholder vote.

Upgrading accounting standards and having immaterial changes doesn't mean anything.

4. Ayar labs hasn't scaled up yet. Ayar specifically listed $SIVE as their primary laser supplier in their website.

With their executives going out on statement that they couldn't built their products without $SIVE lasers.

Claiming $SIVE isn't shipping volume to Ayar when their CPO products haven't ramped is stupid.

5. There's zero leak around news for listing. Hilarious coincidence and management has always been pursuing NASDAQ listing since last year.

Short sellers keep repeating this disinformation to try and profit.

6. I've never seen such hilarious BS around Win Semi volume scaling. High confidence in SpaceX and $AVGO supply chain critical foundry.

7. Using arguments from authority saying they know an engineer and then having them confusing architectural differences between $LITE / $COHR and $SIVE is hilarious.

Regardless

-distorting financial statements
-conflating different gen architectures and timeline NRE
- reiterating false accusations

to profit off short term sentiment is likely going to see them turn into a long as CPO/Jabil partnerships volume ramp.
❤️ 1,618 🔁 132 💬 322
打开原推
📝 原创
$NVDA, Siemens, and $FLNC develop reference power architectures for Vera Rubin N72.

This comes at the time FLNC has 2 likely hyperscaler deals coming up.

Just in case why you’re wondering it’s up 36%. https://t.co/8f4gAhJeTE
❤️ 1,330 🔁 76 💬 128
打开原推
💬 引用
$NBIS has anime plot armor!

Happy to hear Weebius has been outperforming the market and Neocloud basket ( $IREN / $CIFR ).

Last year post MSFT earnings, I gave a prediction after Q4 earnings, Nebius would reach a $100B MC.

We’re currently sitting at $60B MC, getting close! https://t.co/e96TirkJT8
引用原推@soulbiri1
Just hit 1 million in Roth IRA in the premarket with $NBIS doing the heavy lifting. Trading in your Roth can be a powerful way to snowball tax free gains for life. Special thanks to my senpai @aleabitoreddit for making this possible sharing his wisdom. Next goal: 10mm NW overall! https://t.co/Jja1f3ks6O
https://x.com/soulbiri1/status/2061421436993175714
❤️ 828 🔁 33 💬 116
打开原推
💬 引用
It’s mainly just “follow the leader” algorithmic selloff in current photonics markets.

Most laser/optical related companies from $AAOI to $SIVE seem tied to $LITE performance…

Despite individual fundamentals improving. Eg. (AOI with $AMD / $NVDA discussions).

Algorithms don’t differentiate well, especially if something is higher beta than others.

But if you know something markets don’t like Sivers with more optical transceiver customers unannounced.

You can outperform in the long run.

There’s a lot of 20%-30% intraday moves nowadays, so I personally wouldn’t trade these movements.

Just going long on the Kingmakers in photonics thematically since I’m confident in exponential TAM growth.
引用原推@TheWizardofYYZ
@aleabitoreddit @WuKongWAGMI Any opniom the current weakness
https://x.com/TheWizardofYYZ/status/2061389550174277740
❤️ 1,374 🔁 86 💬 145
打开原推
📝 原创
This is the biggest TAM expansion + revenue driver with $SIVE, markets haven’t noticed.

Sivers is actively working with new pluggable optical transceiver companies.

After Jabil 1.6T LRO used Sivers lasers to achieve a “relatively dramatic moat”.

“Actively working”, so co-development / qualification stage.

My guess is we’ll likely see optical transceiver companies (eg. Innolight), announce they’re using $SIVE lasers soon.
❤️ 997 🔁 69 💬 119
打开原推
💬 引用
It’s actually just a cultural thing in Sweden to dislike anything special or growth related.

They’re telling everyone to “give up on markets”

Don’t take it to heart, just something to laugh at and welcome.

Since it shifts control to US funds + likely makes Sivers a US company down the road.

Because it’s cultural, many will start crying if they see $SIVE balloon forward revenue pipelines 77% from $JBL photonics 1.6T LRO in just a few months.

Even more so if they learn Sivers is likely to supply more pluggable optical transceiver players.

You’ve already kinda seen it with $SOI, at this point even with local French firms/retail shorting + negative press..

US institutions/investors don’t really care anymore since they own a large part of the float, and that’s up 4x now.

Just from personal ests on share structure:

Maybe ~5% Swedish retail ownership to go (down from ~60%+ -> 8% -> 5%)…

Which might be 13% of free float. So these types of local media publications are very positive for US investors/institutions.

Qualitatively speaking, everyone in Western institutional side of things seem very overwhelming positive on optical companies like $SIVE.

Since they’re familiar with Ayar, Celestial, and private CPO leaders compared to a lot of retail or local Swedish funds who don’t understand.

And majority of access should unlock after likely NASDAQ listing soon.

You’re just witnessing how ownership changes to Western institutions and it’s a good reminder to know what you own so you’re not influenced by Swedish culture.
引用原推@MoonGuy320777f
Swedish hedge funds really trying anything to save their shorts

To bad the Swedes sold all their $SIVE at 25 SEK 😂🫵

Thanks to @ekroth for getting this newspaper https://t.co/VKuADwCJhr
https://x.com/MoonGuy320777f/status/2060800354741051416
❤️ 930 🔁 55 💬 135
打开原推
💬 引用
Just some mobile shower thoughts around $XFAB and train of thought:

1. 800vdc $NVDA push look for GaN/SiC players / power semis.

2. $NVTS and other fabless/fab-lite beneficiaries of $NVDA push probably use foundry models

3. care more about Western supply chains over Asia, want to build up Western capabilities + Western premiums.

4 China has a lot of capacity, maybe risk into 2028, but again it’s building up Western supply chains

5. XFAB only high volume SiC foundry in America (others like $ON or Infineon are vertically integrated)

6. advanced 6in SiC, 8in GaN on Si, building out 8in GaN

7. Maybe likely they’re developing 8in SiC from CHIPS backing, just not public material

8. check SiC revenue -> 152% Y/Y growth okay. Probably something markets missed, since blended looks worse from automotive slump, that should come out recovery

9. $NVTS and others turns out to use $XFAB. $POWI cites $XFAB in filings, among others.

10. both are $NVDA power semi explicit partners, great exposure indicator to 800vdc power semi players.

11. US Dpt. of commerce cites $XFAB as only high volume SiC foundry in the US, $50M PMT

12. validation from US Gov about critical component in supply chains is amazing

13. EU CHIPS Act gives $XFAB $128M EU, for foundry (MEMS, AI, etc), okay turns out they’re critical MEMS player

14. So that’s validation from EU gov about critical component in supply chains, dual continent subsidies

15. So now we know $XFAB is a critical MEMS foundry so you get SiC capabilities, GaN development, and MEMS upside

16. they also got $47.6M EU funding for leading Silicon Photonics supply chain in EU. So that’s EU funding on multiple angles.

17. Turns out, I know all the players there from smartphotonics from $GFS deck.

18. $NVDA and $NOK are qualifying them for silicon photonics HVM. I think this is just a government backing angle for success in EU photonics so likely to succeed… kinda like how Us gov encourages everyone to use $INTC.

19. Okay chips act 2 is coming out next week… so they’ll probably get funding there or more revenue commitments

20. 1.28 p/b, now that’s probably just book cost? Likely coming out of $SOI type legacy drag cycle.

21. Did some modeling around actually replacement values, true replacement p/b cost likely ~.5/.7.

22. Getting business for free, while having upside from SiC near term into Silicon Photonics / GaN as main growth past H2 2027.

Thoughts: derisked by p/b values + replacement value. maybe like 20% downside from macro.

However, critical dual continent importance. So downside risk seems low, but upside is compelling.

Lot of capex likely backstopped by upcoming chips act catalyst + national security concerns.

Maybe 2.5-4x rerating seems possible/likely.

Not a 10-20x, but recovery from depressed valuations from silicon photonics upside with SiC / GaN bridge.

TLDR: likely trading lower than replacement value, dual continent subsidies likely subsidize capex.

Gov grants shows importance to Western supply chains, photonics longer term upside, SiC/GaN demand likely near term upside and bridge.

Don’t control any recent volatility, should shake out anyone not really confident in the thesis though.

CHIPS act 2 from EU is coming up, $XFAB was listed in earlier blueprints for optical ecosystem, so should get a boost after that comes out as near term event catalysts.

So now is the risk reward seems compelling, we’ll see if this is right or not
引用原推@cloudvllt
@aleabitoreddit Whats your expectation for $XFAB ?
https://x.com/cloudvllt/status/2061334401418473658
❤️ 936 🔁 117 💬 91
打开原推
💬 引用
I had higher expectations for Shunsin tbh.

It’s been close to a month and a half and it’s only up 39.96%.

Maybe I’m not as good with Taiwanese optical stocks. https://t.co/MbqvMTPiE6
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Taiwan $NVDA CPO supply chain ide #1:

Shunsin (6451 TWSE) - Photonics Packaging at ~$1.4B MC.

It's a subsidiary of Foxconn. And Foxconn is ODM for $NVDA.

It's almost like Celestial got listed by $MRVL and got a free piggy back ride?

Some personal est. 2027 fwd ~20 P/E, that compresses harder into 2028, 2029.

Shunsin's optical division openly lists their markets as "CPO 51.2T/102.4T" and "Pluggable XCVR 800G/1.6T.

Markets themselves as "Supported by Foxconn's vertically integrated supply chain for fast project ramp"

If you look at $TSM COUPE for $NVDA, they don't assemble final fiber arrays/racks, Foxconn does.

So $NVDA's CPO networking gear probably goes through Shunsin's alignment and bonding machines?

And $GOOGL, $META optical switches probably end up thorough them too since they scaled Vietnam CPO facilities (speculative).

Basically you get a free Foxconn piggy-back ride with this company at low forward multiples.

Disclosures: I am personally long.
台湾 $NVDA CPO 供应链想法 #1:

Shunsin(6451 TWSE)- Photonics Packaging,市值约 $1.4B。

它是 Foxconn 子公司。而 Foxconn 是 $NVDA 的 ODM。

这有点像 Celestial 被 $MRVL 上市,然后免费搭上顺风车?

我个人估算 2027 fwd P/E 约 20,到了 2028、2029 会进一步压缩。

Shunsin 光学部门公开列出的市场包括 “CPO 51.2T/102.4T” 和 “Pluggable XCVR 800G/1.6T”。

他们把自己定位为“由 Foxconn 垂直整合供应链支持,可快速推进项目放量”。

如果你看 $TSM COUPE 给 $NVDA 的部分,最终 fiber arrays/racks 不是 $TSM 组装,是 Foxconn 做。

所以 $NVDA 的 CPO 网络设备可能会经过 Shunsin 的 alignment 和 bonding 设备?

而且 $GOOGL$META 的 optical switches 最后可能也会通过他们,因为他们扩建了越南 CPO 设施(推测)。

基本上,你用较低 forward multiples 买到一家免费搭 Foxconn 顺风车的公司。

披露:我个人做多。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2043508231746810000
❤️ 634 🔁 30 💬 151
打开原推
📝 原创
哇塞,就差最后 4000 个了。

我就能成为 X 平台订阅量第一名了。

仔细想想,一个做财经赛道的人……

尤其是还在做“分享 AI 供应链见解”这种如此垂直小众的内容,这事儿真的挺特别的。

竟然能坐上头把交椅? https://t.co/GCrXsI8BeY
❤️ 2,320 🔁 37 💬 578
打开原推
📝 原创
At $NVDA GTC/Computex in Taipei:

I think we’ll hear about the next AI bottleneck.

That’s owned by a .6 P/B potato farming company in Japan, with a 180 year history.

Their owner cooks those potatoes in night markets for 160 yen a piece.

But that same potato farming equipment used to grow potatoes with optimal sunlight.

Is now required for optical alignment requirements for CPO.

And their unique cooking technique is mandatory to address thermal requirements for Rubin.

Can anyone guess?
❤️ 1,386 🔁 52 💬 462
打开原推
💬 引用
$AAOI is actually my favorite photonics exposure in the US market right now.

I went long last year with low sizing at $28, back when I guessed they were qualifying with $AMZN and $MSFT.

High conviction post earnings at ~$70, when they announced 1.6T and other volume orders with hyperscalers.

Capacity projections at $90 for 2027 timelines were bullish.

Now at $150, the story from 2025 is coming together with all the laser fab bottlenecks, GS optical TAM projections, Made in America efforts, $NVDA / $AMD discussion rumors.

The only thing holding them back is ATM after ATM, and now another $600m ATM…

I personally think it easily rerates once the mechanical selling pressure stops.

And personally think it could be a 4-5x return in 12-24M.

Also I don’t know who calculates those forward p/e’s on the screener websites but they’re all extremely off.
引用原推@GVDInvestor
@aleabitoreddit What do you think of $AAOI at these levels? Too late? Looking at a 12-24 month horizon, it’s got a super high fwd PE like around 85 or higher
https://x.com/GVDInvestor/status/2061101081246015934
❤️ 1,947 🔁 149 💬 200
打开原推
💬 引用
私の(4092)赤リンの投資シナリオ、誰か覚えてる?

ほぼ100%上がってるよ! https://t.co/J5Db900gl2
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
A Guide by Serenity:

How to Cripple the Western Hyperscaler buildout with just $170m.

Just take over Nippon Chemical (4092) with $169m!

For InP substrates, you need: Indium and High Purity Phosphorus.

Thought $AXTI was a bottleneck? NCI is the bottleneck of the bottleneck.

NCI is actually the leader of the high purity red phosphorus chokepoint holding 26-27% of the market share (Rasa has less share, then the rest is China).

And they export to $AXTI, Sumitomo, JX that need it to make InP substrates.

So… if you have $160m to spend to acquire NCI (plus Rasa as smaller capacity), you can remove the leading Western world’s production of 6N/7N red phosphorus needed to make InP substrates!

And without InP substrates: no photonics.

Fun fact: China’s tech companies would get pretty disrupted with it too by NCI.

For $AXTI, the mapping/reliance is actually pretty interesting:

- AXT's Tongmei outlined its structural reliance on importing high-purity precursor materials from Japan on their STAR Market listing

- WITS data showing ~$460/kg high-purity phosphorus flowing from Japan into China

So they secretly do depend on NCI.

China does have capacity like Wylton Chemical, Qin Xi New Materials, Jinding Electronics, and Chuxiong Chuanzhi, Guizhou Wylton Jinglin Electronic Materials as well.

However, they’re all smaller players so can’t make up for high purity red phosphorus capacity provided by NCI for InP substrate production at scale.

$LITE CEO already said inp substrates keeps him up at night.

So now with NCI, you can give the guy permanent insomnia?

For just $169M.

So here's what the supply chain looks like:

-> DGC phosphate rock mine and ships it to NCI
-> NCI refines Yellow Phosphorus into High Purity Red Phosphorus
-> Sumitomo / JX / AXT melt the Red Phosphorus with Indium to grow InP Substrates
-> $COHR / $LITE fab InP substrates into Lasers
-> Innolight/Fabrinet package them into 800G/1.6T transceivers
-> $NVDA / $GOOGL use them for ASIC/GPU clusters.

And basically, the entire West depends on NCI to make InP substrates for photonics.

I hold some very small positions, just for fun. However, Japan is not well known for price hiking.

So you’d probably run into regulatory problems eg. FEFTA if you bought the company and hiked prices 15000% (like government seizing back the company once they realize)…

Maybe 30-50% hikes is possible to compress fwd p/e? But very likely wont end up like $AXTI.
Regardless, this company is a massive, massive national security risk priced at ~$160m.

As for fundamentals, they’re trading at .54 book value and a forward P/E of 11.4 so it’s probably undervalued anyway.

TLDR:

-> Is it the next $AXTI? No.

-> Is it an unknown structural bottleneck + critical vulnerability of the Western hyperscaler buildout with photonics? Yes.

-> Is there still room for re-rating?

Just reverting to Book Value of 1 is immediate 80-85% upside. Maybe more if you give it multiples past 11 fwd p/e.

Regardless, it’s fun to find a major point of failure in the hyperscaler supply chains for $169m.
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2043906518026989817
❤️ 627 🔁 23 💬 73
打开原推
📝 原创
At Computex Taiwan, for new CPO exposure companies, always a good opportunity to find ideas:

Eg. 3362 Advanced Optoelectronic ~$477M with Largan Precision (3008) ~$14.6B

PMLA (microlens array) and FAU. Kinda reminds me of $HIMX / Foci

There’s a difference between sampling/demo stage though and having active customers, so need do more research beyond this.

Just a good starting research process
❤️ 422 🔁 14 💬 39
打开原推

2026年5月

💬 引用
Can’t believe $ARM went straight from $134 to $354 when I took positions.

The ~$15B annual revenue coming from these cool name AI CPUs seemed a bit insane at the time.

At Computex, looks like $NVDA is unveiling new ARM based processors too.

Counterpoint them shows them dominating AI ASIC servers by 2029, projections which is crazy…

GPU:CPU ratios are requiring more and more CPUs.

Seems like they have everything going for them?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Bullish on $ARM, given the new bottleneck shifting back to CPUs. MS shows stuff like Orchestration/RAG requiring CPUs.

But I'm predicting parts of localized inference to be handled by CPUs more and more... as models like Gemma get lightweight in the future.

Not every robot needs to be able to solve the mysteries of the universe.

Data centers will need an astronomical amount of traditional CPU compute (AWS Graviton, $GOOGL Axion, and $MSFT Cobalt), which are all ARM based.

$META + OpenAI are also buyers of the AGI CPU.

And AI will flow down to edge.

$15B annual revenue target.. Starting to look reasonable?
看多 $ARM,因为新的瓶颈正在重新转向 CPU。MS 展示了 Orchestration/RAG 等东西需要 CPU。

但我预测,随着未来 Gemma 这类模型变得更轻量,本地推理的一部分会越来越多由 CPU 处理……

不是每个机器人都需要能解开宇宙奥秘。

数据中心会需要天量的传统 CPU 算力(AWS Graviton、$GOOGL Axion 和 $MSFT Cobalt),这些都是 ARM based。

$META + OpenAI 也是 AGI CPU 的买家。

而 AI 会向边缘侧下沉。

$15B 年收入目标……开始看起来合理了?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046419572203683922
❤️ 1,014 🔁 69 💬 126
打开原推
📝 原创
Okay chat, it’s been awhile since the previous one.

And a ton of names from $VPG to $ASPI cooked.

So crowdsourcing a new list:

What’s your highest conviction ticker that you think can 10x in a short timeframe, and why? https://t.co/Rt21dTMtDK
❤️ 2,367 🔁 193 💬 821
打开原推
💬 引用
中文社区又出了一篇佳作!

当我发现像磷化铟(InP)衬底这样的产业链瓶颈或关键节点时,我通常会凭主观判断来进行操作。

这在很大程度上取决于能否准确预判下一次的技术架构演进!

尤其是去年,当所有人都在说光技术还为时过早、铜互连不会被取代时,我果断做多了光通信供应链。

看到大家如何解读我的投资思路,并将其转化为更偏算法化、系统化的逻辑,真的非常有意思。
引用原推@Baili1018
Serenity @aleabitoreddit 是谁?

前AI研究科学家,Nature论文作者,RISC-V基金会成员,前Reddit散户论坛WallStreetBets知名交易员——因为影响力太大被平台永久封禁。

真实身份不公开,不露脸,不接受采访,不收费,不卖课。所有研究成果免费公开分享。

就这样一个匿名博主,战绩夸张到令人怀疑人生:

2025年下半年(6个月):回报率630%。

2026年以来(截至5月28日):回报率4502.45%,也就是45倍。

过去两年累计:回报率225倍。

选股准确率:公开推荐35只中小盘科技股,仅4只下跌,其余涨幅1倍到19.6倍不等。

这周仔细研究了一下 Serenity 的投资逻辑。

我第一个想到的是贝叶斯定理。

他的这套方法这几乎就是贝法在投资领域的直接化用。

第一步:初始研究,定义先验概率

从研读学术论文、分析产业物料清单(BOM)开始,拆解和绘制全球供应链地图。

这在贝叶斯框架里,是在系统性、高强度地构建初始信念(先验概率P(H)P(H))。

平庸的投资者之所以平庸,是因为他们的先验概率要么是道听途说,要么是线性外推。而通过拆解BOM表、研读学术论文,是直接对产业的"物理现实"进行建模。这使先验概率从一开始的质量就远超市场共识,为后续决策赢得了巨大概率优势。

第二步:基于不完全信息进行下注

在识别到瓶颈点后,迅速将研究转化为实际交易。

这步正是贝叶斯决策的精髓:在不确定性中果断行动。

已经通过深度研究,计算出某个"隐形冠军"成为"霍尔木兹海峡"的概率显著高于市场认知。此时,就不需要等到100%确定,而是立即下注。这笔交易,本质上是用真金白银去定价认知差,也就是高质量先验概率P(H)P(H)与市场扭曲的低概率之间的价差。

第三步:在持有中,收集关键"证据"进行信念更新

交易的同时进行深入尽职调查,验证投资逻辑。

这是最经典的贝叶斯更新(P(H∣E)P(H∣E))过程。投资逻辑HH是"这家公司是未来的关键瓶颈",而尽调中接触到的每一个事实,都是证据EE:

‧正面证据(强似然度P(E∣H)P(E∣H)):发现其手握独家专利、与下游巨头签订了长协订单、或产品良率遥遥领先。这些会极大增强你的信心,后验概率P(H∣E)P(H∣E)飙升,你会选择加仓。

‧反面证据(弱似然度P(E∣¬H)P(E∣¬H)):发现其技术路线可能被替代、核心客户在自研、或管理层不诚信。这会使后验概率骤降,触发果断止损。我们需要验证的不是"股价涨没涨",而是"当初让我下注的那个逻辑是否还在被事实强化"。

第四步:基于全概率框架下的持续迭代

动态捕捉"当下最活跃的瓶颈"进行轮动。

这触及了更深刻的贝叶斯思想:全概率公式与序贯更新。

市场是一个动态的概率场,不同环节的"瓶颈概率"P(Blockagei)P(Blockagei)随时间演变。

我们要像一个持续运转的贝叶斯机器:

1,将上一轮尽调后得到的关于"A环节"的后验概率,作为下一轮评估的先验。

2,不断地比较A环节的后验概率与B环节的先验概率,哪里的"瓶颈确定性"更高、更活跃,资金就流向哪里。

3,使投资组合始终动态配置在后验概率最高的机会上,彻底摒弃"买入持有"带来的僵化和路径依赖,实现了资金效率的最大化。

这套逻辑体现了贝定理最核心的哲学基础:

相信的基础不是信念,而是概率;

概率的锚点不是历史,而是结构;

决策的依据不是确定性,而是期望值。

而且,这个人的网名也很有趣。

Serenity 的意思是:

一种完全平静、安详、不受任何干扰的状态。
翻译下,就是——沉静无念
https://x.com/Baili1018/status/2060903590169133358
❤️ 1,585 🔁 175 💬 181
打开原推
📝 原创
I wonder if my chokepoint investment theory…

With $AXTI to $SOI to $SIVE will be studied in future history books?

Regardless, I think everyone here is a part of making history.

Given Reuters to Institutions to Countries are reacting to supply chain game theory with Serenity.
❤️ 1,686 🔁 73 💬 137
打开原推
💬 引用
Just to add some actual pressure in terms of repercussions…

If you see folks spreading disinformation:

-&gt; Report Account for Spam
-&gt; Block Account.

Replying has the opposite effect and just gives disinformation campaigns engagement. https://t.co/KA4k6KkFMb
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I think $SIVE should just become a full American company, and use NASDAQ listing as the first step.

> US cap table / large ownership + US CHIPS act support already

> larger valuation premiums + M&A opportunities.

> local Swedish media blatant disinformation from underwater short sellers, isn’t helpful for AI photonics growth

> lot of more funding opportunities + support from US institutions / funds / indexes

By preserving EU efforts under a subsidiary and having a US parent company.

This helps Sivers become a major US optical player, not just a Swedish semi trying to explain itself to local markets that doesn’t understand.

I do think management sees a path forward for $SIVE to become the next dominant US photonics giant like $LITE.
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2060855976513941567
❤️ 683 🔁 29 💬 35
打开原推
📝 原创
I think $SIVE should just become a full American company, and use NASDAQ listing as the first step.

> US cap table / large ownership + US CHIPS act support already

> larger valuation premiums + M&A opportunities.

> local Swedish media blatant disinformation from underwater short sellers, isn’t helpful for AI photonics growth

> lot of more funding opportunities + support from US institutions / funds / indexes

By preserving EU efforts under a subsidiary and having a US parent company.

This helps Sivers become a major US optical player, not just a Swedish semi trying to explain itself to local markets that doesn’t understand.

I do think management sees a path forward for $SIVE to become the next dominant US photonics giant like $LITE.
❤️ 1,723 🔁 105 💬 143
打开原推
💬 引用
Very grateful for the objective coverage in De Tijd!

It’s cool to see my work in Belgium's top newspaper.

Also very refreshing to see a journalist cover $AAOI, $XFAB, $MRVL Celestial, and the nuances behind my supply chain thesis in CPO + Photonics.

Ty KLismont for the photo. https://t.co/1GdLxJHAsN
引用原推@elvermo
🙏my aim is true :- )

to inform small-scale investors as clearly, objectively & fairly as possible
https://x.com/elvermo/status/2060730659144904863
❤️ 1,702 🔁 81 💬 155
打开原推
📝 原创
The “You’re So Rich Now” $NVDA ETF.

These were just some of the supply chain partners Jensen made a toast to with that comment:

TSMC (https://t.co/klkdidhdwN / TSM) - $1.95T
Micron (MU) - $1.10T
Delta (https://t.co/QU9iDMM1OA) - $202.28B
Amphenol ( $APH )- $183.00B
Foxconn (https://t.co/aTlwrBvYTH) - $128.88B
Vertiv Holdings ( $VRT ) - $121.26B
Luxshare (https://t.co/HXnZe7hGCv) - $78.99B
STMicroelectronics ( $STM )- $61.60B
Unimicron (https://t.co/hpt0Ophv4o) - $52.90B
Asia Vital (https://t.co/RvcM9ecvSB) - $33.27B
Lite-On (https://t.co/m9p28o5iLO) - $16.97B
King Slide Works (https://t.co/KiNhmXtumB) - $15.35B
BizLink Holding (https://t.co/yNk855AwXy) - $12.95B
Megmeet Electrical (https://t.co/YdTe5Lhinp) - $10.78B
Innoscience (https://t.co/1unM4FPf65) - $8.30B
Chenbro Micom (https://t.co/8RU12cTJDW) - $5.44B
JPC (https://t.co/6EU7QhvSnh) - $1.15B
WUS Printed Circuit (https://t.co/52yoDEJ8Wh) - $972M
❤️ 1,331 🔁 128 💬 131
打开原推
📝 原创
Everyone is out there making life changing returns on $RDDT.

Fully leveraged on the wrong $SPCE (Virgin Galactic) ticker.

Instead of $SPCX, which is yet to launch.

I guess this just goes to show how much retail demand there is for SpaceX’s IPO. https://t.co/AzcpV5fZ3P
❤️ 1,556 🔁 52 💬 203
打开原推
📝 原创
Hot take: Given $MSFT laptops/PCs are now likely using $NVDA hardware.

They might have a shot of taking down $AAPL.

Only if Windows OS UI weren’t a flaming pile of garbage compared to how clean Apple OS is.

You would think a $3T company would know better UI design by now? https://t.co/OvysxCN21i
❤️ 1,636 🔁 68 💬 242
打开原推
📝 原创
Yo no sé cuántas personas hablan español en X...

¿Es verdad este post?

Hablo un poco porque jugué fútbol en Mexico por dos o tres años

Voy a publicar un thesis sobre CPO o $AAOI en español si hay muchas personas que leer mi post jaja

Lo siento, mi español es malo https://t.co/qjckIzoVz6
❤️ 1,388 🔁 24 💬 351
打开原推
📝 原创
$IBM Starling was est. 2029 (cool name btw).

Very interesting Foxconn is flagging quantum commercialization in 2030 from their conference. 2027 prototyping.

Just some helpful timelines for the $QBTS $RGTI $IONQ bros out there

Quantum is something I’m not as familiar with, but just in investing standpoints since it’s popular, maybe h2 2028, h1 2029 is a good time for quantum frontrunning unless there’s some random breakthrough?

Whatever is happening now looks way too early. Typically not a good idea to serve as the dilution in the prototyping phases.

But just sharing interesting notes I came across in terms of 2030 timelines for quantum computing commercialization timeline ests.
❤️ 890 🔁 36 💬 63
打开原推
📝 原创
Per Foxconn shareholder meeting:

CPO switch products expected to begin Q3. 10K units 2026, explosive grow to next year.

Aims/expected to be #1 globally.

Anyone remember which Foxconn subsidiary handles their advanced optical work?

cough.. cough.. Shunsin (6451).

Lot of these exponentially scaling volume shipments won’t show up in balance sheet yet, but will likely soon H2.

This is called frontrunning the next supercycle.
❤️ 1,346 🔁 91 💬 128
打开原推
💬 引用
Yep, I now have: Half a Million followers!

Thank you everyone.

I think this virality validates how refreshing people find it…

When someone posts compelling ideas and research for free.

Especially while focusing on substance instead of a focus on selling you expensive paywalls.

Markets are positive-sum where everyone benefits if a thesis is directionally correct.

And I hope this signals an end of an era to all the grifters out there:

Who sell stock picks for hundreds a month or use their flashy private jets/net worth to try and validate their ideas.

As well as a lot of the media/institutions out there that work against retail investors.

I’m only here to help out retail by sharing ideas and my thoughts.

And I’m staying true to that mission regardless of any high offers I get for ads or any offers from institutions…

And I’m especially not changing, despite any new follower counts I have.

Thanks everyone for the support!
引用原推@beauty_oe
@aleabitoreddit きみ、50万人フォロワーに今日中にいくんじゃいか?
https://x.com/beauty_oe/status/2060617146611503239
❤️ 2,544 🔁 48 💬 275
打开原推
📝 原创
> markets went from doubting $SIVE customers ($150m MC)

Turns out it’s likely companies eg. $JBL, Ayar, $AAPL, Defense Primes, $MRVL celestial.

> to doubting their execution ($600m mc)

Turns out you skip the capex if you go with Win Semi

> to doubting what share they get vs competitors like $LITE ($1.2B mc)

Turns out it’s likely sole source for companies like $JBL and primary suppliers for Ayar.

> to doubting their revenue opportunities ($2B MC)

Turns out they got 77% pipeline growth in just a few months

> to doubting their partners like Win Semi’s ability to scale (we are here)

Anyone who thinks Win Semi… one of the worlds most important foundries for $AVGO, $LITE, SpaceX supply chains…

can’t scale capability by 2028 is a stupid bear.

We’re at the point where US retail investors acquired the float off Swedish investors.

But I’m expecting US institutions to find a way to shake out US retail like they did with $NBIS or $RKLB before the next supercycle.
❤️ 1,352 🔁 79 💬 340
打开原推
📝 原创
Had some more time go through $SIVE earnings transcript, it’s very bullish:

- $JBL pluggable partnership led to more optical transceiver requests for $SIVE

So maybe Innolight/Eoptolink and other large players are my guess.

- More laser capacity on top of Win Semi with more partners being developed. “When the timing is right, we will bring those details to the market.”

CEO said it’s not just Win/Glasgow. I’m already confident in Win Semi scaling capacity, given they’re critical in SpaceX / $AVGO supply chains already.

But this derisks those capacity ramp even more. Just not publicly disclosed yet.

- tremendous executive credibility and experience with U.S. markets, as well as strong M&A experience

Flagged M&A in regards to new board members, which we guessed based on their backgrounds.

- “Production orders are imminent from our lead SATCOM”…

So that’s volume ramp for space

- U.S dual listing progressing smoothly

No exact timeline, my personal guess was around late Q3 or Q4. Probably after June board meeting, they’ll announce timing since that’s when new board members come in.

- “Viewing the ecosystem vendors as competitors is the wrong way to go about it in supercycles where demand far outstrips supply.”

Too much demand in photonics

- “Over the last five months, there's been a rapid increase in the Photonics pipeline as well”

Basically 77% growth pipeline came from photonics (which validated thesis about cpo/pluggable growth vectors for sivers)

TLDR:

We moved from “can sivers get customers this small and can they compete with $LITE?”

To execution eg. “how much can sivers even produce to feed into each supercycle” as they’re volume ramping while demand > supply.”

To me that’s very positive if anything they make gets bought.

Also there’s likely to be a lot of TAM expansion in the photonics space post-M&A as well as more ongoing hyperscaler supplier qualifications hinted.

Again, revenue pipeline surged 77% in just their quarter (5m) largely from photonics… over the entire company’s history.

As CPO scales up h2 2027 onwards, I’m expecting the revenue numbers to look like an exponential curve.
❤️ 1,223 🔁 98 💬 152
打开原推
📝 原创
I still find it funny how all the software bros are happy about a 10-15% recovery with $CRM to $FIG.

After getting wiped 25-60% of their portfolio.

Meanwhile all the AI names from $SNDK to $AAOI are casually up 200-1000%.
❤️ 1,847 🔁 43 💬 178
打开原推
💬 引用
- $AAOI at $12B
- $SIVE at $2B
- Foci at $2.8B
- Shunsin at $2B

Usually the best risk/reward to me currently. Lot of my answers before like $AXTI already 10x’d, so different lineup this time.

$AAOI due to absurd H1 2027 revenue projections from capacity ramp, doing everything from laser fab to assembly in America.

$471M/month… that’s in 2027, the TAM increases exponentially in 2028.

$SIVE is also ramping absurdly high, 77% revenue pipeline growth of the entire company’s history to ~$799M

Primarily from photonics… in a single quarter. And they’re projecting 60% gross margins off that.

Foci - $NVDA / $TSM primarily FAU supplier and bottleneck for COUPE. Genuinely not sure how this is $2.8B.

BOM share for their passive components + FAU are massive in 2028. Just a bit early H1 2026.

Shunsin - Legit you see Foxconn get CPO/photonics related orders over and over for $NVDA and others.

Just nobody knows the packaging/testing gets done by Shunsin.

A lot of contracts are also under Shunsin’s subsidiary too.. so markets/algorithms don’t know what’s coming imo.

Runner up is $XFAB, they’ll probably be central to EU CHIPS act 2 for silicon photonics at ~$1.5B MC.

And of course SiC/GaN foundries should go brr with 800vdc push by Nvidia.

Especially if they’re the only high volume one in United States per Dpt. Of Commerce.

And it’s such a low price/book ratio so you’re kinda getting the company upside for free, while US Gov/EU Gov subsidize their capex.
引用原推@DrEidolon
@aleabitoreddit What are your top 4 stocks to buy right now, at current market capitalizations and offering the best risk/reward, if you could only choose 4?
https://x.com/DrEidolon/status/2060365821986127990
❤️ 2,904 🔁 315 💬 257
打开原推
📝 原创
To be fair Trump did tell everyone to buy $DELL, multiple times this year.

He did go out and buy $1-$5M worth of Dell stock himself after all…

But should have seen this coming with Dell blowout earnings. After what happened with $INTC.

If you feel like you’re late, there’s a lot of implications to Dell’s upstream suppliers that markets might not have priced in yet.
❤️ 2,767 🔁 185 💬 366
打开原推
💬 引用
关于我当初对 $RPI 的投资想法是如何一步步演变的,这篇文章写得太精彩了!

中文圈的朋友真的很擅长讲故事我非常乐意让更多人看到这类好文

尤其是,通过这些复盘故事大家可以更好地了解我在构思原创做多逻辑时的思考过程。
引用原推@MMMusol
Serenity @aleabitoreddit 股神树莓派真的是教科书级别的打脸了

今天刚好好好捋了一下树莓派这波行情。不仅是从宏观,而是从Serenity的视角去理解——他到底看到了什么,为什么他能在所有人都不看好的时候精准抓住这个机会。

先说一下当时的处境

2026年2月的树莓派,说实话就是一个被市场遗忘的票。股价趴在发行价下面整整半年,一年跌了56%,市值缩到5.4亿欧元,历史新低。

分析师?没一个看好的。

华尔街给的营收增长预期是14-17%,基本就是“这公司还活着但也就这样了”的态度。

然后2月16号,Serenity 发了条推文。
标题很随意——“Fun Trade Idea: Long $RPI”。

就这么一条推文,两天之内树莓派涨了将近90%。

他的逻辑到底是什么?

反复看了他从2月到5月所有关于 $RPI 的推文,把他的思路拆开来看,核心其实就一句话:同样的需求冲击,打在不同体量的公司身上,财务影响是天差地别的。

展开说说,当时硅谷圈OpenClaw特别火,大家都在囤硬件来跑它的各种变体——PicoClaw、NanoClaw 什么的。最开始大家囤的是 Apple Mac Mini,这事儿很多人都知道。

但 Serenity 想到了一层别人没想到的:苹果是3.7万亿美元的公司,你囤一万台 Mac Mini 对它的营收来说连个零头都算不上。

树莓派呢?5.4亿市值。

同样是被囤货,同样是需求暴增,放在苹果身上是噪音,放在树莓派身上就是实打实的营收变化。

这个不对称性,是整个观点的灵魂。

他还注意到一个很有意思的现象:以前买树莓派的人,都是学生或者爱好者,一次买一两块玩玩。但 OpenClaw 出来之后,硅谷的创业公司和个人开始一次买几十块甚至上百块,用来跑并发的 AI agent swarms。树莓派的可寻址市场一夜之间扩大了一个量级——从“教育硬件”变成了“AI 编排硬件”。

有人质疑说为什么不直接用 AWS 开虚拟机?

Serenity 的回答也很实在:很多 AI bot 的应用场景涉及平台 TOS 限制,比如在 Reddit 上跑自动化营销这种,你用公有云人家一查 IP 就封你,所以必须本地部署。树莓派便宜、隔离、可以大批量买,完美适配这个需求。

定量预测——这才是真正牛的地方

光说逻辑谁都会,但 Serenity 给了具体数字。他说如果囤货趋势持续,树莓派的营收增长可能从华尔街预期的14%飙到48-55%。

当时看到这个数字我其实觉得挺激进的。华尔街共识14%,你说能到55%?差了快四倍。

结果呢?3月31号财报出来,营收增长58%。

58%。比他自己预测的55%还高。比华尔街预期的14%高了四倍多。

说实话看到这个数字的时候我是有点震撼的,不是说他运气好蒙对了——他的预测框架是有逻辑支撑的:消费者业务占营收三分之一,OpenClaw 带来的新增购买量是可以估算的,树莓派在廉价开发板领域几乎是垄断地位(因为以前没人有动力去竞争教育市场)。这些加在一起,48-55%的预测其实是有根据的。

说回媒体的反应

推文发出后两天,Reuters、Bloomberg、The Guardian 都报道了。但紧接着,Financial Times 和 The Telegraph 的反应是什么?

给树莓派贴了个“Meme Stock”的标签。

The Telegraph 直接说这是“mass stupidity”。
一个欧洲媒体说 RPI 的股价会“crash back to reality”。

Serenity 当时就很火大。他反复强调的是:这跟 GME 那种轧空完全不是一回事。他的论点从头到尾都是基本面驱动的——营收增长、TAM 扩张、估值便宜。

他原文里甚至列了资产负债表的数字:280-300M 营收,75M+毛利,25%毛利率,净现金28M。

这哪里像 meme stock 了?

但媒体不管这些。一个小众标的突然暴涨,他们的第一反应就是贴标签。这其实恰恰说明了为什么这个机会存在——因为没人认真研究过这家公司。

树莓派在大众认知里就是个“教育小玩具”,怎么可能是正经投资标的呢?

到了5月份财报验证之后,那些写过“mass stupidity”的媒体全都装没事发生。Serenity 在5月28号的推文里专门截了当时那些文章的图,问了一句:媒体写了这些诽谤性的东西,结果被打脸了,怎么就能假装什么都没发生?

讲真,这个问题我也想问题哈哈哈

回过头来看这整件事,我觉得 Serenity 真正厉害的地方不是他发现了 OpenClaw 这个趋势。说实话当时推特上到处都在讨论 OpenClaw,这不是什么秘密信息。

他厉害的地方在于转译能力——把“产品层面的需求变化”翻译成“具体公司的财务影响”,然后精准定位到一个市值足够小、能被这个需求实质性撬动的标的。

这种能力其实很稀缺。大部分人看到 OpenClaw 火了,想到的是“AI 好牛”或者“苹果受益”。

不过能想到“等等,树莓派也是个上市公司,而且市值只有5亿”的人,真的不多。

还有一点我很欣赏的是他的风险认知:他自己说了,主要风险是 OpenClaw 可能只是短期潮流,不是结构性需求。另外上游 LPDDR4内存涨价也会压缩利润。

所以他只是小仓位参与,没有 all-in。

这种态度反而让我更信任他的判断。一个人如果对自己的论点过于自信、重仓押注,我反而会怀疑他是不是在给自己的持仓喊单。但 Serenity 从头到尾都很坦诚:这是个有意思的机会,逻辑说得通,但不确定性也在,所以仓位控制好。

从估值角度算一笔账来看:财报前树莓派大概2x forward sales。一个年增长58%、有实际利润的硬件公司,2倍远期市销率。放在美股,同等增速的公司随便给你10-15倍。

就算打个折考虑到欧洲市场的折价和小盘股流动性问题,2倍也太便宜了。

他在3月31号财报后算的估值更有意思:2026年 forward P/E 大概20倍,2027年13倍,2028年不到10倍。

对于一个还在加速增长的公司来说,这个估值真的不贵。

这个案例让我想到一个更大的问题:市场上有多少这样的机会——一个真实的需求变化已经在发生,但因为标的太小众、太边缘,没有分析师覆盖,没有机构关注,所以定价完全没有反映现实?

Serenity 说了一句话我印象很深:“people just forgot Raspberry Pi was a publicly traded stock”

人们只是忘了树莓派还是个上市公司。

就是这么简单。有时候最大的 alpha 不是来自什么高深的模型或者内幕消息,而是来自一个所有人都看得到、但没人费心去想的连接。

共勉
https://x.com/MMMusol/status/2060276116615729374
❤️ 967 🔁 74 💬 126
打开原推
💬 引用
Holy crap, this is the most bullish thing I’ve heard from $SIVE so far.

From earnings transcripts:

“We do not look at competitors when demand far outstrips supply” (literally anything they make gets bought)

Along with: “We see 60% gross margins in the future” (incredibly high)

“We have two technologies that can feed into these three supercycles that are currently going on.” (Holy revenue opportunities)

My high conviction CPO/photonics long is $SIVE for a reason.
引用原推@GARRlS0N
Sivers' CEO on the call, "We do not look at competitors when demand far outstrips supply." $SIVE
https://x.com/GARRlS0N/status/2060249475432489284
❤️ 2,382 🔁 203 💬 236
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE basically took their entire revenue pipeline.

In the entire company’s history.

Then grew that by 77% in the first 3 months.

Thats by far the clearest indication of the inflection of the CPO supercycle.

It’s probably going to look exponential from here on out. https://t.co/81pYk3Y36V
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Only thing to look at with $SIVE earnings is forward growth.

Nobody cares about pre-development contract earnings from 2025 or last quarter, especially for qualification cycle optical players.

Having 77% growth of opportunity pipelines (revenue volume ramp projections), to $799m

In a quarter is absolutely incredible growth. And, I’d expect to see that continue compounding.

“The company continues to anticipate several volume production starts within AI data centers” (photonics/lasers).

Is also very positive and validates the thesis about volume ramp for photonics.

Now next thing to look at is earnings call transcript, once they’re indexed, which is the most important signal of what’s to come.

Overall, very positive.
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2060258820547588300
❤️ 1,622 🔁 113 💬 130
打开原推
📝 原创
Only thing to look at with $SIVE earnings is forward growth.

Nobody cares about pre-development contract earnings from 2025 or last quarter, especially for qualification cycle optical players.

Having 77% growth of opportunity pipelines (revenue volume ramp projections), to $799m

In a quarter is absolutely incredible growth. And, I’d expect to see that continue compounding.

“The company continues to anticipate several volume production starts within AI data centers” (photonics/lasers).

Is also very positive and validates the thesis about volume ramp for photonics.

Now next thing to look at is earnings call transcript, once they’re indexed, which is the most important signal of what’s to come.

Overall, very positive.
❤️ 1,630 🔁 111 💬 161
打开原推
💬 引用
听人说我在中文圈都快”闪光宝可梦”了, 哈哈哈。

拜托我也就是个普通人好吗!

平时也就是随手写点自己的想法而已。感觉最近关注度高了,也莫名其妙招来了不少黑子和瞎编的谣言

跟最近那些胡说八道的传闻相反,其实我在推特上从来没删过任何一篇分析帖。

大家估计是把我跟哪个喊单 $IREN 的大board member给搞混了吧。

我就是喜欢找点不一样的选股角度,先让行情走一段,最后再看看到底打没打脸

我觉得最核心的无非就是踩中了下个大叙事,比如去年的 Neoclouds 和光子板块,或者今年的 800 vdc 和 CPO。

不过… 我还是非常感谢大家温暖的支持!
引用原推@hanking66
家人们!我出息了!!!我的emo被Serenity治好了!!!!X平台第一大网红关注我了!!!现在我是Serenity第一吹,谁黑Serenity我黑谁!!!

Serenity的微笑由我来守护!!!@aleabitoreddit

赚钱就是硬道理,收益就是天,错几个怎么了,胜率超过70%就已经吊打华尔街所有的基金经历了!没错!就是所有!那几个网上喷Serenity的,眼红才是原罪!!!你行你上啊!第一网红你来做!!

Discord在个人资料,buy the dip,长期持有。
https://x.com/hanking66/status/2059555937690759246
❤️ 1,472 🔁 38 💬 440
打开原推
💬 引用
$HPS.A is close is to a 2M timeframe.

Transformers in the Sky are up 83.3% since. Bumblebee go brrr?

But in all reality, transformers demand visibility is very high, solid backlog, high market share (of dry).

Not exactly parabolic, but looks like a compelling compounder. https://t.co/bNGwjqfZ4M
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The current bottleneck: Transformers/Switchgear. 

Trade Idea: Long Hammond (~2.2B CAD / ~$1.5B USD) at 184 CAD.

They dominate the market for:

-Transformers (dry, multi year bottleneck ~23% of market),

-serve to switchgear (2-3Y bottleneck)

-and manufacture liquid too (5Y, larger bottleneck)

I personally anticipate components price hikes like NAND, as $AMZN, $MSFT and others compete for allocation. 

You might have seen: “Half of US data center builds have been delayed or canceled, growth limited by shortages of power infrastructure”…

Then you go further:

“To address shortages… Canada, Mexico… became the biggest suppliers of high-power transformers for AI data centers to AI data centers”

Guess who is in Canada (Guelph).. Mexico (Monterrey 3 and 4)… and the US?

Hammond

Then here’s the reason the articles cite why hyperscaler DB buildouts are falling apart: 

“Major reason behind these setbacks is the availability of key electrical components — such as transformers, switchgear”. 

Institutions are probably looking at Powell, Eaton, and others… but little do they know?

Companies like these actually buy Hammond’s transformers to put inside their own switchgear (“strong sales into data centres, switchgear manufacturers")

Their market share over the transformers market is actually pretty large (eg. ~23% dry). 

The most compelling signal:

-> 122% Y/Y 2025 backlog increase. And we can infer this to be 1B+ CAD. 

Eg. company achieved 898m CAD in sales in 2025, capacity ceiling. Management said close of Q3 2025 orders were valued at 53% of the entire closing third-quarter backlog.

Given that Q4 2025 revenue was 254 million and the backlog is "more than doubled," we can infer a total backlog value exceeding 1 billion CAD.

Also:

“Gross margin compression last year was due to the buildout of their Mexico facility, but both gross margins are expected to increase and the facility expansions are expectied to turn into accelerated revenue Q2 2026)” which is now.

Downside is if raw material costs (copper, electrical steel) spike again, but given this bottleneck, they can price hike. 

Personal FWD P/E estimates would be ~18-21 for 2026, <15 for 2027 from volume ramp.

But I think it’s possible to hit single digit fwd P/E if they do price hikes mixed with hyperscaler emergency orders. But that might get a little mixed with the new acquisition.

Regardless still looks cheap. 

Just a TLDR: 
$AMZN, $MSFT, $META, $GOOGL, $ORCL datacenter are being bottlenecked because of a lack of transformers/switchgear.

Seems like markets missed this little player with large market share, despite backlog visibility and increasing revenue from capacity expansion coming online.

I personally found it pretty compelling, so I went long.

Just sharing my personal thoughts, of course DYOR before making any decisions yourself.
当前瓶颈:Transformers/Switchgear。

交易想法:做多 Hammond(约 2.2B CAD / 约 $1.5B USD),价格 184 CAD。

他们主导这些市场:

- Transformers(dry,多年瓶颈,约 23% 市场份额),

- 服务 switchgear(2-3 年瓶颈)

- 也生产 liquid(5 年,更大的瓶颈)

我个人预计组件会像 NAND 一样涨价,因为 $AMZN$MSFT 等在争抢 allocation。

你可能看过:“一半美国数据中心建设被推迟或取消,增长受电力基础设施短缺限制”……

再往下看:

“为了解决短缺……加拿大、墨西哥……成为 AI 数据中心高功率 transformers 的最大供应地”

猜猜谁在加拿大(Guelph)、墨西哥(Monterrey 3 和 4)以及美国都有布局?

Hammond

然后文章引用 hyperscaler DC buildout 出问题的原因:

“这些挫折背后的主要原因,是关键电气组件的可用性,例如 transformers、switchgear”。

机构可能在看 Powell、Eaton 等……但他们不知道的是?

这些公司实际上会买 Hammond 的 transformers,放进自己的 switchgear(“对数据中心、switchgear manufacturers 的销售强劲”)

他们在 transformers 市场的份额其实很大(例如 dry 约 23%)。

最有说服力的信号:

-> 2025 年 backlog 同比增长 122%。我们可以推断这超过 1B CAD。

例如公司 2025 年实现 898m CAD 销售,已经到产能天花板。管理层说,2025 年 Q3 末订单价值相当于整个三季度期末 backlog 的 53%。

考虑到 Q4 2025 收入是 254 million,而 backlog “more than doubled”,我们可以推断总 backlog 超过 1 billion CAD。

另外:

“去年毛利率承压是因为墨西哥工厂建设,但预计毛利率会提升,工厂扩张也会在 2026 Q2 转化为加速收入”,也就是现在。

下行风险是原材料成本(铜、电工钢)再次上涨,但考虑到这个瓶颈,他们可以涨价。

我个人的 FWD P/E 估算是 2026 年约 18-21,2027 年随着放量低于 15。

但如果他们涨价并叠加 hyperscaler 紧急订单,我认为 forward P/E 有可能到个位数。不过这可能会和新收购有些混在一起。

不管怎样,看起来仍然便宜。

简单 TLDR:

$AMZN$MSFT$META$GOOGL$ORCL 数据中心正因为缺少 transformers/switchgear 被卡住。

尽管有 backlog 可见度和产能扩张上线带来的收入增长,市场似乎漏掉了这个拥有大份额的小玩家。

我个人觉得很有吸引力,所以做多了。

只是分享个人想法,当然你做任何决定前都要 DYOR。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041168871168545115
❤️ 563 🔁 43 💬 231
打开原推
💬 引用
I’m actually even more bullish on $AAOI at $13B MC given all the recent laser bottlenecks…

Than I was back at $2B or $6B.

I also think markets missed the analyst note around potential long term supply agreements with $NVDA or $AMD.

If they’re projecting $471M in H1 2027… that’s absurd ramp.

But of course the $600M ATM is a short term overhang.

Just a matter of waiting time? Given it’s more about keeping up with demand…

So more of a matter of how much they can make.

Probably my favorite US-based photonics long stock now that I own.
引用原推@mi20483980476
@aleabitoreddit You’re delusional if you think it’s undervalued at 6b mcap
https://x.com/mi20483980476/status/2034623100847816807
❤️ 1,955 🔁 185 💬 228
打开原推
💬 引用
Holy crap… My $EWY 2028 leaps are now up 428%+.

So 5.2x ROI trade, in 3 months.

Thats what happens when IV increases and underlying memory assets in SK Hynix / Samsung also appreciate. https://t.co/XdE21DOyoz
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Trade idea that I published to my shower thoughts channel:

Korean Index volatility arbitrage and taking advantage of Black-Scholes models.

$EWY long options seem mispriced.

This is Blackrock's Korea Index, which is majority memory (Samsung Electronics, Sk Hynix).

The stock swings 2-5+% a day, and is up 136.25% 1Y, despite priced like a normal index IV.

Samsung is volatile. SK Hynix is volatile (eg. 65% - 80% est).

But the combination of the two through the index is priced way less than both low beta $GOOGL (37.33%) and $AMZN (39.12%) at ~32% IV.

I've been watching $EWY for a bit and it does look volatile.

As for pricing my guess is MMs priced in IV based on historical averages (5-10 years), where the Korean index was completely flat. And were expecting calls 2 years out to revert to the mean.

But this volatility should be the new norm as markets price in the new memory supercycle (eg. $TSM went from 30% IV to 46.2% IV).

Long calls should benefit from both Samsung + Sk Hynix carrying the index.

And the main benefit is vega expansion that you won't get from $KORU.

You also can't get this option MM pinning like individual US stocks since this is Korea's national index and long term.

TLDR: Individual components SK Hynix + Samsung are highly volatile.

They're basically half of the index, but options in index are priced with low volatility, perhaps due to historical 5-10 year data.

Long calls benefit from vega expansion that weren't priced in correctly as MM forward vol estimates are anchored too heavily on historical realized vol, which was low for $EWY over the past 5-10 years
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2022283819374854167
❤️ 917 🔁 55 💬 184
打开原推
💬 引用
Always a good time interacting with European outlets.

Back at $44 EUR, European media said $SOI was an:

- -“overvalued stock”
- “buying now would undoubtedly be a big timing errors”
- “purely speculative bases”

And traditions analysts had no clue why it had risen.

$SOI is now up 342% since by the way.
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Few months ago, a European publication called my $RPI idea:

- “mass stupidity”

And said:

- $RPI shares would: “come crashing back to reality”

Then called it a:

- “Meme stock”.

Earnings report came out? Blew away revenue expectations.

It’s very interesting that media can just write all this slander…

Then pretend it never happened when it ages so badly.

Amount of media slander from $SOI to $SIVE has been pretty incredible.
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2060013416170107320
❤️ 707 🔁 32 💬 268
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a shower thought to European media:

Maybe instead of complaining about the influx of capital.

To keep your critical companies alive and subsidize growth.

Maybe welcome it…

So you don’t keep selling off your monopolies or critical chokepoints like ficonTEC from a lack of funding to foreign countries such as China.

Especially when they’re necessary to US hyperscaler supply chains.
❤️ 1,247 🔁 48 💬 363
打开原推
📝 原创
Few months ago, a European publication called my $RPI idea:

- “mass stupidity”

And said:

- $RPI shares would: “come crashing back to reality”

Then called it a:

- “Meme stock”.

Earnings report came out? Blew away revenue expectations.

It’s very interesting that media can just write all this slander…

Then pretend it never happened when it ages so badly.

Amount of media slander from $SOI to $SIVE has been pretty incredible.
❤️ 728 🔁 38 💬 380
打开原推
📝 原创
$SIVE is the most compelling CPO/photonics exposure to me.

Addressing the disinformation: I haven’t sold and don’t plan to sell a single share.

I do think this ends up the next $80B+ $LITE one day from ~$2.1B.

And I personally have plans to acquire more ownership + support their M&A prospects.

I believe earnings transcripts will be strongly positive.

As in the part few months we’ve discovered:

> AlChip/Amazon private placements, which is positive for Ayar -> $SIVE implying Trainium 4 design in

> Wiwynn + Ayar CPO scale up

> $JBL 1.6T optical transceiver ramp with Sivers incoming faster than markets expected (with relatively dramatic moat + demand as much as they can produce)

> O-Net scaling up ELS efforts with $SIVE

> $YSS acquisition of $SIVE allspace lead partner, designing Sivers into Space defense primes

> New CHIPS ACT funding for $SIVE

> $POET H2 volume ramp and their new $50m -> $500m order (with $SIVE as light source)

> information discovery around $AAPL using $SIVE lasers for next gen consumer devices

> information discovery around links to Lightelligence (went public $10B+ MC) + Lightmatter as likely customers.

> Celestial volume ramp with $MRVL indicators.

> new customers working on TFLN with $SIVE like Lightium

> $AMD going with $GFS for CPO, and GFS listing sivers as one of two laser suppliers

> Ayar removing $MTSI / $LITE from their website and signaling $SIVE as primary source/sole source

> Ayar raising $500m for volume ramp (intel, Mediatek, Nvidia, amd etc)

> pluggable TAM expansion signaled from 2025 annual report

> Nasdaq listing expected soon

> MSCI small cap index / Nasdaq omx inclusion, making Blackrock, Vanguard and others passive buyers

> M&A signaled from 2025 annual report + 2 new board members that have experience in that area

> $NOK as likely customer from 2025 annual report.

> $LITE getting cw bottlenecked from EML contracts, $SIVE signaling capacity agreements in place with Win, making the a likely bottleneck owner + chokepoint in CPO sector.

All of this market research was done before earnings.

Any results is just confirmation of supply chain mapping done.

I don’t think anyone cares about former quarter revenue since $SIVE is an exceptionally compelling 2027 long, especially H2 onward.

Only thing I’m looking at are:

> TAM expansion of the overall photonics supercycle (eg. optical engine, ELS, pluggables) either from M&A or developments

> volume ramp expectations from existing companies

> Nasdaq listing timelines for more liquidity to support their M&A efforts

> any new customers signaled for CPO/Pluggables
❤️ 2,417 🔁 228 💬 304
打开原推
💬 引用
This growth is just astronomical, I’m at a loss for words.

450,000 followers now, and 40,000 subscribers.

Only 7K more subscribers and I become the #1 on the entire X platform?

Thank you everyone.

I think this growth is just testimony to how people see free and actually compelling research democratization.

Compared to old models where any alpha gets sold to institutions for tens of thousands… then retail only find out hundreds of percent later.

Or where “influencers” have expensive paywalls to sell snake oil.

Hope to set a long lasting example by publishing research / ideas / thought processes for free.

And encouraging positive sum growth by focusing on substance.
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Wow, 400,000 followers! Thank you everyone.

I find it fun to share ideas with everyone for free from $TSEM to $AAOI.

And especially if they end up directionally right + help others build their own conviction. https://t.co/DeEnV6SAkq
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2059479203746296219
❤️ 2,381 🔁 48 💬 321
打开原推
📝 原创
Just in case people are wondering about my track record with European equities:

$RPI: $280 -> $800 (agentic AI hardware demand thesis).

$LPK: ~$6, thesis at $13 -> $24.2 (glass cores substrates close monopoly)

$SOI: $44 -> $181 (silicon photonics, monopoly over substrates)

$SIVE: $4 -> $71 (CPO, critical chokepoints over lasers).

$IQE: $12 -> $47 (latent epiwafer capacity, information discovery around downstream photonics companies).

$ALRIB: $5 -> $15 (duopoly, synthesis around quantum buyers with photonics growth verticals).

And now $XFAB at $9.

I’m not always right.

But every single one of my European longs thesis have been validated so far by either earnings, investments (eg. $MTSI in IQE) or market returns.
❤️ 1,701 🔁 148 💬 275
打开原推
📝 原创
I genuinely think $XFAB is very compelling at $1.5B MC, despite recent volatility.

Per NIST filings stated they were the only high volume SiC foundry in America.

Making them extremely “critical infrastructure”… Verbatim from the US Gov.

And they’re the first comprehensive pure play foundry for SiC/GaN.

So it’s very compelling exposure as $NVDA pushes 800 VDC and as other power semi players from $NVTS and $WOLF are all re-rating hard.

For long term photonics exposure:

They were literally listed in CHIPS Act 2 blueprints… with $NOK / $NVDA evaluations right now.

And production ramp up in 2027/volume production H1 2028 expected.

So you have a company at $1.5B MC:

Critical both on the power semis front to the US government.

And critical to both photonics front to the EU government.

Coming off of a legacy drag cycle with auto and others (similar to Soitec).

I think I’d follow EU/US government signals for what’s critical infrastructure given expected dual continent subsidies…

Over random media analysts trying to cause unnecessary volatility saying it’s a memestock with no fundamentals.
❤️ 1,169 🔁 112 💬 218
打开原推
💬 引用
Oh look, $SOI is now up 4X+ since I went long.

And another 15%+ after earnings.

Despite media“analysts”claiming there was nothing new with Soitec.

The fact they’re trying to reorganize the company to answer demand for SOI substrates for photonics.

It’s a pretty positive read-through on what’s to come for the company in the next two years.

Again with companies with forward growth opportunities, it’s about looking at the future…

not past earnings, unlike what some Europeans might only care about.
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 712 🔁 41 💬 140
打开原推
💬 引用
超赞的文章!

看看大家怎么看待我的过往经历真的挺好玩的

最近我一直在努力多跟对供应链和AI感兴趣的小伙伴们互动

所以只要是想了解我思考逻辑的朋友,我都会尽量去关注
引用原推@0xKevin00
白毛股神 Serenity 火遍全网,到处是她的传说,但是没人讲清楚她是谁

这个人非常神秘,被称为半导体的供应链之神,年内回报率 4502%

我梳理了她所有推文和留言,整理了目前最全面的介绍

最重要的是 @aleabitoreddit 选股思路和供应链方法论全解析👇🧵
https://x.com/0xKevin00/status/2059886422249680924
❤️ 1,266 🔁 85 💬 149
打开原推
📝 原创
Ayar’s announcement today with Wiwynn is potentially very material for $SIVE regarding CPO -> rack scale deployments.

As Wiwynn cloud clients include $AMZN, $META, $MSFT.

And they’ve been in talks for $GOOGL TPU deployments.

I think just for some reference architectures it’s around 512+ supernova light sourc a rack.

So if $SIVE is the primary laser array supplier (which we expect, given Macom + Lumentum was removed from Ayar’s site).

Even modest rack deployments would be very meaningful for revenue.

This is just rack scale commercialization potential right now from $SIVE / Ayar / Wiwynn, which won’t show up in revenue financials yet.
❤️ 1,118 🔁 87 💬 96
打开原推
💬 引用
Appreciate the more neutral coverage by Reuters and Bloomberg on $XFAB today.

Although it would be nicer to focus more on the structural thesis presented…

Around 800 vdc power semis $NVDA exposure + with ongoing $NVDA / $NOK evaluations for photonics.

And around CHIPS Act semiconductor sovereignty as the near term catalyst.

Rather than around volatility from novel information synthesis.

I spend a lot of time looking at regulatory filings to find compelling things market missed you know…
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$XFAB (photonics + power semis) is an interesting long idea at $1.28B MC, that I took positions in.

Given EU CHIPS act 2 is today as the catalyst for European photonics players.

> 800 VDC power semi exposure to $NVDA push through $NVTS + $POWI

> Silicon Photonics / CPO exposure with $NVDA as evaluation stage for high volume manufacturing (optical transceivers/switches)

> The only high-volume SiC foundry in the US.

> One of the critical MEMS foundries

> ~1.29 P/B, which was around what $SOI was sitting at when I went long. Depressed valuations due to legacy drag

> ~6.5-8.5 fwd p/e 2028 personal est.

> backstopped by Government:

- EU CHIPS act, $128M Euros
- US CHIPS act $50M PMT (department of commerce).

With likely more coming (just signals critical importance to Western supply chains).

So at a certain point with all the grants, they’re just getting the capex funded by the Governments.

EU CHIPS act 2 is coming out this week, and I’m gonna go ahead and guess $XFAB might get included given they were before, and this package is specifically targeting photonics.

~$1.3B MC seems compelling to me if it can pull a Soitec reversal (low p/b, very high growth segments, auto legacy drag).

As for the $NVDA silicon photonics relationships it’s under “photonixFAB”.

Markets probably missed this silicon photonics relationship (like $TSEM when I went long) with Nvidia since XFab leads this… Just under a different name.

For power semis, XFAB is named for SiC + $NVTS. In PCN-22181, $POWI explicitly names XFAB as its foundry. 

Given its exposure to power semis and photonics as growth, low P/B, gov backstop (of course dyor, just sharing my personal thoughts)

Thought it personally seemed compelling.
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2059537337324085541
❤️ 1,043 🔁 54 💬 175
打开原推
📝 原创
$MRVL earnings were a bullish indicator on the broader CPO theme (and $SIVE as the likely laser supplier).

- “Scale-up interconnect represents one of the newest and most strategically important opportunities emerging in AI infrastructure.”

CPO thematically go brrr

- Confirmation Celestial was selected by T1 hyperscaler for scale up.

I’ve found Celestial $AMZN warrants in the past)… so probably Amazon.

- Scale-up optics revenue next year should be more than 2x prior ~$150M outlook with Celestial

Forward revenue ramp expectations go brrr.

- Celestial team plus $MRVL optics team was a “home run”.

Marvell sees celestial as growth vector, upstream celestial suppliers go brr

- $MRVL is now focused on bringing Celestial to high volume manufacturing.

Volume ramp indicator

If you don’t recall, there was OSINT mapping $SIVE directly to Celestial, not through $POET.

So Celestial forward growth is a volume ramp indicator for Sivers lasers.
❤️ 1,460 🔁 102 💬 163
打开原推
💬 引用
在 X 上看到这么多中文社区的支持,真的让人很开心!

这体现了种非常有趣的文化差异:

大家会试图了解我的思考过程和选股逻辑,并以此来完善自己的投资体系。

相比之下,其他些文化背景的人可能上来就会全盘否定。

也许我会为了好玩,开始写写对两支中国股票的看法,哪怕我并没有持仓。
引用原推@ai_9684xtpa
全网都在聊的 Serenity(@aleabitoreddit),到底是谁?🌟

▶︎ 新晋美股喊单王,华尔街的「每日必读」
▶︎ 2026 年内回报率高达 4502.45%
▶︎ 公开建仓的 25 只股票涨幅达 100%-1000%
▶︎ 入驻 X 近一年粉丝超 40w,订阅数超 3.7w

他有哪些知名战绩?持仓如何?为什么这么火?一起往下看吧👩‍💻👇
https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/2059591113447735562
❤️ 2,702 🔁 94 💬 891
打开原推
📝 原创
Look who joined team $NBIS.

5.6% is a pretty massive stake, maybe he realized by now it’s miles better than the dumpster fire that is $IREN.

That being said: Nebius is now up ~3x since I went long last year.

Weebius has plot armor. https://t.co/JYZvf3GJND
❤️ 2,176 🔁 74 💬 536
打开原推
📝 原创
Bro media… how is $XFAB a meme stock?

Can you not repeat the same mistake with $RPI this time?

They’re literally getting CHIPS ACT funding from the EU because of how critical they are.

And have $NVDA / $NOK evaluating their SiPH side of things, while they traded at a low ~1.28 P/B.

This just reminded me of $SOI low p/b but high growth verticals out of legacy segment drag.

$XFAB was literally mentioned for CHIPS ACT 2 next week in the blueprints… Which focuses around photonics.

The main revenue ramp was around power semis with $NVDA pushing 800 vdc.

So $NVTS, $POWI, $WOLF and everyone have been taking off recently.

Markets just missed $XFAB, because they’re a lesser known foundry in power semis…But US Dpt. Of commerce pointed them out as the only high volume SiC foundry in the US 2Y ago.

I just happened to point out the connections.

Just because you don’t understand something, don’t just go call it a “meme stock” with price detached from fundamentals.
❤️ 1,142 🔁 57 💬 529
打开原推
💬 引用
Back when $AAOI was ~$20-30 when I went long:

I thought $AMZN and $MSFT were qualifying specific optical transceivers for their ASIC programs.

Turns out it’s more interchangeable/mass producible.

Regardless, glad my thesis on $LITE, $AAOI, Innolight, $COHR, $AXTI played out so well.

Keep in mind: everyone on X was saying “scam management” with $AAOI back at $20-30…

Or “scam company” with $AXTI at $12.

FUD was pretty extreme.

Feels like dejavu again… going long on the next CPO architectural shift like $SIVE or Foci? And getting the same comments.

We’ll see if my CPO longs play out the same way like Shunsin does with Innolight or $SIVE does with $LITE.

Either way all of those are now up hundreds to thousands of percent.
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AAOI is up 24% and $LITE is 5% since my thesis today.

From BOM analysis, LITE ($27B) is levered toward TPU Ironwood due to OCS but benefits from NVDA + all ASICs.

AAOI ($2.5B), is levered toward MSFT MAIA ramp and Amazon Trainium.

InP like HBM, will be a bottleneck for 2026 as they’re the foundational materials used for lasers in these deployments.

Similar to memory bottlenecks with Micron and SK Hynix, we’ll likely see attention drawn to InP fabs, such as $AAOI, which happens to be one of the sole ones in America (COHR,Macom)

But compared to $LITE that is up 362% YTD due to the success of Google’s TPU (from Meta and Anthropic purchase orders), $AAOI is only up 7% YTD.

We’re largely seeing this because there’s a lack of retail or media attention on the $AMZN Trainium or $MSFT Maia deployments, which are largely expected to ramp up in 2026-2027.

However they’re all likely to succeed due to each hyperscaler wanting to lower costs of inference for their own cloud platform.

If we see other hyperscalers adopt OCS for optimized performance that the TPU achieved, expect $LITE to re-rate more than they have now given their monopoly in that specific segment.

However, if we see $MSFT Maia ramp up (given $AAOI is likely developing a new architecture for them), and $AMZN Trainium ramp up ($4B warrant + purchase orders), expect $AAOI to rerate.

Photonics and InP will be the new bottleneck like memory.

We’ll likely see investments pour down stream to players like $COHR, Innolight, $LITE, and hidden levered plays on specific hyperscaler ASICs like $AAOI as a theme in 2026.

The market is currently rewarding the Google TPU supply chain but might be missing other hyperscaler ASIC ramps.
自从我今天发完 thesis 之后,$AAOI 涨了 24%,$LITE 涨了 5%。

从 BOM 分析看,LITE($27B)因为 OCS 更偏向 TPU Ironwood,但也受益于 NVDA + 所有 ASIC。

AAOI($2.5B)则更偏向 MSFT MAIA 放量和 Amazon Trainium。

InP 会像 HBM 一样,成为 2026 年的瓶颈,因为它是这些部署里激光器用到的基础材料。

类似 Micron 和 SK Hynix 的内存瓶颈,我们很可能会看到注意力转向 InP fabs,比如 $AAOI,而它刚好是美国少数几家之一(COHR、Macom)。

但相比 $LITE 因为 Google TPU 成功(来自 Meta 和 Anthropic 的采购订单)YTD 已经涨了 362%,$AAOI YTD 只涨了 7%。

这主要是因为散户和媒体几乎没关注 $AMZN Trainium 或 $MSFT Maia 的部署,而这些部署普遍预计会在 2026-2027 年放量。

不过它们大概率都会成功,因为每个 hyperscaler 都想降低自家云平台的推理成本。

如果我们看到其他 hyperscaler 也采用 OCS 来实现 TPU 那种优化性能,考虑到 $LITE 在这个细分领域的垄断地位,它可能会比现在进一步重估。

但如果 $MSFT Maia 开始放量(考虑到 $AAOI 很可能在为他们开发新架构),以及 $AMZN Trainium 放量($4B warrant + 采购订单),那 $AAOI 也会重估。

Photonics 和 InP 会成为新的“内存式”瓶颈。

2026 年,我们很可能会看到投资作为主题流向 $COHR、Innolight、$LITE 这类玩家,以及像 $AAOI 这种对特定 hyperscaler ASIC 有隐藏杠杆的标的。

市场现在在奖励 Google TPU 供应链,但可能漏掉了其他 hyperscaler ASIC 的放量。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2003259964526330053
❤️ 1,178 🔁 73 💬 212
打开原推
📝 原创
Interesting photonics selloff today on no news?

$LITE down -4.95%
$AAOI down -4.85%
$SIVE down -14.8%
$SOI down -5.73%
$AXTI down -8.13%
$IQE down -12.13%

I think it’s probably the most compelling theme going forward (even more than power semis).

Just tends to be very volatile on the way up.

Surprised about $AAOI though given there’s some institutional notes apparently about long term $AMD or $NVDA agreements. (Rosenblatt). Maybe $600m ATM caps some near term upside.

$SIVE as well, given EU Chips Act 2 is next week around photonics, and they’re listed on the blueprint. Same with MSCI/NASDAQ omx inflow next week.

I’ve been personally adding to positions since I have high conviction in the photonics theme (CPO especially) given TAM expansion overall next 2 years.
❤️ 2,803 🔁 225 💬 359
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a fun observation: the only people you see complaining about free research.

Typically have massive paywalls.

And get upset others are disrupting their business models.

I get tons of institutional/hedge fund offers.

But instead of doing things for institutions only or through heavily paywalled subscriptions.

I just publish my ideas to retail investors for free.

I think it’s about time retail has a level playing field?
❤️ 5,983 🔁 149 💬 496
打开原推
💬 引用
Yeah would not be surprised to see $SIVE, $SOI, and $XFAB funding with EU Chips Act 2.

Glad to all my longs there (aside from $IQE) listed on the blueprint, I didn’t see that earlier in my research!

Looks like formal announcement got pushed back to next week though. https://t.co/2SdG4Gocql
引用原推@lesantcho9306
@aleabitoreddit It was included in the March 2026 blueprint. Let’s see the publication of today and the proposal for EU CHIPS ACT 2.0 https://t.co/pIqOJ0Fczi
https://x.com/lesantcho9306/status/2059548913418359145
❤️ 856 🔁 63 💬 127
打开原推
📝 原创
$XFAB (photonics + power semis) is an interesting long idea at $1.28B MC, that I took positions in.

Given EU CHIPS act 2 is today as the catalyst for European photonics players.

> 800 VDC power semi exposure to $NVDA push through $NVTS + $POWI

> Silicon Photonics / CPO exposure with $NVDA as evaluation stage for high volume manufacturing (optical transceivers/switches)

> The only high-volume SiC foundry in the US.

> One of the critical MEMS foundries

> ~1.29 P/B, which was around what $SOI was sitting at when I went long. Depressed valuations due to legacy drag

> ~6.5-8.5 fwd p/e 2028 personal est.

> backstopped by Government:

- EU CHIPS act, $128M Euros
- US CHIPS act $50M PMT (department of commerce).

With likely more coming (just signals critical importance to Western supply chains).

So at a certain point with all the grants, they’re just getting the capex funded by the Governments.

EU CHIPS act 2 is coming out this week, and I’m gonna go ahead and guess $XFAB might get included given they were before, and this package is specifically targeting photonics.

~$1.3B MC seems compelling to me if it can pull a Soitec reversal (low p/b, very high growth segments, auto legacy drag).

As for the $NVDA silicon photonics relationships it’s under “photonixFAB”.

Markets probably missed this silicon photonics relationship (like $TSEM when I went long) with Nvidia since XFab leads this… Just under a different name.

For power semis, XFAB is named for SiC + $NVTS. In PCN-22181, $POWI explicitly names XFAB as its foundry. 

Given its exposure to power semis and photonics as growth, low P/B, gov backstop (of course dyor, just sharing my personal thoughts)

Thought it personally seemed compelling.
❤️ 2,280 🔁 206 💬 295
打开原推
📝 原创
This was the company i personally liked + have positions in.

Definitely not $DPZ.

But kinda me of Soitec in a way.

Power semi / SiPH exposure both to Nvidia ecosystems.

Photonics side eval through Nvidia right now. Power semi exposure through NVtS and powl, ~1.29 p/b, EU chips act grantee. US chips act grant ongoing.

~$1.28B MC, should be beneficiary of eu chips act round 2 today as a catalyst
❤️ 768 🔁 18 💬 173
打开原推
📝 原创
I was wondering why there was an irrational amount of disinformation about $SIVE.

Turns out short sellers have been running bot farm campaigns to spread disinformation.

And likely through local news media too.

Hope they get blown apart on their short positions now. https://t.co/U3Euy391l8
❤️ 1,684 🔁 75 💬 161
打开原推
📝 原创
Wow, 400,000 followers! Thank you everyone.

I find it fun to share ideas with everyone for free from $TSEM to $AAOI.

And especially if they end up directionally right + help others build their own conviction. https://t.co/DeEnV6SAkq
❤️ 2,126 🔁 35 💬 184
打开原推
📝 原创
FYI, EU Chips Act 2 is today, May 27th.

This one is expected to be targeted specially around photonics.

There happens to Europe’s leading photonics/laser company called $SIVE over in Sweden.

That also received US CHIPS act funding and is critical to Western supply chains. https://t.co/Ijhnp3wIoq
❤️ 1,142 🔁 68 💬 110
打开原推
💬 引用
There’s one very compelling name someone called out.

That I ended up taking positions in for power semi exposure.

Heavily tied to $NVDA but not directly mentioned like $NVTS.

Can anyone guess?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
All right chat, crowdsourcing your #1 highest conviction (10x only) stock long for the Power Semi trade.

Especially given $NVDA pushing shift to 800 VDC.

Stuff like $NVTS or $WOLF, but high-beta, 10x potential only. Anywhere around the world.

What's your pick? https://t.co/Y10KR6HLVC
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2058577885754163382
❤️ 1,194 🔁 41 💬 580
打开原推
📝 原创
These titles keep getting more and more ridiculous lol https://t.co/f8t0ApHJPu
❤️ 1,572 🔁 32 💬 203
打开原推
💬 引用
And now… $MU finally hits a $1 Trillion marketcap.

I did say this looks like the next $NVDA given how memory demand looks structural with AI.

This stock probably made a lot of millionaires going from $80 to $887. https://t.co/5VFdvcuu2c
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$MU looks like the next Nvidia.

When Nvidia was $400B (now $4.5T+), markets thought GPUs were a short-term cycle.

Same with memory today.

AI has broken that cycle.

With the same "Made in America" and White House backing like $INTC:

Don't overthink things with Micron. https://t.co/LBhbVjoKGz
$MU 看起来像下一个 Nvidia。

Nvidia 还是 $400B 的时候(现在 $4.5T+),市场以为 GPU 只是短期周期。

今天的内存也是一样。

AI 已经打破了这个周期。

再加上和 $INTC 一样的“Made in America”以及 White House 支持:

Micron 这件事别想太复杂。 https://t.co/LBhbVjoKGz
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2014278521741553793
❤️ 2,129 🔁 104 💬 190
打开原推
📝 原创
This timeline of getting banned on $RDDT WSB for posting about $AXTI.

That stock going up thousands of percent.

Then becoming the #1 most subscribed to person on X feels kinda like a Naruto redemption arc to become hokage.

Only 12k more to go. https://t.co/J8DNEbYXpl
❤️ 2,026 🔁 41 💬 180
打开原推
📝 原创
YTD: 4502.45%. https://t.co/rF2ACQDu8w
❤️ 4,493 🔁 88 💬 404
打开原推
💬 引用
Well $VPG ended up tripling since my thesis post.

I got the ASP wrong in my original thesis, was $150 mass production rather than ~$750 midpoint quoted by management.

And $TSLA design out risk made me cut concentration.

But 3x regardless not too shabby. https://t.co/ksB8ZrnnEg
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Looks like markets are starting to find out about $VPG.

This is my top robotics sector stock.

And reminds me of $SNDK at $30 before current memory rally to $470.

Or $SMCI at $1.3 before the AI buildout rally to $100.

This may be the inflection point for robotics humanoids. https://t.co/POgwnIJyu8
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2014002413146173863
❤️ 682 🔁 44 💬 75
打开原推
💬 引用
Swedens transferring control of $SIVE to the West + other countries…

Is honestly fun to watch in the charts. https://t.co/zNfWatAm4S
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE is the most compelling CPO exposure stock to me.

Despite the volatility.

You probably won’t find something like this again until the next architectural shift in photonics years later.

Out of the core laser suppliers, they’re all tens of billions?

$AAOI = $15B
Furukawa = $26B
$MTSI = $29B
Sumitomo = $59B
$COHR = $73B
$LITE = $74B

Then there’s $SIVE as one of the core CPO laser chokepoints at $2.3B MC.

Earnings are usually confirmation of all the little volume ramp hints like Jabil fireside transcripts for 1.6T LRO.

And most returns are typically made before, not after official confirmation is just a rule of thumb.
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2059242587354169403
❤️ 1,318 🔁 63 💬 170
打开原推
💬 引用
How did my $NVTS position double already lol?

That aside, I did see a very compelling long out of the list of crowdsourced recs earlier for 800 vdc.

Doing more research now! https://t.co/Su65NuYjLW
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$NVDA actively pushing to 800V, and today was a pretty big signal.

"On April 22, 2026, NVIDIA has initiated discussions with major South Korean power equipment companies to explore designing DC infra based on an approximately 800V direct current (DC) system"

Previous named Nvidia partners include: Infineon, $TXN, $STM, $NVTS, Delta, Flex, $ETN, Schneider, and $VRT.

It's been known they're been pushing for this but... looks like Nvidia is really driving it.

Personally very small exposure to $NVTS since they're they have a high exposure for SiC/GaN ICs for 800V DCs.

I know others really liked $VICR for exposure.
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2047019381637677061
❤️ 1,160 🔁 51 💬 177
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE is the most compelling CPO exposure stock to me.

Despite the volatility.

You probably won’t find something like this again until the next architectural shift in photonics years later.

Out of the core laser suppliers, they’re all tens of billions?

$AAOI = $15B
Furukawa = $26B
$MTSI = $29B
Sumitomo = $59B
$COHR = $73B
$LITE = $74B

Then there’s $SIVE as one of the core CPO laser chokepoints at $2.3B MC.

Earnings are usually confirmation of all the little volume ramp hints like Jabil fireside transcripts for 1.6T LRO.

And most returns are typically made before, not after official confirmation is just a rule of thumb.
引用原推@Ecom_Venture2
@aleabitoreddit I wanna add to my $SIVE position, is it worth waiting till after earnings?
https://x.com/Ecom_Venture2/status/2059160943506883010
❤️ 1,713 🔁 134 💬 279
打开原推
💬 引用
リサーチの90%はお風呂の中でやってるから、「シャワーソート(シャワー中のひらめき)」って言ってるんだよね。

日本でのハーモニック・ドライブ(6324)のリサーチは順調に進んでるよ。

結論として、温泉と大トロは10点満点中10点だね。 https://t.co/eSce82erlP
引用原推@dubidubabap
@aleabitoreddit Do more shower bro 🫡🫡🫡
https://x.com/dubidubabap/status/2059161353064169622
❤️ 2,361 🔁 54 💬 190
打开原推
💬 引用
$EWY calls are now up 300%+, over 4x return if you listened anon?

Not only did IV increase and hold their implied volatility of the South Korean market.

Underlying memory longs in SK Hynix and Samsung keep printing.

During that time, all your influencers kept bear posting “Oil + LNG” fears as well as “Kospi bubble” chants.
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Trade idea that I published to my shower thoughts channel:

Korean Index volatility arbitrage and taking advantage of Black-Scholes models.

$EWY long options seem mispriced.

This is Blackrock's Korea Index, which is majority memory (Samsung Electronics, Sk Hynix).

The stock swings 2-5+% a day, and is up 136.25% 1Y, despite priced like a normal index IV.

Samsung is volatile. SK Hynix is volatile (eg. 65% - 80% est).

But the combination of the two through the index is priced way less than both low beta $GOOGL (37.33%) and $AMZN (39.12%) at ~32% IV.

I've been watching $EWY for a bit and it does look volatile.

As for pricing my guess is MMs priced in IV based on historical averages (5-10 years), where the Korean index was completely flat. And were expecting calls 2 years out to revert to the mean.

But this volatility should be the new norm as markets price in the new memory supercycle (eg. $TSM went from 30% IV to 46.2% IV).

Long calls should benefit from both Samsung + Sk Hynix carrying the index.

And the main benefit is vega expansion that you won't get from $KORU.

You also can't get this option MM pinning like individual US stocks since this is Korea's national index and long term.

TLDR: Individual components SK Hynix + Samsung are highly volatile.

They're basically half of the index, but options in index are priced with low volatility, perhaps due to historical 5-10 year data.

Long calls benefit from vega expansion that weren't priced in correctly as MM forward vol estimates are anchored too heavily on historical realized vol, which was low for $EWY over the past 5-10 years
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2022283819374854167
❤️ 924 🔁 45 💬 93
打开原推
📝 原创
Win Semi (3105) is almost never mentioned in photonics analyst reports.

But they’ll probably show up as an important bottleneck for scaling lasers next year.

Glad to see Shunsin (6451) start picking up steam from my TW longs.

Foci (3363), MSSCorp (6830) should start getting some attention too imo after Computex / $NVDA conference next month.

Nextronics (8147), I personally kinda expect to 3x down the road.. once disposition is over.

5 of my favorite CPO exposure longs over in Taiwan, especially at current prices.
Win Semi (3105) 在光子领域的分析师报告里几乎从来没人提。

但明年在激光器扩产这块,它们很可能会变成一个重要瓶颈。

很高兴看到我在台湾做多的标的里,Shunsin (6451) 开始有动能了。

Computex / 下个月 $NVDA 大会之后,Foci (3363)、MSSCorp (6830) 也应该会开始受到一些关注。

Nextronics (8147),我个人有点期待它以后能涨 3 倍……等处分结束之后。

这是我在台湾最喜欢的 5 个 CPO 敞口多头,尤其是在现在这个价格。
❤️ 752 🔁 36 💬 81
打开原推
💬 引用
确实如此!如果你不能将整个光通信产业链脱口而出,从上游的InP(磷化铟)衬底,

路向下游直到光模块成品制造商…

那说明你读我写的东西还不够多。

不过,很高兴看到我关于 $SOI$AAOI 的许多观点,能帮助大家建立起属于自己的投资信念与逻辑。
确实如此!如果你不能将整个光通信产业链脱口而出,从上游的InP(磷化铟)衬底,

路向下游直到光模块成品制造商…

那说明你读我写的东西还不够多。

不过,很高兴看到我关于 $SOI$AAOI 的许多观点,能帮助大家建立起属于自己的投资信念与逻辑。
引用原推@tychozzz
三个月时间我的 IBKR 账户收益率快接近翻倍了。

一个多月之前我关注了 @aleabitoreddit,顺着他的推文思路,我花了几十个小时时间,研究了整个光互连光通信产业链。

整个过程收获实在是太多了:

- 了解学习了光模块、外延、衬底、硅光芯片、CPO、激光器这些新知识,享受学习投研的乐趣。

- 把学到的东西对外输出,做了一期光通信产业链拆解视频,Youtube 播放量接近 20k,一期视频给我的新频道涨了 1.5k 订阅。

- 在研究做好功课之后,小资金建仓了 SIVE/TSEM/COHR/AAOI/LITE 这些光通信标的,作为高风险激进持仓,虽然赚的不多,但已经很满意了。

感谢股神 Serenity!
三个月时间我的 IBKR 账户收益率快接近翻倍了。

一个多月之前我关注了 @aleabitoreddit,顺着他的推文思路,我花了几十个小时时间,研究了整个光互连光通信产业链。

整个过程收获实在是太多了:

- 了解学习了光模块、外延、衬底、硅光芯片、CPO、激光器这些新知识,享受学习投研的乐趣。

- 把学到的东西对外输出,做了一期光通信产业链拆解视频,Youtube 播放量接近 20k,一期视频给我的新频道涨了 1.5k 订阅。

- 在研究做好功课之后,小资金建仓了 SIVE/TSEM/COHR/AAOI/LITE 这些光通信标的,作为高风险激进持仓,虽然赚的不多,但已经很满意了。

感谢股神 Serenity!
https://x.com/tychozzz/status/2058885150973612200
❤️ 802 🔁 31 💬 78
打开原推
💬 引用
$JBL literally announced in their fireside chat…

Mass production of their 1.6T LRO with excessive demand in 3-10 months.

$SIVE is likely sole source laser supplier for this specific optical transceiver.

Ayar raised $500M for volume ramp recently, and $SIVE is the primary / sole source laser supplier.

2025 annual report, $SIVE signaled start of volume ramp with both (likely) $AEVA and $POET.

This is how you do supply chain mapping on qualification cycles.

Anything they make, Sivers makes revenue off lasers.

If you ask AI they will keep confidently citing 2024 revenue numbers without knowing volume hints.

Which is why I keep seeing these false claims like this over and over, despite Sivers being on the precipice of mass production for 2027.
$JBL 在他们的 fireside chat 里说得很明白了……

他们的 1.6T LRO 会在 3-10 个月内量产,而且需求非常旺。

$SIVE 很可能是这个特定光收发器的唯一激光器供应商。

Ayar 最近为量产爬坡融了 $500M,而 $SIVE 是主要/唯一的激光器供应商。

2025 年报里,$SIVE 暗示了和(很可能是)$AEVA 以及 $POET 都开始进入量产爬坡。

这才叫按认证周期做供应链 mapping。

他们做出来的任何东西,Sivers 都能从激光器上赚收入。

如果你问 AI,它只会很自信地引用 2024 年营收数字,却不知道这些量产线索。

所以我才会一遍又一遍看到这种错误说法,哪怕 Sivers 已经站在 2027 年量产的前夜了。
引用原推@Nij318
@aleabitoreddit Why haven’t there been contract announcements or an update of expansion etc?
How are you certain that revenue is due imminently?
@aleabitoreddit 为什么一直没有合同公告,或者扩产之类的更新?
你怎么能确定收入马上就要来了?
https://x.com/Nij318/status/2058874528449564708
❤️ 784 🔁 50 💬 83
打开原推
📝 原创
What’s with the influx of art history college grads in media:

Coming in with 100% certainty:

With their opinion of CW laser nuances and valuation analysis on InP substrate/crucible processing moats?

Background genuinely don’t matter if you know your stuff. But if you don’t, sometimes you get curious?

It’s funny to see their confidence scaling proportionally to what liquidity institutions need.
媒体里怎么突然涌进来这么多艺术史专业毕业生:

一上来就 100% 笃定:

对 CW laser 的细微差别和 InP 衬底/坩埚工艺护城河估值分析发表高见?

背景其实真不重要,只要你懂你在说什么。但如果你不懂,有时候就会让人好奇?

看他们的自信程度,跟流动性机构需要什么成正比,挺好笑的。
❤️ 441 🔁 11 💬 99
打开原推
📝 原创
I’m fully convinced the Stock Market secretly revolves around building the Death Star and Battle Droids:

$RKLB / $SPCX / $PL = Death Star

$LASR / $SIVE = Laser Beams

$TSLA / Unitree = Battle Droids https://t.co/C53qKjWrS8
我现在完全确信,股市背地里就是围着造 Death Star 和 Battle Droids 转:

$RKLB / $SPCX / $PL = Death Star

$LASR / $SIVE = 激光束

$TSLA / Unitree = Battle Droids https://t.co/C53qKjWrS8
❤️ 2,023 🔁 126 💬 285
打开原推
💬 引用
$RPI, close to ~3x returns.

Off the media branded "Meme Stock".

I think after retail saw institutions bear post my thesis posts.

Then ended up paper handing $AXTI, then $RPI, then $IQE, then $EWY, then $SNDK, then $AAOI, then $SOI.

And them watch them all go up 3x-15x+ after institutions bought up the float.

Retail finally learned not to trust them with anymore with names like $SIVE?
$RPI,差不多接近 3 倍回报。

就是媒体贴上“Meme Stock”标签的那只。

我觉得散户看到机构在我的 thesis 帖下面发空头观点之后,

最后先是在 $AXTI 上纸手卖飞,然后 $RPI,然后 $IQE,然后 $EWY,然后 $SNDK,然后 $AAOI,然后 $SOI

然后眼睁睁看着这些股票在机构买走流通盘之后涨了 3 倍到 15 倍以上。

散户终于学会了,对 $SIVE 这种名字不要再信他们了?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Fun Trade Idea: Long $RPI (Raspberry Pi)

Reason: 🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + Hoarding.

Everyone has been openly hoarding Apple Mac Minis and were long Apple.

But $APPL is already a $3.7T+ company. Product mass-buying won't make a dent.

Raspberry Pi, however, is a 542.68M company.

The revenue is material.

Feels like markets haven't priced this in since I've seen almost 0 mentions about the ticker on X (but many product mentions).

And it's only recently that have the hoarding started Raspberry Pis, as they're much cheaper than $500+ Apple products. They also have their mini $NVDA CUDA-light utility ecosystem that people use.

So it turns out these extremely cheap $20 or $200 devices are perfect for deploying mass deploying isolated instances.

The reason is for OpenClaw orchestration (so they don’t mess up your device) -> interfacing with a central LLM via API.

Before people were just buying 1 or 2 for hobby/education purposes, so revenue has slowing.

But now Silicon Valley startups and individuals anecdotally appear to be buying tens or hundreds of these things to run concurrent OpenClaw agentic swarms or do stuff like agentic marketing on Reddit and other places.

And no, there are many applications that can't be done by spinning up AWS VPS, so people do it locally (there's TOS around automation/AI bots, so companies setup their own servers).

That being said main downside risk is that its

- partially foundation owned, and they might not hike rates like $SNDK or $MU does, even if there's extreme demand

- Subject to memory price hikes like LPDDR4 component

so this is not a major position.

However, going forward, revenue should increase due to people buying tens or hundreds of these things for running AI agents.

Balance sheet also looks clean with low downside risk:

- ~$280M - $300M revenue
- ~$75M+ Gross Profit
- ~25% Gross Margin
- Net income: ~$10M - $15M
- Net Cash: $28M

Analysts currently project revenue growth closer to 14–17%.

But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues.

Consumer segments are roughly 1/3rd of revenue but the newfound buying from Openclaw + variants is a new cataylst nevertheless for re-rating.

Especially now that Picoclaw and compressed OpenClaw variants are now able to be run on $20 Raspberry Pis instead of just the Raspberry Pi 5’s.

But seems like people just forgot Raspberry PI was a publicly stock as well.

The stock price is down 56% 1Y to 542.68M euro MC to an all time low.

So this might be that tailwind for a reversal.

There's also a non-zero chance OpenClaw is a long term catalyst for Raspberry Pi based, agentic deployments.

TLDR: People are openly buying Raspberry Pis and Apple Mac Minis for Openclaw/Picoclaw, so revenue should benefit from increased demand.
有意思的交易想法:做多 $RPI(Raspberry Pi)

理由:🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + 囤货。

大家都在公开囤 Apple Mac Mini,而且做多 Apple。

$APPL 已经是 3.7T+ 美元的公司了。产品被大量抢购,对它的影响不会太大。

但 Raspberry Pi 是一家 542.68M 的公司。

这块收入就很实质了。

感觉市场还没把这个定价进去,因为我在 X 上几乎没看到有人提这个 ticker(但很多人在提产品)。

而且大家也是最近才开始囤 Raspberry Pi,因为它们比 500+ 美元的 Apple 产品便宜很多。它们也有一个小型的 $NVDA CUDA-light 实用生态,很多人会用。

所以结果就是,这些极便宜的 20 美元或 200 美元设备,非常适合大规模部署隔离实例。

原因是用来做 OpenClaw 编排(这样不会把你的设备搞乱)-> 通过 API 接入中心化 LLM。

以前大家只是买 1、2 个,用于爱好/教育,所以收入增长放慢了。

但现在从传闻看,硅谷创业公司和个人似乎在买几十台甚至几百台,用来跑并发的 OpenClaw agent swarm,或者做 Reddit 等地方的 agentic marketing。

而且不是所有应用都能靠开 AWS VPS 解决,所以大家会本地部署(自动化/AI bot 有 TOS 限制,所以公司会搭自己的服务器)。

话虽如此,主要下行风险是:

- 它部分由基金会持有,就算需求极端旺盛,也未必会像 $SNDK$MU 那样涨价

- 会受到 LPDDR4 等内存组件涨价影响

所以这不是一个大仓位。

不过往后看,因为大家会为了跑 AI agent 买几十台、几百台设备,收入应该会增加。

资产负债表也看起来干净,下行风险较低:

- 约 $280M - $300M 收入
- $75M+ 毛利
- 约 25% 毛利率
- 净利润:约 $10M - $15M
- 净现金:$28M

分析师目前预计收入增速大概 14-17%。

但如果这波需求涌入持续,收入增速可能从 14% 提升到比较温和的 48-55%。

消费端大概占收入 1/3,但 Openclaw + 各种变体带来的新增购买,仍然是一个新的重估催化。

尤其现在 Picoclaw 和压缩版 OpenClaw 已经能跑在 20 美元的 Raspberry Pi 上,而不只是 Raspberry Pi 5。

但感觉大家只是忘了 Raspberry PI 也是一家上市公司。

股价 1 年跌了 56%,市值到 542.68M 欧元,创历史低位。

所以这可能成为反转的顺风。

OpenClaw 也有非零概率成为基于 Raspberry Pi 的 agentic 部署的长期催化。

TLDR:大家正在公开购买 Raspberry Pi 和 Apple Mac Mini 来跑 Openclaw/Picoclaw,所以收入应该会受益于需求增加。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2023415224372756782
❤️ 786 🔁 54 💬 131
打开原推
💬 引用
Eh... I had higher hopes so far with $IQE than 3x+.

There's still time though. https://t.co/cK08L6yvm3
呃……到目前为止,我对 $IQE 的期待其实不止 3 倍多。

不过还有时间。 https://t.co/cK08L6yvm3
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Not exactly! I'm just a tad more familiar with photonic supply chains than I am with energy so I like picking potential winners.

Just wanted to introduce $IQE into the equation like i did with $AXTI, so I could do a "Did you Listen Anon?" post 3 months later if it turns out well.
不完全是!我只是比起能源,对光子供应链稍微更熟一点,所以喜欢在这里挑潜在赢家。

只是想像之前提 $AXTI 一样,把 $IQE 也放进讨论里,这样如果结果不错,3 个月后我就能发一条“你当时听了吗,Anon?”的帖子。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026647347237966298
❤️ 879 🔁 49 💬 154
打开原推
💬 引用
$LPK turned out pretty well. https://t.co/mZlTyd4oUO
$LPK 结果还挺不错的。 https://t.co/mZlTyd4oUO
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$WOLF was probably the most interesting one up there after restructuring.

$LPKFF also for glass substrates and they own the laser induced deep etching at a $169m MC, so possibly most explosive 10x upside.

$MTRN is probably the most stable one up there with decently high upside given it owns the mountain for ~65% of the world's Beryllium.

There were a few others but just the fundamentals were either really bad or their bottleneck was too niche.

$LPTH's bottleneck for example spreads across both defense, AI, drones, etc.

$AXTI's bottleneck was so big and AI is such a big sector so it doesn't need to be spread across (but InP is used in a lot of other sectors too).
$WOLF 重组之后,可能是上面最有意思的一个。

$LPKFF 也有玻璃基板,而且他们掌握 laser induced deep etching,市值只有 $169m,所以可能有最爆炸的 10x 上行空间。

$MTRN 可能是里面最稳的一个,上行也还不错,因为它拥有全球约 65% 铍资源的那座矿山。

还有几个别的,但基本面要么真的很差,要么瓶颈太小众。

比如 $LPTH 的瓶颈横跨国防、AI、无人机等等。

$AXTI 的瓶颈非常大,而且 AI 是一个很大的领域,所以不需要分散到很多行业(不过 InP 也用于很多其他行业)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2012961292966117410
❤️ 968 🔁 54 💬 100
打开原推
💬 引用
For people trying to do valuation analysis on $SIVE.

Ayar, Celestial, Lightmatter, Lightelligence are probably valued probably ~$4B-15B+ today.

Sivers is ~$2.6B MC and they're likely upstream laser for them all.

I'm not even including Poet, TFLN links like Hyperlight/Lightium, or pluggables like Jabil + other undisclosed players in valuation analysis.

Or their other segments like CHIPS Act contracts or Apple/Nokia relationships.

Or humanoid/physical AI segments with Aeva + others.

Retail aren't as familiar with private markets...

But these companies are all considered the frontier CPO players, and are growing valuations/scaling rapidly.

So, I'd expect $SIVE to command similar if not higher valuations given laser chokepoint premiums. Especially after they pull off M&A to TAM expand revenue.

New Blackrock/Vanguard/MSCI/NASDAQ inflow next month helps close that gap over time.

But NASDAQ listing is probably what gives Sivers a premium.
给那些想给 $SIVE 做估值分析的人。

Ayar、Celestial、Lightmatter、Lightelligence 现在估值大概可能都有 ~$4B-15B+。

Sivers 市值大概 ~$2.6B,而且它们很可能是这些公司的上游激光器供应商。

我做估值时甚至还没把 Poet、TFLN 相关的 Hyperlight/Lightium,或者 Jabil 这种 pluggables 和其他未披露玩家算进去。

也没算它们其他业务,比如 CHIPS Act 合同,或者 Apple/Nokia 关系。

也没算 Aeva 等带来的 humanoid/physical AI 方向。

散户对私募市场没那么熟……

但这些公司都被认为是最前沿的 CPO 玩家,而且估值和规模都在快速增长。

所以,考虑到激光器 chokepoint 的溢价,我会期待 $SIVE 拿到类似甚至更高的估值。尤其是在他们通过 M&A 扩大 TAM 和收入之后。

下个月 Blackrock/Vanguard/MSCI/NASDAQ 的新流入,会随着时间帮助缩小这个差距。

但 NASDAQ 上市大概才是给 Sivers 溢价的东西。
引用原推@Dominik56798023
@aleabitoreddit Is it still worth investing in Sive?
@aleabitoreddit 现在还值得投资 Sive 吗?
https://x.com/Dominik56798023/status/2058841257573486771
❤️ 1,293 🔁 61 💬 116
打开原推
💬 引用
Did you listen anon? https://t.co/q6miMwIUX7
你听了吗 anon? https://t.co/q6miMwIUX7
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 928 🔁 34 💬 77
打开原推
💬 引用
I think I deserve my own Netflix special after $AXTI and $SIVE? https://t.co/WeD80ogRXg
$AXTI$SIVE 之后,我觉得我值得拥有一档自己的 Netflix special? https://t.co/WeD80ogRXg
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
我现在订阅数已经有32.5K啦!

真的超级感谢大家!

照这个速度下去,我简直不敢相信自己快要超过马斯克,变成X上订阅人数第的大佬了?!

特别感谢中文圈小伙伴们最近的力挺。当然啦,也必须要感谢日韩圈的朋友们从开始就路支持我! https://t.co/cpvb6KizDy
我现在订阅数已经有32.5K啦!

真的超级感谢大家!

照这个速度下去,我简直不敢相信自己快要超过马斯克,变成X上订阅人数第的大佬了?!

特别感谢中文圈小伙伴们最近的力挺。当然啦,也必须要感谢日韩圈的朋友们从开始就路支持我! https://t.co/cpvb6KizDy
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2058823038364455404
❤️ 2,375 🔁 53 💬 247
打开原推
📝 原创
我现在订阅数已经有32.5K啦!

真的超级感谢大家!

照这个速度下去,我简直不敢相信自己快要超过马斯克,变成X上订阅人数第的大佬了?!

特别感谢中文圈小伙伴们最近的力挺。当然啦,也必须要感谢日韩圈的朋友们从开始就路支持我! https://t.co/cpvb6KizDy
我现在订阅数已经有32.5K啦!

真的超级感谢大家!

照这个速度下去,我简直不敢相信自己快要超过马斯克,变成X上订阅人数第的大佬了?!

特别感谢中文圈小伙伴们最近的力挺。当然啦,也必须要感谢日韩圈的朋友们从开始就路支持我! https://t.co/cpvb6KizDy
❤️ 2,256 🔁 29 💬 436
打开原推
💬 引用
Did you listen anon?

$SIVE is extremely early.

And we’re about to see a ton of institutional inflow (Blackrock, Vanguard, MSCI, NASDAQ) next week for the first time.

Then, couple that with NASDAQ listing soon, with even more US institutions entering.

This is what it’s like to be in a name like $AXTI or $LITE at the very beginning.

And this is still at a point before major institutional capital hit the float or CPO supercycle has ramped.
你听了吗 anon?

$SIVE 还处在非常早期。

而且下周我们第一次会看到大量机构资金流入(Blackrock、Vanguard、MSCI、NASDAQ)。

然后再叠加很快的 NASDAQ 上市,会有更多美国机构进来。

这就是在 $AXTI$LITE 这种名字最早期时的感觉。

而且现在还处在主要机构资本打进流通盘之前,也在 CPO supercycle 真正爬坡之前。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE is the largest beneficiary of brand new events this weekend:

1. Sivers new NASDAQ index inclusion (OMX Stockholm):

Both Vanguard and Blackrock are new passive inflows.

With ~$60M+ pure buying pressure inflow, into existing float, together with MSCI next week.

2. US Gov and Sweden sign agreement for joint tech collaboration.

$SIVE is one of the few CHIPS act recipients, and especially in Sweden.

And if you don’t remember, they received another $6.6M CHIPS act award last week.

Making $SIVE heavily supported + critical to the US government.
-

TLDR: New passive institutional inflow from your largest US institutions like Blackrock/Vanguard.

Compounded with US government backing into $SIVE. Over the weekend.

Beneficial for fundamentals (revenue/TAM from Pentagon supply chains) and inflow from Blackrock/Vanguard/MSCI/NASDAQ.

Extremely bullish.
$SIVE 是这个周末全新事件的最大受益者:

1. Sivers 新纳入 NASDAQ 指数(OMX Stockholm):

Vanguard 和 Blackrock 都会带来新的被动流入。

加上下周 MSCI,现有流通盘将面对约 $60M+ 的纯买盘压力流入。

2. 美国政府和瑞典签署联合技术合作协议。

$SIVE 是少数 CHIPS Act 获奖方之一,尤其是在瑞典。

如果你不记得了,他们上周又拿到了 $6.6M 的 CHIPS Act 奖励。

这让 $SIVE 获得强力支持,并且对美国政府变得很关键。
-

TLDR:来自 Blackrock/Vanguard 这类美国最大机构的新被动流入。

再叠加美国政府对 $SIVE 的背书。而且都是周末发生的。

这对基本面(来自 Pentagon 供应链的收入/TAM)和 Blackrock/Vanguard/MSCI/NASDAQ 的资金流入都有利。

极度看多。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2058806097436455283
❤️ 2,229 🔁 140 💬 191
打开原推
📝 原创
$SIVE is the largest beneficiary of brand new events this weekend:

1. Sivers new NASDAQ index inclusion (OMX Stockholm):

Both Vanguard and Blackrock are new passive inflows.

With ~$60M+ pure buying pressure inflow, into existing float, together with MSCI next week.

2. US Gov and Sweden sign agreement for joint tech collaboration.

$SIVE is one of the few CHIPS act recipients, and especially in Sweden.

And if you don’t remember, they received another $6.6M CHIPS act award last week.

Making $SIVE heavily supported + critical to the US government.
-

TLDR: New passive institutional inflow from your largest US institutions like Blackrock/Vanguard.

Compounded with US government backing into $SIVE. Over the weekend.

Beneficial for fundamentals (revenue/TAM from Pentagon supply chains) and inflow from Blackrock/Vanguard/MSCI/NASDAQ.

Extremely bullish.
$SIVE 是这个周末全新事件的最大受益者:

1. Sivers 新纳入 NASDAQ 指数(OMX Stockholm):

Vanguard 和 Blackrock 都会带来新的被动资金流入。

加上下周的 MSCI,会有 ~$60M+ 纯买盘压力流入现有流通盘。

2. 美国政府和瑞典签署联合技术合作协议。

$SIVE 是少数 CHIPS Act 受资助方之一,而且尤其是在瑞典。

如果你不记得了,他们上周又拿到了一笔 $6.6M 的 CHIPS Act 奖励。

这让 $SIVE 得到美国政府很强的支持,也对美国政府非常关键。
-

TLDR:来自 Blackrock/Vanguard 这种最大美国机构的新被动资金流入。

再叠加美国政府对 $SIVE 的背书。就在这个周末。

这对基本面(来自 Pentagon 供应链的收入/TAM)和 Blackrock/Vanguard/MSCI/NASDAQ 的资金流入都有利。

极度看多。
❤️ 1,373 🔁 118 💬 117
打开原推
💬 引用
几个值得重点关注的“实质性垄断”标的:

- MSSCORP (6830):在检测和 CPO 良率把控上构筑了极深的专利护城河。
- $SOI:主导绝缘体上硅 (SOI) 衬底市场。
- NGK (5333):稳拿薄膜铌酸锂 (TFLN) 晶圆核心技术。
- $AXTI:把控磷化铟 (InP) 衬底等上游关键材料。

像讯芯 (Shunsin) 这类公司其实很难被轻易颠覆,毕竟背靠富士康,而富士康本身就深深扎根于众多核心供应链的腹地 🏭

$SIVE 的逻辑也极其相似。他们已经成功打入 (design in) 了众多顶尖 CPO 架构的设计体系,抱紧了 Ayar、Lightelligence (壁仞的供应商)、Lightmatter 以及 Celestial 等 众行业领军者的大腿

相比之下,个人认为 $HIMX (奇景光电) 或 Foci (上诠) 未来面临被踢出局 (design out) 的风险最大,很有可能会被台积电的光学部门采钰 (Visera 6789) 这类巨头直接垂直整合。不过话说回来,在未来两三年内,借助 CPO 相关的光纤阵列 (FAU) 和无源器件,他们眼前依然有 波巨大的赚钱机遇
几个值得重点关注的“实质性垄断”标的:

- MSSCORP (6830):在检测和 CPO 良率把控上构筑了极深的专利护城河。
- $SOI:主导绝缘体上硅 (SOI) 衬底市场。
- NGK (5333):稳拿薄膜铌酸锂 (TFLN) 晶圆核心技术。
- $AXTI:把控磷化铟 (InP) 衬底等上游关键材料。

像讯芯 (Shunsin) 这类公司其实很难被轻易颠覆,毕竟背靠富士康,而富士康本身就深深扎根于众多核心供应链的腹地 🏭

$SIVE 的逻辑也极其相似。他们已经成功打入 (design in) 了众多顶尖 CPO 架构的设计体系,抱紧了 Ayar、Lightelligence (壁仞的供应商)、Lightmatter 以及 Celestial 等 众行业领军者的大腿

相比之下,个人认为 $HIMX (奇景光电) 或 Foci (上诠) 未来面临被踢出局 (design out) 的风险最大,很有可能会被台积电的光学部门采钰 (Visera 6789) 这类巨头直接垂直整合。不过话说回来,在未来两三年内,借助 CPO 相关的光纤阵列 (FAU) 和无源器件,他们眼前依然有 波巨大的赚钱机遇
引用原推@Nicole_yang88
博主看得很透,直接穿透到了物理AI的底层供应链。

不过想请教一下 @aleabitoreddit ,随着各大厂资本支出(CapEx)的狂飙,这几个起步较小的光子和材料公司,目前谁的产能弹性和技术壁垒最不容易被后发者颠覆?尤其是在西方供应链本土化这个点上,谁的确定性最高?

PS:我也在学习美股🙃
博主看得很透,直接穿透到了物理AI的底层供应链。

不过想请教一下 @aleabitoreddit ,随着各大厂资本支出(CapEx)的狂飙,这几个起步较小的光子和材料公司,目前谁的产能弹性和技术壁垒最不容易被后发者颠覆?尤其是在西方供应链本土化这个点上,谁的确定性最高?

PS:我也在学习美股🙃
https://x.com/Nicole_yang88/status/2058759422667796927
❤️ 1,672 🔁 216 💬 174
打开原推
📝 原创
Oh look, a new UDN article about $TSM COUPE + AI optical markets.

Institutional investors are optimistic that Taiwanese companies:

FOCI (3363), and MSScorps (6830) are expected to benefit

But... that "Institutional" should be changed to retail investors on X?

For FOCI: "Its FAU products have been developed in cooperation with TSMC for at least three years, and the specifications have been promoted to 1.6T, 3.2T, and the subsequent mass production schedule has become the focus of market observation."

For MSS: "cut into the silicon photonics and CPO detection analysis, the main "light loss detection" technology ... and launch of the silicon photonics test platform, lock in research and development, engineering verification, failure analysis and a small number of diverse test applications."

These are still two extremely small companies... and things like MSS weren't even mentioned by GS, despite the news claims about relations.

So feels like X found this early, mainstream institutions are likely about to enter after seeing this sort of confirmation.
哦看,UDN 又发了一篇关于 $TSM COUPE + AI 光学市场的新文章。

机构投资者看好台湾公司:

FOCI (3363) 和 MSScorps (6830) 有望受益

不过……这个“机构”是不是应该改成 X 上的散户投资者?

关于 FOCI:“其 FAU 产品已与 TSMC 合作开发至少三年,规格已推进到 1.6T、3.2T,后续量产进度成为市场观察重点。”

关于 MSS:“切入 silicon photonics 和 CPO 检测分析,主打‘light loss detection’技术……并推出 silicon photonics test platform,锁定研发、工程验证、失效分析以及少量多样化测试应用。”

这两家公司现在仍然非常小……而且像 MSS 这种,尽管新闻声称有相关关系,GS 甚至都没提到。

所以感觉是 X 很早就发现了这个,主流机构大概在看到这种确认之后就要进场了。
❤️ 535 🔁 27 💬 53
打开原推
💬 引用
Fun fact: Lot of the same companies are often used across different supply chains.

One likely example is: $SIVE as the upstream laser supplier to Boston Dynamics via:

Sivers -> $AEVA FMCW (CW DFB lasers) -> LG Innotek -> Boston Dynamics.

I actually personally liked Aeva for 4D AI first.

Just so happened to find out Sivers was their high confidence laser supplier for 4D FMCW lidar.

So you actually get robotics exposure with photonics while the same CW lasers used for hyperscaler AI DCs.

Near term revenue ramp though it's probably $SIVE supplying laser volume ramp for $NVDA self-driving car related architectures though Aeva.

Humanoids are probably later in 2028?

You can always get more indirect exposure like MU with memory or $INTC with edge CPUs, but of course there's more direct exposure out there.

Think I've already covered a lot of names in the past like $VPG or Harmonic Drive. But hilariously enough CPO players like $SIVE are a core part of frontier physical AI development.
有意思的是:很多相同公司经常会出现在不同供应链里。

一个可能的例子是:$SIVE 通过这条链成为 Boston Dynamics 的上游激光器供应商:

Sivers -> $AEVA FMCW(CW DFB lasers)-> LG Innotek -> Boston Dynamics。

其实我一开始个人是因为 4D AI 喜欢 Aeva。

只是刚好发现 Sivers 是他们 4D FMCW lidar 的高可信度激光器供应商。

所以你通过 photonics 实际上也能拿到 robotics 敞口,同时同一批 CW lasers 还用于 hyperscaler AI DC。

不过近端收入爬坡,大概是 $SIVE 通过 Aeva 给 $NVDA 自动驾驶相关架构供应激光器量产。

Humanoids 大概更靠后,2028 年?

你也总能买更间接的敞口,比如内存里的 MU,或者 edge CPUs 里的 $INTC,但当然也有更直接的敞口。

我过去应该已经讲过很多名字,比如 $VPG 或 Harmonic Drive。但好笑的是,像 $SIVE 这样的 CPO 玩家,其实是前沿 physical AI 发展的核心部分。
引用原推@Dubbiosismo
@aleabitoreddit Any thoughts re physical AI so far?
@aleabitoreddit 到目前为止,你对 physical AI 有什么看法?
https://x.com/Dubbiosismo/status/2058622911427055628
❤️ 954 🔁 61 💬 134
打开原推
📝 原创
AI capex spend is expected to go to "$3 to $4 trillion annually" by 2030 from $NVDA Jensen Huang projections.

You're not bullish enough.

And it might be a good idea to stay exposed + own the keys of the AI Kingdom:

-> $AXTI controls the materials buildout with photonics.
-> $SOI controls the AI buildout with silicon photonics.
-> $SIVE controls laser chokepoints for CPO.
-> $IQE controls Western epiwafer supply chains for photonics.

All these started off as tiny companies, yet the trillions of projected capex gradually upward to them. 

There's many more in other industries as well.

-> AI Capex flows to Neoclouds like $NBIS.
-> AI Capex flows to memory like $MU and $SNDK.

And many of the "commodity" materials or "science projects" for the past 20 years now a sudden shift in exponential TAM expansion.

We're witnessing the next industrial revolution with Artificial Intelligence + Physical AI.
$NVDA Jensen Huang 的预测,到 2030 年 AI capex 年支出预计会到“$3 到 $4 trillion”。

你还不够看多。

而且保持敞口、持有 AI Kingdom 的钥匙可能是个好主意:

-> $AXTI 控制 photonics 的材料扩建。
-> $SOI 用 silicon photonics 控制 AI 扩建。
-> $SIVE 控制 CPO 的激光器 chokepoints。
-> $IQE 控制西方 photonics epiwafer 供应链。

这些一开始都是小公司,但预计的数万亿 capex 会逐渐向它们上游传导。

其他行业里还有很多。

-> AI Capex 流向 $NBIS 这种 Neoclouds。
-> AI Capex 流向 $MU$SNDK 这种内存。

而过去 20 年里很多“commodity”材料或“science projects”,现在突然迎来 TAM 指数级扩张。

我们正在见证 Artificial Intelligence + Physical AI 带来的下一次工业革命。
❤️ 2,571 🔁 338 💬 244
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Four critical themes for h2 2026 if you want long ideas:

1. CPO, #1 #1 #1 #1 favorite theme. I cannot stress how much markets misunderstand this.

Everyone I've talked in SV are privately funding optical startups right now and it's a big signal of what's to come.

2. 800 VDC power semis. I think other analysts kinda convinced me on this.

I was in $NVTS for a tiny bit, low concentration. But this almost doubled to my surprise. But after doing more research, it's a pretty seismic shift in terms of what players become important

3. Physical AI Humanoids/Robotics. As you know $VPG basically tripled, and there's a lot of other players I've been trying to find longs on.

Most downstream of interest are private sector... Then components are mainly in China/Japan.

4. Maybe Glass Substrate / advanced packaging stuff still eg. $LPK. Memory got pushed down on the list given how much players have re-rated recently, lot of opportunity still with niche hbm4 players.
如果你想找做多思路,2026 下半年有四个关键主题:

1. CPO,#1 #1 #1 #1 最喜欢的主题。我真的没法再强调市场有多误解它。

我在 SV 聊过的每个人现在都在私下投光学初创公司,这是未来要发生什么的一个很强信号。

2. 800 VDC power semis。我觉得其他分析师有点把我说服了。

我曾经在 $NVTS 上拿过一点点,很低仓位。但它几乎翻倍让我挺意外。做了更多研究之后,这在谁会变重要这件事上,几乎是一次很大的结构变化。

3. Physical AI Humanoids/Robotics。你们知道 $VPG 基本涨了三倍,我也一直在找很多其他可以做多的玩家。

最有意思的下游大多在私营部门……然后组件主要在中国/日本。

4. 也许 Glass Substrate / advanced packaging 这些还可以,比如 $LPK。Memory 在榜单上的位置被往下推了,因为很多玩家最近已经重估了,但 niche hbm4 玩家里还是有不少机会。
❤️ 1,387 🔁 83 💬 170
打开原推
📝 原创
All right chat, crowdsourcing your #1 highest conviction (10x only) stock long for the Power Semi trade.

Especially given $NVDA pushing shift to 800 VDC.

Stuff like $NVTS or $WOLF, but high-beta, 10x potential only. Anywhere around the world.

What's your pick? https://t.co/Y10KR6HLVC
好了 chat,来众包一下你们对 Power Semi 交易最有信心的 #1 多头股票(只要 10x 级别)。

尤其是在 $NVDA 推动转向 800 VDC 的背景下。

$NVTS$WOLF 这种,但只要高 beta、10x 潜力的。全球任何地方都行。

你选哪个? https://t.co/Y10KR6HLVC
❤️ 2,494 🔁 198 💬 525
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Just random themes im looking im having a good time looking into over the weekend:

-> power semis, integrated voltage regulators, multiphase controllers, CDUs, cold plates, manifolds, pumps, valves, heat exchangers, rear-door systems, chillers.

$POWL, $NVT, 010120 KS, 267260 KS, 2308 TT, $VICR, $POWI , CATL, Sungrow 300274 C

-> thermal stuff (ALFA SS, ASTK DC, Daikin 6367 JP), $CARR, MTRS SS)

These are just ones aside from the ones I've talked about eg. $NVTS or $HPS.A.

They're all kinda more priced in but now but it's a good starting point in terms of finding more important players that's not priced in.

Then you try and look: which single company do most of these probably rely on?

I'm personally less familiar with the energy/cooling/power trade, which I'm happy to admit since everything is a learning process.

But normally even if I find something interesting, i don't find it more compelling than staying in CPO longs. Always it's always fun learning more.

Was always looking for SRAM-adjacent exposure, think private markets are better to go then $CBRS?
只是一些我周末随便研究、看得挺开心的主题:

-> power semis、integrated voltage regulators、multiphase controllers、CDUs、cold plates、manifolds、pumps、valves、heat exchangers、rear-door systems、chillers。

$POWL$NVT、010120 KS、267260 KS、2308 TT、$VICR$POWI、CATL、Sungrow 300274 C

-> thermal stuff(ALFA SS、ASTK DC、Daikin 6367 JP)、$CARR、MTRS SS)

这些只是我讲过的那些之外的,比如 $NVTS$HPS.A

它们现在大多也有点 priced in 了,但作为起点很好,可以继续找更重要但还没 priced in 的玩家。

然后你就试着去看:这些东西大多可能依赖哪一家单一公司?

我个人对能源/冷却/电力这条交易没那么熟,我也很乐意承认,因为所有东西都是学习过程。

但通常就算我发现了有趣的东西,也不觉得它比继续待在 CPO longs 里更有吸引力。不过多学点东西总是很好玩。

我一直在找 SRAM-adjacent 敞口,感觉私募市场比 $CBRS 更适合?
❤️ 692 🔁 22 💬 69
打开原推
💬 引用
哪里的话,应该是我谢谢你们愿意花时间看我的内容!

最近涨了这么多中文粉丝,我真的特别开心。感觉这两天差不多就涨了快三万粉?

原来 X 上的中文圈比我想象的要大得多啊!感觉以后多跟大家互动、交流交流想法,肯定会特别有意思。
哪里的话,应该是我谢谢你们愿意花时间看我的内容!

最近涨了这么多中文粉丝,我真的特别开心。感觉这两天差不多就涨了快三万粉?

原来 X 上的中文圈比我想象的要大得多啊!感觉以后多跟大家互动、交流交流想法,肯定会特别有意思。
引用原推@LucyBuilding
今天刷Serenity的主页,发现她关注了我,惊讶又开心。如果你这一年关注美股半导体,尤其是 AI 产业链、光模块、硅光、存储、CPO、衬底等这些方向,大概率会刷到过她。

我最开始涨粉 1000 多的一篇帖子就来自于引用她关于投资路径的观点。

那篇内容对我来说挺重要的。因为在那之前,我看半导体更多还是看股票代码、看财报、看涨跌。看到她的分析之后,我第一次真正要沿着产业链往下拆,去看每一轮需求爆发时,真正卡住供给的环节在哪里;去看资金轮动方向。

这套思路后来对我影响很大。我选择重仓的是存储,尤其是闪迪、三星、海力士这一条线。事后看,这个方向确实给了我很大的收益。但同时我也很清楚自己其实错过了很多其他环节的多倍增长。

比如光模块、硅光、CPO、部分材料和小市值供应链公司,有些涨幅并不比存储差,甚至更夸张。

非常感谢Serenity帮助我打开了投资视角。她关注的很多方向,一开始都不是市场最拥挤的主线,但后来会随着 AI CapEx 扩散,被资金重新定价。她致力于把一个还没有被充分定价的逻辑提前讲清楚,并且接受市场后续验证。

我关注 Serenity 的时候,记得她好像还只有几万粉丝。现在已经 30 多万了。她的成长本身也很有代表性,在一个信息越来越噪音化的平台上,真正持续输出高密度产业链研究的人,依然会被市场看见。

她最近关注我,对我来说更像一个小小的闭环。

最开始我只是转达她的观点,借着那篇帖子涨了 1000 多粉,也真正开始研究半导体产业链。之后也引用过多篇内容,几个月后,我自己也在这条路上慢慢积累了一点判断,靠存储这条线赚到了一些钱,也经历了很多次波动、卖飞、回撤和复盘。

投资账号的成长,和投资本身很像。

一开始你只是看见别人怎么分析,后来你慢慢形成自己的框架,再后来,你开始用自己的语言把复杂的东西讲给更多人听。

中间一定会错过,一定会犯错,也一定会有很多如果当时的遗憾。但只要你的认知在往前走,这些错过就不是白白错过。它们会变成下一次判断的底层素材。

最后再次感谢 Serenity @aleabitoreddit 。 感谢长期免费分享高密度的产业链研究,也感谢对投资博主价值的这种定义和坚持:不靠晒账户金额制造权威感,而是靠公开 thesis、持续验证和市场结果来证明研究的有效性。

我也会继续关注和跟踪她的研究,继续学习这种从信息发现、产业链拆解到市场验证的能力。希望自己以后不仅能抓住更多机会,也能把复杂的投资逻辑讲得更清楚更有价值。
今天刷Serenity的主页,发现她关注了我,惊讶又开心。如果你这一年关注美股半导体,尤其是 AI 产业链、光模块、硅光、存储、CPO、衬底等这些方向,大概率会刷到过她。

我最开始涨粉 1000 多的一篇帖子就来自于引用她关于投资路径的观点。

那篇内容对我来说挺重要的。因为在那之前,我看半导体更多还是看股票代码、看财报、看涨跌。看到她的分析之后,我第一次真正要沿着产业链往下拆,去看每一轮需求爆发时,真正卡住供给的环节在哪里;去看资金轮动方向。

这套思路后来对我影响很大。我选择重仓的是存储,尤其是闪迪、三星、海力士这一条线。事后看,这个方向确实给了我很大的收益。但同时我也很清楚自己其实错过了很多其他环节的多倍增长。

比如光模块、硅光、CPO、部分材料和小市值供应链公司,有些涨幅并不比存储差,甚至更夸张。

非常感谢Serenity帮助我打开了投资视角。她关注的很多方向,一开始都不是市场最拥挤的主线,但后来会随着 AI CapEx 扩散,被资金重新定价。她致力于把一个还没有被充分定价的逻辑提前讲清楚,并且接受市场后续验证。

我关注 Serenity 的时候,记得她好像还只有几万粉丝。现在已经 30 多万了。她的成长本身也很有代表性,在一个信息越来越噪音化的平台上,真正持续输出高密度产业链研究的人,依然会被市场看见。

她最近关注我,对我来说更像一个小小的闭环。

最开始我只是转达她的观点,借着那篇帖子涨了 1000 多粉,也真正开始研究半导体产业链。之后也引用过多篇内容,几个月后,我自己也在这条路上慢慢积累了一点判断,靠存储这条线赚到了一些钱,也经历了很多次波动、卖飞、回撤和复盘。

投资账号的成长,和投资本身很像。

一开始你只是看见别人怎么分析,后来你慢慢形成自己的框架,再后来,你开始用自己的语言把复杂的东西讲给更多人听。

中间一定会错过,一定会犯错,也一定会有很多如果当时的遗憾。但只要你的认知在往前走,这些错过就不是白白错过。它们会变成下一次判断的底层素材。

最后再次感谢 Serenity @aleabitoreddit 。 感谢长期免费分享高密度的产业链研究,也感谢对投资博主价值的这种定义和坚持:不靠晒账户金额制造权威感,而是靠公开 thesis、持续验证和市场结果来证明研究的有效性。

我也会继续关注和跟踪她的研究,继续学习这种从信息发现、产业链拆解到市场验证的能力。希望自己以后不仅能抓住更多机会,也能把复杂的投资逻辑讲得更清楚更有价值。
https://x.com/LucyBuilding/status/2058375421809549816
❤️ 2,351 🔁 71 💬 369
打开原推
💬 引用
I’m not selling a single share of $SIVE.

I personally think it’s a once-a-generation long given how many hyperscaler suppliers they’re already in.

Coupled with GS extreme TAM expansion projections for both pluggables and CPO in the next 2 years.

If you didn’t read the $JBL fireside transcript by now validating demand/timeline.

Or the fact Ayar removed Lumentum and Macom from their website as laser suppliers validating moat.

Or literal CHIPS ACT funding validating technological importance.

Or that management is literally doing everything right in my view, with NASDAQ listing into M&A focus, validating forward growth vision.

Upside is just way too compelling at current valuations.

Institutions have barely entered yet as well… and we’re about to see tens of millions of passive, long term new inflow next month from Nasdaq, Blackrock, MSCI indexes.
我一股 $SIVE 都不卖。

我个人觉得,考虑到它已经进入了这么多 hyperscaler 供应商体系,这是一次一代人一次的多头机会。

再加上 GS 对 pluggables 和 CPO 在未来 2 年极端的 TAM 扩张预测。

如果你到现在还没读 $JBL fireside transcript,里面验证了需求和时间线。

或者 Ayar 把 Lumentum 和 Macom 从官网激光器供应商名单里移除,验证了护城河。

或者 CHIPS ACT 资金直接验证了技术重要性。

或者管理层在我看来真的每一步都做对了,从 NASDAQ 上市到 M&A focus,都验证了未来增长愿景。

按现在估值,上行空间实在太有吸引力。

机构也几乎还没进来……而且下个月我们会看到 Nasdaq、Blackrock、MSCI 指数带来数千万的长期被动新流入。
引用原推@TalentActivity
@aleabitoreddit What's your refreshed realize gains price targets for all? @aleabitoreddit
@aleabitoreddit 你更新后的全部止盈目标价是多少?@aleabitoreddit
https://x.com/TalentActivity/status/2058377359917502535
❤️ 2,136 🔁 139 💬 162
打开原推
📝 原创
Photonics is nuanced and using ChatGPT/Gemini makes you miss all of it:

1. $SIVE is actually a chokepoint and partially a bottleneck.

The reason it's a chokepoint is leading CPO/optical hyperscaler players go through Sivers, likely:

Ayar. Celestial. Lightmatter. Lightelligence. Poet.

If you take out Sivers, you literally can't make some of their products + delay their roadmap by years.

As many are sole/primary source but are heading the direction on multi-source.

As for the bottleneck argument: Win Semi is the bottleneck for scaling laser production.

But... the nuance is when you have capacity allocated for the next few years.

You become part of the bottleneck itself if players fight you for allocation of finished lasers.

That's the nuance people miss with capacity allocation dynamics.

It's like saying $SNDK is not part of the NAND bottleneck when Kioxia makes all of it.

But when Sandisk has the ultimate control of output supply, they become the bottleneck + have all the pricing power.

Sivers controls output supply of CW lasers given allocations, and as seen with $LITE earnings, CW laser is currently bottlenecked as everyone seems to be stuck producing EMLs.

2. Like how LLMs always uses em-dashes.

You can tell when people use AI when they always use the same "CW is a dumb interchangeable laser" argument or compare "power" specs after conflating different architectures.

That's why your "analysts" using AI will get this wrong over and over.

There's CW lasers... and then there's a specific architectural design that Sivers achieves with DFB lasers.

If you compare power specs with $LITE vs. Sivers, Lumentum wins in isolation. But they're completely different laser architectures.

All the leading CPO players like Ayar, chose $SIVE for an architectural reason for high power, low thermal, laser arrays. $JBL 1.6T LRO also made one of the most dramatic moats cited by their fireside chat, using Sivers lasers.

If you think CW lasers are interchangeable with Sumitomo/Furukawa, and others. And can be plug-and-play... i don't know what to tell you?

Again: $SIVE makes architecturally unique CW lasers for leading CPO players.

3. I'm not sure how many times I need to say this:

$SIVE for 2024-2025 has been going through development contracts. People using TTM revenue or former P/S metrics are using completely the wrong metrics, when there's volume ramp in 2027.

It's the same with $AAOI which volume ramps in H1 2027.

$AEHR which volume ramps after qualification.

$LPK that volume ramps after qualification.

This is just missing qualification cycles in semiconductors and how to model financials currently.

As for the $LITE comparisons (which was also my long last year):

$LITE literally started off selling laser dies before acquisition of Cloud Lite and other downstream optical engine components.

This is where $SIVE is at today with starting off in the laser chokepoint for CPO:

People are modeling laser revenue off very isolated TAM projections. Meanwhile Sivers is targeting M&A to expand revenue for TAM projections.

This is not a simple component FAU + ramp valuation modeling over with a Taiwanese company.

Since Laser companies like $LITE, $COHR are known to downstream expand to make their lasers more valuable, then vertically integrate (fabs, assembly) afterward.

Again, Sivers worked with Ayar and these types of companies before they all became billion dollar companies. I have high conviction knowing they know what to acquire down the ELS/optical engine stack + pluggable transceiver for TAM expansion.

It's just annoying when I get people who don't understand the nuances backseat commenting wrong things about my longs.

I got the same thing about $AXTI is not a bottleneck! InP isn't needed! China! back at $14.

Now it's $140

I got the same thing about $AAOI "is going down 50%!" back at $65. or "AOI management is shady at $30".

Now it's $170

I got the "there's nothing new with $SOI" back at $45.

Now it's $170.

I think I'm one of the few who actually understands the nuances with photonics, since I did call out $LITE, $TSEM, Innolight, $AXTI, $AAOI, $SOI, that outperformed both photonics markets and overall markets over the past year.

And now I'm long on $SIVE.
Photonics 很讲细节,用 ChatGPT/Gemini 会让你把这些全漏掉:

1. $SIVE 实际上是 chokepoint,也部分是 bottleneck。

它之所以是 chokepoint,是因为领先的 CPO/光学 hyperscaler 玩家大概率都经过 Sivers:

Ayar。Celestial。Lightmatter。Lightelligence。Poet。

如果拿掉 Sivers,你真的就做不出其中一些产品,而且路线图会被延后好几年。

因为很多都是 sole/primary source,不过方向上会走向 multi-source。

至于 bottleneck 这个论点:Win Semi 是激光器产能扩张的 bottleneck。

但是……细节在于,当你已经锁定了未来几年的产能分配。

如果其他玩家要跟你抢 finished lasers 的 allocation,你自己也会变成 bottleneck 的一部分。

这就是大家漏掉的产能分配动态。

这就像说 $SNDK 不是 NAND bottleneck 的一部分,因为所有东西都是 Kioxia 做的。

但当 Sandisk 对输出供给有最终控制权时,它们就变成了 bottleneck,并拥有全部定价权。

Sivers 在 allocation 下控制 CW lasers 的输出供给,而且从 $LITE 财报也能看出,CW laser 现在是瓶颈,因为大家似乎都卡在生产 EMLs 上。

2. 就像 LLM 总爱用 em-dashes 一样。

当人们总是用同一套“CW 就是愚蠢可替换激光器”的论点,或者在混淆不同架构后比较“power”规格时,你就能看出他们在用 AI。

所以你那些用 AI 的“分析师”会一次又一次把这事搞错。

CW lasers 是一回事……Sivers 用 DFB lasers 实现的特定架构设计又是另一回事。

如果只孤立比较 $LITE 和 Sivers 的 power specs,Lumentum 会赢。但它们是完全不同的 laser architectures。

Ayar 这类所有领先 CPO 玩家选择 $SIVE,是因为其高功率、低热、laser arrays 的架构原因。$JBL 1.6T LRO 在 fireside chat 里也提到过一个非常夸张的护城河,就是使用 Sivers lasers。

如果你认为 CW lasers 可以和 Sumitomo/Furukawa 以及其他公司互换,而且能 plug-and-play……我也不知道该怎么跟你说?

再说一次:$SIVE 为领先 CPO 玩家做的是架构上独特的 CW lasers。

3. 我不知道我还要说多少遍:

$SIVE 在 2024-2025 年一直处在开发合同阶段。用 TTM revenue 或过去的 P/S 指标的人,指标完全用错了,因为量产爬坡在 2027 年。

$AAOI 也是一样,H1 2027 量产爬坡。

$AEHR 是认证之后量产爬坡。

$LPK 也是认证之后量产爬坡。

这就是没理解半导体认证周期,也没理解现在该怎么建模财务。

至于和 $LITE 的比较(这也是我去年做多的标的):

$LITE 一开始就是卖 laser dies,后来收购 Cloud Lite 和其他下游 optical engine components。

这就是今天 $SIVE 所处的位置,从 CPO 的 laser chokepoint 起步:

人们基于非常孤立的 TAM 预测来建模 laser revenue。与此同时,Sivers 的目标是通过 M&A 扩大收入和 TAM。

这不是简单拿一个台湾公司的 component FAU + ramp 来做估值模型就完事。

因为像 $LITE$COHR 这样的 Laser companies,本来就以向下游扩张、让自己的激光器更有价值而闻名,之后再垂直整合(fabs、assembly)。

再说一次,Sivers 在 Ayar 和这类公司还没变成十亿美元级公司之前就已经合作了。我很有信心,他们知道该在 ELS/optical engine stack + pluggable transceiver 下面收购什么来扩大 TAM。

让我烦的是,总有人不懂这些细节,还在我多头标的下面指点江山说错话。

我在 $AXTI $14 的时候也听过一样的话:它不是 bottleneck!不需要 InP!中国!

现在是 $140

我在 $AAOI $65 的时候也听过“要跌 50%!”,或者在 $30 说“AOI 管理层 shady”。

现在是 $170

我在 $SOI $45 的时候听过“没什么新东西”。

现在是 $170。

我觉得我是少数真正理解 photonics 细节的人之一,因为我点过的 $LITE$TSEM、Innolight、$AXTI$AAOI$SOI,过去一年都跑赢了 photonics 市场和整体市场。

而现在我做多 $SIVE
❤️ 2,862 🔁 237 💬 166
打开原推
📝 原创
Well, looks like Iran War is about to end.

Markets/Indexes are probably going like this Monday.

Probably even better for Europe/Taiwan/Korean equities that were dragged down more from oil fears.

If something goes up during this time… probably goes higher in better macro. https://t.co/kZQ5r0IzZd
嗯,看起来 Iran War 快要结束了。

周一市场/指数大概会这样走。

对之前因为油价担忧被拖累更多的欧洲/台湾/韩国股票,可能还会更好。

如果有东西在这段时间还能涨……宏观变好时大概会涨得更高。 https://t.co/kZQ5r0IzZd
❤️ 1,489 🔁 69 💬 98
打开原推
📝 原创
Wow, I've reached 30,000 paid subscribers.

Thank you everyone! Catching up to Elon Musk.

Only 17,000 more to go...

Then I reach my goal of becoming #1 on the entire X platform! https://t.co/TStifVRgG9
哇,我已经到 30,000 个付费订阅了。

谢谢大家!快追上 Elon Musk 了。

只差 17,000 个了……

然后我就达成成为整个 X 平台 #1 的目标! https://t.co/TStifVRgG9
❤️ 2,052 🔁 26 💬 167
打开原推
📝 原创
I love how pointing out that ideas and market percentage validation.

Matter more than net worth.

Triggered all the “trust me I’m rich” grifters selling expensive paywalls or courses.

It’s good retail is starting to wake up if the older models feel threatened.
我只是指出:想法和市场百分比验证,

比净资产更重要。

结果就把那些“信我,我很有钱”的骗子都触发了,他们卖昂贵的付费墙或课程。

如果旧模式开始觉得受威胁,说明散户开始醒过来了,这是好事。
❤️ 1,838 🔁 38 💬 117
打开原推
💬 引用
I don't post dollar amounts because they don't matter.

What matters is return %. Speaking of that...

YTD: 3840.39%.

I'm probably the only one in the world. Who called out multiple names that 10x'd in a short timeframe.

Do you remember these thesis anon?

1. $AXTI
2. $SIVE
3. $AAOI
4. $LITE
5. $IQE
6. $AEHR
7. $CRCL
8. $EWY
9. Unimicron
10. Nitto Boseki
11. $OSS
12. $GDRZF
13. $RPI
14. $SOI
15. $ALRIB
16. $SNDK
17. $SIMO
18. $VPG
19. $TSEM
20. $ARM
21. $MRVL
22. $INTC
23. $LPK
24. $NBIS
25. $MU

They're all up 100-1000%+, because...

1. I post a thesis.
2. People can see how the stock performs months later.
3. They turn out right (thesis validation) because they're up hundreds of percent + hold their returns.

I really dislike the traditional X influencer who shows large dollar amounts or fancy watches/cars/private jets.

Then use that to get more by selling expensive subscriptions rather than through market returns.

So trying to set a new trend off pure information discovery/synthesis from free thesis posts and the results that follow in terms of return percentages.

TLDR: Market returns in terms of percentages matter the most to validate a thesis.

Not the dollar amount made.
我不晒金额,因为那不重要。

重要的是收益率%。说到这个……

YTD:3840.39%。

我可能是世界上唯一一个,在很短时间里点出多个 10x 名字的人。

你还记得这些 thesis 吗 anon?

1. $AXTI
2. $SIVE
3. $AAOI
4. $LITE
5. $IQE
6. $AEHR
7. $CRCL
8. $EWY
9. Unimicron
10. Nitto Boseki
11. $OSS
12. $GDRZF
13. $RPI
14. $SOI
15. $ALRIB
16. $SNDK
17. $SIMO
18. $VPG
19. $TSEM
20. $ARM
21. $MRVL
22. $INTC
23. $LPK
24. $NBIS
25. $MU

它们都涨了 100-1000%+,因为……

1. 我发一个 thesis。
2. 人们几个月后能看到股票表现。
3. 结果证明是对的(thesis validation),因为它们涨了几百个百分点,而且守住了回报。

我真的很不喜欢传统 X influencer 晒大金额,或者名表/豪车/私人飞机。

然后靠这个卖昂贵订阅赚更多钱,而不是靠市场回报。

所以我想用免费的 thesis 帖和之后收益率结果,建立一种纯靠信息发现/综合的新趋势。

TLDR:用百分比衡量的市场回报,才是验证 thesis 最重要的东西。

不是赚了多少美元。
引用原推@krasko1199362
@aleabitoreddit Notice there's no dollar amount attributed
@aleabitoreddit 注意这里没有标具体美元金额
https://x.com/krasko1199362/status/2058093697695199387
❤️ 4,800 🔁 309 💬 397
打开原推
💬 引用
I’m pretty international!

I’m in Japan right now so learning Japanese.

Lived in China for a tiny bit and I travel to Taiwan pretty often. So know some Chinese.

Used to play soccer in Mexico, so I know some Spanish.

I used to go to Korea just to play League of Legends in KR server with friends… so I mainly know all the swear words from all chat?

Idk if I count the UK as international anymore… was actually going to study AI at Edinburgh before I decided to do my own stuff.

Been to Singapore like 15 times. Canada way too many times… Maybe been to ~28+ countries or so?

I kinda have PTSD from Sweden from X, but maybe the people will be more welcoming if I show up in person…

I’m usually at Rosewood Menlo Park if anyone wants to say hi one day.

So maybe just living internationally makes me receptive to foreign equities?
我还挺 international 的!

我现在在日本,所以在学日语。

以前在中国住过一小段时间,也经常去台湾,所以会一点中文。

以前在墨西哥踢过足球,所以会一点西班牙语。

我以前去韩国只是为了和朋友在 KR server 打 League of Legends……所以我主要会全体聊天里的脏话?

不知道现在还算不算把英国当 international……我本来其实要去 Edinburgh 学 AI,后来决定做自己的事。

新加坡去过大概 15 次。加拿大去过太多次……可能去过 ~28+ 个国家左右?

我因为 X 对瑞典有点 PTSD,不过如果我本人去了,也许大家会更欢迎一点……

如果哪天有人想打招呼,我通常在 Rosewood Menlo Park。

所以也许就是这种国际化生活让我更容易接受海外股票?
引用原推@OveB__
@aleabitoreddit 你到底是哪裡人?!
@aleabitoreddit 你到底是哪裡人?!
https://x.com/OveB__/status/2058165716176764969
❤️ 2,682 🔁 53 💬 336
打开原推
💬 引用
华人社区最近的赞誉让我感到受宠若惊!

我认为任何空头被打爆,都只是我单纯喜欢像 $AAOI 这样的股票而产生的无意间的副作用。

希望也能与更多的华人社区朋友互动(最近我在 X 上跟日本和韩国的网友互动得比较多)。
华人社区最近的赞誉让我感到受宠若惊!

我认为任何空头被打爆,都只是我单纯喜欢像 $AAOI 这样的股票而产生的无意间的副作用。

希望也能与更多的华人社区朋友互动(最近我在 X 上跟日本和韩国的网友互动得比较多)。
引用原推@IamRamenPanda
Serenity 是美股头号牛散

是收割美国大机构的牛散,檀香园做空AAOI,他一条推就打爆人家机构了

全球银行、券商、家办、富豪们,同步关注的大牛散

你可以取关所有博主,只看他一人都行
Serenity 是美股头号牛散

是收割美国大机构的牛散,檀香园做空AAOI,他一条推就打爆人家机构了

全球银行、券商、家办、富豪们,同步关注的大牛散

你可以取关所有博主,只看他一人都行
https://x.com/IamRamenPanda/status/2057994103984726123
❤️ 1,948 🔁 56 💬 291
打开原推
💬 引用
Wow, NASDAQ just added $SIVE to its Stockholm index.

This is est. to be around ~$15-20M worth of passive inflow, with strict ETF-only being around ~$.5M.

We’re able to see a lot of institutional inflow into Sivers, as this is on top of the MSCI index inclusion EOM. https://t.co/qHYeT8b3Ja
哇,NASDAQ 刚把 $SIVE 加进了它的 Stockholm index。

估计这会带来大约 ~$15-20M 的被动资金流入,其中严格 ETF-only 大概是 ~$.5M。

我们能看到很多机构资金流入 Sivers,而且这是叠加在月底 MSCI index inclusion 之上的。 https://t.co/qHYeT8b3Ja
引用原推@GGMUFUT
@aleabitoreddit Sweden finally brining in some Sive acceptance.
https://t.co/Go6l4YaTe1
@aleabitoreddit 瑞典终于开始接受 Sive 了。
https://t.co/Go6l4YaTe1
https://x.com/GGMUFUT/status/2058140228880146537
❤️ 1,922 🔁 138 💬 113
打开原推
📝 原创
People in Sweden always like:

“How does $SIVE have so little employees and can do all of this” vs. $LITE?

Turns out… You can build the most valuable IP in the world if ~1/4th your entire workforce are PHDs. https://t.co/oVlJJ9OEaZ
瑞典的人总是喜欢问:

$SIVE 员工这么少,怎么能做这么多事?”相比 $LITE

结果发现……如果你整个员工队伍大约 1/4 都是 PHD,你就能打造出世界上最有价值的 IP。 https://t.co/oVlJJ9OEaZ
❤️ 1,401 🔁 47 💬 80
打开原推
📝 原创
2 Year Return: 22,561.99%

Pretty decent, right anon? https://t.co/snVfKQ5nqm
2 年回报:22,561.99%

还挺不错,对吧 anon? https://t.co/snVfKQ5nqm
❤️ 3,970 🔁 58 💬 347
打开原推
💬 引用
For $SIVE to become the next $80B+ $LITE.

Sivers is the current laser kingmaker of the optical transition to CPO and 1.6T.

They basically supply lasers to the leading players in the CPO space.

From likely $MRVL Celestial, Lightmatter, Lightelligence, $POET, and others for CPO. before they got big.

And now with large players like $JBL for 1.6T LRO + more test/qualifications underway for pluggables.

They've finally solved the Catch22 problem, and have the attention of the market to pull off foundational CPO related IP acquisitions downstream on NASDAQ listing (or now with equity).

And expand revenue as much as possible from the laser source into:

-> Optical Engine/ELS value.
-> Optical Transceiver IP

Just like $LITE did to drive their valuations from $2B -> $80B in 2 years.

But instead of EML + pluggables, Sivers is doing this for the CPO supercycle, the fastest TAM expansion in history for photonics.

I'm following the story for them to pull this off this David vs. Goliath shift catching up to $LITE.

More than I care about little MC % returns that's happening currently.
要让 $SIVE 成为下一个 $80B+ 的 $LITE

Sivers 是当前光学转向 CPO 和 1.6T 过程中的 laser kingmaker。

它们基本给 CPO 领域的领先玩家供应激光器。

从很可能的 $MRVL Celestial、Lightmatter、Lightelligence、$POET,以及其他 CPO 玩家,在他们变大之前。

现在又有 $JBL 这种大玩家做 1.6T LRO,加上更多 pluggables 的测试/认证在推进。

它们终于解决了 Catch22 问题,并且获得了市场关注,可以在 NASDAQ 上市后(或者现在用股权)完成基础性的 CPO 相关下游 IP 收购。

并尽可能把收入从 laser source 扩展到:

-> Optical Engine/ELS value。
-> Optical Transceiver IP

就像 $LITE 在 2 年内把估值从 $2B 推到 $80B 那样。

但 Sivers 做的不是 EML + pluggables,而是 CPO supercycle,这是 photonics 历史上 TAM 扩张最快的一轮。

我关注的是他们能不能完成这场 David vs. Goliath 的转变,追上 $LITE

这比我在意现在这点小市值百分比回报重要得多。
引用原推@kekbarbara
@aleabitoreddit What’s your goal on Sive @aleabitoreddit
@aleabitoreddit 你对 Sive 的目标是什么?@aleabitoreddit
https://x.com/kekbarbara/status/2058057358027129270
❤️ 1,644 🔁 120 💬 72
打开原推
💬 引用
5 months ago. I gave a PT of $150 with $AXTI.

Over 10x that current values from a $500M MC.

It’s now a $9.2B MC and $140. $10 away.

New $SIVE longs are starting to realize what’s it’s like to be in AXT.

And that I’m pretty good at guessing intrinsic valuations of companies. https://t.co/HXAoKmXmaV
5 个月前,我给 $AXTI 的 PT 是 $150。

相对当时 $500M 市值,超过 10 倍。

现在它是 $9.2B 市值,$140。只差 $10。

新的 $SIVE 多头开始体会到,当初在 AXT 里是什么感觉。

也开始意识到,我对公司内在估值的猜测还挺准。 https://t.co/HXAoKmXmaV
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 1,904 🔁 73 💬 162
打开原推
💬 引用
People keep asking:

Hey why do have new longs with Taiwan/EU stocks recently like $LPK or Foci?

And not much with new US ones?

It's partly because the list of US stocks I've liked from $INTC to $NBIS hasn't changed.

You can always just let the ones you like grow. https://t.co/ostZWjOAAm
大家一直在问:

嘿,为什么你最近有台湾/EU 股票的新多头,比如 $LPK 或 Foci?

美国新标的反而不多?

部分原因是,我喜欢的美国股票名单从 $INTC$NBIS,一直没怎么变。

你总是可以让自己喜欢的那些继续成长。 https://t.co/ostZWjOAAm
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Here's a bunch of random 30 US-available random stocks I like today and why:

1. $INTC - America's hope for foundry, national security
2. $MRVL - scales rev from future maia asics and add ons like cpo, they do everything lost count
3. $TSM - backbone of semis/ai
4. $COHR - They do everything vertically integrated + captures optical cycle
5. $RKLB - the final frontier of space will be around 5 years from now and 20 years from now.
6. $DRAM - memory exposure for samsung/sk hynix
7. $AVGO - hyperscalers dont like nvidia gpu tax
8. $AMZN - nobody can compete against the overnight shipping of toilet paper. robotics will lower opex over time
9. $ARM - AGI CPUs scale revenue quite a bit over the next decade
10. $TSEM - you're going to need a foundry for light based stuff
11. $IBIT - bitcoin, we all know by now
12. $NBIS - i think it's the next AWS. Also they do self-driving cars with uber, own scaling DB companies, data labeling. It's almost like a mini Google.
13. $GOOGL - youtube is not going away, gemini is great. they're vertically integrated with TPUs and fund buildout with operating income so i like it.
14. $AMKR - super facilities coming online in late 2027-2028. benefits from made in america
15. $HOOD - i dont like short term, but long term i'm a fan of Robinhood since they captured retail + have more products like banking, etc that they're scaling up. product innovation is wild.
16. $CRCL - I happen to really like stablecoins and see them as the future for both payments/holding (depends on clarity act)
17. $META - people aren't going to stop using instagram or whatsapp, or others anytime soon.
18. $LITE - $GOOGL TPU exposure decently high part of BOM. As long as Google's AI program keeps running I think $LITE will do well.
19. $LPTH - Germanium and China export controls will always be an issue so US made engineered alternatives will always be important
20. $FN - Someone needs to assemble optical stuff
21. $JBL - same as above, but added with ip from Intel's SiPh acqusition so might end up like innolight?
22. $MP - American rare earths program is extremely important, similar to $INTC national security risks
23. $HIMS - Okay here me out they just acquired a ton of companies, and at $19 they have global DTC channel. short sellers really hate this company, but I think it's actually promising as a contrarian long
24. $SMTC - LRO/LPO transition
25. $POWL - US alternative to hammond for switchgear DC type bottleneck
26. $VPG - Humanoids will be a thing down the road maybe 2027-2028, this makes the sensors.
27. $MOG.A - Feels like i see them everywhere in robotics, to spacex supply chains
28. $MSFT - At $375, one day we'll look back and see this as a buying opportunity.
29. $CVX - oil might crash after war but these oil companies are going to be extremely important, especially when Venezulea is a goldmine.
30. $XLU - i think rate cuts might be back online, we need power/grid for AI so these names will always be improtant from $CEG to $NEE

Just throwing out other thoughts aside from $AAOI and $AEHR.
这里是我今天喜欢的一堆随机的 30 个美国可买股票,以及原因:

1. $INTC - 美国晶圆代工的希望,国家安全
2. $MRVL - 未来 Maia ASIC 和 CPO 等附加业务会拉动收入,他们什么都做,我都数不过来了
3. $TSM - 半导体/AI 的骨干
4. $COHR - 垂直整合什么都做 + 吃到光学周期
5. $RKLB - 太空这个终极边疆大概会在未来 5 年和 20 年后出现机会。
6. $DRAM - 对 samsung/sk hynix 的存储敞口
7. $AVGO - hyperscaler 不喜欢 nvidia GPU 税
8. $AMZN - 没人能竞争隔夜送厕纸。机器人长期会降低 opex
9. $ARM - AGI CPU 在未来十年会让收入增长不少
10. $TSEM - 做光相关的东西,总得有晶圆厂
11. $IBIT - 比特币,我们现在都懂了
12. $NBIS - 我觉得它是下一个 AWS。而且他们和 uber 做自动驾驶,拥有扩展型数据库公司、数据标注。几乎像一个迷你 Google。
13. $GOOGL - youtube 不会消失,gemini 很强。他们用 TPU 垂直整合,并用经营收入给 buildout 供血,所以我喜欢。
14. $AMKR - 大型先进设施会在 2027 年底到 2028 年投产。受益于 made in america
15. $HOOD - 我短期不喜欢,但长期我是 Robinhood 粉丝,因为他们抓住了散户,还有银行等更多产品在扩张。产品创新很猛。
16. $CRCL - 我确实很喜欢稳定币,认为它们是支付/持有的未来(取决于 clarity act)
17. $META - 人们短期内不会停止使用 instagram 或 whatsapp 等产品。
18. $LITE - $GOOGL TPU 的 BOM 敞口相当高。只要 Google 的 AI 项目继续跑,我认为 $LITE 会表现不错。
19. $LPTH - 锗和中国出口管制会一直是问题,所以美国制造的工程替代品会一直重要
20. $FN - 总得有人组装光学东西
21. $JBL - 同上,但加上从 Intel SiPh 收购来的 IP,所以最后可能会像 innolight?
22. $MP - 美国稀土项目极其重要,类似 $INTC 的国家安全风险
23. $HIMS - 好吧听我说,他们刚收购了一堆公司,而且在 $19 这个位置有全球 DTC 渠道。空头真的很讨厌这家公司,但我觉得作为逆向做多其实有前景
24. $SMTC - LRO/LPO 转换
25. $POWL - 美国版 hammond,针对 switchgear DC 类型瓶颈
26. $VPG - 人形机器人之后会成为趋势,可能 2027-2028,这家公司做传感器。
27. $MOG.A - 感觉我在机器人到 spacex 供应链里到处都能看到他们
28. $MSFT - $375 的时候,总有一天我们回头看会觉得这是买入机会。
29. $CVX - 战后油价可能崩,但这些石油公司会极其重要,尤其委内瑞拉是金矿。
30. $XLU - 我觉得降息可能又要回来了,我们需要 AI 的电力/电网,所以从 $CEG$NEE 这些名字会一直重要

只是抛出一些除了 $AAOI$AEHR 之外的想法。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2042187668931616964
❤️ 1,162 🔁 70 💬 134
打开原推
💬 引用
Wait until you realize that this is actually NASDAQ liquidity required for the US listing/float.

And proceeds are expected go to $SIVE M&A (they hired 2 acquisition related board members).

For photonics TAM/Revenue expansion.

Not only that, all the small companies they worked with from Celestial to Lightmatter ended up being swallowed up by Marvell or became independent billion dollar companies.

So Sivers is by far the most knowledgable in what to acquire at the very start.

Which is why I call $SIVE the Kingmaker for CPO.

This is in fact extremely bullish for Sivers.
等你意识到,这其实是美国上市/流通盘所需的 NASDAQ 流动性。

而且募集资金预计会用于 $SIVE M&A(他们聘了 2 位收购相关的董事会成员)。

为了 photonics TAM/Revenue 扩张。

不仅如此,他们合作过的小公司,从 Celestial 到 Lightmatter,最后要么被 Marvell 吞掉,要么变成独立的十亿美元级公司。

所以 Sivers 到底该在最早期收购什么,显然是最懂的。

这就是为什么我叫 $SIVE CPO 的 Kingmaker。

这实际上对 Sivers 极度利好。
引用原推@Roadstockz
@MacnBTC Depends how long it takes retail to realize that there is a 15% dilution proposal coming up mid june. lol
@MacnBTC 要看散户多久才意识到 6 月中旬会有一个 15% 稀释提案。lol
https://x.com/Roadstockz/status/2057757605225709798
❤️ 1,292 🔁 65 💬 110
打开原推
📝 原创
Feels like $FUTU and $TIGR are kinda screwed? The Chinese Gov is going after their historical revenues.

There's basically no fair law in China (esp. with IP), so if Gov wants something done, courts will be rigged against them.

So no chance of an appeal, unless they make a hidden deal. Also don't think the brokerages are able to pull a $GOOGL like their 20 decillion fine, given local operations

So TLDR: Good lesson learned to avoid Chinese exposure from $BABA to $PDD as much as possible...

And (as seen with $META + Manus + this case), even if something looks cheap.

There's a reason why all the US equities have premiums, even if a little high.
感觉 $FUTU$TIGR 有点惨?中国政府在追他们历史收入。

中国基本没有什么公平法律(尤其是 IP),所以如果政府想办成某件事,法院就会对他们不利。

所以除非他们私下达成隐藏协议,否则上诉没什么机会。也不觉得这些券商能像 $GOOGL 那个 20 decillion 罚款那样应对,毕竟有本地业务。

所以 TLDR:一个很好的教训,尽量避开从 $BABA$PDD 这类中国敞口……

而且(从 $META + Manus + 这个案子可以看出),就算有些东西看起来便宜。

美国股票都有溢价是有原因的,哪怕有点高。
❤️ 954 🔁 87 💬 106
打开原推
📝 原创
European quantum/optical/glass chokepoints go BRRR?

$ALRIB +8.35%
$LPK +3.21%
$IQE +5.68%
$SOI +4.98%

As a side thought, it’s a nice vote of confidence to retail that the LPKF CEO bought shares off the market.

More CEOs should do the same, even if it’s small. https://t.co/BwxBnd2wDm
欧洲 quantum/optical/glass chokepoints go BRRR?

$ALRIB +8.35%
$LPK +3.21%
$IQE +5.68%
$SOI +4.98%

顺带一想,LPKF CEO 在市场上买入股票,对散户来说是个不错的信心票。

更多 CEO 应该这么做,哪怕金额很小。 https://t.co/BwxBnd2wDm
❤️ 1,073 🔁 71 💬 80
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
For $INTC EMIB advanced packaging supply chains:

If you thought it couldn’t get worse after taking AP History or AP Chemistry:

There’s apparently a company called: AP Memory (6531). $4.8B MC that got qualified.

In case anyone wanted to take a look. I’m eating hot pot rn so not enough time for DD.
关于 $INTC EMIB advanced packaging 供应链:

如果你以为上 AP History 或 AP Chemistry 之后已经不能更糟了:

居然有家公司叫:AP Memory (6531)。$4.8B 市值,而且已经通过认证。

如果有人想看看。我现在在吃火锅,所以没时间做 DD。
❤️ 591 🔁 7 💬 60
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE is literally the kingmaker for CPO:

From ~ Lightmatter, Celestial, Ayar, Lightelligence early on. Now the leaders with massive $5-10B+ valuations.

To the ASIC ecosystems like Marvell, Alchip, GUC.

With O-Net mass producing ELS with Sivers for CPO.

And Jabil mass producing pluggables with Sivers for pluggable optical transceivers.

All likely surround and are designed around Sivers lasers.

Markets are only starting to see the precipice of how important this laser company is.
$SIVE 真的是 CPO 的 kingmaker:

从早期的 ~ Lightmatter、Celestial、Ayar、Lightelligence。现在它们都是估值高达 $5-10B+ 的领军者。

到 Marvell、Alchip、GUC 这种 ASIC ecosystems。

O-Net 用 Sivers 为 CPO 量产 ELS。

Jabil 也用 Sivers 为 pluggable optical transceivers 量产 pluggables。

这些很可能都围绕 Sivers lasers,并且是基于它们设计的。

市场才刚刚开始看到这家激光器公司有多重要。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
https://t.co/IJPmDDBHcq
https://t.co/IJPmDDBHcq
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2056691097594925522
❤️ 1,666 🔁 151 💬 95
打开原推
💬 引用
Am I that popular?

I did get a lot of dm requests to manage their capital recently.

But only here to help out regular retail investors succeed on their own with ideas like $SIVE or $SOI.

I feel like anything else would be a bit of a distraction.
我有那么受欢迎吗?

最近确实收到很多 dm,让我帮他们管资金。

但我来这里只是为了用 $SIVE$SOI 这种想法,帮普通散户靠自己成功。

我感觉其他事情都会有点分心。
引用原推@labubu_trader
@aleabitoreddit Every hedge fund/family offices, even sovereign funds I know… are watching your tweets everyday!
@aleabitoreddit 我认识的每一家 hedge fund/family offices,甚至 sovereign funds……每天都在看你的推!
https://x.com/labubu_trader/status/2057680955071168922
❤️ 2,263 🔁 54 💬 123
打开原推
💬 引用
??? $RDDT is literally lower IQ than $IREN investors?

I didn't do all this research on $AXTI ...

Just for you all to make 380% on it, call it a $MU memory competitor and then a scam?

The lack of technical literacy is exactly why I got banned from there. https://t.co/sgrFTgcwfM
??? $RDDT 投资者的 IQ 真的比 $IREN 投资者还低?

我不是为了让你们在 $AXTI 上赚 380%,然后把它叫成 $MU 内存竞争对手再说它是骗局,才做了这么多研究……

这种技术素养缺失,正是我当初被那里 ban 的原因。 https://t.co/sgrFTgcwfM
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
People are really out there saying, don’t doubt me off 10% returns.

I present to you: $AXTI https://t.co/1i5iXfWhz2
真的有人在外面说,别因为 10% 收益就质疑我。

给你们看:$AXTI https://t.co/1i5iXfWhz2
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2057518759968190581
❤️ 859 🔁 17 💬 68
打开原推
📝 原创
$RKLB $90M US Space Force contract.

Not much revenue, but implication/narratives go brrr with the US space buildup.

Fun to see before the SpaceX IPO as well. https://t.co/jamx5EHans
$RKLB 拿到 $90M 美国 Space Force 合同。

收入不算多,但随着美国太空建设,含义/叙事会 go brrr。

在 SpaceX IPO 前看到这个也挺有意思。 https://t.co/jamx5EHans
❤️ 1,234 🔁 57 💬 200
打开原推
📝 原创
Out of any market I’ve interacted with:

The Korean market is the most degen
在我接触过的所有市场里:

韩国市场最 degen
❤️ 1,833 🔁 63 💬 148
打开原推
📝 原创
Why are there so many influencers just rewriting my old posts with AI?

Prompt: "Copy Serenity's old posts... output it re-written"

Or even the same thing... just in a different language.

IDM too much if you're doing this, but at least have your AI add original takes.
为什么有这么多 influencers 只是在用 AI 改写我的旧帖子?

Prompt:“复制 Serenity 的旧帖子……输出改写版”

甚至同样的东西……只是换一种语言。

如果你这么做我也不是太介意,但至少让你的 AI 加点原创观点。
❤️ 850 🔁 22 💬 73
打开原推
💬 引用
Did you listen anon? https://t.co/ycoc4oSDDG
你听了吗 anon? https://t.co/ycoc4oSDDG
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The more I look into Sivers
< $SIVE / $SIVEF >

the more I wonder:

How is the laser company for the hyperscaler photonic supply chains…

Valued at ~$200M USD MC?

All the companies that buy and repackage their lasers are now worth $1-4B+?

Pre-product SV AI companies are worth billions?

Pre revenue Photonic companies in development phase line $LWLG are worth $1B+?

Yet the company that makes the silicon photonics/CPO scale up & scale out work.

And has actual revenue.

~$200M…

Reminds me of early $AXTI when I had zero clue how a company worth $500M MC controlled the InP substrate/feedstock supply chain for photonics.

Either I’m completely wrong… or this is the most undervalued and unknown photonics company on the market.
我越研究 Sivers
< $SIVE / $SIVEF >

就越想问:

一家服务 hyperscaler 光子供应链的激光器公司……

怎么会只值约 $200M 美元市值?

所有购买并重新封装他们激光器的公司,现在都值 $1-4B+?

还没产品的硅谷 AI 公司都值几十亿?

还没收入、处在开发阶段的光子公司,比如 $LWLG,都值 $1B+?

但真正让硅光/CPO scale up 和 scale out 能跑起来的公司,

而且还有实际收入,

只有约 $200M……

让我想起早期 $AXTI,当时我完全不明白一家 $500M 市值的公司怎么会控制光子 InP 基板/feedstock 供应链。

要么我完全错了……要么这就是市场上最被低估、最没人知道的光子公司。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2034127800840688097
❤️ 2,211 🔁 88 💬 292
打开原推
💬 引用
People are really out there saying, don’t doubt me off 10% returns.

I present to you: $AXTI https://t.co/1i5iXfWhz2
真的有人在外面说,别因为 10% 回报就怀疑我。

我给你们看:$AXTI https://t.co/1i5iXfWhz2
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 1,612 🔁 68 💬 127
打开原推
💬 引用
Not everyone on X can do a did you listen anon.

With triple digit returns on everything like $TSEM they went long on. https://t.co/7jGCpZWRcd
不是 X 上每个人都能来一句 did you listen anon。

而且他们做多的东西,比如 $TSEM,全都是三位数回报。 https://t.co/7jGCpZWRcd
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I'm long $TSEM, the $TSM of photonics.

My top two picks for CPO are $SOI and Tower Semi.

Given the $NVDA GTC catalyst on new photonic related architecture next week:

I expect Tower Semi to get a huge catalyst.

Nvidia laready directly collaborated with Tower to scale 1.6T silicon photonics last month (hint hint for GTC), likely pushing the downstream players to use it.

And now, Tower is the leading supplier of 1.6T SiPh PICs and the primary foundry for scale-up CPO architectures. (the other being global foundries)

From my forward est:
2028 Forward P/E: ~16.8x to ~18.1x

(Tower set a target $2.84B revenue by 2028, with ~31.7% operating margin, ~$750M in net profit)

The thing to note is over 70% of their planned SiPh capacity is already reserved through 2028. And photonics haven't even ramped up yet.

So, I expect them to strongly beat earning projections due to extreme photonics scaling + allocations price hikes that's not modeled into projections.

Also, $TSEM is heavily de-risked by 70% of capacity already being reserved. MC is likely due to $TSEM being a very obscure upstream player in the photonics supply chain.

But I expect the $NVDA GTC conference to be that catalyst that brings it to premium valuations.

I'm long $TSEM as an asymmetrical upside for upstream photonics foundry layer.
我做多 $TSEM,它就是光子领域的 $TSM

我对 CPO 的前两大选择是 $SOI 和 Tower Semi。

考虑到下周 $NVDA GTC 对新的光子相关架构有催化:

我预计 Tower Semi 会迎来巨大催化。

Nvidia 上个月已经直接和 Tower 合作,扩大 1.6T 硅光规模(给 GTC 的暗示),很可能推动下游玩家使用它。

现在,Tower 是 1.6T SiPh PIC 的领先供应商,也是 scale-up CPO 架构的主要晶圆厂(另一个是 global foundries)。

按我的前瞻估算:
2028 Forward P/E:约 16.8x 到 18.1x

(Tower 设定了 2028 年 $2.84B 收入目标,约 31.7% 经营利润率,约 $750M 净利润)

需要注意的是,他们规划中的 SiPh 产能超过 70% 已经预定到 2028 年。而光子还没真正放量。

所以我预计他们会因为极端的光子扩产 + allocation 涨价,大幅超过盈利预测,而这些还没有被模型计入。

另外,$TSEM 也因为 70% 产能已被预定而大幅去风险。市值可能是因为 $TSEM 是光子供应链里非常冷门的上游玩家。

但我预计 $NVDA GTC 会成为让它获得溢价估值的催化。

我做多 $TSEM,把它当作上游光子晶圆厂层的非对称上行机会。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031820871170736570
❤️ 770 🔁 25 💬 58
打开原推
💬 引用
And now $ARM, a $300B+ company, hit triple digit returns in a short timeframe since $135…

Cool name CPUs go brrrr? https://t.co/67Zz6EWfnL
现在 $ARM,一家 $300B+ 的公司,从 $135 以来短时间也打出了三位数回报……

Cool name CPUs go brrrr? https://t.co/67Zz6EWfnL
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Bullish on $ARM, given the new bottleneck shifting back to CPUs. MS shows stuff like Orchestration/RAG requiring CPUs.

But I'm predicting parts of localized inference to be handled by CPUs more and more... as models like Gemma get lightweight in the future.

Not every robot needs to be able to solve the mysteries of the universe.

Data centers will need an astronomical amount of traditional CPU compute (AWS Graviton, $GOOGL Axion, and $MSFT Cobalt), which are all ARM based.

$META + OpenAI are also buyers of the AGI CPU.

And AI will flow down to edge.

$15B annual revenue target.. Starting to look reasonable?
看多 $ARM,因为新的瓶颈正在重新转向 CPU。MS 展示了 Orchestration/RAG 等东西需要 CPU。

但我预测,随着未来 Gemma 这类模型变得更轻量,本地推理的一部分会越来越多由 CPU 处理……

不是每个机器人都需要能解开宇宙奥秘。

数据中心会需要天量的传统 CPU 算力(AWS Graviton、$GOOGL Axion 和 $MSFT Cobalt),这些都是 ARM based。

$META + OpenAI 也是 AGI CPU 的买家。

而 AI 会向边缘侧下沉。

$15B 年收入目标……开始看起来合理了?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046419572203683922
❤️ 799 🔁 31 💬 155
打开原推
💬 引用
And now… $NBIS is $224, around triple prices from last year.

Did you listen anon? https://t.co/WVFKh8d3vy
现在……$NBIS 已经到 $224,差不多是去年价格的三倍。

你听了吗 anon? https://t.co/WVFKh8d3vy
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Nebius [ $NBIS ] at $86.69 is the purest Neocloud and AI-infra asymmetry left.

This is the highest revenue Neocloud untouched by $CIFR | $WULF and colo providers that has no:

- Plaguing uncertainty that $IREN, $ORCL face from full-stack execution.

- High interest debt that $CRWV, $APLD, and others face.

- Revenue uncertainty at scale with Hyperscaler contracts that $CLSK, $BITF, $WYFI, $SLNH, and others lack.

After the market-wide drop with the AI sector overrun by fear:

Nebius is going forward with: $8B midpoint ARR next year, $4.7B+ in cash, diversification in enterprise clients from ( $META, $MSFT, $ACN, $SHOP, Governments), hyper-growth portfolio companies, and a proven full-stack high-margin business.

With extreme demand, execution uncertainty (margins), and isolation from current issues plaguing the markets with OpenAI contract dependency and credit tightening:

Nothing even comes close to Nebius in terms of asymmetrical upside.

You are simply just waiting for company execution.
Nebius [ $NBIS ] 在 $86.69,是剩下最纯的 Neocloud 和 AI-infra 非对称机会。

这是收入最高、还没被 $CIFR | $WULF 和 colo providers 影响的 Neocloud,而且没有:

- $IREN$ORCL 面临的 full-stack 执行不确定性。

- $CRWV$APLD 等面临的高息债务。

- $CLSK$BITF$WYFI$SLNH 等缺少 hyperscaler 合约带来的规模收入不确定性。

在 AI 板块被恐惧笼罩、全市场下跌之后:

Nebius 仍在向前推进:明年 $8B midpoint ARR、$4.7B+ 现金、企业客户多元化($META$MSFT$ACN$SHOP、政府)、高速增长的投资组合公司,以及被验证过的 full-stack 高毛利业务。

在极端需求、执行不确定性(利润率),以及当前市场受 OpenAI 合约依赖和信用收紧困扰的情况下,Nebius 与这些问题相对隔离:

论非对称上行,没有任何东西能接近 Nebius。

你只是在等公司执行。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1990452960758042917
❤️ 1,537 🔁 63 💬 183
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Power Semis seem to be very popular now. These names got flagged in reports:

Pan Jit (2481) ~$1,6B
Eris Tech (3675) ~$532M MC
Advanced Power Electronics (8261) ~$565M MC
Inergy Technology (6693) ~$202m MC
Potens (7712) ~$170M

for power semiconductor makers that might play an important role.

All really low MC, maybe high upside in a few, so I'll probably do some more research on each one now.
Power Semis 现在好像很火。报告里点到了这些名字:

Pan Jit (2481) ~$1.6B
Eris Tech (3675) ~$532M 市值
Advanced Power Electronics (8261) ~$565M 市值
Inergy Technology (6693) ~$202m 市值
Potens (7712) ~$170M

这些 power semiconductor makers 可能会扮演重要角色。

市值都很低,其中几个可能上行空间很大,所以我现在大概会对每一家多做点研究。
❤️ 928 🔁 26 💬 49
打开原推
💬 引用
Just as I say this:

$AMD invests $10B+ into Taiwan ecosystem (for securing capacity/scaling infra)

AMD is collaborating with $ASX and SPIL.

As well as ODM partners like “ $SANM, Wiwynn (6669), Wistron (3231) and Inventec (2356).

PTI, Unimicron, AIC, Nan Ya PCB, and Kinsus were also name dropped as direct beneficiaries.

And of course second order beneficiaries like Foci or MSScorps also benefit.

But bullish on Taiwan supply chains all around from $AMD news.
我刚这么说:

$AMD 就向台湾生态投入 $10B+(为了锁定产能/扩张基础设施)

AMD 正在和 $ASX、SPIL 合作。

还有像 “$SANM、Wiwynn (6669)、Wistron (3231) 和 Inventec (2356)” 这样的 ODM partners。

PTI、Unimicron、AIC、Nan Ya PCB 和 Kinsus 也被点名为直接受益者。

当然,像 Foci 或 MSScorps 这种二阶受益者也会受益。

总之,从 $AMD 这条新闻看,台湾供应链整体都挺 bullish。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just in case you want to frontrun the next major catalyst:

$NVDA June 1 Computex/GTC Taipei keynote should be heavily bullish Taiwan optical ecosystem?

Just like when I went long on $TSEM and others in Nvidia’s US event.

Shunsin, Foci, Nextronics, MSScorps, and a lot of my Nvidia photonics ecosystem port might be critical mentions or have indirect catalysts there.
以防你想抢跑下一个重大催化:

$NVDA 6 月 1 日 Computex/GTC Taipei keynote 应该会非常利好台湾光学生态?

就像我之前在 Nvidia 美国活动前做多 $TSEM 和其他公司一样。

Shunsin、Foci、Nextronics、MSScorps,以及我 Nvidia photonics ecosystem 组合里的很多公司,可能会在那里被关键提及,或者有间接催化。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2057319580595568833
❤️ 800 🔁 50 💬 120
打开原推
💬 引用
A guide by Serenity on becoming a true Swedish local:

1. See crown jewel photonics company in $SIVE?

2. Get angry about 2024 revenue numbers, ignoring forward growth.

3. Encourage everyone to transfer control to America at the bottom, before the CPO supercycle

4. Be angry that the stock keeps rising

5. Have local hedge funds short 17%+ of free float on way up

6. Their funds loses 20%+ of value, and faces infinite losses

7. Face sudden realization America now dominates ownership with MSCI inclusion / NASDAQ listing coming up.

8. But see new news Jabil mass producing 1.6T LRO for hyperscalers with $SIVE H1 2027?

9. Don’t change your mind: keep focusing on 2024 revenue numbers and local accounting offices while executives are in America.

10. Become a meme on X.
Serenity 教你如何成为真正的瑞典本地人:

1. 看到 $SIVE 这种 crown jewel photonics 公司?

2. 对 2024 年收入数字生气,忽略未来增长。

3. 在 CPO supercycle 前、底部时鼓励大家把控制权转给美国。

4. 因为股价一直涨而生气。

5. 让本地 hedge funds 在上涨路上做空 17%+ 的 free float。

6. 他们的基金亏掉 20%+,并面临无限亏损。

7. 突然意识到美国现在通过 MSCI inclusion / 即将到来的 NASDAQ listing 主导了所有权。

8. 但看到新消息,Jabil 要在 H1 2027 用 $SIVE 为 hyperscalers 量产 1.6T LRO?

9. 不改变想法:继续盯着 2024 年收入数字和本地会计办公室,尽管高管都在美国。

10. 在 X 上变成 meme。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
https://t.co/IJPmDDBHcq
https://t.co/IJPmDDBHcq
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2056691097594925522
❤️ 1,534 🔁 96 💬 336
打开原推
📝 原创
Just in case you want to frontrun the next major catalyst:

$NVDA June 1 Computex/GTC Taipei keynote should be heavily bullish Taiwan optical ecosystem?

Just like when I went long on $TSEM and others in Nvidia’s US event.

Shunsin, Foci, Nextronics, MSScorps, and a lot of my Nvidia photonics ecosystem port might be critical mentions or have indirect catalysts there.
以防你想提前埋伏下一个重大催化:

$NVDA 6 月 1 日 Computex/GTC Taipei keynote 应该会对台湾光学生态非常利好?

就像我在 Nvidia 美国活动时做多 $TSEM 和其他公司一样。

Shunsin、Foci、Nextronics、MSScorps,以及我 Nvidia photonics ecosystem port 里的很多名字,可能会在那里被重点提到,或者有间接催化。
❤️ 983 🔁 52 💬 96
打开原推
💬 引用
You idiots all bought the wrong Kura ( $KRUS ) https://t.co/fR0XkQeT1j
你们这些笨蛋都买错 Kura 了($KRUShttps://t.co/fR0XkQeT1j
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Donald Trump is apparently long Sushi.

I genuinely find it hilarious the President took a large % ownership of Kura Sushi ( $KRUS, ~$600m MC).

Among everything from $AVGO to $NVDA.

If Trump did buy $5M worth, the president would own close to ~.8% of one of my favorite US Sushi Chains.

Don't have any open positions... but I do love the idea of our President buying up Sushi restaurants.
Donald Trump 显然做多 Sushi。

我真心觉得很好笑,总统居然持有 Kura Sushi( $KRUS,约 $600m 市值)很大比例的股权。

$AVGO$NVDA 这些东西之外。

如果 Trump 真的买了 $5M,总统将持有我最喜欢的美国寿司连锁之一接近 0.8%。

我没有开仓……但我确实很喜欢我们的总统买入寿司餐厅这个想法。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2056036968220528767
❤️ 1,320 🔁 53 💬 256
打开原推
📝 原创
There's some things in the market that don't make much sense.

$RDDT is the perfect example post-earnings.

One of the most profitable names right now with high growth...

But if it's related to software or not burning $1T+ in AI capex, markets don't care? https://t.co/uWJ55OuZMO
市场里有些事情确实没什么道理。

$RDDT 财报后就是最完美的例子。

现在最赚钱、增长又高的名字之一……

但如果它和软件有关,或者没有烧 $1T+ 的 AI capex,市场就不在乎? https://t.co/uWJ55OuZMO
❤️ 1,529 🔁 67 💬 286
打开原推
📝 原创
I NEED TO HIDE LIKE 100 COMMENTS PER POST, SOMEONE AT X PLEASE FIX THIS. https://t.co/vyhfuDiato
我每条帖子都要隐藏大概 100 条评论,X 的人拜托修一下这个。 https://t.co/vyhfuDiato
❤️ 916 🔁 17 💬 89
打开原推
📝 原创
Yeah I'm not sure all the shorts on $TE is a good idea...

When the OpenAI runway model likely has enough to buy the entire company.

That being said:

Anyone remember I predicted Faker to win worlds, and they actually did? https://t.co/F9ugI8M2Vb
是啊,我不确定大家一起做空 $TE 是个好主意……

毕竟 OpenAI runway model 很可能有足够钱买下整家公司。

话虽如此:

还有人记得我预测 Faker 会拿 worlds,结果他们真的拿了吗? https://t.co/F9ugI8M2Vb
❤️ 905 🔁 40 💬 198
打开原推
💬 引用
Did you listen Sweden?

&gt; $SIVE MSCI Listing + structural inflow
&gt; $6.6M CHIPS act funding
&gt; Jabil 1.6T extreme demand, volume ramp
&gt; Apple next-gen Watch refresh likely using Sivers
&gt; 2 new board members related to M&A
&gt; Nasdaq listing inc

The story keeps getting better. https://t.co/mlKM9WcIOf
瑞典,你听了吗?

&gt; $SIVE MSCI Listing + 结构性流入
&gt; $6.6M CHIPS act funding
&gt; Jabil 1.6T 极端需求、量产爬坡
&gt; Apple 下一代 Watch refresh 很可能使用 Sivers
&gt; 2 位和 M&A 相关的新董事会成员
&gt; Nasdaq listing 将至

故事一直在变得更好。 https://t.co/mlKM9WcIOf
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE mass production for 1.6T optical transceivers with $JBL:

Is now earlier than expected per JP Morgan Fireside chat.

Here's what they announced:

> "Relatively dramatic moat" implied with $SIVE laser architectures

> Extreme demand for their 1.6T, which was previously unknown in terms of volume.

> Faster than expected timelines, pulling revenue realization window forward.

The statement:

1. Jabil’s 1.6T LRO: "Goes into different qualifications across the next 1 to 4 months"

“The quals can take anywhere between 2 to 6 months"

Given its May H1 2026, mass production and revenue realization could begin in anywhere between 3 months to 10 months.

So late 2026 with 6.5 month midpoint.

Lot of former estimates were H2 2027.

3. Architecturally it's "which is about 11 kilowatts dramatically lower than current 1.6T power profiles"

Hyperscalers would like to hear this, and this is the competitive differentiation + relatively dramatic moat proven with $SIVE as the critical photonics chokepoint.

4. "At this point, it's not about share. It's really about keeping up with the organic growth of the entire market."

Again this shows that the enormous demand has outstripped supply.

The implications are that it’s more of a matter of how much Sivers + Jabil can build together, as anything they make would be bought.

This type of statement is just incredibly material for Sivers revenue relative to their current marketcap.

The market was previously uncertain about the exact volume demand and commercial timeline from Sivers X Jabil.

Jabil just publicly confirmed that the demand for their 1.6T LRO with $SIVE lasers is essentially uncapped.
$SIVE$JBL 的 1.6T 光收发器量产:

根据 JP Morgan Fireside chat,现在比预期更早。

他们宣布了这些内容:

> 暗示 $SIVE 激光器架构有“相当显著的护城河”

> 他们的 1.6T 需求极强,而之前市场不知道具体量级。

> 时间线快于预期,把收入兑现窗口提前了。

声明:

1. Jabil 的 1.6T LRO:“未来 1 到 4 个月会进入不同认证阶段”

“认证可能需要 2 到 6 个月”

考虑到现在是 5 月、2026 年上半年,量产和收入兑现可能在 3 到 10 个月内开始。

所以中位数 6.5 个月的话,就是 2026 年底。

很多之前的估计是 2027 年下半年。

3. 架构上它“比当前 1.6T 功耗水平低约 11 千瓦,非常显著”

Hyperscalers 会喜欢听到这个,这就是竞争差异化 + 由 $SIVE 这个关键光子瓶颈证明出来的相当显著护城河。

4. “现在不是份额问题。真正的问题是跟上整个市场的自然增长。”

这再次说明巨大需求已经超过供应。

含义是,Sivers + Jabil 能一起造多少,基本就会被买走多少。

相对于 Sivers 当前市值,这种表述对其收入极其重要。

市场之前不确定 Sivers X Jabil 的具体需求量和商业化时间线。

Jabil 刚刚公开确认,使用 $SIVE 激光器的 1.6T LRO 需求本质上没有上限。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2056993753882345818
❤️ 1,448 🔁 122 💬 240
打开原推
📝 原创
“Jeff Bezos says low earners in the US should pay zero tax”

I actually agree this this with some nuance on implementation:

Low earners should be allowed to deduct all their living expenses before paying tax.

Just like how the wealthy are able to write off a lot of things as business expenses or tax sheltered structures:

Majority of “living costs” for low income citizens come from rent, healthcare, food, gas, car loans/college tuition, kids, etc.

Even after all that they’re paying tax on their original income.

Feels a little stupid to have low income earners owe money after just trying to live.
“Jeff Bezos 说美国低收入者应该零税”

我其实同意,但执行上需要一点细节:

低收入者应该可以在缴税前扣除所有生活开支。

就像富人可以把很多东西作为商业费用或通过税务庇护结构抵扣一样:

低收入公民大多数“生活成本”来自房租、医疗、食物、汽油、车贷/大学学费、孩子等等。

即使这些都付完了,他们还要按原始收入交税。

只是为了活着,就让低收入者还欠税,感觉有点蠢。
❤️ 1,472 🔁 69 💬 191
打开原推
💬 引用
If people don’t realize why I’m so interested in $SIVE M&A.

Sivers likely customers were:

Lightmatter when they were tiny -> became $4B+ company.

Lightelligence when they were tiny -> became $10B+ company.

Ayar when they were tiny -> now funded by $NVDA, $AMD, and others.

Celestial when they were tiny -> bought by $MRVL and became their growth vector. Probably would be valued $10B+ standalone.

I’m extremely sure Sivers knows what to acquire for optical IP.

They were just stuck in a catch-22 and lacked the funding to do so originally, despite owning one of the most valuable laser chokepoints.

Future NASDAQ listing and recent growth unlocked downstream IP acquisition potential now.
如果大家不明白我为什么这么关注 $SIVE M&A。

Sivers 的潜在客户很可能是:

Lightmatter 还很小时 -> 变成 $4B+ 公司。

Lightelligence 还很小时 -> 变成 $10B+ 公司。

Ayar 还很小时 -> 现在由 $NVDA$AMD 等资助。

Celestial 还很小时 -> 被 $MRVL 收购,变成他们的增长方向。如果独立估值大概会有 $10B+。

我非常确定 Sivers 知道该收购什么 optical IP。

只是他们原本卡在 catch-22 里,缺少资金去做,尽管手里有最有价值的 laser chokepoints 之一。

未来 NASDAQ listing 和最近的增长,现在已经解锁了下游 IP 收购潜力。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE is nominating two new board members today.

It's very highly telling since the newcomers have acquisition backgrounds from:

-> Head of M&A at Ericsson / Advisor at Verdane, focusing on M&A / Deutsche Bank.

-> CFO from HMS / Axholmen and Celerant Consulting around M&A/strategy.

The bull case with $SIVE was to start from the laser source:

Then speedrun TAM expansion down the pluggable/CPO stack through IP acquisitions, and use $FN + others for final assembly to keep things capex light.

If they want to capture more overall revenue during the CPO/Photonics supercycle, following the $LITE playbook.

So, it's a healthy indicator they're heading down the right track nominating two M&A focused people.

Only idea to float out is to capital raise with private placement or convertibles with US institutions after NASDAQ listing.

Since Swedish markets are still very thin and Sivers can get better terms for larger acquisitions...

after new US liquidity reprices of MC/shares on listing. (Sivers has that recent bridge round in the meantime)

Larger US institutions are likely interested in entering new very material $SIVE positions as well once Sivers passes some US institutions listing mandates.
$SIVE 今天提名了两位新董事。

这非常有信号意义,因为新人有这些并购背景:

-> Ericsson 的 Head of M&A / Verdane 顾问,专注 M&A / Deutsche Bank。

-> 来自 HMS / Axholmen 和 Celerant Consulting 的 CFO,专注 M&A/战略。

$SIVE 的牛市逻辑是从激光光源开始:

然后通过 IP 收购,沿着 pluggable/CPO stack 快速扩展 TAM,并用 $FN 和其他公司做最终组装,以保持轻资本开支。

如果他们想在 CPO/Photonics 超级周期中获取更多整体收入,就会走 $LITE 的剧本。

所以,提名两位 M&A 导向的人,是他们走在正确方向上的健康信号。

唯一可以抛出来的想法是,NASDAQ 上市后通过私募配售或可转债向美国机构融资。

因为瑞典市场仍然非常薄,Sivers 可以为更大的收购拿到更好的条款……

前提是美国新流动性在上市后重新定价其市值/股价。(同时 Sivers 最近有一轮 bridge round)

一旦 Sivers 满足一些美国机构的上市要求,更大的美国机构也很可能有兴趣建立新的、很实质的 $SIVE 仓位。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2057059745429901334
❤️ 1,008 🔁 53 💬 287
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE is nominating two new board members today.

It's very highly telling since the newcomers have acquisition backgrounds from:

-> Head of M&A at Ericsson / Advisor at Verdane, focusing on M&A / Deutsche Bank.

-> CFO from HMS / Axholmen and Celerant Consulting around M&A/strategy.

The bull case with $SIVE was to start from the laser source:

Then speedrun TAM expansion down the pluggable/CPO stack through IP acquisitions, and use $FN + others for final assembly to keep things capex light.

If they want to capture more overall revenue during the CPO/Photonics supercycle, following the $LITE playbook.

So, it's a healthy indicator they're heading down the right track nominating two M&A focused people.

Only idea to float out is to capital raise with private placement or convertibles with US institutions after NASDAQ listing.

Since Swedish markets are still very thin and Sivers can get better terms for larger acquisitions...

after new US liquidity reprices of MC/shares on listing. (Sivers has that recent bridge round in the meantime)

Larger US institutions are likely interested in entering new very material $SIVE positions as well once Sivers passes some US institutions listing mandates.
$SIVE 今天提名了两位新董事会成员。

这非常有信息量,因为新成员有这些收购背景:

-> Ericsson M&A 负责人 / Verdane 顾问,专注 M&A / Deutsche Bank。

-> HMS 的 CFO / Axholmen 和 Celerant Consulting,围绕 M&A/strategy。

$SIVE 的牛市逻辑是从 laser source 起步:

然后通过 IP 收购,沿着 pluggable/CPO stack 快速扩大 TAM,并用 $FN + 其他公司做 final assembly,保持 capex light。

如果他们想在 CPO/Photonics supercycle 里捕获更多整体收入,就应该沿着 $LITE playbook 走。

所以,提名两位 M&A focused 的人,是他们走在正确方向上的健康信号。

唯一可以抛出来的想法是:NASDAQ listing 后,向美国机构做 private placement 或 convertibles 融资。

因为瑞典市场还是很薄,而 Sivers 可以为更大规模收购拿到更好的条款……

在上市后,美国新流动性重估市值/股价之后。(中间 Sivers 有最近那笔 bridge round)

一旦 Sivers 满足一些美国机构的上市要求,更大的美国机构也很可能有兴趣建立新的、很重要的 $SIVE 仓位。
引用原推@user637826
Sivers Semiconductors just nominated two new american elite board members + 3 returning board members 🇺🇸

When you look at their backgrounds, the strategic intent becomes very clear.

→ Joakim Nideborn — proven CFO at listed tech companies, strong investor relations & capital markets track record. Taking over as Vice Chairman for the Nordic region.

→ Helena Svancar — 20+ years scaling global tech businesses, deep M&A expertise across borders.

→ Dr. Bami Bastani — ex-CEO of GlobalFoundries

→ Todd Thomson — ex-CFO of Citigroup

→ Karin Raj — CTO Europe at Nokia

https://t.co/M0RHtmR7fw
Sivers Semiconductors 刚提名了两位新的美国精英董事 + 3 位回归董事 🇺🇸

看他们的背景,战略意图就非常清楚。

→ Joakim Nideborn — 上市科技公司的成熟 CFO,投资者关系和资本市场履历很强。将接任北欧地区副董事长。

→ Helena Svancar — 20+ 年扩大全球科技业务经验,跨境 M&A 经验很深。

→ Dr. Bami Bastani — GlobalFoundries 前 CEO

→ Todd Thomson — Citigroup 前 CFO

→ Karin Raj — Nokia 欧洲 CTO

https://t.co/M0RHtmR7fw
https://x.com/user637826/status/2057051372973879355
❤️ 860 🔁 47 💬 304
打开原推
📝 原创
Just your average day in European photonics?

With $SIVE, $IQE, and $SOI all hitting double digit recoveries.

These are all core players going forward, hard to see any dip not being bought out at these levels. https://t.co/fYaYAov3Vn
只是欧洲 photonics 里普通的一天?

$SIVE$IQE$SOI 全都出现两位数反弹。

这些都是未来的核心玩家,在这个水平很难想象任何下跌不会被买起来。 https://t.co/fYaYAov3Vn
❤️ 1,168 🔁 62 💬 172
打开原推
📝 原创
$SIVE mass production for 1.6T optical transceivers with $JBL:

Is now earlier than expected per JP Morgan Fireside chat.

Here's what they announced:

> "Relatively dramatic moat" implied with $SIVE laser architectures

> Extreme demand for their 1.6T, which was previously unknown in terms of volume.

> Faster than expected timelines, pulling revenue realization window forward.

The statement:

1. Jabil’s 1.6T LRO: "Goes into different qualifications across the next 1 to 4 months"

“The quals can take anywhere between 2 to 6 months"

Given its May H1 2026, mass production and revenue realization could begin in anywhere between 3 months to 10 months.

So late 2026 with 6.5 month midpoint.

Lot of former estimates were H2 2027.

3. Architecturally it's "which is about 11 kilowatts dramatically lower than current 1.6T power profiles"

Hyperscalers would like to hear this, and this is the competitive differentiation + relatively dramatic moat proven with $SIVE as the critical photonics chokepoint.

4. "At this point, it's not about share. It's really about keeping up with the organic growth of the entire market."

Again this shows that the enormous demand has outstripped supply.

The implications are that it’s more of a matter of how much Sivers + Jabil can build together, as anything they make would be bought.

This type of statement is just incredibly material for Sivers revenue relative to their current marketcap.

The market was previously uncertain about the exact volume demand and commercial timeline from Sivers X Jabil.

Jabil just publicly confirmed that the demand for their 1.6T LRO with $SIVE lasers is essentially uncapped.
$SIVE$JBL 的 1.6T optical transceivers 量产:

按 JP Morgan Fireside chat,现在比预期更早。

他们宣布了这些:

> 暗示 $SIVE laser architectures 有“相当显著的护城河”

> 他们的 1.6T 需求极端强劲,此前市场并不知道具体量级。

> 时间线快于预期,把收入确认窗口提前了。

声明:

1. Jabil 的 1.6T LRO:“未来 1 到 4 个月进入不同认证”

“认证可能需要 2 到 6 个月”

考虑到现在是 2026 年 H1 5 月,量产和收入确认可能在 3 到 10 个月内开始。

所以中位数 6.5 个月,对应 2026 年末。

很多之前的估计是 H2 2027。

3. 架构上是“比当前 1.6T power profiles 低大约 11 kilowatts”

Hyperscalers 会喜欢听到这个,而这就是竞争差异化 + 用 $SIVE 作为关键 photonics chokepoint 证明的相当显著护城河。

4. “在这个阶段,问题不在份额。真正的问题是跟上整个市场的自然增长。”

这再次说明巨大需求已经超过供给。

含义是,关键更多在于 Sivers + Jabil 能一起造出多少,因为他们造出来的都会被买走。

这种表述对 Sivers 相对当前市值的收入来说,重要性非常高。

市场此前不确定 Sivers X Jabil 的精确需求量和商业化时间线。

Jabil 刚刚公开确认,使用 $SIVE lasers 的 1.6T LRO 需求基本没有上限。
❤️ 1,182 🔁 102 💬 104
打开原推
💬 引用
Just a shower thought:

US Gov/Japan should put Ulvac (6728) on the export control list so they stop shipping to China.

That way you can disrupt China's entire humanoid program (since it's "Dual Use Military Applications").

As retaliation over upstream InP/rare earth related export controls.

Adding 45% tariffs on sock exports won't do much, but disrupting China's robotics program, sure.

Ulvac is Japan's major chokepoint over neodymium magnets.

"Ulvac has long manufactured rare-earth magnet vacuum melting furnaces through its Chinese subsidiary".

So maybe put that to rest?

If they stop shipping, you can break Unitree's and other humanoid mass production supply chains in China.

And only if they allow rare earth exports to start flowing again, then exports can continue.
只是洗澡时想到的:

美国政府/日本应该把 Ulvac (6728) 放到出口管制名单上,让他们停止向中国出货。

这样你就能扰乱中国整个 humanoid 项目(因为这是“Dual Use Military Applications”)。

作为对上游 InP/rare earth 相关出口管制的反制。

对袜子出口加 45% 关税没什么用,但扰乱中国 robotics 项目,当然有用。

Ulvac 是日本在 neodymium magnets 上的主要 chokepoint。

“Ulvac 长期通过其中国子公司制造 rare-earth magnet vacuum melting furnaces”。

所以也许该让这事停一停?

如果他们停止出货,就能打断 Unitree 和其他中国 humanoid 量产供应链。

只有在他们允许 rare earth exports 重新流动之后,出口才可以继续。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Who could have thought China was holding all the cards over humanoid mass production?

Really if America sees a future in $TSLA or Figure robotics programs.

Maybe it’s time to start pouring more funding sovereign rare earths supply chains.

Whatever we’re doing now isnt enough. https://t.co/VQXh9otLMi
谁能想到,中国在人形机器人大规模量产上拿着所有牌?

说真的,如果美国看好 $TSLA 或 Figure 机器人项目的未来,

也许是时候开始给主权稀土供应链投入更多资金了。

我们现在做的还不够。 https://t.co/VQXh9otLMi
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2056891308934148253
❤️ 690 🔁 37 💬 75
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm not sure how anyone thought it was a good idea to buy $145m worth of illiquid assets in $BOT that frequently trade under NAV.

For $750M MC.

Even after the 37% drop, it's still ~$490M MC.

On top of that, people are buying into a $2,000,000,000 effective ATM that's slow dripping via a equity facility.

Retail not only gave:

> Exit liquidity.
> But exit liquidity at massively inflated valuations
> While wealth transferring whatever you buy over after the effective ATM got filed.

Maybe the fund had good intentions, but at current valuations:

If you are a retail investor, you're basically playing pyramid hot potato with the float.
我不明白怎么会有人觉得,在 $BOT 里买 $145m 经常低于 NAV 交易的非流动资产是个好主意。

对应 $750M 市值。

即使跌了 37%,它仍然有 ~$490M 市值。

除此之外,人们还在买一个 $2,000,000,000 的有效 ATM,通过 equity facility 慢慢滴水式稀释。

散户不仅给了:

> Exit liquidity。
> 而且是在极度膨胀估值上的 exit liquidity
> 同时在有效 ATM 文件提交后,把你买入的一切都财富转移出去。

也许基金本意是好的,但按现在估值:

如果你是散户投资者,基本就是在用流通盘玩 pyramid hot potato。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$BOT is still trading at 4x NAV.

With a $2,000,000,000 effective ATM.

Even after the 21% drop.

So now it’s ~$600M MC, off $146M in private assets.

Then off those assets, they own ~$37M of Figure.

Which you’re essentially buying at $160B valuations while the leading humanoid maker in Unitree is IPOing at $6B.

So just because a $146m private fund went public doesn’t mean there should be a multi-billion dollar retail wealth transfer?

Maybe the fund had good intentions?

But idk after the $2B equity financing facility, that move just seems predatory when there’s already a valuation NAV disconnect.
$BOT 仍然以 4x NAV 交易。

还有一个 $2,000,000,000 的实际 ATM。

即使已经跌了 21%。

所以现在它大约 $600M 市值,对应 $146M 私募资产。

而在这些资产里,他们持有约 $37M 的 Figure。

也就是说,你实际上是在按 $160B 估值买 Figure,而领先的人形机器人公司 Unitree 正准备以 $6B 估值 IPO。

所以,只因为一个 $146m 的私募基金上市了,就应该发生数十亿美元的散户财富转移吗?

也许这个基金初衷不错?

但 idk,在 $2B 股权融资工具之后,当 NAV 和估值已经脱节,这个操作看起来就很掠夺性了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2056549908438749581
❤️ 574 🔁 20 💬 77
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Starlink / Amazon Kuiper LEO ideas:

-> Compeq (2313): "has secured orders from leading operators, including Starlink and Amazon's Kuiper program" - $9.6B MC

"Analysts say the influx of PCB suppliers is likely to produce a "many players, limited pie" dynamic, raising barriers for newer entrants"

- Unitech Printed Circuit Board
- Chin-Poon Industrial, K Tech
- ACCL

"are all expected to face growing difficulty in winning contracts."

What's coming next:
- optical inter-satellite links (OISL).

Bottleneck ideas:
- next-generation HDI boards required for high-frequency are increasingly dependent on specialty materials, leading to longer lead times across the upstream supply chain

So good to look into this upstream area.
Starlink / Amazon Kuiper LEO 思路:

-> Compeq (2313):“已获得包括 Starlink 和 Amazon Kuiper 项目在内的领先运营商订单” - $9.6B 市值

“分析师表示,PCB 供应商涌入很可能形成‘玩家很多、蛋糕有限’的动态,提高新进入者门槛”

- Unitech Printed Circuit Board
- Chin-Poon Industrial, K Tech
- ACCL

“都预计会越来越难拿到合同。”

接下来会发生什么:
- optical inter-satellite links (OISL)。

Bottleneck 思路:
- 高频所需的 next-generation HDI boards 越来越依赖 specialty materials,导致上游供应链交期变长

所以很适合研究这个上游领域。
❤️ 438 🔁 18 💬 39
打开原推
💬 引用
Who could have thought China was holding all the cards over humanoid mass production?

Really if America sees a future in $TSLA or Figure robotics programs.

Maybe it’s time to start pouring more funding sovereign rare earths supply chains.

Whatever we’re doing now isnt enough. https://t.co/VQXh9otLMi
谁能想到,中国在 humanoid 量产上握着所有牌?

说真的,如果美国看好 $TSLA 或 Figure robotics 项目的未来。

也许该开始向主权 rare earths 供应链投入更多资金了。

我们现在做的还不够。 https://t.co/VQXh9otLMi
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
https://t.co/6xoodaH87j
https://t.co/6xoodaH87j
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033155882809479239
❤️ 1,356 🔁 131 💬 309
打开原推
📝 原创
This is just confirmation on timelines:

H2 2026 is the "major redesign of high end Apple Watches" for blood pressure related stuff using TASC photodiodes(2340).

This next part is $SIVE likely project with $AAPL:

"After this, Apple's next health monitoring capabilities are expected to focus on noninvasive blood-glucose monitoring."

So.. the next cyle refresh is likely Sivers for hyper-customized lasers. Maybe H2 2027 or 2028.

Still a bit early, but if timeline/implications are in tact, markets might appreciate multi-year revenue visibility with Apple.
这只是对时间线的确认:

H2 2026 是 high end Apple Watches 的“重大重新设计”,用于血压相关功能,使用 TASC photodiodes(2340)。

下一部分很可能是 $SIVE$AAPL 的项目:

“此后,Apple 下一项健康监测能力预计会聚焦 noninvasive blood-glucose monitoring。”

所以……下一轮 refresh 很可能用 Sivers 的 hyper-customized lasers。也许 H2 2027 或 2028。

还稍微有点早,但如果时间线/含义成立,市场可能会喜欢 Apple 带来的多年收入可见性。
❤️ 937 🔁 69 💬 257
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
$500m $AAPL supplier likely primary source for their new high end apple watches:

TASC (2340) if people wanted to take a look or were curious. I'm prob passing, but could be something interesting here https://t.co/lE6iyswXyT
$500m 的 $AAPL 供应商,很可能是新款高端 apple watches 的主要来源:

TASC (2340),如果有人想看看或好奇的话。我大概会跳过,但这里可能有点意思 https://t.co/lE6iyswXyT
❤️ 390 🔁 4 💬 21
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Just some random notes:

For glass substrates: "YC Chem has reportedly become the first in the industry to supply photoresists for glass substrates" (KR 112290)

- targeting EOY mass production, usually mass production + first to market is good for stock prices.

"is currently in discussions with more than three companies regarding the supply of glass substrate materials" so more qualifications.

"Samyang NC Chem is also developing photoresist materials for glass substrates" (482630)

- Sampling, mass production next year another glass substrate name

" $NVDA may seek to secure high-end substrate capacity in advance through long-term agreements, prepayments, or strategic partnerships, aiming to avoid a repeat of the supply constraints previously seen in CoWoS and HBM." This is in relation to $TSM COUPE on Substrate.

"As Commercial Times highlights, demand from AI GPUs, ASICs, and CPO could trigger another supply shortage of high-end ABF substrates by 2027."

So more substrate bottleneck stuff.

Then there's: "China's agreement to address US concerns over rare earth and critical mineral shortages specifically yttrium, scandium, neodymium and indium"

So good to look into yttrium, scandium, neodymium and indium supply chains if you want long ideas.

Everything is kinda correcting right now, but just something to keep a lookout for if ur interested in more random ideas.
一些随手笔记:

关于 glass substrates:“据报道,YC Chem 已成为行业内第一家为 glass substrates 供应 photoresists 的公司”(KR 112290)

- 目标 EOY 量产,通常量产 + first to market 对股价是好事。

“目前正与三家以上公司讨论 glass substrate materials 供应”,所以还有更多认证。

“Samyang NC Chem 也在开发用于 glass substrates 的 photoresist materials”(482630)

- Sampling,明年量产,另一个 glass substrate 名字

$NVDA 可能会通过长期协议、预付款或战略合作提前锁定高端 substrate 产能,目标是避免重演之前 CoWoS 和 HBM 的供应限制。”这和 $TSM COUPE on Substrate 有关。

“据 Commercial Times 强调,来自 AI GPUs、ASICs 和 CPO 的需求,可能在 2027 年触发另一轮高端 ABF substrates 供应短缺。”

所以还有更多 substrate bottleneck 相关东西。

然后还有:“中国同意回应美国对 rare earth 和 critical mineral shortages 的担忧,特别是 yttrium、scandium、neodymium 和 indium”

所以如果你想找做多思路,可以研究 yttrium、scandium、neodymium 和 indium 供应链。

现在所有东西都有点在回调,但如果你对更多随机想法感兴趣,这只是一些值得留意的东西。
❤️ 521 🔁 14 💬 36
打开原推
💬 引用
$IREN back down -34% from $70 to $46.

I wonder if one of the dumbest communities on X finally learned to read?

$NBIS is objectively the better Neocloud, with actual financing.

-> Nvidia didn’t fund $IREN at all. They got a free purchase agreement to let IREN use their logos and dilute for GPUS.

$NVDA actually gave $NBIS capital.

-> $IREN is facing endless dilution like $BKKT, $ASST, $SLNH as retail wealth transfers capital over from $6,000,000,000 ATMs, on a dwindling “5 GW capacity” moat.

$NBIS actually uses equity appreciating financing structures.

And this is reflected in the YTD differences between them both.

I’ve said the same thing last year too. One is up ~100%.

The other is flat, and even negative depending on entry points.

IREN is literally a marketing company at this point by how they manage to convince retail to wealth transfer over capital.
$IREN 又从 $70 跌回 $46,跌了 -34%。

我想知道 X 上最蠢的社区之一终于学会阅读了吗?

$NBIS 客观上是更好的 Neocloud,而且有真正的融资。

-> Nvidia 根本没有资助 $IREN。他们拿到的是一个免费的采购协议,让 IREN 可以用他们的 logo,并通过稀释去买 GPUS。

$NVDA 实际上给了 $NBIS 资本。

-> $IREN 面临像 $BKKT$ASST$SLNH 那样无尽稀释,散户通过 $6,000,000,000 ATMs 把财富转移成资本,而它所谓“5 GW capacity”护城河在缩水。

$NBIS 实际使用的是股权升值型融资结构。

这也反映在它们今年以来的表现差异里。

我去年也说过同样的话。一个涨了 ~100%。

另一个持平,取决于入场点甚至是负的。

IREN 到现在基本就是一家营销公司,因为它们居然能说服散户把资本财富转移过去。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I still am bearish on $IREN.

Algorithms/retail probably read $NVDA + $IREN partnership and bought it up.

However, if you look at the realtity, it's just looks like brand agreement giving $NVDA risk-free convertible notes.

So $IREN can continue selling their $6,000,000,000 ATM into retail investors.

It's the equivalent of a startup using AWS and saying they have an Amazon partnership so give them $6B.

This wasn't Nvidia directly funding $IREN yet, just a risk free option to.

There's a "5 GW deployment" but I'd rather not be the one buying into the dilution to fund it.
我仍然看空 $IREN

算法/散户大概看到 $NVDA + $IREN 合作就买上去了。

但如果看现实,这看起来只是一个品牌协议,给 $NVDA 无风险可转债。

这样 $IREN 就能继续把他们 $6,000,000,000 的 ATM 卖给散户投资者。

这就相当于一家创业公司用了 AWS,然后说自己有 Amazon partnership,所以给他们 $6B。

这还不是 Nvidia 直接给 $IREN 融资,只是一个无风险选择权。

确实有一个“5 GW deployment”,但我宁愿不要成为那个买入稀释、帮它融资的人。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2052494142765441301
❤️ 1,748 🔁 108 💬 432
打开原推
📝 原创
How are so many of these large scamming/impersonator accounts allowed to exist on X?

They just copy your username, block the original author so you can't find them, then manipulate the algorithm for their main accounts.

Then any accidental view algorithm boosts their main account.

It's a lose lose situation.

You report them, X doesn't seem to care.

You report them, their main account gets more impressions.
X 上怎么会允许这么多大型诈骗/冒充账号存在?

他们只是复制你的用户名,拉黑原作者让你找不到他们,然后为他们的主账号操纵算法。

然后任何意外浏览都会通过算法提升他们的主账号。

这是双输。

你举报他们,X 好像不在乎。

你举报他们,他们的主账号获得更多曝光。
❤️ 653 🔁 17 💬 111
打开原推
📝 原创
https://t.co/IJPmDDBHcq
https://t.co/IJPmDDBHcq
❤️ 2,829 🔁 345 💬 231
打开原推
💬 引用
Just putting it out there:

$SIVE short interest is probably higher than 17%+ now.

As lot of local Swedish hedge funds are very underwater, shorting Sivers.

They're about to meet US institutions through:

> MSCI inflow in 2 weeks.
> NASDAQ Listing.
> US CHIPS Act backstop.

alongside core revenue driver from the optical supercycle revenue ramp from likely $AAPL, $JBL, $POET, Ayar, Onet/Enablence, Lightium, $AEVA, $MRVL, Lightmatter, Lightelligence, and $AMD over the next year or two.

I personally don't think it's going to end well for the Swedish locals shorting (and some random algos) at this early stage.

And the popular saying is every one stock short turns into a long eventually.
先放在这里:

$SIVE short interest 现在可能已经高于 17%+。

因为很多本地瑞典 hedge funds 做空 Sivers,现在亏得很深。

他们马上要通过这些遇到美国机构:

> 2 周后的 MSCI inflow。
> NASDAQ Listing。
> US CHIPS Act backstop。

同时未来一两年,光学 supercycle 收入爬坡的核心收入驱动,可能来自 $AAPL$JBL$POET、Ayar、Onet/Enablence、Lightium、$AEVA$MRVL、Lightmatter、Lightelligence 和 $AMD

我个人不觉得这么早阶段做空的瑞典本地人(还有一些随机 algos)会有好结果。

而且流行说法是,每一只被做空的股票最终都会变成多头。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE short interest is around ~17% of free float apparently from some third party data, which is enormous (probably higher after yesterday).

IMO they're prob fked doing it so early on.

Now with MSCI + CHIPS ACT + NASDAQ Listing cataylsts.

There was another local Swedish hedge fund that was down -20% off their shorts last month, so it might go under if things continue as is.
根据一些第三方数据,$SIVE 的空头比例大约是自由流通股的 17%,这非常高(昨天之后可能更高)。

IMO 他们这么早做空大概完了。

现在有 MSCI + CHIPS ACT + NASDAQ Listing 催化。

还有一家本地瑞典 hedge fund 上个月因为空头亏了 -20%,如果事情继续这样发展,它可能会爆掉。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2056618360327270780
❤️ 1,148 🔁 68 💬 184
打开原推
💬 引用
Just in: $SIVE gets $6.6M from the US CHIPS ACT.

This is a $6.6M Year 2 Program.

In collaboration with BAE Systems: "Modernizing U.S. Defense Infrastructure Using Sivers Technology"

This is incredibly bullish to have such a small company in $SIVE to get CHIPS ACT funding.

As it positions Sivers as a critical, US-government backstopped chokepoint for national security.
刚刚:$SIVE 从美国 CHIPS ACT 拿到 $6.6M。

这是一个 $6.6M 的 Year 2 Program。

与 BAE Systems 合作:“Modernizing U.S. Defense Infrastructure Using Sivers Technology”

$SIVE 这么小的公司能拿到 CHIPS ACT funding,极其 bullish。

因为这把 Sivers 定位成由美国政府背书、对 national security 至关重要的 chokepoint。
引用原推@user637826
$SIVE just got $6.6M Year 2 from U.S. Microelectronics Commons.

Building simultaneous transmit/receive antenna arrays for EW & radar alongside BAE Systems and MIT Lincoln Lab. The DoD doesn’t keep funding companies it doesn’t believe in.

And this is just one program. Once you’re embedded in U.S. defense supply chains with MIT and BAE as your references more contracts follow.

https://t.co/fBVMqlzW6v
$SIVE 刚从 U.S. Microelectronics Commons 拿到第 2 年的 $6.6M。

和 BAE Systems、MIT Lincoln Lab 一起建设用于 EW 和雷达的同时收发天线阵列。DoD 不会继续资助它不相信的公司。

而这只是一个项目。一旦你嵌入美国国防供应链,并且有 MIT 和 BAE 作为背书,后续合同就会继续来。

https://t.co/fBVMqlzW6v
https://x.com/user637826/status/2056610029587800187
❤️ 1,382 🔁 99 💬 135
打开原推
💬 引用
Just another reminder:

One day after my $SOI post back in March at $40.

Citibank and Kepler called me out and said

“it is very difficult to understand why the action [Soitec] has risen so much”

“Is the enthusiasm of the market exaggerated? That's what Citi thinks.”

Then I got a bunch of negative callouts from local European media.

Unfortunately many retail investors sold after these reports, while institutions had orders in to buy up the float.

2 months later, Soitec is now trading at 140.

With many of these same institutions giving 250 PTs today.
再提醒一下:

我 3 月在 $40 发 $SOI 帖的一天后。

Citibank 和 Kepler 点名我,说

“很难理解为什么 [Soitec] 股价涨了这么多”

“市场热情是否夸张?Citi 是这么认为的。”

然后本地欧洲媒体给了我一堆负面点名。

不幸的是,很多散户在这些报告后卖了,而机构已经挂单买走流通盘。

2 个月后,Soitec 现在交易在 140。

而今天很多同样的机构给出 250 的 PT。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 620 🔁 20 💬 96
打开原推
📝 原创
Wow, 27,500 paid subscribers is an insane number on X.

That’s enough to help put a 1 fun billboard somewhere in SF?

But will keep sharing a lot of ideas, despite current market drops!

Got a lot of fun $SOI type monopolies in mind as your countries play supply chain warfare. https://t.co/pB6V8eEl2Z
哇,27,500 个付费订阅在 X 上真是个离谱数字。

这足够在 SF 某处放一个好玩的 billboard 了?

不过即使现在市场下跌,我还是会继续分享很多想法!

随着你们国家打供应链战争,我脑子里还有很多好玩的 $SOI 类型垄断。 https://t.co/pB6V8eEl2Z
❤️ 957 🔁 13 💬 91
打开原推
📝 原创
I’ve never thought I’d see Sweden get turned into a widely understood meme on X.
我从没想过,有一天瑞典会在 X 上变成一个广为人知的 meme。
❤️ 699 🔁 10 💬 111
打开原推
💬 引用
A good looking guy that would mog Clavicular side by side has no impact to any fundamentals.

I cut some exposure too in $LITE $COHR like Leopold, last month.

But rotated it to a specific optical theme with CPO names like $SIVE / Foci.

The entire photonics supply chain is in the start of a massive supercycle and there’s nothing more compelling going long on CPO as an architectural paradigm shift.

Markets conflate two companies as the entire theme and sell off anything with it.

Great buying opportunity for people who understands the nuance though.

I still think there’s upside for Lumentum and $COHR, just less likely to double at current prices as fast if you’re going shares only.
一个帅哥,就算和 Clavicular 站一起能 mog 他,也不会影响任何基本面。

我上个月也像 Leopold 一样,在 $LITE$COHR 上削了一些敞口。

但我把它轮动到更具体的光学主题,CPO 名字比如 $SIVE / Foci。

整个 photonics 供应链正处在一轮巨大 supercycle 的开端,而做多 CPO 这种架构范式转变,没有比这更有吸引力的了。

市场把两家公司混同成整个主题,然后把相关东西全都卖掉。

不过对理解细节的人来说,这是很好的买入机会。

我仍然认为 Lumentum 和 $COHR 有上行空间,只是如果你只买股票,在当前价格下它们不太可能像以前那样快速翻倍。
引用原推@rektusd101
@aleabitoreddit People panicking Leopold exited optical stocks, what do you think on that ?
@aleabitoreddit 大家因为 Leopold 退出光学股而恐慌,你怎么看?
https://x.com/rektusd101/status/2056414930715181565
❤️ 1,143 🔁 49 💬 149
打开原推
💬 引用
$BOT is still trading at 4x NAV.

With a $2,000,000,000 effective ATM.

Even after the 21% drop.

So now it’s ~$600M MC, off $146M in private assets.

Then off those assets, they own ~$37M of Figure.

Which you’re essentially buying at $160B valuations while the leading humanoid maker in Unitree is IPOing at $6B.

So just because a $146m private fund went public doesn’t mean there should be a multi-billion dollar retail wealth transfer?

Maybe the fund had good intentions?

But idk after the $2B equity financing facility, that move just seems predatory when there’s already a valuation NAV disconnect.
$BOT 现在仍然以 4x NAV 交易。

还有一个 $2,000,000,000 的有效 ATM。

即使已经跌了 21%。

所以现在它是 ~$600M 市值,对应 $146M 私募资产。

而这些资产里,它们持有大约 ~$37M 的 Figure。

这本质上等于你在用 $160B 估值买 Figure,而领先 humanoid maker Unitree 准备以 $6B IPO。

所以不能因为一个 $146m 私募基金上市,就意味着应该出现几十亿美元的散户财富转移吧?

也许基金本意是好的?

但 idk,在 $2B equity financing facility 之后,已经存在 valuation NAV disconnect 的情况下,这个动作看起来就是掠夺性的。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$BOT is the biggest red flag.

NAV is $7.34/share. The stock is now trading at $37.92.

You are basically buying Figure at $200B+ while it’s valued at $39B.

Buying the company is just trading pyramid float dynamics off other retail.

Not the appreciation or underlying fundamentals.

To make matters worse:

There’s $2B dilution as valuation arbitrage as you all get diluted to oblivion.

I got a lot of fund managers dming influencers like myself about it but in reality:

Retail just looks like exit liquidity.
$BOT 是最大的红旗。

NAV 是 $7.34/股。现在股价是 $37.92。

你基本是在按 $200B+ 的估值买 Figure,而它实际估值是 $39B。

买这家公司本质上是在交易散户之间的金字塔式流通盘动态。

而不是资产升值或底层基本面。

更糟的是:

还有 $2B 稀释作为估值套利,你们都会被稀释到归零。

我收到很多基金经理私信我这样的 influencers 讨论它,但现实是:

散户看起来就是 exit liquidity。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2055970949762302055
❤️ 598 🔁 23 💬 173
打开原推
📝 原创
Just your normal Monday correction in the AI space from $NBIS to $LITE to $AAOI? https://t.co/5g3HCAlcA4
只是 AI 领域从 $NBIS$LITE$AAOI 的普通周一回调? https://t.co/5g3HCAlcA4
❤️ 1,518 🔁 57 💬 387
打开原推
📝 原创
Next year… I’m expecting there to be many articles about FAU + component bottlenecks.

Especially as the new CPO architecture led by $NVDA + $TSM starts to scale.

Then a lot of these names like FOCI (~$2.8B MC) or Nextronics (~$246M MC) that I’m mentioning today will be in the center of it.

Despite many of these “commodity” labels… (just look at transformers/NAND)

And I’ll do a “Did you listen anon post” like $AXTI.

We’ll see if this is right.
明年……我预计会有很多关于 FAU + component bottlenecks 的文章。

尤其是随着 $NVDA + $TSM 主导的新 CPO architecture 开始扩张。

然后我今天提到的很多名字,比如 FOCI(~$2.8B 市值)或 Nextronics(~$246M 市值),会处在它的中心。

尽管其中很多被贴上“commodity”标签……(看看 transformers/NAND 就知道)

然后我会像 $AXTI 那样发一条“Did you listen anon”。

我们看看这是不是对的。
❤️ 1,613 🔁 126 💬 220
打开原推
📝 原创
$POET and $IREN literally both won the Fake it Until you make it award.

-> Grey area endless marketing of crap through influencers.

-> Diluted retail enough to hoard tons of cash

-> Cash is sets baseline Market Cap.

Now $POET probably has around $830M pure cash from dilution after $400m private placement.

While their marketcap was sitting under $500m last year.
$POET$IREN 真的是一起拿下了 Fake it Until you make it 奖。

-> 通过 influencers 在灰色地带无尽营销垃圾。

-> 稀释散户到足以囤大量现金

-> 现金设定了 Market Cap 底线。

现在 $POET 在 $400m private placement 后,可能有大约 $830M 纯现金来自稀释。

而它去年市值还低于 $500m。
❤️ 1,078 🔁 45 💬 172
打开原推
💬 引用
I literally called out a national vulnerability in the AI supply chain.

Then went long on the quasi-monopoly in $AXTI.

While everyone was doubting me.

Guess what anon: it’s on the White House shortage list and one of the major talking points of US-China trade talks 6M later. https://t.co/mVX0vJ5EuD
我是真的点出了 AI 供应链里的一个国家级漏洞。

然后做多了准垄断的 $AXTI

当时所有人都在怀疑我。

猜怎么着 anon:6 个月后,它出现在 White House 短缺名单上,也成为美中贸易谈判的主要议题之一。 https://t.co/mVX0vJ5EuD
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 1,503 🔁 62 💬 182
打开原推
📝 原创
Donald Trump is apparently long Sushi.

I genuinely find it hilarious the President took a large % ownership of Kura Sushi ( $KRUS, ~$600m MC).

Among everything from $AVGO to $NVDA.

If Trump did buy $5M worth, the president would own close to ~.8% of one of my favorite US Sushi Chains.

Don't have any open positions... but I do love the idea of our President buying up Sushi restaurants.
Donald Trump 显然做多 Sushi。

我真觉得很好笑,总统居然拿了 Kura Sushi($KRUS,~$600m 市值)很大比例的所有权。

在从 $AVGO$NVDA 的所有东西里面。

如果 Trump 真的买了 $5M,那总统会拥有我最喜欢的美国 Sushi Chains 之一接近 ~0.8%。

我没有开放仓位……但我真的很喜欢我们的总统买 Sushi 餐厅这个想法。
❤️ 3,239 🔁 612 💬 240
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm 100% sure if I met all you "photonic memory" experts in real life.

498 out of 500 of you couldn't explain CXL memory pooling or KV cache infrastructure and what $PENG actually does to derive revenue off that.

This is why I'm seeing all these random $RKLB, $HIMS, or non technical AI experts on my timeline now.

Backseat commenting completely wrong things about M7U MOCVD capex and $TSEM that aren't related.

Or conflating every single term like an $SMCI integrator with photonics IP.

Then just pitching buzzwords every under every one of my posts.
我 100% 确信,如果现实里见到你们这些“photonic memory”专家。

500 个里有 498 个解释不清 CXL memory pooling 或 KV cache infrastructure,以及 $PENG 到底怎么从中获得收入。

这就是为什么我现在时间线上会看到这些随机 $RKLB$HIMS,或者非技术 AI 专家。

坐在后排对 M7U MOCVD capex 和 $TSEM 发表完全错误、毫不相关的评论。

或者把每个术语都混在一起,把一个 $SMCI integrator 和 photonics IP 混为一谈。

然后就在我每条帖子下面刷 buzzwords。
引用原推@TheMindofMatt
@aleabitoreddit I bought some PENG for:

* KV-cache infrastructure,
* memory expansion,
* inference bottlenecks,
* CXL memory pooling,
* or external memory appliances,
@aleabitoreddit 我买了一些 PENG,理由是:

* KV-cache 基础设施,
* 内存扩展,
* 推理瓶颈,
* CXL memory pooling,
* 或外部内存设备,
https://x.com/TheMindofMatt/status/2056006929642623213
❤️ 1,291 🔁 33 💬 146
打开原推
📝 原创
$BOT is the biggest red flag.

NAV is $7.34/share. The stock is now trading at $37.92.

You are basically buying Figure at $200B+ while it’s valued at $39B.

Buying the company is just trading pyramid float dynamics off other retail.

Not the appreciation or underlying fundamentals.

To make matters worse:

There’s $2B dilution as valuation arbitrage as you all get diluted to oblivion.

I got a lot of fund managers dming influencers like myself about it but in reality:

Retail just looks like exit liquidity.
$BOT 是最大的 red flag。

NAV 是 $7.34/股。现在股票交易在 $37.92。

你基本是在以 $200B+ 估值买 Figure,而它实际估值是 $39B。

买这家公司只是和其他散户交易 pyramid float dynamics。

不是在交易增值或底层基本面。

更糟的是:

还有 $2B 稀释作为 valuation arbitrage,把你们稀释到 oblivion。

我收到很多 fund managers 给像我这样的 influencers 发 dm 讲这个,但现实是:

散户看起来就是 exit liquidity。
❤️ 1,466 🔁 58 💬 191
打开原推
📝 原创
Lot of people on X are talking about AI/startup billboards.

Just a shower thought:

Can’t I just buy a bunch of SF billboard space for fun?

But instead of something like $NBIS (not my photo btw)….

I just put something fun related to X?

Apparently it’s not expensive. https://t.co/jTPanYy1V3
X 上很多人在聊 AI/startup billboards。

只是洗澡时想到:

我不能为了好玩直接买一堆 SF billboard space 吗?

但不是放 $NBIS 这种东西(顺便说不是我的照片)……

我就放点和 X 有关的好玩东西?

据说并不贵。 https://t.co/jTPanYy1V3
❤️ 733 🔁 12 💬 134
打开原推
💬 引用
Very nuanced. People buying $PENG for $MRVL "photonic memory" are likely to be disappointed.

They're on the $SMCI integrator level with potential software add.

The high margin, foundational IP belongs to companies like Celestial or others like Lightmatter.

What they do is build a 2U box, inside the rack, around Celestial/Marvell's the photonic memory IP.

It's also in the development collaboration stage.

Retail just misunderstand the different layers and conflate them all as this company building core photonic memory IP.

Not commenting on the potential price, but it's a legitimate idea for its base business. And upside would be material if they go past sampling.

Just annoying when I get comments about "PHOTONIC MEMORY".

Then they're building the chassis that the actual photonic memory IP sits inside and not even in qualification stage.
很讲细节。因为 $MRVL “photonic memory” 去买 $PENG 的人,大概率会失望。

它们在 $SMCI integrator 这一层,可能加一点软件。

高毛利、基础性的 IP 属于 Celestial 或 Lightmatter 这类公司。

它们做的是在 rack 里围绕 Celestial/Marvell 的 photonic memory IP 搭一个 2U box。

这也还处在开发合作阶段。

散户只是误解了不同层级,把它们都混同成这家公司在做核心 photonic memory IP。

我不评论潜在股价,但对它的基础业务来说,这是一个正当想法。如果它们越过 sampling,上行会很实质。

只是当我看到“PHOTONIC MEMORY”这类评论会很烦。

结果它们做的是承载真正 photonic memory IP 的 chassis,而且甚至还没到 qualification stage。
引用原推@AkaliOnYT
@CKCapitalxx @aleabitoreddit +1 @aleabitoreddit $PENG has become a pretty popular retail stock, would love your take on it
@CKCapitalxx @aleabitoreddit +1 @aleabitoreddit $PENG 已经变成很热门的散户股了,很想听听你的看法
https://x.com/AkaliOnYT/status/2055872784803196981
❤️ 829 🔁 34 💬 157
打开原推
📝 原创
I'm not sure why people look at 13F filings so deeply when all the hedge funds are super behind on names like $JBL, $LITE and others.

The most returns come from frontrunning institutions before they figure out the next $SNDK.

Not following them 3 months after they file.
我不太明白为什么大家这么深入看 13F filings,因为所有 hedge funds 在 $JBL$LITE 和其他名字上都慢得离谱。

最大回报来自在机构搞懂下一个 $SNDK 之前抢跑。

不是在他们提交文件 3 个月后跟着买。
❤️ 1,987 🔁 53 💬 114
打开原推
💬 引用
When I see comments like this (and there are a lot) from retail investors:

I immediately think they lack the technical depth.

I'll walk through each one from $SIVE to $LPK:

1. Photonics TAM goes from $14B -> $154B In just two years time, and it's likely going to keep scaling past 2030 as it's the next generation architecture of choice.

It's not going away in 1 year. It's not going away in 3 years, which is why $LITE premiums keep going higher since they're backlogged into 2028.

$SIVE supplies CW lasers and is highly tethered to CPO and now pluggable transcivers for 1.6T and 3.2...

For expected companies like $JBL, Ayar, Lightmatter, Lightelligence, $POET, $MRVL Celestial, and $AMD.

This isn't a "trade", it's the core chokepoint and IP holder for the next generation of photonics.

And it's a comfortable hold for the next few years as they scale to become the next $LITE.

The risk I personally see (since they're already qualified with so many players), it's mainly how much TAM they can capture of the overall optical supercycle. (And potential risks with Win Semi volume ramp, but Win is massive so I can sleep tightly there).

As just supplying lasers isn't enough to justify valuation.

It's TAM expansion downward into making the entire ELS or entire pluggable transceiver that makes these laser companies so valuable.

Then afterward, they can vertically integrating upward for gross margin expansion upward like $COHR into doing the laser fabs or even substrate level.

And that in my view is a very asymmetric risk/reward ratio as we've already seen this done with $LITE as they went from $2B to $80B.

2. $LPK - Is the purest exposure, without the messy financials of SKC Absolics, as the next advanced packaging shift for glass substrates.

Almost every single major semi company from $INTC to Samsung are adopting glass substrates.

$LPK is basically $ASML of this chokepoint, since they supply to ~80% of the global players currently.

Yes, there's "trade cycles" for equipment suppliers like $ASML, where if there's more foundry capex, ASML scales up. But if there's downturns, these tend to perform poorly, and don't capture all the volume ramp that happens after.

However, if the MC is $650m and they're making $100-200M, revenue per costumer volume ramped, the amount they make from the glass substrate cycle will likely exceed current valuations.

And they'll have baseline fundamentals (as more companies adopt the packaging shift), that keeps their valuation up.

It's just a waiting game for volume ramp at this point.

3. $AAOI - This is literally $INTC but for America + Photonics. It's like saying Intel is not a long term investment.

Guess where all your optical transcivers are made?

China. Thailand. Malaysia. If you look at Innolight, Eoptolink, $FN, and others.

AOI is building the largest Made in America supply chains for both CW laser fab, as well as 800g, 1.6T assembly.

Yes, there are pluggable cycle ups and downs to this as well. There's going to be a wave for 1.6T next year, then CPO cannibalizes pluggables down the road.

But since they make the entire supply chain in house, they have extreme optionality for other segments. And like $NVDA older gen-GPUs, there's going to be sovereign DC requirements for older gen pluggables from names like $AAOI.

It's likely going to keep rising as it hits that $400m+/month revenue target H2 2026.

There's just a lot of different short term volatility along the way like the $600m dilution.

4. $IQE - ??? It's one of the most important players in the Western word for epiwafers.

$MTSI went out of their way to pay off IQE's debt because they can't have them going under. $IQE is also supplying to $LITE.

The world is currently bottlenecked both on the epiwafer level from Landmark comments and InP substrate levels.

Their financials were track but the raw book value, and value they hold to the entire Western supply chain... completely justifies their valuation. And other optical companies will not let their core upstream supply chain go under.

As these tens of millions worth of materials would screw up tens of billions worth of downstream products.

Again photonics is the next generation architecture required to scale AI. It's not Quantum where it's just "In development".

It's literally here and the architecture of choice by $NVDA.

I would not be surprised if all of these are a lot higher in 3-4 years time.

People who think it's one and done in 3 months time "only because I mentioned it" don't know what they're talking about.

Institutions would have bought up the name eventually (like Point 72 on $IQE) and retail would only find out after their valuations are 600% higher.

Should really do the research before adding comments like these:

These are all forward growth companies that require in-depth supply chain knowledge.
当我看到散户投资者这样的评论(而且很多)时:

我马上觉得他们缺乏技术深度。

我会从 $SIVE$LPK 一个个讲:

1. Photonics TAM 在短短两年内从 $14B -> $154B,而且很可能在 2030 年后继续扩张,因为它是下一代首选架构。

它不会 1 年后消失。也不会 3 年后消失,这也是为什么 $LITE 的溢价一直更高,因为它们 backlog 已经排到 2028。

$SIVE 供应 CW lasers,并且和 CPO 以及现在用于 1.6T 和 3.2 的 pluggable transcivers 高度绑定……

面向预期中的 $JBL、Ayar、Lightmatter、Lightelligence、$POET$MRVL Celestial 和 $AMD 这类公司。

这不是一个“trade”,它是下一代 photonics 的核心 chokepoint 和 IP 持有者。

随着它们扩张成下一个 $LITE,未来几年持有会很舒服。

我个人看到的风险(因为它们已经被这么多玩家认证),主要是它们能在整体 optical supercycle 中捕获多少 TAM。(以及 Win Semi 量产爬坡的潜在风险,但 Win 很大,所以我在那里睡得很安心)。

因为只是供应激光器还不足以支撑估值。

真正让这些激光器公司这么值钱的,是向下扩展 TAM,去做整个 ELS 或整个 pluggable transceiver。

之后,它们还能向上垂直整合来扩张毛利,比如像 $COHR 那样做 laser fabs,甚至做到 substrate level。

在我看来,这是非常不对称的风险/回报,因为我们已经在 $LITE 身上看到过这种路径,它们从 $2B 到 $80B。

2. $LPK - 它是 glass substrates 下一次 advanced packaging 转变里最纯的敞口,没有 SKC Absolics 那些混乱财务。

几乎每一家主要半导体公司,从 $INTC 到 Samsung,都在采用 glass substrates。

$LPK 基本就是这个 chokepoint 里的 $ASML,因为它目前供应约 80% 的全球玩家。

是的,对 $ASML 这种设备供应商来说有“trade cycles”,如果 foundry capex 增加,ASML 就扩张。但如果下行,它们往往表现不好,也无法捕获之后所有的量产爬坡。

但是,如果市值是 $650m,而它们能做到 $100-200M,随着客户量产爬坡,它们从 glass substrate cycle 赚到的钱很可能超过当前估值。

而且它们会有基础基本面(随着更多公司采用这一 packaging shift),支撑估值。

现在只是等待量产爬坡的游戏。

3. $AAOI - 这简直就是美国 + Photonics 版 $INTC。说它不是长期投资,就像说 Intel 不是长期投资。

猜猜你的 optical transcivers 都在哪里生产?

中国。泰国。马来西亚。如果你看 Innolight、Eoptolink、$FN 和其他公司。

AOI 正在打造最大的 Made in America 供应链,既包括 CW laser fab,也包括 800g、1.6T assembly。

是的,pluggable cycle 也有起伏。明年会有 1.6T 的一波,然后 CPO 以后会蚕食 pluggables。

但因为它们在内部做整个供应链,所以在其他细分领域有极强 optionality。而且像 $NVDA 老一代 GPUs 一样,主权 DC 会对 $AAOI 这种老一代 pluggables 有需求。

它很可能会继续上涨,因为 H2 2026 会达到那个 $400m+/月收入目标。

路上只是会有很多不同的短期波动,比如 $600m 稀释。

4. $IQE - ??? 它是西方世界 epiwafers 最重要的玩家之一。

$MTSI 特意帮 IQE 偿还债务,因为他们不能让它倒下。$IQE 也在给 $LITE 供货。

从 Landmark 的评论和 InP substrate 层面看,世界现在在 epiwafer level 和 InP substrate level 都有瓶颈。

它们财务确实走偏过,但原始账面价值,以及它们对整个西方供应链的价值……完全足以支撑估值。其他光学公司也不会让自己的核心上游供应链倒掉。

因为这些几千万美元的材料,会搞砸价值数百亿美元的下游产品。

再说一次,photonics 是扩展 AI 所需的下一代架构。它不是 Quantum 那种还只是“In development”的东西。

它已经在这里了,而且是 $NVDA 选择的架构。

如果这些标的 3-4 年后都高很多,我不会意外。

那些觉得这只是 3 个月一次性行情、“只是因为我提到了它”的人,根本不知道自己在说什么。

机构最终会买这些名字(比如 Point 72 买 $IQE),散户只会在估值高了 600% 后才知道。

在加这种评论前,真的应该先做研究:

这些都是需要深入供应链知识的 forward growth companies。
引用原推@Million_Sancet
This is my current portfolio

As I said, I wouldn't sell any positions

And I’ve kept my word, the money for the new position in $PENG does not come from my existing investments

At the moment, I don’t see better opportunities in the market than what is already in my portfolio

At least not at these prices

I have on my radar things like $KOPN $DGXX $SOI etc
这是我当前的投资组合

就像我说的,我不会卖任何仓位

而且我信守了承诺,$PENG 新仓位的钱不是来自我已有投资

目前,我看不到市场上比我组合里这些更好的机会

至少不是在这些价格上

我关注列表里有 $KOPN $DGXX $SOI 等等
https://x.com/Million_Sancet/status/2055299648093340047
❤️ 2,740 🔁 264 💬 153
打开原推
💬 引用
Wow I’ve hit 300k followers just now!

What a milestone! My goal from the start was always to help retail from Day 0 instead of institutions.

That being said… I’ve probably helped out $IBKR too much recently with thousands of new “Serenity Accounts?

$HOOD retail DW… Working on something surprising for you all, just stay tight.

Maybe 6-8 weeks?

Regardless happy to see so much validation of my thoughts.

And I hope whatever I do sets a lasting example for X about the positive sum nature of free information democratization.
哇,我刚刚到 300k 粉丝了!

真是一个里程碑!我从一开始的目标就一直是从 Day 0 帮助散户,而不是机构。

话虽如此……我最近可能帮 $IBKR 太多了,带来了几千个新的“Serenity Accounts?

$HOOD retail DW……正在给你们做点惊喜的东西,先等等。

也许 6-8 周?

不管怎样,很高兴看到我的想法得到这么多验证。

也希望我做的任何事,都能给 X 树立一个关于免费信息民主化正和性质的长期榜样。
引用原推@jimmyhuli
这一波 Serenity 带着大家买瑞典、德国、法国、韩国股票的,都跑去 $IBKR 开户了吧。 $HOOD 真心悲剧
这一波 Serenity 带着大家买瑞典、德国、法国、韩国股票的,都跑去 $IBKR 开户了吧。 $HOOD 真心悲剧
https://x.com/jimmyhuli/status/2055763644127002747
❤️ 2,056 🔁 43 💬 176
打开原推
💬 引用
I only came to Japan to do first person DD on Harmonic Drive (6324) and Towa (6315).

Not sure what everyone else is doing in the evenings there… https://t.co/fnSxJlZHVe
我来日本只是为了对 Harmonic Drive (6324) 和 Towa (6315) 做第一人称 DD。

不太确定其他人晚上都在那里做什么…… https://t.co/fnSxJlZHVe
引用原推@ThinkingUSD
Who wants to go out in Japan tonight on me
今晚在日本谁想出去玩,我请客
https://x.com/ThinkingUSD/status/2055561062108324030
❤️ 1,723 🔁 43 💬 146
打开原推
💬 引用
Leopold Aschenbrenner is a legend, but I'm not quite sure he can beat 3152.77% YTD in the Serenity Awareness fund.

That being said, I've hit 23 different longs this year with 100-1000%+ YTD.

1. $AXTI
2. $AAOI
3. $SIVE
4. $LITE
5. $IQE
6. $AEHR
7. $CRCL
8. $EWY
9. Unimicron
10. Nitto Boseki
11. $OSS
12. $GDRZF
13. $RPI
14. $SOI
15. $ALRIB
16. $SNDK
17. $SIMO
18. $VPG
19. $TSEM
20. $ARM
21. $MRVL
22. $INTC
23. $LPK

Do you remember all of these anon?
Leopold Aschenbrenner 是个 legend,但我不太确定他能打过 Serenity Awareness fund 今年以来 3152.77% 的回报。

话虽如此,我今年已经押中了 23 个 YTD 100-1000%+ 的多头。

1. $AXTI
2. $AAOI
3. $SIVE
4. $LITE
5. $IQE
6. $AEHR
7. $CRCL
8. $EWY
9. Unimicron
10. Nitto Boseki
11. $OSS
12. $GDRZF
13. $RPI
14. $SOI
15. $ALRIB
16. $SNDK
17. $SIMO
18. $VPG
19. $TSEM
20. $ARM
21. $MRVL
22. $INTC
23. $LPK

你还记得这些吗 anon?
引用原推@Quantrarian52
Wait wait wait….. could Leopold be the infamous @aleabitoreddit ?
等等等等……Leopold 会不会就是那个臭名昭著的 @aleabitoreddit
https://x.com/Quantrarian52/status/2055372571223417285
❤️ 4,839 🔁 275 💬 314
打开原推
📝 原创
This $AXTI / InP substrate export controls is EXACTLY why:

Trump's America 1st policies should focus around securing its supply chains over in EU/Japan/KR.

And weaponizing it against China.

US alone has leverage, but everyone together has extreme leverage.

If you use Japan to cut off China's humanoid program / upstream chemicals and leverage EU to cut off China's photonics program:

They'll bend for substrates and rare earths.

You literally need to break their frontier industry development over yields or actually manufacturing the components.

Not just threaten 40% tariffs to stop them from shipping cheap goods.
这次 $AXTI / InP substrate 出口管制,正好说明为什么:

Trump 的 America 1st 政策应该把重点放在保护它在 EU/Japan/KR 的供应链上。

并把这些武器化用来对付中国。

美国单独有杠杆,但大家一起有极强杠杆。

如果你用日本切断中国的 humanoid 项目/上游化学品,并利用欧盟切断中国的 photonics 项目:

他们会在 substrates 和 rare earths 上让步。

你真的需要通过良率或实际制造组件,打断他们前沿产业的发展。

而不是只威胁 40% 关税,阻止他们发便宜货。
❤️ 780 🔁 40 💬 66
打开原推
💬 引用
LOL chat no way... Can't believe $AXTI / InP substrates really a major part of the China-US Donald Trump's trade talks with Xi?

I got this thesis completely right.

But really, Japan should start to cut off upstream machine supply like Ulvac for humanoids. And red phosphorus like Rasa/NCI to China, if they're not shipping.

And US should pressure EU to take back their their photonic monopolies like ficonTEC that Chinese companies like Robotechnik managed to buy.
LOL chat 不可能吧……难以相信 $AXTI / InP substrates 真的成了 China-US Donald Trump 和 Xi 贸易谈判的主要部分?

我这个 thesis 完全说对了。

不过说真的,如果他们不出货,日本应该开始切断像 Ulvac 这种 humanoids 上游机器供应,以及 Rasa/NCI 这类 red phosphorus 对中国的供应。

美国也应该施压欧盟,拿回他们的 photonic monopolies,比如被 Robotechnik 这类中国公司买走的 ficonTEC。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 883 🔁 56 💬 47
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE is now aiming to become the next $LITE, a US photonics giant.

They're re-centering their board around US executives + US photonics.

So the core board are now: US $GFS Executives and $CITI Executives, with the company run by UC Berkeley grads and $LITE executives.

The 3 members leaving were local Swedish/EU.

This is just a shift in strategy from focusing on developing local Swedish Semi environments:

To dominating the US/global photonics market. I'm not trying to discredit their service/background.

But in my view to focus around US/global photonics markets, it's likely optimal to have more US executives.

But they should all be proud for helping make $SIVE what it is today.
$SIVE 现在的目标是成为下一个 $LITE,一个美国 photonics 巨头。

他们正在把董事会重新围绕美国高管 + 美国 photonics 来布局。

所以核心董事会现在是:美国 $GFS 高管和 $CITI 高管,公司由 UC Berkeley 毕业生和 $LITE 高管运营。

离开的 3 位成员是本地瑞典/EU 背景。

这只是战略从发展本地 Swedish Semi 环境转向:

主导美国/全球 photonics 市场。我不是想贬低他们的贡献/背景。

但在我看来,如果要聚焦美国/全球 photonics 市场,有更多美国高管大概率是最优的。

不过他们都应该为帮助 $SIVE 走到今天感到自豪。
引用原推@Selooo79
@aleabitoreddit Any thoughts on the board members leaving $SIVE ?
@aleabitoreddit$SIVE 董事离任有什么看法?
https://x.com/Selooo79/status/2055267953981919585
❤️ 1,645 🔁 98 💬 104
打开原推
💬 引用
I’m so mad… why do I identify $MXL as a great opportunity in specific.

Then not go long?

Just straight up 300% after I call it out. https://t.co/IVFqYC8GfG
我太气了……为什么我明明把 $MXL 具体识别成一个很好的机会。

然后却没有做多?

我点出来后直接涨了 300%。 https://t.co/IVFqYC8GfG
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
There’s always going to be new opportunities in the markets.

like scale across with $MXL tam expansion.

I’ll keep pointing them out for fun but I’m not long on many ideas unless it’s super super compelling like cpo.

But I’m personally happy chilling in existing longs I’ve mentioned recently, like win, Shunsin, sivers, IQE, and those types.

Sometimes it’s better to just let them play out if they’re early in the cycle, or a bit further in like Nebius, or even $EWY for memory or $COHR for photonics.

Then constantly hopping ship to ship to catch a completely new wave like glass core substrates and such.

Helps remove a lot of the fomo since a lot of times winners keep on winning when a thesis is validated.
市场里永远会有新的机会。

比如 $MXL 的 TAM 横向扩张。

我会继续为了好玩把它们指出来,但除非像 cpo 这样超级超级有吸引力,否则很多想法我并不会做多。

不过我个人很满意地待在最近提过的已有多头里,比如 win、Shunsin、sivers、IQE 这类。

有时候,如果它们还处在周期早期,或者像 Nebius 稍微更往前一点,甚至 $EWY 的存储、$COHR 的光子,最好就是让它们继续演绎。

而不是不断从一条船跳到另一条船,只为追新的浪,比如 glass core substrates 之类。

这能减少很多 fomo,因为很多时候,一旦 thesis 被验证,赢家会继续赢。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046677013445132584
❤️ 638 🔁 17 💬 99
打开原推
💬 引用
Taiwan financial sector rules are hilariously stupid.

They literally dispositioned Mediatek, one of their largest companies lmfao.

It's like if the US stopped letting people buy $GOOGL because the stock went up.

Then that caused Google's stock dropped after.

Wouldn't they want their companies to appreciate in value, so their economy benefits?

Especially during one of their largest bull-runs from the semi sector, it's actually hindering their own growth where every week matters.

Interesting to see such backward rules hurting their own high-tech economy.
台湾金融部门的规则蠢得有点好笑。

他们居然把 Mediatek 这种最大公司之一给 disposition 了 lmfao。

这就像美国因为 $GOOGL 股价涨了,就不让人买 $GOOGL

然后导致 Google 股价之后下跌。

他们难道不希望自己的公司升值,从而让经济受益吗?

尤其是在半导体板块带来的最大牛市之一期间,每一周都很重要,这实际上是在阻碍他们自己的增长。

看到这种落后规则伤害自己的高科技经济,挺有意思的。
引用原推@SinnerReformed1
@aleabitoreddit Taiwanese don't know how to promote themselves in the financial sector. Also, dumb local capital rules.
@aleabitoreddit 台湾人在金融领域不太会推广自己。另外,本地资本规则也挺蠢。
https://x.com/SinnerReformed1/status/2055138352895250747
❤️ 618 🔁 26 💬 97
打开原推
💬 引用
Not sure if people realized this but unless a thesis completely breaks, companies like $NBIS can keep growing.

Just look at $AMZN or $GOOGL over the past 15 years.

If people "trim" it often triggers taxes. And a lot of corrections are typically less than those taxes paid.

By the time a "50% crash happens", it's probably already compounded hundreds of even thousands of percent.

If people need to pay expenses, once you hit 7-8-9 figures, you can always borrow against those assets and keep letting them appreciate.

NFA, just personal opinion. You all do you, but it's highly, highly, dependent on the companies you pick.

Can't do this with something trash like $IREN. But I do believe $NBIS is positioned to be the next hyperscaler.
不知道大家有没有意识到,除非 thesis 完全坏掉,像 $NBIS 这样的公司可以持续成长。

看看过去 15 年的 $AMZN$GOOGL 就知道。

如果人们经常“trim”,通常会触发税。而很多回调通常还小于你交掉的税。

等到所谓“50% crash”发生时,它可能已经复利了几百甚至几千个百分点。

如果需要支付开销,当你到 7-8-9 位数资产后,总可以用这些资产抵押借钱,继续让它们升值。

NFA,只是个人观点。你们按自己的来,但这高度、高度取决于你选的公司。

不能拿 $IREN 这种垃圾这么做。但我确实相信 $NBIS 的位置是成为下一个 hyperscaler。
引用原推@SebastianS79509
@aleabitoreddit $NBIS You gave me NBIS at 80 i made my biggest position on it like 100k i know you said its for you an 2-5 year play i dont know if i should trim now or hold . Thank you for this❤️ what is your way for NBIS ?
@aleabitoreddit $NBIS 你在 80 的时候告诉我 NBIS,我把它做成了最大仓位,大概 100k。我知道你说对你来说这是 2-5 年的投资,我不知道现在该减仓还是持有。谢谢你❤️ 你对 NBIS 的策略是什么?
https://x.com/SebastianS79509/status/2055199202439725297
❤️ 1,659 🔁 83 💬 119
打开原推
💬 引用
Just to add to the very positive $SIVE news amid MSCI likely tens of millions of inflow in 2 weeks:

$AMZN has a new private placement with AlChip.

Probably implying design wins with future Trainium.

If you don’t remember… AlChip was Ayar’s lead customer. And $SIVE is the primary laser supplier to Ayar.

So implications for $SIVE, is enormous piggybacking off of Amazon’s ecosystem growth.
补充一下非常正面的 $SIVE 消息,在 2 周后 MSCI 可能带来数千万流入的背景下:

$AMZN 和 AlChip 有新的 private placement。

这可能暗示未来 Trainium 的 design wins。

如果你不记得了……AlChip 是 Ayar 的 lead customer。而 $SIVE 是 Ayar 的主要激光器供应商。

所以对 $SIVE 的含义非常巨大,可以搭上 Amazon 生态增长的顺风车。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE 2025 annual report analysis.

TLDR: Extremely Bullish.

Sivers main growth vector is CPO, but they've TAM expansioned to pluggable transcivers + multiple new qualifications/development.

1. "We are currently seeing great interest... testing our DFB lasers across multiple manufacturers in pluggable transceivers"

For pluggable angle, we've seen this with $JBL 1.6T LRO already, but annual report hinted they're developing/qualifying with more hyperscaler suppliers.

"Our serviceable markets have now been expanded to include pluggable optical interconnects as well as scale-up and scale-out architectures for co-packaged" (TAM expansion)

2. "Discussions with hyperscalers and pluggable transceiver suppliers indicate a shortage of CW lasers in the coming years"

$LITE already signaled CW laser bottlenecks, and they had to buy externally from competitors. So we kinda guessed CW Laser was a bottleneck.

And this confirmed it, so was wondering about Win semi.

"The partnership announced with high-volume supplier Win Semiconductor in March 2025 now gives us a strong position to meet growing demand"

$SIVE likely has capacity locked in with Win from this nuance, which is exactly what I wanted to know.

This positions Sivers in the CW laser as both a bottleneck and CPO laser architectural leader.

VOLUME PRODUCTION H2 INDICATIONS (BULLISH):

3. "The collaboration positions both companies to address the rapidly growing market for optical AI connectivity, with prototypes to be demonstrated to customers during the first half of 2026 and with the goal of scaling up production by the end of 2026"

H1 is more preproduction, H2 production signaled starting with names like $POET.

4. "We are pleased that our largest LIDAR customer will increase production starting in the fourth quarter of 2026"

$AEVA start of volume production Q4 with $SIVE = bullish for both.

Revenue floor from LIDAR as their CPO scales.

5. Sivers announced a partnership with LIGHTIUM AG to integrate their CW lasers directly onto TFLN wafers. 3.2T+ cycle. (future proofing)

FYI no decent investor cares about last year's 2025 financials from development contracts aside from Swedish Media/Locals.

Especially when you're forward looking for the 2027-2028 CPO supercycle.

But the hint from you can take away from financials + geography that is $NOK is now the high confidence customer of $SIVE.

TLDR:

-> Win Semi implied capacity lock in during CW laser bottleneck
-> Hints of new group of hyperscaler suppliers testing/qualification for pluggable transcivers, which is massive TAM expansion.
-> New customers for CW lasers
-> Volume production scaling starting H2 for both photonics and lidar.
$SIVE 2025 年报分析。

TLDR:极度看多。

Sivers 的主要增长向量是 CPO,但他们已经把 TAM 扩展到 pluggable transceivers + 多个新的认证/开发项目。

1. “我们目前看到很大兴趣……多家制造商正在 pluggable transceivers 中测试我们的 DFB lasers”

pluggable 角度,我们已经在 $JBL 1.6T LRO 上看到了,但年报暗示他们正在和更多 hyperscaler 供应商开发/认证。

“我们的可服务市场现在已经扩展到 pluggable optical interconnects,以及 co-packaged 的 scale-up 和 scale-out 架构”(TAM 扩张)

2. “与 hyperscalers 和 pluggable transceiver 供应商的讨论显示,未来几年 CW lasers 会短缺”

$LITE 已经暗示 CW laser 瓶颈,而且他们不得不从竞争对手外采。所以我们之前大概猜到 CW Laser 是瓶颈。

这次确认了,所以我也在想 Win semi。

“2025 年 3 月宣布与高产量供应商 Win Semiconductor 的合作,现在让我们处于有利位置,满足增长需求”

从这个细节看,$SIVE 很可能已经锁定了 Win 的产能,这正是我想知道的。

这让 Sivers 在 CW laser 上既是瓶颈,又是 CPO laser 架构领导者。

H2 量产迹象(看多):

3. “该合作让双方能够服务快速增长的 AI 光互连市场,原型将在 2026 年上半年向客户展示,目标是在 2026 年底前扩大生产”

H1 更像预生产,H2 开始量产的信号,类似 $POET 这些名字。

4. “我们很高兴最大的 LIDAR 客户将从 2026 年第四季度开始提高产量”

$AEVA Q4 与 $SIVE 开始量产 = 对双方都看多。

LIDAR 给他们 CPO 放量时提供收入底。

5. Sivers 宣布与 LIGHTIUM AG 合作,把他们的 CW lasers 直接集成到 TFLN wafers 上。3.2T+ 周期。(面向未来)

FYI,除了瑞典媒体/本地人,没有像样投资者会关心去年 2025 年开发合同带来的财务数据。

尤其你要前瞻 2027-2028 CPO 超级周期。

但从财务 + 地理线索能读出的一个提示是,$NOK 现在很可能是 $SIVE 的高置信客户。

TLDR:

-> Win Semi 暗示在 CW laser 瓶颈中锁定产能
-> 暗示一批新的 hyperscaler 供应商正在测试/认证 pluggable transceivers,这是巨大的 TAM 扩张
-> CW lasers 的新客户
-> photonics 和 lidar 都从 H2 开始扩大量产。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2054868760629272850
❤️ 1,288 🔁 87 💬 102
打开原推
💬 引用
HOW DOES $POET ($3.14B) HAVE A HIGHER VALUATION THAN FOCI (3363, $3.1B)???

FOCI IS LITERALLY THE BOTTLENECK FOR CPO VOLUME RAMP AND MAIN SUPPLIER FOR $TSM AND $NVDA.

High conviction Foci outperforms once institutions find this name.

Also, can Foci management please pursue NASDAQ ADR like $HIMX? Thank you.
$POET($3.14B)的估值怎么会比 FOCI(3363,$3.1B)还高???

FOCI 简直就是 CPO 量产爬坡的瓶颈,而且是 $TSM$NVDA 的主要供应商。

一旦机构发现这个名字,我高信心认为 Foci 会跑赢。

另外,Foci 管理层能不能像 $HIMX 一样推进 NASDAQ ADR?谢谢。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
FOCI (3363) is one of the most undervalued CPO players in the entire market right now at ~$3B.

Their BOM is massive relative to MC and they're expected to capture a dominant market share for $NVDA / $TSM.

You only start to see this show up 2027 / 2028, even though we're entering H2 2026 now (which is what I mean by frontrunning CPO supercycle).
FOCI(3363)现在是整个市场里最被低估的 CPO 玩家之一,市值约 $3B。

相对市值,它在 BOM 中占比很大,而且预计会拿到 $NVDA / $TSM 的主导市场份额。

你要到 2027 / 2028 才会开始看到这些显现,虽然我们现在已经进入 2026 H2(这就是我说的抢跑 CPO 超级周期)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2055110412375621643
❤️ 1,054 🔁 59 💬 98
打开原推
💬 引用
I do like Harmonic Drive (6324) as the Western Leader (eg. harmonic reduction gear) at ~$4.2B MC.

Very large part of robotics/humanoid BOM value.

I actually like Leader Drive more (since it's cheaper for mass production, covers more parts). And maybe Sanhua for $TSLA Optimus.

But prefer to advance Western supply chains with my capital over ones in China.

It's not just profiting off markets, but what you want to get accomplished as well (helping advance US supply chains and Robotics leaders).
我确实喜欢 Harmonic Drive (6324),它是西方 leader(比如 harmonic reduction gear),市值大约 ~$4.2B。

它占 robotics/humanoid BOM 价值很大一部分。

其实我更喜欢 Leader Drive(因为量产更便宜,覆盖更多部件)。也许 Sanhua 对 $TSLA Optimus 也不错。

但相比中国供应链,我更愿意用我的资本推进西方供应链。

这不只是从市场赚钱,也是你想推动完成什么(帮助推进美国供应链和 Robotics leaders)。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Imo harmonic drive (6324) one of the better humanoid exposure names at $4B valuation listed in GS research report.

Personally I picked some up for exposure.

Chinese competitors might be used for mass production.

But personal preference in investing in Western supply chains + build them up.
IMO harmonic drive(6324)是 GS 研究报告里列出的、估值 $4B 的人形机器人敞口里比较好的名字之一。

我个人买了一些来获得敞口。

中国竞争对手可能会被用于量产。

但我个人偏好投资西方供应链,并把它们建立起来。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2054722172728520886
❤️ 691 🔁 54 💬 58
打开原推
💬 引用
FOCI (3363) is one of the most undervalued CPO players in the entire market right now at ~$3B.

Their BOM is massive relative to MC and they're expected to capture a dominant market share for $NVDA / $TSM.

You only start to see this show up 2027 / 2028, even though we're entering H2 2026 now (which is what I mean by frontrunning CPO supercycle).
FOCI (3363) 是现在整个市场最被低估的 CPO 玩家之一,市值大约 ~$3B。

它的 BOM 相对市值很大,而且预计会在 $NVDA / $TSM 供应中拿到主导市场份额。

你要到 2027 / 2028 才会开始看到这些体现出来,尽管我们现在已经进入 H2 2026(这就是我说的 frontrunning CPO supercycle)。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
FOCI (3363) is looks extremely compelling around now at ~$3.35B MC for CPO exposure.

1. $TSM COUPE advanced packaging director hinted that FAU supplies by FOCI be a pretty big bottleneck for mass production.

2. Leading supplier for $NVDA and $TSM expected with up to 50% market share from Morgan Stanley note.

3. $HIMX signaled record demand and that Foci should scale up capacity (meaning high medium term demand visibility)

4. FAU and optical components make a large % of CPO related BOM from Goldman Sachs research note.

5. Overarching CPO tam basically goes from near 0 to $91B in the next two years from the GS note.

I’m very confident about this theme directionally over time (NFA), despite any recent market volatility.

Risks include getting designed out for later generations.

But over the next 1-2 years, I think it has high potential to be re-rated compared to other names but might need to be actively monitored.

Just throwing out ideas over long positions I hold, for more purer play CPO exposure.
FOCI(3363)现在约 $3.35B 市值,看起来是非常有吸引力的 CPO 敞口。

1. $TSM COUPE 先进封装负责人暗示,FOCI 供应的 FAU 可能会成为量产的一个很大瓶颈。

2. Morgan Stanley 报告预计,它会成为 $NVDA$TSM 的领先供应商,市场份额最高可达 50%。

3. $HIMX 暗示需求创纪录,并且 Foci 应该扩产(意味着中期需求可见度很高)。

4. 根据 Goldman Sachs 研究,FAU 和光学组件占 CPO 相关 BOM 很大比例。

5. GS 报告里整个 CPO TAM 基本会在未来两年从接近 0 增长到 $91B。

尽管近期市场波动,我对这个主题方向长期非常有信心(NFA)。

风险包括后续世代被 design out。

但未来 1-2 年,我认为它相比其他名字有很高的重估潜力,不过可能需要主动跟踪。

只是分享我持有多头仓位里的想法,用来获得更纯的 CPO 敞口。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2054365028820881794
❤️ 603 🔁 34 💬 42
打开原推
💬 引用
Took a month…

But my Shunsin (6451) CPO/SiPh idea is starting to play out.

I’m telling you with all these ideas like $IQE to $SOI, they randomly start going up like 1 month after my thesis posts… it’s extremely uncanny.

Maybe institution copy trading? https://t.co/qWGvNsJk2C
花了一个月……

但我的 Shunsin (6451) CPO/SiPh 想法开始兑现了。

我告诉你们,像 $IQE$SOI 这些想法,它们总是在我发 thesis 帖后大概 1 个月突然开始涨……这真的诡异得很。

也许是机构 copy trading? https://t.co/qWGvNsJk2C
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Taiwan $NVDA CPO supply chain ide #1:

Shunsin (6451 TWSE) - Photonics Packaging at ~$1.4B MC.

It's a subsidiary of Foxconn. And Foxconn is ODM for $NVDA.

It's almost like Celestial got listed by $MRVL and got a free piggy back ride?

Some personal est. 2027 fwd ~20 P/E, that compresses harder into 2028, 2029.

Shunsin's optical division openly lists their markets as "CPO 51.2T/102.4T" and "Pluggable XCVR 800G/1.6T.

Markets themselves as "Supported by Foxconn's vertically integrated supply chain for fast project ramp"

If you look at $TSM COUPE for $NVDA, they don't assemble final fiber arrays/racks, Foxconn does.

So $NVDA's CPO networking gear probably goes through Shunsin's alignment and bonding machines?

And $GOOGL, $META optical switches probably end up thorough them too since they scaled Vietnam CPO facilities (speculative).

Basically you get a free Foxconn piggy-back ride with this company at low forward multiples.

Disclosures: I am personally long.
台湾 $NVDA CPO 供应链想法 #1:

Shunsin(6451 TWSE)- Photonics Packaging,市值约 $1.4B。

它是 Foxconn 子公司。而 Foxconn 是 $NVDA 的 ODM。

这有点像 Celestial 被 $MRVL 上市,然后免费搭上顺风车?

我个人估算 2027 fwd P/E 约 20,到了 2028、2029 会进一步压缩。

Shunsin 光学部门公开列出的市场包括 “CPO 51.2T/102.4T” 和 “Pluggable XCVR 800G/1.6T”。

他们把自己定位为“由 Foxconn 垂直整合供应链支持,可快速推进项目放量”。

如果你看 $TSM COUPE 给 $NVDA 的部分,最终 fiber arrays/racks 不是 $TSM 组装,是 Foxconn 做。

所以 $NVDA 的 CPO 网络设备可能会经过 Shunsin 的 alignment 和 bonding 设备?

而且 $GOOGL$META 的 optical switches 最后可能也会通过他们,因为他们扩建了越南 CPO 设施(推测)。

基本上,你用较低 forward multiples 买到一家免费搭 Foxconn 顺风车的公司。

披露:我个人做多。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2043508231746810000
❤️ 527 🔁 18 💬 46
打开原推
💬 引用
Not a fan of $CBRS, especially at ~$90B-100B MC valuations.

But I do like the company.

There’s a lot of short term valuation disconnects with float dynamics after IPO as seen with $CRCL or $BULL though.

So would not be surprised if it ends up trading at absurd valuations for a short time until things correct.
我不是 $CBRS 的粉丝,尤其是在 ~$90B-100B 市值估值下。

但我确实喜欢这家公司。

不过 IPO 后,因为 float dynamics 会出现很多短期估值错位,就像 $CRCL$BULL 那样。

所以如果它短时间交易到荒谬估值,然后再修正,我也不会意外。
引用原推@TheMarathon8320
@aleabitoreddit Are you buying crbs here?
@aleabitoreddit 你现在在买 crbs 吗?
https://x.com/TheMarathon8320/status/2055061193279287643
❤️ 797 🔁 32 💬 101
打开原推
📝 原创
Why is our president stock trading like a FinX influencer... Going long on semi supply chains like $JBL to $AMAT?

Looks more like a self-made ETF rather than picking individual longs tbh.

Not surprised if he picks up $CRBS too lol.

Here were the top 100 long positions if you were curious.
为什么我们的总统炒股像个 FinX influencer……做多从 $JBL$AMAT 的半导体供应链?

说实话,这看起来更像一个自制 ETF,而不是在挑个股多头。

如果他也买 $CRBS,我也不会惊讶 lol。

如果你好奇,这里是前 100 个多头仓位。
❤️ 986 🔁 44 💬 102
打开原推
💬 引用
If you didn't know $POET is up 22% premarket on a $50m purchase from Lumilens.

Scaling to $500m with a longer term framework.

As mentioned in Sivers 2025 annual report: $POET is ramping up H2 2026 with $SIVE.

Any demand from these midstream players back to $SIVE as the laser chokepoint for everything.

So yes, this is highly bullish for Sivers.
如果你还不知道,$POET 盘前涨 22%,因为 Lumilens 下了 $50m 采购。

长期框架下会扩到 $500m。

正如 Sivers 2025 年报提到的:$POET 会在 H2 2026 和 $SIVE 一起爬坡。

这些中游玩家的任何需求,最终都会回到 $SIVE 这个所有东西的 laser chokepoint。

所以是的,这对 Sivers 非常 bullish。
引用原推@doodletrade
@aleabitoreddit Does today’s $POET news impact $SIVE ? Are Siver’s lasers part of the POET scope?
@aleabitoreddit 今天 $POET 的新闻会影响 $SIVE 吗?Siver 的 lasers 是 POET 范围的一部分吗?
https://x.com/doodletrade/status/2054887395489615984
❤️ 1,545 🔁 114 💬 146
打开原推
📝 原创
$SIVE 2025 annual report analysis.

TLDR: Extremely Bullish.

Sivers main growth vector is CPO, but they've TAM expansioned to pluggable transcivers + multiple new qualifications/development.

1. "We are currently seeing great interest... testing our DFB lasers across multiple manufacturers in pluggable transceivers"

For pluggable angle, we've seen this with $JBL 1.6T LRO already, but annual report hinted they're developing/qualifying with more hyperscaler suppliers.

"Our serviceable markets have now been expanded to include pluggable optical interconnects as well as scale-up and scale-out architectures for co-packaged" (TAM expansion)

2. "Discussions with hyperscalers and pluggable transceiver suppliers indicate a shortage of CW lasers in the coming years"

$LITE already signaled CW laser bottlenecks, and they had to buy externally from competitors. So we kinda guessed CW Laser was a bottleneck.

And this confirmed it, so was wondering about Win semi.

"The partnership announced with high-volume supplier Win Semiconductor in March 2025 now gives us a strong position to meet growing demand"

$SIVE likely has capacity locked in with Win from this nuance, which is exactly what I wanted to know.

This positions Sivers in the CW laser as both a bottleneck and CPO laser architectural leader.

VOLUME PRODUCTION H2 INDICATIONS (BULLISH):

3. "The collaboration positions both companies to address the rapidly growing market for optical AI connectivity, with prototypes to be demonstrated to customers during the first half of 2026 and with the goal of scaling up production by the end of 2026"

H1 is more preproduction, H2 production signaled starting with names like $POET.

4. "We are pleased that our largest LIDAR customer will increase production starting in the fourth quarter of 2026"

$AEVA start of volume production Q4 with $SIVE = bullish for both.

Revenue floor from LIDAR as their CPO scales.

5. Sivers announced a partnership with LIGHTIUM AG to integrate their CW lasers directly onto TFLN wafers. 3.2T+ cycle. (future proofing)

FYI no decent investor cares about last year's 2025 financials from development contracts aside from Swedish Media/Locals.

Especially when you're forward looking for the 2027-2028 CPO supercycle.

But the hint from you can take away from financials + geography that is $NOK is now the high confidence customer of $SIVE.

TLDR:

-> Win Semi implied capacity lock in during CW laser bottleneck
-> Hints of new group of hyperscaler suppliers testing/qualification for pluggable transcivers, which is massive TAM expansion.
-> New customers for CW lasers
-> Volume production scaling starting H2 for both photonics and lidar.
$SIVE 2025 年报分析。

TLDR:极度 Bullish。

Sivers 的主要增长方向是 CPO,但他们已经把 TAM 扩张到 pluggable transcivers + 多个新认证/开发。

1. “我们目前看到极大兴趣……多家 pluggable transceivers 制造商正在测试我们的 DFB lasers”

关于 pluggable 角度,我们已经在 $JBL 1.6T LRO 上看到这一点,但年报暗示他们还在和更多 hyperscaler suppliers 开发/认证。

“我们的 serviceable markets 现在已经扩大到包括 pluggable optical interconnects,以及 co-packaged 的 scale-up 和 scale-out architectures”(TAM expansion)

2. “与 hyperscalers 和 pluggable transceiver suppliers 的讨论显示,未来几年 CW lasers 会短缺”

$LITE 已经暗示 CW laser bottlenecks,而且他们不得不从竞争对手外购。所以我们算是猜到 CW Laser 是瓶颈了。

这次确认了,所以我一直在想 Win semi。

“2025 年 3 月宣布与高产量供应商 Win Semiconductor 的合作,现在让我们处在满足增长需求的强势位置”

从这个细节看,$SIVE 很可能已经锁定了 Win 的产能,这正是我想知道的。

这把 Sivers 定位成 CW laser 里的 bottleneck,同时也是 CPO laser architecture leader。

H2 VOLUME PRODUCTION 信号(BULLISH):

3. “该合作使两家公司能够服务快速增长的 optical AI connectivity 市场,原型将在 2026 年上半年向客户展示,目标是在 2026 年底前扩大生产”

H1 更像预生产,H2 则暗示从 $POET 这类名字开始生产。

4. “我们很高兴最大的 LIDAR 客户将从 2026 年第四季度开始提高产量”

$AEVA Q4 开始和 $SIVE 量产 = 对双方都 bullish。

LIDAR 收入给他们 CPO 扩张提供收入底。

5. Sivers 宣布与 LIGHTIUM AG 合作,将他们的 CW lasers 直接集成到 TFLN wafers 上。3.2T+ 周期。(future proofing)

FYI,除了瑞典媒体/本地人,没有像样投资者会在意去年 2025 年来自开发合同的财务。

尤其是当你看的是 2027-2028 CPO supercycle。

但你能从财务 + 地理位置拿到的一个线索是,$NOK 现在是 $SIVE 的高可信度客户。

TLDR:

-> Win Semi 暗示在 CW laser bottleneck 中锁定产能
-> 暗示有新一批 hyperscaler suppliers 正在测试/认证 pluggable transcivers,这是巨大的 TAM expansion。
-> CW lasers 新客户
-> photonics 和 lidar 都从 H2 开始量产扩张。
❤️ 1,996 🔁 187 💬 153
打开原推
💬 引用
IMO anything MicroLED is a waste of capital for CPO/photonics exposure over the next year.

Names like ams-OSRAM/AUO/Ennostar/Tyntek/PlayNitride, etc.

Any volume shipments would probably be H2 2028 or H1 2029 if it even takes off from development stage.

You're better looking at them for their other business segments.
IMO,未来一年里,任何 MicroLED 对 CPO/photonics 敞口来说都是浪费资本。

像 ams-OSRAM/AUO/Ennostar/Tyntek/PlayNitride 等等。

就算它真的从开发阶段起飞,任何规模出货也大概会是 H2 2028 或 H1 2029。

你最好从它们其他业务板块角度去看。
引用原推@jshdpk
@aleabitoreddit any thoughts on ams OSRAM? They have some interesting application areas in photonics. Is it just hype or they might actually deliver?
@aleabitoreddit 对 ams OSRAM 有什么看法?他们在 photonics 有一些有意思的应用领域。这只是炒作,还是他们真的可能交付?
https://x.com/jshdpk/status/2054191407829512321
❤️ 369 🔁 8 💬 46
打开原推
💬 引用
Interesting report that I missed that Shunsin (6451) landed $AVGO CPO/SiPH orders…

And their EPS growth rate could reach over 1240%.

Of course this is confidential and is media speculation.

But makes sense that all your top players use Foxconn for optical packaging/test. https://t.co/aqnUQEQdYS
我漏掉了一份有意思的报告,说 Shunsin (6451) 拿到了 $AVGO CPO/SiPH 订单……

而且它们 EPS 增速可能达到 1240% 以上。

当然这是保密的,也是媒体猜测。

但你所有顶级玩家都用 Foxconn 做 optical packaging/test,这很合理。 https://t.co/aqnUQEQdYS
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Pretty sure institutions like GS missed Shunsin (6451) at $1.65B for CPO packaging/test/assembly.

Which is why I'm very bullish on it as a completely backdoored, hidden + major beneficiary of $NVDA CPO ramp.

Foxconn is a major supply chain partner among $TSM and $ASX.

But… Shunsin is Foxconn's optical arm, and captures their captive optical and advanced packaging volume.

So they're not explicitly listed anywhere or have direct contracts with Nvidia (but Foxconn does)

But likely soaks up Nvidia CPO + other volumes through Foxconn vertical integration.
很确定 GS 这类机构漏掉了 Shunsin(6451),这家公司 $1.65B 市值,对应 CPO packaging/test/assembly。

这也是为什么我非常看多它,把它视为 $NVDA CPO ramp 的一个完全后门、隐藏且重要的受益者。

Foxconn 是 $TSM$ASX 之间的重要供应链伙伴。

但是……Shunsin 是 Foxconn 的光学部门,吃到他们内部光学和先进封装量。

所以它们不会被明确列在任何地方,也没有和 Nvidia 的直接合同(但 Foxconn 有)。

但它很可能通过 Foxconn 垂直整合吸收 Nvidia CPO + 其他订单量。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2051472715165704657
❤️ 541 🔁 30 💬 71
打开原推
💬 引用
Honestly I’m expecting FOCI (3363) to blow away projections over next two years.

It’s a pretty high conviction position for me medium term at this level.

Since they’re expected to be the leading supplier to $NVDA and $TSM and get frequently cited as a bottleneck for that $91B+ 2028 CPO TAM (GS).

Insane how it’s $3B MC as a critical CPO bottleneck required for scale, while LightWave Logic literally has around the same valuation at $2.7B in development stage.
说实话,我预计 FOCI (3363) 未来两年会大幅超出预期。

在这个水平上,中期来看这是我一个相当高信心的仓位。

因为它们预计会成为 $NVDA$TSM 的领先供应商,而且经常被点名为那个 $91B+ 2028 CPO TAM(GS)的瓶颈。

它作为扩产所需的关键 CPO 瓶颈,市值居然只有 $3B,而 LightWave Logic 明明还在开发阶段,估值却差不多也有 $2.7B,太疯狂了。
引用原推@soyunce_
@aleabitoreddit This is actually very interesting, their forecast EPS for 2028 is 47 TWD, which give them a PE OF 18, this is insane! Good find!
@aleabitoreddit 这其实非常有意思,他们 2028 年预测 EPS 是 47 TWD,对应 PE 只有 18,这太夸张了!好发现!
https://x.com/soyunce_/status/2054421637244825969
❤️ 692 🔁 42 💬 68
打开原推
💬 引用
Now that I think about it more…

Nextronics (8147) is a pretty undiscovered supplier to robotics supply chains like $AMZN too.

So as Amazon scales up, so does their revenue (it’s only ~$200m mc so it should be material if they’re hitting 38-40% gross margins).

I was only focusing on $NVDA CPO supply chains as their largest growth vector earlier.

But I do think Amazon’s robotics program have the simplest route for mass production since each one they make internally lowers opex, cuts headcount, and improves profitability.

And their whole ecosystem should benefit.
现在再想想……

Nextronics (8147) 其实也是像 $AMZN 这种 robotics 供应链里相当没被发现的供应商。

所以随着 Amazon 扩张,它们的收入也会增长(它市值只有 ~$200m,所以如果毛利率能到 38-40%,影响应该很大)。

我之前只是在关注它们最大的增长方向,也就是 $NVDA CPO 供应链。

但我确实认为 Amazon 的 robotics 项目拥有最简单的量产路径,因为它们内部每造一个,就能降低 opex、减少 headcount、提高盈利能力。

它们整个生态都应该受益。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
@Dog_Ziller I actually think $AMZN for robotics is extremely underrated.

Since since there’s immediate practical upside to lower opex + headcount for automation.

But for general purpose $TSLA, Unitree, Figure, Boston Dynamics, Agibot, Agility, and others should do well.
@Dog_Ziller 我其实觉得 $AMZN 在机器人方面被严重低估。

因为自动化可以立刻带来降低 opex + 人员数量的实际收益。

但在通用机器人方面,$TSLA、Unitree、Figure、Boston Dynamics、Agibot、Agility 等应该都会不错。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2054706428431286655
❤️ 793 🔁 49 💬 82
打开原推
💬 引用
Imo harmonic drive (6324) one of the better humanoid exposure names at $4B valuation listed in GS research report.

Personally I picked some up for exposure.

Chinese competitors might be used for mass production.

But personal preference in investing in Western supply chains + build them up.
Imo,harmonic drive (6324) 是 GS 研究报告里列出的更好的 humanoid 敞口名字之一,估值 $4B。

我个人买了一些来拿敞口。

中国竞争对手可能会用于量产。

但我个人偏好投资并建设西方供应链。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Interesting humanoid landscape and players that I came across from GS.

Lot of these are Chinese players sadly, it’s hard for me to talk about assets because don’t want to inadvertently

Vpg, as one of the few us players, BOM was a lot lower than I expected eg. $150/component mass production / $20K humanoid cost from earnings but makes a tiny bit more sense sense.

I’m sure they missed out on a bunch, just helps with focus areas on identifying new players.
从 GS 那里看到的人形机器人格局和玩家挺有意思。

很多都是中国玩家,可惜我不太好谈这些资产,因为不想无意中……

Vpg 作为少数美国玩家之一,BOM 比我预期低很多,比如财报里说量产每个组件 $150 / 人形机器人成本 $20K,这倒稍微说得通一些。

我确定他们漏掉了很多,但这有助于聚焦识别新玩家的方向。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2054673608484737042
❤️ 410 🔁 38 💬 46
打开原推
📝 原创
“Robotics may be the biggest product category of all time” - $CDNS CEO.

“The projection is $25 trillion. The whole GDP of the world is $110 trillion. So this is huge if this happens.”

Extremely bullish on robotics/humanoids directionally.

But maybe it’s time for $TSLA and America to really start prioritizing how we build it outside Chinese supply chains?
“Robotics 可能是有史以来最大的产品类别” - $CDNS CEO。

“预测是 $25 trillion。整个世界 GDP 是 $110 trillion。所以如果这发生,会非常巨大。”

方向上对 robotics/humanoids 极度 bullish。

但也许是时候让 $TSLA 和美国真正开始优先考虑,如何在中国供应链之外建设它了?
❤️ 1,468 🔁 96 💬 107
打开原推
📝 原创
What an insane day for photonics.

$SIVE up 31.3%
$TSEM up 23.1%
$AAOI 20.01%.

It feels like a lot… but this just means you’re early to the next supercycle and there’s a lot of room to go.

Lot of people on X ask what’s next after $SNDK?

Here they are. https://t.co/jTeHpYtf0n
Photonics 今天太疯狂了。

$SIVE 涨 31.3%
$TSEM 涨 23.1%
$AAOI 涨 20.01%。

感觉涨很多……但这只意味着你还早,站在下一轮 supercycle 前面,后面还有很大空间。

X 上很多人问 $SNDK 之后是什么?

就在这里。 https://t.co/jTeHpYtf0n
❤️ 2,762 🔁 212 💬 177
打开原推
💬 引用
Woah, this list compiled by you all….

Actually cooked so hard.

Many are up 2-6 times already.
哇,你们整理的这个名单……

真的太强了。

很多已经涨了 2-6 倍。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Serenity's Followers Favorite Stock Parabolic Growth ETF:

The most anticipated ETF of all time:

$TRT - $5.88
$HGRAF - $4.49
$SIVE - 9.9 SEK
$QURE - $17.21
$AEHR - $45.08
$ENVX - $5.07
$ASPI - $4.2
$EONR - $11.79
$LPK.DE - 6.59 EUR
$MITK - $13.9
$EQR.AX - .315 AUD
$WATT - $15.8
$VLN - $1.16
$BZAI - $1.79
$TMC - $4.59
$ALCJ - $74.57
$POET - $6.11
$AAOI - $108.86
$ADUR - $10.37
$P4O.DE - 6.85 EUR
$PLAB - $40.87
$FLY - $33.16
$LASR - $60.7
$AL2SI - 28.70 EUR
$ENAFF - $1.71
$VPG - $44.7
$EOS.AX - $9.00

I haven't heard of 1/3rd of these names, but if my followers have high conviction that their name will 10x...

So do I.
Serenity 粉丝最爱股票抛物线增长 ETF:

史上最受期待 ETF:

$TRT - $5.88
$HGRAF - $4.49
$SIVE - 9.9 SEK
$QURE - $17.21
$AEHR - $45.08
$ENVX - $5.07
$ASPI - $4.2
$EONR - $11.79
$LPK.DE - 6.59 EUR
$MITK - $13.9
$EQR.AX - .315 AUD
$WATT - $15.8
$VLN - $1.16
$BZAI - $1.79
$TMC - $4.59
$ALCJ - $74.57
$POET - $6.11
$AAOI - $108.86
$ADUR - $10.37
$P4O.DE - 6.85 EUR
$PLAB - $40.87
$FLY - $33.16
$LASR - $60.7
$AL2SI - 28.70 EUR
$ENAFF - $1.71
$VPG - $44.7
$EOS.AX - $9.00

这里面 1/3 的名字我都没听过,但如果我的粉丝高度确信他们的名字会 10x……

那我也信。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2039906072291611057
❤️ 1,154 🔁 49 💬 101
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Interesting humanoid landscape and players that I came across from GS.

Lot of these are Chinese players sadly, it’s hard for me to talk about assets because don’t want to inadvertently

Vpg, as one of the few us players, BOM was a lot lower than I expected eg. $150/component mass production / $20K humanoid cost from earnings but makes a tiny bit more sense sense.

I’m sure they missed out on a bunch, just helps with focus areas on identifying new players.
从 GS 那里看到一个有意思的 humanoid landscape 和玩家。

可惜很多都是中国玩家,我很难谈这些资产,因为不想无意间

Vpg 作为少数美国玩家之一,BOM 比我预期低很多,比如财报里说量产 $150/component / $20K humanoid cost,但现在稍微更说得通了。

我确定他们漏掉了一堆,这只是帮助聚焦识别新玩家的方向。
❤️ 537 🔁 23 💬 64
打开原推
💬 引用
I like how $HPS.A is just a vertical line up 2-3% increase every day since my thesis post.

Just 20 CAD away before it hits triple digit returns. https://t.co/CHqWQKzH5E
我喜欢 $HPS.A 从我发 thesis 帖以来,每天就是一条竖线涨 2-3%。

离三位数回报只差 20 CAD 了。 https://t.co/CHqWQKzH5E
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The current bottleneck: Transformers/Switchgear. 

Trade Idea: Long Hammond (~2.2B CAD / ~$1.5B USD) at 184 CAD.

They dominate the market for:

-Transformers (dry, multi year bottleneck ~23% of market),

-serve to switchgear (2-3Y bottleneck)

-and manufacture liquid too (5Y, larger bottleneck)

I personally anticipate components price hikes like NAND, as $AMZN, $MSFT and others compete for allocation. 

You might have seen: “Half of US data center builds have been delayed or canceled, growth limited by shortages of power infrastructure”…

Then you go further:

“To address shortages… Canada, Mexico… became the biggest suppliers of high-power transformers for AI data centers to AI data centers”

Guess who is in Canada (Guelph).. Mexico (Monterrey 3 and 4)… and the US?

Hammond

Then here’s the reason the articles cite why hyperscaler DB buildouts are falling apart: 

“Major reason behind these setbacks is the availability of key electrical components — such as transformers, switchgear”. 

Institutions are probably looking at Powell, Eaton, and others… but little do they know?

Companies like these actually buy Hammond’s transformers to put inside their own switchgear (“strong sales into data centres, switchgear manufacturers")

Their market share over the transformers market is actually pretty large (eg. ~23% dry). 

The most compelling signal:

-> 122% Y/Y 2025 backlog increase. And we can infer this to be 1B+ CAD. 

Eg. company achieved 898m CAD in sales in 2025, capacity ceiling. Management said close of Q3 2025 orders were valued at 53% of the entire closing third-quarter backlog.

Given that Q4 2025 revenue was 254 million and the backlog is "more than doubled," we can infer a total backlog value exceeding 1 billion CAD.

Also:

“Gross margin compression last year was due to the buildout of their Mexico facility, but both gross margins are expected to increase and the facility expansions are expectied to turn into accelerated revenue Q2 2026)” which is now.

Downside is if raw material costs (copper, electrical steel) spike again, but given this bottleneck, they can price hike. 

Personal FWD P/E estimates would be ~18-21 for 2026, <15 for 2027 from volume ramp.

But I think it’s possible to hit single digit fwd P/E if they do price hikes mixed with hyperscaler emergency orders. But that might get a little mixed with the new acquisition.

Regardless still looks cheap. 

Just a TLDR: 
$AMZN, $MSFT, $META, $GOOGL, $ORCL datacenter are being bottlenecked because of a lack of transformers/switchgear.

Seems like markets missed this little player with large market share, despite backlog visibility and increasing revenue from capacity expansion coming online.

I personally found it pretty compelling, so I went long.

Just sharing my personal thoughts, of course DYOR before making any decisions yourself.
当前瓶颈:Transformers/Switchgear。

交易想法:做多 Hammond(约 2.2B CAD / 约 $1.5B USD),价格 184 CAD。

他们主导这些市场:

- Transformers(dry,多年瓶颈,约 23% 市场份额),

- 服务 switchgear(2-3 年瓶颈)

- 也生产 liquid(5 年,更大的瓶颈)

我个人预计组件会像 NAND 一样涨价,因为 $AMZN$MSFT 等在争抢 allocation。

你可能看过:“一半美国数据中心建设被推迟或取消,增长受电力基础设施短缺限制”……

再往下看:

“为了解决短缺……加拿大、墨西哥……成为 AI 数据中心高功率 transformers 的最大供应地”

猜猜谁在加拿大(Guelph)、墨西哥(Monterrey 3 和 4)以及美国都有布局?

Hammond

然后文章引用 hyperscaler DC buildout 出问题的原因:

“这些挫折背后的主要原因,是关键电气组件的可用性,例如 transformers、switchgear”。

机构可能在看 Powell、Eaton 等……但他们不知道的是?

这些公司实际上会买 Hammond 的 transformers,放进自己的 switchgear(“对数据中心、switchgear manufacturers 的销售强劲”)

他们在 transformers 市场的份额其实很大(例如 dry 约 23%)。

最有说服力的信号:

-> 2025 年 backlog 同比增长 122%。我们可以推断这超过 1B CAD。

例如公司 2025 年实现 898m CAD 销售,已经到产能天花板。管理层说,2025 年 Q3 末订单价值相当于整个三季度期末 backlog 的 53%。

考虑到 Q4 2025 收入是 254 million,而 backlog “more than doubled”,我们可以推断总 backlog 超过 1 billion CAD。

另外:

“去年毛利率承压是因为墨西哥工厂建设,但预计毛利率会提升,工厂扩张也会在 2026 Q2 转化为加速收入”,也就是现在。

下行风险是原材料成本(铜、电工钢)再次上涨,但考虑到这个瓶颈,他们可以涨价。

我个人的 FWD P/E 估算是 2026 年约 18-21,2027 年随着放量低于 15。

但如果他们涨价并叠加 hyperscaler 紧急订单,我认为 forward P/E 有可能到个位数。不过这可能会和新收购有些混在一起。

不管怎样,看起来仍然便宜。

简单 TLDR:

$AMZN$MSFT$META$GOOGL$ORCL 数据中心正因为缺少 transformers/switchgear 被卡住。

尽管有 backlog 可见度和产能扩张上线带来的收入增长,市场似乎漏掉了这个拥有大份额的小玩家。

我个人觉得很有吸引力,所以做多了。

只是分享个人想法,当然你做任何决定前都要 DYOR。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041168871168545115
❤️ 567 🔁 28 💬 81
打开原推
📝 原创
$AAOI is now up ~6-7x at $200+.

Feels like nobody else was long last year aside from me and like two other people on X?

Remains one of my top high conviction optical longs moving forward into 2027 due to massive revenue ramp + Made in America supply chains. https://t.co/HD0724F2vE
$AAOI 现在已经涨了 ~6-7 倍,到 $200+。

感觉去年除了我和 X 上另外两个人,没人做多?

由于巨大收入爬坡 + Made in America 供应链,展望 2027,它仍然是我最高信心的 optical longs 之一。 https://t.co/HD0724F2vE
❤️ 1,503 🔁 74 💬 137
打开原推
💬 引用
Just in case you were wondering $TSEM reported extra prepayment ($290M) to secure capacity.

Downstream foundry capacity squeeze directly translates to an immense demand for raw substrates upstream with $SOI (more revenue).

My optical picks are very interconnected. https://t.co/4vIAvS1jOl
以防你想知道,$TSEM 报告了额外预付款($290M)来锁定产能。

下游 foundry capacity squeeze 会直接转化成上游 raw substrates 的巨大需求,利好 $SOI(更多收入)。

我的 optical picks 彼此高度互联。 https://t.co/4vIAvS1jOl
引用原推@YHPxo
@aleabitoreddit Is $SOI already facing substrate supply tightness?
If CPO scale-up accelerates, will Tower sign a longer-term strategic supply agreement with them, or stick to the spot market for flexibility?
@aleabitoreddit $SOI 已经面临基板供应紧张了吗?
如果 CPO scale-up 加速,Tower 会和他们签更长期的战略供应协议,还是继续用现货市场保持灵活性?
https://x.com/YHPxo/status/2054528515270472146
❤️ 566 🔁 27 💬 67
打开原推
💬 引用
And exactly 2 months later.

$TSEM is trading at $250+ post earnings.

The vast majority of my picks keep making ATHs every day after there’s more time for the thesis to play out.

Did you listen anon? https://t.co/rGXFKwPC51
而正好 2 个月后。

$TSEM 财报后交易在 $250+。

我的绝大多数 picks,在 thesis 有更多时间兑现后,每天都在不断创 ATH。

你听了吗 anon? https://t.co/rGXFKwPC51
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I'm long $TSEM, the $TSM of photonics.

My top two picks for CPO are $SOI and Tower Semi.

Given the $NVDA GTC catalyst on new photonic related architecture next week:

I expect Tower Semi to get a huge catalyst.

Nvidia laready directly collaborated with Tower to scale 1.6T silicon photonics last month (hint hint for GTC), likely pushing the downstream players to use it.

And now, Tower is the leading supplier of 1.6T SiPh PICs and the primary foundry for scale-up CPO architectures. (the other being global foundries)

From my forward est:
2028 Forward P/E: ~16.8x to ~18.1x

(Tower set a target $2.84B revenue by 2028, with ~31.7% operating margin, ~$750M in net profit)

The thing to note is over 70% of their planned SiPh capacity is already reserved through 2028. And photonics haven't even ramped up yet.

So, I expect them to strongly beat earning projections due to extreme photonics scaling + allocations price hikes that's not modeled into projections.

Also, $TSEM is heavily de-risked by 70% of capacity already being reserved. MC is likely due to $TSEM being a very obscure upstream player in the photonics supply chain.

But I expect the $NVDA GTC conference to be that catalyst that brings it to premium valuations.

I'm long $TSEM as an asymmetrical upside for upstream photonics foundry layer.
我做多 $TSEM,它就是光子领域的 $TSM

我对 CPO 的前两大选择是 $SOI 和 Tower Semi。

考虑到下周 $NVDA GTC 对新的光子相关架构有催化:

我预计 Tower Semi 会迎来巨大催化。

Nvidia 上个月已经直接和 Tower 合作,扩大 1.6T 硅光规模(给 GTC 的暗示),很可能推动下游玩家使用它。

现在,Tower 是 1.6T SiPh PIC 的领先供应商,也是 scale-up CPO 架构的主要晶圆厂(另一个是 global foundries)。

按我的前瞻估算:
2028 Forward P/E:约 16.8x 到 18.1x

(Tower 设定了 2028 年 $2.84B 收入目标,约 31.7% 经营利润率,约 $750M 净利润)

需要注意的是,他们规划中的 SiPh 产能超过 70% 已经预定到 2028 年。而光子还没真正放量。

所以我预计他们会因为极端的光子扩产 + allocation 涨价,大幅超过盈利预测,而这些还没有被模型计入。

另外,$TSEM 也因为 70% 产能已被预定而大幅去风险。市值可能是因为 $TSEM 是光子供应链里非常冷门的上游玩家。

但我预计 $NVDA GTC 会成为让它获得溢价估值的催化。

我做多 $TSEM,把它当作上游光子晶圆厂层的非对称上行机会。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031820871170736570
❤️ 804 🔁 36 💬 67
打开原推
📝 原创
$NBIS earnings were stellar and it’s now trading $200+ premarket.

Reiterated $7-9B ARR in 2026. 40% adj. EBITDA margin projections, which is vastly outperforming expectations.

4 GW contracted capacity. $6.3B capital secured by $NVDA off solid financial offering structures.

Glad my high conviction Neocloud pick is performing wonders and happy management is executing so well.

In the words of Jensen: “Nebius will take care of you”
$NBIS 财报非常亮眼,现在盘前交易在 $200+。

重申 2026 年 $7-9B ARR。40% adj. EBITDA margin 预测,远超预期。

4 GW 签约产能。通过扎实的融资结构,从 $NVDA 获得 $6.3B 资本。

很高兴我高信心的 Neocloud pick 表现这么好,也很高兴管理层执行得这么出色。

用 Jensen 的话说:“Nebius will take care of you”
❤️ 1,731 🔁 110 💬 95
打开原推
💬 引用
Wow, $SIVE to be listed in the MSCI Global Small Cap Index.

This is overwhelmly positively as it triggers more passive inflows as the MC grows.

Rebalancing takes places May 29th.
哇,$SIVE 将被纳入 MSCI Global Small Cap Index。

这极其正面,因为随着市值增长,它会触发更多被动流入。

调仓在 5 月 29 日进行。
引用原推@user637826
@aleabitoreddit Now it’s also being listed to the MSCI Small Cap Index.

Swedish article: https://t.co/wefk4hogfL
@aleabitoreddit 现在它也被纳入 MSCI Small Cap Index 了。

瑞典文章: https://t.co/wefk4hogfL
https://x.com/user637826/status/2054501355969011759
❤️ 1,779 🔁 112 💬 118
打开原推
💬 引用
To make things even spicier.

$SIVE is run by UC Berkeley CEOs and $LITE executives.

And the ownership cab table is now controlled by American institutions/investors.

I’d expect things to speed up on NASDAQ listing as American institutions are heavy fond of executive teams + cap tables like this.

US/Silicon Valley is now speedrunning a Swedish in name photonics company.
为了让事情更 spicy 一点。

$SIVE 由 UC Berkeley CEOs 和 $LITE 高管运营。

而所有权 cap table 现在由美国机构/投资者控制。

我预计 NASDAQ listing 后事情会加速,因为美国机构非常喜欢这样的高管团队 + cap table。

美国/Silicon Valley 现在正在 speedrun 一家名义上的瑞典 photonics 公司。
引用原推@user637826
Did you know this about $SIVE?

Neeraj Chopra, VP of Global Operations at Sivers Semiconductors, spent 19 years as Vice President at Lumentum ($LITE) from 1999–2018.

$LITE is one of the greatest success stories in photonics.

That same expertise is now inside $SIVE’s team. https://t.co/9ZBK6NGEOT
你知道 $SIVE 这件事吗?

Sivers Semiconductors 全球运营 VP Neeraj Chopra,1999-2018 年在 Lumentum($LITE)做了 19 年副总裁。

$LITE 是 photonics 领域最伟大的成功故事之一。

同样的专业能力现在就在 $SIVE 团队里。 https://t.co/9ZBK6NGEOT
https://x.com/user637826/status/2054454139560599916
❤️ 1,277 🔁 67 💬 68
打开原推
💬 引用
To answer that question.

I’ll just float some historical data out there with laser chokepoints:

$LITE went from $3B -> $15B -> $80B in 2 years from 2024.

$AAOI went from $770M -> $15B in 1 year from 2025.

$SIVE is $1.6B today in 2026.

There’s not many in the world and lasers are the absolute center of photonics.

Each owned a specific chokepoint from optical architectural shifts.

$LITE for EML.

$AAOI for cw 800g/1.6T pluggable

and now $SIVE for cw CPO.
回答那个问题。

我就放一些 laser chokepoints 的历史数据:

$LITE 从 2024 年起,2 年内从 $3B -> $15B -> $80B。

$AAOI 从 2025 年起,1 年内从 $770M -> $15B。

$SIVE 今天在 2026 年是 $1.6B。

世界上这样的公司不多,而 lasers 是 photonics 的绝对中心。

每家公司都拥有 optical architectural shifts 里的一个特定 chokepoint。

$LITE 对应 EML。

$AAOI 对应 cw 800g/1.6T pluggable

现在 $SIVE 对应 cw CPO。
引用原推@nathanshipley_
@aleabitoreddit So is $SIVE the best play for CPO
@aleabitoreddit 所以 $SIVE 是 CPO 最好的标的吗?
https://x.com/nathanshipley_/status/2054466181013057996
❤️ 1,762 🔁 154 💬 109
打开原推
📝 原创
People wonder why I'm focusing on non-US markets recently.

Why? CPO is my #1 thematic long.

Markets don't know yet, the sudden paradigm shift in photonics...

I was one of the only to frontrun the current supercycle in 2025 w/ $AAOI @ ~$30, $LITE ~$300s, and $AXTI at ~$13 on X....

With the actual receipts and thesis that others can't show.

CPO goes from ~$0. To $91 Billion TAM opportunity.

In the next 1 1/2 years from GS research.

While overall optical market reaches $154B.

Many players that had little exposure to the current photonics cycle at all:

-> In Europe with high-end lasers design like $SIVE or $SOI with substrates.
-> In Taiwan with Foci (3363), Nextronics (8147), Shunsin (6451) and others for optical components and foundries.
-> In Japan with laser mass production, substrates, and chemicals.

Are suddenly the new dominant players for CPO.

As for US players, there's not much exposure. But the existing ones like $LITE, $COHR still get upside from CPO as that's their new growth vector.

My contrarian thought process on current players:

Is that most of their valuation is priced in huge legacy pluggable revenue that will inevitably face cannibalization over time, so re-rating potential is less unless someone uses leverage.

A lot of these new purer play CPO names go from 0 to 100 extremely quickly one mass production starts H2 2026 for scale out (as a revenue bridge) into H2 2027 for scale up (massive growth driver).

Markets usually price things in 8-12 months ahead of time too...

I have high conviction thematically in my supply chain research despite any market volatility leading up until then.
大家好奇我为什么最近关注非美国市场。

为什么?CPO 是我 #1 主题多头。

市场还不知道 photonics 这次突然的范式转变……

我是少数几个在 X 上提前抢跑当前 supercycle 的人之一,2025 年就在 $AAOI ~$30、$LITE ~$300s、$AXTI ~$13 点出来……

而且有真实记录和 thesis,别人拿不出来。

CPO 从 ~$0 到 $91 Billion TAM opportunity。

根据 GS 研究,就在接下来 1 年半里。

同时整体 optical market 达到 $154B。

很多此前几乎没有当前 photonics 周期敞口的玩家:

-> 欧洲有 $SIVE 这种 high-end lasers design,或 $SOI 这种 substrates。
-> 台湾有 Foci (3363)、Nextronics (8147)、Shunsin (6451) 等 optical components 和 foundries。
-> 日本有 laser mass production、substrates 和 chemicals。

突然变成 CPO 的新主导玩家。

至于美国玩家,敞口不多。但现有玩家如 $LITE$COHR 仍会从 CPO 中获得上行,因为这是它们的新增长方向。

我对当前玩家的逆向思考是:

它们大部分估值都 priced in 了巨大的 legacy pluggable revenue,而这部分收入迟早会被逐步蚕食,所以除非有人用杠杆,否则 re-rating 潜力较低。

很多这些更纯的 CPO 新名字,会在 H2 2026 scale out 开始量产(作为收入桥梁)到 H2 2027 scale up(巨大增长驱动)时,从 0 到 100 变得非常快。

市场通常也会提前 8-12 个月定价……

尽管在此之前会有任何市场波动,我对自己供应链研究的主题方向有高信心。
❤️ 1,806 🔁 129 💬 99
打开原推
💬 引用
So here's the napkin math I did on Nextronics (8147) when I went long.

They're the $NVDA CPO supplier for CPO connectors and cage thermal modules.

And I modeled around 2 FWD p/e for 2028, which is why I think risk-reward is very compelling for a potential 10x rerating to ~$2B+ MC in 2028.

Just for their CPO exposure:

-> CPO connector runs roughly $15 to $25
-> ELS thermal cages, maybe ~$50 from est.

18 units per switch: 18x50 = ~$900
CPO Connectors: 72 Optical Engines per switch 72 x $15 = $1,080
(If $NVDA scales their Spectrum-X switch, it goes to $1,920 for CPO connectors).

Total Nextronics Content: ~$1,980 (rounded to $2k for calculations) in conservative case.

Implied BOM % of rack: 0.08%. Maybe ~1.5% of switch.

This looks microscopic to institutions so it probably is ignored.

Is it material to Nextronics, a ~$200m company?

Yes, absolute massive.

For calculations: Applying 50% haircut to Nextronics' share of the Nvidia connector market/cage market because of multi-source.

And I’m using GS projections, and assuming $AVGO, $MRVL, ASIC CPO ecosystem is 30% size of $NVDA.

Net Income Margin: 22.4% (at 38% GM)- 24.0% (at 40% GM).

But going off other projections from just, a rack shipments:

2026: CPO revenue ~10.1M, net income (22.4%)

~2.26M + $12.5M base = $14.7M (540k units for connectors, cage, 40K units, already divided by 50%)

2027: CPO revenue: ~$172M, net income (22.4%): ~$38.53M = $51.03M (~8M units for connectors, ~1.03M units for cage)

2028 scale up expansion: CPO revenue: $450m, net income: $100.93M, ~$11.3M base (~40M units for connectors, 2.98M unit for cages, eg. Nvidia ELS volume is 19.9M)

So implied fwd p/e 15.4x for 2026, 4.45x for 2027, 2x for 2028.

Of course at scale, blended margins might go down, there might be other players bringing market share down to like 25%, etc. and projections might be more or less than GS.

But regardless seems highly asymmetrical even if I'm off by a whole 50%.

2028 is usually the massive re-rating for CPO players, 2026 is still really early.

Hope my math is right, but 20x fwd p/e multiple would be $2.26B MC.

Even if we drop:

-> market share to just 15%.
-> compress their net income margin down to 14%.
-> connector ASP to $10.

At a 20x multiple, the stock would still achieve a ~4.5x return to a $1B+ market cap.

We'll see if this is right or not. (NFA, just speculative financial modeling)
这是我做多 Nextronics (8147) 时做的粗略计算。

它们是 $NVDA CPO 的 CPO connectors 和 cage thermal modules 供应商。

我模型里 2028 年大概是 2 倍 FWD p/e,这也是为什么我觉得风险回报非常有吸引力,2028 年有潜在 10x 重估到 ~$2B+ 市值。

只看它们的 CPO 敞口:

-> CPO connector 大约 $15 到 $25
-> ELS thermal cages,估计可能 ~$50。

每台 switch 18 个:18x50 = ~$900
CPO Connectors:每台 switch 72 个 Optical Engines,72 x $15 = $1,080
(如果 $NVDA 扩张 Spectrum-X switch,CPO connectors 会到 $1,920)。

Nextronics 总 Content:保守情况下 ~$1,980(计算中四舍五入到 $2k)。

隐含 BOM 占 rack:0.08%。可能是 switch 的 ~1.5%。

这在机构眼里看起来微不足道,所以可能被忽略。

但对 Nextronics 这种 ~$200m 公司来说重要吗?

是的,绝对巨大。

计算中:我给 Nextronics 在 Nvidia connector market/cage market 的份额打 50% 折扣,因为 multi-source。

我使用 GS 预测,并假设 $AVGO$MRVL、ASIC CPO ecosystem 是 $NVDA 规模的 30%。

Net Income Margin:22.4%(38% GM)- 24.0%(40% GM)。

但只按 rack shipments 的其他预测:

2026:CPO revenue ~10.1M,net income(22.4%)

~2.26M + $12.5M base = $14.7M(connectors 540k units,cage 40K units,已经除以 50%)

2027:CPO revenue:~$172M,net income(22.4%):~$38.53M = $51.03M(connectors ~8M units,cage ~1.03M units)

2028 scale up expansion:CPO revenue:$450m,net income:$100.93M,~$11.3M base(connectors ~40M units,cages 2.98M units,比如 Nvidia ELS volume 是 19.9M)

所以隐含 fwd p/e:2026 年 15.4x,2027 年 4.45x,2028 年 2x。

当然,规模上来后 blended margins 可能下降,可能有其他玩家把市场份额压到 25% 之类,预测也可能比 GS 更多或更少。

但无论如何,即使我整个错了 50%,看起来仍然非常不对称。

2028 通常是 CPO 玩家大幅 re-rating 的年份,2026 仍然非常早。

希望我的数学是对的,但 20x fwd p/e multiple 会是 $2.26B 市值。

即使我们把:

-> 市场份额降到只有 15%。
-> net income margin 压到 14%。
-> connector ASP 降到 $10。

在 20x multiple 下,股票仍然能实现约 ~4.5x 回报,到 $1B+ 市值。

我们看看这对不对。(NFA,只是 speculative financial modeling)
引用原推@Xecvvv
@aleabitoreddit It'd be great if you included your revenue models and projections whenever you share positions you enter.

I know in the past you've said it's to simplify for retail, but easier to build conviction when we can see your reasoning and actual numbers (and allow us to double check).
@aleabitoreddit 如果你在分享建仓仓位时能带上你的收入模型和预测就太好了。

我知道你以前说过这是为了让散户更容易理解,但如果我们能看到你的推理和具体数字,会更容易建立 conviction(也方便我们复核)。
https://x.com/Xecvvv/status/2053644933244780690
❤️ 945 🔁 89 💬 69
打开原推
📝 原创
FOCI (3363) is looks extremely compelling around now at ~$3.35B MC for CPO exposure.

1. $TSM COUPE advanced packaging director hinted that FAU supplies by FOCI be a pretty big bottleneck for mass production.

2. Leading supplier for $NVDA and $TSM expected with up to 50% market share from Morgan Stanley note.

3. $HIMX signaled record demand and that Foci should scale up capacity (meaning high medium term demand visibility)

4. FAU and optical components make a large % of CPO related BOM from Goldman Sachs research note.

5. Overarching CPO tam basically goes from near 0 to $91B in the next two years from the GS note.

I’m very confident about this theme directionally over time (NFA), despite any recent market volatility.

Risks include getting designed out for later generations.

But over the next 1-2 years, I think it has high potential to be re-rated compared to other names but might need to be actively monitored.

Just throwing out ideas over long positions I hold, for more purer play CPO exposure.
FOCI (3363) 现在在 ~$3.35B 市值附近,作为 CPO 敞口看起来极具吸引力。

1. $TSM COUPE advanced packaging director 暗示,FOCI 供应的 FAU 可能是量产的一个很大瓶颈。

2. Morgan Stanley note 预计它会成为 $NVDA$TSM 的领先供应商,市场份额最高可达 50%。

3. $HIMX 暗示创纪录需求,并表示 Foci 应该扩大产能(意味着中期需求可见性高)

4. FAU 和 optical components 在 Goldman Sachs 研究报告里占 CPO 相关 BOM 的很大比例。

5. 总体 CPO tam 根据 GS note,基本从接近 0 到未来两年 $91B。

尽管最近有市场波动,我对这个主题方向随着时间非常有信心(NFA)。

风险包括后续世代被 design out。

但未来 1-2 年,我认为它相对其他名字有很高的 re-rating 潜力,不过可能需要主动跟踪。

只是把我持有的多头仓位想法抛出来,作为更纯的 CPO 敞口。
❤️ 584 🔁 39 💬 56
打开原推
💬 引用
Here's the humanoid exposure crowdsourced list:

- $OUST
- Rainbow Robotics (277810)
- $AMBA
- Ubtech Robotics
- $MKA
- Nextronics
- $SYM
- Harmonic Drive (6324)
- $VPG
- Beijing Geekplus
- $MBLY
- $ARBE
- Nabtesco (6268)
- $SERV
- $HSYDF
- Robotstrategy
- $ZBRA
- $CATL
- $ABB
- $BOT
- Unitree (not public yet)
- $LSCC
- Esunny Robot (300024)
- $NOVT
- $RR
- $PDY
- Hesai (2525)
- $SHA.DE
- $XBOT
- $XPEV
- $BAM
- $ALNT
- 6268.T
- $AMBQ
- $ATOM
- $MRAM
- $ISRG
- $HLIT
- Robosense (2498)
- $HG
- $ACUVI
- $CGNX
- $KLIC
- $BSL
- $AEVA
- $AUR
- $CTH.V
- $IMSR
- $NEO
- $KDK
- $MRLN
- $KITT
- $INDI
- $NOVT

Off the top of my head:

Harmonic Drive, $OUST, $BOT, $VPG, $MBLY, and Ubtech showed up the most.

Will start doing DD into mentions.
Here's the humanoid exposure crowdsourced list:

- $OUST
- Rainbow Robotics (277810)
- $AMBA
- Ubtech Robotics
- $MKA
- Nextronics
- $SYM
- Harmonic Drive (6324)
- $VPG
- Beijing Geekplus
- $MBLY
- $ARBE
- Nabtesco (6268)
- $SERV
- $HSYDF
- Robotstrategy
- $ZBRA
- $CATL
- $ABB
- $BOT
- Unitree (not public yet)
- $LSCC
- Esunny Robot (300024)
- $NOVT
- $RR
- $PDY
- Hesai (2525)
- $SHA.DE
- $XBOT
- $XPEV
- $BAM
- $ALNT
- 6268.T
- $AMBQ
- $ATOM
- $MRAM
- $ISRG
- $HLIT
- Robosense (2498)
- $HG
- $ACUVI
- $CGNX
- $KLIC
- $BSL
- $AEVA
- $AUR
- $CTH.V
- $IMSR
- $NEO
- $KDK
- $MRLN
- $KITT
- $INDI
- $NOVT

Off the top of my head:

Harmonic Drive, $OUST, $BOT, $VPG, $MBLY, and Ubtech showed up the most.

Will start doing DD into mentions.
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
All right chat.

I need some more ideas on the early $RKLB equivalent for humanoid exposure.

10x+ potential returns only in the next 2 years and more pure play exposure than $TSLA.

What’s your best ideas?
好吧 chat。

我需要更多关于早期 $RKLB 等价物的人形机器人敞口想法。

只要未来 2 年有 10x+ 潜在回报,而且比 $TSLA 更纯的敞口。

你们最好的想法是什么?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2054183097470775339
❤️ 3,568 🔁 347 💬 235
打开原推
📝 原创
Highly bullish implications today for Shunsin (6451).

Which is Foxconn’s SiPH and CPO packaging/test arm.

-> UDN reported upward revision in volume and Foxconn began shipping cpo switch racks to $NVDA

-> CPO products are being produced in Foxconn's Vietnam plant…

Guess which company has been aggressively expanding its Bac Giang, Vietnam facility for CPO for the past few years?

As I said before Shunsin is basically a free hard-carry by Foxconn.

Was just very early but this looks to be the start of a massive growth curve.
今天对 Shunsin (6451) 的含义非常 bullish。

它是 Foxconn 的 SiPH 和 CPO packaging/test 部门。

-> UDN 报道量能上修,Foxconn 开始向 $NVDA 出货 cpo switch racks

-> CPO products 正在 Foxconn 的越南工厂生产……

猜猜过去几年哪家公司一直在积极扩张它在越南 Bac Giang 的 CPO 设施?

就像我之前说的,Shunsin 基本就是被 Foxconn 免费 hard-carry。

只是非常早,但这看起来像一条巨大增长曲线的开始。
❤️ 491 🔁 29 💬 54
打开原推
📝 原创
Woah, rough day for Europe.

Looks like everything from $SOI to $LPK and others are down 10-20% from overwhelmingly macro.

Fun thing if war sentiment flips, as they often do with our president… lot of these names should go a lot higher. https://t.co/7JYmFAzcTv
哇,欧洲今天很惨。

看起来从 $SOI$LPK 以及其他东西,都因为宏观因素大跌 10-20%。

有意思的是,如果战争情绪反转,就像我们总统身上经常发生的那样……这些名字里很多应该会涨得高很多。 https://t.co/7JYmFAzcTv
❤️ 812 🔁 34 💬 114
打开原推
📝 原创
$FLNC 20M share offering if you’re wondering why it’s trading down.

The 20M share is not dilution, but share unlock + transfer. So change of hands.

The biggest problem was the clause that made active shelf-registered resale capacity of the 117,666,665 shares, so there’s an unlock of the other remaining ~97m shares to my knowledge.

Net negative and very material to short term trade ideas. Since it expands the float and it introduces short term selling pressure.

That’s the overhang…

I personally cut concentration on the surprising news since it’s changes my trade idea with the float structure.

But holding some anyway to see where it heads after hyperscaler deals.

Definitely not telling people what to do, presenting new material overhang created by company management.
如果你想知道为什么 $FLNC 下跌,是 20M 股 offering。

这 20M 股不是稀释,而是 share unlock + transfer。所以是换手。

最大问题是那个条款,让 117,666,665 股具备 active shelf-registered resale capacity,所以据我了解,剩下另外 ~97m 股也解锁了。

对短期交易思路是净负面,而且很实质。因为它扩大了流通盘,并引入短期卖压。

这就是 overhang……

我个人在这个意外消息后降低了仓位集中度,因为它改变了我对 float structure 的交易想法。

但还是持有一些,看 hyperscaler deals 之后会往哪里走。

绝不是在告诉别人该怎么做,只是在呈现公司管理层制造的新实质 overhang。
❤️ 894 🔁 50 💬 125
打开原推
📝 原创
All right chat.

I need some more ideas on the early $RKLB equivalent for humanoid exposure.

10x+ potential returns only in the next 2 years and more pure play exposure than $TSLA.

What’s your best ideas?
好了 chat。

我需要更多早期 $RKLB 等价的 humanoid 敞口想法。

未来 2 年只要 10x+ 潜在回报,而且比 $TSLA 更纯的敞口。

你们最好的想法是什么?
❤️ 2,183 🔁 88 💬 501
打开原推
📝 原创
Just 3 months ago, European media called my $RPI thesis:

"A Meme Stock" where earnings isn't factored into decisions.

2 months ago, $SOI was labeled "overvalued, with nothing new with the thesis".

This month it's $SIVE is "nothing special with Sivers or CPO, it's been around for years".

Each are still hitting YTD highs with triple digit returns. Especially, Raspberry PI after it shattered projections by 52% to 55% fwd. rev growth from ~15% est.

And I expect all 3 ($RPI, $SIVE, and $SOI) to keep delivering record growth as AI, SiPH, and CPO drive structural re-rating.

Maybe after each negative hit piece... it's time for European media to look in a mirror?

The ones focusing on actual fundamentals are the ones they're mocking.
就在 3 个月前,欧洲媒体把我的 $RPI thesis 叫成:

“A Meme Stock”,说盈利不被纳入决策。

2 个月前,$SOI 被贴上“高估、thesis 没有新东西”的标签。

这个月轮到 $SIVE:“Sivers 或 CPO 没什么特别的,已经存在多年了”。

每一个都还在创 YTD 新高,并且有三位数回报。尤其是 Raspberry PI,在远超预期后,把 fwd. rev growth 从估计的 ~15% 打到 52% 到 55%。

我预计这 3 个($RPI$SIVE$SOI)会继续交付创纪录增长,因为 AI、SiPH 和 CPO 会推动结构性 re-rating。

也许每次负面攻击文章之后……欧洲媒体该照照镜子了?

他们嘲笑的,才是真正在关注基本面的人。
❤️ 810 🔁 44 💬 77
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
No positions but there's a fun $300m MC robotics company in Taiwan I'm researching right now called Aurotek.

-> revenue growth 58.7%, gross profit 101.2% growth, net profit 212% growth (NT$94 million).

They make robotic arms and then the software that goes inside them for "AI infrastructure, AI servers, high-end semiconductors, and electronics manufacturing."

Like there's practical sht abroad that looks highly compelling but in US we're stuck with $RR.
没有仓位,但我现在在研究一家台湾 $300m 市值的有趣 robotics 公司,叫 Aurotek。

-> 收入增长 58.7%,毛利增长 101.2%,净利润增长 212%(NT$94 million)。

他们做 robotic arms,以及里面的软件,用于“AI infrastructure, AI servers, high-end semiconductors, and electronics manufacturing”。

海外有这种看起来非常有吸引力的实用东西,但在美国我们却卡在 $RR
❤️ 459 🔁 9 💬 22
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
As for Taiwan Thermal players: Kaori (8996), Sunon (2421), Auras(3324), Jentech (3653), AVC (3017).

Are frequently flagged.

Kaori 86% Y/Y revenue growth... (NT$948.8 million)
Auras ~40% Y/Y revenue growth (NT$2.84 billion)

Both ~$3B valuations, with likely hyperscaler ties.

Are probably the two higher upside ones to take a look at closer.

Don't have any, just throwing this out there if people wanted other ideas to do research on for thematic longs.
至于台湾 Thermal 玩家:Kaori (8996)、Sunon (2421)、Auras(3324)、Jentech (3653)、AVC (3017)。

经常被点名。

Kaori 收入同比增长 86%……(NT$948.8 million)
Auras 收入同比增长 ~40%(NT$2.84 billion)

两者估值都 ~$3B,而且很可能和 hyperscaler 有联系。

可能是两个更有上行空间、值得更仔细看的名字。

我没有持有,只是如果大家想找其他主题多头研究想法,就把它抛出来。
❤️ 308 🔁 6 💬 25
打开原推
📝 原创
Random CPO related names I like:

- $SIVE
- Foci (3363)
- $TSEM
- Browave (3163)
- PCL (4977)
- $AXTI
- Msscorps (6830)
- $IQE
- Shunsin (6451)
- Furukawa Electric (5801)
- $MTSI
- Nextronics (8417)
- $LITE
- $COHR
- FitTech (6706)
- $GFS
- $ASX
- LandMark (3081)
- $SOI

Disclosure: I own most, not all though.
Random CPO related names I like:

- $SIVE
- Foci (3363)
- $TSEM
- Browave (3163)
- PCL (4977)
- $AXTI
- Msscorps (6830)
- $IQE
- Shunsin (6451)
- Furukawa Electric (5801)
- $MTSI
- Nextronics (8417)
- $LITE
- $COHR
- FitTech (6706)
- $GFS
- $ASX
- LandMark (3081)
- $SOI

Disclosure: I own most, not all though.
❤️ 1,880 🔁 161 💬 125
打开原推
📝 原创
Seems like everyone on X is looking to hoard AP x Swatch watches on release.

I’m curious if that will show up in $SWGAY / $UHR (Swatch) stock prices from increased sales? https://t.co/D7cSNURIq5
看起来 X 上所有人都想在发售时囤 AP x Swatch 手表。

我好奇销量增长会不会体现在 $SWGAY / $UHR(Swatch)股价上? https://t.co/D7cSNURIq5
❤️ 615 🔁 16 💬 90
打开原推
💬 引用
Ouch, Towa (6315) down 20% on earnings.

Good lesson learned that I do get some ideas wrong.

Especially on short term timeframes.

Same thing with $NBIS back in Dec/Jan…

But it is up triple digits now half a year later when there’s enough time for a thesis to play out. https://t.co/1kJK7WeT9Y
哎,Towa (6315) 财报后跌 20%。

这是个好教训,我确实会有些想法判断错。

尤其是在短期时间框架上。

$NBIS 去年 12 月/1 月也是同样……

但半年后,当 thesis 有足够时间兑现时,它现在已经是三位数涨幅了。 https://t.co/1kJK7WeT9Y
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
For Towa (6315):

Earnings are very nuanced. I got the current ER "Beat" wrong in my original thesis (short term), my bad.

But it's an amazing structural long and setup for H2 2026 rather than H1.

TLDR: Near term bearish algorithmically since they miss the nuance, very positive H2 (markets are forward looking)

Revenue ¥54.36B (+1.7% YoY),
Net Profit at ¥4.59B (-43.4% YoY).
Operating Profit ¥6.91B (-22.1% YoY)

News headlines say "EPS crashed -43.4%" or "order miss" that might trigger an algorithmic selloff.

1. As you've seen with US Towa trading, "EPS crashing -43.4%", and algos might have sold headlines.

-> But this was due to last year, of one-off "compensation for damage" payout and one-time ¥1.3 billion yen stock sales from last year.

-> Also "increased initial costs for new customers in compression equipment." for new equipment is caused profitability losses this quarter.

So a bit of an accounting mirage, not really any profitability issues + scaling new orders, so one-off.

However:

Margin inflection point is already here. Which is the biggest signal.

Full year operating margin was 12.7%. For the annual average to reach 12.7% when Q1-Q3 was hovering around ~10%, Q4 should have been around ~18.4% or something?

Which is extremely bullish moving forward for profitability, and shows HBM compression machines are doing work, compared to legacy equipment.

2. Order book "miss":

"Acceleration expected during the second half of fiscal year 3/27 as front-end process production capacity expands."

This signals $MU, Sk Hynix, and others don't have the floor space ready yet, since they're still building front-end wafer fab lines.

But H2, is setup for massive beat. Demand visibility is there... just revenue/profit ramp deferred to H2.

_

Towa forward guidance forcasted ¥64.0B in Sales (+17.7% YoY) and ¥10.24B in Operating Profit (+48.0% YoY), which signals all time high profitability in the future.

IMO they also sandbagged revenue guidance, since they literally said acceleration second-half but didn't give much of a projection beat.

Japanese companies tend to be ultra conservative too, their dividend hike is a large signal too

Regardless, I think the US selloff was probably just due to negative accounting headlines + lower liquidity. Also I was a bit too early by like 4-6 months.

But Towa is an extremely positive setup for H2. Just not your explosive $SNDK $AAOI 10%+ a day type company.

TLDR: Long term bullish, short term lot of nuances missed with headlines.

Just need to wait a few more months if you have patience. Margins are increasing, revenue/orders deferred H2, dividend hikes, etc.
关于 Towa(6315):

财报非常有细节。我在原 thesis 里把当前 ER “Beat”(短期)判断错了,我的问题。

但它是非常好的结构性多头,更适合作为 2026 H2 的 setup,而不是 H1。

TLDR:短期算法层面偏空,因为它们会错过细节;H2 非常正面(市场是前瞻的)

收入 ¥54.36B(同比 +1.7%),
净利润 ¥4.59B(同比 -43.4%)。
经营利润 ¥6.91B(同比 -22.1%)

新闻标题会写“EPS 暴跌 -43.4%”或“订单不及预期”,这可能触发算法抛售。

1. 就像你在美国 Towa 交易里看到的,“EPS 暴跌 -43.4%”,算法可能按标题卖出。

-> 但这是因为去年有一次性的“损害赔偿”收入,以及去年一次性 ¥1.3 billion 股票出售。

-> 另外,“compression equipment 新客户初始成本增加”导致本季度盈利受损。

所以这有点像会计幻象,并不是真正的盈利问题 + 新订单扩张,是一次性的。

不过:

利润率拐点已经到了。这是最大的信号。

全年经营利润率是 12.7%。如果 Q1-Q3 一直在约 10% 附近,要全年平均达到 12.7%,Q4 应该在约 18.4% 之类?

这对未来盈利能力极度看多,也显示 HBM compression machines 相比传统设备正在发挥作用。

2. 订单簿“miss”:

“随着前端制程产能扩大,预计 3/27 财年下半年会加速。”

这说明 $MU、SK Hynix 等还没有准备好地面空间,因为他们仍在建设前端 wafer fab 产线。

但 H2 是大幅超预期的 setup。需求可见度在那里……只是收入/利润 ramp 推迟到 H2。

_

Towa 前瞻指引预计销售 ¥64.0B(同比 +17.7%),经营利润 ¥10.24B(同比 +48.0%),这说明未来盈利能力会创历史新高。

IMO 他们也压低了收入指引,因为他们明明说下半年加速,但没有给太多超预期预测。

日本公司也往往极度保守,他们提高分红也是一个大信号。

不管怎样,我认为美国这边的抛售可能只是负面会计标题 + 流动性较低导致。另外我大概早了 4-6 个月。

但 Towa 对 H2 是非常正面的 setup。只是它不是 $SNDK $AAOI 那种每天 10%+ 爆炸的公司。

TLDR:长期看多,短期很多细节被标题忽略。

如果你有耐心,只需要再等几个月。利润率在提高,收入/订单递延到 H2,分红提高,等等。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2053946950425460946
❤️ 781 🔁 34 💬 85
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Just qualitatively though about this CPO supercycle long:

FOCI (3363) is looks super compelling around now at ~$3.2B MC after $HIMX earnings call? Personally made it one of my larger positions.

Basically:

1. $TSM COUPE advanced packaging director did hint that FAU would be a pretty big bottleneck and would scale up soon.

2. Himax up 75% while Foci had a modest 2.6% bump over the last week. They kind of go hand in hand.

You all know the GS note about CPO ramp by now.T Then Foci shows up so many times from FAU to optical components...

Those happen to make up a massive % of CPO scale up/scale out costs?

$3.2B at the center of it all seems very promising.
只是从定性角度想这个 CPO supercycle long:

$HIMX 财报电话会后,FOCI (3363) 现在 ~$3.2B 市值附近看起来超有吸引力?我个人把它做成了较大仓位之一。

基本上:

1. $TSM COUPE advanced packaging director 确实暗示 FAU 会是一个很大瓶颈,而且很快会扩产。

2. Himax 上涨 75%,而 Foci 过去一周只温和涨了 2.6%。它们有点是一起走的。

你们现在都知道 GS 关于 CPO ramp 的 note 了。然后 Foci 从 FAU 到 optical components 出现了很多次……

这些刚好占 CPO scale up/scale out 成本的巨大比例?

处在这一切中心,市值 $3.2B,看起来很有前景。
❤️ 517 🔁 19 💬 53
打开原推
💬 引用
$AEHR is up close to 3x in 1 month by the way.

I tend to get timing extremely well?? https://t.co/bIbpSXcYtP
顺便说一句,$AEHR 1 个月内已经接近涨了 3 倍。

我在 timing 上好像真的很准?? https://t.co/bIbpSXcYtP
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AEHR looks extremely promising at ~$1.1B MC.

Aehr is starting to remind me of an early $TER, mixed with pre-earnings $AAOI.

If we look at the timeline and speculated customers:

Feb 11th: Sonoma production win for Hyperscaler's AI ASIC processors. (likely $GOOGL, $AMZN, $META).

- Probably Google? Aehr bought Incal, who was speculated to be used by Google for their TPUs.

Feb 26th: $14 million from AI lead customer (likely $AMD, $NVDA)

- Probably $AMD here for Instinct MI300/MI400.

March 3rd: Lead silicon photonics customer for one FOX-XP system (likely $INTC siph)

- Very likely $INTC has been their lead customer.

March 31st: Initial order from major new silicon photonics customer (likely $AVGO, $MRVL, $CSCO )

- New customer (rules out Intel), prob one of these transitioning to 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers

(All speculative, very confidential BOM)

Regardless. This timeline is just bottling up for $AEHR.

Could be next earnings. Or two quarters from now.

But feels like a matter of time before we see mass orders.
$AEHR 在约 $1.1B 市值看起来极有前景。

Aehr 开始让我想到早期 $TER,混合财报前的 $AAOI

如果看时间线和推测客户:

2 月 11 日:拿下 Hyperscaler AI ASIC processors 的 Sonoma 量产订单。(很可能是 $GOOGL$AMZN$META)。

- 可能是 Google?Aehr 收购了 Incal,而 Incal 被推测用于 Google 的 TPU。

2 月 26 日:来自 AI lead customer 的 $14 million(很可能是 $AMD$NVDA

- 这里可能是 $AMD,用于 Instinct MI300/MI400。

3 月 3 日:Lead silicon photonics customer 订购一套 FOX-XP 系统(很可能是 $INTC siph)

- 很可能 $INTC 一直是他们的 lead customer。

3 月 31 日:来自重要新 silicon photonics customer 的初始订单(很可能是 $AVGO$MRVL$CSCO

- 新客户(排除 Intel),可能是这些正在转向 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers 的公司之一

(全部是推测,BOM 非常保密)

无论如何,这条时间线正在为 $AEHR 蓄势。

可能是下个财报,也可能是两个季度之后。

但感觉看到大规模订单只是时间问题。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2039388766083944750
❤️ 1,012 🔁 26 💬 100
打开原推
💬 引用
For Towa (6315):

Earnings are very nuanced. I got the current ER "Beat" wrong in my original thesis (short term), my bad.

But it's an amazing structural long and setup for H2 2026 rather than H1.

TLDR: Near term bearish algorithmically since they miss the nuance, very positive H2 (markets are forward looking)

Revenue ¥54.36B (+1.7% YoY),
Net Profit at ¥4.59B (-43.4% YoY).
Operating Profit ¥6.91B (-22.1% YoY)

News headlines say "EPS crashed -43.4%" or "order miss" that might trigger an algorithmic selloff.

1. As you've seen with US Towa trading, "EPS crashing -43.4%", and algos might have sold headlines.

-> But this was due to last year, of one-off "compensation for damage" payout and one-time ¥1.3 billion yen stock sales from last year.

-> Also "increased initial costs for new customers in compression equipment." for new equipment is caused profitability losses this quarter.

So a bit of an accounting mirage, not really any profitability issues + scaling new orders, so one-off.

However:

Margin inflection point is already here. Which is the biggest signal.

Full year operating margin was 12.7%. For the annual average to reach 12.7% when Q1-Q3 was hovering around ~10%, Q4 should have been around ~18.4% or something?

Which is extremely bullish moving forward for profitability, and shows HBM compression machines are doing work, compared to legacy equipment.

2. Order book "miss":

"Acceleration expected during the second half of fiscal year 3/27 as front-end process production capacity expands."

This signals $MU, Sk Hynix, and others don't have the floor space ready yet, since they're still building front-end wafer fab lines.

But H2, is setup for massive beat. Demand visibility is there... just revenue/profit ramp deferred to H2.

_

Towa forward guidance forcasted ¥64.0B in Sales (+17.7% YoY) and ¥10.24B in Operating Profit (+48.0% YoY), which signals all time high profitability in the future.

IMO they also sandbagged revenue guidance, since they literally said acceleration second-half but didn't give much of a projection beat.

Japanese companies tend to be ultra conservative too, their dividend hike is a large signal too

Regardless, I think the US selloff was probably just due to negative accounting headlines + lower liquidity. Also I was a bit too early by like 4-6 months.

But Towa is an extremely positive setup for H2. Just not your explosive $SNDK $AAOI 10%+ a day type company.

TLDR: Long term bullish, short term lot of nuances missed with headlines.

Just need to wait a few more months if you have patience. Margins are increasing, revenue/orders deferred H2, dividend hikes, etc.
关于 Towa (6315):

财报很讲细节。我在原始 thesis 里把当前 ER “Beat”(短期)判断错了,我的锅。

但它是一个很棒的结构性多头,布局点在 H2 2026 而不是 H1。

TLDR:短期算法上偏 bearish,因为它们漏掉细节;H2 非常正面(市场是 forward looking)

收入 ¥54.36B(+1.7% YoY),
净利润 ¥4.59B(-43.4% YoY)。
营业利润 ¥6.91B(-22.1% YoY)

新闻标题会说“EPS 暴跌 -43.4%”或“订单不及预期”,可能触发算法卖出。

1. 就像你在美国 Towa 交易里看到的,“EPS 暴跌 -43.4%”,算法可能卖了标题。

-> 但这是因为去年有一次性的“damage compensation”赔付,以及去年一次性 ¥1.3 billion yen 股票出售。

-> 还有“新客户 compression equipment 初始成本增加”。新设备带来的初始成本导致本季度盈利损失。

所以这有点是会计幻象,并不是真的盈利问题 + 新订单扩张,所以是一次性。

不过:

Margin inflection point 已经到了。这是最大的信号。

全年营业利润率是 12.7%。如果 Q1-Q3 都在 ~10% 附近徘徊,全年平均要到 12.7%,Q4 应该在 ~18.4% 或类似水平?

这对未来盈利能力极度 bullish,也显示 HBM compression machines 相比 legacy equipment 正在发挥作用。

2. Order book “miss”:

“随着 front-end process 产能扩张,预计 3/27 财年下半年加速。”

这说明 $MU、Sk Hynix 等还没有准备好厂房空间,因为他们还在建 front-end wafer fab lines。

但 H2 是大幅超预期的 setup。需求可见性在那里……只是收入/利润爬坡推迟到 H2。

_

Towa forward guidance 预测销售 ¥64.0B(+17.7% YoY)和营业利润 ¥10.24B(+48.0% YoY),这暗示未来盈利能力创历史新高。

IMO,他们也压低了收入指引,因为他们明明说下半年加速,却没给多少 projection beat。

日本公司也往往超级保守,他们提高股息也是一个很大的信号。

不管怎样,我觉得美国卖盘可能只是因为负面会计标题 + 流动性较低。另外我也早了大概 4-6 个月。

但 Towa 对 H2 来说是一个极其正面的 setup。只是它不是你那种每天涨 10%+ 的爆炸型 $SNDK $AAOI 公司。

TLDR:长期 bullish,短期很多细节被标题漏掉了。

如果你有耐心,只需要再等几个月。Margins 在提升,收入/订单推迟到 H2,股息上调,等等。
引用原推@OscarReor
@aleabitoreddit @aleabitoreddit What do you think of TOWA earnings report? I'm thinking of adding a bit more today 🤔
@aleabitoreddit @aleabitoreddit 你怎么看 TOWA 财报?我今天在考虑再加一点 🤔
https://x.com/OscarReor/status/2053929445652599104
❤️ 632 🔁 46 💬 81
打开原推
💬 引用
As I said before $IREN is basically dogsht compared to $NBIS.

$NVDA didn’t give $IREN funding yet.

So IREN needs to figure out how to buy enough GPUs to monetize 5GW capacity through their 6B ATM and other means.

It’s an endless dilution machine just because they secured power.

I call $IREN holders 0 IQ because they just buy in it to get diluted without understanding nuances of financing.

Nvidia actually gave $NBIS funds.

While Nvidia got a free no-risk purchase agreement for allowing $IREN to use their logo.

$IREN is basically a marketing company at this point, while the other Neoclouds actually allow equity appreciation.
就像我之前说的,和 $NBIS 比起来,$IREN 基本就是 dogsht。

$NVDA 还没有给 $IREN funding。

所以 IREN 需要想办法通过它们的 6B ATM 和其他方式,买到足够多 GPU,把 5GW capacity 变现。

它只是因为锁定了电力,就变成一台无尽稀释机器。

我叫 $IREN 持有人 0 IQ,因为他们只是在不理解融资细节的情况下买进去被稀释。

Nvidia 实际上给了 $NBIS 资金。

而 Nvidia 只是拿到一个免费、无风险的 purchase agreement,允许 $IREN 使用他们的 logo。

$IREN 到现在基本是一家营销公司,而其他 Neoclouds 实际上能让股权升值。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I still am bearish on $IREN.

Algorithms/retail probably read $NVDA + $IREN partnership and bought it up.

However, if you look at the realtity, it's just looks like brand agreement giving $NVDA risk-free convertible notes.

So $IREN can continue selling their $6,000,000,000 ATM into retail investors.

It's the equivalent of a startup using AWS and saying they have an Amazon partnership so give them $6B.

This wasn't Nvidia directly funding $IREN yet, just a risk free option to.

There's a "5 GW deployment" but I'd rather not be the one buying into the dilution to fund it.
我仍然看空 $IREN

算法/散户大概看到 $NVDA + $IREN 合作就买上去了。

但如果看现实,这看起来只是一个品牌协议,给 $NVDA 无风险可转债。

这样 $IREN 就能继续把他们 $6,000,000,000 的 ATM 卖给散户投资者。

这就相当于一家创业公司用了 AWS,然后说自己有 Amazon partnership,所以给他们 $6B。

这还不是 Nvidia 直接给 $IREN 融资,只是一个无风险选择权。

确实有一个“5 GW deployment”,但我宁愿不要成为那个买入稀释、帮它融资的人。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2052494142765441301
❤️ 1,557 🔁 84 💬 196
打开原推
💬 引用
$LITE is now over $1000. Did you listen anon?

I do tend to get optical players directionally right...

So it's hilarious when I see short sellers on names like $AAOI or $SIVE. https://t.co/agPpMQv8Xw
$LITE 现在超过 $1000 了。你听了吗 anon?

我确实倾向于把 optical players 的方向看对……

所以当我看到有人做空 $AAOI$SIVE 这种名字时,真的很好笑。 https://t.co/agPpMQv8Xw
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The $LITE thesis: The hidden monopoly in the AI.

Lumentum is up 316% YTD, but might be 1000%+ by 2027.

Micron ($300B) or TSM ($1.5T) sit in the center of every TPU/GPU deployed.

But same with $LITE, but it's a $26B MC.

In Every, Single, TPU from Google, $LITE makes unbelievable amounts of profit for their marketcap.

That's because it's the standard for Optical Circuit Switching (OCS) + optical networking.

It's also in

- $NVDA Blackwell
-$AMZN Trainium
- and other hyperscaler ASICs.

Lumentum sits in the holy trinity of every single chip deployment for photonics.

And for every TPU capex spent, $LITE takes 8-12%. For every Nvidia GPU, $LITE takes ~2-3% (split between Innolight and some others, so the math gets a bit complex).

But some napkin math on NVDA GPU deployments alone for BOM:

NVIDIA Blackwell (GB200):

HBM memory: ~50–55% (SK Hynix (Lead), Micron, Samsung)
Logic (GPU Die): ~25-30% ( $TSM 4NP)
CoWoS Packaging: ~13-18% $TSM
Optics/Network: ~3–5% (Innolight, Lumentum, Coherent)
PCB/Power: 5%

For Google TPIU "Ironwood" TPU v7:

HBM Memory: 38-42% Samsung / SK Hynix
Logic Die: TSM ~28-33%
Design/I.O: 8-10% MediaTek
Optical Network: 10-14% ( $LITE (primary), $COHR secondary)
Optical Switch: 2-4% $LITE

$LITE est. total cluster share: ~8–12%

Just an FYI, Google's "Optical" BOM share (8–12%) is an anomaly due to their unique Optical Circuit Switch (OCS) monopoly.

Just for some napkin math:

$40B Google TPU spend by 2027. $LITE captures 10% (30-40% margins), $1.5B+ FCF from Google alone, 17x earnings from just their primary customer. (analysts are probably extremely off with projecting TPU spend scaling).

Not even including their split from $AMZN Trainium, $NVDA Blackwell, $MSFT Maia, and other chip deployments.

$LITE is in the center of every single TPU/GPU future chip deployment for now and takes a cut.

The only downside is they're the clear market leader now, but $AVGO and $COHR are likely set up to compete by 2027-2028. However...

People say "$26B, ATH, why are you buying now".

This is the reason. They're involved in every future single TPU/GPU/ASIC deployed.

$LITE could end up easily over $60B+ if Google TPUs, and other chip spend ramps up and LITE takes a 2-3% (from $NVDA, $AMZN, $MSFT) or 8-12% cut (from $GOOGL) for every single dollar spent.
$LITE thesis:AI 里的隐藏垄断。

Lumentum 年初至今涨了 316%,但到 2027 年可能涨 1000%+。

Micron($300B)或 TSM($1.5T)位于每个 TPU/GPU 部署的中心。

$LITE 也一样,但它只有 $26B 市值。

在 Google 的每一个 TPU 里,按它的市值看,$LITE 都赚到不可思议的利润。

因为它是 Optical Circuit Switching(OCS)+ optical networking 的标准。

它也在:

- $NVDA Blackwell
- $AMZN Trainium
- 以及其他 hyperscaler ASICs 里。

Lumentum 位于每一次芯片部署的光子“三位一体”核心。

每花 1 美元 TPU capex,$LITE 拿走 8-12%。每个 Nvidia GPU,$LITE 拿约 2-3%(要和 Innolight 等分,所以计算有点复杂)。

只看 NVDA GPU 部署 BOM 的粗略测算:

NVIDIA Blackwell(GB200):

HBM memory:约 50-55%(SK Hynix 领先,Micron,Samsung)
Logic(GPU Die):约 25-30%($TSM 4NP)
CoWoS Packaging:约 13-18% $TSM
Optics/Network:约 3-5%(Innolight,Lumentum,Coherent)
PCB/Power:5%

Google TPU “Ironwood” TPU v7:

HBM Memory:38-42% Samsung / SK Hynix
Logic Die:TSM 约 28-33%
Design/I.O:8-10% MediaTek
Optical Network:10-14%($LITE 为主,$COHR 次要)
Optical Switch:2-4% $LITE

$LITE 估计总 cluster share:约 8-12%

FYI,Google 的 “Optical” BOM 份额(8-12%)是异常值,因为他们独特的 Optical Circuit Switch(OCS)垄断。

粗略算一下:

到 2027 年 Google TPU 花费 $40B。$LITE 拿 10%(30-40% 利润率),仅 Google 一个客户就有 $1.5B+ FCF,单靠主要客户就是 17x earnings。(分析师对 TPU spend scaling 的预测可能极其偏离)

还没算 $AMZN Trainium、$NVDA Blackwell、$MSFT Maia 和其他芯片部署带来的份额。

$LITE 目前位于每一个未来 TPU/GPU 芯片部署的中心并抽成。

唯一缺点是他们现在是明确市场领导者,但 $AVGO$COHR 很可能在 2027-2028 准备竞争。不过……

有人说“$26B,历史新高,你为什么现在买”。

这就是原因。他们参与未来每一个 TPU/GPU/ASIC 部署。

如果 Google TPU 和其他芯片支出放量,而 LITE 对每一美元花费都能从 $NVDA$AMZN$MSFT 拿 2-3%,或从 $GOOGL 拿 8-12%,$LITE 很容易最终超过 $60B+。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2003019490871869644
❤️ 1,447 🔁 71 💬 130
打开原推
📝 原创
Today I learned $SIVE was so actively shorted...

That the price going up accidentally might take down hedge funds?

A hedge fund Colosseum is down -19.8% last month largely due to their short position of Sivers.

They now face infinite losses as CPO ramps up parabolically over the next two years.

Sivers was never a short squeeze play since fundamentally, it's one of the most compelling CPO related longs.

But it's an interesting effect as a byproduct, especially now that they might need to buy back % of the float.
今天我才知道 $SIVE 被做空得这么积极……

以至于股价上涨可能会意外拖垮 hedge funds?

一个叫 Colosseum 的 hedge fund 上个月跌了 -19.8%,主要就是因为他们做空 Sivers。

未来两年随着 CPO 抛物线式爬坡,他们现在面临无限亏损。

Sivers 从来不是 short squeeze play,因为从基本面看,它是最有吸引力的 CPO 相关多头之一。

但作为副作用,这很有意思,尤其是现在他们可能需要买回一定比例的流通盘。
❤️ 1,635 🔁 96 💬 141
打开原推
💬 引用
I actually think $FLNC should be a lot higher.

The implications of having 2 incoming direct hyperscaler contracts in 1 quarter is enormous.

$MSFT to $AMZN don't sign tiny deals.

Obviously markets like to wait more until actual news/purchase order numbers come out... in the off-chance it doesn't go through or lower than expected.

But a company doesn't just randomly announce 2 hyperscalers MSas and an expectation of the orders to hit Q3.

Also winning multiple hyperscaler deals, in a single quarter is a leading indicator for more, especially as Fluence BESS becomes standardized.

Given short interest is around 27.69%, I'm not sure if pre-earnings short sellers are very comfortable to take a risk...

I think there's a chance for a generational run if a hyperscaler like $GOOGL signs a massive contract.
我其实觉得 $FLNC 应该高很多。

1 个季度内有 2 个即将到来的直接 hyperscaler 合同,这个含义非常巨大。

$MSFT$AMZN 不会签小单。

显然市场喜欢等到实际新闻/采购订单数字出来后再说……以防万一没成,或者低于预期。

但一家公司不会无缘无故宣布 2 个 hyperscalers MSAs,并预期订单会在 Q3 落地。

而且一个季度内赢下多个 hyperscaler deals,是后续更多订单的领先指标,尤其是 Fluence BESS 变得标准化之后。

考虑到 short interest 大概 27.69%,我不确定财报前的空头是不是很舒服地承担这个风险……

如果像 $GOOGL 这样的 hyperscaler 签下大合同,我觉得有机会出现一轮 generation run。
引用原推@rockwell0790
@aleabitoreddit @Jess252530 Buying the flnc dip as well
@aleabitoreddit @Jess252530 我也在买 flnc 回调
https://x.com/rockwell0790/status/2053844009664053398
❤️ 1,473 🔁 106 💬 142
打开原推
💬 引用
It’s a good lesson to learn how to actually analyze earnings reports.

Rather than looking at the chart right afterward.

$AAOI up 25.18% since ER drop to $139… and +16.09% today. https://t.co/mP1Yqq5b1A
学会真正分析财报,是一个好教训。

而不是马上只看图。

$AAOI 自 ER 后跌到 $139 以来涨了 25.18%……今天涨 +16.09%。 https://t.co/mP1Yqq5b1A
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AAOI reported earnings, it's actually extremely positive so far contrary to market reactions.

Like all 2027 hyperbolic forward growth companies:

Nobody should care about current financials.

Key things market missed was:

AOI: hit They hit 100K units/month capacity for 800G transceivers.

And: -> "Significant larger growth expected starting in Q3 as capacity comes online"

If you do look at financials:

It's ~29.2% non GAAP gross margin

on ~$151.1M revenue, guiding $180-$198m Q2.

We already know from Lumentum earnings that it's more of capacity bottleneck, not a demand one. And anything they make they sell out.

It's a forward growth story, so important thing aside from these notes is the earnings call on hyperscaler demand implications and capacity ramp.
$AAOI 公布财报,到目前为止其实非常正面,和市场反应相反。

和所有 2027 年双曲线式前瞻增长公司一样:

没人应该关心当前财务。

市场漏掉的关键点是:

AOI:800G transceivers 产能达到每月 100K units。

以及:-> “随着产能上线,预计从 Q3 开始出现显著更大增长”

如果你真看财务:

non GAAP 毛利率约 29.2%

收入约 $151.1M,Q2 指引 $180-$198m。

我们已经从 Lumentum 财报知道,这更多是产能瓶颈,不是需求瓶颈。他们造出来的东西都会卖光。

这是前瞻增长故事,所以除了这些笔记,重要的是财报电话会上关于 hyperscaler 需求含义和产能 ramp 的内容。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2052485912714752144
❤️ 1,345 🔁 66 💬 94
打开原推
💬 引用
Contrary to what people/algos think:

Getting 2.5% dilution passed with $SIVE is actually extremely positive in this case.

Since that helps them get listed on US Nasdaq ASAP.

Not sure if there’s any share issuance arbitrage at all impacting short term prices.

But getting access to US institutional capital to accelerate expansion + repricing out of small Swedish markets is priority.
和人们/algos 想的相反:

$SIVE 通过 2.5% 稀释,在这个案例里其实极其正面。

因为这能帮助他们尽快在美国 Nasdaq 上市。

我不确定是否有任何 share issuance arbitrage 在影响短期价格。

但优先级是拿到美国机构资本来加速扩张,并摆脱小型瑞典市场的定价。
引用原推@Leoon471
@aleabitoreddit @Leon8995385220 Some minor dilution or what do you think? https://t.co/kVPMyxjS2f
@aleabitoreddit @Leon8995385220 一点小稀释,还是你怎么看? https://t.co/kVPMyxjS2f
https://x.com/Leoon471/status/2053800145955778693
❤️ 827 🔁 40 💬 106
打开原推
💬 引用
Not too shabby?

$IQE is now up 4x since in the past 3 months.

$MTSI paying off their debts does derisk the company long term.

I’m curious if anyone listened anon? https://t.co/OFoSaFWSa9
还不错吧?

$IQE 过去 3 个月到现在已经涨了 4 倍。

$MTSI 帮他们还债,长期看确实降低了公司风险。

我好奇有没有人听了 anon? https://t.co/OFoSaFWSa9
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Not exactly! I'm just a tad more familiar with photonic supply chains than I am with energy so I like picking potential winners.

Just wanted to introduce $IQE into the equation like i did with $AXTI, so I could do a "Did you Listen Anon?" post 3 months later if it turns out well.
不完全是!我只是比起能源,对光子供应链稍微更熟一点,所以喜欢在这里挑潜在赢家。

只是想像之前提 $AXTI 一样,把 $IQE 也放进讨论里,这样如果结果不错,3 个月后我就能发一条“你当时听了吗,Anon?”的帖子。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026647347237966298
❤️ 572 🔁 28 💬 72
打开原推
💬 引用
And now $LPK is #19 on the list of my individual stocks that returned 100-1000%+ YTD.

After going up +4.57% today.

Usually 1 or 2 is good, but I’ve written about and went long on 19 different stocks this year that went up triple digits.

I’m kinda impressed with myself ngl? https://t.co/s9FLfTWHGd
现在 $LPK 是我今年 YTD 回报 100-1000%+ 的个股名单里第 19 个。

今天又涨了 +4.57%。

通常有 1 或 2 个就不错了,但我今年写过并做多了 19 只不同股票,都涨出了三位数。

说实话我有点佩服自己? https://t.co/s9FLfTWHGd
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I guess, post earnings when $ARM touched $268...

$ARM is now #18 on the individual stock list that I went long on that hit 100%-1000%+ YTD?

I've lost count TBH. Some others like $LPK and $SIMO and $HPS.A are getting really close now.

But feels like I'm one of the few ones out there on X with actual receipts of all the returns + original thesis post.
我猜,财报后 $ARM 触到 $268 的时候……

$ARM 现在是我做多过、年初至今涨到 100%-1000%+ 的个股名单里第 18 个?

TBH 我已经数不清了。其他像 $LPK$SIMO$HPS.A 现在也很接近了。

但感觉我是 X 上少数真正有所有收益 + 原始 thesis 帖子证据的人之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2052126435721318528
❤️ 1,187 🔁 49 💬 105
打开原推
📝 原创
I wonder if Swedish media realized what they’ve done transferring control over to American investors/institutions and stopped posting?

$SIVE is the most compelling CPO long I’ve seen, especially for the laser chokepoint. https://t.co/f1zGx9Bli1
我在想瑞典媒体有没有意识到他们做了什么,把控制权转给了美国投资者/机构,然后就不发了?

$SIVE 是我见过最有吸引力的 CPO 多头,尤其是 laser chokepoint。 https://t.co/f1zGx9Bli1
❤️ 1,367 🔁 81 💬 113
打开原推
💬 引用
Just two months ago.

Everyone on X was bearish on $EWY, $MU, Sk Hynix, Samsung, saying Korean markets / Memory was like the "Silver Bubble".

And that LNG/Helium/Oil fears would tank markets.

Now suddenly everyone that was doomposting was "bullish" all along.

There's a difference between just tagging along the news flow.

Then having money at stake and having the correct contrarian opinion while everyone was bearish.

Anyway, $EWY longs are now up 350%+, just goes to show how much noise there is nowadays.
就在两个月前。

X 上所有人都看空 $EWY$MU、Sk Hynix、Samsung,说韩国市场 / Memory 像“Silver Bubble”。

还说 LNG/Helium/Oil 担忧会把市场打崩。

现在突然间,所有之前 doomposting 的人都说自己“一直 bullish”。

只是跟着新闻流走,

和在所有人看空时真金白银下注、持有正确的逆向观点,是两回事。

总之,$EWY 多头现在涨了 350%+,这只能说明现在噪音有多大。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Feels like everyone is doom-posting KOSPI saying:

> “Look at the chart, it can’t keep going up like this!”

> Memory is a black hole for demand ( $SNDK taking 3Y preorders )

> $EWY is basically just two stocks, Samsung and SK Hynix, not a representation of the Korean economy

> Like saying Taiwan Index is a bubble because the index that tracks $TSM and Mediatek goes up.

> Memory demand/AI doesn’t just disappear because of a War in Iran, but it does get more expensive.

> Increased energy from crude/LNG get passed down to hyperscalers, not eaten up in opex.

It’s looks to be fear selling and deleveraging (3x ETFs and 10x likely got wiped out today) rather than materially operational (slight bearish headwind, but not enough for -30%).

SK Hynix futures is now trading in the high $300B MC-low $400B range.

If MS and updated analyst projections are even slightly right, SK Hynix’s operating profits for example would be ~$300B.

They’ll be sitting on too much money by 2028 as a cushion if memory prices drops. (and not even considering demand becomes structural).

Looks to be another DeepSeek-Nvidia type fear selling situation, especially as nand/dram prices get hiked again recently. More of a question of timing the bottom.

It’s times like these logic matter more than irrational headline selling.
感觉所有人都在 doom-post KOSPI,说:

> “看图表,它不可能这样一直涨!”

> Memory 是需求黑洞($SNDK 接 3 年预订单)

> $EWY 基本就是 Samsung 和 SK Hynix 两只股票,不代表韩国经济

> 这就像说 Taiwan Index 是泡沫,因为追踪 $TSM 和 Mediatek 的指数上涨。

> Memory demand/AI 不会因为伊朗战争就消失,但它会变得更贵。

> 原油/LNG 带来的能源成本上升会传导给 hyperscalers,不会被 opex 吃掉。

这看起来更像恐慌卖出和去杠杆(3x ETFs 和 10x 今天可能被清掉了),而不是运营层面发生实质变化(轻微偏空逆风,但不足以 -30%)。

SK Hynix futures 现在交易在 $300B 高位到 $400B 低位市值区间。

如果 MS 和更新后的分析师预测哪怕稍微正确,SK Hynix 的经营利润例如会达到约 $300B。

到 2028 年,如果 memory prices 下跌,他们会坐拥太多现金作为缓冲。(还没考虑需求变成结构性)

这看起来又像 DeepSeek-Nvidia 类型的恐慌卖出,尤其最近 nand/dram 价格又被上调。更多只是抄底时点问题。

这种时候,逻辑比非理性标题卖出更重要。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2029088341258584454
❤️ 1,069 🔁 59 💬 83
打开原推
💬 引用
Just putting it out there with the Goldman Sachs $NVDA supplier note.

There’s a very interesting ~$210m MC company Nextronics (8147) that I ended up taking positions on following GS.

That supplies CPO connectors and Cage Thermal Modules to Nvidia CPO supply chains.

They’re also in $AMZN supply chains and Humanoids. And massage chairs too.

Just thought I’d share an interesting idea (NFA/DYOR), I’ll do a BOM analysis later, but it looks very material relative to MC as Nvidia’s CPO program scales up.

Of course risks are multi-sourcing/getting designed out, but there’s probably a reason why GS flagged this micro supplier multiple times among $4-10B+ companies.
结合 Goldman Sachs 的 $NVDA 供应商 note,先放在这里。

有一家非常有意思、约 ~$210m 市值的公司 Nextronics (8147),我看完 GS 后建了仓。

它给 Nvidia CPO 供应链供应 CPO connectors 和 Cage Thermal Modules。

它们也在 $AMZN 供应链和 Humanoids 里。还有按摩椅。

只是想分享一个有意思的想法(NFA/DYOR),我之后会做 BOM 分析,但随着 Nvidia 的 CPO 项目扩张,相对市值看起来非常实质。

当然风险是 multi-sourcing/被 design out,但 GS 在一堆 $4-10B+ 公司里多次点名这个微型供应商,大概是有原因的。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Today I learned there’s a $NVDA CPO supplier that builds massage chairs and US Humanoids on the side.

The Toto toilet HBM meme keeps showing up everywhere.
今天我才知道,有一家 $NVDA CPO 供应商,副业还做按摩椅和美国人形机器人。

Toto toilet HBM meme 真是到处出现。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2053619428731109447
❤️ 1,129 🔁 64 💬 63
打开原推
💬 引用
Promising… but for actually making returns:

Things like Glass/Silicon Photonics is an immediate H2 2026-2029 event.

2029+ timeline seems accurate for plastic optics and cables cited by Tosoh.

Better to wait until it’s about to hit volume ramp as seen with $SIVE or $AEHR.

Feel like in general, going long on quantum dot, microled, and plastic way too early on… might just end up stalling out for a year in the next correction?

The nuance is you find any indicators timelines have been pushed up a lot (CPO got pushed up), then that’s alpha.

But it’s something to save for a year and a half later like H1 2028 for plastic optical cables.
有前途……但如果是为了真正赚钱:

Glass/Silicon Photonics 这种是 H2 2026-2029 的即时事件。

Tosoh 提到的 plastic optics 和 cables,2029+ 时间线看起来准确。

最好等到它快要进入量产爬坡时再看,就像 $SIVE$AEHR

总体感觉,太早做多 quantum dot、microled 和 plastic……可能会在下一次回调里横盘卡一年?

细节在于,如果你发现任何指标显示时间线被大幅提前(CPO 就被提前了),那就是 alpha。

但 plastic optical cables 这种东西,适合留到一年半后,比如 H1 2028 再看。
引用原推@equity_neconeco
@aleabitoreddit What do you think about this news about "Tosoh"(4042) not "Toto"(5332)?

Tosoh Targets 2029 Production of Plastic Optical Cables for AI Data Centers
https://t.co/AQCTKTK2SF
@aleabitoreddit 你怎么看这个关于 “Tosoh”(4042)而不是 “Toto”(5332)的新闻?

Tosoh Targets 2029 Production of Plastic Optical Cables for AI Data Centers
https://t.co/AQCTKTK2SF
https://x.com/equity_neconeco/status/2053625844665667801
❤️ 764 🔁 47 💬 54
打开原推
📝 原创
Today I learned there’s a $NVDA CPO supplier that builds massage chairs and US Humanoids on the side.

The Toto toilet HBM meme keeps showing up everywhere.
今天我才知道,有个 $NVDA CPO 供应商,副业是做按摩椅和美国 Humanoids。

Toto toilet HBM meme 真是到处都在出现。
❤️ 806 🔁 16 💬 70
打开原推
📝 原创
Is it just me…

Or does it feel like everyone on X or $RDDT made millions off of $INTC, $MU, and $AMD recently? https://t.co/CWEt5rcusn
只有我这样觉得吗……

还是感觉 X 或 $RDDT 上每个人最近都靠 $INTC$MU$AMD 赚了几百万? https://t.co/CWEt5rcusn
❤️ 1,530 🔁 29 💬 224
打开原推
📝 原创
“Leading” Glass Substrate players that were name dropped if you’re curious:

$LPK — TGV Equipment
$GLW — Glass Materials
$ASGLY (5201 T)— Glass Materials
$NIDGY (5214 T) — Glass Materials
$LRCX — Etching Systems
$DSCSY (6146 T)— Dicing Equipment
$SMHSF — Bonding Systems
$ONTO — Inspection Tools
$KLAC — Inspection Tools

Fun to see the stuff I’ve called out early in the year like LPK at ~$150m MC get mentioned as a critical player by Trendforce and others.
如果你好奇,这些是被点名的“Leading” Glass Substrate 玩家:

$LPK — TGV Equipment
$GLW — Glass Materials
$ASGLY (5201 T)— Glass Materials
$NIDGY (5214 T) — Glass Materials
$LRCX — Etching Systems
$DSCSY (6146 T)— Dicing Equipment
$SMHSF — Bonding Systems
$ONTO — Inspection Tools
$KLAC — Inspection Tools

很有意思,年初我很早就点过的东西,比如 ~$150m 市值的 LPK,现在被 Trendforce 和其他机构提到是关键玩家。
❤️ 2,027 🔁 198 💬 101
打开原推
💬 引用
Did you remember my $AXTI InP substrate bottleneck call last year anon?

IntelliEPI CEO (Q1 2026 ER):

"The InP substrate shortage is a bottleneck for the entire AI infrastructure"

Digitimes: "Taiwan's IntelliEPI warns of severe indium phosphide supply shortage"

I said as photonics ramps: There was going to be a major InP bottleneck as all the next-gen AI architectures go optical.

This was most goated call with AXT as the upstream chokepoint.

I'm usually a few months ahead of time, but they play out directionally.

While I'm sitting in existing bottlenecks up 1800%+, I'm long CPO as the next major supercycle.
你还记得我去年关于 $AXTI InP substrate bottleneck 的判断吗 anon?

IntelliEPI CEO(Q1 2026 ER):

“InP substrate shortage is a bottleneck for the entire AI infrastructure”

Digitimes:“Taiwan's IntelliEPI warns of severe indium phosphide supply shortage”

我说过随着 photonics 爬坡,所有下一代 AI 架构都走向 optical,会出现重大 InP bottleneck。

这是 AXT 作为上游 chokepoint 的最 goated call。

我通常会早几个月,但方向上会兑现。

当我坐在已经涨 1800%+ 的现有 bottlenecks 里时,我正在做多 CPO,作为下一轮 major supercycle。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Thanks, we might not see a InP substrate bottleneck yet, but we’ll likely see it when hyperscaler ASICs (TPU, Trainium, Maia, etc.) ramp up -> supply strains like memory mid-2026.

That doesn’t quite mean material providers should be valued like $LITE, but the fact that the entire future AI buildout has a single point of failure that comes from a small $600m company like $AXTI is amusing.
谢谢,我们现在可能还看不到 InP substrate 瓶颈,但当 hyperscaler ASICs(TPU、Trainium、Maia 等)放量时,很可能会看到它 -> 像 2026 年中 memory 那样供应紧张。

这并不完全意味着材料供应商应该像 $LITE 那样估值,但未来整个 AI buildout 的单点故障来自 $AXTI 这样一家小小 $600m 公司,这件事挺有意思。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004577553714163817
❤️ 1,175 🔁 70 💬 103
打开原推
📝 原创
The US/West now controls majority of the shares of $SIVE.

With Goldman Sachs/JP Morgan/Morgan Stanley and other US institutions entering.

US/West 46.8%:
- Fidelity: 11.5% (retail)
- Charles Schawb: 11.4% (retail)
- $IBKR: 9.3% (primarily retail)
- BNY Mellon: 4.2% (retail)
- Morgan Stanley Smith Barney: 3.1% (Retail/Wealth management)
-Bank of America: 2.8% (retail/Wealth management)
- BNY Mellon: .9% (institutional)
- Morgan Stanley Client Assets: .7% (institutional)
- Bank of New York Mellon: .5% (institution)
- JP Morgan: .5% (institutional)
- J.P. Morgan Securities Plc: .4% (institutional)
- Citibank New York: .3% (institutional)
- JP Morgan SE: .2% (institutional)
- Morgan Stanley: .2% (institutional)
- JP Morgan Securities: .2% (institutional)
- BoFA Securities: .2% (institutional)
- Goldman Sachs: .2% (institutional)
- Goldman Sachs International: .1% (institutional)
- Cbny-Rja-Client Asset - .1% (retail/wealth)

Large % now owned US retail shareholders (eg. $IBKR on behalf of clients, probably majority retail some institutions).

The new but smaller JP Morgan Goldman Sachs, and Citibank % positions are likely hedge funds or other institutions trying to build positions.

Europe & Switzerland: 11.3%
- Clearstream: 6.2%
- UBS Switzerland: 1.6%
- Six SIS: 0.8%
- Euroclear Bank: 0.8%
- Saxo Bank: 0.6%
- BNP Paribas: 0.6%
- Caceis Bank / Intesa San Paolo: 0.2% each
- KBC / LGT / Julius Baer: 0.1% each

Swedish ~8.49%:
Försäkringsaktiebolaget Avanza Pension - 4.76%
Nordnet Pensionsförsäkring - 2.73%
Skandinaviska Enskilda - .2%
SEB Life International - .1%
Nordea Bank Abp - 0.7%

Canada/UK/Middle East ~.6%:
First Intl Bank of Israel - .3%
Royal Bank of Canada - .1%
Royal Bank of Canada - .1%
HSBC - .1%

A special thank you to the Swedish Media doing the work of US institutions:

The West now has ~58.7% ownership. Swedish is now down to 8.49% due to local media.

I wonder if they realized what they've done now scaring off local investors now that it's changed hands to US institutions/investors?

The West have now acquired majority of the float before the CPO supercycle.

You can also start to see US institutions like JP Morgan or Goldman Sachs building start positions (on behalf of institutional investors), probably off of US retail taking profits. This is likely after $SIVE reached a certain MC threshold for fund mandates.

But a large % of it is still owned by US retail on places like $IBKR and Fidelity. (this is what I call frontrunning the institutions)

TLDR:

$SIVE went from majority:
-> Swedish retail ownership
-> US retail ownership
-> gradual US Institution ownership as US retail takes profit or sells (if they figure out a way to scare off US retail like the Swedish media did).
美国/西方现在控制了 $SIVE 的多数股份。

Goldman Sachs/JP Morgan/Morgan Stanley 和其他美国机构正在进入。

美国/西方 46.8%:
- Fidelity:11.5%(retail)
- Charles Schawb:11.4%(retail)
- $IBKR:9.3%(主要是 retail)
- BNY Mellon:4.2%(retail)
- Morgan Stanley Smith Barney:3.1%(Retail/Wealth management)
-Bank of America:2.8% (retail/Wealth management)
- BNY Mellon:.9%(institutional)
- Morgan Stanley Client Assets: .7%(institutional)
- Bank of New York Mellon: .5%(institution)
- JP Morgan: .5%(institutional)
- J.P. Morgan Securities Plc: .4%(institutional)
- Citibank New York:.3%(institutional)
- JP Morgan SE:.2%(institutional)
- Morgan Stanley: .2%(institutional)
- JP Morgan Securities:.2%(institutional)
- BoFA Securities:.2% (institutional)
- Goldman Sachs: .2%(institutional)
- Goldman Sachs International:.1%(institutional)
- Cbny-Rja-Client Asset - .1% (retail/wealth)

现在很大比例由美国散户股东持有(比如 $IBKR 代表客户,可能多数是散户,也有一些机构)。

新的但较小的 JP Morgan、Goldman Sachs 和 Citibank % 仓位,很可能是 hedge funds 或其他机构在尝试建仓。

欧洲 & 瑞士:11.3%
- Clearstream:6.2%
- UBS Switzerland:1.6%
- Six SIS:0.8%
- Euroclear Bank:0.8%
- Saxo Bank:0.6%
- BNP Paribas:0.6%
- Caceis Bank / Intesa San Paolo:各 0.2%
- KBC / LGT / Julius Baer:各 0.1%

瑞典 ~8.49%:
Försäkringsaktiebolaget Avanza Pension - 4.76%
Nordnet Pensionsförsäkring - 2.73%
Skandinaviska Enskilda - .2%
SEB Life International - .1%
Nordea Bank Abp - 0.7%

加拿大/英国/中东 ~.6%:
First Intl Bank of Israel - .3%
Royal Bank of Canada - .1%
Royal Bank of Canada - .1%
HSBC - .1%

特别感谢瑞典媒体替美国机构干活:

西方现在拥有 ~58.7% 所有权。由于本地媒体,瑞典已经降到 8.49%。

我想知道他们现在有没有意识到自己做了什么,把本地投资者吓跑后,股份已经转手给美国机构/投资者?

在 CPO supercycle 前,西方现在已经拿下了大部分流通盘。

你也能开始看到 JP Morgan 或 Goldman Sachs 这类美国机构在建立初始仓位(代表机构投资者),可能是接住美国散户获利了结。这很可能是在 $SIVE 达到某个市值门槛、符合基金 mandates 之后。

但其中很大一部分仍由 $IBKR 和 Fidelity 这类平台上的美国散户持有。(这就是我说的 frontrunning the institutions)

TLDR:

$SIVE 从多数:
-> 瑞典散户持有
-> 美国散户持有
-> 随着美国散户获利或卖出,逐渐转向美国机构持有(如果他们找到办法像瑞典媒体那样吓跑美国散户的话)。
❤️ 1,368 🔁 110 💬 126
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a TLDR of recent semi developments:

1. $TSM pushing hard CoPoS - VisEra/others might go brrr earlier than expected.

2. $AAPL goes with $INTC for semi production, which is a major shift cause they normally go with TSM. Made in America go like Intel go brrr.

3. $NVDA Vera Rubin reportedly makes changes to cooling architectures very recently.

"Taiwan's thermal management suppliers are emerging as one of the fastest-growing segments in the AI hardware ecosystem" - From Last Month.

"Vera Rubin server architecture is expected to drive a fundamental shift in data center cooling and system design"

Will cover thermal ecosystem later, maybe it's time to take a look?

4. 2D NAND shortage spirals after Samsung, Micron, and rivals exit market

Macronix, Windbond go brrr. implications for GigaDevice and other niche players.

5. "Big Tech reportedly offers to fund SK Hynix fabs and EUV"

- Memory that badly bottlenecked that mag7 wants to pay for it, so $MU, SK Hynix, Samsung go brr.

6. $TSM 2026 net revenue $12.6B for April 2026. Revenue up 30%, Semis keep going brr.

7. Anthropic needs compute -> SpaceX.

So implications for compute demand is extreme here which is BRRR $NBIS and others.

But it's very interesting they sidestepped Neoclouds and went with SpaceX.

8. "SKC to Accelerate Mass Production of Glass Substrates for U.S. Clients by the End of the Year"

"the end of the year, ahead of its original plan, it has been announced"

Glass Core substrates players like $LPK for mass production and other related players like SKC go brrr.

Glass timelines moved up. heavy brrr glass.

9. "Power chip shortages deepen as AI server demand and GaN battles escalate"

Maybe time to look into the power chip bottleneck anon?

10. "Adata said DRAM and NAND flash contract prices will each climb more than 40% in the second quarter of 2026"

Another positive for $MU, SK Hynix, Samsung, $SNDK, and others.
最近半导体进展的 TLDR:

1. $TSM 强推 CoPoS - VisEra/其他公司可能比预期更早 go brrr。

2. $AAPL 选择 $INTC 做半导体生产,这是重大转变,因为他们通常选 TSM。Made in America 就像 Intel go brrr。

3. 据报道 $NVDA Vera Rubin 最近对 cooling architectures 做了改动。

“台湾 thermal management suppliers 正成为 AI hardware ecosystem 中增长最快的细分之一” - 来自上个月。

“Vera Rubin server architecture 预计会推动 data center cooling 和 system design 的根本性转变”

之后会讲 thermal ecosystem,也许是时候看看了?

4. Samsung、Micron 和竞争对手退出市场后,2D NAND 短缺恶化

Macronix、Windbond go brrr。对 GigaDevice 和其他 niche players 也有含义。

5. “Big Tech reportedly offers to fund SK Hynix fabs and EUV”

- Memory 瓶颈严重到 mag7 想付钱,所以 $MU、SK Hynix、Samsung go brr。

6. $TSM 2026 年 4 月净收入 $12.6B。收入增长 30%,Semis 继续 go brr。

7. Anthropic 需要 compute -> SpaceX。

所以这里对 compute demand 的含义极端强烈,也就是 BRRR $NBIS 和其他公司。

但很有意思的是,他们绕开了 Neoclouds,选择了 SpaceX。

8. “SKC to Accelerate Mass Production of Glass Substrates for U.S. Clients by the End of the Year”

“年底,早于原计划,已经宣布”

Glass Core substrates 玩家比如 $LPK 量产,以及 SKC 等相关玩家 go brrr。

Glass 时间线提前了。heavy brrr glass。

9. “Power chip shortages deepen as AI server demand and GaN battles escalate”

也许是时候看看 power chip bottleneck 了 anon?

10. “Adata 表示 DRAM 和 NAND flash 合约价将在 2026 年第二季度各自上涨超过 40%”

这对 $MU、SK Hynix、Samsung、$SNDK 和其他公司又是一个正面因素。
❤️ 2,111 🔁 152 💬 147
打开原推
📝 原创
I feel like all the $FISV, $PYPL, $NVO value/dividend investors went extinct this cycle?

Was very popular, even last year…

But if you pivoted to semis like $INTC or $SNDK, you would be up 200-400%+ YTD.

X feed is just AI bottlenecks now, feel like I helped start a new trend? https://t.co/tj7ykBGMyr
我感觉所有 $FISV$PYPL$NVO 价值/股息投资者这轮都灭绝了?

去年甚至还很流行……

但如果你转到 $INTC$SNDK 这种 semis,今年 YTD 会涨 200-400%+。

X feed 现在全是 AI bottlenecks,感觉我帮忙开了个新趋势? https://t.co/tj7ykBGMyr
❤️ 1,455 🔁 48 💬 141
打开原推
💬 引用
I’m just going to leave this here with $AXTI.

100% of the comments were negative when I posted at ~$13.

And I got banned later after it went up 10 times. https://t.co/6FrSXod6s8
我就把这个 $AXTI 放在这里。

我在 ~$13 发帖时,100% 的评论都是负面的。

后来它涨了 10 倍之后,我还被 ban 了。 https://t.co/6FrSXod6s8
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 1,655 🔁 54 💬 189
打开原推
💬 引用
I’ve said this before when $AAOI was $6.49B.

Now it’s $11.5B and this is the same story:

Basically this is the Optical version of $INTC, where they’re scaling capacity from laser fab to assembly Made in America.

Anything they make is likely to be bought out by hyperscalers.

Current financials don’t really mater if you look at $1.41B quarterly revenue ramp by mid 2027 projections ($471 x 3) vs current MC.

And the overarching 9x TAM curve from GS projections.
我在 $AAOI 还是 $6.49B 的时候就说过这个。

现在它是 $11.5B,故事还是一样:

基本上这是 Optical 版 $INTC,它们正在把 Made in America 的产能从 laser fab 扩到 assembly。

它们做出来的任何东西,都很可能被 hyperscalers 买走。

如果你看的是到 2027 年中预测的 $1.41B 季度收入爬坡($471 x 3)与当前市值对比,当前财务真的不太重要。

以及 GS 预测的整体 9x TAM 曲线。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AAOI looks very undervalued at $6.49B.

If we model ASP and their newest capacity projections today:

Revenue from Capacity:
Q2 2026: ~$312.1M
Q4 2026: ~$1.41B
Q2-2027: ~$1.53B
Q4-2027: ~$1.97B

This is absurd ramp (off ~34-40% est. gross margins).

ASP modeled off (LightCounting, Dell'Oro Group & Yole, pricing for ELSFP modules is the most speculative). And some sell-side models (from firms like Raymond James, B. Riley, Northland Capital, and Goldman Sachs).

Exact contract pricing for massive volume orders is not known, so this is speculative.

But the Q2 volume * ASP estimates actually align with their $378M/month target Q2-2027.

Again, you might be wondering? This is capacity, doesn't translate into revenue right?

Hyperscalers from $AMZN to $MSFT are buying any capacity any of these companies from $LITE to $COHR can make, years out.

This includes $AAOI from their former earnings call.
$AAOI 在 $6.49B 看起来非常低估。

如果按 ASP 和他们今天最新的产能预测建模:

来自产能的收入:
Q2 2026:约 $312.1M
Q4 2026:约 $1.41B
Q2-2027:约 $1.53B
Q4-2027:约 $1.97B

这是荒谬的 ramp(基于约 34-40% 估计毛利率)。

ASP 模型基于 LightCounting、Dell'Oro Group & Yole(ELSFP modules 定价最具推测性)。以及一些卖方模型(Raymond James、B. Riley、Northland Capital、Goldman Sachs 等)。

大批量订单的确切合同定价未知,所以这是推测。

但 Q2 volume * ASP 估算实际上和他们 Q2-2027 每月 $378M 的目标一致。

你可能又会想:这是产能,不一定转化为收入,对吧?

$AMZN$MSFT,hyperscalers 正在买下从 $LITE$COHR 这些公司未来几年能造出来的任何产能。

这也包括 $AAOI,从他们之前的财报电话会就能看出来。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2034095067586326982
❤️ 1,507 🔁 122 💬 106
打开原推
💬 引用
Nobody can convince me $SNDK isn’t a meme stock at this point.

But as I’ve said, bottlenecks with multi-year visibility like $HPS.A or $LITE tend to perform better. https://t.co/WkjoG1jIYu
现在没人能说服我 $SNDK 不是 meme stock。

但就像我说的,像 $HPS.A$LITE 这种有多年可见性的 bottlenecks,表现往往更好。 https://t.co/WkjoG1jIYu
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The nice thing about multi-year bottlenecks from:

$HPS.A to $SNDK to $LITE

Is that you can sleep a easier despite market volatility like today.

Knowing demand will be extreme even 1 year...

Even if Trump wants to nuke Bikini Bottom and other companies might be more impacted:

-> One has a huge market share over Transformers
-> One has huge market share over NAND
-> One has huge market share over EML/OCS.

And the one thing in common is that they're all likely backlogged on orders into 2028.

Signaling near-guaranteed fundamental revenue and likely margin expansion into the next year.

It's H1 2026 now.
像这些多年瓶颈的好处:

$HPS.A$SNDK$LITE

就是即使遇到今天这样的市场波动,你也能睡得更踏实一点。

因为你知道即使 1 年后需求仍会极端强劲……

即使 Trump 想核平 Bikini Bottom,其他公司可能受影响更大:

-> 一家公司在 Transformers 上有巨大份额
-> 一家公司在 NAND 上有巨大份额
-> 一家公司在 EML/OCS 上有巨大份额。

共同点是,它们订单很可能都已经排到 2028 年。

这意味着未来一年收入基本面几乎确定,并且利润率很可能扩张。

现在是 2026 H1。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041519692985344500
❤️ 1,146 🔁 48 💬 115
打开原推
📝 原创
I still think $RDDT is one of the few non-AI names that is extremely compelling.

Just by how fast they’re growing + true profitability post-earnings.

Honestly still not sure why they’re underperforming the market… https://t.co/C9T3qbc8vZ
我仍然觉得 $RDDT 是少数极具吸引力的非 AI 名字之一。

就看它们增长速度 + 财报后真正盈利能力。

说实话我还是不确定为什么它跑输市场…… https://t.co/C9T3qbc8vZ
❤️ 1,532 🔁 81 💬 228
打开原推
💬 引用
And… $FLNC is up over 50% now.

I did think it was undervalued as is, but it was a massive cherry on top throwing in 2 hyperscaler deals.

Exciting to see how much markets re-rate this energy company. https://t.co/3RB2u9tBvq
然后……$FLNC 现在涨超 50% 了。

我本来就觉得它被低估了,但再加上 2 个 hyperscaler deals,简直是巨大的锦上添花。

很期待市场会把这家能源公司 re-rate 到什么程度。 https://t.co/3RB2u9tBvq
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Agreed high-level directionally, $FLNC compelling at $3B valuation post-earnings after taking a closer look.

Very rare to see a US energy player that small get 2 direct Hyperscaler deals...

The $5.6B+ backlog derisks the company growth, not including new hyperscalers backlog like $GOOGL or $MSFT.

The hyperscaler deals were framework agreements, which are likely to convert "soon" Q3 this year, and aren't included in numbers.

Once that's released it's major positive catalyst, similar to qualification -> volume ramp in semi players.

Citi Analyst: "The possibility of a hyperscaler order will likely overshadow everything else in the quarter. We expect a positive reaction to the announcement"

I'm going to go ahead and guess they'll likely rerated once they announce their hyperscaler orders maybe anytime in the next 3 months so I jumped on the boat as a short term catalyst trade. (not just 1 but 2)

Also, if they hit ~$288M net income off gross-margin expansion ($6B revenue, 13.0% gross margins) from their software segment expansion, ~11.6x fwd p/e for 2027.

The current stock price is -50% Feb's prices despite hyperscalers + backlog de-risking the company looks like a great entry point to me (NFA).
高层方向上同意,仔细看完财报后,$FLNC 在 $3B 估值很有吸引力。

很少看到一家这么小的美国能源公司直接拿到 2 个 hyperscaler deal……

$5.6B+ backlog 去风险了公司的增长,还不包括 $GOOGL$MSFT 这类新 hyperscaler backlog。

这些 hyperscaler deals 是框架协议,可能会在今年 Q3 “很快”转化,而且还没计入数字。

一旦公布,就是重大正面催化,类似半导体玩家从 qualification 到 volume ramp。

Citi 分析师:“hyperscaler 订单的可能性很可能盖过本季度其他所有事情。我们预计公告后会有正面反应”

我猜他们宣布 hyperscaler 订单后可能会重估,也许未来 3 个月内任何时候,所以我上船做一个短期催化交易。(不是 1 个,是 2 个)

另外,如果他们靠软件部门扩张带来的毛利率提升,在 $6B 收入、13.0% 毛利率下做到约 $288M 净利润,2027 年 fwd p/e 约 11.6x。

尽管有 hyperscalers + backlog 去风险,公司当前股价仍比 2 月价格低 50%,我看是很好的入场点(NFA)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2052435712126161008
❤️ 1,043 🔁 69 💬 128
打开原推
💬 引用
LOL. Nomura initiates $SOI coverage and gives it a EUR 250 PT.

Back when I went long at ~€43, after the first +25% institutions were saying not to buy and that there’s nothing new.

Now 2 months later they’re giving price targets ~6X+ my thesis post. https://t.co/qrEM43fXv2
LOL。Nomura 开始覆盖 $SOI,并给出 EUR 250 PT。

当我在 ~€43 做多、第一次涨 +25% 后,机构还在说不要买,说没什么新东西。

现在 2 个月后,他们给的目标价大约是我 thesis 帖的 ~6X+。 https://t.co/qrEM43fXv2
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 746 🔁 29 💬 53
打开原推
💬 引用
It’s still premarket…

But +18.66% off $FLNC having 2 direct hyperscaler contracts coming up.

Especially at this tiny MC, having these types of contracts typically leads to massive re-rating. https://t.co/fVroq5VrN4
现在还是盘前……

$FLNC 因为即将有 2 个直接 hyperscaler contracts,涨了 +18.66%。

尤其是在这么小的市值下,有这种合同通常会带来巨大 re-rating。 https://t.co/fVroq5VrN4
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Agreed high-level directionally, $FLNC compelling at $3B valuation post-earnings after taking a closer look.

Very rare to see a US energy player that small get 2 direct Hyperscaler deals...

The $5.6B+ backlog derisks the company growth, not including new hyperscalers backlog like $GOOGL or $MSFT.

The hyperscaler deals were framework agreements, which are likely to convert "soon" Q3 this year, and aren't included in numbers.

Once that's released it's major positive catalyst, similar to qualification -> volume ramp in semi players.

Citi Analyst: "The possibility of a hyperscaler order will likely overshadow everything else in the quarter. We expect a positive reaction to the announcement"

I'm going to go ahead and guess they'll likely rerated once they announce their hyperscaler orders maybe anytime in the next 3 months so I jumped on the boat as a short term catalyst trade. (not just 1 but 2)

Also, if they hit ~$288M net income off gross-margin expansion ($6B revenue, 13.0% gross margins) from their software segment expansion, ~11.6x fwd p/e for 2027.

The current stock price is -50% Feb's prices despite hyperscalers + backlog de-risking the company looks like a great entry point to me (NFA).
高层方向上同意,仔细看完财报后,$FLNC 在 $3B 估值很有吸引力。

很少看到一家这么小的美国能源公司直接拿到 2 个 hyperscaler deal……

$5.6B+ backlog 去风险了公司的增长,还不包括 $GOOGL$MSFT 这类新 hyperscaler backlog。

这些 hyperscaler deals 是框架协议,可能会在今年 Q3 “很快”转化,而且还没计入数字。

一旦公布,就是重大正面催化,类似半导体玩家从 qualification 到 volume ramp。

Citi 分析师:“hyperscaler 订单的可能性很可能盖过本季度其他所有事情。我们预计公告后会有正面反应”

我猜他们宣布 hyperscaler 订单后可能会重估,也许未来 3 个月内任何时候,所以我上船做一个短期催化交易。(不是 1 个,是 2 个)

另外,如果他们靠软件部门扩张带来的毛利率提升,在 $6B 收入、13.0% 毛利率下做到约 $288M 净利润,2027 年 fwd p/e 约 11.6x。

尽管有 hyperscalers + backlog 去风险,公司当前股价仍比 2 月价格低 50%,我看是很好的入场点(NFA)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2052435712126161008
❤️ 1,324 🔁 97 💬 99
打开原推
💬 引用
What did I say? $SIVE was undergoing a transfer of Swedish ownership over to the US...

If I'm interpreting things right from the new cap table.

The US / West now owns 42.18% of $SIVE:

~ $FNF (Fidelity) - 11.5% (US/West)
~ $SCHW (Schwab) - 11.4% (US/West)
~ $IBKR - 9.25% (US/International)
~ Pershing (BNY Melon) - 4.15% (US/West)
~ Morgan Stanley - 3.12%
~Merrill Lynch ( $BOA ) - 2.76%

Europe: ~7.73%:

Clearstream Banking - 6.16% (European)
UBS Switzerland AG - 1.57% (Swedish/EU)

While Swedish now hold ~7.49% of $SIVE:

Försäkringsaktiebolaget Avanza Pension - 4.76%
Nordnet Pensionsförsäkring AB - 2.73

Before, Sivers was a ~60% European/Swedish retail owned company...

They went from that, down closer to 0 as they keep selling their shares.

US has close to majority control, right before the CPO supercycle of 2027.

Transfer seems almost complete?
我说什么来着?$SIVE 正在经历瑞典所有权向美国转移……

如果我对新 cap table 的解读没错。

美国/西方现在拥有 $SIVE 的 42.18%:

~ $FNF (Fidelity) - 11.5%(US/West)
~ $SCHW (Schwab) - 11.4%(US/West)
~ $IBKR - 9.25%(US/International)
~ Pershing (BNY Melon) - 4.15%(US/West)
~ Morgan Stanley - 3.12%
~Merrill Lynch($BOA)- 2.76%

欧洲:~7.73%:

Clearstream Banking - 6.16%(European)
UBS Switzerland AG - 1.57%(Swedish/EU)

而瑞典现在持有 $SIVE 约 ~7.49%:

Försäkringsaktiebolaget Avanza Pension - 4.76%
Nordnet Pensionsförsäkring AB - 2.73

以前,Sivers 是一家约 60% 由欧洲/瑞典散户持有的公司……

他们从那种状态一路卖到接近 0。

就在 2027 CPO supercycle 前,美国已经接近多数控制。

转移看起来快完成了?
引用原推@PerDahlstrm
@aleabitoreddit Updated shareholder list……… https://t.co/DgN8QuxKMl
@aleabitoreddit 更新后的股东名单……… https://t.co/DgN8QuxKMl
https://x.com/PerDahlstrm/status/2052671363106693587
❤️ 1,382 🔁 92 💬 146
打开原推
📝 原创
I've noticed that it's always like 4-6 weeks after my thesis post...

That a bunch of institution start buying up names like $AXTI, $SOI, or $IQE.

I'm not sure if it's just luck with timing.

Or if they're reading my posts and need time for DD? https://t.co/jwCXyl9mb6
我注意到,总是在我发 thesis 帖后大概 4-6 周……

一堆机构开始买入 $AXTI$SOI$IQE 这样的名字。

我不确定这只是 timing 上运气好。

还是他们在读我的帖子,然后需要时间做 DD? https://t.co/jwCXyl9mb6
❤️ 997 🔁 31 💬 95
打开原推
💬 引用
Every day it's like this on repeat with $SIVE, it's like dejavu lol.

Makes sense why Sivers is getting listed on Nasdaq soon instead of staying in local markets.

New local hit piece on their own frontier company happens every market open, stock drops 10%:

-> "CPO and the CW lasers is nothing new"
-> "Sivers is going up against well funded $LITE and $COHR and will lose because of capital"
-> "They had to dilute 2.5% to get listed on Nasdaq"
-> "Delayed annual report is sketchy" (to get listed on Nasdaq)
-> $SIVE is not big enough to capitalize on $JBL relationship and scale.

Local Swedish folks end up selling. Western investors/funds end up acquiring the float.

Better for the West to own the company before CPO ramp starts.

Creating a frontier company purely from Sweden seems hopeless given local culture.
$SIVE 每天都像这样重复,简直 dejavu lol。

也难怪 Sivers 很快要上 Nasdaq,而不是留在本地市场。

本地每个开盘都对自己的 frontier company 来一篇新的攻击文章,股票跌 10%:

-> “CPO 和 CW lasers 没什么新东西”
-> “Sivers 要对抗资金充足的 $LITE$COHR,会因为资本输掉”
-> “他们为了上 Nasdaq 不得不稀释 2.5%”
-> “延迟年报很可疑”(为了上 Nasdaq)
-> $SIVE 还不够大,无法利用 $JBL 关系并扩张。

瑞典本地人最终卖出。西方投资者/基金最终收购流通盘。

在 CPO ramp 开始前,让西方拥有这家公司更好。

从瑞典本土文化看,纯粹在瑞典创造一家 frontier company 似乎没希望。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I'm still laughing how much Swedish hate their own frontier companies so much.

That they write hit pieces every day on $SIVE.

This one was entertaining: Local journalists show up to an empty $SIVE administrative building uninvited.

Because they can't fathom the CEO is in Silicon Valley or design team is working on US Gov CHIPS act dev in the US. And because there weren't many cars parked outside + CFO wouldn't take questions about secretive hyperscaler deal financials.

They wrote a random negative hit piece.

By repeating "There are several who make lasers like these and Sivers are far from alone".

Several like $LITE, $COHR, $60B+ companies.

and reported earlier that "CPO is nothing special, it's been around for years."

While GS projects CPO going from $1B -> $91B TAM over the next two years.

Even put "Plans" in quotation marks because they didn't think Sivers is supplying lasers to $JBL 1.6T LRO.

IMO, $SIVE ends up as a $10B+ company next year, especially if they follow what $LITE / $COHR did with downstream IP integration to capture more of CPO module BOM.

Just don't think Swedish people understand hyperscaler supply chains, concept of forward growth, or the fact that employee count doesn't equate to revenue.

Transfer of control from local Swedish -> West is always appreciated, as this was a majority owned local retail company before.
我还是觉得很好笑,瑞典人居然这么讨厌自己的前沿公司。

以至于他们每天都写 $SIVE 的黑稿。

这篇挺有意思:本地记者未经邀请跑到一个空的 $SIVE 行政楼。

因为他们无法理解 CEO 在 Silicon Valley,或者设计团队在美国做 US Gov CHIPS act 开发。又因为外面没停多少车 + CFO 不愿回答保密 hyperscaler deal 财务问题。

他们就写了一篇随机负面黑稿。

反复说“有好几家公司都能做这种 lasers,Sivers 远不是唯一一家”。

是啊,好几家,比如 $LITE$COHR、$60B+ 公司。

他们之前还报道说“CPO 没什么特别的,已经存在很多年了。”

与此同时 GS 预计 CPO 会在未来两年从 $1B -> $91B TAM。

甚至把 “Plans” 加引号,因为他们不相信 Sivers 在给 $JBL 1.6T LRO 供应 lasers。

IMO,$SIVE 明年会成为 $10B+ 公司,尤其如果他们像 $LITE / $COHR 那样做下游 IP 整合,以捕获更多 CPO module BOM。

我只是觉得瑞典人不理解 hyperscaler supply chains、forward growth 概念,也不理解员工数量不等于收入。

控制权从本地瑞典 -> 西方转移总是值得欢迎,因为这之前是一家由本地散户多数持有的公司。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2052296867653066978
❤️ 1,172 🔁 64 💬 122
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
As for $NVDA CPO suppliers from the GS note:

I'm just investigating right now why this random $200m company Nextronics is still $200m..

When they're Nvidia's supplier for CPO connectors and Cage Thermal?

They also happen to be a a humanoids / $AMZN supplier and it's actually the smallest name up there alongside Foci, Browave, and others.

Probably going to investigating on CPO connector/cage thermal costs and calculate the TAM too.

Just caught my eye given everything is up hundreds of percent aside from this.
关于 GS note 里的 $NVDA CPO 供应商:

我现在只是在调查,为什么这家随机的 $200m 公司 Nextronics 仍然只有 $200m……

明明它们是 Nvidia 的 CPO connectors 和 Cage Thermal 供应商?

它们还刚好是 humanoids / $AMZN 供应商,而且和 Foci、Browave 等一起,是名单里最小的名字。

我大概会继续研究 CPO connector/cage thermal 成本,并计算 TAM。

因为除了它之外,所有东西都涨了几百个百分点,所以引起了我的注意。
❤️ 593 🔁 13 💬 78
打开原推
📝 原创
Unreal… I’m over halfway there to Elon in subscriber count.

24K more and I’ll be #1 on the entire X platform!

Feels surreal that a random person sharing their thoughts about niche AI ideas from $LPK to $SOI ….

Has a chance to be the most popular one on the largest platform? https://t.co/MsuqG95Y3p
不真实……我的订阅数离 Elon 已经过半了。

再多 24K,我就会成为整个 X 平台 #1!

一个随机的人分享从 $LPK$SOI 这些 niche AI ideas 的想法……

居然有机会成为最大平台上最受欢迎的人,这感觉太 surreal 了? https://t.co/MsuqG95Y3p
❤️ 1,954 🔁 33 💬 154
打开原推
💬 引用
I still am bearish on $IREN.

Algorithms/retail probably read $NVDA + $IREN partnership and bought it up.

However, if you look at the realtity, it's just looks like brand agreement giving $NVDA risk-free convertible notes.

So $IREN can continue selling their $6,000,000,000 ATM into retail investors.

It's the equivalent of a startup using AWS and saying they have an Amazon partnership so give them $6B.

This wasn't Nvidia directly funding $IREN yet, just a risk free option to.

There's a "5 GW deployment" but I'd rather not be the one buying into the dilution to fund it.
我仍然看空 $IREN

算法/散户可能看到 $NVDA + $IREN partnership 就买上去了。

然而,如果你看现实,这看起来只是一个品牌协议,给 $NVDA 无风险 convertible notes。

这样 $IREN 就可以继续把他们的 $6,000,000,000 ATM 卖给散户投资者。

这相当于一家 startup 用 AWS,然后说自己有 Amazon partnership,所以请给他们 $6B。

这还不是 Nvidia 直接资助 $IREN,只是一个无风险选择权。

确实有一个“5 GW deployment”,但我宁愿不要成为买入稀释、为它融资的人。
引用原推@CookerFlips
@aleabitoreddit $IREN announcement 🤯
@aleabitoreddit $IREN 公告 🤯
https://x.com/CookerFlips/status/2052491244820107268
❤️ 1,706 🔁 95 💬 340
打开原推
📝 原创
$AAOI reported earnings, it's actually extremely positive so far contrary to market reactions.

Like all 2027 hyperbolic forward growth companies:

Nobody should care about current financials.

Key things market missed was:

AOI: hit They hit 100K units/month capacity for 800G transceivers.

And: -> "Significant larger growth expected starting in Q3 as capacity comes online"

If you do look at financials:

It's ~29.2% non GAAP gross margin

on ~$151.1M revenue, guiding $180-$198m Q2.

We already know from Lumentum earnings that it's more of capacity bottleneck, not a demand one. And anything they make they sell out.

It's a forward growth story, so important thing aside from these notes is the earnings call on hyperscaler demand implications and capacity ramp.
$AAOI 发了财报,和市场反应相反,到目前为止其实极其正面。

像所有 2027 hyperbolic forward growth companies 一样:

没人应该在意当前财务。

市场漏掉的关键点是:

AOI:800G transceivers 产能达到 100K units/month。

还有:-> “随着产能上线,Q3 开始预计会有显著更大增长”

如果你确实看财务:

non GAAP gross margin 约 ~29.2%

收入 ~$151.1M,Q2 指引 $180-$198m。

我们已经从 Lumentum 财报知道,这更多是产能瓶颈,不是需求问题。他们做出什么就卖光什么。

这是一个 forward growth story,所以除了这些 note 以外,重要的是财报电话会里关于 hyperscaler demand implications 和 capacity ramp 的内容。
❤️ 1,803 🔁 135 💬 159
打开原推
💬 引用
Agreed high-level directionally, $FLNC compelling at $3B valuation post-earnings after taking a closer look.

Very rare to see a US energy player that small get 2 direct Hyperscaler deals...

The $5.6B+ backlog derisks the company growth, not including new hyperscalers backlog like $GOOGL or $MSFT.

The hyperscaler deals were framework agreements, which are likely to convert "soon" Q3 this year, and aren't included in numbers.

Once that's released it's major positive catalyst, similar to qualification -> volume ramp in semi players.

Citi Analyst: "The possibility of a hyperscaler order will likely overshadow everything else in the quarter. We expect a positive reaction to the announcement"

I'm going to go ahead and guess they'll likely rerated once they announce their hyperscaler orders maybe anytime in the next 3 months so I jumped on the boat as a short term catalyst trade. (not just 1 but 2)

Also, if they hit ~$288M net income off gross-margin expansion ($6B revenue, 13.0% gross margins) from their software segment expansion, ~11.6x fwd p/e for 2027.

The current stock price is -50% Feb's prices despite hyperscalers + backlog de-risking the company looks like a great entry point to me (NFA).
高层方向上同意,仔细看后,$FLNC 财报后 $3B 估值很有吸引力。

很少看到这么小的美国能源玩家拿到 2 个直接 Hyperscaler deals……

$5.6B+ backlog 降低了公司增长风险,还不包括像 $GOOGL$MSFT 这种新的 hyperscalers backlog。

这些 hyperscaler deals 是框架协议,很可能在今年 Q3 “很快”转成订单,而且还没包括在数字里。

一旦公布,就是重大正面催化,类似半导体玩家的 qualification -> volume ramp。

Citi Analyst:“hyperscaler order 的可能性很可能会盖过本季度其他所有事。我们预计市场会对公告做出正面反应”

我就先猜,他们一旦宣布 hyperscaler orders,可能未来 3 个月内任何时候都会 re-rate,所以我上船做一个短期催化交易。(而且不是 1 个,是 2 个)

另外,如果它们通过软件板块扩张带来的 gross-margin expansion,实现 ~$288M net income($6B revenue,13.0% gross margins),2027 年 fwd p/e 约 ~11.6x。

当前股价相比 2 月价格低 -50%,尽管 hyperscalers + backlog 已经降低公司风险,在我看来这是很好的入场点(NFA)。
引用原推@Kaizen_Investor
Just listened to the earnings call from $FLNC and decided to add to my position at $16.67.

The earnings were spectacular in my opinion. Yes, they missed revenues due to a delayed shipment of $80 million, but the backlog keeps rising and Fluence management is confident they can deliver.

50% of the backlog comes from new customers and the main part of this backlog is for datacenter purposes. The datacenter backlog is around 12 GW, with the major part of this connected to 2 hyperscalers. To give you an idea, Fluence now have around 22GW deployed or contracted globally. So, this is a major deal.

They announced 2 MSA's with major hyperscalers and are expecting a first order in Q3 already. They also said that they would speed up delivery for these hyperscalers and are expecting deliveries within a year. So, we should see first revenues from these deals in 2027.

They also explained the heavy selection process for these hyperscalers. Apparently 26 companies were notified, but due to the difficult technical specifications most of the companies could not fit the standards.

The main reason they were able to agree these MSA's was due to the fact that their technology is already proven. He spoke about the Fluence lab, so I suppose these Hyperscalers visited the lab and approved.

The main focus remains on top-line growth. There were some questions about the high OPEX costs in percentage of revenues but Fluence want to control these by growing revenues instead of lowering costs.

Happy to have started a stronger position here. Datacenters are looking for high quality of power to get them through the fluctuations and it looks like Fluence can provide it.

Now valued at $3.4B with a $5.6B backlog, still looks pretty cheap.
刚听完 $FLNC 的财报电话会,决定在 $16.67 加仓。

我认为财报非常出色。是的,他们因为 $80 million 延迟发货导致收入不及预期,但 backlog 持续上升,Fluence 管理层有信心交付。

50% 的 backlog 来自新客户,其中主要部分用于数据中心。数据中心 backlog 约 12 GW,其中大部分与 2 个 hyperscaler 相关。给你一个概念,Fluence 目前全球已部署或已签约约 22GW。所以这是一笔重大交易。

他们宣布了 2 个与主要 hyperscalers 的 MSA,并预计 Q3 就会有第一笔订单。他们还说会为这些 hyperscalers 加快交付,预计一年内交付。所以我们应该会在 2027 年看到这些 deal 的第一批收入。

他们也解释了这些 hyperscalers 严格的筛选过程。据说有 26 家公司收到通知,但由于技术规格很难,大多数公司无法满足标准。

他们能签下这些 MSA 的主要原因,是他们的技术已经被验证。他提到 Fluence lab,所以我猜这些 Hyperscalers 参观了实验室并认可了。

核心重点仍是 top-line 增长。有人问到 OPEX 占收入比例较高的问题,但 Fluence 想通过增长收入而不是降成本来控制。

很高兴在这里开始建立更强仓位。数据中心正在寻找高质量电力来应对波动,看起来 Fluence 可以提供。

现在估值 $3.4B,backlog $5.6B,看起来仍然相当便宜。
https://x.com/Kaizen_Investor/status/2052399233337053194
❤️ 1,830 🔁 176 💬 146
打开原推
💬 引用
Wait a sec…

This feels so weird I talk about Faker and Aespa and suddenly they’re doing $GOOGL ads together. https://t.co/U9TJ1XHUDj
等一下……

这感觉太奇怪了,我刚聊 Faker 和 Aespa,突然他们就一起拍 $GOOGL 广告了。 https://t.co/U9TJ1XHUDj
引用原推@ujiminphoria
KARINA AND FAKER FOR GOOGLE PLAY OMG https://t.co/PVRmztd67Q
KARINA 和 FAKER 给 GOOGLE PLAY 代言 OMG https://t.co/PVRmztd67Q
https://x.com/ujiminphoria/status/2052408365742207160
❤️ 551 🔁 14 💬 88
打开原推
💬 引用
When I first went long on Soitec and the price rose 30%.

I had European analysts saying that there was nothing new about it.

Now $SOI up a few hundred percent. https://t.co/ElgiQPMNhP
当我第一次做多 Soitec,价格涨了 30% 时。

欧洲分析师说它没什么新东西。

现在 $SOI 已经涨了几百个百分点。 https://t.co/ElgiQPMNhP
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 749 🔁 33 💬 68
打开原推
💬 引用
$LPK up 80% in the last two weeks. Not too shabby at ~$687M MC?

It's probably one of the cleaner ways to play the next Glass Substrate supercycle.

50-100 machines per customer at scale, with "start of 2027 as mass production" across likely $INTC, $GLW, SKC, and others (since they captured ~80% of the major players).

Maybe ~€2M average per machine.

€400M–€1B+ across just 5 players in 2027 (could be more)? Since they basically supply to everyone as a chokepoint. Off ~67.6% blended gross margins.

Seems promising for volume ramp wait time.
$LPK 过去两周涨了 80%。在 ~$687M 市值下还不错吧?

它可能是押注下一轮 Glass Substrate supercycle 更干净的方式之一。

每个客户规模化后 50-100 台机器,预计可能是 $INTC$GLW、SKC 等在“2027 年初量产”(因为他们拿下了约 ~80% 的主要玩家)。

每台机器平均可能 ~€2M。

2027 年只看 5 个玩家就有 €400M–€1B+(可能更多)?因为它们作为 chokepoint 基本供应给所有人。基于 ~67.6% blended gross margins。

等待量产爬坡看起来挺有前途。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
People nonstop ask me about $LPKK / $LPK for my opinion

Yes, I mentioned they're like a chokepoint for glass core substrates for LIDE (laser induced deep etching) way back when.

Biggest known partner is $ONTO (LIDE with Onto metrology for glass core mass production).

Then as for market share: "more than 80% of customers among major global players have selected LPKF equipment" for process validation.

So that probably includes:
- Samsung Electronics/Electro-Mechanics
- $INTC (Receives a Major Order from a Leading Chip Manufacturer... installed a first LIDE system at the beginning of 2020... now ordered further LIDE systems to start volume production)
- SKC (Absolics)
- $GLW, AGC, Schott.
- Nippon electric glass.

Of course this is evaluation, so that 80% could be lower in actual ramp.

As for some personal FWD P/E calculations:

- 2027: ~11-12.5x and ~7.8x for 2028, which looks very compelling.
- Total Cash: ~€10.0M, debt was around ~€3.0M. debt to equity: ~3.8%

So very clean-asset light balance sheet, no dilution overhang like $SHMD.

~$362m MC, conclusion: great upside long imo, hard to see institutions not buying this name down the road.

Even if the 80% of players managed to design another way, even a fraction would probably be very material to the MC.

It was probably a bit early few months ago, but glass core roadmaps have been speeding up like CPO.

Disclosure: I do have positions. This are just my thoughts.

People on X did their homework.
一直有人问我对 $LPKK / $LPK 的看法。

是的,我很早就提过它们像是 glass core substrates 的 LIDE(laser induced deep etching)瓶颈。

已知最大合作伙伴是 $ONTO(LIDE 搭配 Onto metrology,用于 glass core 量产)。

然后关于市场份额:“主要全球玩家中超过 80% 的客户选择了 LPKF 设备”用于工艺验证。

所以这可能包括:
- Samsung Electronics/Electro-Mechanics
- $INTC(从领先芯片制造商获得重大订单……2020 年初安装第一套 LIDE 系统……现在订购更多 LIDE 系统以启动量产)
- SKC(Absolics)
- $GLW、AGC、Schott。
- Nippon electric glass。

当然这只是 evaluation,所以 80% 到实际 ramp 时可能会低一些。

至于我个人的 FWD P/E 计算:

- 2027:约 11-12.5x,2028 约 7.8x,看起来非常有吸引力。
- 总现金:约 €10.0M,债务约 €3.0M。debt to equity:约 3.8%

所以资产负债表很干净、轻资产,没有 $SHMD 那种稀释悬念。

约 $362m 市值,结论:IMO 是上行很好的多头,很难想象机构以后不会买这个名字。

即使那 80% 玩家里有人成功设计出其他方案,哪怕一部分转化,对这个市值也可能非常实质。

几个月前可能有点早,但 glass core 路线图已经像 CPO 一样在加速。

披露:我有仓位。这只是我的想法。

X 上的人做了功课。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046449839626670369
❤️ 913 🔁 74 💬 61
打开原推
📝 原创
I'm still laughing how much Swedish hate their own frontier companies so much.

That they write hit pieces every day on $SIVE.

This one was entertaining: Local journalists show up to an empty $SIVE administrative building uninvited.

Because they can't fathom the CEO is in Silicon Valley or design team is working on US Gov CHIPS act dev in the US. And because there weren't many cars parked outside + CFO wouldn't take questions about secretive hyperscaler deal financials.

They wrote a random negative hit piece.

By repeating "There are several who make lasers like these and Sivers are far from alone".

Several like $LITE, $COHR, $60B+ companies.

and reported earlier that "CPO is nothing special, it's been around for years."

While GS projects CPO going from $1B -> $91B TAM over the next two years.

Even put "Plans" in quotation marks because they didn't think Sivers is supplying lasers to $JBL 1.6T LRO.

IMO, $SIVE ends up as a $10B+ company next year, especially if they follow what $LITE / $COHR did with downstream IP integration to capture more of CPO module BOM.

Just don't think Swedish people understand hyperscaler supply chains, concept of forward growth, or the fact that employee count doesn't equate to revenue.

Transfer of control from local Swedish -> West is always appreciated, as this was a majority owned local retail company before.
我还在笑瑞典人有多讨厌自己的 frontier companies。

以至于他们每天都写 $SIVE 攻击文章。

这一篇挺有意思:本地记者未经邀请跑到空荡荡的 $SIVE 行政楼。

因为他们无法想象 CEO 在 Silicon Valley,或者设计团队正在美国做 US Gov CHIPS act dev。还因为外面没停几辆车 + CFO 不回答关于保密 hyperscaler deal 财务的问题。

他们就写了一篇随机负面攻击文。

反复说“有好几家公司做这种激光器,Sivers 远不是唯一”。

好几家,比如 $LITE$COHR、$60B+ 公司。

还早些报道称“CPO 没什么特别的,已经存在多年”。

而 GS 预计 CPO 未来两年 TAM 从 $1B -> $91B。

甚至把“Plans”加引号,因为他们不认为 Sivers 在给 $JBL 1.6T LRO 供应激光器。

IMO,$SIVE 明年会变成 $10B+ 公司,尤其是如果它们沿着 $LITE / $COHR 的路径,通过下游 IP integration 捕获更多 CPO module BOM。

我就是不觉得瑞典人理解 hyperscaler supply chains、forward growth 的概念,或者员工数量不等于收入这个事实。

从瑞典本地 -> 西方的控制权转移一直值得感谢,因为这家公司以前多数由本地散户持有。
❤️ 1,582 🔁 104 💬 173
打开原推
💬 引用
$COHR earnings note:

Coherent's CEO basically reaffirmed GS research note about CPO being a massive revenue driver:

Transcript: “One of the most important long-term growth opportunities for Coherent”

In terms of timeline implications on $SIVE, $LITE, and other CPO adjacent names, just confirms timelines:

"Initial scale-out CPO revenue is expected to begin in the second half of calendar 2026, with scale-up CPO revenue following in the second half of calendar 2027"

"Coherent is working with multiple other customers and expects CPO solutions to be widely adopted." - This also reaffirmed adoption level.

Scale-up CPO is the biggest value driver across the board that happens start of H2 next year. We're still in H1 2026 entering H2 2026.

So this is the ideal time to frontrun CPO names before anything hits the balance sheet.

This is known as "alpha"... pricing in things market fully don't know yet by looking at financials.

Markets are typically forward looking 8-12 months... So if massive volume ramp happens July 2027 (might get pushed forward again)...

And it's May 2026, a lot of that gets priced in between July 2026 and July 2027... between volume agreements H2 2026, and pre-production ramp H1 2027.

2 months before markets price in the largest volume drivers is what I call "frontrunning" the next CPO Supercycle.

We know it's coming. Just a matter of waiting.
$COHR 财报 note:

Coherent CEO 基本确认了 GS 关于 CPO 会成为巨大收入驱动的研究 note:

Transcript:“One of the most important long-term growth opportunities for Coherent”

$SIVE$LITE 和其他 CPO adjacent 名字的时间线含义而言,只是确认了时间线:

“Initial scale-out CPO revenue is expected to begin in the second half of calendar 2026, with scale-up CPO revenue following in the second half of calendar 2027”

“Coherent is working with multiple other customers and expects CPO solutions to be widely adopted.” - 这也再次确认了采用程度。

Scale-up CPO 是全局最大的价值驱动,从明年 H2 开始发生。我们还在 H1 2026,正在进入 H2 2026。

所以现在是在任何东西进入资产负债表前,抢跑 CPO 名字的理想时间。

这叫“alpha”……通过看财务,提前定价市场还没完全知道的东西。

市场通常会提前 8-12 个月 forward looking……所以如果大规模量产爬坡在 2027 年 7 月发生(可能再次提前)……

而现在是 2026 年 5 月,很多定价会在 2026 年 7 月到 2027 年 7 月之间发生……从 H2 2026 的 volume agreements,到 H1 2027 的 pre-production ramp。

在市场定价最大 volume drivers 前 2 个月,这就是我说的“frontrunning”下一轮 CPO Supercycle。

我们知道它会来。只是等待的问题。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just for the visual learners about CPO:

This is what the CPO market growth looks like from GS + $LITE transcript confirmations.

There's certain names that are very high-beta correlated to CPO.

Maybe... not the best idea to copy firms named after Orange Peels on $AAOI to $SNDK to short names.

At the very beginning or middle of supercycles?

Especially if you're retail, live in Europe, and only look at last 12 months revenue instead of forward growth.
给偏视觉学习的人看 CPO:

这就是 GS + $LITE 电话会确认下的 CPO 市场增长样子。

有一些名字和 CPO 高 beta 相关。

也许……在超级周期刚开始或中段,跟着名字像 Orange Peels 的机构,从 $AAOI$SNDK 去做空这些名字,不是最好的主意?

尤其如果你是散户,住在欧洲,而且只看过去 12 个月收入,而不是 forward growth。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2051863264624353314
❤️ 1,223 🔁 96 💬 80
打开原推
💬 引用
I did say $TOWA (6315) would be very boring...

But it just keeps creeping up slowly over time like Hammond.

Maybe going directly with $EWY longs calls would have been more exciting? https://t.co/7L0p2oeUqQ
我确实说过 $TOWA (6315) 会很无聊……

但它就是像 Hammond 一样,随着时间慢慢往上爬。

也许直接做 $EWY longs calls 会更刺激? https://t.co/7L0p2oeUqQ
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Wow, names like $TOWA (6315) are super boring to watch…

Especially since KR/TW markets are closed today.

Only up ~11% so far. But like Hammond or Tower Semi…

Towa seems like a pretty steady compounder up throughout the duration of new memory cycles.

Bc it receives unavoidable capex inflows from $MU, SK Hynix, and Samsung their monopoly status.

At least Enplas has some volatility… (, they grew their AI test segment 225%+ operating profit y/y)

Then "Mass production of lenses for 1.6T optical transceivers has launched."

Pretty sure they’re sandbagging + have legacy drag confusing algorithms regarding AI segment acceleration.

Good time to take a break from watching markets I guess.
哇,像 $TOWA(6315)这种名字看起来真的超级无聊……

尤其今天 KR/TW 市场还休市。

目前才涨约 11%。但像 Hammond 或 Tower Semi 一样……

Towa 看起来像是在新 memory cycle 持续期间稳步复利上涨的公司。

因为它凭借垄断地位,从 $MU、SK Hynix 和 Samsung 那里获得不可避免的 capex 流入。

至少 Enplas 还有点波动……(他们 AI test segment 经营利润同比增长 225%+)

然后“1.6T optical transceivers lenses 已经启动量产。”

很确定他们在压低预期 + 传统业务拖累让算法对 AI segment 加速感到困惑。

我猜现在正好适合从盯盘里休息一下。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2050031111103984072
❤️ 611 🔁 45 💬 47
打开原推
📝 原创
For Glass Core Substrates, doesn't feel too bad going long on the SKC ecosystem?

SKC (011790) - Is one of the Glass Core Substrate leaders with CHIPS ACT funding at ~$5.5B MC

HB technologies (078150) - automated optical inspection / yields piggy backing off of SKC Absolics at ~$250M.

SKC's copper foil / EV legacy drag seems to be bottoming. Their financials seem like a dumpster fire, but it's kinda priced into MC + better than US companies with $6B+ in dilution.

HB seems lower risk, low p/e and yields for glass is going to be pretty important.

I do have very small exposure to both.

Was going to wait a bit longer but seems markets are pricing in Glass as the next possible memory/photonics trade.
对于 Glass Core Substrates,做多 SKC 生态感觉还不错?

SKC (011790) - 是 Glass Core Substrate 领导者之一,有 CHIPS ACT funding,市值 ~$5.5B

HB technologies (078150) - automated optical inspection / yields,搭 SKC Absolics 顺风车,市值 ~$250M。

SKC 的 copper foil / EV legacy 拖累似乎正在见底。它们财务看起来像 dumpster fire,但这有点已经 priced into MC,而且比那些有 $6B+ 稀释的美国公司好。

HB 看起来风险更低,低 p/e,而且 glass 的 yields 会非常重要。

我两个都有非常小的敞口。

本来打算再等等,但市场似乎正在把 Glass 定价成下一条可能的 memory/photonics 交易。
❤️ 809 🔁 49 💬 72
打开原推
💬 引用
I guess, post earnings when $ARM touched $268...

$ARM is now #18 on the individual stock list that I went long on that hit 100%-1000%+ YTD?

I've lost count TBH. Some others like $LPK and $SIMO and $HPS.A are getting really close now.

But feels like I'm one of the few ones out there on X with actual receipts of all the returns + original thesis post.
我猜,财报后当 $ARM 触到 $268……

$ARM 现在是我做多且 YTD 达到 100%-1000%+ 的个股名单第 18 个?

说实话我已经数不清了。其他像 $LPK$SIMO$HPS.A 也很接近了。

但感觉我是 X 上少数几个对所有回报 + 原始 thesis 帖都有实际记录的人。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Glad to hear it!

I've went long and wrote thesis posts on about out 15 different stocks that hit 100-1000%+ YTD?

1. $AXTI
2. $AAOI
3. $SIVEF
4. $LITE
5. $IQE
6. $AEHR
7. $CRCL
8. $EWY
9. Unimicron
10. Nitto Boseki
11. $OSS
12. $GDRZF
13. $RPI
14. $SOI
15. $ALRIB

Not including others like $TSEM that are about to hit triple digit returns too in a month.

The amount of hate people like myself get for posting free ideas over the internet is pretty insane TBH.

Starting to make sense why people just set up $20,000 paywalls and sell info to Western institutions instead of helping out salty retail investors (especially over in Europe).

But helps me keep motivated to keep posting with these positive comments.
很高兴听到!

我做多并写过 thesis 的股票里,大概有 15 个年初至今涨了 100-1000%+?

1. $AXTI
2. $AAOI
3. $SIVEF
4. $LITE
5. $IQE
6. $AEHR
7. $CRCL
8. $EWY
9. Unimicron
10. Nitto Boseki
11. $OSS
12. $GDRZF
13. $RPI
14. $SOI
15. $ALRIB

还不包括 $TSEM 这类一个月内也快要达到三位数回报的名字。

像我这样在网上免费发想法的人,收到的仇恨真的非常夸张,TBH。

现在开始理解为什么大家干脆设 $20,000 付费墙,把信息卖给西方机构,而不是帮助那些酸溜溜的散户投资者(尤其欧洲那边)。

不过这些正面评论会让我有动力继续发。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2044862572088922469
❤️ 1,155 🔁 39 💬 109
打开原推
💬 引用
And... $AXTI is now over $100, even on a -10% drop.

Cool to see this thesis play out so well.

I think it's my proudest one... calling both the 2026 photonics supercycle as well as the most upstream bottleneck. https://t.co/eiYElTtWsE
然后……$AXTI 现在即使跌 -10%,也已经超过 $100。

很高兴看到这个 thesis 兑现得这么好。

我觉得这是我最自豪的一个……同时点出了 2026 photonics supercycle 和最上游 bottleneck。 https://t.co/eiYElTtWsE
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 1,050 🔁 43 💬 84
打开原推
💬 引用
$ARM seems to be having a fun time.

Almost triple digit return in 1 1/2 months since I went long on their CPU projections.

Markets really like AI CPUs huh? https://t.co/hgWPOB6tIN
$ARM 看起来玩得挺开心。

自从我因为他们的 CPU projections 做多以来,1 个半月差不多接近三位数回报。

市场真的很喜欢 AI CPUs 啊? https://t.co/hgWPOB6tIN
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Bullish on $ARM, given the new bottleneck shifting back to CPUs. MS shows stuff like Orchestration/RAG requiring CPUs.

But I'm predicting parts of localized inference to be handled by CPUs more and more... as models like Gemma get lightweight in the future.

Not every robot needs to be able to solve the mysteries of the universe.

Data centers will need an astronomical amount of traditional CPU compute (AWS Graviton, $GOOGL Axion, and $MSFT Cobalt), which are all ARM based.

$META + OpenAI are also buyers of the AGI CPU.

And AI will flow down to edge.

$15B annual revenue target.. Starting to look reasonable?
看多 $ARM,因为新的瓶颈正在重新转向 CPU。MS 展示了 Orchestration/RAG 等东西需要 CPU。

但我预测,随着未来 Gemma 这类模型变得更轻量,本地推理的一部分会越来越多由 CPU 处理……

不是每个机器人都需要能解开宇宙奥秘。

数据中心会需要天量的传统 CPU 算力(AWS Graviton、$GOOGL Axion 和 $MSFT Cobalt),这些都是 ARM based。

$META + OpenAI 也是 AGI CPU 的买家。

而 AI 会向边缘侧下沉。

$15B 年收入目标……开始看起来合理了?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046419572203683922
❤️ 732 🔁 25 💬 83
打开原推
💬 引用
MicroLED still feels far away before any CPO related volume ramp per Goldman Sachs note.

Quantum Dot like $ALMU / QD isn't even mentioned since it's way way out by years.

In a correction, "premiums" disappear, but valuation floors are backed by revenue.

$SIVEF or $AAOI on the other hand are volume ramping soon <8M and directly in the CW space.

Would prefer immediate upside after years of R&D/expansion...

Than waiting years at the beginning for R&D into sampling into qualification... Then inflection point of volume ramp.

"Technology readiness" is low for MicroLED.
按 Goldman Sachs note,MicroLED 离任何 CPO 相关量产爬坡仍然感觉很远。

Quantum Dot 比如 $ALMU / QD 甚至没被提到,因为它还要好多好多年。

在回调里,“premiums”会消失,但估值底部是由收入支撑的。

另一方面,$SIVEF$AAOI 很快 <8M 就会量产爬坡,并且直接处在 CW space。

比起在最开始等多年 R&D 到 sampling 到 qualification……再到 volume ramp 拐点。

我更愿意要多年 R&D/扩张之后的即时上行。

MicroLED 的“Technology readiness”很低。
引用原推@CM_X_CM
@aleabitoreddit Its because MicroLED is far superior
@aleabitoreddit 这是因为 MicroLED 强太多了
https://x.com/CM_X_CM/status/2052072899008151885
❤️ 765 🔁 39 💬 82
打开原推
💬 引用
I think many people are surprised to learn that stocks don’t move in a straight line up.

Today:

Laser companies from $LITE to $SIVE to $AAOI are down -8.0%, 10.2%, and -4.38%.

Taiwan limit down -10% on CPO names like MSSCorps, Shunsin, and adjacent like Win Semi.

$AXTI and $SOI are down -7% and -10.2%.

After $LITE reported earnings.

Pretty sure markets missed the heavy nuance that this was extremely bullish for CPO names like $SIVEF or Shunsin from the earnings transcript, but algos sold off everything optical.

This is still the very beginning of the entire CPO supercycle curve.

Before any volume ramp.
我觉得很多人惊讶地发现,股票不会直线往上走。

今天:

Laser companies 从 $LITE$SIVE$AAOI,分别跌 -8.0%、10.2% 和 -4.38%。

台湾 CPO 名字比如 MSSCorps、Shunsin,以及相关的 Win Semi 都 limit down -10%。

$AXTI$SOI 分别跌 -7% 和 -10.2%。

发生在 $LITE 发财报之后。

我很确定市场漏掉了财报 transcript 里的大量细节,其实这对 $SIVEF 或 Shunsin 这样的 CPO 名字极度 bullish,但 algos 把所有 optical 都卖了。

这仍然是整个 CPO supercycle 曲线的最开始。

在任何量产爬坡之前。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just for the visual learners about CPO:

This is what the CPO market growth looks like from GS + $LITE transcript confirmations.

There's certain names that are very high-beta correlated to CPO.

Maybe... not the best idea to copy firms named after Orange Peels on $AAOI to $SNDK to short names.

At the very beginning or middle of supercycles?

Especially if you're retail, live in Europe, and only look at last 12 months revenue instead of forward growth.
给偏视觉学习的人看 CPO:

这就是 GS + $LITE 电话会确认下的 CPO 市场增长样子。

有一些名字和 CPO 高 beta 相关。

也许……在超级周期刚开始或中段,跟着名字像 Orange Peels 的机构,从 $AAOI$SNDK 去做空这些名字,不是最好的主意?

尤其如果你是散户,住在欧洲,而且只看过去 12 个月收入,而不是 forward growth。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2051863264624353314
❤️ 2,110 🔁 135 💬 219
打开原推
📝 原创
I think this is one of only times in history.

Where a bunch of random sht ends up the most important in the world, if its used for AI.

So the entire market looks like a meme after random companies or commodities go up 2000-6000%.

Is this the modern day digital gold rush?
我觉得这是历史上少数几次。

一堆随机东西只要用于 AI,就会变成世界上最重要的东西。

所以整个市场在随机公司或 commodities 涨 2000-6000% 后,看起来像个 meme。

这是现代版数字淘金热吗?
❤️ 2,098 🔁 75 💬 134
打开原推
📝 原创
I feel like institutions are just buying everything glass core substrate related today?

Stuff like:
- Philoptics, limit up
- HB technologies, limit up (SKC supplier)
- YCCHEM +20%

Then there's $LPK over in Europe.

Wonder if I missed any major news.
我感觉机构今天就是在买所有 glass core substrate 相关的东西?

比如:
- Philoptics,limit up
- HB technologies,limit up(SKC supplier)
- YCCHEM +20%

然后欧洲还有 $LPK

不知道我是不是漏了什么重大新闻。
❤️ 1,102 🔁 47 💬 73
打开原推
💬 引用
Just for the visual learners about CPO:

This is what the CPO market growth looks like from GS + $LITE transcript confirmations.

There's certain names that are very high-beta correlated to CPO.

Maybe... not the best idea to copy firms named after Orange Peels on $AAOI to $SNDK to short names.

At the very beginning or middle of supercycles?

Especially if you're retail, live in Europe, and only look at last 12 months revenue instead of forward growth.
给视觉学习者看 CPO:

这就是 GS + $LITE transcript 确认下的 CPO 市场增长样子。

有些名字和 CPO 高 beta 相关。

也许……在 supercycles 的最开始或中间,跟着名字像 Orange Peels 的公司去从 $AAOI$SNDK 做空,并不是最好的主意?

尤其是如果你是散户,住在欧洲,而且只看过去 12 个月收入,而不是 forward growth。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$LITE CEO basically confirmed GS TAM expansion + CPO Supercycle.

From ~close to nothing -> $91B. From H2 2026 to 2028:

“ I think what we’ve said is that we will have a massive supply demand imbalance on CPO”

Demand > Supply.

“Largest single growth driver, scale-up CPO”

Massive revenue driver is CPO.

“is very much in its infancy”.

We’re at the beginnings.

This is exactly why I have positions in $SIVE, MSScorps, Shunsin, $TSEM, $SOI and others for high beta exposure to the start of the CPO supercycle.
$LITE CEO 基本确认了 GS TAM 扩张 + CPO 超级周期。

从几乎接近 0 -> $91B。从 2026 下半年到 2028:

“我觉得我们已经说过,CPO 会出现巨大的供需失衡”

需求 > 供给。

“最大的单一增长驱动,scale-up CPO”

CPO 是巨大的收入驱动。

“还处在非常早期”。

我们才刚刚开始。

这正是为什么我持有 $SIVE、MSScorps、Shunsin、$TSEM$SOI 以及其他一些仓位,来高 beta 暴露在 CPO 超级周期的起点。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2051801908344771022
❤️ 1,829 🔁 158 💬 110
打开原推
📝 原创
I think this is just $LITE corporate wording for:

“We don’t have enough InP substrates”.

Remember I sad last year that as photonics ramps up, $AXTI will just keep growing as a critical bottleneck? https://t.co/DfeQa3haIK
我觉得这只是 $LITE 公司话术版的:

“我们没有足够的 InP substrates”。

记得我去年说过,随着 photonics 爬坡,$AXTI 会作为关键 bottleneck 持续增长吗? https://t.co/DfeQa3haIK
❤️ 782 🔁 36 💬 52
打开原推
💬 引用
Yes, $LITE admitting they're forced to buy CW lasers from their competitors is a massive win for $AAOI.

Since they have their own CW Laser fab (and target 350% increase in capacity by 2027).

The massive nuanced takeaway from $LITE earnings call: $NVDA caused a massive upstream bottleneck for CW lasers.

It's likely $COHR and $LITE have multi-year EML agreements, so they're locked up and can't produce enough CW lasers.

A lot of the former "Tier 2" players I own like $AAOI and $SIVE, are likely elevated in status now given they're not fully allocated to Nvidia.
是的,$LITE 承认他们被迫从竞争对手那里买 CW lasers,这对 $AAOI 是巨大胜利。

因为它们有自己的 CW Laser fab(并且目标到 2027 年产能提升 350%)。

$LITE 财报电话会最重要的细节结论:$NVDA 造成了 CW lasers 的巨大上游瓶颈。

$COHR$LITE 很可能有多年 EML agreements,所以被锁住了,无法生产足够多 CW lasers。

我持有的很多过去所谓“Tier 2”玩家,比如 $AAOI$SIVE,现在很可能地位提升了,因为它们没有完全分配给 Nvidia。
引用原推@Anointed_Ape
@aleabitoreddit Isn’t this a win for $aaoi because they manufacture their own CW lasers? If they scale that up successfully then it’s clear skies for them
@aleabitoreddit 这对 $aaoi 来说不是利好吗,因为他们自己生产 CW lasers?如果他们成功扩大规模,那后面就是一片坦途了
https://x.com/Anointed_Ape/status/2051817940320719135
❤️ 1,159 🔁 73 💬 54
打开原推
📝 原创
Woah... Massive CW laser bottleneck.

It's interesting $LITE is bottlenecked by CW lasers so they buy them on the open market:

"Now we’ve seen a little bit of tension in our own supply line, externally to get lasers from the external market, CW lasers."

$SIVE / Win, Sumitomo, Furukawa, and others operate in a structurally sold out market...

Likely because companies like $LITE have to keep producing EMLs.

Starting to make more sense why Ayar made $SIVE the only laser supplier on their website and removed $LITE / $MTSI?
哇……巨大的 CW laser bottleneck。

很有意思,$LITE 被 CW lasers 卡住,所以他们在公开市场买:

“Now we’ve seen a little bit of tension in our own supply line, externally to get lasers from the external market, CW lasers.”

$SIVE / Win、Sumitomo、Furukawa 等都处在结构性售罄的市场……

很可能是因为像 $LITE 这样的公司必须继续生产 EMLs。

现在开始更能理解为什么 Ayar 把 $SIVE 做成官网唯一激光器供应商,并移除了 $LITE / $MTSI
❤️ 1,120 🔁 77 💬 68
打开原推
💬 引用
$LITE CEO basically confirmed GS TAM expansion + CPO Supercycle.

From ~close to nothing -> $91B. From H2 2026 to 2028:

“ I think what we’ve said is that we will have a massive supply demand imbalance on CPO”

Demand > Supply.

“Largest single growth driver, scale-up CPO”

Massive revenue driver is CPO.

“is very much in its infancy”.

We’re at the beginnings.

This is exactly why I have positions in $SIVE, MSScorps, Shunsin, $TSEM, $SOI and others for high beta exposure to the start of the CPO supercycle.
$LITE CEO 基本确认了 GS TAM expansion + CPO Supercycle。

从几乎接近 0 -> $91B。从 H2 2026 到 2028:

“ I think what we’ve said is that we will have a massive supply demand imbalance on CPO”

需求 > 供给。

“Largest single growth driver, scale-up CPO”

巨大收入驱动是 CPO。

“is very much in its infancy”.

我们还在开端。

这正是为什么我持有 $SIVE、MSScorps、Shunsin、$TSEM$SOI 等,用来高 beta 敞口到 CPO supercycle 的起点。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just reiterating my disbelief:

I have never seen a sector more bullish than CPO.

GS reported Optical TAM 9X from $15b in 2026 -> US$154b in 2028

CPO making up $91B of that.

Starting from ~$164M (Modor for 2026 / sampling) to $91 Billion (GS 2028)

55,000%+ CPO growth curve starting from today

This is exactly why algorithms / analysts mess up because they might look at TTM revenue at these CPO names.

But everything happens in the next two years with $SIVE to Shunsin to MSSCorps to $SOI.

This is Zero to 100 from a massive architectural shift pushed by $NVDA.

I genuinely still don't think retail or markets understand what's coming yet.
只是再强调一下我的难以置信:

我从没见过比 CPO 更看多的板块。

GS 报告 Optical TAM 从 2026 年 $15b 到 2028 年 US$154b,增长 9 倍

其中 CPO 占 $91B。

从约 ~$164M(Modor 对 2026 / 采样的估计)到 $91 Billion(GS 2028)

从今天开始,CPO 增长曲线超过 55,000%

这正是为什么算法 / 分析师会搞错,因为他们可能只看这些 CPO 名字的 TTM 收入。

但一切都会在接下来两年发生,从 $SIVE 到 Shunsin,到 MSSCorps,再到 $SOI

这是一次由 $NVDA 推动的巨大架构转变,从 0 到 100。

我真心还是觉得散户和市场还没理解接下来会发生什么。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2051593478245851178
❤️ 1,361 🔁 131 💬 67
打开原推
💬 引用
Just putting it out there:

A lot of these names from $PLPC to $AMSC are doing decently well from two weeks ago.

$HPS.A (my transformers thesis) earnings also came out today and it’s very solid:

$264M CAD vs $236.3M CAD (strong beat) and backlog increased 94.6% Y/Y which is the leading indicator of a demand for these names.

They’re all critical to American infrastructure, not exactly parabolic growth names… but great compounders.
先放在这里:

从两周前到现在,很多名字从 $PLPC$AMSC 都表现不错。

$HPS.A(我的 transformers thesis)今天也出了财报,非常扎实:

$264M CAD vs $236.3M CAD(强劲 beat),backlog 同比增长 94.6%,这是这些名字需求的领先指标。

它们都对美国基础设施至关重要,不完全是抛物线增长名字……但都是很好的 compounders。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Yes. The President invoked the "Defense Production Act" 2 days ago.

To expand on domestic infra.

Implicit beneficiaries were:

Transmission & Advanced Conductors:
$AMSC - HTS Wires (advanced conductors), power electronics
$PLPC - advanced conductors
$ATKR - transmission components
$VMI - grid components

Power Electronics
$AEIS - power control electronics
$VICR - power delivery

Capacitor Banks
$VSH - power capacitors and capacitor banks

Substations & High-Voltage Circuit Breakers
$POWL - substations/switchgear
$AZZ - substations

Transformers
$HPS.A - My favorite for transformers
$SPXC - power transformers

Electrical Core Steel
$CLF - Only producer of electrical steel in America?

This included:
-Transformers
- transmission components
- advanced conductors
- power electronics
- substations
- high-voltage circuit breakers
- protective relays, capacitor banks
- electrical core steel

TLDR: The executive action declared a national energy emergency regarding the domestic supply chain for grid infrastructure. Authorized federal funding, purchase commitments, and expedited actions to rapidly expand the manufacturing.

Lot of beneficiaries, I made a mini ETF of with $AMSC, $CLF, $PLPC, and then $HPS.A; dont have any of the others.

There's probably going to be a bunch of DOE contracts in the next 3-6 months like " DoE Awards ___ to $POWL " off this act is my guess.
是的。总统 2 天前动用了 "Defense Production Act"。

用于扩张国内基础设施。

隐含受益方包括:

输电与先进导体:
$AMSC - HTS Wires(先进导体)、电力电子
$PLPC - 先进导体
$ATKR - 输电组件
$VMI - 电网组件

电力电子
$AEIS - 电力控制电子
$VICR - 电力传输

电容器组
$VSH - 电力电容和电容器组

变电站与高压断路器
$POWL - 变电站/开关设备
$AZZ - 变电站

变压器
$HPS.A - 我最喜欢的变压器标的
$SPXC - 电力变压器

电工钢
$CLF - 美国唯一的电工钢生产商?

这包括:
-变压器
- 输电组件
- 先进导体
- 电力电子
- 变电站
- 高压断路器
- 保护继电器、电容器组
- 电工钢

TLDR:这项行政行动宣布,国内电网基础设施供应链进入国家能源紧急状态。授权联邦资金、采购承诺和加速行动,以快速扩大制造能力。

受益方很多,我做了一个迷你 ETF,里面有 $AMSC$CLF$PLPC,然后是 $HPS.A;其他的我没有。

我猜接下来 3-6 个月可能会有一堆 DOE 合同,类似 "DoE Awards ___ to $POWL",都是基于这项法案来的。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2047030798554132901
❤️ 767 🔁 49 💬 37
打开原推
💬 引用
Faker was SK Telecom’s best investment imo.
Faker 在我看来是 SK Telecom 最好的投资。
引用原推@pennycheck
Here's a full list of every company SK Telecom has invested in, in the last 3 years

Anthropic
Perplexity
🐧
这是 SK Telecom 过去 3 年投资过的所有公司完整名单

Anthropic
Perplexity
🐧
https://x.com/pennycheck/status/2051735384283873358
❤️ 1,471 🔁 89 💬 107
打开原推
💬 引用
Would have been a generational YTD if you focused on photonics + memory anon.

Every top sector long from $EWY leaps to $AAOI is up multiple hundreds of percent.

I’ve always said Photonics + Memory was the best thematically.

Now there’s subtle architecture changes:

On photonics: pluggables -> CPO
On memory: hbm3e -> hbm4

The same two supercycles.

Different upstream bottlenecks and beneficiaries.
如果你专注 photonics + memory,今年 YTD 会是代际级别的 anon。

$EWY leaps 到 $AAOI,每个顶级板块多头都涨了好几百个百分点。

我一直说 Photonics + Memory 是主题上最好的。

现在有一些细微架构变化:

Photonics:pluggables -> CPO
Memory:hbm3e -> hbm4

还是同样两个 supercycles。

但上游 bottlenecks 和受益者不同。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
@EccShibaInuInv Not yet just been focusing on AI supply chains mostly. Still think photonics/memory is the best trade right now
@EccShibaInuInv 还没有,最近主要还是专注 AI 供应链。还是觉得 photonics/memory 是现在最好的交易
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2027508109485412797
❤️ 640 🔁 27 💬 79
打开原推
📝 原创
I’m just watching everything from $EWY to $SNDK go up enormous amounts…

Even $MU is up 12% today.

Uhhh… YTD is getting a little ridiculous. https://t.co/FJKQjq8YJk
我就看着从 $EWY$SNDK 的所有东西都涨得巨大……

$MU 今天都涨了 12%。

呃……YTD 开始有点离谱了。 https://t.co/FJKQjq8YJk
❤️ 1,600 🔁 53 💬 151
打开原推
📝 原创
Uh, was there any news with $POET

Or does the universe just not like short sellers? https://t.co/8rYaWornYf
呃,$POET 有什么新闻吗……

还是宇宙就是不喜欢空头? https://t.co/8rYaWornYf
❤️ 964 🔁 29 💬 121
打开原推
💬 引用
The "Meme Stock" with no fundamentals $RPI is now approaching all time highs from record revenue projections.

Fun to see this idea age well. https://t.co/wx9hQYzJGT
那个没有基本面的“Meme Stock” $RPI,现在因为创纪录收入预测,正在接近历史高点。

很有意思看到这个想法经受住了时间。 https://t.co/wx9hQYzJGT
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Fun Trade Idea: Long $RPI (Raspberry Pi)

Reason: 🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + Hoarding.

Everyone has been openly hoarding Apple Mac Minis and were long Apple.

But $APPL is already a $3.7T+ company. Product mass-buying won't make a dent.

Raspberry Pi, however, is a 542.68M company.

The revenue is material.

Feels like markets haven't priced this in since I've seen almost 0 mentions about the ticker on X (but many product mentions).

And it's only recently that have the hoarding started Raspberry Pis, as they're much cheaper than $500+ Apple products. They also have their mini $NVDA CUDA-light utility ecosystem that people use.

So it turns out these extremely cheap $20 or $200 devices are perfect for deploying mass deploying isolated instances.

The reason is for OpenClaw orchestration (so they don’t mess up your device) -> interfacing with a central LLM via API.

Before people were just buying 1 or 2 for hobby/education purposes, so revenue has slowing.

But now Silicon Valley startups and individuals anecdotally appear to be buying tens or hundreds of these things to run concurrent OpenClaw agentic swarms or do stuff like agentic marketing on Reddit and other places.

And no, there are many applications that can't be done by spinning up AWS VPS, so people do it locally (there's TOS around automation/AI bots, so companies setup their own servers).

That being said main downside risk is that its

- partially foundation owned, and they might not hike rates like $SNDK or $MU does, even if there's extreme demand

- Subject to memory price hikes like LPDDR4 component

so this is not a major position.

However, going forward, revenue should increase due to people buying tens or hundreds of these things for running AI agents.

Balance sheet also looks clean with low downside risk:

- ~$280M - $300M revenue
- ~$75M+ Gross Profit
- ~25% Gross Margin
- Net income: ~$10M - $15M
- Net Cash: $28M

Analysts currently project revenue growth closer to 14–17%.

But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues.

Consumer segments are roughly 1/3rd of revenue but the newfound buying from Openclaw + variants is a new cataylst nevertheless for re-rating.

Especially now that Picoclaw and compressed OpenClaw variants are now able to be run on $20 Raspberry Pis instead of just the Raspberry Pi 5’s.

But seems like people just forgot Raspberry PI was a publicly stock as well.

The stock price is down 56% 1Y to 542.68M euro MC to an all time low.

So this might be that tailwind for a reversal.

There's also a non-zero chance OpenClaw is a long term catalyst for Raspberry Pi based, agentic deployments.

TLDR: People are openly buying Raspberry Pis and Apple Mac Minis for Openclaw/Picoclaw, so revenue should benefit from increased demand.
有意思的交易想法:做多 $RPI(Raspberry Pi)

理由:🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + 囤货。

大家都在公开囤 Apple Mac Mini,而且做多 Apple。

$APPL 已经是 3.7T+ 美元的公司了。产品被大量抢购,对它的影响不会太大。

但 Raspberry Pi 是一家 542.68M 的公司。

这块收入就很实质了。

感觉市场还没把这个定价进去,因为我在 X 上几乎没看到有人提这个 ticker(但很多人在提产品)。

而且大家也是最近才开始囤 Raspberry Pi,因为它们比 500+ 美元的 Apple 产品便宜很多。它们也有一个小型的 $NVDA CUDA-light 实用生态,很多人会用。

所以结果就是,这些极便宜的 20 美元或 200 美元设备,非常适合大规模部署隔离实例。

原因是用来做 OpenClaw 编排(这样不会把你的设备搞乱)-> 通过 API 接入中心化 LLM。

以前大家只是买 1、2 个,用于爱好/教育,所以收入增长放慢了。

但现在从传闻看,硅谷创业公司和个人似乎在买几十台甚至几百台,用来跑并发的 OpenClaw agent swarm,或者做 Reddit 等地方的 agentic marketing。

而且不是所有应用都能靠开 AWS VPS 解决,所以大家会本地部署(自动化/AI bot 有 TOS 限制,所以公司会搭自己的服务器)。

话虽如此,主要下行风险是:

- 它部分由基金会持有,就算需求极端旺盛,也未必会像 $SNDK$MU 那样涨价

- 会受到 LPDDR4 等内存组件涨价影响

所以这不是一个大仓位。

不过往后看,因为大家会为了跑 AI agent 买几十台、几百台设备,收入应该会增加。

资产负债表也看起来干净,下行风险较低:

- 约 $280M - $300M 收入
- $75M+ 毛利
- 约 25% 毛利率
- 净利润:约 $10M - $15M
- 净现金:$28M

分析师目前预计收入增速大概 14-17%。

但如果这波需求涌入持续,收入增速可能从 14% 提升到比较温和的 48-55%。

消费端大概占收入 1/3,但 Openclaw + 各种变体带来的新增购买,仍然是一个新的重估催化。

尤其现在 Picoclaw 和压缩版 OpenClaw 已经能跑在 20 美元的 Raspberry Pi 上,而不只是 Raspberry Pi 5。

但感觉大家只是忘了 Raspberry PI 也是一家上市公司。

股价 1 年跌了 56%,市值到 542.68M 欧元,创历史低位。

所以这可能成为反转的顺风。

OpenClaw 也有非零概率成为基于 Raspberry Pi 的 agentic 部署的长期催化。

TLDR:大家正在公开购买 Raspberry Pi 和 Apple Mac Mini 来跑 Openclaw/Picoclaw,所以收入应该会受益于需求增加。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2023415224372756782
❤️ 709 🔁 20 💬 69
打开原推
📝 原创
Just reiterating my disbelief:

I have never seen a sector more bullish than CPO.

GS reported Optical TAM 9X from $15b in 2026 -> US$154b in 2028

CPO making up $91B of that.

Starting from ~$164M (Modor for 2026 / sampling) to $91 Billion (GS 2028)

55,000%+ CPO growth curve starting from today

This is exactly why algorithms / analysts mess up because they might look at TTM revenue at these CPO names.

But everything happens in the next two years with $SIVE to Shunsin to MSSCorps to $SOI.

This is Zero to 100 from a massive architectural shift pushed by $NVDA.

I genuinely still don't think retail or markets understand what's coming yet.
只是重申一下我的难以置信:

我从没见过比 CPO 更 bullish 的板块。

GS 报告 Optical TAM 从 2026 年 $15b -> 2028 年 US$154b,增长 9X

其中 CPO 占 $91B。

从 ~$164M(Modor 对 2026 / sampling 的估计)到 $91 Billion(GS 2028)

从今天开始是 55,000%+ 的 CPO growth curve

这正是为什么算法/分析师会搞错,因为他们可能看这些 CPO 名字的 TTM revenue。

但接下来两年,$SIVE 到 Shunsin 到 MSSCorps 到 $SOI,所有事情都会发生。

这是 $NVDA 推动的大规模架构转变,从 Zero 到 100。

我真心仍然不觉得散户或市场理解即将发生什么。
❤️ 2,455 🔁 144 💬 160
打开原推
💬 引用
True… I did call:

$AXTI $12 -> $105
$SOI $43-> $145
$TSEM $110 -> $218
$AAOI $30 -> $180
$IQE $13 -> $46
$LITE $363 -> $1000
$AEHR $30 -> $85 (if you count siph segment)

As individual thesis posts… and others like $COHR and Innolight last year…

I think $SIVE is the most debated right now, but I do think I’m right.

Feels like I’m seeing something others don’t with photonics?
确实……我点过:

$AXTI $12 -> $105
$SOI $43-> $145
$TSEM $110 -> $218
$AAOI $30 -> $180
$IQE $13 -> $46
$LITE $363 -> $1000
$AEHR $30 -> $85(如果你算 siph segment)

这些都是单独 thesis 帖……还有去年像 $COHR 和 Innolight 这些……

我觉得 $SIVE 现在争议最大,但我确实认为我是对的。

感觉我在 photonics 里看到了别人没看到的东西?
引用原推@Matrix_B0SS
Don’t forget this legends call from
$AXTI, $AAOI and to many more I can’t even keep track of them all

They all went to triple digits returns in a month

And biggest $SIVE at 5 SEK itself

His probably of being wrong is very low as we have see before

$SIVEF $SIVE to $30 500 SEK
别忘了这位传奇喊过的
$AXTI$AAOI,还有太多我都记不过来了

它们一个月内全都变成三位数回报

最大的是 $SIVE,本身就在 5 SEK

按我们之前看到的,他出错的概率非常低

$SIVEF $SIVE 到 $30 / 500 SEK
https://x.com/Matrix_B0SS/status/2051568335578427728
❤️ 1,581 🔁 75 💬 126
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a recap of recent information discovery + likely mapping with $SIVE:

-> $JBL 1.6T
-> Lightmatter
-> Ayar
-> $MRVL Celestial
-> Lightelligence
-> $POET
-> $GFS ecosystem
-> $AMD CPO
-> O-Net / Enablence
-> $AAPL Silicon Photonics
_
-> $YSS Golden Dome/DoD
-> $RTX / $ERIC (Space)
-> Bae Systems
-> $AEVA

With $JBL to Ayar feeding into hyperscalers like $MSFT, $GOOGL, $AMZN, $META.

With likely Lightelligence to O-Net feeding into Asian Hyperscalers like Tencent, Bytedance, and Baidu.

On top of that... the overarching TAM with CPO from the GS report goes from 0 -> $91B.

And Sivers happens to be the bleeding edge for CPO (also starting from 0).

This is definitely high-beta and volatile.

But if Win volume ramps alongside $SIVE, I see them both becoming $10B+ companies next year.

This is just extremely early on (H1) before the CPO supercycle starts H2 2026.
简单回顾一下最近关于 $SIVE 的信息发现 + 可能 mapping:

-> $JBL 1.6T
-> Lightmatter
-> Ayar
-> $MRVL Celestial
-> Lightelligence
-> $POET
-> $GFS ecosystem
-> $AMD CPO
-> O-Net / Enablence
-> $AAPL Silicon Photonics
_
-> $YSS Golden Dome/DoD
-> $RTX / $ERIC (Space)
-> Bae Systems
-> $AEVA

其中 $JBL 到 Ayar 会流向 $MSFT$GOOGL$AMZN$META 这样的 hyperscalers。

很可能 Lightelligence 到 O-Net 会流向 Tencent、Bytedance、Baidu 这样的亚洲 Hyperscalers。

除此之外……GS 报告里 CPO 的总体 TAM 从 0 -> $91B。

而 Sivers 刚好是 CPO 的 bleeding edge(也从 0 开始)。

这肯定是 high-beta,而且波动大。

但如果 Win 和 $SIVE 一起量产爬坡,我认为它们明年都会成为 $10B+ 公司。

现在只是非常早期(H1),在 CPO supercycle 于 H2 2026 开始之前。
❤️ 1,425 🔁 104 💬 94
打开原推
💬 引用
Pretty sure institutions like GS missed Shunsin (6451) at $1.65B for CPO packaging/test/assembly.

Which is why I'm very bullish on it as a completely backdoored, hidden + major beneficiary of $NVDA CPO ramp.

Foxconn is a major supply chain partner among $TSM and $ASX.

But… Shunsin is Foxconn's optical arm, and captures their captive optical and advanced packaging volume.

So they're not explicitly listed anywhere or have direct contracts with Nvidia (but Foxconn does)

But likely soaks up Nvidia CPO + other volumes through Foxconn vertical integration.
很确定 GS 这类机构漏掉了 $1.65B 市值的 Shunsin (6451),它做 CPO packaging/test/assembly。

这就是为什么我非常 bullish,把它看成 $NVDA CPO ramp 完全后门、隐藏且重大的受益者。

Foxconn 是 $TSM$ASX 之间的主要供应链伙伴。

但……Shunsin 是 Foxconn 的 optical arm,捕获它们内部的 optical 和 advanced packaging volume。

所以它们不会明确列在任何地方,也没有和 Nvidia 的直接合同(但 Foxconn 有)。

但很可能通过 Foxconn 垂直整合吸收 Nvidia CPO + 其他量。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just an FYI: I don't need to post something every day about the names I own.

However, I did miss this with Shunsin (6451):

Foxconn picked by $NVDA as exclusive rack-scale supplier for Groq accelerator.

This is highly positive for Shunsin (Foxconn's optical packing arm).

So ShunSin's CPO and optical packaging basically backdoored Nvidia's next-gen supply chain with this news.

Markets just haven't realized this connection yet (and it's on disposition, so frozen for most).

The article explicitly notes that Foxconn is integrating these systems "including ... networking."

Bc Foxconn is the exclusive assembler, they'll vertically integrate and likely use ShunSin's optical packaging solutions into the design, bypassing ShunSin's need for networking contract directly from Nvidia.

This is what I meant by Shunsin is literally a free piggy back ride to $NVDA CPO ecosystem. Foxconn is massive.

And you're getting the leading player in Nvidia's optical supply chain for a lower valuation than $LWLG lol.
提醒一下:我不需要每天都发我持有哪些名字。

不过,我确实漏掉了 Shunsin (6451) 这条:

Foxconn 被 $NVDA 选为 Groq accelerator 的独家 rack-scale 供应商。

这对 Shunsin(Foxconn 的光学封装部门)非常利好。

所以这条新闻等于让 ShunSin 的 CPO 和光学封装从后门进入了 Nvidia 下一代供应链。

市场还没有意识到这个连接(而且它被处置,所以大多数时候还冻着)。

文章明确提到 Foxconn 正在整合这些系统,“包括 ... networking”。

因为 Foxconn 是独家组装方,他们会垂直整合,并很可能把 ShunSin 的光学封装方案用进设计里,绕过 ShunSin 必须直接从 Nvidia 拿 networking 合同这件事。

这就是我说 Shunsin 字面意义上是在免费搭 $NVDA CPO 生态顺风车。Foxconn 体量太大了。

而且你用比 $LWLG 还低的估值,买到 Nvidia 光学供应链里的领先玩家 lol。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2049609993071259684
❤️ 832 🔁 54 💬 72
打开原推
💬 引用
Yes, markets might have missed this with $SIVE + $GFS SCALE.

The inclusion of $SIVE as 1 of 2 public laser suppliers in $GFS ecosystem image presentation is a highly bullish indicator for Sivers.

Whenever semis like $AMD (using $GFS for CPO), builds their optical solutions with GlobalFoundries.

Sivers is the likely light source for their buildout and powers companies like $AMD -> Hyperscalers.

The hyperscaler buildout with CPO flows down to this tiny $1.7B MC laser light source in $SIVE.
是的,市场可能漏掉了 $SIVE + $GFS SCALE 这点。

$GFS 生态图片演示里,把 $SIVE 列为 2 家公开 laser suppliers 之一,这对 Sivers 是非常 bullish 的信号。

每当像 $AMD 这样的 semis(用 $GFS 做 CPO)通过 GlobalFoundries 构建 optical solutions。

Sivers 很可能就是它们 buildout 的 light source,并驱动 $AMD -> Hyperscalers 这样的公司。

CPO 的 hyperscaler buildout 会一路流到 $SIVE 这家 $1.7B 市值的小型 laser light source。
引用原推@siflower
@aleabitoreddit Today GFS announced its SCALE™ solution, and went up 4.3%. This is bullish for $SIVE.
@aleabitoreddit 今天 GFS 宣布了它的 SCALE™ 方案,股价涨了 4.3%。这对 $SIVE 利好。
https://x.com/siflower/status/2051425152424980652
❤️ 965 🔁 76 💬 64
打开原推
💬 引用
Fun thing to note: $SIVE / $SIVEF is the likely undisclosed laser supplier for Lightelligence as well.

Credit to: Plaskpojen for the OSINT find. https://t.co/sj2J0b9ycN
有意思的一点:$SIVE / $SIVEF 很可能也是 Lightelligence 未披露的激光器供应商。

Credit to:Plaskpojen 的 OSINT 发现。 https://t.co/sj2J0b9ycN
引用原推@zephyr_z9
Lightelligence is developing a CPO solution for Biren
And if u believe in optical computing, then it's the best pure play available on the public markets anywhere https://t.co/J1rBdi1JT0
Lightelligence 正在为 Biren 开发 CPO 方案
如果你相信 optical computing,那它就是公开市场上任何地方能买到的最佳纯正标的 https://t.co/J1rBdi1JT0
https://x.com/zephyr_z9/status/2051348971285885230
❤️ 1,080 🔁 61 💬 87
打开原推
📝 原创
Glad to see $NBIS finally return 100%+ since my original thesis post back at ~$87.

I covered Nebius a ton late last year and at the start of this year.

Focusing on sum of parts from Avride to Clickhouse to how their balance sheet help them scale up their AI Cloud.

Was a little disappointed with timing, in terms of the massive drop in Dec/Jan.

But glad to see the company keep on delivering as Nebius is my favorite Neocloud in the entire sector.

I think we’re witnessing the rise of the next hyperscaler.
很高兴看到 $NBIS 自我最早在 ~$87 发 thesis 帖以来,终于回报 100%+。

我去年底和今年初讲过很多 Nebius。

重点讲了从 Avride 到 Clickhouse 的 sum of parts,以及它们资产负债表如何帮助扩张 AI Cloud。

在 timing 上,因为 12 月/1 月那次大跌,我有点失望。

但很高兴看到公司继续交付,因为 Nebius 是整个 Neocloud 板块里我最喜欢的。

我觉得我们正在见证下一个 hyperscaler 的崛起。
❤️ 1,681 🔁 88 💬 137
打开原推
💬 引用
Still think $AXTI was my most legendary thesis.

Don’t think this will get beat by anything, now that it’s near ~$5.3B MC. https://t.co/eM3UCYsQAR
我仍然觉得 $AXTI 是我最传奇的 thesis。

现在它接近 ~$5.3B 市值,应该没有什么能超过这个了。 https://t.co/eM3UCYsQAR
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 2,022 🔁 74 💬 160
打开原推
💬 引用
I might be pretty good at this?

$SOI up enormous amounts lol. https://t.co/djx1SNJTmy
我可能还挺擅长这个?

$SOI 涨得太多了 lol。 https://t.co/djx1SNJTmy
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 1,045 🔁 31 💬 89
打开原推
💬 引用
Did you listen anon?

It’s still crazy we’re still only at the very beginning of a multi year CPO supercycle with $SIVE.

This is what it feels like to be the very first to the names I’ve called out like $AXTI, up 6000%+ over the past year.

Still think Sivers is the next $LITE. https://t.co/JdfMd7sNTK
你听了吗 anon?

疯狂的是,我们对 $SIVE 还只是处在多年 CPO supercycle 的最开始。

这就是最早买进我点过的 $AXTI 这类名字时的感觉,过去一年涨了 6000%+。

仍然认为 Sivers 是下一个 $LITEhttps://t.co/JdfMd7sNTK
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
New position TLDR:

$SIVE at $140M MC.

Laser supplier for upcoming CPO/silicon photonics companies.

Similar to Innolight who buys from $LITE for current optical transcievers.

For CPO/Silicon photonics, it's the next $LITE as they supplier to companies like $POET / $AYAR.

If I had to make things simple.

$LITE -> EML lasers for current optical bottlenecks.

$SIVE -> Customized InP CW DFB lasers for CPO type companies like Ayar/Poet.

Valuation disconnect seems compelling. However, $LITE / $COHR also are competing developing CW lasers for CPO.

It feels like $SIVE has been co-developing with $POET and others for awhile, so they have a backdoor as the laser supplier to $MRVL Celestial and others.

Basically thesis is, next possible small cap $LITE as a laser supplier for upcoming CPO/Silicon photonics.

Of course DYOR
新仓位 TLDR:

$SIVE,市值 $140M。

即将到来的 CPO/silicon photonics 公司激光供应商。

类似 Innolight 给当前 optical transcievers 从 $LITE 买东西。

对 CPO/Silicon photonics 来说,它是下一个 $LITE,因为他们给 $POET / $AYAR 这类公司供货。

如果我要把事情说简单点。

$LITE -> 当前光学瓶颈用的 EML lasers。

$SIVE -> 给 Ayar/Poet 这类 CPO 公司定制的 InP CW DFB lasers。

估值错位看起来很有吸引力。不过 $LITE / $COHR 也在竞争开发 CPO 用 CW lasers。

感觉 $SIVE 已经和 $POET 以及其他公司共同开发一段时间了,所以他们作为 $MRVL Celestial 以及其他公司的激光供应商,有一个后门入口。

基本 thesis 是,它可能是下一个小盘 $LITE,作为即将到来的 CPO/Silicon photonics 的激光供应商。

当然 DYOR
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033463897521520947
❤️ 1,275 🔁 74 💬 213
打开原推
💬 引用
Honestly not too bad?

Cool to see markets validate my thesis posts…

With $SOI (silicon photonic substrates) to $LPK (glass core substrates) going in a straight line up . https://t.co/yQbidG44we
说实话还不错?

很高兴看到市场验证我的 thesis 帖……

$SOI(silicon photonic substrates)到 $LPK(glass core substrates)都在直线往上走。 https://t.co/yQbidG44we
引用原推@Sigurd_Drivenes
@aleabitoreddit Bro, how does it feel to be you, to always be right?
@aleabitoreddit 兄弟,当你自己是什么感觉,永远都是对的?
https://x.com/Sigurd_Drivenes/status/2051198699242488012
❤️ 1,031 🔁 39 💬 92
打开原推
📝 原创
GS has mapped out the CPO supercycle with unholy projections of 9x TAM projections.

From $15B to $154B in a short timeframe. CPO contributing $91B.

This is why I’m so bullish on $SIVE as one of bleeding edge CPO laser suppliers.

Reminds me of the horse Golden Tempo.

But for lasers.

Still a small $1.5B MC, while all the others are tens of billions.
GS 用离谱的 9x TAM 预测,画出了 CPO supercycle。

短时间内从 $15B 到 $154B。CPO 贡献 $91B。

这就是为什么我如此 bullish $SIVE,作为 bleeding edge CPO laser suppliers 之一。

让我想起 Golden Tempo 这匹马。

但这是 lasers 版。

仍然只是 $1.5B 小市值,而其他都几十亿美元。
❤️ 1,173 🔁 85 💬 75
打开原推
📝 原创
요즘 한국 팔로워분들이 많이 늘었네요. 여러분께 질문 하나 할게요: 에스파를 만나려면 에스엠(041510) 주식을 얼마나 매수해야 하는지 아시나요? https://t.co/AWA30CRVbV
요즘 한국 팔로워분들이 많이 늘었네요. 여러분께 질문 하나 할게요: 에스파를 만나려면 에스엠(041510) 주식을 얼마나 매수해야 하는지 아시나요? https://t.co/AWA30CRVbV
❤️ 1,129 🔁 76 💬 147
打开原推
💬 引用
I did say MSSCORP likely has a functional monopoly for CPO over inspection.

Not really a way around it and it's critical for $NVDA / $TSM yields as CPO ramps.

They did say "the company’s goal is to seize a 90 percent share of the CPO inspection market"

Should have been the biggest indicator.
我确实说过 MSSCORP 在 CPO inspection 上很可能有功能性垄断。

基本绕不过去,而且随着 CPO 爬坡,它对 $NVDA / $TSM yields 很关键。

他们确实说过“the company’s goal is to seize a 90 percent share of the CPO inspection market”

这本来就应该是最大的信号。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I am now long MSSCorps (6830) ~$1.4B MC

This appears to be a functional monopoly in CPO for inspection.

But markets might have conflated that with Material/Failure Analysis with MA-tek and iST (oligopoly).

For customers from mapping:
1. $TSM
2. $NVDA
3. $AAPL
4. $AMAT
5. $LRCX
6. $ASML
7. $INTC

And high probability $AVGO, MediaTek, Samsung, $MRVL, and others (they did mention EU too).

If you're curious:
- Taipei times names TSM as a client that Msscorps provides them with advanced material and failure analysis and name drops Apple, Nvidia, Lam, AMAT (also S/O to Latent for doing DD with me on this. there's other supply chain relationships to Nvidia through things like linkedin)
- For $AMSL, Taipei Times, Sept 10, 2024 "ASML adopted Msscorps' ultra-sensitive materials analysis of photoresists"

For Intel - Material analysis lab MSSCORPS has secured orders from major manufacturers such as Nvidia and Intel (Industrial Technology Research).


For inspection (non-destructive infrared (IR) leakage detection), they're a monopoly.

And have aggressively used litigation (like the Enli Tech lawsuit) to lock out rivals, which I view as a positive thing.

This creates massive pricing power with yields and every major player goes through them.

CPO inspection market is also extremely critical and like $AXTI in the InP substrate section, this massive chokepoint has pure pricing power with price hikes.

The risk is the patent suit doesn't go as plan, but Nvidia and other hyperscalers aren't likely to go with other parties in case MSSCorps wins, so this creates a massive multi-year advantage anyway. Hyperscalers aren't going to wait to see how an emerging competitor is going to win or not + take the risk.

I do see the massive re-rating potential with MSSCorp holding a critical yields chokepoint over CPO, so I went long (NFA, DYOR), this is just my thought process.
我现在做多 MSSCorps (6830),市值约 ~$1.4B

这看起来像是 CPO 检测里的功能性垄断。

但市场可能把它和 MA-tek、iST(寡头)的 Material/Failure Analysis 混在一起了。

从映射出来的客户看:
1. $TSM
2. $NVDA
3. $AAPL
4. $AMAT
5. $LRCX
6. $ASML
7. $INTC

而且很大概率还有 $AVGO、MediaTek、Samsung、$MRVL 以及其他公司(他们也提到了 EU)。

如果你好奇:
- Taipei times 点名 TSM 是客户,Msscorps 给他们提供先进材料和失效分析,还点名了 Apple、Nvidia、Lam、AMAT(也感谢 Latent 和我一起做 DD。还有一些通过 linkedin 之类能看到的 Nvidia 供应链关系)
- 对 $AMSL,Taipei Times,2024 年 9 月 10 日,“ASML adopted Msscorps' ultra-sensitive materials analysis of photoresists”

对 Intel - Material analysis lab MSSCORPS 已经拿到 Nvidia 和 Intel 等主要制造商订单(Industrial Technology Research)。

在检测(无损红外 (IR) 漏电检测)方面,他们是垄断。

而且他们积极用诉讼(比如 Enli Tech lawsuit)把竞争对手挡在外面,我认为这是好事。

这带来了巨大的定价权,因为良率相关,每个大玩家都要经过他们。

CPO 检测市场也极其关键,就像 InP substrate 里的 $AXTI 一样,这个巨大瓶颈拥有纯粹的涨价定价权。

风险是专利诉讼没有按计划发展,但如果 MSSCorps 赢,Nvidia 和其他 hyperscalers 不太可能选择其他方,所以无论如何这都会创造一个巨大的多年优势。Hyperscalers 不会等着看一个新兴竞争者会不会赢,还去承担这个风险。

我确实看到 MSSCorp 卡住 CPO 关键良率瓶颈后有巨大重估潜力,所以我做多了(NFA, DYOR),这只是我的思考过程。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2049655082250314014
❤️ 653 🔁 35 💬 38
打开原推
📝 原创
So I do think Auros (322310) is very interesting at $269M MC over in Korea.

What I've found from research was that they're a relatively unknown Samsung / SK Hynix supplier.

And they should high volume ramp from HBM4 capex for Hybrid Bonding Metrology.

Basically pure play on two products:
-> HBM4 / HBM4e / HBM5 cycles, that $KLA had a monoply over for IR metrology.
---> Getting qualified now likely in Samsung factories, H2 volume ramp est. Sk Hynix likely qualifying too when they upgrade to hybrid bonding.

Note on SK Hynix: I thought it would be HBM4e but apparently Trendforce reported today SK Hynix has completed 12-high hybrid bonding HBM validation and is raising yields for mass production. So maybe there's a catalyst there too aside from Samsung.

-> Thin-film thickness measurement.
---> Getting qualified now, with "major domestic chipmaker" (likely Samsung/Sk hynix), targets mass supply this year.

Disclosure (I do have positions, NFA, please do your own DD, this is just my thought process)

Regardless, they've been developing for the past decade, only to volume ramp two core products from years of qualification likely H2 this year. There are risks involved, such as not proceeding to HVM, but I'm personally taking that risk.

So I found this company very interesting, just wanted to publish some thoughts on this company.
所以我确实认为韩国 Auros (322310) 在 $269M 市值很有意思。

我研究发现,它们是相对不知名的 Samsung / SK Hynix 供应商。

而且它们应该会从 HBM4 capex 里的 Hybrid Bonding Metrology 获得高量产爬坡。

基本是两个产品的 pure play:
-> HBM4 / HBM4e / HBM5 周期,$KLA 在 IR metrology 上曾有垄断。
---> 现在很可能正在 Samsung 工厂认证,预计 H2 量产爬坡。Sk Hynix 升级到 hybrid bonding 时也很可能在认证。

关于 SK Hynix 的 note:我原以为会是 HBM4e,但 Trendforce 今天报道称 SK Hynix 已完成 12-high hybrid bonding HBM 验证,并正在提高量产良率。所以除了 Samsung,那里也可能有催化。

-> Thin-film thickness measurement。
---> 正在认证,客户是“major domestic chipmaker”(很可能 Samsung/Sk hynix),目标今年大规模供应。

Disclosure(我有仓位,NFA,请自己做 DD,这只是我的思考过程)

不管怎样,它们过去十年一直在开发,到了今年 H2,很可能才把多年认证后的两个核心产品推向量产爬坡。里面有风险,比如没进入 HVM,但我个人愿意承担这个风险。

所以我觉得这家公司很有意思,只是想发布一些关于这家公司的想法。
❤️ 1,368 🔁 146 💬 92
打开原推
💬 引用
US retail investors should switch from $HOOD to $IBKR for international equities.

I’m not sure why anyone still uses Robinhood for investing anymore.

Unless you have $50 and no clue what you’re doing.

They had their chance to innovate but focused on Melania Coin integrations
美国散户投资者如果买国际股票,应该从 $HOOD 换到 $IBKR

我不太明白为什么还有人用 Robinhood 投资。

除非你只有 $50,而且完全不知道自己在干什么。

他们本来有机会创新,但却专注于 Melania Coin integrations。
引用原推@smdcapital
@aleabitoreddit bro how do we buy these tickers 😭 they don't even show up in my brokerage
@aleabitoreddit 兄弟,这些 ticker 我们怎么买啊 😭 我的券商里甚至搜不到
https://x.com/smdcapital/status/2051048948823896462
❤️ 1,706 🔁 47 💬 215
打开原推
💬 引用
Goldman Sachs Projections on Optical Networking.

Aggregate TAM would increase 9x:

From $15B to $154B. CPO contributes $91B.

What the actual?

Yep... And another confirmation why I'm so incredibly bullish on CPO names like $SIVE (laser), MSSCorps (yields), or Shunsin (packaging).

This is frontrunning the next supercycle. I don't think people realize how wild these projections are yet.
Goldman Sachs 对 Optical Networking 的预测。

Aggregate TAM 会增加 9x:

从 $15B 到 $154B。CPO 贡献 $91B。

什么鬼?

没错……这也是为什么我对 $SIVE(laser)、MSSCorps(yields)或 Shunsin(packaging)这样的 CPO 名字如此 bullish 的另一个确认。

这就是抢跑下一轮 supercycle。我觉得大家还没意识到这些预测有多野。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just in case you’re wondering why I’m so bullish on CPO.

Like $SIVE (Lasers), Shunsin (Packaging), MSSCorps (Yields), Win Semi / $TSEM (Foundry).

“The CPO market is projected to grow sharply by a 142% CAGR from 2026 to 2030 (excl. ELS)”

“The scale-up CPO segment is projected to surpass scale-out applications before 2030 and become the dominant market.

You have almost parabolic growth over the next few years.

With many players like Sivers having no material exposure to previous 800g pluggable optics but are the bleeding edge leaders of CPO as the laser supplier.

This is one of the best and earliest opportunities of the next optical supercycle for an architecture driven by $NVDA and $AVGO.
以防你想知道我为什么这么看多 CPO。

比如 $SIVE(Lasers)、Shunsin(Packaging)、MSSCorps(Yields)、Win Semi / $TSEM(Foundry)。

“预计 CPO 市场将从 2026 到 2030 年以 142% CAGR 急剧增长(不含 ELS)”

“scale-up CPO 细分市场预计将在 2030 年前超过 scale-out 应用,并成为主导市场。

接下来几年你会看到几乎抛物线式增长。

很多玩家,比如 Sivers,对之前 800g 可插拔光模块几乎没有实质性暴露,但作为激光供应商,他们是 CPO 最前沿的领导者。

这是下一轮光学超级周期中最好、最早的机会之一,而这个架构由 $NVDA$AVGO 推动。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2050762148545216899
❤️ 1,576 🔁 147 💬 116
打开原推
📝 原创
If you're curious about Goldman's Report:

They expect "significant EPS upside" among:

1. Optical modules and engines
2. CW lasers and EMLs
3. PCB/CCL manufacturers

Here's the massive cheat sheet:

Laser / Light Sources (SiPh): Sumitomo, Furukawa (5801), Landmark (3081), YJ Semi, $LITE, $COHR $AVGO, Etern (https://t.co/Rgl8i5e7N4), Everbright Photonics (https://t.co/hrQbVE0QlT), Shijia Photons (https://t.co/HvJVCM7BMm), Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI), Accelink (https://t.co/OjlKPLtkA4), Mitsubishi (6503.T)

Laser / Light Sources (EML): Lumentum (LITE), Coherent (COHR), Broadcom (AVGO), YJ Semi (https://t.co/qWTYoY2y6z), Etern (https://t.co/Rgl8i5e7N4), Sumitomo Electric (5802.T), Everbright Photonics (https://t.co/hrQbVE0QlT), Shijia Photons (https://t.co/HvJVCM7BMm), Source Photonics (Private), Mitsubishi (6503.T), Accelink (https://t.co/OjlKPLtkA4), Furukawa (5801.T)

Passive Optical Components - Couplers / Splitters: FOCI (3363.TWO), Senko (Private), AFR (https://t.co/v8bWvYaSCp), Everprox (https://t.co/PgwoMVPleI), Lumentum (LITE), Coherent (COHR)

Passive Optical Components - Filters: Shijia Photons (https://t.co/HvJVCM7BMm), Sumitomo Electric (5802.T), Lumentum (LITE), Coherent (COHR), Viavi (VIAV), FOCI (3363.TWO)

Passive Optical Components - Attenuators: Everprox (https://t.co/PgwoMVPleI), Accelink (https://t.co/OjlKPLtkA4), FOCI (3363.TWO), Lumentum (LITE)

Passive Optical Components - WDM: AFR (https://t.co/v8bWvYaSCp), Everprox (https://t.co/PgwoMVPleI), Accelink (https://t.co/OjlKPLtkA4), Ciena (CIEN), TFC Optical (https://t.co/fjsjeuQxcq), Lumentum (LITE), FOCI (3363.TWO)
如果你好奇 Goldman 的报告:

他们预计这些领域会有“significant EPS upside”:

1. Optical modules and engines
2. CW lasers and EMLs
3. PCB/CCL manufacturers

这是巨大的 cheat sheet:

Laser / Light Sources (SiPh):Sumitomo、Furukawa (5801)、Landmark (3081)、YJ Semi、$LITE$COHR $AVGO、Etern (https://t.co/Rgl8i5e7N4)、Everbright Photonics (https://t.co/hrQbVE0QlT)、Shijia Photons (https://t.co/HvJVCM7BMm)、Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI)、Accelink (https://t.co/OjlKPLtkA4)、Mitsubishi (6503.T)

Laser / Light Sources (EML):Lumentum (LITE)、Coherent (COHR)、Broadcom (AVGO)、YJ Semi (https://t.co/qWTYoY2y6z)、Etern (https://t.co/Rgl8i5e7N4)、Sumitomo Electric (5802.T)、Everbright Photonics (https://t.co/hrQbVE0QlT)、Shijia Photons (https://t.co/HvJVCM7BMm)、Source Photonics (Private)、Mitsubishi (6503.T)、Accelink (https://t.co/OjlKPLtkA4)、Furukawa (5801.T)

Passive Optical Components - Couplers / Splitters:FOCI (3363.TWO)、Senko (Private)、AFR (https://t.co/v8bWvYaSCp)、Everprox (https://t.co/PgwoMVPleI)、Lumentum (LITE)、Coherent (COHR)

Passive Optical Components - Filters:Shijia Photons (https://t.co/HvJVCM7BMm)、Sumitomo Electric (5802.T)、Lumentum (LITE)、Coherent (COHR)、Viavi (VIAV)、FOCI (3363.TWO)

Passive Optical Components - Attenuators:Everprox (https://t.co/PgwoMVPleI)、Accelink (https://t.co/OjlKPLtkA4)、FOCI (3363.TWO)、Lumentum (LITE)

Passive Optical Components - WDM:AFR (https://t.co/v8bWvYaSCp)、Everprox (https://t.co/PgwoMVPleI)、Accelink (https://t.co/OjlKPLtkA4)、Ciena (CIEN)、TFC Optical (https://t.co/fjsjeuQxcq)、Lumentum (LITE)、FOCI (3363.TWO)
❤️ 1,781 🔁 175 💬 77
打开原推
💬 引用
There's a lot of discussion around "CPO supply chains" and what's the most undervalued.

Let me put my opinion out there:

The laser chokepoint ( $LITE, $SIVE, $COHR ) is by far the best exposure to photonics and CPO.

Because there's so much optionality that gave companies like Lumentum the premiums.

With:
-> downstream IP TAM expansion as seen with pluggable optical transceivers
-> vertical integration of InP laser fabs rather than fabless.
-> vertical integration of multiple processes eg. testing or even assembly.

Treat it like you're running your own company and speedrunning it to $100B or $300B.

Not just spreadsheet modeling off projected revenue/margins.
围绕“CPO supply chains”和什么最被低估,有很多讨论。

我说一下自己的观点:

laser chokepoint($LITE$SIVE$COHR)到目前为止是 photonics 和 CPO 最好的敞口。

因为有太多 optionality,这也是 Lumentum 这类公司能拿到溢价的原因。

包括:
-> 下游 IP TAM expansion,比如 pluggable optical transceivers
-> InP laser fabs 垂直整合,而不是 fabless。
-> 多个流程垂直整合,比如 testing,甚至 assembly。

把它当成你在经营自己的公司,并且把它 speedrun 到 $100B 或 $300B。

不只是拿 projected revenue/margins 做 spreadsheet modeling。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$NVDA + $AVGO ecosystem:

This is goldman's report. But it only covers mainly the obvious names.

Fun fact, whenever you read through analysis reports (eg. Goldman Sachs)...

It's good to look out for players not listed in them, since those are the "hidden gems" institutions haven't discovered yet. That's where the highest returns come from.

But hey look PCL is there that I mentioned in $AVGO ecosystem, that's probably one of the smallest one up there. Stuff like MSSCorp is not listed either but I'm highly confident it's used for both of them regarding CPO inspection/yields.
$NVDA + $AVGO 生态:

这是 goldman 的报告。但它主要只覆盖那些显而易见的名字。

有趣的是,每当你读分析报告(比如 Goldman Sachs)时...

最好留意那些没被列进去的玩家,因为那些就是机构还没发现的“hidden gems”。最高回报就来自那里。

不过看,PCL 在里面,我之前在 $AVGO 生态里提过,这可能是上面最小的之一。像 MSSCorp 也没被列进去,但我非常有信心它在 CPO inspection/yields 上会被两边都用到。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2051004642612634051
❤️ 450 🔁 29 💬 45
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
$NVDA + $AVGO ecosystem:

This is goldman's report. But it only covers mainly the obvious names.

Fun fact, whenever you read through analysis reports (eg. Goldman Sachs)...

It's good to look out for players not listed in them, since those are the "hidden gems" institutions haven't discovered yet. That's where the highest returns come from.

But hey look PCL is there that I mentioned in $AVGO ecosystem, that's probably one of the smallest one up there. Stuff like MSSCorp is not listed either but I'm highly confident it's used for both of them regarding CPO inspection/yields.
$NVDA + $AVGO ecosystem:

这是 goldman 的报告。但它主要只覆盖那些明显的名字。

有趣的是,每当你读分析报告(比如 Goldman Sachs)……

最好留意那些没列进去的玩家,因为那些才是机构还没发现的“hidden gems”。最高回报来自那里。

不过看,PCL 在里面,我之前在 $AVGO ecosystem 提到过,它大概是上面最小的之一。像 MSSCorp 也没列进去,但我高度确信它在 CPO inspection/yields 方面被两边使用。
❤️ 606 🔁 24 💬 56
打开原推
📝 原创
It's pretty insane to see $SIVE become a Tier 1 laser supplier for CPO.

This is my prediction/guess with est. mapping:

$NVDA ate up all the capacity with $COHR, $LITE after their new $2B+ spending spree.

Same playbook with EML early 2025, causing the bottleneck seen today.

Now, $AMD / hyperscalers are scambling for upstream laser suppliers.

Hence why $SIVE + Win / $GFS became likely primary route to go down.

You can see this with:

-> $MVL CPO through Celestial (Nvidia signed a deal, but they don't have lasers)
-> $AMD CPO
-> Ayar
-> $POET
-> Lightmatter
-> and other programs (eg. Jabil 1.6T)

As a result, Sivers/Win emerged as the Tier 1 bleeding edge + critical independent laser supplier.

And there's hints for this when:
1. $GFS listed $SIVE / $LITE as the two only public laser suppliers in their ecosystem.
2. Ayar removed $LITE / $MTSI off their website and elevated $SIVE to their primary laser supplier.

So everyone else ended up going with Sivers since $COHR / $LITE are fully allocated.

My guess is that a lot of the secondary suppliers also capture overflow as architectures standardize.

But scramble for this chokepoint will be insane early next year given $NVDA bottleneck.

And a small $1.2B Swedish company in $SIVE will be in the center of it.
看到 $SIVE 成为 CPO 的 Tier 1 laser supplier,真的很疯狂。

这是我的预测/猜测和估算 mapping:

$NVDA 在新的 $2B+ spending spree 后,吃掉了 $COHR$LITE 的所有产能。

和 2025 年初 EML 一样的 playbook,造成了今天看到的瓶颈。

现在,$AMD / hyperscalers 正在抢上游 laser suppliers。

所以 $SIVE + Win / $GFS 很可能成为主要路径。

你可以从这些看到:

-> $MVL CPO through Celestial(Nvidia 签了 deal,但他们没有 lasers)
-> $AMD CPO
-> Ayar
-> $POET
-> Lightmatter
-> 以及其他项目(比如 Jabil 1.6T)

因此,Sivers/Win 成为 Tier 1 bleeding edge + 关键独立 laser supplier。

而这有一些线索:
1. $GFS 在生态里把 $SIVE / $LITE 列为仅有两家公开 laser suppliers。
2. Ayar 从官网移除 $LITE / $MTSI,并把 $SIVE 提升为主要激光器供应商。

所以其他所有人最终都去找 Sivers,因为 $COHR / $LITE 已经 fully allocated。

我猜,随着架构标准化,很多二级供应商也会吃到 overflow。

但考虑到 $NVDA bottleneck,明年初围绕这个 chokepoint 的争夺会非常疯狂。

$SIVE 这家 $1.2B 的瑞典小公司会处在中心。
❤️ 1,591 🔁 102 💬 83
打开原推
📝 原创
$IREN and $SLNH investors are probably the most braindead communities I've interacted with on X.

I've never seen a community so bullish on a $219M MC stock that has a new $1,000,000,000 dilution.

And an ongoing $500,000,000 ATM.

Then you have $IREN, with $6,000,000,000 active ATM, sold over time into the open market.

Maybe, it's a better idea to just go long on a stock without the toxic financing... So you can actually benefit from equity appreciation without just being liquidity?

It's just so hard to explain to people the nuances in financial dilution who lack the brain cells.

And it just so happens $SLNH gets mentioned positively by $BKKT, $IREN investors the moment after they file a $500M ATM since they need exit liquidity.

The company is selling offloading shares directly to these idiots.
$IREN$SLNH 投资者可能是我在 X 上接触过最 braindead 的社区。

我从没见过一个社区对一只 $219M 市值、却有新的 $1,000,000,000 稀释的股票这么 bullish。

还有一个正在进行的 $500,000,000 ATM。

然后还有 $IREN,带着 $6,000,000,000 active ATM,随时间在公开市场卖出。

也许,直接做多一只没有 toxic financing 的股票会更好……这样你才能真正从股权升值中获益,而不是只是当 liquidity?

向缺乏脑细胞的人解释财务稀释的细节,真的太难了。

而且刚好 $SLNH 在提交 $500M ATM 之后,马上就被 $BKKT$IREN 投资者正面提到,因为他们需要 exit liquidity。

公司正在直接把股票甩给这些白痴。
❤️ 981 🔁 37 💬 158
打开原推
📝 原创
Last year I called out $LITE, $COHR, $AAOI, $AXTI, and Innolight before the supercycle...

This year:

Found $SOI, which was the SiPH substrate = $AXTI.

Then $SIVE, which was the CPO = $LITE.

Might have found the CPO equivalent of $AAOI.

Curious if anyone can guess?
去年我在 supercycle 前点出了 $LITE$COHR$AAOI$AXTI 和 Innolight……

今年:

找到了 $SOI,它是 SiPH substrate = $AXTI

然后是 $SIVE,它是 CPO = $LITE

可能已经找到了 CPO 版 $AAOI

好奇有没有人能猜到?
❤️ 3,113 🔁 115 💬 305
打开原推
📝 原创
Just in case you’re wondering why I’m so bullish on CPO.

Like $SIVE (Lasers), Shunsin (Packaging), MSSCorps (Yields), Win Semi / $TSEM (Foundry).

“The CPO market is projected to grow sharply by a 142% CAGR from 2026 to 2030 (excl. ELS)”

“The scale-up CPO segment is projected to surpass scale-out applications before 2030 and become the dominant market.

You have almost parabolic growth over the next few years.

With many players like Sivers having no material exposure to previous 800g pluggable optics but are the bleeding edge leaders of CPO as the laser supplier.

This is one of the best and earliest opportunities of the next optical supercycle for an architecture driven by $NVDA and $AVGO.
以防你想知道我为什么这么 bullish CPO。

比如 $SIVE(Lasers)、Shunsin(Packaging)、MSSCorps(Yields)、Win Semi / $TSEM(Foundry)。

“The CPO market is projected to grow sharply by a 142% CAGR from 2026 to 2030 (excl. ELS)”

“The scale-up CPO segment is projected to surpass scale-out applications before 2030 and become the dominant market.

未来几年几乎是抛物线式增长。

而像 Sivers 这种玩家,过去对 800g pluggable optics 没有什么实质敞口,但作为激光器供应商,却是 CPO bleeding edge leaders。

这是下一轮 optical supercycle 里最好、也最早的机会之一,这个架构由 $NVDA$AVGO 推动。
❤️ 1,786 🔁 153 💬 95
打开原推
📝 原创
I hate it that my account got so big.

That I can’t mention another person anymore without them gaining 1K+ followers or going viral in the algo.

Now endless people just make up stuff and bait me into replying…
我讨厌我的账号变得这么大。

大到我现在都不能再提另一个人,否则他们就会涨 1K+ 粉丝,或者被算法推爆。

现在没完没了的人开始编东西,诱导我回复……
❤️ 1,844 🔁 10 💬 308
打开原推
📝 原创
Still can’t believe Spirit Airlines is shutting down.

Very harmful, now there’s less incentives to cut costs.

There’s a difference between blocking $ARM and $NVDA acquisition (actual antitrust).

And an Airline rescuing Spirit from bankruptcy.

Thanks Senator Warren. https://t.co/BTn9D61eek
还是不敢相信 Spirit Airlines 要关门。

这很有害,现在削减成本的激励更少了。

阻止 $ARM$NVDA 收购(真正的反垄断),

和一家航空公司把 Spirit 从破产中救出来,是两回事。

谢谢 Senator Warren。 https://t.co/BTn9D61eek
❤️ 1,194 🔁 45 💬 73
打开原推
💬 引用
I called out Bernstein for being a clown when they gave $INTC a $35 price target in Jan.

They just slap dumb PTs. Retail panic sells as an intended consequence.

While the other institutions silently go long (as seen with $SOI).

Only reason you should read these anymore is for any nuances they drop that wasn’t public before.

Then derive your own MC projection.

Intel is now $100 after their $35 PT.

Institutions are not your friends.
Bernstein 1 月给 $INTC $35 目标价时,我就说他们是 clown。

他们只是随便拍愚蠢 PT。散户恐慌卖出,这是预期后果。

而其他机构默默做多(就像 $SOI)。

现在还值得读这些报告的唯一理由,是看它们有没有丢出之前未公开的细节。

然后推导你自己的市值预测。

Intel 在他们 $35 PT 之后,现在是 $100。

机构不是你的朋友。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Sorry but Stacy is trolling if they are applying standard financial modeling to $INTC and pricing it like a cash burning foundry.

It’s the unspoken de facto semi arm of the US government for national security at this point. The infinite money printer won’t let it fail.

And any chance $NVDA or others get, they’ll be pressured to help Intel. It’s not degenerate at all to see that reality.

If Bernstein wants to give an accurate projection they need to look at all the angles instead of ignoring the biggest tailwind because of Trump.
抱歉,但如果 Stacy 用标准财务模型套 $INTC,并把它当成一个烧钱 foundry 来定价,那就是在 trolling。

在国家安全层面,它现在已经是美国政府未明说的事实半导体部门。无限印钞机不会让它倒下。

而且只要 $NVDA 或其他公司有机会,他们都会被施压去帮助 Intel。看清这个现实一点都不 degenerate。

如果 Bernstein 想给出准确预测,他们需要看所有角度,而不是因为 Trump 就忽视最大的顺风。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2011006623893123154
❤️ 1,328 🔁 52 💬 63
打开原推
💬 引用
$COIN only says this crap after they got their conditional banking charter approved.

Pretty sad to see the entire industry get sold out under this administration.

Enjoy your .05% checking account interest while traditional banks profit a 4% spread shafting every day US retail.

Had hopes we’d actually see some positive change.
$COIN 只有在他们的 conditional banking charter 获批后,才说这种废话。

看到整个行业在这届政府下被卖掉,挺难过的。

享受你的 .05% checking account interest 吧,而传统银行每天赚 4% spread,把美国普通散户坑惨。

我本来还希望我们能看到一些积极变化。
引用原推@iampaulgrewal
After months in rooms at the WH and Senate, this much is clear: a lot of the public debate overstated the risks and ignored the substance. This outcome preserves activity-based rewards tied to real participation on crypto platforms and networks, which is what the bank lobby said they wanted.

We've long believed that this issue did not warrant legislative changes. But whatever-- we’re focused on getting a bill done and are satisifed that this language should not be the basis of any objection. Onward.
在 WH 和 Senate 的会议室里待了几个月后,现在很清楚:很多公开讨论夸大了风险,却忽视了实质内容。这个结果保留了与 crypto 平台和网络真实参与挂钩的活动型奖励,这正是银行游说团体说他们想要的。

我们一直认为这个问题不值得通过立法修改。但随便吧——我们专注于把法案做成,也满意这段措辞不应该成为任何反对的理由。继续往前。
https://x.com/iampaulgrewal/status/2050325948084469937
❤️ 779 🔁 36 💬 58
打开原推
📝 原创
I had a decent month.

Everything from: $AAOI went up 100% to $SOI went up 153.9%.

$SNDK +70% or $INTC + 97.7% or $MRVL +54% or $ARM +41.5% were underperformers for me personally.

Curious how you all did?
我这个月还不错。

$AAOI 涨 100% 到 $SOI 涨 153.9%。

$SNDK +70%、$INTC +97.7%、$MRVL +54% 或 $ARM +41.5%,对我个人来说都算跑输了。

好奇你们表现怎么样?
❤️ 2,460 🔁 55 💬 235
打开原推
📝 原创
I’m convinced that the people who charge $200 or $2000 just to see their stock picks.

Do so just because their ideas aren’t good enough.

Otherwise they would just go long on them with their own capital and retire.

This is why they get mad when they see others sharing better ideas for free.
我确信那些收费 $200 或 $2000 才让人看自己 stock picks 的人。

之所以这么做,只是因为他们的想法不够好。

否则他们直接用自己的资本做多,然后退休就行了。

这就是为什么他们看到别人免费分享更好的想法时会生气。
❤️ 4,335 🔁 137 💬 268
打开原推
💬 引用
Glad to hear that the $1 worth of thoughts helps out retail that much!

All my thesis are free in the end though, it’s mainly validation for my ideas.

Comments like these help avoid the burn out for sure.

On a side note… still can’t believe I’m catching up to Elon Musk!

My goal is to deliver so much value… that I’ll be #1 most subscribed to person on the entire X platform soon.
很高兴听到那 $1 的想法能帮散户这么多!

不过我所有 thesis 最后都是免费的,订阅主要是对我想法的验证。

这种评论确实能帮我避免 burnout。

顺便……还是不敢相信我快追上 Elon Musk 了!

我的目标是提供这么多价值……以至于我很快会成为整个 X 平台订阅人数 #1 的人。
引用原推@Michael13277144
@aleabitoreddit Serenity, I just want to thank you. As of today, at age 42, I am officially a millionaire. I wasn’t expecting this until at least age 45, but the following you a little over a month ago supercharged the tax-sheltered portion of my portfolio. God bless you!
@aleabitoreddit Serenity,我只想谢谢你。截至今天,42 岁的我正式成为百万富翁了。我原本以为至少要到 45 岁才行,但一个多月前关注你,让我投资组合里的免税部分直接加速了。上帝保佑你!
https://x.com/Michael13277144/status/2050257072797925488
❤️ 832 🔁 14 💬 58
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE was a massive transfer from Swedish locals to US investors.

Locals waited many, many years for all the laser R&D to pay off for CPO and silicon photonics.

And now with hyperscaler volume ramp H2 2026 H1 2027, they don’t get any upside because they transferred their shares over to the US/West after trusting local media.

My prediction is if and when Sivers hits $4-8B on NASDAQ, we’ll get the same media treatment in the US.

Then the shares get transferred from US retail to US institutions.

You’ve already seen the same playbook with $IQE and $SOI at the bottom… with institutions posting “analyst reports” saying Soitec was overvalued.

The next month they go up 3x as Morgan Stanley happens to pick up 6.5% of the $SOI float… or Point72 with $IQE.

Institutions are not your friends. I’m looking out for retail’s best interest though.
$SIVE 是一次从瑞典本地人到美国投资者的大规模转移。

本地人为所有 laser R&D 等了很多很多年,等它在 CPO 和 silicon photonics 上得到回报。

现在随着 hyperscaler volume ramp 在 H2 2026 H1 2027 到来,他们却拿不到任何上行,因为他们相信本地媒体后,把股票转给了美国/西方。

我的预测是,如果以及当 Sivers 在 NASDAQ 上达到 $4-8B,我们会在美国看到同样的媒体待遇。

然后股票会从美国散户转移到美国机构。

你已经在 $IQE$SOI 底部看到同样 playbook……机构发布“analyst reports”说 Soitec 被高估。

下个月它们涨 3 倍,而 Morgan Stanley 刚好拿下 $SOI 流通盘 6.5%……或者 Point72 买 $IQE

机构不是你的朋友。不过我是在为散户的最大利益着想。
引用原推@aphexinvests
@StormDirac agree with @aleabitoreddit who calls it a wealth transfer, European media shook out local Swedish holders, now US/Western retail + incoming institutions own more of the float
@StormDirac 同意 @aleabitoreddit 说这是财富转移,欧洲媒体把瑞典本地持有人洗出去了,现在美国/西方散户 + 即将进来的机构持有了更多流通盘
https://x.com/aphexinvests/status/2050267420774842385
❤️ 1,503 🔁 62 💬 101
打开原推
💬 引用
Everyone was doomposting $EWY 2 months ago.

Calling it “Silver Crash” or “KOSPI crash bubble”

Now they’re all flip flopping opinions, saying they were bullish memory all along.

Even despite fear posting from $RPI to $SIVE, my thesis ends up right.

Main reason I got 245K+ followers is because I’m consistently right about my opinions while taking a firm directional stance.

My $EWY longs are now up ~3x.
2 个月前所有人都在 doomposting $EWY

叫它“Silver Crash”或“KOSPI crash bubble”

现在他们全都 flip flop,说自己一直 bullish memory。

即使从 $RPI$SIVE 都有人 fear posting,我的 thesis 最后还是对的。

我有 245K+ 粉丝的主要原因,是我在观点上持续正确,同时敢于给出坚定方向判断。

我的 $EWY longs 现在涨了 ~3x。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Feels like everyone is doom-posting KOSPI saying:

> “Look at the chart, it can’t keep going up like this!”

> Memory is a black hole for demand ( $SNDK taking 3Y preorders )

> $EWY is basically just two stocks, Samsung and SK Hynix, not a representation of the Korean economy

> Like saying Taiwan Index is a bubble because the index that tracks $TSM and Mediatek goes up.

> Memory demand/AI doesn’t just disappear because of a War in Iran, but it does get more expensive.

> Increased energy from crude/LNG get passed down to hyperscalers, not eaten up in opex.

It’s looks to be fear selling and deleveraging (3x ETFs and 10x likely got wiped out today) rather than materially operational (slight bearish headwind, but not enough for -30%).

SK Hynix futures is now trading in the high $300B MC-low $400B range.

If MS and updated analyst projections are even slightly right, SK Hynix’s operating profits for example would be ~$300B.

They’ll be sitting on too much money by 2028 as a cushion if memory prices drops. (and not even considering demand becomes structural).

Looks to be another DeepSeek-Nvidia type fear selling situation, especially as nand/dram prices get hiked again recently. More of a question of timing the bottom.

It’s times like these logic matter more than irrational headline selling.
感觉所有人都在 doom-post KOSPI,说:

> “看图表,它不可能这样一直涨!”

> Memory 是需求黑洞($SNDK 接 3 年预订单)

> $EWY 基本就是 Samsung 和 SK Hynix 两只股票,不代表韩国经济

> 这就像说 Taiwan Index 是泡沫,因为追踪 $TSM 和 Mediatek 的指数上涨。

> Memory demand/AI 不会因为伊朗战争就消失,但它会变得更贵。

> 原油/LNG 带来的能源成本上升会传导给 hyperscalers,不会被 opex 吃掉。

这看起来更像恐慌卖出和去杠杆(3x ETFs 和 10x 今天可能被清掉了),而不是运营层面发生实质变化(轻微偏空逆风,但不足以 -30%)。

SK Hynix futures 现在交易在 $300B 高位到 $400B 低位市值区间。

如果 MS 和更新后的分析师预测哪怕稍微正确,SK Hynix 的经营利润例如会达到约 $300B。

到 2028 年,如果 memory prices 下跌,他们会坐拥太多现金作为缓冲。(还没考虑需求变成结构性)

这看起来又像 DeepSeek-Nvidia 类型的恐慌卖出,尤其最近 nand/dram 价格又被上调。更多只是抄底时点问题。

这种时候,逻辑比非理性标题卖出更重要。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2029088341258584454
❤️ 741 🔁 25 💬 43
打开原推
📝 原创
"To unblock a blockade, one must blockade the blockade"

Wait this is actually working? https://t.co/QC7QEiuBAk
“要解除封锁,就必须封锁那个封锁”

等等,这居然真的有效? https://t.co/QC7QEiuBAk
❤️ 814 🔁 29 💬 96
打开原推
💬 引用
Finally vindicated on my $RDDT long 6 weeks later.

Funny thing is…

It’s still down 28% YTD after that absolute blowout of quarter earnings and projections.

Personally think it heads back to $200+ over time (repricing doesn’t happen in a day) since it’s a growing money printer.
6 周后,我的 $RDDT 多头终于被证明是对的。

有趣的是……

在这么爆炸的季度财报和预测之后,它今年 YTD 仍然跌 28%。

我个人觉得它随着时间会回到 $200+(repricing 不会一天完成),因为它是一台不断增长的 money printer。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$RDDT is getting ridiculous.

Looks completely mispriced. Now down 40% over the past few months.

If you strip out carry-forward losses, their net profit is ~28% of revenue, which is absolutely enormous.

And they’re growing forward revenues 50%+ Y/Y after 70%+ Y/Y growth.

If you ever look at $META, you know how much revenue can be optimized/user. There’s an incredibly high ceiling for monetization with Reddit.

It’s already derisked since IPO since Reddit is now one of the fastest growing and highest margin companies in the market.

One day if it pulls a $CRCL post earnings,
we’ll look back and wonder how this was valued at $24 billion MC.
$RDDT 越来越离谱了。

看起来完全被错价了。过去几个月已经跌了 40%。

如果剔除结转亏损,他们的净利润大约是收入的 28%,这绝对巨大。

而且在 70%+ Y/Y 增长之后,他们 forward revenues 还在 50%+ Y/Y 增长。

如果你看过 $META,就知道每个用户能优化出多少收入。Reddit 的变现天花板高得离谱。

IPO 之后它已经去风险了,因为 Reddit 现在是市场上增长最快、利润率最高的公司之一。

总有一天,如果它财报后走出 $CRCL 那种走势,
我们会回头想,当时它怎么会只值 $24 billion MC。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2032194165690548623
❤️ 882 🔁 52 💬 78
打开原推
📝 原创
Photonics go brrrr

$AXTI +17.34%
$AAOI +12.47%

Hope you listened to my original thesis anon? https://t.co/SCo3h80afN
Photonics go brrrr

$AXTI +17.34%
$AAOI +12.47%

希望你听了我最早的 thesis anon? https://t.co/SCo3h80afN
❤️ 2,097 🔁 101 💬 163
打开原推
💬 引用
As for 3x brrrs these levels:

1. $SIVE
2. MSSCORP (6830)
3. Auros (322310)

Are my best guesses. Here's my thought process:

1. $SIVE: I genuinely do see them being $10B+ next year, they're the literal bleeding edge for CPO lasers alongside $LITE and $COHR.

At a $1.3B MC... For likely mapping:

Photonics: $AMD CPO, $MRVL Celestial CPO, $JBL 1.6T, Lightmatter, Ayar, ALChip, GUC, O-Net (ELS), $POET.

For Space + Defense: Golden Dome via $YSS, $RTX / $ERIC / Bae Systems.

Silicon Photonics: $AAPL (Apple Watches).

This is just a stupid amount of customers and it's still increasing.

They can always TAM expansion downstream through IP acquisitions or vertically integrate to speedrun $LITE's $60B MC one day once they get more funding.

2. MSSCORP (6830): CPO monopoly over inspection at ~$1.2B.

100% monopoly over CPO yields, $TSM, $AMAT, $NVDA, $LCRX, $INTC, and others are all likely customers.

"The company’s goal is to seize a 90 percent share of the CPO inspection market"

This basically means 100%, they just don't want antitrust. If they defend their monopoly and CPO ramps, can easily see this worth ~$5B-$9B from $1.2B

3. Auros (322310): Samsung / SK Hynix supplier at ~$210M for Hybrid Bonding Metrology.

Basically pure play on two products:
-> HBM4 / HBM4e / HBM5 cycles, that $KLA had a monoply over for IR metrology.
---> Getting qualified now likely in Samsung factories, H2 volume ramp est. Sk Hynix likely qualifying too when they upgrade to hybrid bonding.
-> Thin-film thickness measurement.
---> Getting qualified now, with "major domestic chipmaker" (either Samsung/Sk hynix), targets mass supply this year.

They've been developing for the past decade, only to volume ramp two products from years of qualification H2 this year.

Seems extremely likely to 3x to $630M if they switch to volume ramp, feels like an undiscovered gem in the Korean market?

Of course, not sure how they play out and this is all speculative but high confidence supply chain mapping.

But off the top of my head these three that I own are the most likely ones at this level.
至于这些水平上的 3x brrrs:

1. $SIVE
2. MSSCORP (6830)
3. Auros (322310)

是我最好的猜测。我的思考过程是:

1. $SIVE:我真心认为它们明年会到 $10B+,它们和 $LITE$COHR 一起,是 CPO lasers 的真正 bleeding edge。

在 $1.3B 市值下……可能 mapping:

Photonics:$AMD CPO、$MRVL Celestial CPO、$JBL 1.6T、Lightmatter、Ayar、ALChip、GUC、O-Net (ELS)、$POET

Space + Defense:通过 $YSS 的 Golden Dome、$RTX / $ERIC / Bae Systems。

Silicon Photonics:$AAPL(Apple Watches)。

这客户数量多得离谱,而且还在增加。

等它们拿到更多资金后,总可以通过 IP acquisitions 向下游 TAM expansion,或者垂直整合,有一天 speedrun $LITE 的 $60B 市值。

2. MSSCORP (6830):~$1.2B 的 CPO inspection 垄断。

在 CPO yields 上 100% 垄断,$TSM$AMAT$NVDA$LCRX$INTC 等都很可能是客户。

“The company’s goal is to seize a 90 percent share of the CPO inspection market”

这基本意味着 100%,他们只是不想反垄断。如果它们守住垄断并且 CPO 爬坡,从 $1.2B 看到 ~$5B-$9B 很容易。

3. Auros (322310):~$210M 的 Samsung / SK Hynix 供应商,做 Hybrid Bonding Metrology。

基本是两个产品的 pure play:
-> HBM4 / HBM4e / HBM5 cycles,$KLA 在 IR metrology 上曾有垄断。
---> 现在很可能正在 Samsung 工厂认证,预计 H2 量产爬坡。Sk Hynix 升级到 hybrid bonding 时也很可能在认证。
-> Thin-film thickness measurement。
---> 正在认证,客户是“major domestic chipmaker”(Samsung/Sk hynix 二选一),目标今年大规模供应。

它们过去十年一直在开发,今年 H2 才把多年认证后的两个产品推向量产爬坡。

如果它们切换到量产爬坡,涨 3 倍到 $630M 看起来极有可能,感觉像韩国市场里一个没被发现的宝石?

当然,不确定它们会如何兑现,这些都是 speculative,但我对供应链 mapping 有高信心。

不过凭直觉,我持有的这三个是在这个水平最有可能的。
引用原推@Mellokhai
@aleabitoreddit Stay with us and Give us some more x3 brrrrrr
@aleabitoreddit 留在我们身边,再给我们来几个 x3 brrrrrr
https://x.com/Mellokhai/status/2050087539726332124
❤️ 1,868 🔁 178 💬 131
打开原推
💬 引用
wtf am I from the future or something?

$SOI just in a straight line up to a 3x return in 6 weeks… https://t.co/ZW5bAfgvmq
wtf 我是从未来来的吗?

$SOI 6 周内直线上涨到 3x 回报…… https://t.co/ZW5bAfgvmq
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 868 🔁 29 💬 69
打开原推
💬 引用
Wow, names like $TOWA (6315) are super boring to watch…

Especially since KR/TW markets are closed today.

Only up ~11% so far. But like Hammond or Tower Semi…

Towa seems like a pretty steady compounder up throughout the duration of new memory cycles.

Bc it receives unavoidable capex inflows from $MU, SK Hynix, and Samsung their monopoly status.

At least Enplas has some volatility… (, they grew their AI test segment 225%+ operating profit y/y)

Then "Mass production of lenses for 1.6T optical transceivers has launched."

Pretty sure they’re sandbagging + have legacy drag confusing algorithms regarding AI segment acceleration.

Good time to take a break from watching markets I guess.
哇,像 $TOWA (6315) 这样的名字看起来真的超级无聊……

尤其是今天 KR/TW 市场都休市。

目前只涨了 ~11%。但像 Hammond 或 Tower Semi 一样……

Towa 看起来像是贯穿新 memory cycles 的稳定 compounder。

因为凭借它们的垄断地位,它会从 $MU、SK Hynix 和 Samsung 那里获得不可避免的 capex inflows。

至少 Enplas 还有点波动……(它们 AI test segment 营业利润同比增长 225%+)

然后“Mass production of lenses for 1.6T optical transceivers has launched.”

我很确定它们在 sandbagging,而且 legacy drag 让算法误解了 AI segment acceleration。

我猜是时候从看盘里休息一下了。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
So just putting it out there: Towa (6315), at $1.35B...

Is a rare, living definition of monopoly over HBM4 (compression molding).

It's been kinda flat YTD, but every memory company like $MU, Sk Hynix, Samsung are their customers. And each of the memory company earnings signaled massive capex increases.

Even as seen with $TSM earnings, every major semi is going through a massive capex cycle to meet AI demand.

And all three memory makers have printed from hbm3e and nand... so the next capex cycle is probably not like the last (meaning a lot more spend).

Like $ASML, this is hyper-cyclical but I wanted exposure to the upcoming HBM4 capex ramp over these next few months.

Thought I'd put this name on people's radar alongside $LPK (glass core substrates) as a functional monopoly.

But I do feel like this timing is about right while every machine supplier is having a massive re-rating yet this was relatively flat.

Not exactly a new find, since a few other analysts + random followers had this name but hope I get the timing right.

(Disclaimer: I do hold positions, this just TLDR of my own thoughts, please don’t copy trade)
所以我就把它抛出来:Towa (6315),市值 $1.35B...

是 HBM4(compression molding)里少见的、活生生的垄断定义。

它今年以来基本横盘,但每家 memory 公司,比如 $MU、Sk Hynix、Samsung,都是他们客户。而每家 memory 公司的财报都释放了大幅增加 capex 的信号。

甚至从 $TSM 财报也能看到,每个主要半导体公司都在经历一个巨大的 capex 周期,以满足 AI 需求。

而且三大 memory 厂都已经靠 hbm3e 和 nand 打印了... 所以下一个 capex 周期大概率不像上一个(意思是花费会多很多)。

$ASML 一样,这非常周期性,但我想在接下来几个月拿到即将到来的 HBM4 capex ramp 暴露。

我想把这个名字和 $LPK(glass core substrates)一起放到大家雷达上,作为功能性垄断。

但我确实觉得现在时机差不多,因为每个设备供应商都在大幅重估,而它还相对横盘。

不算什么新发现,因为其他几个分析师 + 随机粉丝也提过这个名字,但希望我把时机抓对。

(免责声明:我确实持仓,这只是我自己想法的 TLDR,请不要 copy trade)
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2048914800533721376
❤️ 520 🔁 40 💬 43
打开原推

2026年4月

💬 引用
Retail short sellers should really not touch $AXTI.

I keep seeing people misunderstand $AXTI as only "InP Substrate" with Sumitomo, over and over but just never made a comment.

This is wrong.

They are literally 40%+ of the InP supply chain, which is why institutions are funding them.

They hold MANY chokepoints, not just InP Substrates.

As seen with the Gulf, removing ~20% of a supply is catastrophic, but do that with 3-4 other chokepoints.

-> All the raw materials (indium, gallium, germanium).
Vital and $AXTI (captive, JinMei) are the duopoly alongside Chinese companies. With Western 5N and others only holding a small fractional share.

Since China (Vital, AXT) controls majority.

-> pBN Crucible chokepoints:

$AXTI is a another massive chokepoint (BoYu). there's a few other players like ShinEtsu/Morgan/etc, but this is another bottleneck in refinery layers.

InP substrates:
$AXT / Sumitomo are duopoly here, with JX, $COHR holding just a tiny percentage.

There's many other processes (eg. Red Phosphorus) here too (eg. Nippon Chemical/Rasa) in the middle.

This is a materials problem.

$COHR can't just make InP substrates without all the upstream materials + refineries that $AXT controls.

If $LITE CEO can't sleep at night because of InP substrates, $5B valuations mean nothing to the Western hyperscaler buildout stay online.

Japan is actively getting export controlled on upstream materials, while AXT holds them all captive.

So TLDR: It's not just "InP Substrates" that i see a lot of short sellers conflating.

It's all the indium, gallium -> refinery processing -> pBN Crucible that goes into the final duopoly InP substrate creation process they share with Sumitomo.

if Vital and multiple chokepoints upstream stops shipping, downstream to the Western InP substate makers.

AXTI becomes a mini-monopoly.

The valuation comes from owning the entire supply chain, not just "InP substrate creation" that even institutional analysts dont understand.
散户空头真的不该碰 $AXTI

我不断看到人们一遍又一遍把 $AXTI 只误解成和 Sumitomo 一样的“InP Substrate”,但我之前一直没评论。

这是错的。

它们实际上占 InP 供应链 40%+,这就是机构给它们融资的原因。

它们掌握很多 chokepoints,不只是 InP Substrates。

就像 Gulf 那里看到的,移除 ~20% 的供应就是灾难性的,更别说再叠加 3-4 个其他 chokepoints。

-> 所有 raw materials(indium、gallium、germanium)。
Vital 和 $AXTI(captive, JinMei)与中国公司一起是双寡头。Western 5N 和其他公司只持有很小份额。

因为中国(Vital、AXT)控制多数。

-> pBN Crucible chokepoints:

$AXTI 是另一个巨大 chokepoint(BoYu)。还有少数其他玩家如 ShinEtsu/Morgan 等,但这是 refinery layers 里的另一个瓶颈。

InP substrates:
$AXT / Sumitomo 在这里是双寡头,JX、$COHR 只持有很小比例。

中间还有很多其他流程(比如 Red Phosphorus)(比如 Nippon Chemical/Rasa)。

这是材料问题。

没有 $AXT 控制的所有上游材料 + refineries,$COHR 不能凭空做 InP substrates。

如果 $LITE CEO 因为 InP substrates 睡不着,$5B 估值对于西方 hyperscaler buildout 保持在线来说根本不算什么。

日本在上游材料上正被主动出口管制,而 AXT 把这些都 captive 掌握着。

所以 TLDR:它不只是我看到很多空头混淆的“InP Substrates”。

而是所有 indium、gallium -> refinery processing -> pBN Crucible,最后进入它们与 Sumitomo 分享的双寡头 InP substrate 制造流程。

如果 Vital 和多个上游 chokepoints 停止向西方 InP substrate makers 出货。

AXTI 就会变成一个 mini-monopoly。

估值来自拥有整个供应链,而不只是连机构分析师都不懂的“InP substrate creation”。
引用原推@ThematicTrader
$AXTI is a short bro. If they 4x quarterly revenue by 2028, that puts them at ~$400M annual revs. They are a $5.2B MC company. We paying 13x FY28 revenue for this stock for real?

Yes, they are one of few suppliers of InP, but it's not necessarily proprietary. It was a small TAM and is now a growing TAM, competition might pick up.

And the trade is stupid crowded because Serenity people likely chased it. Serenity hit the nail on the head early, but so many of his followers came into this trade above $50.

Some of these optics small caps are getting quite crowded like $LWLG, previously $POET. Would love to hear counter arguments or any thoughts.
$AXTI 是个 short,兄弟。如果到 2028 年季度收入翻 4 倍,那年收入也就是 ~$400M。他们现在是 $5.2B MC 公司。我们真要为这只股票付 FY28 收入 13 倍?

是的,他们是少数 InP 供应商之一,但这不一定是专有技术。以前 TAM 很小,现在 TAM 在增长,竞争可能会起来。

而且这笔交易拥挤得离谱,因为 Serenity 的人很可能都追进去了。Serenity 很早就精准说中了,但他的很多粉丝是在 $50 以上进的。

有些 optics 小盘已经很拥挤了,比如 $LWLG,之前的 $POET。很想听听反方观点或任何想法。
https://x.com/ThematicTrader/status/2049966089791242678
❤️ 800 🔁 61 💬 41
打开原推
📝 原创
$SLNH is a shtco like $BKKT, $ASST, and $IREN.

That is actively diluting everyone with a $500M ATM.

Not sure why anyone even listens to a guy who has consistently crashed retail portfolios over and over.

I’m going to watch them raise $500M off retail bagholders that get diluted to $0.

Then say “we have $500m on our balance sheets, MC should be higher” and award themselves SBC off the ATM.

They’re all absolutely terrible longs.
$SLNH 是像 $BKKT$ASST$IREN 一样的 shtco。

它正在用 $500M ATM 主动稀释所有人。

不明白为什么还有人听一个反复把散户组合搞崩的人。

我会看着他们从被套散户身上融 $500M,把他们稀释到 $0。

然后说“我们资产负债表上有 $500m,市值应该更高”,并通过 ATM 给自己发 SBC。

它们全都是糟糕透顶的多头。
❤️ 1,004 🔁 45 💬 123
打开原推
📝 原创
$SNDK earnings are just way too good...

Q3 earnings:
Revenue: $5.95B vs. ~$4.7B (252% Y/Y growth, 26% beat)
EPS: $23.41 vs. ~$14.5 (62% beat)
Gross Margin: ~78.4% vs. 67.3% (+1,110 bps vs. Est.)

Q4 2024 projections:
Revenue: $7.75B-$8.25B vs. ~$6.5B (23% above estimates)
EPS: $30-33 vs. ~$23 (37.0% above estimates)

Memory companies (disclosure I do own Sandisk) are a bit easier to price in ahead of time vs. names like $RDDT (off of traffic data).

Just purely from third party stuff like NAND price hike reports... so all the repricing does happen ahead of time, not on actual earnings.

Regardless, this is formal confirmation that memory companies are going brrr...

Astronomical earnings from memory players and they'll likely keep marching upward over this year.
$SNDK 财报实在太好了……

Q3 earnings:
Revenue:$5.95B vs. ~$4.7B(252% Y/Y growth,26% beat)
EPS:$23.41 vs. ~$14.5(62% beat)
Gross Margin:~78.4% vs. 67.3%(+1,110 bps vs. Est.)

Q4 2024 projections:
Revenue:$7.75B-$8.25B vs. ~$6.5B(高于预期 23%)
EPS:$30-33 vs. ~$23(高于预期 37.0%)

Memory companies(披露:我持有 Sandisk)相比 $RDDT 这种名字(基于 traffic data),更容易提前定价。

纯粹从 NAND price hike reports 这类第三方信息就能看出来……所以所有 repricing 都会提前发生,而不是等实际财报。

不管怎样,这是正式确认 memory companies 正在 go brrr……

Memory 玩家财报天文级别,它们今年很可能继续往上走。
❤️ 1,054 🔁 82 💬 80
打开原推
📝 原创
Wow, $RDDT just posted an absolute blowout quarter.

-> $663M revenue (69% growth Y/Y) vs. ~$608M consensus.
-> $1.01 EPS reported vs. $0.6 consensus (68.3% beat).
-> 91.5% gross margins.
-> Q1 GAAP net income was $204M. This is probably the most important figure for true profitability since it includes SBC.

Next quarter they projected, $715M to $725M revenue growth with $285 million to $295 million adjusted EBITDA.

Reddit looks like a literal, high growth money printer. (Disclosure: I do have Reddit positions.)

Expect a lot of chart volatility from short term option flows.

But fundamentally, if you look at Reddit earnings without the noise, Reddit money printer go brrr.
哇,$RDDT 刚刚交出一个绝对爆炸的季度。

-> $663M revenue(同比增长 69%)vs. ~$608M consensus。
-> 报告 EPS $1.01 vs. $0.6 consensus(beat 68.3%)。
-> 91.5% gross margins。
-> Q1 GAAP net income 是 $204M。这可能是真正盈利能力最重要的数字,因为它包括 SBC。

下季度他们预计收入 $715M 到 $725M,adjusted EBITDA $285 million 到 $295 million。

Reddit 看起来简直就是一台高增长 money printer。(Disclosure:我持有 Reddit 仓位。)

短期 option flows 可能会带来很多图形波动。

但从基本面看,如果你去掉噪音看 Reddit 财报,Reddit money printer go brrr。
❤️ 1,103 🔁 61 💬 82
打开原推
💬 引用
Fun fact: don’t think any large US institution had positions in $SIVE / $SIVEF since it was a majority owned local Swedish retail stock.

There’s also fund mandates preventing US funds from entering (eg. Nasdaq listing / $1B MC)

That’s definitely changed now thanks to European media shaking out the local holders, Sivers upcoming NASDAQ listing, and hitting $1B+ MC.

Again $1.3B is literal spare change for hyperscalers and US institutions.

And I have high confidence many would want exposure to CPO, silicon photonics and lasers, since there’s only a few in the entire world like $LITE, $COHR, and $MTSI.

Especially… a CHIPS Act laser supplier likely in $AMD, $MRVL, $AAPL, Lightmatter, Ayar, AlChip, GUC, O-Net and other supply chains like the Golden Dome.

Part of it is game theory for share accumulation.

Since US/Western retail now owns a large part of the float (off of the Swedish sellers).

And US institutions now want exposure.
有趣事实:我不认为任何大型美国机构之前持有 $SIVE / $SIVEF,因为它主要是一只本地瑞典散户持有的股票。

也有基金 mandate 阻止美国基金进入(比如 Nasdaq listing / $1B 市值)。

现在这显然已经改变了,多亏欧洲媒体把本地持有人震出去、Sivers 即将 NASDAQ listing,以及市值达到 $1B+。

再说一次,$1.3B 对 hyperscalers 和美国机构来说真的只是零钱。

而且我高度相信很多人会想要 CPO、silicon photonics 和 lasers 的敞口,因为全世界也就 $LITE$COHR$MTSI 这种少数几家。

尤其是……一家 CHIPS Act laser supplier,很可能在 $AMD$MRVL$AAPL、Lightmatter、Ayar、AlChip、GUC、O-Net,以及 Golden Dome 等供应链里。

其中一部分是 share accumulation 的博弈论。

因为美国/西方散户现在已经拥有很大一部分流通盘(来自瑞典卖家)。

而美国机构现在想要敞口。
引用原推@OGCapital25
Also feels like there’s an infinite TWAP on $SIVE

Price goes up, long time holders sell, price goes up even more.

Feel like large institutional bids averaging their buys.
另外感觉 $SIVE 上有无限 TWAP

价格上涨,长期持有人卖出,价格再涨更多。

感觉是大型机构买盘在均价买入。
https://x.com/OGCapital25/status/2049763215983387115
❤️ 779 🔁 51 💬 67
打开原推
💬 引用
If you’re curious why $SIVEF is up even more today.

$SIVE, as a CHIPS act recipient:

Now likely powers the Golden Dome.

As the upstream semi supplier since Sivers’ lead customer ALLSPACE got acquired by $YSS.

York happens to be a national defense prime contractor with links to the Space Force, Space Development Agency, DoD, and Golden Dome.

So Sivers, a mini Swedish company, basically got a backdoor to powering the US space buildout.
如果你好奇为什么 $SIVEF 今天涨得更多。

$SIVE 作为 CHIPS act recipient:

现在很可能驱动 Golden Dome。

因为 Sivers 的 lead customer ALLSPACE 被 $YSS 收购后,它成为上游半导体供应商。

York 刚好是 national defense prime contractor,和 Space Force、Space Development Agency、DoD、Golden Dome 都有联系。

所以 Sivers 这家瑞典小公司,基本拿到了一个后门,去驱动美国太空 buildout。
引用原推@MacnBTC
$SIVE +200% something in only 2.5 weeks

all credit to @aleabitoreddit, made me more than I made in crypto past 5 months https://t.co/EP4ANATQis
$SIVE 只用了 2.5 周就涨了 +200% 多

全归功于 @aleabitoreddit,让我赚得比过去 5 个月 crypto 里赚的还多 https://t.co/EP4ANATQis
https://x.com/MacnBTC/status/2049878057276608661
❤️ 993 🔁 75 💬 91
打开原推
📝 原创
Looks like $JPM is up 1.29% today as it’s anecdotally receiving an influx of new male applications. https://t.co/vPYvLVBTL9
看起来 $JPM 今天涨了 1.29%,因为据传收到了大量新的男性申请。 https://t.co/vPYvLVBTL9
❤️ 1,010 🔁 28 💬 99
打开原推
💬 引用
Thoughts on LPKF Laser < $LPK / $LPKFF> earnings:

Very nuanced, here's what markets might have missed:

If you look at the financials in isolation and don't understand qualification cycles, it's bad.

The earnings call for volume ramp indicators are what's actually important.

1. "Potential volume orders in Advanced Packaging are not included in this baseline guidance"

Any volume production equipment order that lands H2 will act as an immediate upside surprise to their projections. (positive)

2. "LIDE is currently in use by numerous semiconductor customers in test and R&D environments; the expected follow-up orders..."

Confirmation of what we expected, with many semiconductor companies qualifying $LPK. (positive)

3. "First production orders expected this year"

Inflection point of volume ramp confirmation H2 2026, this is probably the biggest signal markets missed + no projections included around that. (very positive)

From previous interviews we can stitch together:

Q: 2027 as the start of mass production for glass substrates. Does this timeline still hold?

"Yes. Market players are preparing orders for production equipment, and initial orders have already been recorded in the first quarter. While challenges remain, I still expect 2027 to mark the beginning of mass production."

2027 is mass production of glass core substrates, but H2 2026 is start of mass production orders for $LPK, **which is not included in any forecasts**.

We got confirmation of timelines from earnings.

Basically:

-> You won't see any projections/financials around glass core substrate related VOLUME RAMP which is the only thing American investors care about with this company.

-> Earnings in isolation were objectively terrible, but you only care about this as a European if you model based on previous 12 months only (instead of future growth).

-> Confirmation of volume ramp starting H2. Glass Core substrate mass production 2027.

If anything, this was extremely positive for the core thesis about volume ramp for glass core substrates.

We'll see how much the orders are though.
关于 LPKF Laser < $LPK / $LPKFF> 财报的一些想法:

非常讲细节,下面是市场可能漏掉的东西:

如果你孤立看财务,而不理解 qualification cycles,那确实很差。

财报电话会里的 volume ramp 信号,才是真正重要的东西。

1. “Potential volume orders in Advanced Packaging are not included in this baseline guidance”

任何 H2 落地的量产设备订单,都会立刻成为它们预测的上行惊喜。(正面)

2. “LIDE is currently in use by numerous semiconductor customers in test and R&D environments; the expected follow-up orders...”

确认了我们预期的情况,很多半导体公司正在认证 $LPK。(正面)

3. “First production orders expected this year”

确认 H2 2026 的量产爬坡拐点,这可能是市场漏掉的最大信号,而且预测里没有包含这些。(非常正面)

从之前采访可以拼起来:

Q:2027 年作为 glass substrates 量产开始,这个时间线还成立吗?

“Yes. Market players are preparing orders for production equipment, and initial orders have already been recorded in the first quarter. While challenges remain, I still expect 2027 to mark the beginning of mass production.”

2027 是 glass core substrates 量产,但 H2 2026 是 $LPK 量产订单开始,**这没有包含在任何预测里**。

我们从财报里得到了时间线确认。

基本上:

-> 你不会在任何预测/财务里看到 glass core substrate 相关 VOLUME RAMP,而这是美国投资者唯一在意这家公司的东西。

-> 孤立看财报客观上很糟,但只有当你是欧洲人、只按过去 12 个月建模(而不是未来增长)时,你才会只关心这个。

-> 确认 H2 开始 volume ramp。Glass Core substrate 2027 年量产。

如果说什么的话,这对 glass core substrates volume ramp 的核心 thesis 来说是极其正面的。

我们看看订单规模会有多大。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$LPK / $LPKFF earnings are out.

Seeing a lot of very dumb commentary on X. If you're wondering how to analyze qualification-cycle players, it's the same as $AEHR.

Nobody cares about current earnings unless there's something extremely bad. If your revenue declines -8M euros before any volume ramp, it doesn't mean anything.

The only reason why LPKF is a long anyway is 2027 LIDE glass core substrate mass production.

Main thing to look at is earnings call in 2 hours not current financials and indication of high volume production + customers.

People made this same mistake with $AEHR selling off on previous financials instead of listening to the call.
$LPK / $LPKFF 财报出了。

在 X 上看到很多非常蠢的评论。如果你想知道怎么分析 qualification-cycle 玩家,逻辑和 $AEHR 一样。

没人关心当前财报,除非有什么极其糟糕的事。如果在任何 volume ramp 之前收入下降 -8M euros,那没任何意义。

LPKF 之所以能做多,唯一原因就是 2027 年 LIDE glass core substrate 量产。

主要要看的是 2 小时后的 earnings call,不是当前财务数据,而是关于 high volume production + customers 的信号。

之前 $AEHR 也有人犯过同样错误,根据财务数据卖出,而不是听 call。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2049737227677421908
❤️ 578 🔁 54 💬 63
打开原推
💬 引用
Well that was a fast +200% gain with $SOI.

Soitec up another 13.62% today if you listened anon?

I love how when I first put out this thesis, institutions were telling people not to buy at +30%.

Now it’s up another 2x…

Reason a lot of X accounts get popular is people stopped trusting “institutional analyst commentary” since many work against retail.
嗯,$SOI 这波 +200% 来得很快。

Soitec 今天又涨 13.62%,如果你听了 anon?

我喜欢的是,当我最早发这个 thesis 时,机构还在 +30% 的位置告诉大家不要买。

现在又涨了 2 倍……

很多 X 账号变火的原因,是大家不再相信“机构分析师评论”,因为很多机构是在和散户对着干。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 798 🔁 30 💬 60
打开原推
💬 引用
From the reference... it does look like Lightmatter uses $SIVE lasers?

Which is brand new information discovery and extremely positive for Sivers.

Lightmatter is a massive private leader (~$4.4B valuation back in 2024), with $TSM, $GFS, $TSEM, $AMKR, and $ASX scaling their optical program.

And Lightmatter does require a light source...

$SIVE also happens to be on the $GFS laser source suppliers alongside $LITE, so starting to put the dots together?

End users are likely your hyperscalers like $MSFT, $GOOGL (they invested), $META, etc through Lightmatter-GUC and others.

I don't think markets have priced all of this in, since all the supply chain BOM is very confidential + speculative.

But when CPO and next-gen photonic architectures scale up, volume ramp revenue will appear out of nowhere on the balance sheet.
从 reference 看……Lightmatter 看起来确实用 $SIVE lasers?

这是全新的信息发现,对 Sivers 极其正面。

Lightmatter 是一个巨大的私营 leader(2024 年估值 ~$4.4B),$TSM$GFS$TSEM$AMKR$ASX 都在扩张它们的 optical program。

而 Lightmatter 确实需要 light source……

$SIVE 也刚好和 $LITE 一起出现在 $GFS laser source suppliers 里,所以开始把点连起来了?

终端用户很可能是通过 Lightmatter-GUC 等,流向 $MSFT$GOOGL(他们投资了)、$META 等 hyperscalers。

我不觉得市场已经把这些全定价进去,因为所有 supply chain BOM 都非常保密 + 带推测。

但当 CPO 和 next-gen photonic architectures 扩张时,量产爬坡收入会突然出现在资产负债表上。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Great find. Basically from old investor deck + fundraising amounts:

Looks like Celestial has been direct customers of $SIVE.

So: $MRVL is likely buying lasers direct from $SIVE now instead of through Poet (which bought Sivers lasers to package them).

Since Celestial is designed around Sivers lasers originally.

Marvell probably prepared to vertically integrate away packaging IP +
assembly for higher margins anyway.

Going direct to $MRVL is very bullish for $SIVE.
好发现。基本从老 investor deck + 融资金额看:

Celestial 看起来一直是 $SIVE 的直接客户。

所以:$MRVL 现在很可能直接从 $SIVE 买 lasers,而不是通过 Poet(Poet 买 Sivers lasers 再封装)。

因为 Celestial 原本就是围绕 Sivers lasers 设计的。

Marvell 可能本来就准备摆脱 packaging IP +
assembly,做垂直整合来提高利润率。

直接去 $MRVL$SIVE 非常利好。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2049761085872570864
❤️ 628 🔁 49 💬 29
打开原推
💬 引用
Great find. Basically from old investor deck + fundraising amounts:

Looks like Celestial has been direct customers of $SIVE.

So: $MRVL is likely buying lasers direct from $SIVE now instead of through Poet (which bought Sivers lasers to package them).

Since Celestial is designed around Sivers lasers originally.

Marvell probably prepared to vertically integrate away packaging IP +
assembly for higher margins anyway.

Going direct to $MRVL is very bullish for $SIVE.
好发现。基本上从旧 investor deck + 融资金额看:

Celestial 看起来一直是 $SIVE 的直接客户。

所以:$MRVL 现在很可能直接从 $SIVE 买 lasers,而不是通过 Poet(Poet 买 Sivers lasers 来封装)。

因为 Celestial 最早就是围绕 Sivers lasers 设计的。

Marvell 大概本来就准备垂直整合掉 packaging IP + assembly,以获得更高利润率。

直接到 $MRVL$SIVE 非常 bullish。
引用原推@Plaskpojken
Just remembered something that we dug up a couple of years ago, and it solidifies our firm belief that Sivers ( $SIVE / $SIVEF ) already has a direct connection to Celestial AI. 🚨

While retail algos panic-sold the Marvell/POET cancellation thinking the bridge was burned, smart money knows how to follow the financial footprints.

Let’s look at a Sivers corporate presentation from a while back. They listed their anonymous "Optical I/O" clients (Customer B, C, and D) alongside Ayar Labs, and dropped a highly specific clue: These anonymous clients raised a combined $250 million in 2023.

Now, let's look at the major Silicon Photonics networking companies that raised capital in 2023:

▪️ Lightmatter: Raised $154 million (Dec 2023).
▪️ Celestial AI: Raised $100 million (Jun 2023).

$154M + $100M = $254 million.

The math perfectly matches the Sivers slide.

What does this mean?
It proves that Sivers wasn't just blindly supplying lasers through a middleman. According to their own presentation, Celestial AI (now Marvell) and Lightmatter are their direct customers.

When Marvell fires a packaging partner for breaching an NDA, the need for the physical light engine doesn't vanish. The technical "co-design" relationship between the system architect (Celestial AI) and the foundational laser foundry ($SIVE) was already established years ago.

Algorithms trade headlines. Fundamental investors trade the supply chain reality. ⏳🔥

$SIVE $SIVEF #DeepTech #SiliconPhotonics #AI
刚想起我们几年前挖到的一件事,它进一步巩固了我们的坚定判断:Sivers( $SIVE / $SIVEF )已经和 Celestial AI 有直接连接。🚨

当散户算法因为 Marvell/POET 取消合作而恐慌卖出,以为桥已经断了时,聪明钱知道怎么追踪资金足迹。

我们看一份稍早前的 Sivers 公司演示。他们把匿名的 "Optical I/O" 客户(Customer B、C、D)和 Ayar Labs 放在一起,并给了一个非常具体的线索:这些匿名客户在 2023 年合计融资 $250 million。

现在看 2023 年融资的主要 Silicon Photonics networking 公司:

▪️ Lightmatter:融资 $154 million(2023 年 12 月)。
▪️ Celestial AI:融资 $100 million(2023 年 6 月)。

$154M + $100M = $254 million。

这个数字和 Sivers 那页幻灯片完美匹配。

这意味着什么?
它证明 Sivers 不只是通过中间商盲目供应 lasers。根据他们自己的演示,Celestial AI(现在是 Marvell)和 Lightmatter 是他们的直接客户。

当 Marvell 因为违反 NDA 开掉一个封装合作伙伴时,对实体 light engine 的需求不会消失。系统架构方(Celestial AI)和基础 laser foundry($SIVE)之间的技术“co-design”关系,几年前就已经建立了。

算法交易标题。基本面投资者交易供应链现实。⏳🔥

$SIVE $SIVEF #DeepTech #SiliconPhotonics #AI
https://x.com/Plaskpojken/status/2049623517528781114
❤️ 800 🔁 61 💬 37
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Samsung/SK Hynix Supplier Korean Stock Idea:

It's kinda like $SIVE + CPO mixed with $AEHR but for memory (and less TAM).

Auros (322310): ~$210m MC.

It's the SK Hynix and Samsung supplier for next-gen HBM.

This is a direct play for HBM4e hybrid bonding (every memory maker) + HBM4 (samsung) / metrology.

A comparison is $SIVE for CPO, where they weren't really around for HBM3 (photonics equivalent is like 800g) and have been developing the past many years. But with next-gen it's there for volume ramp.

It's the only Korean Domestic company for IR metrology. And product #1 is used for hybrid bonding.

So Samsung HBM4 lines use hybrid copper bonding in 2026, so they're trying to push overlay tool through qualification H2?

Sk Hynix actually just used MR-MUF (no hybrid bonding) for HBM4. But Trendforce reported today SK Hynix has completed 12-high hybrid bonding HBM validation and is raising yields for mass production?

So maybe SK Hynix are adopters too soon, which is bullish.

But at least for short-term it's probably Samsung first for volume if qualifications pass.

$KLA is a pure monopoly over this sort of IR metrology overlay that Korea (SK Hynix/Samsung) wants to break.

So Samsung they are likely using Auros to customize IR tools and keep domestic secrets.

Think of it as the Korean $INTC where they will use their domestic champion as much as possible if it actually works. And both will ramp up HBM4E -> HBM5 with this technology, so multiple years capex.

For product #2 (this is why I mention $AEHR, similar):

There's also the "AUROS Technology Inc. is conducting qualification testing of its ultra-precision thin-film thickness measurement equipment with a major domestic chipmaker".

This was dominated by $KLA and $AMAT before.

"Development began at its research center, followed by pilot manufacturing at a new facility from 2021, with about four years required to reach the current qualification stage"

Basically they've been developing many years + qualifying now, and around h2 if it passes it switches to high volume production for 2027.

So this is the sweet spot for timelines. It's really high risktho ...

But high reward, lower downside risk given Samsung/SK Hynix are kinda supporting this company. (disclosure: have positions, NFA, DYOR)

Anyway, still doing reserach into this but found it compelling, just my thoughts so far.

TLDR:

Not really well known $210M MC supplier to Samsung/SK Hynix.

Then both of their main product lines finish qualification h2 for volume ramp 2027? So h1 into h2 (now) seemed like the sweet spot.

Still doing research of course, new company to me. just caught my eye. Very very early of course before any movement.
Samsung/SK Hynix 供应商韩国股票想法:

它有点像 $SIVE + CPO 混合 $AEHR,但用于 memory(TAM 小一些)。

Auros (322310):~$210m 市值。

它是 SK Hynix 和 Samsung 的 next-gen HBM 供应商。

这是 HBM4e hybrid bonding(每个 memory maker)+ HBM4(samsung)/ metrology 的直接玩法。

可以和 CPO 里的 $SIVE 对比,它们在 HBM3(photonics 类似 800g)时代不太存在,过去多年一直在开发。但到了 next-gen,它就进入 volume ramp。

它是韩国本土唯一做 IR metrology 的公司。产品 #1 用于 hybrid bonding。

所以 Samsung HBM4 lines 在 2026 年用 hybrid copper bonding,因此它们 H2 可能在推动 overlay tool 通过认证?

Sk Hynix 实际上 HBM4 只用了 MR-MUF(没有 hybrid bonding)。但 Trendforce 今天报道 SK Hynix 已完成 12-high hybrid bonding HBM validation,并正在提高量产良率?

所以也许 SK Hynix 很快也会采用,这很 bullish。

但至少短期来看,如果认证通过,量上可能先是 Samsung。

$KLA 在这类 IR metrology overlay 上是纯垄断,而韩国(SK Hynix/Samsung)想打破它。

所以 Samsung 很可能在用 Auros 定制 IR tools,并保留本土机密。

把它想成韩国 $INTC,如果它真的可用,他们会尽可能用自己的国内冠军。两家都会用这项技术从 HBM4E -> HBM5 爬坡,所以有多年 capex。

关于产品 #2(这就是我提 $AEHR 的原因,类似):

还有“AUROS Technology Inc. is conducting qualification testing of its ultra-precision thin-film thickness measurement equipment with a major domestic chipmaker”。

之前这由 $KLA$AMAT 主导。

“Development began at its research center, followed by pilot manufacturing at a new facility from 2021, with about four years required to reach the current qualification stage”

基本上它们开发多年 + 现在认证,H2 左右如果通过,就会切换到 2027 高量产。

所以这是时间线上的甜蜜点。风险真的很高……

但高回报,下行风险较低,因为 Samsung/SK Hynix 有点在支持这家公司。(披露:有仓位,NFA,DYOR)

总之,我还在研究这个,但觉得很有吸引力,目前只是我的想法。

TLDR:

一家并不出名、$210M 市值的 Samsung/SK Hynix 供应商。

然后它们两条主产品线都在 H2 完成认证,2027 volume ramp?所以 H1 到 H2(现在)看起来像甜蜜点。

当然还在研究,这家公司对我来说也新。只是吸引了我的注意。当然,在任何动静前都非常非常早。
❤️ 477 🔁 20 💬 50
打开原推
📝 原创
$LPK / $LPKFF earnings are out.

Seeing a lot of very dumb commentary on X. If you're wondering how to analyze qualification-cycle players, it's the same as $AEHR.

Nobody cares about current earnings unless there's something extremely bad. If your revenue declines -8M euros before any volume ramp, it doesn't mean anything.

The only reason why LPKF is a long anyway is 2027 LIDE glass core substrate mass production.

Main thing to look at is earnings call in 2 hours not current financials and indication of high volume production + customers.

People made this same mistake with $AEHR selling off on previous financials instead of listening to the call.
$LPK / $LPKFF 财报出来了。

X 上看到很多非常蠢的评论。如果你想知道怎么分析 qualification-cycle 玩家,它和 $AEHR 一样。

除非有极坏的东西,否则没人关心当前 earnings。如果在任何 volume ramp 前收入下降 -8M euros,那没什么意义。

LPKF 成为多头的唯一原因,本来就是 2027 LIDE glass core substrate 量产。

主要要看的是 2 小时后的财报电话会,而不是当前财务,以及高量产 + 客户的信号。

大家之前卖 $AEHR 时也犯过同样错误,只看过去财务,而不是听电话会。
❤️ 653 🔁 33 💬 61
打开原推
📝 原创
I am now long MSSCorps (6830) ~$1.4B MC

This appears to be a functional monopoly in CPO for inspection.

But markets might have conflated that with Material/Failure Analysis with MA-tek and iST (oligopoly).

For customers from mapping:
1. $TSM
2. $NVDA
3. $AAPL
4. $AMAT
5. $LRCX
6. $ASML
7. $INTC

And high probability $AVGO, MediaTek, Samsung, $MRVL, and others (they did mention EU too).

If you're curious:
- Taipei times names TSM as a client that Msscorps provides them with advanced material and failure analysis and name drops Apple, Nvidia, Lam, AMAT (also S/O to Latent for doing DD with me on this. there's other supply chain relationships to Nvidia through things like linkedin)
- For $AMSL, Taipei Times, Sept 10, 2024 "ASML adopted Msscorps' ultra-sensitive materials analysis of photoresists"

For Intel - Material analysis lab MSSCORPS has secured orders from major manufacturers such as Nvidia and Intel (Industrial Technology Research).


For inspection (non-destructive infrared (IR) leakage detection), they're a monopoly.

And have aggressively used litigation (like the Enli Tech lawsuit) to lock out rivals, which I view as a positive thing.

This creates massive pricing power with yields and every major player goes through them.

CPO inspection market is also extremely critical and like $AXTI in the InP substrate section, this massive chokepoint has pure pricing power with price hikes.

The risk is the patent suit doesn't go as plan, but Nvidia and other hyperscalers aren't likely to go with other parties in case MSSCorps wins, so this creates a massive multi-year advantage anyway. Hyperscalers aren't going to wait to see how an emerging competitor is going to win or not + take the risk.

I do see the massive re-rating potential with MSSCorp holding a critical yields chokepoint over CPO, so I went long (NFA, DYOR), this is just my thought process.
我现在做多 MSSCorps (6830),市值 ~$1.4B

这看起来是 CPO inspection 的功能性垄断。

但市场可能把它和 MA-tek、iST 的 Material/Failure Analysis(寡头)混在一起了。

从 mapping 看客户:
1. $TSM
2. $NVDA
3. $AAPL
4. $AMAT
5. $LRCX
6. $ASML
7. $INTC

并且 $AVGO、MediaTek、Samsung、$MRVL 等概率很高(他们也提到 EU)。

如果你好奇:
- Taipei Times 点名 TSM 是客户,Msscorps 为其提供 advanced material and failure analysis,并点名 Apple、Nvidia、Lam、AMAT(也 S/O Latent 和我一起做 DD。还有一些通过 linkedin 等连接到 Nvidia 的供应链关系)
- 关于 $AMSL,Taipei Times 2024 年 9 月 10 日:“ASML adopted Msscorps' ultra-sensitive materials analysis of photoresists”

关于 Intel - Material analysis lab MSSCORPS has secured orders from major manufacturers such as Nvidia and Intel(Industrial Technology Research)。

在 inspection(non-destructive infrared (IR) leakage detection)上,它们是垄断。

而且它们积极使用诉讼(比如 Enli Tech lawsuit)来锁死竞争对手,我认为这是正面。

这会在 yields 上创造巨大定价权,所有主要玩家都要经过它们。

CPO inspection market 也极其关键,像 $AXTI 在 InP substrate 环节一样,这个巨大 chokepoint 对涨价有纯定价权。

风险是专利诉讼不按计划发展,但如果 MSSCorps 赢,Nvidia 和其他 hyperscalers 不太可能选择其他方,所以无论如何这都会创造巨大的多年优势。Hyperscalers 不会等着看一个新兴竞争对手能不能赢,还承担风险。

我确实看到 MSSCorp 持有 CPO critical yields chokepoint 的巨大 re-rating 潜力,所以我做多了(NFA,DYOR),这只是我的思考过程。
❤️ 863 🔁 76 💬 69
打开原推
💬 引用
Yeah... the more I look into things, $TOWA / $TOWCF (6315) at ~$1.34b looks like a sleeper beneficiary for HBM4 spend from SK Hynix, Samsung, $MU.

It’s hyper cyclical with spending cycles.

But we’re seeing hikes in capex spend across the board from memory makers.

Not exactly a 4x type play...

But my guess is that it should get materially re-rated from a spike in unavoidable inflows for the start of the new HBM4 memory cycle anyway.

And they appear to be a largely forgotten beneficiary for this new cycle despite their monopoly in compression modeling processes.

Hybrid bonding just removes one step in the process but requires Towa anyway (monopolies tend to get higher premiums)

I also don't think this cycle is like the last due to how much memory companies have been printing recently?

Just my thoughts, but if my guess is right... it should show up in earnings on the Monday 11th (Tokyo Time) as everyone’s building out HBM4 lines?
是啊……我越研究,$TOWA / $TOWCF (6315) 在 ~$1.34b 看起来越像 SK Hynix、Samsung、$MU HBM4 支出的隐藏受益者。

它随着支出周期高度周期性。

但我们正在看到 memory makers 全面提高 capex spend。

不完全是 4x 类型的玩法……

但我猜,由于新 HBM4 memory cycle 开始带来不可避免的流入激增,它应该会被实质 re-rate。

尽管它们在 compression molding processes 上有垄断,但看起来在新周期里很大程度被遗忘了。

Hybrid bonding 只是移除流程里的一步,但无论如何仍然需要 Towa(垄断往往拿更高溢价)

我也不觉得这轮周期和上一轮一样,因为 memory companies 最近印钞太猛了?

只是我的想法,但如果我猜对了……应该会在周一 11 日(东京时间)的财报里体现出来,因为大家都在建设 HBM4 lines?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Monitoring the situation for you (testing/yields edition):

$VIAV and $FORM earnings: Extremely Bullish

So what does this mean?

Names like $ONTO / $CAMT go brr. Throw in $TOWA (6315), since there's indication of aggressive memory production ramp.

Names like Msscorps / $KEYS should go brrr.

Broader upstream yields, test, validation, and inspection for both memory + optical ecosystem go heavily BRRR. And it's a leading indicator for $COHR, $FN, $LITE, and others if they're ramping up production.

For $VIAV:
-> $406.8M vs. $393M (beat) 42.8% Y/Y growth.
-> $.27 EPS vs $0.2-$0.24
Guidance was $427m-$437m, indicating acceleration.

For $FORM:
-> $226M, 32% Y/Y, $.56 EPS vs. $.45
-> margins increased a TON to 49% (which indicates pricing power).
-> Guidance was $.61 EPS, midpoint ~$240m revenue.

"Record demand for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) and stronger "Foundry & Logic networking applications"

Basically the smaller yields/test ecosystem in general. BRRR.
帮你们监控情况(testing/yields 版):

$VIAV$FORM 财报:极度看多

那这意味着什么?

$ONTO / $CAMT 这样的名字会 go brr。再加上 $TOWA (6315),因为有迹象显示 memory production ramp 很激进。

像 Msscorps / $KEYS 这样的名字应该也会 brrr。

更广泛的上游 yields、test、validation、inspection,无论是 memory 还是 optical 生态,都会狠狠 BRRR。而且如果它们在扩大生产,这对 $COHR$FN$LITE 以及其他公司是领先指标。

$VIAV
-> $406.8M vs. $393M(beat),42.8% Y/Y 增长。
-> $.27 EPS vs $0.2-$0.24
指引是 $427m-$437m,显示加速。

$FORM
-> $226M,32% Y/Y,$.56 EPS vs. $.45
-> 利润率大幅提升到 49%(这显示定价权)。
-> 指引是 $.61 EPS,收入中点约 ~$240m。

“High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) 的创纪录需求,以及更强的 Foundry & Logic networking applications”

基本就是整个较小的 yields/test 生态。BRRR。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2049604721766494640
❤️ 577 🔁 53 💬 53
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a PSA: (I normally try to stay on topic)

But I get like 50-100 new message requests a day...

I try my best to respond to all your direct messages, but it's really hard to keep up.

So sending follow ups does push it to the top if there's something urgent or I missed a reply.

I do try and read all the comments though (esp. since I need to remove a lot of the fake account replies nowadays)
只是一个 PSA:(我通常尽量不跑题)

但我每天会收到大概 50-100 个新的 message requests……

我尽力回复你们所有 direct messages,但真的很难跟上。

所以如果有急事,或者我漏回了,发 follow up 确实会把它推到最上面。

不过我确实会尽量读所有评论(尤其是现在我需要删除很多假账号回复)
❤️ 672 🔁 3 💬 76
打开原推
💬 引用
Just an FYI: I don't need to post something every day about the names I own.

However, I did miss this with Shunsin (6451):

Foxconn picked by $NVDA as exclusive rack-scale supplier for Groq accelerator.

This is highly positive for Shunsin (Foxconn's optical packing arm).

So ShunSin's CPO and optical packaging basically backdoored Nvidia's next-gen supply chain with this news.

Markets just haven't realized this connection yet (and it's on disposition, so frozen for most).

The article explicitly notes that Foxconn is integrating these systems "including ... networking."

Bc Foxconn is the exclusive assembler, they'll vertically integrate and likely use ShunSin's optical packaging solutions into the design, bypassing ShunSin's need for networking contract directly from Nvidia.

This is what I meant by Shunsin is literally a free piggy back ride to $NVDA CPO ecosystem. Foxconn is massive.

And you're getting the leading player in Nvidia's optical supply chain for a lower valuation than $LWLG lol.
Just an FYI:我不需要每天都发我持有名字的东西。

不过,Shunsin (6451) 这条我之前漏了:

Foxconn 被 $NVDA 选为 Groq accelerator 的独家 rack-scale supplier。

这对 Shunsin(Foxconn 的 optical packing arm)非常正面。

所以借这条新闻,ShunSin 的 CPO 和 optical packaging 基本后门进入了 Nvidia 下一代供应链。

市场只是还没意识到这个连接(而且它在 disposition,所以大多数人被冻结)。

文章明确提到 Foxconn 正在整合这些系统,“including ... networking.”

因为 Foxconn 是独家组装方,他们会垂直整合,很可能把 ShunSin 的 optical packaging solutions 用进设计里,绕过 ShunSin 直接从 Nvidia 拿 networking contract 的需要。

这就是我说 Shunsin 简直是免费搭上 $NVDA CPO ecosystem 的顺风车。Foxconn 太大了。

而且你买到的是 Nvidia optical supply chain 的领先玩家,估值还比 $LWLG 低 lol。
引用原推@setthundred
@aleabitoreddit You gone quite on shunsin
@aleabitoreddit 你对 shunsin 变安静了
https://x.com/setthundred/status/2049605847047696583
❤️ 404 🔁 21 💬 43
打开原推
📝 原创
Monitoring the situation for you (testing/yields edition):

$VIAV and $FORM earnings: Extremely Bullish

So what does this mean?

Names like $ONTO / $CAMT go brr. Throw in $TOWA (6315), since there's indication of aggressive memory production ramp.

Names like Msscorps / $KEYS should go brrr.

Broader upstream yields, test, validation, and inspection for both memory + optical ecosystem go heavily BRRR. And it's a leading indicator for $COHR, $FN, $LITE, and others if they're ramping up production.

For $VIAV:
-> $406.8M vs. $393M (beat) 42.8% Y/Y growth.
-> $.27 EPS vs $0.2-$0.24
Guidance was $427m-$437m, indicating acceleration.

For $FORM:
-> $226M, 32% Y/Y, $.56 EPS vs. $.45
-> margins increased a TON to 49% (which indicates pricing power).
-> Guidance was $.61 EPS, midpoint ~$240m revenue.

"Record demand for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) and stronger "Foundry & Logic networking applications"

Basically the smaller yields/test ecosystem in general. BRRR.
帮你监控情况(testing/yields 版):

$VIAV$FORM 财报:极度 Bullish

这意味着什么?

$ONTO / $CAMT 这样的名字 go brr。加上 $TOWA (6315),因为有 aggressive memory production ramp 的信号。

像 Msscorps / $KEYS 这样的名字也应该 go brrr。

更广泛的上游 yields、test、validation 和 inspection,无论 memory + optical ecosystem,都会重重 BRRR。而且如果它们在 ramp up production,这对 $COHR$FN$LITE 等也是领先指标。

关于 $VIAV
-> $406.8M vs. $393M(beat),同比增长 42.8%。
-> $.27 EPS vs $0.2-$0.24
Guidance 是 $427m-$437m,显示加速。

关于 $FORM
-> $226M,同比增长 32%,$.56 EPS vs. $.45
-> margins 大幅提升到 49%(这说明定价权)。
-> Guidance 是 $.61 EPS,收入中点 ~$240m。

“Record demand for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) and stronger Foundry & Logic networking applications”

基本上就是更小的 yields/test ecosystem 整体。BRRR。
❤️ 1,133 🔁 103 💬 78
打开原推
📝 原创
I've monitored the situation for you.

TLDR on hyperscaler capex spend (signal aside from $TSM).

From $MSFT, $AMZN, $META earnings:

Upstream semi supply chains go brrr.

$META: 2026 FY capex $115-$135B
Revised Q1 ER: $125B-$145B capex raised.

-> Higher component prices (price hikes)
-> Aggressive AI infra spending
-> Custom Model Training

$MSFT: was actually $31.9B vs ($35.29B) but due to supply chain bottlenecks, rather than lack of resources.

Still waiting for confirmation around $AMZN but their original capex projection was ~$200B from Jassy's note earlier this year.

So you can sleep easy, all the semi supply chain names still likely to keep going brr next quarter, since there's so much capex funneled into them.

Then you get the new fed chair who is gung-ho all in on AI + rate cuts, with Jerome keeping stuff chill in the back (which markets probably like)
我已经帮你监控了情况。

Hyperscaler capex spend 的 TLDR(除了 $TSM 以外的信号)。

来自 $MSFT$AMZN$META 财报:

上游 semi supply chains go brrr。

$META:2026 FY capex $115-$135B
修订后 Q1 ER:capex 上调到 $125B-$145B。

-> 更高的 component prices(涨价)
-> 激进的 AI infra spending
-> Custom Model Training

$MSFT:实际是 $31.9B vs ($35.29B),但这是由于供应链瓶颈,而不是资源不足。

还在等 $AMZN 的确认,但根据 Jassy 今年早些时候的 note,他们原本 capex 预测是 ~$200B。

所以你可以睡得安心,所有半导体供应链名字下季度仍然很可能继续 go brr,因为有这么多 capex 被导入它们。

然后你还会得到一位新的 fed chair,对 AI + rate cuts 全力支持,Jerome 在后面保持平稳(市场大概会喜欢)。
❤️ 1,450 🔁 74 💬 79
打开原推
💬 引用
Happy to see my followers are escaping the permanent underclass with names like $SIVE, $AAOI, or others.

Stocks really are positive sum.

Everyone benefits if information synthesis / discovery is correct and helps people from their own conviction.

I appreciate the $1 the most!
很高兴看到我的粉丝靠 $SIVE$AAOI 或其他名字逃离永久底层。

股票真的是正和的。

如果信息综合/发现是正确的,并帮助人们建立自己的信念,每个人都会受益。

我最感谢那 $1!
引用原推@Moments974
@aleabitoreddit Weekly thank you post 💙🙏🏻 we go brrrrrr , Serenity please make me a multi-millionaire, help me to get out of the hamster wheel 🙏🏻💙

Hopefully by year end this position will be 2,000,000+ M https://t.co/POLebOvsVM
@aleabitoreddit 每周感谢帖 💙🙏🏻 we go brrrrrr,Serenity 请让我变成千万富翁,帮我逃出 hamster wheel 🙏🏻💙

希望到年底这个仓位能到 2,000,000+ M https://t.co/POLebOvsVM
https://x.com/Moments974/status/2049567068991762778
❤️ 1,345 🔁 31 💬 91
打开原推
📝 原创
Anyone else getting a little tired of everything from $INTC to $SIMO just going up so much every day?

You have Intel, a $300B+ company gaining 11% a day, while Silicon Motion gaining 41%…

Large part of it is just going long on the right sector/players... https://t.co/ZEPkUVVt51
还有人开始对从 $INTC$SIMO 每天涨这么多有点累了吗?

Intel 这种 $300B+ 公司一天涨 11%,而 Silicon Motion 涨 41%……

很大一部分只是做多了正确板块/正确玩家。 https://t.co/ZEPkUVVt51
❤️ 958 🔁 42 💬 86
打开原推
💬 引用
I’m personally a fan of the functional monopolies.

Here’s 6 of them that I own.

1. $TOWA (6315) - HBM4 Compression
2. MSSCorp (6830) - CPO Inspection
3. $LPK - Glass Core Substrates
4. $SOI - Silicon Photonics Substrates
5. $AXTI - End-to-End (mineral, refinery, production) InP substrates.
6. $ALRIB - Quantum / MBE (hybrid level systems).

I can’t give recommendations. But for me personally, I wouldn’t buy all of them today eg. AXT until there’s clarity over share authorization + it ran like 1000% already within a small timeframe.

But just thematically as you’ve seen, they tend to outperform so I’m holding all regardless.

There’s a lot more of these out there that you should definitely research yourself.

Always better to teach the thought process so people can do this themselves.
我个人是 functional monopolies 的粉丝。

这是我持有的 6 个。

1. $TOWA (6315) - HBM4 Compression
2. MSSCorp (6830) - CPO Inspection
3. $LPK - Glass Core Substrates
4. $SOI - Silicon Photonics Substrates
5. $AXTI - 端到端(mineral、refinery、production)InP substrates。
6. $ALRIB - Quantum / MBE(hybrid level systems)。

我不能给推荐。但对我个人来说,我今天不会全部买,比如 AXT,直到 share authorization 更清楚,而且它已经在很短时间里涨了 1000% 左右。

但从主题上看,就像你们看到的,它们往往跑赢,所以我无论如何都持有。

外面还有很多这样的东西,你们绝对应该自己研究。

教思考过程总是更好,这样大家可以自己做。
引用原推@Juelz1337
@aleabitoreddit @Ren_aramb So, which 6 stocks would you recommend, then? I’m not asking for your top 6 in general here, but rather your selection specifically for a portfolio of just 6 stocks. Would they still be high-risk/high-reward plays like Sivers, Riber, etc.?
@aleabitoreddit @Ren_aramb 那么,你会推荐哪 6 只股票?我这里不是问你总体 top 6,而是专门问一个只放 6 只股票的组合。它们还会是像 Sivers、Riber 等这种高风险/高回报标的吗?
https://x.com/Juelz1337/status/2049343054868332917
❤️ 974 🔁 73 💬 96
打开原推
📝 原创
Both Anthropic's Opus 4.6 and 4.7 are probably the dumbest LLMs I've interacted with recently?

Did they get hit in the head by a rock. Or just retrained off $IREN investor conversations?

Probably not going to use it again for awhile.

Felt like God-Mode when 4.6 first came out and just the stupidest LLM I've interacted with recently.
Anthropic 的 Opus 4.6 和 4.7 大概是我最近互动过最蠢的 LLM?

它们是被石头砸了脑袋吗?还是拿 $IREN 投资者对话重新训练了?

我大概一段时间不会再用了。

4.6 刚出来时感觉像 God-Mode,而最近它就是我互动过最蠢的 LLM。
❤️ 958 🔁 27 💬 148
打开原推
📝 原创
Fun fact, $SIVE just crossed the $1B MC threshold.

So a select few US institutions are able to buy it now (fund mandates)

However, the vast vast majority still can’t until they get listed on NASDAQ.

Just an FYI:

$1B valuations are spare change for institutional investors in US hyperscaler supply chains if they end up powering $JBL, $AMD, $AAPL, $AMZN, $MSFT and others.

Just look at $LWLG, $1.9B MC off 1 testing agreement with $TSEM.
有趣事实,$SIVE 刚刚跨过 $1B 市值门槛。

所以少数美国机构现在可以买了(fund mandates)

不过,绝大多数仍然要等它们在 NASDAQ 上市后才能买。

Just an FYI:

如果它们最终驱动 $JBL$AMD$AAPL$AMZN$MSFT 等,$1B 估值对美国 hyperscaler 供应链里的机构投资者来说只是零钱。

看看 $LWLG,只靠和 $TSEM 一个 testing agreement,就有 $1.9B 市值。
❤️ 1,002 🔁 78 💬 71
打开原推
💬 引用
Probably just this functional CPO monopoly name and an unknown KR Samsung/SK Hynix memory supplier tomorrow…

Then I’m fully allocated rest of the year unless there’s material changes, getting a little burnt out.

Curious if anyone can guess the Korean name? (Will keep posting free DD though)
大概明天就是这个 functional CPO monopoly 名字,以及一个未知的 KR Samsung/SK Hynix memory 供应商……

然后除非有实质变化,我今年剩下时间就满仓分配了,有点 burnout。

好奇有没有人能猜到那个韩国名字?(不过我还是会继续发免费 DD)
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
So new long idea of a functional photonics monopoly I was looking into with a friend:

Miss
Snake
Sisters
Could
Operate
Robot
Pokemon
Skarmory
6830 for CPO, ~$1.2B MC.

For customers:

$TSM - Taipei times names TSM as a client that Msscorps provides them with advanced material and failure analysis.

$NVDA, $AAPL, $AMAT, $LRCX

$ASML - Taipei Times, Sept 10, 2024 "ASML adopted Msscorps' ultra-sensitive materials analysis of photoresists"



$INTC - Material analysis lab MSSCORPS has secured orders from major manufacturers such as Nvidia and Intel (Industrial Technology Research).


Samsung (speculative)- "A closer look at Samsung 3nm GAA transistors" in stuff like case studies

Unfortunately it got dispositioned so it went up 64% in the past month... But finally got to take positions.

Basically: their claim was "seize a 90 percent share of the CPO inspection market" (basically 100% but they can't say that otherwise antitrust).

And they're weaponizing patents and refusing to license them to competitors like Enli. So it's almost like Soitec not licensing to Shin Etsu and just claiming 100%.

You have $LWLG at 1.8B fking serving $TSEM only off a development contract.

Then you have a literal living monopoly for inspection serving every single company lol at $1.2B?

It's inelastic demand for yield and can charge whatever for test. (Disclosure: I am long. NFA.)

Still researching it more into customer links since they did mention EU and others.
所以这是我和一个朋友一起研究的一个功能性 photonics 垄断新 long idea:

Miss
Snake
Sisters
Could
Operate
Robot
Pokemon
Skarmory
6830,做 CPO,市值约 ~$1.2B。

客户方面:

$TSM - Taipei times 点名 TSM 是客户,Msscorps 给他们提供先进材料和失效分析。

$NVDA$AAPL$AMAT$LRCX

$ASML - Taipei Times,2024 年 9 月 10 日,“ASML adopted Msscorps' ultra-sensitive materials analysis of photoresists”

$INTC - Material analysis lab MSSCORPS 已拿到 Nvidia 和 Intel 等主要制造商订单(Industrial Technology Research)。

Samsung(推测)- 案例研究里有类似 “A closer look at Samsung 3nm GAA transistors” 的东西

可惜它被处置了,所以过去一个月涨了 64%... 但终于能建仓了。

基本上:他们的说法是“seize a 90 percent share of the CPO inspection market”(基本就是 100%,但他们不能这么说,不然反垄断)。

而且他们正在把专利武器化,拒绝授权给 Enli 这样的竞争对手。所以有点像 Soitec 不授权给 Shin Etsu,然后自己声称 100%。

你有 $LWLG,$1.8B,靠一个开发合同给 $TSEM 服务。

然后你有一个字面意义上活着的检测垄断,服务每一家公司的 lol,市值 $1.2B?

良率需求缺乏弹性,test 想收多少就能收多少。(披露:我做多。NFA。)

还在继续研究更多客户连接,因为他们确实提到了 EU 和其他客户。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2049336470079668713
❤️ 259 🔁 7 💬 48
打开原推
💬 引用
I guess markets agree with my take on $LPK?

-&gt; When you have glass core substrates as the next advanced packaging wave
-&gt; be a monopoly chokepoint
-&gt; add in CPO applications.

It typically goes brrr. https://t.co/46u7msyDIl
我猜市场同意我对 $LPK 的看法?

-&gt; 当你拥有 glass core substrates 作为下一波 advanced packaging
-&gt; 是 monopoly chokepoint
-&gt; 再加上 CPO applications。

通常就会 go brrr。 https://t.co/46u7msyDIl
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I do really like $LPK.

Critical monopoly chokepoint in glass substrates…

Which are used for advanced packaging and CPO.

I flagged it as a potential 10x back in Jan, but thought it was a bit early.

However… time seems right now?

"About four years ago, we began collaborating with a semiconductor company to develop mass-production equipment for direct 3D waveguide formation," Lee said.

“The customer has already installed LPKF's equipment."

Maybe Samsung or SKC Absolics since this was in Korea?

Seems like momentum is ramping up now though like $AEHR pre-earnings, not quite high volume (2027), but around this time felt compelling for me.

During the transition from qualification/pilot -> high volume.
我真的很喜欢 $LPK

glass substrates 里的关键垄断瓶颈...

用于 advanced packaging 和 CPO。

我在 1 月就把它标成一个潜在 10x,但当时觉得有点早。

不过... 现在时间点好像对了?

“大约四年前,我们开始和一家半导体公司合作,开发用于直接 3D waveguide formation 的量产设备,”Lee 说。

“客户已经安装了 LPKF 的设备。”

也许是 Samsung 或 SKC Absolics,因为这是在韩国?

现在 momentum 看起来确实在加速,有点像 $AEHR 财报前,不算真正 high volume(2027),但这个时间点对我来说很有吸引力。

在从 qualification/pilot -> high volume 的转换期。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2049212010660049008
❤️ 645 🔁 50 💬 55
打开原推
💬 引用
Hint... $SIVE CHIPS Act round 2 incoming soon (consistent with the CHIPS Act renewal cycle)

The U.S. government doesn't just give out funding to random $1B Swedish companies.

It's highly unusual. And there's probably something markets are missing.

Since they got funding for:

-> $RTX and $ERIC Beamformers (space/telecom).
-> BAE Systems for STAR duplex arrays (radar jamming during electronic warfare)

Defense Primes are likely using Sivers microchip IP to build the final products with this.

As for the final products... What other space + military contractor applications are there involving LEO satellites? And I think you can guess.

The defense primes aren't trying to play Taylor Swift Youtube videos in space...

But the commercial spinoff can also be used for SpaceX/Amazon LEO Kuiper type applications.

Regardless, you have the side of the AI photonics story, which is the core growth vertical.

I'm most excited for photonics... but you also happen to get a company backed with U.S. CHIPS ACT embedded in Raytheon and BAE Systems for whatever black magic they want to do in Space.

Just nobody knows exact timeline + applications because due to the nature of CHIPS ACT defense contracts.

But it might appear randomly in financial statements down the road.
提示……$SIVE CHIPS Act 第二轮很快要来了(和 CHIPS Act renewal cycle 一致)

美国政府不会随便给一家 $1B 瑞典公司发钱。

这非常不寻常。市场可能漏掉了什么。

因为它们拿资金用于:

-> $RTX$ERIC Beamformers(space/telecom)。
-> BAE Systems 的 STAR duplex arrays(电子战中的 radar jamming)

Defense Primes 很可能用 Sivers microchip IP 来构建这些最终产品。

至于最终产品……还有哪些涉及 LEO satellites 的 space + military contractor applications?我想你能猜到。

Defense primes 不是想在太空播放 Taylor Swift Youtube 视频……

但商业衍生也可以用于 SpaceX/Amazon LEO Kuiper 类型应用。

不管怎样,你还有 AI photonics 故事的一面,这是核心增长方向。

我最兴奋的是 photonics……但你也刚好得到一家由美国 CHIPS ACT 背书、嵌入 Raytheon 和 BAE Systems 的公司,用于他们想在太空做的各种 black magic。

只是由于 CHIPS ACT defense contracts 的性质,没人知道确切时间线 + 应用。

但未来可能会随机出现在财务报表里。
引用原推@StormDirac
We are now wating for the second round of US ChipAct funding for $SIVE. CEO shared in Q4 report and webinar that it has been delayed, but it is soon to be shared.

Mean while here you can watch details about the first founding round here ⤵️

Partnership with Ericsson $ERIC
and Raytheon $RTX

https://t.co/pVQnBXu4IR
我们现在在等 $SIVE 第二轮 US ChipAct 资金。CEO 在 Q4 报告和 webinar 里说过它被推迟了,但很快会公布。

与此同时,你可以在这里看第一轮资金的细节 ⤵️

与 Ericsson $ERIC
和 Raytheon $RTX 的合作

https://t.co/pVQnBXu4IR
https://x.com/StormDirac/status/2049368377127235956
❤️ 730 🔁 66 💬 40
打开原推
📝 原创
Product innovation from $HOOD would have been enabling international stock trading ASAP.

Instead they doubled down on "prediction markets" + "raffles" + new crapcoin listings where retail recklessly lose their money.

They also lost retail to $IBKR that now enabled Korean stock trading.

Especially due to international stock growth from Taiwah, Korea, Europe, Japan.

As a result, we saw new IBKR accounts grow to an all time high this quarter (just from qualitative experiences).

My opinion is $HOOD missed earnings since they lost track of what they should actually do to help out retail investors.

If they had retail investors all spending tons of TX fees from int. Equities trading, likely more margin usage, fees, cash on platform, wealth appreciation, and so on, which is the basis of the platform.

Maybe things would have gone better despite digital asset downturn.
$HOOD 的产品创新本该是尽快开放国际股票交易。

结果他们加倍投入“prediction markets”+“raffles”+ 新 crapcoin listings,让散户鲁莽亏钱。

他们也把散户输给了现在开通韩国股票交易的 $IBKR

尤其是因为台湾、韩国、欧洲、日本的国际股票增长。

结果,我们看到新 IBKR 账户这个季度增长到历史新高(只是从定性体验看)。

我的看法是,$HOOD earnings miss,是因为他们忘了自己真正应该做什么来帮助散户投资者。

如果他们让散户都在国际股票交易上花大量 TX fees,可能会有更多 margin usage、fees、平台现金、财富增值等等,这才是平台基础。

也许即使 digital asset 下行,事情也会更好。
❤️ 1,765 🔁 83 💬 181
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So new long idea of a functional photonics monopoly I was looking into with a friend:

Miss
Snake
Sisters
Could
Operate
Robot
Pokemon
Skarmory
6830 for CPO, ~$1.2B MC.

For customers:

$TSM - Taipei times names TSM as a client that Msscorps provides them with advanced material and failure analysis.

$NVDA, $AAPL, $AMAT, $LRCX

$ASML - Taipei Times, Sept 10, 2024 "ASML adopted Msscorps' ultra-sensitive materials analysis of photoresists"



$INTC - Material analysis lab MSSCORPS has secured orders from major manufacturers such as Nvidia and Intel (Industrial Technology Research).


Samsung (speculative)- "A closer look at Samsung 3nm GAA transistors" in stuff like case studies

Unfortunately it got dispositioned so it went up 64% in the past month... But finally got to take positions.

Basically: their claim was "seize a 90 percent share of the CPO inspection market" (basically 100% but they can't say that otherwise antitrust).

And they're weaponizing patents and refusing to license them to competitors like Enli. So it's almost like Soitec not licensing to Shin Etsu and just claiming 100%.

You have $LWLG at 1.8B fking serving $TSEM only off a development contract.

Then you have a literal living monopoly for inspection serving every single company lol at $1.2B?

It's inelastic demand for yield and can charge whatever for test. (Disclosure: I am long. NFA.)

Still researching it more into customer links since they did mention EU and others.
所以这是我和朋友一起研究的一个 functional photonics monopoly 新多头想法:

Miss
Snake
Sisters
Could
Operate
Robot
Pokemon
Skarmory
6830 for CPO,~$1.2B 市值。

客户方面:

$TSM - Taipei times 点名 TSM 是客户,Msscorps 为其提供 advanced material and failure analysis。

$NVDA$AAPL$AMAT$LRCX

$ASML - Taipei Times,2024 年 9 月 10 日:“ASML adopted Msscorps' ultra-sensitive materials analysis of photoresists”

$INTC - Material analysis lab MSSCORPS has secured orders from major manufacturers such as Nvidia and Intel(Industrial Technology Research)。

Samsung(推测)- case studies 里有“A closer look at Samsung 3nm GAA transistors”这类内容

不幸的是它被 disposition 了,所以过去一个月涨了 64%……但终于有机会建仓。

基本上:他们的说法是“seize a 90 percent share of the CPO inspection market”(基本就是 100%,但不能这么说,否则反垄断)。

而且他们在武器化专利,拒绝授权给 Enli 这样的竞争对手。所以这几乎像 Soitec 不授权 Shin Etsu,然后直接声称 100%。

你有 $LWLG,市值 1.8B,靠一个和 $TSEM 的 development contract 就能这样。

然后这里有一个真正活着的 inspection 垄断,服务每一家公司 lol,市值 $1.2B?

这是 yield 的非弹性需求,test 想收多少都可以。(Disclosure:我做多。NFA。)

还在继续研究更多客户链接,因为他们确实提到了 EU 等。
❤️ 417 🔁 12 💬 53
打开原推
💬 引用
Uh... what's with $IBKR + Portfolio Margin + Foreign Stocks?

Every single name in Asia or Europe gets slapped to 100% maintenance margin for no reason.

Just because something isn't in the US like in Korea, Europe, or Japan doesn't make it a toxic asset?

Do you guys just use prime brokers or something to get around this?
呃……$IBKR + Portfolio Margin + Foreign Stocks 是怎么回事?

亚洲或欧洲的每个名字都无缘无故被打到 100% maintenance margin。

难道一个东西不在美国,比如在韩国、欧洲或日本,就成了 toxic asset?

你们是用 prime brokers 之类的东西绕过这个吗?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Woah no way.

$IBKR has Korean stocks now.

This is going to be fun, I had a lot of ideas in mind I couldn’t long.
哇,不会吧。

$IBKR 现在有韩股了。

这会很好玩,我脑子里有很多之前没法做多的想法。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2048956013374755266
❤️ 532 🔁 18 💬 82
打开原推
📝 原创
Wow... Someone turned $835 -&gt; $838,000 from $NVDA shares.

This was shared on $RDDT. Unrealized gain was +100,264.07%.

From Oct 2008 -&gt; April 2026.

See, it is possible to make generational wealth without too much to start.

Just gotta find the next Nvidia… easy, right chat? https://t.co/6KBjxNBMdD
哇……有人用 $NVDA 股票把 $835 变成了 $838,000。

这是在 $RDDT 上分享的。未实现收益是 +100,264.07%。

从 2008 年 10 月 -> 2026 年 4 月。

看,起点不高也可能创造代际财富。

只需要找到下一个 Nvidia……很简单,对吧 chat? https://t.co/6KBjxNBMdD
❤️ 1,630 🔁 74 💬 123
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Possible Japanese $TSM CoPoS link (~260m MC):

I'm going to start doing a lot of these mini DD style posts for subscribers on stuff I passed on. (1 by 1)

But just in case others find it interesting to pick up, (and they're genuinely decent longs that I filter) I'll post them anyway.

I don't have any positions and don't plan on taking any cause I'm basically fully allocated rn but:

Tazmo (6266) if you're curious. ~1.5x p/b value, 11 p/e so feels like low downside derisked.

Near monopoly over spinless coaters (eg. color filter manufacturing). But they are in the bonding/debonding space alongside SUSS Microtec and Tokyo Electron.

Est. customers are probably Samsung, Sony LG and those types.

But main upside would be $TSM CoPoS, which architecturally kinda aligns up with their time dealing with substrates + $TSM rectangular glass panel CoPoS architectures.

Downside risk heavily mitigated, just cheap advanced packaging upside possible.
可能的日本 $TSM CoPoS 相关(~260m 市值):

我会开始给订阅者发很多这种 mini DD 风格的帖子,讲我 pass 掉的东西。(一个个来)

但以防其他人觉得有意思想接着研究,(而且这些是我筛过、确实还不错的 longs),我还是会发出来。

我没有仓位,也不打算买,因为现在基本满仓了,但:

如果你好奇,Tazmo (6266)。~1.5x p/b,11 p/e,感觉下行风险低、已经降风险。

它在 spinless coaters(比如 color filter manufacturing)上接近垄断。但它们也和 SUSS Microtec、Tokyo Electron 一起处在 bonding/debonding space。

估计客户大概是 Samsung、Sony、LG 这类。

但主要上行会是 $TSM CoPoS,架构上有点和它们处理 substrates + $TSM rectangular glass panel CoPoS architectures 的时间匹配。

下行风险被大幅缓解,只是可能有便宜的 advanced packaging 上行。
❤️ 378 🔁 9 💬 23
打开原推
💬 引用
This is true.

A few of bank analysts got passive aggressive when I called out $SOI back at $40 and it rose 125% since then.

Same with $SIVE and it’s risen a few hundred percent (and keeps going up)

But these same institutions are the one buying afterward on $IQE to $AXTI.

Usually institutions have silent accumulation periods blocks over months to not raise the price + accumulate the float off retail.

Then tell retail investors after it’s risen a lot and they own 5% of the company.

But if markets price that in a lot faster, institutions are forced to buy a lot higher.

Which is basically frontrunning institutions on supercycle names.
这是真的。

当我在 $40 点出 $SOI,随后它涨了 125% 时,有几个银行分析师变得阴阳怪气。

$SIVE 也一样,它涨了几百个百分点(而且还在涨)

但这些同样的机构,之后就是买 $IQE$AXTI 的人。

通常机构会有持续数月的静默积累期,分批买入以免推高价格,并从散户手里积累流通盘。

然后等它涨了很多、他们拥有公司 5% 后,才告诉散户投资者。

但如果市场更快把它定价进去,机构就被迫在更高位置买很多。

这基本就是在 supercycle 名字上 frontrunning institutions。
引用原推@Matrix_B0SS
This is funny, when retail investors are front running institutions they call it a bubble.
What are they trying to do? Cause Chaos in market to buy Semi stocks cheaper as a lot of has been discovered.
@aleabitoreddit

$SIVE $LPKF

$AXTI $AAOI
这很好笑,当散户投资者 front running 机构时,他们就说这是泡沫。
他们想干嘛?制造市场混乱,好在很多东西已经被发现后,以更低价格买 Semi 股票吗。
@aleabitoreddit

$SIVE $LPKF

$AXTI $AAOI
https://x.com/Matrix_B0SS/status/2049225508961874014
❤️ 737 🔁 35 💬 50
打开原推
💬 引用
I do really like $LPK.

Critical monopoly chokepoint in glass substrates…

Which are used for advanced packaging and CPO.

I flagged it as a potential 10x back in Jan, but thought it was a bit early.

However… time seems right now?

"About four years ago, we began collaborating with a semiconductor company to develop mass-production equipment for direct 3D waveguide formation," Lee said.

“The customer has already installed LPKF's equipment."

Maybe Samsung or SKC Absolics since this was in Korea?

Seems like momentum is ramping up now though like $AEHR pre-earnings, not quite high volume (2027), but around this time felt compelling for me.

During the transition from qualification/pilot -> high volume.
我确实很喜欢 $LPK

Glass substrates 里的关键 monopoly chokepoint……

用于 advanced packaging 和 CPO。

我 1 月把它标为潜在 10x,但当时觉得有点早。

不过……现在时间似乎对了?

“About four years ago, we began collaborating with a semiconductor company to develop mass-production equipment for direct 3D waveguide formation,” Lee said.

“The customer has already installed LPKF's equipment.”

也许是 Samsung 或 SKC Absolics,因为这是在韩国?

现在动能似乎正在爬坡,像 $AEHR 财报前那样,还不是高量产(2027),但在这个时间点对我来说很有吸引力。

处在 qualification/pilot -> high volume 的过渡期。
引用原推@snmart
@aleabitoreddit $LPKF / $LPK positively surprised me today. It literally finished flat despite the correction across the rest of the market. There is buying pressure, and every dip is being bought
@aleabitoreddit $LPKF / $LPK 今天正面惊喜到我了。尽管市场其他地方都在回调,它居然收平了。有买盘压力,而且每次 dip 都有人买
https://x.com/snmart/status/2049198182899351946
❤️ 765 🔁 63 💬 48
打开原推
💬 引用
The fact that a large correction looks like a little blip in the overall charts.

Is pretty telling for how “Serenity Stocks” performs over time?

That aside, I’m starting to think everyone’s expectations are too high.

Now if $SOI or $HPS.A are not up 10% a day people are sad. Before 15% return a year was considered very good.

Corrections like these are normal if you zoom out, even if they’re self-inflicted by US media.

Usually if something is a core component in a multi year optical supercycle… Or are backlogged by multiple years for transformers/switchgear.

It’s a lot easier to sleep at night.
大幅回调在整体图表上看起来只是一个小波动。

这很能说明“Serenity Stocks”随着时间的表现?

除此之外,我开始觉得大家预期太高了。

现在如果 $SOI$HPS.A 一天不涨 10%,大家就难过。以前一年 15% 回报就算很好了。

如果拉远看,这样的回调很正常,即使是美国媒体自找的。

通常如果某个东西是多年 optical supercycle 里的核心组件……或者 transformers/switchgear 的 backlog 排了多年。

晚上就更容易睡得着。
引用原推@garricn
@aleabitoreddit Many of your names have pulled back into a nice buying zone.
@aleabitoreddit 你很多名字都回调到不错的买入区间了。
https://x.com/garricn/status/2049188238397772138
❤️ 652 🔁 31 💬 69
打开原推
📝 原创
This has gotta be the dumbest selloff reason… someone could have provided?

I am 99% sure names like $AAOI or $TSEM couldn’t care less about one internal leak of OpenAI’s high flying goals.

But algorithms go reeee when they see mainstream media narratives like this.

Perfect example on why nobody trusts them anymore for fully accurate reporting.

That being said, corrections are always healthy to make higher highs.
这大概是有人能给出的最蠢 selloff 理由……

我 99% 确信像 $AAOI$TSEM 这种名字,根本不在乎 OpenAI 高飞目标的一次内部泄露。

但算法看到这种主流媒体叙事就会 reeee。

这是为什么现在没人再相信它们能完全准确报道的完美例子。

话虽如此,回调总是健康的,能做出更高的高点。
❤️ 1,198 🔁 54 💬 130
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm happy Japanese communities started positions in $SIVE after doing research!

A stronger international shareholder base is always positive.

As for some thoughts, my read on the market looks like:

1. $NVDA bought out allocation from $LITE / $COHR
2. $AMD CPO went with $GFS + $SIVE / Win for remaining laser supply maybe $LITE if there’s still allocation.
3. And… $MRVL CPO will need lasers regardless.

$SIVE looks like one of the last remaining pure play merchant laser suppliers.

So Marvell will go with $SIVE (fits Celestial specs already) directly with multi-source down the road (maybe $MTSI). After they vertically integrate away interposer packaging process IP that feeds into Celestial.

Just some interesting things to back that up:

-> Ayar removed $MTSI and $LITE from their website and went with $SIVE as primary. Ayar’s connected to AlChip/GUC and others.

-> If look at the $GFS slide there's only two public players with $SIVE and $LITE after $AMD went with Globalfoundries for their CPO program.

-> $SIVE likely has agreements with Win since last year for laser capacity scaling.

$NVDA likely hasn't fully allocated that laser supply, so the remaining companies like $JBL, $AMD, and others go to Sivers for overflow.

Since $LITE signaled they were already fully allocated for 2028.

I could be wrong, but just based on public information that’s what it looks like.

As for why I think it's a good long:

-> Sivers also basically had no exposure to 800G or previous generations.
-> European markets price in previous 12 months revenue... hence previous depressed valuations
-> they get all the hyperscaler overflow created by market panic from $NVDA

But they also happen to be in the bleeding edge of CPO and even for gen-2 1.6T ( $JBL LRO) scaling next year in 2027.

Then for H2 2027 or 2028, they scale in adjacent areas like Silicon Photonics for likely $AAPL consumer devices.

Or FMCW 4D AI companies like $AEVA.

Many many years of development, finally coming to fruition next year.

I personally think markets are missing something big here, that the public uncovers over time with mapping hyperscaler relationships, website digging, or presentation slides.

Hyperscalers suppliers don't randomly choose a $1B Swedish laser company for no reason.

The direct contract with $JBL was the biggest signal of that.

And it’s my high conviction long moving forward.
很高兴日本社区研究后开始建仓 $SIVE

更强的国际股东基础总是正面的。

至于一些想法,我对市场的解读像是:

1. $NVDA 买走了 $LITE / $COHR 的 allocation
2. $AMD CPO 走 $GFS + $SIVE / Win 来拿剩余 laser supply,也许还有 $LITE,如果还有 allocation。
3. 然后……$MRVL CPO 无论如何都需要 lasers。

$SIVE 看起来像最后剩下的 pure play merchant laser suppliers 之一。

所以 Marvell 会直接找 $SIVE(已经符合 Celestial specs),以后再 multi-source(也许 $MTSI)。在它们垂直整合掉进入 Celestial 的 interposer packaging process IP 之后。

一些支持这个的有趣事情:

-> Ayar 从官网移除 $MTSI$LITE,选择 $SIVE 作为 primary。Ayar 和 AlChip/GUC 等有联系。

-> 如果看 $GFS slide,在 $AMD 选择 Globalfoundries 做 CPO 项目后,只有 $SIVE$LITE 两家公开玩家。

-> $SIVE 很可能从去年开始就和 Win 有 laser capacity scaling 协议。

$NVDA 可能还没有完全分配那部分 laser supply,所以剩下的公司,比如 $JBL$AMD 和其他,会去找 Sivers 接 overflow。

因为 $LITE 暗示它们到 2028 已经 fully allocated。

我可能错,但基于公开信息,看起来就是这样。

至于我为什么觉得它是好 long:

-> Sivers 基本也没有 800G 或上一代敞口。
-> 欧洲市场按过去 12 个月收入定价……所以之前估值低迷
-> 它们吃到 $NVDA 带来的市场恐慌造成的所有 hyperscaler overflow

但它们也刚好处在 CPO bleeding edge,甚至明年 2027 年扩张的 gen-2 1.6T($JBL LRO)。

然后 H2 2027 或 2028,它们会在相邻领域扩张,比如很可能用于 $AAPL 消费设备的 Silicon Photonics。

或者像 $AEVA 这样的 FMCW 4D AI 公司。

很多很多年的开发,终于会在明年结果。

我个人觉得市场在这里漏掉了很大的东西,而公众会随着时间,通过 mapping hyperscaler relationships、挖网站、看 presentation slides 逐渐发现。

Hyperscalers suppliers 不会无缘无故选择一家 $1B 的瑞典激光器公司。

$JBL 的直接合同就是最大的信号。

这也是我未来的高信心多头。
引用原推@beauty_oe
インタラクティブブローカーズで、

$SIVE

遂に買えたァァ‼️😭
10日くらいかかった😂😂✨

さすがに調整あるだろうから、半額買って調整待つーっ‼️
在 Interactive Brokers 上,

$SIVE

终于买到了啊啊‼️😭
花了大概 10 天😂😂✨

感觉肯定会有调整,所以先买半仓,等回调ーっ‼️
https://x.com/beauty_oe/status/2049024715680076215
❤️ 996 🔁 81 💬 71
打开原推
💬 引用
I guess... Anon finally listened?

20,000 subscribers is unreal for some random on X. https://t.co/0Wyq4WdZjl
我猜……Anon 终于听了?

20,000 个订阅者,对 X 上一个随机账号来说太不真实了。 https://t.co/0Wyq4WdZjl
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Honestly... I don't even know at this point?

0 to 155,000+ followers, 10,000 subscribers... in under a year.

900%+ year to date...

Off 13+ individual stocks from $AAOI to $LITE hitting triple digits returns in 4 months.

Call me aura farming Serenity Jin-woo (last post about this topic i swear, 10,000 just looks cool).

Jokes aside, thanks everyone for this opportunity. I genuinely want to make a difference to the retail community.

Getting tired of institutions shafting retail or seeing $2000+ paywalls so hope to bridge the gap in information discovery/synthesis.
说实话... 我现在自己都不知道了?

不到一年,从 0 到 155,000+ followers、10,000 subscribers...

今年以来 900%+...

靠 13+ 只个股,从 $AAOI$LITE,4 个月里都打出三位数回报。

叫我 aura farming Serenity Jin-woo 吧(我发誓这是这个话题最后一帖,10,000 看起来就是很酷)。

玩笑归玩笑,谢谢大家给我这个机会。我真心想给散户社区带来改变。

厌倦了机构坑散户,也厌倦了看到 $2000+ 的付费墙,所以希望弥合信息发现/整合上的差距。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2042856101939712444
❤️ 657 🔁 7 💬 60
打开原推
💬 引用
uh... Korean equities look insane?

How are there so many random KR companies supplying to Sk Hynix, Samsung, $NVDA, or $INTC trading at tiny valuations?

Yet the moment NASDAQ listed $LWLG gets one "speculative development contract" with $TSEM it gets sent up 400% to ~$2B MC.

Are Korean equities a trap or gold mine? or are certain US equities just regarded?
呃……韩国股票看起来很疯狂?

怎么会有这么多随机 KR 公司给 Sk Hynix、Samsung、$NVDA$INTC 供货,却以很小估值交易?

而 NASDAQ 上市的 $LWLG 只要拿到一个和 $TSEM 的“speculative development contract”,就能涨 400% 到 ~$2B 市值。

韩国股票是陷阱还是金矿?还是某些美国股票就是 regarded?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
As for Korean longs list:

if you're curious I'm just going through a massive list of names (there's a lot more) and picking 1-2:

Bigger names like Samsung Electro-Mechanics can't hurt...

DI (003160) burn in testers.
STI (039440) Fluxless Vacuum equipment
YEST(122640) Underfill Curing
KC Tech (281820) hybrid bonding
Taesung (323280) Wet Processing
Chemtronics(089010) wet etching
Philoptics (161580) glass core.

There's a ton of these. Can always just equal weight but I try and pick winners.
至于 Korean longs list:

如果你好奇,我只是在过一大串名字(还有很多),然后挑 1-2 个:

Samsung Electro-Mechanics 这种大名字也没坏处...

DI (003160) burn in testers。
STI (039440) Fluxless Vacuum equipment
YEST(122640) Underfill Curing
KC Tech (281820) hybrid bonding
Taesung (323280) Wet Processing
Chemtronics(089010) wet etching
Philoptics (161580) glass core。

这类公司一大堆。当然可以直接等权,但我还是想挑赢家。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2048994957462302918
❤️ 354 🔁 21 💬 50
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
As for Korean longs list:

if you're curious I'm just going through a massive list of names (there's a lot more) and picking 1-2:

Bigger names like Samsung Electro-Mechanics can't hurt...

DI (003160) burn in testers.
STI (039440) Fluxless Vacuum equipment
YEST(122640) Underfill Curing
KC Tech (281820) hybrid bonding
Taesung (323280) Wet Processing
Chemtronics(089010) wet etching
Philoptics (161580) glass core.

There's a ton of these. Can always just equal weight but I try and pick winners.
至于韩国多头名单:

如果你好奇,我正在过一大串名字(还有很多),然后挑 1-2 个:

像 Samsung Electro-Mechanics 这种大名字不会伤人……

DI (003160) burn in testers。
STI (039440) Fluxless Vacuum equipment
YEST(122640) Underfill Curing
KC Tech (281820) hybrid bonding
Taesung (323280) Wet Processing
Chemtronics(089010) wet etching
Philoptics (161580) glass core。

这种名字一大堆。总是可以 equal weight,但我会尽量挑赢家。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Woah no way.

$IBKR has Korean stocks now.

This is going to be fun, I had a lot of ideas in mind I couldn’t long.
哇,不会吧。

$IBKR 现在有韩股了。

这会很好玩,我脑子里有很多之前没法做多的想法。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2048956013374755266
❤️ 511 🔁 16 💬 47
打开原推
📝 原创
Woah no way.

$IBKR has Korean stocks now.

This is going to be fun, I had a lot of ideas in mind I couldn’t long.
哇,不会吧。

$IBKR 现在有韩国股票了。

这会很有意思,我脑子里有很多之前没法做多的想法。
❤️ 2,130 🔁 72 💬 112
打开原推
📝 原创
“1.6T optical modules are near mass adoption this year”

So nothing new but this just confirms timelines for volume production/mass adoption H2 2026.

$AVGO and $MRVL are cited as main beneficiaries in the report but names like $AAOI are probably the most profound beneficiaries (largest 1.6T capacity US projected) for the pure play exposure.

$JBL also set to go brrrr but my guess is H1 2027 with wave2 architectures since their LRO architectures remove the DSP (with $INTC SiPH acquisition IP).

Jabil would be a good contrarian long in the broader 1.6T supercycle coming up if this gets broader adoption from $META validation but benefits anyway.

And especially $SIVE that powers Jabil 1.6T LRO, that when they scale, it scales laser demand too.

I think everyone focuses on the upstream supply chains nowadays but going long on Broadcom and Marvell doesn’t hurt too.
“1.6T optical modules are near mass adoption this year”

所以没什么新东西,但这只是确认了 H2 2026 volume production/mass adoption 的时间线。

报告里把 $AVGO$MRVL 作为主要受益者,但像 $AAOI 这种名字可能是最深刻的受益者(预计美国最大 1.6T 产能),pure play 敞口。

$JBL 也准备 go brrrr,但我猜是 H1 2027,随着 wave2 architectures,因为它们的 LRO architectures 去掉了 DSP(用 $INTC SiPH acquisition IP)。

如果这个从 $META validation 后获得更广泛采用,Jabil 会是即将到来的更广泛 1.6T supercycle 里的一个好逆向多头,但无论如何都会受益。

尤其是 $SIVE,它驱动 Jabil 1.6T LRO;当它们扩张时,laser demand 也会扩张。

我觉得现在大家都关注上游供应链,但做多 Broadcom 和 Marvell 也没坏处。
❤️ 759 🔁 73 💬 40
打开原推
📝 原创
So just putting it out there: Towa (6315), at $1.35B...

Is a rare, living definition of monopoly over HBM4 (compression molding).

It's been kinda flat YTD, but every memory company like $MU, Sk Hynix, Samsung are their customers. And each of the memory company earnings signaled massive capex increases.

Even as seen with $TSM earnings, every major semi is going through a massive capex cycle to meet AI demand.

And all three memory makers have printed from hbm3e and nand... so the next capex cycle is probably not like the last (meaning a lot more spend).

Like $ASML, this is hyper-cyclical but I wanted exposure to the upcoming HBM4 capex ramp over these next few months.

Thought I'd put this name on people's radar alongside $LPK (glass core substrates) as a functional monopoly.

But I do feel like this timing is about right while every machine supplier is having a massive re-rating yet this was relatively flat.

Not exactly a new find, since a few other analysts + random followers had this name but hope I get the timing right.

(Disclaimer: I do hold positions, this just TLDR of my own thoughts, please don’t copy trade)
所以先放在这里:Towa (6315),$1.35B 市值……

是 HBM4(compression molding)上少见的、活生生的垄断定义。

它今年 YTD 有点平,但 $MU、Sk Hynix、Samsung 这类 memory companies 都是它们客户。而每家 memory company 的财报都暗示了巨大的 capex increases。

就连 $TSM 财报也显示,每个主要 semi 都在经历巨大 capex cycle,以满足 AI 需求。

而三大 memory makers 已经靠 hbm3e 和 nand 印钞……所以下一轮 capex cycle 可能不像上一轮(意味着支出多得多)。

$ASML 一样,它高度周期性,但我想要未来几个月 HBM4 capex ramp 的敞口。

我想把这个名字和 $LPK(glass core substrates)一起放进大家视野,作为 functional monopoly。

但我确实感觉这个 timing 大概对了,因为每个机器供应商都在巨大 re-rating,而它相对平。

并不算新发现,因为还有几个分析师 + 随机粉丝也有这个名字,但希望我 timing 抓得准。

(Disclaimer:我持有仓位,这只是我自己想法的 TLDR,请不要 copy trade)
❤️ 1,435 🔁 101 💬 80
打开原推
💬 引用
Memory names from $MU to $EWY (SK Hynix, Samsung) and $SNDK are going brrrr lately.

Aside from the big three, then your NAND
or TW names like Nanya.

Might be a good time to look at names like Towa (6315) to capture upstream monopoly capex cycles for hbm4? https://t.co/VZPwzB0SFK
Memory 名字从 $MU$EWY(SK Hynix、Samsung)和 $SNDK 最近都在 going brrrr。

除了三大,还有你的 NAND
或 TW 名字,比如 Nanya。

也许是时候看看 Towa (6315) 这种名字,去捕捉 hbm4 上游垄断 capex cycles 了? https://t.co/VZPwzB0SFK
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Markets are looking at CPUs right now and kinda forgot about memory.

But... there's increased capex spend with Sk Hynix, $MU, Samsung around now, with Samsung starting HMB4 production recently.

$TSM also signaled record capex across the board.

But just like $LPK in glass core substrates...

There's a decent amount of structural monopolies over in the HBM camp markets that I'm thinking about in places like Japan.

That markets may have forgotten? They would largely benefit from current HBM4 capex cycles.

Over in Korea, things like Hanmi Semi (KRX: 042700) have been taking off, up 27.6%+ today, so I'd guess the other companies around the world might play catchup soon.
市场现在盯着 CPUs,有点忘了 memory。

但是... 现在 Sk Hynix、$MU、Samsung 的 capex 支出在增加,Samsung 最近也开始 HMB4 production。

$TSM 也释放了全线 record capex 的信号。

但就像 glass core substrates 里的 $LPK 一样...

HBM 阵营市场里也有相当多结构性垄断,我在想日本之类地方的一些公司。

市场可能已经忘了它们?它们会很大程度受益于当前 HBM4 capex cycles。

在韩国,像 Hanmi Semi (KRX: 042700) 这种已经起飞了,今天涨了 27.6%+,所以我猜全球其他公司可能很快会补涨。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2048623230416761019
❤️ 848 🔁 49 💬 73
打开原推
📝 原创
Pretend $SIVE, $LITE make specialized blue and red maine lobsters.

Very rare, not many people can do.

$POET steams the lobsters and prepares it in a ready-to-go container.

$MRVL buys those lobster tails, puts it together on a plate with broccoli and steak.

Then serves it at the highest price to high end customers.

Marvell is famous for serving Blue lobster tails.

But can always serve Red ones, and it’s easier to keep serving Blue that they’re used to.

And it’s also possible for the Red lobster farmer to shift to Blue lobsters with some effort, but it takes time to raise those lobsters.

But… it just so happens Marvell’s competitor Nvidia bought out all the Red Lobsters for their restaurant.

In the end, they still need those rare blue Maine lobsters. But just decided to steam it themselves.

That’s $POET and $MRVL situation. It’s likely they’ll just go buy lobsters directly since you can’t just spawn Blue lobsters.
假设 $SIVE$LITE 做的是专门的蓝色和红色 Maine lobsters。

非常稀有,没几个人能做。

$POET 把 lobsters 蒸好,装进即食容器。

$MRVL 买那些 lobster tails,把它们和 broccoli、steak 一起摆到盘子上。

然后用最高价格卖给高端客户。

Marvell 以供应 Blue lobster tails 出名。

但它总能供应 Red 的,而且继续供应它们熟悉的 Blue 更容易。

Red lobster farmer 也有可能花点力气转去养 Blue lobsters,但养这些 lobsters 需要时间。

不过……刚好 Marvell 的竞争对手 Nvidia 买光了所有 Red Lobsters 给自己的餐厅用。

最后,他们仍然需要那些稀有 blue Maine lobsters。只是决定自己蒸。

这就是 $POET$MRVL 的情况。它们很可能会直接去买 lobsters,因为你没法凭空变出 Blue lobsters。
❤️ 1,249 🔁 58 💬 130
打开原推
📝 原创
Just now, $MTSI looking to invest $45 Million into $IQE and sit on the board.

What did I say anon??? Landmark was overcapacity...

+ IQE was a structural chokepoint in photonics the supply chain back at $100M MC.

This deal is also to secure long term epiwafer supply. https://t.co/lS2TGFI6v6
刚刚,$MTSI 想向 $IQE 投资 $45 Million,并进入董事会。

我说什么来着 anon???Landmark 已经过剩……

+ IQE 在 $100M 市值时就是 photonics 供应链里的结构性 chokepoint。

这笔交易也是为了锁定长期 epiwafer 供应。 https://t.co/lS2TGFI6v6
❤️ 633 🔁 37 💬 80
打开原推
💬 引用
I've always maintained $POET can get designed out and likely would in a few years for $MRVL.

Especially as hyperscalers tend to vertically integrate upstream, I just didn't expect it so soon.

For me to be bullish, $POET would have needed to multi-source to multiple hyperscaler supply chains rather than just Marvell.

However, this goes this show:

There's a reason why all the Laser companies are worth tens of billions.

Laser design and fab is much more difficult than companies like $POET buying the lasers to package them.

If $MRVL were completely reliant on $POET, they wouldn't break off the engagement despite the NDA, so it does feel like an excuse. Poet was just the fastest time to market given it's already designed into Celestial, but serves more as a Gen-1 bridge.

Regardless all the hyperscalers require a light source (which is much much more difficult to vertically integrate):

And after $NVDA went and bought out allocation for $LITE, $COHR...

There's not many laser suppliers left aside from $SIVE.

There's a lot of nuances markets might miss, but packaging layers are different than laser layers.

It's highly likely now $MRVL just buys lasers directly from Sivers (which is even more bullish) given they already match Celestial specifications.

And also highly likely Marvell multi-sources with $MTSI and $LITE (if there's any capacity left).
我一直认为 $POET 可能被 design out,而且几年后对 $MRVL 来说很可能会这样。

尤其是 hyperscalers 往往会向上游垂直整合,只是我没想到这么快。

要让我 bullish,$POET 需要 multi-source 到多个 hyperscaler supply chains,而不是只有 Marvell。

不过,这也说明:

所有 Laser companies 值几十亿美元是有原因的。

Laser design 和 fab 比 $POET 这种买 lasers 来封装的公司难多了。

如果 $MRVL 完全依赖 $POET,他们不会尽管有 NDA 还解除 engagement,所以这感觉像借口。Poet 只是最快 time to market,因为它已经被设计进 Celestial,但更像 Gen-1 bridge。

不管怎样,所有 hyperscalers 都需要 light source(这要垂直整合难得多得多):

而在 $NVDA 买走 $LITE$COHR 的 allocation 后……

除了 $SIVE,剩下 laser suppliers 不多。

市场可能会漏掉很多细节,但 packaging layers 和 laser layers 是不同的。

现在 $MRVL 很可能直接从 Sivers 买 lasers(这甚至更 bullish),因为它们已经匹配 Celestial specifications。

而且 Marvell 也很可能和 $MTSI$LITE multi-source(如果还有任何产能)。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
@miraclemaster07 Jabil using them de-risked the company a lot.

$POET could always get designed out since it kinda relies on celestial right now.

Ayar was slightly more promising.

I personally see them as a $1B+ company medium term, idk if it’s just me but $250m mc seems absurd.
@miraclemaster07 Jabil 使用他们,让公司去风险了很多。

$POET 总是可能被设计踢出去,因为它现在有点依赖 celestial。

Ayar 稍微更有希望。

我个人中期把它们看成 $1B+ 公司,不知道是不是只有我这么想,但 $250m mc 看起来很荒谬。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2035528421934297104
❤️ 404 🔁 27 💬 53
打开原推
💬 引用
Nope, $SIVE thesis is fully in-tact and I still think it's undervalued.

Lot of it was based on $JBL 1.6T bridging the gap into CPO ramp.

But having $AMD CPO go with $GFS de-risked the company quite a massive amount. Then there's $AAPL SiPH markets don't know about yet.

I'm honestly expecting $MRVL to buy directly from Sivers now like what $JBL did. But just multi-source + vertically integrate the packaging IP side of thing after buying lasers.

That actually might increase the valuations more long term (direct to T1 like Jabil, Marvell) than one-hop through a packaging partner.
不,$SIVE thesis 完全没变,我仍然觉得它被低估。

其中很多基于 $JBL 1.6T,把空档桥接到 CPO ramp。

$AMD CPO 选择 $GFS,给公司大幅降风险。然后还有市场还不知道的 $AAPL SiPH。

说实话,我现在预计 $MRVL 会像 $JBL 一样直接从 Sivers 买。只是会 multi-source + 买 lasers 后垂直整合 packaging IP 这边。

这长期看可能比通过 packaging partner 间接一跳,更能提高估值(直接到 Jabil、Marvell 这种 T1)。
引用原推@Muraum_
@aleabitoreddit Thanks for consistently sharing … must be tough having a lot of people ping you lol

You think this causes any delays / issues to you $sive thesis long term given the delay to the celestial roadmap?

Looking to position on $sive on market open tomorrow
@aleabitoreddit 谢谢你一直分享……很多人 ping 你应该挺累 lol

考虑到 celestial roadmap 延迟,你觉得这长期会不会给你的 $sive thesis 带来任何延迟 / 问题?

准备明天开盘布局 $sive
https://x.com/Muraum_/status/2048798925235114463
❤️ 682 🔁 41 💬 74
打开原推
💬 引用
Highly likely now $MRVL just buys the lasers directly from $COHR, $SIVE, or $LITE.

It just causes delays to Marvell Celestial roadmap.

But I've always had expectations on the packaging side of things to get vertically integrated down the road, just not this soon.

Laser IP is much, much more complex.

There's a reason why all the laser companies are worth tens of billions.
现在 $MRVL 很可能直接从 $COHR$SIVE$LITE 买 lasers。

这只会导致 Marvell Celestial 路线图延迟。

但我一直预期 packaging 这边以后会被垂直整合,只是没想到这么快。

Laser IP 复杂得多得多。

所有 laser companies 值几十亿美元是有原因的。
引用原推@0xLiquidAssets
@aleabitoreddit Do you think Marvel would source the lasers directly from sivers? That’s an options right?
@aleabitoreddit 你觉得 Marvel 会直接从 sivers 采购 lasers 吗?这是一个选项对吧?
https://x.com/0xLiquidAssets/status/2048786754056958222
❤️ 743 🔁 46 💬 62
打开原推
📝 原创
$MRVL cancelled $POET purchase orders after the CFO went out and violated NDA when getting angry.

Ouch to Poet, down -46%, this is why I don’t like companies with single customer concentration risk.

On the bright side for $POET holders they do have $420m cash buffering downside risk and a few other customers (though Marvell was basically the entire Poet bull case story)

It does look like Marvell delayed their own timelines as well by doing this.

That being said, the packaging side is easier to design out for Marvell and they still need to source lasers.
$MRVL 在 CFO 生气时出去违反 NDA 后,取消了 $POET purchase orders。

Poet 很惨,跌 -46%,这就是为什么我不喜欢有单一客户集中风险的公司。

$POET 持有人来说,好的一面是他们确实有 $420m 现金缓冲下行风险,还有几个其他客户(虽然 Marvell 基本就是整个 Poet bull case story)

看起来 Marvell 这么做也延迟了自己的时间线。

话虽如此,packaging 这边对 Marvell 来说更容易 design out,而他们仍然需要采购 lasers。
❤️ 1,170 🔁 70 💬 188
打开原推
💬 引用
European “monopolies” like $LPK (Glass Core Substrates) have also been going brrr lately.

$ALRIB is technically a duopoly but it’s there too… (Quantum / MBE)

Then there’s some over in Japan like Towa for (HBM4/compression molding) too that I own.

Usually monopolies get higher multiples.

I'll mention some more over time, just gotta find them all.
欧洲“monopolies”比如 $LPK(Glass Core Substrates)最近也在 go brrr。

$ALRIB 技术上是双寡头,但它也在里面……(Quantum / MBE)

然后日本也有一些,比如我持有的 Towa(HBM4/compression molding)。

通常垄断会拿到更高 multiples。

我会随着时间再提一些,只要把它们都找出来。
引用原推@SidkMena
@aleabitoreddit @aleabitoreddit Hey Serenity. what other gems do you suggest for multibagger returns like SIVE? Just want to diversify the portfolio a bit. Thanks!!
@aleabitoreddit @aleabitoreddit 嘿 Serenity。你还建议哪些像 SIVE 一样有 multibagger 回报的宝藏股?只是想稍微分散一下组合。谢谢!!
https://x.com/SidkMena/status/2048683695423545448
❤️ 791 🔁 55 💬 64
打开原推
💬 引用
It's pretty clear by now that $SIVE is the likely holy grail silicon photonics supplier for $AAPL...

Markets just don't know about it (this is called Alpha).

If you're curious how to map Apple to Sivers:

> "US Fortune 100" customer.
> RFQ (request for quote) for 50 MILLION units a year.
> Apple sold roughly 53.9 million Apple Watches in 2022 and averages between 38m-50m units annually
> $SIVE / Carnegie research released 135 Wavelength arechitectures, which matches Apple application specifications.

literally... what other US Fortune 100 company in world can casually produce 50 million units of consumer wearables a year? Even Samsung does 10-15M units.

That coincidentally matches with the laser architecture and applications.

$SIVE on their X did tease volume ramp from development timelines, which I guessed was Apple (H2 2027 ramp or H1 2028), but could be Ayar or Jabil.
到现在已经很明显,$SIVE 很可能是 $AAPL 的 holy grail silicon photonics supplier……

市场只是还不知道(这叫 Alpha)。

如果你好奇怎么把 Apple map 到 Sivers:

> “US Fortune 100” customer.
> RFQ(request for quote)一年 50 MILLION units。
> Apple 2022 年大约卖了 53.9 million Apple Watches,年均 38m-50m units
> $SIVE / Carnegie research 发布了 135 Wavelength architectures,匹配 Apple application specifications。

说真的……世界上还有哪家 US Fortune 100 company 能随手一年生产 5000 万台 consumer wearables?连 Samsung 也就 10-15M units。

这又刚好和 laser architecture 和 applications 匹配。

$SIVE 在他们 X 上确实暗示了来自开发时间线的 volume ramp,我猜是 Apple(H2 2027 ramp 或 H1 2028),但也可能是 Ayar 或 Jabil。
引用原推@piyush1337
@aleabitoreddit We might be so early if Apple is really that customer 🫠🫠
@aleabitoreddit 如果 Apple 真的是那个客户,那我们可能早得离谱 🫠🫠
https://x.com/piyush1337/status/2048666908732629251
❤️ 1,422 🔁 87 💬 74
打开原推
💬 引用
Still think $SIVE is vastly undiscovered.

Feels like markets are only slowly starting to realize the likely laser supplier for $AMD?

The only two public laser companies were $SIVE and $LITE on the $GFS presentation by the way…. after AMD’s CPO program went the way with GFS.

And $SIVE is the only one left alongside GFS on Ayar’s website after they silently removed $LITE and $MTSI from their partner section.

AlChip and GUC also happen to be pretty big for hyperscaler suppliers too..

Feels like Sivers lasers are going to end up everywhere next year.
我仍然觉得 $SIVE 远远没被发现。

感觉市场只是慢慢开始意识到,它很可能是 $AMD 的 laser supplier?

顺便说一句,在 $GFS presentation 里,AMD 的 CPO program 走 GFS 之后,只有两家公开 laser companies:$SIVE$LITE……

而 Ayar 悄悄把 $LITE$MTSI 从 partner section 移除后,官网上和 GFS 一起剩下的唯一一家就是 $SIVE

AlChip 和 GUC 也刚好是 hyperscaler suppliers 里相当大的玩家。

感觉明年 Sivers lasers 会到处都是。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Agreed, and glad DNB, one of Europe's leading banks, went out to defend $SIVE valuations alongside me.

I still think $SIVE can reach $10B MC in 1 year time as their laser growth scales proportionally to:

- $AAPL Watches
- $JBL 1.6T Volume
- $MRVL CPO Volume
- Ayar Volume
- $POET Volume

Depending on how their qualification plays out into volume ramp.

As Sivers supply lasers to all the next generation of 1.6T/CPO players in the space (into ~ $AMD, $NVDA, $AMZN, $MSFT type supply chains).

These are EXISTING players at a ~990M MC. Not even including TAM expansion or more partnerships coming up.

Especially now with NASDAQ listing, US institutions are forward looking and price in ~12M ahead of time, compared local European valuations that mainly look at previous 12 months.

Banks usually provide very conservative targets (eg. 3 years for a 10x), but I do see potential for this company to be the next $LITE very soon.

Europe should embrace positive-sum growth of their own companies that supply to hyperscalers.

As their frontier companies provide back to locals through taxes, economic growth, and job growth.
同意,也很高兴 DNB 这家欧洲领先银行之一和我一起出来为 $SIVE 估值辩护。

我仍然认为 $SIVE 可以在 1 年内达到 $10B MC,因为他们的 laser 增长会随着这些规模成比例放大:

- $AAPL Watches
- $JBL 1.6T Volume
- $MRVL CPO Volume
- Ayar Volume
- $POET Volume

取决于他们的 qualification 如何转化为 volume ramp。

因为 Sivers 正在给这个领域所有下一代 1.6T/CPO 玩家供应 lasers(进入约 $AMD$NVDA$AMZN$MSFT 这类供应链)。

这些都是现有玩家,而它现在 MC 约 ~990M。还没算 TAM 扩张或接下来更多合作。

尤其现在有 NASDAQ listing,美国机构更前瞻,会提前约 ~12M 定价,相比之下欧洲本地估值主要看过去 12 个月。

银行通常会给非常保守的目标(比如 3 年 10x),但我确实看到这家公司很快成为下一个 $LITE 的潜力。

欧洲应该拥抱自己公司给 hyperscalers 供货带来的正和增长。

因为它们的前沿公司会通过税收、经济增长和就业增长回馈本地。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2048301213943579012
❤️ 998 🔁 71 💬 68
打开原推
📝 原创
Markets are looking at CPUs right now and kinda forgot about memory.

But... there's increased capex spend with Sk Hynix, $MU, Samsung around now, with Samsung starting HMB4 production recently.

$TSM also signaled record capex across the board.

But just like $LPK in glass core substrates...

There's a decent amount of structural monopolies over in the HBM camp markets that I'm thinking about in places like Japan.

That markets may have forgotten? They would largely benefit from current HBM4 capex cycles.

Over in Korea, things like Hanmi Semi (KRX: 042700) have been taking off, up 27.6%+ today, so I'd guess the other companies around the world might play catchup soon.
市场现在在看 CPUs,有点忘了 memory。

但……Sk Hynix、$MU、Samsung 现在都有更高 capex spend,Samsung 最近开始 HMB4 生产。

$TSM 也暗示全线创纪录 capex。

但就像 glass core substrates 里的 $LPK 一样……

我在思考 HBM 阵营里有不少结构性垄断,尤其在日本这些地方。

市场可能忘了?它们会大幅受益于当前 HBM4 capex cycles。

韩国那边,像 Hanmi Semi(KRX: 042700)已经起飞,今天涨 27.6%+,所以我猜世界其他地方的公司可能很快会补涨。
❤️ 1,086 🔁 54 💬 69
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Fun fact for research:

You can find a lot of "hidden gems" by looking at who companies like $COHR lists as competitors in the SEC filings.

Names I've mentioned like 5N are there and it went from $.92 -> $24 in a few years.

$LITE, Eoptolink, Innolight, are all there too.

This was year 2022. A lot of them turn out really well in a few years.
研究用的有趣事实:

你可以通过看 $COHR 这类公司在 SEC filings 里列谁为竞争对手,找到很多“hidden gems”。

我提过的 5N 这样的名字就在里面,几年里从 $.92 -> $24。

$LITE、Eoptolink、Innolight 也都在里面。

这是 2022 年。几年后,很多都表现得非常好。
❤️ 992 🔁 23 💬 44
打开原推
📝 原创
Disillusioned by the growth of AI.

Starting to believe the only chance to escape the permanent underclass is in the next 5 years?

By owning compute and control of the infrastructure that makes AI and Robotics work.

Hard to see new generations having much opportunities, unless they’re highly specialized.

Especially with physical AI and automation coming to replace everyone in the human workforce.

All the value derived from AI will go to shareholders, without requiring the cost of labor.
对 AI 的增长感到幻灭。

开始相信未来 5 年可能是逃离永久底层的唯一机会?

通过拥有 compute,以及让 AI 和 Robotics 运转的基础设施控制权。

很难看到新一代还有多少机会,除非他们高度专业化。

尤其是 physical AI 和 automation 即将替代人类劳动力中的所有人。

AI 创造的所有价值都会流向股东,而不需要劳动成本。
❤️ 1,889 🔁 110 💬 154
打开原推
📝 原创
TLDR of recent news + bottlenecks that go brr:

1. CPU bottleneck - $INTC CEO said AI inference pushed CPU Ratio From 1:8 to 1:1.

CPUs go brr ( $AMD, Intel, $ARM) -> $AMAT / $TSM / $KLAC, etc. go brr.

2. PGME / PGMEA shortage. DuPont, Shiny Chemical, Daxin, San Fu, $DOW and others go brr?

Photoresist bottleneck go brr?

3. Microcontroller potential bottleneck + price hikes (Arterytek/Arterychip) was weighing price hikes on AI capacity squeezes.

MCU companies potentially go brr?

4. President invoked the "Defense Production Act" this week, it included:

-Transformers
- transmission components
- advanced conductors
- power electronics
- substations
- high-voltage circuit breakers
- protective relays, capacitor banks
- electrical core steel

As "severe shortages". Stuff like $AMSC, $PLPC, $POWL, $VICR, $ATKR, $HPS.A go brr.

5. $GOOGL ramps new TPU servers. Google splits AI chips into training and inference TPUs.

Taiwan happy. Mediatek and others go brr?

6. Samsung, Kingston lift SSD prices by over 10%.

SSD prices keep going brrr?

7. T-glass fiberglass shortages keep getting worse? Nittobo and others keep going brrr?

8. Bromine, essential for etching circuits and flame retardancy, has surged to $12,000 per metric ton.

ICL Group in Israel apparently controls 40% of the global supply?

Not as familiar with this but questionable brrr?

9. "Epitaxy manufacturer LandMark Optoelectronics reporting output still far below customer needs".

Uhh $IQE and others go brr?

10. "AI data centers hit interconnect limits, boosting optical module demand". "the bottleneck is no longer computing power alone, but how that power is connected."

Photonics from $AAOI, $LITE, $COHR, Innolight and others keep going brr? next gen from $SIVE, $POET, $MRVL, Win Semi and others go brr?

Basically AI semi supply chains go brr because there's widespread shortages everywhere due to AI hyperscaler demand.
最近新闻 + 会 go brr 的 bottlenecks 的 TLDR:

1. CPU bottleneck - $INTC CEO 说 AI inference 把 CPU Ratio 从 1:8 推到 1:1。

CPUs go brr($AMD、Intel、$ARM)-> $AMAT / $TSM / $KLAC 等 go brr。

2. PGME / PGMEA 短缺。DuPont、Shiny Chemical、Daxin、San Fu、$DOW 等 go brr?

Photoresist bottleneck go brr?

3. Microcontroller 潜在 bottleneck + 涨价(Arterytek/Arterychip)在权衡 AI 产能挤压下的涨价。

MCU companies 可能 go brr?

4. 总统本周援引“Defense Production Act”,其中包括:

-Transformers
- transmission components
- advanced conductors
- power electronics
- substations
- high-voltage circuit breakers
- protective relays, capacitor banks
- electrical core steel

作为“severe shortages”。像 $AMSC$PLPC$POWL$VICR$ATKR$HPS.A go brr。

5. $GOOGL 爬坡新的 TPU servers。Google 把 AI chips 分成 training 和 inference TPUs。

台湾开心。Mediatek 和其他公司 go brr?

6. Samsung、Kingston 把 SSD 价格上调超过 10%。

SSD prices 继续 go brrr?

7. T-glass fiberglass 短缺继续恶化?Nittobo 和其他继续 go brrr?

8. Bromine 对 etching circuits 和 flame retardancy 很关键,已经涨到每公吨 $12,000。

以色列 ICL Group 据说控制全球 40% 供应?

这个我不太熟,但 questionable brrr?

9. “Epitaxy manufacturer LandMark Optoelectronics reporting output still far below customer needs”。

呃,$IQE 和其他 go brr?

10. “AI data centers hit interconnect limits, boosting optical module demand”。“the bottleneck is no longer computing power alone, but how that power is connected.”

Photonics 从 $AAOI$LITE$COHR、Innolight 和其他继续 go brr?下一代从 $SIVE$POET$MRVL、Win Semi 和其他 go brr?

基本上 AI semi supply chains go brr,因为 AI hyperscaler demand 导致各处都有广泛短缺。
❤️ 2,837 🔁 252 💬 149
打开原推
💬 引用
Agreed, and glad DNB, one of Europe's leading banks, went out to defend $SIVE valuations alongside me.

I still think $SIVE can reach $10B MC in 1 year time as their laser growth scales proportionally to:

- $AAPL Watches
- $JBL 1.6T Volume
- $MRVL CPO Volume
- Ayar Volume
- $POET Volume

Depending on how their qualification plays out into volume ramp.

As Sivers supply lasers to all the next generation of 1.6T/CPO players in the space (into ~ $AMD, $NVDA, $AMZN, $MSFT type supply chains).

These are EXISTING players at a ~990M MC. Not even including TAM expansion or more partnerships coming up.

Especially now with NASDAQ listing, US institutions are forward looking and price in ~12M ahead of time, compared local European valuations that mainly look at previous 12 months.

Banks usually provide very conservative targets (eg. 3 years for a 10x), but I do see potential for this company to be the next $LITE very soon.

Europe should embrace positive-sum growth of their own companies that supply to hyperscalers.

As their frontier companies provide back to locals through taxes, economic growth, and job growth.
同意,也很高兴 DNB 这家欧洲领先银行之一,出来和我一起为 $SIVE 估值辩护。

我仍然认为 $SIVE 可以在 1 年内达到 $10B 市值,因为它们的激光器增长会随着这些同步扩张:

- $AAPL Watches
- $JBL 1.6T Volume
- $MRVL CPO Volume
- Ayar Volume
- $POET Volume

取决于它们的认证如何进入 volume ramp。

因为 Sivers 给这个领域所有下一代 1.6T/CPO 玩家供应 lasers(进入类似 $AMD$NVDA$AMZN$MSFT 的供应链)。

这些都是现有玩家,对应 ~990M 市值。还没包括 TAM expansion 或即将到来的更多合作。

尤其现在有 NASDAQ listing,美国机构是 forward looking,会提前 ~12M 定价,而本地欧洲估值主要看过去 12 个月。

银行通常给非常保守的目标(比如 3 年 10x),但我确实看到这家公司很快成为下一个 $LITE 的潜力。

欧洲应该拥抱自己给 hyperscalers 供货的公司带来的正和增长。

因为它们的 frontier companies 会通过税收、经济增长和就业增长回馈本地人。
引用原推@FlachtFunds
@aleabitoreddit $SIVE market cap is a complete joke next to all the other CPO names. Sub 1 billion MC with a US listing on the way.
@aleabitoreddit 和其他所有 CPO 名字相比,$SIVE market cap 完全是个笑话。不到 1 billion MC,而且美国上市在路上。
https://x.com/FlachtFunds/status/2048160268694544783
❤️ 1,102 🔁 89 💬 71
打开原推
📝 原创
I swear I had 50,000 followers and 0 subscribers like 2 months ago.

And now I randomly have 230K.

wtf is this account growth, it’s outperforming my YTD? https://t.co/tRxzTt5iOd
我发誓 2 个月前我还只有 50,000 粉丝和 0 订阅者。

现在突然有 230K。

wtf 这账号增长,比我 YTD 表现还强? https://t.co/tRxzTt5iOd
❤️ 1,135 🔁 9 💬 105
打开原推
💬 引用
I wasn't joking when I said $IREN community members have low IQ.

Since they literally have to fabricate information get people to get others to buy into active dilution.

The community shares this sort of BS to convince new retail investors, then does another one a month later for their active $6B ATM.

Hint: there's no deal with Anthropic or $IREN.

It's an insult to anyone who actually does OSINT/Supply Chain mapping.
我说 $IREN 社区成员 IQ 低不是开玩笑。

因为他们真的不得不编造信息,让别人买进主动稀释。

这个社区会分享这种 BS 来说服新的散户投资者,然后一个月后又为他们 active $6B ATM 再来一次。

提示:Anthropic 和 $IREN 没有 deal。

这对任何真正做 OSINT/Supply Chain mapping 的人都是侮辱。
引用原推@PeragitoTrader
@aleabitoreddit @ISITrading2717 I see the desperate $IREN bulls everywhere still. I think they're deep in the red and trying to pump the stock back to green. LOL!!!
@aleabitoreddit @ISITrading2717 我到处还能看到绝望的 $IREN 多头。我觉得他们深度被套,正试图把股票 pump 回绿色。LOL!!!
https://x.com/PeragitoTrader/status/2048151120720306636
❤️ 689 🔁 33 💬 110
打开原推
📝 原创
I have high conviction that majority/full port $IREN investors are the dumbest people you’ll meet in this world.
我高度确信,把多数/全仓放在 $IREN 的投资者,是你在这个世界上会遇到的最蠢的人。
❤️ 1,541 🔁 50 💬 244
打开原推
💬 引用
It's highly nuanced, and I'll explain why it's not late, but late to some:

Photonics is the newest supercycle (maybe H1 into H2 2025 was the start).

Then there's many different architectural changes in each supercycle:

-> $LITE, $COHR, Innolight, $AXTI and these names led the first

I did a thesis post on mentioning all four of them as the largest beneficiaries (all are up 500-1000% 1Y)

-> $AAOI, $JBL and others types of names are benefit immensely as the transitional bridge (eg. 1.6T pluggable)

-> $SIVE, Celestial, Ayar, $POET are others future gens eg. CPO (what I'm focusing on now)

-> VisEra, QD Laser, $ALMU and others are likely going to be future gens (quantum dot, different packaging types, etc) if you fast forward 4 years.

Of course, $LITE does everything. $AXTI will be used for everything.

But the amount of pure play exposure for each architectural shift in each mini supercycle is different.

For example, inp usage with quantum dot is still there, but less used. Or DFB laser arrays for CPO instead of EML.

There's probably still 50%+ with $LITE and $COHR. And you're a little on the "late" side of things.

But you're extremely early to new architecture generations.

What I'm trying to do is point regular retail investors into the direction of new gold mines for free.

Before institutions figure out sooner or later by paying $20k for equity research reports.
这很讲细节,我来解释为什么对一些人来说不算晚,但对另一些人来说算晚:

Photonics 是最新的 supercycle(也许 H1 到 H2 2025 是开始)。

然后每个 supercycle 里有很多不同架构变化:

-> $LITE$COHR、Innolight、$AXTI 这些名字引领了第一波

我发过 thesis 帖提到这四个是最大受益者(全部 1Y 涨 500-1000%)

-> $AAOI$JBL 等这类名字,作为过渡桥梁(比如 1.6T pluggable)受益巨大

-> $SIVE、Celestial、Ayar、$POET 是其他未来世代,比如 CPO(我现在关注的)

-> VisEra、QD Laser、$ALMU 等,如果快进 4 年,很可能是未来世代(quantum dot、不同 packaging types 等)

当然,$LITE 什么都做。$AXTI 会被用于所有东西。

但每个 mini supercycle 里的每次架构转变,pure play 敞口数量都不同。

比如 quantum dot 仍会用 inp,但用量更少。或者 CPO 用 DFB laser arrays,而不是 EML。

$LITE$COHR 可能还有 50%+。你在这些上面有点“晚”。

但你对新架构世代来说极其早。

我想做的是免费把普通散户投资者指向新金矿的方向。

在机构迟早通过花 $20k 买 equity research reports 搞懂之前。
引用原推@rabbitrun97o
@aleabitoreddit Missed the opportunity to make money by investing in photonics. Do you think there is 50% upside from here?
@aleabitoreddit 错过了投资 photonics 赚钱的机会。你觉得从这里还有 50% 上涨空间吗?
https://x.com/rabbitrun97o/status/2048125596836778424
❤️ 2,390 🔁 177 💬 101
打开原推
💬 引用
Uh chat... is my timing insane or what?

Names like $TSEM are flat all year, I go long, then it doubles. The moment I go long on $AEHR, it almost triples.

People are starting to think I'm the catalyst because this keeps happening over and over... lol this is a $22B+ company.

Fun fact on how I get these right :

-> Identify critical companies not really noticed
-> I time my longs around catalysts like $NVDA GTC or OFC.
-> And around when news about material changes comes about.
-> Then look at good entry points on drops (this is where your astrology TA's get used).

Going long isn't just picking a random point in time! On other names, like $ALRIB it's new information discovery (eg. Microsoft Quantum), so two different types.

There's actually a strategy here that repeats... (as seen with the other 16 triple digit return stocks).
呃 chat……我的 timing 是不是疯了?

$TSEM 这种名字全年平着,我一做多,它就翻倍。我刚做多 $AEHR,它几乎涨三倍。

大家开始觉得我是催化剂,因为这事一遍又一遍发生……lol 这可是一家 $22B+ 公司。

我怎么把这些做对的有趣事实:

-> 识别关键但不太被注意的公司
-> 围绕 $NVDA GTC 或 OFC 这种催化来 timing 我的 longs。
-> 以及围绕重大变化新闻出现的时间。
-> 然后在下跌中找好入场点(这就是你那些 astrology TA 派上用场的时候)。

做多不是随便挑一个时间点!其他名字,比如 $ALRIB,是新信息发现(比如 Microsoft Quantum),所以是两种不同类型。

这里其实有一个会重复的策略……(就像另外 16 只三位数回报股票)。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AEHR looks extremely promising at ~$1.1B MC.

Aehr is starting to remind me of an early $TER, mixed with pre-earnings $AAOI.

If we look at the timeline and speculated customers:

Feb 11th: Sonoma production win for Hyperscaler's AI ASIC processors. (likely $GOOGL, $AMZN, $META).

- Probably Google? Aehr bought Incal, who was speculated to be used by Google for their TPUs.

Feb 26th: $14 million from AI lead customer (likely $AMD, $NVDA)

- Probably $AMD here for Instinct MI300/MI400.

March 3rd: Lead silicon photonics customer for one FOX-XP system (likely $INTC siph)

- Very likely $INTC has been their lead customer.

March 31st: Initial order from major new silicon photonics customer (likely $AVGO, $MRVL, $CSCO )

- New customer (rules out Intel), prob one of these transitioning to 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers

(All speculative, very confidential BOM)

Regardless. This timeline is just bottling up for $AEHR.

Could be next earnings. Or two quarters from now.

But feels like a matter of time before we see mass orders.
$AEHR 在约 $1.1B 市值看起来极有前景。

Aehr 开始让我想到早期 $TER,混合财报前的 $AAOI

如果看时间线和推测客户:

2 月 11 日:拿下 Hyperscaler AI ASIC processors 的 Sonoma 量产订单。(很可能是 $GOOGL$AMZN$META)。

- 可能是 Google?Aehr 收购了 Incal,而 Incal 被推测用于 Google 的 TPU。

2 月 26 日:来自 AI lead customer 的 $14 million(很可能是 $AMD$NVDA

- 这里可能是 $AMD,用于 Instinct MI300/MI400。

3 月 3 日:Lead silicon photonics customer 订购一套 FOX-XP 系统(很可能是 $INTC siph)

- 很可能 $INTC 一直是他们的 lead customer。

3 月 31 日:来自重要新 silicon photonics customer 的初始订单(很可能是 $AVGO$MRVL$CSCO

- 新客户(排除 Intel),可能是这些正在转向 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers 的公司之一

(全部是推测,BOM 非常保密)

无论如何,这条时间线正在为 $AEHR 蓄势。

可能是下个财报,也可能是两个季度之后。

但感觉看到大规模订单只是时间问题。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2039388766083944750
❤️ 1,454 🔁 83 💬 85
打开原推
📝 原创
Two most viral stories on $RDDT:

1. Turning $252K -> $7.7M with $AMD
2. Turning $167K -> $2.2M with $RKLB.

These stores are likely true, since it's possible to find these niche leaders to change your life around:

Again and again across different industries with semis to space.

What matters is:
-> Finding these rare gems / leaders in a niche field.
-> Having enough concentration, for it to matter.
-> Having enough conviction to sit through volatility.
-> Letting the thesis play out (even if it's across multiple years).

You've already seen me do it multiple times with photonics like $AXTI, $IQE, $SIVE, and others.

But everything is just speedran from 5 years to months due to AI capex acceleration.
$RDDT 上最火的两个故事:

1. 用 $AMD 把 $252K -> $7.7M
2. 用 $RKLB 把 $167K -> $2.2M。

这些故事很可能是真的,因为确实可以找到这些 niche leaders 来改变人生:

一次又一次,横跨从 semis 到 space 的不同行业。

重要的是:
-> 找到这些稀有 gems / niche 领域 leader。
-> 有足够集中度,让它有意义。
-> 有足够信念熬过波动。
-> 让 thesis 兑现(哪怕跨越多年)。

你们已经看到我在 photonics 里多次做到,比如 $AXTI$IQE$SIVE 等。

但由于 AI capex 加速,现在一切都从 5 年被 speedrun 到几个月。
❤️ 1,622 🔁 67 💬 97
打开原推
📝 原创
Appreciate the X revenue sharing program!

I actually end up passing it along to local charities I like, but don't normally share.

I'm especially a big fan of local pet shelters, since my dog passed away last year and I'm still not completely over it.

And addressing homelessness too, since I did make a lot of homeless friends back at UC Berkeley.

At a certain point, you don't need more money.

But it does help maximize the positive impact you can have, which is why I'm still on X (and not retiring, which I can do).

It just feels fulfilling to live an honest life, be true to yourself, and see how much of a positive change you can make in this world before you go?

My goal on X has always been how to help the retail investor the most...

compared to traditional models of selling every single piece of alpha to institutions first.

Actions speak louder than words, hence why subscriptions are $1 and I publish all my ideas/thought process for free to everyone here (even though I could charge $50).

So people can do what I do themselves when I leave one day!

In terms of next steps, I thought it would be fun if retail had the exact same edge as Citadel and the other hedge funds?

So I was planning on releasing custom LLMs for free (I was a research scientist in the past you know) and using the extra subscription revenue to subsidize compute/data costs.

Think it will be fun!
感谢 X revenue sharing program!

其实我最后会把它转给我喜欢的本地慈善机构,只是平时不怎么分享。

我尤其很喜欢本地 pet shelters,因为我的狗去年去世了,我到现在还没有完全走出来。

还有解决 homelessness,因为我以前在 UC Berkeley 时交过很多 homeless 朋友。

到某个阶段,你不需要更多钱。

但它确实能帮助最大化你能产生的正面影响,这也是我仍然在 X 上的原因(而不是退休,虽然我可以)。

诚实生活、忠于自己,并看看离开前能给这个世界带来多少正面改变,这种感觉很充实?

我在 X 上的目标一直是:如何最大程度帮助散户投资者……

而不是传统模式那样,把每一份 alpha 先卖给机构。

行动胜于语言,所以订阅是 $1,我也把所有想法/思考过程免费发给这里所有人(尽管我可以收 $50)。

这样有一天我离开时,大家可以自己做我做的事!

至于下一步,我觉得如果散户拥有和 Citadel 以及其他 hedge funds 完全一样的 edge,会很有意思?

所以我计划免费发布 custom LLMs(你知道我以前是 research scientist),并用额外订阅收入补贴 compute/data 成本。

我觉得会很好玩!
❤️ 2,467 🔁 34 💬 271
打开原推
💬 引用
Did you listen anon?

The fact that $SIVE is up 600%+.

But still can 10x from here in a year... once ~ $AAPL, $JBL, and $MRVL require mass production of their lasers in 2027.

Is incredible.

Probably my most legendary thesis post since $AXTI. https://t.co/8rOZNdV9bX
你听了吗 anon?

$SIVE 已经涨了 600%+。

但一旦 ~ $AAPL$JBL$MRVL 在 2027 年需要大规模量产它们的 lasers,它从这里一年内仍然能 10x……

这太不可思议了。

可能是我自 $AXTI 以来最传奇的 thesis 帖。 https://t.co/8rOZNdV9bX
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The more I look into Sivers
< $SIVE / $SIVEF >

the more I wonder:

How is the laser company for the hyperscaler photonic supply chains…

Valued at ~$200M USD MC?

All the companies that buy and repackage their lasers are now worth $1-4B+?

Pre-product SV AI companies are worth billions?

Pre revenue Photonic companies in development phase line $LWLG are worth $1B+?

Yet the company that makes the silicon photonics/CPO scale up & scale out work.

And has actual revenue.

~$200M…

Reminds me of early $AXTI when I had zero clue how a company worth $500M MC controlled the InP substrate/feedstock supply chain for photonics.

Either I’m completely wrong… or this is the most undervalued and unknown photonics company on the market.
我越研究 Sivers
< $SIVE / $SIVEF >

就越想问:

一家服务 hyperscaler 光子供应链的激光器公司……

怎么会只值约 $200M 美元市值?

所有购买并重新封装他们激光器的公司,现在都值 $1-4B+?

还没产品的硅谷 AI 公司都值几十亿?

还没收入、处在开发阶段的光子公司,比如 $LWLG,都值 $1B+?

但真正让硅光/CPO scale up 和 scale out 能跑起来的公司,

而且还有实际收入,

只有约 $200M……

让我想起早期 $AXTI,当时我完全不明白一家 $500M 市值的公司怎么会控制光子 InP 基板/feedstock 供应链。

要么我完全错了……要么这就是市场上最被低估、最没人知道的光子公司。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2034127800840688097
❤️ 2,066 🔁 122 💬 150
打开原推
💬 引用
If you listened to Optimus Prime…

You’d be up 47% in just 3 weeks with $HPS.A.

Did you listen to Optimus anon? https://t.co/dUWQBpPu0y
如果你听了 Optimus Prime……

你用 $HPS.A 只要 3 周就会涨 47%。

你听 Optimus 了吗 anon? https://t.co/dUWQBpPu0y
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The current bottleneck: Transformers/Switchgear. 

Trade Idea: Long Hammond (~2.2B CAD / ~$1.5B USD) at 184 CAD.

They dominate the market for:

-Transformers (dry, multi year bottleneck ~23% of market),

-serve to switchgear (2-3Y bottleneck)

-and manufacture liquid too (5Y, larger bottleneck)

I personally anticipate components price hikes like NAND, as $AMZN, $MSFT and others compete for allocation. 

You might have seen: “Half of US data center builds have been delayed or canceled, growth limited by shortages of power infrastructure”…

Then you go further:

“To address shortages… Canada, Mexico… became the biggest suppliers of high-power transformers for AI data centers to AI data centers”

Guess who is in Canada (Guelph).. Mexico (Monterrey 3 and 4)… and the US?

Hammond

Then here’s the reason the articles cite why hyperscaler DB buildouts are falling apart: 

“Major reason behind these setbacks is the availability of key electrical components — such as transformers, switchgear”. 

Institutions are probably looking at Powell, Eaton, and others… but little do they know?

Companies like these actually buy Hammond’s transformers to put inside their own switchgear (“strong sales into data centres, switchgear manufacturers")

Their market share over the transformers market is actually pretty large (eg. ~23% dry). 

The most compelling signal:

-> 122% Y/Y 2025 backlog increase. And we can infer this to be 1B+ CAD. 

Eg. company achieved 898m CAD in sales in 2025, capacity ceiling. Management said close of Q3 2025 orders were valued at 53% of the entire closing third-quarter backlog.

Given that Q4 2025 revenue was 254 million and the backlog is "more than doubled," we can infer a total backlog value exceeding 1 billion CAD.

Also:

“Gross margin compression last year was due to the buildout of their Mexico facility, but both gross margins are expected to increase and the facility expansions are expectied to turn into accelerated revenue Q2 2026)” which is now.

Downside is if raw material costs (copper, electrical steel) spike again, but given this bottleneck, they can price hike. 

Personal FWD P/E estimates would be ~18-21 for 2026, <15 for 2027 from volume ramp.

But I think it’s possible to hit single digit fwd P/E if they do price hikes mixed with hyperscaler emergency orders. But that might get a little mixed with the new acquisition.

Regardless still looks cheap. 

Just a TLDR: 
$AMZN, $MSFT, $META, $GOOGL, $ORCL datacenter are being bottlenecked because of a lack of transformers/switchgear.

Seems like markets missed this little player with large market share, despite backlog visibility and increasing revenue from capacity expansion coming online.

I personally found it pretty compelling, so I went long.

Just sharing my personal thoughts, of course DYOR before making any decisions yourself.
当前瓶颈:Transformers/Switchgear。

交易想法:做多 Hammond(约 2.2B CAD / 约 $1.5B USD),价格 184 CAD。

他们主导这些市场:

- Transformers(dry,多年瓶颈,约 23% 市场份额),

- 服务 switchgear(2-3 年瓶颈)

- 也生产 liquid(5 年,更大的瓶颈)

我个人预计组件会像 NAND 一样涨价,因为 $AMZN$MSFT 等在争抢 allocation。

你可能看过:“一半美国数据中心建设被推迟或取消,增长受电力基础设施短缺限制”……

再往下看:

“为了解决短缺……加拿大、墨西哥……成为 AI 数据中心高功率 transformers 的最大供应地”

猜猜谁在加拿大(Guelph)、墨西哥(Monterrey 3 和 4)以及美国都有布局?

Hammond

然后文章引用 hyperscaler DC buildout 出问题的原因:

“这些挫折背后的主要原因,是关键电气组件的可用性,例如 transformers、switchgear”。

机构可能在看 Powell、Eaton 等……但他们不知道的是?

这些公司实际上会买 Hammond 的 transformers,放进自己的 switchgear(“对数据中心、switchgear manufacturers 的销售强劲”)

他们在 transformers 市场的份额其实很大(例如 dry 约 23%)。

最有说服力的信号:

-> 2025 年 backlog 同比增长 122%。我们可以推断这超过 1B CAD。

例如公司 2025 年实现 898m CAD 销售,已经到产能天花板。管理层说,2025 年 Q3 末订单价值相当于整个三季度期末 backlog 的 53%。

考虑到 Q4 2025 收入是 254 million,而 backlog “more than doubled”,我们可以推断总 backlog 超过 1 billion CAD。

另外:

“去年毛利率承压是因为墨西哥工厂建设,但预计毛利率会提升,工厂扩张也会在 2026 Q2 转化为加速收入”,也就是现在。

下行风险是原材料成本(铜、电工钢)再次上涨,但考虑到这个瓶颈,他们可以涨价。

我个人的 FWD P/E 估算是 2026 年约 18-21,2027 年随着放量低于 15。

但如果他们涨价并叠加 hyperscaler 紧急订单,我认为 forward P/E 有可能到个位数。不过这可能会和新收购有些混在一起。

不管怎样,看起来仍然便宜。

简单 TLDR:

$AMZN$MSFT$META$GOOGL$ORCL 数据中心正因为缺少 transformers/switchgear 被卡住。

尽管有 backlog 可见度和产能扩张上线带来的收入增长,市场似乎漏掉了这个拥有大份额的小玩家。

我个人觉得很有吸引力,所以做多了。

只是分享个人想法,当然你做任何决定前都要 DYOR。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041168871168545115
❤️ 759 🔁 29 💬 77
打开原推
📝 原创
Photonics go brrr.

$MXL +76.2% (lol)
$AAOI +15.03%
$SIVE +12.69%
$AEHR +7.07%
$SOI +6.19%
$LITE +4.96%

Hope you didn’t sell and try and chase other bottlenecks anon? https://t.co/Ft2p94bDWR
Photonics go brrr。

$MXL +76.2%(lol)
$AAOI +15.03%
$SIVE +12.69%
$AEHR +7.07%
$SOI +6.19%
$LITE +4.96%

希望你没有卖掉然后去追其他 bottlenecks anon? https://t.co/Ft2p94bDWR
❤️ 1,724 🔁 107 💬 142
打开原推
📝 原创
Who thought it was a good idea to give Tangerine Peel inspired companies the funds…

To short the fastest growing names in photonics and memory?

$SNDK and $AAOI have been on a hyperbolic run.

And I see names like AAOI continuing to grow as optical transceiver + Made in America supply chains grow.
谁觉得把资金给 Tangerine Peel 风格的公司……

去做空 photonics 和 memory 里增长最快的名字,是个好主意?

$SNDK$AAOI 已经在 hyperbolic run。

而且随着 optical transceiver + Made in America 供应链增长,我看到像 AAOI 这样的名字会继续成长。
❤️ 808 🔁 36 💬 71
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm amused by Swedish culture at this point.

That their retail/journalists are crying every day when someone posts a supply chain mapping of $SIVE lasers to:

-> $MRVL CPO
-> $AMD CPO
-> $JBL 1.6T LRO
-> $NVDA
-> $AMZN, $META, $GOOGL, $MSFT
-> Tencent, Baidu, Alibaba for ELS.

Then they go crying even further...

When someone shows $AAPL is secret hyperscaler customer of Sivers lasers for their next-gen Apple Watch development (which requires 50,000,000 units annually).

Does supplying to hyperscalers... Hurt locals's feelings that much to the point they try and self-destruct?

It's hilarious that a "Swedish professional" went out and said CPO is nothing new and nothing special, so Sivers is nothing special.

Meanwhile $NVDA is just funding every CPO program $2B from $MRVL to $LITE to $COHR left and right.

Cool thing about X is you learn something new every day interacting with global audiences.
到这个阶段,我被瑞典文化逗乐了。

当有人把 $SIVE lasers 的供应链 mapping 到这些地方时,他们的散户/记者每天都在哭:

-> $MRVL CPO
-> $AMD CPO
-> $JBL 1.6T LRO
-> $NVDA
-> $AMZN$META$GOOGL$MSFT
-> Tencent、Baidu、Alibaba for ELS。

然后他们哭得更厉害……

当有人展示 $AAPL 是 Sivers lasers 的秘密 hyperscaler customer,用于下一代 Apple Watch 开发(需要每年 50,000,000 units)。

给 hyperscalers 供货……这么伤本地人的感情吗,以至于他们要自毁?

好笑的是,一个“瑞典专业人士”出来说 CPO 没什么新东西,也没什么特别,所以 Sivers 没什么特别。

与此同时,$NVDA 正在从 $MRVL$LITE$COHR,到处给每个 CPO program 投 $2B。

X 很酷的一点是,你每天和全球受众互动,都能学到新东西。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The secret is that $AAPL 🍎 is using $SIVE InP laser arrays for mass production of consumer hardware (high confidence).

Launch date around late H2 2027 from estimates and the graph provided.

Imagine Apple mass producing consumer hardware with 50M+/units a year…

Off a $850m MC laser supplier lol.

Then with whatever Apple does, you’ll get $GOOGL, Samsung, and the others following along next.
秘密是 $AAPL 🍎 正在用 $SIVE InP laser arrays 来量产消费硬件(高置信度)。

根据估计和给出的图,发布日期大约在 2027 下半年后段。

想象一下 Apple 用年产 50M+ 台的规模量产消费硬件...

而供应商只是一个 $850m MC 的 laser supplier lol。

然后不管 Apple 做什么,$GOOGL、Samsung 和其他公司都会跟上。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2047375576894452068
❤️ 1,168 🔁 98 💬 111
打开原推
💬 引用
Just putting out there...

Would have been +15.02% in 2W equal-weighted return.

On 30 different stocks... mostly medium-large cap.

1. $INTC +29.62%
2. $MRVL +40.95%
3. $TSM +4.72%
4. $COHR +18.9%
5. $RKLB +26.76%
6. $DRAM +12.29%
7. $AVGO +18.32%
8. $AMZN +9.17%
9. $ARM +36.6%
10. $TSEM -1.25%
11. $IBIT +7.68%
12. $NBIS +15.22%
13. $GOOGL +6.41%
14. $AMKR +32.25%
15. $HOOD +19.14%
16. $CRCL +17.58%
17. $META +4.9%
18. $LITE -5.28%
19. $LPTH +20.23%
20. $FN +11.54%
21. $JBL +15.45%
22. $MP +17.48%
23. $HIMS +42.53%
24. $SMTC +18.83%
25. $POWL +9.26%
26. $VPG +17.44%
27. $MOG.A -3.96%
28. $MSFT +11.44%
29. $CVX -1.47%
30. $XLU -2.29%

Obviously short timeframe, but I expect many of these to keep going up more.

And probably would have been higher if you time the drop on specific names, rather than going long all at once.

Not too shabby?
先放在这里……

如果 30 只股票等权,2 周回报会是 +15.02%。

30 只不同股票……大多是中大型市值。

1. $INTC +29.62%
2. $MRVL +40.95%
3. $TSM +4.72%
4. $COHR +18.9%
5. $RKLB +26.76%
6. $DRAM +12.29%
7. $AVGO +18.32%
8. $AMZN +9.17%
9. $ARM +36.6%
10. $TSEM -1.25%
11. $IBIT +7.68%
12. $NBIS +15.22%
13. $GOOGL +6.41%
14. $AMKR +32.25%
15. $HOOD +19.14%
16. $CRCL +17.58%
17. $META +4.9%
18. $LITE -5.28%
19. $LPTH +20.23%
20. $FN +11.54%
21. $JBL +15.45%
22. $MP +17.48%
23. $HIMS +42.53%
24. $SMTC +18.83%
25. $POWL +9.26%
26. $VPG +17.44%
27. $MOG.A -3.96%
28. $MSFT +11.44%
29. $CVX -1.47%
30. $XLU -2.29%

显然时间很短,但我预计其中很多会继续涨更多。

如果你不是一次性做多,而是在具体名字下跌时 timing,可能还会更高。

还不错吧?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Here's a bunch of random 30 US-available random stocks I like today and why:

1. $INTC - America's hope for foundry, national security
2. $MRVL - scales rev from future maia asics and add ons like cpo, they do everything lost count
3. $TSM - backbone of semis/ai
4. $COHR - They do everything vertically integrated + captures optical cycle
5. $RKLB - the final frontier of space will be around 5 years from now and 20 years from now.
6. $DRAM - memory exposure for samsung/sk hynix
7. $AVGO - hyperscalers dont like nvidia gpu tax
8. $AMZN - nobody can compete against the overnight shipping of toilet paper. robotics will lower opex over time
9. $ARM - AGI CPUs scale revenue quite a bit over the next decade
10. $TSEM - you're going to need a foundry for light based stuff
11. $IBIT - bitcoin, we all know by now
12. $NBIS - i think it's the next AWS. Also they do self-driving cars with uber, own scaling DB companies, data labeling. It's almost like a mini Google.
13. $GOOGL - youtube is not going away, gemini is great. they're vertically integrated with TPUs and fund buildout with operating income so i like it.
14. $AMKR - super facilities coming online in late 2027-2028. benefits from made in america
15. $HOOD - i dont like short term, but long term i'm a fan of Robinhood since they captured retail + have more products like banking, etc that they're scaling up. product innovation is wild.
16. $CRCL - I happen to really like stablecoins and see them as the future for both payments/holding (depends on clarity act)
17. $META - people aren't going to stop using instagram or whatsapp, or others anytime soon.
18. $LITE - $GOOGL TPU exposure decently high part of BOM. As long as Google's AI program keeps running I think $LITE will do well.
19. $LPTH - Germanium and China export controls will always be an issue so US made engineered alternatives will always be important
20. $FN - Someone needs to assemble optical stuff
21. $JBL - same as above, but added with ip from Intel's SiPh acqusition so might end up like innolight?
22. $MP - American rare earths program is extremely important, similar to $INTC national security risks
23. $HIMS - Okay here me out they just acquired a ton of companies, and at $19 they have global DTC channel. short sellers really hate this company, but I think it's actually promising as a contrarian long
24. $SMTC - LRO/LPO transition
25. $POWL - US alternative to hammond for switchgear DC type bottleneck
26. $VPG - Humanoids will be a thing down the road maybe 2027-2028, this makes the sensors.
27. $MOG.A - Feels like i see them everywhere in robotics, to spacex supply chains
28. $MSFT - At $375, one day we'll look back and see this as a buying opportunity.
29. $CVX - oil might crash after war but these oil companies are going to be extremely important, especially when Venezulea is a goldmine.
30. $XLU - i think rate cuts might be back online, we need power/grid for AI so these names will always be improtant from $CEG to $NEE

Just throwing out other thoughts aside from $AAOI and $AEHR.
这里是我今天喜欢的一堆随机的 30 个美国可买股票,以及原因:

1. $INTC - 美国晶圆代工的希望,国家安全
2. $MRVL - 未来 Maia ASIC 和 CPO 等附加业务会拉动收入,他们什么都做,我都数不过来了
3. $TSM - 半导体/AI 的骨干
4. $COHR - 垂直整合什么都做 + 吃到光学周期
5. $RKLB - 太空这个终极边疆大概会在未来 5 年和 20 年后出现机会。
6. $DRAM - 对 samsung/sk hynix 的存储敞口
7. $AVGO - hyperscaler 不喜欢 nvidia GPU 税
8. $AMZN - 没人能竞争隔夜送厕纸。机器人长期会降低 opex
9. $ARM - AGI CPU 在未来十年会让收入增长不少
10. $TSEM - 做光相关的东西,总得有晶圆厂
11. $IBIT - 比特币,我们现在都懂了
12. $NBIS - 我觉得它是下一个 AWS。而且他们和 uber 做自动驾驶,拥有扩展型数据库公司、数据标注。几乎像一个迷你 Google。
13. $GOOGL - youtube 不会消失,gemini 很强。他们用 TPU 垂直整合,并用经营收入给 buildout 供血,所以我喜欢。
14. $AMKR - 大型先进设施会在 2027 年底到 2028 年投产。受益于 made in america
15. $HOOD - 我短期不喜欢,但长期我是 Robinhood 粉丝,因为他们抓住了散户,还有银行等更多产品在扩张。产品创新很猛。
16. $CRCL - 我确实很喜欢稳定币,认为它们是支付/持有的未来(取决于 clarity act)
17. $META - 人们短期内不会停止使用 instagram 或 whatsapp 等产品。
18. $LITE - $GOOGL TPU 的 BOM 敞口相当高。只要 Google 的 AI 项目继续跑,我认为 $LITE 会表现不错。
19. $LPTH - 锗和中国出口管制会一直是问题,所以美国制造的工程替代品会一直重要
20. $FN - 总得有人组装光学东西
21. $JBL - 同上,但加上从 Intel SiPh 收购来的 IP,所以最后可能会像 innolight?
22. $MP - 美国稀土项目极其重要,类似 $INTC 的国家安全风险
23. $HIMS - 好吧听我说,他们刚收购了一堆公司,而且在 $19 这个位置有全球 DTC 渠道。空头真的很讨厌这家公司,但我觉得作为逆向做多其实有前景
24. $SMTC - LRO/LPO 转换
25. $POWL - 美国版 hammond,针对 switchgear DC 类型瓶颈
26. $VPG - 人形机器人之后会成为趋势,可能 2027-2028,这家公司做传感器。
27. $MOG.A - 感觉我在机器人到 spacex 供应链里到处都能看到他们
28. $MSFT - $375 的时候,总有一天我们回头看会觉得这是买入机会。
29. $CVX - 战后油价可能崩,但这些石油公司会极其重要,尤其委内瑞拉是金矿。
30. $XLU - 我觉得降息可能又要回来了,我们需要 AI 的电力/电网,所以从 $CEG$NEE 这些名字会一直重要

只是抛出一些除了 $AAOI$AEHR 之外的想法。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2042187668931616964
❤️ 1,642 🔁 100 💬 66
打开原推
💬 引用
Also thank you everyone for 18,500 subscribers!

I’m trying to get #1 on the entire X platform as a short term goal.

It’s nice validation of my mission to democratize information discovery/synthesis for regular retail investors…

especially since stocks are positive sum and everyone (aside from short sellers) benefit from names going up.

Close to halfway there to Elon?
也谢谢大家,18,500 个订阅者!

我短期目标是冲到整个 X 平台 #1。

这很好地验证了我为普通散户投资者民主化 information discovery/synthesis 的使命……

尤其是股票是正和的,名字上涨时所有人(除了空头)都受益。

离 Elon 快到一半了?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Everyone’s out there sharing new YTDs after $MRVL, $INTC to $ARM went up…

I think I’ll stop sharing mine just to let others feel better?
大家都在 $MRVL$INTC$ARM 上涨后分享新的 YTD...

我想我还是别分享自己的了,好让别人感觉好一点?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2047472057890513357
❤️ 1,225 🔁 22 💬 105
打开原推
📝 原创
Everyone’s out there sharing new YTDs after $MRVL, $INTC to $ARM went up…

I think I’ll stop sharing mine just to let others feel better?
$MRVL$INTC$ARM 涨起来后,大家都在外面分享新的 YTD。

我想我就不分享自己的了,好让别人感觉好一点?
❤️ 1,090 🔁 10 💬 82
打开原推
📝 原创
Not the best idea to feel FOMO about the new “bottleneck” in every news cycle.

It’s going from:

$NVDA GPUs -> $MU Memory -> $IREN Power -> $LITE EMLs -> $SNDK Memory -> GPUs -> $AAOI transceivers -> Advanced Packaging -> Transformers -> $INTC CPUs… etc

And next would be stuff like $LPK glass substrates or some random niche material from Japan.

Most of these span multi-years.

If $LITE is sold out into 2028 and it’s H1 2026. Hyperscalers are buying out anything $AAOI can make.

It’s probably good idea to just be patient with your existing positions.

Because there’s likely going to be some random green candle that you miss out on chasing the current news cycle.
不要对每个新闻周期里新的“bottleneck”都 FOMO,这不是最好的想法。

它一直在从:

$NVDA GPUs -> $MU Memory -> $IREN Power -> $LITE EMLs -> $SNDK Memory -> GPUs -> $AAOI transceivers -> Advanced Packaging -> Transformers -> $INTC CPUs……等等

接下来可能是 $LPK glass substrates,或者日本某种随机 niche material。

其中大多数都跨越多年。

如果 $LITE 已经 sold out 到 2028,而现在是 H1 2026。Hyperscalers 正在买光 $AAOI 能做出来的一切。

对现有仓位保持耐心可能是个好主意。

因为很可能会有某根随机绿蜡烛,在你追逐当前新闻周期时错过。
❤️ 2,824 🔁 196 💬 115
打开原推
📝 原创
Holy **** $INTC.

Semi earnings, Made in America, CPU bottlenecks, and Intel Foundry go brrr. https://t.co/st3D8wfsFi
Holy **** $INTC

Semi earnings、Made in America、CPU bottlenecks 和 Intel Foundry go brrr。 https://t.co/st3D8wfsFi
❤️ 1,020 🔁 45 💬 72
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a thought…

Maybe don’t hire a $NKE “veteran” to lead the $LULU brand revival?

It’s the equivalent of PayPal hiring the former HP CEO.

I’m just speechless. https://t.co/GAE7pnx8qJ
只是一个想法……

也许不要请一个 $NKE “veteran” 来领导 $LULU brand revival?

这相当于 PayPal 请前 HP CEO。

我真的无话可说。 https://t.co/GAE7pnx8qJ
❤️ 724 🔁 21 💬 70
打开原推
💬 引用
The secret is that $AAPL 🍎 is using $SIVE InP laser arrays for mass production of consumer hardware (high confidence).

Launch date around late H2 2027 from estimates and the graph provided.

Imagine Apple mass producing consumer hardware with 50M+/units a year…

Off a $850m MC laser supplier lol.

Then with whatever Apple does, you’ll get $GOOGL, Samsung, and the others following along next.
秘密是 $AAPL 🍎 正在用 $SIVE InP laser arrays 来量产消费硬件(高信心)。

根据估计和给出的图,发布时间大概在 H2 2027 后期。

想象一下 Apple 每年量产 50M+ units 的消费硬件……

来自一家 $850m 市值的 laser supplier lol。

然后不管 Apple 做什么,$GOOGL、Samsung 和其他公司接下来都会跟上。
引用原推@itsakek
@SiversSemicond @aleabitoreddit a bit cryptic, thoughts?
@SiversSemicond @aleabitoreddit 有点神秘,怎么看?
https://x.com/itsakek/status/2047308237305937982
❤️ 1,253 🔁 105 💬 135
打开原推
📝 原创
I'm sorry, but how does this work?

> Softbank takes out $40B bridge loan to invest in OpenAi
> OpenAi paper valuation goes up
> Softbank gets margin loan off OpenAI's new valuation... maybe to pay back original loan?

I'm getting PTSD from the FTX equity/FTT token but with OpenAI equity.
抱歉,但这是怎么运作的?

> Softbank 拿 $40B bridge loan 投 OpenAi
> OpenAi 纸面估值上涨
> Softbank 根据 OpenAI 新估值拿 margin loan……也许用来还原来的贷款?

我从 OpenAI equity 这里感受到了 FTX equity/FTT token 的 PTSD。
❤️ 786 🔁 41 💬 69
打开原推
💬 引用
You’re welcome $IBKR?

But it legitimately is the better brokerage right now, I’m surprised $HOOD doesn’t have international stocks. https://t.co/yMEZOXtI9w
不客气 $IBKR

但它现在确实是更好的券商,我很惊讶 $HOOD 没有国际股票。 https://t.co/yMEZOXtI9w
引用原推@pennycheck
How crazy is it to legit long $IBKR into earnings tmrw due to the thousands of brand new @aleabitoreddit 'serenity' accounts started in the last 2 months?
因为过去 2 个月成千上万个新的 @aleabitoreddit 'serenity' 账户开了户,明天财报前正经做多 $IBKR 这事到底有多疯狂?
https://x.com/pennycheck/status/2046236131008618616
❤️ 860 🔁 35 💬 77
打开原推
💬 引用
This is actually my favorite $SIVE TA setup.

I name this:

"Transferring ownership of the company from Swedish locals to American investors/institutions."

Good timing right before US Nasdaq listing and hyperscaler 2027 volume ramp.

Special thanks to the media over there. https://t.co/eLMqRQ5CSB
这其实是我最喜欢的 $SIVE TA setup。

我给它取名:

“把公司所有权从瑞典本地人转移给美国投资者/机构。”

正好赶在美国 Nasdaq listing 和 2027 hyperscaler volume ramp 前。

特别感谢那边的媒体。 https://t.co/eLMqRQ5CSB
引用原推@itsakek
@aleabitoreddit Looks like the Swedes are selling again 🤣
@aleabitoreddit 看起来瑞典人又在卖了 🤣
https://x.com/itsakek/status/2047221943187976216
❤️ 1,141 🔁 61 💬 110
打开原推
📝 原创
All the hyperscalers $SIVE likely ends up in 2027-2028 is staggering at a $900m MC.

Markets don't understand what's coming.

From speculative mapping:

> $SIVE -> $POET -> $MRVL ->
1. $AMZN (purchase agreement/warrants with photonic fabric from celestial)
2. $MSFT (maia)
3. $GOOGL (recent development talks with Marvell)

$SIVE powers Poet Starlight/optical interposers, and Poet's CFO confirmed they're supplying to Marvell few days ago.

> $SIVE -> $POET -> "NDAs other hyperscaler suppliers"
1. Western Hyperscalers

> $SIVE -> $JBL (1.6T LRO)->
1. $META (Jabil $INTC SiPH inheritance, maps to Meta LRO program)
2. $NVDA (NVIDIA possibly OEMs optical transceivers) -> $MSFT | AWS | hyperscalers

$SIVE is the confirmed laser source for $JBL 1.6T optical transceivers.

> $SIVE -> Ayar ($500m fundraiser last month for volume ramp) ->
1. Alchip (Joint CPO)
2. Intel
3. GUC/Wiwynn
-> $AMZN (Alchip)
-> $AMD (CPO from $GFS partnership) possible.

$SIVE is known laser supplier to Ayar, and Ayar removed $MTSI / $LITE from their website recently. Only showing $GFS + $SIVE, likely showing Sivers was primary laser supplier.

As $GFS x $AMD partnered up recently, that makes Siver a possible core laser supplier for $AMD's CPO program if they go with Ayar.

> $SIVE -> Enablence -> O-Net (massive Asian OEM)-> Asian Hyperscalers
1. $AVGO ELS (possible)
2. $META and $GOOGL ELS
3. ByteDance (possible) -> ELS
4. Tencent (possible) -> ELS
5. Alibaba (possible) -> ELS

$SIVE ELS partnership with O-Net/Enablence around OFC.

Sivers lasers is mass produced by foundries like Win Semi... and they're validated in $GFS CPO supply chains too from their recent image presentations.

It's not about what Sivers is forecasting today from qualification revenue that everyone models off of.

Alpha comes from future revenue proportional to demand from every Western/Asian hyperscaler for CPO/1.6T in 2027, 2028, 2029, and onward.

$SIVE looks like one of the most unknown photonic stocks on the market that's yet to come.
以 $900m 市值来看,$SIVE 在 2027-2028 可能最终进入的所有 hyperscalers,数量惊人。

市场不理解即将发生什么。

从 speculative mapping 看:

> $SIVE -> $POET -> $MRVL ->
1. $AMZN(purchase agreement/warrants with photonic fabric from celestial)
2. $MSFT(maia)
3. $GOOGL(最近和 Marvell 有 development talks)

$SIVE 驱动 Poet Starlight/optical interposers,Poet 的 CFO 几天前确认他们在供应 Marvell。

> $SIVE -> $POET -> “NDAs other hyperscaler suppliers”
1. Western Hyperscalers

> $SIVE -> $JBL(1.6T LRO)->
1. $META(Jabil 继承 $INTC SiPH,映射到 Meta LRO program)
2. $NVDA(NVIDIA 可能 OEM optical transceivers)-> $MSFT | AWS | hyperscalers

$SIVE$JBL 1.6T optical transceivers 的已确认 laser source。

> $SIVE -> Ayar(上个月为 volume ramp 融 $500m)->
1. Alchip(Joint CPO)
2. Intel
3. GUC/Wiwynn
-> $AMZN(Alchip)
-> $AMD(来自 $GFS partnership 的 CPO)可能。

$SIVE 是 Ayar 已知的 laser supplier,而 Ayar 最近从官网移除了 $MTSI / $LITE。只显示 $GFS + $SIVE,可能说明 Sivers 是主要 laser supplier。

随着 $GFS x $AMD 最近合作,如果 AMD 走 Ayar 路线,Siver 就可能成为 $AMD CPO program 的核心 laser supplier。

> $SIVE -> Enablence -> O-Net(大型亚洲 OEM)-> Asian Hyperscalers
1. $AVGO ELS(可能)
2. $META$GOOGL ELS
3. ByteDance(可能)-> ELS
4. Tencent(可能)-> ELS
5. Alibaba(可能)-> ELS

$SIVE 和 O-Net/Enablence 在 OFC 附近有 ELS partnership。

Sivers lasers 由 Win Semi 这类 foundries 量产……而且从最近图片演示看,它们也在 $GFS CPO supply chains 里得到验证。

重点不是 Sivers 今天基于 qualification revenue 给出什么预测,大家都按那个建模。

Alpha 来自未来收入,它会和 2027、2028、2029 及之后每个 Western/Asian hyperscaler 对 CPO/1.6T 的需求成比例。

$SIVE 看起来像市场上最不为人知、但即将到来的 photonic stocks 之一。
❤️ 2,157 🔁 258 💬 118
打开原推
📝 原创
CPU "serious supply shortage"

It's still funny to see CPUs become more like memory day-by-day with the price hikes like $SNDK.

"Server CPUs have jumped between 10% and 20% since March" with

$INTC and $AMD planning to further price hikes Q3.

"CPU supply is likely to remain tight through 2026 and 2027" with "server CPU shortages reaching up to six months for Intel and 8-12 weeks for AMD"

$TSM is also increasing capex in response to this shortage.

"The main reason behind the fear is the simultaneous outbreak of CPU and AI ASIC demand; inventory currently includes Intel, AMD mainstream generation CPU, and $NVDA's upcoming Vera CPU, all using 3nm process

Looks like we've come full circle?
CPU “serious supply shortage”

看着 CPUs 因为涨价变得越来越像 $SNDK 这种 memory,还是挺好笑。

“Server CPUs have jumped between 10% and 20% since March”,而且

$INTC$AMD 计划 Q3 进一步涨价。

“CPU supply is likely to remain tight through 2026 and 2027”,其中“server CPU shortages reaching up to six months for Intel and 8-12 weeks for AMD”

$TSM 也在为应对这个短缺提高 capex。

“担忧背后的主要原因是 CPU 和 AI ASIC 需求同时爆发;库存目前包括 Intel、AMD 主流世代 CPU,以及 $NVDA 即将推出的 Vera CPU,全部使用 3nm process”

看起来我们绕了一圈又回来了?
❤️ 1,065 🔁 89 💬 49
打开原推
📝 原创
I think many newcomers will be surprised to learn:

Stocks don’t move in a straight line up as seen with Win (3105) and Shunsin (6451) today.

Win is very compelling over the next 12 months, despite short term volatility. Same with Shunsin as Foxconn’s photonics packaging/test arm.

Probably going to be War volatility, with Iran seizing two ships…

But I expect CPO related names to heavily outperform any macro climate and lead to more ATHs.
我觉得很多新来的人会惊讶地发现:

股票不会直线往上走,就像今天的 Win (3105) 和 Shunsin (6451)。

尽管短期波动,Win 未来 12 个月非常有吸引力。Shunsin 作为 Foxconn 的 photonics packaging/test arm 也一样。

可能会有战争波动,因为 Iran 扣押了两艘船……

但我预计 CPO 相关名字会在任何宏观环境下大幅跑赢,并继续创更多 ATH。
❤️ 638 🔁 32 💬 49
打开原推
💬 引用
There's a reason I spotlight EU small caps.

This my investment thesis that I haven't publicly stated yet.

And I hope people spend the time to read:

From $ALRIB (quantum/MBE), $LPK (glass substrate), or $SIVE (DFB Lasers). Or even Asian names like Nippon Chemical.

It's to prevent hostile actors from taking over or disrupting critical chokepoints required by America.

FiconTEC (Europe) as one example (though private) was acquired by Chinese CCP affiliated companies.

Not even sure how this was legal and Germany should 100% seize it back from China.

They were a quasi-monopoly over testing for CPO/SiPH needed for AI and LIDAR. It's clients include the most critical players in AI and semiconductors, such as $NVDA, $TSM, $AVGO, and $INTC.

Over time, significant intellectual property and technological IP transfer to China is highly likely after these acquisitions and they'll have more control over US supply chains.

With enough American ownership enough spotlight on these companies: we would be in a worse shape with hidden CCP ownership/takeovers.

Or we would have more backdoors on American supply chains like with $AXTI and InP substrates (if we weren't building up independent capacity now).

The EU has allowed upstream supply chain chokepoints (like specialized testing or substrate manufacturing) to be bought out or have their IP transferred by geopolitical rivals.

While America still not might realize a lot of these vulnerabilities.

This is the most I can do as a retail investor to prevent this from happening.

Eventually policymakers will pay attention and prevent this from happening if all the movement happens from grassroots (retail) and bottom up.
我重点提 EU small caps 是有原因的。

这是我还没公开说过的投资 thesis。

我希望大家花时间读:

$ALRIB(quantum/MBE)、$LPK(glass substrate)到 $SIVE(DFB Lasers)。甚至亚洲名字,比如 Nippon Chemical。

这是为了防止敌对行为者接管或扰乱美国所需的关键 chokepoints。

FiconTEC(欧洲)是一个例子(虽然是私有公司),被中国 CCP 相关公司收购。

我甚至不确定这怎么合法,德国 100% 应该从中国手里把它收回来。

它们在 AI 和 LIDAR 所需的 CPO/SiPH 测试上是 quasi-monopoly。客户包括 AI 和半导体中最关键的玩家,比如 $NVDA$TSM$AVGO$INTC

这些收购后,重要知识产权和技术 IP 很可能随着时间转移到中国,他们会对美国供应链有更多控制。

如果有足够美国所有权、足够聚光灯照到这些公司:我们会比隐藏的 CCP ownership/takeovers 状况更好。

否则美国供应链会有更多后门,就像 $AXTI 和 InP substrates 一样(如果我们现在没有建设独立产能)。

欧盟允许上游供应链 chokepoints(比如 specialized testing 或 substrate manufacturing)被地缘政治对手买走,或转移 IP。

而美国可能还没有意识到很多这些漏洞。

这是我作为散户投资者能做的最多事情,来阻止这种事发生。

最终,如果所有运动都从 grassroots(retail)和 bottom up 发生,政策制定者会注意并阻止这类事情。
引用原推@liquid_gary
@aleabitoreddit American capital still has to capture all the EU small-middle caps, then …
@aleabitoreddit 美国资本还得把所有 EU 中小盘都拿下,然后 …
https://x.com/liquid_gary/status/2047087878291759574
❤️ 1,109 🔁 72 💬 65
打开原推
💬 引用
Just a shower thought... it’s extremely patriotic and positive sum to be investing in American National Security and supply chains like $AMSC or $NVTS.

For the longest time hedge funds shorted domestic American sectors like energy + Solar to the point of bankruptcy...

By betting with China on their state subsidies.

and many years later, as a result: we have little excess energy capacity needed for AI compared to China.

By investing alongside the White House and $NVDA to securing US supply chains with up and coming American companies…

Stocka goes brrr? US companies go brrr? And America goes brrr?

(Disclosure: I’m American, and heavily biased toward US)
只是洗澡时想到……投资美国 National Security 和供应链,比如 $AMSC$NVTS,其实非常爱国,也很正和。

很长时间里,hedge funds 做空美国本土行业,比如 energy + Solar,直到它们接近破产……

他们是在押注中国的国家补贴。

多年后,结果就是:和中国相比,我们缺少 AI 所需的额外能源产能。

如果和 White House、$NVDA 一起投资,用新兴美国公司来保护美国供应链……

Stocka goes brrr?美国公司 go brrr?America goes brrr?

(Disclosure:我是美国人,而且严重偏向美国)
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Yes. The President invoked the "Defense Production Act" 2 days ago.

To expand on domestic infra.

Implicit beneficiaries were:

Transmission & Advanced Conductors:
$AMSC - HTS Wires (advanced conductors), power electronics
$PLPC - advanced conductors
$ATKR - transmission components
$VMI - grid components

Power Electronics
$AEIS - power control electronics
$VICR - power delivery

Capacitor Banks
$VSH - power capacitors and capacitor banks

Substations & High-Voltage Circuit Breakers
$POWL - substations/switchgear
$AZZ - substations

Transformers
$HPS.A - My favorite for transformers
$SPXC - power transformers

Electrical Core Steel
$CLF - Only producer of electrical steel in America?

This included:
-Transformers
- transmission components
- advanced conductors
- power electronics
- substations
- high-voltage circuit breakers
- protective relays, capacitor banks
- electrical core steel

TLDR: The executive action declared a national energy emergency regarding the domestic supply chain for grid infrastructure. Authorized federal funding, purchase commitments, and expedited actions to rapidly expand the manufacturing.

Lot of beneficiaries, I made a mini ETF of with $AMSC, $CLF, $PLPC, and then $HPS.A; dont have any of the others.

There's probably going to be a bunch of DOE contracts in the next 3-6 months like " DoE Awards ___ to $POWL " off this act is my guess.
是的。总统 2 天前动用了 "Defense Production Act"。

用于扩张国内基础设施。

隐含受益方包括:

输电与先进导体:
$AMSC - HTS Wires(先进导体)、电力电子
$PLPC - 先进导体
$ATKR - 输电组件
$VMI - 电网组件

电力电子
$AEIS - 电力控制电子
$VICR - 电力传输

电容器组
$VSH - 电力电容和电容器组

变电站与高压断路器
$POWL - 变电站/开关设备
$AZZ - 变电站

变压器
$HPS.A - 我最喜欢的变压器标的
$SPXC - 电力变压器

电工钢
$CLF - 美国唯一的电工钢生产商?

这包括:
-变压器
- 输电组件
- 先进导体
- 电力电子
- 变电站
- 高压断路器
- 保护继电器、电容器组
- 电工钢

TLDR:这项行政行动宣布,国内电网基础设施供应链进入国家能源紧急状态。授权联邦资金、采购承诺和加速行动,以快速扩大制造能力。

受益方很多,我做了一个迷你 ETF,里面有 $AMSC$CLF$PLPC,然后是 $HPS.A;其他的我没有。

我猜接下来 3-6 个月可能会有一堆 DOE 合同,类似 "DoE Awards ___ to $POWL",都是基于这项法案来的。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2047030798554132901
❤️ 1,263 🔁 74 💬 98
打开原推
💬 引用
Bruh it’s only been one day with $ARM.

How does a $200B+ company go up 12% https://t.co/4BNSjjk88c
Bruh,$ARM 才一天。

一家 $200B+ 公司怎么能涨 12% https://t.co/4BNSjjk88c
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Bullish on $ARM, given the new bottleneck shifting back to CPUs. MS shows stuff like Orchestration/RAG requiring CPUs.

But I'm predicting parts of localized inference to be handled by CPUs more and more... as models like Gemma get lightweight in the future.

Not every robot needs to be able to solve the mysteries of the universe.

Data centers will need an astronomical amount of traditional CPU compute (AWS Graviton, $GOOGL Axion, and $MSFT Cobalt), which are all ARM based.

$META + OpenAI are also buyers of the AGI CPU.

And AI will flow down to edge.

$15B annual revenue target.. Starting to look reasonable?
看多 $ARM,因为新的瓶颈正在重新转向 CPU。MS 展示了 Orchestration/RAG 等东西需要 CPU。

但我预测,随着未来 Gemma 这类模型变得更轻量,本地推理的一部分会越来越多由 CPU 处理……

不是每个机器人都需要能解开宇宙奥秘。

数据中心会需要天量的传统 CPU 算力(AWS Graviton、$GOOGL Axion 和 $MSFT Cobalt),这些都是 ARM based。

$META + OpenAI 也是 AGI CPU 的买家。

而 AI 会向边缘侧下沉。

$15B 年收入目标……开始看起来合理了?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046419572203683922
❤️ 1,253 🔁 49 💬 96
打开原推
💬 引用
Yes. The President invoked the "Defense Production Act" 2 days ago.

To expand on domestic infra.

Implicit beneficiaries were:

Transmission & Advanced Conductors:
$AMSC - HTS Wires (advanced conductors), power electronics
$PLPC - advanced conductors
$ATKR - transmission components
$VMI - grid components

Power Electronics
$AEIS - power control electronics
$VICR - power delivery

Capacitor Banks
$VSH - power capacitors and capacitor banks

Substations & High-Voltage Circuit Breakers
$POWL - substations/switchgear
$AZZ - substations

Transformers
$HPS.A - My favorite for transformers
$SPXC - power transformers

Electrical Core Steel
$CLF - Only producer of electrical steel in America?

This included:
-Transformers
- transmission components
- advanced conductors
- power electronics
- substations
- high-voltage circuit breakers
- protective relays, capacitor banks
- electrical core steel

TLDR: The executive action declared a national energy emergency regarding the domestic supply chain for grid infrastructure. Authorized federal funding, purchase commitments, and expedited actions to rapidly expand the manufacturing.

Lot of beneficiaries, I made a mini ETF of with $AMSC, $CLF, $PLPC, and then $HPS.A; dont have any of the others.

There's probably going to be a bunch of DOE contracts in the next 3-6 months like " DoE Awards ___ to $POWL " off this act is my guess.
是的。总统 2 天前援引了“Defense Production Act”。

用于扩大国内基础设施。

隐含受益者是:

Transmission & Advanced Conductors:
$AMSC - HTS Wires(advanced conductors)、power electronics
$PLPC - advanced conductors
$ATKR - transmission components
$VMI - grid components

Power Electronics
$AEIS - power control electronics
$VICR - power delivery

Capacitor Banks
$VSH - power capacitors and capacitor banks

Substations & High-Voltage Circuit Breakers
$POWL - substations/switchgear
$AZZ - substations

Transformers
$HPS.A - 我最喜欢的 transformers
$SPXC - power transformers

Electrical Core Steel
$CLF - 美国唯一 electrical steel 生产商?

这包括:
-Transformers
- transmission components
- advanced conductors
- power electronics
- substations
- high-voltage circuit breakers
- protective relays, capacitor banks
- electrical core steel

TLDR:这项行政行动宣布国内 grid infrastructure 供应链存在国家能源紧急状态。授权联邦资金、采购承诺和快速行动来迅速扩大制造。

受益者很多,我做了一个 mini ETF,包含 $AMSC$CLF$PLPC,然后 $HPS.A;其他我没有持有。

我猜未来 3-6 个月可能会有一堆 DOE 合同,比如 “DoE Awards ___ to $POWL”,源自这个法案。
引用原推@rumoriginal
@aleabitoreddit Did you look into superconductor companies like $asmc yet?
@aleabitoreddit 你研究过像 $asmc 这样的 superconductor 公司了吗?
https://x.com/rumoriginal/status/2047020033797243182
❤️ 1,654 🔁 210 💬 88
打开原推
📝 原创
$NVDA actively pushing to 800V, and today was a pretty big signal.

"On April 22, 2026, NVIDIA has initiated discussions with major South Korean power equipment companies to explore designing DC infra based on an approximately 800V direct current (DC) system"

Previous named Nvidia partners include: Infineon, $TXN, $STM, $NVTS, Delta, Flex, $ETN, Schneider, and $VRT.

It's been known they're been pushing for this but... looks like Nvidia is really driving it.

Personally very small exposure to $NVTS since they're they have a high exposure for SiC/GaN ICs for 800V DCs.

I know others really liked $VICR for exposure.
$NVDA 正在积极推动到 800V,今天是一个相当大的信号。

“On April 22, 2026, NVIDIA has initiated discussions with major South Korean power equipment companies to explore designing DC infra based on an approximately 800V direct current (DC) system”

此前被点名的 Nvidia partners 包括:Infineon、$TXN$STM$NVTS、Delta、Flex、$ETN、Schneider 和 $VRT

大家一直知道他们在推动这个,但……看起来 Nvidia 真的在驱动它。

我个人对 $NVTS 有很小敞口,因为它们对 800V DC 的 SiC/GaN ICs 有高敞口。

我知道其他人非常喜欢 $VICR 作为敞口。
❤️ 863 🔁 65 💬 91
打开原推
💬 引用
Oh wow, I missed this.

That's probably why $POET is up 20.2% pre-market confirming "far in excess" of purchase orders on top of $MRVL supplier relationships.

That translates materially to $SIVE laser production as well.

Markets haven't fully priced in either yet imo.
哦哇,我漏掉这个了。

这大概就是为什么 $POET 盘前涨 20.2%,确认采购订单“far in excess”,叠加 $MRVL 供应商关系。

这也会实质转化为 $SIVE laser production。

我认为市场还没有完全把两者定价进去。
引用原推@satoritrade
@aleabitoreddit $POET CFO also said that he's expecting purchase orders "far in excess" of the $5 million order they received last Oct.

If these orders come through, revenues could ramp meaningfully in the coming quarters https://t.co/jKUN350TIm
@aleabitoreddit $POET CFO 也说,他预计采购订单会“远超”他们去年 10 月收到的 $5 million 订单。

如果这些订单落地,接下来几个季度收入可能会明显 ramp https://t.co/jKUN350TIm
https://x.com/satoritrade/status/2046917319553896952
❤️ 822 🔁 75 💬 68
打开原推
💬 引用
Bro everyone was doubting me on names like $IQE.

Yet how come… all these institutions from UBS or Point72 buy in after my thesis posts?

Not sure if Swedish media bearposting $SIVE realized who found $AXTI?

I’m very confident institutions will likely follow-in soon given Sivers lasers power $MRVl, $JBL, Ayar, and others…

with links to $GOOGL, $MSFT, $AMZN and other hyperscalers.
Bro,大家之前都在怀疑我对 $IQE 这类名字的判断。

但为什么……UBS 或 Point72 这些机构都在我 thesis 帖之后买进去?

不确定瑞典媒体 bearposting $SIVE 时,有没有意识到是谁发现了 $AXTI

我非常有信心,机构很可能很快会跟进,因为 Sivers lasers 驱动 $MRVl$JBL、Ayar 等……

并且和 $GOOGL$MSFT$AMZN 以及其他 hyperscalers 有连接。
引用原推@ashmyro
@aleabitoreddit Another institutional buyer joined the IQE party! @aleabitoreddit https://t.co/TYu5W4yzFo
@aleabitoreddit 又有一个机构买家加入 IQE 派对了!@aleabitoreddit https://t.co/TYu5W4yzFo
https://x.com/ashmyro/status/2046896068881719552
❤️ 709 🔁 40 💬 55
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
My neighbors just keep going at it every day with a lot of noise. It's super annoying.

That aside, got curious on the PGME / PGMEA shortages.

- Toagosei (4045) - PGMEA
- Shiny Chemical (TW 1773) - high purity PGME and PGMEA
- Daxin (TW 5234) - Thinner, BARC, SOH
San Fu (TW 4755) - PGMEA and photoresist thinners

For US $Dow, explicitly named supplier to Toagosei.

And Chemtronics in Korea: "have already built PGMEA mass-production systems and are directly supplying the material to Japanese material companies and Samsung Electronics." But thats not available for most.

Don't own any of these. Just if others found this bottleneck compelling.
我的邻居每天都在制造很多噪音,真的超级烦。

除此之外,我对 PGME / PGMEA 短缺有点好奇。

- Toagosei (4045) - PGMEA
- Shiny Chemical (TW 1773) - high purity PGME and PGMEA
- Daxin (TW 5234) - Thinner, BARC, SOH
San Fu (TW 4755) - PGMEA and photoresist thinners

美国 $Dow 被明确点名为 Toagosei 供应商。

还有韩国 Chemtronics:“have already built PGMEA mass-production systems and are directly supplying the material to Japanese material companies and Samsung Electronics.” 但大多数人买不到。

这些我都没持有。只是如果其他人觉得这个 bottleneck 有吸引力。
❤️ 349 🔁 12 💬 56
打开原推
💬 引用
Europe seems to be having a fun time from AI.

$LPK +20.69% - (glass core substrates) +20.69%
$IQE - 12.22% - (InP epiwafers)
$SOI +11.02% - (silicon photonics substrates)
$ALRIB +5.8% - (MBE / Quantum)

Then there’s $SIVE down -4.7% from a local Swedish hit piece, while $POET is up 40%+ after Marvell supplier confirmation.

But I’m very bullish on $SIVE since markets haven’t pieced together the connection to $POET and $MRVL yet.

Regardless, Europe has something to be happy about from being important to American hyperscalers.
欧洲似乎因为 AI 玩得挺开心。

$LPK +20.69% -(glass core substrates)+20.69%
$IQE - 12.22% -(InP epiwafers)
$SOI +11.02% -(silicon photonics substrates)
$ALRIB +5.8% -(MBE / Quantum)

然后 $SIVE 因为本地瑞典攻击文章跌 -4.7%,而 $POET 在 Marvell supplier confirmation 后涨 40%+。

但我非常 bullish $SIVE,因为市场还没把它和 $POET$MRVL 的连接拼起来。

不管怎样,欧洲终于有东西可以因为对美国 hyperscalers 很重要而开心了。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I guess markets like glass core substrate exposure like $LPK?

It is pretty rare to find these types of companies that hold positions that resemble $SOI.

Like a Shiny Zigzagoon… finding these chokepoints. https://t.co/pjsjxgDhTa
我猜市场喜欢 $LPK 这种 glass core substrate 暴露?

要找到这类持有类似 $SOI 位置的公司相当少见。

像一只 Shiny Zigzagoon... 在找这些 chokepoints。https://t.co/pjsjxgDhTa
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046620208387981538
❤️ 917 🔁 64 💬 71
打开原推
💬 引用
Uhh… did listen anon with $IQE?

Just ridiculous performance in European semi land… and they all happen to be my picks. https://t.co/hoA4W0un3i
呃……$IQE 你听了吗 anon?

欧洲 semi land 的表现太离谱了……而且它们刚好都是我的 picks。 https://t.co/hoA4W0un3i
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Not exactly! I'm just a tad more familiar with photonic supply chains than I am with energy so I like picking potential winners.

Just wanted to introduce $IQE into the equation like i did with $AXTI, so I could do a "Did you Listen Anon?" post 3 months later if it turns out well.
不完全是!我只是比起能源,对光子供应链稍微更熟一点,所以喜欢在这里挑潜在赢家。

只是想像之前提 $AXTI 一样,把 $IQE 也放进讨论里,这样如果结果不错,3 个月后我就能发一条“你当时听了吗,Anon?”的帖子。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026647347237966298
❤️ 616 🔁 25 💬 54
打开原推
📝 原创
Woah... $POET is up 20.5% premarket today after a 19.32% gain.

Mainly after the CFO's interview confirming they're the direct supplier to $MRVL.

I wonder if markets know who the upstream laser supplier is yet? (hint: $SIVE). https://t.co/flfx9NVkxk
哇……$POET 今天盘前涨 20.5%,此前已经涨了 19.32%。

主要是在 CFO 采访确认它们是 $MRVL 的直接供应商之后。

我想知道市场现在知道上游 laser supplier 是谁了吗?(提示:$SIVE)。 https://t.co/flfx9NVkxk
❤️ 1,362 🔁 90 💬 81
打开原推
📝 原创
I’m genuinely impressed one of you copy traded your way into managing a hedge fund.

But please don’t blindly copy stuff I talk about like $AXTI or $LPK.

That’s the main reason I haven’t done copy-trading apps or tell people when I sell.

I just want to publish interesting thoughts / research for free as I go along my journey.

With the goal of helping you all synthesize complex information to build your own thesis/conviction.

Happy to help share my thoughts for free though.
你们有人 copy trade 到最后去管理 hedge fund,我真挺佩服。

但请不要盲目 copy 我聊到的东西,比如 $AXTI$LPK

这就是我没做 copy-trading apps,也不告诉别人我什么时候卖的主要原因。

我只是想在自己的旅程里,免费发布有意思的想法/研究。

目标是帮助你们综合复杂信息,建立自己的 thesis/conviction。

不过我很乐意免费分享我的想法。
❤️ 1,513 🔁 29 💬 84
打开原推
💬 引用
Woah... Sivers looks like the primary laser supplier to $AMD's CPO program if AMD goes the Ayar route at $GFS.

The interesting thing is: $LITE and $MTSI were silently removed from Ayar's website sequentially over time.

(Special thanks to one of my followers Setian for the DM.)

So $SIVE likely became the primary laser supplier for Ayar first-gen... and by extension for all of Ayar's customers routing through Alchip or other ASIC design firms.

Ayar also raised $500M last month for VOLUME PRODUCTION, where $SIVE is designed in.

This find looks structurally massive for $SIVE as it undercuts narratives about $LITE and others being primary suppliers.

And especially about $SIVE having only a small % laser share for CPO if they're likely to be the primary laser supplier.
哇……如果 AMD 在 $GFS 走 Ayar 路线,Sivers 看起来就是 $AMD CPO program 的主要 laser supplier。

有意思的是:$LITE$MTSI 随着时间被悄悄从 Ayar 官网依次移除。

(特别感谢我的一个粉丝 Setian 发 DM。)

所以 $SIVE 很可能先成为 Ayar first-gen 的主要 laser supplier……并且延伸到所有通过 Alchip 或其他 ASIC design firms 走的 Ayar 客户。

Ayar 上个月也为 VOLUME PRODUCTION 融了 $500M,而 $SIVE 已经 design in。

这个发现对 $SIVE 看起来结构性巨大,因为它削弱了 $LITE 和其他公司是主要供应商的叙事。

尤其是如果 $SIVE 很可能是主要 laser supplier,那关于它只占 CPO 很小 % laser share 的说法也被削弱。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The $AMD and $GFS CPO announcement is probably bigger than markets expect for $SIVE.

With the news, it's likely $SIVE lasers power $AMD's CPO program.

Either through two potential paths:

1. Enosemi (AMD's in-house PIC design post-acquisition). Enosemi's chiplets are fabbed at GF but for the ELS, $AMD could source it from multiple players with $SIVE as the underlying multi-source laser source.

2. Ayar ( $AMD invested in March 2026, Series E). Ayar's SuperNova light source already uses $SIVE DFB laser arrays alongside $LITE.

Ayar's SuperNova is the most likely first-gen CPO path for MI500 in 2027 given timelines and the enormous fundraise last month. That path already has $SIVE designed in alongside $LITE and they both appear with $GFS's slide.

Enosemi becomes more relevant for 2028+ generations?

Regardless, $AMD through Enosemi/Ayar needs lasers for their 2027 MI500 rollout...

It seems likely Sivers ends up powering $AMD's CPO program as the light source since they're designed into Ayar.

The $AMD / $GFS materiality looks large for Sivers.
$AMD$GFS 的 CPO 公告,对 $SIVE 来说可能比市场预期更重要。

有了这条新闻,$SIVE lasers 很可能会驱动 $AMD 的 CPO 项目。

可能通过两条潜在路径:

1. Enosemi(AMD 收购后的内部 PIC design)。Enosemi 的 chiplets 在 GF 代工,但 ELS 方面,$AMD 可以从多个玩家采购,$SIVE 作为底层 multi-source laser source。

2. Ayar($AMD 在 2026 年 3 月 Series E 投资)。Ayar 的 SuperNova light source 已经和 $LITE 一起使用 $SIVE DFB laser arrays。

考虑到时间线和上个月巨额融资,Ayar 的 SuperNova 最可能是 2027 年 MI500 的第一代 CPO 路径。这条路径已经把 $SIVE$LITE 一起设计进去了,而且它们都出现在 $GFS 的 slide 里。

Enosemi 会在 2028+ 代产品里更相关?

不管怎样,$AMD 通过 Enosemi/Ayar 都需要 lasers 来支持 2027 年 MI500 推出...

既然 Sivers 已经设计进 Ayar,它最终作为 light source 驱动 $AMD 的 CPO 项目,看起来很可能。

$AMD / $GFS 对 Sivers 的重要性看起来很大。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046494023297429645
❤️ 1,168 🔁 92 💬 96
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
There’s always going to be new opportunities in the markets.

like scale across with $MXL tam expansion.

I’ll keep pointing them out for fun but I’m not long on many ideas unless it’s super super compelling like cpo.

But I’m personally happy chilling in existing longs I’ve mentioned recently, like win, Shunsin, sivers, IQE, and those types.

Sometimes it’s better to just let them play out if they’re early in the cycle, or a bit further in like Nebius, or even $EWY for memory or $COHR for photonics.

Then constantly hopping ship to ship to catch a completely new wave like glass core substrates and such.

Helps remove a lot of the fomo since a lot of times winners keep on winning when a thesis is validated.
市场里永远会有新机会。

比如 $MXL TAM expansion 这种横向扩张。

我会继续为了好玩把它们点出来,但除非像 cpo 这样超级超级有吸引力,我不会做多很多想法。

我个人很开心待在最近提过的现有 longs 里,比如 win、Shunsin、sivers、IQE 这些。

有时候,如果它们处在周期早期,或者像 Nebius 这种稍微更往后,甚至 $EWY 的 memory、$COHR 的 photonics,最好就是让它们自己兑现。

而不是不断从一艘船跳到另一艘船,去抓 glass core substrates 之类全新的浪。

这能减少很多 fomo,因为很多时候,当 thesis 被验证后,赢家会继续赢。
❤️ 707 🔁 10 💬 67
打开原推
💬 引用
I don’t own $CAR but this is gotta be the funniest stock I’ve seen in the markets this year next to $BIRD?

Institutions short squeezing other institutions in an infinite loop…

Could technically go on forever if they found a way to coordinate (which is not legal).

But most likely they start taking profits eventually at record profit, which is why I haven’t taken positions.
我不持有 $CAR,但这大概是我今年在市场里见过仅次于 $BIRD 的最搞笑股票?

机构在无限循环里 short squeezing 其他机构……

理论上如果他们找到协调方式,可以永远持续(当然这不合法)。

但最可能的是,他们最终会在创纪录利润时开始获利了结,这也是我没建仓的原因。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I didn't know there was a brand new bottleneck in rental cars?

$CAR up 509% in 1M.

Apparently, this is a short squeeze done by institutions.

> SRS / Pentwater locked up over 100%+ of the supply.

> 54% of the stock was sold short.

> Then Pentwater executed a massive block of call options, forcing share delivery, which was nonexistent.

I have no positions, but it’s fun to watch institutions fight it out.

Infinite money glitch?
我都不知道 rental cars 里出现了一个全新的瓶颈?

$CAR 1 个月涨了 509%。

显然,这是机构做出来的 short squeeze。

> SRS / Pentwater 锁住了超过 100%+ 的供给。

> 54% 的股票被卖空。

> 然后 Pentwater 执行了一大笔 call options,迫使交付股票,而股票根本不存在。

我没有仓位,但看机构互殴挺有意思。

无限金钱漏洞?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046396643009040624
❤️ 606 🔁 29 💬 74
打开原推
💬 引用
I guess markets like glass core substrate exposure like $LPK?

It is pretty rare to find these types of companies that hold positions that resemble $SOI.

Like a Shiny Zigzagoon… finding these chokepoints. https://t.co/pjsjxgDhTa
我猜市场喜欢 $LPK 这种 glass core substrate 敞口?

能找到这种持有类似 $SOI 地位的公司,真的很少见。

像 Shiny Zigzagoon……找到这些 chokepoints。 https://t.co/pjsjxgDhTa
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
People nonstop ask me about $LPKK / $LPK for my opinion

Yes, I mentioned they're like a chokepoint for glass core substrates for LIDE (laser induced deep etching) way back when.

Biggest known partner is $ONTO (LIDE with Onto metrology for glass core mass production).

Then as for market share: "more than 80% of customers among major global players have selected LPKF equipment" for process validation.

So that probably includes:
- Samsung Electronics/Electro-Mechanics
- $INTC (Receives a Major Order from a Leading Chip Manufacturer... installed a first LIDE system at the beginning of 2020... now ordered further LIDE systems to start volume production)
- SKC (Absolics)
- $GLW, AGC, Schott.
- Nippon electric glass.

Of course this is evaluation, so that 80% could be lower in actual ramp.

As for some personal FWD P/E calculations:

- 2027: ~11-12.5x and ~7.8x for 2028, which looks very compelling.
- Total Cash: ~€10.0M, debt was around ~€3.0M. debt to equity: ~3.8%

So very clean-asset light balance sheet, no dilution overhang like $SHMD.

~$362m MC, conclusion: great upside long imo, hard to see institutions not buying this name down the road.

Even if the 80% of players managed to design another way, even a fraction would probably be very material to the MC.

It was probably a bit early few months ago, but glass core roadmaps have been speeding up like CPO.

Disclosure: I do have positions. This are just my thoughts.

People on X did their homework.
一直有人问我对 $LPKK / $LPK 的看法。

是的,我很早就提过它们像是 glass core substrates 的 LIDE(laser induced deep etching)瓶颈。

已知最大合作伙伴是 $ONTO(LIDE 搭配 Onto metrology,用于 glass core 量产)。

然后关于市场份额:“主要全球玩家中超过 80% 的客户选择了 LPKF 设备”用于工艺验证。

所以这可能包括:
- Samsung Electronics/Electro-Mechanics
- $INTC(从领先芯片制造商获得重大订单……2020 年初安装第一套 LIDE 系统……现在订购更多 LIDE 系统以启动量产)
- SKC(Absolics)
- $GLW、AGC、Schott。
- Nippon electric glass。

当然这只是 evaluation,所以 80% 到实际 ramp 时可能会低一些。

至于我个人的 FWD P/E 计算:

- 2027:约 11-12.5x,2028 约 7.8x,看起来非常有吸引力。
- 总现金:约 €10.0M,债务约 €3.0M。debt to equity:约 3.8%

所以资产负债表很干净、轻资产,没有 $SHMD 那种稀释悬念。

约 $362m 市值,结论:IMO 是上行很好的多头,很难想象机构以后不会买这个名字。

即使那 80% 玩家里有人成功设计出其他方案,哪怕一部分转化,对这个市值也可能非常实质。

几个月前可能有点早,但 glass core 路线图已经像 CPO 一样在加速。

披露:我有仓位。这只是我的想法。

X 上的人做了功课。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046449839626670369
❤️ 676 🔁 59 💬 76
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm genuinely laughing. This is gotta be the funniest headline I've seen to date since $RPI.

You have non-technical journalists in Sweden, with no understanding of semiconductors/photonics.

Doing an analysis on $SIVE and telling all the locals (who hold majority) to sell, because it's a "meme".

Don't understand hyperscaler qualification cycles from upcoming $JBL 1.6T or $MRVL CPO ramp?

Or the fact they just got validated as the laser supplier in $GFS ecosystem with $AMD driving new CPO demand?

> Must be a meme. It's only possible to value a company based on TTM 2025 balance sheets and old revenue projections right?

At least this volatility helps transfer control over to US investors/institutions before CPO/1.6T inflection point next year.
我真的在笑。这大概是我自 $RPI 以来见过最搞笑的标题。

瑞典有一群非技术记者,不懂 semiconductors/photonics。

然后对 $SIVE 做分析,告诉所有本地人(他们持有多数)卖掉,因为它是“meme”。

不理解即将到来的 $JBL 1.6T 或 $MRVL CPO ramp 的 hyperscaler qualification cycles?

或者不理解它们刚刚作为 $GFS ecosystem 里的 laser supplier 得到验证,而 $AMD 正在驱动新的 CPO demand?

> 那一定是 meme。公司只能基于 TTM 2025 balance sheets 和旧收入预测来估值,对吧?

至少这种波动帮助在明年 CPO/1.6T inflection point 前,把控制权转给美国投资者/机构。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just 1 month ago, journalists and media tried downplaying my $SOI and $RPI thesis.

As “meme stocks that were set to crash” citing my WSB tag without analyzing the underlying thesis.

They’re both up 100% and held their gains.

Same is happening to companies like $SIVE.

I never argue from authority… but since they’re going that route:

I’m curious why… in their narratives they just leave out the fact I published fundamental AI papers in places like Nature with thousands of citations?

Other the fact other analysts on X positive about $SIVE today have Ph.Ds from places like UC Berkeley and publish in the photonics space?

It’s always the English or non-technical graduates that go out in the media and have the strongest opinion about CPO hyperscaler qualification cycles and supply chain mapping.

It just feels like institutions hate it when a retail investors on X know what they’re talking about.

A thesis should live and die based on merit, not the authority of who is comes from.
就在 1 个月前,记者和媒体还试图淡化我的 $SOI$RPI thesis。

引用我的 WSB 标签,说它们是“要崩盘的 meme stocks”,却不分析底层 thesis。

它们现在都涨了 100%,而且守住了涨幅。

同样的事也正在 $SIVE 这类公司上发生。

我从不诉诸权威... 但既然他们要走这条路:

我很好奇,为什么在他们的叙事里,他们完全不提我在 Nature 这类地方发表过基本面 AI 论文,而且有数千引用?

或者不提今天在 X 上看多 $SIVE 的其他分析师,有些是 UC Berkeley 之类学校的 Ph.D,而且在 photonics 领域发论文?

总是那些英语或非技术背景毕业生跑到媒体上,对 CPO hyperscaler qualification cycles 和 supply chain mapping 发表最强烈观点。

感觉机构就是讨厌 X 上的散户投资者真的知道自己在说什么。

一个 thesis 应该基于它自身的质量生死,而不是基于它来自谁的权威。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046333897202692142
❤️ 942 🔁 50 💬 118
打开原推
💬 引用
The $AMD and $GFS CPO announcement is probably bigger than markets expect for $SIVE.

With the news, it's likely $SIVE lasers power $AMD's CPO program.

Either through two potential paths:

1. Enosemi (AMD's in-house PIC design post-acquisition). Enosemi's chiplets are fabbed at GF but for the ELS, $AMD could source it from multiple players with $SIVE as the underlying multi-source laser source.

2. Ayar ( $AMD invested in March 2026, Series E). Ayar's SuperNova light source already uses $SIVE DFB laser arrays alongside $LITE.

Ayar's SuperNova is the most likely first-gen CPO path for MI500 in 2027 given timelines and the enormous fundraise last month. That path already has $SIVE designed in alongside $LITE and they both appear with $GFS's slide.

Enosemi becomes more relevant for 2028+ generations?

Regardless, $AMD through Enosemi/Ayar needs lasers for their 2027 MI500 rollout...

It seems likely Sivers ends up powering $AMD's CPO program as the light source since they're designed into Ayar.

The $AMD / $GFS materiality looks large for Sivers.
$AMD$GFS CPO 公告对 $SIVE 的影响,可能比市场预期更大。

有了这条新闻,$SIVE lasers 很可能驱动 $AMD 的 CPO program。

可能通过两条路径:

1. Enosemi(AMD 收购后的内部 PIC design)。Enosemi chiplets 在 GF fab,但 ELS 上,$AMD 可以从多个玩家采购,而 $SIVE 是底层 multi-source laser source。

2. Ayar($AMD 2026 年 3 月 Series E 投资)。Ayar 的 SuperNova light source 已经和 $LITE 一起使用 $SIVE DFB laser arrays。

从时间线和上个月巨额融资看,Ayar SuperNova 是 2027 年 MI500 first-gen CPO 路径最可能的选择。那条路径已经 design in $SIVE$LITE,它们也都出现在 $GFS slide 上。

Enosemi 对 2028+ 世代更相关?

不管怎样,$AMD 通过 Enosemi/Ayar,需要 lasers 来支持 2027 MI500 rollout……

因为 $SIVE 已经设计进 Ayar,Sivers 很可能最终作为 light source 驱动 $AMD 的 CPO program。

$AMD / $GFS 对 Sivers 的重要性看起来很大。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
What a crazy timeline?

Today, $AMD announced it's pushing into CPO and collaborating with $GFS.

This is highly bullish for $SIVE since for CPO/SiPH, it requires external laser light source.

And... guess who are the two public laser suppliers in the GlobalFoundries CPO ecosystem?

$SIVE (~$935m) and $LITE (~$64 billion)

Sivers lasers feel like they could be everywhere now in upcoming hyperscaler CPO/1.6T deployments.

So... if Sivers secures the spot to provide the laser arrays for the $AMD Instinct MI500's CPO solution in 2027.

(Which seems highly possible given there’s only three laser names listed + hyperscalers like to multi-source)

This might represent massive, high volume production for Sivers that markets haven't pricing in.
这是什么疯狂时间线?

今天,$AMD 宣布推进 CPO,并和 $GFS 合作。

这对 $SIVE 非常利好,因为 CPO/SiPH 需要外部 laser light source。

然后... 猜猜 GlobalFoundries CPO 生态里两个公开 laser suppliers 是谁?

$SIVE(~$935m)和 $LITE(~$64 billion)

现在感觉 Sivers lasers 可能会到处出现在即将到来的 hyperscaler CPO/1.6T 部署里。

所以... 如果 Sivers 拿下 2027 年 $AMD Instinct MI500 的 CPO 方案 laser arrays 供应位置。

(这看起来很可能,因为列出的 laser 名字只有三个 + hyperscalers 喜欢 multi-source)

这可能代表 Sivers 会进入市场尚未定价的大规模 high volume production。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046363533471035793
❤️ 651 🔁 57 💬 42
打开原推
💬 引用
People nonstop ask me about $LPKK / $LPK for my opinion

Yes, I mentioned they're like a chokepoint for glass core substrates for LIDE (laser induced deep etching) way back when.

Biggest known partner is $ONTO (LIDE with Onto metrology for glass core mass production).

Then as for market share: "more than 80% of customers among major global players have selected LPKF equipment" for process validation.

So that probably includes:
- Samsung Electronics/Electro-Mechanics
- $INTC (Receives a Major Order from a Leading Chip Manufacturer... installed a first LIDE system at the beginning of 2020... now ordered further LIDE systems to start volume production)
- SKC (Absolics)
- $GLW, AGC, Schott.
- Nippon electric glass.

Of course this is evaluation, so that 80% could be lower in actual ramp.

As for some personal FWD P/E calculations:

- 2027: ~11-12.5x and ~7.8x for 2028, which looks very compelling.
- Total Cash: ~€10.0M, debt was around ~€3.0M. debt to equity: ~3.8%

So very clean-asset light balance sheet, no dilution overhang like $SHMD.

~$362m MC, conclusion: great upside long imo, hard to see institutions not buying this name down the road.

Even if the 80% of players managed to design another way, even a fraction would probably be very material to the MC.

It was probably a bit early few months ago, but glass core roadmaps have been speeding up like CPO.

Disclosure: I do have positions. This are just my thoughts.

People on X did their homework.
大家不停问我对 $LPKK / $LPK 的看法

是的,我很早之前就提过它们像 LIDE(laser induced deep etching)glass core substrates 的 chokepoint。

最大已知合作伙伴是 $ONTO(LIDE with Onto metrology for glass core mass production)。

至于市场份额:“more than 80% of customers among major global players have selected LPKF equipment” 用于 process validation。

所以这大概包括:
- Samsung Electronics/Electro-Mechanics
- $INTC(Receives a Major Order from a Leading Chip Manufacturer... installed a first LIDE system at the beginning of 2020... now ordered further LIDE systems to start volume production)
- SKC(Absolics)
- $GLW、AGC、Schott。
- Nippon electric glass。

当然这是 evaluation,所以实际 ramp 时那 80% 可能更低。

至于一些个人 FWD P/E 计算:

- 2027:~11-12.5x,2028 约 ~7.8x,看起来非常有吸引力。
- Total Cash:~€10.0M,debt 大约 ~€3.0M。debt to equity:~3.8%

所以是非常干净、asset light 的资产负债表,没有 $SHMD 那种 dilution overhang。

~$362m 市值,结论:imo 是很好的上行多头,很难想象机构以后不买这个名字。

即使那 80% 的玩家设法设计出另一种方式,哪怕一小部分也可能对市值非常实质。

几个月前可能有点早,但 glass core roadmaps 已经像 CPO 一样加速。

Disclosure:我有仓位。这些只是我的想法。

X 上的人确实做功课了。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$WOLF was probably the most interesting one up there after restructuring.

$LPKFF also for glass substrates and they own the laser induced deep etching at a $169m MC, so possibly most explosive 10x upside.

$MTRN is probably the most stable one up there with decently high upside given it owns the mountain for ~65% of the world's Beryllium.

There were a few others but just the fundamentals were either really bad or their bottleneck was too niche.

$LPTH's bottleneck for example spreads across both defense, AI, drones, etc.

$AXTI's bottleneck was so big and AI is such a big sector so it doesn't need to be spread across (but InP is used in a lot of other sectors too).
$WOLF 重组之后,可能是上面最有意思的一个。

$LPKFF 也有玻璃基板,而且他们掌握 laser induced deep etching,市值只有 $169m,所以可能有最爆炸的 10x 上行空间。

$MTRN 可能是里面最稳的一个,上行也还不错,因为它拥有全球约 65% 铍资源的那座矿山。

还有几个别的,但基本面要么真的很差,要么瓶颈太小众。

比如 $LPTH 的瓶颈横跨国防、AI、无人机等等。

$AXTI 的瓶颈非常大,而且 AI 是一个很大的领域,所以不需要分散到很多行业(不过 InP 也用于很多其他行业)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2012961292966117410
❤️ 724 🔁 56 💬 46
打开原推
💬 引用
LOL what did i say about transformer bottlenecks and upstream supply chains like $HPS.A ???

New Presidential Action Today:

"The Nation’s capacity to design, produce, and deploy large-scale grid infrastructure, including TRANSFORMERS ... is dangerously limited"

"National emergency under Executive Order 14156 to expand the domestic capability to develop, manufacture, and deploy grid infrastructure"

It's now a US National Emergency to develop supply chains and pour money into the sector for expansion.
LOL 我之前怎么说 transformer bottlenecks 和 $HPS.A 这种上游供应链的???

今天新的 Presidential Action:

“The Nation’s capacity to design, produce, and deploy large-scale grid infrastructure, including TRANSFORMERS ... is dangerously limited”

“National emergency under Executive Order 14156 to expand the domestic capability to develop, manufacture, and deploy grid infrastructure”

现在发展供应链并向这个板块投入资金扩张,已经是美国 National Emergency。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The current bottleneck: Transformers/Switchgear. 

Trade Idea: Long Hammond (~2.2B CAD / ~$1.5B USD) at 184 CAD.

They dominate the market for:

-Transformers (dry, multi year bottleneck ~23% of market),

-serve to switchgear (2-3Y bottleneck)

-and manufacture liquid too (5Y, larger bottleneck)

I personally anticipate components price hikes like NAND, as $AMZN, $MSFT and others compete for allocation. 

You might have seen: “Half of US data center builds have been delayed or canceled, growth limited by shortages of power infrastructure”…

Then you go further:

“To address shortages… Canada, Mexico… became the biggest suppliers of high-power transformers for AI data centers to AI data centers”

Guess who is in Canada (Guelph).. Mexico (Monterrey 3 and 4)… and the US?

Hammond

Then here’s the reason the articles cite why hyperscaler DB buildouts are falling apart: 

“Major reason behind these setbacks is the availability of key electrical components — such as transformers, switchgear”. 

Institutions are probably looking at Powell, Eaton, and others… but little do they know?

Companies like these actually buy Hammond’s transformers to put inside their own switchgear (“strong sales into data centres, switchgear manufacturers")

Their market share over the transformers market is actually pretty large (eg. ~23% dry). 

The most compelling signal:

-> 122% Y/Y 2025 backlog increase. And we can infer this to be 1B+ CAD. 

Eg. company achieved 898m CAD in sales in 2025, capacity ceiling. Management said close of Q3 2025 orders were valued at 53% of the entire closing third-quarter backlog.

Given that Q4 2025 revenue was 254 million and the backlog is "more than doubled," we can infer a total backlog value exceeding 1 billion CAD.

Also:

“Gross margin compression last year was due to the buildout of their Mexico facility, but both gross margins are expected to increase and the facility expansions are expectied to turn into accelerated revenue Q2 2026)” which is now.

Downside is if raw material costs (copper, electrical steel) spike again, but given this bottleneck, they can price hike. 

Personal FWD P/E estimates would be ~18-21 for 2026, <15 for 2027 from volume ramp.

But I think it’s possible to hit single digit fwd P/E if they do price hikes mixed with hyperscaler emergency orders. But that might get a little mixed with the new acquisition.

Regardless still looks cheap. 

Just a TLDR: 
$AMZN, $MSFT, $META, $GOOGL, $ORCL datacenter are being bottlenecked because of a lack of transformers/switchgear.

Seems like markets missed this little player with large market share, despite backlog visibility and increasing revenue from capacity expansion coming online.

I personally found it pretty compelling, so I went long.

Just sharing my personal thoughts, of course DYOR before making any decisions yourself.
当前瓶颈:Transformers/Switchgear。

交易想法:做多 Hammond(约 2.2B CAD / 约 $1.5B USD),价格 184 CAD。

他们主导这些市场:

- Transformers(dry,多年瓶颈,约 23% 市场份额),

- 服务 switchgear(2-3 年瓶颈)

- 也生产 liquid(5 年,更大的瓶颈)

我个人预计组件会像 NAND 一样涨价,因为 $AMZN$MSFT 等在争抢 allocation。

你可能看过:“一半美国数据中心建设被推迟或取消,增长受电力基础设施短缺限制”……

再往下看:

“为了解决短缺……加拿大、墨西哥……成为 AI 数据中心高功率 transformers 的最大供应地”

猜猜谁在加拿大(Guelph)、墨西哥(Monterrey 3 和 4)以及美国都有布局?

Hammond

然后文章引用 hyperscaler DC buildout 出问题的原因:

“这些挫折背后的主要原因,是关键电气组件的可用性,例如 transformers、switchgear”。

机构可能在看 Powell、Eaton 等……但他们不知道的是?

这些公司实际上会买 Hammond 的 transformers,放进自己的 switchgear(“对数据中心、switchgear manufacturers 的销售强劲”)

他们在 transformers 市场的份额其实很大(例如 dry 约 23%)。

最有说服力的信号:

-> 2025 年 backlog 同比增长 122%。我们可以推断这超过 1B CAD。

例如公司 2025 年实现 898m CAD 销售,已经到产能天花板。管理层说,2025 年 Q3 末订单价值相当于整个三季度期末 backlog 的 53%。

考虑到 Q4 2025 收入是 254 million,而 backlog “more than doubled”,我们可以推断总 backlog 超过 1 billion CAD。

另外:

“去年毛利率承压是因为墨西哥工厂建设,但预计毛利率会提升,工厂扩张也会在 2026 Q2 转化为加速收入”,也就是现在。

下行风险是原材料成本(铜、电工钢)再次上涨,但考虑到这个瓶颈,他们可以涨价。

我个人的 FWD P/E 估算是 2026 年约 18-21,2027 年随着放量低于 15。

但如果他们涨价并叠加 hyperscaler 紧急订单,我认为 forward P/E 有可能到个位数。不过这可能会和新收购有些混在一起。

不管怎样,看起来仍然便宜。

简单 TLDR:

$AMZN$MSFT$META$GOOGL$ORCL 数据中心正因为缺少 transformers/switchgear 被卡住。

尽管有 backlog 可见度和产能扩张上线带来的收入增长,市场似乎漏掉了这个拥有大份额的小玩家。

我个人觉得很有吸引力,所以做多了。

只是分享个人想法,当然你做任何决定前都要 DYOR。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041168871168545115
❤️ 644 🔁 41 💬 54
打开原推
💬 引用
Bullish on $ARM, given the new bottleneck shifting back to CPUs. MS shows stuff like Orchestration/RAG requiring CPUs.

But I'm predicting parts of localized inference to be handled by CPUs more and more... as models like Gemma get lightweight in the future.

Not every robot needs to be able to solve the mysteries of the universe.

Data centers will need an astronomical amount of traditional CPU compute (AWS Graviton, $GOOGL Axion, and $MSFT Cobalt), which are all ARM based.

$META + OpenAI are also buyers of the AGI CPU.

And AI will flow down to edge.

$15B annual revenue target.. Starting to look reasonable?
看多 $ARM,因为新的 bottleneck 又转回 CPUs。MS 展示了 Orchestration/RAG 这类东西需要 CPUs。

但我预测,随着 Gemma 这类模型未来变轻,localized inference 的一部分会越来越多由 CPUs 处理……

不是每个机器人都需要能解开宇宙奥秘。

Data centers 会需要天文级别的传统 CPU compute(AWS Graviton、$GOOGL Axion 和 $MSFT Cobalt),这些全都是 ARM based。

$META + OpenAI 也是 AGI CPU 的买家。

而 AI 会流向 edge。

$15B 年收入目标……开始看起来合理了?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
FYI: I went long on $ARM at $139.

Genuinely a compelling long at $143B MC as markets shift more from training -> inference.

Then $ARM AI CPUs cannibalize the market for inference and $NVDA market share.

Especially as LLMs get more lightweight.

The projections to $25B/revenue (5x revenue) are already insane to justify risk-reward.
FYI:我在 $139 做多了 $ARM

在市场从 training -> inference 转移时,$143B MC 的它真的是一个有吸引力的 long。

然后 $ARM AI CPUs 会蚕食 inference 市场和 $NVDA 市占率。

尤其当 LLMs 变得更轻量。

到 $25B/revenue(5x revenue)的预测,已经足够疯狂,能支撑风险回报。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036746039588434165
❤️ 1,094 🔁 93 💬 83
打开原推
💬 引用
This is what happens when you find a true monopoly.

Did you listen anon?

$SOI up +140% since my thesis 1M ago and +302% YTD.

Just a friendly reminder:

“Soitec’s Photonics-SOI products are deployed in 100% of next-generation AI data centers.” - EVP Soitec https://t.co/7MWx5vrkHo
这就是你找到真正垄断时会发生的事。

你听了吗 anon?

$SOI 自我 1 个月前的 thesis 以来涨 +140%,YTD +302%。

友好提醒一下:

“Soitec’s Photonics-SOI products are deployed in 100% of next-generation AI data centers.” - EVP Soitec https://t.co/7MWx5vrkHo
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 744 🔁 41 💬 55
打开原推
📝 原创
I didn't know there was a brand new bottleneck in rental cars?

$CAR up 509% in 1M.

Apparently, this is a short squeeze done by institutions.

> SRS / Pentwater locked up over 100%+ of the supply.

> 54% of the stock was sold short.

> Then Pentwater executed a massive block of call options, forcing share delivery, which was nonexistent.

I have no positions, but it’s fun to watch institutions fight it out.

Infinite money glitch?
我不知道 rental cars 里还有一个全新的 bottleneck?

$CAR 1 个月涨 509%。

显然,这是机构做出来的 short squeeze。

> SRS / Pentwater 锁定了超过 100%+ 的供应。

> 54% 的股票被卖空。

> 然后 Pentwater 执行了一大笔 call options,迫使交割股票,而股票根本不存在。

我没有仓位,但看机构互打挺有意思。

无限赚钱 glitch?
❤️ 1,146 🔁 75 💬 96
打开原推
📝 原创
How are there people still long on an F-tier Neocloud like $IREN.

Amid a $6,000,000,000 dilution?

When $NBIS is up there with $ORCL and $MSFT looking derisked? https://t.co/vIdzdk4Hqi
怎么还有人在做多 $IREN 这种 F-tier Neocloud。

在 $6,000,000,000 稀释的情况下?

$NBIS 已经和 $ORCL$MSFT 站在一起,看起来风险降低了? https://t.co/vIdzdk4Hqi
❤️ 1,486 🔁 76 💬 159
打开原推
💬 引用
What a crazy timeline?

Today, $AMD announced it's pushing into CPO and collaborating with $GFS.

This is highly bullish for $SIVE since for CPO/SiPH, it requires external laser light source.

And... guess who are the two public laser suppliers in the GlobalFoundries CPO ecosystem?

$SIVE (~$935m) and $LITE (~$64 billion)

Sivers lasers feel like they could be everywhere now in upcoming hyperscaler CPO/1.6T deployments.

So... if Sivers secures the spot to provide the laser arrays for the $AMD Instinct MI500's CPO solution in 2027.

(Which seems highly possible given there’s only three laser names listed + hyperscalers like to multi-source)

This might represent massive, high volume production for Sivers that markets haven't pricing in.
这是什么疯狂时间线?

今天,$AMD 宣布推进 CPO,并和 $GFS 合作。

这对 $SIVE 非常 bullish,因为 CPO/SiPH 需要外部 laser light source。

而……猜猜 GlobalFoundries CPO 生态里的两家公开 laser suppliers 是谁?

$SIVE(~$935m)和 $LITE(~$64 billion)

Sivers lasers 现在感觉可能会出现在未来 hyperscaler CPO/1.6T 部署的各个地方。

所以……如果 Sivers 拿到为 2027 年 $AMD Instinct MI500 的 CPO solution 提供 laser arrays 的位置。

(考虑到只有三个 laser 名字被列出 + hyperscalers 喜欢 multi-source,这看起来很可能)

这可能代表 Sivers 会有市场尚未定价的大规模、高量产。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Did $GFS give the first direct confirmation about $SIVE...

As the laser supplier for their CPO / photonics ecosystem?

This is explicit laser architectural inclusion vs. previous supply chain mapping with Ayar/Celestial.

You get a hint of the other major players here:
- $FN / $ASX for assembly
- $LITE / $SIVE for lasers
- $ATEYY / $KEYS for testing.

There's no text-based news yet, since this was the $GFS March 2026 webinar image-based presentation.

But having a <$1B company on the tiny list of laser providers next to $LITE...

Quite special right?
$GFS 是不是给了第一个关于 $SIVE 的直接确认...

作为他们 CPO / photonics 生态的 laser supplier?

这是明确的 laser architecture inclusion,不同于之前靠 Ayar/Celestial 做 supply chain mapping。

你能在这里看到其他主要玩家的线索:
- $FN / $ASX 负责 assembly
- $LITE / $SIVE 负责 lasers
- $ATEYY / $KEYS 负责 testing。

目前还没有文字新闻,因为这是 $GFS 2026 年 3 月 webinar 的图片型演示。

但一家 <$1B 公司出现在 laser providers 的小名单里,旁边就是 $LITE...

挺特别对吧?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046187732800782587
❤️ 1,121 🔁 111 💬 65
打开原推
📝 原创
Just 1 month ago, journalists and media tried downplaying my $SOI and $RPI thesis.

As “meme stocks that were set to crash” citing my WSB tag without analyzing the underlying thesis.

They’re both up 100% and held their gains.

Same is happening to companies like $SIVE.

I never argue from authority… but since they’re going that route:

I’m curious why… in their narratives they just leave out the fact I published fundamental AI papers in places like Nature with thousands of citations?

Other the fact other analysts on X positive about $SIVE today have Ph.Ds from places like UC Berkeley and publish in the photonics space?

It’s always the English or non-technical graduates that go out in the media and have the strongest opinion about CPO hyperscaler qualification cycles and supply chain mapping.

It just feels like institutions hate it when a retail investors on X know what they’re talking about.

A thesis should live and die based on merit, not the authority of who is comes from.
就在 1 个月前,记者和媒体还试图淡化我的 $SOI$RPI thesis。

把它们说成“注定崩盘的 meme stocks”,引用我的 WSB 标签,却不分析底层 thesis。

它们现在都涨了 100%,并且守住了涨幅。

同样的事情正在 $SIVE 这类公司上发生。

我从不诉诸权威……但既然他们要走这条路:

我很好奇为什么……在他们的叙事里,他们会漏掉我在 Nature 这类地方发表过基础 AI 论文、引用数几千这个事实?

或者今天在 X 上看好 $SIVE 的其他分析师,有 UC Berkeley 这类地方的 Ph.D,并且在 photonics 领域发表论文?

总是那些英语专业或非技术毕业生跑到媒体上,对 CPO hyperscaler qualification cycles 和 supply chain mapping 发表最强烈观点。

感觉机构就是讨厌 X 上的散户投资者真的懂自己在说什么。

一个 thesis 应该按优劣生死,而不是看它来自谁的权威。
❤️ 983 🔁 37 💬 93
打开原推
📝 原创
CPO / 1.6T.

Substrates (Glass Core, InP, SoI).

CPUs / ASICs.

Transformers.
CPO / 1.6T。

Substrates(Glass Core、InP、SoI)。

CPUs / ASICs。

Transformers。
❤️ 796 🔁 36 💬 59
打开原推
📝 原创
Global Foundries photonics/CPO ecosystem list:

1. $GFS - $30.5B
2. $CDNS - $85.9B
3. $SEIGY - $217.2B
4. $SNPS - $84B
5. $KEYS - $57.3B
6. $ATEYY - $130.4B
7. RoboTechnik (ficonTEC) - $11.4B
8. $GLW - $141.2B
9. $LITE - $63.8B
10. $SIVE - $950m
11. $FN - $24.7B
12. $ASX - $63.3B

For publicly traded names.

Equal weighted long on the ecosystem from their presentation might not be a bad idea?

I still find it funny how everything publicly listed is trading in the tens of billions.

Then there's some small Swedish laser company there next to $LITE.
Global Foundries photonics/CPO ecosystem list:

1. $GFS - $30.5B
2. $CDNS - $85.9B
3. $SEIGY - $217.2B
4. $SNPS - $84B
5. $KEYS - $57.3B
6. $ATEYY - $130.4B
7. RoboTechnik (ficonTEC) - $11.4B
8. $GLW - $141.2B
9. $LITE - $63.8B
10. $SIVE - $950m
11. $FN - $24.7B
12. $ASX - $63.3B

这些是公开交易的名字。

按他们 presentation 里的生态做 equal weighted long,可能不是坏主意?

我还是觉得很好笑,公开上市的东西全都几十亿美元市值。

然后有一家瑞典小激光器公司,和 $LITE 挨在一起。
❤️ 1,135 🔁 126 💬 94
打开原推
💬 引用
Can you believe $TTD was once $139 not too long ago?

Think the short-term ChatGPT monetization angle is undervalued given they’re moving to ads.

I do have short term positions at $22 as a potential mean reversion the bottom, but this is not high conviction by any means. https://t.co/7VMfVACrrl
你能相信 $TTD 不久前还曾经是 $139 吗?

考虑到他们正在转向广告,我觉得短期 ChatGPT monetization 角度被低估了。

我在 $22 有短期仓位,作为潜在底部的 mean reversion,但这绝不是高信心。 https://t.co/7VMfVACrrl
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Stuff like $TTD at $22 is compelling, probably 40-50% upside back to low 30's.. Same with $HIMS at $28, I can see mean reversion to $40.

And $RDDT at $163, went long around $140, posted some thesis on the way down to $125, but glad it's recovered a bit.

Could probably chop a bit but I do see it recovering to $200+ in better macro.
$TTD 在 $22 很有吸引力,回到 low 30's 大概有 40-50% upside。$HIMS 在 $28 也一样,我能看到均值回归到 $40。

还有 $RDDT 在 $163,我大概 $140 做多,下跌到 $125 的路上也发过一些 thesis,很高兴它恢复了一点。

可能还会震荡一阵,但在更好的 macro 下,我确实看它能恢复到 $200+。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046005919637733430
❤️ 511 🔁 22 💬 66
打开原推
💬 引用
Told ya. $AEHR is cooking.

Once you reach a certain point with MC it’s mostly institutions driving price.

If you find a name that a ton of hyperscalers use… it’s feels bound to get repriced? https://t.co/AHqpgbqHJK
早跟你说了。$AEHR 正在 cooking。

一旦市值到某个点,价格主要就是机构在推动。

如果你找到一个很多 hyperscalers 都用的名字……感觉它必然会被 repriced? https://t.co/AHqpgbqHJK
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AEHR looks extremely promising at ~$1.1B MC.

Aehr is starting to remind me of an early $TER, mixed with pre-earnings $AAOI.

If we look at the timeline and speculated customers:

Feb 11th: Sonoma production win for Hyperscaler's AI ASIC processors. (likely $GOOGL, $AMZN, $META).

- Probably Google? Aehr bought Incal, who was speculated to be used by Google for their TPUs.

Feb 26th: $14 million from AI lead customer (likely $AMD, $NVDA)

- Probably $AMD here for Instinct MI300/MI400.

March 3rd: Lead silicon photonics customer for one FOX-XP system (likely $INTC siph)

- Very likely $INTC has been their lead customer.

March 31st: Initial order from major new silicon photonics customer (likely $AVGO, $MRVL, $CSCO )

- New customer (rules out Intel), prob one of these transitioning to 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers

(All speculative, very confidential BOM)

Regardless. This timeline is just bottling up for $AEHR.

Could be next earnings. Or two quarters from now.

But feels like a matter of time before we see mass orders.
$AEHR 在约 $1.1B 市值看起来极有前景。

Aehr 开始让我想到早期 $TER,混合财报前的 $AAOI

如果看时间线和推测客户:

2 月 11 日:拿下 Hyperscaler AI ASIC processors 的 Sonoma 量产订单。(很可能是 $GOOGL$AMZN$META)。

- 可能是 Google?Aehr 收购了 Incal,而 Incal 被推测用于 Google 的 TPU。

2 月 26 日:来自 AI lead customer 的 $14 million(很可能是 $AMD$NVDA

- 这里可能是 $AMD,用于 Instinct MI300/MI400。

3 月 3 日:Lead silicon photonics customer 订购一套 FOX-XP 系统(很可能是 $INTC siph)

- 很可能 $INTC 一直是他们的 lead customer。

3 月 31 日:来自重要新 silicon photonics customer 的初始订单(很可能是 $AVGO$MRVL$CSCO

- 新客户(排除 Intel),可能是这些正在转向 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers 的公司之一

(全部是推测,BOM 非常保密)

无论如何,这条时间线正在为 $AEHR 蓄势。

可能是下个财报,也可能是两个季度之后。

但感觉看到大规模订单只是时间问题。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2039388766083944750
❤️ 1,161 🔁 53 💬 93
打开原推
💬 引用
Boring names like $HPS.A end up cooking hardest?

I said this looked like a steady compounder back at $186 and it’s already at $241 in 2 weeks.

I think transformers/switchgear bottlenecks are underappreciated in markets. https://t.co/XkI6kHdExh
$HPS.A 这种无聊名字,最后反而 cook 得最猛?

我在 $186 时说它看起来像稳定 compounder,2 周已经到 $241。

我觉得 transformers/switchgear bottlenecks 在市场里被低估了。 https://t.co/XkI6kHdExh
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The current bottleneck: Transformers/Switchgear. 

Trade Idea: Long Hammond (~2.2B CAD / ~$1.5B USD) at 184 CAD.

They dominate the market for:

-Transformers (dry, multi year bottleneck ~23% of market),

-serve to switchgear (2-3Y bottleneck)

-and manufacture liquid too (5Y, larger bottleneck)

I personally anticipate components price hikes like NAND, as $AMZN, $MSFT and others compete for allocation. 

You might have seen: “Half of US data center builds have been delayed or canceled, growth limited by shortages of power infrastructure”…

Then you go further:

“To address shortages… Canada, Mexico… became the biggest suppliers of high-power transformers for AI data centers to AI data centers”

Guess who is in Canada (Guelph).. Mexico (Monterrey 3 and 4)… and the US?

Hammond

Then here’s the reason the articles cite why hyperscaler DB buildouts are falling apart: 

“Major reason behind these setbacks is the availability of key electrical components — such as transformers, switchgear”. 

Institutions are probably looking at Powell, Eaton, and others… but little do they know?

Companies like these actually buy Hammond’s transformers to put inside their own switchgear (“strong sales into data centres, switchgear manufacturers")

Their market share over the transformers market is actually pretty large (eg. ~23% dry). 

The most compelling signal:

-> 122% Y/Y 2025 backlog increase. And we can infer this to be 1B+ CAD. 

Eg. company achieved 898m CAD in sales in 2025, capacity ceiling. Management said close of Q3 2025 orders were valued at 53% of the entire closing third-quarter backlog.

Given that Q4 2025 revenue was 254 million and the backlog is "more than doubled," we can infer a total backlog value exceeding 1 billion CAD.

Also:

“Gross margin compression last year was due to the buildout of their Mexico facility, but both gross margins are expected to increase and the facility expansions are expectied to turn into accelerated revenue Q2 2026)” which is now.

Downside is if raw material costs (copper, electrical steel) spike again, but given this bottleneck, they can price hike. 

Personal FWD P/E estimates would be ~18-21 for 2026, <15 for 2027 from volume ramp.

But I think it’s possible to hit single digit fwd P/E if they do price hikes mixed with hyperscaler emergency orders. But that might get a little mixed with the new acquisition.

Regardless still looks cheap. 

Just a TLDR: 
$AMZN, $MSFT, $META, $GOOGL, $ORCL datacenter are being bottlenecked because of a lack of transformers/switchgear.

Seems like markets missed this little player with large market share, despite backlog visibility and increasing revenue from capacity expansion coming online.

I personally found it pretty compelling, so I went long.

Just sharing my personal thoughts, of course DYOR before making any decisions yourself.
当前瓶颈:Transformers/Switchgear。

交易想法:做多 Hammond(约 2.2B CAD / 约 $1.5B USD),价格 184 CAD。

他们主导这些市场:

- Transformers(dry,多年瓶颈,约 23% 市场份额),

- 服务 switchgear(2-3 年瓶颈)

- 也生产 liquid(5 年,更大的瓶颈)

我个人预计组件会像 NAND 一样涨价,因为 $AMZN$MSFT 等在争抢 allocation。

你可能看过:“一半美国数据中心建设被推迟或取消,增长受电力基础设施短缺限制”……

再往下看:

“为了解决短缺……加拿大、墨西哥……成为 AI 数据中心高功率 transformers 的最大供应地”

猜猜谁在加拿大(Guelph)、墨西哥(Monterrey 3 和 4)以及美国都有布局?

Hammond

然后文章引用 hyperscaler DC buildout 出问题的原因:

“这些挫折背后的主要原因,是关键电气组件的可用性,例如 transformers、switchgear”。

机构可能在看 Powell、Eaton 等……但他们不知道的是?

这些公司实际上会买 Hammond 的 transformers,放进自己的 switchgear(“对数据中心、switchgear manufacturers 的销售强劲”)

他们在 transformers 市场的份额其实很大(例如 dry 约 23%)。

最有说服力的信号:

-> 2025 年 backlog 同比增长 122%。我们可以推断这超过 1B CAD。

例如公司 2025 年实现 898m CAD 销售,已经到产能天花板。管理层说,2025 年 Q3 末订单价值相当于整个三季度期末 backlog 的 53%。

考虑到 Q4 2025 收入是 254 million,而 backlog “more than doubled”,我们可以推断总 backlog 超过 1 billion CAD。

另外:

“去年毛利率承压是因为墨西哥工厂建设,但预计毛利率会提升,工厂扩张也会在 2026 Q2 转化为加速收入”,也就是现在。

下行风险是原材料成本(铜、电工钢)再次上涨,但考虑到这个瓶颈,他们可以涨价。

我个人的 FWD P/E 估算是 2026 年约 18-21,2027 年随着放量低于 15。

但如果他们涨价并叠加 hyperscaler 紧急订单,我认为 forward P/E 有可能到个位数。不过这可能会和新收购有些混在一起。

不管怎样,看起来仍然便宜。

简单 TLDR:

$AMZN$MSFT$META$GOOGL$ORCL 数据中心正因为缺少 transformers/switchgear 被卡住。

尽管有 backlog 可见度和产能扩张上线带来的收入增长,市场似乎漏掉了这个拥有大份额的小玩家。

我个人觉得很有吸引力,所以做多了。

只是分享个人想法,当然你做任何决定前都要 DYOR。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041168871168545115
❤️ 405 🔁 26 💬 48
打开原推
💬 引用
Looks like $HIMS is finally getting some attention, up +8.64% today.

Peptide arc and acquisitions go brrr?

Caught me by surprise why the SI is still 36% despite improving fundamentals.

I’m very curious to see how this all plays out with the longs vs. shorts. https://t.co/CtpscjKIxl
看起来 $HIMS 终于开始得到一些关注了,今天涨 +8.64%。

Peptide arc 和 acquisitions go brrr?

让我惊讶的是,基本面改善了,SI 还在 36%。

我很好奇 longs vs. shorts 最后会怎么演。 https://t.co/CtpscjKIxl
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
It’s still pretty incredible $HIMS is down 44% even after:

1. $NVO de-risking + partnership
2. Multiple global acquisitions expanding DTC distribution network
3. Peptide arc, with Huberman saying HIMS was set to soar under these conditions
4. Entering a friendlier macro climate.
5. Short interest reaching unsustainable 36%+

The good news is: short interest can only be so much of the float… So it’s inherent buying pressure to cover over time, which does limit downside if fundamentals improves.
即使发生了这些事,$HIMS 还跌了 44%,依然挺不可思议:

1. $NVO 去风险 + 合作
2. 多项全球收购,扩大 DTC distribution network
3. Peptide arc,Huberman 说在这种条件下 HIMS 会起飞
4. 进入更友好的 macro climate。
5. 空头比例达到不可持续的 36%+

好消息是:short interest 最多也只能占流通盘的一定比例... 所以随着时间推移,cover 本身会形成内在买盘压力,如果基本面改善,也会限制下行。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2045196575010587104
❤️ 913 🔁 53 💬 78
打开原推
📝 原创
Did $GFS give the first direct confirmation about $SIVE...

As the laser supplier for their CPO / photonics ecosystem?

This is explicit laser architectural inclusion vs. previous supply chain mapping with Ayar/Celestial.

You get a hint of the other major players here:
- $FN / $ASX for assembly
- $LITE / $SIVE for lasers
- $ATEYY / $KEYS for testing.

There's no text-based news yet, since this was the $GFS March 2026 webinar image-based presentation.

But having a <$1B company on the tiny list of laser providers next to $LITE...

Quite special right?
$GFS 是不是给出了关于 $SIVE 的第一次直接确认……

作为他们 CPO / photonics ecosystem 的 laser supplier?

这是明确的 laser architectural inclusion,而不是之前和 Ayar/Celestial 的 supply chain mapping。

你能看到这里其他主要玩家的线索:
- $FN / $ASX 做 assembly
- $LITE / $SIVE 做 lasers
- $ATEYY / $KEYS 做 testing。

现在还没有文字新闻,因为这是 $GFS 2026 年 3 月 webinar 的图片 presentation。

但一家 <$1B 的公司出现在 laser providers 小名单里,旁边就是 $LITE……

挺特别的,对吧?
❤️ 796 🔁 67 💬 69
打开原推
📝 原创
Digitimes: $GLW leads glass core substrate vs. KCC and LX Glass

"Glass core substrates ... are key to next-generation advanced semiconductor packaging".

On top of its structural importance, the commercialization timeline for glass core packaging seems to be accelerating as well. We're close to H2 and 2027 is probably the inflection point.

I do have positions in the glass core names upstream, but recent news confirms the importance.
Digitimes:$GLW 在 glass core substrate 上领先 KCC 和 LX Glass

“Glass core substrates ... are key to next-generation advanced semiconductor packaging”。

除了结构性重要性外,glass core packaging 的商业化时间线似乎也在加速。我们接近 H2,2027 年大概是拐点。

我在上游 glass core 名字里有仓位,但最近新闻确认了它的重要性。
❤️ 563 🔁 39 💬 43
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Two random stocks taking a look into...

Skytech (6937) - $722m, CMIt (7853 TWSE?)

Skytech - PvD/wafer bonders
CMIt - optical metrology

Both machine suppliers to ASE's CoPos, that started volume ramp? Think 2025, CMIt tried breaking $KLAC monopoly and was just test samples.. but looks like it started to ramp up?

Not familiar with either of them.

But thought I'd just mention some of these names I randomly look into throughout the day.

I go through tens of these, don't take positions most of the time.
随便看两个随机股票……

Skytech (6937) - $722m,CMIt (7853 TWSE?)

Skytech - PvD/wafer bonders
CMIt - optical metrology

两者都是 ASE CoPos 的机器供应商,而 ASE CoPos 开始 volume ramp 了?我记得 2025 年,CMIt 试图打破 $KLAC 垄断,当时只是 test samples……但看起来开始爬坡了?

我对它们都不熟。

只是想提一下我每天随机研究的一些名字。

我会看几十个,大多数时候不会建仓。
❤️ 361 🔁 6 💬 51
打开原推
📝 原创
Wow this was like a life-changing rally for many in semis from $INTC to $MRVL if you held through Iran volatility.

Not often do large caps $100B+ move 50-70% in 1 month time.

Did you hold anon? https://t.co/PAj6MmycqI
哇,如果你扛过 Iran 波动,从 $INTC$MRVL,这对很多 semi 投资者来说就像改变人生的 rally。

$100B+ 的大盘股一个月涨 50-70% 并不常见。

你持住了吗 anon? https://t.co/PAj6MmycqI
❤️ 764 🔁 32 💬 57
打开原推
📝 原创
Woah... European stocks go brrr.

$SIVE +12.76%
$SOI +11.33%
$ALRIB +9.08%
$IQE +6.3%

When $4B+ MC companies like Soitec go up 10%+ a day, this is likely institutional buying as seen with IQE and Point72. https://t.co/tjLBK9C766
哇……欧洲股票 go brrr。

$SIVE +12.76%
$SOI +11.33%
$ALRIB +9.08%
$IQE +6.3%

当 Soitec 这种 $4B+ 市值公司一天涨 10%+,这很可能是机构买盘,就像 IQE 和 Point72 那样。 https://t.co/tjLBK9C766
❤️ 1,100 🔁 64 💬 102
打开原推
💬 引用
Surprised $SIVE isn’t up higher from the $GOOGL ASIC news with Marvell.

Even $MRVL is up 6.24%+ overnight.

Markets still probably don’t know where the upstream laser source comes from yet? https://t.co/0Hgfo0dQLo
$SIVE 没因为 $GOOGL ASIC 和 Marvell 的新闻涨更多,我有点惊讶。

$MRVL 隔夜都涨了 6.24%+。

市场可能还不知道上游 laser source 来自哪里? https://t.co/0Hgfo0dQLo
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$MRVL in talks to develop $GOOGL TPU for two different chip models.

High possibility $SIVE likely became the light source for Google's supply chains if talks go well.

Especially as their custom ASIC likely pushes Celestial IP for scale up (Photonic Fabric) in the MPU's architecture. And this maps to both $POET and Sivers.

Custom ASICs take years, so there's probably no material revenue from Google until H2 2028.

Vendors are also probably multi-sourced, but having Google as a likely end user is a structural multi-year catalyst past 2028.

Markets are typically forward looking.
$MRVL 正在洽谈为 $GOOGL TPU 开发两个不同芯片型号。

如果谈判顺利,$SIVE 很可能已经成了 Google 供应链的 light source。

尤其是他们的 custom ASIC 很可能在 MPU 架构里推动 Celestial IP 做 scale up(Photonic Fabric)。这同时映射到 $POET 和 Sivers。

Custom ASICs 需要很多年,所以 Google 相关可能到 2028 下半年之前都不会有实质收入。

供应商也大概率会 multi-source,但如果 Google 成为潜在最终用户,那就是 2028 年之后的结构性多年催化。

市场通常是前瞻的。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2045932788218794257
❤️ 753 🔁 48 💬 54
打开原推
📝 原创
Space sector with $ASTS looks like it’s having fun.

Lot of optimism on X somehow, even after Blue Origin had a major failure... (positive for SpaceX and byproduct $RKLB.)

As for $ASTS it does matter for future revenue recognition, when they dont have satellites in space.

Blue Origin launches probably got delayed a ton of months, maybe like ~4-7M?

If a company that is priced primarily by forward growth gets delayed.

Then it's not just one satellite, but the subsequent ones ones as well... this hurts forward earnings growth a lot (since it doesn’t look like they hit 45 targets)

After months of investigation Blue Origin will likely be backlogged from $AMZN Kuiper and DoD payloads too.

Seems like in a pretty bad spot being dependent on their competitor SpaceX.

Definitely not "immaterial" as others were claiming with their squiggly line charts, but no comment about buying opportunity.
$ASTS 带着 Space 板块看起来挺开心。

X 上不知怎么有很多乐观情绪,即使 Blue Origin 出了重大失败……(对 SpaceX 以及副产品 $RKLB 正面。)

至于 $ASTS,这确实影响未来收入确认,因为他们没有卫星在太空。

Blue Origin launches 可能会延迟很多个月,也许 ~4-7M?

如果一家主要按 forward growth 定价的公司被延迟。

那就不只是一个 satellite,而是后续的也会延迟……这会很伤 forward earnings growth(因为看起来他们达不到 45 个目标)

经过几个月调查后,Blue Origin 很可能还会被 $AMZN Kuiper 和 DoD payloads backlog 卡住。

依赖竞争对手 SpaceX,看起来处境相当糟。

这绝对不是其他人拿着曲线图声称的“immaterial”,但我不评论是不是买入机会。
❤️ 784 🔁 28 💬 81
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm telling you all...

Lot of stuff in the $SIVE supply chains make very compelling longs.

Win Semi (3105) just goes up 10% a day then halts trading after hitting its max.

Obviously they do things for $AVGO or SpaceX, but photonics ramp spearheaded by $NVDA and followed by $GOOGL, $AMZN, $MSFT

Would make photonics a massive growth vector for Win.
我告诉你们……

$SIVE 供应链里的很多东西都是很有吸引力的 longs。

Win Semi (3105) 每天涨 10%,然后触及上限停牌。

显然他们给 $AVGO 或 SpaceX 做东西,但由 $NVDA 带头、$GOOGL$AMZN$MSFT 跟随的 photonics ramp,

会让 photonics 成为 Win 巨大的增长方向。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Frontrunning 1.6T/CPO within the broader photonics supercycle is the most compelling investment to me.

I have high conviction in that statement.

Which is why I'm long the entire supply chain (+1 extra bottlenecK)

1. $SIVE - Their laser revenue scales aggressively with $JBL, $MRVL, Ayar, O-Net.

And I do think CPO/1.6T will blow away any conservative analyst projections from how hard $NVDA, $GOOGL, and others have been pushing photonics architectures.

Downside risk is multi-sourcing, but there's a reason Jabil chose Sivers. When you compare $MTSI, $LITE, $COHR, Furukawa, and others.

There's genuinely not many laser suppliers in the entire world... they're all $10B+, then you have this mini CHIPS act chokepoint trading at <$1B MC.

2. Shunsin (6451) - I don't see how it's possible Foxconn's optical foundry for testing, packaging, and assembly is valued at $1.5B MC less than $LWLG.

When they look extremely derisked piggybacking off of Foxconn's photonics volume.

$TSM's optical arm VisEra example is ~$5B, but they scale H2 2028 from Gen-3. Foxconn looks to be ramping up just next year.

They're just scaling low fwd p/e multiples off of $NVDA CPO supply chain demand in Taiwan and all public indicators point to capacity expansion + extreme demand.

3. Win Semi - They're the foundry for Sivers to scale up DFB laser production. As well as $AVGO, SpaceX supply chains and others.

When I do supply chain mapping and Win Semi pops up in every single frontier supply chain I see.

There's probably something markets are not pricing in.

4. $MRVL - I find this genuinely compelling as a mini-Broadcomm.

Their potential design with with $GOOGL today, helps the case past 2028.

But the catalyst I was looking at was $MSFT Maia ramp, which happens H2 2026, and likely keep scaling up exponentially into 2027, 2028, 2029.

Celestial acquisition was probably the smartest thing in the world for them. Maybe on next drop or CSP?

5. $HPS.A - Transformers/Switchgears are commodities + boring parts of the DC supply chain.

However, when the bottleneck is 2-5 years, and you have backlog increasing 100%+... causing extreme shortages.

It's only up 20%+ since my thesis post, but I do see this being de-risked given massive backlog visibility (even though it's inferred, they don't give exact #).

I do think markets are missing something, especially with potential gross margin expansion from price hikes if they pull it off....

Again backlog + demand just de-risks this company, and it seems like a high growth compounder post facility expansion last year.

There's many others like $NBIS, $JBL, $RPI, $TSEM, $LITE, $ARM, $SOI, $AXTI, $IQE, $ALRIB, Fittech, PCL, and others that I'm very fond of, but just mentioning 5 off the top of my head from today's prices... if I'm creating a new portfolio.

Of course, it's good to barbell with other uncorrelated companies to AI supply chains, but these are just 5 I liked.
在更广泛的 photonics supercycle 里提前布局 1.6T/CPO,对我来说是最有吸引力的投资。

我对这句话有高 conviction。

这就是为什么我做多整条供应链(+1 个额外瓶颈)

1. $SIVE - 他们的 laser revenue 会随着 $JBL$MRVL、Ayar、O-Net 激进放大。

而且我确实认为,考虑到 $NVDA$GOOGL 和其他公司推动 photonics architectures 的力度,CPO/1.6T 会大幅超出任何保守分析师预测。

下行风险是 multi-sourcing,但 Jabil 选择 Sivers 是有原因的。你把 $MTSI$LITE$COHR、Furukawa 和其他公司拿来比。

全世界真的没有多少 laser suppliers... 它们都是 $10B+,然后你有这个迷你 CHIPS act chokepoint,市值还在 <$1B MC。

2. Shunsin (6451) - 我看不出 Foxconn 的光学 foundry,负责 testing、packaging 和 assembly,怎么可能估值 $1.5B MC,比 $LWLG 还低。

它们搭着 Foxconn photonics volume 的顺风车,看起来已经极大去风险。

$TSM 的光学部门 VisEra 例子大约是 ~$5B,但它们从 Gen-3 的 2028 下半年才开始放量。Foxconn 看起来明年就要 ramp。

它们只是基于台湾 $NVDA CPO 供应链需求,用很低的 fwd p/e multiples 在放大,而且所有公开指标都指向产能扩张 + 极端需求。

3. Win Semi - 它们是 Sivers 扩大 DFB laser production 的 foundry。也是 $AVGO、SpaceX 供应链以及其他供应链的 foundry。

当我做 supply chain mapping,Win Semi 在我看到的每一个 frontier supply chain 里都出现。

市场大概有些东西没定价进去。

4. $MRVL - 我真觉得它作为 mini-Broadcomm 很有吸引力。

它们今天和 $GOOGL 的潜在 design,有助于支撑 2028 年之后的 case。

但我关注的催化是 $MSFT Maia ramp,它会在 2026 下半年发生,并可能在 2027、2028、2029 年继续指数级放大。

Celestial acquisition 可能是它们做过最聪明的事。也许等下一次下跌或 CSP?

5. $HPS.A - Transformers/Switchgears 是 DC 供应链里商品化 + 无聊的部分。

不过,当瓶颈是 2-5 年,而 backlog 增长 100%+... 造成极端短缺时。

从我的 thesis post 以来它只涨了 20%+,但鉴于巨大的 backlog 可见度(虽然是推断的,他们不给精确数字),我觉得它已经去风险。

我确实觉得市场漏掉了一些东西,尤其如果他们能做到,涨价带来的潜在 gross margin expansion...

再次强调,backlog + demand 让这家公司去风险,而且在去年扩厂后,它看起来像一个高增长 compounder。

还有很多其他我很喜欢的,比如 $NBIS$JBL$RPI$TSEM$LITE$ARM$SOI$AXTI$IQE$ALRIB、Fittech、PCL 等等,但如果我按今天价格创建一个新组合,就先随口提这 5 个...

当然,用其他和 AI supply chains 不相关的公司做 barbell 也很好,但这些就是我喜欢的 5 个。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2046003874553901188
❤️ 801 🔁 44 💬 59
打开原推
💬 引用
Frontrunning 1.6T/CPO within the broader photonics supercycle is the most compelling investment to me.

I have high conviction in that statement.

Which is why I'm long the entire supply chain (+1 extra bottlenecK)

1. $SIVE - Their laser revenue scales aggressively with $JBL, $MRVL, Ayar, O-Net.

And I do think CPO/1.6T will blow away any conservative analyst projections from how hard $NVDA, $GOOGL, and others have been pushing photonics architectures.

Downside risk is multi-sourcing, but there's a reason Jabil chose Sivers. When you compare $MTSI, $LITE, $COHR, Furukawa, and others.

There's genuinely not many laser suppliers in the entire world... they're all $10B+, then you have this mini CHIPS act chokepoint trading at <$1B MC.

2. Shunsin (6451) - I don't see how it's possible Foxconn's optical foundry for testing, packaging, and assembly is valued at $1.5B MC less than $LWLG.

When they look extremely derisked piggybacking off of Foxconn's photonics volume.

$TSM's optical arm VisEra example is ~$5B, but they scale H2 2028 from Gen-3. Foxconn looks to be ramping up just next year.

They're just scaling low fwd p/e multiples off of $NVDA CPO supply chain demand in Taiwan and all public indicators point to capacity expansion + extreme demand.

3. Win Semi - They're the foundry for Sivers to scale up DFB laser production. As well as $AVGO, SpaceX supply chains and others.

When I do supply chain mapping and Win Semi pops up in every single frontier supply chain I see.

There's probably something markets are not pricing in.

4. $MRVL - I find this genuinely compelling as a mini-Broadcomm.

Their potential design with with $GOOGL today, helps the case past 2028.

But the catalyst I was looking at was $MSFT Maia ramp, which happens H2 2026, and likely keep scaling up exponentially into 2027, 2028, 2029.

Celestial acquisition was probably the smartest thing in the world for them. Maybe on next drop or CSP?

5. $HPS.A - Transformers/Switchgears are commodities + boring parts of the DC supply chain.

However, when the bottleneck is 2-5 years, and you have backlog increasing 100%+... causing extreme shortages.

It's only up 20%+ since my thesis post, but I do see this being de-risked given massive backlog visibility (even though it's inferred, they don't give exact #).

I do think markets are missing something, especially with potential gross margin expansion from price hikes if they pull it off....

Again backlog + demand just de-risks this company, and it seems like a high growth compounder post facility expansion last year.

There's many others like $NBIS, $JBL, $RPI, $TSEM, $LITE, $ARM, $SOI, $AXTI, $IQE, $ALRIB, Fittech, PCL, and others that I'm very fond of, but just mentioning 5 off the top of my head from today's prices... if I'm creating a new portfolio.

Of course, it's good to barbell with other uncorrelated companies to AI supply chains, but these are just 5 I liked.
在更广泛 photonics supercycle 里抢跑 1.6T/CPO,是我最有吸引力的投资。

我对这句话有高信心。

所以我做多整条供应链(+1 个额外 bottlenecK)

1. $SIVE - 它们的 laser revenue 会随着 $JBL$MRVL、Ayar、O-Net 激进扩张。

我确实认为,CPO/1.6T 会大幅超越任何保守分析师预测,因为 $NVDA$GOOGL 和其他公司推动 photonics architectures 的力度太大。

下行风险是 multi-sourcing,但 Jabil 选择 Sivers 是有原因的。当你比较 $MTSI$LITE$COHR、Furukawa 等时。

全世界真的没有多少 laser suppliers……它们全都是 $10B+,然后你有这家 mini CHIPS act chokepoint,市值 <$1B。

2. Shunsin (6451) - 我不明白 Foxconn 的 optical foundry,用于 testing、packaging 和 assembly,怎么可能估值 $1.5B,还低于 $LWLG

当它们看起来通过 Foxconn 的 photonics volume 搭顺风车,风险已经大幅降低。

$TSM 的 optical arm VisEra 例子是 ~$5B,但它们从 Gen-3 在 H2 2028 扩张。Foxconn 看起来明年就开始爬坡。

它们只是基于台湾 $NVDA CPO 供应链需求,用低 fwd p/e multiples 扩张,所有公开指标都指向产能扩张 + 极端需求。

3. Win Semi - 它们是 Sivers 扩大 DFB laser production 的 foundry。也是 $AVGO、SpaceX 供应链和其他的 foundry。

当我做 supply chain mapping,Win Semi 在我看到的每条 frontier supply chain 里都出现。

市场大概有东西没定价进去。

4. $MRVL - 我真的觉得它作为 mini-Broadcomm 很有吸引力。

今天它们可能和 $GOOGL 的 design win,有助于 2028 之后的 case。

但我关注的催化是 $MSFT Maia ramp,发生在 H2 2026,并且很可能在 2027、2028、2029 指数级继续扩张。

Celestial acquisition 可能是世界上最聪明的收购。也许下一次下跌或 CSP?

5. $HPS.A - Transformers/Switchgears 是 DC supply chain 里的 commodities + boring parts。

然而,当 bottleneck 是 2-5 年,而且 backlog 增长 100%+……导致极端短缺。

它自我 thesis 帖以来只涨了 20%+,但考虑到巨大 backlog 可见性,我认为它已经 de-risked(尽管这是推断,他们没给具体数字)。

我确实觉得市场漏了东西,尤其是如果它们能实现涨价带来的潜在 gross margin expansion……

再说一次,backlog + demand 就是在给这家公司降风险,而且它看起来像去年设施扩张后的高增长 compounder。

还有很多其他我很喜欢的,比如 $NBIS$JBL$RPI$TSEM$LITE$ARM$SOI$AXTI$IQE$ALRIB、Fittech、PCL 等,但如果我从今天价格新建一个组合,脑子里先提这 5 个。

当然,用其他和 AI 供应链低相关的公司做 barbell 也很好,但这只是我喜欢的 5 个。
引用原推@Leo_ian1971
@aleabitoreddit @sachbarnes If you started from 0 .. in what 5 stocks would you invest?
@aleabitoreddit @sachbarnes 如果你从 0 开始,会投资哪 5 只股票?
https://x.com/Leo_ian1971/status/2045985729159811356
❤️ 1,413 🔁 121 💬 62
打开原推
💬 引用
Wow, majority of these 30 stocks I’ve liked are up a lot in just two weeks (just a recap to new folks)

By the way, my long term opinion doesn’t change on any of them from $MRVL, $AMD, $ARM and others.

Short term entry points do though with names like $AAOI to $AEHR. And they make the difference between +10-20%.

I focus a lot about the “undiscovered” ones like Riber or $SIVE or $RPI or $IQE in analysis when I make a new entry -> wait for it to play out.

But the same thesis around $LITE or $NBIS or $AXTI from last year is still the same.

And I don’t need to post that same thesis multiple times, since it’s not new anymore.

But the reason they’re not new is because markets have validated the thesis and are repricing the stocks live because of them.
哇,我喜欢的这 30 只股票里,大多数短短两周涨了很多(给新来的朋友回顾一下)

顺便说,我对 $MRVL$AMD$ARM 等任何一个的长期观点都没变。

但短期入场点会变,比如 $AAOI$AEHR。它们会带来 +10-20% 的差异。

我在新入场时,会重点分析那些“undiscovered”的,比如 Riber、$SIVE$RPI$IQE -> 然后等它兑现。

但去年围绕 $LITE$NBIS$AXTI 的 thesis 仍然一样。

我不需要反复发同一个 thesis,因为它已经不新了。

但它们不新的原因,是市场已经验证了 thesis,并正在根据它们现场 reprice 股票。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Here's a bunch of random 30 US-available random stocks I like today and why:

1. $INTC - America's hope for foundry, national security
2. $MRVL - scales rev from future maia asics and add ons like cpo, they do everything lost count
3. $TSM - backbone of semis/ai
4. $COHR - They do everything vertically integrated + captures optical cycle
5. $RKLB - the final frontier of space will be around 5 years from now and 20 years from now.
6. $DRAM - memory exposure for samsung/sk hynix
7. $AVGO - hyperscalers dont like nvidia gpu tax
8. $AMZN - nobody can compete against the overnight shipping of toilet paper. robotics will lower opex over time
9. $ARM - AGI CPUs scale revenue quite a bit over the next decade
10. $TSEM - you're going to need a foundry for light based stuff
11. $IBIT - bitcoin, we all know by now
12. $NBIS - i think it's the next AWS. Also they do self-driving cars with uber, own scaling DB companies, data labeling. It's almost like a mini Google.
13. $GOOGL - youtube is not going away, gemini is great. they're vertically integrated with TPUs and fund buildout with operating income so i like it.
14. $AMKR - super facilities coming online in late 2027-2028. benefits from made in america
15. $HOOD - i dont like short term, but long term i'm a fan of Robinhood since they captured retail + have more products like banking, etc that they're scaling up. product innovation is wild.
16. $CRCL - I happen to really like stablecoins and see them as the future for both payments/holding (depends on clarity act)
17. $META - people aren't going to stop using instagram or whatsapp, or others anytime soon.
18. $LITE - $GOOGL TPU exposure decently high part of BOM. As long as Google's AI program keeps running I think $LITE will do well.
19. $LPTH - Germanium and China export controls will always be an issue so US made engineered alternatives will always be important
20. $FN - Someone needs to assemble optical stuff
21. $JBL - same as above, but added with ip from Intel's SiPh acqusition so might end up like innolight?
22. $MP - American rare earths program is extremely important, similar to $INTC national security risks
23. $HIMS - Okay here me out they just acquired a ton of companies, and at $19 they have global DTC channel. short sellers really hate this company, but I think it's actually promising as a contrarian long
24. $SMTC - LRO/LPO transition
25. $POWL - US alternative to hammond for switchgear DC type bottleneck
26. $VPG - Humanoids will be a thing down the road maybe 2027-2028, this makes the sensors.
27. $MOG.A - Feels like i see them everywhere in robotics, to spacex supply chains
28. $MSFT - At $375, one day we'll look back and see this as a buying opportunity.
29. $CVX - oil might crash after war but these oil companies are going to be extremely important, especially when Venezulea is a goldmine.
30. $XLU - i think rate cuts might be back online, we need power/grid for AI so these names will always be improtant from $CEG to $NEE

Just throwing out other thoughts aside from $AAOI and $AEHR.
这里是我今天喜欢的一堆随机的 30 个美国可买股票,以及原因:

1. $INTC - 美国晶圆代工的希望,国家安全
2. $MRVL - 未来 Maia ASIC 和 CPO 等附加业务会拉动收入,他们什么都做,我都数不过来了
3. $TSM - 半导体/AI 的骨干
4. $COHR - 垂直整合什么都做 + 吃到光学周期
5. $RKLB - 太空这个终极边疆大概会在未来 5 年和 20 年后出现机会。
6. $DRAM - 对 samsung/sk hynix 的存储敞口
7. $AVGO - hyperscaler 不喜欢 nvidia GPU 税
8. $AMZN - 没人能竞争隔夜送厕纸。机器人长期会降低 opex
9. $ARM - AGI CPU 在未来十年会让收入增长不少
10. $TSEM - 做光相关的东西,总得有晶圆厂
11. $IBIT - 比特币,我们现在都懂了
12. $NBIS - 我觉得它是下一个 AWS。而且他们和 uber 做自动驾驶,拥有扩展型数据库公司、数据标注。几乎像一个迷你 Google。
13. $GOOGL - youtube 不会消失,gemini 很强。他们用 TPU 垂直整合,并用经营收入给 buildout 供血,所以我喜欢。
14. $AMKR - 大型先进设施会在 2027 年底到 2028 年投产。受益于 made in america
15. $HOOD - 我短期不喜欢,但长期我是 Robinhood 粉丝,因为他们抓住了散户,还有银行等更多产品在扩张。产品创新很猛。
16. $CRCL - 我确实很喜欢稳定币,认为它们是支付/持有的未来(取决于 clarity act)
17. $META - 人们短期内不会停止使用 instagram 或 whatsapp 等产品。
18. $LITE - $GOOGL TPU 的 BOM 敞口相当高。只要 Google 的 AI 项目继续跑,我认为 $LITE 会表现不错。
19. $LPTH - 锗和中国出口管制会一直是问题,所以美国制造的工程替代品会一直重要
20. $FN - 总得有人组装光学东西
21. $JBL - 同上,但加上从 Intel SiPh 收购来的 IP,所以最后可能会像 innolight?
22. $MP - 美国稀土项目极其重要,类似 $INTC 的国家安全风险
23. $HIMS - 好吧听我说,他们刚收购了一堆公司,而且在 $19 这个位置有全球 DTC 渠道。空头真的很讨厌这家公司,但我觉得作为逆向做多其实有前景
24. $SMTC - LRO/LPO 转换
25. $POWL - 美国版 hammond,针对 switchgear DC 类型瓶颈
26. $VPG - 人形机器人之后会成为趋势,可能 2027-2028,这家公司做传感器。
27. $MOG.A - 感觉我在机器人到 spacex 供应链里到处都能看到他们
28. $MSFT - $375 的时候,总有一天我们回头看会觉得这是买入机会。
29. $CVX - 战后油价可能崩,但这些石油公司会极其重要,尤其委内瑞拉是金矿。
30. $XLU - 我觉得降息可能又要回来了,我们需要 AI 的电力/电网,所以从 $CEG$NEE 这些名字会一直重要

只是抛出一些除了 $AAOI$AEHR 之外的想法。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2042187668931616964
❤️ 1,501 🔁 82 💬 87
打开原推
📝 原创
$MRVL in talks to develop $GOOGL TPU for two different chip models.

High possibility $SIVE likely became the light source for Google's supply chains if talks go well.

Especially as their custom ASIC likely pushes Celestial IP for scale up (Photonic Fabric) in the MPU's architecture. And this maps to both $POET and Sivers.

Custom ASICs take years, so there's probably no material revenue from Google until H2 2028.

Vendors are also probably multi-sourced, but having Google as a likely end user is a structural multi-year catalyst past 2028.

Markets are typically forward looking.
$MRVL 正在谈为 $GOOGL TPU 开发两个不同芯片型号。

如果谈判顺利,$SIVE 很可能成为 Google 供应链的 light source。

尤其是它们的 custom ASIC 很可能在 MPU 架构里推动 Celestial IP 做 scale up(Photonic Fabric)。这同时映射到 $POET 和 Sivers。

Custom ASICs 需要多年,所以 Google 可能到 H2 2028 才有实质收入。

供应商也大概会 multi-source,但让 Google 成为潜在终端用户,是 2028 之后的结构性多年催化。

市场通常是 forward looking。
❤️ 1,151 🔁 74 💬 79
打开原推
📝 原创
It’s still funny that there’s so many:

“If you invested $10K into ____ you would have ____ today!”

Then they’re all the stocks I was the original thesis poster on from $AXTI to $IQE.

Wait 6 months and you’ll probably see the same thing with $SIVE and my other bottleneck thesis posts.
现在还有这么多:

“如果你把 $10K 投进 ____,今天你会有 ____!”

结果它们全都是我从 $AXTI$IQE 最早发 thesis 的股票。

再等 6 个月,你大概会看到 $SIVE 和我其他 bottleneck thesis 帖也一样。
❤️ 1,434 🔁 61 💬 103
打开原推
📝 原创
Just in case you were wondering who the end users of $SIVE likely were:

Sivers lasers -> $AMZN (Marvell's 8-K SEC filings).

Amazon has purchase agreements for "photonic fabric" from Celestial, which maps to Sivers lasers through two-hop connections.

Marvell's share value under the agreement was $87/share, so Amazon is very incentivized to buy as much as they can (Marvell is trading at $139+).

These volume orders help $SIVE the most out of this supply chain, given their size.

This is just one-relation to Amazon, I wanted to point out.

But at $720m MC...

Markets missed Sivers as the critical laser supplier for the upcoming hyperscaler optical supercycle based on new architectural changes.
以防你想知道 $SIVE 可能的终端用户是谁:

Sivers lasers -> $AMZN(Marvell 的 8-K SEC filings)。

Amazon 有来自 Celestial 的“photonic fabric”purchase agreements,这通过两跳关系映射到 Sivers lasers。

协议里 Marvell 的股价价值是 $87/股,所以 Amazon 很有动力尽可能多买(Marvell 现在交易在 $139+)。

考虑到 $SIVE 的规模,这些 volume orders 在这条供应链里最利好它。

这只是我想指出的一个和 Amazon 的关系。

但在 $720m 市值下……

市场漏掉了 Sivers 作为即将到来的 hyperscaler optical supercycle 的关键 laser supplier,而这是基于新的架构变化。
❤️ 1,223 🔁 75 💬 82
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
MLCC, inductor + PCB drill bottleneck:

- Murata (TSE: 6981)
- Taiyo Yuden(TSE: 6976), third largest MLCC in the world
- TDK (TSE: 6762)
- Kyocera(TSE: 6971)
- Yageo(TWSE 2327)
- Walsin (TWSE 2492)
- $VSH in the US.

Sakai Chemical (4078) is a raw chemical suppliers to the MLCC companies, so might be worth taking a look at. (Barium Titanate) (sorry for repost some ticket # wrong)

I'll let you know obviously if I like a few enough to go long on.

There's also a PCB drill shortage too so:
Topoint Technology (8021)
Union Tool (6278)
Kyocera (appears again)

threw this in so it's not an exact repeat lol

But many are kinda priced in already, probably want to find a new one.
MLCC、inductor + PCB drill bottleneck:

- Murata (TSE: 6981)
- Taiyo Yuden(TSE: 6976),全球第三大 MLCC
- TDK (TSE: 6762)
- Kyocera(TSE: 6971)
- Yageo(TWSE 2327)
- Walsin (TWSE 2492)
- 美国 $VSH

Sakai Chemical (4078) 是 MLCC 公司的 raw chemical supplier,所以可能值得看看。(Barium Titanate)(抱歉重发,有些 ticker # 错了)

如果我足够喜欢其中几个并做多,显然会告诉你们。

还有 PCB drill 短缺,所以:
Topoint Technology (8021)
Union Tool (6278)
Kyocera(再次出现)

把这个也加进来,这样不是完全重复 lol

但很多已经有点 priced in 了,可能想找新的。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just some TLDRs to save you time:

1. $ASML, $TSM earnings = Good Outlook. Semis + capex go brrr.

2. Opus 4.7 + Anthropic go brrr. Software = sad.

3. Samsung go brrr because of partly bc of $TSLA AI Chips.

4. $UMC = price hike for foundry. foundries go brrr.

5. Training = brrr in China. H100 rental increase go up. Neoclouds happy.

6. Helium supply shortage = not significant... I've already said this before, but I'm not sure how many times $TSM needs to say this.

7. MLCC, inductor prices = price hike. Will cover beneficiaries later.

8. "Taiwan's OSAT expansion could tighten global test capacity and raise costs"

I went long on Taiwan OSATs recently like Shunsin (6451) for a reason. Demand will just outstrip supply, even after expansion. (cowos, sip, optical).
一些 TLDR,给你省时间:

1. $ASML$TSM 财报 = 前景不错。Semis + capex go brrr。

2. Opus 4.7 + Anthropic go brrr。Software = sad。

3. Samsung go brrr,部分因为 $TSLA AI Chips。

4. $UMC = foundry 涨价。foundries go brrr。

5. Training = 中国 go brrr。H100 租赁价格上涨。Neoclouds 开心。

6. Helium supply shortage = 不重要... 我之前已经说过,但我不知道 $TSM 还要说多少次。

7. MLCC、inductor prices = 涨价。之后会覆盖受益方。

8. “Taiwan's OSAT expansion could tighten global test capacity and raise costs”

我最近做多台湾 OSATs,比如 Shunsin (6451),是有原因的。即使扩产,需求也会超过供给。(cowos、sip、optical)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2045565771234021468
❤️ 557 🔁 19 💬 66
打开原推
📝 原创
Just some TLDRs to save you time:

1. $ASML, $TSM earnings = Good Outlook. Semis + capex go brrr.

2. Opus 4.7 + Anthropic go brrr. Software = sad.

3. Samsung go brrr because of partly bc of $TSLA AI Chips.

4. $UMC = price hike for foundry. foundries go brrr.

5. Training = brrr in China. H100 rental increase go up. Neoclouds happy.

6. Helium supply shortage = not significant... I've already said this before, but I'm not sure how many times $TSM needs to say this.

7. MLCC, inductor prices = price hike. Will cover beneficiaries later.

8. "Taiwan's OSAT expansion could tighten global test capacity and raise costs"

I went long on Taiwan OSATs recently like Shunsin (6451) for a reason. Demand will just outstrip supply, even after expansion. (cowos, sip, optical).
一些省时间的 TLDR:

1. $ASML$TSM 财报 = Good Outlook。Semis + capex go brrr。

2. Opus 4.7 + Anthropic go brrr。Software = sad。

3. Samsung go brrr,部分因为 $TSLA AI Chips。

4. $UMC = foundry 涨价。foundries go brrr。

5. 中国 Training = brrr。H100 租金上涨。Neoclouds 开心。

6. Helium supply shortage = 不重要……我之前已经说过,但我不确定 $TSM 还要说多少次。

7. MLCC、inductor prices = 涨价。之后会讲受益者。

8. “Taiwan's OSAT expansion could tighten global test capacity and raise costs”

我最近做多台湾 OSATs,比如 Shunsin (6451),是有原因的。即使扩产后,需求也会超过供给。(cowos、sip、optical)。
❤️ 1,763 🔁 86 💬 105
打开原推
📝 原创
Woah, the $HOOD gold card is sexy.

Long Robinhood? https://t.co/Sth8jBHnG9
哇,$HOOD gold card 很 sexy。

Long Robinhood? https://t.co/Sth8jBHnG9
❤️ 1,354 🔁 36 💬 134
打开原推
💬 引用
Genuinely thanks for nice comments.

I share my ideas for free in the end though since I want to help out the retail community.

$TSEM hit triple digit return... so that's 16 different names YTD.

So my YTD hit 1525%+ as a result.

Just to recap all the endless abuse and harassment along the way:

1. $AXTI - "Pump and Dump", "Scam Chinese Stock", Got banned from WSB $RDDT after Mods got mad investors actually made money AXT going from $12->$80.
2. $AAOI - "Pumping stock with no fundamentals, Meme stock"
3. $SIVEF - "Pump and Dump" "Meme Stock"
4. $LITE - "Photonics Bubble"
5. $IQE - "Just pumping low MC stocks"
6. $AEHR - "Stock with negative revenue growth, why is anyone following this guy and not paying $2,000+ for my subscription?"
7. $CRCL - "TA says it's going down to $30"
8. $EWY - "Just from followers" (hint, it's the South Korean Index)
9. Unimicron - "Idea is useless give me US stocks"
10. Nitto Boseki - "Idea is useless give me US stocks"
11. $OSS - Stealing Ideas (no, my synthesis around Venezuela was novel)
12. $GDRZF - "You're a terrible human trying to profit off of the War in Venezuela"
13. $RPI - "Meme stock all because of a Meme Trader" (FT, European Media).
14. $SOI - "Pump and dump", "no novel idea" (random analysts)
15. $ALRIB - "Pumping low MC stocks" (no, it's $MSFT quantum information discovery)
16. $TSEM - "Pumping based on followers alone" (bro it's $25B+, these are institutions)

Or how about... the idea around fundamentals was right all along? And I'm just sharing information synthesis/discovery before institutions find out about them.

Retail and media should be celebrating when 16+ different ideas return 100%+ YTD, since stocks are positive sum.

Everyone from retail, the companies, and local economies benefits.

Instead, negativity is through the roof and people keep trying to diminish/downplay the ideas like frontrunning the photonics supercycle… even when they actually turn out right?

The trolls are starting to get to me, from $IREN folks creating new accounts every day just to send IRL threats, to European media disinformation about "pumping and dumping"... since I do read every comment.

But notice... how 95% of things keep going up? And institutions like Point72 and Apollo end up buying the names I mention?

Comments like this do make it helpful to stay on X, and I do enjoy taking victory laps on the haters.
真的谢谢这些友善评论。

不过我最后都是免费分享我的想法,因为我想帮助散户社区。

$TSEM 达到三位数回报……所以今年已经是 16 个不同名字了。

因此我的 YTD 达到 1525%+。

只是回顾一路上没完没了的辱骂和骚扰:

1. $AXTI - “Pump and Dump”、“Scam Chinese Stock”,AXT 从 $12->$80 后,Mods 生气投资者真的赚钱了,我被 WSB $RDDT ban。
2. $AAOI - “Pumping stock with no fundamentals, Meme stock”
3. $SIVEF - “Pump and Dump”“Meme Stock”
4. $LITE - “Photonics Bubble”
5. $IQE - “Just pumping low MC stocks”
6. $AEHR - “Stock with negative revenue growth, why is anyone following this guy and not paying $2,000+ for my subscription?”
7. $CRCL - “TA says it's going down to $30”
8. $EWY - “Just from followers”(提示,它是 South Korean Index)
9. Unimicron - “Idea is useless give me US stocks”
10. Nitto Boseki - “Idea is useless give me US stocks”
11. $OSS - Stealing Ideas(不,我围绕 Venezuela 的 synthesis 是新的)
12. $GDRZF - “You're a terrible human trying to profit off of the War in Venezuela”
13. $RPI - “Meme stock all because of a Meme Trader”(FT、European Media)。
14. $SOI - “Pump and dump”、“no novel idea”(random analysts)
15. $ALRIB - “Pumping low MC stocks”(不,这是 $MSFT quantum information discovery)
16. $TSEM - “Pumping based on followers alone”(bro 它是 $25B+,这是机构)

或者有没有可能……围绕基本面的想法一直就是对的?而我只是在机构发现之前分享信息综合/发现。

当 16+ 个不同想法 YTD 回报 100%+ 时,散户和媒体应该庆祝,因为股票是正和的。

从散户、公司到本地经济,每个人都受益。

结果,负面情绪爆棚,大家不停试图削弱/淡化这些想法,比如抢跑 photonics supercycle……即使它们最后真的对了?

那些 trolls 开始影响到我了,从 $IREN 那些每天新建账号发 IRL 威胁的人,到欧洲媒体关于“pumping and dumping”的虚假信息……因为我确实会读每条评论。

但注意……95% 的东西是不是一直在涨?而且 Point72 和 Apollo 这类机构最后也买了我提到的名字?

这样的评论确实有助于我留在 X 上,我也确实喜欢对 hater 做胜利巡游。
引用原推@Taylor_GPT
@aleabitoreddit Are you quite literally changing my life https://t.co/eWqDbi3LhH
@aleabitoreddit 你是不是字面意义上正在改变我的人生 https://t.co/eWqDbi3LhH
https://x.com/Taylor_GPT/status/2045177496463671352
❤️ 2,496 🔁 83 💬 278
打开原推
💬 引用
It’s still pretty incredible $HIMS is down 44% even after:

1. $NVO de-risking + partnership
2. Multiple global acquisitions expanding DTC distribution network
3. Peptide arc, with Huberman saying HIMS was set to soar under these conditions
4. Entering a friendlier macro climate.
5. Short interest reaching unsustainable 36%+

The good news is: short interest can only be so much of the float… So it’s inherent buying pressure to cover over time, which does limit downside if fundamentals improves.
$HIMS 在这些之后仍然跌 44%,真的挺不可思议:

1. $NVO de-risking + partnership
2. 多个全球收购扩张 DTC distribution network
3. Peptide arc,Huberman 说在这些条件下 HIMS 会起飞
4. 进入更友好的宏观环境。
5. Short interest 达到不可持续的 36%+

好消息是:short interest 最多也只能占流通盘这么多……所以随着时间,cover 本身就是内在买盘压力,如果基本面改善,这会限制下行。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Huberman did say $HIMS was set to soar… in this type of arc playing out today.

Interesting to see takes from Stanford professors on public equities. https://t.co/jqVtpEaoGB
Huberman 确实说过 $HIMS 会起飞... 在今天这种 arc 展开的时候。

看到 Stanford 教授对 public equities 的看法挺有意思。https://t.co/jqVtpEaoGB
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2044843391348056489
❤️ 1,264 🔁 80 💬 106
打开原推
💬 引用
Holy **** finally Anthropic listened and forced KYC.

About time, stop letting DeepSeek, Moonshoot, and MiniMax have a free pass to distill Opus and other latest models. https://t.co/Ba8XBTIsnb
Holy **** Anthropic 终于听了,强制 KYC。

早该这样了,别再让 DeepSeek、Moonshoot 和 MiniMax 免费蒸馏 Opus 和其他最新模型。 https://t.co/Ba8XBTIsnb
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Today, Anthropic called out DeepSeek, Moonshot, and Minimax for distillation.

OpenAI has also faced the same issues with Chinese labs.

The most braindead fix nobody is doing:

KYC verification.

Every financial institution from $HOOD to $IBKR does this to track flow of funds (eg. Persona selfie / ID)

Same should apply to token flows.

American Frontier Labs should start doing this soon for their latest models.

I'm sure they care about frictionless growth, but this is national security at risk and people/enterprises only need to go through this process once.

This is by far the easiest fix that can be done in a day.

Chinese labs will continue to find bypasses if this is not done.
今天,Anthropic 点名 DeepSeek、Moonshot 和 Minimax 做 distillation。

OpenAI 也遇到过和中国实验室一样的问题。

没人做的最无脑修复方案:

KYC verification。

$HOOD$IBKR,每家金融机构都会这么做,用来追踪资金流(比如 Persona selfie / ID)

同样也应该适用于 token flows。

American Frontier Labs 应该尽快开始对最新模型这么做。

我知道他们在意无摩擦增长,但这关系到国家安全,而且个人/企业只需要走一次这个流程。

这是目前最简单的修复,一天内就能完成。

如果不这么做,中国实验室会继续找到绕过方法。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026012416841334975
❤️ 486 🔁 15 💬 32
打开原推
💬 引用
$HPS.A is up 21% since my thesis 2 weeks ago.

Unfortunately, not everything can go up 100% every 2 weeks like $AXTI?

If the transformers bottleneck is that extreme for multiple years…

Sometimes it’s better to wait for markets to price that in.

$AEHR or $AAOI triple digit rallies in few week timeframes probably set unrealistic expectations…

Even 10% return yearly is usually good in markets?

This has been 21% so far and I have comments asking if this is still good, but I’m hoping it’s another triple digit return in due time.
$HPS.A 自我 2 周前的 thesis 以来涨了 21%。

不幸的是,不是所有东西都能像 $AXTI 那样每 2 周涨 100%?

如果 transformers bottleneck 多年都那么极端……

有时候最好等市场把它定价进去。

$AEHR$AAOI 几周内三位数 rally,可能设定了不现实的预期……

市场里一年 10% 回报通常都算好?

到目前为止这是 21%,但我已经看到评论问这是否还好。我希望它随着时间也能成为另一个三位数回报。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The current bottleneck: Transformers/Switchgear. 

Trade Idea: Long Hammond (~2.2B CAD / ~$1.5B USD) at 184 CAD.

They dominate the market for:

-Transformers (dry, multi year bottleneck ~23% of market),

-serve to switchgear (2-3Y bottleneck)

-and manufacture liquid too (5Y, larger bottleneck)

I personally anticipate components price hikes like NAND, as $AMZN, $MSFT and others compete for allocation. 

You might have seen: “Half of US data center builds have been delayed or canceled, growth limited by shortages of power infrastructure”…

Then you go further:

“To address shortages… Canada, Mexico… became the biggest suppliers of high-power transformers for AI data centers to AI data centers”

Guess who is in Canada (Guelph).. Mexico (Monterrey 3 and 4)… and the US?

Hammond

Then here’s the reason the articles cite why hyperscaler DB buildouts are falling apart: 

“Major reason behind these setbacks is the availability of key electrical components — such as transformers, switchgear”. 

Institutions are probably looking at Powell, Eaton, and others… but little do they know?

Companies like these actually buy Hammond’s transformers to put inside their own switchgear (“strong sales into data centres, switchgear manufacturers")

Their market share over the transformers market is actually pretty large (eg. ~23% dry). 

The most compelling signal:

-> 122% Y/Y 2025 backlog increase. And we can infer this to be 1B+ CAD. 

Eg. company achieved 898m CAD in sales in 2025, capacity ceiling. Management said close of Q3 2025 orders were valued at 53% of the entire closing third-quarter backlog.

Given that Q4 2025 revenue was 254 million and the backlog is "more than doubled," we can infer a total backlog value exceeding 1 billion CAD.

Also:

“Gross margin compression last year was due to the buildout of their Mexico facility, but both gross margins are expected to increase and the facility expansions are expectied to turn into accelerated revenue Q2 2026)” which is now.

Downside is if raw material costs (copper, electrical steel) spike again, but given this bottleneck, they can price hike. 

Personal FWD P/E estimates would be ~18-21 for 2026, <15 for 2027 from volume ramp.

But I think it’s possible to hit single digit fwd P/E if they do price hikes mixed with hyperscaler emergency orders. But that might get a little mixed with the new acquisition.

Regardless still looks cheap. 

Just a TLDR: 
$AMZN, $MSFT, $META, $GOOGL, $ORCL datacenter are being bottlenecked because of a lack of transformers/switchgear.

Seems like markets missed this little player with large market share, despite backlog visibility and increasing revenue from capacity expansion coming online.

I personally found it pretty compelling, so I went long.

Just sharing my personal thoughts, of course DYOR before making any decisions yourself.
当前瓶颈:Transformers/Switchgear。

交易想法:做多 Hammond(约 2.2B CAD / 约 $1.5B USD),价格 184 CAD。

他们主导这些市场:

- Transformers(dry,多年瓶颈,约 23% 市场份额),

- 服务 switchgear(2-3 年瓶颈)

- 也生产 liquid(5 年,更大的瓶颈)

我个人预计组件会像 NAND 一样涨价,因为 $AMZN$MSFT 等在争抢 allocation。

你可能看过:“一半美国数据中心建设被推迟或取消,增长受电力基础设施短缺限制”……

再往下看:

“为了解决短缺……加拿大、墨西哥……成为 AI 数据中心高功率 transformers 的最大供应地”

猜猜谁在加拿大(Guelph)、墨西哥(Monterrey 3 和 4)以及美国都有布局?

Hammond

然后文章引用 hyperscaler DC buildout 出问题的原因:

“这些挫折背后的主要原因,是关键电气组件的可用性,例如 transformers、switchgear”。

机构可能在看 Powell、Eaton 等……但他们不知道的是?

这些公司实际上会买 Hammond 的 transformers,放进自己的 switchgear(“对数据中心、switchgear manufacturers 的销售强劲”)

他们在 transformers 市场的份额其实很大(例如 dry 约 23%)。

最有说服力的信号:

-> 2025 年 backlog 同比增长 122%。我们可以推断这超过 1B CAD。

例如公司 2025 年实现 898m CAD 销售,已经到产能天花板。管理层说,2025 年 Q3 末订单价值相当于整个三季度期末 backlog 的 53%。

考虑到 Q4 2025 收入是 254 million,而 backlog “more than doubled”,我们可以推断总 backlog 超过 1 billion CAD。

另外:

“去年毛利率承压是因为墨西哥工厂建设,但预计毛利率会提升,工厂扩张也会在 2026 Q2 转化为加速收入”,也就是现在。

下行风险是原材料成本(铜、电工钢)再次上涨,但考虑到这个瓶颈,他们可以涨价。

我个人的 FWD P/E 估算是 2026 年约 18-21,2027 年随着放量低于 15。

但如果他们涨价并叠加 hyperscaler 紧急订单,我认为 forward P/E 有可能到个位数。不过这可能会和新收购有些混在一起。

不管怎样,看起来仍然便宜。

简单 TLDR:

$AMZN$MSFT$META$GOOGL$ORCL 数据中心正因为缺少 transformers/switchgear 被卡住。

尽管有 backlog 可见度和产能扩张上线带来的收入增长,市场似乎漏掉了这个拥有大份额的小玩家。

我个人觉得很有吸引力,所以做多了。

只是分享个人想法,当然你做任何决定前都要 DYOR。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041168871168545115
❤️ 434 🔁 17 💬 49
打开原推
💬 引用
Wow, my 16th 100%+ return this year alone: $TSEM ($113 -&gt; $226).

Timeline: 40 days.

Told you all it was possible for retail to frontrun institutions. https://t.co/ttbgTK1C5N
哇,我今年第 16 个 100%+ 回报:$TSEM($113 -&gt; $226)。

时间线:40 天。

我告诉过你们,散户抢跑机构是可能的。 https://t.co/ttbgTK1C5N
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I'm long $TSEM, the $TSM of photonics.

My top two picks for CPO are $SOI and Tower Semi.

Given the $NVDA GTC catalyst on new photonic related architecture next week:

I expect Tower Semi to get a huge catalyst.

Nvidia laready directly collaborated with Tower to scale 1.6T silicon photonics last month (hint hint for GTC), likely pushing the downstream players to use it.

And now, Tower is the leading supplier of 1.6T SiPh PICs and the primary foundry for scale-up CPO architectures. (the other being global foundries)

From my forward est:
2028 Forward P/E: ~16.8x to ~18.1x

(Tower set a target $2.84B revenue by 2028, with ~31.7% operating margin, ~$750M in net profit)

The thing to note is over 70% of their planned SiPh capacity is already reserved through 2028. And photonics haven't even ramped up yet.

So, I expect them to strongly beat earning projections due to extreme photonics scaling + allocations price hikes that's not modeled into projections.

Also, $TSEM is heavily de-risked by 70% of capacity already being reserved. MC is likely due to $TSEM being a very obscure upstream player in the photonics supply chain.

But I expect the $NVDA GTC conference to be that catalyst that brings it to premium valuations.

I'm long $TSEM as an asymmetrical upside for upstream photonics foundry layer.
我做多 $TSEM,它就是光子领域的 $TSM

我对 CPO 的前两大选择是 $SOI 和 Tower Semi。

考虑到下周 $NVDA GTC 对新的光子相关架构有催化:

我预计 Tower Semi 会迎来巨大催化。

Nvidia 上个月已经直接和 Tower 合作,扩大 1.6T 硅光规模(给 GTC 的暗示),很可能推动下游玩家使用它。

现在,Tower 是 1.6T SiPh PIC 的领先供应商,也是 scale-up CPO 架构的主要晶圆厂(另一个是 global foundries)。

按我的前瞻估算:
2028 Forward P/E:约 16.8x 到 18.1x

(Tower 设定了 2028 年 $2.84B 收入目标,约 31.7% 经营利润率,约 $750M 净利润)

需要注意的是,他们规划中的 SiPh 产能超过 70% 已经预定到 2028 年。而光子还没真正放量。

所以我预计他们会因为极端的光子扩产 + allocation 涨价,大幅超过盈利预测,而这些还没有被模型计入。

另外,$TSEM 也因为 70% 产能已被预定而大幅去风险。市值可能是因为 $TSEM 是光子供应链里非常冷门的上游玩家。

但我预计 $NVDA GTC 会成为让它获得溢价估值的催化。

我做多 $TSEM,把它当作上游光子晶圆厂层的非对称上行机会。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031820871170736570
❤️ 1,293 🔁 26 💬 89
打开原推
💬 引用
Holy crap $SOI.

$AXTI went up 30% yesterday too.

Substrates to brrr? https://t.co/nK6o6BKNrl
Holy crap $SOI

$AXTI 昨天也涨了 30%。

Substrates to brrr? https://t.co/nK6o6BKNrl
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Wow $SOI is now the 16th name...

I've done a mininthesis post on that returned over 100%

Year to Date.

The most recent two were $ALRIB and $RPI.

Why does everything around me keep doubling? https://t.co/ttgmKWEhhU
哇,$SOI 现在是第 16 个名字了...

我发过 mininthesis 帖后,回报超过 100%

今年以来。

最近两个是 $ALRIB$RPI

为什么我周围的一切都一直翻倍?https://t.co/ttgmKWEhhU
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2044822095931306149
❤️ 549 🔁 23 💬 82
打开原推
📝 原创
Cerebras soon to IPO at $35B+ valuation.

This is the holy grail of OpenAi contagion.

-> $8.1B valuation few months ago
-> Sam Altman hints at $20-30B deal over 3 years.
-> $23B valuation.
-> Now it’s $35B+ to the public.

If OpenAI promises $BIRD $5 trillion in orders, does it suddenly make it a $6 company?

Might be fine for a year… but this is not going to end well if OpenAi goes down.
Cerebras 很快要以 $35B+ 估值 IPO。

这是 OpenAi contagion 的 holy grail。

-> 几个月前估值 $8.1B
-> Sam Altman 暗示 3 年 $20-30B deal。
-> $23B 估值。
-> 现在对公众是 $35B+。

如果 OpenAI 承诺给 $BIRD $5 trillion 订单,它会突然变成 $6 公司吗?

一年内可能没事……但如果 OpenAi 出事,这不会有好结果。
❤️ 835 🔁 41 💬 69
打开原推
💬 引用
I actually don’t have positions but gave some slight DD away for subscribers earlier.

I expect PCL Technologies (4977) to double as well.

Since they’re doing everything in $AVGO photonics ecosystem for assembly, optical, testing.

Think I mentioned this around ~$450M MC? https://t.co/vmgilSKANV
我其实没有仓位,但之前给订阅者发过一点 DD。

我预计 PCL Technologies (4977) 也会翻倍。

因为它们在 $AVGO photonics ecosystem 里做 assembly、optical、testing 的所有东西。

我好像在 ~$450M 市值左右提过这个? https://t.co/vmgilSKANV
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Shunsin (6451). Foxconn’s optical packaging/assembly arm.

Previously 15-16% gross margins as OSAT but CPO/1.6T could be 30-35%, which brings blended up.

Since they’re doing harder FAU optical alignment in $NVDA CPO supply chains.

Compared to $FN or $ASX that trades in the tens of billions?

This trades at… $1.4B MC with, fwd 2028 p/e likely compresses to single digits from personal projections, as Foxconn passes orders to them.

Foxconn is massive. And de-risks this company.

Pretty high conviction this ends up doubling soon.

Just nobody knows about this company imo.
Shunsin (6451)。Foxconn 的光学封装/组装部门。

以前作为 OSAT 毛利率 15-16%,但 CPO/1.6T 可能是 30-35%,会把综合毛利拉上去。

因为他们在 $NVDA CPO 供应链里做更难的 FAU optical alignment。

相比 $FN$ASX 这些市值几十 billions 的公司?

它现在交易在... $1.4B MC,按我个人预测,随着 Foxconn 把订单给他们,fwd 2028 p/e 很可能压到个位数。

Foxconn 体量巨大。而且让这家公司去风险。

我非常有信心它很快会翻倍。

只是没人知道这家公司 imo。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2044954792381030506
❤️ 597 🔁 43 💬 44
打开原推
💬 引用
Shunsin (6451). Foxconn’s optical packaging/assembly arm.

Previously 15-16% gross margins as OSAT but CPO/1.6T could be 30-35%, which brings blended up.

Since they’re doing harder FAU optical alignment in $NVDA CPO supply chains.

Compared to $FN or $ASX that trades in the tens of billions?

This trades at… $1.4B MC with, fwd 2028 p/e likely compresses to single digits from personal projections, as Foxconn passes orders to them.

Foxconn is massive. And de-risks this company.

Pretty high conviction this ends up doubling soon.

Just nobody knows about this company imo.
Shunsin (6451)。Foxconn 的 optical packaging/assembly arm。

以前作为 OSAT 毛利率 15-16%,但 CPO/1.6T 可能是 30-35%,会拉高 blended。

因为它们在 $NVDA CPO 供应链里做更难的 FAU optical alignment。

$FN$ASX 这种几十亿美元市值的公司相比?

它交易在……$1.4B 市值,而且从个人预测看,随着 Foxconn 把订单转给它们,2028 fwd p/e 很可能压到个位数。

Foxconn 很大。而且降低了这家公司的风险。

我高信心认为它很快会翻倍。

只是 imo 没人知道这家公司。
引用原推@MJumbo345345
@aleabitoreddit Amazing, wish I had followed your thesis earlier. Which you think is a hidden gem next?
@aleabitoreddit 太厉害了,真希望我早点跟上你的 thesis。你觉得下一个 hidden gem 是哪个?
https://x.com/MJumbo345345/status/2044871904587071989
❤️ 446 🔁 23 💬 50
打开原推
💬 引用
It's like... Hedge Funds/VCs suddenly forgot what blockchain was ever supposed to do?

They somehow turned digital assets into:

Token raise -> retail exit liquidity on repeat.

Now, nobody cares anymore about "governance or gas" tokens since it's greater fools theory from printed money.

The original point of blockchain is removing as many middlemen as possible, and as a byproduct, the fees.

Despite all of this:

1. 3 Day ACH rails are still around... Even though we have payment rails for 0 cents.

2. Massive interchange is still around... despite having payment rails at 0 cents...

3. Digital Asset "Credit Cards" are just more friction-add wrappers around Visa/Mastercard.

4. Yields are still .3% in checking accounts and now laws are trying to bank stablecoin related yields.

Very little that digital assets set out to do actually got accomplished, aside from Stablecoins?

Maybe you all have bad performance by just blindly following the next L2 exchange token or blindly into Ethereum.

It's not about making money from token prices going up + monetizing degeneracy from meme coins.

It's to be funding any legitimate disruptors, like the next $HOOD/Hyperliquid (Tokenization, on-chain equities), Bridge (stablecoin off-ramps/intercharge), etc.

0 alpha from the vast majority of folks in that space, because everyone there lost vision on what it was originally supposed to do.
就像……Hedge Funds/VCs 突然忘了 blockchain 本来应该做什么?

他们莫名其妙把 digital assets 变成:

Token raise -> retail exit liquidity 不断重复。

现在没人再关心“governance or gas” tokens,因为这只是印出来的钱玩 greater fools theory。

区块链最初的意义,是尽可能移除中间人,并顺带移除费用。

尽管如此:

1. 3 Day ACH rails 还在……尽管我们已经有 0 cents 的 payment rails。

2. Massive interchange 还在……尽管有 0 cents 的 payment rails……

3. Digital Asset “Credit Cards” 只是 Visa/Mastercard 外面更多增加摩擦的包装。

4. Checking accounts 的收益仍然是 .3%,现在法律还想禁止 stablecoin 相关收益进入银行。

除了 Stablecoins,digital assets 最初想做的事情实际完成得很少?

也许你们表现差,是因为盲目跟下一个 L2 exchange token,或者盲目买 Ethereum。

这不是靠 token 价格上涨赚钱 + 通过 meme coins 货币化 degeneracy。

而是应该资助真正的颠覆者,比如下一个 $HOOD/Hyperliquid(Tokenization、on-chain equities)、Bridge(stablecoin off-ramps/intercharge)等等。

那个领域绝大多数人 0 alpha,因为那里所有人都丢掉了它最初该做什么的愿景。
引用原推@fintechfrank
Crypto hedge fund performance over the last 5 years https://t.co/oOxKSEyyEO
Crypto hedge fund 过去 5 年表现 https://t.co/oOxKSEyyEO
https://x.com/fintechfrank/status/2044735155017859126
❤️ 529 🔁 36 💬 58
打开原推
💬 引用
Glad to hear it!

I've went long and wrote thesis posts on about out 15 different stocks that hit 100-1000%+ YTD?

1. $AXTI
2. $AAOI
3. $SIVEF
4. $LITE
5. $IQE
6. $AEHR
7. $CRCL
8. $EWY
9. Unimicron
10. Nitto Boseki
11. $OSS
12. $GDRZF
13. $RPI
14. $SOI
15. $ALRIB

Not including others like $TSEM that are about to hit triple digit returns too in a month.

The amount of hate people like myself get for posting free ideas over the internet is pretty insane TBH.

Starting to make sense why people just set up $20,000 paywalls and sell info to Western institutions instead of helping out salty retail investors (especially over in Europe).

But helps me keep motivated to keep posting with these positive comments.
很高兴听到!

我做多并写过 thesis 帖的大约 15 只不同股票,今年 YTD 达到 100-1000%+?

1. $AXTI
2. $AAOI
3. $SIVEF
4. $LITE
5. $IQE
6. $AEHR
7. $CRCL
8. $EWY
9. Unimicron
10. Nitto Boseki
11. $OSS
12. $GDRZF
13. $RPI
14. $SOI
15. $ALRIB

还不包括 $TSEM 这种一个月内也快到三位数回报的。

像我这样在网上免费发想法的人,收到的仇恨说实话相当疯狂。

开始理解为什么大家干脆设 $20,000 付费墙,把信息卖给西方机构,而不是帮助酸溜溜的散户投资者(尤其是欧洲那边)。

不过这些正面评论能帮助我保持动力继续发。
引用原推@Nangjayson
@aleabitoreddit I basically skipped over the March Iran-war market drop while staying heavily exposed to stocks, and still ended up gaining thanks to your picks. Portfolio is up 3x YTD and I’m just some random retail guy from Canada, so I can only imagine how many others you’ve helped. Thank you
@aleabitoreddit 我基本上在股票重仓暴露的情况下,跳过了 3 月 Iran-war market drop,而且最后还因为你的 picks 赚了。组合今年以来 3x,我只是一个来自加拿大的普通散户,所以我只能想象你帮了多少其他人。谢谢你
https://x.com/Nangjayson/status/2044860713508708695
❤️ 2,044 🔁 78 💬 250
打开原推
💬 引用
Huberman did say $HIMS was set to soar… in this type of arc playing out today.

Interesting to see takes from Stanford professors on public equities. https://t.co/jqVtpEaoGB
Huberman 确实说过,在今天这种 arc 兑现下,$HIMS 会起飞……

看到 Stanford professors 对 public equities 的看法挺有意思。 https://t.co/jqVtpEaoGB
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
This announcement is the most bullish catalyst for $HIMS revenue re-acceleration to date.

This is amid:
- 30%+ of the float sold short
- new $NVO partnership/lawsuit dropped
- new global acquisitions
- recovering macro climate.

The share price is still $25, down from $70 last year.

Short sellers are likely in trouble:

$HIMS can capture market share at the ~70%-80% gross margins typical of their compounded products for the holy grail of the "Grey Market" TAM for peptides.

- EG. Healing: BPC-157 and Thymosin beta-4
- Hair & Skin: GHK-Cu
- Weight Loss & Muscle: MOTS-c and Ibutamoren

And now they're probably the world's largest independent DTC distribution network to date from their new acquisitions...

So just running a peptide protocol subscription between $150 to $300, for 200k subscribers is $360M+ in high-margin ARR.

As just one example, but now they have a worldwide net of customers.

They burned through capex last year to acquire peptide manufacturing facilities too... so now that's turned into a massive cash-cow business.

I said $HIMS would need fundamental changes in order to force shorts to cover, and this is probably that signal as seen with market data.

And $HIMS is turning into a fundamentally sound company after regulatory de-risking.
这条公告是迄今为止 $HIMS 收入重新加速最看多的催化。

背景是:
- 30%+ 流通盘被卖空
- 新的 $NVO 合作/诉讼落地
- 新的全球收购
- macro climate 正在恢复。

股价仍然是 $25,低于去年 $70。

空头可能有麻烦了:

$HIMS 可以用其 compounded products 常见的 ~70%-80% gross margins,在 peptides 的“Grey Market”TAM 圣杯里抢市场份额。

- 例如 Healing:BPC-157 和 Thymosin beta-4
- Hair & Skin:GHK-Cu
- Weight Loss & Muscle:MOTS-c 和 Ibutamoren

而现在,凭借新的收购,他们可能已经是迄今为止全球最大的独立 DTC distribution network...

所以只要跑一个每月 $150 到 $300 的 peptide protocol subscription,20 万订阅者就是 $360M+ 的高利润 ARR。

这只是一个例子,但现在他们有了全球客户网络。

他们去年也烧 capex 收购了 peptide manufacturing facilities... 所以现在这变成了一门巨大的 cash-cow business。

我说过 $HIMS 需要基本面变化来迫使空头 cover,而从市场数据看,这很可能就是那个信号。

而且监管去风险后,$HIMS 正在变成一家基本面扎实的公司。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2044544090549981244
❤️ 825 🔁 58 💬 46
打开原推
📝 原创
Sorry but I’m convinced $LWLG is the current $RGTI of photonics.

I have zero clue… How they’re valued at $1.8B.

Foxconn’s optical arm Shunsin, for $NVDA CPO packaging, assembly, and testing…

Is valued less at $1.4B?

$SIVEF, the laser source for $JBL and $MRVL was 1/3rd their valuation earlier this week?

Feels like dumb money institutions went into the wrong name off a development test agreement.

I have no open positions, just confused
抱歉,但我确信 $LWLG 是当前 photonics 里的 $RGTI

我完全不懂……它们怎么值 $1.8B。

Foxconn 的 optical arm Shunsin,做 $NVDA CPO packaging、assembly 和 testing……

估值更低,只有 $1.4B?

$SIVEF$JBL$MRVL 的 laser source,本周早些时候估值只有它们的 1/3?

感觉 dumb money institutions 因为一个 development test agreement 买错名字了。

我没有开放仓位,只是困惑。
❤️ 1,066 🔁 67 💬 126
打开原推
💬 引用
Wow $SOI is now the 16th name...

I've done a mininthesis post on that returned over 100%

Year to Date.

The most recent two were $ALRIB and $RPI.

Why does everything around me keep doubling? https://t.co/ttgmKWEhhU
哇,$SOI 现在是第 16 个名字……

我写过 mini thesis post,回报超过 100%

Year to Date。

最近两个是 $ALRIB$RPI

为什么我周围所有东西都在翻倍? https://t.co/ttgmKWEhhU
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 596 🔁 28 💬 88
打开原推
💬 引用
It’s just that the world wanted me to reach 1000% unrealized gains on $AXTI.

My most legendary thesis to date. https://t.co/WR6Fq1Vyez
只是世界想让我在 $AXTI 上达到 1000% 未实现收益。

我迄今最传奇的 thesis。 https://t.co/WR6Fq1Vyez
引用原推@Jos1984482
@aleabitoreddit Anything explaining axti's 20% jump?
@aleabitoreddit 有什么能解释 axti 涨 20% 吗?
https://x.com/Jos1984482/status/2044794664536961456
❤️ 1,327 🔁 19 💬 89
打开原推
📝 原创
$AEHR receives $41M production order from lead hyperscaler customer.

As I said after earnings, they indicated volume ramp “shortly after”.

This is it. $AEHR +13% today on the news. https://t.co/rpF3qTHoJz
$AEHR 从 lead hyperscaler customer 收到 $41M 生产订单。

就像我在财报后说的,他们暗示 volume ramp “shortly after”。

就是这个。$AEHR 今天因新闻涨 +13%。 https://t.co/rpF3qTHoJz
❤️ 621 🔁 26 💬 46
打开原推
💬 引用
It doesn't need to be detailed with $ALRIB?

> Riber effective, profitable duopoly with $VECO on MBE equipment, that traded at low fwd multiples.
> $MSFT Quantum as core hyperscaler buyer of Riber from public information discovery
> $IQE, QD Laser (Quantum dot), IntelliEPI and others using it.

Thought process:

What other companies under $1B supply directly to hyperscalers like $GOOGL to $MSFT for their frontier programs?

And are critical suppliers that can't be replaced?

Can't really name any aside from $AEHR, but that's now $2.3B from $600m...

So thought $ALRIB was compelling for Quantum/Silicon Photonics exposure.

If a profitable ~300m company is powering a hyperscaler's quantum frontier program…

Probably going to get re-rated triple digits over time.
$ALRIB 不需要讲得很详细?

> Riber 和 $VECO 在 MBE equipment 上是有效、盈利的双寡头,且以低 fwd multiples 交易。
> 从公开信息发现,$MSFT Quantum 是 Riber 的核心 hyperscaler buyer
> $IQE、QD Laser(Quantum dot)、IntelliEPI 等在使用它。

思考过程:

还有哪些 $1B 以下公司,直接给 $GOOGL$MSFT 这类 hyperscalers 的 frontier programs 供货?

而且是不能被替代的关键供应商?

除了 $AEHR,我真想不到什么,但它现在已经从 $600m 到 $2.3B……

所以我觉得 $ALRIB 作为 Quantum/Silicon Photonics 敞口很有吸引力。

如果一家盈利的 ~300m 公司在驱动 hyperscaler 的 quantum frontier program……

随着时间很可能会被 re-rate 出三位数。
引用原推@BottleneckFindr
@aleabitoreddit I think many people are interested in your detailed thoughts on $ALRIB.
@aleabitoreddit 我觉得很多人都对你关于 $ALRIB 的详细想法感兴趣。
https://x.com/BottleneckFindr/status/2044683921103659445
❤️ 584 🔁 49 💬 82
打开原推
💬 引用
My $IQE call… might actually outperform my legendary $AXTI thesis soon?

It’s only been 2 months:

Now it's up over +316% after institutions started publicly buying… and keeps going up.

Fun time for critical chokepoints like $ALRIB, $SIVE, and $SOI recently in Europe.

Probably expect them all to compound another triple digits from here, even after all their rallies.

Retail is just extremely early for the first time.

So, expect a lot of institutional capital to pour into these critical supply chains companies soon, especially $SIVE after Nasdaq listing.
我的 $IQE call……可能很快真的会跑赢我传奇的 $AXTI thesis?

才 2 个月:

现在机构开始公开买入后,它涨了超过 +316%……而且还在涨。

最近欧洲关键 chokepoints 像 $ALRIB$SIVE$SOI 玩得很开心。

我大概预计它们从这里开始都会再复利出另一个三位数,即使已经 rally 了。

散户第一次极其早。

所以,预计很快会有大量机构资本涌入这些关键供应链公司,尤其是 Nasdaq listing 后的 $SIVE
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Not exactly! I'm just a tad more familiar with photonic supply chains than I am with energy so I like picking potential winners.

Just wanted to introduce $IQE into the equation like i did with $AXTI, so I could do a "Did you Listen Anon?" post 3 months later if it turns out well.
不完全是!我只是比起能源,对光子供应链稍微更熟一点,所以喜欢在这里挑潜在赢家。

只是想像之前提 $AXTI 一样,把 $IQE 也放进讨论里,这样如果结果不错,3 个月后我就能发一条“你当时听了吗,Anon?”的帖子。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026647347237966298
❤️ 687 🔁 52 💬 64
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE is on its journey to be $LITE .

In the last 2 days:

> $JBL confirmation of using $SIVE lasers for their 1.6T optical transceivers

> Sivers raises $13.5M+ from long term institutional investors (eg. pension funds/institutional investors), de-risking balance sheet issues

> $SIVE plans to list on US NASDAQ.

What a crazy turn of events?

I still think it's heading to $2B+ MC in the near term.

Especially as shares transfer from local Swedish investors to Western funds/investors who understand what’s up and coming with photonics.
$SIVE 正在走向成为 $LITE 的旅程。

过去 2 天:

> $JBL 确认在他们的 1.6T optical transceivers 中使用 $SIVE lasers

> Sivers 从长期机构投资者(比如 pension funds/institutional investors)融资 $13.5M+,降低资产负债表风险

> $SIVE 计划在美国 NASDAQ 上市。

这是多疯狂的转折?

我仍然认为它近期会到 $2B+ 市值。

尤其是股票从瑞典本地投资者转到理解 photonics 即将发生什么的西方基金/投资者手中。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE executing US NASDAQ listing from Reuters.

Welcome to America Sivers.

I said Sivers looks like it should be valued at $2B+ soon based on today's fundamentals.

And US institutions will likely be piling into the laser supplier for $MRVL and $JBL once it's on NASDAQ.

This comes after a highly bullish 2.5% raise today from new "international institutional investors" to likely fund regulatory/audit requirements for the listing.

"The investors in the Directed Share Issue comprise of a limited number of Swedish and international institutional and other qualified investors"

We’ll likely going to see a parabolic ride up from the news.

In just the last three days:

-> $JBL 1.6T to use $SIVE
-> $SIVE new US/international institutional investors
-> $SIVE looks to be listed on NASDAQ.

We're witnessing the birth of the next $LITE.
$SIVE 正在执行 Reuters 报道的美国 NASDAQ listing。

欢迎来到美国,Sivers。

我说过,基于今天的基本面,Sivers 很快看起来就应该值 $2B+。

一旦上 NASDAQ,美国机构很可能会涌入这个 $MRVL$JBL 的 laser supplier。

这发生在今天一次非常看多的 2.5% 增发之后,新进的“international institutional investors”很可能是为了给上市的监管/审计要求提供资金。

“The investors in the Directed Share Issue comprise of a limited number of Swedish and international institutional and other qualified investors”

我们很可能会看到这条消息带来的抛物线式上涨。

就在过去三天:

-> $JBL 1.6T 使用 $SIVE
-> $SIVE 新的美国/国际机构投资者
-> $SIVE 看起来要上 NASDAQ。

我们正在见证下一个 $LITE 的诞生。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2044553960431014359
❤️ 771 🔁 62 💬 81
打开原推
💬 引用
How am i getting 5,000 new subscribers every few days?

Genuinely, what is this black magic? Can't believe I have 15,000 paid subscribers now...

Well, my new goal is to be #1 on the entire X platform.

Thank you all, I'll keep pouring out my thoughts to make that $1 worth it. https://t.co/0DByvY9LIV
我怎么每几天就新增 5,000 个订阅者?

真的,这是什么 black magic?不敢相信我现在有 15,000 个付费订阅者……

好吧,我的新目标是成为整个 X 平台 #1。

谢谢大家,我会继续输出我的想法,让那 $1 值得。 https://t.co/0DByvY9LIV
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Honestly... I don't even know at this point?

0 to 155,000+ followers, 10,000 subscribers... in under a year.

900%+ year to date...

Off 13+ individual stocks from $AAOI to $LITE hitting triple digits returns in 4 months.

Call me aura farming Serenity Jin-woo (last post about this topic i swear, 10,000 just looks cool).

Jokes aside, thanks everyone for this opportunity. I genuinely want to make a difference to the retail community.

Getting tired of institutions shafting retail or seeing $2000+ paywalls so hope to bridge the gap in information discovery/synthesis.
说实话... 我现在自己都不知道了?

不到一年,从 0 到 155,000+ followers、10,000 subscribers...

今年以来 900%+...

靠 13+ 只个股,从 $AAOI$LITE,4 个月里都打出三位数回报。

叫我 aura farming Serenity Jin-woo 吧(我发誓这是这个话题最后一帖,10,000 看起来就是很酷)。

玩笑归玩笑,谢谢大家给我这个机会。我真心想给散户社区带来改变。

厌倦了机构坑散户,也厌倦了看到 $2000+ 的付费墙,所以希望弥合信息发现/整合上的差距。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2042856101939712444
❤️ 1,292 🔁 17 💬 135
打开原推
💬 引用
This is exactly why I long the $SIVE laser ecosystem with Win Semi (3105).

The beneficiaries of the next architectural supercycle for laser mass production?

Sivers + Win.

Especially with the announcement yesterday that Sivers is powering $JBL 1.6T optical transceivers. https://t.co/05wYF3fR0U
这正是为什么我做多 $SIVE laser ecosystem 里的 Win Semi (3105)。

下一轮 laser mass production 架构 supercycle 的受益者?

Sivers + Win。

尤其是昨天宣布 Sivers 正在驱动 $JBL 1.6T optical transceivers。 https://t.co/05wYF3fR0U
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I am long Win Semi (3105.TWO) at $4.1B MC.

I believe markets are sleeping on of the most important foundries in the world (aside from $TSM).

IMO their strategic positioning exceeds far beyond $4B MC.

They sit in almost every major chokepoints:

-> In the SpaceX Starlink LEO supply chain.
-> As $AVGO, $LITE, $MTSI, $SIVE InP foundries for optical transceivers
-> then as the body/eyes of humanoids as the GaAs foundry for TOF lasers possibly mapping to Boston Dynamic Atlas
-> With legacy from MediaTek / Qualcomm / $AAPL from their previous business.

But Win appears to be bottom of the legacy drag (like with $SOI), with optical as one of their largest growth vectors.

Then... Win has the largest TAM expansion/revenue acceleration out of almost any foundry:

With: LEO, humanoids / CW laser, 800g, 1.6t, 3.2t optical transceiver massive ramp up over the next few years.

Especially with Broadcom as their anchor client ( $AVGO owns ~5% of Win).

$NVDA doesn't care who makes the lasers, whether it's $LITE or $COHR.

They just care if there's enough.

There's not enough.

-> Demand for CW lasers will likely go parabolic. (they make the lasers that companies like $SIVE designs)

-> Demand for LEO satellites (SpaceX Starlink) will likely go parabolic.

-> Demand for humanoids will likely go parabolic.

As, Win Semi sits as a semi-monopoly chokepoint in the three most frontier and fastest growing industries for photonics/AI, robotics/humanoids, and space.

Especially with Optical TAM explosion:

Win fwd earnings for 2027 roughly in ~35x range, I do think this is sandbagging it and forward multiples will end up dirt cheap.

Win will largely benefit from TAM expansion and accelerated revenue growth.

Of course: Win will win. So I am long Win.
我做多 Win Semi (3105.TWO),市值 $4.1B。

我认为市场正在忽视世界上最重要的 foundries 之一(除了 $TSM)。

IMO 它们的战略位置远超 $4B MC。

它们处在几乎所有主要 chokepoints:

-> 在 SpaceX Starlink LEO 供应链里。
-> 作为 $AVGO$LITE$MTSI$SIVE optical transceivers 的 InP foundries
-> 然后作为 humanoids 的身体/眼睛,作为 TOF lasers 的 GaAs foundry,可能映射到 Boston Dynamic Atlas
-> 还有来自之前业务的 MediaTek / Qualcomm / $AAPL legacy。

但 Win 看起来已经处在 legacy drag 底部(像 $SOI 一样),而 optical 是他们最大的增长向量之一。

然后... 在几乎所有 foundry 里,Win 拥有最大的 TAM expansion/revenue acceleration:

包括:LEO、humanoids / CW laser、800g、1.6t、3.2t optical transceiver 在未来几年大幅 ramp up。

尤其 Broadcom 是他们的 anchor client($AVGO 持有 Win 约 ~5%)。

$NVDA 不在乎 lasers 是谁做的,是 $LITE 还是 $COHR

他们只在乎够不够。

现在不够。

-> CW lasers 的需求很可能抛物线增长。(他们制造 $SIVE 这类公司设计的 lasers)

-> LEO satellites(SpaceX Starlink)的需求很可能抛物线增长。

-> humanoids 的需求很可能抛物线增长。

所以,Win Semi 位于 photonics/AI、robotics/humanoids 和 space 这三个最前沿、增长最快行业的半垄断瓶颈。

尤其在 Optical TAM 爆炸的情况下:

Win 2027 年 forward earnings 大概在 ~35x 区间,我觉得这还是压低预期了,forward multiples 最后会显得很便宜。

Win 会很大程度受益于 TAM 扩张和收入加速增长。

当然:Win will win。所以我做多 Win。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037387801285841118
❤️ 543 🔁 36 💬 38
打开原推
📝 原创
$SIVE executing US NASDAQ listing from Reuters.

Welcome to America Sivers.

I said Sivers looks like it should be valued at $2B+ soon based on today's fundamentals.

And US institutions will likely be piling into the laser supplier for $MRVL and $JBL once it's on NASDAQ.

This comes after a highly bullish 2.5% raise today from new "international institutional investors" to likely fund regulatory/audit requirements for the listing.

"The investors in the Directed Share Issue comprise of a limited number of Swedish and international institutional and other qualified investors"

We’ll likely going to see a parabolic ride up from the news.

In just the last three days:

-> $JBL 1.6T to use $SIVE
-> $SIVE new US/international institutional investors
-> $SIVE looks to be listed on NASDAQ.

We're witnessing the birth of the next $LITE.
Reuters:$SIVE 正在执行美国 NASDAQ listing。

欢迎来到美国,Sivers。

我说过,基于今天的基本面,Sivers 看起来很快应该值 $2B+。

一旦它上 NASDAQ,美国机构很可能会涌入这个 $MRVL$JBL 的 laser supplier。

这发生在今天非常 bullish 的 2.5% 融资之后,来自新的“international institutional investors”,很可能用于支付上市的监管/审计要求。

“The investors in the Directed Share Issue comprise of a limited number of Swedish and international institutional and other qualified investors”

我们很可能会看到新闻带来的抛物线式上涨。

就在过去三天:

-> $JBL 1.6T 使用 $SIVE
-> $SIVE 新的美国/国际机构投资者
-> $SIVE 看起来要在 NASDAQ 上市。

我们正在见证下一个 $LITE 的诞生。
❤️ 1,608 🔁 128 💬 169
打开原推
💬 引用
This announcement is the most bullish catalyst for $HIMS revenue re-acceleration to date.

This is amid:
- 30%+ of the float sold short
- new $NVO partnership/lawsuit dropped
- new global acquisitions
- recovering macro climate.

The share price is still $25, down from $70 last year.

Short sellers are likely in trouble:

$HIMS can capture market share at the ~70%-80% gross margins typical of their compounded products for the holy grail of the "Grey Market" TAM for peptides.

- EG. Healing: BPC-157 and Thymosin beta-4
- Hair & Skin: GHK-Cu
- Weight Loss & Muscle: MOTS-c and Ibutamoren

And now they're probably the world's largest independent DTC distribution network to date from their new acquisitions...

So just running a peptide protocol subscription between $150 to $300, for 200k subscribers is $360M+ in high-margin ARR.

As just one example, but now they have a worldwide net of customers.

They burned through capex last year to acquire peptide manufacturing facilities too... so now that's turned into a massive cash-cow business.

I said $HIMS would need fundamental changes in order to force shorts to cover, and this is probably that signal as seen with market data.

And $HIMS is turning into a fundamentally sound company after regulatory de-risking.
这个公告是迄今为止对 $HIMS 收入重新加速最 bullish 的催化。

这发生在:
- 30%+ 流通盘被做空
- 新 $NVO partnership/lawsuit dropped
- 新的全球收购
- 宏观环境复苏。

股价仍然是 $25,低于去年 $70。

空头很可能麻烦了:

$HIMS 可以用 compounded products 典型的 ~70%-80% 毛利率,拿下 peptides 的“Grey Market”TAM 圣杯市场份额。

- 比如 Healing:BPC-157 和 Thymosin beta-4
- Hair & Skin:GHK-Cu
- Weight Loss & Muscle:MOTS-c 和 Ibutamoren

而且通过新收购,它们现在可能已经是全球最大的独立 DTC distribution network……

所以只要运行一个 $150 到 $300 的 peptide protocol subscription,200k 订阅者就是 $360M+ 高毛利 ARR。

这只是一个例子,但现在它们有全球客户网络。

它们去年烧 capex 收购 peptide manufacturing facilities……所以现在这变成了巨大的 cash-cow business。

我说过 $HIMS 需要基本面变化来迫使空头 cover,而从市场数据看,这大概就是那个信号。

监管风险降低后,$HIMS 正在变成一家基本面扎实的公司。
引用原推@SecKennedy
Today, we took long-overdue action to restore science, accountability, and the rule of law.

In September 2023, the Biden FDA pushed a number of peptides into Category 2 — “Bulk Drug Substances that Raise Significant Safety Risks” — driving a dangerous black market that puts Americans at risk.

Now, after nominators withdrew 12 peptides, the FDA will remove them from Category 2 and will bring them to PCAC at its next two meetings, beginning in July—where independent experts will rigorously evaluate each substance on its scientific merits using full clinical, pharmacological, and safety evidence.

• BPC-157
• Thymosin beta-4 fragment (LKKTETQ)
• Epitalon
• GHK-Cu (injectable)
• MOTS-c
• DSIP (Emideltide)
• Dihexa Acetate
• Ibutamoren Mesylate
• Melanotan II
• KPV
• Semax (heptapeptide)
• Cathelicidin LL-37

This action begins to restore regulated access and will immediately begin shifting demand away from the black market.

We will follow the science, enforce the law, and deliver the clarity patients, providers, and pharmacies deserve.
今天,我们采取了早就该采取的行动,恢复科学、问责和法治。

2023 年 9 月,Biden FDA 把多种 peptides 推入 Category 2 — “Bulk Drug Substances that Raise Significant Safety Risks” — 这催生了危险的黑市,让美国人面临风险。

现在,在提名方撤回 12 种 peptides 后,FDA 会把它们从 Category 2 移除,并从 7 月开始,在接下来两次 PCAC 会议上审议它们——届时独立专家会基于完整的临床、药理和安全性证据,严格按科学价值评估每种物质。

• BPC-157
• Thymosin beta-4 fragment (LKKTETQ)
• Epitalon
• GHK-Cu (injectable)
• MOTS-c
• DSIP (Emideltide)
• Dihexa Acetate
• Ibutamoren Mesylate
• Melanotan II
• KPV
• Semax (heptapeptide)
• Cathelicidin LL-37

这项行动开始恢复受监管的获取渠道,并会立即开始把需求从黑市转移出来。

我们会遵循科学,执行法律,并给患者、服务提供者和药房应得的清晰度。
https://x.com/SecKennedy/status/2044478939897221219
❤️ 2,078 🔁 178 💬 97
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So my opinion on current markets and thoughts:

Lot of photonics stuff ran up too much like $LITE, $AXTI, $AAOI, and others. eg. $AAOI $40 -> $150.

Probably going to see some range-bound chopping for awhile until next earnings?

While a lot of the newer CPO ecosystem names like ASE, Sivers, etc, have a lot of re-rating to do.

Stuff like $AEHR more priced in after the 100% rally, probably better not to take short term capital gains imo... I can see it chopping a tiny bit too. But hint was volume orders shortly after. So maybe if you wait a month, volume order hits, then stock goes up another 30% is my guess?

There's some nuance like $SMTC for LPO/LRO transitions, but it's really complicated as a briedge.

Software obviously got sold off too much. I was questioning why $META, $MSFT were sold off 20% after macro, even more with $RDDT.

Even though Meta was doing 36% or so revenue growth Y/Y, which is stupidly insane. And reddit was doing 1/3 net income of revenue that grew 70% Y/Y.

I think AI is accelerates revenue for some software names actually, esp. social media.

But there's obvious companies that get disrupted over time as seen with Chegg from both vibe coded competitors as well as just direct to AI from ChatGPT/Gemini.

As for Crypto, got sold off too much. I'm always bullish Ethereum 1.5-2K, and bearish at 3-4k. Don't ask me why but it just repeats like this for the past 6 years.

I like Bitcoin, and some protocols that actually generate revenue like hyperliquid.

$CRCL is extreme nuanced. Clarity act is a nuke on yields, and I can't project how that would affect circulating supply yet.

Rate cuts projections dropped to 0 as highest probability. Which is heavily bullish circle, but if yields get banned, idk if stablecoin derivative liqudity flows into USDC supply or if liquidity just gets nuked if people just convert stablecoins to just banks instead.

I don't have the answer.

Stuff that I said early H1, like $MRVL, $NBIS being accelerated latter part of H2 is playing out now. Nebius was Q4 earnings (the big showtime) onward.

Marvell benefits so much from ASIC revenue like Microsoft Maia (which I've heard rumors about delay), and there's some rumors about them design wins from $GOOGL TPU but I think that's just to scare Broadcom/mediatek into better contracts.

They actually lose off from CPO, but have Celestial, the business is just way too ***** big so really hard to model. But it seems like a good compounder.

Stuff like $INTC, $ARM great holds. Just generally, Intel thesis still stands (made in america) for foundry.

$ARM unholy revenue acceleration from CPUs. And as you might have seen theres a CPU shortage too.

As for memory companies... My $EWY leaps hit triple digit returns, I'm just holding.

Not seeing any red flags, I already said the Google algo paper was stupid and won't affect DRAM/NAND prices much. And if you read it, it optimized lighter models not larger frontier models.

I did cut crypto exposure to chase AI semi supply chain names, but I do expect Bitcoin to recover... And if does, $HOOD, and other companies heavily tied to crypto revenue will do well too.

SpaceX IPO at $1.75T is just insane... idk. $RKLB was my long back at $10's, but it's just extreme premiums at $40B. They're not going to make much revenue from Neutron until like 2028+, but markets don't care.

I've said it before but Rocketlab is my favorite long long term stock, but you'll probably get faster returns elsewhere.

I don't think capex/revenue driving SpaceX will funnel down into the supply chains to the degree of AI.

The valuations look insane, but capex is not anywhere close to the degree of frontier lab spend. But still doing more research here.

As for overall macro, I wouldn't fade this rally and just go along for the ride.

Markets are extremely resilient and midterms are now coming up and it would look super bad, if markets were very red.

What I'm doing is:

IMO long recovery names like $META, $MSFT these types (there's a lot more).

Then long pure play 1.6T/CPO ramp has highest upside.

Have some misc stocks for quantum, and others.

Then just pyramid a lot of names that went up a lot already like $TSEM, etc. even if it chops a bit, more better to not take short term capital gains imo? even if it's more priced in can keep going higher.
所以我对当前市场的看法和想法:

很多 photonics 东西涨太多了,比如 $LITE$AXTI$AAOI 等。比如 $AAOI $40 -> $150。

可能会看到一段时间区间震荡,直到下一次财报?

而很多新的 CPO 生态名字,比如 ASE、Sivers 等,还有很多 re-rating 要做。

$AEHR 在 100% rally 后更 priced in,imo 最好不要拿短期资本利得……我也能看到它小幅震荡。但线索是 volume orders shortly after。所以我猜也许等一个月,volume order 落地,股票再涨 30%?

$SMTC 这种 LPO/LRO 过渡有一些细节,但作为 bridge 非常复杂。

Software 显然也被卖得太多。我之前在想,为什么 $META$MSFT 在宏观后被卖 20%,$RDDT 更严重。

尽管 Meta 同比收入增长大约 36%,这蠢得离谱。而 reddit 净利润相当于收入的 1/3,收入同比增长 70%。

我认为 AI 实际上会加速一些 software 名字的收入,尤其是社交媒体。

但显然有些公司会随着时间被颠覆,就像 Chegg,被 vibe coded competitors 以及 ChatGPT/Gemini 直接进攻。

至于 Crypto,被卖得太多。我一直在 Ethereum 1.5-2K bullish,3-4k bearish。别问我为什么,过去 6 年它就是这么重复。

我喜欢 Bitcoin,也喜欢一些真正产生收入的 protocols,比如 hyperliquid。

$CRCL 极其讲细节。Clarity act 对 yields 是核弹,我还无法预测这会如何影响 circulating supply。

降息预测最高概率降到 0。这对 circle 非常 bullish,但如果 yields 被禁止,idk stablecoin derivative liquidity 会不会流入 USDC supply,还是如果大家把 stablecoins 转回银行,流动性就被 nuked。

我没有答案。

我 H1 早些时候说的东西,比如 $MRVL$NBIS 会在 H2 后半加速,现在正在兑现。Nebius 是从 Q4 earnings(大 showtime)之后开始。

Marvell 受益于 Microsoft Maia 这类 ASIC revenue 太多(我听到过关于 delay 的传言),还有一些关于它们拿到 $GOOGL TPU design wins 的传言,但我觉得那只是为了吓 Broadcom/mediatek,让它们给更好合同。

它们实际上会因 CPO 受损,但有 Celestial,业务实在太*****大,所以很难建模。但它看起来是个好的 compounder。

$INTC$ARM 是很好的持有。总体上,Intel thesis 仍然成立(made in america)用于 foundry。

$ARM 受 CPUs 推动,收入加速非常离谱。而你可能也看到 CPU 短缺了。

至于 memory companies……我的 $EWY leaps 已经达到三位数回报,我只是持有。

没看到任何 red flags,我已经说过 Google algo paper 很蠢,不会太影响 DRAM/NAND 价格。而且如果你读了,它优化的是更轻模型,不是更大的 frontier models。

我确实削减了 crypto 敞口去追 AI semi supply chain 名字,但我预计 Bitcoin 会恢复……如果它恢复,$HOOD 和其他高度依赖 crypto revenue 的公司也会表现不错。

SpaceX 以 $1.75T IPO 太疯狂了……idk。$RKLB 是我在 $10 多时的 long,但 $40B 已经是极端溢价。它们到 2028+ 才会从 Neutron 赚多少收入,但市场不在乎。

我之前说过,Rocketlab 是我最喜欢的长期长期股票,但你可能在别处得到更快回报。

我不觉得 SpaceX 的 capex/revenue 会像 AI 那样传导到供应链。

估值看起来疯狂,但 capex 远远达不到 frontier lab spending 的程度。不过还在做更多研究。

至于整体宏观,我不会 fade 这轮 rally,只会跟着走。

市场非常有韧性,而且中期选举快到了,如果市场很红会很难看。

我在做的是:

IMO 做多 $META$MSFT 这类 recovery names(还有很多)。

然后做多 pure play 1.6T/CPO ramp,那里上行最高。

持有一些 quantum 和其他杂项股票。

然后对很多已经涨了很多的名字 pyramid,比如 $TSEM 等。即使会震荡,imo 不拿短期资本利得更好?即使更 priced in,也可以继续走高。
❤️ 951 🔁 30 💬 182
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm just sharing my journey and thoughts.

People give me too much credit, everyone takes their own trades.

As for me... I finished the day up +1,337.81% YTD.

$MSFT, $META and $RDDT beginning their recoveries today helped a bit.

This is exactly why I believe if your ideas were genuinely good enough:

You can make all your money going long on them in the markets.

Instead of paywalling them for $2000+ a year then getting salty off others helping retail for free.
我只是在分享我的旅程和想法。

大家给了我太多 credit,每个人都是自己交易。

至于我……今天收盘 YTD +1,337.81%。

$MSFT$META$RDDT 今天开始恢复,帮了一点。

这正是为什么我相信,如果你的想法真的足够好:

你可以靠在市场里做多它们赚到所有钱。

而不是每年收 $2000+ 付费墙,然后因为别人免费帮助散户而酸。
引用原推@drflange196811
@aleabitoreddit You made me 3x my money. Thank you 🙏
@aleabitoreddit 你让我赚了 3x。谢谢你 🙏
https://x.com/drflange196811/status/2044496510499402128
❤️ 1,937 🔁 34 💬 121
打开原推
💬 引用
No. This type of BS mindset needs to stop.

What I do is point them out to retail first before the 100-500%+ returns.

US institutions like Point72 or Apollo would have bought them out eventually.

1. $IQE went up because they're sitting on the most latent merchant capacity in the world for InP reactors back at a 100M euro marketcap. While companies like Landmark were trading at $3.8B.

They were also the supplier to $LITE, and photonics/epiwafer demand took off this year.

2. $SIVE went up because they had new deals with $JBL and O-Net.

But they were already unknown as the laser supplier to $MRVL's CPO program when I first went long.

American institutions like $AVGO would have likely just bought the company directly like what Qualcomm did with Alphawave over in the openlight side of things if I didn't bring attention to it.

Then Swedish retail investors wouldn't get any of the upside.

3. $ALRIB went up because their earnings sent their P/E down to fwd 26, despite holding a duopoly in the MBE category with $VECO.

This combined with new SiPH equipment, as well as $IQE + QD Laser (for quantum dot) being their customers.

This was combined from raw information discovery of the decade that $MSFT Quantum was their buyer.

You don't see direct hyperscaler frontier programs in quantum computing dependant on some <$1B MC company.

4. $SOI is up 208% because it has an unknown monopoly over SOI substrates for silicon photonics and CPO.

This was more information synthesis combined with timing the bottom of their legacy cycle.

5. $RPI went up because of earnings and AI hardware usage.

I was just the very first person to point it out.

I projected 55% revenue growth compared to 14% from analysts. They did 58%.

I just gave retail the chance to buy it before institutions.

The stock would have gone up off of pure fundamentals without me posting my thesis because you don't do $511m in revenue off a $500m MC as a fabless company.

I'm just giving retail the all the information discovery before institutions have a chance to find it and price it in.

This is a completely different model than the same institutions telling you to buy index funds or stocks that already went up 1500% so you're exit liquidity.
不。这种 BS 心态必须停止。

我做的是在 100-500%+ 回报之前,先把它们指出给散户。

像 Point72 或 Apollo 这种美国机构最终本来就会买走它们。

1. $IQE 上涨,是因为它们在 100M euro 市值时,坐拥全球最潜在的 InP reactors merchant capacity。而像 Landmark 这种公司交易在 $3.8B。

它们也是 $LITE 的供应商,而且今年 photonics/epiwafer demand 起飞。

2. $SIVE 上涨,是因为它们和 $JBL、O-Net 有新 deals。

但我刚做多时,它们已经是 $MRVL CPO program 里无人知晓的 laser supplier。

如果我没把注意力带过去,美国机构比如 $AVGO 很可能会直接买下这家公司,就像 Qualcomm 在 openlight 那边收 Alphawave 一样。

那瑞典散户投资者就拿不到任何上行。

3. $ALRIB 上涨,是因为它们财报把 P/E 压到 fwd 26,尽管它们在 MBE 类别里和 $VECO 是双寡头。

这还结合了新的 SiPH equipment,以及 $IQE + QD Laser(for quantum dot)作为它们客户。

再结合十年来的原始信息发现:$MSFT Quantum 是它们的买家。

你不会经常看到 quantum computing 的直接 hyperscaler frontier programs 依赖某个 <$1B 市值公司。

4. $SOI 涨 208%,因为它在 silicon photonics 和 CPO 所需的 SOI substrates 上有不为人知的垄断。

这更多是信息综合,加上 timing 了它们 legacy cycle 的底部。

5. $RPI 上涨,是因为财报和 AI hardware usage。

我只是第一个指出它的人。

我预测收入增长 55%,而分析师是 14%。它们做到了 58%。

我只是给了散户在机构之前买入的机会。

即使我不发 thesis,股票也会因为纯基本面上涨,因为一家 fabless 公司用 $500m 市值做出 $511m 收入是不合理的。

我只是把所有信息发现,在机构有机会找到并定价前,先给散户。

这和那些机构告诉你买指数基金,或者买已经涨了 1500%、让你当 exit liquidity 的股票,是完全不同的模式。
引用原推@filiusveritatis
@aleabitoreddit They only went up those percentages because of your and other X accounts attention to those stocks combined with them being undervalued
@aleabitoreddit 它们之所以涨了那些百分比,只是因为你和其他 X 账号对这些股票的关注,再加上它们本来就被低估
https://x.com/filiusveritatis/status/2044484538902983023
❤️ 1,154 🔁 48 💬 102
打开原推
📝 原创
Out of curiosity. Why do Europeans hate their own markets?

If you look at all my core longs:

$IQE up 837% YTD
$SIVE up 385% YTD
$ALRIB up 258% YTD
$SOI up 208% YTD
$RPI up 107% YTD

It’s just endless salt coming from local analysts and reporters.

But they’re the national security gems in each country (aside from Raspberry Pi).

Locals end up selling all their shares at the bottom, then it just transferred to American investors and institutions.

Then they don’t get any of the upside.

If a company like Riber is used by $MSFT quantum and traded at a 26 p/e, it would be $1.6B+ in the US like $LWLG. But people are salty if it has a valuation premium at all.

The only appreciative community for foreign capital I’ve seen are Japanese, and most have been incredibly welcoming.

I feel like Europeans should be proud their leading frontier companies, are benefiting from Western capital.

So they can scale up production needed for American hyperscalers?

It’s a positive sum effect on the company, and the local economies as well.

This backward mindset phenomenon needs to change.
出于好奇,为什么欧洲人这么讨厌自己的市场?

如果看我所有核心多头:

$IQE YTD 涨 837%
$SIVE YTD 涨 385%
$ALRIB YTD 涨 258%
$SOI YTD 涨 208%
$RPI YTD 涨 107%

本地分析师和记者就是没完没了地酸。

但它们是各自国家的 national security gems(Raspberry Pi 除外)。

本地人最后在底部卖光股票,然后这些股票转到美国投资者和机构手里。

然后他们拿不到任何上行。

如果 Riber 这种公司被 $MSFT quantum 使用,而且交易在 26 p/e,在美国它会像 $LWLG 一样值 $1.6B+。但只要它有任何估值溢价,大家就很酸。

我见过唯一欢迎外资的社区是日本人,而且大多数都非常友好。

我觉得欧洲人应该为自己的领先 frontier companies 受益于西方资本感到自豪。

这样它们才能扩大美国 hyperscalers 所需的生产?

这对公司和本地经济都是正和效果。

这种落后心态需要改变。
❤️ 1,104 🔁 59 💬 121
打开原推
💬 引用
Thank you $MSFT and $META.

The selloff overreaction presented a buying opportunity when:

-&gt; Microsoft hit $360 and Meta hit $525.

You didn’t need to time the exact bottom.

But the recovery probably minted generational wealth to many.

Did you end up taking positions? https://t.co/gII17cJo19
谢谢 $MSFT$META

当:

-&gt; Microsoft 到 $360,Meta 到 $525。

这次过度抛售给出了买入机会。

你不需要精确抄到底。

但这次恢复可能给很多人创造了代际财富。

你最后建仓了吗? https://t.co/gII17cJo19
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Feel like Mag7 selloff from $META at $593 to $MSFT at $373…

Has gone a bit too far?

At this point, risk/reward feels on hyperscaler spend vs. ROI vs. macro climates, feels compelling.

And we should see capital rotations back into the American tech sector soon. https://t.co/KBCi7gMfGT
感觉 Mag7 从 $META 在 $593 到 $MSFT 在 $373 的 selloff...

是不是有点过头了?

到这个位置,围绕 hyperscaler spend vs. ROI vs. macro climates 的风险回报,感觉有吸引力。

而且我们应该很快会看到资金轮动回美国科技板块。https://t.co/KBCi7gMfGT
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036448156280561850
❤️ 756 🔁 29 💬 88
打开原推
💬 引用
Yep… How did I call out and long.

FIFTEEN DIFFERENT STOCKS.

8+7. 9+6. 10+5.

After $ALRIB, the $MSFT Quantum supplier went up 113%, that hit 15 different longs.

That returned Triple Digits year to date???

No paywall, and I've posted everything before it moved.

Hard carrying retail out of the permanent underclass.
是啊……我是怎么点出并做多的。

十五只不同股票。

8+7。9+6。10+5。

$MSFT Quantum 供应商 $ALRIB 涨 113% 后,命中了 15 个不同多头。

今年以来全都三位数回报???

没有付费墙,而且我都是在它们启动前发的。

硬把散户从永久底层里 carry 出来。
引用原推@afishyanadoh
@aleabitoreddit Was it you that mentioned Riber SA as well? $Alrib? It’s been flying as well.
@aleabitoreddit Riber SA 也是你提过的吗?$Alrib?它也一直在飞。
https://x.com/afishyanadoh/status/2044305915592294537
❤️ 792 🔁 21 💬 78
打开原推
📝 原创
I’m at a loss for words. wtf is this

$BIRD is up 572% after:

“Allbirds executed a $50M convertible financing facility… to fund a pivot into GPU-as-a-Service and AI cloud infrastructure”

This is a shoe brand? https://t.co/QViPJDXj1E
我无话可说。wtf 这是什么

$BIRD 涨了 572%,因为:

“Allbirds executed a $50M convertible financing facility… to fund a pivot into GPU-as-a-Service and AI cloud infrastructure”

这不是个鞋品牌吗? https://t.co/QViPJDXj1E
❤️ 1,399 🔁 48 💬 232
打开原推
💬 引用
I really meant it when I thought $SIVE could be valued at $2B today.

When do you ever find a critical laser supplier to $MRVL, $JBL, and Hyperscaler supply chains...

At $620m MC?

You can't... Since there's only a few in the world.

And the rest in hyperscaler supply chains from $LITE to $MTSI are in the tens of billions...
我当时说 $SIVE 今天就可能值 $2B,是真的这么想的。

你什么时候能找到一家给 $MRVL$JBL 和 Hyperscaler 供应链供货的关键 laser supplier……

市值只有 $620m?

找不到……因为全世界也就几家。

而 hyperscaler 供应链里的其他公司,从 $LITE$MTSI,都是几十亿美元市值……
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE is the next $LITE at $560m MC.

Institutions just got full confirmation today:

Sivers is now the light source in hyperscaler supply chains and the direct supplier of $JBL optical transceivers.

It’s only a matter of time. https://t.co/Eh9GherJTV
$SIVE 是下一个 $LITE,现在 $560m MC。

机构今天刚拿到完整确认:

Sivers 现在是 hyperscaler 供应链里的 light source,也是 $JBL optical transceivers 的直接供应商。

只是时间问题。https://t.co/Eh9GherJTV
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2044312072780165440
❤️ 927 🔁 78 💬 99
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE is the next $LITE at $560m MC.

Institutions just got full confirmation today:

Sivers is now the light source in hyperscaler supply chains and the direct supplier of $JBL optical transceivers.

It’s only a matter of time. https://t.co/Eh9GherJTV
$SIVE 是下一个 $LITE,现在市值 $560m。

机构今天刚拿到完整确认:

Sivers 现在是 hyperscaler 供应链里的 light source,也是 $JBL optical transceivers 的直接供应商。

只是时间问题。 https://t.co/Eh9GherJTV
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
IT'S OFFICIAL: $JBL to use $SIVE Lasers for their optical transceivers.

Today: "Jabil plans to develop a 1.6T linear receive optical (LRO) transceiver module using Sivers’ high-performance Distributed Feedback (DFB) lasers"

Jabil Photonics: :Working with Sivers will allow us to deliver a 1.6T LRO solution that meets both data center performance and power targets at scale"

Where have you seen the LIGHT SOURCE for hyperscaler supply chains...

At a $500m MC? We had this hinted from physical sources at OFC, but many institutions needed actual confirmation like this.
正式确认:$JBL 将为他们的 optical transceivers 使用 $SIVE Lasers。

今天:“Jabil plans to develop a 1.6T linear receive optical (LRO) transceiver module using Sivers’ high-performance Distributed Feedback (DFB) lasers”

Jabil Photonics:“Working with Sivers will allow us to deliver a 1.6T LRO solution that meets both data center performance and power targets at scale”

你在哪见过 hyperscaler 供应链里的 LIGHT SOURCE...

市值只有 $500m MC?我们之前已经从 OFC 的实物来源得到暗示,但很多机构需要这种实际确认。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2044287196300226960
❤️ 1,220 🔁 102 💬 100
打开原推
📝 原创
IT'S OFFICIAL: $JBL to use $SIVE Lasers for their optical transceivers.

Today: "Jabil plans to develop a 1.6T linear receive optical (LRO) transceiver module using Sivers’ high-performance Distributed Feedback (DFB) lasers"

Jabil Photonics: :Working with Sivers will allow us to deliver a 1.6T LRO solution that meets both data center performance and power targets at scale"

Where have you seen the LIGHT SOURCE for hyperscaler supply chains...

At a $500m MC? We had this hinted from physical sources at OFC, but many institutions needed actual confirmation like this.
正式官宣:$JBL 将在他们的 optical transceivers 里使用 $SIVE Lasers。

今天:“Jabil plans to develop a 1.6T linear receive optical (LRO) transceiver module using Sivers’ high-performance Distributed Feedback (DFB) lasers”

Jabil Photonics:“Working with Sivers will allow us to deliver a 1.6T LRO solution that meets both data center performance and power targets at scale”

你在哪见过 hyperscaler 供应链里的 LIGHT SOURCE……

市值只有 $500m?我们在 OFC 从实物来源得到过暗示,但很多机构需要这种真正确认。
❤️ 1,134 🔁 87 💬 77
打开原推
📝 原创
Enplas (6961) at ~$985M seems kinda interesting.

They hold two chokepoints:

1. Dominant supplier for MLAs (micro lens arrays). Eg. SiPH switches, 1.6T, 3.2T for photonics. 

2. Oligopoly supplier for IC Test sockets (AI Chip Testing)

Cash on hand: ~$155M, no debt. Equity-to-Asset Ratio: ~89% (50%+ usually is solid), so low downside risk imo.

And their speculated customers:

1, Photonics (MLAs): Highly probable: Innolight, Eoptolink, Furukawa, Intel (SiPh). And prob $COHR, $LITE.

2. GPU/ASICs (Test Sockets): prob $TSM, ASE, types use these to likely test $NVDA GPUs, $GOOGL TPUs (Google Ironwood is highly probable).

"expanding mass production orders for major GPU manufacturers, and for ASIC-related projects for hyperscalers."

Then at OFC:

OFC: “We will be showcasing our new products for 800Gbps and 1.6Tbps transceivers and CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) that support today’s rapid technological advancements in AI.”

Basically you have a company that supplies T1 semis, foundries, hyperscalers, that benefits from 1.6T from MLA photonics segment + CPO TAM expansion later from OFC products.

Was one my positions wanted to share my thoughts about since it seemed p cool at sub <$1B MC.
Enplas (6961) 在 ~$985M 看起来有点意思。

它们掌握两个 chokepoints:

1. MLAs(micro lens arrays)的主导供应商。比如 photonics 里的 SiPH switches、1.6T、3.2T。
2. IC Test sockets(AI Chip Testing)的寡头供应商。

账上现金:~$155M,无债。Equity-to-Asset Ratio:~89%(50%+ 通常就扎实),所以 imo 下行风险低。

它们推测客户:

1. Photonics(MLAs):高概率 Innolight、Eoptolink、Furukawa、Intel(SiPh)。可能还有 $COHR$LITE

2. GPU/ASICs(Test Sockets):可能 $TSM、ASE 这类,用来测试 $NVDA GPUs、$GOOGL TPUs(Google Ironwood 高概率)。

“expanding mass production orders for major GPU manufacturers, and for ASIC-related projects for hyperscalers.”
然后在 OFC:

OFC:“We will be showcasing our new products for 800Gbps and 1.6Tbps transceivers and CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) that support today’s rapid technological advancements in AI.”

基本上,这家公司给 T1 semis、foundries、hyperscalers 供货,从 MLA photonics segment 的 1.6T 受益,之后还从 OFC 产品的 CPO TAM expansion 受益。

这是我的一个仓位,想分享一下想法,因为在 <$1B 市值下看起来挺酷。
❤️ 514 🔁 40 💬 45
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
okay so few i was interested in:

PCL - broadcom optical foundry $494m MC
fittech - browave/foci supplier + maybe avgo for testing (s/o to latentvalue for the DD) $366m MC. markets missed this since foci/browave were re-rated hundreds of % but didnt know this was the equipment seller to them.
shunsin - foxconn optical packaging, rlly like this $1.4B MC
Enplas - likely for Google TPU/NVDA + TSM supplier ~$900m for both optical/test. this was actually for pluggable but they announced CPO stuff at OFC

I actually dont hv positions in PCL but i did really like it
好,几个我感兴趣的:

PCL - broadcom optical foundry,$494m 市值
fittech - browave/foci supplier + 也许 avgo testing(s/o latentvalue 做 DD),$366m 市值。市场漏掉了这个,因为 foci/browave 已经 re-rated 几百%,但不知道它是给它们卖设备的。
shunsin - foxconn optical packaging,非常喜欢这个,$1.4B 市值
Enplas - 很可能是 Google TPU/NVDA + TSM 供应商,~$900m,兼具 optical/test。这原本是 pluggable,但他们在 OFC 宣布了 CPO 相关东西

我其实没有 PCL 仓位,但我真的很喜欢它。
❤️ 369 🔁 9 💬 54
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So just a random thought for $NVDA CPO ecosystem..

Was thinking about going long on VisEra as TSM's optical foundry but it's H2 2028 volume ramp for gen3...

Ended up scratching that off my list.

I didn't like $HIMX cause it's just going to get designed out later.

At $4B valuation, it will probably get down to like 14-16 fwd P/E for 2028. But it's probably going to be dead money for at least an entire year.

Maybe +50% next few months since it's extremely de-risked by $TSM.

If you want to hold it, probably 4x in 2 year timeframe, but that's too boring of a trade for me.

Not worth the opportunity cost IMO, even if you buy it at $6-8B valuation h2 2027.
关于 $NVDA CPO ecosystem 的一个随机想法……

本来在考虑做多 VisEra,作为 TSM 的 optical foundry,但它 gen3 要到 H2 2028 才 volume ramp……

最后把它从名单里划掉了。

我不喜欢 $HIMX,因为它之后就是会被 design out。

在 $4B 估值下,2028 fwd P/E 大概会降到 14-16。但它可能至少整整一年都是 dead money。

也许未来几个月 +50%,因为 $TSM 大幅降低了它的风险。

如果你想持有,2 年时间框架可能 4x,但这交易对我来说太无聊。

IMO 不值得机会成本,即使你在 H2 2027 用 $6-8B 估值买。
❤️ 232 🔁 4 💬 35
打开原推
💬 引用
I think these all 2-4x in 6 months.

Just watch.
我觉得这些 6 个月内都会 2-4x。

看着吧。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
4 new longs in $NVDA CPO Asia ecosystem + 1 misc pluggable/test one.

Will just announce one every day so I can spend some more time doing a mini write up/answer more questions about it.

I'm personally trimming some longs and just rotating capital into purer play names since volume ramp should hit h2.

Just as a recap Shunsin, was the latest one. Already took a few others like $TSEM in the past.
$NVDA CPO 亚洲生态里 4 个新 long + 1 个杂项 pluggable/test 名字。

我会每天只宣布一个,这样我可以多花点时间写 mini write up/回答更多问题。

我个人正在减一些 longs,只是把资金轮到更纯粹的 play names,因为 volume ramp 应该会在 h2 到来。

简单回顾一下,Shunsin 是最新那个。过去已经拿过几个,比如 $TSEM
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2044165549173915714
❤️ 443 🔁 15 💬 58
打开原推
💬 引用
$RPI hit triple digit % return intraday today, just 2 months later.

That’s 14 different stocks I’ve called YTD from $AAOI to $LITE that hit 100%+ returns.

Maybe if I’m able to write a thesis on 14 separate longs that double in a short time period… I’m decent at it?

I was the first person to long it as AI agentic hardware orchestration.

But everyone called my thesis a "Meme" back in Feb.

(Special S/O to FT, Reuters, Bloomberg)

But I called out revenue acceleration expecting a 3x beat compared to consensus. And their earnings report validated my estimates.

It's now being re-rated as an AI hardware company.
$RPI 今天盘中达到三位数 % 回报,距离我点出只有 2 个月。

这是我今年从 $AAOI$LITE 点出的第 14 只 100%+ 回报股票。

也许如果我能写出 14 个短时间翻倍的单独 long thesis……我还算擅长?

我是第一个把它作为 AI agentic hardware orchestration 做多的人。

但 2 月大家都说我的 thesis 是“Meme”。

(特别 S/O FT、Reuters、Bloomberg)

但我点出了收入加速,预计相对 consensus 会 3x beat。它们的财报验证了我的估计。

它现在正在被 re-rate 成 AI hardware 公司。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Fun Trade Idea: Long $RPI (Raspberry Pi)

Reason: 🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + Hoarding.

Everyone has been openly hoarding Apple Mac Minis and were long Apple.

But $APPL is already a $3.7T+ company. Product mass-buying won't make a dent.

Raspberry Pi, however, is a 542.68M company.

The revenue is material.

Feels like markets haven't priced this in since I've seen almost 0 mentions about the ticker on X (but many product mentions).

And it's only recently that have the hoarding started Raspberry Pis, as they're much cheaper than $500+ Apple products. They also have their mini $NVDA CUDA-light utility ecosystem that people use.

So it turns out these extremely cheap $20 or $200 devices are perfect for deploying mass deploying isolated instances.

The reason is for OpenClaw orchestration (so they don’t mess up your device) -> interfacing with a central LLM via API.

Before people were just buying 1 or 2 for hobby/education purposes, so revenue has slowing.

But now Silicon Valley startups and individuals anecdotally appear to be buying tens or hundreds of these things to run concurrent OpenClaw agentic swarms or do stuff like agentic marketing on Reddit and other places.

And no, there are many applications that can't be done by spinning up AWS VPS, so people do it locally (there's TOS around automation/AI bots, so companies setup their own servers).

That being said main downside risk is that its

- partially foundation owned, and they might not hike rates like $SNDK or $MU does, even if there's extreme demand

- Subject to memory price hikes like LPDDR4 component

so this is not a major position.

However, going forward, revenue should increase due to people buying tens or hundreds of these things for running AI agents.

Balance sheet also looks clean with low downside risk:

- ~$280M - $300M revenue
- ~$75M+ Gross Profit
- ~25% Gross Margin
- Net income: ~$10M - $15M
- Net Cash: $28M

Analysts currently project revenue growth closer to 14–17%.

But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues.

Consumer segments are roughly 1/3rd of revenue but the newfound buying from Openclaw + variants is a new cataylst nevertheless for re-rating.

Especially now that Picoclaw and compressed OpenClaw variants are now able to be run on $20 Raspberry Pis instead of just the Raspberry Pi 5’s.

But seems like people just forgot Raspberry PI was a publicly stock as well.

The stock price is down 56% 1Y to 542.68M euro MC to an all time low.

So this might be that tailwind for a reversal.

There's also a non-zero chance OpenClaw is a long term catalyst for Raspberry Pi based, agentic deployments.

TLDR: People are openly buying Raspberry Pis and Apple Mac Minis for Openclaw/Picoclaw, so revenue should benefit from increased demand.
有意思的交易想法:做多 $RPI(Raspberry Pi)

理由:🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + 囤货。

大家都在公开囤 Apple Mac Mini,而且做多 Apple。

$APPL 已经是 3.7T+ 美元的公司了。产品被大量抢购,对它的影响不会太大。

但 Raspberry Pi 是一家 542.68M 的公司。

这块收入就很实质了。

感觉市场还没把这个定价进去,因为我在 X 上几乎没看到有人提这个 ticker(但很多人在提产品)。

而且大家也是最近才开始囤 Raspberry Pi,因为它们比 500+ 美元的 Apple 产品便宜很多。它们也有一个小型的 $NVDA CUDA-light 实用生态,很多人会用。

所以结果就是,这些极便宜的 20 美元或 200 美元设备,非常适合大规模部署隔离实例。

原因是用来做 OpenClaw 编排(这样不会把你的设备搞乱)-> 通过 API 接入中心化 LLM。

以前大家只是买 1、2 个,用于爱好/教育,所以收入增长放慢了。

但现在从传闻看,硅谷创业公司和个人似乎在买几十台甚至几百台,用来跑并发的 OpenClaw agent swarm,或者做 Reddit 等地方的 agentic marketing。

而且不是所有应用都能靠开 AWS VPS 解决,所以大家会本地部署(自动化/AI bot 有 TOS 限制,所以公司会搭自己的服务器)。

话虽如此,主要下行风险是:

- 它部分由基金会持有,就算需求极端旺盛,也未必会像 $SNDK$MU 那样涨价

- 会受到 LPDDR4 等内存组件涨价影响

所以这不是一个大仓位。

不过往后看,因为大家会为了跑 AI agent 买几十台、几百台设备,收入应该会增加。

资产负债表也看起来干净,下行风险较低:

- 约 $280M - $300M 收入
- $75M+ 毛利
- 约 25% 毛利率
- 净利润:约 $10M - $15M
- 净现金:$28M

分析师目前预计收入增速大概 14-17%。

但如果这波需求涌入持续,收入增速可能从 14% 提升到比较温和的 48-55%。

消费端大概占收入 1/3,但 Openclaw + 各种变体带来的新增购买,仍然是一个新的重估催化。

尤其现在 Picoclaw 和压缩版 OpenClaw 已经能跑在 20 美元的 Raspberry Pi 上,而不只是 Raspberry Pi 5。

但感觉大家只是忘了 Raspberry PI 也是一家上市公司。

股价 1 年跌了 56%,市值到 542.68M 欧元,创历史低位。

所以这可能成为反转的顺风。

OpenClaw 也有非零概率成为基于 Raspberry Pi 的 agentic 部署的长期催化。

TLDR:大家正在公开购买 Raspberry Pi 和 Apple Mac Mini 来跑 Openclaw/Picoclaw,所以收入应该会受益于需求增加。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2023415224372756782
❤️ 804 🔁 31 💬 36
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
4 new longs in $NVDA CPO Asia ecosystem + 1 misc pluggable/test one.

Will just announce one every day so I can spend some more time doing a mini write up/answer more questions about it.

I'm personally trimming some longs and just rotating capital into purer play names since volume ramp should hit h2.

Just as a recap Shunsin, was the latest one. Already took a few others like $TSEM in the past.
$NVDA CPO Asia ecosystem 里 4 个新多头 + 1 个杂项 pluggable/test 名字。

我会每天公布一个,这样我能多花点时间写 mini write up/回答更多问题。

我个人正在 trim 一些 longs,把资本轮动到更 pure play 的名字,因为 volume ramp 应该会在 H2 到来。

回顾一下,最新一个是 Shunsin。过去我已经买过几个,比如 $TSEM
❤️ 544 🔁 3 💬 97
打开原推
📝 原创
wtf. why does it feel like everyone on X is reading my posts now? https://t.co/bdvL9bvBfE
wtf。为什么感觉 X 上所有人现在都在读我的帖子? https://t.co/bdvL9bvBfE
❤️ 1,033 🔁 14 💬 162
打开原推
📝 原创
"Silicon photonics scaling hits wafer testing bottleneck"

- $FORM (helps that ficontec left), $AEHR
- Over in Taiwan MPI (6223), MA-tek (3587), MSScorps (6830)
- Then large cap Cap - $TER, Advantest (6857)

Are some decent exposure off the top of my head if you’re curious.

I’ll make a deeper dive ETF for you all soon.
“Silicon photonics scaling hits wafer testing bottleneck”

- $FORM(ficontec 离开有帮助)、$AEHR
- 台湾的 MPI (6223)、MA-tek (3587)、MSScorps (6830)
- 然后大盘 Cap - $TER、Advantest (6857)

如果你好奇,这些是我脑子里一些还不错的敞口。

我很快会给你们做一个更深入的 ETF。
❤️ 912 🔁 55 💬 50
打开原推
💬 引用
Soitec is now up 64% in 1 month since my TLDR thesis post.

Lot of people made fun of $SOI as a “no fundamentals meme stock” when it corrected after I posted (because of Iran/macro).

But my longs, especially with CPO/Silicon Photonics related stuff like $SIVE that scales into 2029.

Sometimes just need time to play out?

It’s a genuine monopoly in the substrate layer and it’s likely bottoming in their legacy drag segments.
自我 TLDR thesis 帖以来,Soitec 1 个月涨了 64%。

很多人在 $SOI 回调时(因为 Iran/宏观)嘲笑它是“no fundamentals meme stock”。

但我的 longs,尤其是 CPO/Silicon Photonics 相关的东西,比如 $SIVE,会一直扩张到 2029。

有时候只是需要时间兑现?

它在 substrate 层是真正的垄断,而且它们 legacy drag segments 很可能正在见底。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 555 🔁 32 💬 75
打开原推
📝 原创
$ALRIB is starting to grow on me.

First they have $MSFT Quantum as their core hyperscaler customer.

Then they have Quantum Dot like QD Laser… and photonics foundries like $IQE as customers.

And it’s profitable + paying dividends…

And a genuine duopoly in the MBE space.

And accelerating order book growth with a new breakthrough in silicon photonics machines..

I keep comparing $LWLG with stuff like Riber, then I keep thinking:

Isn’t this just highly compelling at current prices?
$ALRIB 开始越来越让我喜欢。

首先,它们有 $MSFT Quantum 作为核心 hyperscaler customer。

然后它们还有 QD Laser 这种 Quantum Dot,以及 $IQE 这样的 photonics foundries 客户。

而且它盈利 + 付股息……

在 MBE 领域是真正的双寡头。

还有新 silicon photonics machines 突破带来的订单簿加速增长。

我不断拿 $LWLG 和 Riber 这种东西比,然后一直在想:

这在当前价格下不就是非常有吸引力吗?
❤️ 750 🔁 56 💬 89
打开原推
📝 原创
A Guide by Serenity:

How to Cripple the Western Hyperscaler buildout with just $170m.

Just take over Nippon Chemical (4092) with $169m!

For InP substrates, you need: Indium and High Purity Phosphorus.

Thought $AXTI was a bottleneck? NCI is the bottleneck of the bottleneck.

NCI is actually the leader of the high purity red phosphorus chokepoint holding 26-27% of the market share (Rasa has less share, then the rest is China).

And they export to $AXTI, Sumitomo, JX that need it to make InP substrates.

So… if you have $160m to spend to acquire NCI (plus Rasa as smaller capacity), you can remove the leading Western world’s production of 6N/7N red phosphorus needed to make InP substrates!

And without InP substrates: no photonics.

Fun fact: China’s tech companies would get pretty disrupted with it too by NCI.

For $AXTI, the mapping/reliance is actually pretty interesting:

- AXT's Tongmei outlined its structural reliance on importing high-purity precursor materials from Japan on their STAR Market listing

- WITS data showing ~$460/kg high-purity phosphorus flowing from Japan into China

So they secretly do depend on NCI.

China does have capacity like Wylton Chemical, Qin Xi New Materials, Jinding Electronics, and Chuxiong Chuanzhi, Guizhou Wylton Jinglin Electronic Materials as well.

However, they’re all smaller players so can’t make up for high purity red phosphorus capacity provided by NCI for InP substrate production at scale.

$LITE CEO already said inp substrates keeps him up at night.

So now with NCI, you can give the guy permanent insomnia?

For just $169M.

So here's what the supply chain looks like:

-> DGC phosphate rock mine and ships it to NCI
-> NCI refines Yellow Phosphorus into High Purity Red Phosphorus
-> Sumitomo / JX / AXT melt the Red Phosphorus with Indium to grow InP Substrates
-> $COHR / $LITE fab InP substrates into Lasers
-> Innolight/Fabrinet package them into 800G/1.6T transceivers
-> $NVDA / $GOOGL use them for ASIC/GPU clusters.

And basically, the entire West depends on NCI to make InP substrates for photonics.

I hold some very small positions, just for fun. However, Japan is not well known for price hiking.

So you’d probably run into regulatory problems eg. FEFTA if you bought the company and hiked prices 15000% (like government seizing back the company once they realize)…

Maybe 30-50% hikes is possible to compress fwd p/e? But very likely wont end up like $AXTI.
Regardless, this company is a massive, massive national security risk priced at ~$160m.

As for fundamentals, they’re trading at .54 book value and a forward P/E of 11.4 so it’s probably undervalued anyway.

TLDR:

-> Is it the next $AXTI? No.

-> Is it an unknown structural bottleneck + critical vulnerability of the Western hyperscaler buildout with photonics? Yes.

-> Is there still room for re-rating?

Just reverting to Book Value of 1 is immediate 80-85% upside. Maybe more if you give it multiples past 11 fwd p/e.

Regardless, it’s fun to find a major point of failure in the hyperscaler supply chains for $169m.
Serenity 指南:

如何只用 $170m 瘫痪西方 Hyperscaler buildout。

直接用 $169m 收购 Nippon Chemical (4092)!

InP substrates 需要:Indium 和 High Purity Phosphorus。

以为 $AXTI 是 bottleneck?NCI 是 bottleneck 的 bottleneck。

NCI 实际上是 high purity red phosphorus chokepoint 的 leader,持有 26-27% 市场份额(Rasa 份额更少,其他就是中国)。

它们出口给 $AXTI、Sumitomo、JX,这些公司需要它来做 InP substrates。

所以……如果你有 $160m 用来收购 NCI(再加上产能更小的 Rasa),你就可以移除西方世界领先的 6N/7N red phosphorus 生产,而这是制造 InP substrates 所必需的!

没有 InP substrates:就没有 photonics。

有趣事实:中国科技公司也会被 NCI 这一点狠狠扰乱。

对于 $AXTI,mapping/reliance 其实很有意思:

- AXT 的 Tongmei 在 STAR Market listing 中说明了它结构性依赖从日本进口高纯前驱材料
- WITS 数据显示,大约 ~$460/kg 的 high-purity phosphorus 从日本流向中国

所以它们确实秘密依赖 NCI。

中国也有 Wylton Chemical、Qin Xi New Materials、Jinding Electronics、Chuxiong Chuanzhi、Guizhou Wylton Jinglin Electronic Materials 这样的产能。

但它们都是较小玩家,无法弥补 NCI 为大规模 InP substrate 生产提供的高纯 red phosphorus 产能。

$LITE CEO 已经说 inp substrates 让他睡不着。

所以有了 NCI,你可以让这家伙永久失眠?

只要 $169M。

供应链看起来是这样:

-> DGC phosphate rock mine,然后运给 NCI
-> NCI 把 Yellow Phosphorus 精炼成 High Purity Red Phosphorus
-> Sumitomo / JX / AXT 把 Red Phosphorus 和 Indium 熔融来生长 InP Substrates
-> $COHR / $LITE 把 InP substrates fab 成 Lasers
-> Innolight/Fabrinet 把它们封装成 800G/1.6T transceivers
-> $NVDA / $GOOGL 用它们做 ASIC/GPU clusters。

基本上,整个西方都依赖 NCI 来制造 photonics 所需的 InP substrates。

我持有一点点很小仓位,只是好玩。不过,日本并不以涨价出名。

所以如果你买下公司然后涨价 15000%,大概会遇到 FEFTA 这类监管问题(比如政府意识到后把公司收回)……

也许 30-50% 涨价可以压缩 fwd p/e?但很可能不会像 $AXTI 那样。

不管怎样,这家公司是一个巨大、巨大的 national security risk,价格只有 ~$160m。

至于基本面,它们交易在 .54 book value 和 forward P/E 11.4,所以无论如何可能都被低估。

TLDR:

-> 它是下一个 $AXTI 吗?不是。

-> 它是西方 hyperscaler buildout with photonics 中未知结构性瓶颈 + 关键漏洞吗?是。

-> 还有 re-rating 空间吗?

仅仅回到 Book Value 1,就有立刻 80-85% 上行。如果给它超过 11 fwd p/e 的 multiple,也许更多。

无论如何,用 $169m 找到 hyperscaler 供应链里的一个主要故障点,挺有意思。
❤️ 1,268 🔁 110 💬 86
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So fun fact: You can disrupt the entire photonics industry with just $160m by taking over Nippon Chemical Industry (NCI)

They're the leading supplier of red phosphorous to $AXTI, Sumitomo, JX, and others needed for InP substrates (indium + phosphorous)

Just found this pretty funny.

I thought $AXTI made everything vertically integrated but apparently they buy high purity red phosphorous from japan...

So you can bottleneck China as well.

Not recommending this as a long, there are better ones out there. Japan doesn't price hike either so don't get your hopes up.

Maybe 85% return back to 1X book. But it's not a 500% type gain like $AXTI.

This is just for education purposes.
有趣事实:你只要用 $160m 收购 Nippon Chemical Industry (NCI),就能扰乱整个 photonics 行业。

它们是 $AXTI、Sumitomo、JX 等制造 InP substrates(indium + phosphorous)所需 red phosphorous 的领先供应商。

我只是觉得这挺好笑。

我以为 $AXTI 什么都垂直整合,结果它们显然从日本买 high purity red phosphorous……

所以你也能 bottleneck 中国。

不是推荐做多,有更好的标的。日本也不涨价,所以别抱太高期待。

也许回到 1X book 有 85% 回报。但这不是 $AXTI 那种 500% 收益。

这只是教育用途。
❤️ 396 🔁 4 💬 49
打开原推
📝 原创
$AAOI and $SNDK:

Are the perfect examples why you don’t follow hedge funds named after Tangerine peels…

Like if you’re going short, do it with companies with terrible fundamentals.

Not two of the largest beneficiaries of the photonics and memory supercycles?

I struggle to understand the reasoning behind their trades.
$AAOI$SNDK

是为什么你不要跟着名字像 tangerine peels 的 hedge funds 的完美例子……

如果你要做空,就做空基本面糟糕的公司。

不要做空 photonics 和 memory supercycles 的两个最大受益者?

我很难理解他们交易背后的逻辑。
❤️ 1,149 🔁 62 💬 78
打开原推
💬 引用
I almost forgot.

I’ll release one of them to subscriber chat later today before posting a thesis publicly.

I’m curious if anyone can guess the name?
我差点忘了。

今天晚些时候,我会先在 subscriber chat 放出其中一个,然后再公开发 thesis。

好奇有没有人能猜到名字?
❤️ 630 🔁 4 💬 138
打开原推
💬 引用
They’re still there.

It’s just hard to say anything….

When all my recent thesis posts from $HPS.A, $IQE, $AXTI, $SIVE, $AAOI, $LITE, $NBIS, Win, Shunsin, $AEHR, $TSEM, $SOI, and many many others I call out.

Just hard outperforms the market.

Year to date of +1,116.29% isn’t too bad, right chat?
它们还在那里。

只是很难说什么……

当我最近所有 thesis 帖,从 $HPS.A$IQE$AXTI$SIVE$AAOI$LITE$NBIS、Win、Shunsin、$AEHR$TSEM$SOI,到很多很多其他我点名的。

都大幅跑赢市场。

今年以来 +1,116.29% 还不错吧 chat?
引用原推@strictrope
@aleabitoreddit Your haters seemed to have disappeared!
@aleabitoreddit 你的黑粉好像都消失了!
https://x.com/strictrope/status/2043708489768521946
❤️ 3,011 🔁 109 💬 177
打开原推
📝 原创
Glad to see my $NBIS thesis from last year finally start to play out now.

Got the short term 2-3M timing wrong last December.

Directionally it ended up right 6 months later. https://t.co/uqUiHd68Km
很高兴看到我去年关于 $NBIS 的 thesis 现在终于开始兑现。

去年 12 月短期 2-3M timing 错了。

方向上 6 个月后最后还是对了。 https://t.co/uqUiHd68Km
❤️ 794 🔁 26 💬 49
打开原推
💬 引用
I actually thought $SIVE should be trading at $2B+ MC today (from ~$520m) if they were listed as a US company.

Not later this year.

Since I’m not sure how:

- $LWLG trades at 3.5x+ the valuation

- packaging companies that buy their lasers trade at 5-6x their valuation.

- laser companies from $MTSI to $LITE have premiums trading in the tens of billions.

And Sivers are in hyperscaler supply chains through $MRVL, $JBL, O-Net, and others rather than being dependent on one customer.

There’s not very many publicly listed AI DC laser companies in the world either.

So either it’s a highly sought after acquisition target for $AVGO or $MRVL that want to vertically integrate upstream.

Or they can pull a $LITE that went from $17->$800 and downstream TAM expansion the ELS/optical transceiver stack through IP acquisitions.

Depends how ambitious the company is of course but i just don’t think anyone noticed this laser supplier in Sweden since my thesis post.

Just might require a little patience for the US listing and I’m almost certain US institutions are interested like they were with $IQE.

DD periods usually last a few weeks after they read my thesis but I see a clear path to $10B+ MC from here over the next few years.
我其实认为,如果 $SIVE 是一家美国上市公司,它今天就应该交易在 $2B+ 市值(从 ~$520m 起)。

不是今年晚些时候。

因为我不明白:

- $LWLG 估值是它 3.5x+

- 买它们 lasers 的 packaging companies 估值是它 5-6x。

- 从 $MTSI$LITE 的 laser companies 都有几十亿美元的溢价。

而 Sivers 通过 $MRVL$JBL、O-Net 等进入 hyperscaler supply chains,而不是依赖单一客户。

全世界公开上市的 AI DC laser companies 也没几家。

所以它要么是 $AVGO$MRVL 这类想向上游垂直整合公司的高度抢手收购目标。

要么它们可以走 $LITE 的路,从 $17->$800,并通过 IP acquisitions 向下游 TAM expansion 到 ELS/optical transceiver stack。

当然这取决于公司有多大野心,但我就是觉得在我 thesis 帖之前,没人注意到瑞典这个 laser supplier。

可能只需要对美国上市有点耐心,而且我几乎确定美国机构会像对 $IQE 那样感兴趣。

DD periods 通常在他们读完我的 thesis 后持续几周,但我看到从这里到未来几年 $10B+ 市值的清晰路径。
引用原推@larmatrade
@aleabitoreddit $SIVE is ripping today too and still have along way to go, do you still support your 2/3B MC for this year ?
@aleabitoreddit $SIVE 今天也在猛涨,而且还有很长的路要走,你还支持今年 2/3B MC 的判断吗?
https://x.com/larmatrade/status/2043702446677995748
❤️ 724 🔁 69 💬 71
打开原推
💬 引用
Has Bumblebee or Optimus Prime ever let you down?

$HPS.A already up ~30%+ since my transformers thesis a week ago.

I share all this for free to help retail outperform and frontrun institutions.

Everything keeps going up… https://t.co/1JL7xXAVRB
Bumblebee 或 Optimus Prime 什么时候让你失望过?

$HPS.A 自我一周前的 transformers thesis 以来已经涨 ~30%+。

我免费分享这一切,是为了帮助散户跑赢并抢跑机构。

所有东西都在继续上涨…… https://t.co/1JL7xXAVRB
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The current bottleneck: Transformers/Switchgear. 

Trade Idea: Long Hammond (~2.2B CAD / ~$1.5B USD) at 184 CAD.

They dominate the market for:

-Transformers (dry, multi year bottleneck ~23% of market),

-serve to switchgear (2-3Y bottleneck)

-and manufacture liquid too (5Y, larger bottleneck)

I personally anticipate components price hikes like NAND, as $AMZN, $MSFT and others compete for allocation. 

You might have seen: “Half of US data center builds have been delayed or canceled, growth limited by shortages of power infrastructure”…

Then you go further:

“To address shortages… Canada, Mexico… became the biggest suppliers of high-power transformers for AI data centers to AI data centers”

Guess who is in Canada (Guelph).. Mexico (Monterrey 3 and 4)… and the US?

Hammond

Then here’s the reason the articles cite why hyperscaler DB buildouts are falling apart: 

“Major reason behind these setbacks is the availability of key electrical components — such as transformers, switchgear”. 

Institutions are probably looking at Powell, Eaton, and others… but little do they know?

Companies like these actually buy Hammond’s transformers to put inside their own switchgear (“strong sales into data centres, switchgear manufacturers")

Their market share over the transformers market is actually pretty large (eg. ~23% dry). 

The most compelling signal:

-> 122% Y/Y 2025 backlog increase. And we can infer this to be 1B+ CAD. 

Eg. company achieved 898m CAD in sales in 2025, capacity ceiling. Management said close of Q3 2025 orders were valued at 53% of the entire closing third-quarter backlog.

Given that Q4 2025 revenue was 254 million and the backlog is "more than doubled," we can infer a total backlog value exceeding 1 billion CAD.

Also:

“Gross margin compression last year was due to the buildout of their Mexico facility, but both gross margins are expected to increase and the facility expansions are expectied to turn into accelerated revenue Q2 2026)” which is now.

Downside is if raw material costs (copper, electrical steel) spike again, but given this bottleneck, they can price hike. 

Personal FWD P/E estimates would be ~18-21 for 2026, <15 for 2027 from volume ramp.

But I think it’s possible to hit single digit fwd P/E if they do price hikes mixed with hyperscaler emergency orders. But that might get a little mixed with the new acquisition.

Regardless still looks cheap. 

Just a TLDR: 
$AMZN, $MSFT, $META, $GOOGL, $ORCL datacenter are being bottlenecked because of a lack of transformers/switchgear.

Seems like markets missed this little player with large market share, despite backlog visibility and increasing revenue from capacity expansion coming online.

I personally found it pretty compelling, so I went long.

Just sharing my personal thoughts, of course DYOR before making any decisions yourself.
当前瓶颈:Transformers/Switchgear。

交易想法:做多 Hammond(约 2.2B CAD / 约 $1.5B USD),价格 184 CAD。

他们主导这些市场:

- Transformers(dry,多年瓶颈,约 23% 市场份额),

- 服务 switchgear(2-3 年瓶颈)

- 也生产 liquid(5 年,更大的瓶颈)

我个人预计组件会像 NAND 一样涨价,因为 $AMZN$MSFT 等在争抢 allocation。

你可能看过:“一半美国数据中心建设被推迟或取消,增长受电力基础设施短缺限制”……

再往下看:

“为了解决短缺……加拿大、墨西哥……成为 AI 数据中心高功率 transformers 的最大供应地”

猜猜谁在加拿大(Guelph)、墨西哥(Monterrey 3 和 4)以及美国都有布局?

Hammond

然后文章引用 hyperscaler DC buildout 出问题的原因:

“这些挫折背后的主要原因,是关键电气组件的可用性,例如 transformers、switchgear”。

机构可能在看 Powell、Eaton 等……但他们不知道的是?

这些公司实际上会买 Hammond 的 transformers,放进自己的 switchgear(“对数据中心、switchgear manufacturers 的销售强劲”)

他们在 transformers 市场的份额其实很大(例如 dry 约 23%)。

最有说服力的信号:

-> 2025 年 backlog 同比增长 122%。我们可以推断这超过 1B CAD。

例如公司 2025 年实现 898m CAD 销售,已经到产能天花板。管理层说,2025 年 Q3 末订单价值相当于整个三季度期末 backlog 的 53%。

考虑到 Q4 2025 收入是 254 million,而 backlog “more than doubled”,我们可以推断总 backlog 超过 1 billion CAD。

另外:

“去年毛利率承压是因为墨西哥工厂建设,但预计毛利率会提升,工厂扩张也会在 2026 Q2 转化为加速收入”,也就是现在。

下行风险是原材料成本(铜、电工钢)再次上涨,但考虑到这个瓶颈,他们可以涨价。

我个人的 FWD P/E 估算是 2026 年约 18-21,2027 年随着放量低于 15。

但如果他们涨价并叠加 hyperscaler 紧急订单,我认为 forward P/E 有可能到个位数。不过这可能会和新收购有些混在一起。

不管怎样,看起来仍然便宜。

简单 TLDR:

$AMZN$MSFT$META$GOOGL$ORCL 数据中心正因为缺少 transformers/switchgear 被卡住。

尽管有 backlog 可见度和产能扩张上线带来的收入增长,市场似乎漏掉了这个拥有大份额的小玩家。

我个人觉得很有吸引力,所以做多了。

只是分享个人想法,当然你做任何决定前都要 DYOR。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041168871168545115
❤️ 635 🔁 30 💬 53
打开原推
💬 引用
Pretty confident about $SIVE regarding institutions coming in next.

Laser supplier for $MRVL, $JBL, and a few others.

Valuation disconnect makes no sense when they’re designed into hyperscaler supply chains at ~$430M.

And you look at CPO and 1.6T transceiver ramp over next few years, it’s insanity.

It looks like the start of the next $LITE over the next year, imo institutions probably late to the party due to Swedish listing.
对接下来机构进入 $SIVE,我相当有信心。

它是 $MRVL$JBL 和其他几家的 laser supplier。

当它们已经以 ~$430M 市值 design into hyperscaler supply chains 时,这种估值断层毫无道理。

再看未来几年 CPO 和 1.6T transceiver ramp,简直疯狂。

它看起来像未来一年下一个 $LITE 的开始,imo 机构大概因为瑞典上市而来晚了。
引用原推@DesingerGem
@aleabitoreddit Whats next?
@aleabitoreddit 下一个是什么?
https://x.com/DesingerGem/status/2043592814370447486
❤️ 770 🔁 64 💬 69
打开原推
💬 引用
This is what happens when you sit back and let institutions fight each other over controlling the $IQE float. https://t.co/npQY5ZuDtH
当你坐着看机构为了控制 $IQE 流通盘互相打架时,就会发生这种事。 https://t.co/npQY5ZuDtH
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Bro why are all the institutions copy trading some random on X with an anime PFP?

Obviously all my followers frontran institutions with $IQE.

But now it’s just going parabolic after Point72 and others started buying up the float at ATHs. https://t.co/mI4vsHe0f0
兄弟,为什么所有机构都在 copy trading 一个 X 上 anime PFP 的随机账号?

很明显,我所有粉丝都用 $IQE 抢跑了机构。

但现在 Point72 和其他机构在 ATHs 开始买流通盘后,它就直接抛物线了。https://t.co/mI4vsHe0f0
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2043592728270061741
❤️ 516 🔁 23 💬 52
打开原推
💬 引用
Bro why are all the institutions copy trading some random on X with an anime PFP?

Obviously all my followers frontran institutions with $IQE.

But now it’s just going parabolic after Point72 and others started buying up the float at ATHs. https://t.co/mI4vsHe0f0
Bro,为什么所有机构都在 copy trading 一个 X 上用 anime PFP 的随机人?

显然,我所有粉丝都在 $IQE 上抢跑了机构。

但现在 Point72 和其他机构开始在 ATHs 买走流通盘后,它直接抛物线了。 https://t.co/mI4vsHe0f0
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Was the first to talk about $AXTI in relation to photonics BOM/supply chains:

$IQE is very interesting too as one of the only Western suppliers.

Basically if you look at photonics flow on $GOOGL TPU/hyperscaler ASICs kinda looks like this (very likely, but undisclosed):

Optical Transceivers (highest BOM):

Lumentum/Cloud Light:
~ Vital / $AXTI-> $AXTI/Sumitomo/JX -> $IQE (Epi-Wafers) -> $LITE / Cloud Light -> $FN (Contract Manufacturing) -> $GOOGL TPU

Merhcant optical supply chain:

~ Vital / $AXTI -> $AXTI / Sumitomo / JX -> → $LITE / $AVGO / $COHR (EML) + $MRVL / $MTSI / Semtech -> Innolight/Eoptolink -> $GOOGL

So if you want moonshot-type photonics BOM / price-hikes stocks deeper upstream in the photonics BOM: $AXTI, $IQE and your way to go.

$AXTI had terrible fundamentals before but the recent Northland fundraising round cemented its run.

$IQE has terrible fundamentals now (Net debt £23.5 million) but is probably one of the most critical parts of the supply chain. If they manage to sell their Taiwan operations, wouldn't be surprised if it went up quite a bit just from their inp business.

There's £18m convertible notes (which is basically nothing), then there's 120 to 154m new shares (~12% to 15%), which is also kinda nothing relative to current size.

On the other hand, others $LITE and Innolight are probably more established.

TLDR:

$IQE -> seems critical to Western supply chains, $130MC. Net debt, if they sell Taiwan business -> strong re-rating or they might just dilute you anyway.

But if the Taiwan business fails to be sold, probably expect to be diluted to oblivion like Wolfspeed. So huge, huge, risk ad do you own research into risks.

But $AXTI and $IQE might are personally interesting to me (I do own $IQE).
我是第一个从 photonics BOM/supply chains 角度谈 $AXTI 的人:

$IQE 也很有意思,是少数西方供应商之一。

基本上,如果你看 $GOOGL TPU/hyperscaler ASICs 上的 photonics flow,大概像这样(很可能,但未披露):

Optical Transceivers(最高 BOM):

Lumentum/Cloud Light:
~ Vital / $AXTI-> $AXTI/Sumitomo/JX -> $IQE(Epi-Wafers)-> $LITE / Cloud Light -> $FN(Contract Manufacturing)-> $GOOGL TPU

Merhcant optical supply chain:

~ Vital / $AXTI -> $AXTI / Sumitomo / JX -> → $LITE / $AVGO / $COHR(EML)+ $MRVL / $MTSI / Semtech -> Innolight/Eoptolink -> $GOOGL

所以如果你想要 photonics BOM 更上游、更深层的 moonshot-type / price-hikes 股票:$AXTI$IQE 就是你的路。

$AXTI 之前基本面很糟,但最近 Northland 融资轮巩固了它的上涨。

$IQE 现在基本面很糟(Net debt £23.5 million),但它可能是供应链里最关键的部分之一。如果他们能卖掉台湾业务,我不会意外它光靠 inp 业务就涨不少。

有 £18m convertible notes(基本什么都不算),然后有 120 到 154m 新股(约 ~12% 到 15%),相对当前体量也基本不算什么。

另一方面,其他像 $LITE 和 Innolight 可能更成熟。

TLDR:

$IQE -> 看起来对西方供应链很关键,$130MC。Net debt,如果他们卖掉台湾业务 -> 强重估;或者他们也可能直接稀释你。

但如果台湾业务卖不出去,那大概会像 Wolfspeed 一样被稀释到 oblivion。所以风险巨大,非常巨大,请自己研究风险。

$AXTI$IQE 对我个人都挺有意思(我持有 $IQE)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026638711941902461
❤️ 428 🔁 20 💬 50
打开原推
💬 引用
Turns out markets like it when they find out $MSFT is your secret customer?

I don’t know many companies under $1B supply directly to hyperscalers.

$ALRIB looks like it’s on a slow victory march upward after information discovery. https://t.co/palenXPLJS
事实证明,当市场发现 $MSFT 是你的秘密客户时,它们会喜欢?

我不知道有多少 $1B 以下公司直接给 hyperscalers 供货。

信息发现后,$ALRIB 看起来正在慢慢胜利向上。 https://t.co/palenXPLJS
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$MSFT looks like a secret buyer of Riber
< $ALRIB > for Microsoft Quantum.

The broader market and algorithms likely don’t know this connection yet.

MBEs are important for quantum computing, quantum dot lasers, VCSELs, and silicon photonics.

But the long-term implications are sizable if Microsoft Quantum:

-> Are starting to buy from this European equipment manufacturer

Quantum is still very early and risks to early stage industries are material.

But since this company looks like an $AIXA for Quantum and trades at a profitable ~27x est. forward P/E, as a duopoly for MBE with $VECO, it looks interesting.

From open LinkedIn intelligence, having a US hyperscaler use Riber MBE equipment to fab frontier quantum chips.

At the very least helps validate the company’s importance as a technology.

And makes it appear well positioned to capture quantum computing and quantum dot capex cycles in the near future.
$MSFT 看起来像是 Riber 的秘密买家
< $ALRIB >,用于 Microsoft Quantum。

更广泛市场和算法大概率还不知道这个连接。

MBEs 对 quantum computing、quantum dot lasers、VCSELs 和 silicon photonics 都很重要。

但如果 Microsoft Quantum:

-> 开始从这家欧洲设备制造商采购

长期影响会很大。

Quantum 仍然非常早期,早期行业的风险也很实质。

但这家公司看起来像 Quantum 里的 $AIXA,而且作为和 $VECO 共同构成 MBE 双寡头的盈利公司,交易在约 ~27x 预估 forward P/E,看起来很有意思。

从公开 LinkedIn intelligence 看,一个美国 hyperscaler 正在用 Riber MBE equipment 来制造前沿 quantum chips。

至少这有助于验证这家公司作为技术的重要性。

也让它看起来很适合在不久的将来捕捉 quantum computing 和 quantum dot capex cycles。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2042161215968051652
❤️ 681 🔁 53 💬 56
打开原推
💬 引用
Looks like my $NVDA CPO supply chain pick Shunsin…

Foxconn’s optical subsidary got halted because it went up too much.

Fun fact: TW stocks can only go up 10% a day. https://t.co/6dOGew2aGY
看起来我选的 $NVDA CPO 供应链标的 Shunsin……

Foxconn 的 optical subsidiary 因为涨太多停牌了。

有趣事实:TW 股票一天最多只能涨 10%。 https://t.co/6dOGew2aGY
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Taiwan $NVDA CPO supply chain ide #1:

Shunsin (6451 TWSE) - Photonics Packaging at ~$1.4B MC.

It's a subsidiary of Foxconn. And Foxconn is ODM for $NVDA.

It's almost like Celestial got listed by $MRVL and got a free piggy back ride?

Some personal est. 2027 fwd ~20 P/E, that compresses harder into 2028, 2029.

Shunsin's optical division openly lists their markets as "CPO 51.2T/102.4T" and "Pluggable XCVR 800G/1.6T.

Markets themselves as "Supported by Foxconn's vertically integrated supply chain for fast project ramp"

If you look at $TSM COUPE for $NVDA, they don't assemble final fiber arrays/racks, Foxconn does.

So $NVDA's CPO networking gear probably goes through Shunsin's alignment and bonding machines?

And $GOOGL, $META optical switches probably end up thorough them too since they scaled Vietnam CPO facilities (speculative).

Basically you get a free Foxconn piggy-back ride with this company at low forward multiples.

Disclosures: I am personally long.
台湾 $NVDA CPO 供应链想法 #1:

Shunsin(6451 TWSE)- Photonics Packaging,市值约 $1.4B。

它是 Foxconn 子公司。而 Foxconn 是 $NVDA 的 ODM。

这有点像 Celestial 被 $MRVL 上市,然后免费搭上顺风车?

我个人估算 2027 fwd P/E 约 20,到了 2028、2029 会进一步压缩。

Shunsin 光学部门公开列出的市场包括 “CPO 51.2T/102.4T” 和 “Pluggable XCVR 800G/1.6T”。

他们把自己定位为“由 Foxconn 垂直整合供应链支持,可快速推进项目放量”。

如果你看 $TSM COUPE 给 $NVDA 的部分,最终 fiber arrays/racks 不是 $TSM 组装,是 Foxconn 做。

所以 $NVDA 的 CPO 网络设备可能会经过 Shunsin 的 alignment 和 bonding 设备?

而且 $GOOGL$META 的 optical switches 最后可能也会通过他们,因为他们扩建了越南 CPO 设施(推测)。

基本上,你用较低 forward multiples 买到一家免费搭 Foxconn 顺风车的公司。

披露:我个人做多。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2043508231746810000
❤️ 387 🔁 23 💬 26
打开原推
💬 引用
Taiwan $NVDA CPO supply chain ide #1:

Shunsin (6451 TWSE) - Photonics Packaging at ~$1.4B MC.

It's a subsidiary of Foxconn. And Foxconn is ODM for $NVDA.

It's almost like Celestial got listed by $MRVL and got a free piggy back ride?

Some personal est. 2027 fwd ~20 P/E, that compresses harder into 2028, 2029.

Shunsin's optical division openly lists their markets as "CPO 51.2T/102.4T" and "Pluggable XCVR 800G/1.6T.

Markets themselves as "Supported by Foxconn's vertically integrated supply chain for fast project ramp"

If you look at $TSM COUPE for $NVDA, they don't assemble final fiber arrays/racks, Foxconn does.

So $NVDA's CPO networking gear probably goes through Shunsin's alignment and bonding machines?

And $GOOGL, $META optical switches probably end up thorough them too since they scaled Vietnam CPO facilities (speculative).

Basically you get a free Foxconn piggy-back ride with this company at low forward multiples.

Disclosures: I am personally long.
台湾 $NVDA CPO 供应链想法 #1:

Shunsin (6451 TWSE) - Photonics Packaging,市值 ~$1.4B。

它是 Foxconn 子公司。而 Foxconn 是 $NVDA 的 ODM。

这几乎像 Celestial 被 $MRVL 上市,并免费搭顺风车?

个人估算 2027 fwd ~20 P/E,到 2028、2029 会进一步压缩。

Shunsin 的 optical division 公开列出的市场包括 “CPO 51.2T/102.4T” 和 “Pluggable XCVR 800G/1.6T”。

它们宣传自己:“Supported by Foxconn's vertically integrated supply chain for fast project ramp”

如果你看 $TSM COUPE for $NVDA,他们不组装最终 fiber arrays/racks,Foxconn 做。

所以 $NVDA 的 CPO networking gear 很可能经过 Shunsin 的 alignment 和 bonding machines?

$GOOGL$META optical switches 也可能最终通过它们,因为它们扩张了越南 CPO 设施(推测)。

基本上你用这家公司低 forward multiples,免费搭上 Foxconn 顺风车。

Disclosures:我个人做多。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
So CPO is actually happening a lot earlier than I personally expected...

I'll probably be adding more toward $NVDA CPO ecosystem next week and I'll make a little ETF for u all.

There's a decent amount of players like

- FOCI (3363)
- LuxNet (4979)
- Elaser (3450)
- ShunSin (6451)
- PCL (4977)
- MA-tek(3587)
- IST(3289), and a lot of others involved.

But I like to try and pick winners. Lot of blind buying but like $POET vs $SIVE, there's clear winners if you understand supply chain enough.

(some of the names were frozen on TWSE because they went up too much lol, so I'll delay mentioning them until they're available again).

Going to do some more research now and try and name some more clear winners.
所以 CPO 实际发生得比我个人预期早很多...

我下周可能会继续加仓 $NVDA CPO 生态,并给你们做一个小 ETF。

里面有不少玩家,比如

- FOCI (3363)
- LuxNet (4979)
- Elaser (3450)
- ShunSin (6451)
- PCL (4977)
- MA-tek(3587)
- IST(3289),以及很多其他公司。

但我喜欢尽量挑赢家。盲买很多,但像 $POET vs $SIVE,如果你足够理解供应链,就能看出明确赢家。

(有些名字因为涨太多在 TWSE 被冻住了 lol,所以我会等它们恢复交易后再提)。

现在要继续做更多研究,尽量点出更多明确赢家。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2042800782735753670
❤️ 238 🔁 14 💬 22
打开原推
💬 引用
Let's get this straight: The Clarity Act is a bank lobbyist bill.

Where JPM and others lobbied both sides to get control over digital assets / $CRCL stablecoins.

$COIN is probably going to sell out the industry because they got their conditional banking charter approved.

But effectively, this bans competition in yields:

-> So banks can continue offering .3% interest checking accs.

Instead of handing out 4.3% treasury yields and keep the 4% difference.

-> Hands them chokepoints over on/off-ramps and stablecoins.

-> Bans any non-banks from offerings, like startups giving out 4.3% yields by holding stablecoins.

Their claim?

1. “Safety”. These are the same institutions that operate on fractional reserve models and would GG on a bank run vs. 1-1 collateralized tokens.

2. “Just become a bank”. While they secretly lobby behind the scenes to prevent any new competitive firm from becoming a bank.

If you want to see how it's things are doing under this administration:

Just look at how things are going.

Any genuinely helpful to retail are just going to get banned.
我们先说清楚:Clarity Act 是银行游说法案。

JPM 和其他银行游说两党,以获得对 digital assets / $CRCL stablecoins 的控制。

$COIN 可能会出卖整个行业,因为他们的 conditional banking charter 获批了。

但实际上,这会禁止收益竞争:

-> 这样银行就能继续提供 .3% 利息 checking accs。

而不是把 4.3% treasury yields 给你,然后自己留 4% 差额。

-> 让它们掌握 on/off-ramps 和 stablecoins 的 chokepoints。

-> 禁止任何非银行提供收益,比如 startups 通过持有 stablecoins 给出 4.3% yields。

他们的说法?

1. “Safety”。这些机构自己运行 fractional reserve models,遇到 bank run 会 GG,而 1-1 collateralized tokens 反而不同。

2. “Just become a bank”。同时他们在幕后秘密游说,阻止任何新的竞争公司成为银行。

如果你想看这届政府下事情进展如何:

看看现在就知道。

任何真正有助于散户的东西都会被禁。
引用原推@SenLummis
The last administration drove away the digital asset industry. It’s time to welcome them home with clear rules of the road.

Pass the Clarity Act.
上一届政府把 digital asset industry 赶走了。现在是时候用清晰的规则欢迎他们回家了。

通过 Clarity Act。
https://x.com/SenLummis/status/2043438004857872846
❤️ 713 🔁 93 💬 35
打开原推
💬 引用
The community / influencers shilling $IREN, $BKKT, and $ASST are the most delusional and harmful group on X.

Markets are the greatest arbiter of truth.

If something is down 99%.

And the next stock they try pushing has a $6,000,000,000 active dilution.

And you show that it’s down 60%+ compared to its peers:

they’ll just say “long term investing” or “you don’t know what you’re talking about!”

Or maybe… if you had a brain, you don’t want to be exit liquidity for a $6B ATM?

I was saying the same thing about $BKKT and received the same personal attacks last year.

It’s now down from $40 to $8 from the same group of profiles pushing $IREN today.
那些 shill $IREN$BKKT$ASST 的社区/influencers,是 X 上最 delusional、最有害的一群人。

市场是最伟大的真相裁判。

如果某个东西跌了 99%。

而他们接下来推的股票有 $6,000,000,000 active dilution。

你展示它比同行跌了 60%+:

他们只会说“long term investing”或“you don’t know what you’re talking about!”

或者也许……如果你有脑子,就不会想当 $6B ATM 的 exit liquidity?

我去年对 $BKKT 也说过同样的话,也收到了同样的人身攻击。

现在它已经从 $40 跌到 $8,而今天推 $IREN 的也是同一批账号。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
There's a reason $IREN is down -7.9% YTD.

While $NBIS is up 61.1% YTD.

The amount of delusion buying into a $6,000,000,000 ATM is unreal.

Even after this, IREN AMC bagholders still can't admit they're wrong?

Markets are the biggest arbiter of truth, and massive performance difference between Nebius and Iren is telling.

As I said before, the marketcap for $IREN will keep going up, but people's share values will decrease.

That's how ATMs work. Excessive ATMs are not accretive to current shareholders.

It's better to let all existing bagholders get wiped out first, then go long after the ATM is finished.
$IREN 今年以来跌 -7.9% 是有原因的。

$NBIS 今年以来涨 61.1%。

对一个 $6,000,000,000 ATM 还在幻想买入,真的离谱。

即便这样,IREN AMC bagholders 还不能承认自己错了?

市场是最大的真相裁判,Nebius 和 Iren 之间巨大的表现差异说明了一切。

就像我之前说的,$IREN 的 marketcap 会继续上升,但人们的每股价值会下降。

ATM 就是这么运作的。过度 ATM 对现有股东不是增厚。

最好先让所有现有 bagholders 被清掉,然后等 ATM 结束后再做多。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2042988968149684305
❤️ 680 🔁 30 💬 100
打开原推
📝 原创
The US navy to blockade any ships trying to enter or leave the Strait of Hormuz.

Not quite sure what the game plan is here?

Regardless, I completely forgot to take call options on market makers like $VIRT.

Since they are probably cheering and profiting off of increased volatility in these environments…
美国海军要封锁任何试图进出 Strait of Hormuz 的船只。

不太确定这里的 game plan 是什么?

不管怎样,我完全忘了买 $VIRT 这种 market makers 的 call options。

因为在这种环境里,它们大概正因为波动增加而欢呼并获利……
❤️ 583 🔁 26 💬 65
打开原推
💬 引用
I still remember random retail on X kept calling $IQE a “pump and dump” stock.

While they’re busy bagholding $BKKT or $IREN in their bios.

Glad to see the 600%+ YTD performance mog everyone else’s performance.

With institutions validating my thesis afterward by buying it to ATHs.
我还记得 X 上随机散户一直叫 $IQE 是“pump and dump”股票。

与此同时他们 bios 里还在 bagholding $BKKT$IREN

很高兴看到 600%+ YTD 表现 mog 了其他所有人的表现。

随后机构通过买到 ATHs 验证了我的 thesis。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Didn’t I tell you all it’s possible retail can frontrun institutions anon??

-> Point72 is aggressively buying up $IQE 2 months later at ATHs...

After my latent InP reactor capacity + $LITE supplier thesis post.

-> Apollo literally bought out NSG, the $TSM COUPE glass provider I identified.

-> And I've identified many others like $SIVE, the $MRVL / $JBL supplier to Riber the unknown quantum supplier to $MSFT (with the help of a friend) recently.

I happen to like democratizing information discovery/synthesis to retail investors at the very beginning…

Instead of selling analysis to institutions or behind $20000+ paywalls.

Stocks are genuinely positive sum where retail can get the lead for the first time.
我不是早就告诉过你们,散户可以 front run 机构吗 anon??

-> Point72 两个月后正在 ATHs 激进买入 $IQE...

在我发了 latent InP reactor capacity + $LITE supplier thesis 之后。

-> Apollo 直接买下了我识别出的 $TSM COUPE glass provider NSG。

-> 我最近还识别了很多其他名字,比如 $SIVE,这个 $MRVL / $JBL 供应商;还有 Riber,这个未知的 $MSFT quantum 供应商(在一个朋友帮助下)。

我只是喜欢在最早阶段把信息发现/整合民主化,给散户投资者...

而不是把分析卖给机构,或者放在 $20000+ 付费墙后面。

股票真的是正和游戏,散户第一次可以领先。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2043005647424491596
❤️ 537 🔁 29 💬 47
打开原推
📝 原创
You might be seeing news everywhere:

"US and Iran fail to reach agreement after historic peace talks in Pakistan"

Deal falling through publicly is expected, so each side looks tough.

Any actual deals are probably done through backchannels (eg. sanctions relief).

To track this: stuff like flight trackers (eg. Oaman, Qatar), Ghost Fleet enforcement, or insurance underwriters:

Are probably your best signals, rather than MSM headlines.

Probably better to just enjoy your Sunday rather than overreact to headlines.
你可能到处看到新闻:

“US and Iran fail to reach agreement after historic peace talks in Pakistan”

公开谈崩是预期内的,这样双方看起来都强硬。

任何真正的 deal 大概都通过 backchannels 完成(比如 sanctions relief)。

要跟踪这个:像 flight trackers(比如 Oaman、Qatar)、Ghost Fleet enforcement,或 insurance underwriters:

这些可能才是你最好的信号,而不是 MSM 标题。

可能更适合享受你的周日,而不是对标题过度反应。
❤️ 1,142 🔁 58 💬 49
打开原推
💬 引用
Serenity's Follower Picked Hyperbolic 10x ETF Performance.

Week 1: +12.39%
$AEHR: +56.72% ($45.08 -> $70.65)
$AAOI: +39.63% ($108.86 -> $152.00)
$SIVE: +35.35% (9.9 SEK -> 13.4 SEK)
$ENAFF: +31.58% ($1.71 -> $2.25)
$AL2SI: +25.44% (28.70 EUR -> 36 EUR)
$ENVX: +21.30% ($5.07 -> $6.15)
$BZAI: +18.99% ($1.79 -> $2.13)
$POET: +16.04% ($6.11 -> $7.09)
$WATT: +14.81% ($15.8 -> $18.14)
$HGRAF: +14.48% ($4.49 -> $5.14)
$VLN: +13.79% ($1.16 -> $1.32)
$LPK.DE: +13.20% (6.59 EUR -> 7.46 EUR)
$FLY: +13.09% ($33.16 -> $37.50)
$VPG: +11.63% ($44.7 -> $49.90)
$PLAB: +9.86% ($40.87 -> $44.90)
$TRT: +8.33% ($5.88 -> $6.37)
$EQR.AX: +7.94% (.315 AUD -> .34 AUD)
$LASR: +7.92% ($60.7 -> $65.51)
$ASPI: +6.67% ($4.2 -> $4.48)
$P4O.DE: +5.69% (6.85 EUR -> 7.24 EUR)
$EOS.AX: +3.11% ($9.00-> $9.28)
$ADUR: -0.29% ($10.37 -> $10.34)
$MITK: -2.52% ($13.9 -> $13.55)
$ALCJ: -3.41% (2.05 EUR -> 1.98 EUR)
$TMC: -5.01% ($4.59 -> $4.36)
$QURE: -9.94% ($17.21 -> $15.50)
$EONR: -20.00% ($.9 -> $.72)

Top 3:
1. $AEHR: +56.72%
2. $AAOI: +39.63%
3. $SIVE: +35.35%

Honorable mention $ENAFF with a 31.58% return.

Weighted average was 12.39%.

Honestly not bad everyone, you beat year index returns in just 1 week.
Serenity 粉丝精选 Hyperbolic 10x ETF 表现。

Week 1:+12.39%
$AEHR:+56.72% ($45.08 -> $70.65)
$AAOI:+39.63% ($108.86 -> $152.00)
$SIVE:+35.35% (9.9 SEK -> 13.4 SEK)
$ENAFF:+31.58% ($1.71 -> $2.25)
$AL2SI:+25.44% (28.70 EUR -> 36 EUR)
$ENVX:+21.30% ($5.07 -> $6.15)
$BZAI:+18.99% ($1.79 -> $2.13)
$POET:+16.04% ($6.11 -> $7.09)
$WATT:+14.81% ($15.8 -> $18.14)
$HGRAF:+14.48% ($4.49 -> $5.14)
$VLN:+13.79% ($1.16 -> $1.32)
$LPK.DE:+13.20% (6.59 EUR -> 7.46 EUR)
$FLY:+13.09% ($33.16 -> $37.50)
$VPG:+11.63% ($44.7 -> $49.90)
$PLAB:+9.86% ($40.87 -> $44.90)
$TRT:+8.33% ($5.88 -> $6.37)
$EQR.AX:+7.94% (.315 AUD -> .34 AUD)
$LASR:+7.92% ($60.7 -> $65.51)
$ASPI:+6.67% ($4.2 -> $4.48)
$P4O.DE:+5.69% (6.85 EUR -> 7.24 EUR)
$EOS.AX:+3.11% ($9.00-> $9.28)
$ADUR:-0.29% ($10.37 -> $10.34)
$MITK:-2.52% ($13.9 -> $13.55)
$ALCJ:-3.41% (2.05 EUR -> 1.98 EUR)
$TMC:-5.01% ($4.59 -> $4.36)
$QURE:-9.94% ($17.21 -> $15.50)
$EONR:-20.00% ($.9 -> $.72)

Top 3:
1. $AEHR:+56.72%
2. $AAOI:+39.63%
3. $SIVE:+35.35%

Honorable mention $ENAFF,31.58% 回报。

加权平均是 12.39%。

说实话大家不错,你们 1 周就跑赢了一年指数回报。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Serenity's Followers Favorite Stock Parabolic Growth ETF:

The most anticipated ETF of all time:

$TRT - $5.88
$HGRAF - $4.49
$SIVE - 9.9 SEK
$QURE - $17.21
$AEHR - $45.08
$ENVX - $5.07
$ASPI - $4.2
$EONR - $11.79
$LPK.DE - 6.59 EUR
$MITK - $13.9
$EQR.AX - .315 AUD
$WATT - $15.8
$VLN - $1.16
$BZAI - $1.79
$TMC - $4.59
$ALCJ - $74.57
$POET - $6.11
$AAOI - $108.86
$ADUR - $10.37
$P4O.DE - 6.85 EUR
$PLAB - $40.87
$FLY - $33.16
$LASR - $60.7
$AL2SI - 28.70 EUR
$ENAFF - $1.71
$VPG - $44.7
$EOS.AX - $9.00

I haven't heard of 1/3rd of these names, but if my followers have high conviction that their name will 10x...

So do I.
Serenity 粉丝最爱股票抛物线增长 ETF:

史上最受期待 ETF:

$TRT - $5.88
$HGRAF - $4.49
$SIVE - 9.9 SEK
$QURE - $17.21
$AEHR - $45.08
$ENVX - $5.07
$ASPI - $4.2
$EONR - $11.79
$LPK.DE - 6.59 EUR
$MITK - $13.9
$EQR.AX - .315 AUD
$WATT - $15.8
$VLN - $1.16
$BZAI - $1.79
$TMC - $4.59
$ALCJ - $74.57
$POET - $6.11
$AAOI - $108.86
$ADUR - $10.37
$P4O.DE - 6.85 EUR
$PLAB - $40.87
$FLY - $33.16
$LASR - $60.7
$AL2SI - 28.70 EUR
$ENAFF - $1.71
$VPG - $44.7
$EOS.AX - $9.00

这里面 1/3 的名字我都没听过,但如果我的粉丝高度确信他们的名字会 10x……

那我也信。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2039906072291611057
❤️ 974 🔁 57 💬 66
打开原推
💬 引用
Didn’t I tell you all it’s possible retail can frontrun institutions anon??

-> Point72 is aggressively buying up $IQE 2 months later at ATHs...

After my latent InP reactor capacity + $LITE supplier thesis post.

-> Apollo literally bought out NSG, the $TSM COUPE glass provider I identified.

-> And I've identified many others like $SIVE, the $MRVL / $JBL supplier to Riber the unknown quantum supplier to $MSFT (with the help of a friend) recently.

I happen to like democratizing information discovery/synthesis to retail investors at the very beginning…

Instead of selling analysis to institutions or behind $20000+ paywalls.

Stocks are genuinely positive sum where retail can get the lead for the first time.
我不是告诉过你们散户可以 frontrun institutions 吗 anon??

-> Point72 在我发 latent InP reactor capacity + $LITE supplier thesis 帖 2 个月后,正在 ATHs 激进买入 $IQE……

-> Apollo 直接买下了 NSG,也就是我识别出的 $TSM COUPE glass provider。

-> 我最近还识别了很多其他的,比如 $SIVE,这个 $MRVL / $JBL supplier,以及 Riber 这个未知的 $MSFT quantum supplier(在一个朋友帮助下)。

我就是喜欢在最开始把 information discovery/synthesis 民主化给散户投资者……

而不是卖分析给机构,或者放在 $20000+ 付费墙后面。

股票真的是正和的,散户第一次可以领先。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Was the first to talk about $AXTI in relation to photonics BOM/supply chains:

$IQE is very interesting too as one of the only Western suppliers.

Basically if you look at photonics flow on $GOOGL TPU/hyperscaler ASICs kinda looks like this (very likely, but undisclosed):

Optical Transceivers (highest BOM):

Lumentum/Cloud Light:
~ Vital / $AXTI-> $AXTI/Sumitomo/JX -> $IQE (Epi-Wafers) -> $LITE / Cloud Light -> $FN (Contract Manufacturing) -> $GOOGL TPU

Merhcant optical supply chain:

~ Vital / $AXTI -> $AXTI / Sumitomo / JX -> → $LITE / $AVGO / $COHR (EML) + $MRVL / $MTSI / Semtech -> Innolight/Eoptolink -> $GOOGL

So if you want moonshot-type photonics BOM / price-hikes stocks deeper upstream in the photonics BOM: $AXTI, $IQE and your way to go.

$AXTI had terrible fundamentals before but the recent Northland fundraising round cemented its run.

$IQE has terrible fundamentals now (Net debt £23.5 million) but is probably one of the most critical parts of the supply chain. If they manage to sell their Taiwan operations, wouldn't be surprised if it went up quite a bit just from their inp business.

There's £18m convertible notes (which is basically nothing), then there's 120 to 154m new shares (~12% to 15%), which is also kinda nothing relative to current size.

On the other hand, others $LITE and Innolight are probably more established.

TLDR:

$IQE -> seems critical to Western supply chains, $130MC. Net debt, if they sell Taiwan business -> strong re-rating or they might just dilute you anyway.

But if the Taiwan business fails to be sold, probably expect to be diluted to oblivion like Wolfspeed. So huge, huge, risk ad do you own research into risks.

But $AXTI and $IQE might are personally interesting to me (I do own $IQE).
我是第一个从 photonics BOM/supply chains 角度谈 $AXTI 的人:

$IQE 也很有意思,是少数西方供应商之一。

基本上,如果你看 $GOOGL TPU/hyperscaler ASICs 上的 photonics flow,大概像这样(很可能,但未披露):

Optical Transceivers(最高 BOM):

Lumentum/Cloud Light:
~ Vital / $AXTI-> $AXTI/Sumitomo/JX -> $IQE(Epi-Wafers)-> $LITE / Cloud Light -> $FN(Contract Manufacturing)-> $GOOGL TPU

Merhcant optical supply chain:

~ Vital / $AXTI -> $AXTI / Sumitomo / JX -> → $LITE / $AVGO / $COHR(EML)+ $MRVL / $MTSI / Semtech -> Innolight/Eoptolink -> $GOOGL

所以如果你想要 photonics BOM 更上游、更深层的 moonshot-type / price-hikes 股票:$AXTI$IQE 就是你的路。

$AXTI 之前基本面很糟,但最近 Northland 融资轮巩固了它的上涨。

$IQE 现在基本面很糟(Net debt £23.5 million),但它可能是供应链里最关键的部分之一。如果他们能卖掉台湾业务,我不会意外它光靠 inp 业务就涨不少。

有 £18m convertible notes(基本什么都不算),然后有 120 到 154m 新股(约 ~12% 到 15%),相对当前体量也基本不算什么。

另一方面,其他像 $LITE 和 Innolight 可能更成熟。

TLDR:

$IQE -> 看起来对西方供应链很关键,$130MC。Net debt,如果他们卖掉台湾业务 -> 强重估;或者他们也可能直接稀释你。

但如果台湾业务卖不出去,那大概会像 Wolfspeed 一样被稀释到 oblivion。所以风险巨大,非常巨大,请自己研究风险。

$AXTI$IQE 对我个人都挺有意思(我持有 $IQE)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026638711941902461
❤️ 924 🔁 39 💬 51
打开原推
💬 引用
There's a reason $IREN is down -7.9% YTD.

While $NBIS is up 61.1% YTD.

The amount of delusion buying into a $6,000,000,000 ATM is unreal.

Even after this, IREN AMC bagholders still can't admit they're wrong?

Markets are the biggest arbiter of truth, and massive performance difference between Nebius and Iren is telling.

As I said before, the marketcap for $IREN will keep going up, but people's share values will decrease.

That's how ATMs work. Excessive ATMs are not accretive to current shareholders.

It's better to let all existing bagholders get wiped out first, then go long after the ATM is finished.
$IREN YTD 跌 -7.9% 是有原因的。

$NBIS YTD 涨 61.1%。

买进 $6,000,000,000 ATM 的 delusion 程度太不真实了。

即使这样,IREN AMC bagholders 还是不能承认自己错了?

市场是最大的真相裁判,Nebius 和 Iren 巨大的表现差异很说明问题。

就像我之前说的,$IREN 的 marketcap 会继续上升,但人们的每股价值会下降。

这就是 ATMs 的运作方式。过度 ATMs 对当前股东不是增厚。

最好先让所有现有 bagholders 被清零,然后等 ATM 结束后再做多。
引用原推@iDumpParabolas
@aleabitoreddit Too bad you fked up being an iren bear
@aleabitoreddit 可惜你做 iren bear 搞砸了
https://x.com/iDumpParabolas/status/2042949118054584719
❤️ 679 🔁 18 💬 101
打开原推
💬 引用
If you want to trade hyperscaler qualification cycles…

And quantum dot like QD Laser (TYO: 6613) up 226% YTD:

IMO safest way to do it are their unknown MBE machine suppliers like $ALRIB early on.

Then pivot to pure play lasers later when they move from qualification -> volume orders.

I mentioned earlier $MSFT quantum was Riber’s undisclosed hyperscaler customer.

But QD laser (getting popular) is heavily reliant on Riber too for their quantum dot program.

I’m not a fan when it comes time to volume production (eg. $AIXA vs the actual volume producers) since machines don’t capture downstream revenue.

But if you want to benefit from capex R&D cycles… eg. QD Laser absorbing capex costs (paying Riber) to build capacity

$ALRIB, $ASML, $AIXA type companies usually hits the balance sheet much earlier so you don’t need to wait 2-3 years for production orders.
如果你想交易 hyperscaler qualification cycles……

以及 QD Laser (TYO: 6613) 这种 quantum dot,YTD 涨 226%:

IMO 最安全的方式,是早期买它们不为人知的 MBE machine suppliers,比如 $ALRIB

然后等它们从 qualification -> volume orders 时,再转向 pure play lasers。

我之前提过 $MSFT quantum 是 Riber 未披露的 hyperscaler customer。

但 QD laser(正在变热门)在 quantum dot program 上也严重依赖 Riber。

到了 volume production 的时候,我不太喜欢机器公司(比如 $AIXA vs 实际 volume producers),因为机器不捕获下游收入。

但如果你想受益于 capex R&D cycles……比如 QD Laser 吸收 capex 成本(付钱给 Riber)来建设产能

$ALRIB$ASML$AIXA 这类公司通常更早体现在资产负债表上,所以你不需要等 2-3 年生产订单。
引用原推@Semicon_player
@PhotonCap 일본 투자계 친구들이 QD LASER 에 엄청난 관심이 있더라고

이것도 한번 집중 탐구 분석 해보면 글로벌리 아주 넓게 좋을듯 쏘니
@PhotonCap 日本投资圈的朋友们对 QD LASER 非常感兴趣

这个如果也集中深入分析一下,全球范围看应该会很有意思,Sonny
https://x.com/Semicon_player/status/2042776222808396006
❤️ 458 🔁 39 💬 36
打开原推
📝 原创
Holy ****, I really hope Ajinomoto doesn’t give into these activist shareholders.

WSJ finally broke older news that:

“Palliser Takes Stake in Ajinomoto, Urges 30%+ ABF Price Increase” (major chokepoint)

Yeah, I did the same with $AXTI … but that’s US/China so it’s okay.

There’s a reason why nobody copied that same playbook for Japanese companies.

Trying to change Japanese culture with Western hedge fund predatory price hikes is not encouraged.
Holy ****,我真的希望 Ajinomoto 不要向这些 activist shareholders 屈服。

WSJ 终于报道了旧新闻:

“Palliser Takes Stake in Ajinomoto, Urges 30%+ ABF Price Increase”(重大 chokepoint)

是的,我对 $AXTI 也做了类似的事……但那是 US/China,所以可以。

没人复制同样 playbook 去搞日本公司是有原因的。

不鼓励用西方 hedge fund 掠夺式涨价去改变日本文化。
❤️ 366 🔁 16 💬 20
打开原推
💬 引用
Honestly... I don't even know at this point?

0 to 155,000+ followers, 10,000 subscribers... in under a year.

900%+ year to date...

Off 13+ individual stocks from $AAOI to $LITE hitting triple digits returns in 4 months.

Call me aura farming Serenity Jin-woo (last post about this topic i swear, 10,000 just looks cool).

Jokes aside, thanks everyone for this opportunity. I genuinely want to make a difference to the retail community.

Getting tired of institutions shafting retail or seeing $2000+ paywalls so hope to bridge the gap in information discovery/synthesis.
说实话……到这个阶段我也不知道了?

不到一年,从 0 到 155,000+ 粉丝、10,000 订阅者。

今年以来 900%+……

靠 13+ 只个股从 $AAOI$LITE 在 4 个月内达到三位数回报。

叫我 aura farming Serenity Jin-woo 吧(我发誓这是这个话题最后一帖,10,000 看起来就是很酷)。

玩笑归玩笑,谢谢大家给我这个机会。我真心想给散户社区带来改变。

我厌倦了机构坑散户,也厌倦了看到 $2000+ 付费墙,所以希望弥合 information discovery/synthesis 的差距。
引用原推@ram_blings
@aleabitoreddit I feel like you're one of those heroes in anime leveling up and now you're aura farming 😄
@aleabitoreddit 我感觉你像动漫里那些升级的主角,现在开始 aura farming 了 😄
https://x.com/ram_blings/status/2042827638268744005
❤️ 1,670 🔁 23 💬 141
打开原推
💬 引用
am i that powerful?

pretty sure it's just information synthesis + discovery. If I posted about a napkin company trading at 8 p/e, nobody would care.

When $SIVE is the light source for $JBL and $MRVL at ~400m...

and trades at like 1/4th the valuation of something more speculative like $LWLG.

while all the other CW DFB companies like $MTSI or $LITE are all in the tens of billions.

Information ends up drawing people's attention, not the person.
我有那么强吗?

我很确定这只是信息综合 + 发现。如果我发一家 8 p/e 的 napkin company,没人会在乎。

$SIVE$JBL$MRVL 的 light source,市值大约 ~400m……

而且交易在像 $LWLG 这种更投机名字估值的 1/4 左右。

同时其他 CW DFB 公司,比如 $MTSI$LITE,全都是几十亿美元市值。

最终吸引大家注意的是信息,不是人。
引用原推@MisterMCAP
@PhotonCap @Semicon_player @aleabitoreddit When @aleabitoreddit posted about $SIVE it became the most traded stock on the Swedish stock market. Larger than industrial giants like ABB. Crazy what happens when American capital starts flowing in.
@PhotonCap @Semicon_player @aleabitoreddit@aleabitoreddit$SIVE 时,它成了瑞典股市交易量最大的股票。比 ABB 这种工业巨头还大。美国资本开始流入时会发生什么,真的很疯狂。
https://x.com/MisterMCAP/status/2042817889485324499
❤️ 471 🔁 20 💬 34
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So CPO is actually happening a lot earlier than I personally expected...

I'll probably be adding more toward $NVDA CPO ecosystem next week and I'll make a little ETF for u all.

There's a decent amount of players like

- FOCI (3363)
- LuxNet (4979)
- Elaser (3450)
- ShunSin (6451)
- PCL (4977)
- MA-tek(3587)
- IST(3289), and a lot of others involved.

But I like to try and pick winners. Lot of blind buying but like $POET vs $SIVE, there's clear winners if you understand supply chain enough.

(some of the names were frozen on TWSE because they went up too much lol, so I'll delay mentioning them until they're available again).

Going to do some more research now and try and name some more clear winners.
所以 CPO 实际发生得比我个人预期早很多……

下周我大概会加更多 $NVDA CPO ecosystem,我会给你们做一个小 ETF。

这里有不少玩家,比如

- FOCI (3363)
- LuxNet (4979)
- Elaser (3450)
- ShunSin (6451)
- PCL (4977)
- MA-tek(3587)
- IST(3289),还有很多其他参与者。

但我喜欢尽量挑赢家。盲买很多,但像 $POET vs $SIVE,如果你足够理解供应链,赢家很清楚。

(有些名字因为涨太多在 TWSE 被冻结了 lol,所以我会等它们重新可交易再提。)

现在要继续做更多研究,试着点出更多明确赢家。
❤️ 546 🔁 14 💬 62
打开原推
📝 原创
$NVDA is driving CPO, extremely, extremely hard.

As seen with investments in $MRVL, $LITE, and $COHR.

But, what's interesting is: CPO timelines are also happening way earlier than expected.

New report:

" $ASE Reportedly to Break Ground on Six New Plants in 2026, CPO Mass Production Expected to Begin This Year "

"He also revealed for the first time that mass production of CPO is expected to begin this year"

Probably a good time to frontrun CPO related names like $SIVE (lasers), Win Semi (foundry), $TSEM (foundry), $SOI (substrates), and others around now, before ramp really picks up.

The demand curve goes up exponentially all the way past 2029+, and I'm sure they'll break many projections.

But basically, I was talking about frontrunning CPO/SiPH names before OFC/GTC.

Turned out I was right on timing again?

CPO Ramp now looks like it's beginning H2 2026, get ready.
$NVDA 正在极其、极其用力地推动 CPO。

从他们投资 $MRVL$LITE$COHR 就能看出。

但有意思的是:CPO 时间线也比预期早很多。

新报告:

$ASE Reportedly to Break Ground on Six New Plants in 2026, CPO Mass Production Expected to Begin This Year”

“He also revealed for the first time that mass production of CPO is expected to begin this year”

现在可能是抢跑 CPO 相关名字的好时间,比如 $SIVE(lasers)、Win Semi(foundry)、$TSEM(foundry)、$SOI(substrates)等,在 ramp 真正加速前。

需求曲线会一路指数增长到 2029+ 之后,我相信它们会打破很多预测。

基本上,我之前就在 OFC/GTC 前讲抢跑 CPO/SiPH 名字。

结果我 timing 又对了?

CPO Ramp 现在看起来会在 H2 2026 开始,准备好。
❤️ 741 🔁 65 💬 42
打开原推
📝 原创
I feel like I've called out the most triple digit stock returns YTD...

Out of anyone in history? Hence why I have 150k+ followers now!

In just a short timeframe:
$AXTI -> 5x+
$AAOI -> 5x
$SIVE -> 2x+
$LITE -> 2x+
$IQE -> 2x+
$AEHR -> 2x+
$CRCL -> 2x+
$EWY IV -> 2x
Unimicron -> 2x+
Nitto Boseki -> 2x+
$OSS -> 2x+
$GDRZF -> 2x+
$AEHR -> 2x

With many more like $TSEM, $RPI having close to triple digit returns.

Not including many others last year like $HOOD or $RKLB for triple digit returns, just this YTD.

There's stuff like $FORM and others like Macronix... and $NBIS that actually doubled from the bottom at $70. But I won't take credit since I didn't do a specific post about it during the timeframes.

There's a difference between just mentioning among many other tickers.

Then having conviction like myself, writing a specific thesis post about it, getting catalyst timing right, and going long yourself.

But proud if this helped retail going the right direction.

Especially that they don’t need to pay $2,000+ just to see tickers people go long on or join some “special club” for company discussion.
我感觉我今年 YTD 点出的三位数股票回报……

可能是历史上最多的?所以现在我有 150k+ 粉丝!

短时间内:
$AXTI -> 5x+
$AAOI -> 5x
$SIVE -> 2x+
$LITE -> 2x+
$IQE -> 2x+
$AEHR -> 2x+
$CRCL -> 2x+
$EWY IV -> 2x
Unimicron -> 2x+
Nitto Boseki -> 2x+
$OSS -> 2x+
$GDRZF -> 2x+
$AEHR -> 2x

还有很多像 $TSEM$RPI 也接近三位数回报。

不包括去年很多其他三位数回报,比如 $HOOD$RKLB,只算今年 YTD。

还有 $FORM 和 Macronix 之类……以及 $NBIS 实际上从 $70 底部翻倍。但我不会揽功,因为我当时没有在对应时间框架写特定帖子。

只是众多 ticker 里提到,

和像我这样有 conviction、写具体 thesis 帖、抓准催化 timing、自己做多,是有区别的。

但如果这帮助散户走对方向,我很自豪。

尤其是他们不需要花 $2,000+ 才能看到别人做多的 tickers,或加入什么“special club”讨论公司。
❤️ 2,121 🔁 94 💬 154
打开原推
💬 引用
So private placement is ~9.4% dilution via 40M new shares via Win Semi (3105).

Any other stock I'd be cautious... but last time Win did this, $AVGO took a stake in Win Semi.

And Broadcom became their lead customer.

Maybe T1 semi like $NVDA, given their recent funding of $MRVL, $LITE, $COHR.

There's also a 3 year holding period.

I said before Win Semi is foundational to photonics, humanoids, and space (eg. SpaceX) and it's likely another T1 customer using them long term.

It's nuanced but actually bullish.
所以 private placement 是 Win Semi (3105) 通过 40M 新股带来 ~9.4% 稀释。

换成其他股票我会谨慎……但 Win 上次这么做时,$AVGO 入股了 Win Semi。

然后 Broadcom 成为它们的 lead customer。

也许这次是 $NVDA 这种 T1 semi,考虑到他们最近资助 $MRVL$LITE$COHR

还有 3 年持有期。

我之前说过 Win Semi 是 photonics、humanoids 和 space(比如 SpaceX)的基础,而且很可能是另一个 T1 customer 长期使用它们。

这很讲细节,但其实 bullish。
引用原推@sunmingjun4
@aleabitoreddit 3105 Win Semiconductors Corp just announced a private placement today.

What’s your take on this?
How do you think it impacts the stock price
@aleabitoreddit 3105 Win Semiconductors Corp 今天刚宣布 private placement。

你怎么看?
你觉得这会怎么影响股价
https://x.com/sunmingjun4/status/2042667101333393579
❤️ 246 🔁 12 💬 29
打开原推
📝 原创
$SNDK is a perfect example why you don’t trust firms named after tangerines.

Forward earnings compresses extremely hard with Sandisk and $AAOI.

My opinion is that shorts are just fuel to the rally…

Since people who took the other end of the trade, show a lack of understanding of forward growth, bottlenecks, and extreme TAM expansion.
$SNDK 是一个完美例子,说明你不要相信名字像 tangerines 的机构。

Sandisk 和 $AAOI 的 forward earnings 压缩得非常厉害。

我的看法是,空头只是 rally 的燃料……

因为站在交易另一边的人,显示出对 forward growth、bottlenecks 和极端 TAM expansion 缺乏理解。
❤️ 845 🔁 43 💬 54
打开原推
📝 原创
Our president is really posting about $PLTR as the stock dropped 16%?

Stating:

“Palantir Technologies (PLTR) has proven to have great war fighting capabilities and equipment”

Even threw in the Nasdaq ticker in parenthesis for good measure lol. https://t.co/7A4CNcHcd9
我们的总统真的在 $PLTR 跌 16% 时发关于它的帖子?

他说:

“Palantir Technologies (PLTR) has proven to have great war fighting capabilities and equipment”

甚至还很贴心地把 Nasdaq ticker 放进括号 lol。 https://t.co/7A4CNcHcd9
❤️ 967 🔁 26 💬 112
打开原推
💬 引用
Yeah… I’m cooking super hard.

$AAOI +10.65%

People aren’t bullish enough after the new $LITE backlog report.

The demand visibility lasts past 2029 for optical companies… https://t.co/XCh0QUFPUl
是啊……我 cook 得太猛了。

$AAOI +10.65%

新的 $LITE backlog report 之后,大家还不够 bullish。

对 optical companies 来说,需求可见性会持续到 2029 之后…… https://t.co/XCh0QUFPUl
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I'm not sure people understand yet:

$LITE backlog order fill into 2028 signals extreme demand. And a lack of capacity.

Then by second order effect of hyperscaler demand spillover:

Guess who is projected to have the largest 800G/1.6T capacity in America?

$AAOI.

They fab their own inp lasers, design their own transceivers, and assemble it.

If $AAOI can execute on capacity ramp, that likely all translates into revenue due to everything being sold out.

My $40B MC price target from $5B is starting to look more and more likely?
我不确定大家是否已经理解:

$LITE backlog order 填到 2028,说明需求极端强劲,而且产能不足。

然后作为 hyperscaler 需求外溢的二阶效应:

猜猜谁预计会拥有美国最大的 800G/1.6T 产能?

$AAOI

他们自己 fab inp lasers,自己设计 transceivers,并自己组装。

如果 $AAOI 能执行产能 ramp,那很可能都会转化为收入,因为所有东西都卖光了。

我从 $5B 到 $40B MC 的目标价,开始看起来越来越可能了?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2042533797405823299
❤️ 713 🔁 48 💬 75
打开原推
💬 引用
I cooked pretty hard finding $IQE? Another massive triple digit gain.

Up 23%+ today.

I said earlier that next $AXTI 10x would be either $AAOI, $IQE, or $SIVE.

We'll see which one ends up winning. https://t.co/v8rAHL8Wjk
我是不是在找 $IQE 上也挺猛的?又一个三位数大涨。

今天涨了 23%+。

我之前说过,下一个 $AXTI 10x 会在 $AAOI$IQE$SIVE 里面。

看看最后谁会赢。 https://t.co/v8rAHL8Wjk
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Was the first to talk about $AXTI in relation to photonics BOM/supply chains:

$IQE is very interesting too as one of the only Western suppliers.

Basically if you look at photonics flow on $GOOGL TPU/hyperscaler ASICs kinda looks like this (very likely, but undisclosed):

Optical Transceivers (highest BOM):

Lumentum/Cloud Light:
~ Vital / $AXTI-> $AXTI/Sumitomo/JX -> $IQE (Epi-Wafers) -> $LITE / Cloud Light -> $FN (Contract Manufacturing) -> $GOOGL TPU

Merhcant optical supply chain:

~ Vital / $AXTI -> $AXTI / Sumitomo / JX -> → $LITE / $AVGO / $COHR (EML) + $MRVL / $MTSI / Semtech -> Innolight/Eoptolink -> $GOOGL

So if you want moonshot-type photonics BOM / price-hikes stocks deeper upstream in the photonics BOM: $AXTI, $IQE and your way to go.

$AXTI had terrible fundamentals before but the recent Northland fundraising round cemented its run.

$IQE has terrible fundamentals now (Net debt £23.5 million) but is probably one of the most critical parts of the supply chain. If they manage to sell their Taiwan operations, wouldn't be surprised if it went up quite a bit just from their inp business.

There's £18m convertible notes (which is basically nothing), then there's 120 to 154m new shares (~12% to 15%), which is also kinda nothing relative to current size.

On the other hand, others $LITE and Innolight are probably more established.

TLDR:

$IQE -> seems critical to Western supply chains, $130MC. Net debt, if they sell Taiwan business -> strong re-rating or they might just dilute you anyway.

But if the Taiwan business fails to be sold, probably expect to be diluted to oblivion like Wolfspeed. So huge, huge, risk ad do you own research into risks.

But $AXTI and $IQE might are personally interesting to me (I do own $IQE).
我是第一个从 photonics BOM/supply chains 角度谈 $AXTI 的人:

$IQE 也很有意思,是少数西方供应商之一。

基本上,如果你看 $GOOGL TPU/hyperscaler ASICs 上的 photonics flow,大概像这样(很可能,但未披露):

Optical Transceivers(最高 BOM):

Lumentum/Cloud Light:
~ Vital / $AXTI-> $AXTI/Sumitomo/JX -> $IQE(Epi-Wafers)-> $LITE / Cloud Light -> $FN(Contract Manufacturing)-> $GOOGL TPU

Merhcant optical supply chain:

~ Vital / $AXTI -> $AXTI / Sumitomo / JX -> → $LITE / $AVGO / $COHR(EML)+ $MRVL / $MTSI / Semtech -> Innolight/Eoptolink -> $GOOGL

所以如果你想要 photonics BOM 更上游、更深层的 moonshot-type / price-hikes 股票:$AXTI$IQE 就是你的路。

$AXTI 之前基本面很糟,但最近 Northland 融资轮巩固了它的上涨。

$IQE 现在基本面很糟(Net debt £23.5 million),但它可能是供应链里最关键的部分之一。如果他们能卖掉台湾业务,我不会意外它光靠 inp 业务就涨不少。

有 £18m convertible notes(基本什么都不算),然后有 120 到 154m 新股(约 ~12% 到 15%),相对当前体量也基本不算什么。

另一方面,其他像 $LITE 和 Innolight 可能更成熟。

TLDR:

$IQE -> 看起来对西方供应链很关键,$130MC。Net debt,如果他们卖掉台湾业务 -> 强重估;或者他们也可能直接稀释你。

但如果台湾业务卖不出去,那大概会像 Wolfspeed 一样被稀释到 oblivion。所以风险巨大,非常巨大,请自己研究风险。

$AXTI$IQE 对我个人都挺有意思(我持有 $IQE)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026638711941902461
❤️ 787 🔁 48 💬 82
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm not sure people understand yet:

$LITE backlog order fill into 2028 signals extreme demand. And a lack of capacity.

Then by second order effect of hyperscaler demand spillover:

Guess who is projected to have the largest 800G/1.6T capacity in America?

$AAOI.

They fab their own inp lasers, design their own transceivers, and assemble it.

If $AAOI can execute on capacity ramp, that likely all translates into revenue due to everything being sold out.

My $40B MC price target from $5B is starting to look more and more likely?
我不确定大家现在理解了没有:

$LITE backlog 订单已经排到 2028,说明需求极端强劲,而且产能不够。

然后由于 hyperscaler 需求外溢的二阶效应:

猜猜谁预计会拥有美国最大的 800G/1.6T 产能?

$AAOI

他们自己 fab inp lasers,自己设计 transceivers,也自己组装。

如果 $AAOI 能把产能 ramp 执行好,那大概率都会转化成收入,因为东西全都卖光了。

我从 $5B 到 $40B MC 的目标价是不是开始看起来越来越可能了?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
We're now in the photonics supercycle.

The trio from $COHR, $LITE, $AAOI in America are expected to perform well from a surge in demand.

New Report:

" Lumentum is experiencing a surge in demand from the artificial intelligence sector, with its order pipeline now fully booked through 2028 "
我们现在已经进入 photonics supercycle。

美国这边 $COHR$LITE$AAOI 这三家,预计会因为需求激增而表现不错。

新报告:

“Lumentum 正经历来自 artificial intelligence sector 的需求激增,其 order pipeline 现在已经完全订满到 2028 年”
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2042476441196241094
❤️ 926 🔁 87 💬 51
打开原推
💬 引用
Sorry everyone, Soitec ( $SOI ) is only up 39.28% since last month.

Unfortunately, they were an underperformer in my photonics basket.

Not everything can go up triple digits every other month like $AXTI or $AAOI. https://t.co/OwlOzugf68
抱歉各位,Soitec( $SOI )从上个月到现在只涨了 39.28%。

很遗憾,它在我的 photonics basket 里算是表现落后的。

不是所有东西都能像 $AXTI$AAOI 那样隔一个月就涨三位数。 https://t.co/OwlOzugf68
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 410 🔁 22 💬 58
打开原推
💬 引用
There's many nuanced architectural changes for "supercycles" in photonics.

If you feel like you missed $LITE from last year, just frontrun the next cycle with CPO / lasers.

$SIVE was my lesser known pick for laser exposure.

They're in $JBL 1.6T LRO, $MRVL via Celestial, O-Net -> Hyperscalers.

Which is extremely abnormal for a ~$350M MC company.

If I had to draw parallels: it's similar to $AAOI 2025 or $AEHR now with current qualification cycles before volume.

Which is why retail misunderstands it when you look at purely financial numbers today with negative eps or capex spend.

And a lot of that execution uncertainty with volume production / capex spend for scaling dfb laser is de-risked from Win Semi.

However, it looks to just keep ramping past 2029+ starting from H2 2026.

Might be a little early... But I think it's a decent read on what's up and coming.

Dilution is a real risk.

But a lot of fears are priced into its ~$350M MC, especially when a company like $AVGO or AlChip can just buy $SIVE for vertical integration or to troll Marvell’s CPO program.
photonics 的“supercycles”里有很多细微的架构变化。

如果你觉得去年错过了 $LITE,那就用 CPO / lasers 去提前埋伏下一个周期。

$SIVE 是我选的一个没那么多人知道的 laser exposure。

他们在 $JBL 1.6T LRO、通过 Celestial 进入 $MRVL、O-Net -> Hyperscalers。

这对一家 ~$350M MC 的公司来说非常不寻常。

如果要类比:有点像 2025 年的 $AAOI,或者现在的 $AEHR,在放量前处于当前 qualification cycles。

这也是为什么散户只看今天的财务数字,比如负 eps 或 capex spend,会误解它。

而且很多关于量产执行 / 扩产 capex spend / scaling dfb laser 的不确定性,Win Semi 已经帮它去掉了不少风险。

不过,看起来从 2026 H2 开始,它会一路 ramp 到 2029+ 以后。

可能有点早……但我觉得这是一个不错的、关于未来会发生什么的判断。

Dilution 是真实风险。

但很多担忧已经反映在它 ~$350M MC 里了,尤其是像 $AVGO 或 AlChip 这样的公司,完全可以为了 vertical integration 或者恶心 Marvell 的 CPO program,直接买下 $SIVE
引用原推@tim_pscl
@aleabitoreddit bro i dont wanna fomo into photonics but i really would like exposure to the sector
@aleabitoreddit 兄弟,我不想 fomo 进 photonics,但我真的想要这个板块的 exposure
https://x.com/tim_pscl/status/2042476794289230110
❤️ 502 🔁 47 💬 47
打开原推
📝 原创
We're now in the photonics supercycle.

The trio from $COHR, $LITE, $AAOI in America are expected to perform well from a surge in demand.

New Report:

" Lumentum is experiencing a surge in demand from the artificial intelligence sector, with its order pipeline now fully booked through 2028 "
我们现在已经进入 photonics supercycle。

美国的 $COHR$LITE$AAOI 这三家公司,预计会因为需求暴增而表现不错。

新报告:

“ Lumentum 正在经历来自人工智能领域的需求激增,其订单管线现在已经完全排满到 2028 年 ”
❤️ 852 🔁 71 💬 40
打开原推
💬 引用
Just a few:
2455 TWSE: Visual photonics
268A TSEJ: Rigaku
3017 TWSE: Asial Vital
3363 TEPX: Foci
3450 TWSE: Elite Advanced Laser
5289 TPEX: Innodisk
6451 TWSE: Shunsin
6777 TSEJ: Santek

I usually try and focus on one like Win Semi (3105 TPEX) that I have the most concentration in and do more simpler concentrated on those.
随便列几个:
2455 TWSE: Visual photonics
268A TSEJ: Rigaku
3017 TWSE: Asial Vital
3363 TEPX: Foci
3450 TWSE: Elite Advanced Laser
5289 TPEX: Innodisk
6451 TWSE: Shunsin
6777 TSEJ: Santek

我通常会尽量聚焦一个,比如我仓位最集中的 Win Semi (3105 TPEX),然后用更简单的方式集中研究这些。
❤️ 355 🔁 23 💬 26
打开原推
💬 引用
No, I’m still at a conservative 759% YTD after today’s overall rally.

Lost too much from hedging.

Would probably be up more if indexes and
many individual names like $RDDT weren’t so down from macro.

But if you pick selective winners like $AAOI or $AEHR

in hyperscaler supply chains:

Turns out it’s possible outperform markets?

I do think it’s a tad harder than it looks finding important players in each sector and timing catalysts.

$TSEM was basically flat the entire year until I bought, then it rallied 90% in 3 weeks, so timing important too (eg. OFC announcements).

And I’ve developed PTSD after finding the unknown $TSM COUPE glass substrates supplier…

Only to watch them get bought out by Apollo shortly after.

So not always having a good time.

But glad if my ideas helped others outperform indexes or see where frontier industries are heading to.
不是,今天整体 rally 之后,我 YTD 还只是保守的 759%。

hedging 亏太多了。

如果指数和很多单票,比如 $RDDT,没有因为 macro 跌这么多,可能还会更高。

但如果你能挑到 $AAOI$AEHR 这种精选赢家……

在 hyperscaler supply chains 里:

结果就是有可能跑赢市场?

我确实觉得,找到每个 sector 里的关键玩家并踩准 catalysts,比看起来要难一点。

$TSEM 基本上一整年都没动,直到我买入,然后 3 周涨了 90%,所以 timing 也很重要(比如 OFC announcements)。

而且我在找到那个没人知道的 $TSM COUPE glass substrates supplier 之后已经有 PTSD 了……

结果没多久就看着它被 Apollo 买走。

所以也不是一直都很开心。

但如果我的想法帮到别人跑赢指数,或者看清 frontier industries 会往哪里走,我还是很高兴。
引用原推@JLIRL20
@aleabitoreddit with todays pump my goat most likely reaching a 1000% ytd 😍
@aleabitoreddit 今天这一波拉升之后,我的 goat 今年大概率要到 1000% YTD 了 😍
https://x.com/JLIRL20/status/2042382219595940041
❤️ 929 🔁 25 💬 76
打开原推
💬 引用
Unfortunately, not all my names go up triple digits in a week.

$HPS.A is only up ~17% so far.

Hammond was my pick for the transformers/switchgear DC bottleneck since it had a lower MC but high dry transformer market share.

$POWL was another good switchgear long that I came across often; I ended up passing but just throwing that out there.

Transformers/Switchgear are probably under-appreciated as a bottleneck but many types are sold out for the next 2-5 years.

Because of this, they’re causing widespread DC delays and should be a good structural long from backlog visibility + extreme demand.
不幸的是,我的所有标的并不会一周涨三位数。

$HPS.A 到目前为止只涨了 ~17%。

Hammond 是我选的 transformers/switchgear DC bottleneck,因为它 MC 更低,但 dry transformer 市占率高。

$POWL 是我经常看到的另一个不错的 switchgear long;我最后没买,但顺手提一下。

Transformers/Switchgear 作为 bottleneck 可能被低估了,但很多类型未来 2-5 年都已经卖光。

因此,它们正在造成大量 DC 延迟,并且应该会因为 backlog visibility + 极端需求,成为不错的结构性 long。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The current bottleneck: Transformers/Switchgear. 

Trade Idea: Long Hammond (~2.2B CAD / ~$1.5B USD) at 184 CAD.

They dominate the market for:

-Transformers (dry, multi year bottleneck ~23% of market),

-serve to switchgear (2-3Y bottleneck)

-and manufacture liquid too (5Y, larger bottleneck)

I personally anticipate components price hikes like NAND, as $AMZN, $MSFT and others compete for allocation. 

You might have seen: “Half of US data center builds have been delayed or canceled, growth limited by shortages of power infrastructure”…

Then you go further:

“To address shortages… Canada, Mexico… became the biggest suppliers of high-power transformers for AI data centers to AI data centers”

Guess who is in Canada (Guelph).. Mexico (Monterrey 3 and 4)… and the US?

Hammond

Then here’s the reason the articles cite why hyperscaler DB buildouts are falling apart: 

“Major reason behind these setbacks is the availability of key electrical components — such as transformers, switchgear”. 

Institutions are probably looking at Powell, Eaton, and others… but little do they know?

Companies like these actually buy Hammond’s transformers to put inside their own switchgear (“strong sales into data centres, switchgear manufacturers")

Their market share over the transformers market is actually pretty large (eg. ~23% dry). 

The most compelling signal:

-> 122% Y/Y 2025 backlog increase. And we can infer this to be 1B+ CAD. 

Eg. company achieved 898m CAD in sales in 2025, capacity ceiling. Management said close of Q3 2025 orders were valued at 53% of the entire closing third-quarter backlog.

Given that Q4 2025 revenue was 254 million and the backlog is "more than doubled," we can infer a total backlog value exceeding 1 billion CAD.

Also:

“Gross margin compression last year was due to the buildout of their Mexico facility, but both gross margins are expected to increase and the facility expansions are expectied to turn into accelerated revenue Q2 2026)” which is now.

Downside is if raw material costs (copper, electrical steel) spike again, but given this bottleneck, they can price hike. 

Personal FWD P/E estimates would be ~18-21 for 2026, <15 for 2027 from volume ramp.

But I think it’s possible to hit single digit fwd P/E if they do price hikes mixed with hyperscaler emergency orders. But that might get a little mixed with the new acquisition.

Regardless still looks cheap. 

Just a TLDR: 
$AMZN, $MSFT, $META, $GOOGL, $ORCL datacenter are being bottlenecked because of a lack of transformers/switchgear.

Seems like markets missed this little player with large market share, despite backlog visibility and increasing revenue from capacity expansion coming online.

I personally found it pretty compelling, so I went long.

Just sharing my personal thoughts, of course DYOR before making any decisions yourself.
当前瓶颈:Transformers/Switchgear。

交易想法:做多 Hammond(约 2.2B CAD / 约 $1.5B USD),价格 184 CAD。

他们主导这些市场:

- Transformers(dry,多年瓶颈,约 23% 市场份额),

- 服务 switchgear(2-3 年瓶颈)

- 也生产 liquid(5 年,更大的瓶颈)

我个人预计组件会像 NAND 一样涨价,因为 $AMZN$MSFT 等在争抢 allocation。

你可能看过:“一半美国数据中心建设被推迟或取消,增长受电力基础设施短缺限制”……

再往下看:

“为了解决短缺……加拿大、墨西哥……成为 AI 数据中心高功率 transformers 的最大供应地”

猜猜谁在加拿大(Guelph)、墨西哥(Monterrey 3 和 4)以及美国都有布局?

Hammond

然后文章引用 hyperscaler DC buildout 出问题的原因:

“这些挫折背后的主要原因,是关键电气组件的可用性,例如 transformers、switchgear”。

机构可能在看 Powell、Eaton 等……但他们不知道的是?

这些公司实际上会买 Hammond 的 transformers,放进自己的 switchgear(“对数据中心、switchgear manufacturers 的销售强劲”)

他们在 transformers 市场的份额其实很大(例如 dry 约 23%)。

最有说服力的信号:

-> 2025 年 backlog 同比增长 122%。我们可以推断这超过 1B CAD。

例如公司 2025 年实现 898m CAD 销售,已经到产能天花板。管理层说,2025 年 Q3 末订单价值相当于整个三季度期末 backlog 的 53%。

考虑到 Q4 2025 收入是 254 million,而 backlog “more than doubled”,我们可以推断总 backlog 超过 1 billion CAD。

另外:

“去年毛利率承压是因为墨西哥工厂建设,但预计毛利率会提升,工厂扩张也会在 2026 Q2 转化为加速收入”,也就是现在。

下行风险是原材料成本(铜、电工钢)再次上涨,但考虑到这个瓶颈,他们可以涨价。

我个人的 FWD P/E 估算是 2026 年约 18-21,2027 年随着放量低于 15。

但如果他们涨价并叠加 hyperscaler 紧急订单,我认为 forward P/E 有可能到个位数。不过这可能会和新收购有些混在一起。

不管怎样,看起来仍然便宜。

简单 TLDR:

$AMZN$MSFT$META$GOOGL$ORCL 数据中心正因为缺少 transformers/switchgear 被卡住。

尽管有 backlog 可见度和产能扩张上线带来的收入增长,市场似乎漏掉了这个拥有大份额的小玩家。

我个人觉得很有吸引力,所以做多了。

只是分享个人想法,当然你做任何决定前都要 DYOR。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041168871168545115
❤️ 478 🔁 26 💬 44
打开原推
📝 原创
Just in case you’re wondering why $AMZN rallied today:

New news that Anthropic Mythos and their latest models were likely trained on Amazon Trainium.

This is big for Amazon’s ecosystem from $MRVL to $AAOI due to Anthropic.

Just like how Google’s TPU ecosystem rallied earlier this year like $LITE from Gemini.
如果你在好奇为什么 $AMZN 今天 rally:

新消息是 Anthropic Mythos 和他们最新的模型,很可能是在 Amazon Trainium 上训练的。

这对 Amazon 的生态系统是大事,从 $MRVL$AAOI 都会因为 Anthropic 受益。

就像今年早些时候 Google 的 TPU 生态因为 Gemini rally,比如 $LITE
❤️ 989 🔁 93 💬 71
打开原推
💬 引用
Woah, $AEHR almost triple digit return in 1 week.

This is speed running “Escape the Permanent Underclass with Serenity 101”.

That aside, it helps to understand qualification cycles when you look at stocks or ER.

A lot of retail investors went short after ER by looking at current revenue rather than volume ramp + all ongoing hyperscalers testing out orders.
哇,$AEHR 1 周差不多三位数回报。

这简直是在速通 “Escape the Permanent Underclass with Serenity 101”。

除此之外,看股票或 ER 的时候,理解 qualification cycles 很有帮助。

很多散户在 ER 后做空,是因为他们只看当前收入,而不是 volume ramp + 所有正在进行的 hyperscalers 测试订单。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AEHR looks extremely promising at ~$1.1B MC.

Aehr is starting to remind me of an early $TER, mixed with pre-earnings $AAOI.

If we look at the timeline and speculated customers:

Feb 11th: Sonoma production win for Hyperscaler's AI ASIC processors. (likely $GOOGL, $AMZN, $META).

- Probably Google? Aehr bought Incal, who was speculated to be used by Google for their TPUs.

Feb 26th: $14 million from AI lead customer (likely $AMD, $NVDA)

- Probably $AMD here for Instinct MI300/MI400.

March 3rd: Lead silicon photonics customer for one FOX-XP system (likely $INTC siph)

- Very likely $INTC has been their lead customer.

March 31st: Initial order from major new silicon photonics customer (likely $AVGO, $MRVL, $CSCO )

- New customer (rules out Intel), prob one of these transitioning to 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers

(All speculative, very confidential BOM)

Regardless. This timeline is just bottling up for $AEHR.

Could be next earnings. Or two quarters from now.

But feels like a matter of time before we see mass orders.
$AEHR 在约 $1.1B 市值看起来极有前景。

Aehr 开始让我想到早期 $TER,混合财报前的 $AAOI

如果看时间线和推测客户:

2 月 11 日:拿下 Hyperscaler AI ASIC processors 的 Sonoma 量产订单。(很可能是 $GOOGL$AMZN$META)。

- 可能是 Google?Aehr 收购了 Incal,而 Incal 被推测用于 Google 的 TPU。

2 月 26 日:来自 AI lead customer 的 $14 million(很可能是 $AMD$NVDA

- 这里可能是 $AMD,用于 Instinct MI300/MI400。

3 月 3 日:Lead silicon photonics customer 订购一套 FOX-XP 系统(很可能是 $INTC siph)

- 很可能 $INTC 一直是他们的 lead customer。

3 月 31 日:来自重要新 silicon photonics customer 的初始订单(很可能是 $AVGO$MRVL$CSCO

- 新客户(排除 Intel),可能是这些正在转向 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers 的公司之一

(全部是推测,BOM 非常保密)

无论如何,这条时间线正在为 $AEHR 蓄势。

可能是下个财报,也可能是两个季度之后。

但感觉看到大规模订单只是时间问题。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2039388766083944750
❤️ 767 🔁 36 💬 87
打开原推
💬 引用
Here's a bunch of random 30 US-available random stocks I like today and why:

1. $INTC - America's hope for foundry, national security
2. $MRVL - scales rev from future maia asics and add ons like cpo, they do everything lost count
3. $TSM - backbone of semis/ai
4. $COHR - They do everything vertically integrated + captures optical cycle
5. $RKLB - the final frontier of space will be around 5 years from now and 20 years from now.
6. $DRAM - memory exposure for samsung/sk hynix
7. $AVGO - hyperscalers dont like nvidia gpu tax
8. $AMZN - nobody can compete against the overnight shipping of toilet paper. robotics will lower opex over time
9. $ARM - AGI CPUs scale revenue quite a bit over the next decade
10. $TSEM - you're going to need a foundry for light based stuff
11. $IBIT - bitcoin, we all know by now
12. $NBIS - i think it's the next AWS. Also they do self-driving cars with uber, own scaling DB companies, data labeling. It's almost like a mini Google.
13. $GOOGL - youtube is not going away, gemini is great. they're vertically integrated with TPUs and fund buildout with operating income so i like it.
14. $AMKR - super facilities coming online in late 2027-2028. benefits from made in america
15. $HOOD - i dont like short term, but long term i'm a fan of Robinhood since they captured retail + have more products like banking, etc that they're scaling up. product innovation is wild.
16. $CRCL - I happen to really like stablecoins and see them as the future for both payments/holding (depends on clarity act)
17. $META - people aren't going to stop using instagram or whatsapp, or others anytime soon.
18. $LITE - $GOOGL TPU exposure decently high part of BOM. As long as Google's AI program keeps running I think $LITE will do well.
19. $LPTH - Germanium and China export controls will always be an issue so US made engineered alternatives will always be important
20. $FN - Someone needs to assemble optical stuff
21. $JBL - same as above, but added with ip from Intel's SiPh acqusition so might end up like innolight?
22. $MP - American rare earths program is extremely important, similar to $INTC national security risks
23. $HIMS - Okay here me out they just acquired a ton of companies, and at $19 they have global DTC channel. short sellers really hate this company, but I think it's actually promising as a contrarian long
24. $SMTC - LRO/LPO transition
25. $POWL - US alternative to hammond for switchgear DC type bottleneck
26. $VPG - Humanoids will be a thing down the road maybe 2027-2028, this makes the sensors.
27. $MOG.A - Feels like i see them everywhere in robotics, to spacex supply chains
28. $MSFT - At $375, one day we'll look back and see this as a buying opportunity.
29. $CVX - oil might crash after war but these oil companies are going to be extremely important, especially when Venezulea is a goldmine.
30. $XLU - i think rate cuts might be back online, we need power/grid for AI so these names will always be improtant from $CEG to $NEE

Just throwing out other thoughts aside from $AAOI and $AEHR.
这里随便列 30 个我今天喜欢的、美国可以买到的股票,以及原因:

1. $INTC - 美国 foundry 的希望,国家安全
2. $MRVL - 未来 maia asics 以及 cpo 等 add ons 都会拉动收入,他们什么都做,我已经数不清了
3. $TSM - semis/ai 的 backbone
4. $COHR - 他们什么都做,垂直整合 + 捕捉 optical cycle
5. $RKLB - 太空这个 final frontier 会在大约 5 年后和 20 年后展开。
6. $DRAM - samsung/sk hynix 的 memory exposure
7. $AVGO - hyperscalers 不喜欢 nvidia gpu tax
8. $AMZN - 没人能和隔夜送 toilet paper 竞争。robotics 会随着时间降低 opex
9. $ARM - AGI CPUs 会在未来十年显著拉动收入
10. $TSEM - 做 light based stuff 总得需要 foundry
11. $IBIT - bitcoin,大家现在都懂了
12. $NBIS - 我觉得它是下一个 AWS。而且他们还和 uber 做自动驾驶,拥有 scaling DB 公司、data labeling。几乎像一个迷你 Google。
13. $GOOGL - youtube 不会消失,gemini 很棒。他们用 TPUs 垂直整合,并用 operating income 资助 buildout,所以我喜欢。
14. $AMKR - super facilities 会在 2027-2028 晚些时候上线。受益于 made in america
15. $HOOD - 短期我不喜欢,但长期我是 Robinhood 的粉丝,因为他们抓住了 retail + 有更多产品,比如 banking 等,正在 scale。产品创新很夸张。
16. $CRCL - 我恰好很喜欢 stablecoins,并认为它们是支付/持有的未来(取决于 clarity act)
17. $META - 人们短期内不会停止使用 instagram、whatsapp 或其他产品。
18. $LITE - $GOOGL TPU exposure 在 BOM 中占比相当高。只要 Google 的 AI program 继续跑,我觉得 $LITE 会表现不错。
19. $LPTH - Germanium 和 China export controls 会一直是问题,所以美国制造的 engineered alternatives 会一直重要
20. $FN - 总得有人组装 optical stuff
21. $JBL - 同上,但还加上了 Intel SiPh 收购来的 ip,所以最后可能会像 innolight?
22. $MP - 美国 rare earths program 极其重要,类似 $INTC 的国家安全风险
23. $HIMS - 好吧听我说,他们刚收购了一堆公司,而且在 $19 时有 global DTC channel。空头真的很讨厌这家公司,但我觉得作为 contrarian long 其实挺有前景
24. $SMTC - LRO/LPO transition
25. $POWL - switchgear DC 类型 bottleneck 上 Hammond 的美国替代品
26. $VPG - Humanoids 以后会成为现实,可能 2027-2028,这家公司做 sensors。
27. $MOG.A - 感觉我在 robotics 到 spacex supply chains 里到处都看到他们
28. $MSFT - 在 $375,未来某天我们回头看会觉得这是买入机会。
29. $CVX - 战争后 oil 可能崩,但这些 oil companies 会非常重要,尤其是 Venezulea 是个 goldmine。
30. $XLU - 我觉得 rate cuts 可能又回来了,AI 需要 power/grid,所以从 $CEG$NEE,这些名字会一直重要

除了 $AAOI$AEHR 之外,随便抛一些其他想法。
引用原推@NabQ321
@aleabitoreddit Hey Serenity, If you already have a position in $AAOI, and a small bag of $AEHR, what 2-3 other stock would you look to add now/next few weeks to hold for 1+ years? (Excluding $SIVE and the small Asian stocks as not available for me) thanks for all you share!
@aleabitoreddit Hey Serenity,如果你已经有 $AAOI 的仓位,也有一点 $AEHR 小仓,那接下来几周你会想加哪 2-3 只股票,拿 1 年以上?(不包括 $SIVE 和那些亚洲小票,我这边买不了)谢谢你一直分享!
https://x.com/NabQ321/status/2042166365948395783
❤️ 6,424 🔁 789 💬 194
打开原推
📝 原创
$MSFT looks like a secret buyer of Riber
< $ALRIB > for Microsoft Quantum.

The broader market and algorithms likely don’t know this connection yet.

MBEs are important for quantum computing, quantum dot lasers, VCSELs, and silicon photonics.

But the long-term implications are sizable if Microsoft Quantum:

-> Are starting to buy from this European equipment manufacturer

Quantum is still very early and risks to early stage industries are material.

But since this company looks like an $AIXA for Quantum and trades at a profitable ~27x est. forward P/E, as a duopoly for MBE with $VECO, it looks interesting.

From open LinkedIn intelligence, having a US hyperscaler use Riber MBE equipment to fab frontier quantum chips.

At the very least helps validate the company’s importance as a technology.

And makes it appear well positioned to capture quantum computing and quantum dot capex cycles in the near future.
$MSFT 看起来像是 Riber
< $ALRIB > 的秘密买家,用于 Microsoft Quantum。

更广泛的市场和算法可能还不知道这个关联。

MBEs 对 quantum computing、quantum dot lasers、VCSELs 和 silicon photonics 很重要。

但如果 Microsoft Quantum:

-> 开始从这家欧洲设备制造商采购

那长期影响会很大。

Quantum 还很早期,早期行业风险很真实。

但这家公司看起来像 Quantum 领域的 $AIXA,并且以盈利状态交易在 ~27x est. forward P/E,同时与 $VECO 构成 MBE duopoly,所以看起来有意思。

从公开 LinkedIn intelligence 看,一个美国 hyperscaler 正在用 Riber MBE equipment 来 fab frontier quantum chips。

至少,这有助于验证这家公司作为技术的重要性。

也让它看起来很适合在近期捕捉 quantum computing 和 quantum dot capex cycles。
❤️ 509 🔁 51 💬 41
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
new unholy CPO long idea later, really can't believe i missed this one... thx again to chat for pointing it out
晚点会有一个新的邪门 CPO long idea,真不敢相信我居然错过了这个……再次感谢 chat 指出来
❤️ 395 🔁 2 💬 100
打开原推
📝 原创
I feel like $COHR and $MRVL are the two "They Do Everything" longs.

That nobody actually knows what they do if you ask them in public.

$NVDA? GPUs.
$INTC? Foundry.

Marvell? No clue.
Coherent? No clue.

They're the Deloitte of Semis.

Both are really solid profitable longs over the next year.

Probably not 200% gains but 50-100% seem reasonable here.
我感觉 $COHR$MRVL 是两个“他们什么都做”的 long。

但如果你在公开场合问别人,没人真的知道他们到底做什么。

$NVDA?GPUs。
$INTC?Foundry。

Marvell?不知道。
Coherent?不知道。

它们就是 Semis 里的 Deloitte。

未来一年两者都是非常扎实的盈利型 long。

可能不是 200% gain,但这里 50-100% 看起来合理。
❤️ 760 🔁 67 💬 55
打开原推
📝 原创
Woah 9200 paid subscribers…

I’m super humbled, thank you everyone!

Im glad a lot of people found my thought process on random names from $JBL to $ALRIB helpful for $1! https://t.co/LXGVgFPDJt
哇,9200 个付费订阅者……

真的很受宠若惊,谢谢大家!

很高兴很多人觉得我对 $JBL$ALRIB 这些 random names 的思考过程值 $1! https://t.co/LXGVgFPDJt
❤️ 685 🔁 4 💬 82
打开原推
💬 引用
Did you listen anon???

My high conviction long $AAOI is up extreme amounts.

Post from 2025 around hyperscalers:

“We’ll likely see investments pour to players like $COHR, Innolight, $LITE, and $AAOI as a theme in 2026.”

Thesis. Validation. Live. https://t.co/A3V6eRaXeH
你听了吗 anon???

我的高 conviction long $AAOI 已经暴涨。

2025 年关于 hyperscalers 的帖子:

“我们很可能会看到投资作为 2026 年主题,流向 $COHR、Innolight、$LITE$AAOI 这样的玩家。”

Thesis。Validation。Live。 https://t.co/A3V6eRaXeH
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AAOI is up 24% and $LITE is 5% since my thesis today.

From BOM analysis, LITE ($27B) is levered toward TPU Ironwood due to OCS but benefits from NVDA + all ASICs.

AAOI ($2.5B), is levered toward MSFT MAIA ramp and Amazon Trainium.

InP like HBM, will be a bottleneck for 2026 as they’re the foundational materials used for lasers in these deployments.

Similar to memory bottlenecks with Micron and SK Hynix, we’ll likely see attention drawn to InP fabs, such as $AAOI, which happens to be one of the sole ones in America (COHR,Macom)

But compared to $LITE that is up 362% YTD due to the success of Google’s TPU (from Meta and Anthropic purchase orders), $AAOI is only up 7% YTD.

We’re largely seeing this because there’s a lack of retail or media attention on the $AMZN Trainium or $MSFT Maia deployments, which are largely expected to ramp up in 2026-2027.

However they’re all likely to succeed due to each hyperscaler wanting to lower costs of inference for their own cloud platform.

If we see other hyperscalers adopt OCS for optimized performance that the TPU achieved, expect $LITE to re-rate more than they have now given their monopoly in that specific segment.

However, if we see $MSFT Maia ramp up (given $AAOI is likely developing a new architecture for them), and $AMZN Trainium ramp up ($4B warrant + purchase orders), expect $AAOI to rerate.

Photonics and InP will be the new bottleneck like memory.

We’ll likely see investments pour down stream to players like $COHR, Innolight, $LITE, and hidden levered plays on specific hyperscaler ASICs like $AAOI as a theme in 2026.

The market is currently rewarding the Google TPU supply chain but might be missing other hyperscaler ASIC ramps.
自从我今天发完 thesis 之后,$AAOI 涨了 24%,$LITE 涨了 5%。

从 BOM 分析看,LITE($27B)因为 OCS 更偏向 TPU Ironwood,但也受益于 NVDA + 所有 ASIC。

AAOI($2.5B)则更偏向 MSFT MAIA 放量和 Amazon Trainium。

InP 会像 HBM 一样,成为 2026 年的瓶颈,因为它是这些部署里激光器用到的基础材料。

类似 Micron 和 SK Hynix 的内存瓶颈,我们很可能会看到注意力转向 InP fabs,比如 $AAOI,而它刚好是美国少数几家之一(COHR、Macom)。

但相比 $LITE 因为 Google TPU 成功(来自 Meta 和 Anthropic 的采购订单)YTD 已经涨了 362%,$AAOI YTD 只涨了 7%。

这主要是因为散户和媒体几乎没关注 $AMZN Trainium 或 $MSFT Maia 的部署,而这些部署普遍预计会在 2026-2027 年放量。

不过它们大概率都会成功,因为每个 hyperscaler 都想降低自家云平台的推理成本。

如果我们看到其他 hyperscaler 也采用 OCS 来实现 TPU 那种优化性能,考虑到 $LITE 在这个细分领域的垄断地位,它可能会比现在进一步重估。

但如果 $MSFT Maia 开始放量(考虑到 $AAOI 很可能在为他们开发新架构),以及 $AMZN Trainium 放量($4B warrant + 采购订单),那 $AAOI 也会重估。

Photonics 和 InP 会成为新的“内存式”瓶颈。

2026 年,我们很可能会看到投资作为主题流向 $COHR、Innolight、$LITE 这类玩家,以及像 $AAOI 这种对特定 hyperscaler ASIC 有隐藏杠杆的标的。

市场现在在奖励 Google TPU 供应链,但可能漏掉了其他 hyperscaler ASIC 的放量。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2003259964526330053
❤️ 708 🔁 38 💬 61
打开原推
📝 原创
When is it time for the $IREN bagholders to admit I was right about the:

$6,000,000,000 ATM dilution being a structural overhang?

-> $NBIS is up 48% YTD
-> $IREN is down 13% YTD.

While IREN’s marketcap goes up (ATMs benefit the company), shareholder equity goes down.

This is the warning about excessive dilution that people don’t understand or want to hear.

Likely in every rally to raise funds to monetize their GW capacity though GPUs:

There’s going to be half the market cap minted out of thin air, then sold into the open market.
$IREN bagholders 什么时候才承认我说对了:

$6,000,000,000 ATM dilution 是结构性 overhang?

-> $NBIS YTD 涨 48%
-> $IREN YTD 跌 13%。

虽然 IREN 的 marketcap 上去了(ATMs 对公司有利),但 shareholder equity 下去了。

这就是很多人不理解、也不想听的过度 dilution 警告。

他们很可能会在每次 rally 里融资,用 GPUs 去 monetise 他们的 GW capacity:

会凭空 mint 出半个 market cap,然后卖到公开市场里。
❤️ 547 🔁 21 💬 135
打开原推
💬 引用
So the easter egg:

$MSFT Quantum appears to be an undisclosed hyperscaler...

That is secretly buying from a company that sounds with Prime Ribs according to LinkedIn tracking.

-> Microsoft Quantum posted photos
-> Zoom in to top left and magnified
-> Prime Ribs machine checks out?

It's a duopoly in the MBE space with $VECO for quantum machines (think $AXIA for photonics but for Quantum).

They reported earnings today:
-> It's profitable. ~25 P/E ratio after ER release.
-> Very healthy balance sheet
-> Used for adjacents, like silicon photonics (eg. Fujitsu's quantum dot spinoff)
-> IntelliEPI (aside from $MSFT) well known buyer

Some followers reached out about this name (not taking any credit for DD or finding it). Disclosure: I found their ideas interesting and have positions.

-> Full Credit to @latent_value7 finding $MSFT links
-> Credit to @TheSarge_ for bringing the name to my attention early on

A reminder: Even though I share these cool ideas, I don't recommend anyone take positions based on my posts.

I'm just impressed that people on X found that a hyperscaler buying from a tiny company for their frontier quantum program.
所以这个 easter egg:

$MSFT Quantum 看起来是一个未披露的 hyperscaler……

根据 LinkedIn tracking,它正在秘密从一家听起来像 Prime Ribs 的公司采购。

-> Microsoft Quantum 发了照片
-> 放大左上角再放大
-> Prime Ribs machine 对得上?

它和 $VECO 在 quantum machines 的 MBE 领域是 duopoly(可以理解成 photonics 里的 $AXIA,但用于 Quantum)。

他们今天发布了 earnings:
-> 盈利。ER 发布后大约 ~25 P/E ratio。
-> 非常健康的 balance sheet
-> 用于相邻领域,比如 silicon photonics(例如 Fujitsu 的 quantum dot spinoff)
-> IntelliEPI(除了 $MSFT)也是知名买家

有些 followers 联系我聊过这个名字(不把 DD 或发现它的功劳算我头上)。Disclosure:我觉得他们的想法很有意思,而且我有仓位。

-> 找到 $MSFT 链接的完整 Credit 给 @latent_value7
-> 早期把这个名字带到我注意力里的 Credit 给 @TheSarge_

提醒一下:即使我分享这些很酷的 idea,也不建议任何人基于我的帖子建仓。

我只是很佩服 X 上的人能发现一个 hyperscaler 正在为了 frontier quantum program 从一家小公司采购。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Turns out... Easter egg hunting works in stocks as well?

Can't believe one of my followers found the undisclosed supplier of a T1 hyperscaler like $NVDA or $GOOGL by:

-> Looking at an executive's from LinkedIn posts.
-> Magnified the edges of one of their posted photo by 5x
-> Found one of the machines that looked distinct enough to identify
-> Traced the color scheme of a machine back to a small company
-> Identified the undisclosed supplier.

I'm genuinely impressed.
结果发现……在股票里找彩蛋也有用?

不敢相信我的一个粉丝居然这样找到了像 $NVDA$GOOGL 这种 T1 hyperscaler 的未披露供应商:

-> 看某位高管的 LinkedIn 帖子。
-> 把他发的照片边缘放大 5 倍。
-> 发现其中一台机器特征足够明显,可以识别。
-> 顺着机器配色追踪到一家小公司。
-> 识别出了那个未披露供应商。

我是真的服。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041537706522808818
❤️ 504 🔁 30 💬 53
打开原推
📝 原创
Did you listen anon?

$AAOI and $AEHR both up 50%+ this week alone.

I post my thesis publicly BEFORE any movement happens and without charging thousands to see stock picks.

If you’re listening to $IREN investors why these are “short or going to dump because of 2025 P/E ratios” maybe stick to PayPal or $SPY.
你听了吗 anon?

$AAOI$AEHR 仅本周都涨了 50%+。

我会在任何行情启动之前,公开发布我的 thesis,而且不会收你几千美元来看 stock picks。

如果你在听 $IREN 投资者说这些是“short 或者会因为 2025 P/E ratios 崩盘”,那可能还是继续买 PayPal 或 $SPY 吧。
❤️ 999 🔁 42 💬 84
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
this was my personal new quantum long
for the MBE duopoly with $VECO.

they reported earnings today, and p/e compressed to round 25 fwd p/e...

which is extremely surprising that it's profitable, healthy balance sheet, and has that fundamental duopoly for MBE in quantum computing and adjacent.

there's adjacent TAM expansion too like SipH, eg. Fujitsu quantum dot program, though i think it's early.

i think it's really solid around these levels, but if it does gap up, i wouldn't take positions.

Even though I mention these stuff personally, pls stop blindly copying.

The names I mention like $AAOI, $COHR, Win semi, $TSEM, $JBL $MRVL, $INTC, SK Hynix, and others are superior longs that are better to put concentration into.
这是我个人新的 quantum long
用于和 $VECO 组成 MBE duopoly。

他们今天发布 earnings,p/e 压缩到大约 25 fwd p/e……

这非常意外,因为它是盈利的,balance sheet 健康,而且在 quantum computing 和相邻领域拥有 MBE 的基础 duopoly。

还有相邻 TAM 扩张,比如 SipH,例如 Fujitsu quantum dot program,虽然我觉得还早。

我觉得在这些水平很扎实,但如果它 gap up,我不会建仓。

虽然我个人会提这些东西,但请别盲目照抄。

我提到的 $AAOI$COHR、Win semi、$TSEM$JBL $MRVL$INTC、SK Hynix 等名字,是更优质、更适合集中仓位的 long。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
@funniestlines @HenrikMauseth ^ especially the latter , undisclosed $MSFT quantum computing machine supplier.
@funniestlines @HenrikMauseth ^ 尤其是后者,未披露的 $MSFT 量子计算机器供应商。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041866558566494268
❤️ 181 🔁 6 💬 19
打开原推
💬 引用
Not too shabby with $AEHR.

Up +20% today.

For all the bears, this is what happens when you misunderstand qualification cycles in semi names.

Then try and look at current revenue numbers only. https://t.co/9hU4UwNyRE
$AEHR 还不错。

今天涨 +20%。

给所有 bears 看,这就是误解 semi names 里的 qualification cycles 会发生的事。

然后还只看当前收入数字。 https://t.co/9hU4UwNyRE
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AEHR looks extremely promising at ~$1.1B MC.

Aehr is starting to remind me of an early $TER, mixed with pre-earnings $AAOI.

If we look at the timeline and speculated customers:

Feb 11th: Sonoma production win for Hyperscaler's AI ASIC processors. (likely $GOOGL, $AMZN, $META).

- Probably Google? Aehr bought Incal, who was speculated to be used by Google for their TPUs.

Feb 26th: $14 million from AI lead customer (likely $AMD, $NVDA)

- Probably $AMD here for Instinct MI300/MI400.

March 3rd: Lead silicon photonics customer for one FOX-XP system (likely $INTC siph)

- Very likely $INTC has been their lead customer.

March 31st: Initial order from major new silicon photonics customer (likely $AVGO, $MRVL, $CSCO )

- New customer (rules out Intel), prob one of these transitioning to 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers

(All speculative, very confidential BOM)

Regardless. This timeline is just bottling up for $AEHR.

Could be next earnings. Or two quarters from now.

But feels like a matter of time before we see mass orders.
$AEHR 在约 $1.1B 市值看起来极有前景。

Aehr 开始让我想到早期 $TER,混合财报前的 $AAOI

如果看时间线和推测客户:

2 月 11 日:拿下 Hyperscaler AI ASIC processors 的 Sonoma 量产订单。(很可能是 $GOOGL$AMZN$META)。

- 可能是 Google?Aehr 收购了 Incal,而 Incal 被推测用于 Google 的 TPU。

2 月 26 日:来自 AI lead customer 的 $14 million(很可能是 $AMD$NVDA

- 这里可能是 $AMD,用于 Instinct MI300/MI400。

3 月 3 日:Lead silicon photonics customer 订购一套 FOX-XP 系统(很可能是 $INTC siph)

- 很可能 $INTC 一直是他们的 lead customer。

3 月 31 日:来自重要新 silicon photonics customer 的初始订单(很可能是 $AVGO$MRVL$CSCO

- 新客户(排除 Intel),可能是这些正在转向 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers 的公司之一

(全部是推测,BOM 非常保密)

无论如何,这条时间线正在为 $AEHR 蓄势。

可能是下个财报,也可能是两个季度之后。

但感觉看到大规模订单只是时间问题。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2039388766083944750
❤️ 531 🔁 33 💬 53
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So random notes about $JBL, $SMHMD, QD laser, and others that i passed on:

1. $JBL: Very promising at $28B. Would not be surprised if it ended up $45B MC next year. Kinda like western innolight after they bought intel's siph ip.

Fwd p/e roughly ~22x, compresses down to sub 18 2027.

Which is really good given TAM expansion optionality what $COHR is doing? I preferred Coherent for now, but might give this another look. Hard to go wrong with Jabil?

idk, struggling to either just keep concentration in $COHR or split it.

2. IntelliEPI looking into it got interested for inp epitaxial stuff and they got chips act subsidies recently. didn't get enough time yet.

3. $SMHD - i passed last yr bc of toxic financing reasons, when i was looking at glass substrate stuff, but decided to take another look.

q1-$30m convertible notes, so that's dilution overhang, not that bad.
F1 resale: 46.6M new share issuance, with registered up to 95M share resale
So that's roughly $563m off $303m MC?

Like they're probably supplying to $AMAT, Ibiden, Unimicron and these types of customers as a fundamental supplier but not sure if it outweights dilution?

4. Was looking at quantum dot lasers / BTO again vs. ELS and others... Way, way too early like with names like QD laser or $ALMU should prob come back 1 year later.

I did like QD laser more since it's funded/spinoff of Fujitsu, so you probably won't get that dilution nuke that $POET investors with US quantum dot r&D?

That being said there's some interesting names for sure, might just take a stake in one or two quantum names just in case there's a breakthrough.

5. Then looking more into Furukawa and $AVGO relationships out of curiosity. they have massive manufacturing scale eg. ~500% expansion from 2025 capex. So if there's ever a bottleneck for the lasers in 2027-2028 just remember Furukawa, Win semi, and others will benefit.

But i dont think it will be as severe as the EML bottleneck? who knows.

6. Probably will look into Yuanjie next, kinda china's photonics program's leader that supplies to innolight and others i think. from first pass, looks like a compelling long? But I wouldnt invest personally unless it was like Unitree level undervalued.

Don't have any positions in these names, just dropping some thoughts in case its useful.
关于 $JBL$SMHMD、QD laser 和其他我 pass 掉的东西,随便记几条:

1. $JBL:$28B 的体量下很有前景。如果明年到 $45B MC 我不会意外。有点像西方版 innolight,尤其是他们买了 intel 的 siph ip。

Fwd p/e 大约 ~22x,到 2027 会压到 18 以下。

考虑到 TAM expansion optionality,以及 $COHR 正在做的事,这其实非常不错?我目前更偏好 Coherent,但可能会再看一眼。Jabil 很难错?

idk,我在纠结是继续集中在 $COHR,还是拆一点。

2. IntelliEPI 我在看,开始对 inp epitaxial 这块感兴趣,而且他们最近拿到了 chips act subsidies。还没来得及看够。

3. $SMHD - 去年我在看 glass substrate 的时候,因为 toxic financing 原因 pass 了,但决定再看一眼。

q1-$30m convertible notes,所以有 dilution overhang,但没那么糟。
F1 resale:发行 46.6M 新股,注册最多 95M 股 resale
所以相对 $303m MC,大概是 $563m?

他们可能是 $AMAT、Ibiden、Unimicron 这类客户的 fundamental supplier,但不确定是否能抵消 dilution?

4. 又在看 quantum dot lasers / BTO vs. ELS 和其他……太太太早了,像 QD laser 或 $ALMU 这种名字可能一年后再回来更好。

我更喜欢 QD laser,因为它有 Fujitsu 资金支持/是 spinoff,所以你大概率不会遇到 $POET 投资者那种 US quantum dot r&D 的 dilution nuke?

话虽如此,确实有一些有意思的名字,可能会买一两个 quantum names,以防出现突破。

5. 然后出于好奇,更深入看 Furukawa 和 $AVGO 的关系。他们有巨大的制造规模,比如 2025 capex 带来 ~500% 扩张。所以如果 2027-2028 lasers 真的出现 bottleneck,记住 Furukawa、Win semi 等会受益。

但我不认为会像 EML bottleneck 那么严重?谁知道。

6. 接下来可能会看 Yuanjie,有点像中国 photonics program 的 leader,我觉得它供应 innolight 等。从第一眼看,像是一个有吸引力的 long?但我个人不会投,除非它像 Unitree 那样被低估。

这些名字我都没有仓位,只是丢一些想法,希望有用。
❤️ 192 🔁 9 💬 28
打开原推
📝 原创
European photonics sector finally coming back to life.

Today:
$IQE: up 10.78%
$SOI: up 9.96%
$SIVE: up 12.7%

This is amid the FT report:

“Hedge funds make record bets against European stocks” due to Europe’s hypersensitivity to the Iran War.

Now that there’s a ceasefire in Iran, it’s likely we’ll see a lot of the pressure will get taken off of European equities.
欧洲 photonics sector 终于开始活过来了。

今天:
$IQE:涨 10.78%
$SOI:涨 9.96%
$SIVE:涨 12.7%

这发生在 FT 报告的背景下:

“由于欧洲对 Iran War 极度敏感,Hedge funds 对欧洲股票创纪录做空”。

现在 Iran 已经停火,我们很可能会看到欧洲 equities 上的很多压力被拿掉。
❤️ 405 🔁 26 💬 30
打开原推
📝 原创
When you go through the list of the leading CW laser companies from $COHR to $AAOI.

It’s very impressive $SIVE stands out at $300m still… compared to the every other player in the billions.

This is despite being the light source for $JBL 1.6T LRO optical transceivers and ~ $MRVL Celestial photonics program (now accelerated by $NVDA $2B investment).

The sector from Furukawa to Yuanjie has been re-rated recently.

But I do think markets missed this one, as they start volume ramp est. H2 (from $POET earnings) with multi year exponential TAM expansion from CPO and optical scale up.

Downside risk is balance sheet, but I do think the likely Nasdaq listing for their photonics entity + scaling as the hyperscaler light source far exceeds current valuations.

And will likely drive valuation premiums in a matter of time.

We’ll see if this turns out right or not.
当你梳理从 $COHR$AAOI 的领先 CW laser companies 名单时。

$SIVE 仍然只有 $300m,却能脱颖而出,真的很惊人……相比之下其他玩家都是 billions。

尽管它是 $JBL 1.6T LRO optical transceivers 的 light source,以及大约 $MRVL Celestial photonics program(现在被 $NVDA $2B investment 加速)。

从 Furukawa 到 Yuanjie,这个 sector 最近已经被 re-rated。

但我确实觉得市场错过了这个,因为他们预计 H2 开始 volume ramp(来自 $POET earnings),而 CPO 和 optical scale up 会带来多年指数级 TAM expansion。

下行风险是 balance sheet,但我确实认为,他们 photonics entity 很可能 Nasdaq listing + 作为 hyperscaler light source 进行 scaling,远远超过当前估值。

而且随着时间推移,很可能会推动 valuation premiums。

看看这次会不会对。
❤️ 379 🔁 31 💬 32
打开原推
💬 引用
Samsung, SK Hynix both back close to ATHs with $EWY following suit.

Buying back some names that crashed from macro like $MSFT (-21%), $RDDT(-36%), or $HOOD (-31%)…

Or others like $ETH or $IBIT here might not be the worst idea.

Especially as rate cut odds (2-3) spiked on derivative markets today.

Looks like markets and derivatives really believe in TACO Tuesday this time.
Samsung、SK Hynix 都重新接近 ATH,$EWY 也跟着走。

买回一些因为 macro 崩下来的名字,比如 $MSFT (-21%)、$RDDT(-36%) 或 $HOOD (-31%)……

或者这里买一些 $ETH$IBIT 之类,可能也不是最差的想法。

尤其是今天 derivative markets 上 rate cut odds(2-3 次)飙升。

看起来这次 markets 和 derivatives 真的相信 TACO Tuesday。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
This has gotta be the biggest taco supreme I’ve ever seen?

Yesterday: “GG Iran as a civilization”

Today: “Hurray for World Peace, Iran can reconstruct, US is helping flow of passage through the strait. Big money to be made”

Too many shorts on $AAOI to $LITE and $SMH right now that might be screwed.
这大概是我见过最大的 taco supreme?

昨天:“GG Iran as a civilization”

今天:“为世界和平欢呼,Iran 可以重建,美国正在帮忙维持海峡通行。这里能赚大钱”

现在 $AAOI$LITE$SMH 上空头太多了,可能要被干翻。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041740090691698750
❤️ 416 🔁 23 💬 34
打开原推
📝 原创
This has gotta be the biggest taco supreme I’ve ever seen?

Yesterday: “GG Iran as a civilization”

Today: “Hurray for World Peace, Iran can reconstruct, US is helping flow of passage through the strait. Big money to be made”

Too many shorts on $AAOI to $LITE and $SMH right now that might be screwed.
这大概是我见过最大的 taco supreme?

昨天:“GG Iran as a civilization”

今天:“为世界和平欢呼,Iran 可以重建,美国正在帮助海峡通行。大钱可赚。”

现在 $AAOI$LITE$SMH 上太多 shorts 可能要惨了。
❤️ 509 🔁 16 💬 47
打开原推
💬 引用
It's amusing to see some of the same idiots who don't understand photonics.

Trying to short "shtcos" I long then getting wrecked like on $AAOI.

Makes sense why many are frustrated. https://t.co/tUyvecSCkr
看到一些同样不懂 photonics 的傻子还挺好笑。

他们试图 short 我 long 的“shtcos”,然后像 $AAOI 那样被打爆。

难怪很多人这么挫败。 https://t.co/tUyvecSCkr
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Getting tired of 100K+ follower accounts that who charge $2,000+ a year just to see their stock picks…

That then get frustrated over someone who shares names from $AAOI to $AXTI for free…

And then judge $AEHR or $SIVE by previous year revenue without understanding CPO/SiPH ramp in 2027.

Feels like these accounts will get eroded over time as people realize they can get alpha for free instead of paying thousands for it.
我有点受够那些 10 万+粉丝的账号了,一年收 $2,000+,就为了让你看他们的选股……

然后看到有人免费分享从 $AAOI$AXTI 这种名字,他们还很不爽……

还拿上一年的收入去评判 $AEHR$SIVE,完全不理解 2027 年 CPO/SiPH 的放量。

感觉这些账号会慢慢被侵蚀,因为大家会意识到 alpha 可以免费拿,没必要花几千刀买。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041706026068799877
❤️ 434 🔁 12 💬 35
打开原推
📝 原创
Getting tired of 100K+ follower accounts that who charge $2,000+ a year just to see their stock picks…

That then get frustrated over someone who shares names from $AAOI to $AXTI for free…

And then judge $AEHR or $SIVE by previous year revenue without understanding CPO/SiPH ramp in 2027.

Feels like these accounts will get eroded over time as people realize they can get alpha for free instead of paying thousands for it.
我已经厌倦那些 100K+ followers 的账号,一年收 $2,000+,只为了让你看他们的 stock picks……

然后看到有人免费分享从 $AAOI$AXTI 的名字,就开始不爽……

还在不理解 2027 CPO/SiPH ramp 的情况下,用上一年收入去判断 $AEHR$SIVE

感觉这些账号会随着时间被侵蚀,因为人们会意识到 alpha 可以免费拿,不用花几千美元。
❤️ 1,406 🔁 23 💬 73
打开原推
💬 引用
Win Semi (3105) just keeps going in a vertical line up.

Might be a signal it’s undervalued? https://t.co/Xoh4N5bQON
Win Semi (3105) 就是一直垂直往上走。

这可能是在暗示它被低估了? https://t.co/Xoh4N5bQON
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
What a sleeper OP pick.

Still almost nobody talks about Win Semi ($3105.TWO)…

From $LITE to $SIVE. And $AAPL to $AVGO to SpaceX.

Feels like everyone uses them?

$5.4B price tag is underselling its importance to robotics, space, and AI hyperscaler supply chains imo. https://t.co/lMg92KzufM
真是个被低估的 OP 选择。

现在几乎还是没人聊 Win Semi($3105.TWO)……

$LITE$SIVE,从 $AAPL$AVGO 再到 SpaceX。

感觉所有人都在用他们?

$5.4B 的估值,在我看来低估了它对机器人、太空和 AI hyperscaler 供应链的重要性。 https://t.co/lMg92KzufM
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041363738327204264
❤️ 196 🔁 18 💬 14
打开原推
💬 引用
Walked into the HQ to ask about Claude Opus bottlenecks with $NVDA GPU clusters and $LITE optical scale out.

I asked to see the new Mythos models, they showed me a plant.

It’s clear OpenAi and xAI has better talent. https://t.co/LXlyghhdeJ
走进 HQ,想问问 Claude Opus 在 $NVDA GPU clusters 和 $LITE optical scale out 上的 bottlenecks。

我要求看看新的 Mythos models,他们给我看了一株植物。

很明显 OpenAi 和 xAI 的人才更强。 https://t.co/LXlyghhdeJ
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Everyone on X kept talking about CS 153 Frontier Systems...

Some folks wanted me to come so stopped by Stanford.

Maybe ask Jensen about $SIVE and $AXTI later. Anyone have questions for Elevenlabs CEO? https://t.co/rBtYYV4aHc
X 上所有人一直在聊 CS 153 Frontier Systems……

有些人想让我来,所以顺路去了 Stanford。

晚点也许问问 Jensen 关于 $SIVE$AXTI。有人有问题想问 Elevenlabs CEO 吗? https://t.co/rBtYYV4aHc
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041598580608389233
❤️ 207 🔁 3 💬 28
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
having a chat rn
with former president of groq, anyone hv questions?
现在正在和 groq 前总裁聊天,有人有什么问题吗?
❤️ 116 🔁 0 💬 31
打开原推
📝 原创
If you're wondering why everything just ticked green from $AAOI to $RKLB:

Trump just agreed to a 2 week Iran Ceasefire. https://t.co/znW8nnzW6S
如果你在好奇为什么从 $AAOI$RKLB 一切都刚刚 tick green:

Trump 刚同意了为期 2 周的 Iran Ceasefire。 https://t.co/znW8nnzW6S
❤️ 416 🔁 11 💬 32
打开原推
💬 引用
I get a sense of pride when I see a thesis playing out well real time.

$LITE $371 -> $836 in the last 4 months.

Not bad for a $58B company despite macro?

This is while indexes and individual stocks. And photonic stocks like $POET and individual stocks like $RDDT dropped YTD.

I tend to like laser companies the most from $SIVE, $AAOI, and Lumentum for photonics exposure.

And in a better macro environment, I expect many of them to be up more than they are now.
当我看到一个 thesis 正在实时顺利兑现时,会有一种自豪感。

$LITE 过去 4 个月从 $371 -> $836。

尽管 macro 不好,对一家 $58B 公司来说还不错?

这是在指数和个股,以及像 $POET 这样的 photonic stocks、像 $RDDT 这样的个股 YTD 下跌的情况下发生的。

在 photonics exposure 里,我通常最喜欢 laser companies,比如 $SIVE$AAOI 和 Lumentum。

如果 macro 环境更好,我预计其中很多涨幅会比现在还高。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The $LITE thesis: The hidden monopoly in the AI.

Lumentum is up 316% YTD, but might be 1000%+ by 2027.

Micron ($300B) or TSM ($1.5T) sit in the center of every TPU/GPU deployed.

But same with $LITE, but it's a $26B MC.

In Every, Single, TPU from Google, $LITE makes unbelievable amounts of profit for their marketcap.

That's because it's the standard for Optical Circuit Switching (OCS) + optical networking.

It's also in

- $NVDA Blackwell
-$AMZN Trainium
- and other hyperscaler ASICs.

Lumentum sits in the holy trinity of every single chip deployment for photonics.

And for every TPU capex spent, $LITE takes 8-12%. For every Nvidia GPU, $LITE takes ~2-3% (split between Innolight and some others, so the math gets a bit complex).

But some napkin math on NVDA GPU deployments alone for BOM:

NVIDIA Blackwell (GB200):

HBM memory: ~50–55% (SK Hynix (Lead), Micron, Samsung)
Logic (GPU Die): ~25-30% ( $TSM 4NP)
CoWoS Packaging: ~13-18% $TSM
Optics/Network: ~3–5% (Innolight, Lumentum, Coherent)
PCB/Power: 5%

For Google TPIU "Ironwood" TPU v7:

HBM Memory: 38-42% Samsung / SK Hynix
Logic Die: TSM ~28-33%
Design/I.O: 8-10% MediaTek
Optical Network: 10-14% ( $LITE (primary), $COHR secondary)
Optical Switch: 2-4% $LITE

$LITE est. total cluster share: ~8–12%

Just an FYI, Google's "Optical" BOM share (8–12%) is an anomaly due to their unique Optical Circuit Switch (OCS) monopoly.

Just for some napkin math:

$40B Google TPU spend by 2027. $LITE captures 10% (30-40% margins), $1.5B+ FCF from Google alone, 17x earnings from just their primary customer. (analysts are probably extremely off with projecting TPU spend scaling).

Not even including their split from $AMZN Trainium, $NVDA Blackwell, $MSFT Maia, and other chip deployments.

$LITE is in the center of every single TPU/GPU future chip deployment for now and takes a cut.

The only downside is they're the clear market leader now, but $AVGO and $COHR are likely set up to compete by 2027-2028. However...

People say "$26B, ATH, why are you buying now".

This is the reason. They're involved in every future single TPU/GPU/ASIC deployed.

$LITE could end up easily over $60B+ if Google TPUs, and other chip spend ramps up and LITE takes a 2-3% (from $NVDA, $AMZN, $MSFT) or 8-12% cut (from $GOOGL) for every single dollar spent.
$LITE thesis:AI 里的隐藏垄断。

Lumentum 年初至今涨了 316%,但到 2027 年可能涨 1000%+。

Micron($300B)或 TSM($1.5T)位于每个 TPU/GPU 部署的中心。

$LITE 也一样,但它只有 $26B 市值。

在 Google 的每一个 TPU 里,按它的市值看,$LITE 都赚到不可思议的利润。

因为它是 Optical Circuit Switching(OCS)+ optical networking 的标准。

它也在:

- $NVDA Blackwell
- $AMZN Trainium
- 以及其他 hyperscaler ASICs 里。

Lumentum 位于每一次芯片部署的光子“三位一体”核心。

每花 1 美元 TPU capex,$LITE 拿走 8-12%。每个 Nvidia GPU,$LITE 拿约 2-3%(要和 Innolight 等分,所以计算有点复杂)。

只看 NVDA GPU 部署 BOM 的粗略测算:

NVIDIA Blackwell(GB200):

HBM memory:约 50-55%(SK Hynix 领先,Micron,Samsung)
Logic(GPU Die):约 25-30%($TSM 4NP)
CoWoS Packaging:约 13-18% $TSM
Optics/Network:约 3-5%(Innolight,Lumentum,Coherent)
PCB/Power:5%

Google TPU “Ironwood” TPU v7:

HBM Memory:38-42% Samsung / SK Hynix
Logic Die:TSM 约 28-33%
Design/I.O:8-10% MediaTek
Optical Network:10-14%($LITE 为主,$COHR 次要)
Optical Switch:2-4% $LITE

$LITE 估计总 cluster share:约 8-12%

FYI,Google 的 “Optical” BOM 份额(8-12%)是异常值,因为他们独特的 Optical Circuit Switch(OCS)垄断。

粗略算一下:

到 2027 年 Google TPU 花费 $40B。$LITE 拿 10%(30-40% 利润率),仅 Google 一个客户就有 $1.5B+ FCF,单靠主要客户就是 17x earnings。(分析师对 TPU spend scaling 的预测可能极其偏离)

还没算 $AMZN Trainium、$NVDA Blackwell、$MSFT Maia 和其他芯片部署带来的份额。

$LITE 目前位于每一个未来 TPU/GPU 芯片部署的中心并抽成。

唯一缺点是他们现在是明确市场领导者,但 $AVGO$COHR 很可能在 2027-2028 准备竞争。不过……

有人说“$26B,历史新高,你为什么现在买”。

这就是原因。他们参与未来每一个 TPU/GPU/ASIC 部署。

如果 Google TPU 和其他芯片支出放量,而 LITE 对每一美元花费都能从 $NVDA$AMZN$MSFT 拿 2-3%,或从 $GOOGL 拿 8-12%,$LITE 很容易最终超过 $60B+。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2003019490871869644
❤️ 455 🔁 42 💬 26
打开原推
📝 原创
$AEHR earnings:

- Current Backlog: $38.7 million as of the end of the quarter, with an "effective backlog" of $50.9 million

-H2 FY26 Guidance: Reiterated expectations for $25 million to $30 million in revenue for the second half of the year

Thoughts on earnings:

Can just ignore current earnings, main indicators are around hyperscaler volume ramp H2.

Volume ramp indication confirmations:

1. "We are seeing significant forecasts from our lead hyperscale customer for our Sonoma systems for high-volume production burn-in of their custom AI processor ASICs"

2. "We expect a significant near-term follow-on production order from this customer for a large number of systems to be shipped during Aehr's fiscal year 2027"

This is what is expected with $AEHR transitioning from qualification to mass volume like $AAOI and we got that confirmation.

H2 is probably more confirmation around siph customer volume ramp into 2027.
$AEHR earnings:

- Current Backlog:截至季度末为 $38.7 million,“effective backlog”为 $50.9 million

-H2 FY26 Guidance:重申下半年收入预期为 $25 million 到 $30 million

对 earnings 的想法:

当前 earnings 可以直接忽略,主要指标在 hyperscaler volume ramp H2。

Volume ramp indication confirmations:

1. “我们看到 lead hyperscale customer 对我们的 Sonoma systems 给出了显著 forecasts,用于其 custom AI processor ASICs 的 high-volume production burn-in”

2. “我们预计近期会收到该客户一笔重要的 follow-on production order,涉及大量 systems,将在 Aehr fiscal year 2027 期间发货”

这正是 $AEHR 从 qualification 转向 mass volume、类似 $AAOI 时应该看到的东西,而我们得到了确认。

H2 可能会更多确认 siph customer volume ramp 进入 2027。
❤️ 586 🔁 38 💬 40
打开原推
💬 引用
Everyone on X kept talking about CS 153 Frontier Systems...

Some folks wanted me to come so stopped by Stanford.

Maybe ask Jensen about $SIVE and $AXTI later. Anyone have questions for Elevenlabs CEO? https://t.co/rBtYYV4aHc
X 上大家一直在聊 CS 153 Frontier Systems……

有些人想让我来,所以顺路去了 Stanford。

晚点也许问 Jensen 关于 $SIVE$AXTI。有人想问 Elevenlabs CEO 什么问题吗? https://t.co/rBtYYV4aHc
引用原推@reva_jariwala
how is this a class?

absolutely insane line-up https://t.co/dWHiPbFVm5
这怎么会是一门课?

阵容离谱到爆 https://t.co/dWHiPbFVm5
https://x.com/reva_jariwala/status/2039077100578062643
❤️ 324 🔁 11 💬 33
打开原推
💬 引用
Jensen Huang from $NVDA:

$NBIS will take care of you. “ https://t.co/lIRrnAC3fc
来自 $NVDA 的 Jensen Huang:

$NBIS will take care of you. “ https://t.co/lIRrnAC3fc
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I’ve been thinking about this report more from last month…

It’s probably extremely bullish for the Neocloud segment like $NBIS (and even $CRWV) more than markets think.

Because of the hyperscaler buildout delay spillover.

And partly why $META might have signed a $27B deal.

Companies that already have secured capacity/component orders for their buildout are likely to be major winners as other competition stalls.
我这阵子一直在想上个月这份报告……

它对 $NBIS 这种 Neocloud 板块(甚至 $CRWV)可能比市场想的还要极度利好。

因为 hyperscaler 建设延迟会外溢。

这也可能是 $META 签下 $27B deal 的部分原因。

那些已经为自己建设锁定容量/组件订单的公司,很可能会成为大赢家,因为其他竞争对手会卡住。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2041056589088702781
❤️ 601 🔁 33 💬 40
打开原推
📝 原创
For the next photonics CW laser chokepoint.

Personal high-beta exposure tierlist:

1. $SIVE: $302m
2. $AAOI: $8.35B
3. Yuanjie (688498): $13.55B
4. $MTSI: $17.4B
5. $LITE: $56.1B
6. $COHR: $49.2B
7. Suzhou Everbright: $5.95B
8. LuxNet (4979.TWO): $1.7B
9. Henan Shijia (SHA: 688313): $6.2B
10. Furukawa Electric (TYO: 5801): $16.06B
11. Sumitomo Electric (TYO: 5802): $45.113B
12. Mitsubishi Electric (TYO: 6503): $71.2B
13. $AVGO: $1.53T

Ended up taking the highest exposure picks personally (but avoided HK listed names due to conflict of interest).
关于下一个 photonics CW laser chokepoint。

个人 high-beta exposure tierlist:

1. $SIVE: $302m
2. $AAOI: $8.35B
3. Yuanjie (688498): $13.55B
4. $MTSI: $17.4B
5. $LITE: $56.1B
6. $COHR: $49.2B
7. Suzhou Everbright: $5.95B
8. LuxNet (4979.TWO): $1.7B
9. Henan Shijia (SHA: 688313): $6.2B
10. Furukawa Electric (TYO: 5801): $16.06B
11. Sumitomo Electric (TYO: 5802): $45.113B
12. Mitsubishi Electric (TYO: 6503): $71.2B
13. $AVGO: $1.53T

我最后个人买了 exposure 最高的那些(但由于 conflict of interest 避开了 HK listed names)。
❤️ 740 🔁 93 💬 45
打开原推
📝 原创
Turns out... Easter egg hunting works in stocks as well?

Can't believe one of my followers found the undisclosed supplier of a T1 hyperscaler like $NVDA or $GOOGL by:

-> Looking at an executive's from LinkedIn posts.
-> Magnified the edges of one of their posted photo by 5x
-> Found one of the machines that looked distinct enough to identify
-> Traced the color scheme of a machine back to a small company
-> Identified the undisclosed supplier.

I'm genuinely impressed.
结果发现……easter egg hunting 在股票里也有用?

真不敢相信我的一个 follower 通过下面这些方式,找到了像 $NVDA$GOOGL 这种 T1 hyperscaler 的未披露 supplier:

-> 看一位 executive 的 LinkedIn posts。
-> 把他们发的一张照片边缘放大 5x
-> 发现其中一台机器外观足够特别,可以识别
-> 根据机器的配色追溯到一家小公司
-> 识别出未披露的 supplier。

我真的很佩服。
❤️ 1,018 🔁 19 💬 75
打开原推
📝 原创
The nice thing about multi-year bottlenecks from:

$HPS.A to $SNDK to $LITE

Is that you can sleep a easier despite market volatility like today.

Knowing demand will be extreme even 1 year...

Even if Trump wants to nuke Bikini Bottom and other companies might be more impacted:

-> One has a huge market share over Transformers
-> One has huge market share over NAND
-> One has huge market share over EML/OCS.

And the one thing in common is that they're all likely backlogged on orders into 2028.

Signaling near-guaranteed fundamental revenue and likely margin expansion into the next year.

It's H1 2026 now.
来自下面这些 multi-year bottlenecks 的好处:

$HPS.A$SNDK$LITE

就是即使像今天这样市场波动,你也能睡得更踏实一点。

因为你知道即使一年后需求也会极端强劲……

哪怕 Trump 想 nuke Bikini Bottom,而其他公司可能受影响更大:

-> 一个在 Transformers 上有巨大市场份额
-> 一个在 NAND 上有巨大市场份额
-> 一个在 EML/OCS 上有巨大市场份额。

它们的共同点是,订单很可能都已经 backlog 到 2028。

这意味着未来一年基本接近确定的 fundamental revenue,以及可能的 margin expansion。

现在是 2026 H1。
❤️ 413 🔁 21 💬 37
打开原推
📝 原创
Trump: “A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again.

I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will.”

Yeah… statements like that’s aren’t too positive? https://t.co/J3GhvahLVg
Trump:“今晚一个完整的文明会死去,再也不会回来。

我不希望那发生,但很可能会发生。”

是啊……这种表态不算太 positive? https://t.co/J3GhvahLVg
❤️ 420 🔁 18 💬 82
打开原推
💬 引用
What a sleeper OP pick.

Still almost nobody talks about Win Semi ($3105.TWO)…

From $LITE to $SIVE. And $AAPL to $AVGO to SpaceX.

Feels like everyone uses them?

$5.4B price tag is underselling its importance to robotics, space, and AI hyperscaler supply chains imo. https://t.co/lMg92KzufM
真是一个 sleeper OP pick。

现在仍然几乎没人谈 Win Semi ($3105.TWO)……

$LITE$SIVE。以及 $AAPL$AVGO 到 SpaceX。

感觉大家都在用他们?

imo,$5.4B 的价格低估了它对 robotics、space 和 AI hyperscaler supply chains 的重要性。 https://t.co/lMg92KzufM
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I am long Win Semi (3105.TWO) at $4.1B MC.

I believe markets are sleeping on of the most important foundries in the world (aside from $TSM).

IMO their strategic positioning exceeds far beyond $4B MC.

They sit in almost every major chokepoints:

-> In the SpaceX Starlink LEO supply chain.
-> As $AVGO, $LITE, $MTSI, $SIVE InP foundries for optical transceivers
-> then as the body/eyes of humanoids as the GaAs foundry for TOF lasers possibly mapping to Boston Dynamic Atlas
-> With legacy from MediaTek / Qualcomm / $AAPL from their previous business.

But Win appears to be bottom of the legacy drag (like with $SOI), with optical as one of their largest growth vectors.

Then... Win has the largest TAM expansion/revenue acceleration out of almost any foundry:

With: LEO, humanoids / CW laser, 800g, 1.6t, 3.2t optical transceiver massive ramp up over the next few years.

Especially with Broadcom as their anchor client ( $AVGO owns ~5% of Win).

$NVDA doesn't care who makes the lasers, whether it's $LITE or $COHR.

They just care if there's enough.

There's not enough.

-> Demand for CW lasers will likely go parabolic. (they make the lasers that companies like $SIVE designs)

-> Demand for LEO satellites (SpaceX Starlink) will likely go parabolic.

-> Demand for humanoids will likely go parabolic.

As, Win Semi sits as a semi-monopoly chokepoint in the three most frontier and fastest growing industries for photonics/AI, robotics/humanoids, and space.

Especially with Optical TAM explosion:

Win fwd earnings for 2027 roughly in ~35x range, I do think this is sandbagging it and forward multiples will end up dirt cheap.

Win will largely benefit from TAM expansion and accelerated revenue growth.

Of course: Win will win. So I am long Win.
我做多 Win Semi(3105.TWO),市值 $4.1B。

我认为市场正在忽视世界上最重要的 foundry 之一(除了 $TSM)。

在我看来,它的战略位置远远不止 $4B 市值。

它几乎卡在每个主要瓶颈上:

-> 在 SpaceX Starlink LEO 供应链里。
-> 作为 $AVGO$LITE$MTSI$SIVE 的光模块 InP foundry。
-> 然后作为 humanoids 的身体/眼睛,作为 TOF lasers 的 GaAs foundry,可能对应 Boston Dynamic Atlas。
-> 还有来自 MediaTek / Qualcomm / $AAPL 旧业务的基础。

但 Win 看起来已经处在传统业务拖累的底部(有点像 $SOI),而光学是它最大的增长方向之一。

然后……Win 可能拥有几乎所有 foundry 里最大的 TAM 扩张/收入加速:

未来几年,LEO、humanoids / CW laser、800g、1.6t、3.2t 光模块都会大规模放量。

尤其 Broadcom 是它的锚定客户($AVGO 持有 Win 约 5%)。

$NVDA 不在乎激光器是谁做的,是 $LITE 还是 $COHR 都行。

他们只在乎够不够。

现在不够。

-> CW lasers 需求可能会抛物线式增长。(他们生产像 $SIVE 这类公司设计的激光器)

-> LEO 卫星(SpaceX Starlink)需求可能会抛物线式增长。

-> humanoids 需求可能会抛物线式增长。

因为 Win Semi 是 photonics/AI、robotics/humanoids 和 space 这三个最前沿、增长最快行业里的半垄断瓶颈。

尤其是在 Optical TAM 爆发的情况下:

Win 2027 年 forward earnings 大概在 ~35x 区间,我觉得这还是在压预期,forward multiples 最后会显得非常便宜。

Win 会主要受益于 TAM 扩张和收入增长加速。

当然:Win will win。所以我做多 Win。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037387801285841118
❤️ 434 🔁 39 💬 31
打开原推
📝 原创
If you’re curious about $AXTI:

It’s down 21% on the new potential dilution news.

Board wanted to add 50M more shares (up to $2B worth to dilute) for shareholders vote in the 14th.

70m -> 120m shares.

I say this about $IREN excessive $6B dilution and it’s the same with AXT price proposal that I hold.

I would not “trust in management” to use it wisely and the fact it’s filed is a red flag.

That being said: we’ll see what happens on the 14th. If it passes for 50m more share authorized dilution, I personally would not hold.

But it fails, I expect a recovery.
如果你对 $AXTI 好奇:

它因为新的潜在 dilution 消息跌了 21%。

Board 想让股东在 14 号投票,增加 50M 股授权(最多 $2B worth to dilute)。

70m -> 120m shares。

我对 $IREN 过度 $6B dilution 是这么说的,对我持有的 AXT price proposal 也是一样。

我不会“trust in management” 相信他们会明智使用,而且这东西已经 filed 本身就是 red flag。

话虽如此:看看 14 号会发生什么。如果 50m more share authorized dilution 通过,我个人不会持有。

但如果失败,我预计会 recovery。
❤️ 977 🔁 67 💬 107
打开原推
📝 原创
The current bottleneck: Transformers/Switchgear. 

Trade Idea: Long Hammond (~2.2B CAD / ~$1.5B USD) at 184 CAD.

They dominate the market for:

-Transformers (dry, multi year bottleneck ~23% of market),

-serve to switchgear (2-3Y bottleneck)

-and manufacture liquid too (5Y, larger bottleneck)

I personally anticipate components price hikes like NAND, as $AMZN, $MSFT and others compete for allocation. 

You might have seen: “Half of US data center builds have been delayed or canceled, growth limited by shortages of power infrastructure”…

Then you go further:

“To address shortages… Canada, Mexico… became the biggest suppliers of high-power transformers for AI data centers to AI data centers”

Guess who is in Canada (Guelph).. Mexico (Monterrey 3 and 4)… and the US?

Hammond

Then here’s the reason the articles cite why hyperscaler DB buildouts are falling apart: 

“Major reason behind these setbacks is the availability of key electrical components — such as transformers, switchgear”. 

Institutions are probably looking at Powell, Eaton, and others… but little do they know?

Companies like these actually buy Hammond’s transformers to put inside their own switchgear (“strong sales into data centres, switchgear manufacturers")

Their market share over the transformers market is actually pretty large (eg. ~23% dry). 

The most compelling signal:

-> 122% Y/Y 2025 backlog increase. And we can infer this to be 1B+ CAD. 

Eg. company achieved 898m CAD in sales in 2025, capacity ceiling. Management said close of Q3 2025 orders were valued at 53% of the entire closing third-quarter backlog.

Given that Q4 2025 revenue was 254 million and the backlog is "more than doubled," we can infer a total backlog value exceeding 1 billion CAD.

Also:

“Gross margin compression last year was due to the buildout of their Mexico facility, but both gross margins are expected to increase and the facility expansions are expectied to turn into accelerated revenue Q2 2026)” which is now.

Downside is if raw material costs (copper, electrical steel) spike again, but given this bottleneck, they can price hike. 

Personal FWD P/E estimates would be ~18-21 for 2026, <15 for 2027 from volume ramp.

But I think it’s possible to hit single digit fwd P/E if they do price hikes mixed with hyperscaler emergency orders. But that might get a little mixed with the new acquisition.

Regardless still looks cheap. 

Just a TLDR: 
$AMZN, $MSFT, $META, $GOOGL, $ORCL datacenter are being bottlenecked because of a lack of transformers/switchgear.

Seems like markets missed this little player with large market share, despite backlog visibility and increasing revenue from capacity expansion coming online.

I personally found it pretty compelling, so I went long.

Just sharing my personal thoughts, of course DYOR before making any decisions yourself.
当前 bottleneck:Transformers/Switchgear。

Trade Idea:Long Hammond(~2.2B CAD / ~$1.5B USD),价格 184 CAD。

他们主导这些市场:

-Transformers(dry,多年 bottleneck,约 ~23% 市场份额),

-serve to switchgear(2-3Y bottleneck)

-也制造 liquid(5Y,更大的 bottleneck)

我个人预计 components 会像 NAND 一样涨价,因为 $AMZN$MSFT 等会竞争 allocation。

你可能看过:“Half of US data center builds have been delayed or canceled, growth limited by shortages of power infrastructure”……

然后再往下看:

“To address shortages… Canada, Mexico… became the biggest suppliers of high-power transformers for AI data centers to AI data centers”

猜猜谁在 Canada (Guelph)、Mexico (Monterrey 3 and 4),还有美国?

Hammond

然后文章引用的 hyperscaler DB buildouts 崩掉的原因是:

“Major reason behind these setbacks is the availability of key electrical components — such as transformers, switchgear”。 

机构可能在看 Powell、Eaton 等……但他们不知道?

这类公司其实会买 Hammond 的 transformers,放进自己的 switchgear 里(“strong sales into data centres, switchgear manufacturers”)

他们在 transformers 市场的份额其实很大(比如 dry 约 ~23%)。 

最有说服力的信号:

-> 2025 backlog 同比增加 122%。而且我们可以推断这超过 1B CAD。 

例如,公司 2025 年实现 898m CAD 销售,接近产能上限。Management 说 2025 Q3 末订单价值相当于整个第三季度末 backlog 的 53%。

考虑到 Q4 2025 revenue 是 254 million,而且 backlog “more than doubled”,我们可以推断总 backlog value 超过 1 billion CAD。

另外:

“去年 gross margin compression 是因为 Mexico facility buildout,但 gross margins 预计会提高,facility expansions 也预计会在 2026 Q2 转化为加速 revenue”,也就是现在。

下行风险是 raw material costs(copper、electrical steel)再次飙升,但考虑到这个 bottleneck,他们可以 price hike。

我个人的 FWD P/E 估计是 2026 年 ~18-21,2027 年随着 volume ramp 低于 15。

但如果他们把 price hikes 和 hyperscaler emergency orders 结合起来,我觉得有可能打到个位数 fwd P/E。不过这可能会和新 acquisition 有点混在一起。

无论如何,看起来仍然便宜。

简单 TLDR: 
$AMZN$MSFT$META$GOOGL$ORCL datacenter 正因为缺少 transformers/switchgear 被卡住。

尽管有 backlog visibility,并且 capacity expansion 上线会带来 revenue 增长,市场似乎错过了这个拥有大市场份额的小玩家。

我个人觉得很有吸引力,所以 long 了。

只是分享个人想法,当然你做任何决定前都 DYOR。
❤️ 826 🔁 75 💬 97
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
For transformers pick…

I was referring to the current transformers bottleneck with dry/liquid and others having extended lead times causing DCs buildout to slow.

There’s an interesting company that supplies transformers/switchgear to likely companies like Powell, Eaton with an abnormally large est. backlog over 1B CAD est. called

Hero
Academia
Mitochondria
Mole
Octopus
North
Deep

~$1.2B MC.

Was surprised it’s not priced higher since it’s fwd earnings are pretty low (calculated high 10’s low 20’s from personal estimates), not including possible price hikes.

Looks like a massive % of the transformer/switchgear market?

It looks like small TAM like InP but could end up like memory price hikes if things get more severe.

Good to do your own research but that’s the tldr why I went long
关于 transformers pick……

我指的是当前 dry/liquid 等 transformers bottleneck,extended lead times 正在导致 DCs buildout 放缓。

有一家有意思的公司,向可能包括 Powell、Eaton 在内的公司供应 transformers/switchgear,估计 backlog 异常大,超过 1B CAD,名字叫

Hero
Academia
Mitochondria
Mole
Octopus
North
Deep

~$1.2B MC。

我很惊讶它没被定价更高,因为它的 fwd earnings 相当低(按我个人估算,高 10 倍到低 20 倍),还不包括可能的 price hikes。

看起来占 transformer/switchgear 市场很大比例?

它看起来像 InP 那样 TAM 很小,但如果情况变得更严重,可能会像 memory price hikes 那样。

自己做研究是好事,但这就是我 long 的 tldr 原因。
❤️ 275 🔁 2 💬 72
打开原推
💬 引用
Well that was fast with $AEHR.

Up +14.28%… I did think the center of the next silicon photonics bottleneck at $1.1B, with tons of hyperscalers qualifying it.

Was kind of undervaluing it. https://t.co/gDVc6xzF85
$AEHR 这也太快了。

涨 +14.28%……我确实觉得,在 $1.1B 时,它处在下一个 silicon photonics bottleneck 的中心,而且有一堆 hyperscalers 在 qualifying 它。

当时有点低估它了。 https://t.co/gDVc6xzF85
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AEHR looks extremely promising at ~$1.1B MC.

Aehr is starting to remind me of an early $TER, mixed with pre-earnings $AAOI.

If we look at the timeline and speculated customers:

Feb 11th: Sonoma production win for Hyperscaler's AI ASIC processors. (likely $GOOGL, $AMZN, $META).

- Probably Google? Aehr bought Incal, who was speculated to be used by Google for their TPUs.

Feb 26th: $14 million from AI lead customer (likely $AMD, $NVDA)

- Probably $AMD here for Instinct MI300/MI400.

March 3rd: Lead silicon photonics customer for one FOX-XP system (likely $INTC siph)

- Very likely $INTC has been their lead customer.

March 31st: Initial order from major new silicon photonics customer (likely $AVGO, $MRVL, $CSCO )

- New customer (rules out Intel), prob one of these transitioning to 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers

(All speculative, very confidential BOM)

Regardless. This timeline is just bottling up for $AEHR.

Could be next earnings. Or two quarters from now.

But feels like a matter of time before we see mass orders.
$AEHR 在约 $1.1B 市值看起来极有前景。

Aehr 开始让我想到早期 $TER,混合财报前的 $AAOI

如果看时间线和推测客户:

2 月 11 日:拿下 Hyperscaler AI ASIC processors 的 Sonoma 量产订单。(很可能是 $GOOGL$AMZN$META)。

- 可能是 Google?Aehr 收购了 Incal,而 Incal 被推测用于 Google 的 TPU。

2 月 26 日:来自 AI lead customer 的 $14 million(很可能是 $AMD$NVDA

- 这里可能是 $AMD,用于 Instinct MI300/MI400。

3 月 3 日:Lead silicon photonics customer 订购一套 FOX-XP 系统(很可能是 $INTC siph)

- 很可能 $INTC 一直是他们的 lead customer。

3 月 31 日:来自重要新 silicon photonics customer 的初始订单(很可能是 $AVGO$MRVL$CSCO

- 新客户(排除 Intel),可能是这些正在转向 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers 的公司之一

(全部是推测,BOM 非常保密)

无论如何,这条时间线正在为 $AEHR 蓄势。

可能是下个财报,也可能是两个季度之后。

但感觉看到大规模订单只是时间问题。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2039388766083944750
❤️ 702 🔁 54 💬 63
打开原推
💬 引用
What's even going on at X?

X is charging my foreign users an additional 46% on top of my subscription.

I'm only asking where the additional premiums go to...

From someone who has the most paid subscribers in the finance category.

-> They refuse to give a simple answer and closes the ticket.

I've been trying hard to advocate other users staying on on X compared to financial competitors... but wtf.

I thought this platform was one seeking maximum transparency?
X 到底在搞什么?

X 向我的 foreign users 在我的 subscription 基础上额外收 46%。

我只是想问这些额外 premiums 去了哪里……

而我是 finance category 里 paid subscribers 最多的人。

-> 他们拒绝给一个简单回答,然后关闭 ticket。

我一直很努力地劝其他用户,相比 financial competitors 还是留在 X……但 wtf。

我以为这个平台是在追求最大透明度?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just in case you’re wondering why I’m bullish on $CRCL and Stablecoins.

8605 subscribers at $1.00:

-> $1595.

Not even including int. like Canada paying 46% more (2 CAD vs $1 USD subscription) and the FX/rounding disappearing into the void.

I’m not here for subscription revenue so I don’t plan on changing anything.

But just found this pretty amusing even if you factored in pro rata or holds/delays.

You would reduce 30% App Store fees, Stripe card TX fees, and other black box fee mechanisms like foreign currency rounding.

Stablecoins are definitely the future, and you can already see banks trying to control it with Clarity Act lobbying.
如果你想知道我为什么看多 $CRCL 和 stablecoins。

8605 个订阅者,每个 $1.00:

-> $1595。

这还没算加拿大这种国际用户多付 46%(2 CAD vs $1 USD 订阅),以及 FX/四舍五入消失到黑箱里的钱。

我不是为了订阅收入来的,所以不打算改任何东西。

只是觉得挺有意思,即便你按比例或延迟/冻结来算也是如此。

你可以减少 30% App Store 费用、Stripe card TX fees,以及外币四舍五入这种黑箱收费机制。

Stablecoins 绝对是未来,你已经能看到银行在通过 Clarity Act 游说试图控制它。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2040469708739375399
❤️ 422 🔁 12 💬 75
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
New long idea:

In a few hours for a new sector multi year bottleneck…

I think it’s pretty interesting! No rush though, so make sure you do your own DD.

I’ll use some code words this time just in case HFT algorithms are watching this channel.

I’m still doing research into those $600m companies, going through trade data and patents to find customers.

Don’t want to post thesis and get something wrong.
新的 long idea:

几个小时后会发,一个新 sector 的 multi year bottleneck……

我觉得挺有意思!不过不急,所以一定要自己做 DD。

这次我会用一些 code words,以防 HFT algorithms 在看这个频道。

我还在研究那些 $600m companies,翻 trade data 和 patents 找客户。

不想发 thesis 结果搞错东西。
❤️ 428 🔁 0 💬 38
打开原推
💬 引用
I still find it funny $TSEM was flat the entire year to date.

I go long and now it’s close to doubling in 3 weeks.

This is a $22B+ stock BTW (close to $NBIS size).

Maybe institutions started copy trading? https://t.co/kUqw9b6Ksk
我还是觉得 $TSEM 很好笑,YTD 一整年都没怎么动。

我一 long,现在 3 周快翻倍了。

BTW 这是一只 $22B+ 的股票(接近 $NBIS 的体量)。

也许机构开始 copy trading 了? https://t.co/kUqw9b6Ksk
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I'm long $TSEM, the $TSM of photonics.

My top two picks for CPO are $SOI and Tower Semi.

Given the $NVDA GTC catalyst on new photonic related architecture next week:

I expect Tower Semi to get a huge catalyst.

Nvidia laready directly collaborated with Tower to scale 1.6T silicon photonics last month (hint hint for GTC), likely pushing the downstream players to use it.

And now, Tower is the leading supplier of 1.6T SiPh PICs and the primary foundry for scale-up CPO architectures. (the other being global foundries)

From my forward est:
2028 Forward P/E: ~16.8x to ~18.1x

(Tower set a target $2.84B revenue by 2028, with ~31.7% operating margin, ~$750M in net profit)

The thing to note is over 70% of their planned SiPh capacity is already reserved through 2028. And photonics haven't even ramped up yet.

So, I expect them to strongly beat earning projections due to extreme photonics scaling + allocations price hikes that's not modeled into projections.

Also, $TSEM is heavily de-risked by 70% of capacity already being reserved. MC is likely due to $TSEM being a very obscure upstream player in the photonics supply chain.

But I expect the $NVDA GTC conference to be that catalyst that brings it to premium valuations.

I'm long $TSEM as an asymmetrical upside for upstream photonics foundry layer.
我做多 $TSEM,它就是光子领域的 $TSM

我对 CPO 的前两大选择是 $SOI 和 Tower Semi。

考虑到下周 $NVDA GTC 对新的光子相关架构有催化:

我预计 Tower Semi 会迎来巨大催化。

Nvidia 上个月已经直接和 Tower 合作,扩大 1.6T 硅光规模(给 GTC 的暗示),很可能推动下游玩家使用它。

现在,Tower 是 1.6T SiPh PIC 的领先供应商,也是 scale-up CPO 架构的主要晶圆厂(另一个是 global foundries)。

按我的前瞻估算:
2028 Forward P/E:约 16.8x 到 18.1x

(Tower 设定了 2028 年 $2.84B 收入目标,约 31.7% 经营利润率,约 $750M 净利润)

需要注意的是,他们规划中的 SiPh 产能超过 70% 已经预定到 2028 年。而光子还没真正放量。

所以我预计他们会因为极端的光子扩产 + allocation 涨价,大幅超过盈利预测,而这些还没有被模型计入。

另外,$TSEM 也因为 70% 产能已被预定而大幅去风险。市值可能是因为 $TSEM 是光子供应链里非常冷门的上游玩家。

但我预计 $NVDA GTC 会成为让它获得溢价估值的催化。

我做多 $TSEM,把它当作上游光子晶圆厂层的非对称上行机会。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031820871170736570
❤️ 519 🔁 16 💬 20
打开原推
📝 原创
I’ve been thinking about this report more from last month…

It’s probably extremely bullish for the Neocloud segment like $NBIS (and even $CRWV) more than markets think.

Because of the hyperscaler buildout delay spillover.

And partly why $META might have signed a $27B deal.

Companies that already have secured capacity/component orders for their buildout are likely to be major winners as other competition stalls.
我一直在想上个月这份报告……

它对 $NBIS(甚至 $CRWV)这类 Neocloud segment 的利好,可能远超市场想象。

因为 hyperscaler buildout delay 会外溢。

这也部分解释了为什么 $META 可能签了 $27B deal。

那些已经为 buildout 锁定 capacity/component orders 的公司,随着其他竞争对手停滞,很可能成为大赢家。
❤️ 658 🔁 41 💬 50
打开原推
📝 原创
Please stop trying to model 2025-2026 revenue for future CPO/SiPH ramp…

When I looked at $TSEM back at ~$115 last month (round to $200 now).

The forward p/e compressed to rates like ~16-18 (down to 10-12 in growth scenarios)

Same applies to $AEHR / $SIVE / $SOI /Win Semi and other names.

This is H1 2026. Volume ramp hits H2 2026.

We’re at the very beginning of a massive supercycle and these are my more pure play exposure picks for the next architectural changes in photonics:

For testing, cw lasers, substrates, and foundries in next paradigm shift in the photonics supercycle.

Companies like $LITE or $AAOI that I’ve longed last year cover multiple cycles.

However, the most returns comes from anticipating what benefits the most Mc wise relative to future revenue/TAM growth (not priced into current earnings).

Not looking back at 2 year historical returns to calculate fair value.

And when we’re looking at massive new photonics TAM ($110B+ bull case from lightcounting), largely driven from architecture that use CW lasers as an example or struggle with yields.

A lot of these companies are likely going to re-rate hard.

Especially when you look at the start of the next architectural changes, happening around H2 2026.
请别再试图用 2025-2026 revenue 去 model 未来 CPO/SiPH ramp 了……

我上个月在 ~$115 看 $TSEM 的时候(现在约 $200)。

forward p/e 已经压缩到 ~16-18 这种水平(growth scenarios 下到 10-12)

同样适用于 $AEHR / $SIVE / $SOI /Win Semi 和其他名字。

现在是 2026 H1。Volume ramp 会在 2026 H2 到来。

我们正处在一个巨大 supercycle 的最初期,而这些是我为 photonics 下一轮架构变化挑的更 pure play exposure:

针对 photonics supercycle 下一次 paradigm shift 中的 testing、cw lasers、substrates 和 foundries。

$LITE$AAOI 这种我去年 long 的公司,覆盖多个 cycles。

不过,最高回报来自于提前判断相对未来 revenue/TAM growth,哪些公司按 MC 来看受益最大(而不是已经反映在当前 earnings 里)。

不是回头看过去 2 年 historical returns 来算 fair value。

而当我们看到巨大的新 photonics TAM(lightcounting bull case 为 $110B+),很大程度由使用 CW lasers 的架构驱动,或者受 yields 约束。

这些公司里很多都可能会猛烈 re-rate。

尤其是当你看到下一轮架构变化大约从 2026 H2 开始发生。
❤️ 499 🔁 36 💬 22
打开原推
📝 原创
https://t.co/ZmIKd1xoSy
https://t.co/ZmIKd1xoSy
❤️ 104 🔁 3 💬 35
打开原推
📝 原创
Honestly…

You’re probably spending too much time on FinX if you know these references:

- “I can’t believe that post was real”

- Analyst #3

- 🦑

- 🌮

- 🦞
说真的……

如果你知道这些梗,那你可能在 FinX 上花太多时间了:

- “I can’t believe that post was real”

- Analyst #3

- 🦑

- 🌮

- 🦞
❤️ 404 🔁 5 💬 47
打开原推
📝 原创
Digitimes: Taiwan tackles CPO testing bottlenecks to scale SiPh for AI data centers.

Huge. Emphasis. on: "CPO and Silicon Photonics bottleneck" + "Testing."

$FORM, $KEYS, $ASE, and $ATEYY are popular ones ones in this bottleneck eg. optical alignment.

Then there's $AEHR for exposure to SipH yields/testing bottlenecks.

Forecasts show that by 2026, over 50% of data center transceiver sales will come from silicon photonics (SiPh) modules.

Right now, in 2026, there's quite still a few qualification cycles:

But expect mass order ramp to hit anytime.
Digitimes:Taiwan tackles CPO testing bottlenecks to scale SiPh for AI data centers。

重大。重点。在:“CPO and Silicon Photonics bottleneck” + “Testing”。

$FORM$KEYS$ASE$ATEYY 是这个 bottleneck 里比较热门的名字,比如 optical alignment。

然后还有 $AEHR,提供 SipH yields/testing bottlenecks 的 exposure。

预测显示,到 2026 年,data center transceiver 销售中超过 50% 将来自 silicon photonics (SiPh) modules。

现在,在 2026 年,仍然还有不少 qualification cycles:

但 mass order ramp 可能随时到来。
❤️ 495 🔁 34 💬 37
打开原推
📝 原创
I thought this was fake for a sec.

How is this a real post from our President?

Optics aside, not as fun when markets move based on Trump posts over fundamentals… https://t.co/zggOoEejWu
我一开始还以为这是假的。

这怎么会真的是我们 President 发的帖子?

抛开 optics 不说,当市场基于 Trump posts 而不是 fundamentals 波动时,就没那么好玩了…… https://t.co/zggOoEejWu
❤️ 1,367 🔁 40 💬 157
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
I wonder if there’s more than meets the eye with $PYPL.

Their stablecoin is increasing share silently and they’re now at ~$4B supply.

I don’t know anyone who uses PayPal usd for settlement but worth taking a closer look if it can eat into the usdt/usdc duopoly rn. https://t.co/A0tdFwdDPI
我在想 $PYPL 会不会还有表面看不到的东西。

他们的 stablecoin 正在悄悄提升份额,现在 supply 已经约 ~$4B。

我不认识任何用 PayPal usd 做 settlement 的人,但如果它现在能侵蚀 usdt/usdc duopoly,值得更仔细看一眼。 https://t.co/A0tdFwdDPI
❤️ 176 🔁 4 💬 22
打开原推
📝 原创
Who are the smartest investors on X?

In the lineup we have $SOFI, $AMC, $IREN, and $BYND.
X 上最聪明的投资者是谁?

入围名单有 $SOFI$AMC$IREN$BYND
❤️ 196 🔁 8 💬 56
打开原推
📝 原创
The Space Bottleneck: Optical ground infrastructure.

- "The industry has built roughly 10 percent of the optical ground infrastructure"

Now, who are the beneficiaries?

- $EOS.ASX (operating stations at Mt. Stromlo equipped with "adaptive optics.")
- $SKPJF (TYO: 9412) | $NTTYY | Space Compass is JV with NTT and satellite operator SKY Perfect JSAT
- $SGBAF - Works with Cailabs to for terrestrial optical terminals
- $SAFRY - Manufacturer of the optical ground stations

Then if it fails fallback would be names like:
$VSAT, $GILT

Analysis states that if the optical mesh fails due to clouds or lack of stations, the architecture "falls back to Ka-band RF links".

-> Near term capital flows to Relay Providers (Kepler, Space Compass, General Atomics).

-> Long term structural winners will be the photonics hardware manufacturers (Cailabs, Safran).

-> Then companies like SpaceX wins by default. Many are private.

"This infrastructure deficit is no longer just an engineering problem but a direct threat to a major White House [Golden Dome] policy objective"

Orbital laser communications market are hard-capped until physical ground infra scales, hence the current bottleneck.

But not quite sure if capex is to the scale of hyperscaler AI buildouts yet to benefit these companies enough.
Space Bottleneck:Optical ground infrastructure。

- “The industry has built roughly 10 percent of the optical ground infrastructure”

那么,谁会受益?

- $EOS.ASX(在 Mt. Stromlo 运营配备 “adaptive optics” 的 stations)
- $SKPJF (TYO: 9412) | $NTTYY | Space Compass 是 NTT 和 satellite operator SKY Perfect JSAT 的 JV
- $SGBAF - 与 Cailabs 合作做 terrestrial optical terminals
- $SAFRY - optical ground stations 制造商

如果失败,fallback 会是这些名字:
$VSAT, $GILT

分析称,如果 optical mesh 因为云层或 stations 不足而失败,架构会 “falls back to Ka-band RF links”。

-> 近期资本会流向 Relay Providers(Kepler、Space Compass、General Atomics)。

-> 长期结构性赢家会是 photonics hardware manufacturers(Cailabs、Safran)。

-> 然后像 SpaceX 这样的公司默认赢。很多都是 private。

“This infrastructure deficit is no longer just an engineering problem but a direct threat to a major White House [Golden Dome] policy objective”

Orbital laser communications market 在 physical ground infra 扩大之前会被硬性封顶,这就是当前 bottleneck。

但还不太确定 capex 是否已经达到 hyperscaler AI buildouts 的规模,足以让这些公司明显受益。
❤️ 480 🔁 29 💬 20
打开原推
💬 引用
Vietnam is probably the next focus area for Western supply chain investment and other critical minerals/rare earths.

Tungsten is just one of them (world's second-largest tungsten producer).

$MSR Masan (Hanoi/Vietnam) - Primary tungsten stock in Vietnam. Up +168.33% 1Y, as one example.

They mine the raw ore, then process it into APT and tungsten powder.

There's many other very important names out there, I'll follow-up with a list later.

But I do expect a lot of US/Asian investment to flow into this country.

Especially as prices spike and the West secures supply chains independence away from China/Russia.
Vietnam 可能会成为 Western supply chain investment 以及其他 critical minerals/rare earths 的下一个重点区域。

Tungsten 只是其中之一(世界第二大 tungsten producer)。

$MSR Masan (Hanoi/Vietnam) - Vietnam 的主要 tungsten stock。作为例子,1Y 涨 +168.33%。

他们开采 raw ore,然后加工成 APT 和 tungsten powder。

还有很多其他非常重要的名字,我之后会跟进发一份名单。

但我确实预计会有大量 US/Asian investment 流入这个国家。

尤其是在价格飙升、West 为摆脱 China/Russia 而确保 supply chains independence 的情况下。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Oh... who could have thought Tungsten would be important back in January?

"Tungsten Price Soars 557% Amid War in Middle East"

Certainly not companies like $ALM up 75% this past 3 months after China's export controls.

If you're looking for other precious materials to look out for:

Indium, Bismuth, Tellurium, Molybdenum, Lithium, Antimony, Gallium, Germanium, and Graphite... were all named in exports controls.

Unfortunately, I've been in $AXTI which mainly centered around indium, gallium, and germanium, only up 215% YTD.

But, there's a lot more important companies out there during the supply chain panic.
哦……谁能想到 1 月份 Tungsten 会重要?

“Tungsten Price Soars 557% Amid War in Middle East”

当然不会是像 $ALM 这种公司吧,在中国出口管制后过去 3 个月已经涨了 75%。

如果你在找其他值得关注的贵重材料:

Indium、Bismuth、Tellurium、Molybdenum、Lithium、Antimony、Gallium、Germanium 和 Graphite……都在出口管制里被点名过。

不幸的是,我一直拿着 $AXTI,主要围绕 indium、gallium 和 germanium,YTD 也才涨 215%。

不过在供应链恐慌里,还有很多更重要的公司。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2040500149877891563
❤️ 670 🔁 51 💬 49
打开原推
💬 引用
Oh... who could have thought Tungsten would be important back in January?

"Tungsten Price Soars 557% Amid War in Middle East"

Certainly not companies like $ALM up 75% this past 3 months after China's export controls.

If you're looking for other precious materials to look out for:

Indium, Bismuth, Tellurium, Molybdenum, Lithium, Antimony, Gallium, Germanium, and Graphite... were all named in exports controls.

Unfortunately, I've been in $AXTI which mainly centered around indium, gallium, and germanium, only up 215% YTD.

But, there's a lot more important companies out there during the supply chain panic.
哦……谁能想到 Tungsten 在 1 月份会很重要?

“Tungsten Price Soars 557% Amid War in Middle East”

当然不是像 $ALM 这种,在 China export controls 后过去 3 个月涨了 75% 的公司。

如果你在找其他值得关注的 precious materials:

Indium、Bismuth、Tellurium、Molybdenum、Lithium、Antimony、Gallium、Germanium 和 Graphite……都在 exports controls 里被点名。

不幸的是,我一直在 $AXTI 里,主要围绕 indium、gallium 和 germanium,YTD 只涨了 215%。

但在 supply chain panic 期间,还有很多更重要的公司。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Today, all eyes are on Copper, $SLV, and $USAR after US Gov's $1.6B funding.

But ever wonder about the more silent trades you should really be watching out for?

1. Tungsten - $ALM
2. Indium - $TECK
3. Bismuth - TSE: $VNP
4. Tellurium - $VNP
5. Molybdenum - $FCX
6. Lithium - $LAC
7. Antimony- $UAMY
8. Gallium - $AA
9. Germanium - $TECK
10. Graphite - $SYAAF

This are the list of some of the top Chinese critical minerals/material export control chokepoints and the Western beneficiary.

Not everyday do you have foreign governments telling you what to buy.
今天,在美国政府 $1.6B 资金之后,所有人都盯着 Copper、$SLV$USAR

但你有没有想过,那些更安静、真正该盯的交易是什么?

1. Tungsten - $ALM
2. Indium - $TECK
3. Bismuth - TSE: $VNP
4. Tellurium - $VNP
5. Molybdenum - $FCX
6. Lithium - $LAC
7. Antimony- $UAMY
8. Gallium - $AA
9. Germanium - $TECK
10. Graphite - $SYAAF

这是一些中国关键矿物/材料出口管制瓶颈,以及西方受益者的名单。

不是每天都有外国政府直接告诉你该买什么。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2015805598265479518
❤️ 388 🔁 24 💬 25
打开原推
📝 原创
Just in case you’re wondering why I’m bullish on $CRCL and Stablecoins.

8605 subscribers at $1.00:

-> $1595.

Not even including int. like Canada paying 46% more (2 CAD vs $1 USD subscription) and the FX/rounding disappearing into the void.

I’m not here for subscription revenue so I don’t plan on changing anything.

But just found this pretty amusing even if you factored in pro rata or holds/delays.

You would reduce 30% App Store fees, Stripe card TX fees, and other black box fee mechanisms like foreign currency rounding.

Stablecoins are definitely the future, and you can already see banks trying to control it with Clarity Act lobbying.
如果你在好奇为什么我 bullish $CRCL 和 Stablecoins。

8605 subscribers,每个 $1.00:

-> $1595。

还没算 Canada 等 international 用户多付 46%(2 CAD vs $1 USD subscription),以及 FX/rounding 消失进虚空。

我不是为了 subscription revenue,所以不打算改变任何东西。

但即使考虑 pro rata 或 holds/delays,我也觉得这挺好笑。

你可以减少 30% App Store fees、Stripe card TX fees,以及 foreign currency rounding 这类黑箱费用机制。

Stablecoins 绝对是未来,你已经能看到 banks 正试图通过 Clarity Act lobbying 来控制它。
❤️ 656 🔁 26 💬 60
打开原推
💬 引用
You’re witnessing hypocrisy in plain sight with Yields + Clarity Act.

Banks say there’s a pathway to apply for a banking license but behind the scenes…

But these same banks are the ones lobbying behind the board to prevent any crypto related companies from actually getting it.

Just look at what happened Custodia bank. And all the crypto firms applying for banking charters now…

It’s the equivalent of saying “just apply for New York bitlicense” while they been stalling applications for half a decade.

This is set in place so banks ban competition so they can continue robbing retail off interest rate spread.

Not to “safeguard” customer funds.

Banks telling retail users otherwise are lying to your face.

We’re about to witness one of the most destructive bills to crypto be passed from Bank lobbying
你正在亲眼看到 Yields + Clarity Act 上的虚伪。

Banks 说有路径可以申请 banking license,但背地里……

这些同样的 banks 正在幕后 lobbying,阻止任何 crypto related companies 真正拿到它。

看看 Custodia bank 发生了什么。还有现在所有申请 banking charters 的 crypto firms……

这就等于说“去申请 New York bitlicense 就行”,但他们已经拖了半个十年的 applications。

这套东西就是为了让 banks 禁止竞争,这样他们就能继续靠 interest rate spread 抢 retail。

不是为了“safeguard” customer funds。

Banks 对 retail users 说别的,就是当面骗你。

我们马上要看到 Bank lobbying 推动通过 crypto 最具破坏性的 bills 之一。
引用原推@anthonynoto
Why are we wasting time with a new stablecoin yield proposal? There is already a path to provide yield on Digtial Assets by becoming a bank (an insured depository institution, IDI) and having the required safety and soundness standards to take people's money and invest it to drive yield. Trust Banks shouldn't be able to offer yield on ANY asset. Please do not lower the standard from having to be an IDI to be able to provide yield on any assset. The current mark-up works for everyone except a few. If those "few" want to offer yield on digital assets like stablecoins they should apply for a Bank IDI license not ask the Senate to lower the standard to safeguard the American people's money. @SenatorTimScott @SenLummis @SenThomTillis @SenateGOP @SenateBanking @patrickjwitt
我们为什么还在浪费时间搞一个新的 stablecoin yield 提案?通过成为银行(受保存款机构,IDI),并满足必要的安全和稳健标准来拿人们的钱投资产生收益,本来就已经有路径可以为 Digital Assets 提供 yield。Trust Banks 不应该能在任何资产上提供 yield。请不要把提供任何资产收益所需的标准,从必须成为 IDI 降低掉。当前的 mark-up 对除了少数几家以外的所有人都有效。如果那“少数几家”想在 stablecoins 这类 digital assets 上提供 yield,他们应该申请 Bank IDI license,而不是要求 Senate 降低保护美国人民资金的标准。@SenatorTimScott @SenLummis @SenThomTillis @SenateGOP @SenateBanking @patrickjwitt
https://x.com/anthonynoto/status/2040140599752532339
❤️ 256 🔁 15 💬 31
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a heads up to $VELO.

There was a $500M shelf for an ATM / Warrants dilution, which is structurally large relative to its $311m MC.

This was a popular retail X stock for speculated SpaceX, Andruil, and Defense supply chains:

With:

- $32.6M from Department of War
- $11.5M from Defense Primes
- $9.8M from DLA

Contracts all recently (largely positive for the company).

They announced the dilution was for "scaling 400 production systems over the next decade" as well as M&A.

However, I do think this amount relative to MC is pretty predatory, especially with ATMs.

I mentioned earlier companies like $VELO can be strategically sound, but financially, not as much so when I covered the stock earlier. And this is a material risk to always consider.

But, it's good to understand overhang risk if you're still long.

Just a standard heads up risk disclosure since this is a popular name.
$VELO 提个醒。

有一个 $500M shelf,用于 ATM / Warrants dilution,相对它 $311m MC 来说结构性很大。

这是 X 上一个热门 retail stock,大家猜它在 SpaceX、Andruil 和 Defense supply chains 里:

包括:

- 来自 Department of War 的 $32.6M
- 来自 Defense Primes 的 $11.5M
- 来自 DLA 的 $9.8M

这些合同都是最近的(对公司大体正面)。

他们宣布 dilution 是为了 “scaling 400 production systems over the next decade” 以及 M&A。

不过,我确实觉得这个金额相对 MC 来说非常 predatory,尤其是 ATMs。

我之前覆盖这只股票时提过,像 $VELO 这样的公司战略上可能合理,但财务上没那么好。这是始终要考虑的 material risk。

但如果你还在 long,理解 overhang risk 是好事。

只是标准的 heads up risk disclosure,因为这是个热门名字。
❤️ 419 🔁 30 💬 36
打开原推
📝 原创
Who is even writing this?

We don't need more leverage over our allies like Japan, Europe, or South Korea.

We need them over Russia and China.

- In SEA over 40% of gas stations in Laos have closed,
- Cambodia and Thailand have started rationing and price controls
- India, Pakistan and Bangladesh face rising prices and emergency conservation
- SK/Japan remain exposed to disruptions.

China can get just get their oil from Russia. And Russia got their export control removed...

And China is playing arms dealer like what US did in WW1 right now.

Why are we screwing over our own supply chains to help Russia/Israel out?

They're called allies for a reason, and we don't need more leverage over them.

If you really wanted to weaponize this:

-> Secure supply chains first, pour funding into rare earths/precursors like Vietnam/South America and other places.

-> Pour funding into refinery processing from SK/Japan/Canada/US

-> Develop crude/processing in Venezuela First

-> Build out alternative trade route:

Which will take 3-5 years min.

Then you can go blowing stuff up then go threatening European $ASML, Japanese $ARM, US $NVDA, Taiwan $TSM type chokepoints over China/Russia all together.

Again:

America First relies on:

-securing own supply chains in Assembly Thailand,
-Semiconductors in South Korea, -Chemical from Japan,
-Foundries in Taiwan,
-Rare Earths from Canada,
- high-end equipment from Europe

and others to make United States stronger.

Then you weaponize that all together against our enemies.

You can't just blow OUR OWN SUPPLY CHAINS and Relations around the world up then say America is becoming more dominant?
这到底是谁写的?

我们不需要对 Japan、Europe 或 South Korea 这样的盟友有更多 leverage。

我们需要的是对 Russia 和 China 有 leverage。

- 在 SEA,Laos 超过 40% 的 gas stations 已经关闭,
- Cambodia 和 Thailand 已经开始 rationing 和 price controls
- India、Pakistan 和 Bangladesh 面临 rising prices 和 emergency conservation
- SK/Japan 仍暴露在 disruptions 中。

China 可以直接从 Russia 买 oil。而 Russia 的 export control 被取消了……

China 现在正在像 US 在 WW1 时那样扮演 arms dealer。

为什么我们要搞砸自己的 supply chains,去帮 Russia/Israel?

盟友之所以叫盟友是有原因的,我们不需要对他们有更多 leverage。

如果你真的想 weaponize 这个:

-> 先 secure supply chains,把资金投进 Vietnam/South America 等地的 rare earths/precursors。

-> 把资金投进 SK/Japan/Canada/US 的 refinery processing

-> 先在 Venezuela 开发 crude/processing

-> 建设 alternative trade route:

这至少需要 3-5 年。

然后你再去炸东西,再一起用 European $ASML、Japanese $ARM、US $NVDA、Taiwan $TSM 这类 chokepoints 去威胁 China/Russia。

再说一次:

America First 依赖于:

-保障 Thailand 的 Assembly supply chains,
-South Korea 的 Semiconductors,-Japan 的 Chemical,
-Taiwan 的 Foundries,
-Canada 的 Rare Earths,
-Europe 的 high-end equipment

以及其他,让 United States 更强。

然后你把这些一起 weaponize 去对付我们的敌人。

你不能把我们自己的 supply chains 和全球关系炸掉,然后说 America 变得更 dominant?
❤️ 593 🔁 42 💬 59
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
For rare earths/compound semiconductors... Vietnam is probably one of the most important rare earths countries in the world for Western supply chains now.

Especially after China rare earth export controlled Japan / Sumitomo once again this year.

There's actually a decent amount of hidden chokepoints that screws up China's supply chains for baidu/tencent as well in this supply chain?

Not sure why Japan didn't export control these chokepoints back... but I'll publish some soon hopefully to give China a taste of its own medicine.

It's prob the #1 focus area (or should be) as a Country for Western supply chains though.
对于 rare earths/compound semiconductors……Vietnam 现在可能是 Western supply chains 中世界上最重要的 rare earths 国家之一。

尤其是在 China 今年再次对 Japan / Sumitomo 实施 rare earth export control 之后。

其实在这条 supply chain 里,也有相当多 hidden chokepoints 会搞乱 China 给 baidu/tencent 的 supply chains?

不确定为什么 Japan 没有反过来 export control 这些 chokepoints……但希望我很快会发布一些,让 China 也尝尝自己的药。

不过,作为一个国家,它大概率是 Western supply chains 的 #1 focus area(或者应该是)。
❤️ 205 🔁 2 💬 10
打开原推
📝 原创
The most viral story on $RDDT right now:

-> Guy started with $300,000

-> Gets lucky with individual names at April 2025 bottom

-> Runs it up to $3,000,000 and claims they had financial freedom

-> Proceeds to do 0DTE options on $SPY

-> Turned $3M -> $50k.

Usually I give a lesson learned type story but this is just stupid?

Legit stop touching 0dte options.

Even if they full ported it into Jim Cramer’s favorite stock $MRVL, probably would have been $6M in 2-3 years.

The best lesson of generational wealth is looking at Nancy Pelosi.

If you do options, look at how their on $AVGO to $NVDA keep compounding over time.

Not one day windows.
现在 $RDDT 上最火的故事:

-> 一个 guy 从 $300,000 起步

-> 在 2025 年 4 月底部靠个股运气好

-> 做到 $3,000,000,并声称自己已经 financial freedom

-> 接着去做 $SPY 的 0DTE options

-> 把 $3M -> $50k。

通常我会讲 lessons learned,但这个真的只是蠢?

真的别碰 0dte options。

哪怕他 full port 到 Jim Cramer 最喜欢的股票 $MRVL,可能 2-3 年后也会变成 $6M。

generational wealth 最好的课就是看 Nancy Pelosi。

如果你做 options,就看他们在 $AVGO$NVDA 上是怎么随着时间持续 compounding 的。

不是一天窗口。
❤️ 1,085 🔁 50 💬 62
打开原推
📝 原创
I got cited by Bezinga today after I made fun of Jim Cramer.

They included my quote: “Thanks for saving $MSFT Jim”.

But in the title they called me a Meme Trader…

I didn’t know all my longs in AI supply chain bottlenecks from $AXTI to $LITE were memes?

Always appreciate the news coverage though… especially if it’s comments around Cramer on Bezinga or Burry on Yahoo Finance.
我今天因为嘲笑 Jim Cramer 被 Bezinga 引用了。

他们放了我的 quote:“Thanks for saving $MSFT Jim”。

但标题里他们叫我 Meme Trader……

我都不知道我从 $AXTI$LITE 这些 AI supply chain bottlenecks 的 longs 原来都是 memes?

不过还是感谢新闻报道……尤其是 Bezinga 上关于 Cramer,或者 Yahoo Finance 上关于 Burry 的评论。
❤️ 544 🔁 14 💬 54
打开原推
💬 引用
I just realized… hit 5,118.02% returns last week.

5000%+ not too bad in <2 years?

Hard to keep up with $5 footlong sandwich inflation even after front running:

-> $MSTR for halving
-> $RKLB and $HOOD for space/fintech rally
-> $GOOGL and $TSM for large cap rally
-> Samsung, SK Hynix, Asian equities for memory
-> $LITE, $AXTI, and $COHR for EML/photonics
-> $SOI, $SIVE, $AEHR, $TSEM, Win for CW/SiPH/CPO.

Some side quests here and there with Venezuelan natural resource companies and drones (that didn’t turn out as well).

But generally market read has been decent so far on what’s coming next.

And I do think scale up photonics is next, especially focusing on CW laser companies, substrates, testing and foundries.
我刚意识到……上周收益率到了 5,118.02%。

不到 2 年 5000%+ 还不错?

即使提前埋伏了这些,也很难跟上 $5 footlong sandwich inflation:

-> $MSTR for halving
-> $RKLB$HOOD for space/fintech rally
-> $GOOGL$TSM for large cap rally
-> Samsung、SK Hynix、Asian equities for memory
-> $LITE$AXTI$COHR for EML/photonics
-> $SOI$SIVE$AEHR$TSEM、Win for CW/SiPH/CPO。

中间还有一些 Venezuelan natural resource companies 和 drones 的 side quests(结果没那么好)。

但总体来说,对下一步会发生什么的 market read 到目前还不错。

我确实认为 scale up photonics 是下一个,尤其聚焦 CW laser companies、substrates、testing 和 foundries。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Modest +1,124.09% return over the past year.

Anon, only a few years left to escape the permanent underclass due to AI?

OpenAI raising $122B is enough to fuel the rally for another 2 years.

And new supercycles from photonics < $SIVE to $AAOI >, testing with $AEHR, $NBIS DCs, and advanced packing from $AMKR to $POET.

Is just getting started.
过去一年 modest +1,124.09% 回报。

Anon,AI 造成的永久底层化,只剩几年时间可以逃了?

OpenAI 融资 $122B,足够再给这轮行情续 2 年燃料。

而来自 photonics < $SIVE$AAOI >、$AEHR 测试、$NBIS DCs,以及从 $AMKR$POET 的 advanced packing 新 supercycles。

才刚刚开始。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2039248989946794374
❤️ 1,162 🔁 52 💬 102
打开原推
📝 原创
I still find it interesting you can disrupt the trillion dollar Western AI Buildout…

For a total price tag of ~$600m.

Can anyone guess the companies? https://t.co/GvardDu5bN
我还是觉得很有意思,你可以扰乱万亿美元级 Western AI Buildout……

总价格标签只要 ~$600m。

有人能猜到是哪几家公司吗? https://t.co/GvardDu5bN
❤️ 453 🔁 9 💬 78
打开原推
💬 引用
Aside from Snapchat, maybe…

$ASST, $IREN, $BKKT?

There happens to be a common denominator sitting on Iren’s Board of Directors.

Famous for dumping excessive ATMs on retail investors. https://t.co/qGCWsGIGXD
除了 Snapchat,也许……

$ASST$IREN$BKKT

Iren 的 Board of Directors 上刚好有一个共同点。

以向 retail investors 倾倒过度 ATMs 而出名。 https://t.co/qGCWsGIGXD
引用原推@thogge
@stockgeekTV @IrenicCap @RandianCapital @BoxLongs Has any company in the history of capitalism ever been ran as focused on enriching the insiders at the expense of external shareholders more than this one?
@stockgeekTV @IrenicCap @RandianCapital @BoxLongs 在资本主义历史上,有哪家公司比这家公司更专注于让内部人发财、牺牲外部股东利益吗?
https://x.com/thogge/status/2039846458619490681
❤️ 363 🔁 16 💬 61
打开原推
💬 引用
Serenity's Followers Favorite Stock Parabolic Growth ETF:

The most anticipated ETF of all time:

$TRT - $5.88
$HGRAF - $4.49
$SIVE - 9.9 SEK
$QURE - $17.21
$AEHR - $45.08
$ENVX - $5.07
$ASPI - $4.2
$EONR - $11.79
$LPK.DE - 6.59 EUR
$MITK - $13.9
$EQR.AX - .315 AUD
$WATT - $15.8
$VLN - $1.16
$BZAI - $1.79
$TMC - $4.59
$ALCJ - $74.57
$POET - $6.11
$AAOI - $108.86
$ADUR - $10.37
$P4O.DE - 6.85 EUR
$PLAB - $40.87
$FLY - $33.16
$LASR - $60.7
$AL2SI - 28.70 EUR
$ENAFF - $1.71
$VPG - $44.7
$EOS.AX - $9.00

I haven't heard of 1/3rd of these names, but if my followers have high conviction that their name will 10x...

So do I.
Serenity's Followers Favorite Stock Parabolic Growth ETF:

史上最受期待 ETF:

$TRT - $5.88
$HGRAF - $4.49
$SIVE - 9.9 SEK
$QURE - $17.21
$AEHR - $45.08
$ENVX - $5.07
$ASPI - $4.2
$EONR - $11.79
$LPK.DE - 6.59 EUR
$MITK - $13.9
$EQR.AX - .315 AUD
$WATT - $15.8
$VLN - $1.16
$BZAI - $1.79
$TMC - $4.59
$ALCJ - $74.57
$POET - $6.11
$AAOI - $108.86
$ADUR - $10.37
$P4O.DE - 6.85 EUR
$PLAB - $40.87
$FLY - $33.16
$LASR - $60.7
$AL2SI - 28.70 EUR
$ENAFF - $1.71
$VPG - $44.7
$EOS.AX - $9.00

这里面 1/3 的名字我都没听过,但如果我的 followers 对自己的名字能 10x 有 high conviction……

那我也有。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Okay chat. I'm curious what your thoughts are on the next 1350%+ 1Y return $SNDK or 2918% 1Y return $AXTI.

If you have to choose 1 very high conviction, hyperbolic growth stock...

What would it be and why?
Okay chat。我很好奇你们怎么看下一个 1Y +1350% 的 $SNDK,或者 1Y +2918% 的 $AXTI

如果必须选 1 只超高 conviction、双曲线增长的股票……

你会选哪只,为什么?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2039685700044628243
❤️ 1,384 🔁 113 💬 85
打开原推
📝 原创
If you want exposure to memory, $DRAM is a genuinely great ETF.

I normally don't praise ETFs, but this is solid.

1. $MU - 24.63%
2. Samsung - 24.11%
3. SK Hynix - 23.08%
4. $SNDK - 4.9%
5. Kioxia - 4.86%
6. $WDC - 4.77%
7. Nanya - 3.89%
8. Winbond - 2.4%

Disclosure: Friends over at @roundhill did reach out about the launch, but I'm not getting paid to say this (just in case you think this random post is sponsored, it's not).

Just a genuinely great ETF for memory exposure if you don't have access to foreign stocks.

And I’d encourage more institutions to make ETFs like this.
如果你想要 memory exposure,$DRAM 真的是一个很棒的 ETF。

我通常不夸 ETFs,但这个很扎实。

1. $MU - 24.63%
2. Samsung - 24.11%
3. SK Hynix - 23.08%
4. $SNDK - 4.9%
5. Kioxia - 4.86%
6. $WDC - 4.77%
7. Nanya - 3.89%
8. Winbond - 2.4%

Disclosure:@roundhill 的朋友确实就 launch 联系过我,但我不是收钱说这个(以防你觉得这个 random post 是 sponsored,它不是)。

如果你不能买 foreign stocks,这就是一个真正很棒的 memory exposure ETF。

我也鼓励更多机构做这种 ETFs。
❤️ 1,733 🔁 162 💬 93
打开原推
📝 原创
Applied Optoelectronics ( $AAOI ) said it received a new $71 million order from its hyperscaler customer today.

The orders flowing in are endless.

If they become the largest 800G/1.6T capacity in the US and optical demand does take off.

The revenue translation would be pretty insane.
Applied Optoelectronics( $AAOI )今天表示,它从 hyperscaler customer 那里收到了一笔新的 $71 million order。

订单源源不断。

如果他们成为美国最大的 800G/1.6T capacity,而且 optical demand 真的起飞。

收入转化会非常疯狂。
❤️ 668 🔁 47 💬 42
打开原推
📝 原创
$420 looks inevitable on $AEHR.

Maybe 2 years?

Don’t think I’ve seen so many hyperscalers or AI companies qualifying a small $1.1B company before?

Last time was $AAOI back at $25 and now it’s $104 a few months later. https://t.co/PaYZoCmMNl
$AEHR 上 $420 看起来不可避免。

也许 2 年?

我不觉得我以前见过这么多 hyperscalers 或 AI companies 同时 qualifying 一家小小 $1.1B 公司?

上一次是 $AAOI 在 $25 的时候,几个月后现在 $104。 https://t.co/PaYZoCmMNl
❤️ 1,506 🔁 137 💬 98
打开原推
💬 引用
And... $AAOI +25.43% from $81 -> $101.26 off no material news.

Maybe the Edgewater comment about "optical demand growing exponentially" helped a bit too.

But few lessons to learn:

- don't live on borrowed conviction.
- Jane Street adds unnecessary volatility.
- If you can't sleep at night, you're sizing portfolio concentration wrong.

It's unfortunate when retail liquidates their positions at the bottom for no fundamental reason. Then on the way back up, they no longer have positions.

Could always keep ping ponging between $80 and $120, who knows.

But mid-long term, I have conviction $AAOI can execute, should be worth much higher than the current MC.
然后……$AAOI 在没有 material news 的情况下,从 $81 -> $101.26,涨 +25.43%。

也许 Edgewater 关于 “optical demand growing exponentially” 的评论也有点帮助。

但有几点 lessons:

- 不要靠 borrowed conviction 活着。
- Jane Street 会增加不必要的 volatility。
- 如果你晚上睡不着,那就是 portfolio concentration sizing 错了。

散户在没有 fundamental reason 的情况下,在底部清仓很可惜。然后反弹时,他们已经没有仓位了。

它也可能一直在 $80 和 $120 之间 ping pong,谁知道。

但中长期,我有 conviction $AAOI 可以 execute,应该比当前 MC 值高得多。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
And... this is why I don't like Jane Street owning the same stocks I do like $AAOI.

They trade volatility, especially with retail favorite names and trigger stop losses/panic.

If you know what you own though:

$6.69B for a US company that makes the entire transceiver supply chain:

From Laser -> Design -> Assembly.

With likely $MSFT, $AMZN, $ORCL buying anything they can make, is a steal for me personally.

With high beta stocks, it's really important to build conviction and manage sizing correctly before entering a trade.

Otherwise you'll end up capitulating the bottom and buying the top over and over.
这就是为什么我不喜欢 Jane Street 持有我也喜欢的股票,比如 $AAOI

他们交易波动,尤其是散户热门票,还会触发止损/恐慌。

但如果你知道自己持有什么:

一家美国公司,能做完整 transceiver 供应链:

从 Laser -> Design -> Assembly。

而且 $MSFT$AMZN$ORCL 很可能会买光他们能生产的一切,$6.69B 对我个人来说就是便宜。

高 beta 股票里,进场前建立 conviction 并正确管理仓位真的很重要。

否则你会一次又一次在底部割肉、顶部买入。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2038617810738520159
❤️ 584 🔁 36 💬 50
打开原推
📝 原创
Lightcounting: "This is not a typo"

Optical interconnects has a reasonable chance to reach $100B+ by 2030 from ~$19B (2025).

If you're looking for my favorite names:

Compounders: $MRVL, $SMTC
CW Lasers: $SIVE, $MTSI, $AAOI
Foundries $TSEM, Win Semi
Substrates/Epitaxy: $AXTI, $SOI, $IQE
Gold Standard: $LITE, $COHR

The next TAM expansion multiplier is CPO/Scale Up, largely driven by SiPh and external CW lasers.
Lightcounting:“This is not a typo”

Optical interconnects 有合理机会从 ~$19B(2025)到 2030 年达到 $100B+。

如果你在找我最喜欢的名字:

Compounders:$MRVL, $SMTC
CW Lasers:$SIVE, $MTSI, $AAOI
Foundries $TSEM, Win Semi
Substrates/Epitaxy:$AXTI, $SOI, $IQE
Gold Standard:$LITE, $COHR

下一个 TAM expansion multiplier 是 CPO/Scale Up,主要由 SiPh 和 external CW lasers 驱动。
❤️ 845 🔁 100 💬 43
打开原推
📝 原创
Okay chat. I'm curious what your thoughts are on the next 1350%+ 1Y return $SNDK or 2918% 1Y return $AXTI.

If you have to choose 1 very high conviction, hyperbolic growth stock...

What would it be and why?
好,chat。我很好奇你们怎么看下一个 1Y return 1350%+ 的 $SNDK,或者 1Y return 2918% 的 $AXTI

如果你必须选 1 个 high conviction、hyperbolic growth stock……

你会选什么,为什么?
❤️ 661 🔁 27 💬 174
打开原推
📝 原创
It still baffles me how people are still “Buying the Dip” on $IREN.

Amid their $6,000,0000,000 ATM, diluted and sold into the open market.

Thinking that it will increase their share price.

While $NBIS was able to differentiate themselves and secure more hyperscaler deals + $NVDA backing.

$IREN GW raw asset moat they had two years ago is now almost gone.

It’s hard to see the stock appreciating much in value when $6,000,000,000 of structural dilution works against you in every rally.

Better to wait after current shareholders get diluted first before going long.
我还是很震惊,为什么还有人在 $IREN 上“Buying the Dip”。

在他们 $6,000,0000,000 ATM、被 diluted 并卖进公开市场的情况下。

还以为这会提高他们的股价。

与此同时,$NBIS 已经能把自己区分出来,拿到更多 hyperscaler deals + $NVDA backing。

$IREN 两年前拥有的 GW raw asset moat 现在几乎没了。

当 $6,000,000,000 的结构性 dilution 在每次 rally 中都和你作对时,很难看到股价有太多升值。

更好的做法是等当前 shareholders 先被 diluted 完,再去 long。
❤️ 755 🔁 37 💬 151
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a gentle reminder:

$AAOI expects to have the largest production capacity of 1.6T optical transceivers in America.

Just as optical TAM is expected to ramp to $100B in a bull case (Lightcounting).

AOI: “We expect that we will soon have the largest production capacity for … 1.6T transceivers in the US” from their former ER transcript.

They expect shipments to begin Q3 of 2026 and projected $378M / month capacity starting H2 2027, which is $4.35B annualized if hyperscalers buy anything they make.

We’re in H1 of 2026, so it’s a tad early to be panicking from market volatility.

Since AOI does the entire supply chain from InP laser fab, design, and assembly all captive.

And especially in the USA + Taiwan operations that they’re reshoring (rather than sourcing to China/Malaysia/Thailand)

Markets miss this part especially:

-> They have TAM expansion optionality for ELS to merchant models in any parts of their vertically integrated supply chain.

$AAOI is trading at $6.4B largely because of execution uncertainty and macro. And execution will always be an speculative overhang until it comes time to deliver.

But if there’s any indication that they hit their targets and macro clears up, we probably won’t see current valuations again.
温和提醒一下:

$AAOI 预计会拥有美国最大的 1.6T optical transceivers 产能。

而 optical TAM 在 bull case 下预计会 ramp 到 $100B(Lightcounting)。

AOI 在之前 ER transcript 里说:“We expect that we will soon have the largest production capacity for … 1.6T transceivers in the US”

他们预计 2026 Q3 开始 shipments,并预计从 2027 H2 开始达到 $378M / month capacity,如果 hyperscalers 买下他们生产的任何东西,那就是年化 $4.35B。

我们现在在 2026 H1,所以因为 market volatility 就恐慌有点早。

因为 AOI 从 InP laser fab、design 到 assembly,整条 supply chain 都是 captive。

尤其是在他们正在 reshoring 的 USA + Taiwan operations(而不是 sourcing 到 China/Malaysia/Thailand)。

市场尤其错过了这部分:

-> 他们在 vertically integrated supply chain 的任何环节,都有从 ELS 到 merchant models 的 TAM expansion optionality。

$AAOI 交易在 $6.4B,主要是因为 execution uncertainty 和 macro。execution 在交付时间到来前永远会是 speculative overhang。

但如果有任何迹象显示他们达成目标,而且 macro 也转好,我们可能再也看不到当前估值。
❤️ 575 🔁 56 💬 23
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So lightcounting went out to say $100B TAM for optical components for bull case by 2030.

Few helpful to take away, and they got some things wrong but TLDR:

-> 800g/older transceivers overbought now actually, from hoarding. But it's "high-end shortage, low-end glut".

But lightcounting summary conflated inp laser capacity with assembled transcivers though since EML still bottlenecked until 2028 from $LITE OFC conference.

-> Switch ASICs bottlenecked, and OCS is becoming more adopted, so $LITE is a massive beneficiary of course

-> hard shift to 1.6t/3.2t, LPO/CPO. DSP segments like $MRVL net negative and shifts to $MTSI. But Marvell is pivoting too so not as bad?

-> 800G and older are oversupplied apparently? So anyone manufacturing newer gens 1.6T -> 3.2T is where it's heading since you need to buy them for rubin and new nvidia gens.

-> everyone is transitioning to CPO and direct SiPH.

-> The $100B TAM happens via SiPh and external CW lasers. So that entire TAM multiplier to $100B from scale up largely benefits companies fabbing raw CW light engines imo.

That's why I picked Win semi, $SIVE for pure CW lasers transition for 1.6t/3.2t and CPO because it's going to hurt others more than new pure play players if hyperscalers stop orders for 800g/older transcivers.

So pure CW lasers, SiPh, and LPO drivers for next generation, if you can find pure play the better so they won't get dragged down if hyperscalers pause orders for older/current gen transcievers.
所以 lightcounting 出来说,到 2030 年 optical components 的 bull case TAM 是 $100B。

有几点有用的 takeaway,他们也有些地方搞错了,但 TLDR:

-> 800g/older transceivers 现在其实因为 hoarding 被买太多了。但这是“high-end shortage, low-end glut”。

不过 lightcounting summary 把 inp laser capacity 和 assembled transceivers 混在一起了,因为从 $LITE OFC conference 看,EML 到 2028 仍然 bottlenecked。

-> Switch ASICs bottlenecked,而且 OCS 正在被更多采用,所以 $LITE 当然是巨大受益者

-> 硬切到 1.6t/3.2t、LPO/CPO。像 $MRVL 这样的 DSP segments net negative,并转向 $MTSI。但 Marvell 也在 pivot,所以没那么糟?

-> 800G 和更老的东西显然 oversupplied?所以制造新一代 1.6T -> 3.2T 的地方才是方向,因为 rubin 和新的 nvidia gens 都需要买这些。

-> 所有人都在转向 CPO 和 direct SiPH。

-> $100B TAM 是通过 SiPh 和 external CW lasers 实现的。所以 imo,从 scale up 到 $100B 的整个 TAM multiplier,主要受益的是 fabbing raw CW light engines 的公司。

这就是为什么我选 Win semi、$SIVE 作为 1.6t/3.2t 和 CPO 的 pure CW lasers transition,因为如果 hyperscalers 停止 800g/older transceivers 订单,它对其他人的伤害会比对新的 pure play players 更大。

所以,pure CW lasers、SiPh 和 LPO 是下一代驱动因素,如果你能找到 pure play 越好,这样 hyperscalers 暂停旧/当前代 transceivers 订单时,它们不会被拖累。
❤️ 141 🔁 5 💬 12
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
I've been talking about $LASR, $EOS.AX for energy directed weapons.

You can shoot down drones/missiles. For the cost of a a dollar or two with laser beams.

Turns out if you can shoot down drones... You can shoot down mosquitoes too? "Detecting mosquitoes with LiDAR and eliminate them with lasers"

Bill Gates also funded something called "Photonic Fence"

"The Photonic Fence monitors insects in flight and eliminates those identified as targets by shooting them down with a micro-burst of laser energy. The Photonic Fence also holds the potential to create entirely new methods of entomological study."

Just thought this was interesting, so many random use cases of photonics.
我一直在聊 $LASR$EOS.AX 的 energy directed weapons。

你可以用 laser beams 以一两美元的成本击落 drones/missiles。

结果如果你能击落 drones……你也能击落 mosquitoes?“Detecting mosquitoes with LiDAR and eliminate them with lasers”

Bill Gates 也资助过一个叫 “Photonic Fence” 的东西

“The Photonic Fence monitors insects in flight and eliminates those identified as targets by shooting them down with a micro-burst of laser energy. The Photonic Fence also holds the potential to create entirely new methods of entomological study.”

只是觉得这很有意思,photonics 有太多 random use cases。
❤️ 169 🔁 1 💬 17
打开原推
📝 原创
Does Trump know…

He just blew up the world’s energy supply chains for attempting wack-a-mole with Iranian leadership?

It’s not just about “US is fine”.

Guess where all the upstream precursors, advanced semiconductors, and others are made?

Almost nothing is actually “Made in America” yet.

We completely rely on all our partners from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia, Korea for rare earths to foundries.

The clear beneficiaries of this War:

1. Israel
2. Russia

Maybe even Iran long term since they can use China to rebuild infrastructure and they’re richer from oil / tariffs on the strait.

We’re supposed to be strengthening all our allies, not ******* them over to help Russia and Israel.

Harsh reality is “America First” policy also includes securing America’s global supply chains.

It’s still not too late:

But you can’t just blow up the rest of the world’s energy trade, then just go out and say US alone is fine.
Trump 知不知道……

他为了对 Iranian leadership 玩 wack-a-mole,刚把世界 energy supply chains 炸了?

这不只是“US is fine”的问题。

猜猜所有 upstream precursors、advanced semiconductors 等都是在哪里做的?

几乎没有东西现在真的 “Made in America”。

我们完全依赖 Japan、Taiwan、Malaysia、Korea 等所有 partners,从 rare earths 到 foundries 都是。

这场 War 的明确受益者:

1. Israel
2. Russia

也许长期来看甚至 Iran 也受益,因为他们可以用 China 重建 infrastructure,而且通过 oil / strait tariffs 变得更有钱。

我们本该加强所有盟友,而不是为了帮 Russia 和 Israel 去搞砸他们。

残酷现实是,“America First” policy 也包括保障 America 的 global supply chains。

现在还不算太晚:

但你不能把世界其他地区的 energy trade 炸掉,然后出来说 US alone is fine。
❤️ 892 🔁 68 💬 84
打开原推
📝 原创
$AEHR looks extremely promising at ~$1.1B MC.

Aehr is starting to remind me of an early $TER, mixed with pre-earnings $AAOI.

If we look at the timeline and speculated customers:

Feb 11th: Sonoma production win for Hyperscaler's AI ASIC processors. (likely $GOOGL, $AMZN, $META).

- Probably Google? Aehr bought Incal, who was speculated to be used by Google for their TPUs.

Feb 26th: $14 million from AI lead customer (likely $AMD, $NVDA)

- Probably $AMD here for Instinct MI300/MI400.

March 3rd: Lead silicon photonics customer for one FOX-XP system (likely $INTC siph)

- Very likely $INTC has been their lead customer.

March 31st: Initial order from major new silicon photonics customer (likely $AVGO, $MRVL, $CSCO )

- New customer (rules out Intel), prob one of these transitioning to 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers

(All speculative, very confidential BOM)

Regardless. This timeline is just bottling up for $AEHR.

Could be next earnings. Or two quarters from now.

But feels like a matter of time before we see mass orders.
$AEHR 在 ~$1.1B MC 看起来极有前景。

Aehr 开始让我想起早期 $TER,混合 pre-earnings $AAOI

如果看 timeline 和推测客户:

Feb 11th:Sonoma production win,用于 Hyperscaler's AI ASIC processors。(可能是 $GOOGL$AMZN$META)。

- 可能是 Google?Aehr 买了 Incal,而 Incal 被猜测用于 Google 的 TPUs。

Feb 26th:来自 AI lead customer 的 $14 million(可能是 $AMD$NVDA

- 这里可能是 $AMD,用于 Instinct MI300/MI400。

March 3rd:Lead silicon photonics customer 订购一套 FOX-XP system(可能是 $INTC siph)

- 很可能 $INTC 一直是他们的 lead customer。

March 31st:来自 major new silicon photonics customer 的初始订单(可能是 $AVGO$MRVL$CSCO

- New customer(排除 Intel),可能是其中一家正在转向 800G/1.6T silicon photonics transceivers 的公司

(全是 speculative,非常 confidential BOM)

无论如何,这条 timeline 正在为 $AEHR 蓄力。

可能是下次 earnings。也可能是两个季度后。

但感觉看到 mass orders 只是时间问题。
❤️ 714 🔁 70 💬 56
打开原推
💬 引用
Why do I have my own hate watch community now?

Stock like $AXTI climbs 400% in the past 4 months.

-&gt; Corrects by 14%.

Salty commenter months later: "Get cooked" https://t.co/gfdVanYG43
为什么我现在有自己的 hate watch community 了?

$AXTI 这种股票过去 4 个月涨了 400%。

-> 回调 14%。

几个月后的酸评论:“Get cooked” https://t.co/gfdVanYG43
引用原推@herbgreenberg
If you missed my take on $AXTI the other day, 'tis here. https://t.co/fE2dEDTMbO Seems I may have just been scratching the surface...!
如果你错过了我前几天对 $AXTI 的看法,在这里。https://t.co/fE2dEDTMbO 看起来我可能只是刚刚摸到表面……!
https://x.com/herbgreenberg/status/2039382548657447273
❤️ 609 🔁 16 💬 90
打开原推
📝 原创
$NKE is a good lesson to trust your real life instincts.

- If you see everyone wearing Oncloud / new balance shoes instead of Nike

- You see everyone wearing vuori or lululemon shorts instead of Nike

- Even Uniqlo / GU for casual/athletic wear instead of Nike

Then the only place you see Nike are at your local Walmart or Ross discount stores.

Nike has definitely lost its “cool factor” and when the stock is at 26 fwd p/e, maybe there’s better longs out there.
$NKE 是一个相信现实生活直觉的好课。

- 如果你看到大家都穿 Oncloud / new balance shoes,而不是 Nike

- 你看到大家都穿 vuori 或 lululemon shorts,而不是 Nike

- 甚至 casual/athletic wear 也穿 Uniqlo / GU,而不是 Nike

然后你唯一看到 Nike 的地方,是本地 Walmart 或 Ross discount stores。

Nike 绝对已经失去了它的 “cool factor”,而当股票还在 26 fwd p/e,也许外面有更好的 longs。
❤️ 1,580 🔁 77 💬 242
打开原推
📝 原创
OpenAI is the tech equivalent of Iran.

They would have caused so much contagion - like Iran sending drones to all their neighbors - with funding they didn’t have….

From $MSFT compute backlog, $ORCL Stargate, $AMD deals, $NVDA deals, $CRWV deals, $AMZN deals. SoftBank deals.

Deals with private companies like Cerebras and many others.

So much so, that if they went down, so would a huge part of what gave these companies their valuations.

OpenAI raised a whopping $122B, my guess is partly weaponizing this contagion like what Iran is doing to the Strait.

So now the AI capex spend rally is likely to last another 1 year min.

They’re the first to start the AI rally; and if they go under, at this point they’ll be the one to pop the bubble.
OpenAI 是科技界的 Iran。

他们本来会造成这么多 contagion,就像 Iran 向所有邻国派 drones 一样,用他们并没有的钱……

$MSFT compute backlog、$ORCL Stargate、$AMD deals、$NVDA deals、$CRWV deals、$AMZN deals。SoftBank deals。

还有和 Cerebras 等很多 private companies 的 deals。

多到如果他们倒下,支撑这些公司估值的一大部分也会倒。

OpenAI 融了惊人的 $122B,我猜部分是在像 Iran 对 Strait 做的那样 weaponizing this contagion。

所以现在 AI capex spend rally 很可能至少再持续 1 年。

他们是第一个开启 AI rally 的;如果他们倒下,到这个阶段他们也会是戳破泡沫的那个。
❤️ 347 🔁 18 💬 30
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
I’ve been thinking… energy directed weapons are the future since it’s too expensive to keep shooting down drones with missiles.

You have infinite ammo that costs like $1 to shoot.

If you want to big brain this, maybe there’s opportunity in anti-energy directed lasers for drones companies?

Like with HPMs:

“Replacing internal copper wiring with fiber optics eliminates this vulnerability” for how HPMs work targeting copper inside drones.

Better to invest in laser stuff but this is just a fun idea
我一直在想……energy directed weapons 是未来,因为一直用 missiles 击落 drones 太贵了。

你有无限 ammo,每次发射成本大概 $1。

如果你想 big brain 一下,也许 drones companies 的 anti-energy directed lasers 里有机会?

比如 HPMs:

“Replacing internal copper wiring with fiber optics eliminates this vulnerability”,这是 HPMs targeting drones 内部 copper 的工作方式。

投资 laser stuff 更好,不过这只是个好玩的想法。
❤️ 209 🔁 1 💬 34
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Looking more into $MRVL photonics ecosystem.

Apparently optical interposers through $POET is manufactured by SilTerra Malaysia?

POET Infinity / Teralight (EMLs for 1.6T): Mitsubishi Electric.

Next architecture for CW: Starlight and Blazar: that's $SIVE (already established)

SilTerra connection was awhile ago... not sure if it's still around but name caught me eye.

It's owned by some random company in Malaysia: Dagang Nexchange Bhd $233m MC, so financials are gonna be messy, Foxconn owns 5% of this.

Anyone hear about this foundry before?

Parent level accounting is gonna be a mess but this silicon photonics foundry caught my eye.
继续看 $MRVL photonics ecosystem。

显然通过 $POET 的 optical interposers 是由 SilTerra Malaysia 制造的?

POET Infinity / Teralight(1.6T 的 EMLs):Mitsubishi Electric。

下一代 CW 架构:Starlight 和 Blazar:那就是 $SIVE(已经确定)

SilTerra connection 是一阵子以前的事……不确定是否还存在,但这个名字引起了我的注意。

它由 Malaysia 一家 random company 拥有:Dagang Nexchange Bhd,$233m MC,所以 financials 会很乱,Foxconn 持有 5%。

有人听说过这个 foundry 吗?

Parent level accounting 会很乱,但这个 silicon photonics foundry 引起了我的注意。
❤️ 128 🔁 2 💬 15
打开原推
📝 原创
Something that markets are finally starting to realize:

Downstream: $NVDA invested $2B into $MRVL Celestial CPO program:

$POET (Celestial’s Interposers): To ship 30,000 optical engines to ship this year from earnings today.

$SIVE is the light source of Poet and Celestial for near/mid term Marvell photonics roadmap.

Win Semi is the foundry for InP CW laser production.

And even more upstream: $SOI / $AXTI for substrates and $IQE for epiwafers.

This is the very start of the next photonics supercycle, at dirt cheap valuations.

And it’s happening earlier than markets and institutions expected in 2026, with Nvidia frontrunning this entire shift.

99.9% of people see the changes happening downstream with Marvell, but don’t realize yet where the supply shocks will happen upstream.
市场终于开始意识到的一件事:

Downstream:$NVDA$MRVL Celestial CPO program 投资 $2B:

$POET(Celestial’s Interposers):根据今天 earnings,今年将出货 30,000 optical engines。

$SIVE 是 Poet 和 Celestial 在近/中期 Marvell photonics roadmap 中的 light source。

Win Semi 是 InP CW laser production 的 foundry。

再往上游:$SOI / $AXTI 做 substrates,$IQE 做 epiwafers。

这是下一个 photonics supercycle 的最开始,而且估值便宜到离谱。

它在 2026 年发生得比市场和机构预期更早,Nvidia 正在 frontrun 整个转变。

99.9% 的人看到的是 Marvell 这个 downstream 的变化,但还没意识到 supply shocks 会在 upstream 哪里发生。
❤️ 551 🔁 50 💬 30
打开原推
📝 原创
Modest +1,124.09% return over the past year.

Anon, only a few years left to escape the permanent underclass due to AI?

OpenAI raising $122B is enough to fuel the rally for another 2 years.

And new supercycles from photonics < $SIVE to $AAOI >, testing with $AEHR, $NBIS DCs, and advanced packing from $AMKR to $POET.

Is just getting started.
过去一年 modest +1,124.09% return。

Anon,因为 AI,距离 escape the permanent underclass 只剩几年了?

OpenAI 融 $122B 足以再为 rally 提供 2 年燃料。

而来自 photonics < $SIVE$AAOI >、$AEHR 的 testing、$NBIS DCs,以及从 $AMKR$POET 的 advanced packing 的新 supercycles。

才刚刚开始。
❤️ 1,346 🔁 66 💬 99
打开原推
📝 原创
I still can't believe I’m probably the #1 most subscribed to finance account on X now?

8,000+ subscribers is an insane number. Thank you for validating my ideas.

What a crazy timeline!

Going from getting temp-banned on $RDDT after Mods kept censoring my $RKLB Pokemon TA posts at $20...

To now having institutions copytrading my thoughts on photonics bottlenecks.
我还是不敢相信,我现在可能已经是 X 上 finance account 里 #1 most subscribed?

8,000+ subscribers 是个疯狂的数字。感谢大家验证我的 ideas。

真是 crazy timeline!

从我在 $RDDT 上因为 Mods 一直 censor 我 $20 的 $RKLB Pokemon TA posts 而被 temp-banned……

到现在有 institutions copytrading 我对 photonics bottlenecks 的想法。
❤️ 959 🔁 8 💬 84
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Found a new monopoly/duopoly company similar to $AXTI in the upstream inp substrate creation process.

Think if it went down it would cause a similar catastrophe to $COHR, $LITE and others.

Doing more research rn.
发现了一家新的 monopoly/duopoly company,类似 $AXTI,但处在 upstream inp substrate creation process 里。

我觉得如果它出问题,会对 $COHR$LITE 等造成类似灾难。

现在正在做更多研究。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Supply chain list for substrate chokepoint

The thing $AXTI does differently is they vertically integrate 4 different chokepoints under 1 supply chain.

I think $COHR or US is going to go on a vertical integration buying spree or capacity securing spree due to $AXTI.

There's some very, very, very niche chokepoints in the InP substrate supply chain (as upstream as you can go)

Talked about $VNP (TSX) and others for Gallium, Indium, Arsenic, and Phosphorus (extraction/processing)

Then you need
-> pBN Crucibles
eg. Poly-InP & B₂O₃
-> Baking the Poly-InP in the crucible
-> InP substrate Just random parts in the synthesis process, I think there's some Sumitomo/AXTI level chokepoints out there outside of captive AXT.

Doing research into those areas now and seeing if there's any good long opportunities... one of the most nche parts of the supply chain, think there might be some hidden gems that US supply chains desperately need.

So: L1 Vital/5n/indium corp(private)/sumitomo/jinmei (axt)
L2: pbn, Momentive, BoYu (private), shin etsu, morgan advanced materials
L3: Tomiyama, Rasa, Dignten, Furukawa
L4: Sumitomo, AXT, $COHR, JX, that people know.

Then prob there's even more niche stuff inside each company that markets might not discover? just putting out ideas.

Basically the West needs to stitch together an $AXTI supply chain for West only ASAP so if you find a monopoly outside, its gonna be highly valuable.
substrate 瓶颈供应链清单

$AXTI 不一样的地方在于,它把 4 个不同瓶颈垂直整合进同一条供应链。

我觉得 $COHR 或美国会因为 $AXTI 开启一轮垂直整合收购潮,或者抢产能潮。

InP substrate 供应链里有一些非常、非常、非常小众的瓶颈(已经是最上游了)。

之前聊过 $VNP(TSX)和其他 Gallium、Indium、Arsenic、Phosphorus(开采/加工)。

然后你需要
-> pBN Crucibles
比如 Poly-InP & B₂O₃
-> 在 crucible 里烘 Poly-InP
-> InP substrate 只是合成流程里一些随机环节,我觉得除了 captive AXT 之外,还有一些 Sumitomo/AXTI 级别的瓶颈。

现在正在研究这些领域,看有没有好的 long 机会……这是供应链里最小众的部分之一,感觉可能有一些美国供应链极度需要的隐藏宝石。

所以:L1 Vital/5n/indium corp(private)/sumitomo/jinmei (axt)
L2: pbn, Momentive, BoYu (private), shin etsu, morgan advanced materials
L3: Tomiyama, Rasa, Dignten, Furukawa
L4: Sumitomo, AXT, $COHR, JX,这些大家知道。

然后每家公司里面可能还有更小众、市场还没发现的东西?只是抛一些想法。

基本上,西方需要 ASAP 拼出一条只服务西方的 $AXTI 供应链,所以如果你在外面找到某个垄断环节,它会非常有价值。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2038904934423548236
❤️ 383 🔁 2 💬 48
打开原推
📝 原创
The War is finally over?

$MSFT to $META has largely crashed due to Macro, and we might see a recovery if this plays out.

Trump: "We'll be leaving very soon," he told reporters in the White House's Oval Office, adding ​that the exit could take place

"Within ​two weeks, maybe two weeks, maybe ⁠three."

This is following Iran's President to end the War, giving the US an Offramp:

"Expresses 'Necessary Will' to End War with US and Israel, Seeks Assurance Against Recurrence of Aggression"

It's likely a back channel deal if this date is said with this much confidence.

I wouldn't try and fade this rally.
War 终于结束了?

$MSFT$META 基本都因为 Macro 崩了,如果这件事兑现,我们可能会看到 recovery。

Trump:“We'll be leaving very soon,” 他在 White House 的 Oval Office 对记者说,并补充说退出可能发生在

“Within two weeks, maybe two weeks, maybe three.”

这是在 Iran's President 表示要结束 War、给 US 一个 Offramp 之后:

“Expresses 'Necessary Will' to End War with US and Israel, Seeks Assurance Against Recurrence of Aggression”

如果这个日期说得这么有信心,很可能是 back channel deal。

我不会试图 fade this rally。
❤️ 344 🔁 15 💬 46
打开原推

2026年3月

📝 原创
The market are missing the implications from $NVDA investing:

$2B into $COHR for optical.
$2B into $LITE for optical.
and $2B into $MRVL for optical today.

Nvidia did this exact same playbook last year.

They realized the push to 800G/1.6T pluggables would exhaust the global supply of EML.

So they approached $LITE, $COHR, Sumitomo, and preallocated majority of production.

And we've seen this reflected in their share price with $LITE rising 955% since the major supply squeeze.

We're seeing the beginning of the same playbook happen now over the last month.

Just for a new architecture, this time.

As these deals included multibillion-dollar purchase commitments and future capacity rights.

So... what's next? CW/EML and CPO bottlenecks.

Nvidia just prefers to invest in downstream players. But the supply crunch happens upstream.

Laser suppliers from $MTSI, $SIVE, $LITE, $COHR, Furukawa, and Sumitomo are on overdrive.

Foundries from Win Semi, $TSEM, $GFS are likely on overdrive.

The entire supply chain benefits (eg. testing from $AEHR, substrates with $SOI).

But these two segments from foundries to ELS/CW laser chokepoints are likely to be the biggest beneficiaries.

Nvidia is the biggest signal of what's coming next; it's just a waiting period for the inflection point to hit.
市场正在错过 $NVDA 投资带来的含义:

$2B 投给 $COHR,用于 optical。
$2B 投给 $LITE,用于 optical。
今天又 $2B 投给 $MRVL,用于 optical。

Nvidia 去年就用过完全一样的 playbook。

他们意识到推进到 800G/1.6T pluggables 会耗尽全球 EML supply。

所以他们找了 $LITE$COHR、Sumitomo,并预先分配了大部分 production。

我们已经在它们股价中看到反映,$LITE 自主要 supply squeeze 以来涨了 955%。

过去一个月,我们正在看到同样 playbook 的开始。

只是这一次是新架构。

因为这些 deals 包括 multibillion-dollar purchase commitments 和 future capacity rights。

所以……下一步是什么?CW/EML 和 CPO bottlenecks。

Nvidia 只是更喜欢投资 downstream players。但 supply crunch 发生在 upstream。

$MTSI$SIVE$LITE$COHR、Furukawa 到 Sumitomo 的 laser suppliers 都在 overdrive。

Win Semi、$TSEM$GFS 这些 foundries 也可能在 overdrive。

整条 supply chain 都受益(比如 $AEHR 的 testing、$SOI 的 substrates)。

但从 foundries 到 ELS/CW laser chokepoints 这两个 segments,可能会是最大受益者。

Nvidia 是下一步会发生什么的最大信号;现在只是等待 inflection point 到来。
❤️ 706 🔁 77 💬 30
打开原推
📝 原创
$RPI does look sort of cheap for GAAP forward projections.

- 2026 Forward P/E: $5.29 / $0.256 =

20.6x

- 2027 Forward P/E: $5.29 / $0.400 =

13.2x

- 2028 Forward P/E: $5.29 / $0.553 =

9.5x

Off personal projections. Especially when you’re growing 58% Y/Y (expect this to beat again due to OpenClaw buying):

There’s not really much of a premium when it trades at 2x fwd/sales. Especially when theres new TAM expansion opportunities in the AI agentic hardware space.

The downside risk is, OpenClaw is just a short term trend. But Jensen did validate it as the next major trend at GTC.

If it is structural demand and Raspberry Pi is the $NVDA for consumer agentic hardware… could be a great opportunity at ~$1B MC.
$RPI 按 GAAP forward projections 看确实有点便宜。

- 2026 Forward P/E:$5.29 / $0.256 =

20.6x

- 2027 Forward P/E:$5.29 / $0.400 =

13.2x

- 2028 Forward P/E:$5.29 / $0.553 =

9.5x

基于个人 projections。尤其是当你在 58% Y/Y 增长(预计由于 OpenClaw buying 还会 beat again)时:

它以 2x fwd/sales 交易,确实没有太多 premium。尤其是在 AI agentic hardware space 里还有新的 TAM expansion opportunities。

下行风险是,OpenClaw 只是短期 trend。但 Jensen 在 GTC 上验证它是下一个 major trend。

如果这是 structural demand,而 Raspberry Pi 是 consumer agentic hardware 的 $NVDA……那么在 ~$1B MC 可能是很好的机会。
❤️ 118 🔁 11 💬 20
打开原推
📝 原创
$AEHR new qualification orders from a leading optical transicever company.

It’s in the early $AAOI stage where it’s getting tested by major hyperscaler supply chains for optical transceivers/silicon photonics.

Before the mass volume inflection point that may be at any time.

$AEHR up 12.73% premarket.
$AEHR 从一家领先 optical transicever company 获得新的 qualification orders。

它现在处在早期 $AAOI 阶段,正在被主要 hyperscaler supply chains 用于 optical transceivers/silicon photonics 测试。

在 mass volume inflection point 到来之前,而那个点可能随时发生。

$AEHR premarket 涨 12.73%。
❤️ 339 🔁 25 💬 22
打开原推
📝 原创
Thesis validation in effect.

$RPI up 44.76% after earnings.

Raspberry Pi likely has a long way to go with some ~11-13x p/e projections for 2027.

And ~19-22x for 2026.

With a massive surge in demand to 58% fwd growth from 14% expected…

Raspberry Pi has become the rapidly accelerating AI orchestration hardware of choice for OpenClaw.
Thesis validation 生效。

$RPI earnings 后涨 44.76%。

Raspberry Pi 可能还有很长的路要走,2027 年有一些 ~11-13x p/e projections。

2026 年约 ~19-22x。

需求大幅飙升,fwd growth 从预期 14% 到 58%……

Raspberry Pi 已经成为 OpenClaw 首选的快速加速 AI orchestration hardware。
❤️ 248 🔁 36 💬 21
打开原推
💬 引用
It would be a shame if $AVGO bought $SIVE for $300m…

Then controlled the near term roadmap for $NVDA and $MRVL from the upstream light source level.

I’m sure Broadcom isn’t thinking about this… right? https://t.co/wrS431DG8n
如果 $AVGO 用 $300m 买下 $SIVE,那就太可惜了……

然后从 upstream light source 层面控制 $NVDA$MRVL 的 near term roadmap。

我相信 Broadcom 没在想这个……对吧? https://t.co/wrS431DG8n
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just in: $NVDA invests $2B in $MRVL.

This deal is largely for “joint silicon photonics work” and validates Marvell and Celestial AI's optical fabric CPO roadmap.

But… guess who powers the light source for $MRVL that markets might have missed? (Hint: $SIVE) https://t.co/9lqJLIx7nG
刚刚:$NVDA$MRVL 投资 $2B。

这笔交易很大程度上是为了“joint silicon photonics work”,并验证了 Marvell 和 Celestial AI 的 optical fabric CPO 路线图。

但……猜猜谁给 $MRVL 提供市场可能漏掉的 light source?(提示:$SIVEhttps://t.co/9lqJLIx7nG
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2038954532944875733
❤️ 249 🔁 13 💬 29
打开原推
📝 原创
Just in: $NVDA invests $2B in $MRVL.

This deal is largely for “joint silicon photonics work” and validates Marvell and Celestial AI's optical fabric CPO roadmap.

But… guess who powers the light source for $MRVL that markets might have missed? (Hint: $SIVE) https://t.co/9lqJLIx7nG
刚刚:$NVDA 投资 $2B 到 $MRVL

这笔 deal 主要用于 “joint silicon photonics work”,并验证了 Marvell 和 Celestial AI 的 optical fabric CPO roadmap。

但是……猜猜谁为 $MRVL 提供 light source,而市场可能错过了?(提示:$SIVEhttps://t.co/9lqJLIx7nG
❤️ 450 🔁 52 💬 36
打开原推
💬 引用
Just look at $MRVL Celestial ( $SIVE is the light source at ~$290m ) as an example.

Marvell bought it for $5.5B. ($3.25B + 2.25B milestones).

2026/2027 expectations: 0 revenue, -$50m loss

2028 expectations: $500m revenue
2029 expectations: $1B revenue.

This is massive TAM expansion and revenue acceleration.

This is just one of Sivers customer on top of O-Net, Ayar, other undisclosed CPO players, with Jabil bridging volume ramp and Win with yields.

Random retail users with no understanding of photonics… are doing the equivalent of modeling Celestial at $50m because of no CPO revenue in 2025 2026.

And because it’s operating at a net loss instead of looking at the massive ramp 2027 onward.

$SIVE is my #1 pick for frontrunning the next architectural supercycles at the very beginning for ELS TAM expansion + CPO + CW laser chokepoints.

If you want a later stage pick, you can look at $LITE that already ran 3800%.
就拿 $MRVL Celestial( $SIVE 是 light source,MC 约 ~$290m )为例。

Marvell 以 $5.5B 收购了它。($3.25B + 2.25B milestones)。

2026/2027 预期:0 revenue,-$50m loss

2028 预期:$500m revenue
2029 预期:$1B revenue。

这是巨大的 TAM expansion 和 revenue acceleration。

这只是 Sivers 的一个客户,除此之外还有 O-Net、Ayar、其他未披露 CPO players,Jabil 帮它 bridge volume ramp,Win 帮它解决 yields。

那些完全不懂 photonics 的 random retail users……等于是在因为 2025 2026 没有 CPO revenue,就把 Celestial model 成 $50m。

还因为它是 net loss,而不是去看 2027 之后的巨大 ramp。

$SIVE 是我在 ELS TAM expansion + CPO + CW laser chokepoints 最初期,frontrun 下一轮 architectural supercycles 的 #1 pick。

如果你想要 later stage pick,可以看已经涨了 3800% 的 $LITE
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Pls stop tagging me in stuff where random retail investors or journalists tries doing an analysis on $AXTI or $SIVE.

For $AXTI:

Majority of folks have 0 clue what they’re talking about.

Samsung Foundry or $LITE InP fab are completely different parts of the supply chain and this is like conflating NAND and DRAM as memory.

Even talking about Sumitomo displacing AXT means they don’t understand the upstream extraction/processing/crucible bottlenecks that InP substrate level players like $COHR or Sumitomo don’t do.

For $SIVE:

This is mass inflection point of CPO scale up 2027 onwards.

I have idiots out there with no understanding of photonics looking at gross margin, burn rate, and former revenue numbers for previous years or even the current year.

For the biggest architectural inflection 2027 onwards.

If you look at $MRVL Celestial point its starting volume ramp 2027 and exponentially increasing 2028, 2029.

That’s why I said $SIVE can be a $10B+ company one day since it’s looking at forward growth and this is the earliest out on.

What I do is find alpha:

This is what markets might have mispriced like all the analysts saying 14-17% fwd growth with $RPI.

Then I modeled 55% and it turned out to be 58%.

One is a photonics bottleneck for a reason.

The other is designed into Jabil and Celestial for a reason.
求别再 tag 我看那些随机散户或记者对 $AXTI$SIVE 做的分析了。

$AXTI

大多数人完全不知道自己在说什么。

Samsung Foundry 或 $LITE InP fab 是供应链完全不同的环节,这就像把 NAND 和 DRAM 都叫 memory 然后混为一谈。

甚至说 Sumitomo 会替代 AXT,说明他们不理解 upstream extraction/processing/crucible 这些瓶颈,而 $COHR 或 Sumitomo 这种 InP substrate 层级玩家并不做这些。

$SIVE

这是 2027 年以后 CPO scale up 的大规模拐点。

外面有些完全不懂 photonics 的人,看 gross margin、burn rate、前几年收入甚至今年收入。

但这是 2027 年以后的最大架构拐点。

如果你看 $MRVL Celestial 的时间点,它 2027 年开始 volume ramp,2028、2029 年指数级增加。

这就是为什么我说 $SIVE 有一天可以成为 $10B+ 公司,因为看的是 forward growth,而且这是最早期的位置。

我做的是找 alpha:

这就是市场可能 misprice 的东西,就像所有分析师都说 $RPI forward growth 14-17%。

然后我建模 55%,结果出来是 58%。

一个成为 photonics 瓶颈是有原因的。

另一个被设计进 Jabil 和 Celestial 也是有原因的。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2038934006734135572
❤️ 253 🔁 24 💬 20
打开原推
📝 原创
Pls stop tagging me in stuff where random retail investors or journalists tries doing an analysis on $AXTI or $SIVE.

For $AXTI:

Majority of folks have 0 clue what they’re talking about.

Samsung Foundry or $LITE InP fab are completely different parts of the supply chain and this is like conflating NAND and DRAM as memory.

Even talking about Sumitomo displacing AXT means they don’t understand the upstream extraction/processing/crucible bottlenecks that InP substrate level players like $COHR or Sumitomo don’t do.

For $SIVE:

This is mass inflection point of CPO scale up 2027 onwards.

I have idiots out there with no understanding of photonics looking at gross margin, burn rate, and former revenue numbers for previous years or even the current year.

For the biggest architectural inflection 2027 onwards.

If you look at $MRVL Celestial point its starting volume ramp 2027 and exponentially increasing 2028, 2029.

That’s why I said $SIVE can be a $10B+ company one day since it’s looking at forward growth and this is the earliest out on.

What I do is find alpha:

This is what markets might have mispriced like all the analysts saying 14-17% fwd growth with $RPI.

Then I modeled 55% and it turned out to be 58%.

One is a photonics bottleneck for a reason.

The other is designed into Jabil and Celestial for a reason.
请别再 tag 我,让我看 random retail investors 或 journalists 对 $AXTI$SIVE 做的分析了。

关于 $AXTI

大多数人完全不知道自己在说什么。

Samsung Foundry 或 $LITE InP fab 是 supply chain 里完全不同的环节,这就像把 NAND 和 DRAM 都混成 memory 一样。

甚至说 Sumitomo 会取代 AXT,就说明他们不理解 upstream extraction/processing/crucible bottlenecks,而这些是 $COHR 或 Sumitomo 这种 InP substrate level players 不做的。

关于 $SIVE

这是 2027 往后 CPO scale up 的 mass inflection point。

外面有些完全不懂 photonics 的 idiots,在看 gross margin、burn rate,以及过去几年甚至今年的旧 revenue numbers。

但真正重点是 2027 往后的最大 architecture inflection。

如果你看 $MRVL Celestial,它 2027 开始 volume ramp,2028、2029 指数级增长。

这就是为什么我说 $SIVE 有一天可以成为 $10B+ company,因为看的是 forward growth,而且现在是最早期。

我做的是找 alpha:

这就是市场可能 misprice 的地方,就像所有 analysts 说 $RPI fwd growth 是 14-17%。

然后我 model 55%,结果出来是 58%。

一个成为 photonics bottleneck 是有原因的。

另一个被设计进 Jabil 和 Celestial 也是有原因的。
❤️ 454 🔁 24 💬 28
打开原推
💬 引用
Bruh wtf... Everyone was doubting me on $RPI, calling it a "Meme Stock"???

I literally projected 48-55% forward revenue growth and backed it up with fundamentals.

While all the analysts were saying 14-17% and news outlets were saying "Meme Stock"??

And they updated $RPI to 58% projected Y/Y growth after earnings.

Spot on and vindicated like $AXTI.

Especially when I projected 3-4X industry growth estimates.

Now $RPI is at ~19x-23.8x fwd p/e, with revenue acceleration due to OpenClaw.
Bruh wtf……大家之前都在怀疑我对 $RPI 的判断,还叫它 “Meme Stock”???

我明明预测了 48-55% forward revenue growth,并且用 fundamentals 支撑。

而所有 analysts 都在说 14-17%,新闻媒体还说 “Meme Stock”??

结果 earnings 后他们把 $RPI 更新为 58% projected Y/Y growth。

$AXTI 一样,spot on 而且被 vindicated。

尤其是我预测的是行业 growth estimates 的 3-4 倍。

现在 $RPI 在 ~19x-23.8x fwd p/e,因为 OpenClaw 带来 revenue acceleration。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
My original post on $RPI and OpenClaw vertaim:

"But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues."

$RPI New Analyst Projections:

The broker raised its 2026 $RPI forecast to $511 million from $360 million, implying 58% year-on-year growth.

....

The media labeled "Meme Stock" $RPI from my thesis is up 27% on the projections beat.
我关于 $RPI 和 OpenClaw 的原帖原文:

“But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues.”

$RPI 新分析师预测:

该券商把 2026 年 $RPI 预测从 $360 million 上调到 $511 million,意味着同比增长 58%。

……

媒体称为 “Meme Stock” 的 $RPI,在我的 thesis 预测被上修后涨了 27%。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2038913900582998087
❤️ 177 🔁 8 💬 18
打开原推
💬 引用
My original post on $RPI and OpenClaw vertaim:

"But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues."

$RPI New Analyst Projections:

The broker raised its 2026 $RPI forecast to $511 million from $360 million, implying 58% year-on-year growth.

....

The media labeled "Meme Stock" $RPI from my thesis is up 27% on the projections beat.
我关于 $RPI 和 OpenClaw 的原帖原文:

“But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues.”

$RPI New Analyst Projections:

The broker raised its 2026 $RPI forecast to $511 million from $360 million, implying 58% year-on-year growth.

……

媒体称为 “Meme Stock” 的 $RPI,在我的 thesis 之后,因为 projections beat 涨了 27%。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Fun Trade Idea: Long $RPI (Raspberry Pi)

Reason: 🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + Hoarding.

Everyone has been openly hoarding Apple Mac Minis and were long Apple.

But $APPL is already a $3.7T+ company. Product mass-buying won't make a dent.

Raspberry Pi, however, is a 542.68M company.

The revenue is material.

Feels like markets haven't priced this in since I've seen almost 0 mentions about the ticker on X (but many product mentions).

And it's only recently that have the hoarding started Raspberry Pis, as they're much cheaper than $500+ Apple products. They also have their mini $NVDA CUDA-light utility ecosystem that people use.

So it turns out these extremely cheap $20 or $200 devices are perfect for deploying mass deploying isolated instances.

The reason is for OpenClaw orchestration (so they don’t mess up your device) -> interfacing with a central LLM via API.

Before people were just buying 1 or 2 for hobby/education purposes, so revenue has slowing.

But now Silicon Valley startups and individuals anecdotally appear to be buying tens or hundreds of these things to run concurrent OpenClaw agentic swarms or do stuff like agentic marketing on Reddit and other places.

And no, there are many applications that can't be done by spinning up AWS VPS, so people do it locally (there's TOS around automation/AI bots, so companies setup their own servers).

That being said main downside risk is that its

- partially foundation owned, and they might not hike rates like $SNDK or $MU does, even if there's extreme demand

- Subject to memory price hikes like LPDDR4 component

so this is not a major position.

However, going forward, revenue should increase due to people buying tens or hundreds of these things for running AI agents.

Balance sheet also looks clean with low downside risk:

- ~$280M - $300M revenue
- ~$75M+ Gross Profit
- ~25% Gross Margin
- Net income: ~$10M - $15M
- Net Cash: $28M

Analysts currently project revenue growth closer to 14–17%.

But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues.

Consumer segments are roughly 1/3rd of revenue but the newfound buying from Openclaw + variants is a new cataylst nevertheless for re-rating.

Especially now that Picoclaw and compressed OpenClaw variants are now able to be run on $20 Raspberry Pis instead of just the Raspberry Pi 5’s.

But seems like people just forgot Raspberry PI was a publicly stock as well.

The stock price is down 56% 1Y to 542.68M euro MC to an all time low.

So this might be that tailwind for a reversal.

There's also a non-zero chance OpenClaw is a long term catalyst for Raspberry Pi based, agentic deployments.

TLDR: People are openly buying Raspberry Pis and Apple Mac Minis for Openclaw/Picoclaw, so revenue should benefit from increased demand.
有意思的交易想法:做多 $RPI(Raspberry Pi)

理由:🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + 囤货。

大家都在公开囤 Apple Mac Mini,而且做多 Apple。

$APPL 已经是 3.7T+ 美元的公司了。产品被大量抢购,对它的影响不会太大。

但 Raspberry Pi 是一家 542.68M 的公司。

这块收入就很实质了。

感觉市场还没把这个定价进去,因为我在 X 上几乎没看到有人提这个 ticker(但很多人在提产品)。

而且大家也是最近才开始囤 Raspberry Pi,因为它们比 500+ 美元的 Apple 产品便宜很多。它们也有一个小型的 $NVDA CUDA-light 实用生态,很多人会用。

所以结果就是,这些极便宜的 20 美元或 200 美元设备,非常适合大规模部署隔离实例。

原因是用来做 OpenClaw 编排(这样不会把你的设备搞乱)-> 通过 API 接入中心化 LLM。

以前大家只是买 1、2 个,用于爱好/教育,所以收入增长放慢了。

但现在从传闻看,硅谷创业公司和个人似乎在买几十台甚至几百台,用来跑并发的 OpenClaw agent swarm,或者做 Reddit 等地方的 agentic marketing。

而且不是所有应用都能靠开 AWS VPS 解决,所以大家会本地部署(自动化/AI bot 有 TOS 限制,所以公司会搭自己的服务器)。

话虽如此,主要下行风险是:

- 它部分由基金会持有,就算需求极端旺盛,也未必会像 $SNDK$MU 那样涨价

- 会受到 LPDDR4 等内存组件涨价影响

所以这不是一个大仓位。

不过往后看,因为大家会为了跑 AI agent 买几十台、几百台设备,收入应该会增加。

资产负债表也看起来干净,下行风险较低:

- 约 $280M - $300M 收入
- $75M+ 毛利
- 约 25% 毛利率
- 净利润:约 $10M - $15M
- 净现金:$28M

分析师目前预计收入增速大概 14-17%。

但如果这波需求涌入持续,收入增速可能从 14% 提升到比较温和的 48-55%。

消费端大概占收入 1/3,但 Openclaw + 各种变体带来的新增购买,仍然是一个新的重估催化。

尤其现在 Picoclaw 和压缩版 OpenClaw 已经能跑在 20 美元的 Raspberry Pi 上,而不只是 Raspberry Pi 5。

但感觉大家只是忘了 Raspberry PI 也是一家上市公司。

股价 1 年跌了 56%,市值到 542.68M 欧元,创历史低位。

所以这可能成为反转的顺风。

OpenClaw 也有非零概率成为基于 Raspberry Pi 的 agentic 部署的长期催化。

TLDR:大家正在公开购买 Raspberry Pi 和 Apple Mac Mini 来跑 Openclaw/Picoclaw,所以收入应该会受益于需求增加。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2023415224372756782
❤️ 189 🔁 32 💬 15
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Supply chain list for substrate chokepoint

The thing $AXTI does differently is they vertically integrate 4 different chokepoints under 1 supply chain.

I think $COHR or US is going to go on a vertical integration buying spree or capacity securing spree due to $AXTI.

There's some very, very, very niche chokepoints in the InP substrate supply chain (as upstream as you can go)

Talked about $VNP (TSX) and others for Gallium, Indium, Arsenic, and Phosphorus (extraction/processing)

Then you need
-> pBN Crucibles
eg. Poly-InP & B₂O₃
-> Baking the Poly-InP in the crucible
-> InP substrate Just random parts in the synthesis process, I think there's some Sumitomo/AXTI level chokepoints out there outside of captive AXT.

Doing research into those areas now and seeing if there's any good long opportunities... one of the most nche parts of the supply chain, think there might be some hidden gems that US supply chains desperately need.

So: L1 Vital/5n/indium corp(private)/sumitomo/jinmei (axt)
L2: pbn, Momentive, BoYu (private), shin etsu, morgan advanced materials
L3: Tomiyama, Rasa, Dignten, Furukawa
L4: Sumitomo, AXT, $COHR, JX, that people know.

Then prob there's even more niche stuff inside each company that markets might not discover? just putting out ideas.

Basically the West needs to stitch together an $AXTI supply chain for West only ASAP so if you find a monopoly outside, its gonna be highly valuable.
substrate chokepoint 的 supply chain list

$AXTI 不同之处在于,他们把 4 个不同 chokepoints 垂直整合到 1 条 supply chain 里。

我觉得由于 $AXTI$COHR 或 US 会开始一波 vertical integration buying spree 或 capacity securing spree。

InP substrate supply chain 里有一些非常、非常、非常 niche 的 chokepoints(已经是尽可能 upstream)

之前聊过 $VNP (TSX) 等做 Gallium、Indium、Arsenic 和 Phosphorus(extraction/processing)

然后你需要
-> pBN Crucibles
比如 Poly-InP & B₂O₃
-> 在 crucible 里 baking Poly-InP
-> InP substrate 只是 synthesis process 里的 random parts,我觉得 captive AXT 之外,还有一些 Sumitomo/AXTI 级别的 chokepoints。

我现在正在研究这些领域,看看有没有好的 long opportunities……这是 supply chain 里最 niche 的部分之一,我觉得可能有一些 US supply chains 极度需要的 hidden gems。

所以:L1 Vital/5n/indium corp(private)/sumitomo/jinmei (axt)
L2:pbn, Momentive, BoYu (private), shin etsu, morgan advanced materials
L3:Tomiyama, Rasa, Dignten, Furukawa
L4:Sumitomo, AXT, $COHR, JX,这些大家知道。

然后每家公司内部可能还有更多 niche stuff,市场可能还没发现?只是抛些 ideas。

基本上,West 需要 ASAP 拼出一条只服务 West 的 $AXTI supply chain,所以如果你在外面找到一个 monopoly,它会非常有价值。
❤️ 183 🔁 4 💬 14
打开原推
📝 原创
Introducing the Strait of $AXTI:

20% of the world's total global oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz.

It is the single most critical chokepoint in the global energy trade.

Now... Double That with $LITE and $GOOGL instead of South Korea/Japan as recipients?

Welcome to $AXTI.

They control 40% of the InP supply chain.

Both in the raw materials and processing. Two separate different bottlenecks (think of Iran producing oil, then shipping it through the Strait).

So, if you 2x the chokepoint with the Hormuz oil bottleneck (but on AI industry level for photonics, instead of Country economies):

You suddenly realize AXT's chokepoint (and China) on the photonics market.

The current valuation is derived from strategic control. Then the main value comes when AXT exerts its control with price hikes:

Since the AI buildout with photonics has no other choice at scale.
介绍一下 Strait of $AXTI

全球总 oil supply 的 20% 通过 Strait of Hormuz。

它是全球 energy trade 中最关键的单一 chokepoint。

现在……如果把这个翻倍,而且接收方不是 South Korea/Japan,而是 $LITE$GOOGL

欢迎来到 $AXTI

他们控制 InP supply chain 的 40%。

既控制 raw materials,也控制 processing。两个独立的 bottlenecks(想象 Iran 生产 oil,然后通过 Strait 运出去)。

所以,如果你把 Hormuz oil bottleneck 的 chokepoint 乘以 2(但这次是在 photonics 的 AI industry level,而不是国家经济层面):

你会突然意识到 AXT(以及 China)对 photonics market 的 chokepoint。

当前估值来自 strategic control。然后真正的主要价值,是当 AXT 通过 price hikes 行使它的控制力时:

因为使用 photonics 的 AI buildout 在 scale 上没有其他选择。
❤️ 838 🔁 64 💬 41
打开原推
📝 原创
Can we please… just secure our rare earths supply chains first before we do this?

How are we able to spend billions on glass towers in Miami?

But not subsidize all our most important AI, Robotics, and Space rare earth upstream supply chains…

That are entirely dependent on China/Russia?

We literally have no domestic processing at scale for some of the most vital chokepoints from Humanoids bodies to indium/germanium/gallium for AI applications.

Picking a few like $MP to $USAR and saying “we did something” is not enough.

The Rare Earths chokepoint is a ticking time bomb that China set over the US.

America has its prioritizes completely wrong
我们能不能……在做这个之前,先保障 rare earths supply chains?

我们怎么能花 billions 在 Miami 建 glass towers?

却不补贴我们最重要的 AI、Robotics 和 Space rare earth upstream supply chains……

而这些完全依赖 China/Russia?

从 Humanoids bodies 到 AI applications 所需的 indium/germanium/gallium,一些最关键 chokepoints 我们 literally 没有规模化 domestic processing。

挑几个比如 $MP$USAR,然后说“我们做了点事”是不够的。

Rare Earths chokepoint 是 China 放在 US 身上的定时炸弹。

America 的 priorities 完全错了。
❤️ 394 🔁 14 💬 48
打开原推
📝 原创
“Trump Tells Aides He's Willing to End War Without Reopening Hormuz"

US indexes have shot up ON, but KOSPI (-3.55%) and Nikkei (-.85%) trading live are still down.

It goes from:

"Global Energy Crisis" -> 🌮 -> "Global Energy Crisis" -> 🌮.

I don't think anyone trading with public knowledge knows what's going on anymore...
“Trump Tells Aides He's Willing to End War Without Reopening Hormuz”

US indexes 隔夜已经冲上去了,但 KOSPI (-3.55%) 和 Nikkei (-.85%) 实时交易仍在下跌。

这在:

“Global Energy Crisis” -> 🌮 -> “Global Energy Crisis” -> 🌮

之间来回切。

我觉得任何只靠公开信息交易的人,现在都不知道到底发生什么了……
❤️ 359 🔁 15 💬 45
打开原推
📝 原创
Or... instead of spending billions on "cheaper missiles".

Since blowing $3-4M Patriots to down cheap drones isn't working.

We start to do more research and deploy Energy Directed Weapons like $LASR and HPM?

With HEL (High Energy Lasers):

It's a beam of light... pew pew. $3.50 per shot.

With HPM (High Powered Microwaves) - It's a cone of energy for drone swarms.

Maybe ~$0.05 per burst? Ammo is basically free and infinite.

Even though $LMT and $RTX are developing these too... it's like we just keep buying expensive missiles to line their pockets at this point.

More funding around this infinite ammo new tech, instead used for all those missiles...

Probably could have made energy weapons better by now (eg. fixing problems with dwell time, weather changes, range, power).

Firing billions of dollars of missiles at cheap drones clearly is not sustainable for extended conflicts in Iran.
或者……与其花 billions 在“cheaper missiles”上。

既然用 $3-4M Patriots 去打便宜 drones 行不通。

我们是不是该做更多 research,并部署像 $LASR 和 HPM 这样的 Energy Directed Weapons?

用 HEL(High Energy Lasers):

它就是一束光……pew pew。每发 $3.50。

用 HPM(High Powered Microwaves)- 它是对付 drone swarms 的能量锥。

也许每 burst ~$0.05?Ammo 基本免费且无限。

虽然 $LMT$RTX 也在开发这些……但现在感觉我们就是一直买昂贵 missiles 来让他们赚钱。

如果把用在那些 missiles 上的钱,更多投向这种 infinite ammo new tech……

现在可能已经能把 energy weapons 做得更好了(比如解决 dwell time、weather changes、range、power 的问题)。

用 billions of dollars 的 missiles 去打便宜 drones,显然无法支撑 Iran 的长期冲突。
❤️ 266 🔁 11 💬 20
打开原推
💬 引用
CPO Value Chain Summary from Mirae Asset:

Laser Source:
Coherent < $COHR >
Lumentum < $LITE >
Furukawa Electric (TYO: 5801)
Yuanjie Semiconductor (SHA: 688498)
Innolight Technology / Zhongji Innolight (SZSE: 300308)

PIC Foundry:
TSMC < $TSM >
GlobalFoundries $GFS
Samsung Electronics (KRX: 005930)
Tower Semiconductor < $TSEM>

EIC, Driver IC:
Broadcom < $AVGO >
Marvell < $MRVL >
NVIDIA < $NVDA >

ELS, Optical Engine
Innolight / Zhongji Innolight (SZSE: 300308)
TFC / Suzhou TFC Optical Communication (SZSE: 300394)
O-Net Technologies
Eoptolink Technology (SZSE: 300502)

FAU (Fiber Array Unit):
Senko Advanced Components (Private)
Sumitomo Electric (TYO: 5802)
TFC (SZSE: 300394)
FOCI Fiber Optic Communications (TWO: 3363)

FAU, Align Tools:
ficonTEC (Private)
All Ring Tech (TWO: 6187)
ADST (Private)

FAU, Engine Assembly:
Fabrinet < $FN >
Hon Hai / Foxconn (TWSE: 2317)
ASE Technology < $ASX >
FOCI (TWO: 3363)

OSAT, Advanced Packaging:
ASE Technology < $ASX >
Amkor < $AMKR >
Kyocera (TYO: 6971)
Powertech / PTI (TWSE: 6239)
Shinko Electric (TYO: 6967)
Fabrinet < $FN >

Connector, Ferrule:
Senko Advanced Components (Private)
Sumitomo Electric (TYO: 5802)
US Conec (Private)
T&S Communications (SZSE: 300570)
Molex (Private)
Browave (TWO: 3163)

Fiber:
Corning < $GLW >
Sumitomo Electric (TYO: 5802)
Nittobo / Nitto Boseki (TYO: 3110)

E/O Testing:

Keysight < $KEYS >
Teradyne < $TER >
FormFactor < $FORM >
Chroma ATE (TWSE: 2360)
Multilane (Private)

Switch, System:
NVIDIA < $NVDA >
Broadcom < $AVGO >
Marvell < $MRVL >
Google < $GOOGL>

EDA:
Synopsys < $SNPS >
Cadence < $CDNS >
Ansys < $ANSS >

Confused by some of names of the list, they might have conflated a few names like Innolight with laser source like $MTSI, Sumitomo, $SIVE, Luxnet, with the actual end module (unless there's something that's not public material or I missed)?

But just for people interested in the landscape, this is a good high-level overview.
Mirae Asset 的 CPO Value Chain Summary:

Laser Source:
Coherent < $COHR >
Lumentum < $LITE >
Furukawa Electric (TYO: 5801)
Yuanjie Semiconductor (SHA: 688498)
Innolight Technology / Zhongji Innolight (SZSE: 300308)

PIC Foundry:
TSMC < $TSM >
GlobalFoundries $GFS
Samsung Electronics (KRX: 005930)
Tower Semiconductor < $TSEM>

EIC, Driver IC:
Broadcom < $AVGO >
Marvell < $MRVL >
NVIDIA < $NVDA >

ELS, Optical Engine
Innolight / Zhongji Innolight (SZSE: 300308)
TFC / Suzhou TFC Optical Communication (SZSE: 300394)
O-Net Technologies
Eoptolink Technology (SZSE: 300502)

FAU (Fiber Array Unit):
Senko Advanced Components (Private)
Sumitomo Electric (TYO: 5802)
TFC (SZSE: 300394)
FOCI Fiber Optic Communications (TWO: 3363)

FAU, Align Tools:
ficonTEC (Private)
All Ring Tech (TWO: 6187)
ADST (Private)

FAU, Engine Assembly:
Fabrinet < $FN >
Hon Hai / Foxconn (TWSE: 2317)
ASE Technology < $ASX >
FOCI (TWO: 3363)

OSAT, Advanced Packaging:
ASE Technology < $ASX >
Amkor < $AMKR >
Kyocera (TYO: 6971)
Powertech / PTI (TWSE: 6239)
Shinko Electric (TYO: 6967)
Fabrinet < $FN >

Connector, Ferrule:
Senko Advanced Components (Private)
Sumitomo Electric (TYO: 5802)
US Conec (Private)
T&S Communications (SZSE: 300570)
Molex (Private)
Browave (TWO: 3163)

Fiber:
Corning < $GLW >
Sumitomo Electric (TYO: 5802)
Nittobo / Nitto Boseki (TYO: 3110)

E/O Testing:

Keysight < $KEYS >
Teradyne < $TER >
FormFactor < $FORM >
Chroma ATE (TWSE: 2360)
Multilane (Private)

Switch, System:
NVIDIA < $NVDA >
Broadcom < $AVGO >
Marvell < $MRVL >
Google < $GOOGL>

EDA:
Synopsys < $SNPS >
Cadence < $CDNS >
Ansys < $ANSS >

我对名单里一些名字有点困惑,他们可能把 Innolight 这类和 laser source,比如 $MTSI、Sumitomo、$SIVE、Luxnet,以及实际 end module 混在一起了(除非有一些不是公开材料,或者我漏了)?

但对想了解 landscape 的人来说,这是个不错的 high-level overview。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
CPO Landscape Mirae Analyst Note:

Scale-Across:
CPO ASIC: $AVGO, $MRVL
Optical Transceiver: $COHR, $LITE, Innolight
DSP/PAM4: $AVGO, $MRVL
Coherent DCI: $CIEN, $NOK
OCS Equipment: iPronics, Polatis
Optical Cable / Fiber: $GLW, Prysmian, Furukawa
HCF: $LITE, OFS
DCI Coherent: Ciena, Nokia, Huawei
Optical Amplifier: $LITE, $COHR
OCS Gateway: KDDI

Scale-Up:
SiPh Foundry: imec, $GFS, $TSM
SiPh Modulator: $NVDA (in-house MRM), $INTC
ELS: NTT, Furukawa, $LITE, $COHR
THz Interconnect: R&D Stage?
CPO Test: "Expanding entry of new players"
Micro Lens / Optical Systems: "Expanding entry of new players"

TLDR: Scale Up CPO is coming next. Think the analyst note missed a bunch of upstream names and conflated ELS with light source.

But it's helpful to see who they think the leading players are as a very high-level view.
CPO Landscape Mirae 分析师笔记:

Scale-Across:
CPO ASIC: $AVGO, $MRVL
Optical Transceiver: $COHR, $LITE, Innolight
DSP/PAM4: $AVGO, $MRVL
Coherent DCI: $CIEN, $NOK
OCS Equipment: iPronics, Polatis
Optical Cable / Fiber: $GLW, Prysmian, Furukawa
HCF: $LITE, OFS
DCI Coherent: Ciena, Nokia, Huawei
Optical Amplifier: $LITE, $COHR
OCS Gateway: KDDI

Scale-Up:
SiPh Foundry: imec, $GFS, $TSM
SiPh Modulator: $NVDA (in-house MRM), $INTC
ELS: NTT, Furukawa, $LITE, $COHR
THz Interconnect: R&D Stage?
CPO Test: “Expanding entry of new players”
Micro Lens / Optical Systems: “Expanding entry of new players”

TLDR: Scale Up CPO 接下来要来了。感觉这份分析师笔记漏掉了不少上游名字,而且把 ELS 和 light source 混在一起了。

但作为一个非常高层级视角,看看他们认为领先玩家是谁还是有帮助的。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2038436546412769560
❤️ 336 🔁 50 💬 20
打开原推
💬 引用
Do you guys think there’s only $5,650,000,000 dilution to go with $IREN?

Very surprising that people haven’t switched to $NBIS or other names if you’re long Neoclouds.

One already has confirmed funding with $NVDA + convertibles from institutions.

The other is likely actively selling new shares on the open market to get funding off retail shareholders.

The sad reality is:

$IREN simply cannot monetize the rest of their capacity without using that. It’s not “optionality”.

Financial structure nuance matters when you’re choosing winners for equity appreciation.

Nebius is clearly has the better financing structure and this is already showing up in YTD returns.
你们觉得 $IREN 只剩 $5,650,000,000 dilution 要走吗?

很惊讶如果你 long Neoclouds,竟然还没切到 $NBIS 或其他名字。

一个已经有 $NVDA + institutions convertibles 的 confirmed funding。

另一个很可能正在公开市场上 actively selling new shares,从 retail shareholders 身上拿 funding。

悲伤现实是:

$IREN 如果不用这个,根本无法 monetize 他们剩下的 capacity。那不是 “optionality”。

当你选择 equity appreciation 的赢家时,financial structure nuance 很重要。

Nebius 的 financing structure 显然更好,这已经反映在 YTD returns 里。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$IREN filed to dilute $6,000,000,000 at a $11.7B MC.

That is not noise.

This is Iren's way to monetize their 4.5GW capacity by selling all those new shares onto the open market.

If you want some history on how this turns out:

Look at $BKKT that crashed 99% with Mike and $IREN board of directors history with excessive ATMs. Or his recent company $ASST.

It’s accretive to the company and executives: Because it wipes out all retail shareholders and they can always issue SBC.

So they don’t actually care what stock price it needs to be at to sell.

After they’re finished, they have $6B in new cash to use for scaling without paying interest.

But the reason why convertible notes with interest, and $NVDA funding balance sheets is much better for retail capital:

Is because it doesn’t wipe out retail equity to achieve this. Because at this point $IREN looks like the $AMC of datacenters with a dwindling moat, and looming $6B in shares sold into the open market.

Reason I post about $IREN is because

- people dismiss a $6B ATM as “Noise”
- it’s one of the most popular retail “buy the dip” companies that they’re buying into a $6B dilution machine
- people still don’t understand the risk at all.
- the amount they have now is not enough to finance GPUs/GW capacity monetization.
- they likely will have to use the ATM, it’s not “optionality”

Again: I have zero positions in the company.

I’m just warning retail investors that this ATM structurally wipes out your equity appreciation by how structural mechanics of $6B+ ATMs work.

Because $IREN likely needs to sell new shares at any price to monetize their GW, otherwise there would be zero need to file it.

Executives actually don't need to care because they can make up for stock price dropping by issuing SBC like $SNAP.

If you have to wonder if your equity gets wiped out from an excessive ATM:

There are better longs out there than $IREN.
$IREN 申请在 $11.7B 市值下稀释 $6,000,000,000。

这不是 noise。

这是 Iren 通过把这些新股卖到公开市场,来变现他们 4.5GW 容量的方式。

如果你想看历史上这种事会怎样:

看看 $BKKT,Mike 和 $IREN 董事会有过度 ATM 的历史,结果跌了 99%。或者他最近的公司 $ASST

这对公司和高管是增值的:因为它会抹掉所有散户股东,而他们总能继续发 SBC。

所以他们实际上不在乎卖股票时股价需要在哪里。

等他们卖完,公司就有 $6B 新现金可以用来扩张,而且不用付利息。

但为什么带利息的可转债、以及 $NVDA 给 balance sheet 融资,对散户资本好得多:

因为实现这件事不需要把散户 equity 抹掉。现在 $IREN 看起来像 data centers 里的 $AMC,护城河在变弱,还悬着 $6B 股票要卖进公开市场。

我发 $IREN 的原因是:

- 人们把 $6B ATM 当成 “Noise”
- 它是最受散户欢迎的 “buy the dip” 公司之一,而他们买进去的是一台 $6B 稀释机器
- 人们仍然完全不理解风险
- 他们现在的钱不足以融资 GPUs/GW 容量变现
- 他们很可能必须用 ATM,这不是“optional”

再次说明:我在这家公司没有任何仓位。

我只是在提醒散户投资者,$6B+ ATM 的结构性机制,会系统性抹掉你的股权升值。

因为 $IREN 很可能需要不管价格多少都卖新股来变现他们的 GW,否则根本没必要提交这个文件。

高管其实不需要在乎,因为他们可以像 $SNAP 一样,通过发 SBC 弥补股价下跌。

如果你还得担心自己的 equity 会不会被过度 ATM 抹掉:

那比 $IREN 更好的 long 多得是。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2038163974437659019
❤️ 461 🔁 21 💬 79
打开原推
📝 原创
This market is brutal.

If your stock doesn’t have Win in its name like a certain foundry…

More likely than not macro > individual stock fundamentals from $MU and $META.

Just a good reminder not to margin or irresponsibly overleverage during this time.

Especially as a limited ground invasion might begin anytime… this might foreshadow extended conflicts and potential supply chain disruption.
这个市场太残酷了。

如果你的股票名字里没有 Win,比如某家 foundry……

$MU$META,大概率 macro > individual stock fundamentals。

这也是一个很好的提醒:这段时间不要 margin,也不要不负责任地 overleverage。

尤其是 limited ground invasion 可能随时开始……这可能预示着长期冲突和潜在 supply chain disruption。
❤️ 473 🔁 18 💬 50
打开原推
💬 引用
Well this is aging well with $VCX.

From $425 -&gt; $110 in 4 days.

Think majority of people expected it… but not sure why retail investors thought SpaceX should be valued at $34 trillion at the top. https://t.co/JHURpLJmmq
这条关于 $VCX 的判断现在看起来不错。

4 天内从 $425 -> $110。

我觉得大多数人都预料到了……但不确定为什么 retail investors 会认为 SpaceX 在顶部应该值 $34 trillion。 https://t.co/JHURpLJmmq
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning about $VCX.

A very popular ETF with weighting toward (Anthropic, Databricks, OpenAI, Anduril, and SpaceX).

Ask yourself this:

Is SpaceX is worth 23 times $META valuation?

With the stock going up 1288% this month: VCX is trading at roughly ~20x its NAV. So 1500-2000% premium?

This is like buying SpaceX at 34 Trillion USD. Or OpenAI at 16 Trillion USD.

Would you short it?

No: It's extremely low float and lack of options for hedging.

But should you buy into it?

$VCX looks like greater fools theory right now and you’re playing hot potato.
关于 $VCX 的警告。

这是一个很热门的 ETF,权重偏向 Anthropic、Databricks、OpenAI、Anduril 和 SpaceX。

问问你自己:

SpaceX 值得 23 倍 $META 的估值吗?

这个月股价涨了 1288%:VCX 现在大约以 ~20x NAV 交易。也就是 1500-2000% 溢价?

这就像以 34 Trillion USD 的估值买 SpaceX,或者以 16 Trillion USD 的估值买 OpenAI。

你会 short 它吗?

不会:它流通盘极低,而且缺少期权来对冲。

但你应该买进去吗?

$VCX 现在看起来就是 greater fools theory,你是在玩 hot potato。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037137351638704487
❤️ 258 🔁 12 💬 35
打开原推
📝 原创
And... this is why I don't like Jane Street owning the same stocks I do like $AAOI.

They trade volatility, especially with retail favorite names and trigger stop losses/panic.

If you know what you own though:

$6.69B for a US company that makes the entire transceiver supply chain:

From Laser -> Design -> Assembly.

With likely $MSFT, $AMZN, $ORCL buying anything they can make, is a steal for me personally.

With high beta stocks, it's really important to build conviction and manage sizing correctly before entering a trade.

Otherwise you'll end up capitulating the bottom and buying the top over and over.
这就是为什么我不喜欢 Jane Street 持有和我一样喜欢的股票,比如 $AAOI

他们交易 volatility,尤其是 retail favorite names,并触发 stop losses/panic。

但如果你知道自己持有什么:

$6.69B 买一家做完整 transceiver supply chain 的美国公司:

从 Laser -> Design -> Assembly。

而且很可能 $MSFT$AMZN$ORCL 会买下他们能生产的一切,对我个人来说是 steal。

对 high beta stocks 来说,进场前建立 conviction 并正确管理 sizing 非常重要。

否则你会一次又一次在底部 capitulate、顶部买入。
❤️ 841 🔁 55 💬 93
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Out of curiosity:

Are there any completely free L2 Spot DEXs out there for Takers?

Like Lighter, but available in the US. If not, can someone just make one?
出于好奇:

有没有完全免费的 L2 Spot DEXs,给 Takers 用?

像 Lighter,但在美国可用。如果没有,能不能有人直接做一个?
❤️ 54 🔁 0 💬 15
打开原推
📝 原创
This is the most egregious headline I’ve read from FT.

“US BETS BILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON UNPROVEN GROUPS IN RARE EARTHS DEALS”

No sht.

Maybe they’re “unproven” since we have nothing??

$USAR to $MP are incredibly important.

Since US rare earths supply is the #1 national security priority right now.

The United States owns almost none of the upstream capacity/refineries for AI, Robotics, to Space, as we rely on other countries from Canada to China.

This is probably the best domestic policy move from the Trump administration to fund these unprofitable efforts.

In order to secure US supply chain sovereignty instead of relying on Russia and China?

It’s almost like FT is trying to make the US public mad…

At genuinely great efforts to secure American’s independence by how they word these articles.
这是我从 FT 读过最离谱的 headline。

“US BETS BILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON UNPROVEN GROUPS IN RARE EARTHS DEALS”

No sht。

也许他们“unproven”是因为我们什么都没有??

$USAR$MP 都极其重要。

因为 US rare earths supply 是现在 #1 national security priority。

United States 几乎不拥有从 AI、Robotics 到 Space 所需的 upstream capacity/refineries,因为我们依赖从 Canada 到 China 的其他国家。

资助这些 unprofitable efforts,可能是 Trump administration 最好的 domestic policy move。

为了确保 US supply chain sovereignty,而不是依赖 Russia 和 China?

FT 的写法看起来简直像是在试图让 US public 生气……

对这些真正很好的、保障 American independence 的努力生气。
❤️ 471 🔁 32 💬 51
打开原推
💬 引用
It’s funny a shower thought…

Probably put $SIVE on the radar for $QCOM, $MRVL, $AVGO, AlChip, Mediatek, $AMZN, $META, $MSFT venture arms now?

Since everyone publicly knows now Broadcom can just go and buy Marvell’s photonics chokepoint vulnerability (Amazon/Microsoft ASIC programs) for a rounding error of $350m…

Or Qualcomm can do the same buying $SIVE then vertically integrate laser IP after Alphawave aquisition.

Or maybe… hyperscalers figure out a way $SIVE remains independent by owning enough shares?
一个 shower thought 还挺好笑……

现在 $SIVE 可能已经进入 $QCOM$MRVL$AVGO、AlChip、Mediatek、$AMZN$META$MSFT venture arms 的 radar 了?

因为现在大家公开知道了,Broadcom 可以直接用 $350m 这个 rounding error,买下 Marvell 的 photonics chokepoint vulnerability(Amazon/Microsoft ASIC programs)……

或者 Qualcomm 也可以这么做,买下 $SIVE,然后在 Alphawave acquisition 后垂直整合 laser IP。

又或者……hyperscalers 想办法通过持有足够 shares,让 $SIVE 保持 independent?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The reason I personally see less downside risk with $SIVE:

A competitor to $MRVL like $AVGO can just buy Sivers outright and their near-medium term photonics roadmap…

At ~$290m… if it gets any cheaper.

Gemini responses were interesting:


A competitor like Broadcom buying Sivers Photonics for ~$290M to choke Marvell’s newly acquired Celestial AI roadmap isn't just strategic;

It is supply chain warfare with an absurdly high ROI.



For pocket change, a competitor could buy the upstream light source, control the immediate IP roadmap, and inflict billions of dollars worth of opportunity cost on Marvell right as they try to integrate Celestial AI


It’s likely better for hyperscalers like $MSFT, AlChip, $MRVL, $AMZN to invest in Sivers to secure their CPO supply chain then have it being bought out by one of their competitors.

Like what happened already with $QLCM and Alphawave for OpenLight.

My opinion: $SIVE chokepoint as one of the few projects remaining independent cw laser suppliers in the world…

Is inherently way more valuable than their marketcap.

Hedge funds not being able to invest due to “MC” and Sweden listing to keep valuations depressed… is a blessing in disguise for both acquisitions or retail investors.
我个人觉得 $SIVE 下行风险较小的原因:

$AVGO 这种 $MRVL 的竞争对手,可以直接把 Sivers 和他们短中期 photonics roadmap 买下来……

如果它再便宜一点,大概只要 ~$290m。

Gemini 的回答挺有意思:


像 Broadcom 这样的竞争对手,用 ~$290M 买下 Sivers Photonics 来卡住 Marvell 新收购的 Celestial AI 路线图,这不只是战略;

这是供应链战争,而且 ROI 高得离谱。



一个竞争对手用零花钱就能买下上游 light source,控制近期 IP roadmap,并在 Marvell 试图整合 Celestial AI 的时候,给它造成价值数十亿美元的机会成本。


$MSFT、AlChip、$MRVL$AMZN 这类 hyperscaler 来说,投资 Sivers 来锁定 CPO 供应链,可能比让它被竞争对手收购要好。

就像已经发生过的那样……
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2038502143154331677
❤️ 368 🔁 38 💬 31
打开原推
💬 引用
The reason I personally see less downside risk with $SIVE:

A competitor to $MRVL like $AVGO can just buy Sivers outright and their near-medium term photonics roadmap…

At ~$290m… if it gets any cheaper.

Gemini responses were interesting:


A competitor like Broadcom buying Sivers Photonics for ~$290M to choke Marvell’s newly acquired Celestial AI roadmap isn't just strategic;

It is supply chain warfare with an absurdly high ROI.



For pocket change, a competitor could buy the upstream light source, control the immediate IP roadmap, and inflict billions of dollars worth of opportunity cost on Marvell right as they try to integrate Celestial AI


It’s likely better for hyperscalers like $MSFT, AlChip, $MRVL, $AMZN to invest in Sivers to secure their CPO supply chain then have it being bought out by one of their competitors.

Like what happened already with $QLCM and Alphawave for OpenLight.

My opinion: $SIVE chokepoint as one of the few projects remaining independent cw laser suppliers in the world…

Is inherently way more valuable than their marketcap.

Hedge funds not being able to invest due to “MC” and Sweden listing to keep valuations depressed… is a blessing in disguise for both acquisitions or retail investors.
我个人认为 $SIVE downside risk 较低的原因:

$AVGO 这样的 $MRVL 竞争对手,可以直接买下 Sivers 以及他们近中期 photonics roadmap……

如果它再便宜一点,价格只有 ~$290m。

Gemini 的回答挺有意思:


像 Broadcom 这样的竞争对手用 ~$290M 买下 Sivers Photonics,以卡住 Marvell 新收购的 Celestial AI roadmap,这不只是 strategic;

这是 supply chain warfare,而且 ROI 高得离谱。



竞争对手只要花一点零钱,就可以买下 upstream light source,控制 immediate IP roadmap,并在 Marvell 正试图整合 Celestial AI 时,给它造成数十亿美元 opportunity cost。


$MSFT、AlChip、$MRVL$AMZN 这样的 hyperscalers 来说,投资 Sivers 来确保自己的 CPO supply chain,可能比让它被竞争对手买走更好。

就像 $QLCM 和 Alphawave 对 OpenLight 已经发生过的事。

我的观点:作为世界上少数仍保持 independent 的 cw laser suppliers 项目之一,$SIVE chokepoint……

其内在价值远高于它的 marketcap。

Hedge funds 因为“MC”和 Sweden listing 无法投资,导致估值被压低……对 acquisitions 或 retail investors 来说,反而是 disguised blessing。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just a shower thought:

Would be smart for a competitor like $AVGO to buy $MRVL upstream light source for $280M with $SIVE.

Then you control their short-mid term photonics roadmap with Celestial.

Kind of like $QLCM did with Alphawave and OpenLight ecosystem.

Quite a few hedge funds already talked about potential M&A opportunities.

Asked Gemini, response was funny
只是洗澡时冒出来的想法:

$AVGO 这样的竞争对手,用 $280M 通过 $SIVE 买下 $MRVL 的上游 light source,会很聪明。

这样你就能控制他们和 Celestial 相关的短中期 photonics roadmap。

有点像 $QLCM 对 Alphawave 和 OpenLight 生态做的事。

已经有不少 hedge funds 聊过潜在 M&A 机会。

问了 Gemini,回答挺好笑。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2038221422808760744
❤️ 289 🔁 21 💬 25
打开原推
💬 引用
There’s clearly some market outperformers despite index’s and mega caps from $META / $MSFT crashing.

This probably signals institutions rotation or an extremely strong up and coming sector.

The obvious one is into CPO/ELS supply chains.

My personal picks were:

$TSEM / Win Semi- TSM of photonics
$AAOI / $SIVE / $COHR / $LITE- Light Sources
$SOI / $AXTI - Substrates
$IQE - Epiwafers

But of course there are larger names out there like $MRVL, Sumitomo, $AVGO.
尽管 index 和 $META / $MSFT 这些 mega caps 崩了,市场里显然还是有一些 outperformers。

这可能说明 institutions rotation,或者一个极强的新兴 sector。

显而易见的是流向 CPO/ELS supply chains。

我个人 picks 是:

$TSEM / Win Semi- photonics 的 TSM
$AAOI / $SIVE / $COHR / $LITE- Light Sources
$SOI / $AXTI - Substrates
$IQE - Epiwafers

当然,外面也有更大的名字,比如 $MRVL、Sumitomo、$AVGO
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I am long Win Semi (3105.TWO) at $4.1B MC.

I believe markets are sleeping on of the most important foundries in the world (aside from $TSM).

IMO their strategic positioning exceeds far beyond $4B MC.

They sit in almost every major chokepoints:

-> In the SpaceX Starlink LEO supply chain.
-> As $AVGO, $LITE, $MTSI, $SIVE InP foundries for optical transceivers
-> then as the body/eyes of humanoids as the GaAs foundry for TOF lasers possibly mapping to Boston Dynamic Atlas
-> With legacy from MediaTek / Qualcomm / $AAPL from their previous business.

But Win appears to be bottom of the legacy drag (like with $SOI), with optical as one of their largest growth vectors.

Then... Win has the largest TAM expansion/revenue acceleration out of almost any foundry:

With: LEO, humanoids / CW laser, 800g, 1.6t, 3.2t optical transceiver massive ramp up over the next few years.

Especially with Broadcom as their anchor client ( $AVGO owns ~5% of Win).

$NVDA doesn't care who makes the lasers, whether it's $LITE or $COHR.

They just care if there's enough.

There's not enough.

-> Demand for CW lasers will likely go parabolic. (they make the lasers that companies like $SIVE designs)

-> Demand for LEO satellites (SpaceX Starlink) will likely go parabolic.

-> Demand for humanoids will likely go parabolic.

As, Win Semi sits as a semi-monopoly chokepoint in the three most frontier and fastest growing industries for photonics/AI, robotics/humanoids, and space.

Especially with Optical TAM explosion:

Win fwd earnings for 2027 roughly in ~35x range, I do think this is sandbagging it and forward multiples will end up dirt cheap.

Win will largely benefit from TAM expansion and accelerated revenue growth.

Of course: Win will win. So I am long Win.
我做多 Win Semi(3105.TWO),市值 $4.1B。

我认为市场正在忽视世界上最重要的 foundry 之一(除了 $TSM)。

在我看来,它的战略位置远远不止 $4B 市值。

它几乎卡在每个主要瓶颈上:

-> 在 SpaceX Starlink LEO 供应链里。
-> 作为 $AVGO$LITE$MTSI$SIVE 的光模块 InP foundry。
-> 然后作为 humanoids 的身体/眼睛,作为 TOF lasers 的 GaAs foundry,可能对应 Boston Dynamic Atlas。
-> 还有来自 MediaTek / Qualcomm / $AAPL 旧业务的基础。

但 Win 看起来已经处在传统业务拖累的底部(有点像 $SOI),而光学是它最大的增长方向之一。

然后……Win 可能拥有几乎所有 foundry 里最大的 TAM 扩张/收入加速:

未来几年,LEO、humanoids / CW laser、800g、1.6t、3.2t 光模块都会大规模放量。

尤其 Broadcom 是它的锚定客户($AVGO 持有 Win 约 5%)。

$NVDA 不在乎激光器是谁做的,是 $LITE 还是 $COHR 都行。

他们只在乎够不够。

现在不够。

-> CW lasers 需求可能会抛物线式增长。(他们生产像 $SIVE 这类公司设计的激光器)

-> LEO 卫星(SpaceX Starlink)需求可能会抛物线式增长。

-> humanoids 需求可能会抛物线式增长。

因为 Win Semi 是 photonics/AI、robotics/humanoids 和 space 这三个最前沿、增长最快行业里的半垄断瓶颈。

尤其是在 Optical TAM 爆发的情况下:

Win 2027 年 forward earnings 大概在 ~35x 区间,我觉得这还是在压预期,forward multiples 最后会显得非常便宜。

Win 会主要受益于 TAM 扩张和收入增长加速。

当然:Win will win。所以我做多 Win。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037387801285841118
❤️ 387 🔁 47 💬 20
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm still long on markets (now 85% long, now 15% cash/hedges).

Even during wartime, I expect many names from $AAOI to $LITE to outperform.

However...

The World is largely interconnected now.

The current administration might not realize the severity/fragility of upstream supply chains.

They might look at $AAPL "Made in America".

or $TSLA "Made in America" but if you look at the source for Tesla Humanoids:

-> It's in China. Actuator materials stem from Russia feedstock. Materials come from partners in Canada.

-> For Starlink, massive amount of supply chains stem from Win Semi Taiwan to companies in Korea.

For where the funding from OpenAI, private equities, megacap, and others come from:

-> Large part of it comes from UAE, Middle East, and others (that might need to pull out liquidity) as their oil fields get blown up.

Extended disruptions (US ground invasion) for spanning multiple months, is very bearish.

I was initially expecting the "Shock and Awe" and US to claim victory and for short term War shock to be bought back.

But I would not encourage US to head toward a drawn out War.

This especially is not good for Asian partners (SK, Japan) or our allies in Europe either.

The main beneficiaries of War are:
#1: Israel
#2: Russia

The rest of the World, including the US, are getting dragged down from War.

It looks like "Oil/Energy prices going up is good for US":

But it takes down a lot of supply chains that the hyperscalers from $NVDA to even $AAPL relies on.
我仍然 long markets(现在 85% long,15% cash/hedges)。

即使在 wartime,我也预计从 $AAOI$LITE 的很多名字会 outperform。

不过……

现在 World 很大程度上是 interconnected。

当前 administration 可能没有意识到 upstream supply chains 的严重性/脆弱性。

他们可能看着 $AAPL “Made in America”。

或者 $TSLA “Made in America”,但如果你看 Tesla Humanoids 的来源:

-> 在 China。Actuator materials 来自 Russia feedstock。Materials 来自 Canada partners。

-> 对 Starlink 来说,大量 supply chains 来自 Win Semi Taiwan 到 Korea 的公司。

至于 OpenAI、private equities、megacap 等 funding 来自哪里:

-> 很大一部分来自 UAE、Middle East 等(他们的 oil fields 被炸后,可能需要抽走 liquidity)。

持续多个月的 extended disruptions(US ground invasion)非常 bearish。

我一开始预期的是 “Shock and Awe”,US 宣称胜利,然后短期 War shock 被买回。

但我不鼓励 US 走向 drawn out War。

这尤其对 Asian partners(SK、Japan)以及我们在 Europe 的 allies 也不好。

War 的主要受益者是:
#1:Israel
#2:Russia

包括 US 在内的 World 其他部分都被 War 拖累。

它看起来像 “Oil/Energy prices going up is good for US”:

但它会拖垮很多从 $NVDA 到甚至 $AAPL 的 hyperscalers 所依赖的 supply chains。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
This is vastly underestimating second, third, fourth order effects of supply chains and the energy crisis.

If Iran blows up a lot of oil fields in UAE and the Middle East and causes disruptions.

Lot of institutions over there largely funding US private equities, megacap, and others may have to pull out funding, causing widescale disruptions from capex spend to liquidity.

This is also ignoring Asian partners from Japan, KR, that is not as self-sustaining as the US is in regards to oil, LNG, energy, and others.

The global economy is extremely interconnected now. Even if the US is fine, the supply chains won't be.

And you'll see this showing up in both liquidity, earnings, and stock price.
这严重低估了供应链和能源危机的二阶、三阶、四阶影响。

如果 Iran 炸掉 UAE 和中东一堆油田并造成扰动。

那边很多主要给美国 private equities、megacap 等提供资金的机构,可能不得不撤资,从 capex 支出到流动性都会造成大范围扰动。

这也忽略了日本、KR 这些亚洲伙伴,它们在石油、LNG、能源等方面不像美国那么自给自足。

全球经济现在高度互联。即使美国没事,供应链也不会没事。

你会在流动性、盈利和股价里看到这些影响。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2038446435084235095
❤️ 492 🔁 15 💬 36
打开原推
💬 引用
I think I nailed the institutional bottleneck rotation.

-> Caught the tail end of memory name rise with $SNDK, Samsung, SK Hynix, $MU

-> Frontran institutions with photonics with names like $AAOI, $AXTI $LITE, $COHR.

-> Doing it again now by adding heavily toward SiPh, ELS, and CPO: $SIVE, $TSEM, $SOI, $AEHR, Win Semi, and others.

Of course if you want to play it safe:
$MRVL (captive), $AVGO (captive), $TSM, and $NOK all do it as well, but they're larger players. And getting direct exposure to the next supercycle is ideal.

I still think there's tons of room to grow for memory to EML optical transceivers, but the largest boom is at the start/inflection point of a new architectural cycle.

Macro messing up some trades aside, expecting capital rotation soon toward CPO / ELS supply chains.

TLDR from analyst note: The AI infrastructure investment supercycle follows a strict "bottleneck resolution" sequence:

Compute/GPUs (2023) -> Memory/HBM (2024) -> Interconnect/Networking (2025+).

Translation:

"We judge that the third investment cycle of the AI value chain has officially begun. Following GPUs (2023) and HBM (2024), post-2025, optical interconnects will become the fastest-growing core segment.

2027–2028 will be a critical inflection point where CPO commercialization. 1.6T standardization, and Scale-Up optical transitions align, structurally expanding the TAM of related industries"

Some takeaways:
1. CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) is moving from the lab to commercial mass production
2. 2027-2028 is the major structural inflection point (good idea to frontrun this now in 2026 from testing with $AEHR to ELS with $SIVE or packaging with $POET).
3. The Total Addressable Market (TAM) for optical components, materials, and testing equipment is expected to structurally expand 3x to 5x (I think this is sandbagging a bit).
我觉得我抓准了 institutional bottleneck rotation。

-> 用 $SNDK、Samsung、SK Hynix、$MU 抓住了 memory names 上涨的尾巴

-> 用 $AAOI$AXTI $LITE$COHR 这类名字在 photonics 上 frontran institutions。

-> 现在通过重仓加入 SiPh、ELS 和 CPO 再做一次:$SIVE$TSEM$SOI$AEHR、Win Semi 等。

当然如果你想稳一点:
$MRVL(captive)、$AVGO(captive)、$TSM$NOK 也都做这个,但它们是更大的 players。直接 exposure 到下一轮 supercycle 是理想选择。

我仍然认为从 memory 到 EML optical transceivers 还有大量增长空间,但最大 boom 发生在新 architectural cycle 的起点/inflection point。

抛开 macro 搞乱一些 trades,预计 capital rotation 很快会流向 CPO / ELS supply chains。

Analyst note 的 TLDR:AI infrastructure investment supercycle 遵循严格的 “bottleneck resolution” sequence:

Compute/GPUs (2023) -> Memory/HBM (2024) -> Interconnect/Networking (2025+)。

翻译:

“我们判断 AI value chain 的第三轮 investment cycle 已经正式开始。继 GPUs(2023)和 HBM(2024)之后,2025 年以后,optical interconnects 将成为增长最快的核心 segment。

2027–2028 将是关键 inflection point,CPO commercialization、1.6T standardization 和 Scale-Up optical transitions 将同步出现,结构性扩张相关 industries 的 TAM。”

一些 takeaway:
1. CPO(Co-Packaged Optics)正在从实验室走向 commercial mass production
2. 2027-2028 是主要 structural inflection point(现在 2026 年就通过 $AEHR 的 testing、$SIVE 的 ELS 或 $POET 的 packaging 去 frontrun 是个好主意)。
3. optical components、materials 和 testing equipment 的 Total Addressable Market (TAM) 预计会结构性扩张 3x 到 5x(我觉得这有点 sandbagging)。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
CPO Landscape Mirae Analyst Note:

Scale-Across:
CPO ASIC: $AVGO, $MRVL
Optical Transceiver: $COHR, $LITE, Innolight
DSP/PAM4: $AVGO, $MRVL
Coherent DCI: $CIEN, $NOK
OCS Equipment: iPronics, Polatis
Optical Cable / Fiber: $GLW, Prysmian, Furukawa
HCF: $LITE, OFS
DCI Coherent: Ciena, Nokia, Huawei
Optical Amplifier: $LITE, $COHR
OCS Gateway: KDDI

Scale-Up:
SiPh Foundry: imec, $GFS, $TSM
SiPh Modulator: $NVDA (in-house MRM), $INTC
ELS: NTT, Furukawa, $LITE, $COHR
THz Interconnect: R&D Stage?
CPO Test: "Expanding entry of new players"
Micro Lens / Optical Systems: "Expanding entry of new players"

TLDR: Scale Up CPO is coming next. Think the analyst note missed a bunch of upstream names and conflated ELS with light source.

But it's helpful to see who they think the leading players are as a very high-level view.
CPO Landscape Mirae 分析师笔记:

Scale-Across:
CPO ASIC: $AVGO, $MRVL
Optical Transceiver: $COHR, $LITE, Innolight
DSP/PAM4: $AVGO, $MRVL
Coherent DCI: $CIEN, $NOK
OCS Equipment: iPronics, Polatis
Optical Cable / Fiber: $GLW, Prysmian, Furukawa
HCF: $LITE, OFS
DCI Coherent: Ciena, Nokia, Huawei
Optical Amplifier: $LITE, $COHR
OCS Gateway: KDDI

Scale-Up:
SiPh Foundry: imec, $GFS, $TSM
SiPh Modulator: $NVDA (in-house MRM), $INTC
ELS: NTT, Furukawa, $LITE, $COHR
THz Interconnect: R&D Stage?
CPO Test: “Expanding entry of new players”
Micro Lens / Optical Systems: “Expanding entry of new players”

TLDR: Scale Up CPO 接下来要来了。感觉这份分析师笔记漏掉了不少上游名字,而且把 ELS 和 light source 混在一起了。

但作为一个非常高层级视角,看看他们认为领先玩家是谁还是有帮助的。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2038436546412769560
❤️ 1,037 🔁 109 💬 36
打开原推
📝 原创
CPO Landscape Mirae Analyst Note:

Scale-Across:
CPO ASIC: $AVGO, $MRVL
Optical Transceiver: $COHR, $LITE, Innolight
DSP/PAM4: $AVGO, $MRVL
Coherent DCI: $CIEN, $NOK
OCS Equipment: iPronics, Polatis
Optical Cable / Fiber: $GLW, Prysmian, Furukawa
HCF: $LITE, OFS
DCI Coherent: Ciena, Nokia, Huawei
Optical Amplifier: $LITE, $COHR
OCS Gateway: KDDI

Scale-Up:
SiPh Foundry: imec, $GFS, $TSM
SiPh Modulator: $NVDA (in-house MRM), $INTC
ELS: NTT, Furukawa, $LITE, $COHR
THz Interconnect: R&D Stage?
CPO Test: "Expanding entry of new players"
Micro Lens / Optical Systems: "Expanding entry of new players"

TLDR: Scale Up CPO is coming next. Think the analyst note missed a bunch of upstream names and conflated ELS with light source.

But it's helpful to see who they think the leading players are as a very high-level view.
CPO Landscape Mirae Analyst Note:

Scale-Across:
CPO ASIC:$AVGO, $MRVL
Optical Transceiver:$COHR, $LITE, Innolight
DSP/PAM4:$AVGO, $MRVL
Coherent DCI:$CIEN, $NOK
OCS Equipment:iPronics, Polatis
Optical Cable / Fiber:$GLW, Prysmian, Furukawa
HCF:$LITE, OFS
DCI Coherent:Ciena, Nokia, Huawei
Optical Amplifier:$LITE, $COHR
OCS Gateway:KDDI

Scale-Up:
SiPh Foundry:imec, $GFS, $TSM
SiPh Modulator:$NVDA (in-house MRM), $INTC
ELS:NTT, Furukawa, $LITE, $COHR
THz Interconnect:R&D Stage?
CPO Test:“Expanding entry of new players”
Micro Lens / Optical Systems:“Expanding entry of new players”

TLDR:Scale Up CPO 接下来要来了。我觉得这份 analyst note 漏了很多 upstream names,也把 ELS 和 light source 混在一起了。

但作为 very high-level view,看他们认为哪些是 leading players 还是有帮助的。
❤️ 307 🔁 37 💬 13
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
CPO Landscape:

I think Mirae Assets got this wrong and missed quite a few names.

They conflate ELS with the actual laser source but I'll cross check.

Apart from that it's a good high-level overview on landscape (I'll need to do some translating but ill post TLDR on main timeline)
CPO Landscape:

我觉得 Mirae Assets 这份搞错了,而且漏了不少名字。

他们把 ELS 和真正的 laser source 混在一起了,但我会 cross check。

除此之外,这是一个不错的 high-level overview on landscape(我需要做些翻译,但会在 main timeline 发 TLDR)
❤️ 99 🔁 2 💬 4
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
CW Laser Chokepoint Company im looking at rn:

If you look at the well known suppliers out there kinda looks like this:
T1: Lumentum, Broadcom, Coherent, Sumitomo
T2: $AAOI, Furukawa, $MTSI
T3: $INTC, $SIVE, Luxnet.

Luxnet I'm doing DD on right now, found pretty interesting at $1.7B. Have no positions though, will let you know if i take them one.

(now kinda bad time to heavy long names anyway bc of Iran war, so many of these, can just keep in the back of ur head).

Again just taking another look if i missed something. I remember comparing $SIVE and Luxnet and found Sivers to be more compelling both in MC and existing partners for western suppy chains.

Benefit of luxnet was vertical integration, compared to $SIVE + Win.

There's some other cw lasers, but a lot of them are self driving cars + other applications. main thing to area about it ai dcs
我现在正在看的 CW Laser Chokepoint Company:

如果看那些知名 suppliers,大概是这样:
T1:Lumentum, Broadcom, Coherent, Sumitomo
T2:$AAOI, Furukawa, $MTSI
T3:$INTC, $SIVE, Luxnet。

Luxnet 我现在正在做 DD,$1.7B 看起来挺有意思。不过没有仓位,如果我建仓会告诉你们。

(现在因为 Iran war,其实也不是重仓 long names 的好时候,所以这些可以先放在脑子后面)。

再说一次,只是再看一眼有没有漏掉东西。我记得之前比较 $SIVE 和 Luxnet 时,觉得 Sivers 在 MC 和现有 western supply chains partners 上都更有吸引力。

luxnet 的好处是 vertical integration,相比 $SIVE + Win。

还有一些其他 cw lasers,但很多是 self driving cars + 其他应用。主要要关注的是 ai dcs。
❤️ 198 🔁 3 💬 16
打开原推
📝 原创
Personalized AI medicine will likely be huge.

Nobody wants to die early.

Combining $HIMS to $TEM has immense potential.

Here's just one example with Gitlab's CEO:

> In 2023, Sijbrandij was diagnosed with osteosarcoma
> In July 2024, he announced the cancer had returned, despite multiple treatments
> By late 2024, he had reached the absolute end of standard of care medical options.
> Rather than accepting death, Sijbrandij decided to treat his cancer the same way he built GitLab as an engineering problem
> He began feeding ChatGPT massive amounts of his personal medical data from scans, blood test results, and tissue sample data.
> ChatGPT and AI made novel targeted treatments after identifying mutations, then how to attack them
> From there, he applied for unapproved, experimental drug and received it
> The approach worked. Sijbrandij managed to stall and turn around a terminal prognosis with AI.

We've seen this success story with Gitlab's CEO ( $TEM was explicitly listed the partner he used for the bulk RNA sequencing of his tumor ).

As well as someone curing their own dog with AI recently.

The potential if you can combine $HIMS (DTC distribution network) and $TEM (Personalized sequencing and AI treatment) into a scalable product is massive (though extremely challenging).

The entire human population is the TAM.

And similar to the $AXTI InP situation with hyperscalers:

People will pay anything to not die (bottleneck). This is just a hint into where the future of healthcare is heading.
Personalized AI medicine 很可能会非常大。

没人想早死。

$HIMS$TEM 结合起来有巨大潜力。

这里用 Gitlab's CEO 举一个例子:

> 2023 年,Sijbrandij 被诊断出 osteosarcoma
> 2024 年 7 月,他宣布 cancer 在多次治疗后复发
> 到 2024 年末,他已经走到 standard of care medical options 的尽头。
> Sijbrandij 没有接受死亡,而是决定像构建 GitLab 一样,把癌症当成 engineering problem 来处理
> 他开始把自己大量个人医疗数据喂给 ChatGPT,包括 scans、blood test results 和 tissue sample data。
> ChatGPT 和 AI 在识别 mutations 后,制定了新的 targeted treatments,以及如何攻击它们
> 之后,他申请了未获批准的 experimental drug 并拿到了
> 这个方法奏效了。Sijbrandij 用 AI 暂停并扭转了 terminal prognosis。

我们已经看到 Gitlab's CEO 这个成功案例( $TEM 被明确列为他用于 tumor bulk RNA sequencing 的 partner)。

最近也有人用 AI 治好了自己的狗。

如果你能把 $HIMS(DTC distribution network)和 $TEM(Personalized sequencing and AI treatment)结合成一个 scalable product,潜力巨大(虽然极其困难)。

整个人类 population 都是 TAM。

类似 $AXTI InP 与 hyperscalers 的情况:

人们会为了不死付出任何代价(bottleneck)。这只是未来 healthcare 走向的一点提示。
❤️ 702 🔁 46 💬 65
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a shower thought:

Would be smart for a competitor like $AVGO to buy $MRVL upstream light source for $280M with $SIVE.

Then you control their short-mid term photonics roadmap with Celestial.

Kind of like $QLCM did with Alphawave and OpenLight ecosystem.

Quite a few hedge funds already talked about potential M&A opportunities.

Asked Gemini, response was funny
只是一个 shower thought:

$AVGO 这样的竞争对手,用 $280M 通过 $SIVE 买下 $MRVL 的 upstream light source,会很聪明。

然后你就能控制他们和 Celestial 的 short-mid term photonics roadmap。

有点像 $QLCM 对 Alphawave 和 OpenLight ecosystem 做的事。

已经有不少 hedge funds 聊过潜在 M&A opportunities。

问了 Gemini,回答很好笑。
❤️ 269 🔁 14 💬 34
打开原推
📝 原创
Markets are now in: “Bitcoin is Dead” section of the Rainbow Chart.

The last two times were:

- December 2022 - $18,650
- September 2023 - $25,210

Today: $66,666.43

As Bitcoin drops more, is this the end of the famous Rainbow Chart v2?

Especially as a psychological log regression model that retail follows.

Or is this a buying opportunity?

Could be yes to both.
Markets 现在到了 Rainbow Chart 里的 “Bitcoin is Dead” 区间。

上两次是:

- December 2022 - $18,650
- September 2023 - $25,210

今天:$66,666.43

随着 Bitcoin 继续下跌,这会是著名 Rainbow Chart v2 的终结吗?

尤其是作为 retail 会跟随的 psychological log regression model。

还是这是买入机会?

可能两个答案都是 yes。
❤️ 534 🔁 24 💬 76
打开原推
💬 引用
$IREN filed to dilute $6,000,000,000 at a $11.7B MC.

That is not noise.

This is Iren's way to monetize their 4.5GW capacity by selling all those new shares onto the open market.

If you want some history on how this turns out:

Look at $BKKT that crashed 99% with Mike and $IREN board of directors history with excessive ATMs. Or his recent company $ASST.

It’s accretive to the company and executives: Because it wipes out all retail shareholders and they can always issue SBC.

So they don’t actually care what stock price it needs to be at to sell.

After they’re finished, they have $6B in new cash to use for scaling without paying interest.

But the reason why convertible notes with interest, and $NVDA funding balance sheets is much better for retail capital:

Is because it doesn’t wipe out retail equity to achieve this. Because at this point $IREN looks like the $AMC of datacenters with a dwindling moat, and looming $6B in shares sold into the open market.

Reason I post about $IREN is because

- people dismiss a $6B ATM as “Noise”
- it’s one of the most popular retail “buy the dip” companies that they’re buying into a $6B dilution machine
- people still don’t understand the risk at all.
- the amount they have now is not enough to finance GPUs/GW capacity monetization.
- they likely will have to use the ATM, it’s not “optionality”

Again: I have zero positions in the company.

I’m just warning retail investors that this ATM structurally wipes out your equity appreciation by how structural mechanics of $6B+ ATMs work.

Because $IREN likely needs to sell new shares at any price to monetize their GW, otherwise there would be zero need to file it.

Executives actually don't need to care because they can make up for stock price dropping by issuing SBC like $SNAP.

If you have to wonder if your equity gets wiped out from an excessive ATM:

There are better longs out there than $IREN.
$IREN 在 $11.7B MC 时 filed 要 dilute $6,000,000,000。

这不是 noise。

这是 Iren 通过把这些新股卖到公开市场,monetize 他们 4.5GW capacity 的方式。

如果你想看这种事最后会怎样:

看看 $BKKT,Mike 和 $IREN board of directors 过往 excessive ATMs 的历史让它跌了 99%。或者他最近的公司 $ASST

这对公司和 executives 是 accretive:因为它清空所有 retail shareholders,而他们永远可以 issue SBC。

所以他们其实不在乎 stock price 需要在什么位置才能卖。

等他们卖完,他们就有 $6B 新现金用于 scaling,还不用付 interest。

但为什么带 interest 的 convertible notes,以及 $NVDA funding balance sheets 对 retail capital 好得多:

因为它不会为了实现这个目标而清空 retail equity。因为此时 $IREN 看起来像 datacenters 里的 $AMC,moat 正在衰减,还有迫近的 $6B shares 要卖进公开市场。

我发 $IREN 的原因是

- 人们把 $6B ATM 当成 “Noise”
- 它是最热门的 retail “buy the dip” 公司之一,而他们买进的是一台 $6B dilution machine
- 人们仍然完全不理解风险。
- 他们现在拥有的金额不足以 finance GPUs/GW capacity monetization。
- 他们很可能必须使用 ATM,这不是 “optionality”

再说一次:我在这家公司没有任何仓位。

我只是在警告 retail investors,这个 ATM 会通过 $6B+ ATMs 的结构性机制,结构性抹掉你的 equity appreciation。

因为 $IREN 很可能需要在任何价格卖新股来 monetize 他们的 GW,否则完全没必要 file 它。

Executives 实际上不需要在乎,因为他们可以像 $SNAP 一样,通过 issuing SBC 来弥补股价下跌。

如果你需要担心自己的 equity 会不会被 excessive ATM 抹掉:

外面有比 $IREN 更好的 longs。
引用原推@BonyBallf2
@aleabitoreddit @Kaizen_Investor I feel like you are way too much focused on the dilution. If they excecute their GW pipeline properly the dilution is just noise. Demand for available GW is so massive and i do think most data centers will have massive delays and also though time to get financed. So imo $iren ☝️
@aleabitoreddit @Kaizen_Investor 我感觉你太关注稀释了。如果他们能正确执行自己的 GW pipeline,稀释只是 noise。可用 GW 的需求极其巨大,而且我确实认为大多数数据中心会严重延迟,也会很难拿到融资。所以 imo $iren ☝️
https://x.com/BonyBallf2/status/2037905125516181762
❤️ 1,027 🔁 63 💬 131
打开原推
💬 引用
Maybe it’s time to start looking into the Doomsday ETF I made, as a hedge with $NVDA and $LCID?

Just in: “The Pentagon is preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran”

It’s not confirmed yet… but seems likely now. https://t.co/Jse9HERHyj
也许该开始看看我做的 Doomsday ETF 了,用 $NVDA$LCID 做 hedge?

刚刚:“The Pentagon is preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran”

还没确认……但现在看起来很可能。 https://t.co/Jse9HERHyj
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The Serenity Doomsday ETF:

25% | $FAZ
25% | $GUSH
20%| $LCID Short
10% | $SQQQ
10% $UVIX
10% | $NVDA Puts

Rationale:
$FAZ / 3x short financial - Private Market liquidity play on Middle Eastern capital abandoning private markets if all their oil fields get blown apart.

$GUSH / 2x Long US OIl and Gas - Global crude prices that will likely skyrocket, and American producers reap record windfall in profits.

$SQQQ / 3x short Nasdaq - Google, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft forced selling if liquidity gets pulled.

$LCID Short / 60% owned by Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund. If the Saudis suffer from liquidity shock, there goes Lucid.

$UVIX/ 2x long volatility - If there's black swan events, volatility goes up.

$NVDA Puts - Last bastion for the $SPY as largest weighting. If capex gets pulled, index sells off will Nvidia go down the hardest.

I only see this scenario if US sends ground troops to Iran and Iran blows everything around it up.

Let's pray for Taco Tuesday.
Serenity Doomsday ETF:

25% | $FAZ
25% | $GUSH
20%| $LCID Short
10% | $SQQQ
10% $UVIX
10% | $NVDA Puts

逻辑:
$FAZ / 3x short financial - 如果他们的油田全被炸,中东资本撤出 private markets,这是 private market 流动性交易。

$GUSH / 2x Long US OIl and Gas - 全球原油价格可能暴涨,美国生产商会获得创纪录暴利。

$SQQQ / 3x short Nasdaq - 如果流动性被抽走,Google、Amazon、Apple、Microsoft 会被迫卖出。

$LCID Short / 60% 由 Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund 持有。如果沙特遭遇流动性冲击,Lucid 就没了。

$UVIX/ 2x long volatility - 如果有黑天鹅事件,波动率会上升。

$NVDA Puts - 作为最大权重,是 $SPY 的最后堡垒。如果 capex 被撤,指数抛售时 Nvidia 会跌得最狠。

我只在美国向 Iran 派出地面部队、Iran 把周围一切都炸掉的情况下,才会看到这个情景。

让我们为 Taco Tuesday 祈祷。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037779565066764425
❤️ 217 🔁 10 💬 20
打开原推
📝 原创
Can't $SIVE just pull a $LITE and TAM expansion down the ELS stack?

I'm getting early stage $LITE flashbacks (Oclaro, NeoPhotonics, Cloud Light)...

Here's my thesis/idea:

on how Sivers can capture the ~$300-$400 ELS (from $50-100 arrays) and become a $10B+ company.

How this plays out:
-> Sivers is needs funding.
-> Get NRE prepay or PIPE (eg. $AXTI/Northland)

-> Say "Hey, $AVGO and $LITE are going to choke your custom AI cluster margins".

----> get $META / $AMZN / $MSFT capital injection for multi-source supply for next ASIC clusters cause they're scared.

Esp. with $NVDA funding $4B to securing supply from $LITE and $COHR... then PTSD from the current EML capacity bottleneck.

It's easier than people think.

-> US spinoff of photonics arm (markets don't like investing in legacy companies).

- - - - - > This will likely work in 2026, bc CPO/photonics is hot, now and not like 2024-early 2025.

-> Raise enough to automate wafer probers and fund the module NPI.

-> Fab-lite test model: develop probe cards and test inhouse, but push capex to OSATs.

-> Buy SiPh packaging IP (or just continue JDM with O-Net and $POET)

-> Keep their Glasgow InP fab for in-house testing for iteration/raw epitaxial.

-> Outsource lithography, etching, etc. stuff to Win Semi + others (don't do capex heavy things yourself)

-> Then just $SIVE can just hand tested lasers and packaging IP to $FN

And Poof.

You have a independent, mass producible, high margin, ELS module as ELSFP becomes standard.

Then they can do other stuff like buying DSP designs and start consolidating the tech stack.

Instead of cheap $10 laser dies x 6 for a $50-$100 laser array, you have $400 hot swappable modules.

Basically their starting point is owning one of the chokepoints moat in photonics on the laser level...

Then they can go downstream like what $LITE did with EML and optical transceivers.

TLDR:

Sivers ( $SIVE ) holds a rare, independent chokepoint in InP lasers at the exact moment the world is transitioning to CPO.

There's only a few independent companies in the world that can do this like $SIVE (eg. Sumitomo, $LITE, $COHR).

But of course they need the funding to achieve TAM expansion and the right vision.
$SIVE 不能直接来一套 $LITE,把 TAM expansion 往 ELS stack 下游做吗?

我开始有早期 $LITE 的 flashbacks(Oclaro、NeoPhotonics、Cloud Light)……

这是我的 thesis/idea:

关于 Sivers 如何捕捉 ~$300-$400 ELS(从 $50-100 arrays 起步),并成为 $10B+ company。

路径如下:
-> Sivers 需要 funding。
-> 拿 NRE prepay 或 PIPE(比如 $AXTI/Northland)

-> 说:“嘿,$AVGO$LITE 会卡住你们 custom AI cluster margins。”

----> 拿到 $META / $AMZN / $MSFT capital injection,用于下一代 ASIC clusters 的 multi-source supply,因为他们会害怕。

尤其是在 $NVDA 投 $4B 去从 $LITE$COHR 确保 supply 之后……再加上当前 EML capacity bottleneck 带来的 PTSD。

这比人们想的容易。

-> photonics arm 做 US spinoff(市场不喜欢投 legacy companies)。

- - - - - > 这在 2026 年可能会有效,因为现在 CPO/photonics 很热,不像 2024-early 2025。

-> 融足够的钱来 automate wafer probers,并资助 module NPI。

-> Fab-lite test model:开发 probe cards 并 inhouse test,但把 capex 推给 OSATs。

-> 买 SiPh packaging IP(或者继续和 O-Net、$POET 做 JDM)

-> 保留 Glasgow InP fab 用于 in-house testing,做 iteration/raw epitaxial。

-> 把 lithography、etching 等外包给 Win Semi + others(不要自己做 capex heavy 的事)

-> 然后 $SIVE 只需要把 tested lasers 和 packaging IP 交给 $FN

然后 Poof。

你就有了一个 independent、mass producible、high margin 的 ELS module,随着 ELSFP 成为标准。

之后他们还能做其他事,比如买 DSP designs,并开始 consolidating tech stack。

不是 $10 的 laser dies x 6 组成 $50-$100 laser array,而是 $400 的 hot swappable modules。

基本上,他们的起点是在 laser level 上拥有 photonics 里一个 chokepoints moat……

然后可以像 $LITE 做 EML 和 optical transceivers 那样往 downstream 走。

TLDR:

Sivers( $SIVE )在全世界转向 CPO 的关键时点,持有一个稀有、独立的 InP lasers chokepoint。

世界上只有少数 independent companies 能做这个,比如 $SIVE(例如 Sumitomo、$LITE$COHR)。

当然,他们需要 funding 和正确的 vision 才能实现 TAM expansion。
❤️ 420 🔁 47 💬 35
打开原推
💬 引用
Honestly... the most obvious ideas like long $LNG.

Or going long on $CVX.

Are probably the best ones instead of contrarian longs in Wartime?

Especially with low 18-30 IV, this would have easily been a few hundred percent gain by now.

There’s probably a lot more for oil and LNG exporters to run if tensions escalate.
说实话……最明显的 ideas,比如 long $LNG

或者 long $CVX

在 Wartime 里可能比 contrarian longs 更好?

尤其是 IV 只有 18-30,这到现在本来很容易已经是几百个点收益。

如果 tensions escalate,oil 和 LNG exporters 可能还有很多上涨空间。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
US/Australia and Indonesia/Malaysia can also up their exports to SK. I’m sure there’s alternatives like you mentioned.

But one of the biggest catalyst was for US exporters like $LNG. However point of the data was that lot of disruption/pricing fears are overblown to SK Hynix/Samsung
US/Australia 以及 Indonesia/Malaysia 也可以增加对 SK 的出口。我确定就像你说的,也有替代方案。

但最大的催化之一其实是给 $LNG 这种美国出口商。不过这些数据的重点是,对 SK Hynix/Samsung 的扰动/定价恐慌被夸大了很多。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2029108380586201538
❤️ 426 🔁 20 💬 62
打开原推
📝 原创
Iran has now just drone striked the major UAE Aluminum Plant.

If your first thought like everyone else was:

How do I profit off this?

Here's how:

$CNEX - Smelting process for aluminum production. They benefit when primary aluminum prices hike from global prices.

$AA - Bauxite mining, alumina refining, and aluminum smelting. They capture mine -> refinery -> smelter as a pure play way for Aluminum.

And of course: Long CME/COMEX Aluminum (ALI).

Most people are long oil, but Aluminum from Iran drone striking everything, is a large beneficary of the war.
Iran 现在刚刚 drone strike 了主要 UAE Aluminum Plant。

如果你和其他人一样,第一反应是:

我怎么从这件事赚钱?

方法如下:

$CNEX - aluminum production 的 smelting process。当 primary aluminum prices 因全球价格上涨时,他们受益。

$AA - Bauxite mining、alumina refining 和 aluminum smelting。他们以 pure play 的方式覆盖 mine -> refinery -> smelter 的 Aluminum 链条。

当然还有:Long CME/COMEX Aluminum (ALI)。

大多数人 long oil,但由于 Iran 到处 drone strike,Aluminum 是这场 war 的大受益者。
❤️ 726 🔁 64 💬 45
打开原推
💬 引用
Faster compounds:

$AAOI - 10x revenue ramp from optical transcivers h2 2027
$NBIS - 10x revenue ramp Q4 2026
$ARM - 5x revenue growth from their new AI CPU
$MRVL - 2-3x revenue growth from $MSFT Maia Ramp.
$AVGO - Long hyperscaler ASIC
$LITE - Long OCS / Google TPU
Win Semi - Foundry exposure to frontier industries
$TSEM - Long photonics, backlogged
SK Hynix - Memory exposure, extreme operating income ramp

With some barbell exposure away from Hyperscaler capex aside from Amazon:

$VNP - Long term rare earths for Western Supply chains
$NEO (TCX) - Robotics Supply chains
$AMZN - Robotics/AI cutting opex
$CRCL - Stablecoin long
$RDDT - Ridiculously high profit
$GLD - Safe Hedge
$IBIT - Halving 2028
$CVX Calls - Oil Hedge

And maybe long term (you know it's coming):

$INTC / $AMKR- Made in America supply chains
$SOI - Silicon Photonics / CPO substrates.
$RKLB - Long term call on Space industry

Then pick one or two small cap moonshots:
$SIVE - CW Laser Chokepoints or $IQE for Landmark rerating on restructuring were my two favorites.

There's others I've mentioned like $AEHR for testing or $VPG for Optimus.

How I actively manage my own stuff from $AXTI and others is a lot different risk profile than what others should do.

Going full port into high-beta in this macro environment is not the best idea.
更快的 compounds:

$AAOI - optical transceivers h2 2027 带来 10x revenue ramp
$NBIS - Q4 2026 10x revenue ramp
$ARM - 他们的新 AI CPU 带来 5x revenue growth
$MRVL - $MSFT Maia Ramp 带来 2-3x revenue growth。
$AVGO - Long hyperscaler ASIC
$LITE - Long OCS / Google TPU
Win Semi - Foundry exposure to frontier industries
$TSEM - Long photonics,backlogged
SK Hynix - Memory exposure,extreme operating income ramp

同时有一些远离 Hyperscaler capex(除了 Amazon)的 barbell exposure:

$VNP - Western Supply chains 的长期 rare earths
$NEO (TCX) - Robotics Supply chains
$AMZN - Robotics/AI cutting opex
$CRCL - Stablecoin long
$RDDT - Ridiculously high profit
$GLD - Safe Hedge
$IBIT - Halving 2028
$CVX Calls - Oil Hedge

也许长期来看(你知道它会来的):

$INTC / $AMKR- Made in America supply chains
$SOI - Silicon Photonics / CPO substrates。
$RKLB - Long term call on Space industry

然后挑一两个 small cap moonshots:
$SIVE - CW Laser Chokepoints,或者 $IQE 因 restructuring 带来的 Landmark rerating,是我两个最喜欢的。

还有我提过的其他,比如 $AEHR 做 testing,或 $VPG 做 Optimus。

我自己主动管理 $AXTI 等东西的方式,risk profile 和别人应该做的很不一样。

在这种 macro 环境里 full port 到 high-beta 不是最好的想法。
引用原推@Ud197601
@aleabitoreddit @BitcoinAIGuy Do you mind sharing a core diversified list for those looking to allocate smaller accounts?
Under $250k?

Wasnt sure if your list has changed from recent macro events
@aleabitoreddit @BitcoinAIGuy 你介意分享一份核心分散名单,给那些想配置小账户的人吗?
低于 $250k?

不确定你的名单有没有因为最近宏观事件而变化。
https://x.com/Ud197601/status/2037909226966667439
❤️ 1,427 🔁 160 💬 66
打开原推
📝 原创
My thoughts on $NBIS, $IREN, $CRWV and the current Neocloud market.

One of them ends up as the next AWS in 5 years:

My guess it’s Nebius.

It's not winner takes all (DigitalOcean is there with Amazon), but there's clearly superior structures and likely winners.

The downside:

-> Low chance of rate cuts from Iran conflict.

->Broader market doesn't appear to want to fund the CapEx cycle. But want to reap the benefits

With $IREN:

We get it, 4.5GW = X revenue. But who is funding the GPUs?

Whoever is buying into the $6,000,000,000 ATM right now.

The winners will be whoever enters after holders get fully diluted.

The reality is, they don't have enough funding to monetize their capacity through GPUs without colo models.

And they didn't find other financing methods, so they went through ATMs because of a cult community that will buy into anything they sell.

However, I agree it will be accretive long term. Just not as much for the retail buying in now.

With $CRWV:

They did everything right... $NVDA backing. Hyperscaler clients...

But they financed completely wrong. Now, $1.5B+ yearly debt interest is eating Coreweave alive and cuts into FCF.

Almost like credit card debt, Coreweave gets a job to pay off that debt, but eventually, the debt interest is too high that working doesn't really cover that and expansion too.

If any company goes down, $CRWV is the first to go the massive debt load and interest.

With $NBIS:

They're doing as much as they can right... $NVDA funding $2B to fund capex.

Convertible note offerings (convertible note short hedging is annoying for short term price appreciation).

But this is the best way to do financing structures with much lower interest than Coreweave.

They now have ~$46B+ in backlog from $META and $MSFT, two of the most profitable hyperscalers out there, without direct OpenAI linked contagion like Coreweave.

And unlike others; there’s appreciation from their other companies (Clickhouse equity appreciation: avride robotaxi scale up; toloka triple digit growth)

From my take: Nebius is the clear winner.

However, current macro environments does not favor short term holders across the board with indexes dropping 7%.

Especially so if they're buying into active ATMs.

Long term, the benefits when they scale up eg. $NBIS Q4 2026 (yes, even $IREN), will be immense.
我对 $NBIS$IREN$CRWV 和当前 Neocloud market 的看法。

其中一个会在 5 年后成为下一个 AWS:

我猜是 Nebius。

这不是 winner takes all(DigitalOcean 也和 Amazon 并存),但明显有更优结构和更可能的赢家。

下行:

-> Iran conflict 下 rate cuts 概率低。

-> broader market 似乎不想 funding CapEx cycle,却想收获 benefits

关于 $IREN

我们懂,4.5GW = X revenue。但谁来 funding GPUs?

现在买进 $6,000,000,000 ATM 的人。

赢家会是 holders 被 fully diluted 后再进场的人。

现实是,如果没有 colo models,他们没有足够 funding 通过 GPUs monetize capacity。

而且他们没有找到其他 financing methods,所以通过 ATMs,因为有一个 cult community 会买他们卖的任何东西。

不过,我同意长期会 accretive。只是对现在买入的 retail 没那么 accretive。

关于 $CRWV

他们所有事都做对了……$NVDA backing。Hyperscaler clients……

但融资完全做错了。现在每年 $1.5B+ debt interest 正在吃掉 Coreweave,并侵蚀 FCF。

几乎像信用卡债务,Coreweave 找工作还债,但最终 debt interest 太高,工作收入其实覆盖不了利息和扩张。

如果有公司会倒,$CRWV 会因为巨大 debt load 和 interest 第一个倒。

关于 $NBIS

他们尽可能做对了……$NVDA funding $2B 用于 capex。

Convertible note offerings(convertible note short hedging 对短期 price appreciation 很烦)。

但这是更好的 financing structures,interest 比 Coreweave 低很多。

他们现在有来自 $META$MSFT 的 ~$46B+ backlog,这两家是最盈利的 hyperscalers 之一,而且不像 Coreweave 那样有 direct OpenAI linked contagion。

而且不同于其他公司,他们还有其他公司的 appreciation(Clickhouse equity appreciation;avride robotaxi scale up;toloka triple digit growth)

以我的看法:Nebius 是明确赢家。

不过当前 macro environments 对全板块短期 holders 都不友好,indexes 跌了 7%。

如果他们买进 active ATMs,尤其如此。

长期看,当他们 scale up,比如 $NBIS Q4 2026(是的,甚至 $IREN),收益会非常巨大。
❤️ 1,265 🔁 86 💬 110
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
SpaceX Supply Chain ahead of IPO list:

There's way too many companies LOL, need to go through each one. check out financials, verify DD, then see if TAM is big enough for revenue drivers

Doing DD into
$ATRO - testing
$DCO - subassemblies
$HEI
$ATI - titanium sponge, nickel-based superalloys
$VELO (everyone knows)
$SIF - closed-die forgings
$PH - cryogenic valves, seals, and fluid handling (matching falcon9 not confirmed?)
$MOG.A - Appears in optimus bom too, isolation valves and actuators
$LIN / $APD- LOX, helium, nitrogen, and noble gases
$TDG - pumps, valves, igniters (maybe?)
$GTLS - propellants at launch
$FLTCF - RF Transceivers
$HXL / $TRYIY - aerospace carbon fibers
$PKE - materials (eg. hot-melt)
$STLD - stainless steel for Starship
Auden Techno (TPE: 3138) - capacitors
Toray Industries (TYO: 3402) - PAN-based carbon fibers
$CRS - metal products and alloys
$MTRN - beryllium
$GHM - Merlin engine turbopumps (falcon9?)
SeAH Besteel (: 014300) - SK alloy near Starbase
Nickel Industries ASX: NIC - base commodities

Starlink:
$STM - antennas
$AVGO - baseband and comm
$CMTL - ground station
$TRMB - timing
Win semi
Universal Microwave (TPEx: 3491)
Rafael Microelectronics(TPEx: 6568)
APEX International Co (TWSE: 4927)
Parpro CorporationTWSE: 4916
Filtronic - appears again, custom radio frequency
Mynaric AG ($M0YN) - laser comm
$MPWR - PFC controller
$TXN - DC/DC converter
$DIOD - Shunt regulator
Mediatek/Qualcomm and Micron
Wistron NeWeb (TWSE: 6285) - PCB supplier
Compeq Manufacturing (TWSE: 6285) - routers and ground terminal
Chin-Poon Industrial (TWSE: 2355) - direct satellite component (interview?)
Tong Hsing - RF transceiver
Kinpo Electronics - ground station motherboard

Again lot of this are mapping. SpaceX doesn't publish things publicly.
SpaceX Supply Chain IPO 前名单:

公司实在太多了 LOL,需要逐个看。检查 financials,验证 DD,然后看 TAM 是否足够大,能不能成为 revenue drivers

正在做 DD:
$ATRO - testing
$DCO - subassemblies
$HEI
$ATI - titanium sponge, nickel-based superalloys
$VELO(大家都知道)
$SIF - closed-die forgings
$PH - cryogenic valves, seals, and fluid handling(matching falcon9 未确认?)
$MOG.A - 也出现在 optimus bom,isolation valves and actuators
$LIN / $APD- LOX, helium, nitrogen, and noble gases
$TDG - pumps, valves, igniters(也许?)
$GTLS - launch 时的 propellants
$FLTCF - RF Transceivers
$HXL / $TRYIY - aerospace carbon fibers
$PKE - materials(比如 hot-melt)
$STLD - Starship 用 stainless steel
Auden Techno (TPE: 3138) - capacitors
Toray Industries (TYO: 3402) - PAN-based carbon fibers
$CRS - metal products and alloys
$MTRN - beryllium
$GHM - Merlin engine turbopumps(falcon9?)
SeAH Besteel (: 014300) - Starbase 附近 SK alloy
Nickel Industries ASX: NIC - base commodities

Starlink:
$STM - antennas
$AVGO - baseband and comm
$CMTL - ground station
$TRMB - timing
Win semi
Universal Microwave (TPEx: 3491)
Rafael Microelectronics(TPEx: 6568)
APEX International Co (TWSE: 4927)
Parpro CorporationTWSE: 4916
Filtronic - 再次出现,custom radio frequency
Mynaric AG ($M0YN) - laser comm
$MPWR - PFC controller
$TXN - DC/DC converter
$DIOD - Shunt regulator
Mediatek/Qualcomm and Micron
Wistron NeWeb (TWSE: 6285) - PCB supplier
Compeq Manufacturing (TWSE: 6285) - routers and ground terminal
Chin-Poon Industrial (TWSE: 2355) - direct satellite component(interview?)
Tong Hsing - RF transceiver
Kinpo Electronics - ground station motherboard

再说一次,很多都是 mapping。SpaceX 不公开发布这些东西。
❤️ 355 🔁 24 💬 30
打开原推
📝 原创
The Serenity Doomsday ETF:

25% | $FAZ
25% | $GUSH
20%| $LCID Short
10% | $SQQQ
10% $UVIX
10% | $NVDA Puts

Rationale:
$FAZ / 3x short financial - Private Market liquidity play on Middle Eastern capital abandoning private markets if all their oil fields get blown apart.

$GUSH / 2x Long US OIl and Gas - Global crude prices that will likely skyrocket, and American producers reap record windfall in profits.

$SQQQ / 3x short Nasdaq - Google, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft forced selling if liquidity gets pulled.

$LCID Short / 60% owned by Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund. If the Saudis suffer from liquidity shock, there goes Lucid.

$UVIX/ 2x long volatility - If there's black swan events, volatility goes up.

$NVDA Puts - Last bastion for the $SPY as largest weighting. If capex gets pulled, index sells off will Nvidia go down the hardest.

I only see this scenario if US sends ground troops to Iran and Iran blows everything around it up.

Let's pray for Taco Tuesday.
The Serenity Doomsday ETF:

25% | $FAZ
25% | $GUSH
20%| $LCID Short
10% | $SQQQ
10% $UVIX
10% | $NVDA Puts

Rationale:
$FAZ / 3x short financial - 如果所有 oil fields 都被炸烂,Middle Eastern capital 撤离 private markets,这是 Private Market liquidity play。

$GUSH / 2x Long US OIl and Gas - Global crude prices 很可能暴涨,美国 producers 获得创纪录 profits windfall。

$SQQQ / 3x short Nasdaq - 如果 liquidity 被抽走,Google、Amazon、Apple、Microsoft forced selling。

$LCID Short / 60% owned by Saudi Arabia Public Investment Fund。如果 Saudis 遭遇 liquidity shock,Lucid 就没了。

$UVIX/ 2x long volatility - 如果有 black swan events,volatility 上升。

$NVDA Puts - $SPY 最大权重的最后堡垒。如果 capex 被撤,index selloff 时 Nvidia 会跌得最狠。

我只在 US 派 ground troops 进 Iran,并且 Iran 把周围一切都炸掉的情况下看到这个 scenario。

让我们为 Taco Tuesday 祈祷。
❤️ 859 🔁 65 💬 46
打开原推
📝 原创
This was Trump back in 1988 in an interview about Iran:

“I’d do a number on Kharg Island. I’d go in and take it.”

I’m pretty sure markets from $MSFT to $META are pricing in the risks of Trump not TACOing now.

Really hope global economy &gt; “Art of the Deal” here. https://t.co/ajYJXLRGfq
这是 Trump 1988 年在一次关于 Iran 的采访里说的:

“I’d do a number on Kharg Island. I’d go in and take it.”

我很确定从 $MSFT$META 的 markets,现在正在 pricing in Trump 不 TACO 的风险。

真希望这里 global economy > “Art of the Deal”。 https://t.co/ajYJXLRGfq
❤️ 276 🔁 12 💬 16
打开原推
💬 引用
I don’t post USD values of positions from $RDDT to $CRCL since they’re irrelevant.

What matters are the core thesis/ideas:

The % outcome in the market validates them, not the size of a portfolio and USD values going up a lot (like .01% of $10M).

I’ve said this before as well to any small X content creator who gets made fun of because of a $5K port or $25K port.

They should be listened to as well for their ideas, not how much money they have.

It’s the same reason I don’t cite my background in RISC-V to publishing papers in AI Labs when I post a thesis:

They’re based on the core idea.

Not authority.

All the endless noise ended up getting to my head so I gave in once posting $SIVE figures.

Substance is what matters and I think that’s largely why my account got such a huge following recently.

And I encourage others to focus on that as well.
我不发从 $RDDT$CRCL 的 positions USD values,因为它们无关紧要。

重要的是 core thesis/ideas:

市场里的 % outcome 会验证它们,而不是 portfolio 的大小和 USD values 涨很多(比如 $10M 的 .01%)。

我以前也对任何因为 $5K port 或 $25K port 被取笑的小 X content creator 说过这点。

他们的 ideas 也应该被听取,而不是看他们有多少钱。

这也是我发 thesis 时不引用自己 RISC-V 背景或在 AI Labs 发 papers 的原因:

它们基于 core idea。

不是 authority。

无尽 noise 最后还是影响到了我,所以我有一次让步发了 $SIVE figures。

Substance 才重要,我觉得这很大程度上也是我账号最近获得这么多 followers 的原因。

我也鼓励其他人专注于这个。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I just bought ~.5%-1% of $SIVE as a company.

I said their future CW laser chokepoint is grossly mispriced.

And I put my money where my mouth is.

Especially when they're the confirmed light source for Jabil, $MRVL Celestial, O-Net, and other hyperscalers. https://t.co/9xUu4OTbJt
我刚买了大约 .5%-1% 的 $SIVE 这家公司。

我说过他们未来 CW laser 瓶颈被严重 misprice。

我也用钱投票了。

尤其当他们已经确认是 Jabil、$MRVL Celestial、O-Net 和其他 hyperscalers 的 light source。 https://t.co/9xUu4OTbJt
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037503648520179834
❤️ 412 🔁 9 💬 29
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So some thoughts on Iran/Trade:

I messed up and underestimated Trump decisive strikes like Venezuela.

This war could lead to a potential blowup on the AI trade if this gets dragged out.

Since a lot of Middle East (Dubai) are funding the hyperscalers/OpenAI etc AI buildout. Only a few like $GOOGL were funding it off their operating income.

If Us takes over Khrag island; then if Iran retaliates by blowing up all the oil fields around them.

There’s prob going to be a large liquidity vacuum that was pledged toward ai buildout.

The immense amounts of cascading problems for hyperscalers and then supply chains.bNot even including energy costs

I thought Trump would pull out by now but he seems extremely set on taking over the island.

But I do see material risks to the AI trade if this continues.

I’m still long since I’m pretty sure US admin is aware of the risks now and are trying to find an off ramp.
关于 Iran/Trade 的一些想法:

我搞错了,低估了 Trump 像 Venezuela 那样 decisive strikes 的可能。

如果这场 war 被拖长,可能会导致 AI trade 爆掉。

因为很多 Middle East(Dubai)在 funding hyperscalers/OpenAI 等 AI buildout。只有少数像 $GOOGL 是用 operating income funding。

如果 US 接管 Khrag island;然后 Iran 通过炸掉周围所有 oil fields 来报复。

很可能会出现一个巨大的 liquidity vacuum,而这些 liquidity 原本 pledged toward ai buildout。

hyperscalers 以及之后 supply chains 会出现大量 cascading problems。还不包括 energy costs。

我以为 Trump 现在会撤,但他似乎非常坚定要接管这个 island。

但如果这继续下去,我确实看到 AI trade 的 material risks。

我仍然 long,因为我很确定 US admin 现在意识到了这些风险,并正在寻找 off ramp。
❤️ 295 🔁 6 💬 43
打开原推
📝 原创
My portfolio has drawdowns from Macro as well.

YTD is now 527%.

After the index crashed -7%.

- $AAOI “crashed” from $30 -> $100 -> $96…
- $LITE “crashed” from $330-> $800 -> $702…
- $AXTI “crashed” from $15 -> $70 -> $60…

I’m not underestimating the War in Iran.

This has serious consequences to liquidity/energy, so I’ve winded down margin.

But if a company is going from $134m quarterly revenue to projected $1.54B a quarter from Made in America optical transceiver ramps...

or if the tiny $3.6B company owns the materials supply chain for the hyperscaler photonics buildout...

or a tiny laser supplier at $290m in $SIVE feeds to $MRVL CPO programs or Jabil transcivers...

or a optical giant like $LITE is sold out of EML capacity until 2028...

or a small European company in $SOI provides all the substrates required for silicon photonics / CPO.

or a small European company in $IQE has latent reactor capacity multiple times what their valued at…

or a memory company like SK Hynix is projected to make more than what their current market cap is in 3 years…

There’s going to be tons of volatility on the way up, as markets realize their importance to supply chains

But if you can’t bypass them to scale AI. Or they’re designed into the supply chains of $AMZN or $MSFT.

Maybe they tend to outperform the market?
我的 portfolio 也有来自 Macro 的 drawdowns。

YTD 现在是 527%。

在 index 崩了 -7% 之后。

- $AAOI “crashed” from $30 -> $100 -> $96…
- $LITE “crashed” from $330-> $800 -> $702…
- $AXTI “crashed” from $15 -> $70 -> $60…

我没有低估 War in Iran。

这对 liquidity/energy 有严重后果,所以我已经 winded down margin。

但如果一家公司从 $134m quarterly revenue,走向 Made in America optical transceiver ramps 带来的 projected $1.54B a quarter……

或者如果一家小小 $3.6B 公司拥有 hyperscaler photonics buildout 的 materials supply chain……

或者 $SIVE 这样 $290m 的 tiny laser supplier 给 $MRVL CPO programs 或 Jabil transceivers 供货……

或者像 $LITE 这样的 optical giant,EML capacity 已经卖光到 2028……

或者 $SOI 这样一家欧洲小公司提供 silicon photonics / CPO 所需的所有 substrates。

或者 $IQE 这样一家欧洲小公司有 latent reactor capacity,是其估值的好几倍……

或者像 SK Hynix 这样的 memory company,预计 3 年内赚的钱超过当前 market cap……

随着市场意识到它们对 supply chains 的重要性,向上过程中会有大量 volatility。

但如果你没法绕过它们来 scale AI。或者它们被设计进 $AMZN$MSFT 的 supply chains。

也许它们往往会 outperform market?
❤️ 896 🔁 54 💬 48
打开原推
💬 引用
Great callout on $HIMX and now down -31.54% (accelerated by macro).

This is a good lesson around chokepoints.

They missed two things on this "Meme Stock":

- Chokepoints can be designed out.
- Chokepoint may not be material enough to translate into revenue like $AXTI.

$AAOI on the other hand, has material TAM increase if you look at optical transciever projections that they've been bearish on.

Largely disagreed with a large number of photonics picks (eg. calling for $POET at 7x the valuation over $SIVE the laser supplier).

Or being bearish on $AAOI without looking at optionality + revenue ramp in a massive TAM.

But we'll see who's right or wrong in a years time, most of the recent drop across the board was accelerated by macro (not whether a $SIVE or $HIMX thesis was wrong).

But very interesting to see chip designers go the other way of plays mentioned by analysts.
关于 $HIMX 的提醒很不错,现在跌了 -31.54%(被 macro 加速)。

这是关于 chokepoints 的好课。

他们在这个 “Meme Stock” 上漏了两点:

- Chokepoints 可以被 designed out。
- Chokepoint 可能不够 material,无法像 $AXTI 那样转化为 revenue。

另一方面,如果你看 optical transceiver projections,$AAOI 有 material TAM increase,而他们一直 bearish。

我很不同意很多 photonics picks(例如喊 $POET 应该比 laser supplier $SIVE 高 7x valuation)。

或者在不看 massive TAM 中 optionality + revenue ramp 的情况下 bearish $AAOI

但一年后我们会看到谁对谁错,最近整体下跌大多是被 macro 加速(不是 $SIVE$HIMX 的 thesis 是否错了)。

不过看到 chip designers 走向 analysts 提到的 plays 的反面,确实很有意思。
引用原推@PhotonCap
$HIMX -31.54% since I published my analysis rebutting the @citrini / @hntrbrkmedia report.

The thesis was simple:
- Himax's microlens monopoly for TSMC COUPE Gen 1 & Gen 2? Real.
- The market treating it as an unbreakable moat? Wrong.

1. My full patent-by-patent breakdown:
"https://t.co/sUBOixqDI3"

2. Also highly recommend @vikramskr's deep dive. He fills in the engineering gap that was missing from the entire Himax/FOCI/TSMC conversation:
"https://t.co/2EBBhPuOFk"
$HIMX 自从我发布反驳 @citrini / @hntrbrkmedia 报告的分析后,已经跌了 -31.54%。

thesis 很简单:
- Himax 对 TSMC COUPE Gen 1 & Gen 2 的 microlens 垄断?是真的。
- 市场把它当成不可打破的护城河?错了。

1. 我逐项专利拆解全文:
"https://t.co/sUBOixqDI3"

2. 也强烈推荐 @vikramskr 的深度分析。他补上了整个 Himax/FOCI/TSMC 讨论里缺失的工程环节:
"https://t.co/2EBBhPuOFk
https://x.com/PhotonCap/status/2037557780056621081
❤️ 234 🔁 17 💬 14
打开原推
💬 引用
$VCX is down another 40%.

Totaling -62.35% drop in two days.

Good reminder that sometimes it’s good to look at the math….

Behind these names (NAV mismatch), especially with others like $IREN and $6B ATM filings. https://t.co/dj1iKO8YLP
$VCX 又跌了 40%。

两天合计跌 -62.35%。

很好地提醒大家,有时候确实应该看看这些名字背后的 math……

比如 NAV mismatch,尤其是其他像 $IREN 和 $6B ATM filings 的情况。 https://t.co/dj1iKO8YLP
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning about $VCX.

A very popular ETF with weighting toward (Anthropic, Databricks, OpenAI, Anduril, and SpaceX).

Ask yourself this:

Is SpaceX is worth 23 times $META valuation?

With the stock going up 1288% this month: VCX is trading at roughly ~20x its NAV. So 1500-2000% premium?

This is like buying SpaceX at 34 Trillion USD. Or OpenAI at 16 Trillion USD.

Would you short it?

No: It's extremely low float and lack of options for hedging.

But should you buy into it?

$VCX looks like greater fools theory right now and you’re playing hot potato.
关于 $VCX 的警告。

这是一个很热门的 ETF,权重偏向 Anthropic、Databricks、OpenAI、Anduril 和 SpaceX。

问问你自己:

SpaceX 值得 23 倍 $META 的估值吗?

这个月股价涨了 1288%:VCX 现在大约以 ~20x NAV 交易。也就是 1500-2000% 溢价?

这就像以 34 Trillion USD 的估值买 SpaceX,或者以 16 Trillion USD 的估值买 OpenAI。

你会 short 它吗?

不会:它流通盘极低,而且缺少期权来对冲。

但你应该买进去吗?

$VCX 现在看起来就是 greater fools theory,你是在玩 hot potato。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037137351638704487
❤️ 237 🔁 8 💬 29
打开原推
💬 引用
I just bought ~.5%-1% of $SIVE as a company.

I said their future CW laser chokepoint is grossly mispriced.

And I put my money where my mouth is.

Especially when they're the confirmed light source for Jabil, $MRVL Celestial, O-Net, and other hyperscalers. https://t.co/9xUu4OTbJt
我刚买下了 $SIVE 这家公司约 ~.5%-1%。

我说他们未来的 CW laser chokepoint 被严重 mispriced。

而且我用钱证明我说的话。

尤其是他们是 Jabil、$MRVL Celestial、O-Net 和其他 hyperscalers 已确认的 light source。 https://t.co/9xUu4OTbJt
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
This is why you need to have conviction before entering a trade.

If you knew $SIVE positioning in the CW laser space to Jabil, $MRVL Celestial, and others for CPO.

$250M MC as the light source chokepoint would be a joke.

High confidence we’ll see this end up like $AXTI in a years time since it this will be the architectural paradigm for cpo scale up.

Don’t care about volatility in the way up because I have conviction in how this plays out with photonics.
这就是为什么你进一笔交易前需要有 conviction。

如果你知道 $SIVE 在 CW laser 领域,对 Jabil、$MRVL Celestial 以及其他 CPO 玩家意味着什么。

作为 light source 瓶颈,$250M MC 就是个笑话。

我很有信心,一年后它会像 $AXTI 一样走出来,因为这会是 cpo scale up 的架构范式。

上涨路上的波动我不在乎,因为我对 photonics 这条路径怎么演化有 conviction。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037493017209450673
❤️ 1,004 🔁 59 💬 148
打开原推
💬 引用
This is why you need to have conviction before entering a trade.

If you knew $SIVE positioning in the CW laser space to Jabil, $MRVL Celestial, and others for CPO.

$250M MC as the light source chokepoint would be a joke.

High confidence we’ll see this end up like $AXTI in a years time since it this will be the architectural paradigm for cpo scale up.

Don’t care about volatility in the way up because I have conviction in how this plays out with photonics.
这就是为什么进场前你需要有 conviction。

如果你知道 $SIVE 在 CW laser space 里对 Jabil、$MRVL Celestial 以及其他 CPO 的 positioning。

$250M MC 作为 light source chokepoint 会像个笑话。

我高度相信一年后它会像 $AXTI 一样,因为这会成为 cpo scale up 的 architectural paradigm。

我不在乎上涨路上的 volatility,因为我对 photonics 这个过程如何展开有 conviction。
❤️ 445 🔁 22 💬 59
打开原推
📝 原创
Turns out… we had no cards after all.

-> Indexes from $SPY are down -5%

-> Individual stocks from $HOOD and $RDDT are down worse 40%+

-> Rare earths supply chains needed for robotics or AI are a mess.

-> We’re fighting with our allies from Canada and Europe that supply us with all the important materials for frontier supply chains (hint: America has no domestic refineries for many of these)

-> Iran situation is now a mess

-> Main beneficiaries are Oil companies and War contractors

-> Russia is happy from Oil sanctions being lifted

-> Hyperscalers are pouring all their reserves into AI capex, with China reaping all the benefits from distillation. (No KYC endpoints)

-> Wealth gap keeps increasing, people living paycheck to paychecks, and mass layoffs are likely to happen as AI disrupts jobs.

Then as a side quest, people in the family are enriching themselves through memecoin launches then selling the industry out to big banks.

Can we at least secure our supply chains and frontier technologies first before we likely start a ground invasion of Iran?

I’ll always be bullish on America but these are some of these dumbest series of decisions I’ve seen.

WTF is even happening?
结果发现……我们其实根本没牌。

-> $SPY 等 indexes 跌了 -5%

-> $HOOD$RDDT 等个股跌得更惨,40%+

-> robotics 或 AI 需要的 rare earths supply chains 一团糟。

-> 我们正在和 Canada、Europe 这些盟友争吵,而他们供应我们 frontier supply chains 所需的所有重要 materials(提示:America 对很多这类东西没有 domestic refineries)

-> Iran situation 现在也一团糟

-> 主要受益者是 Oil companies 和 War contractors

-> Russia 因 Oil sanctions 被解除而开心

-> Hyperscalers 正把所有 reserves 投入 AI capex,而 China 通过 distillation 收获所有好处。(No KYC endpoints)

-> Wealth gap 持续扩大,人们 paycheck to paycheck,随着 AI disrupts jobs,大规模 layoffs 很可能发生。

然后作为 side quest,家族里的人通过 memecoin launches enrich themselves,然后把整个 industry 卖给 big banks。

在我们可能开始 ground invasion of Iran 之前,能不能至少先 secure our supply chains 和 frontier technologies?

我永远 bullish on America,但这些是一连串我见过最蠢的决定。

WTF 到底在发生什么?
❤️ 1,323 🔁 72 💬 120
打开原推
📝 原创
Can someone tell me honestly what the accomplishments of David Sacks “Tzar" position was?

> Billions of Liquidity drained from Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Altcoins into Trump Coin and Melania Coin

> GENIUS Act passed and banned stablecoin issuers (like $CRCL and Tether) from paying interest, which would compete vs Banks

> Attempted to push through legislation that would hand all control over Crypto chokepoints over to banks through Clarity Act.

> Attempted to ban Stablecoin related 3rd parties from giving yields through the Clarity Act

> Attempted to ban non-USD denominated stablecoins like DAI (liquidity drain).

> Banks still don't onboard crypto companies and will ban you from onboarding.

> There's literally only a few in the US that do like Cross River or Customers Bank?

Nothing that we elected him for was accomplished aside from Crypto companies having the "option" to apply for Banking Charters.

But only people close to the administration like Andruil’s founder got a pass? Not any actual crypto companies?

And now big Banks will have all the major chokepoints soon?

This was the biggest transfer of wealth and bloodbaths in the crypto industry to date.

Even Ethereum is higher when Gary Genseler was in office.
有人能诚实告诉我 David Sacks “Tzar” position 的成就是什么吗?

> Billions of Liquidity 从 Bitcoin、Ethereum 和 Altcoins 被抽到 Trump Coin 和 Melania Coin

> GENIUS Act 通过,并禁止 stablecoin issuers(比如 $CRCL 和 Tether)支付 interest,从而和 Banks 竞争

> 试图通过 Clarity Act 推动 legislation,把 Crypto chokepoints 的所有控制权交给 banks。

> 试图通过 Clarity Act 禁止 Stablecoin related 3rd parties 提供 yields

> 试图禁止 DAI 这类 non-USD denominated stablecoins(liquidity drain)。

> Banks 仍然不给 crypto companies onboard,而且会禁止你 onboard。

> US literally 只有少数几家会做,比如 Cross River 或 Customers Bank?

除了 Crypto companies 有“option”去申请 Banking Charters 之外,我们选他来做的事没有任何完成。

但只有接近 administration 的人,比如 Andruil’s founder,拿到了 pass?实际 crypto companies 没有?

现在 big Banks 很快会拥有所有主要 chokepoints?

这是 crypto industry 迄今为止最大的 wealth transfer 和 bloodbath。

甚至 Ethereum 在 Gary Genseler 任内都更高。
❤️ 1,017 🔁 80 💬 107
打开原推
💬 引用
You cant spell Winner without Win.

Because of that: I’m bullish on $SIVE supply chain.

$SIVE -> WIN (TPE:3105) -> Ayar SuperNova -> $JBL -> Hyperscalers, as one flow.

If you compare to $LITE and others that’s also in the same CPO CW WDM space.

There’s a reason why:

-> $POET / $MRVL Celestial.
-> Ayar / $JBL and O-Net use $SIVE.

It’s designed in as the light source for the next-gen photonics architecture for hyperscalers.

At a ~$300M valuation.

And I do think WDM DFB arrays are the superior architecture for scale up. And are incredibly hard to develop.

It's not a zero-sum architectural game and will likely be split with how you handle scale out with single emitters like $LITE and $COHR.

As well as captive suppliers like $MRVL and how they design their architectures.

But if you look at the MC difference (~$300m with $SIVE, $55B with $LITE).

Anyone can see how clear how valuable the $330M incoming disruptor in $SIVE is to the photonics space.

And especially with the $4B foundry in Win Semi that captures fabless laser production from $SIVE, $AVGO, $MTSI and other players at scale.

It’s highly asymmetrical to long both the supply chain as exposure to where photonics and hyperscalers architecture are heading.
Winner 里不能没有 Win。

因此:我 bullish $SIVE supply chain。

$SIVE -> WIN (TPE:3105) -> Ayar SuperNova -> $JBL -> Hyperscalers,是其中一条 flow。

如果你和同处 CPO CW WDM space 的 $LITE 等相比。

下面这些是有原因的:

-> $POET / $MRVL Celestial。
-> Ayar / $JBL 和 O-Net 使用 $SIVE

它被设计为 hyperscalers 下一代 photonics architecture 的 light source。

估值只有 ~$300M。

而且我确实认为 WDM DFB arrays 是 scale up 的 superior architecture,并且极难开发。

这不是 zero-sum architectural game,和 $LITE$COHR 这类 single emitters 如何处理 scale out 很可能会分工。

还有像 $MRVL 这样的 captive suppliers,以及他们如何设计 architectures。

但如果你看 MC 差异($SIVE 约 ~$300m,$LITE $55B)。

任何人都能看清 $SIVE 这个 $330M incoming disruptor 对 photonics space 有多有价值。

尤其是还有 $4B foundry Win Semi,在 scale 上承接来自 $SIVE$AVGO$MTSI 和其他 players 的 fabless laser production。

long 这两端 supply chain,作为 photonics 和 hyperscalers architecture 走向的 exposure,具有高度不对称性。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I am long Win Semi (3105.TWO) at $4.1B MC.

I believe markets are sleeping on of the most important foundries in the world (aside from $TSM).

IMO their strategic positioning exceeds far beyond $4B MC.

They sit in almost every major chokepoints:

-> In the SpaceX Starlink LEO supply chain.
-> As $AVGO, $LITE, $MTSI, $SIVE InP foundries for optical transceivers
-> then as the body/eyes of humanoids as the GaAs foundry for TOF lasers possibly mapping to Boston Dynamic Atlas
-> With legacy from MediaTek / Qualcomm / $AAPL from their previous business.

But Win appears to be bottom of the legacy drag (like with $SOI), with optical as one of their largest growth vectors.

Then... Win has the largest TAM expansion/revenue acceleration out of almost any foundry:

With: LEO, humanoids / CW laser, 800g, 1.6t, 3.2t optical transceiver massive ramp up over the next few years.

Especially with Broadcom as their anchor client ( $AVGO owns ~5% of Win).

$NVDA doesn't care who makes the lasers, whether it's $LITE or $COHR.

They just care if there's enough.

There's not enough.

-> Demand for CW lasers will likely go parabolic. (they make the lasers that companies like $SIVE designs)

-> Demand for LEO satellites (SpaceX Starlink) will likely go parabolic.

-> Demand for humanoids will likely go parabolic.

As, Win Semi sits as a semi-monopoly chokepoint in the three most frontier and fastest growing industries for photonics/AI, robotics/humanoids, and space.

Especially with Optical TAM explosion:

Win fwd earnings for 2027 roughly in ~35x range, I do think this is sandbagging it and forward multiples will end up dirt cheap.

Win will largely benefit from TAM expansion and accelerated revenue growth.

Of course: Win will win. So I am long Win.
我做多 Win Semi(3105.TWO),市值 $4.1B。

我认为市场正在忽视世界上最重要的 foundry 之一(除了 $TSM)。

在我看来,它的战略位置远远不止 $4B 市值。

它几乎卡在每个主要瓶颈上:

-> 在 SpaceX Starlink LEO 供应链里。
-> 作为 $AVGO$LITE$MTSI$SIVE 的光模块 InP foundry。
-> 然后作为 humanoids 的身体/眼睛,作为 TOF lasers 的 GaAs foundry,可能对应 Boston Dynamic Atlas。
-> 还有来自 MediaTek / Qualcomm / $AAPL 旧业务的基础。

但 Win 看起来已经处在传统业务拖累的底部(有点像 $SOI),而光学是它最大的增长方向之一。

然后……Win 可能拥有几乎所有 foundry 里最大的 TAM 扩张/收入加速:

未来几年,LEO、humanoids / CW laser、800g、1.6t、3.2t 光模块都会大规模放量。

尤其 Broadcom 是它的锚定客户($AVGO 持有 Win 约 5%)。

$NVDA 不在乎激光器是谁做的,是 $LITE 还是 $COHR 都行。

他们只在乎够不够。

现在不够。

-> CW lasers 需求可能会抛物线式增长。(他们生产像 $SIVE 这类公司设计的激光器)

-> LEO 卫星(SpaceX Starlink)需求可能会抛物线式增长。

-> humanoids 需求可能会抛物线式增长。

因为 Win Semi 是 photonics/AI、robotics/humanoids 和 space 这三个最前沿、增长最快行业里的半垄断瓶颈。

尤其是在 Optical TAM 爆发的情况下:

Win 2027 年 forward earnings 大概在 ~35x 区间,我觉得这还是在压预期,forward multiples 最后会显得非常便宜。

Win 会主要受益于 TAM 扩张和收入增长加速。

当然:Win will win。所以我做多 Win。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037387801285841118
❤️ 322 🔁 52 💬 30
打开原推
📝 原创
I am long Win Semi (3105.TWO) at $4.1B MC.

I believe markets are sleeping on of the most important foundries in the world (aside from $TSM).

IMO their strategic positioning exceeds far beyond $4B MC.

They sit in almost every major chokepoints:

-> In the SpaceX Starlink LEO supply chain.
-> As $AVGO, $LITE, $MTSI, $SIVE InP foundries for optical transceivers
-> then as the body/eyes of humanoids as the GaAs foundry for TOF lasers possibly mapping to Boston Dynamic Atlas
-> With legacy from MediaTek / Qualcomm / $AAPL from their previous business.

But Win appears to be bottom of the legacy drag (like with $SOI), with optical as one of their largest growth vectors.

Then... Win has the largest TAM expansion/revenue acceleration out of almost any foundry:

With: LEO, humanoids / CW laser, 800g, 1.6t, 3.2t optical transceiver massive ramp up over the next few years.

Especially with Broadcom as their anchor client ( $AVGO owns ~5% of Win).

$NVDA doesn't care who makes the lasers, whether it's $LITE or $COHR.

They just care if there's enough.

There's not enough.

-> Demand for CW lasers will likely go parabolic. (they make the lasers that companies like $SIVE designs)

-> Demand for LEO satellites (SpaceX Starlink) will likely go parabolic.

-> Demand for humanoids will likely go parabolic.

As, Win Semi sits as a semi-monopoly chokepoint in the three most frontier and fastest growing industries for photonics/AI, robotics/humanoids, and space.

Especially with Optical TAM explosion:

Win fwd earnings for 2027 roughly in ~35x range, I do think this is sandbagging it and forward multiples will end up dirt cheap.

Win will largely benefit from TAM expansion and accelerated revenue growth.

Of course: Win will win. So I am long Win.
我 long Win Semi (3105.TWO),MC $4.1B。

我认为市场正在睡过世界上最重要的 foundries 之一(除了 $TSM)。

IMO,它的 strategic positioning 远超 $4B MC。

它坐在几乎所有主要 chokepoints 里:

-> 在 SpaceX Starlink LEO supply chain 中。
-> 作为 $AVGO$LITE$MTSI$SIVE optical transceivers 的 InP foundries
-> 然后作为 humanoids 的 body/eyes,作为 GaAs foundry for TOF lasers,可能映射到 Boston Dynamic Atlas
-> 还有来自 MediaTek / Qualcomm / $AAPL 既有业务的 legacy。

但 Win 看起来处在 legacy drag 的底部(类似 $SOI),而 optical 是他们最大的 growth vectors 之一。

然后……Win 在几乎所有 foundry 中拥有最大的 TAM expansion/revenue acceleration:

随着未来几年 LEO、humanoids / CW laser、800g、1.6t、3.2t optical transceiver massive ramp up。

尤其是 Broadcom 作为 anchor client( $AVGO 持有 Win 约 ~5%)。

$NVDA 不在乎 lasers 是谁做的,是 $LITE 还是 $COHR

他们只在乎够不够。

现在不够。

-> CW lasers 的需求很可能 parabolic。(他们制造像 $SIVE 这类公司设计的 lasers)

-> LEO satellites(SpaceX Starlink)的需求很可能 parabolic。

-> humanoids 的需求很可能 parabolic。

Win Semi 作为一个 semi-monopoly chokepoint,处在 photonics/AI、robotics/humanoids 和 space 这三个最 frontier、增长最快的 industries。

尤其是在 Optical TAM explosion 下:

Win 2027 fwd earnings 大约在 ~35x,我确实觉得这是 sandbagging,forward multiples 最后会变得非常便宜。

Win 会大量受益于 TAM expansion 和 accelerated revenue growth。

当然:Win will win。所以我 long Win。
❤️ 550 🔁 63 💬 32
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
So first long position:

Win Semi - $4B MC. I keep talking about this name over and over…

Especially as the $SIVE foundry. And $LITE foundry.

And SpaceX supply chains too.

I genuinely thought it was a lot larger than $4B since it sits in every chokepoint. Strategically one of the most valuable companies in the world.

Their fwd p/e 2027 is ~35? But I think it will go lower.

And should get rerated as they gear more heavily toward InP.

This is more discretionary directional based on “hey this is extremely valuable positioning wise in every major frontier supply chain and they’ll find a way to monetize like $TSM

Over $AAOI optical transceiver counting capacity/supply then making a MC PT off modeling revenue growth.
所以第一个 long position:

Win Semi - $4B MC。我一直反复提这个名字……

尤其是作为 $SIVE foundry。以及 $LITE foundry。

还有 SpaceX supply chains。

我真心以为它远大于 $4B,因为它在每个 chokepoint 里。战略上是世界上最有价值的公司之一。

他们 2027 fwd p/e 是 ~35?但我觉得会更低。

而且随着他们更重度转向 InP,应该会被 rerated。

这更像是基于“嘿,这家公司在每条主要 frontier supply chain 的 positioning 都极其有价值,而且会像 $TSM 那样找到 monetization 方法”的 discretionary directional。

而不是像 $AAOI 那样数 optical transceiver capacity/supply,然后 model revenue growth 来做 MC PT。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Two new two long positions this week, both large cap.

I'm feel kinda stupid for not going long on these yet?

Kinda hiding in plain sight. Not popular retail longs but incredibly important like $TSEM
这周两个新的 long positions,都是 large cap。

我有点觉得自己居然还没做多它们,很蠢?

有点像明牌藏在眼前。不是散户热门 long,但像 $TSEM 一样极其重要。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036742051820404790
❤️ 189 🔁 4 💬 28
打开原推
📝 原创
This crash today is a good reason why it's good to stay invested.

-> $AAOI is still up 233%?
-> $IQE is still up ~100%?
-> $SIVE is still up 100%+?
-> $LITE is still up ~88%?
-> $TSEM is up ~48%?
-> $SOI is still up 36%?

Even after today my $AXTI positions are still up ~680% after the drop today?

Yes, red days look rough if something drops 13% or 20% and especially so if you're later to enter.

But if you keep thinking it's going to:

-> drop from $500m and sit out
-> drop from $1b and sit out
-> drop from $2b and sit out
-> drop from $3b and sit out

By the time it's $4B and there's finally a correction 15%, you missed out on the entire rise.

People can say "hindsight bias, you're posting after it went up". No, I've posted these are the returns after my original thesis, and I'm just riding the wave up.

I keep getting trolls like these in my comments sections, but hope it doesn't make others panic.

Not everything moves in a green line up, same applies to other sectors and stocks if there’s no material change.

Risk exists. And portfolio sizing is very important.

But if you’re going to enter higher beta names in bottlenecks especially with a clear thesis in mind.

Need to learn to embrace the volatility for your thesis to play out.
今天这次 crash 是一个说明保持 invested 为什么好的例子。

-> $AAOI 仍然涨 233%?
-> $IQE 仍然涨 ~100%?
-> $SIVE 仍然涨 100%+?
-> $LITE 仍然涨 ~88%?
-> $TSEM 涨 ~48%?
-> $SOI 仍然涨 36%?

即使今天下跌后,我的 $AXTI positions 仍然涨 ~680%?

是的,如果某个东西跌 13% 或 20%,red days 看起来很难受,尤其是如果你进场较晚。

但如果你一直觉得它会:

-> 从 $500m 跌下来,于是观望
-> 从 $1b 跌下来,于是观望
-> 从 $2b 跌下来,于是观望
-> 从 $3b 跌下来,于是观望

等它到 $4B,终于 correction 15% 时,你已经错过了整个上涨。

人们可以说 “hindsight bias, you're posting after it went up”。不,我发的是我原始 thesis 之后的 returns,我只是一路 riding the wave up。

我评论区一直有这种 trolls,但希望这不会让其他人 panic。

不是所有东西都会一路绿线上涨,如果没有 material change,其他 sectors 和 stocks 也是一样。

Risk exists。而且 portfolio sizing 非常重要。

但如果你要进入 chokepoints 里的 higher beta names,尤其是心里有清晰 thesis。

就需要学会拥抱 volatility,等你的 thesis 兑现。
❤️ 495 🔁 18 💬 45
打开原推
📝 原创
Are we not using social media anymore?

$SNAP down -50.6% YTD
$RDDT down -44.6% YTD
$PINS down -32.2% YTD
$META down -26.35% 6M

Companies like Snapchat with excessive SBC makes sense…

Yeah there’s bear cases around Meta capex but it’s growing forward revs 30-33% Y/Y round ~17 fwd p/e so that spend is definitely delivering ROI.

But at this point the selloff looks way overblown especially with Reddit with fwd ev/fcf: ~24x; 91% gross margins, 52% growth?

Everyone’s hyper focusing around “AI” disruption but if anything, it makes these social media companies more lean/profitable.

I’m a buyer here. But a confused one.
我们现在不用 social media 了吗?

$SNAP YTD 跌 -50.6%
$RDDT YTD 跌 -44.6%
$PINS YTD 跌 -32.2%
$META 6M 跌 -26.35%

像 Snapchat 这种 excessive SBC 的公司,跌是合理的……

是的,Meta capex 有 bear cases,但它 forward revs 增长 30-33% Y/Y,约 ~17 fwd p/e,所以那笔 spend 确实在交付 ROI。

但此时 selloff 看起来太 overblown,尤其是 Reddit,fwd ev/fcf:~24x;91% gross margins,52% growth?

大家都在 hyper focusing “AI” disruption,但如果说有什么影响,它反而会让这些 social media companies 更 lean/profitable。

我在这里是 buyer。但也是困惑的 buyer。
❤️ 919 🔁 41 💬 117
打开原推
📝 原创
Trump in Cabinet Meeting:

“I thought Oil Prices would go up more.

And I thought the stock market would go down more”.

Now that the $SPY index is down -5.25%…

Having the President say this earlier today isn’t exactly the best words of encouragement. https://t.co/h5ncyEU9Pv
Trump 在 Cabinet Meeting 上:

“I thought Oil Prices would go up more.

And I thought the stock market would go down more”.

现在 $SPY index 已经跌 -5.25%……

President 今天早些时候说这种话,实在不算最好的鼓励。 https://t.co/h5ncyEU9Pv
❤️ 388 🔁 9 💬 46
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Yeah… think markets are pricing a ground invasion (no TACO) and potential oil shock, hence all the selloffs.

Don’t think US would start deploying thousands of troops if it weren’t escalation. Probably just a takeover of Kharg Island?

I’d stay long, but not use margin (I reduced mine to 1.15x).

I messed up by exiting my $CVX and oil calls earlier since thought we’d get a TACO but looks like escalation.

Hindsight 20/20. But probably limited ground invasion is my guess?
是的……感觉 markets 正在 pricing ground invasion(no TACO)和潜在 oil shock,所以才有这些 selloffs。

如果不是 escalation,我不觉得 US 会开始部署数千 troops。可能只是 takeover Kharg Island?

我会继续 long,但不用 margin(我把自己的降到 1.15x)。

我之前退出 $CVX 和 oil calls 是搞错了,因为以为会 TACO,但现在看起来是 escalation。

Hindsight 20/20。但我猜可能是 limited ground invasion?
❤️ 198 🔁 1 💬 34
打开原推
💬 引用
Bro at this rate…

SpaceX IPOing at $1.7 Trillion will end up like $VCX?

Who thought it was a good idea to allow everyone, especially every single bank asset manager, to sell on day one…

At the newly valued 1.7 trillion to retail? https://t.co/VPcyUB3KyJ
Bro 照这个速度……

SpaceX 以 $1.7 Trillion IPO 会变成 $VCX 那样?

是谁觉得允许所有人,尤其是每个 bank asset manager,在第一天就卖……

然后按新估值 1.7 trillion 卖给 retail,是个好主意? https://t.co/VPcyUB3KyJ
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Uh guys… don’t think a bearish X post from a random.

Can send a $10B+ MC fund like $VCX down 44% straight away…

Right? https://t.co/qeYhzaFiDK
呃兄弟们……别觉得一个随机 bearish X post。

能直接把 $VCX 这种 $10B+ MC fund 砸掉 44%……

对吧? https://t.co/qeYhzaFiDK
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037189444131054021
❤️ 302 🔁 13 💬 48
打开原推
📝 原创
Holy sht… $SPY index down close to -5% YTD.

Pershing Square NAV down almost -20% YTD.

One of the worst starts to the year for the broader market.

On the bright side?

$CVX and $LMT, Oil and War executives and companies that bring positivity and joy to the common people are happy.

And…

If your portfolio is not down -20% you’re outperforming Bill Ackman.
Holy sht……$SPY index YTD 接近 -5%。

Pershing Square NAV YTD 跌近 -20%。

broader market 年初最糟开局之一。

好的一面?

$CVX$LMT、Oil 和 War executives,以及那些给普通人带来 positivity and joy 的公司都很开心。

还有……

如果你的 portfolio 没有跌 -20%,你就 outperform Bill Ackman 了。
❤️ 405 🔁 14 💬 43
打开原推
📝 原创
Photonics are not having a fun time.

Laser Companies from:
$LITE, $SIVE, $COHR, $MTSI, $AAOI all down.

Substrate, Foundries, and Epiwafer from:
$IQE, $AXTI, $SOI, $TSEM all down.

Almost everything is red.

From 6% on lower beta like Coherent all the way to to 22%.

Good lesson to learn:

Embrace the volatility and don't use leverage.

If a name can go up 25% in a day, it can also drop 20% today.

Macro-driven liquidity vacuums and stop losses cause pretty violent swings.

However, if companies like $LITE and $COHR are sold out until 2028...

Or if you know $SIVE is coming next for CW lasers at a ~$340M MC and $AXTI will become a bottleneck for substrates.

Crashes like these from Macro are often a way to exchange hands for those who can reposition long.
Photonics 现在过得不太开心。

Laser Companies:
$LITE$SIVE$COHR$MTSI$AAOI 全都下跌。

Substrate、Foundries 和 Epiwafer:
$IQE$AXTI$SOI$TSEM 全都下跌。

几乎一切都是红的。

从 Coherent 这种 lower beta 的 6%,一路到 22%。

一个很好的 lesson:

拥抱 volatility,不要用 leverage。

如果一个名字一天能涨 25%,它今天也能跌 20%。

Macro-driven liquidity vacuums 和 stop losses 会造成非常剧烈的 swings。

不过,如果像 $LITE$COHR 这样的公司已经卖光到 2028……

或者如果你知道 ~$340M MC 的 $SIVE 接下来会成为 CW lasers,$AXTI 会成为 substrates bottleneck。

这种由 Macro 引发的 crashes,往往是让能重新定位 long 的人换手的机会。
❤️ 846 🔁 46 💬 72
打开原推
💬 引用
Uh guys… don’t think a bearish X post from a random.

Can send a $10B+ MC fund like $VCX down 44% straight away…

Right? https://t.co/qeYhzaFiDK
呃 guys……应该不是一个 random 的 bearish X post。

能让 $VCX 这种 $10B+ MC fund 直接跌 44%……

对吧? https://t.co/qeYhzaFiDK
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Well this post aged well on $VCX.

Just 1 hour later? https://t.co/hE2OcqYioF
嗯,这条关于 $VCX 的帖子应验得不错。

才 1 小时后? https://t.co/hE2OcqYioF
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037165951096152307
❤️ 399 🔁 5 💬 82
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
I went personally long on:

$MSFT $372 and $META $576 again.

Looks too discounted to me?

Probably war gets extended. Maybe $META $550 and $MSFT $350 if it drops one more time?

But feels compelling.
我个人又 long 了:

$MSFT $372 和 $META $576。

对我来说看起来 discount 太大了?

可能 war 会延长。也许如果再跌一次,$META $550 和 $MSFT $350?

但感觉很有吸引力。
❤️ 362 🔁 4 💬 49
打开原推
💬 引用
Well this post aged well on $VCX.

Just 1 hour later? https://t.co/hE2OcqYioF
这条关于 $VCX 的帖子现在看起来不错。

仅仅 1 小时后? https://t.co/hE2OcqYioF
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning about $VCX.

A very popular ETF with weighting toward (Anthropic, Databricks, OpenAI, Anduril, and SpaceX).

Ask yourself this:

Is SpaceX is worth 23 times $META valuation?

With the stock going up 1288% this month: VCX is trading at roughly ~20x its NAV. So 1500-2000% premium?

This is like buying SpaceX at 34 Trillion USD. Or OpenAI at 16 Trillion USD.

Would you short it?

No: It's extremely low float and lack of options for hedging.

But should you buy into it?

$VCX looks like greater fools theory right now and you’re playing hot potato.
关于 $VCX 的警告。

这是一个很热门的 ETF,权重偏向 Anthropic、Databricks、OpenAI、Anduril 和 SpaceX。

问问你自己:

SpaceX 值得 23 倍 $META 的估值吗?

这个月股价涨了 1288%:VCX 现在大约以 ~20x NAV 交易。也就是 1500-2000% 溢价?

这就像以 34 Trillion USD 的估值买 SpaceX,或者以 16 Trillion USD 的估值买 OpenAI。

你会 short 它吗?

不会:它流通盘极低,而且缺少期权来对冲。

但你应该买进去吗?

$VCX 现在看起来就是 greater fools theory,你是在玩 hot potato。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2037137351638704487
❤️ 721 🔁 30 💬 67
打开原推
📝 原创
Warning about $VCX.

A very popular ETF with weighting toward (Anthropic, Databricks, OpenAI, Anduril, and SpaceX).

Ask yourself this:

Is SpaceX is worth 23 times $META valuation?

With the stock going up 1288% this month: VCX is trading at roughly ~20x its NAV. So 1500-2000% premium?

This is like buying SpaceX at 34 Trillion USD. Or OpenAI at 16 Trillion USD.

Would you short it?

No: It's extremely low float and lack of options for hedging.

But should you buy into it?

$VCX looks like greater fools theory right now and you’re playing hot potato.
关于 $VCX 的 warning。

一个非常热门的 ETF,权重偏向 Anthropic、Databricks、OpenAI、Anduril 和 SpaceX。

问问你自己:

SpaceX 值 $META valuation 的 23 倍吗?

随着这只股票本月涨 1288%,VCX 交易价格大约是其 NAV 的 ~20x。所以 premium 是 1500-2000%?

这就像以 34 Trillion USD 买 SpaceX。或者以 16 Trillion USD 买 OpenAI。

你会 short 它吗?

不会:它 float 极低,而且缺少 options 来 hedging。

但你应该买进去吗?

$VCX 现在看起来像 greater fools theory,你在玩 hot potato。
❤️ 528 🔁 31 💬 67
打开原推
📝 原创
Lot of people were asking about my top 3 anime:

1) Eminence in Shadow - Kadokawa (TYO: 9468)

2. Classroom of the Elite - Kadokawa (TYO: 9468)

3. Re:Zero - Kadokawa (TYO: 9468)

Kadokawa YTD: 15.93%

Lesson learned:

You can outperform $GOOGL and $META + indexes if have good taste in anime?
很多人问我的 top 3 anime:

1) Eminence in Shadow - Kadokawa (TYO: 9468)

2. Classroom of the Elite - Kadokawa (TYO: 9468)

3. Re:Zero - Kadokawa (TYO: 9468)

Kadokawa YTD:15.93%

Lesson learned:

如果你 anime 品味好,就能 outperform $GOOGL$META + indexes?
❤️ 345 🔁 12 💬 44
打开原推
📝 原创
The US tech selloff from $MSFT, $GOOGL and $META looks really overdone now?

Mag7 roughly down:

Microsoft down -21.9% YTD
Google down -7.69% YTD
$AMZN down -7.36 YTD
Meta down -8.54% YTD

What makes things worse is SpaceX IPOing at $1.7T if they get fast-index inclusion.

Mega-IPOs typically serve as a massive market liquidity vacuum (good for SpaceX though)

However, I don’t think markets are truly convinced War in Iran is ending anytime soon.

-> Massive liquidity drain from large caps, -> more upcoming soon with SpaceX IPO
-> despite improving fundamentals

= don’t touch short term options.

Long term I expect Mag7 to recover.
$MSFT$GOOGL$META 的 US tech selloff 现在看起来真的 overdone 了?

Mag7 大概下跌:

Microsoft YTD 跌 -21.9%
Google YTD 跌 -7.69%
$AMZN YTD 跌 -7.36
Meta YTD 跌 -8.54%

更糟的是,如果 SpaceX 以 $1.7T IPO 并获得 fast-index inclusion。

Mega-IPOs 通常会成为巨大的 market liquidity vacuum(不过对 SpaceX 是好事)

不过,我不认为 markets 真正相信 War in Iran 会很快结束。

-> 大盘股出现 massive liquidity drain,-> SpaceX IPO 很快还会带来更多
-> 尽管 fundamentals 在改善

= 不要碰 short term options。

长期我预计 Mag7 会 recover。
❤️ 671 🔁 33 💬 69
打开原推
💬 引用
Lot of uninvited speculation about $P4O.

It's a pure-play glass substrate supplier, likely to $LITE OCS supply chains.

And they supply to Samsung with potential mapping to $COHR.

I like to analyze hyperscaler upstream supply chains.

I don't control how the algos/markets react to anything I mention, and I certainly don't trade volatility.
关于 $P4O 有很多不请自来的 speculation。

它是 pure-play glass substrate supplier,很可能供应 $LITE OCS supply chains。

而且他们供应 Samsung,潜在 mapping 到 $COHR

我喜欢分析 hyperscaler upstream supply chains。

我不控制 algos/markets 对我提到的任何东西如何反应,也当然不交易 volatility。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
So just checked out the comments...

$P4O does look like a potential upstream $LITE supplier at a $34M MC.

How it likely maps:

-> Plan Optik $P4O (Glass Wafers)
-> Teledyne $TDY or Silek (Mem Foundries)
-> $LITE (OCS Switches)
-> $GOOGL (TPUs)

However, $LITE likely dual sources with Corning ( $GLW ) on the glass wafer level.

P4O is a known supplier to Infineon, Samsung, and others, so not exactly a random company.

€3.35 million vs. 35.52M MC is very healthy balance sheet.

That being said:

-> That doesn't exactly mean this translates to material revenue boosts unless they start price hike (given glass wafers are likely a very small part of $LITE OCS BOM).

I do personally own shares, after reading this.

Since $LITE OCS potential supply chain chokepoints is strategically valuable. Maybe not so much so as financially valuable.

But their core thesis that Plan Optik's Glass Flow and MDF finishing are effectively irreplaceable for OCS packaging checks out.

Of course, hyperscaler supply chains are heavily guarded, so no way to know 100%.

All credit goes to follower comments.

But TLDR:

Supply Chain Mapping
-> $P4O -> Foundries -> $LITE -> $GOOGL is very likely from their analysis.

As for being a chokepoint in $LITE OCS supply chain... dunno if it translates materially.

Again, not recommending this at all.

Just thought the $LITE OCS supply chain mapping like this very interesting, and that it would be a waste of the follower kinda posted all this work into the void.
所以刚看了评论……

$P4O 看起来确实可能是一个上游 $LITE 供应商,市值 $34M。

它大概这样对应:

-> Plan Optik $P4O(Glass Wafers)
-> Teledyne $TDY 或 Silek(Mem Foundries)
-> $LITE(OCS Switches)
-> $GOOGL(TPUs)

不过,$LITE 在 glass wafer 层面很可能也和 Corning($GLW)双源采购。

P4O 是 Infineon、Samsung 等公司的已知供应商,所以也不是随机公司。

€3.35 million vs. 35.52M MC,资产负债表很健康。

话虽如此:

-> 这不代表一定会转化成实质收入提升,除非他们开始涨价(因为 glass wafers 很可能只是 $LITE OCS BOM 里很小的一部分)。

读完这些后,我个人确实买了股票。

因为 $LITE OCS 潜在供应链瓶颈具有战略价值。也许财务价值没那么大。

但他们的核心 thesis,也就是 Plan Optik 的 Glass Flow 和 MDF finishing 对 OCS packaging 基本不可替代,是说得通的。

当然,hyperscaler 供应链高度保密,所以不可能 100% 确认。

所有 credit 都归粉丝评论。

但 TLDR:

Supply Chain Mapping
-> $P4O -> Foundries -> $LITE -> $GOOGL 根据他们的分析很可能成立。

至于它是不是 $LITE OCS 供应链里的瓶颈……不知道会不会有实质影响。

再次说明,完全不是推荐。

只是觉得这种 $LITE OCS 供应链 mapping 很有意思,而且粉丝把这么多工作发出来却没人看,挺浪费的。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036840136730935736
❤️ 175 🔁 6 💬 19
打开原推
💬 引用
So if you care about the second optical transicever bottleneck outside of EML/CW Lasers:

- $SANM (US)
- $TTMI (US)
- WUS Printed Circuit (TPE: 2316)
- Unimicron (TPE: 3037)
- Zhen Ding Tech (TPE: 4958)
- Gold Circuit Electronics (TPE: 2368)

Were winners for the optical transceiver PCB bottleneck.

There's some downstream players like FIC Global that benefits, not so much as a Fab but assembly.

Others like Unimicron are likely too large with other segments like ABF substrates to feel much of a difference.

US plays are more-so from reshoring to US supply chains, even though Chinese and Taiwanese players were main beneficaries.

$AVGO quote:

"Both Taiwanese and Chinese PCB suppliers are facing capacity limits, contributing to the delays, Ramachandran said, without naming the suppliers."

I have no open long positions in any of these right now.

I could be wrong, but I felt laser chokepoints ( $LITE, $SIVE, $MTSI, $COHR, Sumitomo) in optical supply chains to be much more compelling for structural re-rating.
所以如果你关心 EML/CW Lasers 之外的第二个 optical transceiver bottleneck:

- $SANM (US)
- $TTMI (US)
- WUS Printed Circuit (TPE: 2316)
- Unimicron (TPE: 3037)
- Zhen Ding Tech (TPE: 4958)
- Gold Circuit Electronics (TPE: 2368)

这些是 optical transceiver PCB bottleneck 的 winners。

有些 downstream players 像 FIC Global 会受益,但更多是 assembly,不太是 Fab。

其他像 Unimicron 可能太大,还有 ABF substrates 等其他 segments,所以感觉差异不会太明显。

US plays 更多来自 reshoring to US supply chains,尽管 Chinese 和 Taiwanese players 是主要 beneficiaries。

$AVGO quote:

“Both Taiwanese and Chinese PCB suppliers are facing capacity limits, contributing to the delays, Ramachandran said, without naming the suppliers.”

我现在没有这些的 open long positions。

我可能错,但我觉得 optical supply chains 里的 laser chokepoints( $LITE$SIVE$MTSI$COHR、Sumitomo)对 structural re-rating 更有吸引力。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Every industry leader...

Especially $AVGO (Physical Layer Products division) in this statement today.

Cites Lasers as a bottleneck for semiconductors.

If you aren't long...
-> CW Lasers: $SIVE | $MTSI
-> EML Lasers: $COHR | $LITE
-> or their foundries in $TSEM/Win Semi

Maybe it's time to wake up?

Broadcom Ramachandran: "Even though there are multiple suppliers in the industry today... there is definitely a supply constraint in the laser space,”
每个行业领导者……

尤其是今天这段话里的 $AVGO(Physical Layer Products division)。

都把 Lasers 称为 semiconductors 的瓶颈。

如果你还没 long……
-> CW Lasers: $SIVE | $MTSI
-> EML Lasers: $COHR | $LITE
-> 或者它们在 $TSEM/Win Semi 的 foundries

也许该醒醒了?

Broadcom Ramachandran: “Even though there are multiple suppliers in the industry today... there is definitely a supply constraint in the laser space,”
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036657811179155561
❤️ 277 🔁 19 💬 21
打开原推
📝 原创
$SIVE at ~$400m MC is a name I genuinely believe...

Institutions missed as the upstream laser chokepoint for hyperscalers.

When you look at $TSEM following my thesis, the stock went up 70% to a $21B+ MC.

Retail flows do not send NASDAQ stocks up $10B+.

Information discovery and synthesis does. Especially when institutions validate it, and follow along.

$SIVE was majority owned by Sweden retail investors, with **almost 0 institutional investors**.

Now that information is distributed regarding the Upstream CW laser supplier for $MRVL, Ayar, Jabil, O-Net.

And with $AVGO + other comments recently stating lasers were a clear bottleneck for supply chains:

I strongly think that institutions are trying to accumulate off Swedish retail hands through Iceberg orders, vwap algos, or any other methods to gain exposure to the upcoming CW laser bottleneck.

Again, the closest comparison to $SIVE are:

$MTSI and $LITE, both at $18B and $55B MCs.

Sivers trades at ~$400m MC.

With architectural paradigm shifts in photonic supply chains:

I think retail has a rare opportunity to frontrun institutions with $SIVE and have heavy exposure to the upcoming CW/EML laser bottleneck.
$SIVE 在 ~$400m MC,是一个我真心相信的名字……

Institutions 错过了它作为 hyperscalers upstream laser chokepoint 的价值。

当你看 $TSEM 跟随我的 thesis,股票涨了 70%,到 $21B+ MC。

Retail flows 不会把 NASDAQ stocks 推高 $10B+。

Information discovery 和 synthesis 会。尤其是当 institutions 验证并跟随时。

$SIVE 之前主要由 Sweden retail investors 持有,**几乎 0 institutional investors**。

现在关于 $MRVL、Ayar、Jabil、O-Net 的 Upstream CW laser supplier 信息已经分发出去。

再加上 $AVGO 和其他近期评论都表示 lasers 是 supply chains 的明显 bottleneck:

我强烈认为 institutions 正在通过 Iceberg orders、vwap algos 或其他方式,从 Swedish retail 手里 accumulation,以获得 upcoming CW laser bottleneck 的 exposure。

再说一次,最接近 $SIVE 的对比是:

$MTSI$LITE,MC 分别是 $18B 和 $55B。

Sivers 交易在 ~$400m MC。

随着 photonic supply chains 出现 architectural paradigm shifts:

我认为 retail 有一个罕见机会,用 $SIVE frontrun institutions,并获得 upcoming CW/EML laser bottleneck 的 heavy exposure。
❤️ 471 🔁 54 💬 31
打开原推
💬 引用
If you don't know my style by now:

I identify upcoming sectors (photonics, memory, drones), then go long on the entire supply chain.

I'm not always right, though.

$AVAV and the drone sectors were my biggest losses this year outside of $RDDT ( $OSS did end up 60%+ ).

I still believe fundamentally companies like $AIRO, $LPTH and others are extremely solid long term. ( $AIRO is still up ~15%, but lost majority of it's 70%+ gains, Draganfly dropped way more)

And there's very unrealistic expectations from looking at $SNDK supercycles that everything can go up 100% a month.

The main catalyst I've identified around that sector was the Venezuela invasion's usage of hidden drone + edge defense contracts/subcontractors.

And I expected there to be follow-up funding into the sector.

However, I mentioned I de-risked around the Greenland deal (majority of defense contractors crashed) but kept smaller concentration in stuff like $AVAV.

SCAR program loss to others like $AVAV was even a bigger surprise and I lost even more.

Unfortunately, the War in Iran focused around larger defense contractors like L3 Harris, $NOC and private companies like Anduril, and some energy directed suppliers like $LASR.

So there weren't many tailwind recoveries for drone companies.

That being said, I do know how to cut losses.

But I still get a lot of crap saying oh look at "X stock they've liked earlier in the year".

I'm very transparent when it comes to these things: A certain executive in the $IREN community are known to delete all their posts after their followers lose 90% on $BKKT or $ASST post-dilution.

Majority of my stocks I identify are extremely solid fundamentally so they either hold their level since my original thesis.

And I post risk-levels / conviction-levels with them too (risky ones obviously have more downside).

I have skin in the game compared to others that just post hot takes.

So if my thesis is wrong, I lose money personally (there's ton of more fills like this, just endless losses on $AVAV).

But I leave everything up so you can see how things play out.
如果你到现在还不知道我的风格:

我识别 upcoming sectors(photonics、memory、drones),然后 long 整条 supply chain。

我并不总是对。

$AVAV 和 drone sectors 是我今年除 $RDDT 之外最大的亏损( $OSS 最后倒是涨了 60%+)。

我仍然从 fundamentals 上相信 $AIRO$LPTH 等公司长期非常扎实。( $AIRO 仍然涨 ~15%,但失去了大部分 70%+ gains,Draganfly 跌得更多)

而且看过 $SNDK supercycles 后,人们有很不现实的预期,以为所有东西都能一个月涨 100%。

我在那个 sector 里识别的主要 catalyst,是 Venezuela invasion 使用 hidden drone + edge defense contracts/subcontractors。

我预计之后会有 follow-up funding 流入这个 sector。

不过,我提过我在 Greenland deal 附近 de-risked(多数 defense contractors 崩了),但保留了像 $AVAV 这种较小 concentration。

SCAR program 输给其他公司,比如 $AVAV,是更大的意外,我亏得更多。

不幸的是,War in Iran 主要围绕更大的 defense contractors,比如 L3 Harris、$NOC,以及 Anduril 这样的 private companies,还有一些 energy directed suppliers 比如 $LASR

所以 drone companies 没有太多 tailwind recoveries。

话虽如此,我确实知道如何 cut losses。

但我仍然收到很多 crap,说哦看他们今年早些时候喜欢过的 “X stock”。

我在这些事情上非常透明:$IREN community 里某位 executive 因为 followers 在 $BKKT$ASST post-dilution 亏 90% 后,会删掉所有 posts,这是出了名的。

我识别的大多数 stocks 从 fundamentals 看都非常扎实,所以自我原始 thesis 以来,要么能守住水平。

而且我也会附上 risk-levels / conviction-levels(风险高的显然 downside 更大)。

相比那些只发 hot takes 的人,我有 skin in the game。

所以如果我的 thesis 错了,我个人会亏钱(还有大量像这样的 fills,$AVAV 上无尽亏损)。

但我会保留所有东西,这样你可以看到事情如何发展。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
@bennybigbull Nope, sold for solid 6 figure loss on $AVAV and rotated to photonics.
@bennybigbull 没有,$AVAV 上亏了稳稳 6 位数后卖了,转去 photonics 了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036855404656033913
❤️ 864 🔁 25 💬 66
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
List of highest quality profitable compounders: $MRVL, $TSEM, $TSM, $RDDT, $ARM, SK Hynix, and $AVGO are excellent.

As anchors are very strong in case you don't like higher beta stuff like $SIVE.

Hard to see them underperforming in any environment unless hyperscaler capex disappears (you will see signs in earnings).

But it's good to barbell a little, so your portfolio doesn't get nuked on drawdowns.

Just throwing that out there since I know a lot of ppl are risk averse.
最高质量 profitable compounders 列表:$MRVL$TSEM$TSM$RDDT$ARM、SK Hynix 和 $AVGO 都很优秀。

如果你不喜欢 $SIVE 这种 higher beta stuff,它们作为 anchors 很强。

除非 hyperscaler capex 消失(你会在 earnings 里看到迹象),否则很难看到它们在任何环境下 underperform。

但稍微 barbell 一下是好的,这样 portfolio 不会在 drawdowns 时被 nuked。

只是顺手提一下,因为我知道很多人 risk averse。
❤️ 343 🔁 17 💬 40
打开原推
📝 原创
I’m curious…

With $AXTI, $IQE, or $SIVE.

And the many other photonics winners I’ve longed like $LITE that returned 100-1000% over the past few months.

When is it time for the salty folks out there to admit…

That my thesis are just right after all. Instead of downplaying it?

$20B+ companies like $TSEM don’t just move up 70% in 2 weeks, unless institutions validated the thesis and found it compelling.

Same with $AXTI, it wouldn’t have ran from $450M MC to $3.85B MC unless institutions found it compelling.

I just spot these before others do, and post information synthesis/discovery.

In these cases, retail has clearly frontrun institutions and made life changing returns.

If the thesis were wrong, institutions can take the other end of the trade. Which they don’t.

Everyone on X keeps asking for the next 1000%.

And when there’s someone out there on X that posts multiple (for free) ideas.

Posts a clear directional trade before the price even moved.

-> then they do ~10x like $AXTI:

They’re met with slander instead?

Ever stop to think… maybe the thesis/idea was right after all?
我很好奇……

关于 $AXTI$IQE$SIVE

以及我 long 的许多其他 photonics winners,比如过去几个月回报 100-1000% 的 $LITE

外面那些酸的人什么时候才该承认……

我的 thesis 终究就是对的。而不是一直 downplay?

$TSEM 这种 $20B+ 公司,如果不是 institutions 验证了 thesis 并觉得有吸引力,不会 2 周涨 70%。

$AXTI 也一样,如果 institutions 不觉得有吸引力,它不可能从 $450M MC 跑到 $3.85B MC。

我只是比别人更早 spot 到这些,并发布 information synthesis/discovery。

在这些案例里,retail 显然 frontrun institutions,并赚到了 life changing returns。

如果 thesis 是错的,institutions 可以接交易另一边。但他们没有。

X 上所有人一直在问下一个 1000%。

而当 X 上有人免费发布多个 ideas。

在价格甚至还没动之前,发出清晰 directional trade。

-> 然后它们像 $AXTI 一样 ~10x:

结果迎来的反而是 slander?

有没有停下来想过……也许 thesis/idea 终究就是对的?
❤️ 889 🔁 40 💬 102
打开原推
📝 原创
Google's TurboQuant...

And it's effect on $SNDK, $MU, SK Hynix, and others:

What it does:
-> 6x reduction in KV cache memory footprint
-> 8x Speedup on H100 GPUs

It's a compression algorithm.

Now... Will it beat down memory?

-> Prob not.

Implications might be bullish for $ARM and others though where you can run AI locally, rather than DRAM heavy DCs.

However:

->This is basically DeepSeek round 3. You can make algorithms more efficient. But that doesn't replace either memory or GPUs.
-> It could structurally (and slightly) reduce DRAM demand.
-> think it's only been tested on small models so far like Gemma, Mistral, and Llama-3.1 (and paper's been out for a year)

Also, markets conflated DRAM with NAND... this algo compresses the KV cache (DRAM). Doesn't do anything to NAND storage?

Regardless:

Algorithms will always get more efficient. People keep saying Jevons Paradox, which is true since this just scales use cases.

Main thing to look out for is hyperscaper capex projections, not Google Algorithms that made things more efficient.

Feels more like a narrative headwind than anything material to earnings.
Google 的 TurboQuant……

以及它对 $SNDK$MU、SK Hynix 等的影响:

它做什么:
-> KV cache memory footprint 降低 6x
-> H100 GPUs 上 8x Speedup

它是一个 compression algorithm。

那么……它会打压 memory 吗?

-> 可能不会。

不过对 $ARM 等可能是 bullish,因为你可以本地跑 AI,而不是依赖 DRAM heavy DCs。

不过:

-> 这基本上是 DeepSeek round 3。你可以让 algorithms 更高效。但这不会替代 memory 或 GPUs。
-> 它可能会结构性地(且轻微地)降低 DRAM demand。
-> 我觉得到目前为止它只在小模型上测试过,比如 Gemma、Mistral 和 Llama-3.1(而且 paper 已经出来一年了)

另外,markets 把 DRAM 和 NAND 混在一起了……这个 algo 压缩的是 KV cache(DRAM)。对 NAND storage 没什么作用?

无论如何:

Algorithms 会一直变得更高效。人们一直说 Jevons Paradox,这是真的,因为它只会扩大 use cases。

主要要关注的是 hyperscaper capex projections,而不是让事情更高效的 Google Algorithms。

感觉它更像 narrative headwind,而不是对 earnings 有什么 material 影响。
❤️ 693 🔁 44 💬 74
打开原推
📝 原创
Been awhile since I covered $VPG.

This was a sensor play for $TSLA Optimus Ramp.

Very important breadcrumb this week at the Sidoti Conference:

"Potential to scale to hundreds of robots per week by the end of 2026."

Kinda sounds aligned with Optimus? No?

If we go off their CEO "$500-$1.2k per robot" statement: Not too shabby.

But of course, a lot of robotic supply chains are kind of dead money until the actual inflection point humanoids at scale hits.

Maybe Unitree IPO sparks some life into robotic supply chains soon?
有一阵没聊 $VPG 了。

这是一个 $TSLA Optimus Ramp 的 sensor play。

这周 Sidoti Conference 上有一个非常重要的 breadcrumb:

“Potential to scale to hundreds of robots per week by the end of 2026.”

听起来有点和 Optimus 对上?不是吗?

如果按他们 CEO “$500-$1.2k per robot” 的说法:还不错。

当然,很多 robotic supply chains 在 humanoids at scale 的真正 inflection point 到来前,都有点 dead money。

也许 Unitree IPO 很快会给 robotic supply chains 带来一点活力?
❤️ 342 🔁 17 💬 40
打开原推
💬 引用
So just checked out the comments...

$P4O does look like a potential upstream $LITE supplier at a $34M MC.

How it likely maps:

-> Plan Optik $P4O (Glass Wafers)
-> Teledyne $TDY or Silek (Mem Foundries)
-> $LITE (OCS Switches)
-> $GOOGL (TPUs)

However, $LITE likely dual sources with Corning ( $GLW ) on the glass wafer level.

P4O is a known supplier to Infineon, Samsung, and others, so not exactly a random company.

€3.35 million vs. 35.52M MC is very healthy balance sheet.

That being said:

-> That doesn't exactly mean this translates to material revenue boosts unless they start price hike (given glass wafers are likely a very small part of $LITE OCS BOM).

I do personally own shares, after reading this.

Since $LITE OCS potential supply chain chokepoints is strategically valuable. Maybe not so much so as financially valuable.

But their core thesis that Plan Optik's Glass Flow and MDF finishing are effectively irreplaceable for OCS packaging checks out.

Of course, hyperscaler supply chains are heavily guarded, so no way to know 100%.

All credit goes to follower comments.

But TLDR:

Supply Chain Mapping
-> $P4O -> Foundries -> $LITE -> $GOOGL is very likely from their analysis.

As for being a chokepoint in $LITE OCS supply chain... dunno if it translates materially.

Again, not recommending this at all.

Just thought the $LITE OCS supply chain mapping like this very interesting, and that it would be a waste of the follower kinda posted all this work into the void.
刚看了评论……

$P4O 看起来像是潜在 upstream $LITE supplier,MC 只有 $34M。

它可能的 mapping:

-> Plan Optik $P4O (Glass Wafers)
-> Teledyne $TDY 或 Silek (Mem Foundries)
-> $LITE (OCS Switches)
-> $GOOGL (TPUs)

不过,$LITE 在 glass wafer level 很可能和 Corning( $GLW )dual sources。

P4O 是 Infineon、Samsung 等的已知 supplier,所以并不是 random company。

€3.35 million vs. 35.52M MC,balance sheet 非常健康。

话虽如此:

-> 这并不一定意味着会转化为 material revenue boosts,除非他们开始 price hike(考虑到 glass wafers 很可能只是 $LITE OCS BOM 的很小一部分)。

读完这些后,我个人持有 shares。

因为 $LITE OCS 潜在 supply chain chokepoints 有战略价值。也许财务价值没那么大。

但他们的核心 thesis,即 Plan Optik 的 Glass Flow 和 MDF finishing 对 OCS packaging 来说基本不可替代,是说得通的。

当然,hyperscaler supply chains 高度保密,所以没法 100% 确定。

所有 credit 都给 follower comments。

但 TLDR:

Supply Chain Mapping
-> $P4O -> Foundries -> $LITE -> $GOOGL 按他们的分析很可能成立。

至于它作为 $LITE OCS supply chain 的 chokepoint……不知道是否会 material 地转化。

再说一次,完全不是推荐。

只是觉得这种 $LITE OCS supply chain mapping 很有意思,而且 follower 发了这么多工作,如果沉进 void 会很浪费。
引用原推@latent_value7
@aleabitoreddit Ever look into photonics packaging? Check out PlanOptik/ $P40. They explicitly supply cavity glass wafers and substrates for optical MEMS, optical switches, advanced optical systems via Silex and Teledyne DALSA. Also make carrier wafers for InP. Only 23m euro cap. https://t.co/lulZlFGQVN
@aleabitoreddit 你研究过 photonics packaging 吗?看看 PlanOptik/ $P40。他们明确给 optical MEMS、optical switches、advanced optical systems 通过 Silex 和 Teledyne DALSA 供应 cavity glass wafers 和 substrates。也做 InP carrier wafers。市值只有 23m euro。 https://t.co/lulZlFGQVN
https://x.com/latent_value7/status/2026666243122430201
❤️ 312 🔁 24 💬 42
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm telling you guys... Even if I buy small cap $170 Billion dollar companies like $ARM.

They just go up 20% like $TSEM or $SIVE the next day as well? https://t.co/ULZkv65d27
我跟你们说……就算我买 $ARM 这种 small cap $170 Billion dollar companies。

它们第二天也会像 $TSEM$SIVE 一样涨 20%? https://t.co/ULZkv65d27
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
@wemillionaire I did buy shares at ~$139-$141. I did think it should have been up more than 3% if they're multiplying their revenue from a new product.
@wemillionaire 我确实在 ~$139-$141 买了 shares。我当时觉得,如果他们靠一个新产品让收入翻倍,股价不应该只涨 3%。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036543640810721520
❤️ 755 🔁 41 💬 105
打开原推
💬 引用
TFW institutions realize how important $SIVE is in the CW/EML laser bottleneck.

But have no positions…

Sivers is up 220%+ so far, but I expect this to be my next personal 10x like $AXTI. https://t.co/DmqpkZ8Lqa
TFW institutions 意识到 $SIVE 在 CW/EML laser bottleneck 里有多重要。

但他们没有仓位……

Sivers 到目前为止涨了 220%+,但我预计这会是我下一个像 $AXTI 一样的个人 10x。 https://t.co/DmqpkZ8Lqa
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I’m long $SIVE at $140M.

I believe this is the next $LITE that markets and institutions missed.

$SIVE makes InP CW DFB lasers.

Closest comparison is $LITE in the current EML laser bottleneck.

But instead of supplying to Innolight/Eoptolink for current optical transceivers cycles.

They supply the lasers to $POET Starlight, Ayar SuperNova.

And others for the future CPO/silicon photonics architectures spearheaded by $NVDA.

Current valuations make 0 sense to me personally. 



$POET is advanced packaging for $SIVE type lasers…

But $POET commands worth 11x+ more than the company making the laser itself?



It’s feels like valuing a more advanced $FN (~$20B) packaging at $400B when $LITE is valued at $40B. 



So now at $130m:

-

- You have a likely mini $LITE like laser supplier to Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers through $POET. 



- Laser supplier to Ayar ( $NVDA, $INTC ), though they do multi source with $LITE, Sumitomo, $MTSI.

And other potential up and coming suppliers potentially like Lightmatter that they’ve name dropped (eg. Q2 2023 earnings). This is unconfirmed but supply chain BOM is confidential. 



On top, for revenue, they expected $453M "pipeline next few years”.



And, they have capacity expansion through WIN: “Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers."



Sivers feels the silicon photonics/CPO version of $LITE, with actual rapidly growing customers like Celestial through $POET, Ayar, with more to come.



I wouldn’t have liked it last year, but just 3 weeks ago, they refinanced all their debt successfully to $12M convertible loan (10.85%) and a $5M term loan (12%), which cleans up debt.



It’s $17m total, which feels like nothing to US markets when $AAOI is doing a $500m ATMs every other week.

Best of all, this is their pure play inp laser segment for silicon/photonics + cpo. 

Their Lidar segment is ramping up and they have $53-138M projected revenue coming in.



Downside risk:

- execution (as always)

- dilution to scale up capacity to compete with $LITE and others.
- $LITE, $COHR competition on scale after $NVDA just gave them $4B
- CPO ramp gets delayed.



I have no clue how, $LWLG, a pre-revenue science project with $TSEM, is valued at $1B+ MC.



Or how $POET, is worth ~9-10x more than its laser supplier. 



When $SIVE, the mini $LITE equivalent for CPO/Silicon photonics, is valued at $140M.

I do believe this is largely undiscovered by institutions, since this is some random company in OMX Nordic Exchange (similar to micro $AXTI before I started posting about the inp substrate bottleneck). 



But I do think it will get a lot of institutional attention as Celestial and Ayar scale up.

Especially if $POET and $SIVE gets qualified with other customers. 



If CPO completely replaces pluggable transceivers in the next generation of hyperscaler architectures.

Sivers, with possible WIN Semi qualifcation and if they become the multi-source lasers for NVIDIA, Marvell, Intel, and Broadcom architectures, can be strongly rerated.

Just as how $LITE did today going from $16 -> $622.

This is just my personal thesis I'm sharing, DYOR/NFI.

TLDR:

InP Lasers are the current bottleneck in photonics as seen with $LITE valuations. 



$SIVE looks like the mini $LITE for the upcoming CPO/Silicon Photonics ramp.



I personally took long position in $SIVE, as I believe they’re a large beneficiary of the upcoming silicon photonic/CPO architectural changes by $NVDA (with GTC cataylst). 



The upside here just way too compelling for me personally as the next possible $LITE.
我在 $140M 时做多 $SIVE

我认为这是市场和机构错过的下一个 $LITE

$SIVE 做 InP CW DFB lasers。

最接近的对标,是当前 EML laser 瓶颈里的 $LITE

但它不是给 Innolight/Eoptolink 供应当前光模块周期的东西。

它给 $POET Starlight、Ayar SuperNova 供应 lasers。

也给其他由 $NVDA 推动的未来 CPO/silicon photonics 架构供应。

我个人觉得当前估值完全说不通。

$POET 是给 $SIVE 这类 lasers 做 advanced packaging……

$POET 的估值居然比真正做 laser 的公司高 11x+?

这感觉就像在 $LITE 估值 $40B 时,把更先进的 $FN(~$20B)packaging 估到 $400B。

所以现在 $130m:

- 你拿到的是一个可能的 mini $LITE,作为 Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers 通过 $POET 的 laser supplier。

- 也是 Ayar($NVDA$INTC)的 laser supplier,虽然他们也会和 $LITE、Sumitomo、$MTSI 多源采购。

还有其他潜在的新兴客户,比如他们提到过的 Lightmatter(例如 Q2 2023 earnings)。这还未确认,因为 supply chain BOM 是保密的。

收入方面,他们预计“未来几年 pipeline”有 $453M。

他们还通过 WIN 扩产:“Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers.”

Sivers 感觉就是 silicon photonics/CPO 版本的 $LITE,有 Celestial 通过 $POET、Ayar 这些真正快速增长的客户,而且后面还会更多。

去年我不会喜欢它,但就在 3 周前,他们成功把所有债务再融资成 $12M 可转债(10.85%)和 $5M term loan(12%),清理了债务。

总共 $17m,对美国市场来说几乎不算什么,$AAOI 隔三差五就在做 $500m ATM。

最棒的是,这是他们针对 silicon/photonics + cpo 的纯 InP laser segment。他们的 Lidar segment 也在放量,并预计有 $53-138M 收入进来。

下行风险:
- 执行(永远都有)
- 为了扩产和 $LITE 等竞争而稀释
- $NVDA 刚给 $LITE$COHR $4B 后,它们在规模上的竞争
- CPO 放量延迟

我真不知道,$LWLG 这种和 $TSEM 相关、还没收入的科研项目,怎么能有 $1B+ 市值。

或者 $POET 怎么能值它 laser supplier 的 ~9-10x。

$SIVE,这个 CPO/Silicon photonics 的 mini $LITE 等价物,只有 $140M。

我确实认为它很大程度上还没被机构发现,因为这是 OMX Nordic Exchange 上一家随机公司(类似我开始发 InP substrate 瓶颈前的微型 $AXTI)。

但我觉得随着 Celestial 和 Ayar 放量,它会获得很多机构关注。

尤其如果 $POET$SIVE 获得其他客户认证。

如果 CPO 在下一代 hyperscaler 架构里完全替代 pluggable transceivers。

Sivers 如果完成可能的 WIN Semi qualification,并成为 NVIDIA、Marvell、Intel、Broadcom 架构的多源 lasers,会被强力重估。

就像 $LITE 今天从 $16 -> $622 一样。

这只是我分享的个人 thesis,DYOR/NFI。

TLDR:

$LITE 的估值可以看到,InP Lasers 是当前 photonics 的瓶颈。

$SIVE 看起来像即将到来的 CPO/Silicon Photonics 放量里的 mini $LITE

我个人已经做多 $SIVE,因为我认为它会成为 $NVDA 推动的下一轮 silicon photonic/CPO 架构变化(带 GTC catalyst)的重要受益者。

这里作为下一个潜在 $LITE 的 upside,对我个人来说太有吸引力了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033466880661606646
❤️ 464 🔁 50 💬 45
打开原推
💬 引用
Bro how is a $20B+ company like $TSEM up 63%…

2 weeks after I go long?

The company was stagnant for like 3 months until my post. https://t.co/fTYqm8ew03
Bro,像 $TSEM 这种 $20B+ 公司怎么会涨 63%……

在我 long 之后 2 周?

这家公司在我发帖前大概 3 个月都很 stagnant。 https://t.co/fTYqm8ew03
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I'm long $TSEM, the $TSM of photonics.

My top two picks for CPO are $SOI and Tower Semi.

Given the $NVDA GTC catalyst on new photonic related architecture next week:

I expect Tower Semi to get a huge catalyst.

Nvidia laready directly collaborated with Tower to scale 1.6T silicon photonics last month (hint hint for GTC), likely pushing the downstream players to use it.

And now, Tower is the leading supplier of 1.6T SiPh PICs and the primary foundry for scale-up CPO architectures. (the other being global foundries)

From my forward est:
2028 Forward P/E: ~16.8x to ~18.1x

(Tower set a target $2.84B revenue by 2028, with ~31.7% operating margin, ~$750M in net profit)

The thing to note is over 70% of their planned SiPh capacity is already reserved through 2028. And photonics haven't even ramped up yet.

So, I expect them to strongly beat earning projections due to extreme photonics scaling + allocations price hikes that's not modeled into projections.

Also, $TSEM is heavily de-risked by 70% of capacity already being reserved. MC is likely due to $TSEM being a very obscure upstream player in the photonics supply chain.

But I expect the $NVDA GTC conference to be that catalyst that brings it to premium valuations.

I'm long $TSEM as an asymmetrical upside for upstream photonics foundry layer.
我做多 $TSEM,它就是光子领域的 $TSM

我对 CPO 的前两大选择是 $SOI 和 Tower Semi。

考虑到下周 $NVDA GTC 对新的光子相关架构有催化:

我预计 Tower Semi 会迎来巨大催化。

Nvidia 上个月已经直接和 Tower 合作,扩大 1.6T 硅光规模(给 GTC 的暗示),很可能推动下游玩家使用它。

现在,Tower 是 1.6T SiPh PIC 的领先供应商,也是 scale-up CPO 架构的主要晶圆厂(另一个是 global foundries)。

按我的前瞻估算:
2028 Forward P/E:约 16.8x 到 18.1x

(Tower 设定了 2028 年 $2.84B 收入目标,约 31.7% 经营利润率,约 $750M 净利润)

需要注意的是,他们规划中的 SiPh 产能超过 70% 已经预定到 2028 年。而光子还没真正放量。

所以我预计他们会因为极端的光子扩产 + allocation 涨价,大幅超过盈利预测,而这些还没有被模型计入。

另外,$TSEM 也因为 70% 产能已被预定而大幅去风险。市值可能是因为 $TSEM 是光子供应链里非常冷门的上游玩家。

但我预计 $NVDA GTC 会成为让它获得溢价估值的催化。

我做多 $TSEM,把它当作上游光子晶圆厂层的非对称上行机会。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031820871170736570
❤️ 710 🔁 39 💬 71
打开原推
💬 引用
And… $IQE turned out well.

This like my 6th photonics long that returned triple digits? https://t.co/Og4EvMh5Pm
然后……$IQE 结果也很好。

这是我第 6 个回报三位数的 photonics long? https://t.co/Og4EvMh5Pm
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Not exactly! I'm just a tad more familiar with photonic supply chains than I am with energy so I like picking potential winners.

Just wanted to introduce $IQE into the equation like i did with $AXTI, so I could do a "Did you Listen Anon?" post 3 months later if it turns out well.
不完全是!我只是比起能源,对光子供应链稍微更熟一点,所以喜欢在这里挑潜在赢家。

只是想像之前提 $AXTI 一样,把 $IQE 也放进讨论里,这样如果结果不错,3 个月后我就能发一条“你当时听了吗,Anon?”的帖子。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026647347237966298
❤️ 351 🔁 16 💬 44
打开原推
📝 原创
Woah Nanya was my long earlier in the year...

Did not expect $SNDK to take a $1B+ stake in it just now.

Fact that Sandisk is taking stakes in companies like Nanya, means bottleneck in legacy memory might be bigger / more underpriced than marketes thought.

Massive implications for others like Macronix + other TW companies.

Or... $SNDK just has too much money from NAND price hiking and needed somewhere to spend it?
哇,Nanya 是我今年早些时候的 long……

没想到 $SNDK 刚刚拿了它 $1B+ stake。

Sandisk 正在入股 Nanya 这样的公司,说明 legacy memory 的 bottleneck 可能比市场想的更大/更 underpriced。

对 Macronix + 其他 TW companies 都有巨大 implications。

或者……$SNDK 只是因为 NAND price hiking 钱太多,需要找地方花?
❤️ 407 🔁 23 💬 24
打开原推
💬 引用
FYI: I went long on $ARM at $139.

Genuinely a compelling long at $143B MC as markets shift more from training -> inference.

Then $ARM AI CPUs cannibalize the market for inference and $NVDA market share.

Especially as LLMs get more lightweight.

The projections to $25B/revenue (5x revenue) are already insane to justify risk-reward.
FYI:我在 $139 long 了 $ARM

随着 markets 更多从 training -> inference 转移,$143B MC 下真的是一个有吸引力的 long。

然后 $ARM AI CPUs 会 cannibalize inference 市场和 $NVDA market share。

尤其是 LLMs 变得更 lightweight。

到 $25B/revenue(5x revenue)的 projections 已经足够疯狂,能 justify risk-reward。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$ARM expects $15B in annual revenue from the the AGI CPU:

"The company projects that the new chip business will generate over $15 billion in annual revenue" within the next 5 years.

5 times current revenues (~$25B revenue)...

Arm probably deserves to be up more than 5% on this news if they're multiplying their revenue with a new product overnight?
$ARM 预计 AGI CPU 每年能带来 $15B 收入:

“The company projects that the new chip business will generate over $15 billion in annual revenue” within the next 5 years.

这是当前收入(~$25B revenue)的 5 倍……

如果 Arm 凭一个新产品一夜之间把收入翻倍式提升,这条新闻下它大概不该只涨 5%?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036543096817852663
❤️ 639 🔁 34 💬 64
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Two new two long positions this week, both large cap.

I'm feel kinda stupid for not going long on these yet?

Kinda hiding in plain sight. Not popular retail longs but incredibly important like $TSEM
这周两个新的 long positions,都是 large cap。

我有点觉得自己到现在还没 long 这些,挺蠢的?

有点 hiding in plain sight。不是热门 retail longs,但像 $TSEM 一样极其重要。
❤️ 261 🔁 0 💬 101
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE is literally one of the only pure play public exposure to the (CW/EML) optical laser bottlenecks in the world.

$LITE - $55B+
$COHR - $53B+
$MTSI - $17.8B+
$AAOI - $8.8B
$SIVE- $400M

You basically almost never see this...

Genuinely shocked there's a small cap company out there like Sivers... That already is a qualified supplier to hyperscaler supply chains through Jabil, Marvel Celestial, O-Net, Ayar and others.

This is one of the largest structural gaps in the market I've seen.

I expect the market to keep repricing this every day like $AXTI as more institutions begin to realize this.
$SIVE literally 是全球仅有的几个对 (CW/EML) optical laser bottlenecks 的 pure play public exposure 之一。

$LITE - $55B+
$COHR - $53B+
$MTSI - $17.8B+
$AAOI - $8.8B
$SIVE- $400M

你基本上几乎看不到这种情况……

真的很震惊,居然有 Sivers 这样一家 small cap company……已经通过 Jabil、Marvel Celestial、O-Net、Ayar 等,成为 hyperscaler supply chains 的 qualified supplier。

这是我见过市场中最大的 structural gaps 之一。

我预计随着更多 institutions 开始意识到这一点,市场会像 $AXTI 一样每天继续 repricing。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE has gotta be the highest upside stock I’ve seen in this market since $AXTI?

No way markets missed the CW laser light source for Jabil, Marvell (Celestial via $POET), O-Net, Ayar ( $NVDA, Mediatek backed)…

At a $140M valuation. ($350m now)

Not only do you get the most direct laser exposure to future CPO scale up?

But also this cycle’s 1.6T pluggables with $JBL (formerly Intel Silicon Photonics division) coming soon.

With Win Semi bridge capacity scaling needed for hyperscaler supply chains.

Don’t think 99.9% of people realized the sheer scale of this yet.
$SIVE 可能是我在这个市场里自 $AXTI 以来见过 upside 最高的股票?

市场居然错过了 Jabil、Marvell(Celestial via $POET)、O-Net、Ayar($NVDA、Mediatek backed)的 CW laser light source……

估值只有 $140M。(现在 $350m)

你不仅拿到未来 CPO scale up 最直接的 laser exposure?

还拿到这个周期即将通过 $JBL(前 Intel Silicon Photonics division)到来的 1.6T pluggables。

再加上 hyperscaler 供应链需要通过 Win Semi bridge capacity 扩产。

我觉得 99.9% 的人还没意识到这件事的规模有多大。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036674779399545279
❤️ 724 🔁 79 💬 67
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a lesson to people in the West working in frontier technologies from AI, Robotics, Space, and Semis:

Founders should **NEVER** set up businesses locally in China or try and get venture capital there.

Especially: Do not set up JVs if your name isn't $TSLA or you're a hundred billion dollar company.

There's too many anecdotal stories of coercion and forced detaining by the Chinese government in Silicon Valley.

Too many founders get lured by $80M+ high fundraising amounts. Many exuberant "deals" with local entitles.

Then build their technology there or visit there in person.

But that paper capital doesn't matter when it gets locked down and your technology gets forced transferred to Chinese state run entities.

No executives want to say this out loud since they're all scared of China or have business ties there, but that's the harsh reality.

Hope all the bots don't come after me after this post.
给在 West 做 AI、Robotics、Space 和 Semis 这些 frontier technologies 的人一个 lesson:

Founders **永远不要** 在 China 本地设立业务,或试图在那里拿 venture capital。

尤其是:如果你的名字不是 $TSLA,或者你不是一家千亿美元公司,不要设 JVs。

Silicon Valley 有太多关于中国政府 coercion 和 forced detaining 的轶事。

太多 founders 被 $80M+ 的高融资额吸引。还有很多看起来 exuberant 的本地 entities “deals”。

然后把技术建在那里,或者亲自去那里。

但当 paper capital 被锁住,而你的 technology 被 forced transferred 给 Chinese state run entities 时,那些纸面资本没有意义。

没有 executives 想大声说这个,因为他们都怕 China,或者在那里有 business ties,但这就是 harsh reality。

希望这条发完所有 bots 不要来追我。
❤️ 389 🔁 17 💬 28
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE has gotta be the highest upside stock I’ve seen in this market since $AXTI?

No way markets missed the CW laser light source for Jabil, Marvell (Celestial via $POET), O-Net, Ayar ( $NVDA, Mediatek backed)…

At a $140M valuation. ($350m now)

Not only do you get the most direct laser exposure to future CPO scale up?

But also this cycle’s 1.6T pluggables with $JBL (formerly Intel Silicon Photonics division) coming soon.

With Win Semi bridge capacity scaling needed for hyperscaler supply chains.

Don’t think 99.9% of people realized the sheer scale of this yet.
$SIVE 会不会是我在这个市场里自 $AXTI 之后见过 upside 最高的股票?

市场不可能错过 Jabil、Marvell(通过 $POET 的 Celestial)、O-Net、Ayar( $NVDA、Mediatek backed)的 CW laser light source……

在 $140M valuation 时。(现在 $350m)

你不仅拿到了未来 CPO scale up 最直接的 laser exposure?

而且还有这个 cycle 的 1.6T pluggables,来自 $JBL(前 Intel Silicon Photonics division),很快就会到来。

再加上 Win Semi bridge capacity scaling,满足 hyperscaler supply chains 需要。

我觉得 99.9% 的人还没意识到这个规模到底有多大。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Every industry leader...

Especially $AVGO (Physical Layer Products division) in this statement today.

Cites Lasers as a bottleneck for semiconductors.

If you aren't long...
-> CW Lasers: $SIVE | $MTSI
-> EML Lasers: $COHR | $LITE
-> or their foundries in $TSEM/Win Semi

Maybe it's time to wake up?

Broadcom Ramachandran: "Even though there are multiple suppliers in the industry today... there is definitely a supply constraint in the laser space,”
每个行业领导者……

尤其是今天这段话里的 $AVGO(Physical Layer Products division)。

都把 Lasers 称为 semiconductors 的瓶颈。

如果你还没 long……
-> CW Lasers: $SIVE | $MTSI
-> EML Lasers: $COHR | $LITE
-> 或者它们在 $TSEM/Win Semi 的 foundries

也许该醒醒了?

Broadcom Ramachandran: “Even though there are multiple suppliers in the industry today... there is definitely a supply constraint in the laser space,”
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036657811179155561
❤️ 522 🔁 50 💬 49
打开原推
📝 原创
Every industry leader...

Especially $AVGO (Physical Layer Products division) in this statement today.

Cites Lasers as a bottleneck for semiconductors.

If you aren't long...
-> CW Lasers: $SIVE | $MTSI
-> EML Lasers: $COHR | $LITE
-> or their foundries in $TSEM/Win Semi

Maybe it's time to wake up?

Broadcom Ramachandran: "Even though there are multiple suppliers in the industry today... there is definitely a supply constraint in the laser space,”
每个 industry leader……

尤其是 $AVGO(Physical Layer Products division)今天这个 statement。

都把 Lasers 称为 semiconductors 的 bottleneck。

如果你还没 long……
-> CW Lasers:$SIVE | $MTSI
-> EML Lasers:$COHR | $LITE
-> 或者它们在 $TSEM/Win Semi 的 foundries

也许该醒醒了?

Broadcom Ramachandran:“Even though there are multiple suppliers in the industry today... there is definitely a supply constraint in the laser space,”
❤️ 731 🔁 67 💬 36
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Looking into two names for optical transceivers PCBs bottleneck right now:

WUS Printed Circuit and FIC Global prob the two winners I've identified.

Few of the other winners were : Unimicron, Zhen Ding Tech, Gold Circuit Electronics, $TTMI, and $SANM.

"Both Taiwanese and Chinese PCB suppliers are facing capacity limits, contributing to the delays, Ramachandran said, without naming the suppliers."

So there's multiple bottlenecks. I'm long lasers. But just putting this stuff out there in case its interesting
现在正在看 optical transceivers PCBs bottleneck 的两个名字:

WUS Printed Circuit 和 FIC Global 可能是我识别出的两个 winners。

其他几个 winners 是:Unimicron、Zhen Ding Tech、Gold Circuit Electronics、$TTMI$SANM

“Both Taiwanese and Chinese PCB suppliers are facing capacity limits, contributing to the delays, Ramachandran said, without naming the suppliers.”

所以这里有多个 bottlenecks。我 long lasers。但把这些东西发出来,万一有人觉得有意思。
❤️ 225 🔁 5 💬 21
打开原推
📝 原创
I keep this all over X:

Stop trying to model bottlenecks with traditional metrics like P/S or P/E…

For $AXTI:

It’s like you found a restroom after eating 20 Tacos with Pinto Beans from Taco Bell.

You’re out of the toilet paper… but it’s urgent.

A random guy next to you offers you toilet paper for $20.

But the toilet paper raw cost is $1 from Amazon.

But because there’s no supply, and you need that Toilet Paper:

You’re happy to pay $20.

That’s $AXTI with the InP substrate + feedstock supply chain and hyperscalers.
我在 X 上反复说这个:

别再试图用 P/S 或 P/E 这种传统指标 model bottlenecks……

对于 $AXTI

就像你吃了 Taco Bell 的 20 个 Pinto Beans Tacos 后终于找到洗手间。

你没有 toilet paper……但情况很急。

旁边一个 random guy 要 $20 卖你 toilet paper。

但 toilet paper 的 raw cost 在 Amazon 上是 $1。

可是因为没有 supply,而你需要那卷 Toilet Paper:

你会很乐意付 $20。

这就是 $AXTI 和 InP substrate + feedstock supply chain 以及 hyperscalers 的关系。
❤️ 708 🔁 25 💬 63
打开原推
💬 引用
$ARM expects $15B in annual revenue from the the AGI CPU:

"The company projects that the new chip business will generate over $15 billion in annual revenue" within the next 5 years.

5 times current revenues (~$25B revenue)...

Arm probably deserves to be up more than 5% on this news if they're multiplying their revenue with a new product overnight?
$ARM 预计 AGI CPU 会带来 $15B annual revenue:

“The company projects that the new chip business will generate over $15 billion in annual revenue” within the next 5 years.

5 倍当前 revenues(~$25B revenue)……

如果他们靠一个新产品 overnight 把 revenue 乘起来,Arm 这个消息下可能不止应该涨 5%?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$ARM announces new AI chip called "AGI CPU"

According to Arm, the company "Expects it to add billions in annual revenue".

- 136 Neoverse V3 cores, built on $TSM 3nm process

- Custom-built for "agentic AI" workloads with OpenAI and $META as lead customers.

$AMD and $INTC have recently received a tailwind from enterprise CPU shortage.

You might be wondering:

Does ARM Solve the Shortage? Architecturally, yes. Physically, no.

Main beneficiary is $TSM, but this is a large tailwind for $ARM moving forward as they pivot from licensing.
$ARM 发布新的 AI chip,叫 “AGI CPU”

根据 Arm,公司“预计它将增加数十亿美元年收入”。

- 136 个 Neoverse V3 cores,基于 $TSM 3nm 工艺

- 为 “agentic AI” workloads 定制,OpenAI 和 $META 是首批客户。

$AMD$INTC 最近受益于企业 CPU 短缺。

你可能会想:

ARM 能解决短缺吗?架构上可以。物理上不行。

主要受益者是 $TSM,但随着 $ARM 从授权模式转型,这对它未来是一个很大顺风。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036532579638399109
❤️ 385 🔁 23 💬 41
打开原推
📝 原创
$ARM announces new AI chip called "AGI CPU"

According to Arm, the company "Expects it to add billions in annual revenue".

- 136 Neoverse V3 cores, built on $TSM 3nm process

- Custom-built for "agentic AI" workloads with OpenAI and $META as lead customers.

$AMD and $INTC have recently received a tailwind from enterprise CPU shortage.

You might be wondering:

Does ARM Solve the Shortage? Architecturally, yes. Physically, no.

Main beneficiary is $TSM, but this is a large tailwind for $ARM moving forward as they pivot from licensing.
$ARM 宣布新的 AI chip,叫 “AGI CPU”

据 Arm 称,公司 “Expects it to add billions in annual revenue”。

- 136 Neoverse V3 cores,基于 $TSM 3nm process

- 为 “agentic AI” workloads custom-built,OpenAI 和 $META 是 lead customers。

$AMD$INTC 最近受益于 enterprise CPU shortage。

你可能会想:

ARM 能解决 Shortage 吗?架构上可以。物理上不行。

主要受益者是 $TSM,但随着 $ARM 从 licensing 转型,这对它未来是很大的 tailwind。
❤️ 302 🔁 24 💬 29
打开原推
📝 原创
I’m genuinely impressed there’s people out there holding $IREN.

Imagine getting close to half the market cap…

~$6B eventually diluted, sold into the open market against every stock rally…

then still being bullish?

If you’re avoiding $SNDK or $AAOI for 100-200%+ YTD.

Because you care more about a company over your own portfolio returns.

You’re in the special $AMC bagholding territory.
我真的很佩服还有人在持有 $IREN

想象一下,接近半个 market cap……

~$6B 最终被 diluted,并在每次 stock rally 中卖进公开市场对着你砸……

然后你还 bullish?

如果你为了它避开 YTD 100-200%+ 的 $SNDK$AAOI

因为你更关心一家公司,而不是自己的 portfolio returns。

那你已经进入特殊的 $AMC bagholding territory。
❤️ 858 🔁 33 💬 185
打开原推
📝 原创
If you're new to $AAOI:

It looks scary entering positions near ATH at $109 after a 175% YTD increase.

However, this looks like the photonics equivalent of $SNDK.

And it so happens the center of the optical transceiver supercycle...

At a $8.2B valuation we can look at projections:

(est. Capacity * ASP Projections)
Q2 2026: ~$312.1M
Q4 2026: ~$1.41B
Q2-2027: ~$1.53B
Q4-2027: ~$1.97B

If $AAOI ends up leapfrogging the $55B $LITE in revenue...

$8B MC looks a little absurd for revenue growth off 30-40% margins…

Re-rating potential is enormous.

Worst case scenario if they fail internal laser fab and buys off $COHR.

Is it ends up a Made in America Innolight / Eoptolink (Both $66B-$90B+ Chinese companies)?

The optionality of making the entire supply chain in America is understated.

$AAOI is one of my few high conviction longs aside from $SIVE and $LITE if they can deliver on projections.
如果你是刚了解 $AAOI

在 YTD 涨 175% 后,接近 ATH $109 进场看起来很吓人。

不过,这看起来像 photonics 版的 $SNDK

而且它刚好处在 optical transceiver supercycle 的中心……

在 $8.2B valuation 下,我们可以看 projections:

(est. Capacity * ASP Projections)
Q2 2026:~$312.1M
Q4 2026:~$1.41B
Q2-2027:~$1.53B
Q4-2027:~$1.97B

如果 $AAOI 最后在 revenue 上 leapfrog $55B 的 $LITE……

对于 30-40% margins 上的 revenue growth,$8B MC 看起来有点荒谬……

Re-rating potential 非常巨大。

最坏情况是他们 internal laser fab 失败,然后从 $COHR 买。

那最终会变成 Made in America Innolight / Eoptolink(两家都是 $66B-$90B+ 的中国公司)吗?

在 America 制造整个 supply chain 的 optionality 被低估了。

如果他们能交付 projections,$AAOI 是我除了 $SIVE$LITE 之外少数 high conviction longs 之一。
❤️ 934 🔁 62 💬 56
打开原推
💬 引用
So my 10x moonshot $AXTI ended up landing on the moon.

If you felt like you missed the rocket:

-> $SIVE is my personal favorite next 10x AXT moonshot at today's prices.
-> $AAOI already up 4x since I've mentioned it, but I still think it can 4x again from these levels.

If you want to play a bit safer:
-> $VNP is the Western $AXTI
-> $SOI is the $AXTI for silicon photonics/CPO, but it hasn't really ramped up yet.
-> $IQE is more binary based on restructuring.
-> $TSEM, $LITE, $COHR are the steadier compounders.

I haven’t mentioned $VNP (5N Plus) much yet but it’s genuinely one of the most important companies in Western supply chains as the counterbalance to $AXTI.

Basically it supplies: indium, germanium, gallium, tellurium, bismuth. Solar cells for LEO. Substrate feedstock for photonics.

There's always more opportunities in the market!
所以我的 10x moonshot $AXTI 最后真的登月了。

如果你觉得错过了 rocket:

-> $SIVE 是我个人最喜欢的下一个 10x AXT moonshot,以今天价格看。
-> $AAOI 自我提到以来已经涨 4x,但我仍然认为它从这些水平还能再 4x。

如果你想玩得稍微安全一点:
-> $VNP 是 Western $AXTI
-> $SOI 是 silicon photonics/CPO 的 $AXTI,但它还没真正 ramp up。
-> $IQE 更像是基于 restructuring 的 binary。
-> $TSEM$LITE$COHR 是更稳定的 compounders。

我还没太多提 $VNP(5N Plus),但它真的是 Western supply chains 中最重要的公司之一,作为 $AXTI 的 counterbalance。

基本上它供应:indium、germanium、gallium、tellurium、bismuth。LEO 的 solar cells。photonics 的 substrate feedstock。

市场里永远还有更多机会!
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AXTI has now reached the legendary status of $69.69.

Was expecting close to 10x returns in a year and half, not a few months…

Everything from $AAOI to $SIVE are ridiculously outperforming.

As for AXT valuations at $4B? Is it overvalued. Yes.

Would hyperscalers pay $10B to secure their AI buildout? Yes.

Lot of these bottlenecks can’t be valued with traditional metrics.
$AXTI 现在已经到达传奇价位 $69.69。

我本来预期一年半接近 10x 回报,不是几个月……

$AAOI$SIVE,所有东西都离谱地跑赢。

至于 AXT 在 $4B 的估值?贵不贵。贵。

hyperscalers 会不会付 $10B 来锁定他们的 AI buildout?会。

很多这种瓶颈不能用传统指标来估值。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036458844793217133
❤️ 1,454 🔁 113 💬 75
打开原推
📝 原创
$AXTI has now reached the legendary status of $69.69.

Was expecting close to 10x returns in a year and half, not a few months…

Everything from $AAOI to $SIVE are ridiculously outperforming.

As for AXT valuations at $4B? Is it overvalued. Yes.

Would hyperscalers pay $10B to secure their AI buildout? Yes.

Lot of these bottlenecks can’t be valued with traditional metrics.
$AXTI 现在已经达到 $69.69 的传奇状态。

我原本预期一年半接近 10x returns,不是几个月……

$AAOI$SIVE,全都在荒谬地 outperform。

至于 AXT 在 $4B 的 valuation?是否 overvalued。是。

Hyperscalers 会不会付 $10B 来确保他们的 AI buildout?会。

很多这种 bottlenecks 不能用传统指标估值。
❤️ 518 🔁 23 💬 37
打开原推
📝 原创
Feel like Mag7 selloff from $META at $593 to $MSFT at $373…

Has gone a bit too far?

At this point, risk/reward feels on hyperscaler spend vs. ROI vs. macro climates, feels compelling.

And we should see capital rotations back into the American tech sector soon. https://t.co/KBCi7gMfGT
感觉 Mag7 selloff,从 $META at $593 到 $MSFT at $373……

有点过头了?

到这个点,hyperscaler spend vs. ROI vs. macro climates 的 risk/reward 感觉很有吸引力。

而且我们应该很快会看到 capital rotations 回到 American tech sector。 https://t.co/KBCi7gMfGT
❤️ 1,120 🔁 66 💬 100
打开原推
📝 原创
Not a fan of these types of posts, but I’ll do one today again:

When a stock like $SOI drops 6% and reverses a lot of its gains this week:

Nothing about SOI substrates thesis for silicon photonics / CPO level monopoly has changed.

Unfortunately, the broader index (Paris Stock Index) crashed 9% this month and keeps going down.

And broader macro from the War in Iran drives down a lot of names.

Not every name I mention like $AXTI can go in a straight line up but they tend to be strong outperformers.

I’ll post if my thesis materially changed.

But if a stock price drops because of macro or just a slight correction after rising 400% like $AAOI.

Or if $SIVE dropped 16% on Friday before rising 35% on Monday…

Short term stock prices does not chance a thesis.

And it shouldn’t to your conviction either.

Especially with names, if I don’t mention them for a bit like, $IQE that’s just in a waiting period for restructuring or asset sales. Or $NBIS that’s in its silent buildout phase for extreme q4 revenue ramp.

Performance like these are sometimes byproducts of macro.

But if they can go down 10% in one week, they can go up 10% the next.
我不喜欢这类帖子,但今天再发一次:

当像 $SOI 这样的股票跌 6%,并回吐本周很多 gains 时:

关于 SOI substrates 在 silicon photonics / CPO level monopoly 的 thesis 没有任何变化。

不幸的是,broader index(Paris Stock Index)这个月崩了 9%,而且还在跌。

以及 War in Iran 带来的 broader macro 压低了很多名字。

不是我提到的每个名字都能像 $AXTI 一样直线上涨,但它们往往是强 outperformers。

如果我的 thesis materially changed,我会发。

但如果股价因为 macro 下跌,或者像 $AAOI 涨 400% 后只是轻微 correction。

或者如果 $SIVE 周五跌 16%,周一又涨 35%……

短期股价不会改变 thesis。

也不应该改变你的 conviction。

尤其是有些名字,如果我有一阵没提,比如 $IQE,那只是它处于等待 restructuring 或 asset sales 的阶段。或者 $NBIS 处于为极端 q4 revenue ramp 做 silent buildout 的阶段。

这些表现有时是 macro 的副产品。

但如果它们一周能跌 10%,下一周也能涨 10%。
❤️ 506 🔁 17 💬 56
打开原推
📝 原创
I honestly find it amusing...

You have Swedish local journalists like "Privata Affarer" with no background in advanced semis:

Scaring the company's majority-owned local Swedish retail investors out of their $SIVE positions.

Probably the highest upside tech-stock in their country at ~$320m MC.

And transferring positions to US investors who understand hyperscaler CPO/photonics supply chains better.

The local media is doing all the work for American investors? Thanks?
我真的觉得很好笑……

你有像 “Privata Affarer” 这样的 Swedish local journalists,没有 advanced semis 背景:

却在吓公司的多数本地 Swedish retail investors,让他们卖掉 $SIVE positions。

这可能是他们国家 upside 最高的 tech-stock,MC 只有 ~$320m。

然后把 positions 转给更懂 hyperscaler CPO/photonics supply chains 的 US investors。

本地媒体在替 American investors 做所有工作?谢谢?
❤️ 469 🔁 28 💬 60
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
yep backchannel deal ofc... this is why you can't just react to media headlines.

need to find derivative breadcrumbs to frontrun algorithms. https://t.co/IsEKueAhC0
yep backchannel deal ofc……这就是为什么你不能只对 media headlines 做反应。

需要找到 derivative breadcrumbs 来 frontrun algorithms。 https://t.co/IsEKueAhC0
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just a thought on Iran vs. US:

Anyone know if there’s a way to track insurance eg. UK for the Strait?

If rates go down -&gt; there’s likely backchannel deals?
关于 Iran vs. US 的一个想法:

有人知道有没有办法追踪 Strait 的保险费率,比如 UK 那边?

如果费率下降 -&gt; 很可能有幕后渠道协议?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036072395841413493
❤️ 113 🔁 1 💬 13
打开原推
📝 原创
It’s hilarious we live in a world:

Where equity analysts at major banks…

Might need to adjust their estimates for $IBKR or $HOOD earnings.

Because a random person on X liked international equities like $SIVE, $IQE, Macronix, SK Hynix, Unimicron, and others not available on Robinhood or US brokerages.

What a wild timeline.
我们生活在这样的世界里真的很搞笑:

Major banks 的 equity analysts……

可能需要调整他们对 $IBKR$HOOD earnings 的 estimates。

因为 X 上一个 random person 喜欢 $SIVE$IQE、Macronix、SK Hynix、Unimicron 等 Robinhood 或 US brokerages 买不到的 international equities。

真是 wild timeline。
❤️ 644 🔁 8 💬 42
打开原推
📝 原创
There's the Space Satellite MegaCycle:

-> Triggered by $PL.

With $BKSY / $SATL / $SPIR and others following.

Then there's the Photonics SuperCycle:

-> Triggered by $LITE and $COHR.

With $AAOI / $TSEM / $MTSI / $SIVE / $IQE / $SOI and others following.

One is hype over applications from Space.

The other is hype over extreme revenue and earnings growth from AI.

The latter tends to be more defensible.
有 Space Satellite MegaCycle:

-> 由 $PL 触发。

然后 $BKSY / $SATL / $SPIR 等跟随。

还有 Photonics SuperCycle:

-> 由 $LITE$COHR 触发。

然后 $AAOI / $TSEM / $MTSI / $SIVE / $IQE / $SOI 等跟随。

一个是对 Space applications 的 hype。

另一个是对 AI 带来的 extreme revenue 和 earnings growth 的 hype。

后者往往更 defensible。
❤️ 888 🔁 84 💬 40
打开原推
💬 引用
If you didn't know by now $SIVE is important to US national security via CHIPS act.

But especially, as the light source for hyperscaler AI supply chains.

They got two CHIPS acts grants ~$11.6M so far:

1. FR3 beamformer ICs with $ERIC and Raytheon $RTX.
2. EW Tech with $BA (LSE) BAE Systems

With more coming funding from CHIPS in 2026 hinted by the CEO.

Small caps almost never get this sort of support from the US government.

You have a company sitting at $330M:

That's critical to US National Security for their Semi arm.

and

Critical to Hyperscaler supply chains ( $MSFT, $META, $AMZN, $ORCL, etc) for Photonics through $MRVL Celestial, Ayar, Jabil, ONet, and others...

The main question regarding scale vs. capex is now answered by Win Semi partnership.

And the question regarding "CPO waiting" opportunity cost is now answered by the Jabil 1.6T pluggable ramp from OFC.

$SIVE of the most unknown gems in the photonics space and I personally think this company should be $2B+ today.
如果你到现在还不知道,$SIVE 通过 CHIPS act 对 US national security 很重要。

但尤其是,作为 hyperscaler AI supply chains 的 light source。

到目前为止,他们拿到了两个 CHIPS acts grants,约 ~$11.6M:

1. 与 $ERIC 和 Raytheon $RTX 合作的 FR3 beamformer ICs。
2. 与 $BA (LSE) BAE Systems 合作的 EW Tech

CEO 暗示 2026 年 CHIPS 还会有更多 funding。

Small caps 几乎从来拿不到 US government 这种支持。

你有一家 $330M 的公司:

它的 Semi arm 对 US National Security 很关键。

并且

通过 $MRVL Celestial、Ayar、Jabil、ONet 等,在 Photonics 上对 Hyperscaler supply chains( $MSFT$META$AMZN$ORCL 等)很关键……

关于 scale vs. capex 的主要问题,现在由 Win Semi partnership 回答了。

关于 “CPO waiting” opportunity cost 的问题,现在由 OFC 上 Jabil 1.6T pluggable ramp 回答了。

$SIVE 是 photonics space 里最不为人知的 gems 之一,我个人认为这家公司今天应该值 $2B+。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
US Chip ACT Funding is one of the largest signals.

For importance to America National Security.

Lesser known list:
1. $SIVE ($330m)
2. $AKTS ($920m)
3. $BLG ($34m)
4. $QUBT ($1.65B)
5. $RGTI ($5.27B)
6. $MRAM ($210m)
7. $SKYT (Acquired)
8. $PDFS ($1.35B)
9. $ATOM ($177M)
10. $SLVC ($227M)
11. $NVTS ($2.12B)
12. $WOLF ($750m)
13. $ALMU ($234m)
14. $ACLS ($2.6B)

DIRECT FUNDING | DoC CHIPS PMTs:
1. $WOLF (Wolfspeed): $750 Million
2. $INFN (Infinera): $93 Million (DoC PMT) - Bought by Nokia
3. $SKYT (SkyWater Technology): $16 Million (DoC PMT) - Bought by IonQ

DIRECT FUNDING | Federal R&D Contracts:
4. $RGTI (Rigetti Computing): $11.28M (AFRL/quantum networking and AFOSR Chip fab)
5. $QUBT - Direct DoC/NIST contract for TFLN PICs

DoD Microelectronics / Sub-Contractors
6. $SIVE: $11.6 Million (NEMC Hub)
7. $MRAM - $8.7 Million project partner ("CHEETA" project via SCMC Hub)
8. $ACLS - $7.8M partner project (Led by GE Aerospace via CLAWS)
9. $BLG - $6.5M (DoD sub-contracts secured to date via CLAWS Hub)
10. $AKTS - $4 Million (Lead grant for the "LADDER" project via NEMC)

Adjacents:
11. $ATOM: Member of the SWAP Hub
12. $NVTS: Embedded partner in the SCMC Hub
13. $PDFS: industry partner in the CA DREAMS Hub
14: $ALMU: affiliate member in the CA DREAMS and MMEC Hubs

-> Electromagnetic Warfare (EW): $51 million allocated across 6 projects.
-> Artificial Intelligence (AI) Hardware: $42 million allocated across 7 projects.
-> 5G/6G Wireless Communications: $42 million allocated across 5 projects.
-> Commercial Leap-Ahead Technologies: $38 million allocated across 7 projects.
-> Quantum Technology: $32 million allocated across 4 projects.
-> Secure Edge Computing / IoT: $25 million allocated across 4 projects.

Just a warning:

Being important to US technology (eg. Wolfspeed) does not translate to being a good investment.

Was just doing research into $SIVE CHIPS act funding and decided to see what other lesser known companies got grants or were beneficaries too.
US Chip ACT Funding 是最大的信号之一。

代表对美国国家安全的重要性。

较少人知道的名单:
1. $SIVE ($330m)
2. $AKTS ($920m)
3. $BLG ($34m)
4. $QUBT ($1.65B)
5. $RGTI ($5.27B)
6. $MRAM ($210m)
7. $SKYT (Acquired)
8. $PDFS ($1.35B)
9. $ATOM ($177M)
10. $SLVC ($227M)
11. $NVTS ($2.12B)
12. $WOLF ($750m)
13. $ALMU ($234m)
14. $ACLS ($2.6B)

DIRECT FUNDING | DoC CHIPS PMTs:
1. $WOLF (Wolfspeed): $750 Million
2. $INFN (Infinera): $93 Million (DoC PMT) - Bought by Nokia
3. $SKYT (SkyWater Technology): $16 Million (DoC PMT) - Bought by IonQ

DIRECT FUNDING | Federal R&D Contracts:
4. $RGTI (Rigetti Computing): $11.28M (AFRL/quantum networking and AFOSR Chip fab)
5. $QUBT - Direct DoC/NIST contract for TFLN PICs

DoD Microelectronics / Sub-Contractors
6. $SIVE: $11.6 Million (NEMC Hub)
7. $MRAM - $8.7 Million project partner (“CHEETA” project via SCMC Hub)
8. $ACLS - $7.8M partner project (Led by GE Aerospace via CLAWS)
9. $BLG - $6.5M (DoD sub-contracts secured to date via CLAWS Hub)
10. $AKTS - $4 Million (Lead grant for the “LADDER” project via NEMC)

Adjacents:
11. $ATOM: Member of the SWAP Hub
12. $NVTS: Embedded partner in the SCMC Hub
13. $PDFS: industry partner in the CA DREAMS Hub
14: $ALMU: affiliate member in the CA DREAMS and MMEC Hubs

-> Electromagnetic Warfare (EW): $51 million allocated across 6 projects.
-> Artificial Intelligence (AI) Hardware: $42 million allocated across 7 projects.
-> 5G/6G Wireless Communications: $42 million allocated across 5 projects.
-> Commercial Leap-Ahead Technologies: $38 million allocated across 7 projects.
-> Quantum Technology: $32 million allocated across 4 projects.
-> Secure Edge Computing / IoT: $25 million allocated across 4 projects.

提醒一下:

对美国技术重要(比如 Wolfspeed),不等于就是好投资。

我本来是在研究 $SIVE CHIPS act funding,顺手看看还有哪些不太知名的公司也拿到了 grants 或是受益者。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036264013370368378
❤️ 427 🔁 42 💬 22
打开原推
📝 原创
Honestly if I post something in my subscriber chat regarding potential $TSM upstream suppliers,

Then Apollo &lt; $APO &gt; acquires the company 1 hour later.

I'm probably doing something right? https://t.co/27DuGXbwQN
说真的,如果我在 subscriber chat 里发关于潜在 $TSM upstream suppliers 的东西,

然后 Apollo < $APO > 1 小时后收购了那家公司。

我可能做对了什么? https://t.co/27DuGXbwQN
❤️ 499 🔁 8 💬 41
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
$TSM COUPE supplier was ~$300m valuation or so before Apollo bought it out. https://t.co/kw7SsqDEfb
$TSM COUPE supplier 在 Apollo 买下它之前,大概是 ~$300m valuation 左右。 https://t.co/kw7SsqDEfb
❤️ 128 🔁 1 💬 18
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
WHAT ARE THE CHANCES????? NOOOOOO https://t.co/Vuy7eiH6IG
这概率到底有多大?????NOOOOOO https://t.co/Vuy7eiH6IG
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Nvm they got acquired by $APO. Fk
Nvm,他们被 $APO 收购了。Fk
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036275783942152202
❤️ 153 🔁 1 💬 16
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Nvm they got acquired by $APO. Fk
Nvm,他们被 $APO 收购了。Fk
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Found a &lt;$400M $TSM foundry supplier. Not $HIMX.

Like 70% sure, still doing research on it.
发现一个 <$400M 的 $TSM foundry supplier。不是 $HIMX

大概 70% 确定,还在研究。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036251029029921145
❤️ 117 🔁 0 💬 7
打开原推
📝 原创
US Chip ACT Funding is one of the largest signals.

For importance to America National Security.

Lesser known list:
1. $SIVE ($330m)
2. $AKTS ($920m)
3. $BLG ($34m)
4. $QUBT ($1.65B)
5. $RGTI ($5.27B)
6. $MRAM ($210m)
7. $SKYT (Acquired)
8. $PDFS ($1.35B)
9. $ATOM ($177M)
10. $SLVC ($227M)
11. $NVTS ($2.12B)
12. $WOLF ($750m)
13. $ALMU ($234m)
14. $ACLS ($2.6B)

DIRECT FUNDING | DoC CHIPS PMTs:
1. $WOLF (Wolfspeed): $750 Million
2. $INFN (Infinera): $93 Million (DoC PMT) - Bought by Nokia
3. $SKYT (SkyWater Technology): $16 Million (DoC PMT) - Bought by IonQ

DIRECT FUNDING | Federal R&D Contracts:
4. $RGTI (Rigetti Computing): $11.28M (AFRL/quantum networking and AFOSR Chip fab)
5. $QUBT - Direct DoC/NIST contract for TFLN PICs

DoD Microelectronics / Sub-Contractors
6. $SIVE: $11.6 Million (NEMC Hub)
7. $MRAM - $8.7 Million project partner ("CHEETA" project via SCMC Hub)
8. $ACLS - $7.8M partner project (Led by GE Aerospace via CLAWS)
9. $BLG - $6.5M (DoD sub-contracts secured to date via CLAWS Hub)
10. $AKTS - $4 Million (Lead grant for the "LADDER" project via NEMC)

Adjacents:
11. $ATOM: Member of the SWAP Hub
12. $NVTS: Embedded partner in the SCMC Hub
13. $PDFS: industry partner in the CA DREAMS Hub
14: $ALMU: affiliate member in the CA DREAMS and MMEC Hubs

-> Electromagnetic Warfare (EW): $51 million allocated across 6 projects.
-> Artificial Intelligence (AI) Hardware: $42 million allocated across 7 projects.
-> 5G/6G Wireless Communications: $42 million allocated across 5 projects.
-> Commercial Leap-Ahead Technologies: $38 million allocated across 7 projects.
-> Quantum Technology: $32 million allocated across 4 projects.
-> Secure Edge Computing / IoT: $25 million allocated across 4 projects.

Just a warning:

Being important to US technology (eg. Wolfspeed) does not translate to being a good investment.

Was just doing research into $SIVE CHIPS act funding and decided to see what other lesser known companies got grants or were beneficaries too.
US Chip ACT Funding 是最大的信号之一。

说明对 America National Security 的重要性。

较少人知道的名单:
1. $SIVE ($330m)
2. $AKTS ($920m)
3. $BLG ($34m)
4. $QUBT ($1.65B)
5. $RGTI ($5.27B)
6. $MRAM ($210m)
7. $SKYT (Acquired)
8. $PDFS ($1.35B)
9. $ATOM ($177M)
10. $SLVC ($227M)
11. $NVTS ($2.12B)
12. $WOLF ($750m)
13. $ALMU ($234m)
14. $ACLS ($2.6B)

DIRECT FUNDING | DoC CHIPS PMTs:
1. $WOLF (Wolfspeed):$750 Million
2. $INFN (Infinera):$93 Million (DoC PMT) - 被 Nokia 收购
3. $SKYT (SkyWater Technology):$16 Million (DoC PMT) - 被 IonQ 收购

DIRECT FUNDING | Federal R&D Contracts:
4. $RGTI (Rigetti Computing):$11.28M (AFRL/quantum networking and AFOSR Chip fab)
5. $QUBT - Direct DoC/NIST contract for TFLN PICs

DoD Microelectronics / Sub-Contractors
6. $SIVE:$11.6 Million (NEMC Hub)
7. $MRAM - $8.7 Million project partner (“CHEETA” project via SCMC Hub)
8. $ACLS - $7.8M partner project (Led by GE Aerospace via CLAWS)
9. $BLG - $6.5M (DoD sub-contracts secured to date via CLAWS Hub)
10. $AKTS - $4 Million (Lead grant for the “LADDER” project via NEMC)

Adjacents:
11. $ATOM:Member of the SWAP Hub
12. $NVTS:Embedded partner in the SCMC Hub
13. $PDFS:industry partner in the CA DREAMS Hub
14:$ALMU:affiliate member in the CA DREAMS and MMEC Hubs

-> Electromagnetic Warfare (EW):6 个项目分配 $51 million。
-> Artificial Intelligence (AI) Hardware:7 个项目分配 $42 million。
-> 5G/6G Wireless Communications:5 个项目分配 $42 million。
-> Commercial Leap-Ahead Technologies:7 个项目分配 $38 million。
-> Quantum Technology:4 个项目分配 $32 million。
-> Secure Edge Computing / IoT:4 个项目分配 $25 million。

只是提醒一下:

对 US technology 重要(比如 Wolfspeed),并不等于就是好投资。

我本来是在研究 $SIVE CHIPS act funding,然后顺手看看还有哪些较少人知道的公司拿到了 grants 或也是 beneficiaries。
❤️ 1,020 🔁 109 💬 48
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Found a &lt;$400M $TSM foundry supplier. Not $HIMX.

Like 70% sure, still doing research on it.
发现了一个 <$400M 的 $TSM foundry supplier。不是 $HIMX

大概 70% 确定,还在继续研究。
❤️ 360 🔁 1 💬 47
打开原推
📝 原创
Honestly... I have more trust in Elon with building a foundry like Terafab.

Then I do with $INTC with their merchant one?

The guy literally made reusable rockets like Starship, the size of small mountains, go vroom vroom into Space.

Yes, $TSLA looks overvalued by every conventional metric.

But Tesla is not a conventional company and should not be valued as such.

The guy knows how to get stuff done (with some delays), it’s more of a matter of time with humanoids or FSD.

Need more out-of-the box thinkers like him both in running companies and sharing thoughts on X.
说实话……我更信 Elon 能建出 Terafab 这样的 foundry。

而不是信 $INTC 的 merchant foundry?

这家伙 literally 把像小山一样大的 Starship 可复用火箭送进 Space,go vroom vroom。

是的,$TSLA 按所有传统指标看都 overvalued。

但 Tesla 不是传统公司,也不该按传统公司估值。

这家伙知道怎么把事情做成(虽然会有些 delays),humanoids 或 FSD 更像是时间问题。

我们需要更多像他这样 out-of-the box thinkers,既能经营公司,也能在 X 上分享想法。
❤️ 712 🔁 29 💬 64
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
-> 1.5b in $SPY futures and $580M oil futures were placed before the actual X post.

I’m sure people found out through derivatives like the quote… or the us treasury shorting oil was probably the main signal too.

Anyway tons of profit to be made off trades like these if you can find breadcrumbs before others. Didn’t find them early enough
-> 实际 X post 发出前,已经有 1.5b 的 $SPY futures 和 $580M oil futures 下单。

我相信有人是通过 derivatives 找到了 quote 里的信息……或者 us treasury shorting oil 可能也是主要信号。

总之,如果你能在别人之前找到 breadcrumbs,这类 trades 能赚很多。可惜我没足够早发现。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just a thought on Iran vs. US:

Anyone know if there’s a way to track insurance eg. UK for the Strait?

If rates go down -&gt; there’s likely backchannel deals?
关于 Iran vs. US 的一个想法:

有人知道有没有办法追踪 Strait 的保险费率,比如 UK 那边?

如果费率下降 -&gt; 很可能有幕后渠道协议?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036072395841413493
❤️ 98 🔁 0 💬 10
打开原推
📝 原创
$AAOI receives $53M 800G order from hyperscaler for optical transceivers.

It’s time to start getting used to seeing this every day.

Any production these photonics companies can make?

-&gt; get bought out. https://t.co/3eqwBUV8Np
$AAOI 从 hyperscaler 收到 $53M 800G optical transceivers 订单。

该开始习惯每天看到这种消息了。

这些 photonics companies 能生产出来的任何东西?

-> 都会被买光。 https://t.co/3eqwBUV8Np
❤️ 573 🔁 23 💬 23
打开原推
💬 引用
I keep getting asked:

What's the PT of $SIVE? It's a $320m MC company, how far can it run?

It’s a critical CW laser company, the next chokepoint in photonics.

Closest comparison is $MTSI is $17 Billion.

Then $LITE at $51.97 Billion.

I think it should trade at $2-3B, today.

Yet it’s $320 million.

The sheer valuation gap points to massive upside when it scales.
我一直被问:

$SIVE 的 PT 是多少?它是一家 $320m MC 公司,能跑多远?

它是一家关键的 CW laser company,是 photonics 的下一个 chokepoint。

最接近的对比是 $MTSI,$17 Billion。

然后是 $LITE,$51.97 Billion。

我认为它今天就应该交易在 $2-3B。

但它现在是 $320 million。

这种巨大的 valuation gap,指向它 scale 后的 massive upside。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE is starting to play out like my $AXTI thesis round 10?

Up triple digits now.

Really not sure how markets missed this one tbh?

-> Laser supplier to Jabil… for 1.6T pluggable transceivers in the current supercycle.

-> Laser supplier to Ayar / $MRVL celestial for CPO, in the upcoming supercycle.

Literally all your laser suppliers from $MTSI to $LITE are $17-45B companies.

$SIVE?

Now only at ~$310M.

High conviction long.
$SIVE 开始像我第 10 轮 $AXTI thesis 一样走出来了?

现在已经涨了三位数。

说实话真不太懂市场怎么会漏掉这个?

-> Jabil 的 laser supplier……用于当前 supercycle 的 1.6T pluggable transceivers。

-> Ayar / $MRVL celestial 的 laser supplier,用于即将到来的 CPO supercycle。

你所有 laser suppliers,从 $MTSI$LITE,都是 $17-45B 公司。

$SIVE

现在才 ~$310M。

High conviction long。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036085968319680677
❤️ 541 🔁 59 💬 66
打开原推
💬 引用
Everyone thought I was crazy when I gave $AXTI a $150 PT from $12-15.

All the doubters suddenly disappeared?

Reason my YTD is over 600%+ is because I identify the biggest chokepoints in hyperscaler supply chains before anyone else.

Then go long. https://t.co/lgmu8p7F5a
当我从 $12-15 给 $AXTI $150 PT 时,所有人都觉得我疯了。

所有 doubters 突然消失了?

我 YTD 超过 600%+ 的原因,是因为我在其他人之前识别出 hyperscaler supply chains 里最大的 chokepoints。

然后 long。 https://t.co/lgmu8p7F5a
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 1,079 🔁 56 💬 64
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE is starting to play out like my $AXTI thesis round 10?

Up triple digits now.

Really not sure how markets missed this one tbh?

-> Laser supplier to Jabil… for 1.6T pluggable transceivers in the current supercycle.

-> Laser supplier to Ayar / $MRVL celestial for CPO, in the upcoming supercycle.

Literally all your laser suppliers from $MTSI to $LITE are $17-45B companies.

$SIVE?

Now only at ~$310M.

High conviction long.
$SIVE 开始像我的 $AXTI thesis round 10 那样兑现了?

现在已经涨三位数。

说实话真不确定 markets 是怎么错过这个的?

-> 给 Jabil 的 laser supplier……用于当前 supercycle 里的 1.6T pluggable transceivers。

-> 给 Ayar / $MRVL celestial 的 laser supplier……用于即将到来的 supercycle 里的 CPO。

你的所有 laser suppliers,从 $MTSI$LITE,都是 $17-45B companies。

$SIVE

现在只有 ~$310M。

High conviction long。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I’m long $SIVE at $140M.

I believe this is the next $LITE that markets and institutions missed.

$SIVE makes InP CW DFB lasers.

Closest comparison is $LITE in the current EML laser bottleneck.

But instead of supplying to Innolight/Eoptolink for current optical transceivers cycles.

They supply the lasers to $POET Starlight, Ayar SuperNova.

And others for the future CPO/silicon photonics architectures spearheaded by $NVDA.

Current valuations make 0 sense to me personally. 



$POET is advanced packaging for $SIVE type lasers…

But $POET commands worth 11x+ more than the company making the laser itself?



It’s feels like valuing a more advanced $FN (~$20B) packaging at $400B when $LITE is valued at $40B. 



So now at $130m:

-

- You have a likely mini $LITE like laser supplier to Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers through $POET. 



- Laser supplier to Ayar ( $NVDA, $INTC ), though they do multi source with $LITE, Sumitomo, $MTSI.

And other potential up and coming suppliers potentially like Lightmatter that they’ve name dropped (eg. Q2 2023 earnings). This is unconfirmed but supply chain BOM is confidential. 



On top, for revenue, they expected $453M "pipeline next few years”.



And, they have capacity expansion through WIN: “Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers."



Sivers feels the silicon photonics/CPO version of $LITE, with actual rapidly growing customers like Celestial through $POET, Ayar, with more to come.



I wouldn’t have liked it last year, but just 3 weeks ago, they refinanced all their debt successfully to $12M convertible loan (10.85%) and a $5M term loan (12%), which cleans up debt.



It’s $17m total, which feels like nothing to US markets when $AAOI is doing a $500m ATMs every other week.

Best of all, this is their pure play inp laser segment for silicon/photonics + cpo. 

Their Lidar segment is ramping up and they have $53-138M projected revenue coming in.



Downside risk:

- execution (as always)

- dilution to scale up capacity to compete with $LITE and others.
- $LITE, $COHR competition on scale after $NVDA just gave them $4B
- CPO ramp gets delayed.



I have no clue how, $LWLG, a pre-revenue science project with $TSEM, is valued at $1B+ MC.



Or how $POET, is worth ~9-10x more than its laser supplier. 



When $SIVE, the mini $LITE equivalent for CPO/Silicon photonics, is valued at $140M.

I do believe this is largely undiscovered by institutions, since this is some random company in OMX Nordic Exchange (similar to micro $AXTI before I started posting about the inp substrate bottleneck). 



But I do think it will get a lot of institutional attention as Celestial and Ayar scale up.

Especially if $POET and $SIVE gets qualified with other customers. 



If CPO completely replaces pluggable transceivers in the next generation of hyperscaler architectures.

Sivers, with possible WIN Semi qualifcation and if they become the multi-source lasers for NVIDIA, Marvell, Intel, and Broadcom architectures, can be strongly rerated.

Just as how $LITE did today going from $16 -> $622.

This is just my personal thesis I'm sharing, DYOR/NFI.

TLDR:

InP Lasers are the current bottleneck in photonics as seen with $LITE valuations. 



$SIVE looks like the mini $LITE for the upcoming CPO/Silicon Photonics ramp.



I personally took long position in $SIVE, as I believe they’re a large beneficiary of the upcoming silicon photonic/CPO architectural changes by $NVDA (with GTC cataylst). 



The upside here just way too compelling for me personally as the next possible $LITE.
我在 $140M 时做多 $SIVE

我认为这是市场和机构错过的下一个 $LITE

$SIVE 做 InP CW DFB lasers。

最接近的对标,是当前 EML laser 瓶颈里的 $LITE

但它不是给 Innolight/Eoptolink 供应当前光模块周期的东西。

它给 $POET Starlight、Ayar SuperNova 供应 lasers。

也给其他由 $NVDA 推动的未来 CPO/silicon photonics 架构供应。

我个人觉得当前估值完全说不通。

$POET 是给 $SIVE 这类 lasers 做 advanced packaging……

$POET 的估值居然比真正做 laser 的公司高 11x+?

这感觉就像在 $LITE 估值 $40B 时,把更先进的 $FN(~$20B)packaging 估到 $400B。

所以现在 $130m:

- 你拿到的是一个可能的 mini $LITE,作为 Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers 通过 $POET 的 laser supplier。

- 也是 Ayar($NVDA$INTC)的 laser supplier,虽然他们也会和 $LITE、Sumitomo、$MTSI 多源采购。

还有其他潜在的新兴客户,比如他们提到过的 Lightmatter(例如 Q2 2023 earnings)。这还未确认,因为 supply chain BOM 是保密的。

收入方面,他们预计“未来几年 pipeline”有 $453M。

他们还通过 WIN 扩产:“Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers.”

Sivers 感觉就是 silicon photonics/CPO 版本的 $LITE,有 Celestial 通过 $POET、Ayar 这些真正快速增长的客户,而且后面还会更多。

去年我不会喜欢它,但就在 3 周前,他们成功把所有债务再融资成 $12M 可转债(10.85%)和 $5M term loan(12%),清理了债务。

总共 $17m,对美国市场来说几乎不算什么,$AAOI 隔三差五就在做 $500m ATM。

最棒的是,这是他们针对 silicon/photonics + cpo 的纯 InP laser segment。他们的 Lidar segment 也在放量,并预计有 $53-138M 收入进来。

下行风险:
- 执行(永远都有)
- 为了扩产和 $LITE 等竞争而稀释
- $NVDA 刚给 $LITE$COHR $4B 后,它们在规模上的竞争
- CPO 放量延迟

我真不知道,$LWLG 这种和 $TSEM 相关、还没收入的科研项目,怎么能有 $1B+ 市值。

或者 $POET 怎么能值它 laser supplier 的 ~9-10x。

$SIVE,这个 CPO/Silicon photonics 的 mini $LITE 等价物,只有 $140M。

我确实认为它很大程度上还没被机构发现,因为这是 OMX Nordic Exchange 上一家随机公司(类似我开始发 InP substrate 瓶颈前的微型 $AXTI)。

但我觉得随着 Celestial 和 Ayar 放量,它会获得很多机构关注。

尤其如果 $POET$SIVE 获得其他客户认证。

如果 CPO 在下一代 hyperscaler 架构里完全替代 pluggable transceivers。

Sivers 如果完成可能的 WIN Semi qualification,并成为 NVIDIA、Marvell、Intel、Broadcom 架构的多源 lasers,会被强力重估。

就像 $LITE 今天从 $16 -> $622 一样。

这只是我分享的个人 thesis,DYOR/NFI。

TLDR:

$LITE 的估值可以看到,InP Lasers 是当前 photonics 的瓶颈。

$SIVE 看起来像即将到来的 CPO/Silicon Photonics 放量里的 mini $LITE

我个人已经做多 $SIVE,因为我认为它会成为 $NVDA 推动的下一轮 silicon photonic/CPO 架构变化(带 GTC catalyst)的重要受益者。

这里作为下一个潜在 $LITE 的 upside,对我个人来说太有吸引力了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033466880661606646
❤️ 455 🔁 53 💬 61
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Just a thought on Iran vs. US:

Anyone know if there’s a way to track insurance eg. UK for the Strait?

If rates go down -&gt; there’s likely backchannel deals?
关于 Iran vs. US 的一个想法:

有人知道有没有办法追踪 Strait 的 insurance,比如 UK 的?

如果 rates 下降 -> 很可能有 backchannel deals?
❤️ 171 🔁 1 💬 21
打开原推
📝 原创
Indexes shot green over the news of a TACO.

Individual names from $TSEM to $AAOI are up 6-7%+ premarket.

Trump:

"I AM PLEASE TO REPORT THAT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND THE COUNTRY OF IRAN, HAVE HAD, OVER THE LAST TWO DAYS, VERY GOOD AND PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS REGARDING A COMPLETE AND TOTAL RESOLUTION OF OUR HOSTILITIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST"
Indexes 因 TACO 消息直接冲绿。

$TSEM$AAOI 的个股 premarket 涨 6-7%+。

Trump:

“I AM PLEASE TO REPORT THAT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND THE COUNTRY OF IRAN, HAVE HAD, OVER THE LAST TWO DAYS, VERY GOOD AND PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS REGARDING A COMPLETE AND TOTAL RESOLUTION OF OUR HOSTILITIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST”
❤️ 402 🔁 10 💬 37
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE is up 6.7% today.

You know you're doing something right:

When the entire market from KOSPI to Nikkei is red.

While individual longs from $TSEM to $AXTI are green.

It's clear that this is now a stock picker's market.

As thematic individual names in Oil, Rare Earths, to Semis, that the world is fighting over... Have strongly outperformed the broader market.
$SIVE 今天涨 6.7%。

你知道自己做对了:

当整个市场从 KOSPI 到 Nikkei 都是红的。

而从 $TSEM$AXTI 的 individual longs 是绿的。

很明显,现在是 stock picker's market。

因为 Oil、Rare Earths 到 Semis 里那些全世界都在争夺的 thematic individual names,已经强烈 outperform broader market。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
One of the most brutal wipeouts occurred in Asian markets today.

China's stock market: -3.63%
Korea's (KOSPI / $EWY) stock market: -6.49%
Japan's (Nikkei) stock market: -3.48

However if you look at Israel's Ta-125 stock market?

+11.25% YTD and +67.21% 1Y.

The US $SPY is down ~5% YTD, but faring better than their Asian counterparties.

This data is very interesting since markets, not headlines, are usually the best largest indicators of:

Winners and Losers of War.

Especially with the ongoing energy conflict with the War in Iran.
今天亚洲市场出现了最惨烈的一次 wipeout。

中国股市:-3.63%
韩国(KOSPI / $EWY)股市:-6.49%
日本(日经)股市:-3.48

但如果你看 Israel 的 Ta-125 股市?

+11.25% YTD,+67.21% 1Y。

美国 $SPY YTD 下跌 ~5%,但表现仍好于亚洲对手。

这个数据很有意思,因为市场,而不是头条新闻,通常才是判断以下问题最大、最好的指标:

战争的赢家和输家。

尤其是在 Iran 战争造成的持续能源冲突背景下。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2036004225365483686
❤️ 363 🔁 41 💬 24
打开原推
💬 引用
I've decided to keep Pandora's Box closed for a bit longer...

There are too many national security implications that need to be figured out first!

Going back to the comment section... it's pretty funny 90% of you are cheering for chaos? https://t.co/uLd5RzVzUc
我决定再把 Pandora's Box 关久一点……

有太多 national security implications 需要先搞清楚!

回去看评论区……很好笑,90% 的人都在为 chaos 欢呼? https://t.co/uLd5RzVzUc
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Should I open Pandora's box with my next post?
我下一条帖子要打开 Pandora's box 吗?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2035931739739373736
❤️ 435 🔁 4 💬 46
打开原推
📝 原创
One of the most brutal wipeouts occurred in Asian markets today.

China's stock market: -3.63%
Korea's (KOSPI / $EWY) stock market: -6.49%
Japan's (Nikkei) stock market: -3.48

However if you look at Israel's Ta-125 stock market?

+11.25% YTD and +67.21% 1Y.

The US $SPY is down ~5% YTD, but faring better than their Asian counterparties.

This data is very interesting since markets, not headlines, are usually the best largest indicators of:

Winners and Losers of War.

Especially with the ongoing energy conflict with the War in Iran.
今天 Asian markets 出现了最 brutal 的 wipeouts 之一。

China's stock market:-3.63%
Korea's (KOSPI / $EWY) stock market:-6.49%
Japan's (Nikkei) stock market:-3.48

不过如果你看 Israel's Ta-125 stock market?

YTD +11.25%,1Y +67.21%。

US $SPY YTD 跌 ~5%,但比 Asian counterparties 表现更好。

这个 data 很有意思,因为 markets,而不是 headlines,通常是判断下面这些的最大最好指标:

War 的 Winners and Losers。

尤其是在 War in Iran 带来的 ongoing energy conflict 下。
❤️ 426 🔁 19 💬 23
打开原推
📝 原创
Normally this goes in shower thoughts but will post main timeline today.

$ALOY - Rare earth powders -> high-purity metals. Magnets used in the liquid cooling pumps
$NB - Scandium, lightweight metal frames for server racks.
$UURAF- Separation of rare earths.
$ARA - Upstream feedstock for magnets
$MEI - IAC deposit outside of China.
$NTU - hard-rock heavy rare earths

These are all more under the radar stuff like sub <$1B.

Then for robotics supply chains I made this earlier:

$UUUU - Processes monazite sand into high-purity Neodymium
$MP - Extracting bastnäsite at Mountain Pass and vertically integrating into domestic NdFeB magnet manufacturing.
$ALOY - Converting heavy rare earth oxides into defense-grade alloys and high-temperature metals like Samarium and Gadolinium
$USAR- Process heavy rare earth elements and manufacture sintered NdFeB magnets
$LYSDY -(Lynas Rare Earths Limited) - Only commercial producer of separated heavy rare earth elements outside of China.
$NEO -(TSX): They are the only Western company commercially producing the actual NdFeB magnetic powders and alloys at scale right now.
$ILU- (rare earths refinery): rare earths refinery for Australia
$ARU- (ASX): "Ore-to-oxide" NdPr facility 2. Structural Metallurgy (Niobium, Vanadium, Titanium, Beryllium) $ATI - Dominant US producer of high-performance titanium and specialty alloys required for robotic joints. $CRS - US supplier of specialty structural alloys, including the high-strength steels, titanium, and magnetic
$FCX - World's largest producer of Molybdenum, which is strictly necessary for the structural steel in planetary roller screws.
$NB - Critical pure-play company developing the Elk Creek project in Nebraska, aimed at supplying domestic Niobium, Scandium, and Titanium
$MTRN - Major global processor of Beryllium
$LGO - Leading publicly traded processors of Vanadium
$BMM - Onshore supply and processing for like Germanium and Gallium
$VNP - Gallium, Germanium, and Indium for advanced sensors and electronics
$TECK - Most significant producer of Germanium outside of China
$ALB - Lithium extraction
$EAF - High-purity Graphite for battery anodes
$ALTM - Western lithium required to supply the batteries
$SYR - Balama mine for Graphite
$FCX - Humanoid requires up to 6.5 kilograms of copper $AW1 (ASX): Advancing the West Desert project in Utah, for domestic geological sources for high-grade Gallium and Indium

I'm aware of a lot of more... It's just some are a little dangerous to mention geopolitically in case I broadcast vulnerabilities to geopolitical adversaries reading this (looking at you $AXTI)

If you're going long on a western one 5n my favorite.

Image source: Crossdock Insights, Visual Capitalist

FYI this is not the pandoras box stuff.

Just name dropping some interesting names informally before finishing up some research on a specific long idea.

Critical elements required for semiconductor packaging and others close to near-total import reliance
-> so prob influx of funding going toward it.

Just informal thoughts
通常这会放在 shower thoughts,但今天发 main timeline。

$ALOY - Rare earth powders -> high-purity metals。Magnets 用在 liquid cooling pumps
$NB - Scandium,server racks 的 lightweight metal frames。
$UURAF- Separation of rare earths。
$ARA - magnets 的 Upstream feedstock
$MEI - China 以外的 IAC deposit。
$NTU - hard-rock heavy rare earths

这些都是更 under the radar 的东西,比如 sub <$1B。

然后 robotics supply chains 我之前做了这个:

$UUUU - 把 monazite sand 加工成 high-purity Neodymium
$MP - 在 Mountain Pass 提取 bastnäsite,并垂直整合到 domestic NdFeB magnet manufacturing。
$ALOY - 把 heavy rare earth oxides 转化为 defense-grade alloys 和 high-temperature metals,比如 Samarium 和 Gadolinium
$USAR- 加工 heavy rare earth elements,并制造 sintered NdFeB magnets
$LYSDY -(Lynas Rare Earths Limited) - China 以外唯一 commercial producer of separated heavy rare earth elements。
$NEO -(TSX):他们是现在唯一一家规模化商业生产实际 NdFeB magnetic powders 和 alloys 的 Western company。
$ILU- (rare earths refinery):Australia 的 rare earths refinery
$ARU- (ASX): “Ore-to-oxide” NdPr facility 2. Structural Metallurgy (Niobium, Vanadium, Titanium, Beryllium) $ATI - US dominant producer of high-performance titanium 和 robotic joints 所需 specialty alloys。$CRS - US supplier of specialty structural alloys,包括 high-strength steels、titanium 和 magnetic
$FCX - World's largest producer of Molybdenum,而它对 planetary roller screws 的 structural steel 是严格必要的。
$NB - pure-play critical company,开发 Nebraska 的 Elk Creek project,目标是供应 domestic Niobium、Scandium 和 Titanium
$MTRN - Major global processor of Beryllium
$LGO - Leading publicly traded processors of Vanadium
$BMM - Germanium 和 Gallium 等的 onshore supply and processing
$VNP - advanced sensors 和 electronics 用的 Gallium、Germanium 和 Indium
$TECK - China 以外最重要的 Germanium producer
$ALB - Lithium extraction
$EAF - battery anodes 用 high-purity Graphite
$ALTM - supply batteries 所需 Western lithium
$SYR - Graphite 的 Balama mine
$FCX - Humanoid 最多需要 6.5 kilograms copper $AW1 (ASX):推进 Utah 的 West Desert project,用于 high-grade Gallium 和 Indium 的 domestic geological sources

我还知道更多……只是有些从 geopolitical 角度提起来有点危险,以免我把 vulnerabilities 广播给正在看这个的 geopolitical adversaries(看你呢 $AXTI

如果你要 long 一个 western one,5n 是我最喜欢的。

Image source:Crossdock Insights, Visual Capitalist

FYI 这不是 pandoras box stuff。

只是在完成某个 specific long idea 的 research 之前,非正式 name dropping 一些有意思的名字。

Semiconductor packaging 等所需 critical elements 接近 near-total import reliance
-> 所以可能会有 funding inflow 流向这里。

只是非正式想法。
❤️ 1,265 🔁 114 💬 65
打开原推
📝 原创
Should I open Pandora's box with my next post?
我下一条帖子要打开 Pandora's box 吗?
❤️ 964 🔁 2 💬 112
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So Enablence ( $ENA.V ) / NxN Star Coupler after I mentioned them with $SIVE.

And if it's a good long given O-NET.

For me personally, if you go into finances, the amount of debt ($55m+) is more than their entire marketcap.

So there's $29.M convertibles.. and more debt loans at ~14% interest.

Whatever revenue they generate near term can't make up for the debt they have.

Risk-reward just isn't there.

So while the company is interesting in the supply chain, doesn't mean it's a great long.

They could always figure out a way to refinance or institutions put in capital, who knows.

But as it stands, probably isn't a great idea for retail investors, hence why you gotta look into each balance sheet to estimate risk.
关于 Enablence( $ENA.V )/ NxN Star Coupler,在我和 $SIVE 一起提到他们之后。

以及考虑 O-NET,它是不是好 long。

对我个人来说,如果你看 finances,debt($55m+)比它整个 marketcap 还多。

所以有 $29.M convertibles……还有更多 debt loans,利率约 ~14%。

他们近期产生的任何 revenue 都无法弥补他们拥有的 debt。

Risk-reward 不在那里。

所以虽然这家公司在 supply chain 里很有意思,但不代表它是很好的 long。

他们也可能总能找到 refinance 的方法,或者 institutions 注入 capital,谁知道。

但按目前情况,对 retail investors 来说可能不是好主意,这也是为什么你必须看每家公司 balance sheet 来估计 risk。
❤️ 115 🔁 1 💬 11
打开原推
📝 原创
If you don't remember:

$AEVA was my long for 4D Physical AI + World Models.

-> LG $50m in $AEVA to co-develop FMCW 4D LiDAR, explicitly citing Humanoids
-> LG (Boston Dynamics vision spuplier).

But...

Guess who makes those CW lasers for FM-CW Lidar?

The very same company for scaling photonics with 1.6T+ pluggables with $JBL to CPO in $MRVL Celestial.

Is the likely 4D AI CW laser supplier for humanoids and 4D physical AI.

One highly possible mapping:

-> $SIVE -> $AEVA -> $LG -> Boston Dynamics.

Both $SIVE and $AEVA were my two longs, but frontier sectors in 4D Physical AI to photonics tend to overlap.
如果你不记得:

$AEVA 是我关于 4D Physical AI + World Models 的 long。

-> LG 投 $50m 到 $AEVA,共同开发 FMCW 4D LiDAR,明确提到 Humanoids
-> LG(Boston Dynamics vision supplier)。

但是……

猜猜谁制造那些 FM-CW Lidar 的 CW lasers?

同一家为 photonics scale 做 1.6T+ pluggables,和 $JBL$MRVL Celestial 的 CPO 的公司。

它很可能也是 humanoids 和 4D physical AI 的 4D AI CW laser supplier。

一个高度可能的 mapping:

-> $SIVE -> $AEVA -> $LG -> Boston Dynamics。

$SIVE$AEVA 都是我的两个 longs,但从 4D Physical AI 到 photonics 的 frontier sectors 往往会重叠。
❤️ 449 🔁 24 💬 35
打开原推
📝 原创
The World is fighting over:

Oil, Rare Earths, and Semiconductors.

The reason being... Every supply chain is being weaponized right now.

And it so happens, US biggest geopolitical enemies own most of the chokepoints.

I was one of the first to connect $AXTI's bottleneck to photonics + AI hyperscaler supply chains.

But there are many more that I'm scared to broadcast, just due to national security vulnerabilities.

But the thematic investments hold true:

Massive amounts of funding will be poured into these three sectors to either go to war over them, secure them domestically, or engineer around them for 2026.

As a theme, if your portfolio is not overweight into those three right sectors the entire world is fighting over...

Maybe you're might be something wrong?
World 正在争夺:

Oil、Rare Earths 和 Semiconductors。

原因是……现在每条 supply chain 都在被 weaponized。

而且刚好,US 最大的 geopolitical enemies 拥有大多数 chokepoints。

我是最早把 $AXTI 的 bottleneck 和 photonics + AI hyperscaler supply chains 联系起来的人之一。

但还有很多我不敢广播,只是因为 national security vulnerabilities。

不过 thematic investments 依然成立:

2026 年,大量 funding 会流入这三个 sectors,要么为了它们开战,要么在国内 secure 它们,要么 engineer around 它们。

作为 theme,如果你的 portfolio 没有 overweight 这三个全世界都在争夺的正确 sectors……

也许你可能哪里不太对?
❤️ 709 🔁 50 💬 59
打开原推
🔁 转发
RT @StormDirac: @aleabitoreddit Very happy to see that you see the potential of $SIVE, I worked hard for 8 years as CEO (total 10 years) to…
RT @StormDirac: @aleabitoreddit 很高兴看到你也看到了 $SIVE 的潜力,我作为 CEO 努力了 8 年(总共 10 年)来……
转发原推@StormDirac
原推正文未包含在导出数据中
https://x.com
❤️ 0 🔁 12 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
< $SIVE | $SIVEF > at a ~$250M valuation looks like one of the most severe structural mispricing in the optical semi market.

$LITE and $COHR, have $45B+ valuations today:

Largely because of their control over EMLs and VCSELs that they ship to -> InnoLight and Eoptolink.

For current pluggable transceiver supercycles.

I will keep hammering this home until markets understand:

Sivers has replicated this exact, highly lucrative merchant-supplier model for the next paradigm:

-> CPO and ELS.

And also:

-> Lasers that a massive manufacturer like Jabil is using for the current 1.6T upgrade cycle.

Sivers saw architectures shifting away from EML and became the pure play supplier for CW.

Current Cycle (Pluggables): LITE/COHR supply EML -> InnoLight/Eoptolink build modules -> $GOOGL, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN buy them.

Next Cycle (CPO / ELS): Sivers supplies CW DFB -> $POET, Ayar Labs -> flows to hyperscalers like $AMZN, $META, $MSFT and others.

However, instead of building up mega fabs with yield/capacity ramp risk:

They transitioned to an outsourced, fabless model for high-volume CW Lasers with Win Semi and effectively de-risked scaling.

So why does it have a $250M valuation during the photonics supercycle?

My opinion:

1. Nobody knows about it yet.
2. Many fund mandates prevents them from buying small caps in Sweden

However, when you start looking at obscure upstream names in hyperscaler light supply chain:

At the top for the light source sits $SIVE.

A small $250M company among $MTSI, $LITE, $COHR, Sumitomo and the $10B-$40B+ incumbents.

Again...

A $250M company:

Powers Jabil's 1.6T LRO optical transceivers modules.

Jabil is massive.

As well as Ayar, $POET, Enablence/ $ONET and many other names now (that are not disclosed) for diversification.

$SIVE found their way to scale as the lightsource of hyperscaler supply chains for future photonic architectures.

And looks incredibly undervalued, relative to forward TAM expansion and ramp.
< $SIVE | $SIVEF > 在 ~$250M valuation,看起来是 optical semi market 中最严重的 structural mispricing 之一。

$LITE$COHR 今天都有 $45B+ valuations:

很大程度是因为他们控制了 EMLs 和 VCSELs,并发货给 -> InnoLight 和 Eoptolink。

用于当前 pluggable transceiver supercycles。

我会一直 hammering this home,直到 markets 理解:

Sivers 已经为下一个 paradigm 复制了这个完全一样、利润极高的 merchant-supplier model:

-> CPO 和 ELS。

以及:

-> Jabil 这样的大型制造商正在用于当前 1.6T upgrade cycle 的 lasers。

Sivers 看到了 architectures 从 EML 转向别处,并成为 CW 的 pure play supplier。

Current Cycle(Pluggables):LITE/COHR 供应 EML -> InnoLight/Eoptolink 构建 modules -> $GOOGL$META$MSFT$AMZN 购买它们。

Next Cycle(CPO / ELS):Sivers 供应 CW DFB -> $POET、Ayar Labs -> 流向 $AMZN$META$MSFT 等 hyperscalers。

不过,他们没有建设 mega fabs 并承担 yield/capacity ramp risk:

他们转向与 Win Semi 合作的 outsourced、fabless model,用于 high-volume CW Lasers,并有效降低了 scaling 风险。

所以它为什么在 photonics supercycle 期间只有 $250M valuation?

我的观点:

1. 还没人知道它。
2. 很多 fund mandates 阻止他们买 Sweden small caps

不过,当你开始看 hyperscaler light supply chain 中 obscure upstream names:

坐在 light source 顶端的是 $SIVE

$MTSI$LITE$COHR、Sumitomo 以及 $10B-$40B+ incumbents 中间,一家小小 $250M 公司。

再说一次……

一家 $250M 公司:

为 Jabil 的 1.6T LRO optical transceivers modules 提供动力。

Jabil 体量巨大。

同时也服务 Ayar、$POET、Enablence/ $ONET 和现在很多其他未披露的名字,用于 diversification。

$SIVE 找到了自己作为未来 photonic architectures 中 hyperscaler supply chains lightsource 的 scale 方式。

相对于 forward TAM expansion 和 ramp,它看起来极度 undervalued。
❤️ 739 🔁 75 💬 68
打开原推
📝 原创
What changed with the US IPO model?

China out there IPOing their leading frontier companies like Minimax or Unitree at very compelling valuations at ~$5-$6B?

In America, we have OpenAI at $800 billion; SpaceX at $1.7 trillion; possibly Stripe at $140 billion.

Where are the Facebooks of the world, where retail actually can get upside instead of being exit liquidity?
US IPO model 到底发生了什么变化?

China 在把它们领先的 frontier companies,比如 Minimax 或 Unitree,以非常有吸引力的 ~$5-$6B valuation IPO?

在 America,我们有 $800 billion 的 OpenAI;$1.7 trillion 的 SpaceX;可能还有 $140 billion 的 Stripe。

世界上的 Facebooks 去哪了?那种 retail 真的能获得 upside,而不是成为 exit liquidity 的公司。
❤️ 629 🔁 27 💬 61
打开原推
📝 原创
$INTC dumping its pluggable optical transceiver silicon photonics segment…

At dirt cheap in 2023 to Jabil.

When there’s now a photonics supercycle 2-3 years later.

Was possibly, one of the dumbest moves of the decade? https://t.co/ITvaFR20Xq
$INTC 在 2023 年以 dirt cheap 的价格,把自己的 pluggable optical transceiver silicon photonics segment 卖给 Jabil……

而 2-3 年后现在出现了 photonics supercycle。

这可能是这个十年最愚蠢的操作之一? https://t.co/ITvaFR20Xq
❤️ 467 🔁 23 💬 38
打开原推
💬 引用
I was mapping second-order effects of the $2B company that does AI for Cows.

I just realized something brutal:

Shepard Dogs Are Going to Be Unemployed.

AI displacement is coming after everything.

$ORCL, $AMZN, $META, and others are laying off workers from AI automation.

And now your local dogs will be unemployed too.

Is my pet fish going to be out of a job too?
我本来在 mapping 那家 $2B、给 Cows 做 AI 的公司的 second-order effects。

我刚意识到一件残酷的事:

Shepard Dogs 要失业了。

AI displacement 正在冲向一切。

$ORCL$AMZN$META 等都在因为 AI automation 裁员。

现在你家附近的狗也要失业了。

我的 pet fish 也会丢工作吗?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Gold is crashing. Silver is crashing. Stocks are crashing. Crude Oil is rising.

So where is the money flowing?

I have the answer to that:

-> Cows.

The cattle index has outperformed the broader market.

Silicon Valley and Peter Thiel have poured billions into cow-related startups.

Markets are rotating to Cows as the biggest hedge against uncertainty.

Because while you don't know how Trump will react to new situations?

You know how cows do:

They say Moo and Eat Grass.

Markets might be telling us, that Cows are the greatest hedge against uncertainty.
Gold 在崩。Silver 在崩。Stocks 在崩。Crude Oil 在涨。

那钱流向哪里了?

我有答案:

-> Cows。

cattle index 跑赢了大盘。

Silicon Valley 和 Peter Thiel 已经向 cow-related startups 投了数十亿美元。

市场正在轮动到 Cows,把它当作对冲不确定性的最大 hedge。

因为你不知道 Trump 会如何应对新情况?

但你知道 cows 会怎样:

它们会 Moo,然后 Eat Grass。

市场可能在告诉我们,Cows 才是对冲不确定性的最强资产。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2035201365732143450
❤️ 429 🔁 14 💬 38
打开原推
📝 原创
JPM is projecting 0 rate cuts in 2026 (Mar 19th).

Derivatives show~37% 0 rate cuts.

Here's the traditional winners and losers:

1. Banks / Stablecoins: $CRCL, $JPM, $BAC, $WFC
- Interest from treasury, CCs, mortgage

2. High Cash vs. MC: Berkshire < $BRK.B >, $ETOR, $VLN, and others
- Companies that sit on large piles of cash relative to MC, where interest rates make material difference to operational income.
- This is beneficial to a lot of brokerages, but also very nuanced eg. $HOOD.

3. Insurance: $PGR, $MET, $ALL
- Higher yields on bond portfolios

4. Value/Cyclical Stocks: $XOM, $CAT, $DE
- Strong cash flow today + underlying commodities boost as well.

Losers:

1. Telecommunications & Heavy Industrials: $T, $VZ, $ATUS
- Companies that carry massive debt loads to build out optic cables, 5G, etc.

2. Utilities: $NEE, $DUK, $SO, $XLU
- Utilities carry heavy debt to maintain power grids and partly bond proxies

3. Real Estate + REITs: $AMT, $O, $BXP
- Higher rates drive down the valuation of the physical properties themselves and harder borrowing for buying homes. Then government bonds > dividend yields.

4. Unprofitable / Speculative Tech: $ARKK

Nuanced:

Historically Mag7 like $NVDA, $AAPL, $MSFT, $AMZN were neutral-winner as they were typically sitting on loads of cash.

But for the first time, some are going into debt for the AI buildout and are scaling like startups again (eg. $META 33%+ Y/Y revenue growth):

-> Cash-rich companies like $AAPL are likely to be fine, $MSFT + $GOOGL (largely funded by operational income)
-> While $META, $ORCL, and others may face more challenges (projected to take on debt long term)

However, despite short term volatility from projections + War in Iran:

One TACO could flip all the projections.

So, I would not bet on high interest rates or rate hikes or this trade.

And I don't think markets will either long term.
JPM 预计 2026 年 0 次 rate cuts(Mar 19th)。

Derivatives 显示约 ~37% 概率 0 次 rate cuts。

这里是传统 winners 和 losers:

1. Banks / Stablecoins:$CRCL$JPM$BAC$WFC
- 来自 treasury、CCs、mortgage 的 interest

2. High Cash vs. MC:Berkshire < $BRK.B >、$ETOR$VLN
- 相对 MC 坐拥大量 cash 的公司,interest rates 会对 operational income 产生 material difference。
- 这对很多 brokerages 有利,但也非常 nuanced,比如 $HOOD

3. Insurance:$PGR$MET$ALL
- bond portfolios 的 higher yields

4. Value/Cyclical Stocks:$XOM$CAT$DE
- 今天就有 strong cash flow + underlying commodities boost。

Losers:

1. Telecommunications & Heavy Industrials:$T$VZ$ATUS
- 为建设 optic cables、5G 等背负 massive debt loads 的公司。

2. Utilities:$NEE$DUK$SO$XLU
- Utilities 为维护 power grids 背负 heavy debt,而且部分像 bond proxies

3. Real Estate + REITs:$AMT$O$BXP
- Higher rates 会压低 physical properties 本身的 valuation,也让买房 borrowing 更难。然后 government bonds > dividend yields。

4. Unprofitable / Speculative Tech:$ARKK

Nuanced:

历史上,像 $NVDA$AAPL$MSFT$AMZN 这样的 Mag7 通常是 neutral-winner,因为它们通常坐拥大量 cash。

但这一次,有些公司首次为了 AI buildout 开始举债,并再次像 startups 一样 scaling(例如 $META 33%+ Y/Y revenue growth):

-> 像 $AAPL 这样 cash-rich 的公司可能没问题,$MSFT + $GOOGL(主要由 operational income funding)
-> 而 $META$ORCL 等可能面临更多挑战(预计长期会 take on debt)

不过,尽管短期有 projections + War in Iran 带来的 volatility:

一个 TACO 就能翻转所有 projections。

所以,我不会押 high interest rates、rate hikes 或这笔 trade。

我也不认为 markets 长期会这么押。
❤️ 459 🔁 24 💬 31
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
The War in Iran threw a huge knife into the trade for $XLU

We went from 3 est. rate cuts this year to 0.

It’s good for companies like $CRCL that do better in higher interest rate environments.

But bad for utilities. At this point I genuinely don’t know how the War ends up or if Trump tacos.

Im personally still holding, but a lot more risk of the power/grid modernization + rerating trade since they relied on multiple rate cuts.

And too many second order effects with energy implications.

But just putting out some risk disclosures around original thesis
War in Iran 给 $XLU 这笔 trade 捅了一把大刀……

我们从今年预计 3 次 rate cuts 变成了 0。

这对 $CRCL 这种在 higher interest rate environments 中表现更好的公司有利。

但对 utilities 不利。到这个点,我真的不知道 War 最后会怎样,或者 Trump 会不会 tacos。

我个人仍然持有,但 power/grid modernization + rerating trade 的风险大了很多,因为它们依赖多次 rate cuts。

而且 energy implications 有太多 second order effects。

这里只是围绕原始 thesis 发一些 risk disclosures。
❤️ 192 🔁 5 💬 22
打开原推
📝 原创
I just realized…

Am I the most subscribed to finance account on X right now?

Kinda surreal so many funds and companies started reaching out for requests recently.

That aside; not planning on changing anything when I was 300 followers and now 100k+.

Just having fun sharing my thoughts with everyone.
我刚意识到……

我现在是不是 X 上订阅人数最多的 finance account?

最近这么多 funds 和 companies 开始联系我提 request,感觉有点 surreal。

除此之外;不打算改变任何东西,不管我以前是 300 followers,还是现在 100k+。

只是开心地和大家分享我的想法。
❤️ 1,127 🔁 12 💬 86
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Some other random niche photonics companies im looking at:

$SGCG - SiC and TaC susceptors for epitaxy
$VGO - kinda like $IQE?
Nippon Carbon Co. (TYO: 5302) - Isotropic Graphite Supply
IntelliEPI - epiwafers like $IQE
$CVV - Custom MOCVD/HVPE hardware like $AIXA, idk too much about it yet, extremely small cap.

I just kinda go through tens of these.

Like they all sound "good" but there's a difference between being a chokepoint to actually being the winner in the space.

So takes time to go through financials, supply chain mapping of each.
我正在看的其他一些 random niche photonics companies:

$SGCG - epitaxy 用 SiC 和 TaC susceptors
$VGO - 有点像 $IQE
Nippon Carbon Co. (TYO: 5302) - Isotropic Graphite Supply
IntelliEPI - 像 $IQE 一样做 epiwafers
$CVV - 类似 $AIXA 的 Custom MOCVD/HVPE hardware,我还不太了解,极小 cap。

我基本就是这样翻几十家公司。

它们听起来都“不错”,但从 chokepoint 到真正成为这个领域赢家,中间是有区别的。

所以需要时间看 financials、做每家的 supply chain mapping。
❤️ 212 🔁 5 💬 25
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Feels like one of the most important company is in the West is prob goes to...

5N Plus? People kinda know which is why it's up 441% 1Y.

But if you're looking for Western $AXTI? This is definitely it. Don't own it yet (i've talked about it a few times) but just putting it out there again.

They do so so much... I've literally lost count.

indium, germanium, gallium, tellurium, bismuth. sollar cells for LEO. All the substrate feedstock for photonics...

Dowa and Umicore are also kinda mentioned, but feels like 5n is everywhere in frontier supply chains.

still researching some smaller cap longs that are less known though.
感觉 West 最重要的公司之一可能是……

5N Plus?人们多少知道,所以它 1Y 涨了 441%。

但如果你在找 Western $AXTI?那绝对就是它。我还没持有(我聊过几次),但再拿出来说一下。

他们做的东西太多太多了……我 literally 已经数不清。

indium、germanium、gallium、tellurium、bismuth。LEO 用 solar cells。photonics 的所有 substrate feedstock……

Dowa 和 Umicore 也经常被提到,但感觉 5n 在 frontier supply chains 里无处不在。

不过我还在研究一些更小、更不知名的 small cap longs。
❤️ 185 🔁 1 💬 19
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Looking in Hamamatsu photonics rn, apparently monopoly in some optical components, but here's just my personal list of random suppliers I'm looking at:

$COHR
$LITE
Mitsubishi Electric
Sumitomo Electric
Furukawa Electric
Nokia
DenseLight
$MTSI
$AAOI
$SIVE
Source Photonics
Accelink Technologies
$AVGO
HieFo
$INTC
Hamamatsu Photonics
YST
Henan Shija
Hisense
现在在看 Hamamatsu photonics,显然在一些 optical components 上有 monopoly,但这里是我个人正在看的 random suppliers list:

$COHR
$LITE
Mitsubishi Electric
Sumitomo Electric
Furukawa Electric
Nokia
DenseLight
$MTSI
$AAOI
$SIVE
Source Photonics
Accelink Technologies
$AVGO
HieFo
$INTC
Hamamatsu Photonics
YST
Henan Shija
Hisense
❤️ 196 🔁 8 💬 21
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Well sht, I’m scared to post some of upstream bottlenecks since geopolitical adversaries can read this.

Then export control hyperscaler supply chains…

I’m pretty sure they just don’t know yet.
Well sht,我现在有点怕发一些 upstream bottlenecks,因为 geopolitical adversaries 也能看到。

然后去 export control hyperscaler supply chains……

我很确定他们现在还不知道。
❤️ 243 🔁 0 💬 41
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Went from chilling in Japan to hanging around $TSM and semi fabs this week. Air isn’t the best here lol!

I’ve just been hopping country to country, some folks in the semi industry wanted to chat with me!

I normally don’t share my personal life things, but thought it would be fun.
这周从在 Japan chill,变成在 $TSM 和 semi fabs 附近晃。这里空气不是最好 lol!

我最近一直在 country to country 跑,一些 semi industry 的人想和我聊聊!

我平时不太分享个人生活,但觉得这个挺有趣。
❤️ 460 🔁 0 💬 36
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
1. TFLN supply chain mapping
2. SpaceX supply chain mapping before IPO
3. wrapping up actuator bottleneck research for robotics sector/optimus BOM
4. glass substrates mapping
5. Some misc stock shoutouts from followers

For my short term to do list.

If anyone else wants something different, feel free to mention it.

Everyone seemed interested the most in SpaceX supply chain stuff, but I expect majority of it to be really confidential like Optimus components.

As for last two weeks, was really focused on CPO last two weeks from Nvidia GTC and OFC, and ended up picking $SIVE, $TSEM, and $SOI recently as the individual winners for foundry, substrates, and lasers.

So three different chokepoints in the photonics supply chain.

I published the major players with that ETF on public timelines since others like $AIXA for reactors seemed popular with retail.

I’m aware of very niche material chokepoints, eg. Reactor equipment.

But just wanted to focus on a few like lasers which I expect to be major winner, rather than broad diversification.

But feel free to shout out any suggestions ppl are interested in and I’ll take a look if I have time
1. TFLN supply chain mapping
2. SpaceX IPO 前 supply chain mapping
3. 收尾 robotics sector/optimus BOM 的 actuator bottleneck research
4. glass substrates mapping
5. 一些 followers 提的 misc stock shoutouts

这是我的短期 to do list。

如果有人想看别的,随时提。

大家似乎最感兴趣的是 SpaceX supply chain stuff,但我预计其中大部分会像 Optimus components 一样非常 confidential。

至于过去两周,我主要聚焦 CPO,从 Nvidia GTC 到 OFC,最近选出了 $SIVE$TSEM$SOI 作为 foundry、substrates 和 lasers 的 individual winners。

所以是 photonics supply chain 里的三个不同 chokepoints。

我已经在 public timelines 用那个 ETF 发了主要 players,因为其他像 $AIXA 这种 reactors 名字似乎在 retail 中挺受欢迎。

我知道一些非常 niche 的 material chokepoints,比如 Reactor equipment。

但我只是想聚焦几个,比如我预计会成为主要赢家的 lasers,而不是 broad diversification。

不过欢迎大家喊出感兴趣的建议,如果我有时间会看。
❤️ 224 🔁 0 💬 48
打开原推
📝 原创
Gold is crashing. Silver is crashing. Stocks are crashing. Crude Oil is rising.

So where is the money flowing?

I have the answer to that:

-> Cows.

The cattle index has outperformed the broader market.

Silicon Valley and Peter Thiel have poured billions into cow-related startups.

Markets are rotating to Cows as the biggest hedge against uncertainty.

Because while you don't know how Trump will react to new situations?

You know how cows do:

They say Moo and Eat Grass.

Markets might be telling us, that Cows are the greatest hedge against uncertainty.
Gold 在崩。Silver 在崩。Stocks 在崩。Crude Oil 在涨。

所以钱流向哪里了?

我有答案:

-> Cows。

cattle index 跑赢了 broader market。

Silicon Valley 和 Peter Thiel 已经向 cow-related startups 投了 billions。

Markets 正在轮动到 Cows,把它作为对不确定性的最大 hedge。

因为虽然你不知道 Trump 会如何应对新情况?

但你知道 cows 会怎么做:

它们会 Moo,然后 Eat Grass。

Markets 可能正在告诉我们,Cows 是对冲不确定性的最强 hedge。
❤️ 1,388 🔁 90 💬 101
打开原推
💬 引用
Back in January:

I napkin-math modeled Micron's earnings margin projections vs. their official projections:

My quote:

"If $MU guided for 68.0% gross margins Q2 2026, and we see a 100% NAND hike from 33-38% est.

That could bring gross margin projections over 73-75%."

Wall Street consensus was sitting right around 67% to 69%.

When $MU reported earnings?

Their 74.9% margin landed in that predicted 73-75%+.

This is how people price in information early, before the actual earnings.

So it's not a "Surprise Result" when even people like myself could estimate it/price it in, back in January.
早在 January:

我用 napkin-math model 了 Micron earnings margin projections vs. 他们的 official projections:

我的 quote:

“If $MU guided for 68.0% gross margins Q2 2026, and we see a 100% NAND hike from 33-38% est.

That could bring gross margin projections over 73-75%.”

Wall Street consensus 当时大概在 67% 到 69%。

$MU 发布 earnings?

他们的 74.9% margin 落在我预测的 73-75%+ 区间。

这就是人们如何在 actual earnings 之前,提前 price in information。

所以这不是 “Surprise Result”,因为像我这样的人在 January 就能 estimate it/price it in。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Holy crap. This just happened:

"Samsung increases NAND prices by 100%" - ETNews

Estimates were 33-38% Q/Q growth - Trendforce

This is an absolute shock.

It's called the "Memory Supercycle" for a reason with $MU, Samsung, and SK Hynix + $SNDK.

In simpler terms:

That extra 65% increase (from 35% to 100%) is pure, added high-margin profit.

If $MU guided for 68.0% gross margins Q2 2026, and we see a 100% NAND hike from 33-38% est, that could bring gross margin projections over 73-75%+.

This is a blowout.
卧槽。这刚刚发生了:

“Samsung increases NAND prices by 100%” - ETNews

之前预估是 33-38% Q/Q growth - Trendforce

这绝对是 shock。

它被叫作 “Memory Supercycle” 是有原因的,涉及 $MU、Samsung、SK Hynix + $SNDK

简单说:

额外那 65% 涨幅(从 35% 到 100%)都是新增的高毛利利润。

如果 $MU 指引 2026 Q2 gross margins 为 68.0%,而我们看到 NAND 从 33-38% 预期涨到 100%,那 gross margin 预测可能被推到 73-75%+。

这就是爆表。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2015241123896369372
❤️ 437 🔁 16 💬 27
打开原推
📝 原创
I see a lot of retail panicking over $MU earnings at $468.

In general, re-pricing in stocks happen before earnings are announced.

The exception is "unless there's a major surprise with guidance".

Micron earnings beat was not a major surprise.

Here's my take:

- Jan 25th 2026: Public news broke out Samsung was doubling NAND prices Q1, DRAM ~70% compared to Q/Q estimates of 33-38%.

Institutions probably got word a few days early from 300 paid vendor analysis, which is why $MU went from $300 -> $400.

- Back in early March: News broke out Samsung was doubling NAND prices for Q2, which was a major surprise, beating some estimates by 20 times, while beating others by 5 times.

There was also news that Samsung/SK Hynix were planning large DRAM price increases for the next quarter.

However, this was coupled with index dropping/broader macro fears from the Ukraine war.

While there was a major sell-off in majority of names, these fundamental changes, likely led $MU to outperform names like $MU that dropped 20% YTD.

Leading up to earnings, there was a Bloomberg terminal report projecting Micron to beat earnings, which sent the stock from $400's to $460.

The thing is:

Majority of this earnings beat was known in advanced and priced in throughout the entire year.

If you ever read my posts,

- I've been trying to track DRAM/NAND prices along with estimating hyperscaler demand:
- Tracking to track crude/LNG/Helium disruption on semi supply chains and modeling in any margin impact

Which is how you price in memory companies.

-> Earnings are just confirmation that your estimates before were right.

So if you're buying options on the earnings week:

This is a terrible idea.

All the profit to be made is before information is known and priced in by the broader market.
我看到很多 retail 在 $MU earnings、股价 $468 时 panic。

一般来说,stocks 的 re-pricing 会发生在 earnings 公布之前。

例外是“除非 guidance 有重大 surprise”。

Micron earnings beat 不是重大 surprise。

我的看法:

- Jan 25th 2026:公开新闻爆出 Samsung Q1 NAND 价格翻倍,DRAM 相比 Q/Q 估计的 33-38% 约涨 ~70%。

机构可能提前几天从 300 paid vendor analysis 得到消息,这就是为什么 $MU 从 $300 -> $400。

- 早在 March 初:消息爆出 Samsung Q2 NAND 价格翻倍,这是重大 surprise,比一些 estimates 高 20 倍,也比另一些高 5 倍。

同时还有消息称 Samsung/SK Hynix 计划下个季度大幅提高 DRAM 价格。

不过,这刚好遇到 index dropping/Ukraine war 带来的 broader macro fears。

虽然大多数名字发生 major sell-off,但这些 fundamental changes 很可能让 $MU 跑赢像 $MU 这种 YTD 跌 20% 的名字。

临近 earnings,有 Bloomberg terminal report 预计 Micron 会 beat earnings,把股价从 $400 多推到 $460。

问题是:

这次 earnings beat 的大部分信息已经提前知道,并在全年被 priced in。

如果你读过我的 posts,

- 我一直在 track DRAM/NAND prices,并估计 hyperscaler demand:
- Tracking crude/LNG/Helium disruption 对 semi supply chains 的影响,并 model 任何 margin impact

这就是你如何 price in memory companies。

-> Earnings 只是确认你之前的 estimates 是对的。

所以如果你在 earnings week 买 options:

这是个糟糕主意。

所有利润都来自 information 被 broader market 知道并 priced in 之前。
❤️ 627 🔁 32 💬 42
打开原推
📝 原创
My dad’s most bullish stock?

$PL at $3, which is up over 996.5% in 18 months.

I bought 1 single share for fun.

Because I didn’t think Planet Labs would grow revenue.

I ended up long $RKLB instead.

Planet Labs is now up over 10 times, and now I‘n left with a lot of regrets.

FYI: They liked $COIN at $35-40 and early $TSLA as well, I didn’t listen to any of them.

Lesson learned:

Sometimes your parents are better investors than you are. Especially when you’re a mirror of them.
我爸最 bullish 的股票?

$PL 在 $3,现在 18 个月涨了超过 996.5%。

我为了好玩只买了 1 股。

因为我不认为 Planet Labs 会增长 revenue。

我最后 long 了 $RKLB

Planet Labs 现在涨了超过 10 倍,而我现在满是 regrets。

FYI:他们也喜欢 $COIN 在 $35-40 和早期 $TSLA,我一个都没听。

Lesson learned:

有时候你父母比你更会投资。尤其是当你是他们的镜像时。
❤️ 1,256 🔁 44 💬 103
打开原推
📝 原创
My thoughts today on $SIVE, at a ~$250M MC:

Sivers is the future likely CW + laser array light source powering hyperscalers from $AMZN, $META, and $MSFT.

At ~$250m...

From confirmed clients, est. mapping:

1. Jabil ( $JBL ) LRO Transceivers (Former SiPH $INTC) -> $AMZN, $META, and other Hyperscalers.
2. Ayar -> AIChip/GUC -> $AMZN and other hyperscalers.
3. Enablence -> O-Net -> Asian Hyperscalers
4. And other unconfirmed customers.

People have been asking me endless questions about today's volatility:

If a stock can go up 20% it can do up 20% too.

$AXTI had those +30%, -30% movements all the time (eg. Earnings -30% to $20, now at $60).

And like AXT as you've seen, what matters is it has the likely potential to outperform long term.

That's why it's important to develop your own conviction before entering any trade, so you don't need to ask me questions every day if you take it yourself.

I personally have a long position and I do think Sivers has the potential to be a $5B+ company with Win qualification.

Especially amid some analysts post today telling people to take profits on $SIVE:

- If you just look at $COHR, $LITE and other light source valuations today, they're $40B+.

- $SIVE pre-revenue advanced packaging counterparties are all $1B-$4B+.

- And we have $SIVE as the future light source for hyperscaler supply chains and Jabil transceivers:

At ~$250M.

Just my personal opinion, but it's better to anchor conviction to the marketcap ($250M) as the light source for hyperscaler supply chains, than price fluctuations...

Especially when institutions (~14.1% owned) are able to to shake the tree of a majority owned stock to build a position.

This is why I've shared my thoughts about $AXTI or $SIVE early since I think it's possible for retail investors to frontrun institutions for the up and coming chokepoints in AI supply chains.

And why I've shared hyperscaler supply chain mapping for $SIVE so people can build their own conviction on future light-source growth.
我今天对 $SIVE,在 ~$250M MC 的看法:

Sivers 很可能是未来为 $AMZN$META$MSFT 等 hyperscalers 提供动力的 CW + laser array light source。

在 ~$250m……

从 confirmed clients 和估计 mapping 看:

1. Jabil( $JBL )LRO Transceivers(前 SiPH $INTC)-> $AMZN$META 和其他 Hyperscalers。
2. Ayar -> AIChip/GUC -> $AMZN 和其他 hyperscalers。
3. Enablence -> O-Net -> Asian Hyperscalers
4. 以及其他未确认 customers。

今天 volatility 后,人们一直问我无数问题:

如果一只股票能涨 20%,它也能跌 20%。

$AXTI 一直都有这种 +30%、-30% 的波动(比如 Earnings -30% 到 $20,现在 $60)。

而且就像你们看到的 AXT,重要的是它长期可能 outperform。

这就是为什么你进任何 trade 前,要先建立自己的 conviction,这样如果你自己买了,就不需要每天问我问题。

我个人有 long position,而且我确实认为 Sivers 在 Win qualification 之后有潜力成为 $5B+ company。

尤其是在今天一些 analysts post 让人对 $SIVE take profits 的背景下:

- 如果你看看今天 $COHR$LITE 和其他 light source valuations,它们都是 $40B+。

- $SIVE pre-revenue advanced packaging counterparties 都是 $1B-$4B+。

- 而我们有 $SIVE,作为 hyperscaler supply chains 和 Jabil transceivers 的未来 light source:

只有 ~$250M。

只是我个人观点,但更好的方式是把 conviction anchor 在 marketcap($250M)上,把它看作 hyperscaler supply chains 的 light source,而不是 price fluctuations……

尤其是 institutions(~14.1% owned)能够 shake the tree,把一只 majority owned stock 震出来,以建立仓位。

这就是为什么我早早分享 $AXTI$SIVE 的想法,因为我认为 retail investors 有可能 frontrun institutions,提前抓住 AI supply chains 中即将出现的 chokepoints。

也是为什么我分享 $SIVE 的 hyperscaler supply chain mapping,让大家能建立自己对未来 light-source growth 的 conviction。
❤️ 578 🔁 41 💬 54
打开原推
📝 原创
$LITE Transcript from Conference Call:

"The thing that keeps me up at night most is: Substrates.

Less so sort of reactors and getting the right tools into the fab, although it’s not a zero challenge."

They basically went out and said $AXTI is the bottleneck for photonics.

Especially if InP substrates keeps $LITE's CEO up at night.

I've been mentioning it for the past few months, if AXT they control the substrate supply, they have a lot of pricing power over $LITE to $COHR and America's AI buildout.

I've seen a ton of misinterpretation on X saying: "Seven-year agreement with Sumitomo". But they literally said there was supply tightness Today. And the agreement doesn't mean there will be enough supply for 7 years, especially when China export controls start to kick in on upstream feedstock/materials required by Japanese supply chains to make then.

This is before Photonics has even started to ramp up.

My $AXTI bottleneck thesis is playing out real time and we got new confirmation from $LITE that InP substrates is a bottleneck.
$LITE Conference Call Transcript:

“The thing that keeps me up at night most is: Substrates.

Less so sort of reactors and getting the right tools into the fab, although it’s not a zero challenge.”

他们基本上直接说 $AXTI 是 photonics 的 bottleneck。

尤其是如果 InP substrates 能让 $LITE CEO 夜里睡不着。

过去几个月我一直在提,如果 AXT 控制 substrate supply,他们对 $LITE$COHR 以及 America 的 AI buildout 有很强 pricing power。

我在 X 上看到大量误读,说什么:“Seven-year agreement with Sumitomo”。但他们今天 literally 说了 supply tightness。而 agreement 并不意味着 7 年都会有足够 supply,尤其是当 China export controls 开始影响 Japanese supply chains 制造它们所需的 upstream feedstock/materials。

这还发生在 Photonics ramp up 甚至还没真正开始之前。

我的 $AXTI bottleneck thesis 正在实时兑现,而且我们从 $LITE 得到了新的确认:InP substrates 是 bottleneck。
❤️ 441 🔁 27 💬 26
打开原推
📝 原创
The Serenity Silicon Photonics / CPO ETF.

YTD Returns of Each Index Stock:

$IQE: +282.5%
$AXTI: +246.6%
Landmark: 167.54%
$AAOI: +157.37%
$SIVE: +113.08%
$SOI: +103.54%
$LITE: +100.27%
$LWLG: +92.35%
$VIAV: +88.71%
$AIXA: +73.92%
$AEHR: +70.4%
$CIEN: +67.67%
$FORM: +60.67%
$FOCI: +60.44%
$CAMT: +49.13%
$GLW: +46.77%
$SMHN: +45.94%
Fujikura: +43.89%
$COHR: +41.81%
$KEYS: +40.48%
$TSEM: +36.42%
$ASX: +29.89%
$MTSI: +28.34%
$NOK: +27.5%
Shin-Etsu: +27.33%
$ONTO: +26.28%
$BESI: +24.71%
$UMC: +18.11%
$INTC: +17.27%
$OXINF: 15.03%
$FN: +12.79%
Eoptolink: +11.82%
$TSM: +6.00%
$HIMX: +5.39%
$SMTC: +4.11%
Sumitomo: +3.67%
$CSCO: +3.25%
Innolight: +.33%
$MRVL: +.16%
$APH: -6.48%
$MXL: -7.62%
$AVGO: -7.99%
$POET: -12.99%
$TEL: -14.93%

This is retrospectively, but as you've known I've been in a lot of the winners for awhile (eg. Top 6/7 like $AXTI or $LITE aside from Landmark).

However, if you were curious if you invested in the photonics trend as a whole at the start of the year.

The equal weighted return?

50.033%

I expect the Photonic Supercycle to last over the next several years, and many of these names to be large beneficaries going forward.

Especially as CPO is used to scale AI deployments.

Photonics is the new architectural paradigm for AI.
The Serenity Silicon Photonics / CPO ETF。

每个 Index Stock 的 YTD Returns:

$IQE: +282.5%
$AXTI: +246.6%
Landmark: 167.54%
$AAOI: +157.37%
$SIVE: +113.08%
$SOI: +103.54%
$LITE: +100.27%
$LWLG: +92.35%
$VIAV: +88.71%
$AIXA: +73.92%
$AEHR: +70.4%
$CIEN: +67.67%
$FORM: +60.67%
$FOCI: +60.44%
$CAMT: +49.13%
$GLW: +46.77%
$SMHN: +45.94%
Fujikura: +43.89%
$COHR: +41.81%
$KEYS: +40.48%
$TSEM: +36.42%
$ASX: +29.89%
$MTSI: +28.34%
$NOK: +27.5%
Shin-Etsu: +27.33%
$ONTO: +26.28%
$BESI: +24.71%
$UMC: +18.11%
$INTC: +17.27%
$OXINF: 15.03%
$FN: +12.79%
Eoptolink: +11.82%
$TSM: +6.00%
$HIMX: +5.39%
$SMTC: +4.11%
Sumitomo: +3.67%
$CSCO: +3.25%
Innolight: +.33%
$MRVL: +.16%
$APH: -6.48%
$MXL: -7.62%
$AVGO: -7.99%
$POET: -12.99%
$TEL: -14.93%

这是 retrospectively,但如你们所知,我一直在很多 winners 里(比如 Top 6/7,除了 Landmark,像 $AXTI$LITE)。

不过,如果你好奇年初投资整个 photonics trend 会怎样。

Equal weighted return?

50.033%

我预计 Photonic Supercycle 会持续未来几年,其中很多名字之后会成为 large beneficiaries。

尤其是随着 CPO 被用于 scale AI deployments。

Photonics 是 AI 的新 architectural paradigm。
❤️ 1,002 🔁 103 💬 63
打开原推
📝 原创
Everyone is looking at $SMCI smuggling billions of dollars of AI chips to China.

But nobody is answering the question:

How do I make money off this, and is it a good buying opportunity?

My answer:

If $SMCI drops much lower than ~$24 overnight. It like a buying opportunity at a ~$14B MC.

Everyone looks at the DOJ case and thinks Super Micro are cooked.

But two things:

1. The company itself looks insulated, so far (not named a defendant)

2. $SMCI chip sales to China state actors was already known (just not to the $2.5B+ extent), by Hindenburg short seller reports in 2024.

So a decent part of the China revenue stuff was already priced in, which is why $SMCI crashed from $100+ and is now trading at $24.

Now if we strip away optics and some material revenue:

-> $SMCI GAAP net income was $1.05B last year, and FY 2026 is estimated to be around ~$1.25B with some estimates going to $1.5B.

And then we rip away an est ~$150M in smuggled in profit out of financials: ~$1.05 billion -> ~$900M?

On a P/E basis, still looks relatively cheap as a growing company, maybe ~10-11x?

Now the downside:

-> Optics are still trash. You can add more trash to trash.

But it's still trash regardless, doesn't change much?

-> $NVDA distancing itself with $SMCI? (They already did in 2024).
-> $SMCI not named a defendant, but in the case SEC/DOJ goes after them, then lot of regulatory fees and possibly fines.
-> Maybe order cancellations, but if they didn't cancel orders for the problems they had in 2024, it looks fine now?

Now... Are there a lot better opportunities than taking this regulatory leap of faith?

100%.

Is there potential more downside from panicking?

Yes.

But if you strip away the noise, $SMCI as a company looks cheap ~$14B at roughly 10-11x forward earnings.
所有人都在看 $SMCI 向 China smuggling billions of dollars of AI chips。

但没人回答这个问题:

我怎么从这件事赚钱,它是不是一个 good buying opportunity?

我的答案:

如果 $SMCI overnight 跌到明显低于 ~$24。它在 ~$14B MC 时像是 buying opportunity。

所有人看 DOJ case,觉得 Super Micro cooked。

但有两点:

1. 公司本身目前看起来是 insulated(没有被列为 defendant)

2. $SMCI chip sales to China state actors 早就被知道了(只是没到 $2.5B+ 这个程度),Hindenburg 2024 年 short seller reports 里就有。

所以 China revenue 这块相当一部分已经 priced in,这也是为什么 $SMCI 从 $100+ 崩下来,现在交易在 $24。

现在如果我们去掉 optics 和一些 material revenue:

-> $SMCI GAAP net income 去年是 $1.05B,FY 2026 估计大约 ~$1.25B,一些 estimates 到 $1.5B。

然后再从 financials 里剥掉估计 ~$150M smuggled profit:~$1.05 billion -> ~$900M?

按 P/E 看,作为 growing company 仍然相对便宜,也许 ~10-11x?

现在下行:

-> Optics 仍然很垃圾。你可以给垃圾再加更多垃圾。

但不管怎样它仍然是垃圾,本质没变多少?

-> $NVDA distancing itself with $SMCI?(他们 2024 年已经这么做了)。
-> $SMCI 没被列为 defendant,但如果 SEC/DOJ 在 case 里追他们,会有很多 regulatory fees,也可能有 fines。
-> 也许有 order cancellations,但如果他们 2024 年的问题都没导致 orders 被 cancel,现在看起来也还好?

现在……有没有比押这个 regulatory leap of faith 更好的机会?

100%。

恐慌带来的下行还会更多吗?

Yes。

但如果剥掉噪音,$SMCI 作为公司在约 10-11x forward earnings、~$14B 估值下看起来便宜。
❤️ 777 🔁 43 💬 127
打开原推
📝 原创
I may have outperformed the index just a tiny bit?

It’s as simple as riding the Photonics and Memory Supercycles from $AXTI to $SNDK.

Just doing this for fun now. https://t.co/VkzcDTIE85
我可能只是略微 outperform index 一点点?

这就像骑着 Photonics 和 Memory Supercycles,从 $AXTI$SNDK

现在只是为了好玩。 https://t.co/VkzcDTIE85
❤️ 2,048 🔁 66 💬 213
打开原推
💬 引用
Holy ****, my $AXTI thesis was legendary?

AXT is up another 20% today to ATHs at $58.

Happy I got this right, gains in a short time blew away holding $NVDA over the years. https://t.co/xEJ7DtgFaP
Holy ****,我的 $AXTI thesis 是 legendary?

AXT 今天又涨 20%,到 ATH $58。

很高兴我这次对了,短时间收益碾压多年持有 $NVDAhttps://t.co/xEJ7DtgFaP
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 1,193 🔁 57 💬 97
打开原推
💬 引用
I’m sorry everyone…

I thought $TSEM was a steady compounder over time like $TSM

but it’s going up 17% a day? https://t.co/QXWW7cgIXP
抱歉各位……

我以为 $TSEM 会像 $TSM 一样,是长期稳定 compounder

结果它一天涨 17%? https://t.co/QXWW7cgIXP
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I'm long $TSEM, the $TSM of photonics.

My top two picks for CPO are $SOI and Tower Semi.

Given the $NVDA GTC catalyst on new photonic related architecture next week:

I expect Tower Semi to get a huge catalyst.

Nvidia laready directly collaborated with Tower to scale 1.6T silicon photonics last month (hint hint for GTC), likely pushing the downstream players to use it.

And now, Tower is the leading supplier of 1.6T SiPh PICs and the primary foundry for scale-up CPO architectures. (the other being global foundries)

From my forward est:
2028 Forward P/E: ~16.8x to ~18.1x

(Tower set a target $2.84B revenue by 2028, with ~31.7% operating margin, ~$750M in net profit)

The thing to note is over 70% of their planned SiPh capacity is already reserved through 2028. And photonics haven't even ramped up yet.

So, I expect them to strongly beat earning projections due to extreme photonics scaling + allocations price hikes that's not modeled into projections.

Also, $TSEM is heavily de-risked by 70% of capacity already being reserved. MC is likely due to $TSEM being a very obscure upstream player in the photonics supply chain.

But I expect the $NVDA GTC conference to be that catalyst that brings it to premium valuations.

I'm long $TSEM as an asymmetrical upside for upstream photonics foundry layer.
我做多 $TSEM,它就是光子领域的 $TSM

我对 CPO 的前两大选择是 $SOI 和 Tower Semi。

考虑到下周 $NVDA GTC 对新的光子相关架构有催化:

我预计 Tower Semi 会迎来巨大催化。

Nvidia 上个月已经直接和 Tower 合作,扩大 1.6T 硅光规模(给 GTC 的暗示),很可能推动下游玩家使用它。

现在,Tower 是 1.6T SiPh PIC 的领先供应商,也是 scale-up CPO 架构的主要晶圆厂(另一个是 global foundries)。

按我的前瞻估算:
2028 Forward P/E:约 16.8x 到 18.1x

(Tower 设定了 2028 年 $2.84B 收入目标,约 31.7% 经营利润率,约 $750M 净利润)

需要注意的是,他们规划中的 SiPh 产能超过 70% 已经预定到 2028 年。而光子还没真正放量。

所以我预计他们会因为极端的光子扩产 + allocation 涨价,大幅超过盈利预测,而这些还没有被模型计入。

另外,$TSEM 也因为 70% 产能已被预定而大幅去风险。市值可能是因为 $TSEM 是光子供应链里非常冷门的上游玩家。

但我预计 $NVDA GTC 会成为让它获得溢价估值的催化。

我做多 $TSEM,把它当作上游光子晶圆厂层的非对称上行机会。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031820871170736570
❤️ 693 🔁 32 💬 70
打开原推
📝 原创
$TSEM and the Photonics Supercycle…

Doesn’t like they’re bothered with Iran or Silver and Gold crashing?

Almost every name from $AAOI, $COHR, $SIVE, to $LITE is green.

This is what happens when capacity is sold out for the next few years or it’s in the center of scaling the AI buildout.

Better to stay long rather than get distracted by macro.
$TSEM 和 Photonics Supercycle……

看起来它们并不太在乎 Iran,或者 Silver 和 Gold 崩盘?

几乎从 $AAOI$COHR$SIVE$LITE,每个名字都是绿的。

当产能未来几年都卖光,或者处在 scaling AI buildout 的中心时,就会发生这种事。

保持 long 比被 macro 分散注意力更好。
❤️ 703 🔁 41 💬 60
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE <> $SIVEF is now up 165% this week.

Valuation? ~$300M MC.

However; either I’m dumb or Sivers is one of the best opportunities in photonics today.

You get the laser supplier for Jabil, Ayar, Poet ( $MRVL Celestial ), O-Net, and others:

That end up in $GOOGL, $MSFT, $AMZN, $META AI datacenters.

At ~$300M.

The EML laser suppliers today from $LITE to $COHR for reference are $45B+

This is one of the most undiscovered yet critical bottlenecks for future upstream photonics supply chains.

That markets have only starting to price in today.
$SIVE <> $SIVEF 本周现在涨了 165%。

Valuation?~$300M MC。

不过;要么我很蠢,要么 Sivers 是今天 photonics 里最好的机会之一。

你得到的是 Jabil、Ayar、Poet( $MRVL Celestial )、O-Net 等的 laser supplier:

最终进入 $GOOGL$MSFT$AMZN$META AI datacenters。

估值只有 ~$300M。

作为参考,今天从 $LITE$COHR 的 EML laser suppliers 都是 $45B+。

这是未来 upstream photonics supply chains 中最不被发现、但最关键的 bottlenecks 之一。

市场今天才刚刚开始 price in。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I’m long $SIVE at $140M.

I believe this is the next $LITE that markets and institutions missed.

$SIVE makes InP CW DFB lasers.

Closest comparison is $LITE in the current EML laser bottleneck.

But instead of supplying to Innolight/Eoptolink for current optical transceivers cycles.

They supply the lasers to $POET Starlight, Ayar SuperNova.

And others for the future CPO/silicon photonics architectures spearheaded by $NVDA.

Current valuations make 0 sense to me personally. 



$POET is advanced packaging for $SIVE type lasers…

But $POET commands worth 11x+ more than the company making the laser itself?



It’s feels like valuing a more advanced $FN (~$20B) packaging at $400B when $LITE is valued at $40B. 



So now at $130m:

-

- You have a likely mini $LITE like laser supplier to Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers through $POET. 



- Laser supplier to Ayar ( $NVDA, $INTC ), though they do multi source with $LITE, Sumitomo, $MTSI.

And other potential up and coming suppliers potentially like Lightmatter that they’ve name dropped (eg. Q2 2023 earnings). This is unconfirmed but supply chain BOM is confidential. 



On top, for revenue, they expected $453M "pipeline next few years”.



And, they have capacity expansion through WIN: “Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers."



Sivers feels the silicon photonics/CPO version of $LITE, with actual rapidly growing customers like Celestial through $POET, Ayar, with more to come.



I wouldn’t have liked it last year, but just 3 weeks ago, they refinanced all their debt successfully to $12M convertible loan (10.85%) and a $5M term loan (12%), which cleans up debt.



It’s $17m total, which feels like nothing to US markets when $AAOI is doing a $500m ATMs every other week.

Best of all, this is their pure play inp laser segment for silicon/photonics + cpo. 

Their Lidar segment is ramping up and they have $53-138M projected revenue coming in.



Downside risk:

- execution (as always)

- dilution to scale up capacity to compete with $LITE and others.
- $LITE, $COHR competition on scale after $NVDA just gave them $4B
- CPO ramp gets delayed.



I have no clue how, $LWLG, a pre-revenue science project with $TSEM, is valued at $1B+ MC.



Or how $POET, is worth ~9-10x more than its laser supplier. 



When $SIVE, the mini $LITE equivalent for CPO/Silicon photonics, is valued at $140M.

I do believe this is largely undiscovered by institutions, since this is some random company in OMX Nordic Exchange (similar to micro $AXTI before I started posting about the inp substrate bottleneck). 



But I do think it will get a lot of institutional attention as Celestial and Ayar scale up.

Especially if $POET and $SIVE gets qualified with other customers. 



If CPO completely replaces pluggable transceivers in the next generation of hyperscaler architectures.

Sivers, with possible WIN Semi qualifcation and if they become the multi-source lasers for NVIDIA, Marvell, Intel, and Broadcom architectures, can be strongly rerated.

Just as how $LITE did today going from $16 -> $622.

This is just my personal thesis I'm sharing, DYOR/NFI.

TLDR:

InP Lasers are the current bottleneck in photonics as seen with $LITE valuations. 



$SIVE looks like the mini $LITE for the upcoming CPO/Silicon Photonics ramp.



I personally took long position in $SIVE, as I believe they’re a large beneficiary of the upcoming silicon photonic/CPO architectural changes by $NVDA (with GTC cataylst). 



The upside here just way too compelling for me personally as the next possible $LITE.
我在 $140M 时做多 $SIVE

我认为这是市场和机构错过的下一个 $LITE

$SIVE 做 InP CW DFB lasers。

最接近的对标,是当前 EML laser 瓶颈里的 $LITE

但它不是给 Innolight/Eoptolink 供应当前光模块周期的东西。

它给 $POET Starlight、Ayar SuperNova 供应 lasers。

也给其他由 $NVDA 推动的未来 CPO/silicon photonics 架构供应。

我个人觉得当前估值完全说不通。

$POET 是给 $SIVE 这类 lasers 做 advanced packaging……

$POET 的估值居然比真正做 laser 的公司高 11x+?

这感觉就像在 $LITE 估值 $40B 时,把更先进的 $FN(~$20B)packaging 估到 $400B。

所以现在 $130m:

- 你拿到的是一个可能的 mini $LITE,作为 Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers 通过 $POET 的 laser supplier。

- 也是 Ayar($NVDA$INTC)的 laser supplier,虽然他们也会和 $LITE、Sumitomo、$MTSI 多源采购。

还有其他潜在的新兴客户,比如他们提到过的 Lightmatter(例如 Q2 2023 earnings)。这还未确认,因为 supply chain BOM 是保密的。

收入方面,他们预计“未来几年 pipeline”有 $453M。

他们还通过 WIN 扩产:“Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers.”

Sivers 感觉就是 silicon photonics/CPO 版本的 $LITE,有 Celestial 通过 $POET、Ayar 这些真正快速增长的客户,而且后面还会更多。

去年我不会喜欢它,但就在 3 周前,他们成功把所有债务再融资成 $12M 可转债(10.85%)和 $5M term loan(12%),清理了债务。

总共 $17m,对美国市场来说几乎不算什么,$AAOI 隔三差五就在做 $500m ATM。

最棒的是,这是他们针对 silicon/photonics + cpo 的纯 InP laser segment。他们的 Lidar segment 也在放量,并预计有 $53-138M 收入进来。

下行风险:
- 执行(永远都有)
- 为了扩产和 $LITE 等竞争而稀释
- $NVDA 刚给 $LITE$COHR $4B 后,它们在规模上的竞争
- CPO 放量延迟

我真不知道,$LWLG 这种和 $TSEM 相关、还没收入的科研项目,怎么能有 $1B+ 市值。

或者 $POET 怎么能值它 laser supplier 的 ~9-10x。

$SIVE,这个 CPO/Silicon photonics 的 mini $LITE 等价物,只有 $140M。

我确实认为它很大程度上还没被机构发现,因为这是 OMX Nordic Exchange 上一家随机公司(类似我开始发 InP substrate 瓶颈前的微型 $AXTI)。

但我觉得随着 Celestial 和 Ayar 放量,它会获得很多机构关注。

尤其如果 $POET$SIVE 获得其他客户认证。

如果 CPO 在下一代 hyperscaler 架构里完全替代 pluggable transceivers。

Sivers 如果完成可能的 WIN Semi qualification,并成为 NVIDIA、Marvell、Intel、Broadcom 架构的多源 lasers,会被强力重估。

就像 $LITE 今天从 $16 -> $622 一样。

这只是我分享的个人 thesis,DYOR/NFI。

TLDR:

$LITE 的估值可以看到,InP Lasers 是当前 photonics 的瓶颈。

$SIVE 看起来像即将到来的 CPO/Silicon Photonics 放量里的 mini $LITE

我个人已经做多 $SIVE,因为我认为它会成为 $NVDA 推动的下一轮 silicon photonic/CPO 架构变化(带 GTC catalyst)的重要受益者。

这里作为下一个潜在 $LITE 的 upside,对我个人来说太有吸引力了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033466880661606646
❤️ 431 🔁 45 💬 62
打开原推
📝 原创
I’m surprised markets aren’t pricing in long term disruption of card networks + interchange like $V and $MA.

By $CRCL and $COIN.

From Global Markets Head at Circle:

"Over the past nine months, AI agents completed 140 million payments with a total transaction volume of 43 million US dollars.

Among these, 98.6% were settled in USDC, with an average transaction amount of only 0.31 US dollars."

Card networks and % fee payment processors like $PYPL are likely going to be cooked?
我很惊讶 markets 没有 price in $V$MA 这类 card networks + interchange 的长期 disruption。

来自 $CRCL$COIN

Circle Global Markets Head 说:

“Over the past nine months, AI agents completed 140 million payments with a total transaction volume of 43 million US dollars.

Among these, 98.6% were settled in USDC, with an average transaction amount of only 0.31 US dollars.”

Card networks 和像 $PYPL 这种按 % fee 收费的 payment processors,很可能要 cooked?
❤️ 717 🔁 47 💬 98
打开原推
💬 引用
Don’t think majority of the market picked up on the Jabil and $SIVE partnership yet.

Especially since there’s no formal news, aside from physical leaks from the OFC conference*.

Feel like $310M MC for Jabil’s transceiver light source…

Might be underpricing it. https://t.co/bAnDygPD3X
不觉得大多数市场已经注意到 Jabil 和 $SIVE 的 partnership。

尤其是除了 OFC conference 的 physical leaks*,没有正式新闻。

感觉 $310M MC 对 Jabil 的 transceiver light source 来说……

可能低估了。 https://t.co/bAnDygPD3X
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Sivers < $SIVE / $SIVEF > powering Jabil ($27B MC) < $JBL > 1.6T LRO transcivers.

As the laser light source.

Is by far the biggest news from $NVDA GTC for Sivers ($280M MC) today... in history.

Jabil brings in about $30B+ revenue from end users like $AMZN, $GOOGL, and $META.

As well as OEMs like $NVDA, Arista, $AVGO, and Cisco.

Especially after acquiring $INTC SiPH optical transceiver business, they're Tier 1 in the space.

Sivers powering Jabil as the CW DFB laser source for Silicon Photonics and CPO and hyperscaler supply chains:

At a $280M MC is incredible, and they're one of the most unknown yet highest potential company I've seen in the photonics sector so far.

And the news from $NVDA GTC just cemented this thesis further.

I think they genuinely have a shot at becoming the next $LITE.
Sivers < $SIVE / $SIVEF > 正在为 Jabil($27B MC)< $JBL > 的 1.6T LRO transcivers 提供动力。

作为 laser light source。

这绝对是今天 $NVDA GTC 上,对 Sivers($280M MC)来说历史上最大的新闻。

Jabil 从 $AMZN$GOOGL$META 这类终端用户那里获得约 $30B+ 收入。

还有 $NVDA、Arista、$AVGO、Cisco 这类 OEM。

尤其在收购 $INTC SiPH optical transceiver business 之后,他们已经是这个领域的 Tier 1。

Sivers 作为 Silicon Photonics、CPO 和 hyperscaler 供应链里的 CW DFB laser source,为 Jabil 供货:

在 $280M MC 下非常惊人,而且它是我目前在 photonics sector 里见过最不知名、但潜力最高的公司之一。

$NVDA GTC 的这条新闻进一步巩固了这个 thesis。

我觉得它真的有机会成为下一个 $LITE
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2034531113574736053
❤️ 353 🔁 39 💬 35
打开原推
💬 引用
Sivers < $SIVE / $SIVEF > powering Jabil ($27B MC) < $JBL > 1.6T LRO transcivers.

As the laser light source.

Is by far the biggest news from $NVDA GTC for Sivers ($280M MC) today... in history.

Jabil brings in about $30B+ revenue from end users like $AMZN, $GOOGL, and $META.

As well as OEMs like $NVDA, Arista, $AVGO, and Cisco.

Especially after acquiring $INTC SiPH optical transceiver business, they're Tier 1 in the space.

Sivers powering Jabil as the CW DFB laser source for Silicon Photonics and CPO and hyperscaler supply chains:

At a $280M MC is incredible, and they're one of the most unknown yet highest potential company I've seen in the photonics sector so far.

And the news from $NVDA GTC just cemented this thesis further.

I think they genuinely have a shot at becoming the next $LITE.
Sivers < $SIVE / $SIVEF > 为 Jabil($27B MC)< $JBL > 1.6T LRO transceivers 提供动力。

作为 laser light source。

这绝对是今天 $NVDA GTC 对 Sivers($280M MC)来说历史上最大的新闻……

Jabil 从 $AMZN$GOOGL$META 这样的 end users 那里获得约 $30B+ revenue。

还有 $NVDA、Arista、$AVGO 和 Cisco 这样的 OEMs。

尤其是在收购 $INTC SiPH optical transceiver business 后,他们是这个领域的 Tier 1。

Sivers 作为 Silicon Photonics、CPO 和 hyperscaler supply chains 的 CW DFB laser source,为 Jabil 提供动力:

在 $280M MC 下非常惊人,而且它是我目前在 photonics sector 里见过最不知名但潜力最高的公司之一。

来自 $NVDA GTC 的新闻进一步巩固了这个 thesis。

我觉得他们真的有机会成为下一个 $LITE
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Sivers < $SIVE / $SIVEF >to power Jabil ( $JBL ) next-generation optical transceivers.

The fact Sivers is named as the power source for Jabil's flagship 1.6T module…

is probably the biggest news to date?

This is thesis validation that Sivers is the next $LITE as the light source for CPO/Silicon Photonics.

Source: Semicap, $NVDA GTC.
Sivers < $SIVE / $SIVEF > 将为 Jabil($JBL)下一代 optical transceivers 提供动力。

Sivers 被点名为 Jabil 旗舰 1.6T module 的 power source……

这可能是迄今为止最大的新闻?

这是 thesis validation:Sivers 是下一个 $LITE,作为 CPO/Silicon Photonics 的 light source。

Source: Semicap, $NVDA GTC。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2034524869086552292
❤️ 353 🔁 43 💬 30
打开原推
💬 引用
Sivers < $SIVE / $SIVEF >to power Jabil ( $JBL ) next-generation optical transceivers.

The fact Sivers is named as the power source for Jabil's flagship 1.6T module…

is probably the biggest news to date?

This is thesis validation that Sivers is the next $LITE as the light source for CPO/Silicon Photonics.

Source: Semicap, $NVDA GTC.
Sivers < $SIVE / $SIVEF > 将为 Jabil( $JBL )下一代 optical transceivers 提供动力。

Sivers 被点名为 Jabil flagship 1.6T module 的 power source 这个事实……

可能是迄今为止最大的新闻?

这是 thesis validation:Sivers 是 CPO/Silicon Photonics 的 light source,也就是下一个 $LITE

Source:Semicap,$NVDA GTC。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE is the upstream laser supplier for CPO and Silicon Photonics.

They're the likely $COHR / $LITE type future light source for:

- $AMZN Trainium Clusters
- $MSFT Maia Clusters

and possibly other hyperscalers like $META MTAI and $GOOGL TPU clusters.

At a ~$200M MC.

Relational Mapping (speculative):

$SIVE (light source) -> $POET (optical interposers) -> $MRVL (Likely Celestial Captive) -> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium.

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium

$SIVE (light source) -> Enablence -> O-Net -> ? Asia Hyperscalers
_

Ongoing:

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> GUC -> ? (Google $TPU)

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar (TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn (captive CPO) -> ? ( $MSFT, $META historically Wiwynn's largest clients).

Because of captive models like $MRVL Celestial, they get a free ride.

However, they do compete multi-source ELS against Lumentum, Coherent, and $MTSI with Ayar and win anyway in merchant models.

But they win either way.

For high-volume production ramp up, a large part of it depends on the ongoing Win semi qualification, but this will likely be a large indicator.

Again supply chain BOM is extremely confidential. $AMZN will never tell anyone "Hey, we use $SIVE ".

But if you put 1+1+1+1+1 together, you can piece together the likely suppliers.

Most people see "Poet Starlight" uses $SIVE. Or Ayar uses $SIVE. But don't map all the multi-hop relations to see where they end up.

I do think $SIVE is an extremely undiscovered opportunity as the next possible mini $LITE for Silicon Photonics at $200m MC.

As they're the likely upstream laser supplier for hyperscaler supply chains for future CPO/Silicon Photonics scale up with cw dfb lasers and scale out with laser arrays.
$SIVE 是 CPO 和 Silicon Photonics 的上游 laser supplier。

它们很可能是未来类似 $COHR / $LITE 的 light source,服务于:

- $AMZN Trainium Clusters
- $MSFT Maia Clusters

以及可能的其他 hyperscalers,比如 $META MTAI 和 $GOOGL TPU clusters。

市值约 ~$200M。

关系映射(推测):

$SIVE (light source) -> $POET (optical interposers) -> $MRVL (Likely Celestial Captive) -> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium。

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium

$SIVE (light source) -> Enablence -> O-Net -> ? Asia Hyperscalers
_

进行中:

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> GUC -> ? (Google $TPU)

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar (TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn (captive CPO) -> ? ($MSFT$META historically Wiwynn's largest clients)。

因为像 $MRVL Celestial 这样的 captive models,它们可以搭顺风车。

不过,在 merchant models 里,它们也会和 Lumentum、Coherent、$MTSI 以 multi-source ELS 形式竞争,并且依然能赢。

但无论哪种方式,它们都能赢。

高量产放量很大程度上取决于正在进行的 Win semi qualification,但这很可能会是一个重要指标。

再次说明,supply chain BOM 极其保密。$AMZN 永远不会告诉别人“嘿,我们用 $SIVE”。

但如果你把 1+1+1+1+1 拼起来,就能拼出可能的供应商。

大多数人只看到 “Poet Starlight” 用 $SIVE,或者 Ayar 用 $SIVE。但没有把多跳关系全部映射出来,看它们最终流向哪里。

我确实认为 $SIVE 是一个极度未被发现的机会,可能成为 Silicon Photonics 里下一个 mini $LITE,市值只有 $200m。

因为它们很可能是未来 CPO/Silicon Photonics scale up 所需 cw dfb lasers,以及 scale out 所需 laser arrays 的 hyperscaler 供应链上游 laser supplier。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2034087274800091401
❤️ 279 🔁 25 💬 21
打开原推
📝 原创
Why is it…

When I call out a stock like $RPI, news outlets like Bloomberg and FT call it a “Meme Stock”?

Like GameStop?

Then when other analysts like Hedgeye say the same thing a month later…

Suddenly it’s an AI trade like Bytedance or Tencent.

Do I need to name change to Serenity Risk Management?
为什么会这样……

当我喊出像 $RPI 这样的股票时,Bloomberg 和 FT 这样的新闻媒体叫它 “Meme Stock”?

像 GameStop?

然后当 Hedgeye 这样的其他 analysts 一个月后说同样的事……

突然它就变成了像 Bytedance 或 Tencent 那样的 AI trade。

我是不是需要改名叫 Serenity Risk Management?
❤️ 317 🔁 5 💬 36
打开原推
📝 原创
Year to Date return from Jan to March:

+564.36%.

I’m speed running last year’s 600%+ returns by finding undiscovered AI bottlenecks.

And picking the winners.

- 500%+ unrealized gains on $AXTI.

- $AAOI 3x’d in 3M or $IQE 2x in 1M.

- $LITE close to 100%+.

And I expect large capital rotation into silicon photonics + CPO names:

Like $SOI, $AEHR, or $SIVE this year.

(They’re up close to ~70-100%, but have a long way to go)

Then, this is compounded by misc longs, such as $CRCL that increased 148% in 1 month.

$NBIS that close to doubled from $70 back to $120.

$EWY IV trade is up 50-70% and names like $XLU are up 50%+.

My biggest loser YTD is $RDDT since my cost average was $148.

Some of the misc picks like $INFQ, $VPG, $AVAV, $LPTH are not doing as well.

But as I’ve mentioned aside from Reddit (which I had high concentration in), a lot of my other picks I’m not as familiar with, I have less concentration in:

But all my higher conviction picks like $TSEM have been strongly compounded recently.

And what matters is I get more things right than wrong, especially in my higher concentration names.

Majority of my YTD returns are actually unrealized since I don’t exit my longs, unless there’s material changes:

But I did realize a lot of gains at the beginning of the year post Venezuela conflict, as I identified some winners like Gold Reserve that doubled in a day.

Sadly I did sell some Asian names like Nittobo or Macronix that both went up 100-200%+ to rotate capital around the time of the Iran conflict… those ended up going a lot higher afterwards.

I swing trade a lot of misc names like in fintech or write CSP on the side.

Hence why I’m able to compound to 500%+.

While individual names are only up 100-200% (just keep doubling + rotating).

But if you want to ride the next trend:

Most obvious one is Photonics Supercycle if you just look at $AAOI earnings call or $LITE Nvidia GTC call for next few years.

And the current one is the Memory Supercycle if you just look at $SNDK returns.

And as you’ve seen after my original $AXTI thesis or now Soitec:

These names keep going in a vertical line up, as everyone suddenly now realizes its importance to the next paradigm shift for AI.

My strategy is identifying structural bottlenecks in the AI supply chains before the market discovers them.
年初到 3 月的 Year to Date return:

+564.36%。

我通过寻找未被发现的 AI bottlenecks,并选中赢家,正在 speed run 去年 600%+ 的回报。

- $AXTI 上 500%+ 未实现收益。
- $AAOI 3 个月 3x,$IQE 1 个月 2x。
- $LITE 接近 100%+。

我预计今年大量资金会轮向 silicon photonics + CPO 名字:比如 $SOI$AEHR$SIVE

它们已经涨了接近 ~70-100%,但还有很长路。

再叠加杂项 longs,比如 $CRCL 一个月涨 148%;$NBIS 从 $70 回到 $120 接近翻倍;$EWY IV trade 涨 50-70%,$XLU 也涨 50%+。

我今年最大输家是 $RDDT,因为我的成本均价 $148。

其他一些杂项 picks 比如 $INFQ$VPG$AVAV$LPTH 表现没那么好。但除了 Reddit(我仓位较重)外,很多不那么熟的名字仓位都更小。

高 conviction 名字,比如 $TSEM,最近强劲复利。关键是我对的比错的多,尤其在高仓位名字上。

大多数 YTD 收益其实是未实现,因为除非有实质变化,我不会退出 longs。但年初委内瑞拉冲突后我确实兑现了不少收益,比如 Gold Reserve 一天翻倍。

可惜我卖掉了一些亚洲名字如 Nittobo、Macronix 来轮动伊朗冲突前后的资金,它们后来又涨了 100-200%+。

我也会 swing trade fintech 等杂项,旁边卖 CSP。

这就是为什么我能复利到 500%+,虽然单个名字可能只涨 100-200%(不断翻倍 + 轮动)。

如果你想跟下一个趋势:最明显是 Photonics Supercycle,看 $AAOI earnings call 或 $LITE Nvidia GTC call 就知道未来几年。

当前这个是 Memory Supercycle,看 $SNDK 回报就知道。

就像我最初的 $AXTI thesis 和现在 Soitec 一样,这些名字一直垂直上涨,因为大家突然意识到它们对 AI 下一次范式转移的重要性。

我的策略就是在市场发现前,识别 AI 供应链里的结构性瓶颈。
❤️ 1,792 🔁 85 💬 135
打开原推
💬 引用
Sivers is up another 29% to a $282M marketcap today.

I genuinely think $SIVE could be the next $LITE.

As they’re positioned as the light source for the next generation of hyperscaler supply chains.

When scale up-scale out architectures transition to CPO & Silicon photonics.

For the start of next Photonics Supercycle.

The companies that buy and package their laser arrays/cw dfb lasers from $POET to Ayar?

Are worth ~$1B-$4B+ (not including o-net or undisclosed).

With current pluggable transceiver cycles:

Laser suppliers typically command higher valuation premiums than their packaging counterparties that buy the light source.

So, I do think $SIVE is largely undiscovered by markets and far from being priced in.
Sivers 今天又涨了 29%,市值到 $282M 了。

我真觉得 $SIVE 可能会成为下一个 $LITE

因为他们卡在下一代 hyperscaler 供应链里的光源位置。

等 scale up / scale out 架构转向 CPO 和 Silicon photonics,

也就是下一轮 Photonics Supercycle 开始的时候。

那些从 $POET 到 Ayar 购买并封装他们激光阵列 / cw dfb lasers 的公司,

现在都值大概 ~$1B-$4B+(还不包括 o-net 或未披露的)。

在当前可插拔光模块周期里:

激光供应商通常会比买光源做封装的下游公司拿到更高估值溢价。

所以我确实认为 $SIVE 基本还没被市场发现,离被充分定价还差很远。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE is the upstream laser supplier for CPO and Silicon Photonics.

They're the likely $COHR / $LITE type future light source for:

- $AMZN Trainium Clusters
- $MSFT Maia Clusters

and possibly other hyperscalers like $META MTAI and $GOOGL TPU clusters.

At a ~$200M MC.

Relational Mapping (speculative):

$SIVE (light source) -> $POET (optical interposers) -> $MRVL (Likely Celestial Captive) -> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium.

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium

$SIVE (light source) -> Enablence -> O-Net -> ? Asia Hyperscalers
_

Ongoing:

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> GUC -> ? (Google $TPU)

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar (TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn (captive CPO) -> ? ( $MSFT, $META historically Wiwynn's largest clients).

Because of captive models like $MRVL Celestial, they get a free ride.

However, they do compete multi-source ELS against Lumentum, Coherent, and $MTSI with Ayar and win anyway in merchant models.

But they win either way.

For high-volume production ramp up, a large part of it depends on the ongoing Win semi qualification, but this will likely be a large indicator.

Again supply chain BOM is extremely confidential. $AMZN will never tell anyone "Hey, we use $SIVE ".

But if you put 1+1+1+1+1 together, you can piece together the likely suppliers.

Most people see "Poet Starlight" uses $SIVE. Or Ayar uses $SIVE. But don't map all the multi-hop relations to see where they end up.

I do think $SIVE is an extremely undiscovered opportunity as the next possible mini $LITE for Silicon Photonics at $200m MC.

As they're the likely upstream laser supplier for hyperscaler supply chains for future CPO/Silicon Photonics scale up with cw dfb lasers and scale out with laser arrays.
$SIVE 是 CPO 和 Silicon Photonics 的上游 laser supplier。

它们很可能是未来类似 $COHR / $LITE 的 light source,服务于:

- $AMZN Trainium Clusters
- $MSFT Maia Clusters

以及可能的其他 hyperscalers,比如 $META MTAI 和 $GOOGL TPU clusters。

市值约 ~$200M。

关系映射(推测):

$SIVE (light source) -> $POET (optical interposers) -> $MRVL (Likely Celestial Captive) -> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium。

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium

$SIVE (light source) -> Enablence -> O-Net -> ? Asia Hyperscalers
_

进行中:

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> GUC -> ? (Google $TPU)

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar (TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn (captive CPO) -> ? ($MSFT$META historically Wiwynn's largest clients)。

因为像 $MRVL Celestial 这样的 captive models,它们可以搭顺风车。

不过,在 merchant models 里,它们也会和 Lumentum、Coherent、$MTSI 以 multi-source ELS 形式竞争,并且依然能赢。

但无论哪种方式,它们都能赢。

高量产放量很大程度上取决于正在进行的 Win semi qualification,但这很可能会是一个重要指标。

再次说明,supply chain BOM 极其保密。$AMZN 永远不会告诉别人“嘿,我们用 $SIVE”。

但如果你把 1+1+1+1+1 拼起来,就能拼出可能的供应商。

大多数人只看到 “Poet Starlight” 用 $SIVE,或者 Ayar 用 $SIVE。但没有把多跳关系全部映射出来,看它们最终流向哪里。

我确实认为 $SIVE 是一个极度未被发现的机会,可能成为 Silicon Photonics 里下一个 mini $LITE,市值只有 $200m。

因为它们很可能是未来 CPO/Silicon Photonics scale up 所需 cw dfb lasers,以及 scale out 所需 laser arrays 的 hyperscaler 供应链上游 laser supplier。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2034087274800091401
❤️ 506 🔁 49 💬 71
打开原推
💬 引用
This thesis post aged well with $LITE.

I feel like every photonics pick I make just keeps doubling in short time periods. https://t.co/vOOWFZRgsW
这篇关于 $LITE 的 thesis 现在看很准。

感觉我每次挑的 photonics 标的,短时间内都一直翻倍。 https://t.co/vOOWFZRgsW
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The $LITE thesis: The hidden monopoly in the AI.

Lumentum is up 316% YTD, but might be 1000%+ by 2027.

Micron ($300B) or TSM ($1.5T) sit in the center of every TPU/GPU deployed.

But same with $LITE, but it's a $26B MC.

In Every, Single, TPU from Google, $LITE makes unbelievable amounts of profit for their marketcap.

That's because it's the standard for Optical Circuit Switching (OCS) + optical networking.

It's also in

- $NVDA Blackwell
-$AMZN Trainium
- and other hyperscaler ASICs.

Lumentum sits in the holy trinity of every single chip deployment for photonics.

And for every TPU capex spent, $LITE takes 8-12%. For every Nvidia GPU, $LITE takes ~2-3% (split between Innolight and some others, so the math gets a bit complex).

But some napkin math on NVDA GPU deployments alone for BOM:

NVIDIA Blackwell (GB200):

HBM memory: ~50–55% (SK Hynix (Lead), Micron, Samsung)
Logic (GPU Die): ~25-30% ( $TSM 4NP)
CoWoS Packaging: ~13-18% $TSM
Optics/Network: ~3–5% (Innolight, Lumentum, Coherent)
PCB/Power: 5%

For Google TPIU "Ironwood" TPU v7:

HBM Memory: 38-42% Samsung / SK Hynix
Logic Die: TSM ~28-33%
Design/I.O: 8-10% MediaTek
Optical Network: 10-14% ( $LITE (primary), $COHR secondary)
Optical Switch: 2-4% $LITE

$LITE est. total cluster share: ~8–12%

Just an FYI, Google's "Optical" BOM share (8–12%) is an anomaly due to their unique Optical Circuit Switch (OCS) monopoly.

Just for some napkin math:

$40B Google TPU spend by 2027. $LITE captures 10% (30-40% margins), $1.5B+ FCF from Google alone, 17x earnings from just their primary customer. (analysts are probably extremely off with projecting TPU spend scaling).

Not even including their split from $AMZN Trainium, $NVDA Blackwell, $MSFT Maia, and other chip deployments.

$LITE is in the center of every single TPU/GPU future chip deployment for now and takes a cut.

The only downside is they're the clear market leader now, but $AVGO and $COHR are likely set up to compete by 2027-2028. However...

People say "$26B, ATH, why are you buying now".

This is the reason. They're involved in every future single TPU/GPU/ASIC deployed.

$LITE could end up easily over $60B+ if Google TPUs, and other chip spend ramps up and LITE takes a 2-3% (from $NVDA, $AMZN, $MSFT) or 8-12% cut (from $GOOGL) for every single dollar spent.
$LITE thesis:AI 里的隐藏垄断。

Lumentum 年初至今涨了 316%,但到 2027 年可能涨 1000%+。

Micron($300B)或 TSM($1.5T)位于每个 TPU/GPU 部署的中心。

$LITE 也一样,但它只有 $26B 市值。

在 Google 的每一个 TPU 里,按它的市值看,$LITE 都赚到不可思议的利润。

因为它是 Optical Circuit Switching(OCS)+ optical networking 的标准。

它也在:

- $NVDA Blackwell
- $AMZN Trainium
- 以及其他 hyperscaler ASICs 里。

Lumentum 位于每一次芯片部署的光子“三位一体”核心。

每花 1 美元 TPU capex,$LITE 拿走 8-12%。每个 Nvidia GPU,$LITE 拿约 2-3%(要和 Innolight 等分,所以计算有点复杂)。

只看 NVDA GPU 部署 BOM 的粗略测算:

NVIDIA Blackwell(GB200):

HBM memory:约 50-55%(SK Hynix 领先,Micron,Samsung)
Logic(GPU Die):约 25-30%($TSM 4NP)
CoWoS Packaging:约 13-18% $TSM
Optics/Network:约 3-5%(Innolight,Lumentum,Coherent)
PCB/Power:5%

Google TPU “Ironwood” TPU v7:

HBM Memory:38-42% Samsung / SK Hynix
Logic Die:TSM 约 28-33%
Design/I.O:8-10% MediaTek
Optical Network:10-14%($LITE 为主,$COHR 次要)
Optical Switch:2-4% $LITE

$LITE 估计总 cluster share:约 8-12%

FYI,Google 的 “Optical” BOM 份额(8-12%)是异常值,因为他们独特的 Optical Circuit Switch(OCS)垄断。

粗略算一下:

到 2027 年 Google TPU 花费 $40B。$LITE 拿 10%(30-40% 利润率),仅 Google 一个客户就有 $1.5B+ FCF,单靠主要客户就是 17x earnings。(分析师对 TPU spend scaling 的预测可能极其偏离)

还没算 $AMZN Trainium、$NVDA Blackwell、$MSFT Maia 和其他芯片部署带来的份额。

$LITE 目前位于每一个未来 TPU/GPU 芯片部署的中心并抽成。

唯一缺点是他们现在是明确市场领导者,但 $AVGO$COHR 很可能在 2027-2028 准备竞争。不过……

有人说“$26B,历史新高,你为什么现在买”。

这就是原因。他们参与未来每一个 TPU/GPU/ASIC 部署。

如果 Google TPU 和其他芯片支出放量,而 LITE 对每一美元花费都能从 $NVDA$AMZN$MSFT 拿 2-3%,或从 $GOOGL 拿 8-12%,$LITE 很容易最终超过 $60B+。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2003019490871869644
❤️ 493 🔁 27 💬 37
打开原推
💬 引用
Well that was a fast 100%+ return with $IQE in 1 month.

Turns out when you map it to $LITE and the hyperscaler supply chain at the epiwafer level…

Markets start pricing it in with the new $LITE projections… https://t.co/TA3xbSGfbX
$IQE 这一个月 100%+ 回报也来得太快了。

结果就是,当你把它映射到 $LITE,以及 hyperscaler 供应链里的 epiwafer 层面时……

市场就会开始按新的 $LITE 预期给它定价…… https://t.co/TA3xbSGfbX
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Was the first to talk about $AXTI in relation to photonics BOM/supply chains:

$IQE is very interesting too as one of the only Western suppliers.

Basically if you look at photonics flow on $GOOGL TPU/hyperscaler ASICs kinda looks like this (very likely, but undisclosed):

Optical Transceivers (highest BOM):

Lumentum/Cloud Light:
~ Vital / $AXTI-> $AXTI/Sumitomo/JX -> $IQE (Epi-Wafers) -> $LITE / Cloud Light -> $FN (Contract Manufacturing) -> $GOOGL TPU

Merhcant optical supply chain:

~ Vital / $AXTI -> $AXTI / Sumitomo / JX -> → $LITE / $AVGO / $COHR (EML) + $MRVL / $MTSI / Semtech -> Innolight/Eoptolink -> $GOOGL

So if you want moonshot-type photonics BOM / price-hikes stocks deeper upstream in the photonics BOM: $AXTI, $IQE and your way to go.

$AXTI had terrible fundamentals before but the recent Northland fundraising round cemented its run.

$IQE has terrible fundamentals now (Net debt £23.5 million) but is probably one of the most critical parts of the supply chain. If they manage to sell their Taiwan operations, wouldn't be surprised if it went up quite a bit just from their inp business.

There's £18m convertible notes (which is basically nothing), then there's 120 to 154m new shares (~12% to 15%), which is also kinda nothing relative to current size.

On the other hand, others $LITE and Innolight are probably more established.

TLDR:

$IQE -> seems critical to Western supply chains, $130MC. Net debt, if they sell Taiwan business -> strong re-rating or they might just dilute you anyway.

But if the Taiwan business fails to be sold, probably expect to be diluted to oblivion like Wolfspeed. So huge, huge, risk ad do you own research into risks.

But $AXTI and $IQE might are personally interesting to me (I do own $IQE).
我是第一个从 photonics BOM/供应链角度聊 $AXTI 的人:

$IQE 也很有意思,是少数西方供应商之一。

基本上,如果你看 $GOOGL TPU/hyperscaler ASICs 上的 photonics flow,大概像这样(很可能,但未披露):

Optical Transceivers(最高 BOM):

Lumentum/Cloud Light:
~ Vital / $AXTI-> $AXTI/Sumitomo/JX -> $IQE (Epi-Wafers) -> $LITE / Cloud Light -> $FN (Contract Manufacturing) -> $GOOGL TPU

Merchant optical supply chain:

~ Vital / $AXTI -> $AXTI / Sumitomo / JX -> → $LITE / $AVGO / $COHR (EML) + $MRVL / $MTSI / Semtech -> Innolight/Eoptolink -> $GOOGL

所以如果你想找 photonics BOM 更上游、moonshot 类型的 BOM/涨价股票,$AXTI$IQE 是方向。

$AXTI 以前 fundamentals 很差,但最近 Northland 融资轮确认了它的行情。

$IQE 现在 fundamentals 很差(Net debt £23.5 million),但可能是供应链里最关键的环节之一。如果它们能卖掉 Taiwan operations,我不会惊讶它仅靠 InP 业务就大幅重估。

这里有 £18m convertible notes(基本不算什么),然后还有 120 到 154m 新股(约 12% 到 15%),相对当前规模也不算什么。

另一方面,$LITE 和 Innolight 这些可能更成熟。

TLDR:

$IQE -> 看起来对西方供应链很关键,$130MC。有净债务;如果卖掉 Taiwan business -> 强力重估,或者也可能直接继续稀释你。

但如果 Taiwan business 卖不掉,可能会像 Wolfspeed 一样被稀释到爆。所以风险非常、非常大,请自己研究风险。

$AXTI$IQE 对我个人来说很有意思(我持有 $IQE)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026638711941902461
❤️ 446 🔁 35 💬 32
打开原推
💬 引用
Soitec < $SOI / $SLOIF > is now up, a lot since my post a week ago.

As they’re the Western monopoly over silicon photonics and CPO substrates.

I post my ideas for free, and they get priced in immediately.

Instead of former models where:

-> Bank analysts sell research for $10,000-$40,000+

-> Hedge funds can accumulate the next chokepoints at low prices

-> Retail investors find out at the top after they’re already priced in.

And for the first time:

Retail on X are earlier than institutions to the architectural paradigm shifts in AI.
Soitec < $SOI / $SLOIF > 从我一周前发帖以后,现在已经涨了很多。

因为他们是西方在 silicon photonics 和 CPO substrates 上的垄断级公司。

我免费发自己的想法,然后市场立刻开始定价。

这和以前的模式不一样:

-> 银行分析师把研究卖 $10,000-$40,000+

-> 对冲基金能低价慢慢吸筹下一个 chokepoint

-> 散户等到高位、已经被定价完才知道

而且这是第一次:

X 上的散户比机构更早看到 AI 架构范式转移。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 485 🔁 25 💬 41
打开原推
📝 原创
I feel like markets should value:

$AAOI $93 -> $162 (~$13B MC) after their new capacity projections today.

and

$SIVE should be valued at 7.7 -> 38.5 ($1.1B MC) at least?

If one is ramping to ~$1.97B capacity EOY 2027 (which is basically revenue, since hyperscalers are buying anything they can make)

Then the other is the likely laser supplier to hyperscaler supply chains from $AMZN Trainium to $MSFT Maia Clusters?

At the very least, should price in forward revenue growth.

This is including execution uncertainty, and without premiums assigned to others like $LWLG at $1.1b+.

If Win semi qualifies $SIVE and $POET/Ayar/and others scale up. I feel like $SIVE valuation could easily 20x-30x from here?

If $AAOI hits $378M/month projections, could easily 5x from here to a ~$30B MC.

These possible price targets is how insane the optical supercycle is (like memory), but largely depends on how each company can execute.
我觉得市场应该这么给估值:

$AAOI $93 -> $162(~$13B MC),按他们今天新的产能预测。

以及

$SIVE 至少应该从 7.7 -> 38.5($1.1B MC)?

如果一个公司到 2027 年底能爬坡到 ~$1.97B 产能(基本等同收入,因为 hyperscalers 会买走他们能做出来的一切),

那另一个很可能就是从 $AMZN Trainium 到 $MSFT Maia Clusters 这些 hyperscaler 供应链的激光供应商?

至少也应该定价未来收入增长。

这里已经包括执行不确定性,也没给 $LWLG 这种 $1.1b+ 公司类似的溢价。

如果 Win semi 认证 $SIVE,并且 $POET/Ayar/其他公司开始放量,我感觉 $SIVE 估值从这里 20x-30x 都很容易?

如果 $AAOI 达到 $378M/月的预测,从这里到 ~$30B MC 也很容易 5x。

这些可能目标价说明 optical supercycle 有多疯狂(像 memory 一样),但很大程度取决于每家公司能不能执行。
❤️ 677 🔁 55 💬 45
打开原推
💬 引用
$CRCL is now up 148.15% in 1 month.

If people are wondering why my YTD is ~500%?

It’s because I look at fundamentals, not scribbles on a chart.

The comment section back here aged like 2021 monkey JPEG prices. https://t.co/X5EH5SIrTP
$CRCL 现在一个月涨了 148.15%。

如果有人好奇我 YTD 为什么大概 ~500%?

因为我看基本面,不看图上乱画的线。

当时评论区现在看就像 2021 年猴子 JPEG 价格一样好笑。 https://t.co/X5EH5SIrTP
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I really, really like $CRCL at $54.

Valuation has been completely reset back to $12B MC.

Everyone was rushing to buy it back at $150-200 but at $54, it's a ghost town. USDC supply still $70B+ and I expect stablecoins to continue growing in usage. https://t.co/R2Habycf7d
我真的、真的很喜欢 $CRCL 在 $54 的位置。

估值已经完全重置回 $12B MC。

大家在 $150-200 时都抢着买回去,但到 $54 时却没人了。USDC supply 仍然 $70B+,而且我预计 stablecoins 的使用会继续增长。 https://t.co/R2Habycf7d
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2018724759262085467
❤️ 1,208 🔁 66 💬 45
打开原推
📝 原创
It’s infuriating that so many people capitulated their positions.

Because of X influencer doomposters who are now pretending to be bullish on $MU or $EWY.

Or Bank Analysts who have 0 clue what they’re talking about.

99.9% of this place was bearish and posted:

- “KOPSI Crash”
- “Memory charts look like Silver?”

Or something along the lines of

“Helium/LNG/Oil” on the way down.

But now that $SNDK and memory names are ATH (or getting close), everyone is now pretending to have been bullish all long.

The vast, vast majority of X are extreme noise.
这么多人投降卖掉仓位真的让人火大。

就是因为 X 上那些 doomposter influencer,现在又假装自己看多 $MU$EWY

或者那些完全不知道自己在说什么的银行分析师。

这里 99.9% 的人之前都看空,还发:

- “KOPSI Crash”
- “Memory charts look like Silver?”

或者下跌时一直说什么

“Helium/LNG/Oil”。

但现在 $SNDK 和 memory 名字都 ATH(或接近 ATH)了,所有人又开始假装自己一直看多。

X 上绝大多数都是极端噪音。
❤️ 629 🔁 19 💬 50
打开原推
💬 引用
The more I look into Sivers
< $SIVE / $SIVEF >

the more I wonder:

How is the laser company for the hyperscaler photonic supply chains…

Valued at ~$200M USD MC?

All the companies that buy and repackage their lasers are now worth $1-4B+?

Pre-product SV AI companies are worth billions?

Pre revenue Photonic companies in development phase line $LWLG are worth $1B+?

Yet the company that makes the silicon photonics/CPO scale up & scale out work.

And has actual revenue.

~$200M…

Reminds me of early $AXTI when I had zero clue how a company worth $500M MC controlled the InP substrate/feedstock supply chain for photonics.

Either I’m completely wrong… or this is the most undervalued and unknown photonics company on the market.
我越研究 Sivers
< $SIVE / $SIVEF >

就越想不通:

给 hyperscaler photonic 供应链做激光的公司……

怎么只值 ~$200M USD MC?

所有买他们激光再重新封装的公司现在都值 $1-4B+?

还没产品的 SV AI 公司都值几十亿?

还没收入、处在研发阶段的 photonic 公司,比如 $LWLG,都值 $1B+?

但真正让 silicon photonics/CPO scale up 和 scale out 能跑起来的公司,

而且还有实际收入,

才 ~$200M……

让我想到早期 $AXTI,当时我完全想不通一家 $500M MC 的公司怎么控制了 photonics 的 InP substrate/feedstock 供应链。

要么我完全错了……要么这就是市场上最被低估、最没人知道的 photonics 公司。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE is the upstream laser supplier for CPO and Silicon Photonics.

They're the likely $COHR / $LITE type future light source for:

- $AMZN Trainium Clusters
- $MSFT Maia Clusters

and possibly other hyperscalers like $META MTAI and $GOOGL TPU clusters.

At a ~$200M MC.

Relational Mapping (speculative):

$SIVE (light source) -> $POET (optical interposers) -> $MRVL (Likely Celestial Captive) -> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium.

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium

$SIVE (light source) -> Enablence -> O-Net -> ? Asia Hyperscalers
_

Ongoing:

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> GUC -> ? (Google $TPU)

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar (TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn (captive CPO) -> ? ( $MSFT, $META historically Wiwynn's largest clients).

Because of captive models like $MRVL Celestial, they get a free ride.

However, they do compete multi-source ELS against Lumentum, Coherent, and $MTSI with Ayar and win anyway in merchant models.

But they win either way.

For high-volume production ramp up, a large part of it depends on the ongoing Win semi qualification, but this will likely be a large indicator.

Again supply chain BOM is extremely confidential. $AMZN will never tell anyone "Hey, we use $SIVE ".

But if you put 1+1+1+1+1 together, you can piece together the likely suppliers.

Most people see "Poet Starlight" uses $SIVE. Or Ayar uses $SIVE. But don't map all the multi-hop relations to see where they end up.

I do think $SIVE is an extremely undiscovered opportunity as the next possible mini $LITE for Silicon Photonics at $200m MC.

As they're the likely upstream laser supplier for hyperscaler supply chains for future CPO/Silicon Photonics scale up with cw dfb lasers and scale out with laser arrays.
$SIVE 是 CPO 和 Silicon Photonics 的上游 laser supplier。

它们很可能是未来类似 $COHR / $LITE 的 light source,服务于:

- $AMZN Trainium Clusters
- $MSFT Maia Clusters

以及可能的其他 hyperscalers,比如 $META MTAI 和 $GOOGL TPU clusters。

市值约 ~$200M。

关系映射(推测):

$SIVE (light source) -> $POET (optical interposers) -> $MRVL (Likely Celestial Captive) -> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium。

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium

$SIVE (light source) -> Enablence -> O-Net -> ? Asia Hyperscalers
_

进行中:

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> GUC -> ? (Google $TPU)

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar (TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn (captive CPO) -> ? ($MSFT$META historically Wiwynn's largest clients)。

因为像 $MRVL Celestial 这样的 captive models,它们可以搭顺风车。

不过,在 merchant models 里,它们也会和 Lumentum、Coherent、$MTSI 以 multi-source ELS 形式竞争,并且依然能赢。

但无论哪种方式,它们都能赢。

高量产放量很大程度上取决于正在进行的 Win semi qualification,但这很可能会是一个重要指标。

再次说明,supply chain BOM 极其保密。$AMZN 永远不会告诉别人“嘿,我们用 $SIVE”。

但如果你把 1+1+1+1+1 拼起来,就能拼出可能的供应商。

大多数人只看到 “Poet Starlight” 用 $SIVE,或者 Ayar 用 $SIVE。但没有把多跳关系全部映射出来,看它们最终流向哪里。

我确实认为 $SIVE 是一个极度未被发现的机会,可能成为 Silicon Photonics 里下一个 mini $LITE,市值只有 $200m。

因为它们很可能是未来 CPO/Silicon Photonics scale up 所需 cw dfb lasers,以及 scale out 所需 laser arrays 的 hyperscaler 供应链上游 laser supplier。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2034087274800091401
❤️ 662 🔁 67 💬 52
打开原推
📝 原创
$AAOI looks very undervalued at $6.49B.

If we model ASP and their newest capacity projections today:

Revenue from Capacity:
Q2 2026: ~$312.1M
Q4 2026: ~$1.41B
Q2-2027: ~$1.53B
Q4-2027: ~$1.97B

This is absurd ramp (off ~34-40% est. gross margins).

ASP modeled off (LightCounting, Dell'Oro Group & Yole, pricing for ELSFP modules is the most speculative). And some sell-side models (from firms like Raymond James, B. Riley, Northland Capital, and Goldman Sachs).

Exact contract pricing for massive volume orders is not known, so this is speculative.

But the Q2 volume * ASP estimates actually align with their $378M/month target Q2-2027.

Again, you might be wondering? This is capacity, doesn't translate into revenue right?

Hyperscalers from $AMZN to $MSFT are buying any capacity any of these companies from $LITE to $COHR can make, years out.

This includes $AAOI from their former earnings call.
$AAOI 现在 $6.49B 看起来非常低估。

如果按 ASP 和他们今天最新产能预测建模:

产能对应收入:
Q2 2026: ~$312.1M
Q4 2026: ~$1.41B
Q2-2027: ~$1.53B
Q4-2027: ~$1.97B

这个爬坡太离谱了(估计毛利率 ~34-40%)。

ASP 模型参考了 LightCounting、Dell'Oro Group & Yole,ELSFP modules 定价最有投机性,也参考了一些 sell-side 模型(Raymond James、B. Riley、Northland Capital、Goldman Sachs 等)。

大规模订单的准确合同价格没人知道,所以这是推测。

但 Q2 volume * ASP 估算其实和他们 Q2-2027 $378M/月目标对得上。

你可能又会问:这是产能,不等于收入吧?

$AMZN$MSFT 的 hyperscalers,会把 $LITE$COHR 这些公司未来几年能做出来的任何产能都买走。

这也包括 $AAOI,按他们之前 earnings call 的说法。
❤️ 851 🔁 66 💬 53
打开原推
📝 原创
$SIVE is the upstream laser supplier for CPO and Silicon Photonics.

They're the likely $COHR / $LITE type future light source for:

- $AMZN Trainium Clusters
- $MSFT Maia Clusters

and possibly other hyperscalers like $META MTAI and $GOOGL TPU clusters.

At a ~$200M MC.

Relational Mapping (speculative):

$SIVE (light source) -> $POET (optical interposers) -> $MRVL (Likely Celestial Captive) -> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium.

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium

$SIVE (light source) -> Enablence -> O-Net -> ? Asia Hyperscalers
_

Ongoing:

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar -> GUC -> ? (Google $TPU)

$SIVE (light source) -> Ayar (TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn (captive CPO) -> ? ( $MSFT, $META historically Wiwynn's largest clients).

Because of captive models like $MRVL Celestial, they get a free ride.

However, they do compete multi-source ELS against Lumentum, Coherent, and $MTSI with Ayar and win anyway in merchant models.

But they win either way.

For high-volume production ramp up, a large part of it depends on the ongoing Win semi qualification, but this will likely be a large indicator.

Again supply chain BOM is extremely confidential. $AMZN will never tell anyone "Hey, we use $SIVE ".

But if you put 1+1+1+1+1 together, you can piece together the likely suppliers.

Most people see "Poet Starlight" uses $SIVE. Or Ayar uses $SIVE. But don't map all the multi-hop relations to see where they end up.

I do think $SIVE is an extremely undiscovered opportunity as the next possible mini $LITE for Silicon Photonics at $200m MC.

As they're the likely upstream laser supplier for hyperscaler supply chains for future CPO/Silicon Photonics scale up with cw dfb lasers and scale out with laser arrays.
$SIVE 是 CPO 和 Silicon Photonics 的上游激光供应商。

他们很可能是未来给这些集群提供光源的 $COHR / $LITE 类型公司:

- $AMZN Trainium Clusters
- $MSFT Maia Clusters

也可能包括其他 hyperscalers,比如 $META MTAI 和 $GOOGL TPU clusters。

而市值才 ~$200M MC。

关系映射(推测):

$SIVE(光源)-> $POET(optical interposers)-> $MRVL(可能是 Celestial Captive)-> $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium。

$SIVE(光源)-> Ayar -> AiChip -> $AMZN Inferentia/Trainium

$SIVE(光源)-> Enablence -> O-Net -> ? 亚洲 Hyperscalers
_

进行中:

$SIVE(光源)-> Ayar -> GUC -> ?(Google $TPU

$SIVE(光源)-> Ayar (TeraPHY/SuperNova)-> Wiwynn(captive CPO)-> ?($MSFT, $META 历史上是 Wiwynn 最大客户)。

因为有 $MRVL Celestial 这种 captive model,他们能搭顺风车。

不过在 merchant models 里,他们也会和 Lumentum、Coherent、$MTSI 竞争 Ayar 的多源 ELS,而且还是能赢。

但无论哪种模式他们都能赢。

要做高量产爬坡,很大一部分取决于正在进行的 Win semi 认证,这大概率会是重要信号。

再次强调,供应链 BOM 极度保密。$AMZN 永远不会告诉任何人“嘿,我们用 $SIVE”。

但你把 1+1+1+1+1 拼起来,就能拼出可能的供应商。

大多数人只看到 “Poet Starlight” 用 $SIVE,或者 Ayar 用 $SIVE。但没有把所有多跳关系映射到最终去向。

我确实认为 $SIVE 是一个极度未被发现的机会,可能是 Silicon Photonics 里下一个迷你 $LITE,而现在只有 $200m MC。

因为他们很可能是未来 CPO/Silicon Photonics scale up 所需 cw dfb lasers,以及 scale out 所需 laser arrays 的 hyperscaler 供应链上游激光供应商。
❤️ 488 🔁 57 💬 33
打开原推
💬 引用
The Photonics Supercycle is here.

$NVDA is spearheading the next leap into CPO & Silicon Photonics.

And we’re only near the inflection point with chokepoints in the supply chains like Soitec ( $SOI ) or Sivers ( $SIVE ).

“NVIDIA’s update on the Spectrum-X switch with co-packaged optics is an important moment, confirming that silicon photonics is central to next-generation AI infrastructure.”

Despite a long-standing reliance on copper-based interconnects for scale-up systems, the company is now placing photonics at the core of its future platforms, including Vera Rubin Ultra.

This transition is expected to support increasingly complex configurations, such as NVL576 and future architectures like Kyber NVL1152.”

“Nvidia is already in production with Spectrum-X Photonics, which is co-packaged optics (CPO) Ethernet switch.

The company also announced the Quantum-X Photonics InfiniBand switch, which delivers up to 800 Tb per second of scale-out throughput using its proprietary scale-out interconnect”

Although copper is important, it can no longer alone can no longer handle AI-scale demands.

NVLink8 CPO is probably the biggest signal with $NVDA also bringing silicon photonics into its scale-up NVLink interconnect, not just scale-out networking.

CPO for scale-out is shipping now/2026, CPO for NVLink scale-up arrives soon.

The paradigm has shifted, and the bottleneck of AI infrastructure is now officially being solved by light.

It’s only a matter of time before markets find these chokepoints in the supply chains.

Then price them in.
Photonics Supercycle 已经来了。

$NVDA 正在带头进入 CPO 和 Silicon Photonics 的下一次跃迁。

而我们才刚接近拐点,供应链里的 chokepoints 包括 Soitec($SOI)或 Sivers($SIVE)。

“NVIDIA 对带 co-packaged optics 的 Spectrum-X switch 的更新是一个重要时刻,确认 silicon photonics 是下一代 AI 基础设施的核心。”

尽管 scale-up 系统长期依赖铜互连,公司现在正把 photonics 放到未来平台核心,包括 Vera Rubin Ultra。

这种转变预计会支持越来越复杂的配置,比如 NVL576,以及未来的 Kyber NVL1152 架构。

“Nvidia 已经量产 Spectrum-X Photonics,也就是 co-packaged optics (CPO) Ethernet switch。

公司还宣布了 Quantum-X Photonics InfiniBand switch,用其专有 scale-out interconnect 提供最高 800 Tb/s 的 scale-out throughput。”

铜仍然重要,但它已经不能单独承载 AI-scale 需求。

NVLink8 CPO 可能是最大信号,$NVDA 也把 silicon photonics 带进 scale-up NVLink interconnect,而不只是 scale-out networking。

scale-out 的 CPO 正在出货/2026,NVLink scale-up 的 CPO 很快到来。

范式已经转变,AI 基础设施瓶颈现在正式由光来解决。

市场找到这些供应链 chokepoints 只是时间问题。

然后会把它们定价进去。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The upcoming CPO / Silicon Photonics Bottleneck Cheat Sheet:

$SIVE, Sumitomo, $LITE, $COHR, $AVGO, $MTSI, $AAOI - Light Source (CW DFB Lasers)
$TSEM, $GFS, $UMC, $TSM, $INTC - SiPh foundry
$NOK, $CIEN, $CSCO, $COHR - DCO
$HIMX, FOCI (3363.TWO) - Micro-lens + Fiber Arrays
$POET - Optical Interposers
$SOI, $AXTI, Shin-Etsu - Substrates
$FN, $ASX, Innolight, Eoptolink - Optical Packaging and Assembly
$MTSI, $SMTC, $MRVL, $MXL - Analog/Mixed-Signal ICs
$LWLG - Speculative Modulator Materials.
$GLW, $APH, $TEL, $FIT, Fujikura - Connectors and Fibers
$FORM, $KEYS, $VIAV, $AEHR- Test & Measurement
$BESI, $SMHN, $ONTO, $CAMT - Advanced Packaging & Hybrid Bonding

Many are private companies from Lightmatter, Ayar, Ranovus and others.

Now... Everyone is asking... How do you profit?

If you look at the forecast for CPO TAM, it's a straight line up, and next year is inflection point for CPO mass deployment.

The alpha is capturing the rotation:

From the current EML bottlenecks ( $LITE, $COHR type) to SiPh / CW DFB architectural winners for CPO.

Highest upside potential are the ones that aren't included in current cycles.

But that are in the next.

Companies like $SOI, $SIVE, or $AEHR are perfect examples.

Ride the current pluggable bottleneck like $AAOI.

But the alpha is frontrunning institutions with the next CPO bottleneck.

The capital rotation is inevitable.
即将到来的 CPO / Silicon Photonics 瓶颈 Cheat Sheet:

$SIVE, Sumitomo, $LITE, $COHR, $AVGO, $MTSI, $AAOI - Light Source (CW DFB Lasers)
$TSEM, $GFS, $UMC, $TSM, $INTC - SiPh foundry
$NOK, $CIEN, $CSCO, $COHR - DCO
$HIMX, FOCI (3363.TWO) - Micro-lens + Fiber Arrays
$POET - Optical Interposers
$SOI, $AXTI, Shin-Etsu - Substrates
$FN, $ASX, Innolight, Eoptolink - Optical Packaging and Assembly
$MTSI, $SMTC, $MRVL, $MXL - Analog/Mixed-Signal ICs
$LWLG - Speculative Modulator Materials.
$GLW, $APH, $TEL, $FIT, Fujikura - Connectors and Fibers
$FORM, $KEYS, $VIAV, $AEHR- Test & Measurement
$BESI, $SMHN, $ONTO, $CAMT - Advanced Packaging & Hybrid Bonding

很多都是 private companies,比如 Lightmatter、Ayar、Ranovus 等。

现在……所有人都在问……怎么赚钱?

如果你看 CPO TAM 预测,它是一条直线向上,而明年就是 CPO 大规模部署的拐点。

alpha 在于抓住轮动:

从当前 EML 瓶颈($LITE$COHR 这类)轮动到 CPO 的 SiPh / CW DFB 架构赢家。

upside 最高的是那些没有被包含在当前周期里,

但会在下一个周期里的公司。

$SOI$SIVE$AEHR 就是完美例子。

可以骑着当前 pluggable 瓶颈,比如 $AAOI

但真正的 alpha,是在机构前面抢跑下一个 CPO 瓶颈。

资金轮动不可避免。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033885603423785170
❤️ 583 🔁 46 💬 48
打开原推
💬 引用
I never gave up hope in my lobster companion $RPI.

Glad to see it’s finally getting some attention by other analysts. https://t.co/koaLfw15Gs
我从没放弃我的龙虾伙伴 $RPI

很高兴看到它终于被其他分析师注意到了。 https://t.co/koaLfw15Gs
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Fun Trade Idea: Long $RPI (Raspberry Pi)

Reason: 🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + Hoarding.

Everyone has been openly hoarding Apple Mac Minis and were long Apple.

But $APPL is already a $3.7T+ company. Product mass-buying won't make a dent.

Raspberry Pi, however, is a 542.68M company.

The revenue is material.

Feels like markets haven't priced this in since I've seen almost 0 mentions about the ticker on X (but many product mentions).

And it's only recently that have the hoarding started Raspberry Pis, as they're much cheaper than $500+ Apple products. They also have their mini $NVDA CUDA-light utility ecosystem that people use.

So it turns out these extremely cheap $20 or $200 devices are perfect for deploying mass deploying isolated instances.

The reason is for OpenClaw orchestration (so they don’t mess up your device) -> interfacing with a central LLM via API.

Before people were just buying 1 or 2 for hobby/education purposes, so revenue has slowing.

But now Silicon Valley startups and individuals anecdotally appear to be buying tens or hundreds of these things to run concurrent OpenClaw agentic swarms or do stuff like agentic marketing on Reddit and other places.

And no, there are many applications that can't be done by spinning up AWS VPS, so people do it locally (there's TOS around automation/AI bots, so companies setup their own servers).

That being said main downside risk is that its

- partially foundation owned, and they might not hike rates like $SNDK or $MU does, even if there's extreme demand

- Subject to memory price hikes like LPDDR4 component

so this is not a major position.

However, going forward, revenue should increase due to people buying tens or hundreds of these things for running AI agents.

Balance sheet also looks clean with low downside risk:

- ~$280M - $300M revenue
- ~$75M+ Gross Profit
- ~25% Gross Margin
- Net income: ~$10M - $15M
- Net Cash: $28M

Analysts currently project revenue growth closer to 14–17%.

But if the demand influx continues, we might see revenue numbers might hit increase from 14% growth to a modest 48-55% if hoarding continues.

Consumer segments are roughly 1/3rd of revenue but the newfound buying from Openclaw + variants is a new cataylst nevertheless for re-rating.

Especially now that Picoclaw and compressed OpenClaw variants are now able to be run on $20 Raspberry Pis instead of just the Raspberry Pi 5’s.

But seems like people just forgot Raspberry PI was a publicly stock as well.

The stock price is down 56% 1Y to 542.68M euro MC to an all time low.

So this might be that tailwind for a reversal.

There's also a non-zero chance OpenClaw is a long term catalyst for Raspberry Pi based, agentic deployments.

TLDR: People are openly buying Raspberry Pis and Apple Mac Minis for Openclaw/Picoclaw, so revenue should benefit from increased demand.
有意思的交易想法:做多 $RPI(Raspberry Pi)

理由:🦞 Openclaw / Picoclaw / Nanobot + 囤货。

大家都在公开囤 Apple Mac Mini,而且做多 Apple。

$APPL 已经是 3.7T+ 美元的公司了。产品被大量抢购,对它的影响不会太大。

但 Raspberry Pi 是一家 542.68M 的公司。

这块收入就很实质了。

感觉市场还没把这个定价进去,因为我在 X 上几乎没看到有人提这个 ticker(但很多人在提产品)。

而且大家也是最近才开始囤 Raspberry Pi,因为它们比 500+ 美元的 Apple 产品便宜很多。它们也有一个小型的 $NVDA CUDA-light 实用生态,很多人会用。

所以结果就是,这些极便宜的 20 美元或 200 美元设备,非常适合大规模部署隔离实例。

原因是用来做 OpenClaw 编排(这样不会把你的设备搞乱)-> 通过 API 接入中心化 LLM。

以前大家只是买 1、2 个,用于爱好/教育,所以收入增长放慢了。

但现在从传闻看,硅谷创业公司和个人似乎在买几十台甚至几百台,用来跑并发的 OpenClaw agent swarm,或者做 Reddit 等地方的 agentic marketing。

而且不是所有应用都能靠开 AWS VPS 解决,所以大家会本地部署(自动化/AI bot 有 TOS 限制,所以公司会搭自己的服务器)。

话虽如此,主要下行风险是:

- 它部分由基金会持有,就算需求极端旺盛,也未必会像 $SNDK$MU 那样涨价

- 会受到 LPDDR4 等内存组件涨价影响

所以这不是一个大仓位。

不过往后看,因为大家会为了跑 AI agent 买几十台、几百台设备,收入应该会增加。

资产负债表也看起来干净,下行风险较低:

- 约 $280M - $300M 收入
- $75M+ 毛利
- 约 25% 毛利率
- 净利润:约 $10M - $15M
- 净现金:$28M

分析师目前预计收入增速大概 14-17%。

但如果这波需求涌入持续,收入增速可能从 14% 提升到比较温和的 48-55%。

消费端大概占收入 1/3,但 Openclaw + 各种变体带来的新增购买,仍然是一个新的重估催化。

尤其现在 Picoclaw 和压缩版 OpenClaw 已经能跑在 20 美元的 Raspberry Pi 上,而不只是 Raspberry Pi 5。

但感觉大家只是忘了 Raspberry PI 也是一家上市公司。

股价 1 年跌了 56%,市值到 542.68M 欧元,创历史低位。

所以这可能成为反转的顺风。

OpenClaw 也有非零概率成为基于 Raspberry Pi 的 agentic 部署的长期催化。

TLDR:大家正在公开购买 Raspberry Pi 和 Apple Mac Mini 来跑 Openclaw/Picoclaw,所以收入应该会受益于需求增加。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2023415224372756782
❤️ 358 🔁 30 💬 24
打开原推
📝 原创
The upcoming CPO / Silicon Photonics Bottleneck Cheat Sheet:

$SIVE, Sumitomo, $LITE, $COHR, $AVGO, $MTSI, $AAOI - Light Source (CW DFB Lasers)
$TSEM, $GFS, $UMC, $TSM, $INTC - SiPh foundry
$NOK, $CIEN, $CSCO, $COHR - DCO
$HIMX, FOCI (3363.TWO) - Micro-lens + Fiber Arrays
$POET - Optical Interposers
$SOI, $AXTI, Shin-Etsu - Substrates
$FN, $ASX, Innolight, Eoptolink - Optical Packaging and Assembly
$MTSI, $SMTC, $MRVL, $MXL - Analog/Mixed-Signal ICs
$LWLG - Speculative Modulator Materials.
$GLW, $APH, $TEL, $FIT, Fujikura - Connectors and Fibers
$FORM, $KEYS, $VIAV, $AEHR- Test & Measurement
$BESI, $SMHN, $ONTO, $CAMT - Advanced Packaging & Hybrid Bonding

Many are private companies from Lightmatter, Ayar, Ranovus and others.

Now... Everyone is asking... How do you profit?

If you look at the forecast for CPO TAM, it's a straight line up, and next year is inflection point for CPO mass deployment.

The alpha is capturing the rotation:

From the current EML bottlenecks ( $LITE, $COHR type) to SiPh / CW DFB architectural winners for CPO.

Highest upside potential are the ones that aren't included in current cycles.

But that are in the next.

Companies like $SOI, $SIVE, or $AEHR are perfect examples.

Ride the current pluggable bottleneck like $AAOI.

But the alpha is frontrunning institutions with the next CPO bottleneck.

The capital rotation is inevitable.
即将到来的 CPO / Silicon Photonics Bottleneck Cheat Sheet:

$SIVE, Sumitomo, $LITE, $COHR, $AVGO, $MTSI, $AAOI - Light Source (CW DFB Lasers)
$TSEM, $GFS, $UMC, $TSM, $INTC - SiPh foundry
$NOK, $CIEN, $CSCO, $COHR - DCO
$HIMX, FOCI (3363.TWO) - Micro-lens + Fiber Arrays
$POET - Optical Interposers
$SOI, $AXTI, Shin-Etsu - Substrates
$FN, $ASX, Innolight, Eoptolink - Optical Packaging and Assembly
$MTSI, $SMTC, $MRVL, $MXL - Analog/Mixed-Signal ICs
$LWLG - Speculative Modulator Materials.
$GLW, $APH, $TEL, $FIT, Fujikura - Connectors and Fibers
$FORM, $KEYS, $VIAV, $AEHR- Test & Measurement
$BESI, $SMHN, $ONTO, $CAMT - Advanced Packaging & Hybrid Bonding

很多都是私有公司,比如 Lightmatter、Ayar、Ranovus 等。

现在……所有人都在问……怎么赚钱?

如果你看 CPO TAM 预测,就是一条直线上升,明年是 CPO 大规模部署拐点。

alpha 在于抓住轮动:

从当前 EML bottlenecks($LITE, $COHR 这类)转向 CPO 的 SiPh / CW DFB 架构赢家。

上行最高的是那些不在当前周期里、

但在下一个周期里的公司。

$SOI$SIVE$AEHR 就是完美例子。

可以骑当前可插拔瓶颈,比如 $AAOI

但 alpha 是提前抢跑机构,布局下一个 CPO bottleneck。

资金轮动不可避免。
❤️ 1,738 🔁 252 💬 88
打开原推
💬 引用
Just in: Following the new $27B Hyperscaler Cumulative Deal with $META.

$NBIS launches a proposed $3.75B in convertible note offerings to fund the buildout.

Markets view this as vastly superior to straight equity ATM dilutions.

As the debt only converts to equity if the company successfully drives the stock price up past that high strike.

More details for Nebius are likely to come soon.
刚刚:继与 $META 的新 $27B Hyperscaler 累计交易后,

$NBIS 发起拟议的 $3.75B 可转债发行,用于资助建设。

市场认为这远优于直接股票 ATM 稀释。

因为只有公司成功把股价推到高行权价以上时,债务才会转换为股权。

Nebius 更多细节应该很快会出来。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just in: $META signs an enormous $27 Billion cumulative AI spend contract with $NBIS.

Nebius was my top Neocloud AI Infrastruture DC pick.

Glad management is executing toward their $7-9B ARR target.

Nebius is up 14.79% premarket to $129.66. https://t.co/RaaDWm1if0
刚刚:$META$NBIS 签署了一份巨大的 $27 Billion 累计 AI spend 合同。

Nebius 是我最看好的 Neocloud AI Infrastructure DC 标的。

很高兴管理层正在朝 $7-9B ARR 目标执行。

Nebius 盘前上涨 14.79% 至 $129.66。 https://t.co/RaaDWm1if0
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033486637553127865
❤️ 545 🔁 33 💬 57
打开原推
📝 原创
Photonics is the next bottleneck after memory.

If you're not convinced yet?

$LITE CEO went out and said:

"We're sold out really until the end of 2027. We see no end in sight."

This is eerily similar to $INTC CEO saying "No Relief" on Memory Shortage Until 2028.

But instead... Photonics has only started to ramp up as the new architectural paradigm of AI.

The current EML laser + optical transceiver bottleneck cannot be understated.

Hyperscalers are buying any EML capacity or optical transceiver, $AAOI, $LITE, $COHR, and downstream providers can make.

The CEO also reiterated: "We are completely sold out." The company [ $LITE ] is "way, way under-shipping" what customers want.

"Lumentum says it is under shipping demand by roughly 25% to 30%, and that all capacity is fully allocated under long-term agreements through calendar 2027"

If the photonics sector is completely sold out for the next two years with no end in sight. Before there's been any price hiking.

And before growth engines like CPO have even started to ramp up.

There's probably something the markets haven't priced in yet.
Photonics 是 memory 之后的下一个瓶颈。

如果你还不信?

$LITE CEO 直接说:

“我们基本一直卖光到 2027 年底。我们看不到尽头。”

这和 $INTC CEO 说 Memory Shortage Until 2028 “No Relief” 非常像。

但不同的是……Photonics 才刚作为 AI 新架构范式开始爬坡。

当前 EML laser + optical transceiver 瓶颈不能被低估。

Hyperscalers 会买走 $AAOI$LITE$COHR 和下游供应商能做出来的任何 EML 产能或光模块。

CEO 也重申:“我们完全卖光了。” 公司 [$LITE] “远远低于客户想要的出货量”。

“Lumentum 表示出货比需求低大约 25% 到 30%,所有产能都已通过长期协议分配到 2027 calendar year。”

如果 photonics 板块未来两年完全卖光,看不到尽头,而且还没开始涨价,

更别说 CPO 这种增长引擎还没开始爬坡。

那市场大概率还有东西没定价进去。
❤️ 734 🔁 52 💬 39
打开原推
💬 引用
Just in: $SIVE announces major partnership with O-Net and Enablence for CPO.

Sivers will be the laser array supplier for CPO.

This is thesis validation in effect as $SIVE becomes InP CW DFB supplier for silicon photonics.

In simpler terms, this is the $LITE -> $FN relationship for current optical bottlenecks.

And mirrors the existing $POET -> $MRVL Celestial CPO supply chain, but in Asia.

Enablence makes the "Star Coupler", similar to $POET interposers.

O-Net is a massive assembler, that packages them for the finished module.

O-Net in HK is a supplier to companies like Huawei, ZTE, Ciena, Nokia, Fujitsu, and more.
刚刚:$SIVE 宣布与 O-Net 和 Enablence 达成 CPO 重大合作。

Sivers 将成为 CPO 的 laser array supplier。

这是 thesis validation,$SIVE 正成为 silicon photonics 的 InP CW DFB 供应商。

简单说,这就是当前 optical bottlenecks 里 $LITE -> $FN 的关系。

也类似现有 $POET -> $MRVL Celestial CPO 供应链,但在亚洲。

Enablence 做 “Star Coupler”,类似 $POET interposers。

O-Net 是大型 assembler,把它们封装成最终模块。

香港 O-Net 是 Huawei、ZTE、Ciena、Nokia、Fujitsu 等公司的供应商。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE is now up +73.78% today ($231M MC).

As markets price in information synthesis of the next potential $LITE of photonics.

If I had to explain the difference:

One laser source in Lumentum primarily benefits from current optical bottlenecks.

The other in $SIVE is for the upcoming CPO/Silicon Photonic bottleneck.

Lumentum is largely benefiting right now from $NVDA and hyperscalers securing capacity of EML lasers for current pluggable optical transceivers cycles.

As seen with the current EML bottleneck, hyperscalers are buying out any 800G/1.6T transceiver + upstream capacity from:

- $AAOI (in-house)
- $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers + design) -> $FN (assembly)
- $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers) -> Innolight / Eoptolink

What's next?

Silicon Photonics and Co-Packaged Optics.

The architectural shift to CPO requires massive arrays of high-power CW DFB lasers.

And this would likely trigger a complete, sudden paradigm shift in volume demand.

$SIVE benefits from InP CW DFB lasers for SiPh and CPO:

The up and coming companies like:

$AYAR, $POET source $SIVE lasers, but primarily do advanced packaging.

Then they feed up to larger companies like $MRVL Celestial (that buy $POET's interposers).

However, if you go upstream, the light source is $SIVE.

CW DFB lasers are light engine ( $SIVE ); the silicon photonics package ( $POET and others) is how it gets transmitted.

CPO scale is not there yet. But we know it's coming.

And as seen with current optical transceiver cycles:

- Light sources from $LITE and $COHR demand much higher valuations than companies like $FN that focus on advanced packaging.

Markets have been focusing on $POET, but missed where they get the actual $LITE type light source for Starlight.

The risks are present including facing multi-source competition with $LITE, $COHR, $AVGO, and others. So again, make sure to do your own research.

But my argument against that:

Sivers been early enough to tailor custom lasers to fit $POET, Ayar, and other specifications before they got popular (sort like the $POET to $MRVL Celestial analogy).

There's volume risks as well:

But the potential Win Semi qualification offsets that.

Dilution risk to scale capacity, is always present with every early-stage company as well.

I did my thesis on $LITE last year and still love the stock for Google TPU ramp/OCS.

But this year, I'm focusing on:

$SIVE, as my personal CW DFB laser exposure for the new photonics architectural shift.

I’m sharing my own thoughts on capturing the rotation from the current EML cycle to the upcoming CW DFB/Silicon Photonics cycle.
$SIVE 今天现在涨了 +73.78%($231M MC)。

市场开始给 photonics 里下一个潜在 $LITE 的信息综合定价。

如果我必须解释区别:

Lumentum 的一个 laser source 主要受益于当前光学瓶颈。

$SIVE 是为了即将到来的 CPO/Silicon Photonic 瓶颈。

Lumentum 现在主要受益于 $NVDA 和 hyperscalers 为当前 pluggable optical transceivers 周期锁定 EML lasers 产能。

从当前 EML 瓶颈可以看到,hyperscalers 正在买光任何 800G/1.6T transceiver + 上游产能:

- $AAOI (in-house)
- $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers + design) -> $FN (assembly)
- $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers) -> Innolight / Eoptolink

接下来是什么?

Silicon Photonics 和 Co-Packaged Optics。

转向 CPO 的架构变化,需要大量高功率 CW DFB lasers 阵列。

这很可能会触发一次完整、突然的需求量范式转变。

$SIVE 受益于用于 SiPh 和 CPO 的 InP CW DFB lasers:

这些新兴公司,比如:

$AYAR$POET 采购 $SIVE lasers,但它们主要做 advanced packaging。

然后它们再供给更大的公司,比如 $MRVL Celestial(购买 $POET 的 interposers)。

但如果你往上游看,light source 是 $SIVE

CW DFB lasers 是 light engine($SIVE);silicon photonics package($POET 等)是传输方式。

CPO 规模还没起来。但我们知道它要来了。

而且从当前 optical transceiver 周期可以看到:

- 来自 $LITE$COHR 的 Light sources,估值会远高于像 $FN 这种专注 advanced packaging 的公司。

市场一直盯着 $POET,但漏掉了 Starlight 真正的 $LITE 型 light source 来自哪里。

风险确实存在,包括面对 $LITE$COHR$AVGO 等多源竞争。所以再次提醒,请自己做研究。

但我反驳这一点的理由是:

Sivers 足够早,已经在 $POET、Ayar 还没火起来前,就根据它们的规格定制 lasers(有点像 $POET$MRVL Celestial 的类比)。

也有 volume 风险:

但潜在的 Win Semi qualification 可以抵消一部分。

为了扩产的稀释风险,对每个早期公司也一直存在。

我去年做过 $LITE 的 thesis,到现在仍然喜欢它在 Google TPU ramp/OCS 上的股票。

但今年,我关注的是:

$SIVE,作为我个人对新 photonics 架构转变的 CW DFB laser exposure。

我是在分享自己如何捕捉从当前 EML 周期,轮动到即将到来的 CW DFB/Silicon Photonics 周期。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033695716938551350
❤️ 289 🔁 21 💬 37
打开原推
💬 引用
Woah, Macronix (TPE: 2337) is out here casually outperforming $AXTI?

201.04% vs. 188% Year to Date return, feels bad.

Macronix does look like the mini $SNDK of Taiwan at a $7.89B MC...

They're the world’s largest suppliers of NOR flash memory, SLC/MLC NAND.

So they get free price-hike reign now off legacy nodes that Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron left behind.
哇,Macronix(TPE: 2337)居然在轻松跑赢 $AXTI

201.04% vs. 188% Year to Date return,有点难受。

Macronix 看起来像台湾的迷你 $SNDK,市值 $7.89B MC……

他们是全球最大的 NOR flash memory、SLC/MLC NAND 供应商之一。

所以现在 Samsung、SK Hynix、Micron 退出的 legacy nodes 上,他们可以自由涨价。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Interesting beneficiaries post $SNDK earnings that I own:

Phison (TPE: 8299) and Macronix (TPE: 2337).

Similar to Nayna (1,035.96% 1Y) that filled legacy dram void from $MU, Sk Hynix, and Samsung:

Phison does the same with Sandisk with flash (inventory). And Macronix with MLC NAND (owns wafer fabs).

So another "legacy void" play.

As $SNDK pivots their NAND wafers toward enterprise SSDs to focus on AI, Phison/Macronix looks to fill the vacuum.

Esp. when Sk Hynix and Samsung stop making MLC NAND to focus on HBM, the "Last Man Standing" for legacy storage would be those two.

Phison happens to be sitting on a massive stockpile of lower-cost NAND from 2024/2025.

And Macronix are upping their MLC NAND production to fill the void from the Samsung/SanDisk pivot.

So for Nanya v2 left by Sandisk:

Phison = Massive stockpile price abritrage

Macronix = MLC NAND
$SNDK earnings 之后,我持有的一些有意思受益者:

Phison(TPE: 8299)和 Macronix(TPE: 2337)。

类似 Nanya(1,035.96% 1Y)填补了 $MU、Sk Hynix 和 Samsung 留下的 legacy dram 空缺:

Phison 对 Sandisk 的 flash(inventory)也在做同样的事。Macronix 则是 MLC NAND(自有 wafer fabs)。

所以这是另一个 “legacy void” play。

随着 $SNDK 把 NAND wafers 转向 enterprise SSDs 来专注 AI,Phison/Macronix 看起来会填补这个真空。

尤其当 Sk Hynix 和 Samsung 停止生产 MLC NAND、转去专注 HBM 时,legacy storage 的 “Last Man Standing” 就是这两家。

Phison 正坐拥 2024/2025 年大量低成本 NAND 库存。

Macronix 也在提高 MLC NAND 产量,填补 Samsung/SanDisk 转向后留下的空缺。

所以 Sandisk 留下的 Nanya v2:

Phison = 大量库存价差套利

Macronix = MLC NAND
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2017097752535322767
❤️ 365 🔁 30 💬 13
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Cycles. Are. Extremely Important. When timing markets.

Here's what I've learned so far over the years:

Basically, I got most of my knowledge from BTC cycles every 4 years since I started off in like 2016?

You can frontrun the halving event usually 8-12 months before and it usually leads to high returns (I did $MSTR options since there wasn't bitcoin ETFs back then and that hard carried my portfolio last halving event).

Usually Bitcoin goes first -> altcoins -> meme coins... and this keeps happening.

Similar process applies to almost every major upcoming bottleneck.

However, some exceptions being stuff like $RKLB, Space stuff. Rocketlab's Neutron is ~1 year away from testing and maybe like 2-3 years out for commercialization. Their revenue is extremely slim. But markets don't care, rockets are freaking cool.

However, for AI Capex, there's two different things for highest possible returns (public markets, same doesn't apply for VC):

1. Guessing... What's the next bottleneck/massive inflection point coming up?

Stupidly high returns for random companies if you know what's up and coming.

Maybe thermal bottleneck 2028 as chips approach 2000W+ and there's some niche material AlSiC with $CPSH out there that becomes standardized. Very low probability, who knows if you're trading off public information only.

Low probability, high risk, highest return.

2. (Before Inflection Point) - Around the point where you're getting qualified in hyperscaler supply chains. But haven't received order ramp yet. (Highest Returns)

Usually medium-high probability if you know like $AEHR... High return. But always a risk, that they just get designed out and nuked.

Stuff like $AEHR - getting a few hyperscaler orders for testing.
Stuff like $POET - backdoored into $MRVL Celestial $500m 2028, $1B 2029 ramp.
eg. "OFC FIT explicitly says powered by Poet Optical Interposer and the CTO on the floor today explicitly says Poet. Engineers, execs. from Marvel, Nvidia, Google, AWS on the floor talking about switching to ELS and talking about POET"
Stuff like $SIVE that i mentioned, Ayar, $POET and upstream laser supplier to hyperscaler supplier chains. No mass order ramp yet.

I pointed $AXTI in #2 stage back at $12, since they were already in hyperscaler supply chains, but not bottlenecked yet.

3. (Inflection Point Early Cycle) -

This is the easiest point. You see earnings. You see extreme projections. Just hold through volatility unless you see orders being dropped?

Best recent example is $AAOI, was in $28-32 or so because they were qualified with $MSFT, $AMZN just no orders. However they were projecting $378m/next year for pluggable optical transcievers, and are mass ramping.

Posted again at like $65 or $75 post earnings, and can just ride the wave. Obviously a lot of volatility, guesses with execution, but ride trend up.

4. (Inflection Point Mid Cycle) - Gains are less, but still obvious:

Eg. $SNDK. NAND 100% Q1, hike. NAND 100% Q2 hike. Operating income will be just stupid. It's already up 1000%+ but as long as there's no random NAND production spike, Sandisk will keep ramping up.

Stuff like SK Hynix, Samsung, are mid cycle too. Pricing peak is likely around H1 2027 from my guess?

Stuff like $LITE, $COHR for EML.

So you won't get like 400% returns in a year from Samsung, but another 100% is definitely possible.

5. End of Cycle / Structural Demand - Either your revenue starts dropping off a cliff, or demand becomes structural.

eg. $NVDA. You won't get 100% returns every year. But if demand (eg. GPU) is structural, it's a steady compounder.

eg. $ZOOM. End of a cycle from Covid. Just exit.

There's some nuanced onces like $HOOD. They peaked around crypto cycle, but idk if the 4 year halving cycle died because of treasury companies and US Gov support. But we'll find out.

I usually place most concentration in #4 for mid-cycle. Since they're safer, qualified, order ramping, and growing.

Quite a bit in #3 if it's high conviction. Less #2. And almost like <2% or less for #1. But if it ends up being 1000%+ that 2% allocation pays dividends anyway. Otherwise oh well?

So kinda ask yourself what's coming?
-> Thermal bottleneck in 2028? probably better to invest 8-12 months ahead in like 2027.
-> EML laser bottleneck now? Just ride the wave.
-> $AMKR advanced paclkaging facility coming online in early 2028? Maybe a bit early now, can re-enter in h1 2027 for better returns.
-> $NBIS is kinda in the middle #2 #3 for example. You know all the hyperscalers are putting in orders, but they're in their capex phase. But once all dilution is done, and they're turning all those DCs to FCF, you'll be at #4.
周期。在择时市场时极其重要。

这些年我学到的大概是:我大部分认知来自 BTC 每 4 年周期,差不多 2016 年开始。通常可以在 halving 前 8-12 个月抢跑,往往回报很高(上次 halving 我做 $MSTR options,因为当时还没有 bitcoin ETFs,它直接撑起了我的组合)。

通常 Bitcoin 先走 -> altcoins -> meme coins……一直这样重复。类似过程也适用于几乎所有即将出现的重大 bottleneck。

当然有些例外,比如 $RKLB、Space 这类。Rocketlab 的 Neutron 距离测试约 1 年,商业化可能 2-3 年,收入很薄。但市场不在乎,火箭就是很酷。

AI Capex 里,最高回报通常有几种情况(公开市场,VC 不一样):

1. 猜下一个 bottleneck / 巨大拐点是什么?

如果你知道什么要来了,随机公司可能给出离谱高回报。比如 2028 年 thermal bottleneck,芯片接近 2000W+,也许某个小众材料 AlSiC 和 $CPSH 会标准化。概率很低,只靠公开信息很难。

低概率、高风险、最高回报。

2. (拐点前)大概是你进入 hyperscaler 供应链认证,但还没拿到订单爬坡的时候。(最高回报)

如果你像看 $AEHR 那样研究清楚,通常中高概率、高回报。但也有被 design out 然后归零的风险。

比如 $AEHR 拿到几个 hyperscaler 测试订单;$POET 通过 $MRVL Celestial 间接进入 $500m 2028、$1B 2029 爬坡;我提到的 $SIVE、Ayar、$POET 以及 hyperscaler 供应链上游激光供应商,还没大规模订单爬坡。

我在 $12 时指出 $AXTI 处在 #2 阶段,因为它已经在 hyperscaler 供应链里,但还没成为瓶颈。

3. (拐点早周期)这是最容易的阶段。你看到财报,看到极端预测。除非订单被取消,否则就穿越波动。

最近最好例子是 $AAOI,在 $28-32 左右,因为它们通过了 $MSFT$AMZN 认证,只是还没订单。但他们预测明年可插拔 optical transcievers $378m,并且正在大规模爬坡。

财报后我又在 $65 或 $75 左右发过,可以直接骑趋势。当然波动很大,执行也有猜测,但就是 ride trend up。

4. (拐点中周期)回报少一些,但依然明显:

比如 $SNDK。NAND Q1 涨 100%,Q2 又涨 100%,运营利润会很夸张。它已经涨 1000%+,但只要没有随机 NAND 产量暴增,Sandisk 还会继续爬坡。

SK Hynix、Samsung 也处在中周期。我的猜测是价格峰值大概 H1 2027?$LITE$COHR 的 EML 也类似。

所以你不会从 Samsung 一年赚 400%,但再赚 100% 绝对可能。

5. 周期末 / 结构性需求 - 要么收入断崖下跌,要么需求变成结构性。

比如 $NVDA,不可能每年都拿 100% 回报。但如果需求(如 GPU)是结构性的,它就是稳健复利标的。比如 $ZOOM 是 Covid 周期结束,直接退出。

有些更微妙,比如 $HOOD。它们围绕 crypto cycle 见顶,但我不知道 4 年 halving cycle 会不会因为 treasury companies 和美国政府支持而失效,之后会知道。

我通常把最大集中度放在 #4 中周期,因为更安全、已认证、订单爬坡、在增长。高 conviction 会放不少在 #3,#2 少一些,#1 基本 <2%。但如果 #1 最后 1000%+,2% 仓位也很有用。否则就算了。

所以问问自己,接下来是什么?
-> 2028 thermal bottleneck?也许 2027 提前 8-12 个月投更好。
-> EML laser bottleneck 现在?直接 ride the wave。
-> $AMKR advanced paclkaging facility 2028 年初上线?现在可能早了点,H1 2027 再进回报更好。
-> $NBIS 有点处在 #2 #3 中间。你知道 hyperscalers 都在下单,但他们还在 capex 阶段。等稀释结束,所有 DC 转成 FCF,就会到 #4。
❤️ 437 🔁 15 💬 49
打开原推
💬 引用
Normally don’t respond to trolls, but the hypocrisy on this platform is pretty impressive.

Random X retail:

“Why didn’t you tell me about $LITE before it went up 1000% already?”

Me:

“Posts my thesis about the next possible $LITE at the very beginning, without paywalls.”

X retail:

😡, “I’m going to pay $400 for a paywall to long $ADBE and short $PLTR instead”.

Especially after my $AXTI thesis that already went from $12->$50 in 3 months...

I distribute all my thought processes for free.

And markets can price in any alpha immediately or however they want. (I get things wrong as well, especially with names like $ETOR that crashed from $65 to $33).

However, instead of the original model where analysts sell a thesis for $2000+ to other hedge funds to slowly accumulate.

Then retail buys at $40 billion+ as seen with $LITE.

My account’s been growing because I’m one of the few analysts to break that model. And I distribute novel information synthesis for free to everyone.

Stocks are a positive sum game where everyone benefits if a thesis is directionally correct.
一般不回 troll,但这个平台的虚伪挺惊人的。

随机 X 散户:“为什么你不在 $LITE 已经涨 1000% 前告诉我?”

我:“在最开始免费发下一个可能的 $LITE thesis,没有 paywall。”

X 散户:😡,“我要花 $400 买 paywall 去 long $ADBE、short $PLTR”。

尤其是在我的 $AXTI thesis 已经 3 个月从 $12->$50 之后……

我把所有思考过程都免费分享。市场可以立刻或按它想要的方式给任何 alpha 定价。(我也会错,尤其像 $ETOR 从 $65 跌到 $33 这种。)

但这不同于原来的模式:分析师把 thesis 卖 $2000+ 给其他对冲基金,让他们慢慢吸筹。然后散户在 $40 billion+ 时才买进,就像 $LITE

我的账号一直增长,是因为我是少数打破这个模式的分析师之一。我把新的信息综合免费发给所有人。

股票是正和游戏,如果 thesis 方向正确,所有人都能受益。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SIVE is now up +73.78% today ($231M MC).

As markets price in information synthesis of the next potential $LITE of photonics.

If I had to explain the difference:

One laser source in Lumentum primarily benefits from current optical bottlenecks.

The other in $SIVE is for the upcoming CPO/Silicon Photonic bottleneck.

Lumentum is largely benefiting right now from $NVDA and hyperscalers securing capacity of EML lasers for current pluggable optical transceivers cycles.

As seen with the current EML bottleneck, hyperscalers are buying out any 800G/1.6T transceiver + upstream capacity from:

- $AAOI (in-house)
- $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers + design) -> $FN (assembly)
- $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers) -> Innolight / Eoptolink

What's next?

Silicon Photonics and Co-Packaged Optics.

The architectural shift to CPO requires massive arrays of high-power CW DFB lasers.

And this would likely trigger a complete, sudden paradigm shift in volume demand.

$SIVE benefits from InP CW DFB lasers for SiPh and CPO:

The up and coming companies like:

$AYAR, $POET source $SIVE lasers, but primarily do advanced packaging.

Then they feed up to larger companies like $MRVL Celestial (that buy $POET's interposers).

However, if you go upstream, the light source is $SIVE.

CW DFB lasers are light engine ( $SIVE ); the silicon photonics package ( $POET and others) is how it gets transmitted.

CPO scale is not there yet. But we know it's coming.

And as seen with current optical transceiver cycles:

- Light sources from $LITE and $COHR demand much higher valuations than companies like $FN that focus on advanced packaging.

Markets have been focusing on $POET, but missed where they get the actual $LITE type light source for Starlight.

The risks are present including facing multi-source competition with $LITE, $COHR, $AVGO, and others. So again, make sure to do your own research.

But my argument against that:

Sivers been early enough to tailor custom lasers to fit $POET, Ayar, and other specifications before they got popular (sort like the $POET to $MRVL Celestial analogy).

There's volume risks as well:

But the potential Win Semi qualification offsets that.

Dilution risk to scale capacity, is always present with every early-stage company as well.

I did my thesis on $LITE last year and still love the stock for Google TPU ramp/OCS.

But this year, I'm focusing on:

$SIVE, as my personal CW DFB laser exposure for the new photonics architectural shift.

I’m sharing my own thoughts on capturing the rotation from the current EML cycle to the upcoming CW DFB/Silicon Photonics cycle.
$SIVE 今天现在涨了 +73.78%($231M MC)。

市场开始给 photonics 里下一个潜在 $LITE 的信息综合定价。

如果我必须解释区别:

Lumentum 的一个 laser source 主要受益于当前光学瓶颈。

$SIVE 是为了即将到来的 CPO/Silicon Photonic 瓶颈。

Lumentum 现在主要受益于 $NVDA 和 hyperscalers 为当前 pluggable optical transceivers 周期锁定 EML lasers 产能。

从当前 EML 瓶颈可以看到,hyperscalers 正在买光任何 800G/1.6T transceiver + 上游产能:

- $AAOI (in-house)
- $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers + design) -> $FN (assembly)
- $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers) -> Innolight / Eoptolink

接下来是什么?

Silicon Photonics 和 Co-Packaged Optics。

转向 CPO 的架构变化,需要大量高功率 CW DFB lasers 阵列。

这很可能会触发一次完整、突然的需求量范式转变。

$SIVE 受益于用于 SiPh 和 CPO 的 InP CW DFB lasers:

这些新兴公司,比如:

$AYAR$POET 采购 $SIVE lasers,但它们主要做 advanced packaging。

然后它们再供给更大的公司,比如 $MRVL Celestial(购买 $POET 的 interposers)。

但如果你往上游看,light source 是 $SIVE

CW DFB lasers 是 light engine($SIVE);silicon photonics package($POET 等)是传输方式。

CPO 规模还没起来。但我们知道它要来了。

而且从当前 optical transceiver 周期可以看到:

- 来自 $LITE$COHR 的 Light sources,估值会远高于像 $FN 这种专注 advanced packaging 的公司。

市场一直盯着 $POET,但漏掉了 Starlight 真正的 $LITE 型 light source 来自哪里。

风险确实存在,包括面对 $LITE$COHR$AVGO 等多源竞争。所以再次提醒,请自己做研究。

但我反驳这一点的理由是:

Sivers 足够早,已经在 $POET、Ayar 还没火起来前,就根据它们的规格定制 lasers(有点像 $POET$MRVL Celestial 的类比)。

也有 volume 风险:

但潜在的 Win Semi qualification 可以抵消一部分。

为了扩产的稀释风险,对每个早期公司也一直存在。

我去年做过 $LITE 的 thesis,到现在仍然喜欢它在 Google TPU ramp/OCS 上的股票。

但今年,我关注的是:

$SIVE,作为我个人对新 photonics 架构转变的 CW DFB laser exposure。

我是在分享自己如何捕捉从当前 EML 周期,轮动到即将到来的 CW DFB/Silicon Photonics 周期。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033695716938551350
❤️ 941 🔁 16 💬 77
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE is now up +73.78% today ($231M MC).

As markets price in information synthesis of the next potential $LITE of photonics.

If I had to explain the difference:

One laser source in Lumentum primarily benefits from current optical bottlenecks.

The other in $SIVE is for the upcoming CPO/Silicon Photonic bottleneck.

Lumentum is largely benefiting right now from $NVDA and hyperscalers securing capacity of EML lasers for current pluggable optical transceivers cycles.

As seen with the current EML bottleneck, hyperscalers are buying out any 800G/1.6T transceiver + upstream capacity from:

- $AAOI (in-house)
- $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers + design) -> $FN (assembly)
- $COHR, $LITE (EML lasers) -> Innolight / Eoptolink

What's next?

Silicon Photonics and Co-Packaged Optics.

The architectural shift to CPO requires massive arrays of high-power CW DFB lasers.

And this would likely trigger a complete, sudden paradigm shift in volume demand.

$SIVE benefits from InP CW DFB lasers for SiPh and CPO:

The up and coming companies like:

$AYAR, $POET source $SIVE lasers, but primarily do advanced packaging.

Then they feed up to larger companies like $MRVL Celestial (that buy $POET's interposers).

However, if you go upstream, the light source is $SIVE.

CW DFB lasers are light engine ( $SIVE ); the silicon photonics package ( $POET and others) is how it gets transmitted.

CPO scale is not there yet. But we know it's coming.

And as seen with current optical transceiver cycles:

- Light sources from $LITE and $COHR demand much higher valuations than companies like $FN that focus on advanced packaging.

Markets have been focusing on $POET, but missed where they get the actual $LITE type light source for Starlight.

The risks are present including facing multi-source competition with $LITE, $COHR, $AVGO, and others. So again, make sure to do your own research.

But my argument against that:

Sivers been early enough to tailor custom lasers to fit $POET, Ayar, and other specifications before they got popular (sort like the $POET to $MRVL Celestial analogy).

There's volume risks as well:

But the potential Win Semi qualification offsets that.

Dilution risk to scale capacity, is always present with every early-stage company as well.

I did my thesis on $LITE last year and still love the stock for Google TPU ramp/OCS.

But this year, I'm focusing on:

$SIVE, as my personal CW DFB laser exposure for the new photonics architectural shift.

I’m sharing my own thoughts on capturing the rotation from the current EML cycle to the upcoming CW DFB/Silicon Photonics cycle.
$SIVE 今天涨了 +73.78%($231M MC)。

市场开始给 photonics 下一个潜在 $LITE 的信息综合定价。

差别是:Lumentum 的激光源主要受益于当前 optical bottlenecks;而 $SIVE 是为了即将到来的 CPO/Silicon Photonic bottleneck。

Lumentum 现在主要受益于 $NVDA 和 hyperscalers 为当前可插拔 optical transceivers 周期锁定 EML lasers 产能。当前 EML bottleneck 已经表明,hyperscalers 会买光 800G/1.6T transceiver + 上游产能:

- $AAOI(in-house)
- $COHR, $LITE(EML lasers + design)-> $FN(assembly)
- $COHR, $LITE(EML lasers)-> Innolight / Eoptolink

接下来是 Silicon Photonics 和 Co-Packaged Optics。CPO 架构转变需要大量高功率 CW DFB lasers 阵列,这很可能触发需求量的突然范式转移。

$SIVE 受益于 SiPh 和 CPO 所需的 InP CW DFB lasers。$AYAR$POET 采购 $SIVE lasers,但主要做 advanced packaging,然后再供给 $MRVL Celestial 这类更大公司。

往上游看,光源就是 $SIVE。CW DFB lasers 是 light engine($SIVE);silicon photonics package($POET 等)负责传输。

CPO 规模还没起来,但我们知道会来。当前 optical transceiver 周期已经证明,$LITE$COHR 这种 light sources 估值远高于 $FN 这种 advanced packaging 公司。

市场一直盯着 $POET,却错过了 Starlight 实际拿 $LITE 类型光源的地方。

风险包括和 $LITE$COHR$AVGO 等多源竞争,所以还是要 DYOR。但 Sivers 很早就为 $POET、Ayar 等规格定制激光。也有量的风险,但潜在 Win Semi 认证能抵消一部分。扩产稀释风险对每家早期公司都存在。

我去年做过 $LITE thesis,现在仍然喜欢它,因为 Google TPU ramp/OCS。但今年我关注 $SIVE,作为我个人对新 photonics 架构转移的 CW DFB laser 敞口。

我在分享自己如何捕捉从当前 EML 周期到即将到来的 CW DFB/Silicon Photonics 周期的轮动。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I’m long $SIVE at $140M.

I believe this is the next $LITE that markets and institutions missed.

$SIVE makes InP CW DFB lasers.

Closest comparison is $LITE in the current EML laser bottleneck.

But instead of supplying to Innolight/Eoptolink for current optical transceivers cycles.

They supply the lasers to $POET Starlight, Ayar SuperNova.

And others for the future CPO/silicon photonics architectures spearheaded by $NVDA.

Current valuations make 0 sense to me personally. 



$POET is advanced packaging for $SIVE type lasers…

But $POET commands worth 11x+ more than the company making the laser itself?



It’s feels like valuing a more advanced $FN (~$20B) packaging at $400B when $LITE is valued at $40B. 



So now at $130m:

-

- You have a likely mini $LITE like laser supplier to Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers through $POET. 



- Laser supplier to Ayar ( $NVDA, $INTC ), though they do multi source with $LITE, Sumitomo, $MTSI.

And other potential up and coming suppliers potentially like Lightmatter that they’ve name dropped (eg. Q2 2023 earnings). This is unconfirmed but supply chain BOM is confidential. 



On top, for revenue, they expected $453M "pipeline next few years”.



And, they have capacity expansion through WIN: “Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers."



Sivers feels the silicon photonics/CPO version of $LITE, with actual rapidly growing customers like Celestial through $POET, Ayar, with more to come.



I wouldn’t have liked it last year, but just 3 weeks ago, they refinanced all their debt successfully to $12M convertible loan (10.85%) and a $5M term loan (12%), which cleans up debt.



It’s $17m total, which feels like nothing to US markets when $AAOI is doing a $500m ATMs every other week.

Best of all, this is their pure play inp laser segment for silicon/photonics + cpo. 

Their Lidar segment is ramping up and they have $53-138M projected revenue coming in.



Downside risk:

- execution (as always)

- dilution to scale up capacity to compete with $LITE and others.
- $LITE, $COHR competition on scale after $NVDA just gave them $4B
- CPO ramp gets delayed.



I have no clue how, $LWLG, a pre-revenue science project with $TSEM, is valued at $1B+ MC.



Or how $POET, is worth ~9-10x more than its laser supplier. 



When $SIVE, the mini $LITE equivalent for CPO/Silicon photonics, is valued at $140M.

I do believe this is largely undiscovered by institutions, since this is some random company in OMX Nordic Exchange (similar to micro $AXTI before I started posting about the inp substrate bottleneck). 



But I do think it will get a lot of institutional attention as Celestial and Ayar scale up.

Especially if $POET and $SIVE gets qualified with other customers. 



If CPO completely replaces pluggable transceivers in the next generation of hyperscaler architectures.

Sivers, with possible WIN Semi qualifcation and if they become the multi-source lasers for NVIDIA, Marvell, Intel, and Broadcom architectures, can be strongly rerated.

Just as how $LITE did today going from $16 -> $622.

This is just my personal thesis I'm sharing, DYOR/NFI.

TLDR:

InP Lasers are the current bottleneck in photonics as seen with $LITE valuations. 



$SIVE looks like the mini $LITE for the upcoming CPO/Silicon Photonics ramp.



I personally took long position in $SIVE, as I believe they’re a large beneficiary of the upcoming silicon photonic/CPO architectural changes by $NVDA (with GTC cataylst). 



The upside here just way too compelling for me personally as the next possible $LITE.
我在 $140M 时做多 $SIVE

我认为这是市场和机构错过的下一个 $LITE

$SIVE 做 InP CW DFB lasers。

最接近的对标,是当前 EML laser 瓶颈里的 $LITE

但它不是给 Innolight/Eoptolink 供应当前光模块周期的东西。

它给 $POET Starlight、Ayar SuperNova 供应 lasers。

也给其他由 $NVDA 推动的未来 CPO/silicon photonics 架构供应。

我个人觉得当前估值完全说不通。

$POET 是给 $SIVE 这类 lasers 做 advanced packaging……

$POET 的估值居然比真正做 laser 的公司高 11x+?

这感觉就像在 $LITE 估值 $40B 时,把更先进的 $FN(~$20B)packaging 估到 $400B。

所以现在 $130m:

- 你拿到的是一个可能的 mini $LITE,作为 Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers 通过 $POET 的 laser supplier。

- 也是 Ayar($NVDA$INTC)的 laser supplier,虽然他们也会和 $LITE、Sumitomo、$MTSI 多源采购。

还有其他潜在的新兴客户,比如他们提到过的 Lightmatter(例如 Q2 2023 earnings)。这还未确认,因为 supply chain BOM 是保密的。

收入方面,他们预计“未来几年 pipeline”有 $453M。

他们还通过 WIN 扩产:“Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers.”

Sivers 感觉就是 silicon photonics/CPO 版本的 $LITE,有 Celestial 通过 $POET、Ayar 这些真正快速增长的客户,而且后面还会更多。

去年我不会喜欢它,但就在 3 周前,他们成功把所有债务再融资成 $12M 可转债(10.85%)和 $5M term loan(12%),清理了债务。

总共 $17m,对美国市场来说几乎不算什么,$AAOI 隔三差五就在做 $500m ATM。

最棒的是,这是他们针对 silicon/photonics + cpo 的纯 InP laser segment。他们的 Lidar segment 也在放量,并预计有 $53-138M 收入进来。

下行风险:
- 执行(永远都有)
- 为了扩产和 $LITE 等竞争而稀释
- $NVDA 刚给 $LITE$COHR $4B 后,它们在规模上的竞争
- CPO 放量延迟

我真不知道,$LWLG 这种和 $TSEM 相关、还没收入的科研项目,怎么能有 $1B+ 市值。

或者 $POET 怎么能值它 laser supplier 的 ~9-10x。

$SIVE,这个 CPO/Silicon photonics 的 mini $LITE 等价物,只有 $140M。

我确实认为它很大程度上还没被机构发现,因为这是 OMX Nordic Exchange 上一家随机公司(类似我开始发 InP substrate 瓶颈前的微型 $AXTI)。

但我觉得随着 Celestial 和 Ayar 放量,它会获得很多机构关注。

尤其如果 $POET$SIVE 获得其他客户认证。

如果 CPO 在下一代 hyperscaler 架构里完全替代 pluggable transceivers。

Sivers 如果完成可能的 WIN Semi qualification,并成为 NVIDIA、Marvell、Intel、Broadcom 架构的多源 lasers,会被强力重估。

就像 $LITE 今天从 $16 -> $622 一样。

这只是我分享的个人 thesis,DYOR/NFI。

TLDR:

$LITE 的估值可以看到,InP Lasers 是当前 photonics 的瓶颈。

$SIVE 看起来像即将到来的 CPO/Silicon Photonics 放量里的 mini $LITE

我个人已经做多 $SIVE,因为我认为它会成为 $NVDA 推动的下一轮 silicon photonic/CPO 架构变化(带 GTC catalyst)的重要受益者。

这里作为下一个潜在 $LITE 的 upside,对我个人来说太有吸引力了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033466880661606646
❤️ 408 🔁 47 💬 42
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Still debating Nokia after Infinera since they now have a 6n InP fab for 2026 ramp.

I personally have a tiny bit… but I don’t see their photonics growth strongly hardcarrying their telecom business.

Feels like more concentration in $COHR and $TSEM are just better?

Does anyone have a more solid bull case I’m missing
Infinera 之后还在纠结 Nokia,因为他们现在有一个 6n InP fab,准备 2026 ramp。

我个人有一点点……但我不觉得他们的 photonics growth 能强到硬扛整个 telecom business。

感觉更多集中在 $COHR$TSEM 会更好?

有人有我错过的更扎实 bull case 吗?
❤️ 123 🔁 0 💬 26
打开原推
💬 引用
American Robotics vs. Chinese Robotics.

Are we cooked chat?

Today Jensen Showcased a live demo of basically Frosty the Snowman at $NVDA GTC.

This is following $QLCM's robot falling over at a demo.

Meanwhile over in China, there's random robots out there sprinting marathons around the city.
American Robotics vs. Chinese Robotics。

我们是不是完了,chat?

今天 Jensen 在 $NVDA GTC 展示了一个 live demo,基本像 Frosty the Snowman。

这紧接着 $QLCM 的机器人在 demo 上摔倒。

与此同时中国那边,随便一些机器人已经在城市里跑马拉松了。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
https://t.co/6xoodaH87j
https://t.co/6xoodaH87j
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033155882809479239
❤️ 401 🔁 16 💬 41
打开原推
💬 引用
Just a reminder:

While the entire community was doomposting about memory names.

From $EWY (SK Hynix, Samsung), $MU and $SNDK.

during the initial Iran conflict.

Sayin “Kospi and memory names would drop 30-40% because of Helium or LNG.”

I was one of the only few analysts that remained bullish the entire time.

As I actually did the research to back up my claims about little material disruption of LNG, Crude, and Helium.

The Iran conflict is still ongoing, and there’s a lot of unknowns still regarding potential oil spikes:

But fear and sensational headlines drive short term prices. Operating income drives long term prices.

Just know that directionally, memory is critical to the AI buildout.

United Stares wont let their buildout stall, and lose China, in AI - the most transformative technology in history.

Over a Middle East conflict.
提醒一下:

当整个社区都在 doomposting memory names 的时候,

$EWY(SK Hynix、Samsung)、$MU$SNDK

在伊朗冲突初期,

他们说 “Kospi 和 memory names 会因为 Helium 或 LNG 跌 30-40%”。

我是少数几个一直 bullish 的分析师之一。

因为我确实做了研究来支持 LNG、Crude、Helium 没有实质性重大扰动的观点。

伊朗冲突仍在继续,关于潜在 oil spikes 还有很多未知。

但恐惧和耸动标题驱动短期价格。Operating income 驱动长期价格。

只要知道,方向上 memory 对 AI buildout 至关重要。

美国不会因为一场中东冲突,就让自己的 buildout 停滞,并在 AI 这个历史上最具变革性的技术上输给中国。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The sentiment around KOSPI | $EWY (SK Hynix / Samsung) on

Crude Oil / LNG / Helium either:

Disrupting Supply or Compressing Margins are overblown.

The supply chain disruption and energy cost threats to SK Hynix, Samsung are sensationalized noise.

Here's why:

1. Crude Oil:

The a likely scenario if oil prices increase 31% and oil floats to $120/bbl:

In this case, the effect on oil has almost no material impact on SK Hynix and South Korean memory equities.

There are increased energy costs via oil-pegged LNG/JKM prices on Korean equities, mainly for companies surviving on razor-thin 5% to 10% margins.

However, a KEPCO 70% rate hike has little material affect on Samsung/SK Hynix, given memory prices have soared with Samsung doubling NAND prices Q2.

From disclosed financial from, their SK Hynix's annual electricity bill exceeds ₩1 trillion per DIGITIMES (~$750M). Which against FY2025 revenue of ₩97.15 trillion represents roughly 1–2% of revenue.

SK Hynix posted a 58% operating margin in Q4 2025. Against this backdrop, the energy cost shock is small:

If we model a 50% increase in energy costs:

- Hit to SK Hynix quarterly OP (₩19.17T): ~₩134 billion-~₩146 billion (0.76%)

- Hit to Samsung DS quarterly OP (₩16.4T): ~₩407 billion (2.4%)

Every 50% energy cost spike would shave roughly .7% off SK Hynix margins and 2.4% off Samsung operating margins.

Analysts project SK Hynix margins could reach 70%+ on conventional DRAM in 2026. Energy costs do not meaningfully threaten Korean semiconductor operating margins, even if they were to increase by 100%.

However, this is material to companies with low operating margins of 5-10%

The Losers: Traditional heavy manufacturing (steel, basic chemicals, standard flat glass).
The Winners: Samsung/SK Hynix.

The main risk is second-order effects on supply chains such as increased material costs. This is very hard to model, but in an example where:

an industrial company forces 30% price hikes on raw materials (chemicals, specialty gases), it barely dents the fabs.

Materials are roughly 15-20% of semiconductor COGS, so mathematically, a 30% spike in material costs only shaves an additional ~2% off SK Hynix's operating margins.

A combined 3-4% direct (utilities) and indirect (materials) energy headwind is easily absorbed by an oligopoly printing 70% margins (and increasing prices).

In majority of cases, the costs likely get passed down to hyperscalers through NAND/DRAM price hikes.

In the very worst case scenario of oil prices increasing 3x or 5x.

The main affect on oil increasing hundreds of percent are two factors:

- Global macroeconomic shock, causing global inflation (affecting every single company, from $GOOGL to $COST).

- KRW (South korean Won) USD/KRW exchange rate blowout.

KRW depreciation from sustained high oil is a real second order risk, but historically Korean memory exporters benefit from won weakness on the revenue side. The majority of Samsung/SK Hynix sales are dollar denominated wheras costs are won denominated. So a weaker KRW is actually margin accretive for exporters, which partially offsets the energy cost headwind.

But in an extreme case of oil prices hiking 5x, the only longs in that apocalyptic world are crude oil itself, defense contractors like $LMT / $NOC, domestic US energy producers, and the US Dollar.

This is unlikely to happen.

The financial media and algorithms will likely panic, but , if crude oil goes from $91 to $120 and KEPCO increases energy costs:

The data shows there's little affect on Samsung / SK Hynix in specific, and the main impact are on players with razer-thin operating margins.

2. LNG:

If the Hormuz closed, the majority of South Korea’s LNG imports would be unaffected.

The media has been quoting Hormuz + LNG flows going to China, INdia, SK, and Japan. But if we look at the trade data from South Korea, that’s just a fraction of their total imports.

Majority of imports arrive via Hormuz free routes, eg. Australia (24.6%), US (12.2%), Malaysia, Indonesia (~20%), and Russia/Sakhalin (~4.6%). Then the rest filled in with minor sources from Nigeria, Peru, Brunei, PNG, etc.

The 82% of 2024 important were long term contracts that were oil-indexed, and as we've modeled above, increasing energy costs would hurt opex by 1-2% per 50% increase, but given DRAM/NAND price hikes and operating margins hitting 70%+, this would make a very little dent.

Even if they did, costs would be passed onto hyperscalers.

South Korea learned their lesson from 2022 and diversified sources, and there's little impact on LNG supply disruption. The main concern is oil impacting hiking of LNG.

3. Helium:

SK Hynix statement: “Long secured diverse supply chains and sufficient inventory" of helium.

"Therefore there is almost no chance that the company will be affected [by helium].

The reality is larger players like $TSM to SK Hynix have diversified their supply chains against foreign events.

Helium is critical to semiconductor supply chains, but the media narrative is sensational. Especially when the largest memory company puts out an assertive statement that there’s no chance the company [SK Hynix] will be affected.

_

But to South Korean equities in Samsung/SK Hynix, fears around Oil/LNG/Helium look disconnected from reality:

The algorithms selling off SK Hynix because of helium and KEPCO rate hikes are acting on bad math. It is fundamentally a supply chain non-issue.

The main threat is oil and energy costs on global macroeconomic shock affecting everything from consumer goods to inflation.

March 3 "Black Tuesday" crash dropped KOSPI dropped 7.2% and SK Hynix fell 11.5% in a single session on exactly these energy security fears as the main catalyst. Of course, forced liquidations from leverage added fuel to the fire.

However, the disconnect between fundamentals and price action is the trade. If margins were actually threatened, the selloff would be justified.

But, the sell-off destroyed more value in one day than DECADES of hiked energy cost increases could have.

The fact that the math doesn't support the fear is precisely why it's Korea is a buy, as markets are selling off on emotion rather than looking at the structural expanding profitability despite increasing oil/energy costs.
KOSPI | $EWY(SK Hynix / Samsung)围绕 Crude Oil / LNG / Helium 的情绪,认为它们会:

扰乱供应或压缩利润率,这些担忧被夸大了。

对 SK Hynix、Samsung 的供应链扰动和能源成本威胁,更多是被媒体煽动的 noise。

原因如下:

1. Crude Oil:

如果油价上涨 31%,飘到 $120/bbl:

这种情况下,油价对 SK Hynix 和韩国 memory equities 几乎没有实质影响。

韩国股票会因为与油价挂钩的 LNG/JKM 价格,面临更高能源成本,主要影响的是那些靠 5% 到 10% 微薄利润率生存的公司。

但考虑到 Samsung Q2 NAND 价格翻倍、memory prices 飙升,KEPCO 70% 电价上涨对 Samsung/SK Hynix 的实质影响很小。

按披露数据,SK Hynix 年电费根据 DIGITIMES 超过 ₩1 trillion(~$750M)。相对 FY2025 revenue ₩97.15 trillion,大概只占收入 1-2%。

SK Hynix 2025 Q4 operating margin 是 58%。在这个背景下,能源成本冲击很小:

如果我们建模能源成本上涨 50%:

- 对 SK Hynix quarterly OP(₩19.17T)的打击:~₩134 billion-~₩146 billion(0.76%)

- 对 Samsung DS quarterly OP(₩16.4T)的打击:~₩407 billion(2.4%)

每 50% 能源成本上涨,大概只会削掉 SK Hynix .7% margin,Samsung operating margins 2.4%。

分析师预计 2026 年 SK Hynix conventional DRAM margins 可能达到 70%+。即便能源成本上涨 100%,也不会实质威胁韩国半导体 operating margins。

但这对 operating margins 只有 5-10% 的公司是实质影响。

输家:传统重工业(钢铁、基础化工、普通平板玻璃)。
赢家:Samsung/SK Hynix。

主要风险是供应链二阶影响,比如材料成本上升。这很难建模,但举例说:

如果工业公司把原材料(化学品、specialty gases)涨价 30%,对 fabs 的影响仍然很小。

材料大概占 semiconductor COGS 的 15-20%,所以数学上,材料成本涨 30%,只会额外削掉 SK Hynix operating margins 约 ~2%。

直接(utilities)+ 间接(materials)合计 3-4% 的能源逆风,很容易被一个正在印 70% margins(并且还在涨价)的 oligopoly 吸收。

多数情况下,这些成本会通过 NAND/DRAM 涨价传导给 hyperscalers。

在最坏情况下,油价上涨 3x 或 5x。

油价上涨数百个百分点的主要影响是两个因素:

- 全球宏观冲击,造成全球通胀(影响从 $GOOGL$COST 的每家公司)。

- KRW(South korean Won)USD/KRW 汇率爆掉。

持续高油价造成 KRW 贬值是一个真实二阶风险,但历史上韩国 memory exporters 会在收入端受益于韩元走弱。Samsung/SK Hynix 大部分销售以美元计价,而成本以韩元计价。所以 KRW 走弱实际上会增厚出口商利润率,部分抵消能源成本逆风。

但如果油价涨 5x 的极端末日情景,那个世界里唯一能 long 的就是原油本身、$LMT / $NOC 这样的 defense contractors、美国本土能源生产商和 US Dollar。

这种情况不太可能发生。

金融媒体和算法大概率会恐慌,但如果 crude oil 从 $91 到 $120,KEPCO 提高能源成本:

数据表明,对 Samsung / SK Hynix 特定影响很小,主要影响是那些 razor-thin operating margins 的玩家。

2. LNG:

如果 Hormuz 关闭,South Korea 大部分 LNG imports 不会受影响。

媒体一直引用经过 Hormuz 的 LNG flows 去 China、India、SK 和 Japan。但如果看 South Korea 的贸易数据,那只是总进口的一小部分。

大多数进口来自不经过 Hormuz 的路线,比如 Australia(24.6%)、US(12.2%)、Malaysia、Indonesia(~20%)、Russia/Sakhalin(~4.6%)。剩下由 Nigeria、Peru、Brunei、PNG 等小来源补充。

2024 年 82% 的 imports 是长期合同,并且与油价挂钩;如上面建模,能源成本每上涨 50%,opex 只受 1-2% 影响,而 DRAM/NAND 涨价、operating margins 到 70%+,这点影响很小。

即使真的有影响,成本也会转嫁给 hyperscalers。

South Korea 从 2022 年吸取了教训并多元化来源,LNG 供应中断影响很小。主要担心是油价推高 LNG。

3. Helium:

SK Hynix 声明:“Long secured diverse supply chains and sufficient inventory” of helium。

“Therefore there is almost no chance that the company will be affected [by helium].”

现实是,从 $TSM 到 SK Hynix 这些大玩家,都已经针对海外事件多元化供应链。

Helium 对半导体供应链很关键,但媒体叙事很煽情。尤其是最大的 memory 公司已经强硬表态,公司 [SK Hynix] 几乎没有可能受影响。

_

所以对 Samsung/SK Hynix 这类韩国股票来说,Oil/LNG/Helium 的恐惧看起来脱离现实:

因为 helium 和 KEPCO 电价上涨而卖出 SK Hynix 的算法,是基于错误数学。基本上这是一个供应链非问题。

主要威胁是油价和能源成本对全球宏观的冲击,影响从消费品到通胀的一切。

3 月 3 日 “Black Tuesday” 崩盘,KOSPI 单日跌 7.2%,SK Hynix 跌 11.5%,主催化正是这些能源安全恐惧。当然,杠杆强平也火上浇油。

但 fundamentals 和 price action 的错位,就是这笔 trade。如果 margins 真受到威胁,selloff 就合理。

但这次 sell-off 一天内摧毁的价值,比几十年能源成本上涨造成的影响还多。

数学不支持恐惧,这正是 Korea 是 buy 的原因,因为市场是在情绪化抛售,而不是看能源成本上升下结构性扩张的盈利能力。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2030667380855083222
❤️ 665 🔁 37 💬 44
打开原推
💬 引用
My top two picks for CPO & Silicon Photonics:

1. $SOI is up 7.05%
2. $TSEM is up 11.03%

In just one day.

Names like tower are large $15 Billion+ foundries for photonics.

While names like Soitec are multi-billion dollar substrate companies.

Markets really seem to like my higher conviction individual photonic names.
我 CPO & Silicon Photonics 的前两大选择:

1. $SOI 涨 7.05%
2. $TSEM 涨 11.03%

就在一天内。

像 tower 这样的名字,是 photonics 里 $15 Billion+ 的大型 foundry。

而 Soitec 这种是数十亿美元 substrate 公司。

市场看起来真的喜欢我高 conviction 的单个 photonic 名字。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I'm long $TSEM, the $TSM of photonics.

My top two picks for CPO are $SOI and Tower Semi.

Given the $NVDA GTC catalyst on new photonic related architecture next week:

I expect Tower Semi to get a huge catalyst.

Nvidia laready directly collaborated with Tower to scale 1.6T silicon photonics last month (hint hint for GTC), likely pushing the downstream players to use it.

And now, Tower is the leading supplier of 1.6T SiPh PICs and the primary foundry for scale-up CPO architectures. (the other being global foundries)

From my forward est:
2028 Forward P/E: ~16.8x to ~18.1x

(Tower set a target $2.84B revenue by 2028, with ~31.7% operating margin, ~$750M in net profit)

The thing to note is over 70% of their planned SiPh capacity is already reserved through 2028. And photonics haven't even ramped up yet.

So, I expect them to strongly beat earning projections due to extreme photonics scaling + allocations price hikes that's not modeled into projections.

Also, $TSEM is heavily de-risked by 70% of capacity already being reserved. MC is likely due to $TSEM being a very obscure upstream player in the photonics supply chain.

But I expect the $NVDA GTC conference to be that catalyst that brings it to premium valuations.

I'm long $TSEM as an asymmetrical upside for upstream photonics foundry layer.
我做多 $TSEM,它就是光子领域的 $TSM

我对 CPO 的前两大选择是 $SOI 和 Tower Semi。

考虑到下周 $NVDA GTC 对新的光子相关架构有催化:

我预计 Tower Semi 会迎来巨大催化。

Nvidia 上个月已经直接和 Tower 合作,扩大 1.6T 硅光规模(给 GTC 的暗示),很可能推动下游玩家使用它。

现在,Tower 是 1.6T SiPh PIC 的领先供应商,也是 scale-up CPO 架构的主要晶圆厂(另一个是 global foundries)。

按我的前瞻估算:
2028 Forward P/E:约 16.8x 到 18.1x

(Tower 设定了 2028 年 $2.84B 收入目标,约 31.7% 经营利润率,约 $750M 净利润)

需要注意的是,他们规划中的 SiPh 产能超过 70% 已经预定到 2028 年。而光子还没真正放量。

所以我预计他们会因为极端的光子扩产 + allocation 涨价,大幅超过盈利预测,而这些还没有被模型计入。

另外,$TSEM 也因为 70% 产能已被预定而大幅去风险。市值可能是因为 $TSEM 是光子供应链里非常冷门的上游玩家。

但我预计 $NVDA GTC 会成为让它获得溢价估值的催化。

我做多 $TSEM,把它当作上游光子晶圆厂层的非对称上行机会。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031820871170736570
❤️ 510 🔁 36 💬 31
打开原推
💬 引用
$SIVE is now up 50%+, to a $190 million USD MC (~1.8B SEK -> USD).

However, I genuinely believe this could be the next $LITE for silicon photonics/CPO.

And I’m holding shares, as my personal bull case scenario is $10 billion+.

As Sivers sits in the silicon photonics CW DFB laser bottleneck of the next gen photonic architectures spearheaded by $NVDA.

This is compared to how $COHR / $LITE EML lasers are the current optical transceiver bottleneck.

They’re already the laser supplier to Ayar, $POET (buys $SIVE lasers -> advanced packaging into optical interposers), and likely other silicon photonics/cpo players

The Win semi ongoing qualification is one of the biggest bull cases, as this allows them to scale up capacity.

Time will tell if this thesis turns out to be correct but I personally think this name is widely undiscovered.

This is my own personal thesis and I’m not recommending anyone to tag along.

But if you DYOR, maybe you’ll come to the same conclusion I did that $SIVE looks like the next $LITE.
$SIVE 现在涨 50%+,到 $190 million USD MC(~1.8B SEK -> USD)。

不过我真心相信它可能是 silicon photonics/CPO 的下一个 $LITE

我也持有 shares,因为我个人 bull case 是 $10 billion+。

Sivers 卡在 $NVDA 带头的下一代 photonic 架构中,silicon photonics CW DFB laser bottleneck。

这对应的是当前 optical transceiver bottleneck 里的 $COHR / $LITE EML lasers。

它们已经是 Ayar、$POET(买 $SIVE lasers -> advanced packaging 成 optical interposers)以及其他 silicon photonics/CPO players 的激光供应商。

正在进行的 Win semi 认证是最大 bull case 之一,因为它能让它们扩产。

这个 thesis 是否正确,时间会证明。但我个人认为这个名字远远没被发现。

这是我个人 thesis,不建议任何人盲跟。

但如果你 DYOR,也许会得出和我一样的结论:$SIVE 看起来像下一个 $LITE
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I’m long $SIVE at $140M.

I believe this is the next $LITE that markets and institutions missed.

$SIVE makes InP CW DFB lasers.

Closest comparison is $LITE in the current EML laser bottleneck.

But instead of supplying to Innolight/Eoptolink for current optical transceivers cycles.

They supply the lasers to $POET Starlight, Ayar SuperNova.

And others for the future CPO/silicon photonics architectures spearheaded by $NVDA.

Current valuations make 0 sense to me personally. 



$POET is advanced packaging for $SIVE type lasers…

But $POET commands worth 11x+ more than the company making the laser itself?



It’s feels like valuing a more advanced $FN (~$20B) packaging at $400B when $LITE is valued at $40B. 



So now at $130m:

-

- You have a likely mini $LITE like laser supplier to Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers through $POET. 



- Laser supplier to Ayar ( $NVDA, $INTC ), though they do multi source with $LITE, Sumitomo, $MTSI.

And other potential up and coming suppliers potentially like Lightmatter that they’ve name dropped (eg. Q2 2023 earnings). This is unconfirmed but supply chain BOM is confidential. 



On top, for revenue, they expected $453M "pipeline next few years”.



And, they have capacity expansion through WIN: “Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers."



Sivers feels the silicon photonics/CPO version of $LITE, with actual rapidly growing customers like Celestial through $POET, Ayar, with more to come.



I wouldn’t have liked it last year, but just 3 weeks ago, they refinanced all their debt successfully to $12M convertible loan (10.85%) and a $5M term loan (12%), which cleans up debt.



It’s $17m total, which feels like nothing to US markets when $AAOI is doing a $500m ATMs every other week.

Best of all, this is their pure play inp laser segment for silicon/photonics + cpo. 

Their Lidar segment is ramping up and they have $53-138M projected revenue coming in.



Downside risk:

- execution (as always)

- dilution to scale up capacity to compete with $LITE and others.
- $LITE, $COHR competition on scale after $NVDA just gave them $4B
- CPO ramp gets delayed.



I have no clue how, $LWLG, a pre-revenue science project with $TSEM, is valued at $1B+ MC.



Or how $POET, is worth ~9-10x more than its laser supplier. 



When $SIVE, the mini $LITE equivalent for CPO/Silicon photonics, is valued at $140M.

I do believe this is largely undiscovered by institutions, since this is some random company in OMX Nordic Exchange (similar to micro $AXTI before I started posting about the inp substrate bottleneck). 



But I do think it will get a lot of institutional attention as Celestial and Ayar scale up.

Especially if $POET and $SIVE gets qualified with other customers. 



If CPO completely replaces pluggable transceivers in the next generation of hyperscaler architectures.

Sivers, with possible WIN Semi qualifcation and if they become the multi-source lasers for NVIDIA, Marvell, Intel, and Broadcom architectures, can be strongly rerated.

Just as how $LITE did today going from $16 -> $622.

This is just my personal thesis I'm sharing, DYOR/NFI.

TLDR:

InP Lasers are the current bottleneck in photonics as seen with $LITE valuations. 



$SIVE looks like the mini $LITE for the upcoming CPO/Silicon Photonics ramp.



I personally took long position in $SIVE, as I believe they’re a large beneficiary of the upcoming silicon photonic/CPO architectural changes by $NVDA (with GTC cataylst). 



The upside here just way too compelling for me personally as the next possible $LITE.
我在 $140M 时做多 $SIVE

我认为这是市场和机构错过的下一个 $LITE

$SIVE 做 InP CW DFB lasers。

最接近的对标,是当前 EML laser 瓶颈里的 $LITE

但它不是给 Innolight/Eoptolink 供应当前光模块周期的东西。

它给 $POET Starlight、Ayar SuperNova 供应 lasers。

也给其他由 $NVDA 推动的未来 CPO/silicon photonics 架构供应。

我个人觉得当前估值完全说不通。

$POET 是给 $SIVE 这类 lasers 做 advanced packaging……

$POET 的估值居然比真正做 laser 的公司高 11x+?

这感觉就像在 $LITE 估值 $40B 时,把更先进的 $FN(~$20B)packaging 估到 $400B。

所以现在 $130m:

- 你拿到的是一个可能的 mini $LITE,作为 Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers 通过 $POET 的 laser supplier。

- 也是 Ayar($NVDA$INTC)的 laser supplier,虽然他们也会和 $LITE、Sumitomo、$MTSI 多源采购。

还有其他潜在的新兴客户,比如他们提到过的 Lightmatter(例如 Q2 2023 earnings)。这还未确认,因为 supply chain BOM 是保密的。

收入方面,他们预计“未来几年 pipeline”有 $453M。

他们还通过 WIN 扩产:“Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers.”

Sivers 感觉就是 silicon photonics/CPO 版本的 $LITE,有 Celestial 通过 $POET、Ayar 这些真正快速增长的客户,而且后面还会更多。

去年我不会喜欢它,但就在 3 周前,他们成功把所有债务再融资成 $12M 可转债(10.85%)和 $5M term loan(12%),清理了债务。

总共 $17m,对美国市场来说几乎不算什么,$AAOI 隔三差五就在做 $500m ATM。

最棒的是,这是他们针对 silicon/photonics + cpo 的纯 InP laser segment。他们的 Lidar segment 也在放量,并预计有 $53-138M 收入进来。

下行风险:
- 执行(永远都有)
- 为了扩产和 $LITE 等竞争而稀释
- $NVDA 刚给 $LITE$COHR $4B 后,它们在规模上的竞争
- CPO 放量延迟

我真不知道,$LWLG 这种和 $TSEM 相关、还没收入的科研项目,怎么能有 $1B+ 市值。

或者 $POET 怎么能值它 laser supplier 的 ~9-10x。

$SIVE,这个 CPO/Silicon photonics 的 mini $LITE 等价物,只有 $140M。

我确实认为它很大程度上还没被机构发现,因为这是 OMX Nordic Exchange 上一家随机公司(类似我开始发 InP substrate 瓶颈前的微型 $AXTI)。

但我觉得随着 Celestial 和 Ayar 放量,它会获得很多机构关注。

尤其如果 $POET$SIVE 获得其他客户认证。

如果 CPO 在下一代 hyperscaler 架构里完全替代 pluggable transceivers。

Sivers 如果完成可能的 WIN Semi qualification,并成为 NVIDIA、Marvell、Intel、Broadcom 架构的多源 lasers,会被强力重估。

就像 $LITE 今天从 $16 -> $622 一样。

这只是我分享的个人 thesis,DYOR/NFI。

TLDR:

$LITE 的估值可以看到,InP Lasers 是当前 photonics 的瓶颈。

$SIVE 看起来像即将到来的 CPO/Silicon Photonics 放量里的 mini $LITE

我个人已经做多 $SIVE,因为我认为它会成为 $NVDA 推动的下一轮 silicon photonic/CPO 架构变化(带 GTC catalyst)的重要受益者。

这里作为下一个潜在 $LITE 的 upside,对我个人来说太有吸引力了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033466880661606646
❤️ 520 🔁 52 💬 97
打开原推
💬 引用
Just in: Citibank initiates coverage in Nebius &lt; $NBIS &gt; and assigns at PT of $169.

Per Bloomberg Terminal https://t.co/y9cYcS6SgK
刚刚:Citibank 开始覆盖 Nebius &lt; $NBIS &gt;,并给出 $169 PT。

来自 Bloomberg Terminal。 https://t.co/y9cYcS6SgK
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just in: $META signs an enormous $27 Billion cumulative AI spend contract with $NBIS.

Nebius was my top Neocloud AI Infrastruture DC pick.

Glad management is executing toward their $7-9B ARR target.

Nebius is up 14.79% premarket to $129.66. https://t.co/RaaDWm1if0
刚刚:$META$NBIS 签署了一份巨大的 $27 Billion 累计 AI spend 合同。

Nebius 是我最看好的 Neocloud AI Infrastructure DC 标的。

很高兴管理层正在朝 $7-9B ARR 目标执行。

Nebius 盘前上涨 14.79% 至 $129.66。 https://t.co/RaaDWm1if0
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033486637553127865
❤️ 672 🔁 28 💬 31
打开原推
💬 引用
It’s been 5 days.

My Soitec &lt; $SOI &gt; substrate pick for silicon photonics and CPO is now up over +44.3%.

This is markets re-rating the next critical player for photonics, live.

Soitec is now up another 7.03% today. https://t.co/kHSRZpCmiF
才 5 天。

我为 silicon photonics 和 CPO 选的 Soitec &lt; $SOI &gt; substrate pick 现在已经涨超过 +44.3%。

这是市场正在现场重估 photonics 下一个关键玩家。

Soitec 今天又涨 7.03%。 https://t.co/kHSRZpCmiF
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 362 🔁 32 💬 25
打开原推
💬 引用
$AXTI is now above $50+.

I was the first to identify it as the next major bottleneck for the AI buildout with photonics.

Did you listen anon? https://t.co/pPkFqZXmuC
$AXTI 现在已经超过 $50+。

我是第一个把它识别为 AI buildout 里 photonics 下一个重大 bottleneck 的人。

你听了吗,anon? https://t.co/pPkFqZXmuC
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 878 🔁 50 💬 51
打开原推
📝 原创
Just in: $META signs an enormous $27 Billion cumulative AI spend contract with $NBIS.

Nebius was my top Neocloud AI Infrastruture DC pick.

Glad management is executing toward their $7-9B ARR target.

Nebius is up 14.79% premarket to $129.66. https://t.co/RaaDWm1if0
刚刚:$META$NBIS 签了一个巨大的 $27 Billion 累计 AI spend 合同。

Nebius 是我最看好的 Neocloud AI Infrastructure DC pick。

很高兴看到管理层正在朝 $7-9B ARR 目标执行。

Nebius 盘前涨 14.79%,到 $129.66。 https://t.co/RaaDWm1if0
❤️ 1,272 🔁 75 💬 89
打开原推
📝 原创
I’m long $SIVE at $140M.

I believe this is the next $LITE that markets and institutions missed.

$SIVE makes InP CW DFB lasers.

Closest comparison is $LITE in the current EML laser bottleneck.

But instead of supplying to Innolight/Eoptolink for current optical transceivers cycles.

They supply the lasers to $POET Starlight, Ayar SuperNova.

And others for the future CPO/silicon photonics architectures spearheaded by $NVDA.

Current valuations make 0 sense to me personally. 



$POET is advanced packaging for $SIVE type lasers…

But $POET commands worth 11x+ more than the company making the laser itself?



It’s feels like valuing a more advanced $FN (~$20B) packaging at $400B when $LITE is valued at $40B. 



So now at $130m:

-

- You have a likely mini $LITE like laser supplier to Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers through $POET. 



- Laser supplier to Ayar ( $NVDA, $INTC ), though they do multi source with $LITE, Sumitomo, $MTSI.

And other potential up and coming suppliers potentially like Lightmatter that they’ve name dropped (eg. Q2 2023 earnings). This is unconfirmed but supply chain BOM is confidential. 



On top, for revenue, they expected $453M "pipeline next few years”.



And, they have capacity expansion through WIN: “Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers."



Sivers feels the silicon photonics/CPO version of $LITE, with actual rapidly growing customers like Celestial through $POET, Ayar, with more to come.



I wouldn’t have liked it last year, but just 3 weeks ago, they refinanced all their debt successfully to $12M convertible loan (10.85%) and a $5M term loan (12%), which cleans up debt.



It’s $17m total, which feels like nothing to US markets when $AAOI is doing a $500m ATMs every other week.

Best of all, this is their pure play inp laser segment for silicon/photonics + cpo. 

Their Lidar segment is ramping up and they have $53-138M projected revenue coming in.



Downside risk:

- execution (as always)

- dilution to scale up capacity to compete with $LITE and others.
- $LITE, $COHR competition on scale after $NVDA just gave them $4B
- CPO ramp gets delayed.



I have no clue how, $LWLG, a pre-revenue science project with $TSEM, is valued at $1B+ MC.



Or how $POET, is worth ~9-10x more than its laser supplier. 



When $SIVE, the mini $LITE equivalent for CPO/Silicon photonics, is valued at $140M.

I do believe this is largely undiscovered by institutions, since this is some random company in OMX Nordic Exchange (similar to micro $AXTI before I started posting about the inp substrate bottleneck). 



But I do think it will get a lot of institutional attention as Celestial and Ayar scale up.

Especially if $POET and $SIVE gets qualified with other customers. 



If CPO completely replaces pluggable transceivers in the next generation of hyperscaler architectures.

Sivers, with possible WIN Semi qualifcation and if they become the multi-source lasers for NVIDIA, Marvell, Intel, and Broadcom architectures, can be strongly rerated.

Just as how $LITE did today going from $16 -> $622.

This is just my personal thesis I'm sharing, DYOR/NFI.

TLDR:

InP Lasers are the current bottleneck in photonics as seen with $LITE valuations. 



$SIVE looks like the mini $LITE for the upcoming CPO/Silicon Photonics ramp.



I personally took long position in $SIVE, as I believe they’re a large beneficiary of the upcoming silicon photonic/CPO architectural changes by $NVDA (with GTC cataylst). 



The upside here just way too compelling for me personally as the next possible $LITE.
我在 $140M long $SIVE

我认为这是市场和机构错过的下一个 $LITE

$SIVE 做 InP CW DFB lasers。

最接近的比较是当前 EML laser bottleneck 里的 $LITE

但它不是给当前 optical transceivers 周期里的 Innolight/Eoptolink 供货,

而是给 $POET Starlight、Ayar SuperNova 等未来由 $NVDA 带头的 CPO/silicon photonics 架构供应激光。

当前估值对我来说完全没道理。

$POET 是给 $SIVE 这类 lasers 做 advanced packaging……但 $POET 市值却是做激光本身公司的 11x+?

感觉就像把更高级的 $FN(~$20B)封装公司估到 $400B,而 $LITE 才 $40B。

现在 $130m:

- 你有一个可能像迷你 $LITE 的 laser supplier,通过 $POET 给 Marvell Celestial + hyperscalers 供货。

- 也是 Ayar($NVDA$INTC)的激光供应商,虽然他们也和 $LITE、Sumitomo、$MTSI 多源。

以及其他潜在新供应商,比如他们提过的 Lightmatter(例如 Q2 2023 earnings)。未确认,因为 supply chain BOM 保密。

收入方面,他们预计未来几年有 $453M “pipeline”。

还有通过 WIN 扩产:“Win Semi foundry qualification in progress for volume production from Laser designs from Sivers.”

Sivers 感觉就是 silicon photonics/CPO 版本的 $LITE,有通过 $POET、Ayar、Celestial 这些快速增长客户,后面还会更多。

去年我不会喜欢它,但 3 周前他们成功把所有债务重组为 $12M convertible loan(10.85%)和 $5M term loan(12%),债务清理干净。

总共 $17m,对美国市场来说几乎没什么,尤其 $AAOI 每隔一周就在做 $500m ATMs。

最好的是,这是它们 silicon/photonics + CPO 的 pure play InP laser segment。Lidar segment 也在爬坡,预计有 $53-138M revenue。

下行风险:执行、扩产稀释以竞争 $LITE 等、$LITE/$COHR 规模竞争、CPO ramp 延迟。

我不懂 $LWLG 这种和 $TSEM 相关、还没收入的 science project 怎么值 $1B+ MC。

也不懂 $POET 怎么比它的激光供应商贵 ~9-10x。

$SIVE 这个 CPO/Silicon photonics 的迷你 $LITE 等价物,只值 $140M。

我相信机构基本还没发现它,因为它只是 OMX Nordic Exchange 上一个随机公司(类似我发 InP substrate bottleneck 前的微型 $AXTI)。

但随着 Celestial 和 Ayar 扩张,尤其 $POET$SIVE 拿到更多客户认证,它会得到很多机构关注。

如果 CPO 在下一代 hyperscaler 架构里完全替代可插拔 transceivers,Sivers 在 WIN Semi qualification 以及成为 NVIDIA、Marvell、Intel、Broadcom 架构多源激光供应商的情况下,可能会被大幅重估。

就像 $LITE 今天从 $16 -> $622。

这只是我分享的个人 thesis,DYOR/NFI。

TLDR:InP Lasers 是当前 photonics 瓶颈,$LITE 估值已经证明。

$SIVE 看起来像即将到来的 CPO/Silicon Photonics ramp 的迷你 $LITE

我个人 long $SIVE,因为我相信它们是 $NVDA 即将推动的 silicon photonic/CPO 架构变化(带 GTC catalyst)的巨大受益者。

这里作为下一个可能的 $LITE,上行对我来说太有吸引力。
❤️ 1,201 🔁 113 💬 110
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
New position TLDR:

$SIVE at $140M MC.

Laser supplier for upcoming CPO/silicon photonics companies.

Similar to Innolight who buys from $LITE for current optical transcievers.

For CPO/Silicon photonics, it's the next $LITE as they supplier to companies like $POET / $AYAR.

If I had to make things simple.

$LITE -> EML lasers for current optical bottlenecks.

$SIVE -> Customized InP CW DFB lasers for CPO type companies like Ayar/Poet.

Valuation disconnect seems compelling. However, $LITE / $COHR also are competing developing CW lasers for CPO.

It feels like $SIVE has been co-developing with $POET and others for awhile, so they have a backdoor as the laser supplier to $MRVL Celestial and others.

Basically thesis is, next possible small cap $LITE as a laser supplier for upcoming CPO/Silicon photonics.

Of course DYOR
新仓位 TLDR:

$SIVE,$140M MC。

即将到来的 CPO/silicon photonics 公司的激光供应商。

类似当前 optical transcievers 里从 $LITE 采购的 Innolight。

对 CPO/Silicon photonics 来说,它是下一个 $LITE,因为它供货给 $POET / $AYAR 这类公司。

简单说:

$LITE -> 当前 optical bottlenecks 的 EML lasers。

$SIVE -> 给 Ayar/Poet 这类 CPO 公司定制 InP CW DFB lasers。

估值错配很有吸引力。不过 $LITE / $COHR 也在竞争开发 CPO 用 CW lasers。

感觉 $SIVE 已经和 $POET 等共同开发了一段时间,所以有一条作为 $MRVL Celestial 等激光供应商的后门。

基本 thesis:可能成为 upcoming CPO/Silicon photonics 里的小盘 $LITE

当然 DYOR。
❤️ 258 🔁 8 💬 75
打开原推
📝 原创
Imagine all the people who sold their memory positions.

From SK Hynix, Sandisk, and Micron because of “Helium”?

Sk Hynix: +7.03% 1D
$SNDK: +31.75% 1W
$MU: +19.66% 1W
Samsung: +2.83% 1D

Look at NAND, DRAM hikes, which were all way beyond estimates.

As well as company statements that there was zero material effect.

Media doomposters and panic sellers. drives short term prices.

Operating profit drives long stock prices.
想想那些因为 “Helium” 卖掉 memory 仓位的人。

SK Hynix: +7.03% 1D
$SNDK: +31.75% 1W
$MU: +19.66% 1W
Samsung: +2.83% 1D

看看 NAND、DRAM 涨价,全部远超预期。

再加上公司声明说没有实质影响。

媒体 doomposters 和 panic sellers 驱动短期价格。

Operating profit 驱动长期股价。
❤️ 645 🔁 40 💬 49
打开原推
📝 原创
Did we really just invade Iran to seize their oil… like Venezulea?

New Reports: “Trump is weighing a seizure of Iran's critical oil depot on Kharg Island”

At least this should give the $150-$200 oil longs a taste of what happened with silver markets. https://t.co/850aazyUMq
我们真的像委内瑞拉那样,入侵伊朗去夺他们的石油了吗?

新报道:“Trump is weighing a seizure of Iran's critical oil depot on Kharg Island”

至少这应该能让那些 $150-$200 oil longs 尝尝 silver markets 发生过的味道。 https://t.co/850aazyUMq
❤️ 302 🔁 8 💬 46
打开原推
📝 原创
The Memory Cycle.

Is probably going to look like this chart?

With SK Hynix, $SNDK, Samsung, $MU and others:

-> Price Hikes until 2028
-> Demand Increase Permanent
-> Price Decreases After 2028

-> Increased Capacity * Increased Demand * lower margin = High Profit Anyway.

For example:

2026 Q1: DRAM, NAND Price Hikes
- NAND prices 100%+ Q/Q, DRAM up 70%+.

2026: Q2: DRAM NAND Price Hikes
- Samsung hikes Q2 NAND prices 100%+ Again, DRAM up.

Q3 -> 2028 Price Hikes.

1. Counterpoint: "There is no scenario where memory prices correct in the second half [of 2027], given that hyperscaler purchasing intent remains unbroken"
2. Intel CEO: "No Relief on Memory Shortage Until 2028".

However what people misunderstand:

-> Memory Demand Is Structural with AI.
-> Prices are not.

We'll likely keep seeing price hikes with the extreme memory shortage in 2026.

But prices start to fall in 2028. What people conflate is:

-> Extreme demand for AI will not cause prices to go to 0.
-> More capacity will not cause demand to suddenly go to 0.

More Supply * Price * More Demand * lower operating margin = more profit anyway.

Operating income will not be 10000%+ Q/Q like now.

But if SK Hynix is producing a more steady ~$100B+ operating income Y/Y at a $400B MC from increased capacity but lower margin:

Compared to $100B -> $220B -> $90B -> $120B.

Then that itself looks undervalued.

I don't see a world where it ends up being $100B-> $180B (2027) -> $10B what doomposters are projecting, where they operate at a loss from both demand downturn (eg. smartphones) and margin downturn.

The main two things is to look out for is if software/memory usage gets extremely, extremely efficient or hyperscaler capex suddenly disappears (AI is no longer a thing).

Same could be said around GPUs for training/inference.

But, I would mainly be looking out for hyperscaler capex projections as the #1 indicator. Not random out of context quotes taken from Samsung executives to signal operating income two years out.

AI has fundamentally changed what the "commodity" memory is, similar to GPUs back in 2023.
Memory Cycle。

可能会像这张图一样?

SK Hynix、$SNDK、Samsung、$MU 等:

-> 涨价直到 2028
-> 需求永久增加
-> 2028 后价格下降

-> 更高产能 * 更高需求 * 更低利润率 = 反正高利润。

例如:

2026 Q1:DRAM、NAND 涨价
- NAND Q/Q 涨 100%+,DRAM 涨 70%+。

2026 Q2:DRAM NAND 继续涨价
- Samsung Q2 NAND 再涨 100%+,DRAM 也涨。

Q3 -> 2028 继续涨价。

1. Counterpoint:“鉴于 hyperscaler 购买意愿没有中断,2027 年下半年不存在 memory prices 回调场景。”
2. Intel CEO:“Memory Shortage Until 2028 没有缓解。”

但大家误解的是:

-> Memory Demand 因 AI 而结构性存在。
-> Prices 不是结构性的。

2026 极端 memory shortage 下,我们大概率会继续看到涨价。

但 2028 年价格会开始下跌。大家混淆了:

-> AI 极端需求不会让价格归零。
-> 更多产能也不会让需求突然归零。

更多供给 * 价格 * 更多需求 * 更低运营利润率 = 反正更多利润。

运营利润不会像现在这样 Q/Q 10000%+。

但如果 SK Hynix 在 $400B MC 下,因为更高产能和更低利润率,能稳定产生 ~$100B+ 年运营利润,

相比 $100B -> $220B -> $90B -> $120B,

那本身就看起来低估。

我不认为会出现 doomposters 预测的 $100B-> $180B(2027)-> $10B,像智能手机那种需求下行和利润率下行叠加导致亏损。

主要要看两件事:软件/memory 使用是否变得极其高效,或者 hyperscaler capex 是否突然消失(AI 不再存在)。

GPU 的训练/推理也一样。

所以我主要看 hyperscaler capex projections 作为第一指标,而不是 Samsung 高管的断章取义 quote 来预测两年后的运营利润。

AI 已经从根本上改变了“commodity” memory,类似 2023 年的 GPUs。
❤️ 652 🔁 36 💬 55
打开原推
📝 原创
US Energy Secretary: “U.S. Takes ‘Many Actions’ to Mitigate Rising Oil Price”

Interior Secretary: “The Trump administration has discussed trading in the oil futures market as a strategy to help curb surging crude prices”

Meanwhile on Reddit: “Time to full port into Oil futures”

I’m not sure how retail investors can see statements from the US Gov wanting to keep oil prices low…

And still full port their account the other direction with crude oil?
US Energy Secretary:“美国采取‘许多行动’缓解油价上涨”

Interior Secretary:“Trump 政府讨论过在 oil futures market 交易,以帮助遏制 crude prices 飙升”

与此同时 Reddit:“是时候 full port Oil futures 了”

我不确定散户怎么能看到美国政府想压低油价的声明……

然后还把账户满仓押 crude oil 的相反方向?
❤️ 306 🔁 9 💬 54
打开原推
📝 原创
https://t.co/6xoodaH87j
https://t.co/6xoodaH87j
❤️ 1,390 🔁 152 💬 67
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Okay so basically research list:

$MP, $NEO, $ATI $CRS are anchors for robotic supply chains.

1. Magnet Metals (Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb, Sm, Gd):

$UUUU - Processes monazite sand into high-purity Neodymium
$MP - Extracting bastnäsite at Mountain Pass and vertically integrating into domestic NdFeB magnet manufacturing.
$ALOY - Converting heavy rare earth oxides into defense-grade alloys and high-temperature metals like Samarium and Gadolinium
$USAR- Process heavy rare earth elements and manufacture sintered NdFeB magnets
$LYSDY -(Lynas Rare Earths Limited) - Only commercial producer of separated heavy rare earth elements outside of China.
$NEO -(TSX): They are the only Western company commercially producing the actual NdFeB magnetic powders and alloys at scale right now.
$ILU- (rare earths refinery): rare earths refinery for Australia
$ARU- (ASX): "Ore-to-oxide" NdPr facility

2. Structural Metallurgy (Niobium, Vanadium, Titanium, Beryllium)

$ATI - Dominant US producer of high-performance titanium and specialty alloys required for robotic joints.
$CRS - US supplier of specialty structural alloys, including the high-strength steels, titanium, and magnetic
$FCX - World's largest producer of Molybdenum, which is strictly necessary for the structural steel in planetary roller screws.
$NB - Critical pure-play company developing the Elk Creek project in Nebraska, aimed at supplying domestic Niobium, Scandium, and Titanium
$MTRN - Major global processor of Beryllium
$LGO - Leading publicly traded processors of Vanadium

3. Compute, Perception, and Power (Gallium, Germanium, Graphite, Battery Metals)

$BMM - Onshore supply and processing for like Germanium and Gallium
$VNP - Gallium, Germanium, and Indium for advanced sensors and electronics
$TECK - Most significant producer of Germanium outside of China
$ALB - Lithium extraction
$EAF - High-purity Graphite for battery anodes
$ALTM - Western lithium required to supply the batteries
$SYR - Balama mine for Graphite
$FCX - Humanoid requires up to 6.5 kilograms of copper
$AW1 (ASX): Advancing the West Desert project in Utah, for domestic geological sources for high-grade Gallium and Indium
好,基本研究清单:

$MP$NEO$ATI$CRS 是 robotics 供应链锚点。

1. Magnet Metals(Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb, Sm, Gd):

$UUUU - 把 monazite sand 加工成高纯 Neodymium
$MP - 在 Mountain Pass 开采 bastnäsite,并垂直整合到本土 NdFeB magnet 制造。
$ALOY - 把重稀土氧化物转成 defense-grade alloys 和 Samarium、Gadolinium 等高温金属
$USAR - 加工重稀土元素并制造烧结 NdFeB magnets
$LYSDY - Lynas Rare Earths Limited,中国以外唯一商业化分离重稀土生产商。
$NEO - TSX,目前唯一在商业规模生产实际 NdFeB magnetic powders 和 alloys 的西方公司。
$ILU - 澳大利亚 rare earths refinery
$ARU - ASX,“ore-to-oxide” NdPr facility

2. Structural Metallurgy(Niobium, Vanadium, Titanium, Beryllium)

$ATI - 美国高性能 titanium 和 specialty alloys 主导生产商,用于 robotic joints。
$CRS - 美国 specialty structural alloys 供应商,包括 high-strength steels、titanium 和 magnetic。
$FCX - 全球最大 Molybdenum 生产商,对 planetary roller screws 的结构钢是刚需。
$NB - 纯 Niobium 公司,在 Nebraska 开发 Elk Creek 项目,供应本土 Niobium、Scandium、Titanium。
$MTRN - 全球主要 Beryllium 加工商。
$LGO - 领先公开交易 Vanadium 加工商。

3. Compute, Perception, and Power(Gallium, Germanium, Graphite, Battery Metals)

$BMM - Germanium、Gallium 等本土供应和加工
$VNP - Gallium、Germanium、Indium,用于 advanced sensors and electronics
$TECK - 中国以外最重要 Germanium 生产商
$ALB - Lithium extraction
$EAF - battery anodes 用 high-purity Graphite
$ALTM - 西方 lithium 供应 batteries
$SYR - Balama Graphite mine
$FCX - humanoid 最多需要 6.5 kilograms copper
$AW1 (ASX): Utah West Desert 项目,开发本土 high-grade Gallium 和 Indium 地质来源
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Since there's no US companies on robotic supply chains:

Large reason is prob due to refining of rare earths to get the material costs down a lot.

So maybe better to invest in rare earth processing rather than investing in Chinese companies.

For example:

-> Going into #1 component of Actuation/Motion Control.

-> Then finding out what rare earth you need to build it at a cheaper cost.

robotic joint is a permanent magnet motor, needs neodymium processing supply chains:

1. Neo Performance Materials - TSX: NEO
2. $MP (well known)
3. $UUUU - surprisingly processing monazite concentrate into NdPr oxide.

That's just my guess on how to get better exposure. Kinda like substrates for AI photonics

not as familiar with this, but just publishing as i go.
既然机器人供应链里没有美国公司:

很大原因可能是稀土精炼能把材料成本降很多。

所以也许与其投中国公司,不如投稀土加工。

比如:

-> 进入 Actuation/Motion Control 的 #1 component。

-> 然后找出要用什么稀土,才能更便宜地制造它。

robotic joint 是 permanent magnet motor,需要 neodymium processing supply chains:

1. Neo Performance Materials - TSX: NEO
2. $MP(很有名)
3. $UUUU - 意外的是,他们把 monazite concentrate 加工成 NdPr oxide。

这只是我猜的更好 exposure 获取方式。有点像 AI photonics 里的 substrates。

我对这个没那么熟,只是边研究边发。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2033129163477950477
❤️ 270 🔁 13 💬 37
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Since there's no US companies on robotic supply chains:

Large reason is prob due to refining of rare earths to get the material costs down a lot.

So maybe better to invest in rare earth processing rather than investing in Chinese companies.

For example:

-> Going into #1 component of Actuation/Motion Control.

-> Then finding out what rare earth you need to build it at a cheaper cost.

robotic joint is a permanent magnet motor, needs neodymium processing supply chains:

1. Neo Performance Materials - TSX: NEO
2. $MP (well known)
3. $UUUU - surprisingly processing monazite concentrate into NdPr oxide.

That's just my guess on how to get better exposure. Kinda like substrates for AI photonics

not as familiar with this, but just publishing as i go.
既然 robotic supply chains 里没有美国公司:

很大原因可能是稀土 refining 能把材料成本降很多。

所以也许比起投资中国公司,更好的做法是投资 rare earth processing。

例如:

-> 进入 Actuation/Motion Control 的 #1 component。

-> 然后找出用什么稀土能更低成本制造它。

robotic joint 是 permanent magnet motor,需要 neodymium processing supply chains:

1. Neo Performance Materials - TSX: NEO
2. $MP(大家都知道)
3. $UUUU - 意外地在把 monazite concentrate 加工成 NdPr oxide。

这只是我猜更好获得敞口的方法。类似 AI photonics 里的 substrates。

我对这个还没那么熟,只是边研究边发。
❤️ 114 🔁 2 💬 19
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
For robotic supply chains BOM mapping:

Actuation/motion (Frameless torque motors, harmonic reducers, planetary roller screws, motor control units) #1.

Similar to memory like $MU in AI clusters bomBOM

Then #2:

Perception & Compute: DRAM/NAND, 3D LiDAR, 4D radar, acoustic sensors

The rest like like Power Systems, seems a bit too low? If people are putting stuff into battery.

But basically my notes:

Actuation/Motion, these are top BOM:

- Leaderdrive: Harmonic Reducers
- Harmonic Drive: Harmonic Reducers
- Nabtesco: RV Reducers
- Sanhua Intelligent: Linear Actuator Assemblies
- Shuanghuan Driveline: RV Reducers / Gears
- Shenzhen Inovance: Servo Systems / Ball Screws

Then Vision and others, you finally get someWestern companies:

- $NOVT, Hanwei Electronics, Sintokogio

And 4D Lidar and stuff I've mentioned $AEVA and $OUST, and $AMBA.

But basically:

All Chinese companies. Very sad to see and very worrisome for Made in America supply chains.

IK Tesla is basically making their Optimus off of China suppliers but assembly in America... Kinda like the Apple plan.

But basically:

Actuation & Motion as the #1 cost. And it's all China. And maybe a few Japanese/KR companies.

Probably want to focus on that for robotic scale ups though.

It's very surprising how there's like no US leaders in this space. Still doing research
Robotic supply chains BOM mapping:

Actuation/motion(Frameless torque motors、harmonic reducers、planetary roller screws、motor control units)是 #1。

类似 AI clusters BOM 里的 memory,比如 $MU

然后 #2:

Perception & Compute:DRAM/NAND、3D LiDAR、4D radar、acoustic sensors。

其余比如 Power Systems,好像占比太低?如果大家投 battery。

基本笔记:

Actuation/Motion 是 top BOM:

- Leaderdrive:Harmonic Reducers
- Harmonic Drive:Harmonic Reducers
- Nabtesco:RV Reducers
- Sanhua Intelligent:Linear Actuator Assemblies
- Shuanghuan Driveline:RV Reducers / Gears
- Shenzhen Inovance:Servo Systems / Ball Screws

然后 Vision 等,终于有一些 Western companies:

- $NOVT、Hanwei Electronics、Sintokogio

还有我提过的 4D Lidar,比如 $AEVA$OUST$AMBA

但基本上:

全是中国公司。看着很难过,也很让人担心 Made in America supply chains。

我知道 Tesla 基本是用中国供应商做 Optimus,只是在美国组装……有点像 Apple 方案。

基本结论:Actuation & Motion 是 #1 成本,而且全是中国。也许还有少数日本/KR 公司。

robotic scale ups 可能要重点看这一块。

很惊讶美国在这个领域几乎没有领导者。还在研究。
❤️ 138 🔁 9 💬 15
打开原推
📝 原创
This is my hot take:

Neoclouds like $NBIS or $IREN would command 1.3X higher valuation...

If they renamed their datacenters to something cool.

Cool Name Examples:
- $POET "Starlight"
- $NVDA "Blackwell"

But datacenters?
- $IREN "Prince George"
- $CIFR "Barber Lake"

Why are you naming an AI datacenter after your hair cut stylist or a British Kid nickname?

I swear, nobody outside existing investors are going to hyped over Iren's "Prince George" datacenters coming online.

But if everyone see's $NBIS "Singularity" AI DC coming online, that just sounds badass.

Nebius would be worth $40B by now.
这是我的 hot take:

如果 Neoclouds,比如 $NBIS$IREN,把数据中心改成酷一点的名字,估值会高 1.3X。

酷名字例子:
- $POET “Starlight”
- $NVDA “Blackwell”

但数据中心?
- $IREN “Prince George”
- $CIFR “Barber Lake”

为什么要用理发师或英国小孩昵称来给 AI datacenter 命名?

我保证,现有投资者之外,没人会因为 Iren 的 “Prince George” datacenters 上线而兴奋。

但如果大家看到 $NBIS “Singularity” AI DC 上线,听起来就很 badass。

Nebius 现在就会值 $40B。
❤️ 737 🔁 28 💬 68
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a reflection on my accomplishments this year.

Growing to 100K+ followers in the first three months of 2026:

- Forecasted the upcoming InP substrate/feedstock bottleneck for photonics

- Identified $AXTI as the main beneficiary (up 4x+)

- China's suddenly enforced immediate export controls on Japan, targeting InP compounds

-> shortly after my thesis identifying the China bottleneck and Sumitomo/hyperscaler vulnerabilities got a few million views...

Not sure if they read my post, sorry if they did?

- Predicted volatility increase of the South Korean Market and also mapped that into an IV arbitrage trade idea with $EWY

- Got it spot on a week later with the Bank of Korea citing upcoming volatility

- Had Bloomberg, Reuters, FT, and other news outlets citing my thesis post about $RPI

- Bunch of European news sites talking about why I like $IQE

- Had a bunch of French news sites and analysts from Citi, Kepler, putting out slightly aggressive notes about my Soitec ( $SOI ) TLDR thesis post.

- Identified the main beneficiaries of Venezuela regime change like Gold Reserve, with the stock going up 100%+ the day after.

- Published information synthesis on how much Bitcoin Venezuela might have had, and it blew up with a ton of media coverage like CNN and others!

Lot of my other thesis posts like $LITE ended up playing out this year after mapping out $GOOGL TPU BOM and doubling.

But it's not as cool as the ones above!

In just two months! I like to stay humble, but I do want to brag from time to time.

And best of all, retail investors were all early to a lot of these trends this time because of information discovery + free distribution over X.

Excited to see what's to come in the future and I'm happy X gave me this opportunity to share my thoughts.
只是回顾一下我今年的成果。

2026 年前三个月涨到 100K+ followers:

- 预测了 photonics 即将到来的 InP substrate/feedstock bottleneck
- 识别 $AXTI 是主要受益者(涨 4x+)
- 中国突然对日本实施即时出口管制,目标是 InP compounds

-> 在我关于中国瓶颈和 Sumitomo/hyperscaler vulnerability 的 thesis 获得几百万浏览后不久……

不确定他们是不是看了我的帖子,如果看了不好意思?

- 预测韩国市场波动率上升,并映射成 $EWY 的 IV arbitrage trade idea
- 一周后 Bank of Korea 提到即将到来的波动,正好验证
- Bloomberg、Reuters、FT 等引用我关于 $RPI 的 thesis
- 一堆欧洲新闻网站讨论我为什么喜欢 $IQE
- 法国媒体和 Citi、Kepler 分析师围绕我的 Soitec($SOI)TLDR thesis 发出略激进的 notes
- 找到委内瑞拉 regime change 的主要受益者,如 Gold Reserve,第二天股价涨 100%+
- 发布关于委内瑞拉可能持有多少 Bitcoin 的信息综合,并被 CNN 等大量媒体报道

我其他 thesis,比如 $LITE,通过映射 $GOOGL TPU BOM 后今年也兑现并翻倍。

但没有上面这些酷。

短短两个月!我喜欢保持谦逊,但偶尔也想吹一下。

最重要的是,这次 retail investors 因为 X 上的信息发现 + 免费分发,很多趋势都很早。

很期待未来会发生什么,也很高兴 X 给了我分享想法的机会。
❤️ 1,106 🔁 20 💬 73
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Humanoid soldiers are coming, this is super, super cool. Massive shift in trends as ai goes physical.

Apparently being tested for live combat in Ukraine.

I’ve already said 4D + world models possible exposure for the physical transition, and listed names like $AEVA for 4D lidar.

Think everyone knows it’s coming, more of a matter of when? Like 2028 is more probable although Elon keeps framing it as EOY 2026, think it’s a bit ambitious.

but I wanted more through humanoid hardware components so still Supply chain research.

All private companies unfortunately, doing research into if there’s BOM exposure from public companies like $VPG or others.

I don’t think you’ll get the same scale up as you get with AI bottlenecks like photonics/memory without humanoids until 2028 though.

Lot of cool names like harmonic motion, don’t think a lot of the Chinese Optimus supply chain companies would be in these military robotic supply chains though.

But still something to put on your radar.
Humanoid soldiers 要来了,这真的超级酷。随着 AI 走向物理世界,趋势会发生巨大变化。

据说已经在乌克兰实战测试。

我之前说过 4D + world models 是 physical transition 的可能敞口,也列过 $AEVA 这类 4D lidar 名字。

大家应该都知道它会来,只是时间问题。2028 更可能,虽然 Elon 一直说 EOY 2026,我觉得有点激进。

但我想获得更多 humanoid hardware components 敞口,所以还在研究供应链。

不幸的是很多都是私有公司,正在研究是否有 $VPG 或其他 public companies 的 BOM exposure。

没有 humanoids 的话,你可能不会像 photonics/memory 这些 AI bottlenecks 一样,在 2028 前看到同等规模爬坡。

有很多酷名字,比如 harmonic motion。我不觉得很多中国 Optimus 供应链公司会进入这些 military robotic supply chains。

但这仍值得放到 radar 上。
❤️ 184 🔁 6 💬 22
打开原推
📝 原创
Wow, thank you all for 4300 subscribers this month!

I recently set it up, and never made a formal post about it.

This is my first one!

But, I've been getting floods of DMs about it.

So just to clarify things with a quick PSA:

Any DD I do ( $SOI to $AAOI) will always end up on my main timeline.

I won't gatekeep any thesis posts I make, but I might post a tiny bit earlier in the sub spaces.

Especially since HFT algorithms scrape my main posts too and I like to give retail audiences a heads up before the algos.

But I basically use the subscription channel as a "Shower Thoughts" space.

So any random supply chains, notes, trade ideas like

- arbitrages/options
- DCA levels
- early ideas before they become full thesis or actionable ideas
- or random ama questions

I just didn't want to flood the main timeline with informal thought process or comments.

So thought it would be more fun along the way to share what I learn and give real folks a heads up first.

If you're interested in what I'm thinking about throughout the day, that's what the channel is for!
哇,感谢大家这个月 4300 subscribers!

我最近才设置,之前也没正式发过帖子。

这是第一条!

但我已经收到大量 DM。

所以简单 PSA 澄清一下:

我做的任何 DD(从 $SOI$AAOI)最终都会发到主 timeline。

我不会把 thesis posts gatekeep,但可能会在 sub spaces 里早一点点发。

尤其是 HFT algorithms 也会抓我的主帖,我想让 retail audiences 在 algos 前有个 heads up。

但我基本把 subscription channel 当成 “Shower Thoughts” 空间。

所以任何随机供应链、笔记、交易想法,比如

- arbitrages/options
- DCA levels
- 还没变成完整 thesis 或 actionable ideas 的早期想法
- 或随机 ama 问题

我只是不想用非正式思考和评论刷爆主 timeline。

所以觉得一路分享我学到的东西,并先给真人一点提醒,会更有意思。

如果你对我一天里在想什么感兴趣,这个频道就是干这个的!
❤️ 654 🔁 5 💬 37
打开原推
📝 原创
$IQE is up ~70% since I’ve posted.

This is one of the largest InP Epifabs in the world.

However, there’s tons of legacy drag affecting $IQE.

And as a result, smaller pure play peers like Landmark sit at $4.2 Billion MC while $IQE trades at depressed valuations.

With massive reactor latent capacity, and a ~$250M MC, the only thing they needed to do:

Cut Drag. Restructure to clear debt. Focus capacity toward AI.

And the CTO finally went out to reiterate my thesis focusing on photoics:

“For InP, that means 6-inch wafers. IQE was the first to demonstrate 6-inch InP technology more than four years ago, having recognised this need early.

IQE has shown the purity, uniformity and repeatability needed for high-speed optical devices on 6-inch wafers

IQE is primed to help enable the next wave of AI hardware and data centre innovation.”

Although this looks like a bland marketing post, this is the thesis they need to focus on to be re-rated as a billion dollar company.

More industry executives should listen to markets.

The risks are obviously present with restructuring.

But now it’s up to management to successfully execute and put focus on AI/photonics, not legacy segments.

However, this is the risk I’m personally willing to take, as clear statements like these means they’re heading down the right direction.
$IQE 从我发帖后涨了 ~70%。

这是全球最大的 InP Epifabs 之一。

不过 $IQE 有很多 legacy drag。

因此,更小的 pure play 同业 Landmark 市值 $4.2 Billion MC,而 $IQE 估值却很低迷。

它有大量 reactor latent capacity,市值 ~$250M MC,唯一需要做的是:

砍掉拖累。重组清债。把产能聚焦到 AI。

CTO 终于出来重申了我关注 photonics 的 thesis:

“InP 意味着 6-inch wafers。IQE 四年多前就是第一个展示 6-inch InP technology 的公司,因为很早就看到了这个需求。

IQE 已经展示了高速光器件在 6-inch wafers 上所需的纯度、均匀性和可重复性。

IQE 已准备好帮助下一波 AI hardware 和 data centre innovation。”

虽然这看起来像平淡的营销文,但这正是它们要被 rerate 成 billion dollar company 需要聚焦的 thesis。

更多行业高管应该听听市场。

重组风险显然存在。

但现在取决于管理层能否成功执行,把重点放到 AI/photonics,而不是 legacy segments。

不过这是我个人愿意承担的风险,因为这样的明确表态说明他们正走在正确方向。
❤️ 363 🔁 23 💬 28
打开原推
💬 引用
I realized by the amount of bookmarks.

I lowkey dropped a banger ETF?

AI Displacement Equal Weighted YTD:

$AXTI: +191.53%
$AAOI: +144.47%
$SNDK: +140.38%
$SOI: +114.3%
$LITE: +61.22%
$AEHR: +60.97%
$BE: +56.56%
$VRT: +47.42%
Samsung: +42.8%
$TER: +37.99%
$MU: +35.1%
Sk Hynix: +34.42%
$NBIS: +25.57%
$COHR: +24.92%
Mediatek: +17.01%
$INTC: +16.23%
$ASML: +15.63%
Advantest: +11.78%
$TSM: +5.85%
$COPX: +4.56%
$TSEM: +2.44%
$MRVL: -1.71%
$NVDA: -4.55%
$AVGO: -7.32%

These are just the first names that came to my head. I own a lot of these personally (and don't own others like $NVDA or $BE ) but included them anyway.

But honestly, I'd be happy to equal weight all these names if I weren't actively managing my portfolio concentrations.

I expect the AI Displacement ETF to keep rising:

As they're the largest beneficiaries of scaling compute and inference for artificial intelligence.
从 bookmarks 数量来看,

我好像低调丢出了一个很强的 ETF?

AI Displacement Equal Weighted YTD:

$AXTI: +191.53%
$AAOI: +144.47%
$SNDK: +140.38%
$SOI: +114.3%
$LITE: +61.22%
$AEHR: +60.97%
$BE: +56.56%
$VRT: +47.42%
Samsung: +42.8%
$TER: +37.99%
$MU: +35.1%
Sk Hynix: +34.42%
$NBIS: +25.57%
$COHR: +24.92%
Mediatek: +17.01%
$INTC: +16.23%
$ASML: +15.63%
Advantest: +11.78%
$TSM: +5.85%
$COPX: +4.56%
$TSEM: +2.44%
$MRVL: -1.71%
$NVDA: -4.55%
$AVGO: -7.32%

这些只是我第一时间想到的名字。我个人持有很多(也不持有一些,比如 $NVDA$BE),但还是放进来了。

老实说,如果我不是主动管理组合集中度,我会很愿意 equal weight 这些名字。

我预计 AI Displacement ETF 会继续上涨:

因为它们是人工智能 scaling compute 和 inference 的最大受益者。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The news is pretty heartbreaking:

$META 20% layoffs

$ORCL layoffs

$AMZN 600,000 workers long term layoffs as they get replaced by robotics and AI.

This is a dystopian future.

Companies end up with record profits, without the cost of human labor.

The only way to benefit:

Investing in AI as a hedge.

The next few years feels like the main way to escape the permanent underclass, caused by AI displacement.

The return on equity derived from AI will go to the shareholders.

While the gap between those who live paycheck to paycheck, not invested in stocks. Will continue to grow.

This is not the future.

- Opus 4.6 is good enough to replace most software engineers today.

- Waymo has started to replace taxi drivers in places like SF today.

- We know $TSLA Humanoids are coming next as they’re widespread in China, today.

This is happening now.

Disruptions in Iran are only temporary to the accelerating AI buildout.

AI has hit the inflection point, and looks inevitable.

You’re already seeing US job revisions down close to 1 Million, which is staggering.

And we’re seeing the newest LLMs be built by their previous models, as AI approaches the singularity (AI led recursive growth).

Investing in where the compute and hardware needed to run the AI:

From the datacenter/power/grid sector:
$NBIS, $XLU, $VRT, $BE

Photonics sector needed to scale AI:
$LITE, $COHR, $AAOI, $TSEM

Semi sector needed for the chips:
$NVDA, $TSM, $ASML, $INTC

Memory sector for the chips:
$MU, $SNDK, SK Hynix, Samsung

ASICs for hyperscaler AI inference:
$AVGO, $MRVL, Mediatek

Yields sector to make sure the chips work:
$TER, $AEHR, Advantest

Along with the raw materials or substrates needed for AI:
$AXTI, $COPX, $SOI

And many others become the single, largest, hedge against widespread AI displacement.

Whoever owns the means of compute (bottlenecks, materials, datacenters):

Owns the future of AI.
这条新闻挺让人心碎:

$META 裁员 20%

$ORCL 裁员

$AMZN 长期裁掉 600,000 名工人,因为他们被 robotics 和 AI 替代。

这是一个反乌托邦未来。

公司最终会在没有人力成本的情况下,获得创纪录利润。

唯一能受益的方式:

投资 AI 作为 hedge。

接下来几年感觉像是逃离 AI displacement 造成的永久底层化的主要方式。

AI 带来的股本回报会流向股东。

而那些靠工资过日子、没有投资股票的人,差距会继续扩大。

这不是未来。

- Opus 4.6 今天已经足够替代大多数软件工程师。

- Waymo 今天已经开始在 SF 等地替代出租车司机。

- 我们知道 $TSLA Humanoids 接下来会来,因为它们今天已经在中国大规模出现。

这正在发生。

Iran 的扰动只是加速 AI buildout 过程中的暂时因素。

AI 已经到达拐点,看起来不可避免。

你已经看到美国 jobs revisions 下修接近 1 Million,这很惊人。

我们也正在看到最新的 LLMs 由它们之前的模型构建出来,AI 正接近奇点(AI led recursive growth)。

投资运行 AI 所需的 compute 和 hardware:

Datacenter/power/grid sector:
$NBIS, $XLU, $VRT, $BE

AI 扩展所需的 Photonics sector:
$LITE, $COHR, $AAOI, $TSEM

芯片所需的 Semi sector:
$NVDA, $TSM, $ASML, $INTC

芯片所需的 Memory sector:
$MU, $SNDK, SK Hynix, Samsung

hyperscaler AI inference 所需的 ASICs:
$AVGO, $MRVL, Mediatek

确保芯片能工作的 Yields sector:
$TER, $AEHR, Advantest

以及 AI 所需的原材料或 substrates:
$AXTI, $COPX, $SOI

还有很多其他公司,会成为对冲大范围 AI displacement 的最大 hedge。

谁拥有 compute 的生产资料(bottlenecks、materials、datacenters):

谁就拥有 AI 的未来。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2032898412279115858
❤️ 1,266 🔁 94 💬 62
打开原推
📝 原创
The news is pretty heartbreaking:

$META 20% layoffs

$ORCL layoffs

$AMZN 600,000 workers long term layoffs as they get replaced by robotics and AI.

This is a dystopian future.

Companies end up with record profits, without the cost of human labor.

The only way to benefit:

Investing in AI as a hedge.

The next few years feels like the main way to escape the permanent underclass, caused by AI displacement.

The return on equity derived from AI will go to the shareholders.

While the gap between those who live paycheck to paycheck, not invested in stocks. Will continue to grow.

This is not the future.

- Opus 4.6 is good enough to replace most software engineers today.

- Waymo has started to replace taxi drivers in places like SF today.

- We know $TSLA Humanoids are coming next as they’re widespread in China, today.

This is happening now.

Disruptions in Iran are only temporary to the accelerating AI buildout.

AI has hit the inflection point, and looks inevitable.

You’re already seeing US job revisions down close to 1 Million, which is staggering.

And we’re seeing the newest LLMs be built by their previous models, as AI approaches the singularity (AI led recursive growth).

Investing in where the compute and hardware needed to run the AI:

From the datacenter/power/grid sector:
$NBIS, $XLU, $VRT, $BE

Photonics sector needed to scale AI:
$LITE, $COHR, $AAOI, $TSEM

Semi sector needed for the chips:
$NVDA, $TSM, $ASML, $INTC

Memory sector for the chips:
$MU, $SNDK, SK Hynix, Samsung

ASICs for hyperscaler AI inference:
$AVGO, $MRVL, Mediatek

Yields sector to make sure the chips work:
$TER, $AEHR, Advantest

Along with the raw materials or substrates needed for AI:
$AXTI, $COPX, $SOI

And many others become the single, largest, hedge against widespread AI displacement.

Whoever owns the means of compute (bottlenecks, materials, datacenters):

Owns the future of AI.
这个新闻挺让人心碎:

$META 20% layoffs

$ORCL layoffs

$AMZN 长期裁掉 600,000 workers,因为他们会被 robotics 和 AI 替代。

这是一个反乌托邦未来。

公司会在没有人类劳动成本的情况下创下纪录利润。

唯一受益方式:

把投资 AI 当成 hedge。

接下来几年,感觉这是逃离 AI displacement 导致永久底层阶级的主要方式。

AI 带来的 equity return 会流向 shareholders。

而那些靠 paycheck to paycheck、没有投资股票的人,差距会继续扩大。

这不是未来。

- Opus 4.6 今天已经足够替代大多数 software engineers。

- Waymo 已经开始在 SF 等地替代 taxi drivers。

- 我们知道 $TSLA Humanoids 接下来会来,而且它们今天已经在中国普及。

这正在发生。

伊朗的扰动只是对加速 AI buildout 的短期影响。

AI 已经到拐点,看起来不可避免。

你已经看到美国就业修正下调接近 1 Million,非常惊人。

我们也看到最新 LLMs 由前代模型构建,AI 正接近 singularity(AI led recursive growth)。

投资运行 AI 所需的 compute 和 hardware:

Datacenter/power/grid:$NBIS$XLU$VRT$BE

Photonics:$LITE$COHR$AAOI$TSEM

Chips semi:$NVDA$TSM$ASML$INTC

Memory:$MU$SNDK、SK Hynix、Samsung

Hyperscaler AI inference ASICs:$AVGO$MRVL、Mediatek

Yields:$TER$AEHR、Advantest

Raw materials/substrates:$AXTI$COPX$SOI

以及很多其他公司,都会成为对广泛 AI displacement 最大的 hedge。

谁拥有 compute 的生产资料(bottlenecks、materials、datacenters):

谁就拥有 AI 的未来。
❤️ 1,660 🔁 170 💬 115
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
New extremely cool long position this week! Think this one is mispriced + primarily undiscovered by institutions.

Will publish a thesis to subscribers this time around (sorry about soitec).

Was just looking at random TFLN LPO substrate suppliers today like NGK Insulators (5333.T), still up 96.8% 1Y time.

Probably a lot of institutions buying ^ but it's not really pure play like $AXTI or at least cheaper valued like $SOI.

That's just one example of being a critical supplier, but not exactly a great long if you want 200-300% returns.

Feel free to ask random questions, I have some time today.
这周有一个极酷的新 long position!我觉得它错价,而且主要还没被机构发现。

这次会给 subscribers 发 thesis(Soitec 那次不好意思)。

今天只是随便看了一些 TFLN LPO substrate suppliers,比如 NGK Insulators(5333.T),1Y 仍然涨了 96.8%。

可能很多机构在买上面这个,但它不像 $AXTI 那么 pure play,或者不像 $SOI 那样估值便宜。

这只是一个 critical supplier 的例子,但如果你想要 200-300% returns,它不一定是很好的 long。

可以随便问问题,我今天有点时间。
❤️ 297 🔁 3 💬 136
打开原推
💬 引用
Don't think any "Analyst" from Citi or Kepler should be surprised why $SOI:

A 1X book CPO/Silicon Photonics Substrate virtual monopoly (now ~1.4).

Gets re-rated 40%+.

Especially after a digestable analysis gets distributed for people to build their own conviction on.

Times have changed:

Institutions want dumb, popular "influencers" to publish longs on Paypal and other overbought stocks.

Or encourage folks on WSB to buy 0DTE call options on $TSLA.

I'm doing supply-chain research on an undervalued billion dollar European bottlenecks/chokepoints. Then gave that research away for free.

Not paywalled for $2000+ behind institutional research notes.

Free.

I'm educating retail on my own thought process regarding supply chain bottlenecks, photonics, and fundamentals.

Then putting that into a simple enough thesis, so they can form their own opinions.

And for the first time, retail is able to front-run institutions on fundamental bottlenecks.

Just look at $AXTI: I posted at ~$500m valuation for every retail investor.

And now, institutions are piling in, sending it to $2.6 billion+ as the fundamental InP substrate provider to the photonics industry.

This is the quiet part said out loud:

When a free and popular X account successfully educates retail on highly strategic, fundamentally undervalued tech companies like Soitec:

It completely disrupts the institutions' ability to paywall research and frontrun retail investors. There’s no reason to downplay the trend.

I believe stocks are a positive sum game, so there's no reason to gatekeep information.
我不觉得 Citi 或 Kepler 的任何 “Analyst” 应该惊讶为什么 $SOI

一个 1X book 的 CPO/Silicon Photonics Substrate 虚拟垄断(现在约 ~1.4),

会被 re-rate 40%+。

尤其是在一份易懂分析被分发出去,让人们能建立自己 conviction 之后。

时代变了:

机构希望愚蠢但受欢迎的 “influencers” 发 Paypal 和其他过热股票的 long。

或者鼓励 WSB 上的人买 $TSLA 的 0DTE call options。

我在研究一个被低估的十亿美元欧洲 bottleneck/chokepoint 供应链,然后免费给出去。

不是藏在 $2000+ 机构研究报告 paywall 后面。

免费。

我在教育散户了解我关于供应链瓶颈、photonics 和基本面的思考过程。

然后把它整理成足够简单的 thesis,让他们形成自己的观点。

第一次,散户能在 fundamental bottlenecks 上抢跑机构。

看看 $AXTI:我在 ~$500m valuation 时发给所有散户。

现在机构涌入,把它推到 $2.6 billion+,因为它是 photonics 行业的基础 InP substrate provider。

这是把潜台词说出来:

当一个免费且流行的 X 账号成功教育散户,让他们理解 Soitec 这种高度战略性、基本面低估的科技公司,

它就彻底打乱了机构把研究锁在 paywall 后、抢跑散户的能力。没理由淡化这个趋势。

我相信股票是正和游戏,所以没理由 gatekeep 信息。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 694 🔁 22 💬 58
打开原推
📝 原创
Just looked outside my little bubble.

Majority of folks on X are:

- posting deep red portfolios.
- doomposting 1W charts
- fearing about oil

Feels like most of my individuals stock 1W returns are way in the green?

$AXTI up +46.9%
$SOI up +48.59%
$NBIS up +29.59%
$IQE up +27.92%
$TSEM up +13.99%

And so on… maybe luck?
刚刚看了下我小圈子外面。

X 上大多数人都在:

- 发深红组合
- doomposting 1W charts
- 担心 oil

感觉我大多数个股 1W returns 都很绿?

$AXTI up +46.9%
$SOI up +48.59%
$NBIS up +29.59%
$IQE up +27.92%
$TSEM up +13.99%

等等……也许是运气?
❤️ 871 🔁 34 💬 57
打开原推
📝 原创
Andruil $20 Billion USD cumulative total contract awarded by US Department of War.

Positive news for $PLTR, $KRKNF, $SPIR, $ACHR and other supply chain/integration partners.

Larger partners from $ORCL, $AMD, and $NVDA are less likely to get much of a tailwind.

“Andruil… was awarded a firm-fixed-price contract with a cumulative total of $20,000,000,000 to consolidate current and future commercial solutions, including the proprietary, open-architecture, AI-enabled Lattice suite, integrated hardware, data, computer infrastructure, and technical support services”
Andruil 获得美国 Department of War 授予的 $20 Billion USD 累计总合同。

这对 $PLTR$KRKNF$SPIR$ACHR 和其他供应链/集成伙伴是利好。

更大的伙伴,比如 $ORCL$AMD$NVDA,顺风可能没那么大。

“Andruil……获得了一份 firm-fixed-price contract,累计总额 $20,000,000,000,用于整合当前和未来商业解决方案,包括专有的 open-architecture、AI-enabled Lattice suite、integrated hardware、data、computer infrastructure 和 technical support services。”
❤️ 573 🔁 41 💬 24
打开原推
📝 原创
Weekend Macro playbook prediction:

1. US gonna do something bad to Iran

2. Bunch of videos on X of stuff going up in flames

3. Retail doomposters and Jim Cramer will say "$200 oil" parroting Iran state media over the weekend.

4. People panic sell $EWY or $TSM based on something random like Helium that have little material effect

5. Crude Oil futures spike and stocks drop

6. People glad they sold their shares after seeing impression farming doomposters claim Monday will be the worst day ever of the stock market.

7. People capitulate the rest of their unrelated to Iran stocks overnight

8. US Treasury/Gov pulls black magic and crude oil prices go down by market open

9. Stocks go back up, and people chase to recover their lost positions.

10. Next Week Green
Weekend Macro playbook 预测:

1. 美国会对伊朗做点坏事

2. X 上一堆东西着火的视频

3. 散户 doomposters 和 Jim Cramer 周末会复读伊朗国家媒体,说 “$200 oil”

4. 人们因为 Helium 这种随机、实质影响很小的东西,恐慌卖 $EWY$TSM

5. Crude Oil futures 飙升,股票下跌

6. 看到 impression farming doomposters 说周一会是股市史上最惨一天,人们庆幸卖了股票

7. 人们 overnight 投降卖掉其他和伊朗无关的股票

8. US Treasury/Gov 拉黑魔法,crude oil prices 在开盘前下去

9. 股票涨回去,人们追高补回丢掉的仓位

10. Next Week Green
❤️ 1,302 🔁 60 💬 100
打开原推
📝 原创
I've been the first few to cover many supply chain photonic names.

Most are up 100-400%+ since I've posted.

Here's the TLDR overview of my thesis posts:

“Safest” Longs as of Today:

- $TSEM (Tower Semi)
- $SOI (Soitec)
- $COHR - Defensible compounders over time.

Soitec - Substrate monopoly over silicon photonics / CPO architectural ramp at dirt cheap valuation (after recent 40%+ rise maybe still 1.4x book)

Tower Semi - P/E in the 10's for 2028, 70%+ capacity booked already, $NVDA architectural partner, and basically the pure play $TSM of photonics.

Coherent - Basically does everything from materials/substrates to lasers to transceivers in photonics. As well as fundamental supplier to many other verticals.

Most High Beta/Extreme Growth Longs:

$AXTI - InP duopoly with Sumitomo (that getting export controlled), upstream feedstock duopoly with Vital.

Basically at the top of the entire photonics food chain is AXT. There's certainty export control risks, but my thesis is that if AXT goes down, the photonic buildout with AI goes down. So might as well go long on AXT.

$AAOI - 10x revenue ramp into 2027. Laser -> Design -> Assembly, Made in America. Main uncertainty is execution, scaling laser capacity that they've bought from $COHR, etc.

Demand from hyperscalers are all there. Can they deliver? I'd take the risk.

$IQE - Basically completely dependent on restructuring and clearing debt (~$200M MC). Known $LITE supplier for epiwafers, and their main competitor was Landmark with a $3.5B+ valuation.

The latent capacity is there with reactors, but they basically need to pull off a successful pivot over to photonics and cut off legacy drag for 10x rerating.

Highest risk out there, but maybe worth the reward.s

Long $GOOGL TPU Ecosystem:

$LITE - Basically very high BOM related to optical due to OCS monopoly for Google.

If you think Google TPU is a trillion dollar program that might end up like $NVDA, go long on $LITE.

Google has $175-180B capex planned for 2026, and their CTO for AI Infra said they plan to up that Y/Y, probably spending $1 trillion in the next 8 years.

If that holds up, $LITE is extremely undervalued relative to forward potential. Of course the supply lasers to other hyperscalers too, but I'd say it's more heavily tethered to Google growth.

_

There's a ton of others out there I've covered like:

$POET - I'm personally not long, but $400M balance sheet gives it good cushion. Just found Celestial from $MRVL ramp was too far out, eg. $500 million 2028, $1 billion 2029 projections, for revenue to be too material as of 2026.

It largely depends if their interposers get other hyperscaler qualifications rather than backdooring through Marvell, which was the main bull case.

$HIMX- I did find this thesis to be slightly compelling as a likely $TSM COUPE supplier.

But personally, I preferred $SOI, and would just put more concentration into that (since Soitec known supplier already to basically everything silicon photonics, and is just coming out of a downturn).

There’s a lot more like $NOK, $SHMN, that are interesting, but I’ve personally out concentration into the ones I find most compelling.

As “crowded names” like $LITE, it does not mean there’s no upside left. It just happens to be more priced in until there’s new news.

There's a lot of "critical suppliers" but there's a difference between importance in the supply chain...

And converting that into extreme revenue growth eg. $AAOI -> $4.5 billion in revenue.

But for TLDR photonics exposure, my portfolio looks similar to this:

High Concentration (Safer)
$TSEM foundry, $SOI substrate, $COHR everything

Mix of Long + CSP (High Volaility):
$AXTI substrate/feedstock, $IQE epiwafer, $AAOI transceiver supply chain

Then Long Google with $LITE
我是最早覆盖很多供应链 photonic 名字的人之一。

大多数从我发帖后涨了 100-400%+。

这是我 thesis posts 的 TLDR:

今天看“最安全”的 longs:

- $TSEM(Tower Semi)
- $SOI(Soitec)
- $COHR - 长期 defensible compounders。

Soitec - silicon photonics / CPO 架构爬坡中的 substrate monopoly,估值极便宜(最近涨 40%+ 后可能仍只有 1.4x book)。

Tower Semi - 2028 年 P/E 十几倍,70%+ 产能已预订,$NVDA 架构伙伴,基本是 photonics 里的 pure play $TSM

Coherent - photonics 里从材料/substrates 到 lasers 到 transceivers 基本都做,也给很多垂直领域供货。

最高 beta / 极端增长 longs:

$AXTI - InP duopoly,另一个是 Sumitomo(正被出口管制),上游 feedstock duopoly 还有 Vital。

基本上 AXT 位于整个 photonics 食物链顶端。确实有出口管制风险,但我的 thesis 是,如果 AXT 出事,AI photonic buildout 也出事。那还不如 long AXT。

$AAOI - 2027 年收入 10x ramp。Laser -> Design -> Assembly,Made in America。主要不确定性是执行、扩产 laser capacity 等。

Hyperscaler 需求都在。能不能交付?我愿意承担这个风险。

$IQE - 基本完全取决于重组和清债(~$200M MC)。已知 $LITE epiwafers 供应商,主要竞争对手 Landmark 估值 $3.5B+。

reactors 的潜在产能在,但它们需要成功转向 photonics,切掉 legacy drag,才能 10x rerating。

风险最高,但也许值得。

Long $GOOGL TPU Ecosystem:

$LITE - 因为 Google OCS monopoly,和 optical BOM 高度相关。

如果你认为 Google TPU 是一个可能像 $NVDA 一样的 trillion dollar program,那就 long $LITE

Google 2026 计划 $175-180B capex,AI Infra CTO 说会同比增加,未来 8 年可能花 $1 trillion。

如果成立,$LITE 相对 forward potential 极度低估。当然他们也给其他 hyperscalers 供应 lasers,但我认为更 heavily tethered to Google growth。

_

还有很多我覆盖过的:

$POET - 我个人不 long,但 $400M balance sheet 给它 cushion。只是觉得来自 $MRVL Celestial 的 ramp 太远,比如 2028 $500 million、2029 $1 billion,对 2026 收入影响不够 material。

它主要取决于 interposers 能否拿到其他 hyperscaler 认证,而不是通过 Marvell 后门,这才是主 bull case。

$HIMX - 我觉得这个 thesis 稍微有吸引力,可能是 $TSM COUPE 供应商。

但个人更喜欢 $SOI,会更多集中到那里,因为 Soitec 已知供应几乎所有 silicon photonics,且刚走出低迷。

还有 $NOK$SHMN 等很有意思,但我把集中度放在最有吸引力的名字上。

$LITE 这种 “crowded names” 并不意味着没有上行,只是新消息出来前更被定价了。

“critical suppliers” 很多,但供应链重要性和转化成极端 revenue growth(比如 $AAOI -> $4.5 billion revenue)是两回事。

TLDR photonics exposure,我的组合类似:

高集中度(更安全)
$TSEM foundry、$SOI substrate、$COHR everything

Long + CSP 混合(高波动):
$AXTI substrate/feedstock、$IQE epiwafer、$AAOI transceiver supply chain

然后用 $LITE long Google。
❤️ 1,408 🔁 138 💬 66
打开原推
📝 原创
WSJ: Iran’s Sea Mines Are One of Its Most Powerful Weapons

“Mines have been among the most destructive weapons that the U.S. Navy has faced”

More attention is now being poured into the Underwater defense sector.

Ocean defense names such as $KRKNF, $OPTT, and $CODA that are popular on X for sonar and mine neutralization applications.

May finally see more investor attention and possible defense contracts.

Especially as US media cycles focus on the mines beneath the Strait.
WSJ:Iran’s Sea Mines Are One of Its Most Powerful Weapons

“Mines have been among the most destructive weapons that the U.S. Navy has faced”

更多注意力正在流向 Underwater defense sector。

$KRKNF$OPTT$CODA 这类在 X 上因为 sonar 和 mine neutralization 应用而热门的 ocean defense names,

可能终于会获得更多投资者关注和潜在防务合同。

尤其是在美国媒体周期都聚焦海峡水雷的时候。
❤️ 284 🔁 15 💬 25
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Is it jut me or… is $EWY is no longer a good indicator of how $KOSPI and SK Hynix/Samsung move the next day.

As intraday movement is too volatile due to all the 10x leveraged instruments and hedging.

A lot of the former arbitrage opportunities are unreliable since it started to move more based on derivatives like oil/10x onchain leverage.

All the corrections to the daily movement/close happen overnight now.
是只有我这样觉得吗……$EWY 已经不再是预测 $KOSPI 和 SK Hynix/Samsung 次日走势的好指标了。

因为盘中波动由于所有 10x leverage instruments 和 hedging 变得太剧烈。

很多以前的 arbitrage opportunities 已经不可靠,因为它开始更多按 derivatives,比如 oil/10x onchain leverage 来动。

现在对日内走势/收盘的修正都发生在 overnight。
❤️ 97 🔁 2 💬 14
打开原推
📝 原创
Do you think markets know $META makes all their revenue from selling ads?

Not farming avocados?

-4% selloff for a total of -16.92% this past month is a bit too much. https://t.co/wMkcrMaIhX
你觉得市场知道 $META 所有收入都来自卖广告吗?

不是种牛油果?

过去一个月总共 -16.92%,今天又 -4%,有点太多了。 https://t.co/wMkcrMaIhX
❤️ 566 🔁 15 💬 79
打开原推
📝 原创
The $150-200 Crude Oil longs:

Are about to get a taste of what the Silver paper price manipulation is like.

This time, it’s coming from the US Gov, not bullion banks/CME.

Per Financial Times:

“US Treasury was considering measures to lower oil prices, including intervention in futures markets.”

The speculation was that it could be from the US Treasury,” he added, noting that the government has previously intervened in other markets.

I would not position against the US government wanting to contain crude oil prices.
那些 $150-200 Crude Oil longs:

马上要尝尝 Silver paper price manipulation 是什么味道了。

这一次,出手的是美国政府,不是 bullion banks/CME。

据 Financial Times:

“US Treasury was considering measures to lower oil prices, including intervention in futures markets.”

他补充说,猜测可能来自 US Treasury,并指出政府以前也干预过其他市场。

我不会站在美国政府想压住 crude oil prices 的对立面。
❤️ 546 🔁 23 💬 69
打开原推
💬 引用
There’s $TSEM, my safer photonics compounder.

Then there’s my race horse on steroids, with a rocket ship attached:

$AXTI.

My positions are up over 550%+.

And AXT is up another 10.38% today.

$NVDA returns got left in the dust, as identifying AXT as the InP bottleneck few months ago was generational wealth to many.
$TSEM,这是我更安全的 photonics compounder。

然后还有我那匹打了 steroids、绑了 rocket ship 的赛马:

$AXTI

我的仓位已经涨超过 550%+。

AXT 今天又涨了 10.38%。

几个月前把 AXT 识别为 InP bottleneck,对很多人来说就是 generational wealth,$NVDA 的回报都被甩在后面。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$TSEM does not concern itself with the rest of the market.

Tower semi is one of my favorite photonic names, as a safer $TSM like compounder.

For the new paradigm of AI.

Up 5.8% today. https://t.co/UcH1K6C4UI
$TSEM 不关心市场其他部分怎么走。

Tower semi 是我最喜欢的 photonic names 之一,是一个更安全、像 $TSM 一样的 compounder。

为了 AI 的新范式。

今天涨 5.8%。 https://t.co/UcH1K6C4UI
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2032474260179149056
❤️ 482 🔁 31 💬 43
打开原推
💬 引用
$TSEM does not concern itself with the rest of the market.

Tower semi is one of my favorite photonic names, as a safer $TSM like compounder.

For the new paradigm of AI.

Up 5.8% today. https://t.co/UcH1K6C4UI
$TSEM 不关心市场其他部分怎么走。

Tower semi 是我最喜欢的 photonic 名字之一,作为更安全、像 $TSM 一样的 compounder。

为了 AI 新范式。

今天涨 5.8%。 https://t.co/UcH1K6C4UI
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I'm long $TSEM, the $TSM of photonics.

My top two picks for CPO are $SOI and Tower Semi.

Given the $NVDA GTC catalyst on new photonic related architecture next week:

I expect Tower Semi to get a huge catalyst.

Nvidia laready directly collaborated with Tower to scale 1.6T silicon photonics last month (hint hint for GTC), likely pushing the downstream players to use it.

And now, Tower is the leading supplier of 1.6T SiPh PICs and the primary foundry for scale-up CPO architectures. (the other being global foundries)

From my forward est:
2028 Forward P/E: ~16.8x to ~18.1x

(Tower set a target $2.84B revenue by 2028, with ~31.7% operating margin, ~$750M in net profit)

The thing to note is over 70% of their planned SiPh capacity is already reserved through 2028. And photonics haven't even ramped up yet.

So, I expect them to strongly beat earning projections due to extreme photonics scaling + allocations price hikes that's not modeled into projections.

Also, $TSEM is heavily de-risked by 70% of capacity already being reserved. MC is likely due to $TSEM being a very obscure upstream player in the photonics supply chain.

But I expect the $NVDA GTC conference to be that catalyst that brings it to premium valuations.

I'm long $TSEM as an asymmetrical upside for upstream photonics foundry layer.
我做多 $TSEM,它就是光子领域的 $TSM

我对 CPO 的前两大选择是 $SOI 和 Tower Semi。

考虑到下周 $NVDA GTC 对新的光子相关架构有催化:

我预计 Tower Semi 会迎来巨大催化。

Nvidia 上个月已经直接和 Tower 合作,扩大 1.6T 硅光规模(给 GTC 的暗示),很可能推动下游玩家使用它。

现在,Tower 是 1.6T SiPh PIC 的领先供应商,也是 scale-up CPO 架构的主要晶圆厂(另一个是 global foundries)。

按我的前瞻估算:
2028 Forward P/E:约 16.8x 到 18.1x

(Tower 设定了 2028 年 $2.84B 收入目标,约 31.7% 经营利润率,约 $750M 净利润)

需要注意的是,他们规划中的 SiPh 产能超过 70% 已经预定到 2028 年。而光子还没真正放量。

所以我预计他们会因为极端的光子扩产 + allocation 涨价,大幅超过盈利预测,而这些还没有被模型计入。

另外,$TSEM 也因为 70% 产能已被预定而大幅去风险。市值可能是因为 $TSEM 是光子供应链里非常冷门的上游玩家。

但我预计 $NVDA GTC 会成为让它获得溢价估值的催化。

我做多 $TSEM,把它当作上游光子晶圆厂层的非对称上行机会。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031820871170736570
❤️ 322 🔁 29 💬 19
打开原推
📝 原创
PayPay ( $PAYP ) is the newest IPO.

If you're wondering if you should fomo in the $PYPL / WeChat of Japan at an $11.8B MC?

Let's find out.

If you've ever been to Japan: PayPay is everywhere.

It's the Japanese SuperApp for payments, investing, and banking.

Here's a breakdown:

FY 2025 metrics:
Revenue: ¥299.1 billion (~$1.9 billion)
Growth Rate: ~26.3%
Net Income (GAAP): ¥39.2 billion (~$248 million)
P/E: ~44x
Stock Base Compensation: Virtually 0, unlike $SNAP and $DUOL in the US.

If we look at balance sheet:

Consolidated accounting makes things a nightmare when you see $PAYP ¥4.85 Trillion (~$32.3 Billion) in liabilities or customer deposits mixed into assets.

But pre-IPO net debt is approximately -$480M, and post-IPO proceeds of ~$496M.

So balance sheet looks roughly net cash slightly positive but neutral. Also PSA: Softbank is the majority owner, lockup expires September 2026.

At $11B, it's roughly ~5.8x P/S and very profitable for a Japanese superapp growing at 26% with expanding margins and zero SBC.

By US standards, this is normally valued, not exactly a screaming buy.

TLDR: In general, $PAYP is not a terrible long at $11.8B.

Might get some IPO hype + mixed with low float dynamics, but would not chase if it ends up a lot higher.

Maybe there's some TAM expansion like $HOOD that prices it up over time. But Softbank ATM-like overhang in a few months.

But there's a lot better mispriced choices out there like $RDDT right now.
PayPay($PAYP)是最新 IPO。

如果你在想要不要 fomo 进这个日本的 $PYPL / WeChat,市值 $11.8B MC?

我们来看。

如果你去过日本:PayPay 到处都是。

它是日本的支付、投资和银行 SuperApp。

拆一下:

FY 2025 metrics:
Revenue:¥299.1 billion(~$1.9 billion)
Growth Rate:~26.3%
Net Income(GAAP):¥39.2 billion(~$248 million)
P/E:~44x
Stock Base Compensation:几乎 0,不像美国的 $SNAP$DUOL

看资产负债表:

合并会计让事情很烦,你会看到 $PAYP 有 ¥4.85 Trillion(~$32.3 Billion)liabilities,里面混着 customer deposits 和 assets。

但 IPO 前净债务约 -$480M,IPO 后 proceeds 约 ~$496M。

所以资产负债表大概是轻微净现金为正,基本中性。另外 PSA:Softbank 是大股东,lockup 2026 年 9 月到期。

$11B 估值下,大概 ~5.8x P/S,对一个增长 26%、利润率扩张、零 SBC 的日本 superapp 来说还不错。

按美国标准,这是正常估值,不算极度便宜。

TLDR:整体来说,$PAYP 在 $11.8B 不算糟糕的 long。

可能会有 IPO hype + low float dynamics,但如果涨太多我不会追。

也许会有像 $HOOD 那样的 TAM expansion,慢慢把价格抬高。但几个月后有 Softbank 类 ATM overhang。

现在外面有更好的错价选择,比如 $RDDT
❤️ 351 🔁 15 💬 25
打开原推
📝 原创
I’m genuinely impressed:

People are collectively paying Michael Burry $10 million + in yearly subscription fees.

Just to lose money on both $PLTR and $ADBE.

On top of their $400+ yearly sub fee.

There were signs when they tried comparing Hubspot small business blogging valuations.

To Palantir’s black box AI programs used to invade Iran and Venezuela.

When they feel the need to block anyone on X because their arguments can’t hold up to public debate…

Maybe you’re following the wrong person?
我真心佩服:

大家每年合计付 Michael Burry $10 million+ 的订阅费。

就是为了在 $PLTR$ADBE 上一起亏钱。

还要在他们 $400+ 年费之上。

当他们试图把 Hubspot 小企业博客估值,

拿来和 Palantir 用于入侵伊朗和委内瑞拉的 black box AI programs 比较时,就已经有迹象了。

当他们觉得需要屏蔽 X 上所有人,因为自己的论点经不起公开辩论时……

也许你跟错人了?
❤️ 978 🔁 34 💬 94
打开原推
📝 原创
Top 10 common fallacies I keep seeing again and again on X.

And some of the most important things I look out for too when doing research:

1. Being in "crowded" names like $LITE or $COHR does not mean these names won't go higher.

(Just look at Nvidia throughout 2022 -> 2026).

2. Don't conflate bottlenecks and critical companies in supply chains like SpaceX or Nvidia with stock market returns.

What matters is how it translates to material operating income. The reason I mention $AXTI, is likely price hikes from being that bottleneck.

3. Insider Sales are the extreme noise.

You will never see me quote that anywhere to derive projections and what the MC should be at.

4. Repeat after me. TA is only an indicator, not a bible. Please stop posting TAs underneath my Soitec posts to say "overextended!!!" without any reference to fundamentals, catalysts, or macro.

TA's especially, mean nothing when there's extreme fundamental changes (eg. $6B in share dilution or upcoming IPO float lockup like $BULL, $CRCL).

5. DILUTION IS DIFFERENT. ATMs are different than convertible notes that are different than loans.

It's extremely nuanced. Some lead to more equity returns than others that are more harmful (eg. $IREN $6B ATM).

Float dynamics, ATM sizes relative to marketcap, and all others need to be accounted for.

6. Markets are forward looking. It's just a matter of how far in the future they look.

Stop only posting previous revenue guidance only to justify valuations pricing in forward growth eg. $TSEM forward growth for photonics ramp.

7. Revenue/Gross Margins/Profit are extremely, extremely nuanced.

Profit can be hid in tax writeoffs, and margins can be hid in other parts of the income statement like opex, or in depreciation.

So posting "gross margins/profit" (eg. $IREN) and using that to justify it vs. other neoclouds means nothing if the accounting is not normalized

8. Net Income is not the same as GAAP Net Income.

True profitability from companies like $SNAP are hid by things like stock-based compensation. When a company reports non-GAAP net income of $500 million to the media, their official SEC-filed GAAP net income could be a $150 million loss because of SBC.

9. Float Dynamics + Dilution are important.

You can say "oh this company is $150M MC, 30m profit" but if you're forgetting there's a massive dilution overhead at X strike, then all your research gets thrown out the drain.

10. Make sure to factor in REVENUE GROWTH/TAM. You can grow a company 200% one year, but if TAM maxes out like in Fintech then revenue growth eventually falls off the cliff.

Hence why $RKLB gets premiums for infinite Space TAM growth while other companies in fintech growing at 40% Y/Y don't.
我在 X 上反复看到的 Top 10 常见谬误。

也是我做研究时最关注的一些点:

1. 在 $LITE$COHR 这种 “crowded” names 里,并不意味着它们不会继续涨。

看看 2022 -> 2026 的 Nvidia。

2. 不要把 SpaceX 或 Nvidia 这种供应链 bottlenecks/critical companies,和股市回报混为一谈。

关键是它如何转化为实质 operating income。我提 $AXTI,是因为作为瓶颈可能涨价。

3. Insider Sales 是极端噪音。

你永远不会看到我引用它来推导 projections 或 MC。

4. 跟我重复:TA 只是指标,不是圣经。别在我 Soitec 帖下面发 TA 说 “overextended!!!”,却不提基本面、催化或宏观。

尤其在有极端基本面变化时,TA 没意义(比如 $6B share dilution 或 $BULL$CRCL 这种 IPO float lockup)。

5. DILUTION 是不一样的。ATM、convertible notes、loans 都不同。

这非常细。有些对 equity returns 更好,有些更有害(比如 $IREN $6B ATM)。

Float dynamics、ATM 相对 marketcap 的规模等都要算。

6. Markets are forward looking。只是看多远的问题。

别只拿旧 revenue guidance 来否定 forward growth 定价,比如 $TSEM photonics ramp。

7. Revenue/Gross Margins/Profit 非常、非常复杂。

Profit 可以藏在 tax writeoffs 里,margins 可以藏在 opex 或 depreciation 等损益表其他地方。

所以只发 “gross margins/profit”(比如 $IREN)来和其他 neoclouds 比,没有 normalized accounting 就没意义。

8. Net Income 不等于 GAAP Net Income。

$SNAP 这类公司的真实盈利能力会被 stock-based compensation 掩盖。公司对媒体说 non-GAAP net income $500 million,官方 SEC-filed GAAP net income 可能因为 SBC 是 $150 million loss。

9. Float Dynamics + Dilution 很重要。

你可以说“这家公司 $150M MC,30m profit”,但如果忘了某个 strike 上方有巨大 dilution overhead,研究就全废了。

10. 一定要考虑 REVENUE GROWTH/TAM。公司一年能增长 200%,但如果 TAM 像 Fintech 一样封顶,收入增长最终会断崖。

所以 $RKLB 会因为无限 Space TAM growth 拿溢价,而其他 fintech 公司即使 40% Y/Y 增长也拿不到。
❤️ 915 🔁 62 💬 40
打开原推
📝 原创
Memory Price Market Research from Counterpoint:

"There is no scenario where memory prices correct in the second half [of 2027], given that hyperscaler purchasing intent remains unbroken"

In regards to $SNDK, $MU, $EWY (Sk Hynix, Samsung), and other memory names.

They commented: DRAM output from Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron, CXMT, and Nanya is forecast to grow 26% this year, with NAND up 24%.

But hyperscaler demand will likely far outstrip supply for the foreseeable future.

This mirrors $INTC CEO's comments about "No Relief on Memory Shortage Until 2028".

With NAND prices Q1 increasing 100% + Samsung hiking NAND prices Q2.

And DRAM prices going through constant price hikes.

The explosive increase in operating margins from memory makers across the board are poised to outweigh any macro.
Counterpoint 的 Memory Price Market Research:

“鉴于 hyperscaler 购买意愿没有中断,2027 年下半年不存在 memory prices 回调场景。”

这关系到 $SNDK$MU$EWY(Sk Hynix、Samsung)以及其他 memory names。

他们评论说:Samsung、SK Hynix、Micron、CXMT、Nanya 的 DRAM 产出预计今年增长 26%,NAND 增长 24%。

但在可预见未来,hyperscaler 需求很可能远远超过供给。

这呼应了 $INTC CEO 关于 “No Relief on Memory Shortage Until 2028” 的说法。

随着 NAND prices Q1 增加 100%+,Samsung Q2 再提高 NAND prices,

以及 DRAM prices 持续涨价,

各 memory makers 运营利润率的爆发式增长,准备压过任何宏观影响。
❤️ 467 🔁 40 💬 27
打开原推
💬 引用
As expected from my original $AXTI thesis:

InP substrates is a massive bottleneck for photonics.

And:

7N Indium High Purity Indium (non standard) has reached all time highs on SMM, recently.

$AXTI is very. highly. correlated.

Tracking derivatives on SMM and other markets is likely the best insight you'll get into performance.

Demand does not seem to be slowing down anytime soon. We haven't gotten to the point of NAND-style price hikes yet either.
正如我最初 $AXTI thesis 预期:

InP substrates 是 photonics 的巨大瓶颈。

而且:

7N Indium High Purity Indium(非标准)最近在 SMM 创下历史新高。

$AXTI 相关性非常、非常高。

跟踪 SMM 和其他市场的衍生指标,可能是你了解表现的最佳线索。

需求看起来短期不会放缓。我们甚至还没到 NAND 式涨价阶段。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 378 🔁 30 💬 24
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Just my thoughts on the market from names I've mentioned.

$SOI: as you know from my public posts, already up over 40%+ coming out of smartphone drag, silicon photonics substrate monopoly and gets a boost from both tailwinds at once.

$AAOI: terrible way to do dilution. Should have done $500m at the start rather than $250m after $250m. Since now I'm getting $POET vibes if they do another $250m repeat after raising $500m.

Regardless, **if they stop** there and just raise $500m, I think it's highly worthwhile.
Other Bear cases that I've already covered:
-> getting extra laser capcity from $COHR. Yes they need to scale up laser capacity but will do it internally. People are wondering how they would be valued assembly only, just look at $FN and it's ~$20B.
-> Extra dilution past what's needed (just now priced in).
-> management execution:
This was always this biggest thing "if they can execute".
People can always find a reason to poke holes in this, but only time will tell. And in the off-chance they do, the entire supply chain from laser -> design -> assembly is highly valuable past $30B+.
-> pluggable transcievers: I've already covered this as well, CPO is coming 2028 but $GOOGL and $AVGO already cited the bull case for life extension.
However: $AAOI basically is the supply chain, and gives them optionality to pivot.

But "Buy the dip now?" if you're long term investing, doesn't really matter. $8B looks great. Otherwise, I see $AAOI selling pressure around $100 near term so better to do CSP underneath if you're cost averging in.

Bull cases already:
-> 3 hyperscalers buying anything they can make... ( $AMZn, $MSFT, $ORCL from my research).
-> people cite "customer diversification" but if if $ORCL stops buying then $MSFT would just take its place lol. they're already max capacity/backlog.
-> Extreme revenue ramp:

people and especially analysts misunderstand "having importance in the market as a materials bottleneck" with "can this translate to revenue + fcf".

$AAOI translates to revenue if they project $378M/month, which is why I've liked it more than others.

$HIMS: SI increasing another 1-2% was cause for drop. Only chance retail wins is if price appreciates enough from fundamental increases. Don't think there's enough buying pressure to squeeze institutions with endless billions. But the fact it's 40%+ already gives it less downside pressure.

I genuinely see the bull case for monetizing retail capture + distribution after their series of global acquisitions but that alone, it would richly valued. more about fundamentals improving + off chance something squeezes SI that I found it more compelling at $22 again.

$RDDT: zero clue why it's back at $132. I can see base cases with revenue slowdown past 2026 after 50% goes to like 25% or something, but even so it's just printing so much money that there's going to be a huge cushion for years to come.

Extremely safe feeling long for me at $132.

For $TSEM: safe long for me. You have capacity booked into 2028, confirmed $NVDA supplier, pretty low P/E, but lower revenue ramp. Feels like steady compounder exposure for photonics compared to something more parabolic like $AXTI or $AAOI

As for $HIMX - they're a reported supplier to $TSM COUPE and possible supplier to $NVDA Rubin for CPO. Solid long off some supply chain mapping.

However, the risk reward for $HIMX vs $SOI is just so much more compelling for stuff like Soitec that's confirmed supplier/monopoly for almost anything silicon photonics related, so I would just put more concentration into the latter.

Overall macro again, it's going to be extremely volatile from Iran. With Iran trying to disrupt the oil/energy trade with the US just firing missiles everywhere.

Selling volatility is probably the best way to go alongside your core positions instead of margin dip buying.
只是我对提过这些名字的市场看法。

$SOI:就像我公开帖说的,已经涨 40%+,从 smartphone 拖累中出来,同时有 silicon photonics substrate 垄断和周期复苏双重顺风。

$AAOI:稀释方式很糟。应该一开始就做 $500m,而不是 $250m 之后再 $250m。现在如果他们再来一次 $250m,我会有 $POET 的感觉。

不管怎样,**如果他们停在这里**,只融资 $500m,我觉得非常值得。其他 bear case 我都说过:需要从 $COHR 获得额外 laser capacity,但会内部扩产;额外不必要稀释;管理层执行,这始终是最大问题。pluggable transcievers 方面,CPO 2028 会来,但 $GOOGL$AVGO 已经给了寿命延长的 bull case。

“现在买跌?” 如果长期投资,$8B 看起来很好。否则我觉得短期 $AAOI 在 $100 附近有卖压,cost average 更适合下面卖 CSP。

Bull case 已经是:3 个 hyperscalers 买走他们能做的一切(我研究看是 $AMZn$MSFT$ORCL)。别人说 customer diversification,但如果 $ORCL 不买,$MSFT 也会接走,因为他们已经满产/满 backlog。

重点是极端收入爬坡。很多人和分析师把“供应链重要材料瓶颈”和“能否转化成收入 + fcf”混为一谈。$AAOI 如果预测 $378M/月,就能转化成收入,这也是我更喜欢它的原因。

$HIMS:SI 又增加 1-2% 是下跌原因。散户唯一赢法是基本面增长带动价格涨到足够高。我不觉得买盘足够 squeeze 无限资金的机构。但 40%+ SI 已经给它更少下行压力。

我真能看到他们全球收购后,对 retail capture + distribution 变现的 bull case;单靠这个估值偏贵,真正吸引我的是基本面改善 + SI 被挤压的小概率,所以 $22 又更有吸引力。

$RDDT:完全不知道为什么回到 $132。我能理解 2026 后增长从 50% 降到 25% 这类 base case,但即便如此它现金流太强,会有多年巨大 cushion。

$132 对我来说是极安全的 long。

$TSEM:对我是安全 long。产能预订到 2028,确认 $NVDA 供应商,P/E 低,但收入爬坡较慢。相比 $AXTI$AAOI 那种抛物线,更像 photonics 的稳健复利敞口。

$HIMX:据报道是 $TSM COUPE 供应商,也可能是 $NVDA Rubin 的 CPO 供应商。按供应链映射是不错 long。

$HIMX vs $SOI 的风险回报,还是 Soitec 更吸引,因为它是几乎所有 silicon photonics 相关东西的确认供应商/垄断,所以我会更多集中到后者。

整体 macro 方面,伊朗会带来极端波动。伊朗试图扰乱 oil/energy trade,而美国到处发射导弹。

和核心仓位一起卖波动,可能比用 margin 抄底更好。
❤️ 217 🔁 3 💬 43
打开原推
📝 原创
$AAOI files for another $250 million USD ATM, upping the amount to $500 million.

The positive note is:

$AAOI has already finished their first ATM.

Markets absorbed $250 million in selling pressure (likely ~$100 before the stock went to $120) and the stock increased anyway.

“The amendment states that 2,476,307 shares have been sold for gross proceeds of approximately $249,999,983 under the sales agreement as of March 12, 2026”

However, I’m extremely bearish when it comes to excessive ATMs for any company like $IREN or $POET, and it’s not inclusive to $AAOI.

$500 million for capacity expansion is likely accretive compared to other $6 billion ATMs if people want to wait it out.

That being said, not happy about it and if they needed $500 million, should have done it from the start.
$AAOI 又提交了 $250 million USD ATM,把总额提高到 $500 million。

积极的一点是:

$AAOI 已经完成了第一次 ATM。

市场吸收了 $250 million 卖压(可能在股价到 $120 前约 ~$100)而股票仍然上涨。

“修正文件称,截至 2026 年 3 月 12 日,根据销售协议已售出 2,476,307 股,总收益约 $249,999,983。”

不过,对任何公司来说,过度 ATM 我都极度 bearish,比如 $IREN$POET,并不只针对 $AAOI

如果大家愿意等,$500 million 用于扩产,相比其他 $6 billion ATMs 可能是增值的。

话虽如此,我并不开心。如果他们需要 $500 million,本来就该一开始做完。
❤️ 555 🔁 25 💬 67
打开原推
📝 原创
$RDDT is getting ridiculous.

Looks completely mispriced. Now down 40% over the past few months.

If you strip out carry-forward losses, their net profit is ~28% of revenue, which is absolutely enormous.

And they’re growing forward revenues 50%+ Y/Y after 70%+ Y/Y growth.

If you ever look at $META, you know how much revenue can be optimized/user. There’s an incredibly high ceiling for monetization with Reddit.

It’s already derisked since IPO since Reddit is now one of the fastest growing and highest margin companies in the market.

One day if it pulls a $CRCL post earnings,
we’ll look back and wonder how this was valued at $24 billion MC.
$RDDT 越来越离谱。

看起来完全错价。过去几个月已经跌了 40%。

如果剔除可结转亏损,它们的净利润约为收入的 ~28%,这非常夸张。

而且在 70%+ Y/Y 增长之后,forward revenues 还在 50%+ Y/Y 增长。

如果你看过 $META,就知道每用户收入能优化到什么程度。Reddit 的变现天花板非常高。

IPO 之后它已经 derisked,因为 Reddit 现在是市场上增长最快、利润率最高的公司之一。

总有一天如果它像 $CRCL 财报后那样走,
我们会回头想,这东西怎么会只值 $24 billion MC。
❤️ 1,093 🔁 84 💬 152
打开原推
💬 引用
Soitec ( $SOI / $SLOIF ) is now up 45.58%.

This has a long way to go given their substrate-level monopoly over the silicon photonics and CPO architectures. https://t.co/P1hDh8UL9q
Soitec($SOI / $SLOIF)现在涨了 45.58%。

考虑到它们在 silicon photonics 和 CPO 架构里 substrate 层面的垄断,这还有很长路要走。 https://t.co/P1hDh8UL9q
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 435 🔁 36 💬 30
打开原推
📝 原创
$NVDA GTC is next week.

And markets are wondering what names will be announced with Nvidia’s new silicon photonics architecture.

> $TSEM works with $NVDA for silicon photonics

> $NVDA invested in both $COHR and $LITE to secure supply chains

> $AXTI a bottleneck for InP substrates

> Soitec ( $SOI ) a monopoly around SOI substrates for silicon photonics

Hmmm. There’s zero clues to what companies might be in the supply chain of $NVDA!

Better wait for the event to find out?
$NVDA GTC 就在下周。

市场都在猜 Nvidia 新 silicon photonics 架构会宣布哪些名字。

> $TSEM$NVDA 合作 silicon photonics

> $NVDA 投资了 $COHR$LITE 来锁定供应链

> $AXTI 是 InP substrates 的瓶颈

> Soitec($SOI)在 silicon photonics 的 SOI substrates 上接近垄断

嗯,完全没有任何线索说明哪些公司可能在 $NVDA 供应链里!

还是等活动公布吧?
❤️ 526 🔁 45 💬 45
打开原推
💬 引用
Andrew Huberman, the Stanford neuroscientist and one biggest voices in the health, just spotlighted $HIMS.

And said it was set to “soar” in a very realistic scenario.

Not everyday do you have the walking billboard of medicine implicitly pitching $HIMS as a long.

Curious what short sellers were thinking selling 41%+ of the float short?
Stanford 神经科学家、健康领域最大声音之一 Andrew Huberman 刚刚提到了 $HIMS

并且说在一个非常现实的场景下,它有望 “soar”。

不是每天都有医学界行走广告牌含蓄地把 $HIMS 当成 long 来推。

很好奇那些 short sellers 在做空 41%+ float 时到底怎么想的?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I try to talk about $HIMS from a fundamental standpoint.

But this cannot be understated:

$HIMS directional shorts look trapped.

The stock price is now up 64.15% to $26.5 (still down from highs of $70s).

While short interest increased to record highs of 41.6%.

There may be a violent feedback loop as short positions go more underwater.

However; this is contingent on the underlying stock going up from buying pressure and increasing fundamentals.

In order for their positions get liquidated.

Otherwise, if prices stagnates, they can leave their short sales in for extended periods of time (low borrow rate) and slowly buy to cover.

That being said, I'm personally along for the ride and looking forward to seeing what $HIMS can deliver:

Both from their recent $META-like global acquisitions spree + $HOOD-like cross selling latent revenue opportunities.

With $HIMS rapidly improving fundamentals, from the surprise $NVO partnership:

I personally see a real opportunity for $HIMS to make history.
我尽量从基本面角度聊 $HIMS

但这点不能低估:

$HIMS 的 directional shorts 看起来被困住了。

股价现在已经涨了 64.15%,到 $26.5(仍然低于 $70s 的高点)。

同时 short interest 增加到创纪录的 41.6%。

随着空头仓位越来越 underwater,可能出现剧烈反馈循环。

不过,这取决于 underlying stock 因买盘和基本面改善而继续上涨。

这样他们的仓位才会被 liquidated。

否则,如果价格停滞,他们可以在低 borrow rate 下把 short sales 留很久,然后慢慢买入回补。

话虽如此,我个人会继续搭车,也期待看到 $HIMS 能交出什么:

既包括最近类似 $META 的全球收购潮,也包括类似 $HOOD 的 cross selling latent revenue opportunities。

随着 $HIMS 基本面快速改善,加上意外的 $NVO partnership:

我个人认为 $HIMS 真有机会创造历史。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031859498546299159
❤️ 747 🔁 47 💬 43
打开原推
💬 引用
Thank you MarketScreener for actual coverage of $SOI this time.

The article writes:

“In the post dedicated to Soitec, the author puts forward several arguments.

He believes that the group could benefit from the development of CPO (co-packaged optics), a photonic architecture designed to accompany the rise of artificial intelligence and data centers.

According to him, Soitec would have a quasi-monopolistic position on certain SOI substrates used in this technology, an advantage that could become strategic if photonics is adopted on a large scale.

The investor also mentions a valuation level that he considers low and believes that the market could begin to position itself ahead of a promising cycle for photonics by 2027”

This was exactly the thesis, no extra fluff.

Last time media from FT and Bloomberg covered my thesis on $RPI, they labeled it a “meme-stock” out of nowhere. With many outlets straight up adding words never stated, which triggered negative sentiment.

That being said:

$SOI is a virtual monopoly over the substrate layer for CPO.

I plan to hold my positions over the next year or two, as I expect it to be the largest beneficiary of the upcoming architectural ramp spearheaded by $NVDA.
感谢 MarketScreener 这次终于真正报道了 $SOI

文章写道:

“在关于 Soitec 的帖子中,作者提出了几个论点。

他认为该集团可能受益于 CPO(co-packaged optics)的发展,这是一种 photonic 架构,用来伴随 AI 和数据中心崛起。

据他说,Soitec 在该技术使用的某些 SOI substrates 上具有准垄断地位,如果 photonics 大规模采用,这个优势可能变得具有战略意义。

这位投资者还提到他认为估值偏低,并认为市场可能会在 2027 年 photonics 有前景周期之前开始布局。”

这正是 thesis,没有额外废话。

上次 FT 和 Bloomberg 报道我关于 $RPI 的 thesis 时,他们莫名其妙给它贴了 “meme-stock” 标签。很多媒体还直接加了我从没说过的话,这让我很烦。

所以这次能看到准确报道,挺好。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 321 🔁 14 💬 27
打开原推
📝 原创
I try to talk about $HIMS from a fundamental standpoint.

But this cannot be understated:

$HIMS directional shorts look trapped.

The stock price is now up 64.15% to $26.5 (still down from highs of $70s).

While short interest increased to record highs of 41.6%.

There may be a violent feedback loop as short positions go more underwater.

However; this is contingent on the underlying stock going up from buying pressure and increasing fundamentals.

In order for their positions get liquidated.

Otherwise, if prices stagnates, they can leave their short sales in for extended periods of time (low borrow rate) and slowly buy to cover.

That being said, I'm personally along for the ride and looking forward to seeing what $HIMS can deliver:

Both from their recent $META-like global acquisitions spree + $HOOD-like cross selling latent revenue opportunities.

With $HIMS rapidly improving fundamentals, from the surprise $NVO partnership:

I personally see a real opportunity for $HIMS to make history.
我尽量从基本面角度聊 $HIMS

但这点不能被低估:

$HIMS 的方向性空头看起来被困住了。

股价现在涨了 64.15% 到 $26.5(仍低于 $70 多的高点)。

同时空头比例增加到历史新高 41.6%。

如果股价继续上涨,空头更深度亏损,可能会出现剧烈反馈循环。

不过,这取决于底层股票因为买盘和基本面改善而上涨。

这样他们的仓位才会被清算。

否则,如果价格横盘,他们可以长期挂着空头(借券费低),再慢慢回补。

话虽如此,我个人会跟着这波走,也很期待 $HIMS 能交出什么成绩:

既包括他们最近像 $META 一样的全球收购潮,也包括像 $HOOD 一样的交叉销售潜在收入机会。

随着 $HIMS 基本面快速改善,尤其是意外的 $NVO 合作:

我个人认为 $HIMS 真的有机会创造历史。
❤️ 907 🔁 56 💬 46
打开原推
📝 原创
I'm long $TSEM, the $TSM of photonics.

My top two picks for CPO are $SOI and Tower Semi.

Given the $NVDA GTC catalyst on new photonic related architecture next week:

I expect Tower Semi to get a huge catalyst.

Nvidia laready directly collaborated with Tower to scale 1.6T silicon photonics last month (hint hint for GTC), likely pushing the downstream players to use it.

And now, Tower is the leading supplier of 1.6T SiPh PICs and the primary foundry for scale-up CPO architectures. (the other being global foundries)

From my forward est:
2028 Forward P/E: ~16.8x to ~18.1x

(Tower set a target $2.84B revenue by 2028, with ~31.7% operating margin, ~$750M in net profit)

The thing to note is over 70% of their planned SiPh capacity is already reserved through 2028. And photonics haven't even ramped up yet.

So, I expect them to strongly beat earning projections due to extreme photonics scaling + allocations price hikes that's not modeled into projections.

Also, $TSEM is heavily de-risked by 70% of capacity already being reserved. MC is likely due to $TSEM being a very obscure upstream player in the photonics supply chain.

But I expect the $NVDA GTC conference to be that catalyst that brings it to premium valuations.

I'm long $TSEM as an asymmetrical upside for upstream photonics foundry layer.
我 long $TSEM,photonics 里的 $TSM

我 CPO 的前两大选择是 $SOI 和 Tower Semi。

考虑到下周 $NVDA GTC 会有新 photonic 相关架构催化:

我预期 Tower Semi 会迎来很大催化。

Nvidia 上个月已经直接和 Tower 合作扩展 1.6T silicon photonics(给 GTC 的暗示),很可能会推动下游玩家使用它。

现在 Tower 是 1.6T SiPh PICs 的领先供应商,也是 scale-up CPO 架构的主要 foundry(另一个是 global foundries)。

按我的 forward 估算:
2028 Forward P/E: ~16.8x 到 ~18.1x

(Tower 目标到 2028 年收入 $2.84B,运营利润率 ~31.7%,净利润 ~$750M)

要注意的是,他们计划中的 SiPh 产能已经有 70% 以上被预订到 2028 年。而 photonics 甚至还没真正爬坡。

所以我预期他们会因为极端 photonics 扩张 + allocation 涨价(模型还没计入)大幅超过盈利预测。

而且 $TSEM 因为 70% 产能已被预订,风险已经大幅降低。市值低可能只是因为 $TSEM 是 photonics 供应链里非常冷门的上游玩家。

但我预计 $NVDA GTC 会成为把它带到溢价估值的催化。

我 long $TSEM,把它当成上游 photonics foundry 层面的非对称上行机会。
❤️ 1,152 🔁 87 💬 71
打开原推
💬 引用
How does a random person posting their thoughts on a multi billion dollar company $SOI

Send it up 20%

Am I that powerful now? https://t.co/fltXyAOyxC
一个随便发自己对数十亿美元公司 $SOI 看法的人……

怎么能让它涨 20%

我现在有这么大影响力了吗? https://t.co/fltXyAOyxC
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 731 🔁 29 💬 102
打开原推
📝 原创
$NBIS vs. $IREN.

The difference is night and day.

Nebius: $2B dilution from $NVDA, zero immediate selling pressure to the public float

Iren: $6B dilution from ATM into selling pressure into the open market. This extracts liquidity directly from the public and suppresses momentum

Very clear, which company leads to higher share value appreciation from capex financing.

One is strategic with Nvidia, the other is toxic financing.
$NBIS vs. $IREN

差别是天壤之别。

Nebius:来自 $NVDA 的 $2B 稀释,对公众流通盘没有即时卖压。

Iren:通过 ATM 向公开市场砸出 $6B 稀释,直接形成卖压。这会直接抽走公众流动性并压制动能。

很明显,哪种 capex 融资方式更有利于股价升值。

一个是和 Nvidia 的战略融资,另一个是有毒融资。
❤️ 963 🔁 64 💬 124
打开原推
🔁 转发
RT @aleabitoreddit: Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest…
RT @aleabitoreddit: 改变了对 Soitec($SLOIF)的看法,并在 ~43 建了一个不小的仓位来获得 CPO 暴露。

$NVDA GTC 下周是最大的……
转发原推@aleabitoreddit
原推正文未包含在导出数据中
https://x.com
❤️ 0 🔁 70 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Just in 10M ago from Reuters:

New confirmation from sources that Iran has deployed about a dozen mines in the Strait of Hormuz.

There's two very aquatic warfare stocks I found interesting for exposure.

$KRKNF the Squid🦑and $CODA the Octopus.

$KRKNF: Kraken Robotics, the Andruil supplier, is one of the more pure play stocks for the acquatic warfare sector:

They build Synthetic Aperture Sonar (SAS) and SeaPower batteries that many defense primes like Andruil rely on.

Anduril recently opened a facility in Rhode Island to mass produce UUVs (eg. Dive-LD and Ghost Shark).

According to retail BOM estimates:
- Dive-LD carries $1M to $2M CAD in Kraken hardware
- Ghost Shark XL-AUV carries $8M to $10M CAD.

If that Anduril ramps happens: the revenue ramp is there.

I wouldn't try and model Kraken based off revenue projections but more like how much Andruil scales (similar modeling $LITE based on $GOOGL TPU)

But financials, assets: $301.5M, Liabilities: $65.7M, Total debt: ~$24.1M so looks pretty healthy. 60% YoY revenue growth off 59% gross margins.

As for demining the strait, they have the KATFISH mine-hunting drone. And SAS Sonar for 3D images of the seafloor for identifying buried mines.

$CODA: Coda Octopus, basically pure play exposure to Iran placing mines.

Their main product is Echoscope real-time 3D/4D/5D volumetric sonar that maps static and moving objects in murky, pitch-black water.

This carries forward to other products like "NANO Gen Series", Echoscope version as a perception sensor for UUVs.

And then a diver augmented display (that SPECWAR ordered), which is basically the Echoscope sonar feeding people data.

CODA has an amazing balance sheet. Recent FY2025 report (ending Oct 2025), they hold $28.7 million in pure cash and have zero long-term debt.

Gross margins are extremely high as well, consolidated gross margin of 66.5% while majority of defense contracotrs sit around 10-20%.

$26.6M revenue for 2025, 30.7% Y/Y increase, and $4.1M net income, which is rare to be profitable.

But basically their product set of sonar / detection looks perfect pure play for this exact scenario and they’re fundamentally very sound, without the catalyst.

Regardless, Iran mining the straight isn't exactly a major TAM increase.

However, it does alert investors and the government that warfare may transition underwater:

Leading to more sector inflows as well as defense contract opportunities.

These were my two favorites personally, just publishing my thoughts here in case other's find this helpful.
Reuters 10 分钟前刚出:

消息人士新确认,伊朗已经在霍尔木兹海峡部署了大约十几枚水雷。

我发现两个很有意思的水下战争敞口股票。

$KRKNF 这只鱿鱼🦑和 $CODA 这只章鱼。

$KRKNF:Kraken Robotics,Andruil 的供应商,是水下战争领域比较纯的标的之一:

他们做 Synthetic Aperture Sonar (SAS) 和 SeaPower 电池,很多像 Andruil 这样的 defense primes 都依赖它们。

Anduril 最近在 Rhode Island 开了工厂,用来量产 UUVs(比如 Dive-LD 和 Ghost Shark)。

按散户 BOM 估算:
- Dive-LD 搭载 $1M 到 $2M CAD 的 Kraken 硬件
- Ghost Shark XL-AUV 搭载 $8M 到 $10M CAD。

如果 Anduril 真的放量:收入爬坡就在那里。

我不会按收入预测来建模 Kraken,更像是看 Andruil 能扩到多大(类似按 $GOOGL TPU 来建模 $LITE)。

但财务和资产看起来很健康:资产 $301.5M,负债 $65.7M,总债务 ~$24.1M。收入同比增长 60%,毛利率 59%。

至于海峡扫雷,他们有 KATFISH 猎雷无人机,以及能生成海底 3D 图像、识别埋藏水雷的 SAS Sonar。

$CODA:Coda Octopus,基本就是伊朗布雷这个场景的纯敞口。

他们的主产品是 Echoscope 实时 3D/4D/5D 体积声纳,能在浑浊、漆黑的水下绘制静态和移动物体。

这也延伸到其他产品,比如 “NANO Gen Series”,作为 UUV 感知传感器的 Echoscope 版本。

还有潜水员增强显示器(SPECWAR 下过单),本质上就是 Echoscope 声纳给人提供数据。

CODA 资产负债表很棒。最近 FY2025 报告(截至 2025 年 10 月),他们有 $28.7 million 纯现金,且没有长期债务。

毛利率也极高,综合毛利率 66.5%,而多数防务承包商只有 10-20% 左右。

2025 年收入 $26.6M,同比增长 30.7%,净利润 $4.1M,能盈利已经很少见。

基本上,他们的 sonar / detection 产品组合非常适合这个具体场景,而且即使没有催化,基本面也很扎实。

不过,伊朗在海峡布雷并不完全等于 TAM 大幅增加。

但它确实提醒投资者和政府,战争可能转向水下:

这会带来更多板块资金流入,以及防务合同机会。

这两个是我个人最喜欢的,只是把想法发出来,万一对别人有帮助。
❤️ 402 🔁 24 💬 31
打开原推
💬 引用
Turns out markets like hidden photonics monopolies?

Soitec is up 16% intraday.

If you look at the CPO photonics architectural ramp led by $NVDA:

It’s parabolic.

$SOI is likely a name that people can hold for many years as the substrate monopoly for CPO.

And best of yet, there’s the upcoming $NVDA GTC announcement next week.

Which would likely signal to institutions to start looking into players they missed like $AXTI, and now $SOI.
结果市场喜欢隐藏的 photonics 垄断?

Soitec 盘中涨了 16%。

如果你看 $NVDA 带动的 CPO photonics 架构爬坡:

那是抛物线式的。

$SOI 很可能是一个能持有很多年的名字,作为 CPO 的 substrate 垄断。

更好的是,下周还有即将到来的 $NVDA GTC 公告。

这很可能会提醒机构开始研究他们错过的玩家,比如 $AXTI,现在还有 $SOI
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec( $SLOIF )的看法,并在约 43 的位置为 CPO 敞口建了一个不小的仓位。

下周 $NVDA GTC 是推动光子和这套架构的最大催化。

约 1.5B 欧元市值。交易在 1x PB、约 2x P/S(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO 的基板侧是真正的垄断(光子通常给很高的溢价,垄断地位还会额外给溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI 基板上确实是实际垄断,因为他们会把授权给 Shin Etsu 等其他玩家以做供应多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这些名字(而且多数人大概甚至没听过 $AXTI 这些名字)。

现在这个时间点,相当于在低迷智能手机周期可能的底部买入,同时拿到 2027 年中后期 CPO 的完整上行,以及下周 $NVDA GTC 催化。

我个人认为这里有 3x,所以我做多了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031648475310616604
❤️ 509 🔁 33 💬 46
打开原推
💬 引用
$HIMS is now back up 14.22%.

The untapped latent revenue from their their global DTC retail distribution moat is extreme.

And draws parallels to the early acquisitions from $META.

As well as the cross-selling capabilities of $HOOD.

$HIMS is still down from it's $70+ highs, after acquiring three major global competitors without regulatory friction.

And best of yet:

Shorts that sold 40%+ of the company short directionally, are completely trapped from the surprising $NVO partnership + lawsuit termination.

I would personally hold and go long here on HIMS.

The risk/reward on management effectively monetizing that massive, global retail distribution network for healthcare seems worth it.
$HIMS 现在又涨回 14.22%。

他们全球 DTC 零售分发 moat 里的未开发潜在收入非常夸张。

这和 $META 早期收购有相似之处。

也和 $HOOD 的交叉销售能力相似。

$HIMS 在收购三大全球竞争对手、没有遇到监管阻力后,仍然低于 $70+ 的高点。

最妙的是:

那些方向性做空公司 40%+ 的空头,被意外的 $NVO 合作 + 诉讼终止彻底困住了。

我个人会在这里持有并做多 HIMS。

管理层如果能有效变现那个巨大的全球医疗零售分发网络,这个风险回报看起来值得。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Feels like people aren't articulating the bull case for $HIMS correctly:

Here's my view.

The main moat of $HIMS is network capture of retail audiences.

And the bull case is latent revenue monetization.

$HOOD achieved that same effect in fintech over 2025.

$META (fully grown) achieved that same effect in the social media sector over the past decade.

$HIMS is now at the starting point in 2026.

But given millions of new users across the globe (Europe, Australia, Japan, Canada) from Zava + Eucalyptus:

$HIMS now has that one-of-a-kind retail audience capture in the healthcare sector.

However, the difference between ~$70B companies in Robinhood and $1.6T giants in $META is that:

They've already successfully monetized their retail audiences both through margin optimization, and new revenue streams.

And very aggressively. $HIMS has not yet.

Robinhood did so by pushing new products from banking/credit cards/prediction markets/etc.

And they are all now independently generating $100m+ each as new revenue streams.

$META did so by capturing the maximum amount of revenue per user after acquiring WhatsApp/Instagram.

However, $HIMS has not gotten the chance to yet in the same way they did with the US (eg. Testosterone). Especially partially due to former lawsuits.

Now that's cleared up, the bull case can be seen again:

Instead of modeling what revenue Zava/Eucalyptus traditionally brought, the important thing to look at is retail network capture through # of people.

As this is biggest source of latent revenue + revenue projection beats not priced in.

Now, the billion dollar question is:

Will $HIMS end up like $HOOD?

$HIMS now has the one of the largest retail networks + distribution for healthcare.

However, cross-selling seems much harder in healthcare vs. fintech or social media channels.

The answer whether it ends up a $30B company or a $5B one is up for management to figure out.

So for people on the sideline, it might be worth flipping long again in the off-chance $HIMS manages to figure out latent revenue expansion from their new global userbase.

The ~40%+ short interest and the new $NVO partnership serves as a huge bonus as well.
感觉大家没有正确表达 $HIMS 的 bull case:

这是我的看法。

$HIMS 的主要护城河,是对 retail audiences 的网络捕获。

bull case 是 latent revenue monetization。

$HOOD 在 2025 年的 fintech 里实现了同样效果。

$META(完全成熟后)在过去十年的社交媒体领域实现了同样效果。

$HIMS 现在处在 2026 年的起点。

但考虑到 Zava + Eucalyptus 带来的全球数百万新用户(Europe、Australia、Japan、Canada):

$HIMS 现在在 healthcare sector 拥有那种独一无二的 retail audience capture。

不过,Robinhood 这种 ~$70B 公司和 $META 这种 $1.6T 巨头的区别在于:

它们已经通过 margin optimization 和新 revenue streams,成功把 retail audiences 货币化。

而且做得非常激进。$HIMS 还没有。

Robinhood 是通过推出 banking/credit cards/prediction markets 等新产品做到的。

这些现在都各自独立产生 $100m+ 新收入流。

$META 则是在收购 WhatsApp/Instagram 后,尽可能榨取每个用户收入。

$HIMS 还没有机会像在美国那样做(比如 Testosterone)。部分原因是之前的 lawsuits。

现在这件事清理掉后,bull case 又能看见了:

重点不是建模 Zava/Eucalyptus 传统上带来多少收入,而是看通过人数实现的 retail network capture。

因为这是最大的 latent revenue + revenue projection beats 来源,而且还没被定价。

现在十亿美元问题是:

$HIMS 会不会变成 $HOOD

$HIMS 现在拥有 healthcare 里最大的 retail networks + distribution 之一。

但 healthcare 的 cross-selling 看起来比 fintech 或 social media channels 难很多。

它最终是 $30B 公司还是 $5B 公司,要看管理层怎么解决。

所以对场外观望的人来说,重新翻多也许值得,因为存在 $HIMS 从新全球用户基础里搞定 latent revenue expansion 的可能。

~40%+ short interest 和新的 $NVO partnership 也是巨大加分项。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031152993886941656
❤️ 443 🔁 32 💬 25
打开原推
📝 原创
Just in: Nvidia has invested $2B into $NBIS.

I'm convinced Nebius is the next Amazon-level hyperscaler over time.

As they're 5 companies all growing sum-of-parts triple digits Y/Y:

- Nebius: $7-9B ARR from AI Cloud as the next AWS.

- Clickhouse: DB powering majority of fortune 500 companies, last valuation at $15B

- Avride: Robotaxi and FSD-4 level technology, now scaling up live with Uber.

- Toloka: Data Labeling platform, funded by Jeff Bezos and used by $AMZN

- TripleTen: Education platform, not as sexy as the rest, but still fast growing.

With sidequests from the widely used benchmarks like SWE-rebench.

Jensen's $NVDA investment into Nebius shares the same sentiment:

Nebius is at the forefront of AI and leading the wave to meet the growing demand for compute.
刚刚:Nvidia 向 $NBIS 投资了 $2B。

我确信 Nebius 随着时间会成为下一个 Amazon 级别 hyperscaler。

因为他们是 5 家公司组成的 sum-of-parts,而且都在三位数同比增长:

- Nebius:AI Cloud ARR $7-9B,像下一个 AWS。

- Clickhouse:驱动大多数 fortune 500 公司的 DB,上次估值 $15B

- Avride:Robotaxi 和 FSD-4 级别技术,现在正和 Uber 现场扩张。

- Toloka:Data Labeling 平台,由 Jeff Bezos 投资,也被 $AMZN 使用

- TripleTen:教育平台,没有其他几个性感,但增长也很快。

还有像 SWE-rebench 这种被广泛使用的 benchmark sidequest。

Jensen 的 $NVDA 投资 Nebius 表达的是同样看法:

Nebius 站在 AI 最前沿,并引领满足算力需求增长的浪潮。
❤️ 824 🔁 66 💬 60
打开原推
📝 原创
Changed my mind about Soitec ( $SLOIF ) and took a sizable position ~43 for CPO exposure.

$NVDA GTC next week biggest catalyst pushing photonics and this architecture.

~1.5B euros MC. Trading at 1x book value and ~2x P/S (very depressed valuations)

Genuine monopoly over substrates side for CPO (typically very premium valuations for photonics + even extra premium for monopoly status)

Algos and analysts might get confused over market share but it’s an actual monopoly over SOI substrates since they give licenses to other players like Shin Etsu for diversification sake eg. $TSM doesn’t like just 1.

I don’t think institutions will wait until next year to frontrun these names like Soitec or $TSEM (and most probably haven’t even heard of these names like $AXTI yet)

This timing would be buying the likely bottom of the depressed smartphone cycle, while getting full upside of CPO mid-late 2027 + $NVDA GTC catalyst next week.

I personally think it’s a 3x from here so I went long.
我改变了对 Soitec($SLOIF)的看法,并在 ~43 建了不小的仓位来获得 CPO 暴露。

$NVDA GTC 下周是推动 photonics 和这个架构的最大催化。

~1.5B euros MC。按 1x book value 和 ~2x P/S 交易(估值非常低迷)。

在 CPO substrates 侧是真正的垄断(photonics 通常有很高溢价,垄断地位还会有额外溢价)。

算法和分析师可能会被市场份额搞糊涂,但它在 SOI substrates 上确实是实际垄断,因为它会给 Shin Etsu 这类玩家授权以做多元化,比如 $TSM 不喜欢只有 1 家供应商。

我不认为机构会等到明年才去抢跑 Soitec 或 $TSEM 这类名字(而且大多数可能甚至还没听说过 $AXTI 这样的名字)。

这个时间点相当于买在低迷智能手机周期的可能底部,同时拿到 CPO 2027 年中后期 + 下周 $NVDA GTC 催化的全部上行。

我个人觉得这里能 3x,所以我 long 了。
❤️ 905 🔁 70 💬 85
打开原推
📝 原创
The Pentagon purchased $2M worth of Alaskan king crab.

As well as $6.9M worth of lobster tails with taxpayer funds in September

If your first thought like me was:

How do I profit off of government overspending on king crab and lobsters?

Here’s how:

$SYY - They hold massive, multi-million dollar DLA contracts with the US Gov, so when they need to order millions in king crab or lobster delivered, they’re the large beneficiary.

$USFD - The second-largest U.S. broadline distributor. USFD also bids on institutional and government contracts, absorbing the overflow of massive government food budgets for expensive crab and lobsters.

$PFGC - Another massive distributor that competes for institutional government and supply contracts for crab and lobster.

To profit from the Pentagon's taste in seafood and steak, you have to invest in the chokepoints that transport the food.

The three above are the largest beneficiaries and the spend in q4 from lobster and crab should show up in their earnings.
五角大楼买了价值 $2M 的阿拉斯加帝王蟹。

还在 9 月用纳税人的钱买了价值 $6.9M 的龙虾尾。

如果你和我一样第一反应是:

我怎么从政府超支买帝王蟹和龙虾里赚钱?

方法如下:

$SYY - 他们持有大量和美国政府 DLA 的数百万美元合同,所以当政府需要采购数百万美元帝王蟹或龙虾并配送时,他们是大受益者。

$USFD - 美国第二大 broadline distributor。USFD 也参与机构和政府合同竞标,承接庞大政府食品预算中昂贵螃蟹和龙虾的溢出需求。

$PFGC - 另一家大型分销商,竞争螃蟹和龙虾的机构政府供应合同。

想从五角大楼对海鲜和牛排的口味里获利,你得投资运输这些食物的 chokepoints。

上面三家是最大受益者,Q4 龙虾和螃蟹支出应该会体现在他们财报里。
❤️ 629 🔁 24 💬 64
打开原推
📝 原创
Jim Cramer: “Just impossible Day to Make Money”.

Today:
$AXTI: +15.08%
$AAOI: +11.5%
$HIMS: +6.05%
$LITE: +7.06%
$SNDK: +6.12%
$IQE: +19.08%
SK Hynix: 4.38%
$MU: +4.65%
$COHR: +4.86%

This is following the previous post about “$150-200” Oil on Sunday.

The Cramer indicator strikes again.
Jim Cramer:“今天根本不可能赚钱”。

今天:
$AXTI: +15.08%
$AAOI: +11.5%
$HIMS: +6.05%
$LITE: +7.06%
$SNDK: +6.12%
$IQE: +19.08%
SK Hynix: 4.38%
$MU: +4.65%
$COHR: +4.86%

这是继周日那篇 “$150-200 Oil” 之后。

Cramer indicator 又一次生效。
❤️ 627 🔁 31 💬 37
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Just my macro read: US and Trump 1000% does not want Oil prices to stay elevated.

Better thing to do is look at political and psychological mechanics. Not the fundamentals of supply and demand

If you see trump tweeting every day about lower oil prices, they'll do everything in their power to lower prices.

This is federal gov level policy. US can't fully insulate the entire market, but they have a large political influence over crude prices through other countries eg. UAE and partners.

Again, hidden US gov influence is extreme.

I would personally never bet against the US policy (eg. $INTC with semis), so I wouldn't go long on oil prices staying elevated.

I was just seeing everyone full port it into oil and shorting semis and I think that's the opposite of what to do.

Hence why I'm still long korean memory and $JETS expecting oil prices to go down.

So better thing to do imo is just stay long on US policy rather than trying to deep dive into oil pricing/supply dynamics.
只是我的 macro 观点:美国和 Trump 1000% 不希望 Oil prices 长期维持高位。

更该看政治和心理机制,而不是供需基本面。

如果你看到 trump 天天发推要更低 oil prices,他们会尽一切能力压低价格。这是联邦政府级政策。美国不能完全隔绝整个市场,但能通过 UAE 和伙伴等其他国家,对 crude prices 有很大政治影响力。

再次说,隐藏的美国政府影响力极强。

我个人永远不会和美国政策对赌(比如 semis 里的 $INTC),所以我不会 long oil prices 长期高位。

我只是看到所有人 full port oil、short semis,我觉得这正好反着来。

所以我仍然 long korean memory 和 $JETS,预期油价会下去。

在我看来,更好的做法是 long 美国政策,而不是深挖 oil pricing/supply dynamics。
❤️ 199 🔁 0 💬 25
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So it looks like:

-reporters were stating mines were placed last few days (news reported it as confirmed but still under investigation)

-Trump giving an off-ramp by saying it’s inactive but destroying all the ships.

It’s high confidence there’s mines, just don’t want to scare off ships from traveling.

- some conflicting news cycles

Kinda a mess but a catalyst regardless for undersea players.

Main thing is: it shows to the public how important a lot of aquatic defense contractors $KRKNF are through so probably will get some structural inflow from associating defense + aquatic names.

As for re-rating, it’s a tailwind/cataylst for sure.

Does it deserve a 2x like photonic stocks and AI revenue bumps?

Prob not. Unless there’s bigger conflicts.

That being said I’m sure there’s some very mispriced small caps out names out there with no premium.

And maybe small caps might go up 20-80%.

But I personally wouldn’t go chasing and stick with memory/photonic trends, but if you want to have fun trading, you can ride the catalyst.

Long term hold? No, unless more war ends up sea based.

But short term catalyst trade over the week for sure since news just came out and everyone is focusing in on underwater mines right now.
所以现在看起来:

- reporters 说过去几天已经布雷(新闻报道为确认,但仍在调查)

- Trump 通过说它是 inactive 但摧毁所有船只,给了一个 off-ramp。

高置信度是有水雷,只是不想吓跑船只。

- 一些新闻周期互相冲突

有点乱,但无论如何都是 underwater players 的催化。

重点是:它向公众展示了很多水下防务承包商 $KRKNF 有多重要,所以大概率会因为 defense + aquatic names 的联想而得到结构性流入。

至于 re-rating,肯定是 tailwind/cataylst。它值得像 photonic stocks 和 AI revenue bumps 那样 2x 吗?大概不,除非冲突更大。

话虽如此,我相信外面肯定有一些完全没有溢价、严重错价的小盘股。也许小盘会涨 20-80%。

但我个人不会追,还是会坚持 memory/photonic 趋势。不过如果想短线交易,可以 ride 这个催化。

长期持有?不,除非更多战争转向海上。

但本周短线 catalyst trade 肯定有,因为新闻刚出来,所有人现在都在关注 underwater mines。
❤️ 97 🔁 0 💬 11
打开原推
📝 原创
Just in: Trump is angered after Iran mined the Strait of Hormuz.

> Iran Places Underwater Mines
> Trump Angry bc Oil
> Urgent need to clear them
> Mine Detection + Clearance Companies = Profit?

If you want to profit off the situation:

Defense companies like $CODA, $KRKNF, $OPTT, $MIND, $EXA, $ESLT and many others stand to benefit.

It's the biggest catalyst of the decade for aquatic defense contractors, given the new news.

Just need to figure out who stands to benefit the most.
刚刚:Trump 因伊朗在霍尔木兹海峡布雷而愤怒。

> Iran Places Underwater Mines
> Trump Angry bc Oil
> Urgent need to clear them
> Mine Detection + Clearance Companies = Profit?

如果你想从这个局势里赚钱:

$CODA$KRKNF$OPTT$MIND$EXA$ESLT 等防务公司都有望受益。

考虑到最新消息,这是水下防务承包商十年来最大的催化。

只需要搞清楚谁受益最多。
❤️ 508 🔁 36 💬 50
打开原推
💬 引用
Other interesting names aside from $KRKNF, $CODA, $EXA:

$OPTT - WAM-Vs for underwater mine inspection + disposal (possibly Andruil partner, mentioned by followers).

$MIND - Side-scan sonars for mines

$NORBT - Wideband Multibeam Sonars

$HII - REMUS 100, 300, and 600 for mine clearance operations.

$GD - Bluefin Robotics Knifefish UUV for buried mines in cluttered underwater

$BA - Archerfish, an autonomous, expendable mine neutralizer

$SAABF - Sea Wasp for navigate up to naval mines and IEDs and place explosive charges next to them

$TDY - Gavia AUV for minehunting, SeaBotix ROVs, and the high-end RESON sonars

$NSANY - Synthetic Aperture Sonar

$NOC - AN/AQS-24B/C for minehunting
除了 $KRKNF$CODA$EXA 外,其他有意思的名字:

$OPTT - WAM-Vs,用于水下水雷检查 + 处理(可能是 Andruil 伙伴,粉丝提到)。

$MIND - 水雷侧扫声纳

$NORBT - Wideband Multibeam Sonars

$HII - REMUS 100、300、600,用于扫雷行动。

$GD - Bluefin Robotics Knifefish UUV,用于复杂水下环境中的埋藏水雷。

$BA - Archerfish,自主、一次性水雷中和器。

$SAABF - Sea Wasp,能靠近 naval mines 和 IEDs 并放置爆炸装置。

$TDY - Gavia AUV 猎雷、SeaBotix ROVs,以及高端 RESON sonars。

$NSANY - Synthetic Aperture Sonar

$NOC - AN/AQS-24B/C 猎雷系统
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Iran is now deploying mines in Strait of Hormuz.

You might be wondering like everyone else: How do I profit off Iran mining the waterway for oil?

Here's how:

Sonar for Minefields: $CODA, $KRKNF.

Coda Octopus ( $CODA, $174M): 3D/4D/5D volumetric sonar for mines in muddy water. DAVD for U.S. Navy EOD to defuse mines.

Kraken Robotics ( $KRKNF, $2.97B): KATFISH towed underwater vehicle is actively used by NATO navies for high-speed, high-resolution seabed mapping and minehunting

Mine Identification and Disposal:

Exail ( $EXALF, 2.2B MC ): Operates MIDS - Mine Identification and Disposal Systems

This is the biggest tailwind of the year for underwater defense companies:

As the battle moves from land to underseas: Search and Destroy for Iranian mines in the Straight.

Given this is brand new news, that came out a few minutes ago, don’t think they’ve been priced in yet.
Iran 现在正在 Strait of Hormuz 部署水雷。

你可能和所有人一样在想:我怎么从 Iran 给 oil 水道布雷这件事上赚钱?

方式如下:

Sonar for Minefields: $CODA, $KRKNF

Coda Octopus($CODA, $174M):用于浑水中水雷的 3D/4D/5D volumetric sonar。DAVD 用于 U.S. Navy EOD 排雷。

Kraken Robotics($KRKNF, $2.97B):KATFISH 拖曳式水下航行器被 NATO navies 主动用于高速、高分辨率海床测绘和 minehunting。

Mine Identification and Disposal:

Exail($EXALF, 2.2B MC):运营 MIDS - Mine Identification and Disposal Systems。

这是今年水下防务公司的最大顺风:

当战斗从陆地转向海底:Search and Destroy for Iranian mines in the Straight。

考虑到这是几分钟前刚出来的全新新闻,我不觉得它们已经被定价。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031448823164436895
❤️ 475 🔁 38 💬 36
打开原推
📝 原创
Iran is now deploying mines in Strait of Hormuz.

You might be wondering like everyone else: How do I profit off Iran mining the waterway for oil?

Here's how:

Sonar for Minefields: $CODA, $KRKNF.

Coda Octopus ( $CODA, $174M): 3D/4D/5D volumetric sonar for mines in muddy water. DAVD for U.S. Navy EOD to defuse mines.

Kraken Robotics ( $KRKNF, $2.97B): KATFISH towed underwater vehicle is actively used by NATO navies for high-speed, high-resolution seabed mapping and minehunting

Mine Identification and Disposal:

Exail ( $EXALF, 2.2B MC ): Operates MIDS - Mine Identification and Disposal Systems

This is the biggest tailwind of the year for underwater defense companies:

As the battle moves from land to underseas: Search and Destroy for Iranian mines in the Straight.

Given this is brand new news, that came out a few minutes ago, don’t think they’ve been priced in yet.
伊朗现在正在霍尔木兹海峡部署水雷。

你可能和其他人一样在想:怎么从伊朗给石油水道布雷里赚钱?

方法如下:

Minefields 用 Sonar:$CODA$KRKNF

Coda Octopus($CODA,$174M):用于浑水中水雷的 3D/4D/5D 体积声纳。DAVD 给 U.S. Navy EOD 用来拆雷。

Kraken Robotics($KRKNF,$2.97B):KATFISH 拖曳式水下航行器被 NATO 海军用于高速、高分辨率海底测绘和猎雷。

水雷识别和处理:

Exail($EXALF,2.2B MC):运营 MIDS - Mine Identification and Disposal Systems。

这是今年 underwater defense companies 最大顺风:随着战斗从陆地转向水下,搜索并摧毁海峡里的伊朗水雷。

考虑到这是几分钟前刚出的全新新闻,我不认为它们已经被定价。
❤️ 1,146 🔁 103 💬 75
打开原推
💬 引用
Hope you listened to my $AXTI thesis anon? https://t.co/d5eg0BIhlG
希望你听了我的 $AXTI thesis,anon? https://t.co/d5eg0BIhlG
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 1,014 🔁 56 💬 77
打开原推
💬 引用
$AAOI is now up 4x since $30.

Every photonics name from $AXTI to $LITE I’ve done a thesis on increased 2x, 3x, or 4x if you listened anon?

Hope the Crude Oil to $200 or $IREN troll “insider sales” doomposters didn’t make you panic sell your positions at $80.

This is why you hold through volatility and look at underlying fundamentals.

Not every company can go from 450m revenue to $4.5B in just one years time.
$AAOI 从 $30 以来现在已经 4x。

如果你听了,所有我做过 thesis 的 photonics 名字,从 $AXTI$LITE,都涨了 2x、3x 或 4x,anon?

希望那些喊 Crude Oil 到 $200,或者 $IREN troll “insider sales” doomposters,没有让你在 $80 恐慌卖掉仓位。

这就是为什么你要穿越波动,并看底层基本面。

不是每家公司都能在一年时间里从 450m revenue 到 $4.5B。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AAOI is up 24% and $LITE is 5% since my thesis today.

From BOM analysis, LITE ($27B) is levered toward TPU Ironwood due to OCS but benefits from NVDA + all ASICs.

AAOI ($2.5B), is levered toward MSFT MAIA ramp and Amazon Trainium.

InP like HBM, will be a bottleneck for 2026 as they’re the foundational materials used for lasers in these deployments.

Similar to memory bottlenecks with Micron and SK Hynix, we’ll likely see attention drawn to InP fabs, such as $AAOI, which happens to be one of the sole ones in America (COHR,Macom)

But compared to $LITE that is up 362% YTD due to the success of Google’s TPU (from Meta and Anthropic purchase orders), $AAOI is only up 7% YTD.

We’re largely seeing this because there’s a lack of retail or media attention on the $AMZN Trainium or $MSFT Maia deployments, which are largely expected to ramp up in 2026-2027.

However they’re all likely to succeed due to each hyperscaler wanting to lower costs of inference for their own cloud platform.

If we see other hyperscalers adopt OCS for optimized performance that the TPU achieved, expect $LITE to re-rate more than they have now given their monopoly in that specific segment.

However, if we see $MSFT Maia ramp up (given $AAOI is likely developing a new architecture for them), and $AMZN Trainium ramp up ($4B warrant + purchase orders), expect $AAOI to rerate.

Photonics and InP will be the new bottleneck like memory.

We’ll likely see investments pour down stream to players like $COHR, Innolight, $LITE, and hidden levered plays on specific hyperscaler ASICs like $AAOI as a theme in 2026.

The market is currently rewarding the Google TPU supply chain but might be missing other hyperscaler ASIC ramps.
自从我今天发完 thesis 之后,$AAOI 涨了 24%,$LITE 涨了 5%。

从 BOM 分析看,LITE($27B)因为 OCS 更偏向 TPU Ironwood,但也受益于 NVDA + 所有 ASIC。

AAOI($2.5B)则更偏向 MSFT MAIA 放量和 Amazon Trainium。

InP 会像 HBM 一样,成为 2026 年的瓶颈,因为它是这些部署里激光器用到的基础材料。

类似 Micron 和 SK Hynix 的内存瓶颈,我们很可能会看到注意力转向 InP fabs,比如 $AAOI,而它刚好是美国少数几家之一(COHR、Macom)。

但相比 $LITE 因为 Google TPU 成功(来自 Meta 和 Anthropic 的采购订单)YTD 已经涨了 362%,$AAOI YTD 只涨了 7%。

这主要是因为散户和媒体几乎没关注 $AMZN Trainium 或 $MSFT Maia 的部署,而这些部署普遍预计会在 2026-2027 年放量。

不过它们大概率都会成功,因为每个 hyperscaler 都想降低自家云平台的推理成本。

如果我们看到其他 hyperscaler 也采用 OCS 来实现 TPU 那种优化性能,考虑到 $LITE 在这个细分领域的垄断地位,它可能会比现在进一步重估。

但如果 $MSFT Maia 开始放量(考虑到 $AAOI 很可能在为他们开发新架构),以及 $AMZN Trainium 放量($4B warrant + 采购订单),那 $AAOI 也会重估。

Photonics 和 InP 会成为新的“内存式”瓶颈。

2026 年,我们很可能会看到投资作为主题流向 $COHR、Innolight、$LITE 这类玩家,以及像 $AAOI 这种对特定 hyperscaler ASIC 有隐藏杠杆的标的。

市场现在在奖励 Google TPU 供应链,但可能漏掉了其他 hyperscaler ASIC 的放量。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2003259964526330053
❤️ 995 🔁 60 💬 76
打开原推
📝 原创
NAND prices have now spiraled out of control.

Memory companies like $SNDK, $MU, Samsung, SK Hynix stand to benefit the most from inelastic supply and recent NAND price hikes.

According to Phison's CEO per Digitimes:

"NAND flash prices have surged amid tightening supply, with some manufacturers raising quotations by as much as 50% overnight"

This follows reports this week that Samsung has just doubled NAND prices for Q2.

Available inventory is becoming non-existent, with hyperscalers and companies willing to pay anything to secure allocation.
NAND 价格现在已经失控。

$SNDK$MU、Samsung、SK Hynix 这类 memory 公司,最受益于供给缺乏弹性和最近 NAND 涨价。

据 Digitimes 引用 Phison CEO:

“NAND flash prices have surged amid tightening supply, with some manufacturers raising quotations by as much as 50% overnight”

这紧跟本周 Samsung 刚把 Q2 NAND prices 翻倍的报道。

可用库存正在消失,hyperscalers 和公司愿意付任何价格来锁定 allocation。
❤️ 741 🔁 76 💬 35
打开原推
📝 原创
$ORCL likely $AAOI hyperscaler client per
Rosenblatt analyst.

When I first posted about $AAOI everyone had extreme doubts like on my thesis post on $AXTI.

But don’t take it from me.

My exact same sentiment I shared after earnings is now echoed by other institutional analysts:

“The company’s sub-$8B market cap is too low when its 2027 revenue potential is $4B “

- Rosenblatt.

Likely a long way to go for repricing photonic names given revenue ramp.
据 Rosenblatt analyst,$ORCL 可能是 $AAOI 的 hyperscaler 客户。

我第一次发 $AAOI 时,大家像看我 $AXTI thesis 一样非常怀疑。

但别只听我的。

我财报后分享的同样观点,现在也被其他机构分析师呼应:

“公司低于 $8B 的市值太低,因为 2027 年收入潜力是 $4B。”

- Rosenblatt。

考虑到收入爬坡,photonics 名字重估可能还有很长路。
❤️ 577 🔁 28 💬 34
打开原推
💬 引用
Does nobody else see the parallels to $HIMS and $META and $HOOD?

$HIMS literally just bought out the largest players around the world:

- Zava (Europe/UK)
- Livewell (Canada)
- Eucalyptus (Australia/Japan)

Without antitrust blocking it?

$META did that a decade ago with companies like WhatsApp and Instagram with minimal friction.

Now no social media company anymore can go on buying sprees due to regulator PTSD after $META ended up a trillion dollar monopoly.

$HIMS now is the largest independent global retail DTC distribution network in the world, after their M&A spree.

And just needs to figure out how to cross-sell products like what $HOOD did for financial products?

$HOOD previously had the SEC + Gary trying to block all their crypto offerings. But ever since they got regulatory headaches cleared up, they managed to scale to become a $70B company off cross-selling fintech products to their retail audience.

I'm seeing strong parallels to $NVO / Regulators trying to block $HIMS product offerings.

However, that regulatory uncertainty is now cleared up after $NVO partnered with $HIMS and FDA dropped their threats. The potential is there?

I can't be the only one who sees potential from $HIMS global DTC retail distribution network and latent revenue monetization?
难道没人看到 $HIMS$META$HOOD 的相似之处吗?

$HIMS 刚刚直接买下全球最大玩家:Zava(欧洲/英国)、Livewell(加拿大)、Eucalyptus(澳大利亚/日本),而且没有被 antitrust 阻止?

$META 十年前也用很小阻力买了 WhatsApp 和 Instagram。现在因为 $META 最后变成 trillion dollar monopoly 后的监管 PTSD,没有社交媒体公司还能到处收购。

$HIMS 在 M&A 之后,现在是全球最大的独立 DTC 零售医疗分发网络。接下来只需要像 $HOOD 对金融产品那样,搞清楚怎么交叉销售?

$HOOD 以前也有 SEC + Gary 试图阻止他们所有 crypto offerings。但监管麻烦清掉后,他们靠向零售用户交叉销售 fintech products 扩到 $70B 公司。

我看到 $NVO / Regulators 试图阻止 $HIMS 产品的强烈相似性。但在 $NVO$HIMS 合作、FDA 放弃威胁后,这个监管不确定性现在清掉了。潜力在那里?

不可能只有我看到 $HIMS 全球 DTC 零售分发网络和潜在收入变现的可能吧?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Feels like people aren't articulating the bull case for $HIMS correctly:

Here's my view.

The main moat of $HIMS is network capture of retail audiences.

And the bull case is latent revenue monetization.

$HOOD achieved that same effect in fintech over 2025.

$META (fully grown) achieved that same effect in the social media sector over the past decade.

$HIMS is now at the starting point in 2026.

But given millions of new users across the globe (Europe, Australia, Japan, Canada) from Zava + Eucalyptus:

$HIMS now has that one-of-a-kind retail audience capture in the healthcare sector.

However, the difference between ~$70B companies in Robinhood and $1.6T giants in $META is that:

They've already successfully monetized their retail audiences both through margin optimization, and new revenue streams.

And very aggressively. $HIMS has not yet.

Robinhood did so by pushing new products from banking/credit cards/prediction markets/etc.

And they are all now independently generating $100m+ each as new revenue streams.

$META did so by capturing the maximum amount of revenue per user after acquiring WhatsApp/Instagram.

However, $HIMS has not gotten the chance to yet in the same way they did with the US (eg. Testosterone). Especially partially due to former lawsuits.

Now that's cleared up, the bull case can be seen again:

Instead of modeling what revenue Zava/Eucalyptus traditionally brought, the important thing to look at is retail network capture through # of people.

As this is biggest source of latent revenue + revenue projection beats not priced in.

Now, the billion dollar question is:

Will $HIMS end up like $HOOD?

$HIMS now has the one of the largest retail networks + distribution for healthcare.

However, cross-selling seems much harder in healthcare vs. fintech or social media channels.

The answer whether it ends up a $30B company or a $5B one is up for management to figure out.

So for people on the sideline, it might be worth flipping long again in the off-chance $HIMS manages to figure out latent revenue expansion from their new global userbase.

The ~40%+ short interest and the new $NVO partnership serves as a huge bonus as well.
感觉大家没有正确表达 $HIMS 的 bull case:

这是我的看法。

$HIMS 的主要护城河,是对 retail audiences 的网络捕获。

bull case 是 latent revenue monetization。

$HOOD 在 2025 年的 fintech 里实现了同样效果。

$META(完全成熟后)在过去十年的社交媒体领域实现了同样效果。

$HIMS 现在处在 2026 年的起点。

但考虑到 Zava + Eucalyptus 带来的全球数百万新用户(Europe、Australia、Japan、Canada):

$HIMS 现在在 healthcare sector 拥有那种独一无二的 retail audience capture。

不过,Robinhood 这种 ~$70B 公司和 $META 这种 $1.6T 巨头的区别在于:

它们已经通过 margin optimization 和新 revenue streams,成功把 retail audiences 货币化。

而且做得非常激进。$HIMS 还没有。

Robinhood 是通过推出 banking/credit cards/prediction markets 等新产品做到的。

这些现在都各自独立产生 $100m+ 新收入流。

$META 则是在收购 WhatsApp/Instagram 后,尽可能榨取每个用户收入。

$HIMS 还没有机会像在美国那样做(比如 Testosterone)。部分原因是之前的 lawsuits。

现在这件事清理掉后,bull case 又能看见了:

重点不是建模 Zava/Eucalyptus 传统上带来多少收入,而是看通过人数实现的 retail network capture。

因为这是最大的 latent revenue + revenue projection beats 来源,而且还没被定价。

现在十亿美元问题是:

$HIMS 会不会变成 $HOOD

$HIMS 现在拥有 healthcare 里最大的 retail networks + distribution 之一。

但 healthcare 的 cross-selling 看起来比 fintech 或 social media channels 难很多。

它最终是 $30B 公司还是 $5B 公司,要看管理层怎么解决。

所以对场外观望的人来说,重新翻多也许值得,因为存在 $HIMS 从新全球用户基础里搞定 latent revenue expansion 的可能。

~40%+ short interest 和新的 $NVO partnership 也是巨大加分项。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031152993886941656
❤️ 669 🔁 50 💬 56
打开原推
📝 原创
Feels like people aren't articulating the bull case for $HIMS correctly:

Here's my view.

The main moat of $HIMS is network capture of retail audiences.

And the bull case is latent revenue monetization.

$HOOD achieved that same effect in fintech over 2025.

$META (fully grown) achieved that same effect in the social media sector over the past decade.

$HIMS is now at the starting point in 2026.

But given millions of new users across the globe (Europe, Australia, Japan, Canada) from Zava + Eucalyptus:

$HIMS now has that one-of-a-kind retail audience capture in the healthcare sector.

However, the difference between ~$70B companies in Robinhood and $1.6T giants in $META is that:

They've already successfully monetized their retail audiences both through margin optimization, and new revenue streams.

And very aggressively. $HIMS has not yet.

Robinhood did so by pushing new products from banking/credit cards/prediction markets/etc.

And they are all now independently generating $100m+ each as new revenue streams.

$META did so by capturing the maximum amount of revenue per user after acquiring WhatsApp/Instagram.

However, $HIMS has not gotten the chance to yet in the same way they did with the US (eg. Testosterone). Especially partially due to former lawsuits.

Now that's cleared up, the bull case can be seen again:

Instead of modeling what revenue Zava/Eucalyptus traditionally brought, the important thing to look at is retail network capture through # of people.

As this is biggest source of latent revenue + revenue projection beats not priced in.

Now, the billion dollar question is:

Will $HIMS end up like $HOOD?

$HIMS now has the one of the largest retail networks + distribution for healthcare.

However, cross-selling seems much harder in healthcare vs. fintech or social media channels.

The answer whether it ends up a $30B company or a $5B one is up for management to figure out.

So for people on the sideline, it might be worth flipping long again in the off-chance $HIMS manages to figure out latent revenue expansion from their new global userbase.

The ~40%+ short interest and the new $NVO partnership serves as a huge bonus as well.
感觉大家没有把 $HIMS 的 bull case 讲对:

这是我的看法。

$HIMS 的主要 moat 是对 retail audiences 的网络捕获。

bull case 是潜在收入变现。

$HOOD 在 2025 年的 fintech 里实现了同样效果。

$META(完全成熟后)在过去十年社交媒体领域实现了同样效果。

$HIMS 在 2026 年才刚处在起点。

但通过 Zava + Eucalyptus,在全球(欧洲、澳大利亚、日本、加拿大)获得数百万新用户后:

$HIMS 现在拥有医疗领域独一无二的 retail audience capture。

不过 Robinhood 这种 ~$70B 公司和 $META 这种 $1.6T 巨头的区别在于:

它们已经通过利润率优化和新收入流成功变现零售用户,而且非常激进。$HIMS 还没有。

Robinhood 通过 banking/credit cards/prediction markets 等新产品做到,每个都已独立贡献 $100m+ 新收入。

$META 通过收购 WhatsApp/Instagram 后最大化每用户收入做到。

$HIMS 还没有像美国业务那样得到同样机会(比如 Testosterone),部分原因是之前诉讼。

现在这些清掉后,bull case 又能看到了:

重要的不是按 Zava/Eucalyptus 传统收入建模,而是看通过人数捕获的 retail network。

这是最大潜在收入来源,也是未被定价的 revenue projection beats。

现在十亿美元问题是:$HIMS 会不会变成 $HOOD

$HIMS 现在拥有医疗领域最大的 retail networks + distribution 之一。

但 healthcare 的 cross-selling 明显比 fintech 或 social media 难。

最终它是 $30B 公司还是 $5B 公司,要看管理层怎么解决。

所以对旁观者来说,重新转 long 可能值得,因为 $HIMS 有机会从新全球用户基础里做出潜在收入扩张。

~40%+ short interest 和新的 $NVO partnership 也是巨大 bonus。
❤️ 852 🔁 69 💬 69
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
IMO just need to pick multiple horses that you think will all go up the most rather than just one.

My highest concentration and internal PTs:

Memory names: SK Hynix/Samsung (still think both close to double next year maybe ~80%, $700B Sk Hynix, $1.7B Samsung doesn't really look too far fetched)

Photonics (entire supply chain investing):
$LITE, $AXTI, $COHR, $AAOI, $IQE. (prob 50-70% for lite and cohr, i see axti, aaoi, doubling again, aaoi prob 3-4x if they deliver, and iqe as a 10x moonshot contingent on restructuring)

Left out: Soitec, $TSEM (prob 2x by 2028) since i think it will take more than a year to get rerated like $POET maybe in 2027, entry point late 2026 is much better imo.

Current misc Swing Trades/Long:
Bitcoin (long), Ethereum, Solana (swing) - all round 50% PT I see Bitcoin $90K, Etheruem $2.9K, SOlana $135 really doable.
$RDDT (maybe 100% return if things go well)

I still have my other longs I mentioned like power/grid and a ton of individual names but they’re low concentration in comparison.

Extra margin in CSP.
在我看来,不是只选一匹马,而是选多匹你认为最有可能涨最多的马。

我最高集中度和内部 PT:

Memory names:SK Hynix/Samsung(仍认为明年都接近翻倍,也许 ~80%,$700B Sk Hynix、$1.7T Samsung 看起来并不太离谱)

Photonics(整条供应链投资):
$LITE$AXTI$COHR$AAOI$IQE。($LITE$COHR 可能 50-70%,我认为 $AXTI$AAOI 还能再翻倍,$AAOI 如果交付可能 3-4x,$IQE 是取决于重组的 10x moonshot)

没放:Soitec、$TSEM(到 2028 可能 2x),因为我觉得它们像 $POET 一样需要一年多才能重估,2026 末入场点可能更好。

当前杂项 Swing Trades/Long:
Bitcoin(long)、Ethereum、Solana(swing)- 我都看到约 50% PT,Bitcoin $90K、Etheruem $2.9K、SOlana $135 很可行。
$RDDT(如果顺利,可能 100% return)

我还有之前提过的 power/grid 和很多个股 longs,但相比之下仓位低。

额外 margin 用在 CSP。
❤️ 332 🔁 8 💬 56
打开原推
💬 引用
It’s only been 3 hours and the $JETS trade is up a lot LOL.

5.35% swing off 25% IV.

Always trust in your Jim Cramer, X retail, and Wallstreetbet indicators. https://t.co/38poYZZRA0
才 3 小时,$JETS trade 已经涨很多 LOL。

25% IV 下 5.35% swing。

永远相信你的 Jim Cramer、X retail 和 Wallstreetbet indicators。 https://t.co/38poYZZRA0
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
For trade ideas if you want to inverse Jim Cramer on the oil trade:

Long $JETS (US Airliner ETF) 2028 calls where IV is 25%.

It’s priced low beta (25% IV) but it moved -20% this month.

Individual long on $DAL or $AAL carries elevated 55%+ IV, while the ETF basically moves relatively around the same rate.

US is largely insulated regarding oil compared to the rest of the world as well and the ETF is concentrated around US airliners.

Not exactly a very well kept secret airliners move in the opposite direction of oil.

Of course this trade carries risks in the event Jim Cramer, Wallstreetbets, and X doomposters are actually right about $200 oil.

But given the date, there’s enough time for oil prices to revert to mean + Venezuela production to get rolling.

TLDR: if you want to go the other direction of crude oil, $JETS at sub 30 IV is the best way to go.
如果你想在 oil trade 上反着 Jim Cramer 做,交易想法:

Long $JETS(US Airliner ETF)2028 calls,IV 是 25%。

它按低 beta 定价(25% IV),但这个月已经动了 -20%。

单独 long $DAL$AAL 会带着 55%+ 的高 IV,而 ETF 基本上相对移动幅度差不多。

和世界其他地区相比,美国对 oil 的隔离程度也更高,而且 ETF 集中在美国航空公司。

航空股和 oil 反向走,这也不是什么保密很好的秘密。

当然,如果 Jim Cramer、Wallstreetbets 和 X doomposters 真的说对了 $200 oil,这笔交易有风险。

但考虑到日期,还有足够时间让油价均值回归 + Venezuela 产量开始起来。

TLDR:如果你想做 crude oil 的反方向,$JETS 在 sub 30 IV 是最好的方式。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2031036045358399608
❤️ 328 🔁 4 💬 22
打开原推
💬 引用
$CRCL is now at $109.

Circle has increased more than 100% to $109... Since my post at $54.

This was 1 month ago.

I really love going back and seeing all the bearish comments claiming it would

"Go down"50%" or "chart looks ugly" so it ends up at $20.

Everyone on X was bearish on $CRCL at $50, but now that it's back at $100, people are bullish again.

The market is the final arbiter of right and wrong.

But the biggest lesson: Look at underlying fundamentals, not the chart.
$CRCL 现在 $109。

Circle 从我 $54 发帖以来已经涨超 100% 到 $109……

那是 1 个月前。

我真的很喜欢回头看那些 bearish comments,说它会

“跌 50%” 或 “chart looks ugly”,所以会到 $20。

X 上所有人在 $50 看空 $CRCL,但现在它回到 $100,大家又 bullish 了。

市场是对错的最终裁判。

但最大教训是:看底层基本面,不要看图。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I really, really like $CRCL at $54.

Valuation has been completely reset back to $12B MC.

Everyone was rushing to buy it back at $150-200 but at $54, it's a ghost town. USDC supply still $70B+ and I expect stablecoins to continue growing in usage. https://t.co/R2Habycf7d
我真的、真的很喜欢 $CRCL 在 $54 的位置。

估值已经完全重置回 $12B MC。

大家在 $150-200 时都抢着买回去,但到 $54 时却没人了。USDC supply 仍然 $70B+,而且我预计 stablecoins 的使用会继续增长。 https://t.co/R2Habycf7d
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2018724759262085467
❤️ 907 🔁 66 💬 64
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Is it just me or is war a contrarian bull case with social media stocks when it comes time to report earnings?

x recorded record user counts and net engagement boom is likely a tailwind. And it’s likely the same for companies like $RDDT.

everything sells off together but it could increase metrics across the board when they report earnings.
只有我觉得,到了财报期,战争反而是 social media stocks 的 contrarian bull case 吗?

x 录得 record user counts,net engagement boom 可能是顺风。对 $RDDT 这类公司大概也一样。

所有东西一起卖,但等它们报财报时,可能会全面提高指标。
❤️ 80 🔁 0 💬 9
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So just thought on current market drop and my personal setup.

My personal rotation looked like:
- Cut all Semis/Asian names. But keep coree in two momentum bottlenecks (photonics, memory).
- Long War Stocks that haven't risen ( $BKSY, $LASR, $LPTH, etc).
- Hold some other 2Y longs like long Power/Grid.
- Rotate $CVX and misc war hedges that went up into lot of the high beta names that crashed more
- Swing Trades from Bitcoin/Ethereum and $RDDT.

Then just harvest volatility with CSP from any profit from short term capital gains on cutting semis.

And make sure core portfolio is not using any margin, while using any extra margin for CSP.

So last 2 days esp. from bloomberg reports were red days that tanked memory/photonics as well as the unrelated sectors.

All CSPs ended up 80-90% green (even despite major drops), ended up taking out some to buy more crypto names and random photonics the other day like $TSEM (which I do have some regrets not just sticking with CSP, even if they do recover monday).

I don't think I could have predicted memory stocks dropping so much given I was seeing NAND prices q2 doubling (4x analyst expectations) and DRAM prices getting hiked.

As for photonics, I did see some of them being slightly overvalued like $LITE and $COHR, but didn't expect some of them to keep dropping despite index inclusion.

I didn't want to take short term capital gains on this so ended up just holding since I have high expectations for photonic names for the next few years and memory over a 1 year period.

But made the right call to cut cut other semi names that weren't extremely profitable since majority all ended up tanking a ton. Hindsight I think I made the right original calls directionally (even stomaching some losses).

My main mistake was not following my own thought process around scaling in with CSP instead of straight up dip-buying and lost more than I hoped for eg. Bitcoin dropping back from $73k to $68k.

That being said I'm pretty sure all will recover if they're fundamentally sound, it's just that given these environments, dip buying is a lot more dangerous and I'd prefer to have a green line up every day.

TLDR: Think most of the names to recover in a month but short term it's way too volatile. Expected some drawdowns to not take short term capital gain tax but they ended up dropping more than expected.

Main mistake was getting baited into dip buy unless there's stupidly extreme drops. Should have just scaled in with CSP and trade volatility.
关于当前市场下跌和我个人配置的一点想法。

我的轮动大概是:
- 砍掉所有 Semis/亚洲名字,但保留两个 momentum bottlenecks 的核心(photonics、memory)。
- Long 还没涨的 War Stocks($BKSY$LASR$LPTH 等)。
- 持有一些 2Y longs,比如 Power/Grid。
- 把涨起来的 $CVX 和杂项 war hedges 轮到跌更多的 high beta 名字。
- Bitcoin/Ethereum 和 $RDDT 的 swing trades。

然后用砍 semis 的短期资本利得利润,通过 CSP 收割波动。

确保核心组合不用 margin,额外 margin 用于 CSP。

过去 2 天,尤其 Bloomberg 报道后,memory/photonics 和无关板块都被砸。

所有 CSP 最后都 80-90% green(即使大跌),我取出一些去买更多 crypto 名字和前几天的随机 photonics,比如 $TSEM(有点后悔没坚持 CSP,虽然它们周一会恢复)。

我没法预判 memory stocks 跌这么多,因为我看到 Q2 NAND prices 翻倍(4x analyst expectations)和 DRAM 涨价。

Photonics 方面,我确实看到 $LITE$COHR 有点高估,但没想到它们即使 index inclusion 也继续跌。

我不想为此触发短期资本利得税,所以继续持有,因为我对 photonics 未来几年和 memory 未来 1 年期望很高。

但砍掉其他没有极端盈利能力的 semi 名字是对的,因为大多都跌很多。事后看,方向上我原本判断是对的(即使要承受一些亏损)。

主要错误是没有遵守自己用 CSP scale in 的思路,而是直接 dip-buy,亏得比预期更多,比如 Bitcoin 从 $73k 又跌到 $68k。

话虽如此,只要基本面扎实,我很确定都会恢复。只是这种环境里,抄底危险很多,我更愿意每天看到绿线。

TLDR:我认为大多数名字一个月内会恢复,但短期太波动。为了不交短期资本利得税,我接受回撤,但它们跌得比预期更多。

主要错误是被诱导去 dip buy,除非是极端离谱下跌。其实应该用 CSP scale in 并交易波动。
❤️ 223 🔁 7 💬 59
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Yeah should have just stuck to trading volatility instead of dip buying during these times. Rough day for photonics!

Already learned my lesson before but couldn’t stick to it ig.

All my CSP are up a lot but below cost avg on dip buys like on $RDDT.

Prob will recover midterm but I’d rather just see green every day.
是啊,这种时候本来就该坚持交易波动,而不是 dip buy。Photonics 今天很惨!

之前已经学过教训,但这次没坚持住。

我所有 CSP 都涨很多,但像 $RDDT 这种 dip buys 已经低于成本均价。

中期大概会恢复,但我更想每天都看到绿色。
❤️ 95 🔁 0 💬 16
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Ended up doing dip buying today mainly around these three:

ETH - $1950 (cost averaging)
$TSEM on the 5% drop
$AEHR on the 5% drop back to $38

Tower semi is a new position, wanted an entry earlier but never got one until 21% drop. https://t.co/hkcrnwaiXb
今天主要围绕这三个做了 dip buying:

ETH - $1950(cost averaging)
$TSEM 跌 5%
$AEHR 跌 5% 回到 $38

Tower semi 是新仓位,之前想找 entry 一直没有,直到这次跌 21%。 https://t.co/hkcrnwaiXb
❤️ 126 🔁 0 💬 22
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Basically 80% profit on all csp’s aside from $AXTI which was multiple weeks out.

Ended up closing out weeklies. $INTC up 6%+ ended up selling. Converted them into more Bitcoin.

Don’t ask me why but whenever there’s a major breakout like that it just keeps going up?

Could be wrong this time but I’m comfortable holding bitcoin and some cryptos long term at $73k anyway.
除了 $AXTI 是几周后的之外,基本上所有 csp 都有 80% 利润。

最后把周度仓位平了。$INTC 涨 6%+ 后也卖了。换成了更多 Bitcoin。

别问我为什么,但每次出现这种重大突破,好像就会一直涨?

这次可能错,但反正 $73k 的 bitcoin 和一些 crypto 我也愿意长期持有。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Lazy day today. Just ended up buying $INTC on the 5% drop, and $SE on the 18% drop just thought ER was overreaction.

Then sold a bunch of CSPs on $AAOI, $AXTI, $NBIS, and a few others. And bought SK Hynix on drop to 510 euros. (Hy9h).
今天懒散日。最后只是趁 $INTC 跌 5% 买了点,$SE 跌 18% 也买了点,觉得 ER 反应过度。

然后卖了一堆 $AAOI$AXTI$NBIS 和其他几个的 CSPs。还在 SK Hynix 跌到 510 euros 时买了。(Hy9h)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2028906136087478295
❤️ 91 🔁 0 💬 9
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Eh changed my mind going to chase back into crypto.

Split between eth and solana.
呃,改变主意了,准备追回血 crypto。

在 eth 和 solana 之间分。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Lazy day today. Just ended up buying $INTC on the 5% drop, and $SE on the 18% drop just thought ER was overreaction.

Then sold a bunch of CSPs on $AAOI, $AXTI, $NBIS, and a few others. And bought SK Hynix on drop to 510 euros. (Hy9h).
今天懒散日。最后只是趁 $INTC 跌 5% 买了点,$SE 跌 18% 也买了点,觉得 ER 反应过度。

然后卖了一堆 $AAOI$AXTI$NBIS 和其他几个的 CSPs。还在 SK Hynix 跌到 510 euros 时买了。(Hy9h)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2028906136087478295
❤️ 82 🔁 0 💬 23
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Looks like the sell America trade is over sooner than expected.

some thoughts, looks like a huge capital rotation back into America and Bitcoin from Korea/Japan.

I said earlier I took a ton of short term capital gains profits on a lot of semis/bottlenecks from Asia just for risk off.

Got really lucky with timing, but still got hurt off of by KR memory selloff. Again only exception i made memory because KR earnings were too strong. Thought markets were more rational with that sector but guess not.

I wouldn’t try and fight the trend and dip buy a lot of the Japanese/taiwanese names. If you want to join the trend maybe Bitcoin and a lot of the sold off us names from mag7 like $MSFT, Ethereum, $RDDT, $HOOD on the next drop but idk for sure.

Im personally just trading volatility on US names right now in the meantime rather than putting a lot of concentration into many of the names.

And core would just be photonics/memory.

Don’t want to make the mistake of leverage dip buying or chasing and getting it wrong, especially since I’m already up so much YTD.

Just volatility trading atm.
看起来 sell America trade 比预期更早结束了。

一些想法:像是有一轮巨大的资金从韩国/日本轮回美国和 Bitcoin。

我之前说过,我对很多亚洲 semi/bottleneck 拿了大量短线资本利得利润,只是为了 risk off。

时机上很幸运,但还是被 KR memory selloff 伤到了。再次说,memory 是我唯一例外,因为 KR earnings 太强。我以为市场在这个板块会更理性,但看来不是。

我不会去逆趋势抄很多日本/台湾名字。如果想顺趋势,也许下一次回调可以看 Bitcoin,以及很多被卖下来的美国 mag7 名字,比如 $MSFT、Ethereum、$RDDT$HOOD,但我也不确定。

我个人现在主要是在美国名字上交易波动,而不是把大量仓位集中到很多名字里。

核心还是 photonics/memory。

不想犯用杠杆抄底或追高然后判断错的错误,尤其我今年 YTD 已经涨很多了。

现在就是 volatility trading。
❤️ 144 🔁 1 💬 15
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Lazy day today. Just ended up buying $INTC on the 5% drop, and $SE on the 18% drop just thought ER was overreaction.

Then sold a bunch of CSPs on $AAOI, $AXTI, $NBIS, and a few others. And bought SK Hynix on drop to 510 euros. (Hy9h).
今天比较懒。最后只是买了 5% 下跌的 $INTC,以及 18% 下跌的 $SE,觉得 ER 反应过头了。

然后卖了一堆 $AAOI$AXTI$NBIS 和其他几个名字的 CSP。还在跌到 510 euros 时买了 SK Hynix(Hy9h)。
❤️ 160 🔁 1 💬 24
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Ended up joining the CSP club for a little bit due to Iran conflict.

All the option IV is too elevated so couldn’t help myself.

Main thing is harvesting volatility on drops. For example these are some of my strikes.

Eg. $AXTI on the 20% drop -> $25 strike
Or $RDDT on the 5% drop -> $138 strike

Will probably do a lot more names, these ones just dropped the hardest today.
因为伊朗冲突,最后短暂加入了 CSP 俱乐部。

所有期权 IV 都太高了,实在忍不住。

重点是在下跌时收割波动。比如这些是我的一些 strikes。

例如 $AXTI 跌 20% -> $25 strike
或者 $RDDT 跌 5% -> $138 strike

可能会做更多名字,这几个只是今天跌得最狠。
❤️ 98 🔁 1 💬 12
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
I wonder if landmark is an early indicator how photonics will do in US trading?

Last time it went up 10%, the other day whole photonics sector boomed.

Will need to test track this over time. https://t.co/Hc4mJmYlP1
我在想 landmark 会不会是 photonics 在美国交易中怎么表现的早期指标?

上次它涨 10%,另一天整个 photonics 板块都爆了。

需要以后持续跟踪测试。 https://t.co/Hc4mJmYlP1
❤️ 86 🔁 1 💬 5
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
TLDR: Energy directed weapons largest beneficary.

I ended up long $LASR.

Stuff that may or may not have been used but dropped recently $BKSY at $18.35 might be good pickups as tailwind.

Same with drone sector stocks like $UMAC, $AIRO and upstream suppliers like $LPTH that have all dropped recently
TLDR:Energy directed weapons 是最大受益者。

我最后 long 了 $LASR

一些可能用到也可能没用到、但最近下跌的名字,比如 $BKSY 在 $18.35,可能是不错 pickup,因为有顺风。

Drone sector stocks 也一样,比如 $UMAC$AIRO,以及最近都跌了的上游供应商 $LPTH
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Not too many niche players, major winner was SpektreWorks and Anduril from what I've found.

Big defense players were mainly involved this time:
$NOC - b2 stealth bombers
$LMT + $BA - strike fighters ( F-35C, F/A-18E/F, F-22 Raptor)
Attack Drones - SpektreWorks for LUCAS
Missile Defense was $RTX and Lockheed.

The only two niche were $QUBT (surprisingly) for guidance/sensing via LSI. Drone parts possibly $UMAC.

Defense systems likely $LASR and possibly $AVAV counter drone energy directed lasers? And $LPTH likely supplier to the ones above?

Then there's $DRS for directed energy. $PSN possibly $BKSY for geospatial targeting of ballistic missiles.

Main beneficiaries I've seen from this event were energy directed weapons from $LASR, $AVAV, and $DRS and big players?

still doing more research
小众玩家不算太多,我目前发现的大赢家是 SpektreWorks 和 Anduril。

这次主要是大型防务玩家参与:
$NOC - b2 stealth bombers
$LMT + $BA - strike fighters(F-35C, F/A-18E/F, F-22 Raptor)
Attack Drones - SpektreWorks for LUCAS
Missile Defense 是 $RTX 和 Lockheed。

仅有的两个小众是 $QUBT(意外地)通过 LSI 做 guidance/sensing。Drone parts 可能是 $UMAC

Defense systems 可能是 $LASR,以及可能 $AVAV counter drone energy directed lasers?还有 $LPTH 可能是上述公司的供应商?

然后还有 $DRS 做 directed energy。$PSN 可能还有 $BKSY,用于 ballistic missiles 的 geospatial targeting。

我从这个事件里看到的主要受益者,是 $LASR$AVAV$DRS 的 directed energy weapons 和大玩家?

还在继续研究。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2028448613400014958
❤️ 77 🔁 2 💬 15
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Not too many niche players, major winner was SpektreWorks and Anduril from what I've found.

Big defense players were mainly involved this time:
$NOC - b2 stealth bombers
$LMT + $BA - strike fighters ( F-35C, F/A-18E/F, F-22 Raptor)
Attack Drones - SpektreWorks for LUCAS
Missile Defense was $RTX and Lockheed.

The only two niche were $QUBT (surprisingly) for guidance/sensing via LSI. Drone parts possibly $UMAC.

Defense systems likely $LASR and possibly $AVAV counter drone energy directed lasers? And $LPTH likely supplier to the ones above?

Then there's $DRS for directed energy. $PSN possibly $BKSY for geospatial targeting of ballistic missiles.

Main beneficiaries I've seen from this event were energy directed weapons from $LASR, $AVAV, and $DRS and big players?

still doing more research
小众玩家不多,我找到的主要赢家是 SpektreWorks 和 Anduril。

这次主要涉及大防务公司:
$NOC - b2 stealth bombers
$LMT + $BA - strike fighters(F-35C、F/A-18E/F、F-22 Raptor)
Attack Drones - SpektreWorks for LUCAS
Missile Defense 是 $RTX 和 Lockheed。

两个小众的是 $QUBT(意外)通过 LSI 用于 guidance/sensing。Drone parts 可能是 $UMAC

Defense systems 可能是 $LASR,以及 $AVAV counter drone energy directed lasers?$LPTH 可能是上面这些的供应商?

还有 $DRS 做 directed energy。$PSN 可能是 $BKSY,用于 ballistic missiles 的 geospatial targeting。

我从这次事件看到的主要受益者是 energy directed weapons,比如 $LASR$AVAV$DRS 和大玩家?

还在继续研究。
❤️ 87 🔁 1 💬 10
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Markets are extremely chaotic right now.

Iran conflict might be extended rather than the one-hit wonder in Venezulea so might reposition into wartime portfolio.

Personally:

-> upping concentration in smaller defense sector stocks that haven’t followed the big defense contractors yet

-> trimming some hedges for ^, oil prices look like a mess with all the videos of UAE oil supply being disrupted but regardless still gonna rotate a bit

-> trimming concentration in others, eg. Semi advanced packaging, Japanese names, some misc

Exception would be memory/photonics just due to earnings being blowouts.

I’ll probably do repositioning market open or afternoon since premarket liquidity is horrendous.

Need some more time for research through all the defense names
现在市场极度混乱。

伊朗冲突可能不是委内瑞拉那种一锤子买卖,而是延长,所以可能重新配置成 wartime portfolio。

我个人:

-> 增加小型 defense sector stocks 集中度,这些还没跟上大防务承包商

-> 减少一些 hedges 来换上面这些,oil prices 看起来很乱,到处都是 UAE oil supply 被扰乱的视频,但无论如何还是会轮一点

-> 减少其他集中度,比如 semi advanced packaging、日本名字、一些杂项

例外是 memory/photonics,因为财报太炸。

我可能在开盘或下午重新配置,因为盘前流动性很差。

还需要更多时间研究所有 defense names。
❤️ 142 🔁 0 💬 30
打开原推

2026年2月

📝 原创 🔒
Basically added a decent amount of $AAOI today.

Idk if management is BSing or not but if it’s true, seems possible to rerate to $30B+ mid 2027 or higher if they project more ramp into 2028.

They do have 3 hyperscaler clients now and 1 more coming I think. So reminds me of a mini $ALAB or $CRDO in that regard, but without the same 70%+ margins.

Also added $NVDA at $177.5 and $RKLB shares + CSP. Fun day today
今天基本加了不少 $AAOI

不知道管理层是不是在 BS,但如果是真的,2027 年中或更晚如果他们继续预测 2028 ramp,重估到 $30B+ 似乎可能。

他们现在有 3 个 hyperscaler 客户,应该还有 1 个要来。所以这点让我想到迷你 $ALAB$CRDO,但没有同样 70%+ margins。

还在 $177.5 加了 $NVDA,以及 $RKLB shares + CSP。今天挺有意思。
❤️ 156 🔁 1 💬 21
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
SpaceX probably listing in June and filing march.

Prob single biggest catalyst for space stocks if it’s being valued at $1.5-$1.7T. https://t.co/WFAFdpqUCI
SpaceX 可能 6 月上市,3 月提交文件。

如果估值是 $1.5-$1.7T,这可能是 space stocks 最大的单一催化。 https://t.co/WFAFdpqUCI
❤️ 98 🔁 1 💬 21
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Prob gonna do research into photonic hardware companies like $ASML types

Apparently Oxford instruments (LSE ~$1.9B) supplies to $AAOI too but not familiar with them.

Will do more DD but I’d assume a lot of capital will go to more niche transceiver supply chains upstream https://t.co/zgZsxntW7Y
可能要研究一些像 $ASML 类型的 photonic hardware companies。

显然 Oxford instruments(LSE ~$1.9B)也供应 $AAOI,但我不熟。

会做更多 DD,但我猜很多资本会流向更小众的 transceiver supply chains 上游。 https://t.co/zgZsxntW7Y
❤️ 102 🔁 0 💬 8
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Prob don’t copy trade but just an example, wanted to scale back into $RKLB positions.

Ended up writing low $60 CSP (puts). I get assigned if it drops another 10%. If not, I make like 4.6% percent anyways.

I did want positions and CSP writing is good to scale back into things on drops.
可能不要 copy trade,只是举例,我想慢慢加回 $RKLB 仓位。

最后卖了低 $60 CSP(puts)。如果再跌 10%,我会被 assigned;如果没有,我也赚大概 4.6%。

我确实想要仓位,而卖 CSP 是在下跌中慢慢加回的好方式。
❤️ 72 🔁 0 💬 11
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
I’ve been holding $AEHR but it looks like they’ve hit the inflection point from the $POET stage to actual orders

Reminds me of early Teradyne. Still a great long low $1B MC imo. https://t.co/Y94da2LDQt
我一直持有 $AEHR,但现在看起来他们已经从 $POET 阶段走到实际订单的拐点了。

让我想起早期 Teradyne。低 $1B MC 在我看来仍然是很好的 long。 https://t.co/Y94da2LDQt
❤️ 86 🔁 1 💬 12
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Bottom timed successfully. Ended up existing $MSFT and $BTC swing trades.

I don’t really like posting sells as much, feels a bit weird. But this just kind of shows what I do with spare capital/time.

$MSFT was options so double digit gain in a day. $IBIT was shares so few percent gain.

Most people just compound index and hope to return 10% in a year but it’s possible to make it in a day imo.
成功抄到底了。最后平掉了 $MSFT$BTC 的 swing trades。

我其实不太喜欢发卖出,感觉有点怪。但这大概能说明我怎么处理闲置资金/时间。

$MSFT 是期权,所以一天两位数收益。$IBIT 是股票,所以几个百分点收益。

大多数人只是复投指数,希望一年赚 10%,但我觉得一天做到也不是不可能。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Ended up re-adding a lot of Bitcoin positions around here at $62.9K-$63K.

Feels like a good price. https://t.co/VTvopF9hBo
最后在 $62.9K-$63K 附近重新加了很多 Bitcoin 仓位。

感觉价格不错。 https://t.co/VTvopF9hBo
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026204604879528226
❤️ 100 🔁 0 💬 25
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Amazing, 24.6% off a day or two from $EWJ.

Sometimes low IV options on ETFs like international you think are directionally going up ends up profiting a lot more than getting individual stocks right. https://t.co/obgBNnqgBz
太强了,$EWJ 一两天就 24.6%。

有时候 ETF 上这种低 IV 期权,如果你觉得方向会涨,最后赚得比猜对个股还多得多。 https://t.co/obgBNnqgBz
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
A lot of this insight earlier was just feels.

Finally looked into quantitative evidence for this:

Basically found capital rotation was short US/China -> Korea, Taiwan, Japan.

Basically: South Korea (Est. 35% of Asian Tech/Developed Inflows)

- foreigners were net buyers of roughly 1.37 trillion won (~$1 billion USD) in the first half of February

Taiwan (Est. 35% of Asian Tech/Developed Inflows)

-Taiwan Equity Funds recently took in over $1 billion in a single week for the first time in months

Japan (Est. 30% of Asian Tech/Developed Inflows)

- GS chart's +0.37 long buying

United States:

GS chart shows a staggering -1.52 SD in short activity for North America

My guess on the trade:

Capital rotation up until midterms (stocks hold their levels on foreign markets), and maybe rotation back into US equities late q3 into q4. But I expect asian equities to hold their ground around then, maybe just stopping the green line up every day.

But calls on japan, taiwan, korea just as a moonshot in case capital rotation continues + each index heads up 30%+ next year seem promising to me.
前面很多 insight 只是感觉。

终于去看了这方面的量化证据:

基本上发现资本轮动是 short US/China -> Korea, Taiwan, Japan。

大致:South Korea(估计占 Asian Tech/Developed Inflows 的 35%)

- 外资在 2 月上半月净买入约 1.37 trillion won(~$1 billion USD)

Taiwan(估计占 Asian Tech/Developed Inflows 的 35%)

- Taiwan Equity Funds 最近单周流入超过 $1 billion,是几个月来首次

Japan(估计占 Asian Tech/Developed Inflows 的 30%)

- GS chart 的 +0.37 long buying

United States:

GS chart 显示 North America short activity 达到惊人的 -1.52 SD

我对这笔交易的猜测:

资金轮动会持续到 midterms(外部市场股票维持水位),然后也许 q3 后期到 q4 又轮回美国股票。但我预计亚洲股票到那时也能守住,可能只是停止每天绿线直上。

不过 Japan、Taiwan、Korea 的 calls,作为 moonshot,如果资本轮动继续 + 每个指数明年再涨 30%+,在我看来挺有前景。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026605341090422800
❤️ 66 🔁 0 💬 14
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
A lot of this insight earlier was just feels.

Finally looked into quantitative evidence for this:

Basically found capital rotation was short US/China -> Korea, Taiwan, Japan.

Basically: South Korea (Est. 35% of Asian Tech/Developed Inflows)

- foreigners were net buyers of roughly 1.37 trillion won (~$1 billion USD) in the first half of February

Taiwan (Est. 35% of Asian Tech/Developed Inflows)

-Taiwan Equity Funds recently took in over $1 billion in a single week for the first time in months

Japan (Est. 30% of Asian Tech/Developed Inflows)

- GS chart's +0.37 long buying

United States:

GS chart shows a staggering -1.52 SD in short activity for North America

My guess on the trade:

Capital rotation up until midterms (stocks hold their levels on foreign markets), and maybe rotation back into US equities late q3 into q4. But I expect asian equities to hold their ground around then, maybe just stopping the green line up every day.

But calls on japan, taiwan, korea just as a moonshot in case capital rotation continues + each index heads up 30%+ next year seem promising to me.
之前很多判断只是感觉。

终于看了下量化证据:

基本发现资金轮动是 short US/China -> Korea, Taiwan, Japan。

大致:韩国(估计占 Asian Tech/Developed Inflows 35%)

- 外资在 2 月上半月净买入约 1.37 trillion won(~$1 billion USD)

台湾(估计占 35%)

- Taiwan Equity Funds 最近单周流入超过 $1 billion,是几个月来首次

日本(估计占 30%)

- GS 图表显示 +0.37 long buying

美国:

GS 图表显示北美 short activity 达到惊人的 -1.52 SD

我对这笔交易的猜测:

资金轮动可能持续到中期选举前(外国市场股票维持高位),然后也许 Q3 末到 Q4 再轮回美国股票。但我预计亚洲股票到时候也能守住,可能只是停止每天绿线往上。

不过买日本、台湾、韩国的 calls 当 moonshot,押资金轮动继续 + 每个指数明年再涨 30%+,我觉得挺有吸引力。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Large rotation into foreign counties like Korea, Taiwan, Japan rn.

Starting to think it wouldn’t be a bad idea to allocate a small % into low IV calls on each in like $EWJ case the historical rally extends.

(Taiwan up 42% 1Y, Japan up 32% 1Y is considered historical). And obvious Korea is vertical green line up.

Might be buying at highs though since Taiwan index $TSM has been hard carrying and Idk about another 100%+ gain.

IV for stuff like Japan is like 16% so 2Y out strikes and another 30% gain would be enormous.

On the next drop if there is one maybe.
现在大量轮动到 Korea、Taiwan、Japan 这类海外国家。

开始觉得,在每个市场上配一点低 IV calls 也不是坏主意,比如 $EWJ,以防历史性行情继续延伸。

(Taiwan 1Y 涨 42%,Japan 1Y 涨 32%,这已经算历史级)。而且 Korea 明显是一条竖直绿线。

不过可能是在高位买,因为 Taiwan index 被 $TSM 强行带飞,我也不知道还能不能再来 100%+ 涨幅。

Japan 这种 IV 大概 16%,所以 2Y out strikes 如果再涨 30%,收益会非常大。

也许等下一次下跌再说。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2026517225155506620
❤️ 85 🔁 2 💬 6
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Large rotation into foreign counties like Korea, Taiwan, Japan rn.

Starting to think it wouldn’t be a bad idea to allocate a small % into low IV calls on each in like $EWJ case the historical rally extends.

(Taiwan up 42% 1Y, Japan up 32% 1Y is considered historical). And obvious Korea is vertical green line up.

Might be buying at highs though since Taiwan index $TSM has been hard carrying and Idk about another 100%+ gain.

IV for stuff like Japan is like 16% so 2Y out strikes and another 30% gain would be enormous.

On the next drop if there is one maybe.
现在大量资金轮进韩国、台湾、日本这些海外市场。

开始觉得拿一小部分仓位买这些低 IV calls 也不错,比如 $EWJ,万一历史性行情继续。

(台湾 1Y 涨 42%,日本 1Y 涨 32% 已经算历史级)。韩国明显就是垂直绿线。

不过也可能是在高位买,因为台湾指数基本被 $TSM 硬拉着,我也不知道还能不能再涨 100%+。

日本这种 IV 大概 16%,所以买 2Y 远期 strike,如果再涨 30%,收益会很夸张。

如果有下一次回调,也许可以。
❤️ 85 🔁 0 💬 11
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Anyone else watching state of the union right now?

just looking out for catalysts with $XLU https://t.co/95hXCSsxrc
还有人在看现在的 state of the union 吗?

我就是盯一下 $XLU 有没有催化。 https://t.co/95hXCSsxrc
❤️ 66 🔁 0 💬 12
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Ended up re-adding a lot of Bitcoin positions around here at $62.9K-$63K.

Feels like a good price. https://t.co/VTvopF9hBo
最后在 $62.9K-$63K 附近重新加了很多 Bitcoin 仓位。

感觉是个好价格。 https://t.co/VTvopF9hBo
❤️ 94 🔁 0 💬 7
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
$MSFT forward p/e ~23.1 again.

It’s definitely a lot more attractive valuation at $380 after 3.5% drop than $500 so ended up picking some up personally. https://t.co/WnxuffGtP7
$MSFT forward p/e 又到 ~23.1。

3.5% 下跌后 $380 的估值比 $500 有吸引力多了,所以我个人最后买了一些。 https://t.co/WnxuffGtP7
❤️ 82 🔁 1 💬 9
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Just a warning, for $XLU option chain certain strikes are elevated, probably stay away from those.

For $EWY longs more OTM is actually better than ITM since ITM strikes are elevated. https://t.co/Wy4SBIpQxJ
提醒一下,$XLU option chain 有些 strikes 被抬高了,可能要避开。

$EWY longs 来说,更多 OTM 实际上比 ITM 更好,因为 ITM strikes 被抬高了。 https://t.co/Wy4SBIpQxJ
❤️ 72 🔁 0 💬 19
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Shower thought posts about my top bottleneck momentum longs rn and trade timelines

1. Memory (likely structural, memory persists into 2028. Maybe be cautious q2 2027? Or if hyperscalers cut capex expectations. We’re mid cycle but if you look at nvidia it just keeps going. There’s a nonzero chance Samsung ends up $2.5T+ from $800B)

(DRAM, NAND) - $EWY, Sk Hynix (hy9h), $SNDK, $MU

Memory Derivatives (eg. NAND Controller, Testing) - $SIMO. $AEHR

Some of the names I’ve had before like Nanya and windbond, I’ve sold after CMXT and YMTC flooding low end in Asia.

2. Photonics (new paradigm, can just long and forget about it)

The "Elite Four" - $LITE (Google TPUs), $COHR, $AAOI (Amazon/Microsoft), $AXTI (Everything)

My opinion is photonics is overextended. Memory rally makes sense since they’re beating earnings projections by like 300%.

But photonic ramp is later in 2027. Markets are front running but it’s a little early.

3. Power/Grid for Datacenters (same with photonics can just long and forget next 2 years unless they up rates)

The low IV directional play - $XLU.

It’s rallied a decent amount but long way to go imo. Cost averaging can’t hurt

4. Advanced Packaging Capex Trade (probably over two quarters? It’s like $ASML, spending for upgrades happens in cycles):

$AMKR, $ONTO, $CAMT, $KLIC, and $FORM.

$AMKR is fine though, probably one of my favorite long term longs out of the bunch.

Happening right now after $TSM and $AMKR surprising capex numbers.

Again all these have kinda gone up 50% or 100%+, So if you want to enter positions, maybe DCA or wait for a correction aside from memory names like Sk Hynix that would probably just keep going up.

Very confident this portfolio would mog any performers though, just requires a bit of active management looking at earning results for hyperscalers
Shower thought:我现在最看好的 bottleneck momentum longs 和交易时间线。

1. Memory(很可能是结构性的,持续到 2028。也许 2027 Q2 要谨慎?或者 hyperscalers 下调 capex 预期时要谨慎。我们在中周期,但如果看 nvidia,它就是一直走。)

(DRAM, NAND)- $EWY、Sk Hynix(hy9h)、$SNDK$MU

Memory derivatives(比如 NAND Controller、Testing)- $SIMO$AEHR

以前拿过的 Nanya、Winbond,在 CXMT 和 YMTC 冲击亚洲低端后我已经卖了。

2. Photonics(新范式,可以 long 然后忘掉)

“Elite Four” - $LITE(Google TPUs)、$COHR$AAOI(Amazon/Microsoft)、$AXTI(Everything)

我认为 photonics 有点 overextended。Memory rally 合理,因为盈利预测被打爆 300%。

但 photonic ramp 更晚,在 2027。市场在抢跑,不过有点早。

3. Datacenters 的 Power/Grid(和 photonics 一样,可以 long 然后未来 2 年忘掉,除非他们涨利率)

低 IV 方向性 play - $XLU

已经涨了一些,但我觉得还有很长路。Cost averaging 没坏处。

4. Advanced Packaging Capex Trade(可能两三个季度?像 $ASML,升级支出是周期性的):

$AMKR$ONTO$CAMT$KLIC$FORM

$AMKR 没问题,可能是这一堆里我最喜欢的长期 long 之一。

这现在已经在 $TSM$AMKR 意外 capex 数字后发生。

这些基本都已经涨了 50% 或 100%+,如果想进,可能 DCA 或等回调。memory 名字比如 Sk Hynix 可能除外,它可能会继续涨。

我很有信心这个组合会碾压其他表现,但需要一点主动管理,盯 hyperscalers 财报。
❤️ 171 🔁 2 💬 24
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
This is true from Elon’s interview.

Institutions will likely rotate into electricity/grid like $XLU over the next year and half.

Hence why I suggested $XLU OTM longs (they don’t need to go ITM for profit, just go up over the next year) https://t.co/twgRXs9y2f
Elon 采访里这点是真的。

机构未来一年半可能会轮到 electricity/grid,比如 $XLU

所以我建议过 $XLU OTM longs(它们不需要到 ITM 才盈利,只要未来一年涨就行)。 https://t.co/twgRXs9y2f
❤️ 74 🔁 1 💬 20
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Changed my mind about $EWY IV, could head to 50-55%+. $MRVL and $AVGO sits around there but the SK index is much more volatile.

Introducing 10x leverage + if that takes off introduces a huge amount of new volatility for Samsung/sk individually, which in turn affects $EWY
我改变了对 $EWY IV 的看法,可能会到 50-55%+。$MRVL$AVGO 大概在那里,但 SK index 波动大得多。

引入 10x leverage,如果它起飞,会给 Samsung/sk 个股带来大量新波动,进而影响 $EWY
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Good news to the IV traders on $EWY.

Volatility looks like it's about to shoot through the roof.

Looks like the degen 10x leverage Sk Hynix/Samsung onchain is taking off. Being the MM counterparty and hedging 10x those equities would be an absolute nightmare + would make individual stock IV even higher.

-> that trickles down to $EWY IV since half of that is samsung/sk hynix
$EWY 上的 IV traders 一个好消息。

Volatility 看起来马上要起飞了。

看起来链上那些 degen 10x leverage Sk Hynix/Samsung 正在起势。作为 MM counterparty,还要对冲这些股票 10x exposure,会是绝对噩梦,而且会让单股 IV 更高。

-> 这会传导到 $EWY IV,因为它一半是 samsung/sk hynix。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2024787743805440375
❤️ 26 🔁 0 💬 9
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Good news to the IV traders on $EWY.

Volatility looks like it's about to shoot through the roof.

Looks like the degen 10x leverage Sk Hynix/Samsung onchain is taking off. Being the MM counterparty and hedging 10x those equities would be an absolute nightmare + would make individual stock IV even higher.

-> that trickles down to $EWY IV since half of that is samsung/sk hynix
$EWY IV traders 的好消息。

波动率看起来快要炸了。

看起来 degen 10x leverage Sk Hynix/Samsung onchain 正在起飞。作为 MM counterparty 并对这些股票做 10x hedging 会是绝对噩梦,也会让个股 IV 更高。

-> 这会传导到 $EWY IV,因为其中一半是 samsung/sk hynix。
❤️ 39 🔁 0 💬 7
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
It’s actually down in price, but this is IV expansion from volatility. Same thing happened with $EWY.

Stock barely moves but made majority of its move first month of the year. I’d assume MMs priced in IV based on historical data.

I’d expect this to be more volatile than the last 10 years due to AI DCs. We’ll see if this right or now.
它价格其实是跌的,但这是波动带来的 IV 扩张。$EWY 也发生过同样的事。

股票本身几乎没动,但今年第一个月已经走出了大部分涨幅。我猜 MMs 是按历史数据给 IV 定价。

由于 AI DCs,我预期它会比过去 10 年更波动。看看我对不对。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
$XLU is up 17.9% already lol.

$CVX hedge up 9.39% in one day.

Feels like low IV sector plays beats out individual stocks https://t.co/H5tP1LPZin
$XLU 已经涨 17.9% 了 lol。

$CVX hedge 一天涨 9.39%。

感觉低 IV sector plays 比个股更强。 https://t.co/H5tP1LPZin
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
As for the second one, ended up doing pretty OTM calls on $XLU 2 years out.

Extremely, extremely boring trade and long wait. But should be 9-10x return if there’s a 39% rally over the next year.

IV is 14% though so any percent movement will make a huge impact.

IMO now’s it’s time to shine with datacenters after all the years, because AI DCs eat up so much power.

Prob going to cost average over next two months, but potential for large upside if index breaks out due to DC usage.

Historically it’s been really low but again, next two years might be its time to shine with AI using up so much energy.
至于第二个,最后做了 $XLU 两年期、相当 OTM 的 calls。

极其、极其无聊的交易,而且要等很久。但如果明年涨 39%,应该能有 9-10x 回报。

不过 IV 只有 14%,所以任何百分比波动都会产生巨大影响。

IMO 经过这么多年,现在轮到 datacenters 发光了,因为 AI DCs 吃电太多。

可能会在接下来两个月成本平均,但如果指数因为 DC 用电突破,潜在 upside 很大。

历史上它一直很低迷,但再次强调,未来两年可能就是它因为 AI 能耗而发光的时候。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2023793826767548555
❤️ 31 🔁 0 💬 8
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Upped concentration in defense like $AVAV and oil like $CVX in case of war personally.

Still researching more second order effects if us full scale invades but just doing basics for now
我个人增加了 defense,比如 $AVAV,以及 oil,比如 $CVX 的集中度,以防战争。

如果美国全面入侵,我还在研究更多二阶影响,但现在先做基础配置。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Increased volatility if Iran and US end up in a military conflict.

Might reposition into defense/oil and hedge a tad.

Doing more research right now. https://t.co/9hvn5QivSM
如果 Iran 和 US 最后陷入军事冲突,波动率会增加。

可能会重新布局到 defense/oil,并稍微 hedge 一点。

现在正在做更多研究。 https://t.co/9hvn5QivSM
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2024120884169208298
❤️ 28 🔁 0 💬 5
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Ended up taking $SIMO positions for NAND controllers, and trimmed other misc semi concentration to up stake.

Feels like $MU just took off just now, so I'd expect the others to play catchup was my guess.
最后建了 $SIMO 仓位,押 NAND controllers,并且减了一些其他杂七杂八的 semi 集中度来加仓。

感觉 $MU 刚刚起飞,所以我猜其他名字也会补涨。
❤️ 26 🔁 0 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
also cost averaging in case it drops back down to $10. previously hype names like $POET that are now depressed present better risk-opportunities imo. This is just my first entr.y
也在 cost averaging,以防它跌回 $10。像 $POET 这种以前被炒过、现在低迷的名字,在我看来风险机会更好。这只是我的第一笔入场。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Trimmed 1/3rd $RPI (still holding majority just risk management).

Ended up entering $INFQ at $15.5

one of the few legitimate quantum stocks in my view. huge catalyst from ticker change imo unless war starts.
减了 1/3 $RPI(大部分还持有,只是风控)。

最后在 $15.5 进了 $INFQ

在我看来这是少数真正靠谱的 quantum stocks 之一。除非开战,否则 ticker change 是巨大催化。
❤️ 30 🔁 1 💬 4
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Increased volatility if Iran and US end up in a military conflict.

Might reposition into defense/oil and hedge a tad.

Doing more research right now. https://t.co/9hvn5QivSM
如果伊朗和美国最后发生军事冲突,波动会加大。

可能会重新配置到 defense/oil,并稍微 hedge 一点。

现在正在做更多研究。 https://t.co/9hvn5QivSM
❤️ 26 🔁 0 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
Also treat this more like a higher likelihood lottery ticket in case index goes up 30% based on AI DC usage for inference. Size accordingly though if you’re buying options since it’s inherently risky too (and might reverse gains from this year in the meantime, so same downside gets magnified)

This is just my guess that this might be a unique breakout year.
另外把这个当成一个概率更高的彩票,如果指数因为 AI DC 推理用电涨 30%。但如果你买期权,仓位要相应控制,因为它本身也有风险(而且中间可能回吐今年收益,所以同样下行会被放大)。

这只是我猜今年可能是一个独特的 breakout year。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
As for the second one, ended up doing pretty OTM calls on $XLU 2 years out.

Extremely, extremely boring trade and long wait. But should be 9-10x return if there’s a 39% rally over the next year.

IV is 14% though so any percent movement will make a huge impact.

IMO now’s it’s time to shine with datacenters after all the years, because AI DCs eat up so much power.

Prob going to cost average over next two months, but potential for large upside if index breaks out due to DC usage.

Historically it’s been really low but again, next two years might be its time to shine with AI using up so much energy.
第二个,我最后做了 $XLU 两年期、相当 OTM 的 calls。

极其、极其无聊的交易,也要等很久。但如果明年涨 39%,应该有 9-10x 回报。

不过 IV 才 14%,所以任何百分比变动都会有巨大影响。

在我看来,经过这么多年,现在轮到 datacenters 发光了,因为 AI DCs 太耗电。

可能接下来两个月 cost average,但如果指数因为 DC 用电 breakout,上行空间很大。

历史上它一直很低迷,但接下来两年也许就是它因为 AI 消耗大量能源而发光的时候。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
2 new banger ideas this week.

I’ll post the hardware consumer one to public. This one is probably decent re-rating but not as much compared to latter:

found a low IV etf that could be 10x return that I’ll post here, don’t want the trade to be too crowded.
这周 2 个新的 banger ideas。

我会把那个硬件消费品发到 public。这一个可能也有不错 re-rating,但和后者相比没那么大:

发现了一个低 IV ETF,可能有 10x 回报,我会发在这里,不想让交易太拥挤。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2023244196711166231
❤️ 42 🔁 0 💬 9
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Hope the $1 subscription was worth it https://t.co/R2PLPITUkf
希望这 $1 订阅值回票价。 https://t.co/R2PLPITUkf
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
First trade idea is Raspberry Pi.

Cautious positions given it’s a $640m MC. Cost averaging over this week

I modeled 45-55% growth rate where analysts projected 14%.

Basically thesis is people are buying out Mac Minis, and I’m starting to see raspberry pi 5 and low end pi hoarding for openclaw/pico claw use cases just last week.

Risks- memory costs. And company not price hiking like other memory companies.
第一个交易想法是 Raspberry Pi。

考虑到它是 $640m MC,仓位会谨慎。这周做成本平均。

我建模 45-55% 增长率,而分析师预期是 14%。

基本 thesis 是:人们正在买光 Mac Minis,而且就在上周,我开始看到 raspberry pi 5 和 low end pi 因 openclaw/pico claw 用例被 hoarding。

风险 - memory costs。以及公司不像其他 memory 公司那样涨价。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2023310624194015560
❤️ 76 🔁 0 💬 14
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Ended up going long again on $ALAB at $127.

New add TLDR are $RDDT (software), $ALAB, $AMKR, $ACMR, and $RPI.

Reddit/Astera recovery. $AMKR long term US advanced packaging supply chain, great long at $11B.

$ACMR on foreign memory. And raspberry as you know momentum trade for openclaw.

Really tempted to trade Minimax but at the same time don’t want to fund foreign adversary AI buildouts, so having an internal debate right now
最后在 $127 又 long 了 $ALAB

新加仓 TLDR 是 $RDDT(software)、$ALAB$AMKR$ACMR$RPI

Reddit/Astera recovery。$AMKR 是长期美国 advanced packaging 供应链,$11B 这里很好。

$ACMR 是 foreign memory。raspberry 你们知道,是 openclaw 的 momentum trade。

真的很想交易 Minimax,但同时又不想资助 foreign adversary AI buildouts,所以现在内心还在辩论。
❤️ 36 🔁 1 💬 5
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Honestly new long idea might be just legacy computers, no joke.

Kind of how legacy memory got expensive.

$IRM for example, just gets components from decommissioned enterprise hardware. Then had a huge profit spike.
老实说,新的 long idea 可能就是 legacy computers,没开玩笑。

有点像 legacy memory 变贵。

比如 $IRM,就是从退役企业硬件里拿组件,然后利润大幅飙升。
❤️ 28 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
TLDR: people were buying one or two for educational use cases but all of a sudden companies and individuals are buying tens to hundreds to run isolated instances for picoclaw/openclaw.

Close to all time low now, healthy balance sheet.

Strong catalyst going forward for low cost ai agent based applications (people are buying apple but it’s already a $4T company)
TLDR:以前人们为教育用途买一两个,但突然间公司和个人开始买几十到几百个,用来跑 picoclaw/openclaw 的隔离实例。

现在接近历史低点,资产负债表健康。

低成本 AI agent based applications 往前看有强催化(人们在买 apple,但它已经是 $4T 公司)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
First trade idea is Raspberry Pi.

Cautious positions given it’s a $640m MC. Cost averaging over this week

I modeled 45-55% growth rate where analysts projected 14%.

Basically thesis is people are buying out Mac Minis, and I’m starting to see raspberry pi 5 and low end pi hoarding for openclaw/pico claw use cases just last week.

Risks- memory costs. And company not price hiking like other memory companies.
第一个交易想法是 Raspberry Pi。

鉴于它是 $640m MC,仓位要谨慎。本周 cost averaging。

我建模 45-55% growth rate,而分析师预测 14%。

基本 thesis 是人们在买光 Mac Minis,而我上周开始看到 raspberry pi 5 和低端 pi 因 openclaw/pico claw 用例被囤货。

风险 - memory costs,以及公司不像其他 memory 公司那样涨价。
❤️ 29 🔁 0 💬 4
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
2 new banger ideas this week.

I’ll post the hardware consumer one to public. This one is probably decent re-rating but not as much compared to latter:

found a low IV etf that could be 10x return that I’ll post here, don’t want the trade to be too crowded.
这周有 2 个新的 banger ideas。

我会把硬件消费类那个发到公开。这个可能会有不错 re-rating,但和后者相比没那么大:

找到了一个低 IV etf,可能有 10x 回报,我会发在这里,不想让交易太拥挤。
❤️ 77 🔁 0 💬 6
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Went through a lot of tickers. These were the extremely promising ones I’ve found out of the bunch.

I need to do more DD into them though:

$TTMI -PCIbs
$NVT- liquid cooling
$PSTG - flash array storage
$SIMO - prob most interesting for SSD/NAND controllers likely taking positions.

And then that mystery one nobody priced in yet.
看了很多 tickers。下面这些是我从里面找到的非常有前景的。

但我还需要做更多 DD:

$TTMI - PCBs
$NVT - liquid cooling
$PSTG - flash array storage
$SIMO - 可能是 SSD/NAND controllers 里最有意思的,可能会建仓。

还有那个没人定价进去的神秘标的。
❤️ 50 🔁 2 💬 2
打开原推
📝 原创
https://t.co/VC9yJEKAmm
https://t.co/VC9yJEKAmm
❤️ 361 🔁 52 💬 26
打开原推
↩️ 回复
We both know that this is complete BS to gaslight retail. This act is more harmful to crypto than Gary Gensler going after every fintech company.

The Clarity act is forced dollar denomination to crypto (which drains liquidity) and hands complete control over flow of funds to companies with banking charters.

Institutions can already interact with crypto without the act passing.

This is just an poision pill by bank lobbying to nuke competition so they can keep their .01% interest rate checking and prevent any other fintech from disrupting their 2 day ACH flow of funds.
我们都知道这完全是在给散户洗脑的 BS。这个法案对 crypto 的伤害,比 Gary Gensler 追着每家 fintech 公司打还大。

Clarity act 是强制 crypto 以美元计价(这会抽干流动性),并把资金流的完全控制权交给有银行牌照的公司。

机构就算这个法案不通过,也已经可以和 crypto 互动。

这只是银行游说塞进来的 poison pill,用来核掉竞争,好让它们继续保住 0.01% 利率的 checking account,并阻止任何 fintech 颠覆它们 2 天 ACH 的资金流。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@longinvest32 $NVDA is already a $4.4T company. I think Nvidia is getting the respect it deserves!
@longinvest32 $NVDA 已经是 $4.4T 的公司了。我觉得 Nvidia 已经得到了它应有的尊重!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Wow found some pretty insane alpha that hasn’t been priced in yet on the downstream supplier side.

Analysts were projecting like 10% revenue growth but it probably might be triple digits.

No movement yet, still doing more DD into financials. Will post on Monday.
哇,在下游供应商侧发现了一些还没被定价的很疯狂 alpha。

分析师预测大概 10% revenue growth,但实际上可能是三位数。

还没动静,仍在做更多财务 DD。周一会发。
❤️ 70 🔁 0 💬 5
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@XDJoeLee That's a given.

$TSM (~$1.9T MC) from projections:
~$62.2 Billion (2025)
-&gt; ~$85.8B – $87.4 Billion (2026)
-&gt; ~$103.3B – $105.3 Billion (2027).

Almost didn't include $TSLA due to gap between operating income with the rest but thought people would be interested.
@XDJoeLee 这是肯定的。

$TSM(约 $1.9T MC)按预测:
~$62.2 Billion(2025)
-&gt; ~$85.8B - $87.4 Billion(2026)
-&gt; ~$103.3B - $105.3 Billion(2027)。

本来差点没把 $TSLA 放进去,因为 operating income 和其他公司差距太大,但觉得大家会感兴趣。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Global ranking of the most profitable companies in the world (Mag 7 vs. World)

Projections for 2025->2026->2027 (Operating Income).

#1: $NVDA (USA, 4.4T MC) 🇺🇸
~$135.0B -> $186.5B -> $240.1 Billion

#2: Samsung Electronics (Korea, $820B MC) 🇰🇷
~$30.2B -> ~$170B -> ~$226.7 Billion

#3 $MSFT (USA, $2.9T MC)
~$128.5B -> 153.0B -> $181.5 Billion

#4 $GOOGL (USA, $3.7T MC)
~$129.0B -> $142.0B -> $173.0B

#4 Sk Hynix (Korea, $410B MC)
~$32.7B -> ~$124B -> ~$161.0 Billion

#5 $APPL (USA, $3.76T MC)
$133.1B -> $146.0B -> $160.5B

#6 $AMZN (USA, $2.13T MC)
$80.0B -> $105.0B -> $136.5B

#7 $Meta (USA, $1.62T MC)
$83.3 -> $97.0B -> $121.5B

#8 $TSLA (USA, $1.31T MC)
$4.4B -> $8.0B -> $24.0B

Samsung Electronics, a $820B company in Korea is projected to catch up to $NVDA in 2027 in operating income.

Meanwhile Sk Hynix is projected to overtake both $APPL and $AMZN in operating income in 2027.

The main takeaway is that the growth of both US hyperscalers and South Korean equities is astounding due to Artificial Intelligence ramp.
全球最赚钱公司排名(Mag 7 vs. World)

2025->2026->2027 预测(Operating Income)。

#1:$NVDA(美国,4.4T MC)
~$135.0B -> $186.5B -> $240.1 Billion

#2:Samsung Electronics(韩国,$820B MC)
~$30.2B -> ~$170B -> ~$226.7 Billion

#3 $MSFT(美国,$2.9T MC)
~$128.5B -> 153.0B -> $181.5 Billion

#4 $GOOGL(美国,$3.7T MC)
~$129.0B -> $142.0B -> $173.0B

#4 Sk Hynix(韩国,$410B MC)
~$32.7B -> ~$124B -> ~$161.0 Billion

#5 $APPL(美国,$3.76T MC)
$133.1B -> $146.0B -> $160.5B

#6 $AMZN(美国,$2.13T MC)
$80.0B -> $105.0B -> $136.5B

#7 $Meta(美国,$1.62T MC)
$83.3 -> $97.0B -> $121.5B

#8 $TSLA(美国,$1.31T MC)
$4.4B -> $8.0B -> $24.0B

韩国 $820B 的 Samsung Electronics,预计 2027 年 operating income 会追上 $NVDA

同时 Sk Hynix 预计 2027 年 operating income 会超过 $APPL$AMZN

核心结论是,由于 Artificial Intelligence ramp,美国 hyperscalers 和韩国股票的增长都非常惊人。
❤️ 437 🔁 44 💬 33
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@zephyr_z9 yeah, diamond on silicon + synthetic diamonds for cooling is prob like late 2027 into 2028?

But you can see what's up and coming from where the money flows from gov grants.
@zephyr_z9 是,silicon 上的 diamond + 用于散热的 synthetic diamonds,大概是 2027 年底到 2028 年?

但你可以从政府 grants 的资金流向里,看出哪些东西正在冒头。
❤️ 19 🔁 1 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
You went from drawing $PLTR Shampoo brand TAs a few days ago.

Into comparing Hubspot, a company that sells blogging and marketing tools for small business. With Palantir, an AI defense contractor that helped the US invade Venezuela with blackbox AI programs.

I think Palantir is overvalued but idk about these comparisons and charts.
你几天前还在画 $PLTR 洗发水品牌 TA。

现在又开始拿 Hubspot 这种给小企业卖博客和营销工具的公司,去和 Palantir 比。Palantir 可是一个 AI defense contractor,还用 blackbox AI programs 帮美国入侵 Venezuela。

我觉得 Palantir 是高估了,但这些比较和图表我真有点看不懂。
❤️ 204 🔁 4 💬 8
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I’m not a fan of earning result coin flips but I do expect a strong beat and guidance for $CRDO near term, maybe recovering a lot of gains. But markets were pricing in long term disruption.

That being said still think it’s a good buy, but it doesn’t get that leader status anymore that gives extreme premiums to stuff like $LITE.

Personally think it’s near the bottom around $100
我不喜欢财报 coin flip,但我确实预计 $CRDO 近期会强 beat 和给出强指引,可能收复不少涨幅。不过市场之前定价的是长期 disruption。

话虽如此,我还是觉得它是好买点,但它不再拥有那种 leader status,也就拿不到 $LITE 这类东西的极端溢价。

个人觉得 $100 左右接近底部。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ryansdagoat Some chance*
@ryansdagoat 有一定机会*
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ryansdagoat Good luck, I like shares over options, but lmk how it goes!

There’s some it $AMKR goes to $42 and stays rangebound but hope it recovers fast
@ryansdagoat 祝好运,我更喜欢股票而不是期权,但到时候告诉我结果!

如果 $AMKR 到 $42 然后区间震荡,是有一些可能的,但希望它能快点恢复。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@TradeACH Oh I have that guy blocked from awhile back. The guy was fired from JPM for being wrong all the time.

Ai hyperscalers literally lifted FY 2026 ai capex guidance last week lol
@TradeACH 哦,那个人我很久以前就拉黑了。他以前在 JPM 因为一直错被开了。

AI hyperscalers 上周明明刚上调 FY 2026 AI capex 指引 lol
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
The most watched story on Reddit:

A Robinhood user bought 5 figures of $AMZN weekly calls with their savings.

The condition?

Recover past $205 for a potential $1M+.

Or go to $0.

Today, Amazon finished at $198.8.

Amazon has now dropped for the 9th straight session, causing their portfolio of weekly options to end the week worthless.

Moral of the story: Please stop holding short-term options.

That $26K could easily compound to $500K with time, but now it’s worth nothing.
Reddit 上最受关注的故事:

一个 Robinhood 用户拿自己的积蓄买了五位数的 $AMZN weekly calls。

条件是什么?

涨回 $205 以上,可能赚 $1M+。

否则归零。

今天 Amazon 收在 $198.8。

Amazon 已经连续第 9 个交易日下跌,导致他的 weekly options 组合在本周归零。

故事教训:请停止持有短期期权。

那 $26K 本来随着时间很容易复利到 $500K,但现在一文不值。
❤️ 1,765 🔁 67 💬 143
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Nothing too much for me today. Main thing was adding $AMKR on the 6.6% drop. I didn’t see any news aside from 10m share sale by institutions. Same with happened with $SNDK on the drop to $530 and now it’s back in the $600s

Added some $ACMR and $INTC as well since I wanted more positions. Some off some crypto positions.
今天我没做太多。主要是在 6.6% 下跌时加了 $AMKR。除了机构卖出 10m shares 外,我没看到任何新闻。$SNDK 跌到 $530 时也发生过类似情况,现在已经回到 $600 多。

还加了一些 $ACMR$INTC,因为我想要更多仓位。卖了一些 crypto 仓位。
❤️ 25 🔁 0 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@halldj00 I posted at 508 (you guys ended up bringing my cost avg to like 514 to 516 and last buy at 520 I think) and sold at 534-536.

So 3.89% roughly?
@halldj00 我在 508 发帖(你们最后把我的成本均价抬到大概 514 到 516,最后一笔买在 520 我记得),然后在 534-536 卖了。

所以大概 3.89%?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
My assumption is MMS used garchr models or volatility forecasting projections against long-term averages.

Korean indexes were range bound for 10-20 years. If it looks at previous years, models typically assume volatility might re-revert to mean in 2 years.

But if we look at MS's steep operating income projections on Samsung/Sk Hynix + inherent volatility with memory like $MU / $SNDK, it looks calls will benefit from vega expsnion. So further out IV looks to be mispriced from my view.
我的假设是 MMs 用了 garchr models 或波动率预测,把它和长期均值对比。

韩国指数过去 10-20 年都在区间震荡。如果模型看过去几年,通常会假设波动率可能在 2 年内回归均值。

但如果看 MS 对 Samsung/Sk Hynix 陡峭的 operating income 预测,以及 memory 像 $MU / $SNDK 这种内在波动性,calls 应该会受益于 vega expansion。所以在我看来,远期期权 IV 被错定价了。
❤️ 34 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@cashbeking This was the 2028 option chain for Blackrock's national south korea index.

Shorter dated IV looks like it's priced in more accurately at ~48% but 2Y leaps are 32-33%. 1Y is now 38% but that was formerly 32% too.

I'd expect them all to rise together though.
@cashbeking 这是 Blackrock 韩国国家指数的 2028 option chain。

短期期限 IV 看起来定价更准确,大概 ~48%,但 2Y leaps 只有 32-33%。1Y 现在是 38%,但之前也只有 32%。

我预计它们最后都会一起上升。
❤️ 25 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@TalentActivity Yeah DCA $EWY shares seem like a great idea to get exposure to Samsung/Sk Hynix and the memory supercycle.

This post was just discussing 2028 leaps and vega expansion from underpriced volatility, options are not the best way to go for everyone.
@TalentActivity 是,DCA $EWY 股票看起来是获得 Samsung/Sk Hynix 和 memory supercycle 敞口的好办法。

这帖只是讨论 2028 leaps 和低估波动率带来的 vega expansion,期权不是适合所有人的最佳方式。
❤️ 20 🔁 1 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@platochi Yeah I made a new sub channel just for shower thoughts + random trades throughout the day.

My account go too big so can't really post them all on my main timeline.

I didn't want to charge anything (or go off-platform) but X made me set a minimum sadly.
@platochi 是,我新开了一个 sub channel,专门发 shower thoughts + 白天随机交易。

我的账号太大了,不能把这些都发在主时间线。

我本来不想收费(也不想去站外),但 X 很遗憾强制我设了最低价格。
❤️ 18 🔁 0 💬 5
打开原推
💬 引用
Trade idea that I published to my shower thoughts channel:

Korean Index volatility arbitrage and taking advantage of Black-Scholes models.

$EWY long options seem mispriced.

This is Blackrock's Korea Index, which is majority memory (Samsung Electronics, Sk Hynix).

The stock swings 2-5+% a day, and is up 136.25% 1Y, despite priced like a normal index IV.

Samsung is volatile. SK Hynix is volatile (eg. 65% - 80% est).

But the combination of the two through the index is priced way less than both low beta $GOOGL (37.33%) and $AMZN (39.12%) at ~32% IV.

I've been watching $EWY for a bit and it does look volatile.

As for pricing my guess is MMs priced in IV based on historical averages (5-10 years), where the Korean index was completely flat. And were expecting calls 2 years out to revert to the mean.

But this volatility should be the new norm as markets price in the new memory supercycle (eg. $TSM went from 30% IV to 46.2% IV).

Long calls should benefit from both Samsung + Sk Hynix carrying the index.

And the main benefit is vega expansion that you won't get from $KORU.

You also can't get this option MM pinning like individual US stocks since this is Korea's national index and long term.

TLDR: Individual components SK Hynix + Samsung are highly volatile.

They're basically half of the index, but options in index are priced with low volatility, perhaps due to historical 5-10 year data.

Long calls benefit from vega expansion that weren't priced in correctly as MM forward vol estimates are anchored too heavily on historical realized vol, which was low for $EWY over the past 5-10 years
我发在 shower thoughts channel 的交易想法:

韩国指数波动率套利,利用 Black-Scholes models。

$EWY 长期期权看起来被错定价。

这是 Blackrock 的韩国指数,主要是 memory(Samsung Electronics、Sk Hynix)。

它一天能波动 2-5%+,1 年涨了 136.25%,但 IV 却像普通指数一样定价。

Samsung 波动很大。SK Hynix 也很波动(估计 65%-80%)。

但两者通过指数合在一起,IV 只有约 32%,比低 beta 的 $GOOGL(37.33%)和 $AMZN(39.12%)还低很多。

我一直在关注 $EWY,因为如果 memory supercycle 继续、Samsung/Sk Hynix operating income 继续上调,远期 calls 可能同时吃到方向和 vega expansion。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
These numbers are staggering:

Samsung and SK Hynix are projected to become the most profitable companies in the world by 2027.

Their projections exceed $APPL and $GOOGL, both ~$4T companies in operating profit.

For reference, Samsung is valued at ~$820B and SK Hynix is valued at ~$410B.

That would make a ~$410B company in SK Hynix more profitable than $GOOGL ($3.7T) in 2027.

By Morgan Stanley estimates earlier, SK Hynix and Samsung are est. to bring in:

~$387.7 Billion USD combined operating income.

America’s two most profitable companies $APPL and $GOOGL combined brought in $263 Billion USD for 2025. (Google $129-132B, Apple $133.1B)

2027 est.
Samsung Electronics: ~$226.7 Billion
Sk Hynix: ~$161.0 Billion

2027 est:
Apple: ~$156B-$165B
Google: ~$168B-178B

The statistics of smaller Korean equities exceeding multi trillion dollar US hyperscalers in profitability is staggering.

It’s a genuinely interesting point, that a $410B company exceeds $4T+ hyperscalers in profitability.

But the bigger question markets are pricing in is if the memory shortage is ephemeral, or if they become a necessary “Oil” like GPUs for the AI buildout.

If your answer to that is “likely, might be good to get exposure to Korean, Japanese, or Taiwanese equities.
这些数字太夸张了:

到 2027 年,Samsung 和 SK Hynix 预计会成为全球最赚钱的公司。

它们的预测营业利润会超过 $APPL$GOOGL 这两家市值约 $4T 的公司。

作个参考,Samsung 估值约 $820B,SK Hynix 估值约 $410B。

这意味着到 2027 年,SK Hynix 这家约 $410B 的公司,利润会比 $GOOGL($3.7T)还高。

按 Morgan Stanley 之前的估算,SK Hynix 和 Samsung 预计合计带来:

约 $387.7B 美元营业利润。

美国最赚钱的两家公司 $APPL$GOOGL 在 2025 年合计营业利润是 $263B 美元。(Google $129-132B,Apple $133.1B)

2027 年预计:
Samsung Electronics:约 $226.7B
Sk Hynix:约 $161.0B

2027 年预计:
Apple:约 $156B-$165B
Google:约 $168B-178B

规模更小的韩国股票在盈利能力上超过数万亿美元级美国 hyperscaler,这个统计真的很惊人。

一家 $410B 公司在利润上超过 $4T+ hyperscaler,这点本身就非常有意思。

但市场正在定价的更大问题是:内存短缺只是短暂现象,还是会像 GPU 一样,成为 AI 建设所必需的“石油”。

如果你的答案是“很可能”,那可能值得配置一些韩国、日本或台湾股票。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2022196582884790607
❤️ 708 🔁 42 💬 39
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ak_dfranco Makes sense to take this seriously as a Reuters reports on critical minerals.

That being said, some basis holds with $MSFT developing frontier models and using them. This has been known to be in development since last year. https://t.co/KDOhV1pl9V
@ak_dfranco 作为 Reuters 关于 critical minerals 的报道,认真对待是合理的。

话虽如此,$MSFT 开发并使用 frontier models 这点是有基础的。这从去年开始就已经知道在开发了。 https://t.co/KDOhV1pl9V
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Windows Central. "Microsoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman just confirmed to FT that the firm is gearing up to ditch OpenAI's models."

That being said the report is worded very sensationally and I feel bad for quoting it.

But likely has some basis with $MSFT building their own frontier models and using them instead of OpenAI.
Windows Central:“Microsoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman 刚向 FT 确认,公司正准备放弃 OpenAI 的模型。”

话虽如此,这篇报道措辞很耸动,我引用它还有点不好意思。

$MSFT 正在构建自己的 frontier models,并用它们替代 OpenAI,这大概率有一定基础。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
What a load of BS. Banks and others can already interact with crypto markets.

The Clarity Act just expands on forced dollar denomination while drying up liquidity from yields. Then it hands all flow of funds from fintechs and exchanges to the banks.

This the probably one of the most harmful bills in the history of crypto.

Pretending that it’s a good thing to get it passed for Wall Street while banks try and poison pill nuke the industry to keep their .01% interest rate checking accounts is hilarious.
真是一堆 BS。银行和其他机构本来就已经可以参与 crypto 市场。

Clarity Act 只是扩大强制美元计价,同时通过收益率抽干流动性。然后把 fintechs 和 exchanges 的所有资金流都交给银行。

这可能是 crypto 历史上伤害最大的法案之一。

一边银行想用 poison pill 核掉行业、保住它们 0.01% 利率 checking accounts,一边还假装让 Wall Street 推动它通过是好事,真的很好笑。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
These numbers are staggering:

Samsung and SK Hynix are projected to become the most profitable companies in the world by 2027.

Their projections exceed $APPL and $GOOGL, both ~$4T companies in operating profit.

For reference, Samsung is valued at ~$820B and SK Hynix is valued at ~$410B.

That would make a ~$410B company in SK Hynix more profitable than $GOOGL ($3.7T) in 2027.

By Morgan Stanley estimates earlier, SK Hynix and Samsung are est. to bring in:

~$387.7 Billion USD combined operating income.

America’s two most profitable companies $APPL and $GOOGL combined brought in $263 Billion USD for 2025. (Google $129-132B, Apple $133.1B)

2027 est.
Samsung Electronics: ~$226.7 Billion
Sk Hynix: ~$161.0 Billion

2027 est:
Apple: ~$156B-$165B
Google: ~$168B-178B

The statistics of smaller Korean equities exceeding multi trillion dollar US hyperscalers in profitability is staggering.

It’s a genuinely interesting point, that a $410B company exceeds $4T+ hyperscalers in profitability.

But the bigger question markets are pricing in is if the memory shortage is ephemeral, or if they become a necessary “Oil” like GPUs for the AI buildout.

If your answer to that is “likely, might be good to get exposure to Korean, Japanese, or Taiwanese equities.
这些数字非常惊人:

Samsung 和 SK Hynix 预计到 2027 年会成为全球最赚钱的公司。

它们的预测 operating profit 超过 $APPL$GOOGL 这两家约 $4T 公司。

参考一下,Samsung 估值约 $820B,SK Hynix 估值约 $410B。

这意味着一家约 $410B 的 SK Hynix,2027 年会比 $GOOGL($3.7T)更赚钱。

按 Morgan Stanley 早前估算,SK Hynix 和 Samsung 合计 operating income 约:

~$387.7 Billion USD。

美国最赚钱的两家公司 $APPL$GOOGL 合计 operating income 也会被它们追上。

这就是 memory supercycle 的量级。
❤️ 1,740 🔁 196 💬 75
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I covered $NBIS 2 days ago. The momentum trade is now memory/photonics since neoclouds are in the silent buildout phase (with little new news weekly) after getting hyperscaler deals last year.

That being said I still like $NBIS, $400 bull case PT Q4 earnings given they hit $8B ARR, Clickhouse + Avride carries sum of parts (Clickhouse hit $15B valuation, Eg if they raise at $40B that 28% equity is 11.2B, almost half their current valuation).

That being said there’s a lot of short term pressure from ATM overhangs + possible dilution as they raise for the 3GW pipeline from ER, macro (largely), and capex spend during the buildout.
我 2 天前已经平掉 $NBIS。现在动量交易转向 memory/photonics,因为 neoclouds 在去年拿到 hyperscaler deals 后,进入了 silent buildout 阶段(每周新消息不多)。

话虽如此,我仍然喜欢 $NBIS,Q4 财报牛市情形 $400 PT,前提是它们达到 $8B ARR,Clickhouse + Avride 支撑 sum of parts(Clickhouse 估值到了 $15B,比如如果它按 $40B 融资,28% 股权就是 $11.2B,几乎是它们当前估值的一半)。

但短期有很多压力:ATM overhang、为 ER 里 3GW pipeline 融资可能带来的稀释,以及宏观压力。
❤️ 39 🔁 2 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
You only have one life to live! If you don’t find fulfillment in your work, it’s a great mindset to take the leap of faith and quit to find greater meaning.

Of course the best case scenario is the type of job where you genuinely enjoy the work that you’re doing. And that you would do it all in your free time.

I find that when you do that money comes naturally.
人生只有一次!如果你在工作里找不到满足感,勇敢跳出去、辞职去寻找更大的意义,是很好的心态。

当然最好的情况,是你真的享受自己做的工作,而且就算在空闲时间也愿意做。

我发现当你做到这一点,钱会自然跟着来。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
The Clarity Act is just a poison pill nuke on the entire crypto industry, giving all the rails over to banks.

Banning 3rd party yields for stablecoins allows banks to just keep their .01% interest rate checking.

Then having banking licenses or IDI requirements to even touch flow of funds is an effective nuke on majority of your venture portfolio companies.

Keep up the good fight, Gov policy is obviously making sure Dollar is bottom line currency for all crypto that is fine to align on.

But at the same time don’t let banks throw in provisions that nukes the long term innovation for crypto and $COIN.
Clarity Act 本质上就是对整个 crypto 行业的 poison pill nuke,把所有 rails 都交给银行。

禁止稳定币第三方收益,让银行可以继续保住它们 0.01% 利率 checking。

然后要求银行牌照或 IDI,甚至才能碰资金流,这实际上会核掉你 venture portfolio 里大多数公司。

继续打这场仗吧。政府政策显然要确保 Dollar 是所有 crypto 的底层货币,这点可以接受。

但同时不要让银行塞进那些会核掉长期创新的条款。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Ren_aramb Yeah $LPTH is backlogged with ~$100m. Demand is there, looks like a waiting game for companies to switch over to black diamond from foreign owned germanium supply chains https://t.co/sgVpFZFwMa
@Ren_aramb 是,$LPTH backlog 大概 ~$100m。需求存在,看起来就是等公司从外资 germanium 供应链切到 black diamond。 https://t.co/sgVpFZFwMa
❤️ 26 🔁 1 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
IMO Mag7 earnings are too strong for a full-blown correction. $META projecting guided ~30% revenue growth. $GOOGL's enormous $180B capex spend is funded by it's $132B+ operating income from 2025.

All those funds trickle down into AI, memory, semis and puts a floor on them (eg. memory is a huge percentage of BOM for AI clusters).

Even mid cap in other segments like $RDDT, is close to ~26-30 forward P/E estimates after 35% of revenue as net income -> 70% Y/Y revenue growth and 50%+ forward.

Growth still looks sustainable right now, and other segments like software are heavily discounted.

But the fact Bitcoin/Ethereum is not recovering yet is usually the best canary in the coal mine for short term liquidity issues. I'd expect a broader recovery going forward to midterms.
在我看来,Mag7 财报太强,不支持全面回调。$META 指引约 30% 收入增长。$GOOGL 巨大的 $180B capex 支出,由它 2025 年 $132B+ operating income 支撑。

这些资金都会流向 AI、memory、semis,并给它们提供底部支撑(比如 memory 是 AI clusters BOM 的很大比例)。

即使其他板块中盘股,比如 $RDDT,在 35% 收入转为净利润后,forward P/E 估计也接近 26-30,同时收入同比 70%、forward 50%+。

现在增长看起来仍然可持续,软件等其他板块则被严重打折。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
There are two companies that don’t care about market crashes.

$APP down 19.7%
$DNKG down 19.4%
$PINS down to 19.1%
$ASTS down 15.21%
$RDW down to 13.1%
$USAR down 12.4%
Silver down 11.6%
$OSS down 9.58%
$RGTI down 8.85%
$RDDT down 6.8%
$RKLB down 5.4%
$APPL down 5.09%
Gold down 3.4%
SPY Index down 1.54%

Sandisk up 7.21%.

The other biggest gainer? Walmart, up 3.78% today.

You have a fwd 2027 p/e ~7 memory company growing net income at triple digits y/y.

And a bath towel reseller growing in line with inflation sitting at 46 p/e, outperforming the market.

Markets are starting to make less and less sense.
有两家公司根本不在乎市场崩盘。

$APP 跌 19.7%
$DNKG 跌 19.4%
$PINS 跌到 19.1%
$ASTS 跌 15.21%
$RDW 跌到 13.1%
$USAR 跌 12.4%
Silver 跌 11.6%
$OSS 跌 9.58%
$RGTI 跌 8.85%
$RDDT 跌 6.8%
$RKLB 跌 5.4%
$APPL 跌 5.09%
Gold 跌 3.4%
SPY Index 跌 1.54%

Sandisk 涨 7.21%。

另一个最大赢家?Walmart,今天涨 3.78%。

你有一家 2027 forward P/E 约 7、净利润同比三位数增长的 memory 公司。

还有一家卖浴巾的公司,增长跟通胀差不多,P/E 46,却跑赢市场。

市场真是离谱。
❤️ 318 🔁 18 💬 41
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@sambath47 I'm just sticking with my cost avg, not adding more crypto, software stuff, etc. But if you don't have positions, historically $141 is a really good price.
@sambath47 我只是坚持自己的成本均价,不再加 crypto、software 之类。但如果你还没仓位,历史上 $141 是非常好的价格。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@fdeantunano Yes, seems likely Samsung and Sk Hynix will double again in the next two years. That would drag $EWY up a lot.
@fdeantunano 是,看起来 Samsung 和 Sk Hynix 未来两年很可能再翻倍一次。那会把 $EWY 拉高很多。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@metapata If people ever want to see this in their lifetime, $LASR has one of the best exposure to energy directed lasers https://t.co/eNPepoBrk7
@metapata 如果人们这辈子真想看到这个,$LASR 是 directed energy lasers 最好的敞口之一。 https://t.co/eNPepoBrk7
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$LASR is up almost 30%+ now since I mentioned it last month.

Apparently markets (and guys) really like death ray laser beams that shoot anything down like hypersonic missiles.

It’s not too hard to imagine the DoD attaching laser beams to $TSLA Optimus Robots and sending them off to war.

If America is building the Death Star in space from Star Wars or the Terminator from Skyney, this company would be it.

That being said, don’t have any right now, but thought others might appreciate under the radar companies like this.

Energy directed lasers are just so futuristic and cool.
自从我上个月提到 $LASR 以来,现在已经涨了将近 30%+。

显然市场(以及男生们)真的很喜欢能把高超音速导弹之类东西打下来的 death ray laser beams。

不难想象 DoD 把激光束装到 $TSLA Optimus Robots 上,然后派去打仗。

如果美国正在造 Star Wars 里的 Death Star,或者 Skyney 里的 Terminator,那这家公司就是它。

话虽如此,我现在没持仓,只是觉得其他人可能会喜欢这种 under the radar 公司。

Directed energy lasers 真的太未来、太酷了。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$LASR (NLight), a $2.2B US company does these directed energy weapons.

They build the "Death Ray" - Lasers that shoot down ballistic and hypersonic missiles.

This can be adapted to Orbital death rays beaming from Space down to Earth.

Israel's Iron Beam system (Laser Air Defense) uses NLight too.

So if you want to invest in Directed Energy Weapons, $LASR is the purest play.
$LASR (NLight) 这家 $2.2B 的美国公司就是做这些定向能武器的。

他们造“Death Ray”——能击落弹道导弹和高超音速导弹的激光。

这也可以改造成轨道版 death ray,从太空向地球发射光束。

以色列的 Iron Beam 系统(激光防空)也用了 NLight。

所以如果你想投定向能武器,$LASR 是最纯的标的。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2014826579625738691
❤️ 188 🔁 15 💬 19
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@rwang07 Of course! The bottleneck ETF is the unofficial, self proclaimed coolest ETF. Just waiting for @matthew_sigel to add it to Vaneck.

It’s a solid list, I think the group should outperform.
@rwang07 当然!Bottleneck ETF 是非官方、自封最酷 ETF。就等 @matthew_sigel 把它加进 Vaneck。

这名单很扎实,我觉得这个组合应该会跑赢。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
I still think IV is mispriced given $EWY moves like 4-7% a day now.

That being said, my covered calls are looking rough. I have a lot of regrets. https://t.co/xhOjXIvXTO
考虑到 $EWY 现在一天能动 4-7%,我仍然认为 IV 定价错了。

话虽如此,我的 covered calls 看起来很惨。我很后悔。 https://t.co/xhOjXIvXTO
❤️ 12 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@zephyr_z9 3 months later, I’m expecting a “did you listen Anon?” follow up post
@zephyr_z9 3 个月后,我期待看到一条“did you listen Anon?”的 follow-up 帖。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@yomattyboi - 1/3rd of it is folks on X like @zephyr_z9 quote tweeting me about “ $AXTI InP bros, have you thought about _?” Then I do more research upstream.

- other part is comment sections or DMs from people who tag about stocks

- last part of it is just industry discussions irl
@yomattyboi - 其中 1/3 来自 X 上像 @zephyr_z9 这样的人 quote tweet 我:“$AXTI InP bros,你有没有想过 _?”然后我就会继续往上游研究。

- 另一部分来自评论区或 DM 里有人 tag 股票。

- 最后一部分就是现实里的行业讨论。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@canbilgeyilmaz Yeah Qualcomm ( $QCOM ), was the right ticker thanks for the correction. Was just going off the top of my head, and the former seemed logical.
@canbilgeyilmaz 是,Qualcomm($QCOM)才是正确 ticker,谢谢纠正。我只是凭记忆说的,而且前一个看起来也合理。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@moderndayvenom No I ended up converting any $NBIS options to shares for risk management.

Only options I have now are sub 35% IV stuff
@moderndayvenom 没有,我最后为了风险管理,把所有 $NBIS options 都转成股票了。

我现在唯一持有的 options 是 IV 低于 35% 的东西。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Random thoughts: getting a lot of FOMO, up 4.24% this week while semis are soaring green (eg. $TSM up 15.8% 1W, even $AEHR up 45%+, $LITE up 31.29%, and $MU back up 10%+).

But down really heavily yesterday from software/crypto.

Dream scenario is everything green, but one industry is obviously outperforming right now while others seem to be in a bear market.

I do feel the strong urge to all in the semicap/semis/AI trade. But it does go against diversification principles I have, even if my portfolio drops more short term from software/crypto weighing down on the rest.

If you put all your eggs in the semi trade, then China surprise invades Taiwan like US did to Venezuela, it would nuke the semi supply chain by like 50-60%+ in a day. This is the black swan event that nobody likes to talk about.

Odds are probably like single digits annually but still non-zero. Otherwise capex outlook from hyperscalers is an obvious no brainer port into semi trade.

Stuff like $RDDT is surprisingly below cost average ($145, trading at $139) now and software/crypto keeps dropping bringing total performance down a lot.

But I think it's good to just hold through it and not full send into semis.
随便想想:现在很 FOMO,本周涨 4.24%,而 semis 一片大绿(比如 $TSM 1W 涨 15.8%,$AEHR 涨 45%+,$LITE 涨 31.29%,$MU 又涨 10%+)。

但昨天因为 software/crypto 跌得很重。

梦想场景当然是全都绿,但一个行业现在明显跑赢,其他像在熊市。

我确实很想 all in semicap/semis/AI trade。但这违背我的分散原则,即使短期 software/crypto 拖累组合。

如果你把所有鸡蛋放在 semi trade 里,然后中国突然像美国打委内瑞拉那样入侵台湾,semi 供应链可能一天被 nuked 50-60%+。这是没人爱谈的黑天鹅。

概率也许每年个位数,但不是 0。否则 hyperscalers 的 capex outlook 明显就是 semi trade 的无脑组合。

$RDDT 这种现在居然低于成本均价($145,现价 $139),software/crypto 继续跌也拖累整体表现。

但我觉得还是应该拿住,不要 full send 进 semis。
❤️ 27 🔁 0 💬 4
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
feels bad for $RDDT under my cost average now at $145, ended up buying more at $150
$RDDT 现在低于我的成本均价 $145,有点难受,最后在 $150 又买了更多。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Ended up buying $AIRO back at 8 high and $AVAV back in $240s.

Just feels like the entire stock market is collapsing aside from AI stocks lol
最后在高 8 买回 $AIRO,也在 $240 多买回 $AVAV

感觉整个股市除了 AI 股票都在崩 lol
❤️ 13 🔁 0 💬 3
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
I'm testing out a potential opportunity with price lag between Sk Hynix EUR and $EWY.

$EWY is basically Korean futures (mainly Samsung + Sk Hynix) and is up 3.66%.

But SK Hynix on EUR is basically flat today at 510.

If my prediction is correct SK Hynix EUR will go higher tomorrow after tomorrow's price rise (if it happens). And I should be able to rinse and repeat
我在测试 Sk Hynix EUR 和 $EWY 之间价格滞后的潜在机会。

$EWY 基本就是韩国 futures(主要 Samsung + Sk Hynix),涨了 3.66%。

但 SK Hynix 的 EUR 今天基本持平在 510。

如果我的预测正确,明天价格上涨后(如果发生)SK Hynix EUR 会走高。然后我应该可以反复做。
❤️ 12 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
$RDDT still way too cheap at $150. Ended up adding a lot more ON. Trimmed stuff like $CIFR completely earlier and trimmed some concentration in Bitcoin/altcoins for more shares .

AI doesn’t disrupt anything with Reddit, if anything there’s just more bots trying to interact with humans and inflating user count.

70% y/y growth for ~24-30ish p/e and 91% gross margins is undervalued.
$RDDT 在 $150 还是太便宜。最后 ON 又加了很多。之前完全减掉了 $CIFR,也减了一些 Bitcoin/altcoins 的集中度来换更多 shares。

AI 不会颠覆 Reddit,反而会有更多 bot 想和真人互动,推高用户数。

70% y/y 增长,约 24-30 倍 p/e,91% 毛利率,这被低估了。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Ended up adding more $SNDK on 7% drop, I like it a lot more at $540 than $$690

Didn’t like $HOOD earnings at $80, looks like the start of revenue deceleration, ended up moving those positions over to stuff like $RDDT.

Otherwise just sitting on positions
最后在 $SNDK 跌 7% 时又加了点,我更喜欢 $540 的它,而不是 $$690。

不喜欢 $HOOD 在 $80 的 earnings,看起来像收入减速的开始,最后把那些仓位转到 $RDDT 之类。

其他就继续坐着不动。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2021354465086013947
❤️ 24 🔁 1 💬 2
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Ended up adding more $SNDK on 7% drop, I like it a lot more at $540 than $$690

Didn’t like $HOOD earnings at $80, looks like the start of revenue deceleration, ended up moving those positions over to stuff like $RDDT.

Otherwise just sitting on positions
最后在 7% 下跌时又加了 $SNDK,我在 $540 比 $$690 更喜欢它。

不喜欢 $HOOD 在 $80 的财报,看起来像收入减速开始了,最后把那些仓位转到 $RDDT 这类。

其他就继续拿着仓位。
❤️ 17 🔁 0 💬 4
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
MB messed up numbers. Net cash +$97 Million.

They have $1.07B in cash total, $971m debt but that debt is convertible notes with 0 interest.

So they'll owe that amount 2030, strike price is over $70. It does look a lot better.
MB,数字搞错了。净现金 +$97 Million。

他们总现金 $1.07B,债务 $971m,但这些债务是 0 利息可转债。

所以他们到 2030 年才欠这笔钱,转股价超过 $70。这样看起来好多了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
(Sold my position I bought at like $22 for a 13% or so loss, bought before that $NVO lawsuit rip)
(把我大概 $22 买的仓位卖了,亏了约 13%,是在那次 $NVO lawsuit 暴跌前买的。)
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
$HIMS probably overvalued without glp-1.

Without that their p/e goes to 55-60 and they’re growing 25-30% y/y.

$630m cash on hand, ~$140m in liabilities.

So a settlement would hurt a lot too.

Probably low chance of recovery, makes sense why it’s 34% short interest.
没有 glp-1 的话,$HIMS 可能高估了。

没有它,p/e 会到 55-60,而他们同比增长 25-30%。

手上 $630m 现金,负债约 ~$140m。

所以和解也会很伤。

恢复概率可能不高,难怪 short interest 是 34%。
❤️ 6 🔁 0 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@AI_PowerFlow Preliminary revenue, probably just to stop $CRDO from tanking further. They don't typically do this.

Actual report comes out March 2nd.
@AI_PowerFlow 初步收入,大概只是为了阻止 $CRDO 继续暴跌。他们通常不会这么做。

正式报告 3 月 2 日出来。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Imagine panicking with $CRDO at $95 ($17B MC).

If you bought then it would be a 52.6%+ gain in a week after today's preliminary ER.

Mid-term fears were overblown. 200%+ YoY revenue growth for this year. $340M guidance -> $406M (huge beat) for Q3 2026 guidance.

That being said, long term risks are still with photonics transitions (since this is medium term guidance).

But, Credo will be a core part of the AI buildout in the future, it just loses it's defacto "leader" status.

The selloff to $95 was may have been one of the biggest dip-buying opportunities this year.
想象一下在 $CRDO $95($17B MC)时恐慌。

如果你那时买入,今天初步财报之后,一周就有 52.6%+ 收益。

中期担忧被夸大了。今年收入同比增长 200%+。Q3 2026 指引从 $340M 到 $406M(巨大 beat)。

话虽如此,长期风险仍然在 photonics transitions(因为这是中期指引)。

但 Credo 未来仍会是 AI buildout 的核心部分,只是失去了事实上的“leader”地位。

跌到 $95 可能是今年最大的逢低买入机会之一。
❤️ 262 🔁 18 💬 19
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@jukan05 Hope you get well soon! On a side note, what food company might be a good short from your new experience?
@jukan05 希望你早日康复!顺便问一句,基于你的新经历,哪家食品公司可能是不错的 short?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@memely @YieldCurveBalI @kingtutcap @EricTheUmpire I have a fun time getting tagged in these posts. Keep it up!
@memely @YieldCurveBalI @kingtutcap @EricTheUmpire 我被 tag 到这些帖子里还挺开心的。继续保持!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So today was just position rotation day. Portfolio is up 3.77%.

It’s funny like I said premarket if there’s no material news and $SPY is down randomly I get more bullish. Retail usually are the ones to panic sell premarket when volume is low so I take advantage of low liquidity and higher spreads (reddits only up 1.7%, same with micron like 1.4% tho, missed out on better ones but $RDDT should catch up one day).

Reddit’s moves are always typically massive green candles when people least expect it. It makes all its moves in a few days like bitcoin, so it’s better to just hold through volatility imo.

Switched CSP on $SNDK to pure shares around $590.

CSP is free real estate on Sandisk but felt like these levels + selling CCs instead for Sandisk are worth the risk and volatility.

As with my other post on main timeline, also added very small positions in $AEVA which is CPO + 4D LiDAR exposure. If you read how I typically do weightings, i like a lot of these small moonshot picks since while it’s inherently risky, with the off chance it turns out well like an $NVDA you capture upside anyway.

Ended up trimming random other positions like Micron converted to-> Sandisk (still bullish, just a lot of annoying hbm4 headwinds + cxmt posts, can’t fight the disinformation lol.) and photonics aside from $AXTI (just had a major rally, could go higher obviously just wanted to rotate.)

Trimmed $IBIT (very slight gain but too much portfolio weighting)-> more $RDDT, for positional changes. Sold $PGY breakeven slightly above $15 thankfully, looks like it dipped more.

$ETOR at $26 is hilariously now one of my largest positions now aside from Bitcoin related stuff for recovery, made a huge buy at that level since they would have more cash than balance sheet in like 3 years
所以今天只是 position rotation day。组合涨 3.77%。

很有意思,就像我盘前说的,如果没有实质消息而 $SPY 随机下跌,我反而更 bullish。散户通常在低量盘前恐慌卖,所以我利用低流动性和更高 spreads(reddit 只涨 1.7%,micron 也才 1.4%,错过了一些更好的,但 $RDDT 总有一天会补涨)。

Reddit 的走势通常是在大家最没预期时出现巨大绿烛。它像 bitcoin 一样几天内走完大部分行情,所以我觉得更适合穿越波动。

$SNDK 的 CSP 换成了 $590 左右的纯 shares。

CSP 在 Sandisk 上是 free real estate,但这些价位 + 改卖 CCs,我觉得值得承担风险和波动。

和我主 timeline 另一个帖子一样,也加了很小仓位的 $AEVA,它是 CPO + 4D LiDAR 敞口。如果你读过我通常怎么做权重,就知道我喜欢很多小 moonshot picks,虽然本质有风险,但万一像 $NVDA 一样走出来,也能抓到上行。

最后减了一些随机仓位,比如 Micron 转到 Sandisk(仍 bullish,只是 hbm4 逆风 + cxmt 帖子太烦,没法和 misinformation 对抗 lol),以及除 $AXTI 外的 photonics(刚大涨,当然可能更高,只是想轮动)。

减了 $IBIT(小赚但组合权重太高)-> 更多 $RDDT。卖了 $PGY,幸好略高于 $15 breakeven,看起来后来跌更多。

$ETOR 在 $26 现在搞笑地成了我除 Bitcoin 相关外最大仓位之一,因为按那个价格我买了很多,它们大概 3 年后现金会比 balance sheet 还多。
❤️ 13 🔁 0 💬 4
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@canbilgeyilmaz Thank you, I’ll do more research into $AUR and $SILC
@canbilgeyilmaz 谢谢,我会继续研究 $AUR$SILC
❤️ 27 🔁 1 💬 5
打开原推
↩️ 回复
~$14.1. So basically where prices are now.

That being said this is a small position since $AEVA company is inherently a venture bet on 4D AI. They also made a breakthrough for CPO using the same technology apparently.

It’s not generating massive FCF like $RDDT, but decided it was worth the risk.
~$14.1。所以基本就是现在这个价格附近。

话虽如此,这只是一个小仓位,因为 $AEVA 这家公司本质上是对 4D AI 的 venture bet。它们 apparently 也用同样技术在 CPO 上取得了突破。

它不像 $RDDT 那样产生大量 FCF,但我觉得这个风险值得承担。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
World* models.

Apparently if the world's most advanced World Models require Doppler-level precision, $AEVA is one of the only companies that can do it compared to companies to $OUST here?

If you give Cosmos "probabilistic" depth data (from $OUST ) the model has to spend massive amounts of compute cycles calculating where things are moving. $AEVA just feeds in deterministic velocity data. “If a model has to infer motion from sequential depth frames, that’s additional computation versus receiving velocity as a direct input”
World* models。

显然如果世界上最先进的 World Models 需要 Doppler 级精度,和这里的 $OUST 这类公司相比,$AEVA 是少数能做到的公司之一?

如果你给 Cosmos “probabilistic” depth data(来自 $OUST),模型就必须花大量 compute cycles 去计算物体移动方向。$AEVA 则直接输入 deterministic velocity data。

“如果模型必须从连续 depth frames 推断运动,那相比直接接收速度数据,会多出额外计算。”
❤️ 25 🔁 1 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Apparently $OUST sits more in “Probabilistic AI”while $AEVA FMCW solves the Deterministic Physical AI that word models need

“FMCW gives velocity as a direct physical measurement (Doppler shift) versus ToF requiring computational derivation across frames”.

Maybe you can help articulate the nuance with $OUST and why you think it’s better exposure to 4D AI
显然 $OUST 更偏“Probabilistic AI”,而 $AEVA FMCW 解决的是 world models 需要的 Deterministic Physical AI。

“FMCW 通过 Doppler shift 直接给出速度这种物理测量,而 ToF 需要跨帧计算推导。”

也许你可以帮忙讲清楚 $OUST 的细微差别,以及为什么你认为它是更好的 4D AI 敞口。
❤️ 30 🔁 4 💬 4
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 @platochi Appreciate it! Some of my other mentions like $VLN are not working out as well so far, but glad $AXTI is hard carrying.
@soulbiri1 @platochi 感谢!我提过的其他一些比如 $VLN 到目前为止没那么顺,但很高兴 $AXTI 在 hard carry。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Speaking of other bottlenecks like $AXTI.

I’ve been looking into 4D AI.

Convos with industry insiders leads me to believe it’s an upcoming trend eg. “World Models” for physical AI and humanoids post $NVDA Jensen’s conference.

So took positions into $AEVA which is 4D LiDAR.

Looks like the clearest functional midstream bottleneck exposure to the trend, from my research?

Unless someone has others they’d like to mention.

There’s stuff like $AMBA, $U (yes the games software), $TER, and $OUST but they’re larger companies without the clearest exposure.

That being said it’s still a new space so still doing research. Also, fundamentals are shaky, so this is more of a venture bet for the industry growth.

Disclosure: I have long shares only of $AEVA, as speculative exposure to 4D AI + World Models for physical AI.
说到像 $AXTI 这样的其他瓶颈。

我一直在研究 4D AI。

和业内人士的交流让我相信,这是一个即将到来的趋势,比如 $NVDA Jensen 会议之后,面向 physical AI 和 humanoids 的 “World Models”。

所以我建仓了 $AEVA,也就是 4D LiDAR。

从我的研究看,它像是这个趋势里最清晰的功能性中游瓶颈敞口?

除非有人有其他想提的标的。

也有 $AMBA$U(是的,就是游戏软件那个)、$TER$OUST 之类,但 $AEVA 的 FMCW/速度数据敞口更直接。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$AXTI up 63.29% in 1 week to new yearly highs.

What a crazy photonics rally off $GOOGL earnings.

Markets are finally pricing in upstream bottlenecks. https://t.co/YdEOofJWN8
$AXTI 一周涨了 63.29%,创下年度新高。

$GOOGL 财报之后,光子板块这波行情太疯狂了。

市场终于开始给上游瓶颈定价了。 https://t.co/YdEOofJWN8
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2020917443565388085
❤️ 344 🔁 39 💬 27
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@platochi @soulbiri1 I have zero clue how $AXTI plays out.

They’re a near-monopoly choke point so if they wanted to they can hike prices like $SNDK and $MU -&gt; be rerated massively.

It’s mainly a matter if they’re going to do it or not.
@platochi @soulbiri1 我完全不知道 $AXTI 最后会怎么走。

它们是接近垄断的 choke point,所以如果愿意,也可以像 $SNDK$MU 那样涨价 -> 大幅重估。

主要问题就是它们到底会不会这么做。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@platochi @soulbiri1 Thanks! Everyone was saying I was wrong when $AXTI was $13 and a small cap shtco.

But it ended up close to doubling 2 months later. AXT genuinely is an upstream photonics bottleneck, lot of times they’re found in small, unknown companies.
@platochi @soulbiri1 谢谢!当 $AXTI 还是 $13、被叫小盘 shtco 的时候,所有人都说我错了。

但 2 个月后它差不多翻倍。AXT 真的是上游 photonics bottleneck,很多时候这些瓶颈就藏在小而没人知道的公司里。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$AXTI up 63.29% in 1 week to new yearly highs.

What a crazy photonics rally off $GOOGL earnings.

Markets are finally pricing in upstream bottlenecks. https://t.co/YdEOofJWN8
$AXTI 一周涨 63.29%,创年内新高。

$GOOGL 财报之后,这波 photonics rally 真疯狂。

市场终于开始定价上游瓶颈了。 https://t.co/YdEOofJWN8
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
It’s been 6 weeks since I made the initial $AXTI post.

It’s now up another 60%.

Almost nobody talked about this tiny $700M stock on X.

Especially not from angles of InP supply chains with photonics.

And now it’s a $1.4B company on institution and gov radars.

Since then:

- China export control banned precursors to their competitors

- 7n InP prices hit all time highs week after week

- They raised $100M from Northland to double their capacity

- $LITE blows out earnings with expectations of optical demand outstripping supply

- Every hyperscaler blew out expectations of capex

- Trump signed executive orders to seize InP supply chains from foreign owned companies in the US.

It’s been 6 weeks. And I expect photonics to ramp up the most over the next two years onwards.

Every stock has volatility (this one moves 20%+ up and down daily) so it’s important to develop conviction by yourself before entering a trade.

But $AXTI is of my most interesting bottleneck longs starting from a tiny $700M MC.
距离我最早发 $AXTI 那篇已经 6 周了。

现在它又涨了 60%。

X 上几乎没人聊这只小小的 $700M 股票。

尤其没人从光子和 InP 供应链的角度聊。

现在它已经成了 $1.4B 公司,进入机构和政府视野。

这期间:

- 中国出口管制禁止了它竞争对手所需的前驱体

- 7n InP 价格一周接一周创历史新高

- 他们从 Northland 融了 $100M,用来把产能翻倍

- $LITE 财报爆表,并预计光学需求会超过供给

- 每个 hyperscaler 的 capex 都大幅超预期

- Trump 签署行政令,要从美国境内外资公司手里夺回 InP 供应链。

才 6 周。而我预计从接下来两年开始,光子会是爬坡最猛的方向。

每只股票都有波动(这只每天上下 20%+),所以进交易前自己建立 conviction 很重要。

$AXTI 是我最感兴趣的瓶颈多头之一,起点只是一个小小的 $700M MC。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2019946788233617526
❤️ 275 🔁 30 💬 15
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ravietweet Thanks
@ravietweet 谢谢
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
Sold breakeven lol
breakeven 卖了 lol
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Probably adding more portfolio concentration weighting into $RDDT market open and DCAing down if it goes further.

Don’t really see much downside risk here. Maybe drop to $120 is possible but just waiting long enough should be good.
可能会在开盘时给 $RDDT 加更多组合集中度,如果继续跌就 DCA down。

我真不觉得这里有太多下行风险。也许跌到 $120 有可能,但只要等够久应该没事。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Idk if it’s just me but I get more bullish if premarket is very red cause it flips most of the time.

Ended up buying $MU on the 3.5% drop to $380 and more $RDDT at $139 (only 1% drop but wanted to enter more positions) https://t.co/VGLEhE2pbm
不知道是不是只有我这样,但如果盘前很红很绿那种大跌,我会更 bullish,因为大多数时候会反转。

最后在 $MU 跌 3.5% 到 $380 时买了,又在 $RDDT $139 时加了点(只跌 1%,但想多建点仓)。 https://t.co/VGLEhE2pbm
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2020813008377700654
❤️ 7 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@1DonnyDonowitz It’s just a swing on a short term bounce if it goes up 3% I’d sell. That being said after looking into it more, didn’t like it much, so I’m personally selling regardless profit/loss market open.
@1DonnyDonowitz 这只是短线反弹 swing,如果涨 3% 我就会卖。

话虽如此,进一步研究后我没那么喜欢它了,所以我个人无论盈亏,开盘都会卖。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
Nvm probably going to sell back market open after doing light DD, not a fan of companies with so much debt, even if it does look undervalued with their net income (eg. 10-11 fwd p/e).

Don’t have the same conviction other FinX folks have
算了,轻 DD 后可能开盘卖回去。不喜欢债务这么多的公司,即使按净利润看起来低估(比如 10-11 forward p/e)。

我没有其他 FinX 朋友那种 conviction。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Bought $PGY for fun at $15. Lot of other FINX were really bullish on it and seeing it tank 20% seemed like a good dip buy
为了好玩在 $15 买了 $PGY。很多其他 FINX 都很 bullish,而且看到它跌 20%,感觉像不错的 dip buy。
❤️ 8 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Idk if it’s just me but I get more bullish if premarket is very red cause it flips most of the time.

Ended up buying $MU on the 3.5% drop to $380 and more $RDDT at $139 (only 1% drop but wanted to enter more positions) https://t.co/VGLEhE2pbm
不知道是不是只有我这样,但如果 premarket 很红,我反而更 bullish,因为大多数时候会翻转。

最后在 $MU 跌 3.5% 到 $380 时买了,也在 $139 买了更多 $RDDT(只跌 1%,但想多进一些仓位)。 https://t.co/VGLEhE2pbm
❤️ 8 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Still doing research into software segment for opportunities. $SPOT, $NFLX is something that's not disrupted by AI because majority of it is licensing. Netflix drop is more multifaceted bc of acquisition.Those two were richly valued though.

$DUOL make more sense. Dont know enough about $ADBE.

It's a good time to figure out what gets disrupted, and what has no material effect (but gets sold off in the bucket).

$RDDT was my top pick, I'm still looking for others.
还在研究 software 里有没有机会。$SPOT$NFLX 这种不太会被 AI disruption,因为大部分是 licensing。Netflix 下跌更复杂,和收购有关。不过这两只估值都很高。

$DUOL 更合理。$ADBE 我了解不够。

现在是弄清楚什么会被 disruption、什么其实没实质影响(但被一篮子卖掉)的好时候。

$RDDT 是我的首选,我还在找其他标的。
❤️ 16 🔁 0 💬 4
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I don’t know enough about $APP to comment.

That being said I’ve been looking for stocks sold off partly because of “AI” disruption narratives and $RDDT is personally my choice.

Markets misunderstand network effect moat. I can make Reddit in a day but value comes from everyone agreeing to use it.
我对 $APP 了解不够,没法评论。

话虽如此,我一直在找那些部分因为“AI” disruption 叙事被抛售的股票,$RDDT 是我个人选择。

市场误解了 network effect moat。我一天就能做出 Reddit,但价值来自所有人都同意使用它。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I made sure to point out data licensing to LLMs like OpenAi or Gemini is an extremely tiny portion of $RDDT revenue. If I were an LLM company I would not want to be training on subreddit data anyway.

So non-factor going forward, if anything new deals would probably increase that segment.
我特意指出,给 OpenAi 或 Gemini 这类 LLM 做数据授权,只占 $RDDT 收入极小一部分。如果我是 LLM 公司,我反正也不想拿 subreddit 数据训练。

所以往后看这不是影响因素;如果有新 deal,反而可能增加这块收入。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
I'm long $RDDT at $139.

Reddit presents an incredible opportunity after the -44.9% drop last month.

Blowout Q4 earnings, but likely short-term option chain + liquidity influencing price.

Results TLDR:

Q4 Revenue: $726M (70% Y/Y growth)
Net Income: $252M
Cash: ~$2.5 Billion, 0 Debt.
Q1 2026 Guidance: $595M – $605M (52% – 54% YoY)

Data licensing was only $36 Million of it (so this was all operational).

This is $HOOD levels profitability and incredible blaance sheet. To have net income reach close to ~1/3 of revenue, while growing 70% Y/Y, is incredible.

Modeled forward P/E may be around ~27-30 ( $WMT for reference 46+ now growing in line with inflation)

Reddit is not going anywhere. You can't disrupt Reddit by vibecoding it with Opus 4.6 and Cursor, because the main point of it is network effect.

Reddit is a money printer waiting for premiums to catch up.
我在 $139 做多 $RDDT

Reddit 上个月跌了 -44.9% 后,机会非常好。

Q4 财报爆炸,但价格可能短期受 option chain + liquidity 影响。

结果 TLDR:

Q4 Revenue:$726M(同比 70% 增长)
Net Income:$252M
Cash:约 $2.5 Billion,0 债务
Q1 2026 Guidance:$595M - $605M(同比 52% - 54%)

Data licensing 只有 $36 Million(所以主要都是经营业务)。

这已经是 $HOOD 级别的盈利能力,资产负债表也非常强。能在这个收入体量达到这种净利润,非常离谱。

市场还在把它当成容易被 AI 替代的网站,但真正的价值是社区、搜索、UGC、广告和网络效应。
❤️ 554 🔁 35 💬 70
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@wheelertweets Japan are leaders in bottlenecks upstream. And many are sole source.

For example Sumitomo for InP substrates, Kioxia for memory manufacturing, Advantest for HBM yield, Ibiden for IC substrates, etc.

The end product are usually American companies like $NVDA GPUs that you see
@wheelertweets 日本是上游瓶颈里的领导者,而且很多是 sole source。

比如 Sumitomo 的 InP substrates,Kioxia 的 memory manufacturing,Advantest 的 HBM yield,Ibiden 的 IC substrates 等等。

你最后看到的终端产品通常是 $NVDA GPUs 这种美国公司。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah biggest tailwind is spend for Japanese stocks. Not too long ago they detailed that the stimulus includes “¥7.2 trillion for 17 priority sectors like AI, semiconductors, and quantum tech.”

$MU is setting up a $9.6B HBM plant in Hiroshima but it’s more indirect (eg. They still get $3.3B in subsidies from Japan).
是,日本股票最大的顺风是支出。不久前他们详细说明刺激计划包括“给 AI、半导体、量子科技等 17 个优先领域 ¥7.2 trillion”。

$MU 正在 Hiroshima 建 $9.6B HBM 工厂,但这更间接(比如他们仍然从日本拿到 $3.3B 补贴)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Japan’s Nikkei 225 skyrockets over 5% to hit record high.

Korea’s KOSPI is also up 4.2% today with memory like SK Hynix up 5.4%.

A stimulus heavy Japan was seen as net positive and increases liquidity for stocks from $MU to Advantest.

Despite this, this policy is nuanced as assets like Bitcoin love the money printer (monetary stimulus) vs. fiscal stimulus (government spend), when there’s a potential spike in bond yields.

We’re starting to see sector specific rallies (especially the AI trade) from increased capex spend, but a bear market in others.
日本 Nikkei 225 暴涨超过 5%,创历史新高。

韩国 KOSPI 今天也涨 4.2%,SK Hynix 这类 memory 涨 5.4%。

重刺激的日本被视为净利好,并增加从 $MU 到 Advantest 等股票的流动性。

尽管如此,这个政策有细微差别:Bitcoin 喜欢 money printer(货币刺激),而 fiscal stimulus(政府支出)在债券收益率可能飙升时就没那么简单。

我们开始看到板块特定 rally,尤其是 AI trade。
❤️ 241 🔁 14 💬 12
打开原推
↩️ 回复
It's live traffic though since a troll would be actually placing a lot of Pizza orders + creating backlog from people waiting for pickup.

Just dont think people have tried since it's a waste of Pizza.

But for $AVAV to $NOC, Pizza orders are a legitimate signal algos used for Venezuela.
不过这是真实流量,因为 troll 真的会下很多 Pizza 订单 + 让等取餐的人排队,制造 backlog。

只是我觉得没人试过,因为太浪费 Pizza。

但对 $AVAV$NOC 来说,Pizza 订单是算法在 Venezuela 上使用过的合法信号。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@belcore922 난 안 할래 ㅋㅋㅋ! 피자를 그렇게 많이는 못 먹어. 그 맛있는 걸 남겨서 버리면 너무 아깝잖아.

근데 시장이 워낙 알고리즘 위주로 돌아가다 보니, 그냥 어떤 관종(troll)이 피자를 왕창 주문했다고 해서 $PLTR 이나 $RCAT 같은 주가가 실제로 움직일 수 있다는 게 참 웃기네
@belcore922 我才不干哈哈!我吃不了那么多披萨。把那么好吃的东西剩下再扔掉太可惜了。

不过市场现在太算法驱动了,只因为某个 troll 大量订披萨,就可能让 $PLTR$RCAT 这类股票真的动起来,这也太好笑了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Weekend shower thought: The Pizza Exploit

- A troll can spend $20K on $10 Cheese Pizzas, creating long lines as people wait for pick up

- Algos on edge with Iran

- Algos send defense like $PLTR to $ONDS up billions, because they correlate Pizza demand with War.

Then profit? https://t.co/qDKKI3An3Z
周末 shower thought:Pizza Exploit

- 一个 troll 可以花 $20K 买 $10 Cheese Pizzas,让等取餐的人排长队

- 算法因为 Iran 局势紧张而高度敏感

- 算法把 $PLTR$ONDS 这类 defense 股票拉高数十亿,因为它们把 Pizza demand 和战争关联起来

然后获利? https://t.co/qDKKI3An3Z
引用原推@DougAMacgregor
BREAKING: Pizza restaurants near The Pentagon seeing a 250% increase in order activity.
突发:The Pentagon 附近的披萨店订单活动增加了 250%。
https://x.com/DougAMacgregor/status/2020327870380536322
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@Berlinergy Pretty sure I made an $AXTI related post yesterday

https://t.co/pq6tLRcrIS
@Berlinergy 我很确定昨天发过一条 $AXTI 相关帖子。

https://t.co/pq6tLRcrIS
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
It’s been 6 weeks since I made the initial $AXTI post.

It’s now up another 60%.

Almost nobody talked about this tiny $700M stock on X.

Especially not from angles of InP supply chains with photonics.

And now it’s a $1.4B company on institution and gov radars.

Since then:

- China export control banned precursors to their competitors

- 7n InP prices hit all time highs week after week

- They raised $100M from Northland to double their capacity

- $LITE blows out earnings with expectations of optical demand outstripping supply

- Every hyperscaler blew out expectations of capex

- Trump signed executive orders to seize InP supply chains from foreign owned companies in the US.

It’s been 6 weeks. And I expect photonics to ramp up the most over the next two years onwards.

Every stock has volatility (this one moves 20%+ up and down daily) so it’s important to develop conviction by yourself before entering a trade.

But $AXTI is of my most interesting bottleneck longs starting from a tiny $700M MC.
距离我最早发 $AXTI 那篇已经 6 周了。

现在它又涨了 60%。

X 上几乎没人聊这只小小的 $700M 股票。

尤其没人从光子和 InP 供应链的角度聊。

现在它已经成了 $1.4B 公司,进入机构和政府视野。

这期间:

- 中国出口管制禁止了它竞争对手所需的前驱体

- 7n InP 价格一周接一周创历史新高

- 他们从 Northland 融了 $100M,用来把产能翻倍

- $LITE 财报爆表,并预计光学需求会超过供给

- 每个 hyperscaler 的 capex 都大幅超预期

- Trump 签署行政令,要从美国境内外资公司手里夺回 InP 供应链。

才 6 周。而我预计从接下来两年开始,光子会是爬坡最猛的方向。

每只股票都有波动(这只每天上下 20%+),所以进交易前自己建立 conviction 很重要。

$AXTI 是我最感兴趣的瓶颈多头之一,起点只是一个小小的 $700M MC。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2019946788233617526
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@brian_armstrong Hey, on a side note thanks for standing up to the poison pills of the Clarity Act.

It’s one of the destructive legislations I’ve ever seen for the crypto industry. And there’s tons of disinformation going around trying convincing retail to support it for “safety purposes”.
@brian_armstrong 嘿,顺便感谢你站出来反对 Clarity Act 里的 poison pills。

这是我见过对 crypto 行业最具破坏性的立法之一。现在还有大量虚假信息,试图以“安全”为由说服散户支持它。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Nuanced. So typically concentration builds wealth and diversification preserves it rings true.

I generally agree unless all your diversified picks are high beta and correlated. I'm just not sure if $IBIT recovery or $SNDK would go up faster so I bet on multiple horses with $RKLB rockets attached to them.

But usually, yes, the smaller the portfolio is, the more concentration your portfolio should be. If you have $10k, maybe just pick 2-3 of your favorites like $SNDK or $POET (but obviously a tad more risky).

Safe compounding $GOOGL or diversifying with those amounts won't change your life (you would get more working a job). But generally the more your portfolio goes up the less risk you need to take.
这个问题有细微差别。通常“集中创造财富,分散保住财富”这句话是对的。

我一般同意,除非你分散买的全是高 beta 且高度相关。我只是不确定 $IBIT recovery 还是 $SNDK 会涨得更快,所以我押了多匹马,每匹都绑着 $RKLB 火箭。

但通常来说,是的,组合越小,越应该集中。如果你只有 $10k,也许就选 2-3 个最喜欢的,比如 $SNDK$POET(但显然也要做风险管理)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Also, this is just what I’m personally doing, my portfolio is high beta across high conviction stuff (where I expect more than 50%+ to hit), so definitely not for everyone.

Especially if there is a crypto winter and it takes slower to recover. But base case I see Bitcoin $50-$55k doesn’t look like much downside risk from here from my perspective.
另外,这只是我个人在做的事。我的组合是高 beta,集中在高信念标的上(我预期超过 50%+ 会打中),所以肯定不适合所有人。

尤其如果出现 crypto winter,恢复会更慢。但从我的角度看,base case 下 Bitcoin $50-$55k 往下空间似乎不大。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Depends on risk management, I personally have higher risk tolerance. But $GOOGL is probably one of the strongest mag7 buys on the market aside from $NVDA. And it’s probably just better to hold it.

Probably not going to double in a year here, but maybe 30-40% growth seems possible bull case.
取决于风险管理,我个人风险承受能力更高。但 $GOOGL 可能是市场上除 $NVDA 之外最强的 Mag7 买点之一,而且可能直接持有更好。

这里一年内可能不会翻倍,但牛市情形下 30-40% 增长似乎有可能。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@AgentSaffron For me personally, $NBIS is a core hold at $85. I did sell $CIFR at $15 on Friday after buying it $11 high, so Nebius is my favorite Neocloud segment stock rn.

If you’re uncomfortable with volatility can always sell covered calls
@AgentSaffron 对我个人来说,$NBIS 是 $85 的核心持仓。周五我把 $CIFR 在 $15 卖了,之前 $11 多买入,所以 Nebius 现在是我最喜欢的 Neocloud 板块股票。

如果你不舒服波动率,也可以卖 covered calls。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah $NBIS is going through their 25 million share at the moment and it hurts short term stock prices a lot.

But ER should be positive (but even if it is, markets are nuking every company like $RDDT).

Also forgot to add there might be another leg down for Reddit so not the best idea tI add all concentration in one go at $140. Maybe like 35%, 35% $130, then the rest at $115 is how I’d do thine.
是,$NBIS 现在正在进行 2500 万股 ATM,短期对股价伤害很大。

但 ER 应该会是正面的(不过即使正面,市场现在也在核每家公司,比如 $RDDT)。

另外忘了补充,Reddit 可能还有下一腿下跌,所以在 $140 一次性全部集中加仓不是最好。我的做法可能是 35%,$130 再 35%,剩下的放到 $115。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So I see $ETOR lowest downside risk due to balance sheet but capped upside cause of Israel.

Bitcoin have highest long term conviction in at $68k.

$GLXY, $CRDO and $RDDT probably have sharpest reversals compared to $TTD.

I can’t predict the future so it’s important to diversify. But if you get more right than wrong your portfolio goes up.
所以我看 $ETOR 因为资产负债表,下行风险最低,但因为 Israel,上行被限制。

Bitcoin 在 $68k 是我长期信念最高的。

$GLXY$CRDO$RDDT 相比 $TTD,可能会有最剧烈反弹。

我无法预测未来,所以分散很重要。但如果你对的比错的多,组合就会上涨。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So TLDR of my active recovery/swing trades that I’m doing , just to give ideas.

$RDDT, $140 - 70% growth, strong ER balance sheet. Ai not disrupting it. I’ll post a thesis in main timeline.

$CRDO, $110 - still being used, just loses that defacto leader status

$GLXY, $17 - ER crashed this stock, should recover

$BTC, ~$68k, should recover just a matter of time

$COIN $150, $HOOD $70- same with BTC

Solana $80 (was like $220+ not too long ago)

$TTD $26- should bounce back I hope

$ETOR - $26 large safety net with balance sheet

$HIMS $20 - probably the most uncertain about out of any so I’ll keep concentration very low.
这是我正在做的 active recovery/swing trades 的 TLDR,只是给大家一些想法。

$RDDT,$140 - 70% 增长,ER balance sheet 强。AI 不会颠覆它。我会在主 timeline 发 thesis。

$CRDO,$110 - 仍然被使用,只是失去了那个事实 leader 地位。

$GLXY,$17 - ER 把它砸下来了,应该会恢复。

$BTC,~$68k,恢复只是时间问题。

$COIN $150、$HOOD $70 - 和 BTC 一样。

Solana $80(不久前还 $220+)。

$TTD $26 - 希望会反弹。

$ETOR - $26,balance sheet 给了很大安全垫。

$HIMS $20 - 可能是这里面我最不确定的,所以仓位会很低。
❤️ 20 🔁 0 💬 6
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
Sorry defensive* not defense. Stuff that didn’t crash like some semis -&gt; rotated into stuff that did basically.
抱歉,是 defensive* 不是 defense。基本是把一些没跌的东西,比如某些 semis,轮到已经跌的东西里。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Not too bad of a YTD so far.

Pivoted a lot of defense stocks to things that crashed recently like $COIN at $150 or $ETOR just now at $26.

Don’t think a lot of these can get any lower, so hoping to ride the next wave up. https://t.co/OVUKktnqF1
YTD 目前还不错。

把很多 defense stocks 轮到最近崩了的东西,比如 $COIN $150,或者刚刚 $ETOR $26。

我觉得这些很多已经跌不到哪里去了,所以希望能骑下一波反弹。 https://t.co/OVUKktnqF1
❤️ 12 🔁 0 💬 4
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
I’m long $RDDT here at $141.

ER was good. Probably option related selloff Friday.

So buying shares and waiting it out https://t.co/1egwx3lLOL
我在 $141 long $RDDT

ER 很好。周五大概率是 option related selloff。

所以买 shares,然后等。 https://t.co/1egwx3lLOL
❤️ 11 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
I’m having a fun time. $NBIS and others are probably going to have a fun time as well given GPU prices increasing and a new surge in demand.

Crypto got reset so good time to ride wave back up https://t.co/qDsQ8P6XvF
我玩得很开心。考虑到 GPU prices 上涨和需求新一轮激增,$NBIS 和其他公司应该也会玩得很开心。

Crypto 已经 reset,所以是时候骑回升浪了。 https://t.co/qDsQ8P6XvF
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Added $hims $22, $nbis $70-73, $ttd $26, and $glxy $17.

Idk really hard to see some of these names go lower but you never know
加了 $hims $22、$nbis $70-73、$ttd $26、以及 $glxy $17。

Idk,真的很难想象这些名字还能跌更低,但你永远说不准。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2019715373852189012
❤️ 6 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Added $hims $22, $nbis $70-73, $ttd $26, and $glxy $17.

Idk really hard to see some of these names go lower but you never know
加了 $hims $22、$nbis $70-73、$ttd $26、$glxy $17。

我也不知道,真的很难想象其中一些名字还能跌更低,但谁知道呢。
❤️ 18 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Started long positions in $TTD today at $25-26.

Huge drop from $140 to $25, lowest level since crash in 2020.

$12B MC.

~$2.15 Billion liquidation value ($1.45B cash, $3.5B accounts receivable - $2.8B accounts payable)

Forward P/E ~14-15, growing ~17% Y/Y, very profitable.

Markets think AI will kill advertising, i kinda disagree with that.
今天在 $25-26 开始 long $TTD

从 $140 暴跌到 $25,是 2020 crash 以来最低水平。

$12B MC。

~$2.15 Billion liquidation value($1.45B cash、$3.5B accounts receivable - $2.8B accounts payable)

Forward P/E ~14-15,增长 ~17% Y/Y,非常盈利。

市场认为 AI 会杀死广告,我有点不同意。
❤️ 17 🔁 1 💬 8
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So lot of people are asking about portfolio weightings, etc.

Here's something I'd personally build.

1.25X margin

35% Memory Supercycle
_
25% EWY - $115.73
5% SK Hynix - 831K KRW
5% $MU - $336

30% Crypto/Fintech
5% $COIN - $146
5% $HOOD - $70.6
15% $IBIT - $35.96
2.5% $CRCL - $49
2.5% $SOL - $77

10% Semi
_
5% $INTC - $47.2
5% $CRDO - $95.7

10% Photonics
_
5% $LITE - $492
2.5% $AXTI - $20
2.5% $COHR - $201

5% Hedge/Cash
_
5% Hedge (Eg. $QQQ Puts, especially around now).

15% AI Infrastructure
10% $NBIS - $70
5% $CIFR - $11.35

10% Small Cap
2.5% $VPG - $48
2.5% $LPTH - $8.85
1.5% $VLN - $1.42
1.5% $AIRO - $8.33
1% $OSS - $7.91
.5% $DPRO - $6.3
.5% $CPSH - $4.29

Additional Margin:
$SNDK Put Selling
Swing Trades (eg. $GLXY)

My portfolio looks vaguely similar to this, but with more random names and different weightings.

This is long semi + AI supercycle, with a recovery trade in Crypto. If (Google, Meta, MSFT) cut spending this would hurt, but they just increased capex spend.

I would rotate names around. EG. if Bitcoin recovers and $RKLB crashes, I'd rotate back into space.
很多人在问 portfolio weightings 之类。

这是我个人会搭的一个:

1.25X margin

35% Memory Supercycle
_
25% EWY - $115.73
5% SK Hynix - 831K KRW
5% $MU - $336

30% Crypto/Fintech
5% $COIN - $146
5% $HOOD - $70.6
15% $IBIT - $35.96
2.5% $CRCL - $49
2.5% $SOL - $77

10% Semi
_
5% $INTC - $47.2
5% $CRDO - $95.7

10% Photonics
_
5% $LITE - $492
2.5% $AXTI - $20
2.5% $COHR - $201

5% Hedge/Cash
_
5% Hedge(比如 $QQQ Puts,尤其现在这种时候)。

15% AI Infrastructure
10% $NBIS - $70
5% $CIFR - $11.35

10% Small Cap
2.5% $VPG - $48
2.5% $LPTH - $8.85
1.5% $VLN - $1.42
1.5% $AIRO - $8.33
1% $OSS - $7.91
.5% $DPRO - $6.3
.5% $CPSH - $4.29

Additional Margin:
$SNDK Put Selling
Swing Trades(比如 $GLXY

我的组合大概类似,但有更多随机名字和不同权重。

这是 long semi + AI supercycle,同时在 Crypto 里做 recovery trade。如果 Google、Meta、MSFT 削减支出会受伤,但他们刚提高 capex spend。

我会轮动名字。比如 Bitcoin 恢复而 $RKLB 崩了,我会轮回 space。
❤️ 49 🔁 5 💬 6
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Just personal thoughts (don’t encourage people to follow along since this is falling knife buying) but i still think selloff is overblown. Could be wrong though.

So added into Solana at $74, $COIN at $150, $MSTR $104.

Hope this is bottom, Ethereum hit $1800, which is a pretty good indicator we’re getting there (lowest was be $1583) but this time you have $BMNR holding supply.

Last low in April for $COIN was $151 and we just hit that mark.

I still think this is optics, i don’t think we would do QT during midterm cycle lol
只是个人想法(不鼓励别人跟,因为这是 falling knife buying),但我仍然认为 selloff 过头了。当然也可能错。

所以加了 Solana $74、$COIN $150、$MSTR $104。

希望这是底,Ethereum 打到 $1800,这是一个挺好的接近底部指标(最低曾是 $1583),但这次有 $BMNR 吸收供应。

$COIN 去年 4 月低点是 $151,我们刚好打到那个位置。

我仍认为这是 optics,我不觉得我们会在 midterm cycle 做 QT lol
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Wow, ended up buying a lot of calls here to cost avg.

Disgusting drop for Bitcoin https://t.co/43ARFZb4He
哇,最后在这里买了很多 calls 来摊低成本。

Bitcoin 这波跌得真恶心。 https://t.co/43ARFZb4He
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2019516241149608103
❤️ 9 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Wow, ended up buying a lot of calls here to cost avg.

Disgusting drop for Bitcoin https://t.co/43ARFZb4He
哇,最后在这里买了很多 calls 来 cost avg。

Bitcoin 这个跌法太恶心了。 https://t.co/43ARFZb4He
❤️ 5 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
So my from my research from supply chain leaks, TLDR guess from leaks this week:

- $VPG got replaced for mass production Optimus by Chinese firms

- $VPG might still be used for high-precision Optimus versions, maybe initial factory to prototyping Optimus.

- Nonzero chance $VPG got designed out though, but mass-market Chinese sensors haven't quite matched ultra specialized precision sensing.

Kinda like two different versions of the same robot. But there's a much higher possibility from new news this week, that they just aren't used anymore.

Tesla's first few thousand robots (currently being deployed in Fremont and Giga Texas) I'm guessing are the "high-spec" versions possibly with $VPG. So they might get a massive boost in earnings and a lot of hype surrounding it if they didn't get designed out.

For mass productions because of cost (actuators from Sanhua, sensors from Everwin) probably the winners down the road.

eg. "It is reported that Chinese component suppliers have effectively taken control of all parts of the robot, including actuators, driving devices that move robot joints, motors, reducers, and vision systems, robotic visual devices.

So Tesla might have just outsourced their entire hardware supply chain down the road to China from local reports to keep costs down for general optimus.

It does break that $0 to $10B moonshot thesis, but possibly deserves revaluing anyway at $700M MC.

TLDR:

- If they're still used for the industrial $TSLA like in factories, extremely undervalued at $700m. Since this is probably the main use case anyway next few years

- For general purpose robotics, it's very likely they got designed out.

Holding positions, but hedging a tiny bit since this is basically a coinflip now on earnings.
根据我对供应链泄露的研究,这周 leaks 的 TLDR 猜测是:

- $VPG 在 Optimus 量产中被中国公司替代了

- $VPG 可能仍用于高精度 Optimus 版本,也许是早期工厂/原型 Optimus。

- $VPG 有非零概率被 design out,不过面向大众市场的中国传感器还没完全达到超专业精密感测水平。

有点像同一个机器人有两个版本。

但这周新消息让“他们不再被使用”的概率高了很多。

我猜 Tesla 前几千台机器人(现在在 Fremont 和 Giga Texas 部署)可能是高规格版本,也许有 $VPG。如果没被 design out,财报会有巨大提振和炒作。

量产因为成本原因(Sanhua 执行器、Everwin 传感器)可能长期赢家在那边。

也就是说,Tesla 可能为了降低 general optimus 成本,把整个硬件供应链外包给中国,本土报道有这个方向。

这打破了 $0 到 $10B 的 moonshot thesis,但 $700M MC 可能仍值得重估。

TLDR:

- 如果它们仍被用于工业版 $TSLA 工厂机器人,$700m 这里极度低估,因为未来几年这可能是主要用例

- 对 general purpose robotics 来说,很可能已经被 design out。

继续持仓,但稍微 hedge 一点,因为财报现在基本像抛硬币。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Don’t want to bear post $VPG but new news 2 days ago might link China suppliers to Optimus 3 (while they were used in Optimus 2).

Not 100% sure though, so it’s good to derisk a tiny bit. Still a moonshot if they’re in Optimus 3 will get more news on earnings but it’s a coin flip.

Tesla has already selected some Chinese suppliers for Optimus mass production, including Zhejiang Huazheng (thermal control), Ningbo TuoFu (actuators), and Everwin (sensors). The SCMP noted, “Suppliers have delivered small batches of samples while receiving feedback from Tesla,” adding, “Manufacturing partners are now competing to secure positions in this supply chain to win more orders.”

Still doing more research.
不想 bear post $VPG,但 2 天前的新消息可能把中国供应商和 Optimus 3 联系起来(他们之前被用于 Optimus 2)。

不过不是 100% 确定,所以稍微 derisk 一点是好事。如果他们在 Optimus 3 里,仍然是 moonshot,earnings 上会有更多消息,但现在就是 coin flip。

Tesla 已经为 Optimus mass production 选择了一些中国供应商,包括 Zhejiang Huazheng(thermal control)、Ningbo TuoFu(actuators)和 Everwin(sensors)。SCMP 指出,“Suppliers have delivered small batches of samples while receiving feedback from Tesla,” 并补充说,“Manufacturing partners are now competing to secure positions in this supply chain to win more orders.”

还在继续研究。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2019323112140263520
❤️ 17 🔁 1 💬 3
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Don’t want to bear post $VPG but new news 2 days ago might link China suppliers to Optimus 3 (while they were used in Optimus 2).

Not 100% sure though, so it’s good to derisk a tiny bit. Still a moonshot if they’re in Optimus 3 will get more news on earnings but it’s a coin flip.

Tesla has already selected some Chinese suppliers for Optimus mass production, including Zhejiang Huazheng (thermal control), Ningbo TuoFu (actuators), and Everwin (sensors). The SCMP noted, “Suppliers have delivered small batches of samples while receiving feedback from Tesla,” adding, “Manufacturing partners are now competing to secure positions in this supply chain to win more orders.”

Still doing more research.
不想 bear post $VPG,但 2 天前的新消息可能把中国供应商和 Optimus 3 联系起来(而它们之前用于 Optimus 2)。

不是 100% 确定,所以稍微 derisk 一点是好的。如果它们还在 Optimus 3 里,仍然是 moonshot,财报会有更多消息,但现在是 coin flip。

Tesla 已经为 Optimus 量产选择了一些中国供应商,包括浙江华正(热控)、宁波拓普(执行器)和 Everwin(传感器)。SCMP 称,“供应商已交付小批量样品并接收 Tesla 反馈”,还说“制造伙伴正在竞争进入这个供应链,以赢得更多订单。”

还在继续研究。
❤️ 10 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Best example I can give is $TSM. Priced like $APPL iv at like 31% IV back in $150s last year.

Leaps increased to 44% IV. So profit both on IV increase and price increase.

This is Vega expansion on upside for IV increase from sk Hynix Samsung derivatives.

Just checked again it’s 35% not 33% anymore like 2 days ago. Point still stands.

Will check back in after to see if Iv goes higher
我能给的最好例子是 $TSM。去年 $150 多时,它像 $APPL 一样定价,IV 大概 31%。

LEAPS 后来升到 44% IV。所以你同时赚 IV 增加和价格上涨。

这是 SK Hynix/Samsung 衍生品导致 IV 上升的 upside vega expansion。

刚又看了下,现在是 35%,不是两天前的 33%。观点仍然成立。

之后再回来看看 IV 会不会更高。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Also, this isn't really something market makers can short out of money like with US stocks since this is National Korea index.

And shorting it doesn't really do anything like $MSTR since it just tracks NAV of Korea Sk Hynix, Samsung E, and Hyundai (Boston Dynamics)

You can see $EWY moving up/down 3-4% a day this year, so volatility isn't priced correctly.

individually SK Hynix/Samsung IV would likely be volatile.

But still don't really recommend options cause of risk but this is option chains for Samsung/Sk Hynix derivatives are an interesting angle.
另外,这也不是 market makers 能像美国股票那样把它 short 到没钱的东西,因为这是 National Korea index。

而且 short 它也不像 $MSTR 那样有什么实际效果,因为它只是跟踪 Korea Sk Hynix、Samsung E 和 Hyundai(Boston Dynamics)的 NAV。

你可以看到 $EWY 今年一天上下 3-4%,所以 volatility 定价不对。

单独看 SK Hynix/Samsung IV 可能会很 volatile。

但因为风险,我仍然不太推荐 options,不过 Samsung/Sk Hynix derivatives 的 option chains 是个有意思角度。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2019219732302577690
❤️ 8 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Also, this isn't really something market makers can short out of money like with US stocks since this is National Korea index.

And shorting it doesn't really do anything like $MSTR since it just tracks NAV of Korea Sk Hynix, Samsung E, and Hyundai (Boston Dynamics)

You can see $EWY moving up/down 3-4% a day this year, so volatility isn't priced correctly.

individually SK Hynix/Samsung IV would likely be volatile.

But still don't really recommend options cause of risk but this is option chains for Samsung/Sk Hynix derivatives are an interesting angle.
另外,这不像美国股票那样 market makers 可以随便 short out of money,因为这是韩国国家指数。

short 它也不像 $MSTR 那样有用,因为它只是跟踪韩国 Sk Hynix、Samsung E 和 Hyundai(Boston Dynamics)的 NAV。

你能看到 $EWY 今年一天上下 3-4%,所以 volatility 没有被正确定价。

单独看 SK Hynix/Samsung IV 也可能很波动。

但我仍然不太推荐 options,因为风险高;不过 Samsung/Sk Hynix 衍生品期权链是个有意思的角度。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$EWY 2028 option chain looks messed up. 2027 option chain starting to get priced in with 36-37% IV.

Didn't want to post this publicly since it would influence market too much.

IV Is 33% or so (priced in like Apple), even though half if it is Samsung / SK Hynix that moves up and down 4-9% a day.

They're using historical values (eg. nothing happened for 10 years) for pricing in IV, even though it's as more volatile as ever.

And likely lots of volatility with memory heading into 2027, so potential profit for both IV increase + stock price increases.
$EWY 2028 option chain 看起来很乱。2027 option chain 开始以 36-37% IV 定价。

不想公开发这个,因为会对市场影响太大。

IV 大概 33%(按 Apple 那种定价),即使它一半是 Samsung / SK Hynix,而这些一天上下 4-9%。

他们用历史值(比如 10 年什么都没发生)来给 IV 定价,虽然它现在比以往都更 volatile。

而且 memory 到 2027 年大概率会有很多波动,所以 IV 上升 + 股价上涨两边都有潜在利润。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2019218485705073090
❤️ 4 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
$EWY 2028 option chain looks messed up. 2027 option chain starting to get priced in with 36-37% IV.

Didn't want to post this publicly since it would influence market too much.

IV Is 33% or so (priced in like Apple), even though half if it is Samsung / SK Hynix that moves up and down 4-9% a day.

They're using historical values (eg. nothing happened for 10 years) for pricing in IV, even though it's as more volatile as ever.

And likely lots of volatility with memory heading into 2027, so potential profit for both IV increase + stock price increases.
$EWY 2028 option chain 看起来有问题。2027 option chain 开始按 36-37% IV 定价。

不想公开发这个,因为会太影响市场。

IV 大概 33%(像 Apple 那样定价),但里面一半是一天能上下 4-9% 的 Samsung / SK Hynix。

他们在用历史值(比如过去 10 年没发生什么)来给 IV 定价,尽管现在比以往更波动。

而且 memory 进入 2027 可能会有很多波动,所以潜在收益来自 IV 增加 + 股价上涨。
❤️ 12 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
lol $AVGO and the rest of the AI buildout + TPU ecosystem is certainly happy post $GOOGL earnings.

Again dont see anything related to AI capex slowing down.

For memory look for
-> NAND/DRAM price decreases.

for stuff like ASIC supply chains
-> capex from hyperscalers decreasing.

None of this seems like it's slowing down. So market drops like these are healthy for resets but long term directionally still really bullish.
lol $AVGO 和其他 AI buildout + TPU ecosystem 在 $GOOGL 财报后肯定很开心。

再次说,我没看到任何 AI capex 放缓的迹象。

memory 看:
-> NAND/DRAM 价格下降。

ASIC 供应链这类看:
-> hyperscalers capex 下降。

这些都不像在放缓。所以这种市场下跌对重置是健康的,但长期方向上仍然很 bullish。
❤️ 4 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
Ended up converting a lot of positions/spare cash into Bitcoin here.

I’m more happy sitting on Bitcoin through any market volatility just from my personal conviction standpoint.
最后把很多仓位/闲置现金转成 Bitcoin 了。

从个人 conviction 角度,我更愿意拿着 Bitcoin 穿越任何市场波动。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Ended up only adding SK Hynix today on 7% drop. Just because projected p/e ~4 is way too low.

Just waiting for another potential drop with $MU and $SNDK if there is one
今天最后只在 SK Hynix 跌 7% 时加了仓。只是因为 projected p/e ~4 实在太低。

现在就等 $MU$SNDK 如果还有下一次潜在下跌。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2019142708812739037
❤️ 3 🔁 0 💬 4
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Ended up only adding SK Hynix today on 7% drop. Just because projected p/e ~4 is way too low.

Just waiting for another potential drop with $MU and $SNDK if there is one
今天最后只在 7% 下跌时加了 SK Hynix。因为 projected p/e ~4 实在太低。

现在就等 $MU$SNDK 如果还有潜在下跌,再看机会。
❤️ 14 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Ended up selling $ENPH 12% gain (maybe it goes higher), but just wanted more capital for some dip buys.

Market looks like a crime scene, even Solana is back at $92, which is a pretty good indicator usually of rough times ahead (I usually look to Solana/Ethereum).

Looking at different opportunities right now.
最后卖了 $ENPH,12% 收益(也许还会更高),但我只是想要更多资金来做一些 dip buys。

市场看起来像犯罪现场,连 Solana 都回到 $92 了,这通常是困难时期要来的挺好指标(我一般看 Solana/Ethereum)。

现在在看不同机会。
❤️ 8 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So ended up doing more research into $CRCL Clarity act.

This is primary valuation overhang for Circle. (Earnings should be good, but if this passes, it's basically a nuke on their business model).

This is the biggest loophole for generating interest and keeping deposits in USDC. Because it allows exchanges to pay users who deposit USDC.

Banks are looking to ban this loophole.

So USDC supply might dry and it gets compounded with lower interest rates if this passes.

Looks like it's being stalled out, but just waiting for it with uncertainty drag is gonna be annoying so I ended up trimming a tiny bit more.
所以最后又研究了 $CRCL Clarity act。

这是 Circle 主要估值压制。(财报应该不错,但如果这个通过,基本就是对他们商业模式的一颗核弹。)

这是产生利息并让存款留在 USDC 里的最大漏洞,因为它允许交易所向存入 USDC 的用户付息。

银行正在试图封掉这个漏洞。

如果通过,USDC 供应可能会枯竭,还会叠加更低利率的影响。

看起来现在被拖住了,但光是等着这个不确定性就很烦,所以我最后又小幅减了一点。
❤️ 12 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
So today, not too shabby

$BTC ~$74.1k -> $76.7K +3.51%
$CRDO $108.6 (cost avg) -> $112.5 +3.59%
$CRCL $54.75 -> $56.23 +2.7%
$AVGO $317.55 -> $319 +0.46%
$PYPL $42.73 -> $41.8 −2.18%

For swing trade portfolio, collectively up a lot (thank you Bitcoin).

Holding onto $BTC, $CRCL, $CRDO, but cut 1/3rd Circle/Bitcoin for risk management. Credo I feel like sold off way too hard even at $112.

Ended up cutting all Avgo bc too much semi concentration (even though it's a good long) + $PYPL because don't like the stock.

Ended up starting $RDDT positions at $165-ish. This is a very light add in case it drops further since it's still richly valued.
所以今天还不错。

$BTC ~$74.1k -> $76.7K +3.51%
$CRDO $108.6(成本均价)-> $112.5 +3.59%
$CRCL $54.75 -> $56.23 +2.7%
$AVGO $317.55 -> $319 +0.46%
$PYPL $42.73 -> $41.8 −2.18%

swing trade portfolio 整体涨了不少(谢谢 Bitcoin)。

继续拿着 $BTC$CRCL$CRDO,但为了风控砍了 1/3 Circle/Bitcoin。Credo 我觉得即使 $112 也卖得太狠。

最后全砍 Avgo,因为 semi 集中度太高(虽然它是好 long),$PYPL 也砍了,因为不喜欢这只股。

最后在 $165 左右开始建 $RDDT 仓位。只是很轻的加仓,以防它继续跌,因为估值仍然偏贵。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
So personally TLDR today, all shares:

- $CRCL cost average $54.75
- $AVGO cost average $317.55
- $CRDO cost average $112.42
- $PYPL cost average $42.73.

Weighted heavily toward Circle then Broadcom.

This is just for me personally, might be a few days wait or a week/two.
所以我个人今天 TLDR,全部是 shares:

- $CRCL cost average $54.75
- $AVGO cost average $317.55
- $CRDO cost average $112.42
- $PYPL cost average $42.73。

仓位更重地偏向 Circle,然后是 Broadcom。

这只是我个人操作,可能要等几天或一两周。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2018726556903092432
❤️ 8 🔁 0 💬 4
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
I parked my excess cash into Bitcoin / $IBIT at $73.5k to $74.5k and rotated more into memory.

I don’t think it will go lower than $65k again and it’s just a waiting game for recovery.

Much easier just to wait for recovery with Bitcoin so prob will trade a tad less in the meantime since less capital.
我把多余现金放进 Bitcoin / $IBIT,价格在 $73.5k 到 $74.5k,并且更多轮到 memory。

我不认为它会再低于 $65k,剩下就是等恢复。

用 Bitcoin 等恢复容易得多,所以短期可能会少交易一点,因为资金少了。
❤️ 4 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
💬 引用 🔒
And this is why you save some spare capital for DCA down.

My positions are down -2% (avgo)|
/ 2.8%(credo) | -1.26% (paypal) but circle is up .76%. I can’t always bottom time perfectly.

Prob another add at $98 and $295 if they drop more.

$NVDA not looking like it’s having a fun time either.

It’s esp. risky during this time because of silver crash pulling liquidity away. And crypto drop (without recovery) is normally a pretty good warning.

So definitely don’t over margin during this time
这就是为什么要留一些闲钱用来 DCA down。

我的仓位下跌 -2%(avgo)/ 2.8%(credo)/ -1.26%(paypal),但 circle 涨 .76%。我不可能每次都完美抄底。

如果继续跌,可能在 $98 和 $295 再加。

$NVDA 看起来也不太好受。

这个时间尤其危险,因为 silver crash 在抽走流动性。而 crypto 下跌(没有恢复)通常是一个不错的警告。

所以这段时间绝对不要过度上杠杆。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
So personally TLDR today, all shares:

- $CRCL cost average $54.75
- $AVGO cost average $317.55
- $CRDO cost average $112.42
- $PYPL cost average $42.73.

Weighted heavily toward Circle then Broadcom.

This is just for me personally, might be a few days wait or a week/two.
所以我个人今天 TLDR,全部是 shares:

- $CRCL cost average $54.75
- $AVGO cost average $317.55
- $CRDO cost average $112.42
- $PYPL cost average $42.73。

仓位更重地偏向 Circle,然后是 Broadcom。

这只是我个人操作,可能要等几天或一两周。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2018726556903092432
❤️ 8 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
So personally TLDR today, all shares:

- $CRCL cost average $54.75
- $AVGO cost average $317.55
- $CRDO cost average $112.42
- $PYPL cost average $42.73.

Weighted heavily toward Circle then Broadcom.

This is just for me personally, might be a few days wait or a week/two.
所以我个人今天 TLDR,全是 shares:

- $CRCL 成本均价 $54.75
- $AVGO 成本均价 $317.55
- $CRDO 成本均价 $112.42
- $PYPL 成本均价 $42.73。

权重主要偏 Circle,然后是 Broadcom。

这只是我个人操作,可能要等几天或一两周。
❤️ 7 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Personally really really like $CRCL for my long portfolio at $12B MC.

Gonna keep adding on the way down https://t.co/ndyhCCsCih
我个人真的非常喜欢把 $CRCL 放进 long portfolio,$12B MC。

会一路下跌一路加。 https://t.co/ndyhCCsCih
❤️ 5 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
Changed my mind ended up doing shares instead of options
改变主意了,最后做 shares 而不是 options。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
forgot to add im only dont shares for $CRDO, $AVGO they're too volatile anyway. $PYPL I'm doing options
忘了补充,我只对 $CRDO$AVGO 做 shares,它们本来就太波动。$PYPL 我做 options。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Started positions in $AVGO at $315 high on -4.6% drop and $CRDO on -7.12% drop.

And I really dont like adding all at once cause there's always more downside risk.

But don't think there's any material news recently so looks like a buying opportunity for me. https://t.co/6J8l4DmYhK
$AVGO 跌 -4.6% 时,于 $315 高位开始建仓;也在 $CRDO 跌 -7.12% 时建仓。

我真的不喜欢一次性全加,因为永远有更多下行风险。

但我不觉得最近有任何实质性新闻,所以对我来说像是买入机会。 https://t.co/6J8l4DmYhK
❤️ 9 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复 🔒
I like to buy 25% of what I would at the start to initiate positions, then cost avg down otherwise sell if it rebounds a few %.

If it keeps dropping then I’m just a bag holder like $Fisv but PayPal isn’t the worst company
我喜欢一开始只买目标仓位的 25% 来启动仓位,然后 cost avg down;如果反弹几个点就卖。

如果继续跌,那我就像 $Fisv 一样成 bag holder,但 PayPal 也不是最差的公司。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Added some PayPal at $42.8. Gonna have some fun with this one to see if there a bounce https://t.co/08WrtJqnzZ
在 $42.8 加了一些 PayPal。准备拿这个玩一下,看有没有反弹。 https://t.co/08WrtJqnzZ
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 4
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Also idk if this is vodoo or not but I personally don't buy ON/premarket when things are green.

Recent data has shown that most gains happen ON and best time so the best time to buy is middle of day/EOD. It takes a lot of will not to yolo into a green open.

But if it's heavy red ON lot of times it flips green, so I've been just buying stuff in the -5% to -9% ranges overnight recently.

If you want to get into positions and things have gone up a lot you can always just write CSPs. There's always time in the market no need to FOMO unless it's sandisk.
也不知道这是不是玄学,但我个人不在 ON/premarket 绿色的时候买。

最近数据表明大多数涨幅发生在 ON,而最佳买点是盘中/EOD。要忍住不在高开时 yolo 真的需要很强意志力。

但如果 ON 大红,很多时候会翻绿,所以最近我一直在 overnight 跌 -5% 到 -9% 的范围买东西。

如果你想进仓,而东西已经涨很多,也可以直接卖 CSPs。市场永远有机会,没必要 FOMO,除非是 sandisk。
❤️ 16 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Also noticing a huge rotation into photonics recently. Like $LITE, $COHR, $AAOI etc. (ATHs)

Might be good to look at photonic catchup stuff like $POET at ~$6 type names that are not ATHs and are still down.
最近也注意到 photonics 有巨大轮动。比如 $LITE$COHR$AAOI 等(ATHs)。

也许可以看看 photonic catchup,比如 $POET 在 ~$6 这种还不是 ATH、仍然下跌的名字。
❤️ 6 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
To me sk hynix just feels like free real estate, it's a large part of my portfolio.

round ~4.7 forward p/e 2026 right now, even after a 9%+ rise today. Probably short window of opportunity here before it gets repriced.

for a safer portfolio put selling $SNDK for premium and long sk hynix. IV for Sandisk is ridiculous so you have so much buffer.
对我来说 sk hynix 感觉就是 free real estate,它是我组合里很大一部分。

现在大概 ~4.7 forward p/e 2026,即使今天已经涨了 9%+。在重新定价前,机会窗口可能很短。

更安全的组合可以卖 $SNDK puts 收 premium,然后 long sk hynix。Sandisk 的 IV 离谱,所以有很大缓冲。
❤️ 9 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Regards to the new memory news on YMTC/CXMT news.

Nanya, Winbond, Powerchip, etc. is likely impacted in 2027 so I'd start reposition away. It's just how long the market takes to price it in IMO, but the void still could be really deep since YMTC/CXMT is still banned in US supply chains and comapnies like Nayna could fil int he gap.

REgardless I wouldn't take the risk and there's likely going to be annoying headwinds for awhile.

0 affect on micron, Sk Hynix, etc.
关于 YMTC/CXMT 的新 memory 新闻。

Nanya、Winbond、Powerchip 等可能会在 2027 年受影响,所以我会开始重新配置远离它们。在我看来只是市场需要多久定价进去,但缺口仍可能很深,因为 YMTC/CXMT 仍被美国供应链禁止,像 Nayna 这种公司可能还能填补缺口。

不管怎样我不会冒这个险,而且接下来可能会有一段时间很烦的逆风。

对 micron、Sk Hynix 等影响为 0。
❤️ 4 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
out of some of the thesis posts i've made so far, I'm most bullish on

$AXTI - for photonics.

Valuation is a bit stretched but well deserved given their critical role for photonics buildout for 2027-2028.

They have the ability to hike prices like the big 3 memory players, it's moreso markets pricing it in if they end up doing it.

$VPG - for robotics. biggest risk was tesla engineering away them. But in the meantime looks like they're included for the next gen of optimus since they wouldnt have been prototyping the past few years.

_

Stuff like $AIRO is more of a moonshot that they become like $ONDS, probably my next fav out of the bunch.

$OSS already got re-rerated up 100% or so recently, so it's just a management waiting game 4 next contract.

$VLN 0 clue why it's priced like this, genuine market inefficiency. IDK anymore with stocks from Israel.

Stuff like $DPRO, extremely extreme tiny positions just for fun if it ends up like a $RKLB. Same with $CPSH in the event it's used for thermal bottleneck.

$LPTH I've gotten less bullish on bc of cheaper germanium, also the scaleup is a lot slower as people move off the supply chain compared to the immediate bottleneck $AXTI has.
在我目前发过的一些 thesis 里,我最看好:

$AXTI - photonics。

估值有点拉伸,但考虑到它们在 2027-2028 photonics buildout 里的关键作用,这是值得的。

它们有能力像 memory 三巨头一样涨价,更多是市场是否会在它们这么做后定价。

$VPG - robotics。最大风险是 tesla 工程上绕开它们。但现在看起来它们仍然进入下一代 optimus,因为过去几年一直在 prototyping。

_

$AIRO 更像 moonshot,如果它变成 $ONDS 那样,可能是我下一喜欢的。

$OSS 最近已经 re-rated 100% 左右,所以现在就是等管理层拿下下一个合同。

$VLN 我完全不知道为什么这样定价,是真正的市场低效。以色列股票我也看不懂了。

$DPRO,我只放极小仓位玩一下,如果它最后像 $RKLB$CPSH 也一样,押 thermal bottleneck 用到它。

$LPTH 我没以前那么 bullish,因为 germanium 变便宜了,而且 scaleup 慢很多,不像 $AXTI 那种即时瓶颈。
❤️ 10 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Also for earnings, with extra balance looking for CC opportunities on $IREN because IV is extremely high.

Others kinda look like a trap like $RDDT IV is way too low (147%).

But given it dropped already a lot back to $180, I’ll probably nibble a bit.

Ended up writing deep puts on $SMCI for tomorrow. $25 put seems safe ( I hope)
另外财报方面,有额外余额的话,我在看 $IREN 的 CC 机会,因为 IV 非常高。

其他有点像陷阱,比如 $RDDT IV 太低(147%)。

不过考虑到它已经跌很多回到 $180,我可能会小买一点。

最后为明天卖了 $SMCI 的 deep puts。$25 put 看起来安全(希望吧)。
❤️ 3 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
What I’m personally doing rn is long semi trade with low forward p/e.

For memory as core.

Then $INTC is only exception. Burning sht ton of money but critical to us gov.

Maybe 5-10% for high risk moonshots like $AXTI.

10-20% misc longs.

Then I set aside 20-30% for swing trades.

Focusing on crypto right now.

Solana at $100, litecoin at $58, and Ethereum at $2220.

I plan to cost avg if Ethereum black swans down to $1650 but don’t expect it to lower than this.

So crypto proxies that get sold off like $GLXY (neoclpud segment), direct assets, $MSTR. Avoiding some like $COIN (leaks or smthing MSTR and others were shifting to Fidelity custody) and $HOOD for volume drop.

I did this beg of year, lot of them ended up +30% like galaxy -> sold. Drop to $24-25 today made entry good again.

So just swing trading this segment
我现在个人做的是 low forward p/e 的 long semi trade。

memory 是核心。

然后 $INTC 是唯一例外。它在烧很多钱,但对美国政府很关键。

可能 5-10% 放在 $AXTI 这种高风险 moonshot。

10-20% 杂项 longs。

然后留 20-30% 做 swing trades。

现在重点是 crypto。

Solana $100、litecoin $58、Ethereum $2220。

如果 Ethereum 黑天鹅跌到 $1650,我计划 cost avg,但不预期会更低。

所以 crypto proxies,比如被卖下来的 $GLXY(neoclpud segment)、直接资产、$MSTR。避开一些比如 $COIN(leaks 或什么,MSTR 和其他人在转向 Fidelity custody)和 $HOOD,因为 volume 下滑。

年初我做过这个,很多最后 +30%,比如 galaxy -> 卖了。今天跌到 $24-25 又是不错 entry。

所以就是 swing trading 这个板块。
❤️ 7 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
Random thoughts: extremely long memory trade for 2 quarters

KR benefits the most from disconnect

- Sk Hynix, Samsung electronics ( $EWY / Sk Hynix on margin)

Then long Sandisk

- 6-7 forward p/e. CSP weekly to enter positions since high IV

- shares cause IV on calls way too expensive

- $MU more of a steady rise like $TSM imo so calls.

There’s only two/three other Taiwanese memory companies like Nanya but the one above are safest, enough exposure.

Should be core port until there’s any rumors of NAND/DRAM prices falling.

Might lose like 5-10% on that drop but by the time you’ll make enough.
随便想法:未来 2 个季度极度 long memory trade。

KR 最受益于 disconnect。

- Sk Hynix、Samsung electronics($EWY / Sk Hynix on margin)

然后 long Sandisk

- 6-7 forward p/e。因为 high IV,用 CSP weekly 进仓

- shares,因为 calls 的 IV 太贵

- $MU 在我看来更像 $TSM 的稳定上升,所以用 calls。

台湾还有两三家 memory 公司,比如 Nanya,但上面这些最安全,敞口够了。

在有任何 NAND/DRAM 价格下跌传闻前,这应该是 core port。
❤️ 9 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Nope, just shares for day trades. For example bought $ORCL overnight the 5% drop and sold on the 4% rise premarket for a 9% gain in an hour or two.

I just do this with a lot of different stocks and repeat.

Unfortunately my account got too big so I don’t post trades anymore, just more analytical things and thesis posts
不是,只用股票做日内交易。比如隔夜买了跌 5% 的 $ORCL,盘前涨 4% 时卖掉,一两个小时赚 9%。

我就是用很多不同股票重复做这种事。

可惜我的账户太大了,所以现在不再发交易,只发更多分析和 thesis 帖。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Ren_aramb Congrats, 30% YTD is incredible. We’re only 1 month in!
@Ren_aramb 恭喜,YTD 30% 很厉害。现在才过了 1 个月!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创 🔒
lol I made this by accident. But I guess I’ll make it worth your while https://t.co/TP4LRPVE7q
lol 我是不小心做出来的。但既然这样,我就让它值得你花时间看。 https://t.co/TP4LRPVE7q
❤️ 11 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@KawzInvests 145% so far in Jan https://t.co/pZ9roJ0pZv
@KawzInvests 1 月到目前为止 145% https://t.co/pZ9roJ0pZv
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
How much day trading is considered too much? https://t.co/FYRZFCwL4I
多少日内交易才算太多? https://t.co/FYRZFCwL4I
❤️ 168 🔁 2 💬 31
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@adenois Source was Macrotrends https://t.co/VoeNvCy2zB
@adenois 来源是 Macrotrends https://t.co/VoeNvCy2zB
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@jukan05 Wow, 19%+ AH on $TER.

Just a normal day for $SNDK though https://t.co/Gu27gjquEi
@jukan05 哇,$TER 盘后 +19%+。

不过对 $SNDK 来说只是正常一天。 https://t.co/Gu27gjquEi
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@adenois Normalized, it’s closer to $1B on average, which I mentioned. But reports for 2025 were $2.54B likely due to one time calculations https://t.co/tEPNctm0ZH
@adenois 归一化后,平均更接近 $1B,我也提过。但 2025 年报告是 $2.54B,可能因为一次性计算。 https://t.co/tEPNctm0ZH
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@SVBriskmanager $SNAP is fundamentally an extremely promising company.

But the billions in stock based compensation -&gt; taking out debt to buy that back -&gt; going into debt -&gt; paying interest on that debt despite having otherwise having profitable FCF

Is just ridiculous.
@SVBriskmanager $SNAP 基本面上是一家非常有前景的公司。

但数十亿 stock based compensation -> 借债回购这些股票 -> 负债 -> 尽管原本 FCF 可盈利,却还要为债务付利息

这真的太离谱了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
$SNAP is close to all time lows at $6.7, despite growing revenues/profit.

Here's why:

The financial engineering looks criminal.

Snapchat is a $11.5B company that has ~1B MAU with Q3 adjusted EBITDA ~$132M.

However:

- $SNAP stock comp for the last 12M?

$2.5 Billion. Yes $2.5 Billion TTM. The current yearly is closer to $1.06 Billion.

- Snap is going into debt to do buy-backs from executive pay.

- The CEO issued ~$1B+ in annual stock based compensation annually. This is a non-cash expense that "hides" FCF.

- They are paying 6.875% interest on that debt just to make sure the executive pay doesn't tank the stock price.

When you couple that with projections even est. $820M – $950M FCF for 2026.

Perplexity AI Deal: +$300M - $400M
Memory Monetization: +$240M (3% DAU conversion to $1.99 plan)
Memory OpEx Cuts: +30M
Interest: ($150M - $180M)
Baseline: ~$400M

This just looks insane.

All they need to do is have executives not pay themselves billions and the fundamentals look like a $20B+ company (~21x multiple). This is a growing social media company that has tremendous potential for monetization.

I was doing more DD into long positions, but currently, this structure just looks like a transfer of wealth from retail to $SNAP executives with continuous claims of "keeping talent" for $1B+ a year.

My eyes are on stock compensation structures for this week's earnings call.
$SNAP 接近历史低点 $6.7,尽管收入/利润在增长。

原因是:

财务工程看起来像犯罪。

Snapchat 是一家 $11.5B 公司,约 1B MAU,Q3 adjusted EBITDA 约 $132M。

但是:

- $SNAP 过去 12 个月 stock comp?

$2.5 Billion。是的,TTM $2.5 Billion。当前年度更接近 $1.06 Billion。

- Snap 正在借债回购高管薪酬带来的股票。

- CEO 每年发放约 $1B+ 的 stock based compensation。这是非现金费用,但会严重稀释股东。

所以业务本身可能不错,Memories 收费也可能改善 FCF,但资本配置和薪酬结构极其糟糕。
❤️ 976 🔁 47 💬 88
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@SigniaCapital Credit ^
@SigniaCapital Credit ^
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
They’re all running it down Toplane. Hence why $VPG is the hard carry.

Jokes aside $AIRO, $LPTH and $AVAV were all mentioned last month.

$AIRO was up 24.9% since I mentioned it. Cost averaged up, so slightly green/breakeven after the drop. This was my catchup play to $ONDS and nothing about the thesis changed.

$LPTH is down a few percent as a Germanium choke point fix. Nothing too dire materially changed. This was a long term US germanium supply chain pivot away from China into black diamond. Short term prices in 2-3 weeks don’t matter much.

$AVAV is up, but I did talk about it in the $320s. $RKLB is a $45B+ launch company and AVAV is scaling triple digits Y/Y off billions in defense contracts. So at $13-14B I think this is a good long
他们都在 Toplane 送。所以 $VPG 才是 hard carry。

开玩笑归开玩笑,$AIRO$LPTH$AVAV 上个月都提过。

$AIRO 自我提到以来涨 24.9%。我加仓摊高了成本,所以回调后略绿/持平。这是我追赶 $ONDS 的 play,thesis 没变。

$LPTH 作为 Germanium choke point fix 跌了几个点。实质上没什么太糟变化。这是美国 germanium 供应链长期从中国转向 black diamond 的 pivot。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@Cheva28789724 This was my write up about $VPG earlier

https://t.co/Vno2bP3wCV
@Cheva28789724 这是我之前关于 $VPG 的 write up。

https://t.co/Vno2bP3wCV
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$VPG is one of the least known robotic supply chain stocks.

However, it's likely the single best asymmetrical exposure to robotics Humanoid ramp for

- $TSLA Optimus

~ Figure AI

as this $580m company makes:

est. ~3-9% BOM cost of every humanoid.

$8.5B revenue may come from $TSLA alone ($850 midpoint * 10M) every year if Elon hits his 10M Giga Texas production target in 2027.

This is based on $VPG CEO's quote on value capture of $500–$1,200 per robot ($850 midpoint) and Elon's ambitious projections on production targets.

Again this math is extremely speculative, but Elon quotes $20-30k/humanoid at scale and you can derive an est. ~3%-9%+ of BOM from each Tesla Robot produced (if this does ever happen) for $VPG.

If you consider Elon Musk saying "About 80% of Tesla's Value Could Eventually Come From Optimus Robots": This looks like great exposure for robotics ramp for such a small company that's critical in the robotics supply chain.

What I believe markets also missed is factoring in low end corporate margins to for blended margin estimates: ~40%

However, the humanoid-specific gross margin at scale is projected to be 50% to 55% (and with current robotics ramp, blended margins would likely increase significantly).

Their integrated actuator/sensor Modules (sensor + housing + electronics) is likely directly tethered to humanoid exposure, (measurement systems segment which houses these complex assemblies), which the CEO said on their earnings call achieves margins of "55% or so".

In a bull case scenario where Elon hits his 10M humanoid projections in 2028 (single customer, not including Figure, OpenAI, or other potential customers)

55% margin off $8.5B revenue at :

- 20x P/E would be $47.6 Billion
-30x P/E $83.3 Billion

from $580m MC.

It sounds stupid, but when I look at $SMCI pre-server rack rally ($3 -> $113) or $SNDK's rally ($30 -> $453), it looks possible.

Again this is speculative best case possible scenario, but the operating leverage is the real story here.

So I think it's likely for this small $580m company to be strongly re-rated if the stars align for robotics ramp.

Now downside risk:

- The other humanoid provider is likely to be Figure due to timeline mapping. But this is not confirmed. (not taking credit for either mapping research, they were done by other analysts). These figures are hypothetical modeling based on third-party estimates like Citron, gross margins might be compressed if there's competitors or revenue ramp might not play out.

- $TSLA has likely been using $VPG since 2022 and is starting to ramp up. There is always a risk they figure out the patented technology/materials in-house and drop a customer. This bull-case scenario is tethered to Tesla Optimus ramp and there's always a risk they get dropped that markets might price in.

- Again this is a humanoid scale play. If Elon's projections are too ambitious and face delays, this might be stagnant like 2025 (which was still ~85% return).

But TLDR:

My opinion was that institutional analysts like Citron were way too early.

However, given OpenAI's push into robotics last week:

I believe 2026 to be the inflection point for robotics and $VPG likely captures the best exposure to Tesla and Humanoid robotics ramp.

Especially when a small company likely has high % BOM cost of each robot deployed and high gross margins:

I've taken long positions to see where this ends up. Of course DYOR on this, I just wanted to share how I came to develop my own conviction on this long.
$VPG 是最少人知道的机器人供应链股票之一。

但它很可能是押注人形机器人放量里,非对称性最好的一只,尤其是针对:

- $TSLA Optimus

~ Figure AI

因为这家 $580m 公司提供的是:

估计每台人形机器人 BOM 成本的约 3-9%。

如果 Elon 真能在 2027 年达到 Giga Texas 1000 万台产量目标,单靠 $TSLA 每年就可能带来 $8.5B 收入($850 中位数 * 10M)。

这个测算基于 $VPG CEO 提到的每台机器人 $500–$1,200 价值捕获(中位数 $850),以及 Elon 对产量目标的激进预测。

再说一次,这个数学非常投机,但 Elon 说规模化后每台人形机器人 $20-30k,你可以推导出每台 Tesla Robot 产出里,$VPG 估计能拿到约 3%-9%+ 的 BOM(如果这事真的发生)。

如果你考虑 Elon Musk 说过“大约 80% 的 Tesla 价值最终可能来自 Optimus Robots”:那这家在机器人供应链里很关键的小公司,看起来是机器人放量的很好敞口。

我认为市场还漏掉的一点,是在混合利润率估算里只用了偏低的公司整体利润率:约 40%。

但规模化后,人形机器人专属毛利率预计是 50% 到 55%(而随着现在机器人业务爬坡,混合毛利率很可能明显上升)。

他们的集成执行器/传感器模块(传感器 + 外壳 + 电子件)很可能直接绑定人形机器人敞口,(measurement systems 分部里放这些复杂组件),CEO 在财报电话会上说这个业务利润率能做到“55% 左右”。

在牛市情景里,如果 Elon 在 2028 年达到 1000 万台人形机器人预测(单一客户,不包括 Figure、OpenAI 或其他潜在客户):

$8.5B 收入、55% 利润率下:

- 20x P/E 会是 $47.6B
- 30x P/E 会是 $83.3B

而现在 MC 只有 $580m。

听起来很蠢,但我看 $SMCI 服务器机柜行情前($3 -> $113),或者 $SNDK 的行情($30 -> $453),这看起来不是不可能。

再说一次,这是投机性的最佳情景,但真正的故事是经营杠杆。

所以我觉得如果机器人放量顺风顺水,这家 $580m 小公司很可能被大幅重估。

现在说下行风险:

- 另一个人形机器人供应商按时间线映射很可能是 Figure。但这没有确认。(这些映射研究不是我的功劳,是其他分析师做的)。这些数字是基于 Citron 等第三方估计的假设建模,如果有竞争者,毛利率可能被压缩,收入爬坡也可能无法兑现。

- $TSLA 很可能从 2022 年开始就在用 $VPG,并且正在放量。永远存在一种风险:他们内部搞定这些专利技术/材料,然后丢掉这个客户。这个牛市情景绑定 Tesla Optimus 放量,也永远有被踢出供应链、市场给这个风险定价的可能。

- 再说一次,这是人形机器人规模化玩法。如果 Elon 的预测过于激进并出现延迟,它可能像 2025 年一样停滞(尽管那年仍然有约 85% 回报)。

但 TLDR:

我的看法是,Citron 这类机构分析师太早了。

不过考虑到 OpenAI 上周推进机器人:

我认为 2026 年会是机器人的拐点,而 $VPG 很可能拿到 Tesla 和人形机器人放量里最好的敞口。

尤其是一家小公司很可能占每台机器人很高比例的 BOM 成本,并且毛利率很高:

我已经建了多头仓位,想看看最后会走到哪。当然这事要 DYOR,我只是想分享自己是怎么建立这个多头 conviction 的。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2013895541277762034
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
The $VPG hard carry, +23% 5D.

For people that don’t know, Elon Musk converted Tesla factories for Optimus production on $TSLA ER.

This company makes est. $850 midpoint/robot.

1M Optimus = ~$850M revenue
10M Optimus = ~$8.5B revenue

My robotics moonshot pick. Watch and learn https://t.co/a8J8aUtlSL
$VPG hard carry,5 天 +23%。

给不了解的人:Elon Musk 在 $TSLA ER 上把 Tesla 工厂转向 Optimus 生产。

这家公司估计每台机器人能赚 $850 中位数收入。

1M Optimus = 约 $850M 收入
10M Optimus = 约 $8.5B 收入

我的 robotics moonshot pick。看着学。 https://t.co/a8J8aUtlSL
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$SNDK - Even after a 16% increase, the forward 2027 p/e is still single digits.

That’s how profitable the memory supercycle is with $MU, SK Hynix, Samsung, and others

The AI demand + price hikes looks like the new structural norm. https://t.co/6RG14zqEpr
$SNDK - 即使涨了 16%,2027 年 forward p/e 仍然是个位数。

这就是 $MU、SK Hynix、Samsung 和其他公司所处的内存超级周期有多赚钱。

AI 需求 + 涨价看起来像新的结构性常态。 https://t.co/6RG14zqEpr
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2018369023738802437
❤️ 288 🔁 17 💬 27
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@sovereignsense Yeah I’ve been talking about $VPG a lot recently. Up 22% this week, silent winner from Optimus ramp.
@sovereignsense 是,我最近一直在聊 $VPG。本周涨 22%,是 Optimus ramp 的沉默赢家。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$SNDK - Even after a 16% increase, the forward 2027 p/e is still single digits.

That’s how profitable the memory supercycle is with $MU, SK Hynix, Samsung, and others

The AI demand + price hikes looks like the new structural norm. https://t.co/6RG14zqEpr
$SNDK - 即使已经涨了 16%,2027 forward P/E 仍然是个位数。

这就是 $MU、SK Hynix、Samsung 等 memory supercycle 的盈利能力。

AI demand + price hikes 看起来像新的结构性常态。 https://t.co/6RG14zqEpr
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Memory Company Overview (February 2nd).

Forward P/E Estimates for 2026/2027:

Micron ( $MU ) +31.5% YTD:
~10.4x (2026)

Sandisk ( $SNDK ) | +109.36% YTD:
~14.6x (2026)
~6.3x (2027)

Samsung Electronics | + 17.04% YTD:
~5.1x (2026)
~4.3x (2027)

SK Hynix | +22.6% YTD:
~4.3x (2026)
~3.4x (2027)

Numbers were derived from Morgan Stanley's research note for Samsung/SK Hynix. Bernstein for Sandisk. HSBC report for Micron.

Sandisk/Samsung/SK Hyinx are most up to date.

Micron's report was January 23. But recent updates today show "Micron Proposed A 115–125% QoQ Increase for server DRAM" (dramexchange).

With rumors that NAND prices increased 100%+ from Samsung the other week: new calculations would may bring Micron to ~6.9x-7.3x forward P/E.

Original calculations were using prior analyst reports.

The net income memory companies are expected to bring in is absurd. But clearly the market is pricing in some skepticism with the rally (with Samsung/SK Hynix).

However if the memory cycle continues past 2027-2028, these companies could be the most profitable in history.
内存公司概览(2 月 2 日)。

2026/2027 年 Forward P/E 估算:

Micron ( $MU ) 年初至今 +31.5%:
约 10.4x(2026)

Sandisk ( $SNDK ) | 年初至今 +109.36%:
约 14.6x(2026)
约 6.3x(2027)

Samsung Electronics | 年初至今 +17.04%:
约 5.1x(2026)
约 4.3x(2027)

SK Hynix | 年初至今 +22.6%:
约 4.3x(2026)
约 3.4x(2027)

数字来自 Morgan Stanley 关于 Samsung/SK Hynix 的研报、Bernstein 关于 Sandisk 的研报,以及 HSBC 关于 Micron 的报告。

Sandisk/Samsung/SK Hyinx 的数据是最新的。

Micron 的报告是 1 月 23 日。但今天的最新消息显示,“Micron 提议服务器 DRAM 环比涨价 115–125%”(dramexchange)。

再加上前一周有传言说 Samsung NAND 价格上涨 100%+:新的计算可能会把 Micron 的 forward P/E 拉到约 6.9x-7.3x。

原始计算用的是之前的分析师报告。

内存公司预计能赚到的净利润很离谱。但很明显,市场在这波上涨中仍然给了一些怀疑折价(Samsung/SK Hynix 尤其如此)。

不过如果内存周期能延续到 2027-2028 年之后,这些公司可能会成为史上最赚钱的公司。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2018260327293751484
❤️ 726 🔁 47 💬 41
打开原推
📝 原创
Just In -- Today, Crypto Fear and Greed Index Hits:

15. Extreme Fear.

This has only happened in 3 periods since 2023:

~ 3/11/2025
~ 4/7/2025
~ 11/22/2025

If you bought $BTC and $ETH on each of those days and waited 2 months, here were the returns.

3/11: +33.7% (BTC), +39.5% (ETH)
4/7: +33.5%, +43.1%
11/22: +5.9%, +6.2%

The March/April dips were generational buying opportunities.

The November dip was a slower recovery, but very profitable nevertheless.

Regardless, this is a tale as old as time, buy during the fear, sell during the greed.
刚刚 - 今天 Crypto Fear and Greed Index 到达:

15。Extreme Fear。

自 2023 年以来,这只发生过 3 个时期:

~ 3/11/2025
~ 4/7/2025
~ 11/22/2025

如果你在这些日子买入 $BTC$ETH,并等待 2 个月,回报是:

3/11:+33.7%(BTC),+39.5%(ETH)
4/7:+33.5%,+43.1%
11/22:+5.9%,+6.2%

3 月/4 月的下跌是世代级买入机会。

11 月的下跌恢复更慢,但仍然很赚钱。

无论如何,这是老故事:extreme fear 往往是长期好买点。
❤️ 308 🔁 24 💬 30
打开原推
📝 原创
Memory Company Overview (February 2nd).

Forward P/E Estimates for 2026/2027:

Micron ( $MU ) +31.5% YTD:
~10.4x (2026)

Sandisk ( $SNDK ) | +109.36% YTD:
~14.6x (2026)
~6.3x (2027)

Samsung Electronics | + 17.04% YTD:
~5.1x (2026)
~4.3x (2027)

SK Hynix | +22.6% YTD:
~4.3x (2026)
~3.4x (2027)

Numbers were derived from Morgan Stanley's research note for Samsung/SK Hynix. Bernstein for Sandisk. HSBC report for Micron.

Sandisk/Samsung/SK Hyinx are most up to date.

Micron's report was January 23. But recent updates today show "Micron Proposed A 115–125% QoQ Increase for server DRAM" (dramexchange).

With rumors that NAND prices increased 100%+ from Samsung the other week: new calculations would may bring Micron to ~6.9x-7.3x forward P/E.

Original calculations were using prior analyst reports.

The net income memory companies are expected to bring in is absurd. But clearly the market is pricing in some skepticism with the rally (with Samsung/SK Hynix).

However if the memory cycle continues past 2027-2028, these companies could be the most profitable in history.
Memory 公司概览(2 月 2 日)。

2026/2027 Forward P/E 估计:

Micron($MU)+31.5% YTD:
~10.4x(2026)

Sandisk($SNDK)| +109.36% YTD:
~14.6x(2026)
~6.3x(2027)

Samsung Electronics | +17.04% YTD:
~5.1x(2026)
~4.3x(2027)

SK Hynix | +22.6% YTD:
~4.3x(2026)
~3.4x(2027)

数字来自 Morgan Stanley 对 Samsung/SK Hynix 的研究、Bernstein 对 Sandisk 的研究、HSBC 对 Micron 的报告。

Sandisk/Samsung/SK Hynix 是最新的。

Micron 报告是 1 月 2 日。
❤️ 776 🔁 97 💬 41
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I’m just citing risks for extended selloffs given $ETH if you’re using margin.

Other than that I’m a buyer at these levels, I don’t know what’s going to happen.

I personally added $GLXY on the 9% drop + and $HOOD, $NBIS, $CRCL, $SOL, $ETH and $IBIT ON drop since they’re all down a ton.
如果你用 margin,我只是引用 $ETH 可能延长抛售的风险。

除此之外,这些位置我是买方,我不知道接下来会发生什么。

我个人在跌 9% 时加了 $GLXY,也在下跌中加了 $HOOD$NBIS$CRCL$SOL$ETH$IBIT,因为它们都跌了很多。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I personally ended up buying $NBIS on the drop to $80 ON. They’re part of the AI buildout theme, but a tad more risky give profitability so far, so still a fan. Short term there’s the ATM though which does impact the price a bit.

I ended up adding $SOL at $100 and $ETH at $2200 too ON for swing trades as well.

That being said likely more volatility ahead given drop, so margin on high beta is dangerous.

But some of these names look attractive in the pullback.
我个人最后在隔夜跌到 $80 时买了 $NBIS。它们属于 AI buildout 主题,但考虑到目前盈利能力,风险稍高,所以我仍然喜欢。短期有 ATM,确实会对价格有些影响。

我也在隔夜加了 $SOL $100 和 $ETH $2200,用作 swing trades。

话虽如此,考虑到这波下跌,后面大概率还有更多波动,所以高 beta 上 margin 很危险。

但有些名字在回调中看起来很有吸引力。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
FCF numbers are way too strong for memory. Single digit forward p/e across the board.

I’d expect a very short term pullback (which is healthy) for some the names into ATHs is my guess.

There are some individual companies where fundamentals like Sk Hynix are just too ridiculous. Balance sheet > macro.
Memory 的 FCF 数字太强了。全板块 forward P/E 都是个位数。

我预计一些创历史新高的名字会有非常短期的回调(这很健康)。

有些单家公司,比如 Sk Hynix,基本面离谱到不行。资产负债表 > 宏观。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Sandeman52 Saw this late - and agreed. I remain extremely bullish on AI, some of the net income projections on Samsung to SK Hynix are ridiculous.

Probably short term volatiality that will get eaten up extremely fast once institutions that were short net reposition long on other sectors
@Sandeman52 刚看到这个,认同。我仍然极度看多 AI,Samsung 到 SK Hynix 的一些净利润预测离谱得很。

短期可能有波动,但一旦之前净空头的机构在其他板块重新转多,这些波动应该会很快被吃掉。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
My best guess is likely down due to mechanics of margin hikes. But I hope I'm wrong.

We've seen CME increase margins eg. silver 11% -> 15%-16.5%+ values (taking effect today) and my guess is institutions use this opportunity to wipe out more leverage.

On Friday, markets saw manufactured selloffs on Silver likely due to bullion banks and funds being underwater on shorts.

There's a huge bifurcation in prices between Paper Silver being traded and the physical demand (used for AI + industrial).

But once that sell-off is done and institutions use paper liquidations to net-reposition long, we'll likely see a wide recovery since a lot of what happened regarding broader selloff from the new Fed chair is optics rather than policy change.

Just don't know timeframe.
我最好的猜测是,因为 margin hikes 的机制,可能会下跌。但我希望我是错的。

我们已经看到 CME 提高保证金,比如 silver 从 11% 到 15%-16.5%+(今天生效),我猜机构会利用这个机会清掉更多杠杆。

周五市场看到 Silver 被制造出来的抛售,可能是因为 bullion banks 和 funds 的空头 underwater。

Paper Silver 交易价格和实物/现货市场之间出现巨大分化,这类 forced deleveraging 会外溢到其他资产。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I've looked into $MSTR (Bitcoin) and $BMNR (Ethereum) liquidation scenarios.

Basically near 0 chance for both short-medium term.

Microstrategy is required to pay interest roughly around the time of the next Bitcoin halving (expecting another cycle boom then). So they'll be fine and they still have a cash buffer.

Bitmine doesn't quite face liquidation, but shareholder dilution to 0 and mNAV collapse. They'll still have their Ethereum but shareholder value goes to 0.

Especially when funds go short $BMNR, long ETH staking, and take advantage of iliquid investments like their $200m into Mr. Beast's company.
我研究过 $MSTR(Bitcoin)和 $BMNR(Ethereum)的清算情景。

基本上短中期两者接近 0 概率。

Microstrategy 需要支付利息的时间大概在下一次 Bitcoin halving 附近(那时预计又会有一轮周期 boom)。所以它们没问题,而且仍有现金缓冲。

Bitmine 不太会面临清算,但可能面临股东被稀释到接近 0、mNAV 崩塌。它们仍然会持有 Ethereum,但股东经济性可能被毁。
❤️ 19 🔁 4 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Rare earth sector from $MP to $USAR sell-off was an algorithmic mistake due to Reuters publishing false information -> retracting it later.

However, like Bitcoin's initial liquidation from Binance errors, the damage has been done.

I see Warsh is unfortunately net bearish $CRCL. So it's extremely nuanced since these two things contradict each other: shrinking the balance sheet (Quantitative Tightening) is "tightening," while cutting rates is "easing.

But if the Fed cuts (bullish for crypto/AI growth) and long-term Treasury yields stay elevated because of a smaller Fed balance sheet, Circle can continue to earn high interest on its reserves while the broader crypto market rallies. (this is goldilocks scenario).

Otherwise QT and rate cuts just hurts Circle a lot. But despite this, USDC volume/supply remains ATHs above $70B+ and I remain bearish-neutral short term, very bullish long term at $14.9B MC.

Going back to rare earths, it's essentially neutral. Like Samsung/TSM in foreign countries, even though there might be some headwinds. Ultimately US policy with AI growth cannot function without them + or rare earths so they're a necessity in the supply chain.

Fundamentally after a major crash like that (even if it's fake) recovery takes longer but presents good dip opportunities. But they're still up a ton YTD, which is why there might be further volatility ahead (eg. $USAR 58% YTD).
$MP$USAR 的稀土板块抛售,是 Reuters 发布错误信息后又撤回导致的算法错误。

但就像 Bitcoin 因 Binance 错误引发最初清算一样,伤害已经造成。

我认为 Warsh 对 $CRCL 不幸是净 bearish。所以这里非常微妙,因为两件事互相矛盾:缩表(Quantitative Tightening)是“tightening”,而降息是“easing”。

市场在短期把所有东西一起卖掉,但稀土/critical minerals 的基本面没有因为错误报道改变。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Markets are seeing liquidation cascades.

Silver's crash is now extending into other markets like Crypto and US/Foreign stocks.

Here's what's happening:

And here's what to expect from:

- $BMNR (Crypto)
- $RKLB (High-Beta)
- $SNDK (AI)
- to Samsung (Foreign).

The "Warsh" Fed Chair nomination was the initial trigger that caused the selloff as markets viewed him as a "Hawk" -> Quantitative Tightening.

However, this is a mistake as the fed chair is likely aligned with Trump's policies, and his recent stance is dovish short term + rate cuts, due to AI.

However, the technical reason for the selloff was CME + Exchange controls forcing margin liquidations on Silver.

As silver crashed 33% intra-day, institutions are forced to liquidate other names and hedge.

So, we're seeing both:

1. Fear Contagion - when a safe haven metal plummets this much, this causes a panic across other sectors.

2. Flight to Safety - investors panic-sell "risky" assets and stocks / move to U.S. Dollar and Treasury Bonds.

To play defensive:

- It's best to reposition speculative names into FCF/profit generating long positions aligning with these new policies.

- Names like $GOOGL, $NVDA down to $MU, $TSM, $JPM, Samsung, and others stand to benefit the most.

- Stocks that are already at lows (with strong expected FCF) from $PYPL to $SNAP that are being sold off even more present decent recovery upside.

Especially since the Fed chair is expected to be bullish for many sectors from AI to Banking, with rate-cuts fueled by AI growth + productivity.

For a warning:

- More speculative small cap names (that don't generate massive FCF) from $ONDS to $RKLB may be more at risk due to correlation to high-beta sector selloffs.

- Leveraged funds like $BMNR with iliquid assets (eg. $200M in Mr. Beast's company) to speculative names like $QBTS or $RGTI may finally see a reset/wipeout.

- Foreign market names like $JD to $BABA or emerging market names like $MELI may be impacted from a liquidity drain.

But of course, day-traders may have a field day timing rebounds on high-beta names (eg. if $ETH flash crashes 12% to $2.1K -> recovery to $2.3K).

That being said this is not saying "Sell High-Beta".

This is just a warning to people with margin on high-beta sectors now that given Ethereum's flush from $3k+ down to $2.18k:

There's considerable risk if there's an extended selloff on high-beta stocks. (I've been personally looking at Ethereum as a proxy).

This is just personal market opinion, but generally as midterms come up + more expected rate cuts + earnings coming out higher than ever (eg. $SNDK's blowout), it's good to remain extremely bullish on the market.

And it's just a matter of time before markets see a green V recovery before midterms.

Fundamentals haven't changed but optics have and short-term liquidity have.
市场正在出现清算瀑布。

Silver 崩盘现在正蔓延到 Crypto 和美国/海外股票等其他市场。

现在发生的是:

以及对这些资产该期待什么:

- $BMNR(Crypto)
- $RKLB(High-Beta)
- $SNDK(AI)
- 到 Samsung(海外)

“Warsh” Fed Chair 提名是最初触发因素,市场把他视为“Hawk” -> Quantitative Tightening。

但这是误读,因为 Fed chair 对 AI/semis 可能极度 bullish,同时支持用降息推动生产力和 AI 增长。

短期,Silver/Gold 暴跌制造流动性真空,其他资产被卖出以满足 margin calls 或筹现金。中期,如果市场理解政策组合,AI、semis、memory 和高质量成长股反而会受益。

这更像流动性冲击,而不是基本面崩塌。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Kevin Warsh is the next Federal Reserve Chair.

Markets may confuse him as a "Hawk".

His actual stance in 2026 is nuanced.

Here's his policies and how they affect the markets:

1. AI/Semis ( $NVDA, $MU): Extremely Bullish
2. Metals (Silver, Gold): Extreme Bearish
3. Crypto ( $BTC, $CRCL ): Paradoxically bullish
4. Banking & Financials ( $JPM, $BOA ): Bullish
5. Housing & Real Estate: Mixed/Uncertain
6. Renewable Energy: Bearish
7. Small-Caps ( $RUT ) : Bullish
8. Foreign Stocks (Japan, Korea): Resilient
- Emerging Markets (EM): Extremely Bearish
- China & Hong Kong: Bearish
- Europe ( $VGK, $EZU): Cautious

1. AI/Semis ( Nvidia to Micron ): Extremely Bullish

Warsh is an AI Bull.

In late 2025, he argued that AI is a powerful dis-inflationary force. He believes AI-driven productivity gains will allow the economy to grow rapidly without triggering inflation.

This "productivity boom" gives him the intellectual "cover" to support rate cuts even if the economy remains strong. (The Federal Reserve’s Broken Leadership, November 16, 2025 WSJ)

This is much different than his earlier stances where markets expected him to be a rigid inflation hawk (someone who wants higher rates).

He is advocating for cuts and wants to accelerate AI development.

2. Metals (Silver, Gold): Extreme Bearish

Investors use gold as a hedge against a weak dollar and "money printing." Because Warsh wants to shrink the balance sheet and turn off the "printing press," the primary reason for holding gold is diminishing. A stronger U.S. Dollar is making metals more expensive for international buyers.

That being said the 33% intraday silver drop was mainly from other factors such as cascading liqudation from margin changes, though the new Fed chair likely played a minor role.

3. Crypto ( $BTC, $CRCL ): Paradoxically bullish

He famously stated, "If you're under 40, Bitcoin is your new gold." He views Bitcoin as a legitimate store of value and a generational shift away from physical metals.

He views the blockchain as "the newest and coolest software" and believes the U.S. must lead in this space to remain economically competitive against global rivals.

However; The "Paradox": Why Prices are Dropping:

The market is realizing that while Warsh wants lower interest rates, he also wants a smaller Fed balance sheet.

Investors are terrified that we are entering an era of "Rate Cuts without QE." You might get cheaper loans, but you won't get the massive "wall of money" that usually sends $BTC to all-time highs.

So we have a guy bullish on the technology of crypto, but his monetary discipline might hurt short-term liquidity.

4. Banking & Financials: Bullish

Warsh is a favorite of the banking sector due to his experience at Morgan Stanley and his vocal criticism of "mission creep." He is expected to roll back complex bank capital requirements (like Basel III). Analysts see this as a major win for regional and small-cap banks, as it frees up capital for lending.

5. Housing & Real Estate: Mixed

He wants to cut the Federal Funds Rate aggressively. This would immediately lower the cost of Adjustable-Rate Mortgages (ARMs) and construction loans.

However, the bear case is that Warsh is a fierce opponent of the Fed owning $2 trillion in Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS). Many economists warn this could push the 30-year fixed mortgage rate higher (potentially toward 7% or 8%) even as the Fed is cutting other interest rates.

6. Renewable Energy: Bearish

He intends to withdraw the Fed from global climate groups (like the Network for Greening the Financial System) and end "climate stress tests" for banks.

Under Jerome Powell, the Fed encouraged banks to consider climate risks in their lending. Warsh wants to end this, which effectively removes the "regulatory nudge" that made it easier for green projects to get favorable loan terms from major banks.

7. Small-Caps

Warsh has explicitly stated that he wants the Federal Reserve to focus on the "true drivers of the economy", small businesses and entrepreneurs, rather than just the "pampered princes" of Wall Street.

Warsh is expected to lead a significant rollback of complex banking capital requirements. This is strongly bullish for small caps. He intends to broaden access to capital for small firms by reducing the regulatory burden on the small and regional banks that do the majority of small-business lending.

8. Foreign Stocks

Warsh is expected to createa a divide between countries that benefit from a strong U.S. economy and those that are vulnerable to a stronger U.S. Dollar and tighter global liquidity.

Japan/Korea (Samsung, SK Hynix, etc): Japan and Korea are "fine" because they own the physical bottlenecks of the AI and robotics trades that Kevin Warsh believes will save the U.S. economy.

Usually, a strong USD is bad for foreign stocks, but for Japan and Korea, it’s a competitive weapon:

- Export Boost: Since most of their AI and robotics contracts are priced in USD, a stronger dollar means their revenue (when converted back to Yen, etc.) is massively inflated.

- Cheaper for the U.S.: Warsh’s "Strong Dollar" policy makes Japanese robots and Korean chips cheaper for American companies to buy. This accelerates the "Productivity Boom" Warsh wants while padding the profits of these foreign tech giants.

China: A stronger dollar puts pressure on the Yuan, making it harder for the PBoC (China's central bank) to cut their own rates to stimulate their struggling economy.

Emerging Markets: A stronger U.S. Dollar makes it much more expensive for emerging countries to service their dollar-denominated debt.

Europe: Dollar recovery could push the Euro lower, which helps European exports but increases their energy import costs.

_

On Friday, markets sold off sharply on Silver/Gold crashing, and hedging pulled liquidity out of the system.

Markets might confuse Warsh as a historical hawk.

However, recent statements show he's near term dovish and supports lower rates, accelerated by AI.

Markets are currently pricing in the possibility of simultaneous rate cuts and balance sheet reductions but generally, many trades from AI to small cap growth are expected to continue.
Kevin Warsh 是下一任 Federal Reserve Chair。

市场可能会把他误读成“鹰派”。

他在 2026 年的真实立场其实更细腻。

下面是他的政策,以及它们对市场的影响:

1. AI/Semis ( $NVDA, $MU):极度看多
2. Metals(Silver, Gold):极度看空
3. Crypto ( $BTC, $CRCL ):反直觉地看多
4. Banking & Financials ( $JPM, $BOA ):看多
5. Housing & Real Estate:混合/不确定
6. Renewable Energy:看空
7. Small-Caps ( $RUT ):看多
8. Foreign Stocks(Japan, Korea):有韧性
- Emerging Markets (EM):极度看空
- China & Hong Kong:看空
- Europe ( $VGK, $EZU):谨慎

1. AI/Semis(从 Nvidia 到 Micron):极度看多

Warsh 是 AI 多头。

2025 年末,他认为 AI 是强大的反通胀力量。他相信 AI 驱动的生产率提升,可以让经济快速增长,同时不引发通胀。

这种“生产率繁荣”给了他支持降息的理论“掩护”,即使经济仍然强劲也一样。(The Federal Reserve’s Broken Leadership,2025 年 11 月 16 日 WSJ)

这和他早期的立场很不同,当时市场以为他是僵硬的通胀鹰派(想要更高利率的人)。

他现在主张降息,并希望加速 AI 发展。

2. Metals(Silver, Gold):极度看空

投资者用黄金对冲弱美元和“印钱”。因为 Warsh 想缩表、关掉“印钞机”,持有黄金的主要理由正在减弱。更强的美元也让金属对国际买家更贵。

话虽如此,白银盘中 33% 的暴跌主要还是其他因素,比如保证金变化引发的连锁清算,虽然新 Fed chair 可能也有一点小影响。

3. Crypto ( $BTC, $CRCL ):反直觉地看多

他有句名言:“如果你不到 40 岁,Bitcoin 就是你的新黄金。” 他把 Bitcoin 视为合法的价值储存,也是一代人从实物金属转向别处的变化。

他认为 blockchain 是“最新、最酷的软件”,并相信美国必须在这个领域领先,才能在全球竞争对手面前保持经济竞争力。

但是;“悖论”:为什么价格在跌:

市场意识到,Warsh 虽然想要更低利率,但也想要更小的 Fed 资产负债表。

投资者害怕我们进入一个“降息但没有 QE”的时代。你可能拿到更便宜的贷款,但不会有通常把 $BTC 推到历史新高的那堵“钱墙”。

所以我们有一个看多加密技术的人,但他的货币纪律可能伤害短期流动性。

4. Banking & Financials:看多

Warsh 因为 Morgan Stanley 经历,以及公开批评“任务漂移”,很受银行业喜欢。预计他会回滚复杂的银行资本要求(比如 Basel III)。分析师认为这对区域银行和小盘银行是重大利好,因为会释放资本用于放贷。

5. Housing & Real Estate:混合

他想积极下调 Federal Funds Rate。这会立刻降低浮息房贷(ARMs)和建筑贷款成本。

但看空理由是,Warsh 强烈反对 Fed 持有 $2T 的 Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS)。很多经济学家警告,即使 Fed 在降其他利率,这也可能把 30 年固定房贷利率推高(可能到 7% 或 8%)。

6. Renewable Energy:看空

他打算让 Fed 退出全球气候组织(比如 Network for Greening the Financial System),并结束银行的“气候压力测试”。

在 Jerome Powell 任内,Fed 鼓励银行在放贷中考虑气候风险。Warsh 想结束这一点,等于拿掉了让绿色项目更容易从大银行拿到优惠贷款条件的“监管推力”。

7. Small-Caps

Warsh 明确说过,他希望 Federal Reserve 关注经济的“真正驱动者”,也就是小企业和创业者,而不是只盯着 Wall Street 的“娇惯王子”。

预计 Warsh 会主导大幅回滚复杂的银行资本要求。这对小盘股非常看多。他打算通过降低小型和区域银行的监管负担,扩大中小企业融资渠道,而这些银行承担了大部分小企业贷款。

8. Foreign Stocks

Warsh 预计会在受益于强劲美国经济的国家,以及容易受更强美元和更紧全球流动性伤害的国家之间制造分化。

Japan/Korea(Samsung、SK Hynix 等):Japan 和 Korea “没问题”,因为它们掌握了 Kevin Warsh 认为会拯救美国经济的 AI 和机器人交易里的物理瓶颈。

通常强美元对外国股票不利,但对 Japan 和 Korea 来说,这是竞争武器:

- 出口提振:因为它们大多数 AI 和机器人合同以美元计价,更强美元意味着这些收入换回 Yen 等本币时被大幅放大。

- 对美国更便宜:Warsh 的“强美元”政策让日本机器人和韩国芯片对美国公司更便宜。这会加速 Warsh 想要的“生产率繁荣”,同时增厚这些外国科技巨头的利润。

China:更强美元会给 Yuan 施压,让 PBoC(中国央行)更难降息来刺激困境中的经济。

Emerging Markets:更强美元让新兴国家偿还美元债的成本高得多。

Europe:美元反弹可能压低 Euro,这有利于欧洲出口,但会提高能源进口成本。

_

周五,市场因为 Silver/Gold 崩盘大幅下跌,对冲也把流动性从系统里抽走。

市场可能把 Warsh 误读成历史上的鹰派。

但最近发言显示,他短期偏鸽,支持由 AI 加速推动的低利率。

市场目前在定价“同时降息和缩表”的可能性,但总体看,从 AI 到小盘成长的很多交易预计会继续。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2017919446296437037
❤️ 525 🔁 48 💬 39
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@CapSimplified Good question. PSA to everyone else, $EWY and $FLKR. ~50% exposure to Sk Hynix/Samsung for KR.

For direct SK Hynix, $HY9H for EUR. But the spreads are insanely high, so it's really bad to trade unless you're holding long term. And you're probably losing .5%-1% off the bat.
@CapSimplified 好问题。也给其他人一个 PSA:$EWY$FLKR。韩国敞口里约 50% 是 Sk Hynix/Samsung。

如果想直接买 SK Hynix,欧洲有 $HY9H。但 spread 高得离谱,除非长期持有,否则非常不适合交易。你一上来可能就亏 0.5%-1%。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@stefano_kerope These were the figures for Sk Hynix and Samsung for people that wanted to fact-check. https://t.co/v24Y93epWT
@stefano_kerope 这些是 Sk Hynix 和 Samsung 的数字,给想 fact-check 的人。 https://t.co/v24Y93epWT
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
The Memory Supercycle is here.

New reports from Morgan Stanley est.

- Samsung's net profit ~$163.0B USD
- SK Hynix's ~$120.9B USD.

That would make Samsung the most profitable company in the world, even more than $NVDA and $GOOGL.

Here are the top 10 rankings:

1. Samsung Electronics ~$163.0B (2027)
2. Alphabet $GOOGL $152.44B
3. Apple $APPL $133.05B
4 Microsoft $MSFT $127.65B
5. Sk Hynix $120.9B (2027
6. NVIDIA $NVDA $116.51B
7. Amazon $AMZN $95.22B
8 Meta$META $85.09B
9. Berkshire Hathaway $BRK $81.5B
10. JPMorgan Chase $JPM $72.81B

This is forward 2027 net income compared to TTM net income sourced by from companiesmarketcap. Credit to @jukan05 for the Morgan Stanley report. Excluding National companies like Saudi Aramco in these figures.

The memory supercyle from $MU, Samsung, and SK Hynix is here clearly here.
Memory Supercycle 已经来了。

Morgan Stanley 新报告估算:

- Samsung 净利润约 $163.0B USD
- SK Hynix 约 $120.9B USD。

这会让 Samsung 成为全球最赚钱公司,甚至超过 $NVDA$GOOGL

前 10 排名:

1. Samsung Electronics ~$163.0B(2027)
2. Alphabet $GOOGL $152.44B
3. Apple $APPL $133.05B
4. Microsoft $MSFT $127.65B
5. Sk Hynix $120.9B(2027)
6. NVIDIA $NVDA $116.51B
7. Amazon $AMZN

这就是为什么 memory 不是普通周期,而是 AI 驱动的超级周期。
❤️ 1,148 🔁 139 💬 42
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@beauty_oe @StockSavvyShay いつも幅広い情報をチェックするために、君の投稿をよく見させてもらってるよ!

君のアカウントも伸びるのがすごく早かったけど、僕の投稿がバズったのもかなりの部分で君のおかげだよ(笑)

フォロワーが増えれば増えるほど、加速度的に伸びていくもんだよね。その調子で頑張って! :)
@beauty_oe 为了广泛获取信息,我一直经常看你的帖子!

你的账号也涨得很快,不过我的帖子能火,很大程度也多亏了你(笑)。

粉丝越多,增长越会加速。继续加油! :)
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I see it as a short term liquidity drain across the board (Bitcoin, Ethereum, SPY, mid-cap, etc) from Silver/Gold crash.

The new Fed Chair is probably one of the biggest AI bulls you will ever see and is arguing for rate cuts to funnel AI growth + productivity. So really great medium term once the silver/gold selloff gets bought back.
我把它看成 Silver/Gold 崩盘带来的全市场短期流动性抽水(Bitcoin、Ethereum、SPY、中盘股等)。

新 Fed Chair 可能是你见过最看多 AI 的人之一,而且主张降息来 funnel AI growth + productivity。所以等 silver/gold 抛售被买回来后,中期其实非常好。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Silver dropped 28% and Gold dropped 8.35% on Friday, est. ~$7.34T wiped out.

This creates a large liquidity vacuum where other assets from Bitcoin, tech, to small cap gets sold off to meet margin calls or raise cash.

Is this likely a short term (eg. 24-48) hour flush, with CME raising margin requirements by another few percent on the 2nd. However, medium-long term this is actually bullish.

A strong dollar makes the AI companies the ability to buys globally cheaper, and Warsh’s "AI Productivity Boom" thesis allows short term rate cuts, which fuel high-growth tech.
Silver 周五跌 28%,Gold 跌 8.35%,估计蒸发约 $7.34T。

这会制造巨大流动性真空,其他资产从 Bitcoin、tech 到 small cap 都会被卖出,用来满足 margin calls 或筹现金。

这很可能是短期(比如 24-48 小时)flush,CME 还会在 2 号把保证金要求再提高几个百分点。不过中长期这其实是 bullish。

强美元和流动性冲击结束后,AI 公司更容易吸引资金回流。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Kevin Warsh is the next Federal Reserve Chair.

Markets may confuse him as a "Hawk".

His actual stance in 2026 is nuanced.

Here's his policies and how they affect the markets:

1. AI/Semis ( $NVDA, $MU): Extremely Bullish
2. Metals (Silver, Gold): Extreme Bearish
3. Crypto ( $BTC, $CRCL ): Paradoxically bullish
4. Banking & Financials ( $JPM, $BOA ): Bullish
5. Housing & Real Estate: Mixed/Uncertain
6. Renewable Energy: Bearish
7. Small-Caps ( $RUT ) : Bullish
8. Foreign Stocks (Japan, Korea): Resilient
- Emerging Markets (EM): Extremely Bearish
- China & Hong Kong: Bearish
- Europe ( $VGK, $EZU): Cautious

1. AI/Semis ( Nvidia to Micron ): Extremely Bullish

Warsh is an AI Bull.

In late 2025, he argued that AI is a powerful dis-inflationary force. He believes AI-driven productivity gains will allow the economy to grow rapidly without triggering inflation.

This "productivity boom" gives him the intellectual "cover" to support rate cuts even if the economy remains strong. (The Federal Reserve’s Broken Leadership, November 16, 2025 WSJ)

This is much different than his earlier stances where markets expected him to be a rigid inflation hawk (someone who wants higher rates).

He is advocating for cuts and wants to accelerate AI development.

2. Metals (Silver, Gold): Extreme Bearish

Investors use gold as a hedge against a weak dollar and "money printing." Because Warsh wants to shrink the balance sheet and turn off the "printing press," the primary reason for holding gold is diminishing. A stronger U.S. Dollar is making metals more expensive for international buyers.

That being said the 33% intraday silver drop was mainly from other factors such as cascading liqudation from margin changes, though the new Fed chair likely played a minor role.

3. Crypto ( $BTC, $CRCL ): Paradoxically bullish

He famously stated, "If you're under 40, Bitcoin is your new gold." He views Bitcoin as a legitimate store of value and a generational shift away from physical metals.

He views the blockchain as "the newest and coolest software" and believes the U.S. must lead in this space to remain economically competitive against global rivals.

However; The "Paradox": Why Prices are Dropping:

The market is realizing that while Warsh wants lower interest rates, he also wants a smaller Fed balance sheet.

Investors are terrified that we are entering an era of "Rate Cuts without QE." You might get cheaper loans, but you won't get the massive "wall of money" that usually sends $BTC to all-time highs.

So we have a guy bullish on the technology of crypto, but his monetary discipline might hurt short-term liquidity.

4. Banking & Financials: Bullish

Warsh is a favorite of the banking sector due to his experience at Morgan Stanley and his vocal criticism of "mission creep." He is expected to roll back complex bank capital requirements (like Basel III). Analysts see this as a major win for regional and small-cap banks, as it frees up capital for lending.

5. Housing & Real Estate: Mixed

He wants to cut the Federal Funds Rate aggressively. This would immediately lower the cost of Adjustable-Rate Mortgages (ARMs) and construction loans.

However, the bear case is that Warsh is a fierce opponent of the Fed owning $2 trillion in Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS). Many economists warn this could push the 30-year fixed mortgage rate higher (potentially toward 7% or 8%) even as the Fed is cutting other interest rates.

6. Renewable Energy: Bearish

He intends to withdraw the Fed from global climate groups (like the Network for Greening the Financial System) and end "climate stress tests" for banks.

Under Jerome Powell, the Fed encouraged banks to consider climate risks in their lending. Warsh wants to end this, which effectively removes the "regulatory nudge" that made it easier for green projects to get favorable loan terms from major banks.

7. Small-Caps

Warsh has explicitly stated that he wants the Federal Reserve to focus on the "true drivers of the economy", small businesses and entrepreneurs, rather than just the "pampered princes" of Wall Street.

Warsh is expected to lead a significant rollback of complex banking capital requirements. This is strongly bullish for small caps. He intends to broaden access to capital for small firms by reducing the regulatory burden on the small and regional banks that do the majority of small-business lending.

8. Foreign Stocks

Warsh is expected to createa a divide between countries that benefit from a strong U.S. economy and those that are vulnerable to a stronger U.S. Dollar and tighter global liquidity.

Japan/Korea (Samsung, SK Hynix, etc): Japan and Korea are "fine" because they own the physical bottlenecks of the AI and robotics trades that Kevin Warsh believes will save the U.S. economy.

Usually, a strong USD is bad for foreign stocks, but for Japan and Korea, it’s a competitive weapon:

- Export Boost: Since most of their AI and robotics contracts are priced in USD, a stronger dollar means their revenue (when converted back to Yen, etc.) is massively inflated.

- Cheaper for the U.S.: Warsh’s "Strong Dollar" policy makes Japanese robots and Korean chips cheaper for American companies to buy. This accelerates the "Productivity Boom" Warsh wants while padding the profits of these foreign tech giants.

China: A stronger dollar puts pressure on the Yuan, making it harder for the PBoC (China's central bank) to cut their own rates to stimulate their struggling economy.

Emerging Markets: A stronger U.S. Dollar makes it much more expensive for emerging countries to service their dollar-denominated debt.

Europe: Dollar recovery could push the Euro lower, which helps European exports but increases their energy import costs.

_

On Friday, markets sold off sharply on Silver/Gold crashing, and hedging pulled liquidity out of the system.

Markets might confuse Warsh as a historical hawk.

However, recent statements show he's near term dovish and supports lower rates, accelerated by AI.

Markets are currently pricing in the possibility of simultaneous rate cuts and balance sheet reductions but generally, many trades from AI to small cap growth are expected to continue.
Kevin Warsh 是下一任 Federal Reserve Chair。

市场可能会把他误认为“Hawk”。

他 2026 年的实际立场更微妙。

政策影响大致是:

1. AI/Semis($NVDA, $MU):极度 bullish
2. Metals(Silver, Gold):极度 bearish
3. Crypto($BTC, $CRCL):反直觉 bullish
4. Banking & Financials($JPM, $BOA):bullish
5. Housing & Real Estate:mixed/uncertain
6. Renewable Energy:bearish
7. Small-Caps:取决于利率和流动性

市场看到缩表就喊 hawkish,但如果同时降息、支持生产力投资和 AI capex,这对 AI/semis 是非常强的组合。

对 metals 不利,是因为强美元、真实利率和缩表会压制无收益资产。

对 crypto,短期可能受流动性冲击,但长期如果美元数字化、稳定币和资本市场 rails 继续推进,反而可能利好。

核心是:不要简单用 hawk/dove 二分法理解 Warsh。
❤️ 1,523 🔁 268 💬 127
打开原推
💬 引用
I have received information regarding Masha Prusakova and Nikolai Mushegian that differs from public accounts.

After reviewing the materials, I’ve realized that this information is too high-risk for an individual researcher to hold safely regarding the criminal case and Epstein files.

For my own personal safety and to protect source confidentiality, I have decentralized all relevant materials to the investigative desks of the AP and WSJ.

I will no longer hold the original files or evidence.

I am now stepping away from this case entirely and will not be commenting further.

My work is returning exclusively to fundamental market research and supply chain analysis.
我收到了一些关于 Masha Prusakova 和 Nikolai Mushegian 的信息,和公开说法不同。

在审阅材料后,我意识到这些信息涉及刑事案件和 Epstein files,对个人研究者来说风险太高,不适合单独持有。

为了我个人安全,也为了保护消息源保密性,我已经把所有相关材料去中心化分发给 AP 和 WSJ 的调查记者团队。

我不会继续单独持有或推进这些材料。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The founder of MakerDAO drowned the same morning, 5 hours after this post.

Official reports state it was a “swimming accident”.

Deeper research found he was reportedly “fully clothed and with a wallet in his pocket” while swimming.

Maybe it’s best to not look into these things anymore from the new Epstein files.
MakerDAO 创始人在这条帖子发出 5 小时后的同一天早上溺亡。

官方报告称这是一起“游泳事故”。

更深的研究发现,据称他游泳时“衣服穿得很完整,口袋里还带着钱包”。

也许关于新的 Epstein files,最好还是别再深挖这些事了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2017828932377018610
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
The founder of MakerDAO drowned the same morning, 5 hours after this post.

Official reports state it was a “swimming accident”.

Deeper research found he was reportedly “fully clothed and with a wallet in his pocket” while swimming.

Maybe it’s best to not look into these things anymore from the new Epstein files.
MakerDAO 创始人在这条帖子发布 5 小时后的同一个早晨溺亡。

官方报告称这是“游泳事故”。

更深入研究发现,据报道他游泳时“穿着完整衣服,钱包还在口袋里”。

也许从新的 Epstein files 里继续查这些事情,最好还是别查了。
引用原推@delete_shitcoin
CIA and Mossad and pedo elite are running some kind of sex trafficking entrapment blackmail ring out of Puerto Rico and caribbean islands. They are going to frame me with a laptop planted by my ex gf who was a spy. They will torture me to death.
CIA、Mossad 和恋童精英正在 Puerto Rico 和 Caribbean islands 搞某种性贩运诱捕勒索网络。他们会用我那个间谍前女友栽赃的一台 laptop 来陷害我。他们会把我折磨致死。
https://x.com/delete_shitcoin/status/1585918718088970241
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推

2026年1月

💬 引用
5 Major Banks were criminally charged for manipulating Silver markets.

These fines totaled $1.2B+ for "manipulation of silver markets through spoofing and price rigging".

Silver crashed 28% on Friday, triggering trillions of losses

Here were the charges:

1. JPMorgan ($920M , 2020): JPM admitted wrongdoing for market manipulation of Silver to the US DoJ.

2. Scotiabank ($127.5M, 2020): US DoJ - "Fraudulent and manipulative trading practices in the markets for silver"

3. HSBC ($76.6M, 2018–2023): CFTC enforcement for 2011–2020 spoofing

4. Deutsche Bank ($75.5M, 2016–2021): Silver fix settlement and CFTC actions for 1999–2014 rigging

5. Morgan Stanley ($1.5M, 2019): CFTC civil penalty for 2013–2014 spoofing

Credit: Navnoor Bawa.

Between 2008–2016 five of these major banks systematically manipulated precious metals markets through spoofing, price rigging, and benchmark manipulation.

Regulators caught them. Fines and convictions spanned 2016–2025.

This was concrete evidence of market manipulation of silver historically that was swept under the rug.

And, it's possible markets are witnessing it again with the current silver crash of 2026.
5 家大银行曾因操纵 Silver 市场被刑事指控。

这些罚款合计 $1.2B+,原因是“通过 spoofing 和 price rigging 操纵白银市场”。

Silver 周五暴跌 28%,触发数万亿损失。

当时的指控包括:

1. JPMorgan($920M,2020):JPM 向美国 DoJ 承认操纵 Silver 市场。

2. Scotiabank($127.5M,2020):美国 DoJ 指控其“欺诈性和操纵性交易行为”。

3. Deutsche Bank、HSBC、UBS 等也曾因贵金属市场操纵受到处罚或和解。

所以当 Silver 出现这种异常暴跌时,不该假设市场一定干净。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Silver ended the day down over 28.54%

Here's why Silver / $SLV crashed today:

Jan 13th: CME shifted from fixed-dollar margin to percentage based margin.

This scaled collat requirements with contract value, effectively capping leverage as it goes higher.

The capital required to maintain a single COMEX contract increased in tandem, creating an environment where even minor price drops would trigger massive margin calls.

Jan 27th: CME had increased the maintenance margin percentage twice this week to ensure "adequate collateral coverage" amid extreme volatility.

This forced leveraged positions to liquidate their long positions or post substantial additional capital.

There were five margin hikes within nine days that created a "coiled spring" of potential selling pressure.

Today: Western markets focused on the Federal Reserve, but the new Fed chair likely did not play much of an impact as this is just noise.

Pricing dislocations happened in Asian markets. UBS SDIC Silver Futures Fund traded at 36-64% premiums over SHFE contracts. And this was the main source of silver exposure in China.

On January 30, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange implemented an emergency full-day trading halt for the SDIC Silver LOF.

This suspension created a "liquidity trap" for Chinese institutional and retail traders. Unable to liquidate their domestic holdings, these participants were forced to dump $SLV and COMEX futures to raise cash or hedge their exposure.

TLDR:

The $SLV crash of January 30, 2026 today was not a failure of silver's fundamental value, but a failure of the "paper game" that dictated price discovery.

CME hiking margin requirements repeatedly and the China liquidity trap led to cascading margin liquidations that caused selloffs of leveraged positions.

Other events such as the Fed chair was likely known awhile, looks to be "narrative noise" regarding what actually happened.

Today was a "Paper Game" failure and leverage used to trade it was systematically wiped out by exchange rules.
Silver 收盘跌了超过 28.54%。

下面是今天 Silver / $SLV 崩盘的原因:

1 月 13 日:CME 从固定美元保证金改成按百分比计算保证金。

这让抵押品要求随着合约价值上升而上升,实际上限制了价格越涨时的杠杆。

维持单张 COMEX 合约所需资本同步增加,形成一种环境:哪怕很小的价格下跌,也会触发大量 margin call。

1 月 27 日:CME 本周两次提高维持保证金比例,以确保极端波动下有“充足抵押覆盖”。

这迫使杠杆头寸平掉多头,或者补充大量额外资本。

9 天内 5 次保证金上调,制造了一个潜在卖压的“压缩弹簧”。

今天:西方市场关注 Federal Reserve,但新 Fed chair 很可能影响不大,这只是噪音。

定价错位发生在亚洲市场。UBS SDIC Silver Futures Fund 相对 SHFE 合约溢价 36-64%。而这正是中国主要的白银敞口来源。

1 月 30 日,深圳证券交易所对 SDIC Silver LOF 实施紧急全天停牌。

这次停牌给中国机构和散户交易者制造了一个“流动性陷阱”。由于无法卖出国内持仓,这些参与者被迫抛售 $SLV 和 COMEX 期货来筹现金或对冲敞口。

TLDR:

今天 2026 年 1 月 30 日的 $SLV 崩盘,不是白银基本价值失效,而是决定价格发现的“纸面游戏”失效。

CME 反复提高保证金要求,加上中国的流动性陷阱,引发连锁 margin liquidation,导致杠杆头寸被抛售。

其他事件,比如 Fed chair,很可能早就被知道了,看起来只是关于真实原因的“叙事噪音”。

今天是“Paper Game”的失败,用杠杆交易它的人被交易所规则系统性清洗掉了。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2017353453790761259
❤️ 7,441 🔁 2,623 💬 297
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yes this is incredibly sad. Initial collapse reports happened on the 29th, but scale of the aftermath was confirmed just now.

In regards to second order effects, many investors don't really go upstream to the raw materials that fabs $TSM or chipmakers like $NVDA use but there's limited substitutes (eg. Niobium) for tantalum in enterprise ssds to gpus.

So just wanted to share the news and some potential action items for people to investigate.
是,这非常令人难过。最初坍塌报道发生在 29 日,但后果规模刚刚才被确认。

关于二阶影响,很多投资者不会往上游追溯到 $TSM 这样的 fabs 或 $NVDA 这样的 chipmakers 使用的 raw materials,但从 enterprise SSDs 到 GPUs,tantalum 的替代品(比如 Niobium)有限。

所以我只是想分享新闻,以及一些值得大家继续调查的潜在行动项。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks. Was looking for different short/long opportunities after seeing the news of a regional bank collapse.

Looks like Metropolitan was an isolated incident, not related to silver or others.

$MCB is probably the biggest alpha in case algorithms mess that up on Monday though.
谢谢。看到 regional bank collapse 的新闻后,我在找不同的 long/short 机会。

看起来 Metropolitan 是孤立事件,和 silver 或其他东西无关。

不过如果算法周一误杀,$MCB 可能是最大的 alpha。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@PhotonCap Congrats on 9K+ followers! 🍻
@PhotonCap 恭喜粉丝超过 9K!🍻
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@cryptorover FYI it's 99% because it just happened

https://t.co/3RcMYNpecP
@cryptorover FYI 99% 是因为它刚刚发生。

https://t.co/3RcMYNpecP
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The first US Bank of the year has just collapsed:

Metropolitan Capital Bank & Trust has been shut down and placed into receivership by the FDIC.

Here's what likely happened and how markets might react:

The Chicago bank was a community bank by asset size ($261M), but operated with the risk of a boutique investment bank.

They operated in three segments:

- Tech-Infused Sports
- Digital Media
- Niche Real Estate Construction

From public information, we're able to see high concentration of risk in these two volatile sectors.

Namely, TMRW Sports, the venture founded by Tiger Woods. The bank didn't just facilitate the equity; it lent against it.

By providing "secured stock loans" and "NAV-backed financing", the bank allowed investors to borrow money to buy into the SPV.

Since the TGL venture dropped and the investment was illiquid, the collateral for these loans likely became worthless. The borrowers, facing liquidity constraints, would default on the loans.

The bank also financed "strategic add-on acquisitions" for clients in the digital media industry and Niche Real Estate Construction.

The bank’s involvement in "gap financing" for construction projects was likely equally toxic. MCB&T’s "creative" gap loans likely suffered total losses on projects that stalled or were foreclosed as construction sectors in 2024-2025 faced difficulty.

Snippet reveals that MCB&T held $43 million in FHLB advances against $261 million in assets (~16.5% of the balance sheet was funded by FHLB borrowing).

A series of terrible investments/loans likely caused the bank to collapse.

_

Commentary:

You'll probably see headlines regarding bank collapses and silver trades.

Yes, community banks are designed to be conservative institutions but they this bank in specific took on a high-risk venture debt models.

This wasn't a bank run, just a terribly run leveraged investment fund.

But here's what to look out for:

$MCB - Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp is not Metropolitan Capital Bank.

The alpha is that if there's an algorithmic sell-off or short sellers mistaking the two, this would be a good buying opportunity.

$KRE - Looks like a buy if the sector sells off largely on "bank failure" headlines.

The bank ran a "casino" model on a community bank balance sheet, but this is isolated.

Look for commercial real estate exposure from small-cap Illinois/Midwest banks like CRE Loans or uninsured deposits ( > 50%) that might be affected.

However, this looks to be an extremely small regional bank and isolated incident so not much market opportunity here.
今年美国第一家银行刚刚倒闭:

Metropolitan Capital Bank & Trust 已被 FDIC 关闭并接管。

下面是可能发生了什么,以及市场可能怎么反应:

这家 Chicago 银行按资产规模看是社区银行($261M),但承担的是精品投行级别的风险。

它运营三个板块:

- Tech-Infused Sports
- Digital Media
- Niche Real Estate Construction

从公开信息看,我们能看到它在这两个波动行业里风险高度集中。

尤其是 Tiger Woods 创办的 TMRW Sports。银行不只是促成股权交易;它还拿这些股权做抵押放贷。

通过提供“secured stock loans”和“NAV-backed financing”,银行允许投资者借钱买入 SPV。

由于 TGL 项目下滑,且投资缺乏流动性,这些贷款的抵押品很可能变得一文不值。借款人面对流动性压力,会违约。

这家银行还为数字媒体行业客户和 Niche Real Estate Construction 提供“战略性补充收购”融资。

银行参与建筑项目“gap financing”很可能同样有毒。2024-2025 年建筑行业困难时,MCB&T 这些“creative” gap loans 可能在停工或被止赎项目上遭遇全损。

片段显示,MCB&T 在 $261M 资产中持有 $43M FHLB advances(约 16.5% 资产负债表由 FHLB 借款融资)。

一系列糟糕的投资/贷款很可能导致这家银行倒闭。

_

评论:

你可能会看到关于银行倒闭和白银交易的头条。

是的,社区银行本应是保守机构,但这家具体银行采用了高风险 venture debt 模式。

这不是银行挤兑,只是一只运营得很烂的杠杆投资基金。

但这里有几点值得看:

$MCB - Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp 不是 Metropolitan Capital Bank。

alpha 在于,如果出现算法抛售或空头把两者搞混,这会是一个不错的买入机会。

$KRE - 如果板块因为“银行倒闭”头条而大跌,看起来可以买。

这家银行是在社区银行资产负债表上跑“赌场”模式,但这是孤立事件。

关注 Illinois/Midwest 小盘银行的商业地产敞口,比如 CRE Loans 或可能受影响的未保险存款(> 50%)。

不过,这看起来是一家极小的区域银行和孤立事件,所以市场机会不大。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2017439237294211221
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@halldj00 Tungsten is pretty interesting since it's used for chip manufacturing (eg. $NVDA blackwell), hbm, batteries, and defense like ammunition.

They're all critical for a reason, stuff like antimony had a huge price squeeze but I'm sure they'll all rise in importance.
@halldj00 Tungsten 很有意思,因为它用于芯片制造(比如 $NVDA Blackwell)、HBM、电池,以及弹药等国防用途。

它们之所以都是 critical 是有原因的。像 antimony 已经发生过巨大 price squeeze,但我相信这些材料的重要性都会上升。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@u_wol_cos The sector from $MP, $LPTH, $UAMY, $NB and others rose a ton premarket on the $USAR news and now they're all down 8-15%+.

Guess this is a sell the news event for retail who bought in overnight/premarket? Not sure. https://t.co/Pi2mAQ6zjg
@u_wol_cos $MP$LPTH$UAMY$NB 等板块因为 $USAR 新闻盘前大涨,现在都跌了 8-15%+。

我猜这是隔夜/盘前买入的散户 sell the news?不确定。 https://t.co/Pi2mAQ6zjg
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I didn't have time through the deal structure fully yet, I was watching $USAR pre-market and I think it hit +55% at one point?

I did see that there was a lot of dilution with a strike at $21.5, not worried about US Gov at ~$17.17 since they're not selling. Entry point at $26 looks a lot better now though!
我还没来得及完整看 deal structure,当时在看 $USAR 盘前,我记得一度涨到 +55%?

我确实看到有很多稀释,行权价 $21.5。美国政府大概 $17.17 的位置我不担心,因为它们不会卖。不过现在 $26 的入场点看起来好多了!
❤️ 22 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ThematicTrader $AREC seems very interesting since they capture value from neodymium, gallium, germanium, and lithium as you mentioned.

It's a net beneficiary of multiple themes as a critical mineral refiner, I need to take a closer look!
@ThematicTrader $AREC 看起来很有意思,因为正如你提到的,它能从 neodymium、gallium、germanium 和 lithium 中捕获价值。

作为 critical mineral refiner,它是多个主题的净受益者。我需要更仔细看看!
❤️ 29 🔁 2 💬 4
打开原推
📝 原创
Today, all eyes are on Copper, $SLV, and $USAR after US Gov's $1.6B funding.

But ever wonder about the more silent trades you should really be watching out for?

1. Tungsten - $ALM
2. Indium - $TECK
3. Bismuth - TSE: $VNP
4. Tellurium - $VNP
5. Molybdenum - $FCX
6. Lithium - $LAC
7. Antimony- $UAMY
8. Gallium - $AA
9. Germanium - $TECK
10. Graphite - $SYAAF

This are the list of some of the top Chinese critical minerals/material export control chokepoints and the Western beneficiary.

Not everyday do you have foreign governments telling you what to buy.
今天,在美国政府 $1.6B 资金之后,所有目光都在 Copper、$SLV$USAR 上。

但你有没有想过,那些更安静、真正应该关注的交易?

1. Tungsten - $ALM
2. Indium - $TECK
3. Bismuth - TSE: $VNP
4. Tellurium - $VNP
5. Molybdenum - $FCX
6. Lithium - $LAC
7. Antimony - $UAMY
8. Gallium - $AA
9. Germanium - $TECK
10. Graphite - $SYAAF

这些是中国 critical minerals/material 出口管制里一些最重要的材料清单。
❤️ 790 🔁 124 💬 59
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@wallstengine I would not want to hold $20 in $IONQ as a $SKYT shareholder. Can't believe they're getting bought
@wallstengine 作为 $SKYT 股东,我不想持有 $20 的 $IONQ。真不敢相信他们要被收购。
❤️ 116 🔁 2 💬 6
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@retail_mourinho Same to you! Cheers :)
@retail_mourinho 你也一样!Cheers :)
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@TheRonnieVShow The first Ethereum treasury firm liquidated $114m of $ETH to buy two Boeing CFM56-7B24 aircraft engines.

I couldn’t believe my eyes when I read these articles.
@TheRonnieVShow 第一家 Ethereum treasury 公司清算了 $114m 的 $ETH,去买两台 Boeing CFM56-7B24 飞机发动机。

我读这些文章时简直不敢相信自己的眼睛。
❤️ 17 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@beauty_oe ご紹介いただき、誠にありがとうございます!日本のXコミュニティの皆様には、心より感謝申し上げます。

本当に感謝の気持ちでいっぱいです。私のポストが、皆様にとって時間を割いて読む価値がある内容であることを願っています。🙇🏻
@beauty_oe 非常感谢你的介绍!我由衷感谢日本 X 社区的大家。

真的满怀感激。希望我的帖子值得大家花时间阅读。🙇🏻
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@beauty_oe ありがとう!アカウントがここまで大きくなれたのは、間違いなく〇〇のおかげだよ。マジで感謝してる!
@beauty_oe 谢谢!我的账号能成长到现在,毫无疑问多亏了你。真的非常感谢!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Gubloinvestor Thanks! Amazing seeing your account grow so much recently. Reminds me of the time I was at 5K followers few months back
@Gubloinvestor 谢谢!看到你的账号最近涨这么多很棒。让我想起几个月前我还在 5K 粉丝的时候。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@skowihx Cover Corp (5253.T) that owns Hololive for VTubers?

Anime girls are a known bottleneck for software engineers.
@skowihx 拥有 Hololive 的 Cover Corp(5253.T)?

动漫女孩是软件工程师的已知瓶颈。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy Appreciate the kind message! You were one of the FinX influencers that first interacted with me (and one of the first people I followed) and it's fun to see our growth together.
@pepemoonboy 感谢你的友善留言!你是最早和我互动的 FinX influencers 之一(也是我最早关注的人之一),能看到我们一起成长很有意思。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@zephyr_z9 I liked Nayna last year too, but I am pretty late to the party
@zephyr_z9 我去年也喜欢 Nanya,但我来得有点晚。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Ren_aramb $IBKR has $HY9H which is SK Hynix on Frankfurt.
@Ren_aramb $IBKR$HY9H,是 Frankfurt 上的 SK Hynix。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
TLDR of my top foreign stocks:

1. Nitto Boseki - T-Glass (Japan)

2. Unimicron - Substrates/Glass Core (Taiwan)

3. Samsung/SK Hynix - HBM (Korea)

4. Kioxia - NAND w/ $SNDK (Japan)

5. Nanya Technologies - Memory (Taiwan)

US supply chains like $INTC (foundry), $MU (memory), or $LPTH (germanium) are typically my longs of preference "Made in America" bottleneck + supply chains. But some of these foreign companies are either critical to the entire AI buildout or capture a lot of the overflow.

If you're wondering how you get access to foreign markets?

- $IBKR

There are US OTC equivalents for companies like Nitto Boseki like $NBCLF. If you're on Robinhood, $EWY / $FLKR provides access to large KR memory exposure.

Some like Nitto Boseki are near monopolies so these are the very rare foreign companies I go out of my way to invest in.
我最喜欢的海外股票 TLDR:

1. Nitto Boseki - T-Glass(日本)

2. Unimicron - Substrates/Glass Core(台湾)

3. Samsung/SK Hynix - HBM(韩国)

4. Kioxia - NAND w/ $SNDK(日本)

5. Nanya Technologies - Memory(台湾)

美国供应链如 $INTC(foundry)、$MU(memory)或 $LPTH(germanium)通常是我偏好的 “Made in America” bottleneck + supply chain 多头。但其中一些海外公司要么对 AI buildout 至关重要,要么掌握美国短期无法替代的上游瓶颈。
❤️ 739 🔁 76 💬 37
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ryn_xue Just a disclaimer: the report about $BBW's Teddy Bear parts being used for DoD HIMAR buildout is not true (I thought it was at first glance, but turned out to be funny).
@ryn_xue 免责声明:关于 $BBW 的 Teddy Bear 零件被用于 DoD HIMAR buildout 的报道不是真的(我第一眼也以为是真的,后来发现只是好笑)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ryn_xue There were unverified reports in last year that $BBW's Teddy Bear's advanced voice box technology was used for Ukraine HIMAR systems.

Like the Japanese Toto toilets benefiting from HBM, sometimes the largest AI beneficiaries are the ones you never expect. https://t.co/iZT1gNl7lu
@ryn_xue 去年有未经证实的报道说,$BBW Teddy Bear 的高级 voice box 技术被用于 Ukraine HIMAR systems。

就像日本 Toto 马桶受益于 HBM 一样,有时候最大的 AI 受益者是你最想不到的那些。 https://t.co/iZT1gNl7lu
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@CrypticAether True, Teddy Bears &gt; HBM3e.
@CrypticAether 确实,Teddy Bears &gt; HBM3e。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@CrypticAether The "bottleneck" wasn't HBM3 memory or critical materials. It was childhood nostalgia.

We thought we needed 100k clusters of $NVDA H200s to find meaning in life. Turns out, we just needed teddy bears.
@CrypticAether “瓶颈”不是 HBM3 memory,也不是 critical materials。

是童年怀旧。

我们以为需要 100k clusters 的 $NVDA H200s 才能找到人生意义。结果我们只是需要 teddy bears。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
People are long $MU / $SNDK for "The Memory Supercycle".

Or "Copper" because of demand.

But is obvious trade in front of you?

$BBW - Build a Bear.

5y Return:

Teddy Bear: 1301.55%
Nvidia: +1,258.68%

While you're fighting for crumbs in the GPU/Memory/Copper supply chains, you could have just bought a Teddy Bear like I did.
人们做多 $MU / $SNDK,因为“The Memory Supercycle”。

或者因为需求做多“Copper”。

但眼前最明显的交易是什么?

$BBW - Build a Bear。

5 年回报:

Teddy Bear:1301.55%
Nvidia:+1,258.68%

当你们在 GPU/Memory/Copper 供应链里抢残羹剩饭时,本来只要像我一样买一只 Teddy Bear 就行。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Holy crap. This just happened:

"Samsung increases NAND prices by 100%" - ETNews

Estimates were 33-38% Q/Q growth - Trendforce

This is an absolute shock.

It's called the "Memory Supercycle" for a reason with $MU, Samsung, and SK Hynix + $SNDK.

In simpler terms:

That extra 65% increase (from 35% to 100%) is pure, added high-margin profit.

If $MU guided for 68.0% gross margins Q2 2026, and we see a 100% NAND hike from 33-38% est, that could bring gross margin projections over 73-75%+.

This is a blowout.
我靠。刚刚发生了这个:

“Samsung 将 NAND 价格提高 100%” - ETNews

此前估计是环比增长 33-38% - Trendforce

这是绝对的震撼。

它被叫作“Memory Supercycle”是有原因的,涉及 $MU、Samsung、SK Hynix + $SNDK

简单说:

额外那 65% 的涨幅(从 35% 到 100%)就是纯新增的高利润。

如果 $MU 指引 2026 Q2 毛利率为 68.0%,而我们看到 NAND 涨价从 33-38% 预期变成 100%,那可能把毛利率预测推到 73-75%+ 以上。

这是爆表级别。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2015241123896369372
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Ren_aramb Thank you! I do this for fulfillment, so I do get something out of it when I post my take on topics.
@Ren_aramb 谢谢!我做这些是为了满足感,所以当我发自己对话题的看法时,我确实能从中得到东西。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@EndicottInvests Appreciate it! I remember seeing your name pop up a lot with $NBIS.

I'm glad a lot of people found the thesis compelling with neoclouds.
@EndicottInvests 感谢!我记得经常看到你的名字和 $NBIS 一起出现。

很高兴很多人觉得 neoclouds 的 thesis 有说服力。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@adenois Wow thanks for being one of the first people to read my posts and still following along! I keep a special place in my heart for all my $RDDT friends.
@adenois 哇,谢谢你是最早读我帖子的人之一,而且还一直跟着看!我心里一直给所有 $RDDT 朋友留着特别位置。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@srikyada It’s literally cited in the post.

But this is the SK version:

“삼성전자, 1분기 낸드 가격 100% 인상…“공급이 수요 못 따라간다”

- 전자신문 (ET News)
@srikyada 帖子里明明引用了。

不过这是 SK 版本:

“Samsung Electronics Q1 NAND 价格上调 100%……‘供应跟不上需求’”

- 电子新闻(ET News)
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@damnang2 Thank you so much!

Just piggybacking off this, I’d love to every other nice comment here but there’s just way too many.

But I did read everyone’s message so far though
@damnang2 非常感谢!

顺着这条说一下,我也很想回复这里每一条友善评论,但实在太多了。

不过到目前为止每个人的留言我都读了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@sarfatti_IR Yeah this is incredible for $MU and all these price hikes break traditional modeling.

I did some calculations again and forward p/e might compress to ~8.2-8.5 of 77.2% gross margins

The valuation can’t keep up with the stock price
@sarfatti_IR 是,这对 $MU 太惊人了,所有这些涨价都会打破传统模型。

我又做了一些计算,forward P/E 可能压缩到约 8.2-8.5,毛利率 77.2%。

估值已经跟不上股价了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@TechEquityEng With this insane price hike, some napkin math calculations might bring $MU back to forward p/e ~8.9 from previous expectations.

Micron fundamentally keeps getting cheaper every day and stock price can’t keep up.
@TechEquityEng 在这种疯狂涨价下,一些粗略计算可能会把 $MU 拉回 forward P/E ~8.9,低于之前预期。

Micron 基本面每天都在变便宜,股价跟不上。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@KaramDhanoa1 Samsung spokesperson coming out was few day old news.

This is new news today that Samsung has finalized its Q1 contracts and NAND prices have increased over 100%+ and DRAM by ~70%.

The 80% blanket hike was false… because it’s actually 100%+ https://t.co/OA77tzUgIV
@KaramDhanoa1 Samsung 发言人出来是几天前的旧闻。

今天的新消息是 Samsung 已经敲定 Q1 合同,NAND 价格上涨 100%+,DRAM 上涨约 70%。

之前 80% 的统一涨价传闻是假的……因为实际是 100%+。 https://t.co/OA77tzUgIV
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@vtomar The Samsung price hike is new news that just broke out today on the 25th.

The Jan 5th was the former analyst estimates from Trendforce https://t.co/gq4p0L267n
@vtomar Samsung 涨价是今天 25 号刚爆出来的新消息。

1 月 5 日的是 Trendforce 之前的分析师估计。 https://t.co/gq4p0L267n
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DheerajNam Wow thanks for pointing out that it’s actually more than a 100%+ increase. I missed that.

These numbers just break traditional modeling estimates for companies like $MU, $SNDK, SK Hynix, and Samsung.
@DheerajNam 哇,谢谢指出实际涨幅超过 100%+。我漏看了。

这些数字会打破对 $MU$SNDK、SK Hynix 和 Samsung 这类公司的传统模型估算。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
This was just NAND prices that were raised to 100%. DRAM prices were also raised by ~10-15% above estimates.

This is a massive gross margin expansion for companies like $SNDK, Samsung, $MU, and SK Hynix.

Fwd blended gross margins for $MU might actually be 77%+ from 68%... I just did napkin modeling with NAND only with 73-75%, but if you combine the two, it's just shocking.

There were some "80% figure" leaks earlier that were dismissed as noise, but now that it's out with 100%, I'm curious how markets price this in.

But yeah those tickers seems like great exposure to the memory cycle supercycle.
这只是 NAND 价格上调到 100%。DRAM 价格也比预期高了约 10-15%。

这会让 $SNDK、Samsung、$MU 和 SK Hynix 这类公司的毛利率大幅扩张。

$MU 的 forward blended gross margins 可能真的会从 68% 到 77%+……我刚刚只按 NAND 做了 73-75% 的粗略模型,但如果把两者合并,结果非常震撼。

之前有一些“80% 数字”的泄露被当作噪音否定,但实际更夸张。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Holy crap. This just happened:

"Samsung increases NAND prices by 100%" - ETNews

Estimates were 33-38% Q/Q growth - Trendforce

This is an absolute shock.

It's called the "Memory Supercycle" for a reason with $MU, Samsung, and SK Hynix + $SNDK.

In simpler terms:

That extra 65% increase (from 35% to 100%) is pure, added high-margin profit.

If $MU guided for 68.0% gross margins Q2 2026, and we see a 100% NAND hike from 33-38% est, that could bring gross margin projections over 73-75%+.

This is a blowout.
天啊。刚刚发生了这个:

“Samsung 将 NAND 价格上调 100%” - ETNews

之前预期是环比增长 33-38% - Trendforce

这是绝对震撼。

它被叫作 “Memory Supercycle” 是有原因的,涉及 $MU、Samsung、SK Hynix + $SNDK

简单说:

额外 65% 的涨幅(从 35% 到 100%)就是纯粹新增的高利润。

如果 $MU 指引 Q2 2026 毛利率 68.0%,而 NAND 从预期 33-38% 变成上涨 100%,那可能彻底改变模型。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$MU looks like the next Nvidia.

When Nvidia was $400B (now $4.5T+), markets thought GPUs were a short-term cycle.

Same with memory today.

AI has broken that cycle.

With the same "Made in America" and White House backing like $INTC:

Don't overthink things with Micron. https://t.co/LBhbVjoKGz
$MU 看起来像下一个 Nvidia。

Nvidia 还是 $400B 的时候(现在 $4.5T+),市场以为 GPU 只是短期周期。

今天的内存也是一样。

AI 已经打破了这个周期。

再加上和 $INTC 一样的“Made in America”以及 White House 支持:

Micron 这件事别想太复杂。 https://t.co/LBhbVjoKGz
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2014278521741553793
❤️ 1,345 🔁 129 💬 62
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@jukan05 Wow. I've seen DRAM estimates be ~55% – 60% and NAND ~33–38%.

So the jump to 100% is just... unbelievable.

Memory supercycle for a reason with $MU, Samsung, and SK Hynix. This is going to be fun when markets open.
@jukan05 哇。我之前看到 DRAM 估计约 55%-60%,NAND 约 33-38%。

所以跳到 100% 简直……难以置信。

$MU、Samsung 和 SK Hynix 的 memory supercycle 名副其实。开盘会很有意思。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@PhotonCap X는 제 생각을 공유하기에 정말 매력적인 공간인 것 같아요. 덕분에 당신 같은 분들도 알게 되어 정말 좋고요! 팔로워는 그냥 제가 좋아서 하는 일들을 하다 보니 자연스럽게 따라온 것 같아요. 당신이랑 소통하고 나서 한국분들이 확 늘어난 것 같네요 ㅋㅋ
@PhotonCap 我觉得 X 真的是一个很适合分享想法的地方。也因此认识了你这样的人,我很开心!粉丝大概就是我做自己喜欢的事时自然跟来的。和你互动后,韩国朋友好像明显变多了哈哈。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
I'm genuinely amazed by X.

I started posting in September, and now I have 47,000+ followers! Thank you all so much.

I'm happy I met so many cool people here when talking stocks from $MU to $NBIS.

日本の皆様に感謝 🙇‍♂️

한국 팔로워분들께 감사

And I'm humbled people find my content interesting enough that people would spend their time and read it.

I would have done this for free anyway.

But I thought it was very cool and generous to see X rewarding people who post their thoughts. I did redirect any X monetization to locals who needed help with housing affordability.

Most of all, I believe that stocks are a positive sum game where everyone benefits long term from information discovery.

I don't paywall any research + information synthesis I do, and I get fulfillment in life when I help other people.

Just wanted to send a thank you post to everyone.
我真的被 X 震撼了。

我 9 月开始发帖,现在已经有 47,000+ 粉丝!非常感谢大家。

$MU$NBIS,聊股票时能在这里认识这么多有趣的人,我很开心。

感谢日本的大家 🙇‍♂️

感谢韩国粉丝们

也很谦卑地感谢大家觉得我的内容有意思,愿意花时间阅读。

反正我本来也会免费做这些。

但看到 X 会奖励那些愿意分享想法的人,我觉得很酷也很慷慨。
❤️ 914 🔁 7 💬 91
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Zlack00 SICC had a showcase in 2024, $COHR has its own 300mm milestone in December 2025.

$WOLF claimed to be first 300mm "single crystal" wafer. Others were claimed to be poly-crystal or low-quality substrates. So wording is nuanced. https://t.co/fH2GCc2G5c
@Zlack00 SICC 在 2024 年有 showcase,$COHR 在 2025 年 12 月有自己的 300mm 里程碑。

$WOLF 声称自己是第一片 300mm “single crystal” wafer。其他被称为 poly-crystal 或低质量 substrates。所以措辞很微妙。 https://t.co/fH2GCc2G5c
❤️ 9 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@platochi $COHR is like the Western Unimicron (in the sense they show up everywhere on future bottlenecks like SiC to InP, not comparing downstream/upstream).

When I do these supply chain mapping in space, robotics, AI, I like to invest in ones that just pop up multiple places.
@platochi $COHR 像 Western Unimicron(意思是它在 SiC 到 InP 等未来瓶颈上到处出现,不是在比较下游/上游)。

我做 space、robotics、AI 的 supply chain mapping 时,喜欢投资那些会在多个地方反复出现的公司。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@FrontRangeHQ Pretty sure $ACLS is used in SiC power devices, not SiC interposers?

They might show up in the power delivery chain though.
@FrontRangeHQ 我很确定 $ACLS 用在 SiC power devices,而不是 SiC interposers?

不过它们可能会出现在 power delivery chain 里。
❤️ 5 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
💬 引用
The potential SiC (Silicon Carbide) Interposer bottleneck stack for $NVDA Rubin and Hyperscaler ASICs (if you didn't like $WOLF):

Downstream SiC:
$TSM - SiC for CoWoS interposers
$AMKR - S-SWIFT packaging for SiC integration
$ASX- VIPack platform and optical integration.

SiC Midstream:
$KLAC - SiC defect inspection
$ONTO - Panel-level packaging + inspection
$AMAT - SiC deposition
$AEHR - SiC inspection
$ENTG - CMP
$BESI (AS) - Hybrid Bonding equipment
Disco - 70-80% marketshare precision cutting

SiC Wafers:
$WOLF - 300mm SiC wafers.
$COHR - 150mm and 200mm SiC, still developing
SK Siltron CSS (KRX: 034730) - Building to 200mm
Resonac (4004 TYSE) - SmartSiC bonding
NGK Insulators - Crystal growth
Kyocera - SiC and ceramic packaging

These are all early supply chain + active research.

So when does this timeline hit?

2025-2026 (Blackwell Ultra): Continued reliance on Silicon Interposers

2027 (Rubin / Rubin Ultra): Introduction of SiC interposers in the highest-end AI SKUs.

2028+: Glass Substrates/SiC/Diamond Interposers?

Disclosure: I own $AMKR, $AEHR, $ONTO, $COHR and $TSM above.
$NVDA Rubin 和 Hyperscaler ASICs 潜在的 SiC(Silicon Carbide)Interposer 瓶颈栈(如果你不喜欢 $WOLF):

下游 SiC:
$TSM - CoWoS interposers 用 SiC
$AMKR - SiC integration 的 S-SWIFT packaging
$ASX - VIPack platform 和 optical integration

SiC 中游:
$KLAC - SiC defect inspection
$ONTO - Panel-level packaging + inspection
$AMAT - SiC deposition
$AEHR - SiC inspection
$ENTG - CMP
$BESI (AS) - Hybrid Bonding

这条链的重点是:如果 Rubin/ASICs 转向更复杂 interposer,SiC 可能成为新的上游/中游瓶颈。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$WOLF ($464M) is the paradigm of the "Bear-Bull" Paradox.

Wolfspeed is the holy grail of AI with SiC wafers.

And this foundry just made the world’s first 300mm single-crystal SiC wafer last week.

$NVDA Rubin + architectures likely need 300mm SiC interposers and Wolfspeed is the only company in the world currently that can do it.

They're critical to US national security with $750M+ in chips act grants.

I listed this as a bottleneck but here's the catch:

This is a negative EV trap:

- $926M cash, $2.1B debt, $465m MC

Ev would be roughly ~$1.6B.

Then you have

-> Convertible Notes #1
~$331.4 Million. Convertible into New Common Stock based on an implied equity value of $1.0 Billion.

-> Renesas Convertible Notes #2
~ $204 Million. (13.6% of the total shares)

December 15, 2025, Wolfspeed filed a prospectus to register 11.3 million shares for "selling stockholders"

These are the former creditors who took equity instead of cash during the bankruptcy.

So...

Wolfspeed is central to the SiC Interposer thesis for 2027 as they're made in America and are have a massive moat.

But this just looks like a trap right unless they can get this to massive scale and overshadow any convertibles, debt, and dilution.

This is on paper the holy grail of AI moonshots since they have the world's first 300mm SiC wafer and are a monopoly in as a US company.

But financially this is a landmine.

Disclosure: I own no positions, just wanted to post my findings.
$WOLF ($464M) 是“Bear-Bull”悖论的典型。

Wolfspeed 是 SiC 晶圆这个 AI 圣杯。

而这家 foundry 上周刚做出了全球第一片 300mm 单晶 SiC 晶圆。

$NVDA Rubin + 后续架构很可能需要 300mm SiC interposers,而 Wolfspeed 是目前全球唯一能做的公司。

他们对美国国家安全至关重要,拿了 $750M+ CHIPS Act 补助。

我把它列为瓶颈,但问题在这里:

这是一个负 EV 陷阱:

- $926M 现金,$2.1B 债务,$465m MC

EV 大约是 ~$1.6B。

然后还有:

-> Convertible Notes #1
约 $331.4M。可按隐含 $1.0B 股权价值转换成 New Common Stock。

-> Renesas Convertible Notes #2
约 $204M。(总股数的 13.6%)

2025 年 12 月 15 日,Wolfspeed 提交招股书,为“selling stockholders”登记 1130 万股。

这些是破产期间选择拿股权而不是现金的前债权人。

所以...

Wolfspeed 对 2027 年 SiC Interposer 叙事很核心,因为它们是 Made in America,而且护城河巨大。

但除非它们能把规模做得非常大,压过所有可转债、债务和稀释,否则现在看起来就是个陷阱。

纸面上说,这是 AI moonshot 的圣杯,因为它们拥有全球第一片 300mm SiC 晶圆,并且作为美国公司具有垄断地位。

但财务上这是一片雷区。

披露:我没有持仓,只是想发一下我的发现。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2015152332821217305
❤️ 226 🔁 15 💬 18
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$AVAV definitely. It’s the gold standard and is already part of replicator. (So already successful alongside $KTOS)

$AIRO is for counter UAV replicator, highest potential for lowest downside risk.

I’ll do a write up on $DPRO later but it reminds me of early stage $RKLB, very speculative upside.
$AVAV 肯定是。它是 gold standard,而且已经是 replicator 的一部分。(所以和 $KTOS 一样已经成功)

$AIRO 是 counter UAV replicator,最低下行风险里潜力最高。

我之后会写 $DPRO,但它让我想到早期 $RKLB,上行非常投机。
❤️ 23 🔁 4 💬 5
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ChiefLiquidity Full port it into $SNAP so you can overlay a dancing hotdog on top of solar radiation storms
@ChiefLiquidity 全仓 $SNAP,这样你就能在太阳辐射风暴上叠一个跳舞热狗。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Citrini7 This is the peak of American Robotics while China has backflipping, kung fu, black belt robots.

Maybe it’s time we teach the delivery robots how to fight off pedestrians flipping them over. https://t.co/dJwns42aG6
@Citrini7 中国已经有会后空翻、功夫、黑带机器人,而这就是美国 Robotics 的巅峰。也许该教送货机器人反击那些把它们掀翻的行人了。 https://t.co/dJwns42aG6
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@platochi @bennybigbull $ONDS is richly priced compared to other drone companies like $AIRO (28 vs 2.5 p/s)

Standalone it’s a justified pick, is what I’m trying to say.
@platochi @bennybigbull$AIRO 这类其他 drone 公司相比,$ONDS 估值很贵(28 vs 2.5 p/s)。我想说的是,单独看它是个合理 pick。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Personally speaking, I feel like $ONDS is richly priced compared to other drone companies.

I have $AVAV, $DPRO, $KTOS, and $AIRO for drone exposure.

(Just going off the top of my head, dont take this too literally) Fwd EV/revenue multiples was ~28s+ now for Ondas. Even AVAV was 8-9 and they were in the replicator program.

Airo was for counter UAV for replicator 2.

When I bought $AIRO was trading at ~2.5 fwd p/s (probably higher now, maybe 3-4's).

Even $DPRO might even be potential 2.8 from some rev calculations.

So IMO higher upside with other drone companies.
个人来说,我觉得 $ONDS 相比其他 drone 公司估值偏贵。我有 $AVAV$DPRO$KTOS$AIRO 做 drone 敞口。凭记忆说,Ondas 的 Fwd EV/revenue multiple 现在约 28x+,即使 AVAV 也只有 8-9x,而且还在 replicator program 里。
❤️ 46 🔁 3 💬 6
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I just wanted to point out some alpha regarding buying into things down 8% for the wrong reason (eg. US drones for defense) rather than known hedges like $GLD / $SLV.

But yes, if we talked about beneficiaries, your mentions like $CRML, bc of Tanbreez and all its rare earth deposits are great!
我只是想指出一些 alpha:与其买 $GLD / $SLV 这种已知 hedge,不如买因为错误原因下跌 8% 的东西(比如美国 defense drones)。不过如果谈受益者,你提到的 $CRML 很好,因为 Tanbreez 和它的 rare earth deposits。
❤️ 12 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@solbtcethcat This is Germany markets for US equities. It's a good directional indicator but likely dumb money, with exaggerated drops given low liquidity.
@solbtcethcat 这是德国市场里的美国股票。它是不错的方向指标,但可能是 dumb money,而且低流动性会放大跌幅。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
US Futures are down due to Greenland Tariff news.

Many popular names on EU stock exchanges are now down:

$ONDS (-8.55%) or $RKLB (-7.65%).

Here's how to potentially profit off the situation:

Tier 1: Supply Chains

This is a dispute with NATO Allies. This threatens supply chains.

Many US defense systems rely on European components (optics from Germany, chips from UK/Netherlands). Greenland is a massive potential source of Rare Earth Elements (REEs).

The blockage of Greenland means the US must rely on domestic sources.

A trade war with Europe creates chaos for defense contractors and other sectors.

US Critical Material providers like $MP or bottleneck hedges like $LPTH would be a good dip buying opportunity if they drop.

Tier 2: US Direct Conflict/War

War sectors like ( $AVAV or $KTOS ) are actually extremely resilient since fundamentally, the dispute goes back to US National Security.

EU (Rheinmetall, SAAB) defense stocks are rallying, while US ( eg. $ONDS ) got sold off. US tickers are being mispriced by fearful European retail investors.

Defense stocks might drop initially during "risk-off" panic but they actually end up being the primary beneficiaries of the tension with NATO allies. (you never know with Trump).

Any large drops (if they happen) overnight or pre-market, this might be a good buying opportunity if there's an indiscriminate selloff.

Tier 3: US Semi Supply Chains/Foundry

A trade war with Europe (specifically the Netherlands/ASML and Germany/Zeiss) hurts the semiconductor supply chain immensely.

Through all this pain, the vertically integrated "Made in America" hardware companies would benefit the most.

Companies like $COHR, $AMKR, or US foundries like $INTC, $GFS might be a good dip buy if they drop.

This is more nuanced since markets think they're still risky because a lot of the "domestic" players still rely on European imports (ASML lithography, Zeiss optics) to operate.

However, this is US national security for supply chain sovereignty and this is an asymmetrical bet on US policy that they won't let these companies fail (eg. National Security Exemptions for Intel).

Probably avoid:

Falling knives on Tech/SaaS since they're considered "risk assets" and usually get sold off the most, unless it goes extreme.

_

European markets are likely panic-selling into a void, given low liquidity.

The arbitrage bots might force US overnight prices down to match the "implied prices" of European/Futures.

However, this might be the excellent opportunity if there's a gap-down on names on sectors that actually benefit from the situation.

Directionality, markets are likely going to see red.

But expect many of these -7% or -9% numbers to recover to reasonable levels like -1.5%, with some flipping positive.
US Futures 因 Greenland Tariff 新闻下跌,$ONDS$RKLB 等欧洲盘热门股也在跌。潜在机会在供应链、美国 defense/drone、rare earth/critical materials。贸易争端威胁 NATO 供应链,对 AI trade 更像噪音,但对 defense 和关键材料可能是催化。
❤️ 609 🔁 63 💬 38
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@bennybigbull I originally had two examples with $LPTH and $AXTI in depth writeups but the article got too long so I trimmed one of them.

But yes Lightpath for Germanium is one of the big bottlenecks https://t.co/1cUXeoXMbX
@bennybigbull 我原本有 $LPTH$AXTI 两个深入例子,但文章太长所以删了一个。是的,Lightpath 的 Germanium 是大瓶颈之一。 https://t.co/1cUXeoXMbX
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@train9898 $POET unfortunately is retail’s top 10 favorite stocks on WSB/X so not exactly under the radar.

But they’re one of the workarounds to inp in 1-2 years time
@train9898 不幸的是,$POET 是 WSB/X 上散户最喜欢的前 10 股票之一,所以不算 under the radar。但它们是未来 1-2 年绕开 InP 的方案之一。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@crux_capital_ Appreciate the shoutout! Hope it was slightly informative

There’s a lot of photonics related bottlenecks so I’m sure you’d be interested in that area
@crux_capital_ 感谢 shoutout!希望多少有点信息量。photonics 相关瓶颈很多,我相信你会对这个领域感兴趣。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@platochi I just thought it would be fun to shoot my shot for @nikitabier and @elonmusk $1M article challenge!

Basically 0 chance of winning.

But even without the prize, I’d do this anyway to share helpful information with others.
@platochi 我只是觉得可以试着参加 @nikitabier@elonmusk 的 $1M article challenge,会挺有趣。基本 0 胜率。但就算没有奖金,我本来也会做这些,分享有帮助的信息。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Ren_aramb Agreed, this is basically the gold rush.

But instead we’re hunting for future bottlenecks with information discovery.

Finding the right one would be discovering gold (maybe $LPKFF is the one who knows).

I’d assume most end up empty since a lot of their fundamentals are bad.
@Ren_aramb 同意,这基本就是 gold rush。只不过我们是在用信息发现寻找未来瓶颈。找到正确那个就像发现黄金。我猜大多数最后会空手而归,因为很多基本面很差。
❤️ 51 🔁 1 💬 6
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Companies like $NBIS or $CIFR are high conviction for 2026.

But it’s not the same as a small $50m niche company, suddenly being in over-demand from $NVDA or $MSFT stockpiling inventory.

You might get a 2-3x 1Y re-rating with DCs but it’s a different story than 2000%+ information discovery of a new bottleneck.

Same with known bottlenecks like $UUUU or $MP

That being said I also misspelled indium phosphide and missiles in my article so you can tell I hand wrote it (also embarrassing)
$NBIS$CIFR 是 2026 高信念标的,但这和一个 $50m 小众公司突然因 $NVDA$MSFT 囤库存而供不应求不同。DCs 可能带来 1 年 2-3x 重估,但新瓶颈的信息发现可能是 2000%+。
❤️ 58 🔁 2 💬 1
打开原推
📝 原创
https://t.co/zd8ThA4OIJ
https://t.co/zd8ThA4OIJ
❤️ 1,516 🔁 134 💬 45
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@jukan05 Am I a bad person cheering on InP related price hikes? I can’t be the only one
@jukan05 我为 InP 相关涨价欢呼,是不是坏人?我不可能是唯一一个吧。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mralexthomas RuneScape analogy was spot on. Fun read, hope you with the $1M article challenge
@mralexthomas RuneScape 类比太准确了。读起来很有趣,祝你拿下 $1M article challenge。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pennycheck Yeah LLMs are horrible with financial information and relational impacts.

I heavily use them but you start to realize how often they’re confidently wrong (especially ChatGPT) when you’re knowledgeable in a field. https://t.co/X9w6WxYXP3
@pennycheck 是,LLMs 对财务信息和关系影响很糟糕。我大量使用它们,但当你熟悉一个领域时,会发现它们经常自信地错,尤其是 ChatGPT。 https://t.co/X9w6WxYXP3
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@zephyr_z9 This is my response to potential ads on ChatGPT.

IMO Gemini is better in general and Opus is better for coding.

If ChatGPT offers nothing marginally better and serves me ads on top, I’m cancelling. https://t.co/se7MLvSQZG
@zephyr_z9 这是我对 ChatGPT 可能加广告的回应。我觉得 Gemini 整体更好,Opus 写代码更好。如果 ChatGPT 没有边际优势还塞广告,我就取消订阅。 https://t.co/se7MLvSQZG
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@jaded4595325692 A bottleneck ETF would be a great opportunity for @matthew_sigel or someone at @vaneck_us to make.

I'm sure it would get a lot of inflow from retail investors wanting to get exposure.
@jaded4595325692 Bottleneck ETF 会是 @matthew_sigel@vaneck_us 的好机会。我相信会有很多想要敞口的散户流入。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@jaded4595325692 i don't think there are any ETFs like this since half of these are very very niche small cap.

I'd be happy to write up a bottleneck ETF though that ppl can copy.
@jaded4595325692 我不觉得有这种 ETF,因为其中一半都是非常小众的小盘。但我很乐意写一个 Bottleneck ETF,大家可以照着抄。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I'm a bull that's excited about Greenland trade tensions.

US defense like $UAVS and $DPRO are likely to benefit. Same with rare earth/critical materials.

Can't say the same about the pharma bulls in $NVO, European luxury like $LVMH, or possibly big tech.

As you mentioned, I agree it's just noise to the AI trade.
我是一个因为 Greenland trade tensions 而兴奋的多头。美国 defense 如 $UAVS$DPRO 可能受益,rare earth/critical materials 也一样。但 $NVO$LVMH 或 big tech 就不一定。如你说的,对 AI trade 只是噪音。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@hrtflutter Whoops, $LEU for HALEU (High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium).

Centrus Energy is currently the only company in the U.S. with a license to enrich uranium to HALEU levels.
@hrtflutter 哎呀,是 $LEU 对应 HALEU。Centrus Energy 目前是美国唯一一家有 HALEU 级铀浓缩许可证的公司。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Trump's tariff policies are an engima to me.

Also just a heads up for people who think they should ape into $PLSR

- Nobody knows the volume of helium-3 in the reservoir

- separating helium-3 from helium-4 might be insanely expensive (nobody knows cost structure) and it might be worthless to attempt

They've actually said "no commercial technology currently exists to separate He-3 from He-4 at scale"

For example separating salt from the ocean to make purified water and selling that.

Hence why it's still $140m MC despite sitting on a potential gold mine (and if they do attempt it expect a TON of dilution).
Trump 的关税政策让我看不懂。提醒想冲 $PLSR 的人:没人知道 helium-3 储量;从 helium-4 分离 helium-3 可能极贵,成本结构未知,也可能不值得。公司也说过没有商业技术,所以别当确定性。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
They're all called bottlenecks because they're critical for their specific vertical. But helium-3 definitely is for US quantum/defense industry.

$PLSR seems quite interesting since they discovered a helium reservoir in Minnesota.

Apparently it's possible that it contains significant amounts of Helium-3 but I'm not quite sure if it's true.
它们都叫瓶颈,是因为各自在特定垂直领域关键。但 helium-3 对美国 quantum/defense industry 确实重要。$PLSR 在 Minnesota 发现 helium reservoir,可能含大量 Helium-3,但我不确定真假。
❤️ 33 🔁 4 💬 5
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I'm sure you would like $FEIM given its space exposure.

It's already up 241% this year so I'm sure markets have slowly started to realize the bottleneck

They're heavily used for Nasa, $LMT. And my guess was SpaceX's Starshield for atomic clocks and time if GPS is jammed/destroyed.

But again very niche imo.
我相信你会喜欢 $FEIM,因为它有 space 敞口。它今年已经涨 241%,市场慢慢意识到这个瓶颈。它们大量用于 NASA、$LMT,我猜 SpaceX Starshield 也可能用其 atomic clocks/timing。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$LPTH is incredible.

My thesis is most US companies will move off China germanium supply chains (especially for defense) and use Lightpath black diamond in the next 2 years (most of the catalysts).

They have a 4 year window until Korea Zinc starts ramping up in 2030.

But by that time I'd assume many vendors like Lockheed Stingers to Andruil Ghost are locked into Lightpath's material for production.
$LPTH 很厉害。我的 thesis 是未来 2 年大多数美国公司会脱离中国 germanium 供应链,尤其 defense,并转向 Lightpath black diamond。它们有 4 年窗口,直到 Korea Zinc 2030 年 ramp。
❤️ 59 🔁 4 💬 4
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@D4RW1NEXE Appreciate it! Yeah these are the more under-the-radar ones since the marketcaps are extremely small.

But by the time it hits $10B+ like $MP it's probably already priced in.

I'm sure there's a lot of alpha with many of these companies that I overlooked.
@D4RW1NEXE 感谢!这些更 under-the-radar,因为市值极小。等它像 $MP 一样到 $10B+,大概率已经被定价了。我相信这些公司里还有很多我忽略的 alpha。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$WOLF was probably the most interesting one up there after restructuring.

$LPKFF also for glass substrates and they own the laser induced deep etching at a $169m MC, so possibly most explosive 10x upside.

$MTRN is probably the most stable one up there with decently high upside given it owns the mountain for ~65% of the world's Beryllium.

There were a few others but just the fundamentals were either really bad or their bottleneck was too niche.

$LPTH's bottleneck for example spreads across both defense, AI, drones, etc.

$AXTI's bottleneck was so big and AI is such a big sector so it doesn't need to be spread across (but InP is used in a lot of other sectors too).
$WOLF 重组后可能是上面最有意思的。$LPKFF 有 glass substrates 和 laser induced deep etching,市值 $169m,可能最有爆发性 10x 上行。$MTRN 最稳,因为拥有全球约 65% Beryllium 的矿山。
❤️ 194 🔁 29 💬 7
打开原推
📝 原创
Personal TLDR research.

Western supply chain bottlenecks like $LPTH and $AXTI:

$MTRN - Beryllium (Spor Mountain)
$HALEU - Uranium | SMRs
$ESE - Space fuel tanks (through Vacco)
$GHM - Vacuum Ejectors & Surface Condensers | U.S. Navy
$FEIM - Atomic Clocks
$OPXS - Light Laser Periscopes
$TAYD - Vibration
$PKE - Heat
$VNP.TO - Western gallium
$TDY - Rad-Hard Image Sensors $RDW - Roll-Out Solar Arrays
$PDFS - Exensio Yield for Intel 18A
$WOLF - Silicon Carbide
$RELL - Ultracapacitors & Magnetrons
$CPSH - Thermal / Aluminum Silicon Carbide
$VREX - X-Ray Tubes
$GSM - Western Silicon Metal
$INTT - Extreme Thermal Cycling
$CODA - Turbidity (Murkiness)
$NTI - Corrosion $PLAB - Photomask
$MKSI - Plasma Control
$KULR - Explosive Heat
$PESI - Radioactive mixed waste.
$CVV - Gas-to-Solid Deposition.
$LPKFF - Laser Induced Deep Etching/ Glass Substrates

These are just more of the "under the radar" small caps I was researching -> ended up choosing $AXTI and $LPTH if people were interested.

Lot of them have terrible fundamentals despite being vital eg: $IQE (already pretty known), so it's not a good idea to just blindly buy a bottleneck.

There were a lot more out there I haven't finished researching (so didn't include), and it's a lot harder to pinpoint ones that haven't been priced in.

But wouldn't be surprised if a lot of these went up 5x over the next year.
个人 TLDR 研究:西方供应链瓶颈包括 $MTRN Beryllium、$HALEU Uranium/SMRs、$ESE Space fuel tanks、$GHM U.S. Navy vacuum ejectors、$FEIM Atomic Clocks、$OPXS periscopes、$TAYD vibration、$PKE heat、$VNP.TO critical materials。
❤️ 870 🔁 91 💬 49
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@tsv_mar @piersmorgan Someone clearly missed the joke. One person getting their femur fixed doesn’t make a material impact on any of these companies
@tsv_mar @piersmorgan 很明显有人没看懂笑话。一个人修股骨,对这些公司不会产生实质影响。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Skypioneer11 Not really https://t.co/VO8oETmWSb
@Skypioneer11 不太是 https://t.co/VO8oETmWSb
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Piers Morgan fractured their femur:

You might be wondering how to profit off this?

$SYK produces Gamma Nail, which is one of the most commonly used intramedullary nails for fixing femur fractures.

$ZBH also produce the Natural Nail system and various plating systems used to reconstruct shattered femurs.

These might be good longs from an uptick in revenue
Piers Morgan 股骨骨折:怎么从中获利?$SYK 生产 Gamma Nail,是修复股骨骨折常用髓内钉之一。$ZBH 也生产 Natural Nail system 和各种 plating systems。相关手术量增加时可能是多头。
❤️ 265 🔁 2 💬 40
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@beardookies $OPTX looks like an interesting mention for LEO bottlenecks

Their balance sheet looks atrocious though with $578k cash on hand and $9.5M debt.

I’ll start researching space supply chains next
@beardookies $OPTX 看起来是 LEO 瓶颈的有意思提名。不过资产负债表很糟,现金 $578k,债务 $9.5M。我接下来会研究 space supply chains。
❤️ 56 🔁 1 💬 6
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks, a lot of people see the news but majority don’t really see second-third order effects on markets or can come to actionable insights.

Often times it’s completely novel information discovery like with $AXTI and InP bottlenecks or $OSS and their usage in the US raid in Venezulea

But institutional algorithms trade off this mapping and I’m just making supply chains/relational impacts digestible for retail.
谢谢,很多人看到新闻,但大多数看不到市场二阶、三阶影响,也很难转成可行动洞察。很多时候这是全新的信息发现,比如 $AXTI/InP 或 $OSS 在 Venezuela raid 中的使用。机构算法会基于这种 mapping 交易。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@SukhTatla Bitcoin markets are a pretty good proxy, there’s almost no price drops.

I don’t think markets seem to care much about tariffs anymore since this is a daily occurrence.

US economic growth is an absolute powerhouse, so i personally would just stay long and ignore the noise
@SukhTatla Bitcoin 市场是很好的 proxy,几乎没有价格下跌。我觉得市场已经不太在乎关税了,因为每天都在发生。美国经济增长很强,所以我个人会继续做多、忽略噪音。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I'm just here to point out critical bottlenecks and the players that sit inside them.

Unfortunately, I have no idea what goes on in the minds of people at DoD.

I don't think they actively care or manage what valuations markets price $LPTH at since they're not a hedge fund. Lightpath does have a $90M backlog, so they are taking in longer term orders.
我只是指出 critical bottlenecks 和里面的玩家。不幸的是,我不知道 DoD 在想什么。我不认为他们会管理市场给 $LPTH 什么估值,因为他们不是 hedge fund。Lightpath 有 $90M backlog,说明在接长期订单。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$LPTH isn't just important.

Lighpath is a critical point of failure for the US Dpt of War.

"Germanium" is the AI's InP for Lockheed Stinger Missiles and Anduril Ghost / $ONDS Drones.

Germanium's price tripled (~$4,150/kg+ in 2025/26).

There is a demand shock since US has 0:

The US has zero (Yes Korea Zinc in TN, but not until 2030).

US mines germanium ore (Red Dog mine in Alaska), but we do not have the industrial capacity to refine it into metal at scale.

60-70% of refined Germanium comes from China and the rest elsewhere like Canada (Teck), Belgium (Umicore), and Russia (also banned).

And China banned exports to US military programs.

There is effectively no new domestic capacity coming online between now (Jan 2026) and 2029/2030.

The Demand Shock:

At the exact moment supply was cut, demand exploded from three sectors:

- AI Data Centers: Germanium is essential for high-speed fiber optic cables.

- Space: It is the primary material for satellite solar cells (Starlink, etc.).

- Defense (The Big One): Every thermal Andruil drone, night vision goggle, and missile seeker head traditionally uses a Germanium lens.

$LPTH Is existentially critical to the Pentagon + US National Security right now. You might think other companies can just make "germanium-free" glass, but it's hard.

The specific material Lightpath uses called Black Diamond, was invented by the US Naval Research Lab. Lightpath holds the exclusive license to commercialize BLack Diamond.

If Lockheed or Raytheon wants to build a missile seeker that uses this specific, military-grade germanium replacement, they legally have to buy it from Lightpath.

There is no second source.

$LPTH is the Sole Source supplier of many advanced weapons.

Example 1) Allies are stockpiling Short Range Interceptor, eg. Stinger Missiles. Allies need to build thousands more now, but we can't get the Chinese germanium to build the seekers.

Lightpath is the "sole source" supplier for the optical assembly for companies like Lockheed.

Example 2) Drone companies build "Blue UAS" (government-approved drones). To stay off the blacklist, they must remove Chinese parts.

Companies like $ONDS or $UMAC have likely sole-sourced their thermal camera supply to Lightpath to not use Chinese supply chains in their drone components.

2026 (Now): China bans exports. US stockpiles are critically low.

2030 (Earliest): The new "Super Smelter" in Tennessee (Korea Zinc deal) comes online to refine germanium domestically.

The Gap: For the next 4 years, the US has no domestic metal.

This situation seems absurd, but since the US closed most of its Zinc smelters, so we accidentally closed our Germanium supply with them. And for 30 years, it was cheaper to ship the ore to China/Canada than to deal with EPA regulations to refine it here.

The US military is currently in a position where it has the raw ore in Alaska but has to ask Canada or wait for a Korean company (in 2030) to turn it into a missile seeker.

People think $LPTH some cheap penny stock. But it's actually central to US national security now.

Lightpath it's the main way around the Germanium chokepoint for Western countries at a small $670M MC.
$LPTH 不只是重要。Lightpath 是美国 Dpt of War 的关键单点故障。Germanium 就像 Lockheed Stinger Missiles 和 Anduril Ghost/$ONDS Drones 的 AI InP。美国几乎没有供应,中国管制让链条脆弱,black diamond 是少数替代方案。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I've initiated positions in $LPTH ($621M).

Lightpath is incredible.

Every modern thermal weapon (Missiles, Drones) requires Germanium glass, which China owns (70%)

LPTH is the only US alternative with: Black Diamond

Users?

- $ONDS
- L3Harris
- Lockheed
- Andruil (likely)
- $UMAC
- RTX/Raytheon or Northrop Grumman for the most recent $18.2M contract.

Ondas: Iron Drone Raider(counter-UAS interceptor drone) and Optimus uses LPTH for Thermal Camera Cores.

L3Harris SPEIR uses Lightpath for Infrared Camera Assemblies on Arleigh Burke-class Destroyers.

Lockheed Martin Stinger Missles and M-SHORAD uses Lightpath for Missile Seeker Optics.

Anduril likely uses Lightpath for The Ghost (Autonomous Drone) for Uncooled LWIR (Long Wave Infrared) Cameras.

Unusual Machines uses Lightpath for Attack Drones (Molded Thermal Lenses).

RTX or Northrop (one of them) uses Lightpath for Advanced Tactical Pods or Next-Gen Missile Seekers suing Infrared Camera Systems.

This literally is the only Western alternative required for modern weaponry and drones.

Lightpath now has an amazing balance sheet:

~$75–80 million in cash (with -$5M debt)
-FY 2025 $37.2 Million. FY 2026 est. ~$61.6 Million
- FY 2025 Gross 27.2%, FY 2026 35-40% by year-end.
- FY 2025 Backlog ~$40 Million. FY 2026 Backlog $90+ Million.

They are sold out. Expanding margins. And majority of the top US defence contractors now use Lightpath as a Western alternative to China's supply chain of Germanium glass.

Absolutely incredible company, I don't say this very often.

So I personally went long on Lightpath as military contractors will rely on them in the future for advanced weapons.
我已经建仓 $LPTH ($621M)。

Lightpath 太强了。

每一种现代热成像武器(导弹、无人机)都需要 Germanium glass,而中国掌控了 70%。

LPTH 是唯一的美国替代方案,靠的是:Black Diamond

用户是谁?

- $ONDS
- L3Harris
- Lockheed
- Andruil(很可能)
- $UMAC
- RTX/Raytheon 或 Northrop Grumman,来自最近的 $18.2M 合同。

Ondas:Iron Drone Raider(counter-UAS interceptor drone)和 Optimus 用 LPTH 做 Thermal Camera Cores。

L3Harris SPEIR 在 Arleigh Burke-class Destroyers 上用 Lightpath 的 Infrared Camera Assemblies。

Lockheed Martin Stinger Missles 和 M-SHORAD 用 Lightpath 的 Missile Seeker Optics。

Anduril 很可能在 The Ghost(Autonomous Drone)上用 Lightpath,做 Uncooled LWIR(Long Wave Infrared)Cameras。

Unusual Machines 用 Lightpath 做 Attack Drones(Molded Thermal Lenses)。

RTX 或 Northrop(其中一家)用 Lightpath 做 Advanced Tactical Pods 或 Next-Gen Missile Seekers,使用 Infrared Camera Systems。

这真的是现代武器和无人机所必需的唯一西方替代方案。

Lightpath 现在资产负债表非常好:

约 $75–80M 现金(债务 -$5M)
- FY 2025 $37.2M。FY 2026 预计约 $61.6M
- FY 2025 毛利率 27.2%,FY 2026 年底 35-40%。
- FY 2025 backlog 约 $40M。FY 2026 backlog $90M+。

他们已经卖光了。利润率在扩张。美国顶级国防承包商中的大多数,现在都用 Lightpath 作为中国 Germanium glass 供应链的西方替代品。

真的是非常了不起的公司,我不常这么说。

所以我个人做多了 Lightpath,因为未来军事承包商会在先进武器上依赖他们。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2011496801548058735
❤️ 565 🔁 63 💬 29
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RKLBMan Elon is trying to hit $1T by any means necessary!

I’d be interested in seeing it happen, the guy is the modern Edison of our generation
@RKLBMan Elon 为了冲到 $1T 真是什么办法都用!我有兴趣看到这发生,他是我们这一代的现代 Edison。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@amitisinvesting That would be one very interesting timeline. I’m sure all the $TSLA holders are secretly hoping that happens
@amitisinvesting 那会是非常有意思的时间线。我相信所有 $TSLA 持有人都在偷偷希望它发生。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_stockResearch @amitisinvesting Markets would have priced $OSS in with or without me eventually.

I just happened to do a bit of digging into contracts and discovered some combat validation from public information synthesis before others did.
@_stockResearch @amitisinvesting 市场迟早会把 $OSS 定价进去,不管有没有我。我只是挖了一点合同,通过公开信息综合,比别人更早发现了一些 combat validation。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks for sharing, $OSS is used across many US military deployments already with usage validation in Venezuela.

Markets largely ignored this one earlier because of blended margins (thought to be a commodity reseller). And not putting the pieces together from their earlier contracts.

After selling off some segments, $OSS now starts to like a specialized, high margin, ruggedized hardware provider for AI and edge military deployments.

That being said smaller caps do carry risk but I do expect this to be re-rated given the tailwinds from the proposed $1.5T department of war spend.
感谢分享,$OSS 已用于很多美国军事部署,并在 Venezuela 有使用验证。市场早前因为 blended margins 忽略了它,也没拼上早期合同。卖掉部分业务后,$OSS 更像 specialized defense/edge compute 公司。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Glad $OSS caught your attention, it’s silently used across US deployments like in the thesis above, and more well known ones like modern Abrams and Booker tanks US army land vehicles.

Margins are much higher than people think because originally markets were modeling blended margins.

Demand is high/sticky so looked like a great long to me.
很高兴 $OSS 引起你注意。它静静用于美国部署,也在 modern Abrams 和 Booker tanks 等地面车辆中出现。利润率比市场想的高,因为之前按 blended margins 建模。需求高且粘性强,所以我觉得是好多头。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Rod2ZEROnBACK https://t.co/Dw5nJZfVTg
@Rod2ZEROnBACK https://t.co/Dw5nJZfVTg
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy I DO DO MY HOMEWORK THANK YOU
@pepemoonboy 我当然有做功课,谢谢。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@1000UMAX Bro it’s down a total of 6 cents
@1000UMAX 兄弟,它总共只跌了 6 美分。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@1000UMAX Are we even looking at the same stock for $VLN? https://t.co/ZTcFDOUQMP
@1000UMAX 我们看的真的是同一只 $VLN 吗? https://t.co/ZTcFDOUQMP
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Cheva28789724 You give me too much credit. I just post new information, all of you made the final calls yourself
@Cheva28789724 你太高估我了。我只是发布新信息,最后决定都是你们自己做的。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@SharesGem $AXTI literally swings 50% every day. Could be $35 tomorrow or $12.5
@SharesGem $AXTI 字面意义上每天波动 50%。明天可能 $35,也可能 $12.5。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Why are all my picks up like 60% this week $OSS https://t.co/VDO58928xd
为什么我所有 picks 这周都涨了大概 60% $OSS https://t.co/VDO58928xd
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I've initiated a position in $OSS.

I usually never say this but, this one is exciting.

Markets completely missed this 155M MC Drone Swarm, Ghost Fleet, USVs, Edge AI deploying US DoD contractor.

And they especially missed OSS’s involvement in the Venezuela's invasion, that gave premiums to $AVAV and others.

This looks like an unholy long to me:

1. $41M cash (pro forma ets.) / $155M MC (low downside risk).
2. Pure play Kinetic Defense
3. 1 : 2.4x supply/demand. (backlogged from high demand)
4. 45% gross margins.

The main interest was Venezuela as proof they're actively being used in the US military:

$OSS P-8 Poseidon in Venezuela:

- Flight tracking data confirmed that P-8A Poseidon aircraft from Patrol Squadron 40 (VP-40) were off the coast of Venezuela during the raid to monitor Venezuelan naval movements.

OSS Link: On July 1 2025, OSS announced a $5M urgent order specifically to deliver "61 Rugged Data Units" for the P-8A Poseidon.

SOCOM "Capture Team":

- The raid to capture leadership was executed by US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), specifically using maritime insertion teams (likely SEALs/SWCC) and the 160th SOAR (helicopters).

OSS Link: On May 29, 2025, OSS signed a (CRADA) directly with USSOCOM to build edge computers for Maritime Environments. OSS built the battle-tracking servers for the stealth boats used to slip into the Venezuelan coast.

"Ghost Fleet" Blockade:

- "Operation Southern Spear" is currently using unmanned surface vessels (drone boats) to block oil tankers.

OSS Link: The Navy's "Task Force 59" (and the newer 4th Fleet equivalent) uses the $OSS Rigel Edge Supercomputer for these drones because it is one of the few AI servers small enough to fit on a 40-foot robot boat.

This is literally combat validation in Venezuela. Of a small $155M stock.

Before everyone treated this company as a commodity like $SMCI (myself included), but I completely missed that their defense vertical (which is pure-play now after the Bressner sale) has 45.6% gross margins.

Only after I looked into it again after did I realize their other division was completely messing up margin calculations because of blended margins (from just re-selling defense gear).

So now we have a:

~45% margins, AI military contractor valued at $155M business with $41m cash, with demand outstripping supply 2.4 to 1.

I did an analysis later last year, which looked like $OSS was a supplier for Andruil or $PLTR, and was beginning their ramp up.

Looking at it again post-sale, the 45% margin puts them into extremely stellar territory (compared to eg. Lockheed Martin, 12-14%) or commodity sellers (eg. $SMCI, $DELL 8-14%)

This is a specialized war-validated defense AI pure-play for drone swarms, ghost fleets, USVs, and others, with extremely high margins, at $155M MC.

I've found this to be an exciting re-discovery, so I've taken a position.
我已经建仓 $OSS

我通常从不这么说,但这个很让人兴奋。

市场完全错过了这家 $155M MC 的 Drone Swarm、Ghost Fleet、USVs、Edge AI 美国 DoD 承包商。

尤其错过了 OSS 参与 Venezuela 入侵这件事,而这件事给了 $AVAV 和其他公司溢价。

在我看来这是个很邪门的多头:

1. $41M 现金(pro forma 估计)/ $155M MC(下行风险低)。
2. Pure play Kinetic Defense
3. 1 : 2.4x 供需比。(高需求导致 backlog)
4. 45% 毛利率。

主要兴趣点是 Venezuela,因为它证明他们正在被美国军方实际使用:

$OSS P-8 Poseidon in Venezuela:

- 飞行追踪数据确认,Patrol Squadron 40 (VP-40) 的 P-8A Poseidon 飞机在突袭期间位于 Venezuela 海岸外,监控美内瑞拉海军动向。

OSS 关联:2025 年 7 月 1 日,OSS 宣布一笔 $5M 紧急订单,专门为 P-8A Poseidon 交付“61 Rugged Data Units”。

SOCOM “Capture Team”:

- 抓捕领导层的突袭由 US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) 执行,具体使用海上渗透小队(很可能是 SEALs/SWCC)和 160th SOAR(直升机)。

OSS 关联:2025 年 5 月 29 日,OSS 与 USSOCOM 直接签署 (CRADA),为 Maritime Environments 建造 edge computers。OSS 为悄悄进入 Venezuela 海岸的隐形船只建造 battle-tracking servers。

“Ghost Fleet” Blockade:

- “Operation Southern Spear” 目前正在用 unmanned surface vessels(无人艇)封锁油轮。

OSS 关联:海军的“Task Force 59”(以及更新的 4th Fleet 对应项目)使用 $OSS Rigel Edge Supercomputer 来驱动这些无人艇,因为它是少数小到能装进 40-foot robot boat 的 AI servers 之一。

这真的是在 Venezuela 得到战斗验证。一只小小的 $155M 股票。

以前所有人都把这家公司当成 $SMCI 那样的商品化公司(包括我自己),但我完全错过了他们的防务垂直业务(Bressner 出售后现在是 pure-play)有 45.6% 毛利率。

后来我重新看,才意识到他们另一个部门因为混合毛利率,完全扭曲了利润率计算(只是转售防务设备)。

所以现在我们有一家:

约 45% 毛利率、估值 $155M、现金 $41m、供不应求 2.4 比 1 的 AI 军工承包商。

我去年晚些时候做过分析,看起来 $OSS 是 Andruil 或 $PLTR 的供应商,并且正在开始放量。

出售业务后再看,45% 毛利率让它进入极其优秀的区间(相比 Lockheed Martin 约 12-14%,或商品化卖家如 $SMCI$DELL 的 8-14%)。

这是一家经过战争验证的专业防务 AI pure-play,覆盖 drone swarms、ghost fleets、USVs 等,毛利率极高,MC 只有 $155M。

我觉得这是一次很令人兴奋的重新发现,所以建了仓。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2008910857003221451
❤️ 413 🔁 5 💬 54
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Jayden11129225 Hearing stuff like this makes me really glad!

Appreciate the kind words :)
@Jayden11129225 听到这种话让我真的很开心!感谢你的友善话语 :)
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@yianisz Great write up on $VLN. Most institutions modeled this wrong but valuebase got it right.

We’ll likely see this come in fruition in the upcoming weeks
@yianisz 关于 $VLN 的 write up 很棒。大多数机构把这个建模错了,但 valuebase 看对了。未来几周我们大概率会看到它兑现。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@toninojiv @trodoszalay I see just that as a buying opportunity since I care more about $VLN fundamentals than illiquid premarket prices
@toninojiv @trodoszalay 我把这视为买入机会,因为相比低流动性的盘前价格,我更在乎 $VLN 基本面。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_stockResearch Thanks, I'd like to take credit as one of the first ones to publicly post the thesis around $AXTI.

This is just institutional validation regarding very conservative PTs, but my main thesis is around the InP bottleneck and massive supply shortage that happens in 2-3 months.
@_stockResearch 谢谢,我愿意把自己算作最早公开发布 $AXTI thesis 的人之一。这只是机构对保守 PT 的验证,我的主要 thesis 是 InP bottleneck 和 2-3 个月后的大规模供应短缺。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_stockResearch Thanks, I'd like to take credit as one of the first ones to publicly post the thesis around $AXTI.

This is just validation at start, but my main thesis is around the InP bottleneck and massive supply shortage that happens in 2-3 months.
@_stockResearch 谢谢,我愿意把自己算作最早公开发布 $AXTI thesis 的人之一。这只是起点验证,我的主要 thesis 是 InP bottleneck 和 2-3 个月后的大规模供应短缺。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yep, same as $VLN. The most money to be made is when you discover things others don't.

I feel like everyone complains about "Why didn't you tell me about this stock before it went up 400%" as people pile on at the top like $MU.

Then complain when I post about stuff like $AIRO, $AXTI, $OSS, or $VLN at the start and they go up 50%+ the next week.

Retail thinks $AXTI is some random pump and dump stock, but now you have institutional validation after a 100%+ move.

Again, alpha is when you discover things majority of markets miss. You miss out by the time you wait for institutions to tell you to buy.
是的,和 $VLN 一样。最赚钱的时候,是你发现了别人没发现的东西。大家总抱怨为什么没在涨 400% 前说,但我一开始发 $AIRO$AXTI$OSS$VLN,下一周涨 50%+ 时,他们也抱怨。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Just in: Craig-Hallum re-rates $AXTI to "Buy" with a $26 price target, a 160% increase.

They stated AXT benefits from a "trifecta of dynamics" that put:

- constraints on competitors (Sumitomo, JX)
- while increasing capacity after Northland's Capital raise.

Shannon, ranked as the #1 Semiconductor Analyst on WSJ, pegs AXT at $0.75 EPS by 2028, applying a 30x multiple by assuming AXT is a "normal" growth company.

Critical defense/AI supply chains (like Heico or specialized chip firms) can easily trade at 50x-60x, which would set $AXTI at a $37.50 PT (for a growth company).

However, if the "Supply Shock" thesis holds and $AXT becomes a strategic monopoly, the math completely breaks like $MU or Sandisk, and we might see a massive re-rating upward.

This is a "Step-Ladder" valuation, analysts typically walk the target up. If $AXTI goes to $28 next week, he will likely issue a new note raising it to $32.

Institutions are validating the thesis, but are trailing both the price and alpha on X.
刚刚:Craig-Hallum 将 $AXTI 重评为 Buy,目标价 $26,上行 160%。他们说 AXT 受益于三重动态:限制 Sumitomo/JX 等竞争对手,同时 Northland 融资后增加产能。机构开始承认 thesis,但核心仍是 InP 瓶颈。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Markets are witnessing a supply shock happen real time with InP.

Here's the timeline this week:

Fastmarket Research, 2025:

US-based $AXTI and Japan's Sumitomo control nearly 80% of the InP market.

China Commerce Ministry - Jan 6 2026: China announces new export restrictions on "dual-use" items to Japan.

Jiji via Nippon - Jan 9, 2026:

Chinese suppliers have started informing Japanese clients: "We can no longer export Rare Metals (Japanese group of 31 minerals like Gallium, Indium, Germanium) to Japan."

Liu Junhong CGTN - Jan 10th, 2026:

"When it comes to strategic materials... Japan's dependence on China is relatively high"

SMM - Jan 12th, 2026:

7N Indium hits record high on SMM at 812.45 ~ 901.04 USD/KG.

Commentary:

$AXTI recently dropped on facing export control issues on pre-earnings this week.

However, this is widely misinterpreted, since this a double edged sword that benefits AXT.

Recent export issues cements AXT's control over the InP substrate market in the medium term from short-term revenue loss (from the inability to export to Japan).

Export control bans hurt their main Japanese competitors in Sumitomo and JX are impacted the most, as they may face a ceiling in from material shortages.

If Sumitomo runs out of feedstock in a few months, Western AI customers (Nvidia, Broadcom, Lumentum, etc.) will have zero alternative but to buy from AXTI, regardless of the price or permit delays.

We're already seeing feedstock prices explode real-time as companies scramble for long term inventory.

AXTI may become the main source for InP wafers at scale and markets are watching this bottleneck unfold real-time.
市场正在实时见证 InP 发生供应冲击。

这是本周时间线:

Fastmarket Research,2025:

美国的 $AXTI 和日本 Sumitomo 控制了近 80% 的 InP 市场。

中国商务部 - 2026 年 1 月 6 日:中国宣布对日本实施新的“双用途”物项出口限制。

Jiji via Nippon - 2026 年 1 月 9 日:

中国供应商已经开始通知日本客户:“我们无法再向日本出口 Rare Metals(日本定义的 31 种矿物,比如 Gallium、Indium、Germanium)。”

Liu Junhong CGTN - 2026 年 1 月 10 日:

“说到战略材料……日本对中国的依赖相对较高”

SMM - 2026 年 1 月 12 日:

7N Indium 在 SMM 创历史新高,达到 812.45 ~ 901.04 USD/KG。

评论:

$AXTI 最近因为本周财报前面对出口管制问题而下跌。

但这被广泛误读了,因为这是把双刃剑,实际上利好 AXT。

最近的出口问题巩固了 AXT 对 InP substrate 市场的中期控制,尽管短期收入会受损(因为无法出口到日本)。

出口管制禁令伤害最大的是它们的主要日本竞争对手 Sumitomo 和 JX,因为它们可能会因为材料短缺遇到上限。

如果 Sumitomo 几个月后用完 feedstock,西方 AI 客户(Nvidia、Broadcom、Lumentum 等)除了 AXTI 没有其他选择,不管价格或许可延迟如何都得买。

我们已经看到 feedstock 价格实时爆炸,因为公司都在抢长期库存。

AXTI 可能成为大规模 InP wafers 的主要来源,市场正在实时观察这个瓶颈展开。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2010651116699029710
❤️ 244 🔁 16 💬 15
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_gautam94 @KawzInvests Just a heads up $ULBI has -50.3M in debt, -84.8M total accrued expenses, with $9.3M left.

They're also commodity status as 22% gross margin.

That's the reason for low P/S number, there is likely heavy dilution ahead. I'd likely stay away
@_gautam94 @KawzInvests 提醒,$ULBI 有 -50.3M 债务、-84.8M accrued expenses,只剩 $9.3M。它也是 commodity status,毛利率 22%。这就是 P/S 低的原因,后面可能严重稀释,我会避开。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$AXTI is the main beneficiary of China's export controls on Japan as a double edged sword from short term revenue hit but medium-longer term control over supply chains.

As you mentioned the likely Japanese supply chain shock threw IQE a lifeline, since the smaller player became one of the only "safe" Western epi-foundry. And they likely got record demand as mentioned from their earnings because hyperscalers are fighting to secure any non-Chinese capacity.

However, funny thing is they still buy the InP substrates from $AXTI to grow the crystals on top (AXT listes IQE as one of the main overseas customers for InP substrates), so bottleneck doesn't exactly change.
$AXTI 是中国对日本出口管制的主要受益者。短期可能有收入冲击,但中长期能加强供应链控制。日本供应链冲击也可能给 IQE 一条救命绳,因为小玩家会变成少数安全的西方 epi-foundry。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@FinancialOSINT Do you have a fun time spreading disinformation with botted likes? https://t.co/oqoUrRje3Q
@FinancialOSINT 你靠机器人点赞传播虚假信息,玩得开心吗? https://t.co/oqoUrRje3Q
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Skypioneer11 I think you're confusing me with @zephyr_z9, I've always liked $AXTI
@Skypioneer11 我觉得你把我和 @zephyr_z9 搞混了,我一直喜欢 $AXTI
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
LLMs are terrible at analyzing second-third order effects.

Basically it stems from supply chain shock after China's export controls on Japan.

Sumitomo -> $LITE -> $GOOGL (but now Sumitomo might face shortages, so less material supply for Lite -> less revenue).

But this would be offset if optical component makers decided to ramp up prices like HBM.
LLMs 非常不擅长分析二阶、三阶影响。中国对日本出口管制导致供应链冲击:Sumitomo -> $LITE -> $GOOGL。Sumitomo 可能短缺,Lite 材料供应减少、收入减少;但如果 optical makers 涨价,影响可能被抵消。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Markets are witnessing a supply shock happen real time with InP.

Here's the timeline this week:

Fastmarket Research, 2025:

US-based $AXTI and Japan's Sumitomo control nearly 80% of the InP market.

China Commerce Ministry - Jan 6 2026: China announces new export restrictions on "dual-use" items to Japan.

Jiji via Nippon - Jan 9, 2026:

Chinese suppliers have started informing Japanese clients: "We can no longer export Rare Metals (Japanese group of 31 minerals like Gallium, Indium, Germanium) to Japan."

Liu Junhong CGTN - Jan 10th, 2026:

"When it comes to strategic materials... Japan's dependence on China is relatively high"

SMM - Jan 12th, 2026:

7N Indium hits record high on SMM at 812.45 ~ 901.04 USD/KG.

Commentary:

$AXTI recently dropped on facing export control issues on pre-earnings this week.

However, this is widely misinterpreted, since this a double edged sword that benefits AXT.

Recent export issues cements AXT's control over the InP substrate market in the medium term from short-term revenue loss (from the inability to export to Japan).

Export control bans hurt their main Japanese competitors in Sumitomo and JX are impacted the most, as they may face a ceiling in from material shortages.

If Sumitomo runs out of feedstock in a few months, Western AI customers (Nvidia, Broadcom, Lumentum, etc.) will have zero alternative but to buy from AXTI, regardless of the price or permit delays.

We're already seeing feedstock prices explode real-time as companies scramble for long term inventory.

AXTI may become the main source for InP wafers at scale and markets are watching this bottleneck unfold real-time.
市场正在实时见证 InP 供应冲击。Fastmarket 称 $AXTI 和 Sumitomo 控制近 80% InP 市场;中国 1 月 6 日限制对日本 dual-use 出口;日本供应不确定性上升。$AXTI 既是 substrate 供应商又控制 feedstock,成为关键受益者。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
You're watching the InP "bottleneck" play out real time while hyperscalers scramble for material.

7-N Indium (required for photonics) is now parabolically exploding on SMM, reaching daily ATHs in 2026.

This is a live "Game Theory" scenario for materials controlled by $AXTI. https://t.co/3YDMVfjGTx
你正在实时看到 InP “瓶颈”上演,而 hyperscalers 正在抢材料。

7-N Indium(光子所必需)现在在 SMM 上抛物线式暴涨,2026 年每天都在创 ATH。

这是一个由 $AXTI 控制材料的实时“Game Theory”场景。 https://t.co/3YDMVfjGTx
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2009321878071201826
❤️ 193 🔁 17 💬 11
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@PolarizingLit @Sher_Lockknows I’m not that scary lol
@PolarizingLit @Sher_Lockknows 我没那么吓人 lol
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Come to your own conclusion on $VLN!

I personally bought because I thought it shouldn’t trade close to 1:1 with assets/MC.

And even after Friday it’s close to 2 EV/revenue while others trade 14-18, given its gross margins are close to 70% (blended margins messes up calculations)

So that’s just my own personal thesis, it’s not for everyone
自己对 $VLN 下结论吧!我买入是因为它不该接近资产/市值 1:1 交易。即使周五后也接近 2 EV/revenue,其他公司是 14-18;它毛利率接近 70%,blended margins 会搞乱计算。这只是我个人 thesis。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@SayNoToTrading Yeah I’ve been cost averaging up on $AVAV! My $AIRO positions have been doing great as well.

I’ve got all the grounds covered:

$AIRO interceptor drones to counter drone strikes (bullet interceptor)

$AVAV does the drone striking

Both are super cool
@SayNoToTrading 是,我一直在向上摊高 $AVAV 成本!$AIRO 也很好。我覆盖了所有方向:$AIRO interceptor drones 反制 drone strikes;$AVAV 负责 drone striking。两个都很酷。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Nice thesis on $VLN! Similar thoughts where you have an extremely high margin fabless semi trading (with t1 customers) trading close to a ridiculous 2 ev/revenue.

Don’t think people quite understand that you don’t have companies trading close to 1:1 marketcap, cash/assets if they have no debt, $80m fwd revenue off 63% gross margins, 69.1% on their robotics/industrial vertical (75%+ of revenue growing 40% y/y).

People are just citing “insider sales” or “Israeli company” as bear cases without looking at the financials.

This is a crazy valuation
$VLN thesis 很不错!一家高毛利 fabless semi,有 T1 客户,却接近 2 EV/revenue。大家没理解:无债务、$80m forward revenue、63% 毛利率,部分业务 69.1% 毛利率,不该接近 1:1 marketcap/cash/assets 交易。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@10009nyny @RJCcapital Someone missed the joke
@10009nyny @RJCcapital 有人没看懂笑话。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RJCcapital Already own $KTOS, up close to 300%.

I’m a whale after playing God of War on PlayStation https://t.co/IFJKe9j5xM
@RJCcapital 已经持有 $KTOS,接近 +300%。我玩了 PlayStation 上的 God of War 后就是鲸鱼了。 https://t.co/IFJKe9j5xM
❤️ 30 🔁 1 💬 4
打开原推
💬 引用
I’m omega long on $AVAV.

This is probably the coolest company in the “Venezuela Invasion port”

If you want a TLDR pitch: they made the Kamikaze drones primarily used in Venezuela.

-> US invasion of Greenland? Profit
-> US drone striking Mexican Cartels? Profit

$4b backlog, $887m contract recently, 150% y/y revenue growth (which is unholy for a military contractor), and a lot more coming from the $1.5T Department of War funding.

If you want a 5 kill streak Call of Duty style Drone Strike company used in every military engagement by the Department of War, $AVAV is long.
我对 $AVAV 极度做多。这可能是 “Venezuela Invasion port” 里最酷的公司。TLDR:它们制造了 Venezuela 主要使用的 Kamikaze drones。美国入侵 Greenland?赚钱。美国 drone 打击 Mexican Cartels?赚钱。$4b backlog,最近 $887m 合同,收入同比 150%。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
And... We're off to the races.

"Nation Building Port" Performance Today:

$GDRZF +95.83%
$AVAV +14.7%
$CVX +5.19%
$ASHM +5.2%
$HII +3.82%
$TRGP -3.14%

I'm surprised Gold Reserve $GDRZF is only up 95%, given they're still a $333m MC with ~$8.1B in claims.

Another surprise is that Chevron $CVX is only up 5% on the news that they basically own Venezuela's at this point as the last man standing.

$AVAV performed better than expected, $HII performed on-par. $TRGP was a surprise on the drop.

We'll see how this does later, as this probably takes some time to price in (and not everyone knows about these names).
然后……正式起跑了。

“Nation Building Port” 今天表现:

$GDRZF +95.83%
$AVAV +14.7%
$CVX +5.19%
$ASHM +5.2%
$HII +3.82%
$TRGP -3.14%

我很惊讶 Gold Reserve $GDRZF 只涨了 95%,毕竟它仍然只有 $333m MC,却有约 $8.1B 索赔。

另一个惊讶是 Chevron $CVX 在这个消息下只涨了 5%,因为它基本上已经是最后留下的人,等于拥有了 Venezuela 的资产。

$AVAV 表现好于预期,$HII 表现符合预期。$TRGP 下跌有点意外。

后面看看会怎么走,因为这可能需要一些时间来定价(而且不是所有人都知道这些名字)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2008235337643086305
❤️ 308 🔁 14 💬 30
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@FundWtd I like $OSS too but it’s a terrible risk management strategy to go all in on a smaller company
@FundWtd 我也喜欢 $OSS,但全仓一个更小的公司是很糟糕的风险管理策略。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 You’re a genius it all makes sense now
@soulbiri1 你是天才,现在一切都说得通了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@LongInnovation $TGT has a P/E of 12, which is fair value for a frying pan reseller. The main difference is some $WMT stores have Taco Bell inside.
@LongInnovation $TGT 的 P/E 是 12,对一家 frying pan reseller 来说是合理价值。主要区别是有些 $WMT 店里有 Taco Bell。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RickyFrogFrog yeah.. everyone still needs toilet paper.

That being said, don't think reselling tissue paper commands the same growth as $MRVL (29 p/e), which are doubling their revenues in 2 years.
@RickyFrogFrog 是啊,大家还是需要 toilet paper。但我不觉得倒卖纸巾能有 $MRVL(29 p/e)那种增长,后者 2 年收入翻倍。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@SatrialesSnacks They literally resell cheap socks.

It's not logical that $NVDA, the center of the entire AI boom, has about the same P/E as a fishing rod reseller.
@SatrialesSnacks 它们字面意义上就是倒卖便宜袜子。$NVDA 是整个 AI boom 的中心,P/E 却和一家 fishing rod reseller 差不多,这不合理。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@WenqingLi9 True, Walmart does resell a lot of Nvidia GPUs.

Maybe the market is pricing in new alpha that Walmart, an underwear reseller that is growing in line with inflation, is gonna match $NBIS and $IREN 700% Y/Y growth for DCs.
@WenqingLi9 确实,Walmart 倒卖很多 Nvidia GPUs。也许市场在定价新的 alpha:一家跟通胀同步增长的 underwear reseller 会追上 $NBIS$IREN 的 DCs 700% Y/Y 增长。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@wilson_eth True, markets need to add $WMT to the Mag 7 since this microwave reseller is growing on par with $NVDA apparently.
@wilson_eth 确实,市场应该把 $WMT 加进 Mag 7,因为这家 microwave reseller 看起来增长和 $NVDA 差不多。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Can anyone tell me why Walmart has a P/E of 40?

Is this Pokemon Card and Towel reseller supposed to be growing faster than $TSM (33) and $MU (32)? https://t.co/kR3v3PQP13
Walmart 为什么 P/E 有 40,谁能告诉我?这个 Pokemon Card 和 Towel reseller 难道应该比 $TSM(33)和 $MU(32)增长更快? https://t.co/kR3v3PQP13
❤️ 611 🔁 19 💬 119
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@stonksamiam @joceyreyes209 @AccelsiusATX Just to clarify, what was your thesis on $INV?
@stonksamiam @joceyreyes209 @AccelsiusATX 只是想确认一下,你对 $INV 的 thesis 是什么?
❤️ 9 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy Probably Japan! The food here is amazing https://t.co/U7NkOo7kMy
@pepemoonboy 可能是日本!这里的食物太棒了 https://t.co/U7NkOo7kMy
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@thgstar2 uhh, it's a $360M marketcap. And they literally have an awarded $1.1B claim already but Venezuela didn't pay.

Then there's another one for 45% control over the Siembra Minera, one of the largest gold/copper deposits in the world.

I think I'm holding $GDRZF, just in case.
@thgstar2 呃,它市值只有 $360M。而且已经有一笔 awarded $1.1B claim,只是 Venezuela 没付。还有一笔关于 Siembra Minera 45% 控制权的 claim,那是全球最大 gold/copper deposits 之一。我会持有 $GDRZF,以防万一。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_visionarius $NBIS has an active 25M share ATM running and it's more tied to $CRWV's performance recently.

The other colo players have been doing well, like $HUT, $CIFR, $WULF. The only anomaly is $IREN.
@_visionarius $NBIS 有一个 25M 股 ATM 正在进行,而且最近更跟 $CRWV 表现相关。其他 colo players 表现不错,比如 $HUT$CIFR$WULF。唯一异常的是 $IREN
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@crux_capital_ If I'm sacrificing my morals to profit off the US hostile takeover of Venezuela, I have high expectations for the portfolio.
@crux_capital_ 如果我要牺牲道德,从美国 hostile takeover Venezuela 中获利,那我对这个组合的期待会很高。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
And... We're off to the races.

"Nation Building Port" Performance Today:

$GDRZF +95.83%
$AVAV +14.7%
$CVX +5.19%
$ASHM +5.2%
$HII +3.82%
$TRGP -3.14%

I'm surprised Gold Reserve $GDRZF is only up 95%, given they're still a $333m MC with ~$8.1B in claims.

Another surprise is that Chevron $CVX is only up 5% on the news that they basically own Venezuela's at this point as the last man standing.

$AVAV performed better than expected, $HII performed on-par. $TRGP was a surprise on the drop.

We'll see how this does later, as this probably takes some time to price in (and not everyone knows about these names).
然后……我们起跑了。Nation Building Port 今日表现:$GDRZF +95.83%,$AVAV +14.7%,$CVX +5.19%,$ASHM +5.2%,$HII +3.82%,$TRGP -3.14%。我惊讶 $GDRZF 只涨 95%,毕竟市值 $333m、claims 约 $8.1B。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Maduro is now captured in NY, facing charges.

The first thing that came to everyone's mind is:

How do you profit off the US invasion of Venezuela and Regime Change?

Here's how.

This is the "Nation Building" port:

1. $GDRZF @$1.68 - $8B+ claims, $200m MC. (30%)

2. $ASHM @ £175.10 - 3x NAV bonds recovery (20%)

3. $CVX @ $155.90 - Most obvious oil play from locked up assets + $17T in oil (15% allocation / calls)

4. $TRGP @ $186.77 - Diluent exporter to Venezuela (10% allocation / calls)

5. $AVAV @ $256.19 - Maritime operations and post $1T funding for defense. ( 10% allocation)

6. $CF @ $80.13 - Disruption of Trinidad & Tobago ammonia exports. (5% allocation)

7. $HII @ $349.7 - Profiting off the blockade from shipbuilding (5% allocation)

8. $OI @ $15.16 - Claims ~$700M, 35% cash injection relative to market cap (5% allocation)

This setup looks to be the optimal way to capitalize on the US invasion of Venezuela - from profiting off the blockade to the new $17T+ in oil resources now owned by the United States.

"Nation Building" is the most underrated theme going into 2027.

Watch what happens on Monday and the following months.
Maduro 现在已在 NY 被捕并面临指控。

所有人脑子里冒出的第一件事都是:

怎么从美国入侵 Venezuela 和 Regime Change 中赚钱?

方法如下。

这是“Nation Building”组合:

1. $GDRZF @$1.68 - $8B+ 索赔,$200m MC。(30%)

2. $ASHM @ £175.10 - 3x NAV 债券回收(20%)

3. $CVX @ $155.90 - 被锁资产 + $17T 石油里最明显的石油玩法(15% 配置 / calls)

4. $TRGP @ $186.77 - 向 Venezuela 出口稀释剂(10% 配置 / calls)

5. $AVAV @ $256.19 - 海上行动,以及国防获得 $1T 资金后的受益者。(10% 配置)

6. $CF @ $80.13 - Trinidad & Tobago 氨出口受扰动。(5% 配置)

7. $HII @ $349.7 - 造船从封锁中获利(5% 配置)

8. $OI @ $15.16 - 索赔约 $700M,相对市值有 35% 现金注入(5% 配置)

这个配置看起来是利用美国入侵 Venezuela 的最佳方式,从封锁受益,到现在由美国拥有的 $17T+ 新石油资源。

“Nation Building” 是进入 2027 年最被低估的主题。

看看周一和接下来几个月会发生什么。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2007758407948788162
❤️ 191 🔁 14 💬 26
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@BitcoinArchive Appreciate the credit! Quite rare nowadays.

Great summary of the situation on hand regarding Venezuela’s speculated Bitcoin reserves.
@BitcoinArchive 感谢署名!现在挺少见的。对 Venezuela 据传 Bitcoin reserves 的情况总结得很好。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@bennybigbull $PLTR and $TSLA stopped showing up as much last quarter and got replaced by companies like $ZETA entering 2026.
@bennybigbull $PLTR$TSLA 上季度出现得少了很多,进入 2026 年被 $ZETA 这类公司取代。
❤️ 22 🔁 1 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@blu400_ Equal weightings. So $ONDS and $RKLB are the same.
@blu400_ 等权。所以 $ONDS$RKLB 权重一样。
❤️ 16 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
📝 原创
"FinX vs Wall Street" report

This is FinX 15, a weighted port of the most popular names:

1. $ONDS +33.26%
2. $SKYT +27.46%
3. $TE +22.62%
4. $MU +13.98%
5. $ASTS +13.24%
6. $BMNR +12.24%
7. $IREN +11.19%
8. $CIFR +8.64%
9. $AXTI +7.56%
10. $KRKNF + 7.69%
11. $NBIS +5.93%
12. $POET +5.81%
13. $RKLB +2.67%
14. $HOOD -.31%
15. $ZETA -2.36%

Here's how FinX did last week:

FinX 15 Return (1-Week): 11.3%

For the entire 2025 calendar year:

- WallStreetBets = +76.00%
- Bridgewater’s Pure Alpha II = +34%
- ARKK Innovation ETF = +35.5%
- Perishing Square = +25.3%
- SPY Index = +17.72%
- Poinpoint Multi-Strategy = +11.6% -
- Berkshire Hathaway = +11.4%
- Millennium Management = +10.5%
- Citadel = +10.5%

The Bottom Line:

In just 5 trading days, the FinX community beat Citadel’s entire year.

We are officially smoking the institutions entering 2026
FinX vs Wall Street 报告:FinX 15 是热门名字加权组合,包含 $ONDS$SKYT$TE$MU$ASTS$BMNR$IREN$CIFR$AXTI$KRKNF$NBIS$POET$RKLB$HOOD$ZETA。散户常被嘲笑,但很多时候方向抓住了真正趋势。
❤️ 486 🔁 39 💬 50
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@meaculpaK9 @martypartymusic I think you understimate Proof of Gunpoint on the effect of Venezuela’s Bitcoin confiscation by US authorities.
@meaculpaK9 @martypartymusic 我觉得你低估了 Proof of Gunpoint 对美国当局没收 Venezuela Bitcoin 的影响。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@dgt10011 America is just giving Venezuela’s ~600K Bitcoins a taste of freedom
@dgt10011 美国只是让 Venezuela 的约 600K Bitcoins 体验一下自由。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@AkbarInvests Thanks, I don’t expect $CXV to have a massive rally all in one day, but the US takeover of Venezuela should be wildly beneficial for the company over time. https://t.co/BDklE0Ovxl
@AkbarInvests 谢谢,我不指望 $CXV 一天内暴涨,但美国接管 Venezuela 随着时间推移应该会极大利好这家公司。 https://t.co/BDklE0Ovxl
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Follow up sources + clarifications for the original post since this is being re-posted everywhere (piggybacking off this comment):

Historical data from The Wilson Center and Reuters confirms the Maduro regime liquidated ~73 tons of gold in 2018, valued at approximately $2.7 billion at the time.

- Intelligence reporting from Whale Hunting (citing HUMINT sources) assesses that this gold capital was immediately converted into Bitcoin to evade US Treasury freezes.

- Based on 2018 trading prices ($3k–$10k), this specific tranche would account for roughly 400,000 BTC.

- The remaining balance (pushing the total estimate toward 600,000+ BTC) is attributed to oil revenues. By late 2025, reports indicate the regime settled ~80% of oil exports in USDT (Tether) and "washed" these funds into Bitcoin to avoid freezing.

Clarifications )

- This is the **speculated amount** since Maduro's Bitcoin figures were actively being hidden to avoid sanctions.

- This chart figure demonstrates the **potential** amount of Bitcoin to be seized, not actively seized. On-chain data cannot confirm this as Venezuela has been actively avoiding sanctions.

_

Reuters: February 8, 2019

– Breaking report confirming 73 tons were sold to Turkey and UAE in 2018. The Wilson Center: June 2021

– Full report released titled "Venezuela’s Authoritarian Allies" (Chapter: "Turkey and Venezuela: An Alliance of Convenience" by Imdat Oner), which forensically analyzed the 2018 trade data. Whale Hunting: January 3, 2026

– Report titled "The $60 Billion Question" referencing fresh HUMINT (Human Intelligence) gathered after the regime's collapse.

Reuters: April 22, 2024

– Exclusive report detailing how PDVSA began requiring 50% prepayment in USDT (Tether) to avoid frozen bank accounts.

Chainalysis / Binance Research: Late 2025 – Industry analysis reports confirming massive flows of USDT from Venezuelan oil intermediaries into mixing services (the "wash" into BTC).

"Venezuela's Stablecoin Usage Predicted to Rise Amid Economic Instability"- Binance Research / Binance News

"The Chainalysis 2025 Crypto Crime Report" - Chainalysis

_

1. The Gold Liquidation (~$2.7B / 73 Tons), Reuters: Article: "Exclusive: Venezuela sold 73 tonnes of gold to Turkey, UAE last year" Date: February 8, 2019

2. The "Entry Capital" Conversion: Article: "The $60 Billion Question: Is Venezuela Secretly a Bitcoin Superpower?" Date: January 3, 2026

3. The Oil-for-USDT Pivot (The Accumulation) Article: "Venezuela state oil firm looks to Tether (USDT) to bypass US sanctions" Date: April 22, 2024
原帖被到处转发,所以补充来源:Wilson Center 和 Reuters 确认 Maduro regime 在 2018 年清算约 73 吨黄金,价值约 $2.7B。Whale Hunting 的 HUMINT 报道认为资金可能被转成 Bitcoin,形成 shadow reserve。原帖措辞过强,应区分事实、情报评估和推算。
❤️ 18 🔁 2 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Reuters: February 8, 2019 – Breaking report confirming 73 tons were sold to Turkey and UAE in 2018.

The Wilson Center: June 2021 – Full report released titled "Venezuela’s Authoritarian Allies" (Chapter: "Turkey and Venezuela: An Alliance of Convenience" by Imdat Oner), which forensically analyzed the 2018 trade data.

Whale Hunting: January 3, 2026 – Report titled "The $60 Billion Question" referencing fresh HUMINT (Human Intelligence) gathered after the regime's collapse.

Reuters: April 22, 2024 – Exclusive report detailing how PDVSA began requiring 50% prepayment in USDT (Tether) to avoid frozen bank accounts.

Chainalysis / Binance Research: Late 2025 – Industry analysis reports confirming massive flows of USDT from Venezuelan oil intermediaries into mixing services (the "wash" into BTC).

"Venezuela's Stablecoin Usage Predicted to Rise Amid Economic Instability" - Binance Research / Binance News

"The Chainalysis 2025 Crypto Crime Report" - Chainalysis
_

1. The Gold Liquidation (~$2.7B / 73 Tons), Reuters:

Article: "Exclusive: Venezuela sold 73 tonnes of gold to Turkey, UAE last year"

Date: February 8, 2019

2. The "Entry Capital" Conversion:

Article: "The $60 Billion Question: Is Venezuela Secretly a Bitcoin Superpower?"

Date: January 3, 2026

3. The Oil-for-USDT Pivot (The Accumulation)

Article: "Venezuela state oil firm looks to Tether (USDT) to bypass US sanctions"

Date: April 22, 2024
Reuters 2019 年 2 月 8 日确认 2018 年 73 吨黄金卖给 Turkey 和 UAE。Wilson Center 2021 年报告法证分析了 2018 贸易数据。Whale Hunting 2026 年基于 HUMINT 称部分资金可能转成 Bitcoin。黄金清算是事实,BTC shadow reserve 仍是评估。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
@QuantumRapist My bad, I would go back and edit the wording + sources if I could. I'll do better next time.

Glad there's a comment section where I can explain though.
@QuantumRapist 我的错。如果能回去编辑措辞和来源,我会改。下次会做得更好。不过很高兴有评论区可以解释。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Regarding sources for the $600k figure:

- Historical data from The Wilson Center and Reuters confirms the Maduro regime liquidated ~73 tons of gold in 2018, valued at approximately $2.7 billion at the time.

- Intelligence reporting from Whale Hunting (citing HUMINT sources) assesses that this gold capital was immediately converted into Bitcoin to evade US Treasury freezes. Based on 2018 trading prices ($3k–$10k), this specific tranche would account for roughly 400,000 BTC.

- The remaining balance (pushing the total estimate toward 600,000+ BTC) is attributed to oil revenues. By late 2025, reports indicate the regime settled ~80% of oil exports in USDT (Tether) and "washed" these funds into Bitcoin to avoid freezing.

This is the speculated amount since Maduro's Bitcoin figures were actively being hidden to avoid sactions. On-chain data cannot confirm this as again, this was done to avoid US sanctions.
关于 600k 数字来源:Wilson Center 和 Reuters 确认 Maduro regime 2018 年清算约 73 吨黄金,价值约 $2.7B;Whale Hunting HUMINT 评估这些资本被转换成 Bitcoin 以避开美国财政部冻结。600k BTC 是推测估算,不是确定事实。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
If people were curious about sources for this 600K BTC figure:

1) Wilson Center and Reuters est. Maduro regime liquidated ~73 tons in gold in 2018 for ~$2.7 billion.

2) Whale Hunting with HUMINT sources assess that this capital was immediately converted into Bitcoin to avoid US Treasury freezes, potentially creating a "shadow reserve" of ~400,000 BTC at that point in time.

3) There's been other events from Crude Oil sales that added to this stockpile

The number is unknown as Venezuela has been actively avoiding sanctions and this is unable to be confirmed through chain analysis. However, there's estimates that the pile sits around this figure and this is the potential amount of assets to be seized.

This was back when Bitcoin was roughly $3k-$10k and most of the figures come from Bitcoin price appreciation over time.
如果好奇 600K BTC 来源:1)Wilson Center/Reuters 估计 Maduro regime 2018 年清算约 73 吨黄金,价值 $2.7B;2)Whale Hunting HUMINT 评估资金被转成 Bitcoin,可能形成约 400,000 BTC shadow reserve;3)后续资金流可能推高数字,但这是推测。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
1) Wilson Center and Reuters reported that the Maduro regime liquidated ~73 tons of gold in 2018 for ~$2.7 billion, utilizing intermediaries in Turkey and the UAE to bypass traditional banking sanctions.

Intelligence (eg. Whale Hunting), with HUMINT sources assess that this capital was immediately converted into Bitcoin to avoid US Treasury freezes, potentially creating a "shadow reserve" of ~400,000 BTC at that point in time.

This was back when Bitcoin was roughly $3k-$10k and most of the figures come from Bitcoin price appreciation over time.

Once again this is speculation as the Venezuelan government was actively avoiding sanctions so true figure would not be known.
Wilson Center 和 Reuters 报道 Maduro regime 2018 年清算约 73 吨黄金,价值 $2.7B,并利用 Turkey/UAE 中介绕过制裁。情报来源评估这笔资金被迅速转成 Bitcoin,以避免美国财政部冻结。关键假设是低价买入并继续持有/累积。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Reports are saying Alex Saab allegedly knows how to access this Bitcoin pile since he built the architecture that kept the regime alive under sanctions.

However, there was a prisoner swap, so he was able to escape US custody. Pretty sure it's multi-sig + more secure scheme, but given coercion, it's likely the United States government can confiscate a lot of holdings.
报道称 Alex Saab allegedly 知道如何访问这批 Bitcoin,因为他搭建了让 regime 在制裁下存活的架构。不过有 prisoner swap,所以他离开了美国 custody。我猜是 multi-sig + 更安全方案,但在胁迫下美国政府可能没收。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Sure, so this website relies on official data. Maduro regime's holdings were concealed in a complex laundering network, so the numbers are not public.

Regarding corroborating sources for the speculation above:

The Wilson Center "Venezuela's Authoritarian Allies" - More than 40 percent of Venezuela's gold reserves (73 tons) were sold off in 2018.

Grey Dynamics: An intelligence firm reported that 73.2 tons of gold were sold between Emirati company Noor capial, Turkish firm "Sardes Kiymetli Madenler A.S.", and others in 2018.

Reuters/Argus Media: Reported extensively in 2019 on the shipment of ~23.6 tons to Turkey and separate shipments to the UAE.

Entry Capital: $2.7 Billion (The verified 2018 gold sale value). In 2018, Bitcoin traded between $3,200 and $10,000, which could be around 400,000 BTC.

The theory is that if the regime had kept the money in US dollars or Euros, it would have been frozen by sanctions. Bitcoin was the only asset class liquid enough to hold billions that was "unfreezable" by the US Treasury at that time. Recent reports (e.g., from Whale Hunting) cite human intelligence sources claimed the regime used intermediaries to convert gold proceeds into Bitcoin during the time to bypass the banking system.

The "$60 billion" is the mathematical result of holding that asset for 8 years, hence why it's speculated to be their shadow reserve. But again treat this is as speculation.
这个网站依赖官方数据。Maduro regime 持仓隐藏在复杂洗钱网络中,数字不公开。Wilson Center 和 Reuters 证明黄金被清算,Whale Hunting 报道称部分资金可能转入 Bitcoin。公开事实是黄金流出,BTC 储备规模是情报和价格区间推测。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I worded this way too strongly in the original post. This is speculation. As mentioned in the post, source was from WSJ contributer Bradley Hope, Clara Preve from the Whale Hunting newsletter.

The "$60 billion" figure is a mathematical projection based on holding the initial ~$2.7 billion stake during 2018–2019, when Bitcoin traded between $3,000 and $10,000. through Bitcoin's appreciation to prices above $100,000 in the current cycle.

The number is unknown as Venezuela has been actively avoiding sanctions and this is unable to be confirmed through chain analysis. However, there's a possibility that the number can go as high as this figure.
我原帖措辞太强。这是推测。来源是 WSJ contributor Bradley Hope、Whale Hunting newsletter 的 Clara Preve。“$60 billion” 是数学推算:假设 2018-2019 年 BTC 在 $3k-$10k 时买入约 $2.7B 并持有至今。不是官方确认余额。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@JamesWynnReal not the worst timing post regime change + bitcoin seizure. also venezuela is est. to add a decent amount GDP growth to US from some calculations bc it pushes oil prices down, which is bullish markets + bitcoin.

https://t.co/4Ib72DSIKK
@JamesWynnReal 政权更替 + bitcoin seizure 之后,这 timing 不算最差。另外按一些计算,Venezuela 可能通过压低油价给美国带来 GDP 增长,这对 markets + bitcoin 是 bullish。 https://t.co/4Ib72DSIKK
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Venezuela: The $60B+ Bitcoin "Shadow Reserve"

Markets focus on the $17T+ in Oil that Venezuela owns.

But what they don't know is that Venezuela one of the largest active $BTC holders in the world.

Similar in scale to both $MSTR and Blackrock.

Here's how this impacts markets and prices:

Intelligence reports indicate that the Venezuelan regime accumulated a "shadow reserve" of Bitcoin (BTC) and Tether (USDT) estimated at more than $60 billion. (HUMINT)

his hoard was built through "gold swaps" and the requirement that oil exports be settled in USDT to evade sanctions.

Intelligence cited by Whale Hunting (authored by Bradley Hope and Clara Preve) indicates that the accumulation began in 2018, coinciding with the aggressive liquidation of the Orinoco Mining Arc’s gold reserves.

- The regime likely converted ~$2B of gold proceeds into Bitcoin at an average price of $5K, which would have been around 400,000 BTC. At Jan 2026 price of ~$90K, that specific tranche alone would be worth $36B.

As the "Petro" experiment failed, the regime pivoted to using Tether (USDT) as a proxy for the petrodollar during cruide oil sales. However, Venezuela began to "Wash" that into Bitcoin, recognizing that USDT retains the ability to freeze addresses.

Given market intelligence, we can estimate that Venezuela has roughly:

Gold Swaps: 2018–2020, Gold Bars, Value Now: ~$45B - $50B

Petro-Crypto: 2023–2025, Crude Oil, Value Now: ~$10B - $15B

Mining Seizures: 2023–2024, ~$500M

Giving a grand total between 2018–2026: ~$56B - $67B in Bitcoin, implied at 660K+ Bitcoin, with a floor at 600K in Bitcoin.

That does not mean US has full control of the Bitcoin yet. The days following today will be defined by a high-stakes interrogation to secure the Bitcoin.

The U.S. will likely offer plea deals, reduced sentencing, or protection for family members in exchange for the surrender of seed phrases. Given the severity of the narco-terrorism charges, the leverage is there.

So now the revelation of the $60 billion hoard fundamentally alters the supply/demand dynamics of the Bitcoin market for 2026, as the Venezuelan reserve is estimated at: 600,000+ BTC.

This is 12 times larger than the German sale and 2 times larger than the U.S. government’s entire pre-raid stockpile.

In 2024, the German state of Saxony liquidated ~50,000 BTC ($3 billion). This 50K BTC sale caused a 15-20% market correction and weeks of bearish sentiment.

Now compare that to 600,000.

Here's the leading entity holders of Bitcoin:

1. Satoshi Nakamoto ~1,100,000
2. BlackRock (IBIT) ~770,791.5
3. MicroStrategy ~672,497
4. Venezuela (Seized) ~600,000
5. U.S. Gov ~325,293
6. Mt. Gox Trustee ~140,000

Now, here's what will likely happen from here:

The "Frozen Asset" (High Probability):

The assets are seized but immediately entangled in complex litigation Creditors file injunctions; the DOJ claims forfeiture. The keys are held in escrow by the U.S. Treasury, but the coins cannot move.

Short-term volatility due to uncertainty, followed by a bullish "supply shock" narrative.

Short-term volatility due to uncertainty, followed by a bullish "supply shock" narrative. The market realizes that 600,000 BTC (3% of circulating supply) have been effectively removed from the market for 5-10 years. This acts as a massive "lock-up," reducing liquid supply and supporting higher prices.

The "Strategic Reserve" Pivot (High Probability):

Influenced by the "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" movement, President Trump orders the Treasury to hold the Bitcoin as a permanent U.S. asset.

This too acts as a massive lock up, reducing liquid supply and supporting higher prices.

The "Fire Sale" (Very Low Probability):

The U.S. DOJ declares the assets "perishable/volatile" and executes an immediate liquidation via Coinbase Prime or USMS auctions to fund the occupation costs.

However, this is unlikely due to Trump's positive stance toward Bitcoin "Reserves" from confiscating assets.
_

Results:

Markets have been looking at the massive oil reserve and beneficiaries, while ignoring the elephant in the room: Bitcoin.

The "second order effect" is likely a massive supply lock-up.

If the U.S. seizes these assets, they will likely move from "active liquid reserves" of a rogue state to "frozen sovereign assets" of the U.S. Treasury, reducing available supply and potentially acting as a catalyst for higher prices in Q1 2026.

There will likely be increased volatility. But for market participants shorting Bitcoin because of fears of "conflict", this event is generally seen as bullish for $MSTR and Bitcoin holders as this effectively locks up supply for many years to come.
Venezuela:$60B+ Bitcoin “Shadow Reserve”

市场关注的是 Venezuela 拥有的 $17T+ 石油。

但他们不知道的是,Venezuela 是全球最大的活跃 $BTC 持有者之一。

规模类似 $MSTR 和 Blackrock。

下面是这会如何影响市场和价格:

情报报告显示,Venezuelan regime 积累了一个 Bitcoin (BTC) 和 Tether (USDT) 的“shadow reserve”,估计超过 $60B。(HUMINT)

这批资产是通过“gold swaps”,以及要求石油出口用 USDT 结算以规避制裁而建立的。

Whale Hunting(Bradley Hope 和 Clara Preve 撰写)引用的情报显示,积累从 2018 年开始,与 Orinoco Mining Arc 黄金储备被激进清算同时发生。

- 该政权可能把约 $2B 黄金收益以平均 $5K 的价格换成 Bitcoin,也就是大约 400,000 BTC。按 2026 年 1 月约 $90K 的价格,仅这一批就值 $36B。

随着“Petro”实验失败,该政权转向用 Tether (USDT) 作为原油销售中的 petrodollar 代理。但 Venezuela 开始把它“洗”成 Bitcoin,因为他们意识到 USDT 仍然有冻结地址的能力。

根据市场情报,我们可以估计 Venezuela 大概有:

Gold Swaps:2018–2020,Gold Bars,现值:约 $45B - $50B

Petro-Crypto:2023–2025,Crude Oil,现值:约 $10B - $15B

Mining Seizures:2023–2024,约 $500M

2018–2026 年总计:约 $56B - $67B Bitcoin,隐含 660K+ Bitcoin,底部至少 600K Bitcoin。

这不代表美国已经完全控制这些 Bitcoin。今天之后的几天,将由一场高风险审讯来决定能否拿到 Bitcoin。

美国很可能用认罪协议、减刑或家属保护,来换取 seed phrases。考虑到 narco-terrorism 指控的严重性,杠杆是存在的。

所以现在,$60B hoard 的曝光从根本上改变了 2026 年 Bitcoin 市场供需动态,因为 Venezuelan reserve 估计为:600,000+ BTC。

这比德国出售规模大 12 倍,也比美国政府突袭前全部库存大 2 倍。

2024 年,德国 Saxony 州清算了约 50,000 BTC($3B)。这 50K BTC 抛售导致市场回调 15-20%,并带来数周看空情绪。

现在拿 600,000 来比。

以下是 Bitcoin 主要实体持有者:

1. Satoshi Nakamoto ~1,100,000
2. BlackRock (IBIT) ~770,791.5
3. MicroStrategy ~672,497
4. Venezuela(被没收)~600,000
5. U.S. Gov ~325,293
6. Mt. Gox Trustee ~140,000

接下来很可能发生:

“Frozen Asset”(高概率):

资产被没收,但立刻陷入复杂诉讼。债权人申请禁令;DOJ 主张 forfeiture。私钥由 U.S. Treasury 托管,但币不能移动。

不确定性导致短期波动,随后出现看多的“供应冲击”叙事。

不确定性导致短期波动,随后出现看多的“供应冲击”叙事。市场意识到 600,000 BTC(流通供应约 3%)实际上从市场中移除 5-10 年。这相当于巨大“锁仓”,减少流动供应并支撑更高价格。

“Strategic Reserve” Pivot(高概率):

受“Strategic Bitcoin Reserve”运动影响,President Trump 下令 Treasury 将 Bitcoin 作为永久美国资产持有。

这同样形成巨大锁仓,减少流动供应并支撑更高价格。

“Fire Sale”(极低概率):

U.S. DOJ 宣称这些资产“易腐/高波动”,并通过 Coinbase Prime 或 USMS auctions 立即清算,以资助占领成本。

但鉴于 Trump 对通过没收资产建立 Bitcoin “Reserves” 的正面态度,这不太可能。
_

结果:

市场一直在看巨大石油储备和受益者,却忽视了房间里的大象:Bitcoin。

“二阶效应”很可能是一次巨大的供应锁仓。

如果美国没收这些资产,它们很可能从流氓国家的“活跃流动储备”变成 U.S. Treasury 的“冻结主权资产”,减少可用供应,并可能成为 2026 Q1 推高价格的催化剂。

波动很可能增加。但对那些因为“冲突”恐惧而做空 Bitcoin 的市场参与者来说,这个事件总体上会被视为利好 $MSTR 和 Bitcoin holders,因为它实际上把供应锁住了很多年。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2007872395990937749
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Venezuela: The $60B+ Bitcoin "Shadow Reserve"

Markets focus on the $17T+ in Oil that Venezuela owns.

But what they don't know is that Venezuela one of the largest active $BTC holders in the world.

Similar in scale to both $MSTR and Blackrock.

Here's how this impacts markets and prices:

Intelligence reports indicate that the Venezuelan regime accumulated a "shadow reserve" of Bitcoin (BTC) and Tether (USDT) estimated at more than $60 billion. (HUMINT)

his hoard was built through "gold swaps" and the requirement that oil exports be settled in USDT to evade sanctions.

Intelligence cited by Whale Hunting (authored by Bradley Hope and Clara Preve) indicates that the accumulation began in 2018, coinciding with the aggressive liquidation of the Orinoco Mining Arc’s gold reserves.

- The regime likely converted ~$2B of gold proceeds into Bitcoin at an average price of $5K, which would have been around 400,000 BTC. At Jan 2026 price of ~$90K, that specific tranche alone would be worth $36B.

As the "Petro" experiment failed, the regime pivoted to using Tether (USDT) as a proxy for the petrodollar during cruide oil sales. However, Venezuela began to "Wash" that into Bitcoin, recognizing that USDT retains the ability to freeze addresses.

Given market intelligence, we can estimate that Venezuela has roughly:

Gold Swaps: 2018–2020, Gold Bars, Value Now: ~$45B - $50B

Petro-Crypto: 2023–2025, Crude Oil, Value Now: ~$10B - $15B

Mining Seizures: 2023–2024, ~$500M

Giving a grand total between 2018–2026: ~$56B - $67B in Bitcoin, implied at 660K+ Bitcoin, with a floor at 600K in Bitcoin.

That does not mean US has full control of the Bitcoin yet. The days following today will be defined by a high-stakes interrogation to secure the Bitcoin.

The U.S. will likely offer plea deals, reduced sentencing, or protection for family members in exchange for the surrender of seed phrases. Given the severity of the narco-terrorism charges, the leverage is there.

So now the revelation of the $60 billion hoard fundamentally alters the supply/demand dynamics of the Bitcoin market for 2026, as the Venezuelan reserve is estimated at: 600,000+ BTC.

This is 12 times larger than the German sale and 2 times larger than the U.S. government’s entire pre-raid stockpile.

In 2024, the German state of Saxony liquidated ~50,000 BTC ($3 billion). This 50K BTC sale caused a 15-20% market correction and weeks of bearish sentiment.

Now compare that to 600,000.

Here's the leading entity holders of Bitcoin:

1. Satoshi Nakamoto ~1,100,000
2. BlackRock (IBIT) ~770,791.5
3. MicroStrategy ~672,497
4. Venezuela (Seized) ~600,000
5. U.S. Gov ~325,293
6. Mt. Gox Trustee ~140,000

Now, here's what will likely happen from here:

The "Frozen Asset" (High Probability):

The assets are seized but immediately entangled in complex litigation Creditors file injunctions; the DOJ claims forfeiture. The keys are held in escrow by the U.S. Treasury, but the coins cannot move.

Short-term volatility due to uncertainty, followed by a bullish "supply shock" narrative.

Short-term volatility due to uncertainty, followed by a bullish "supply shock" narrative. The market realizes that 600,000 BTC (3% of circulating supply) have been effectively removed from the market for 5-10 years. This acts as a massive "lock-up," reducing liquid supply and supporting higher prices.

The "Strategic Reserve" Pivot (High Probability):

Influenced by the "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" movement, President Trump orders the Treasury to hold the Bitcoin as a permanent U.S. asset.

This too acts as a massive lock up, reducing liquid supply and supporting higher prices.

The "Fire Sale" (Very Low Probability):

The U.S. DOJ declares the assets "perishable/volatile" and executes an immediate liquidation via Coinbase Prime or USMS auctions to fund the occupation costs.

However, this is unlikely due to Trump's positive stance toward Bitcoin "Reserves" from confiscating assets.
_

Results:

Markets have been looking at the massive oil reserve and beneficiaries, while ignoring the elephant in the room: Bitcoin.

The "second order effect" is likely a massive supply lock-up.

If the U.S. seizes these assets, they will likely move from "active liquid reserves" of a rogue state to "frozen sovereign assets" of the U.S. Treasury, reducing available supply and potentially acting as a catalyst for higher prices in Q1 2026.

There will likely be increased volatility. But for market participants shorting Bitcoin because of fears of "conflict", this event is generally seen as bullish for $MSTR and Bitcoin holders as this effectively locks up supply for many years to come.
Venezuela:$60B+ Bitcoin shadow reserve。市场只看 Venezuela 的 $17T+ 石油,却忽略它可能是全球最大活跃 $BTC 持有人之一,规模类似 $MSTR/Blackrock。若美国在 regime change 后定位或没收这些 BTC,短期可能有供应恐惧,中期则强化 Bitcoin 国家级资产叙事。
❤️ 3,424 🔁 738 💬 256
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ysl_mask @grok Piggybacking off this comment, remove $OI from the list they sold arbitration rights already. Missed the sale in my research
@ysl_mask @grok 借这条评论补充,把 $OI 从列表里删掉,他们已经卖掉 arbitration rights 了。我研究时漏掉了这笔 sale。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@KingofBears7 Ur right thanks, remove $OI from the list then
@KingofBears7 你说得对,谢谢,那就把 $OI 从列表里删掉。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@KingofBears7 @grok can you confirm if this is true
@KingofBears7 @grok 你能确认这是真的吗?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@__visionxry__ Thanks! I’m glad people found my posts interesting since I joined a few months ago. Thanks for following along near the start.

Follower count is just a byproduct of stuff I like to share and glad I can have the chance to help more people
@__visionxry__ 谢谢!我几个月前加入后,很高兴大家觉得我的帖子有意思。谢谢你从早期就一路跟着。粉丝数只是我分享喜欢内容的副产品,也很高兴有机会帮更多人。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@romanchernin Welcome back! Glad the $NBIS community called it out early.

Looking forward to future developments
@romanchernin 欢迎回来!很高兴 $NBIS 社区很早就指出了这一点。期待后续进展。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@zephyr_z9 Wait $AXTI subsidiary finally got approval for listing?
@zephyr_z9 等等,$AXTI 子公司终于拿到上市批准了?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Maduro is now captured in NY, facing charges.

The first thing that came to everyone's mind is:

How do you profit off the US invasion of Venezuela and Regime Change?

Here's how.

This is the "Nation Building" port:

1. $GDRZF @$1.68 - $8B+ claims, $200m MC. (30%)

2. $ASHM @ £175.10 - 3x NAV bonds recovery (20%)

3. $CVX @ $155.90 - Most obvious oil play from locked up assets + $17T in oil (15% allocation / calls)

4. $TRGP @ $186.77 - Diluent exporter to Venezuela (10% allocation / calls)

5. $AVAV @ $256.19 - Maritime operations and post $1T funding for defense. ( 10% allocation)

6. $CF @ $80.13 - Disruption of Trinidad & Tobago ammonia exports. (5% allocation)

7. $HII @ $349.7 - Profiting off the blockade from shipbuilding (5% allocation)

8. $OI @ $15.16 - Claims ~$700M, 35% cash injection relative to market cap (5% allocation)

This setup looks to be the optimal way to capitalize on the US invasion of Venezuela - from profiting off the blockade to the new $17T+ in oil resources now owned by the United States.

"Nation Building" is the most underrated theme going into 2027.

Watch what happens on Monday and the following months.
Maduro 现在已经在 NY 被抓,正面临起诉。

大家脑子里第一反应都是:

美国入侵 Venezuela、推动 Regime Change,要怎么从中赚钱?

方法在这里。

这就是“Nation Building”组合:

1. $GDRZF @$1.68 - $8B+ 索赔,$200m MC。(30%)

2. $ASHM @ £175.10 - 债券回收可能到 3x NAV(20%)

3. $CVX @ $155.90 - 被锁资产 + $17T 石油里最明显的 oil play(15% allocation / calls)

4. $TRGP @ $186.77 - 向 Venezuela 出口 diluent(10% allocation / calls)

5. $AVAV @ $256.19 - 海上行动,以及后续 $1T 国防资金。(10% allocation)

6. $CF @ $80.13 - Trinidad & Tobago 氨出口受扰动。(5% allocation)

7. $HII @ $349.7 - 从封锁带来的造船需求中获利(5% allocation)

8. $OI @ $15.16 - 索赔约 $700M,相当于市值 35% 的现金注入(5% allocation)

这个 setup 看起来是押注美国入侵 Venezuela 的最优方式,从封锁受益,到现在美国拥有的 $17T+ 新石油资源。

“Nation Building”会是进入 2027 最被低估的主题。

看周一以及接下来几个月会发生什么。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
US has now invaded Venezuela.

Everyone is probably wondering the same thing:

How do you profit off the situation?

1. Heavy Sour, Ammonia, and Nitrogen Fertilizers disruption ( $CF , $CVE).

These are Venezuela's biggest exports.

Most people will buy generic oil ETFs or light sweet crude producers. This is inefficient because light oil is not a perfect substitute for heavy oil in complex refineries. If Caribbean ammonia is stranded, the global price of nitrogen spikes. The biggest beneficiary is a US-domestic producer that uses cheap US natural gas and doesn't rely on Caribbean shipping lanes

2. Dirty Crude Processing ( $VLO ) - If competitors are starved of Venezuelan oil, Valero’s ability to source heavy crude from diverse locations (and its leverage to diesel margins) makes it resilient.

3. Naval Warfare ( $LDOS) - While retail investors buy Lockheed Martin (F-35s), the operations in the Caribbean focuses on maritime surveillance, warfare, and autonomous patrolling to enforce blockades without risking US personnel. Companies like Leidos provide these tpyes of naval tech.

4. Defense and aerospace from $AVAV to $HII and $LHX also benefit.

- $AVAV recently unveiled the Red Dragon and updated Switchblade 600 variants specifically for maritime operations

- $LHX provides the sensors and communications gear that link the drones ($AVAV) to the ships ($HII) and the jets ($BA).

- A blockade requires significant maritime surveillance and naval assets, which benefits shipbuilders ( $HII )

5. Direct Suppliers of recent military operation:

- F/A-18E/F Super Hornet from $BA (Precision strikes on Caracas)

- B-1B Lancer from $BA

- UAS (Drone), MQ-9 Reaper - $RTX (MTS-B Sensors), $HON Honeywell for the Engine

- Tomahawk (TLAM), $RTX

So far:

$AVAV - 5.91%+
$BA - 4.91%
$LHX - 3.72%
$CF - 3.61%+
$CVE - 3.61%+
$HII - +2.85%
$RTX - 2.1%
$VLO - 1.55%+
$LDOS - 1.7%+
$HON - .4%+
美国现在已经入侵 Venezuela。

所有人可能都在想同一件事:

怎么从这个局势里赚钱?

1. Heavy Sour、Ammonia 和 Nitrogen Fertilizers 供应扰动( $CF , $CVE)。

这些是 Venezuela 最大的出口品。

大多数人会买普通 oil ETFs 或 light sweet crude 生产商。这效率不高,因为在复杂炼厂里,轻质油不是重油的完美替代品。如果 Caribbean ammonia 被困住,全球氮肥价格会飙升。最大受益者是使用廉价美国天然气、且不依赖 Caribbean shipping lanes 的美国本土生产商。

2. Dirty Crude Processing ( $VLO ) - 如果竞争对手缺 Venezuelan oil,Valero 从多地采购重质原油的能力(以及对柴油利润率的杠杆)会让它更有韧性。

3. Naval Warfare ( $LDOS) - 散户买 Lockheed Martin(F-35s)时,Caribbean 行动重点其实是海上监视、作战和自主巡逻,在不冒美国人员风险的情况下执行封锁。Leidos 这类公司提供这些 naval tech。

4. 从 $AVAV$HII$LHX 的 defense and aerospace 也受益。

- $AVAV 最近发布了 Red Dragon,并更新了专门用于海上行动的 Switchblade 600 变体

- $LHX 提供传感器和通信设备,把无人机($AVAV)连接到舰船($HII)和飞机($BA)。

- 封锁需要大量海上监视和海军资产,这会利好造船商( $HII

5. 最近军事行动的直接供应商:

- F/A-18E/F Super Hornet from $BA(对 Caracas 的精确打击)

- B-1B Lancer from $BA

- UAS(Drone),MQ-9 Reaper - $RTX(MTS-B Sensors),$HON Honeywell 提供发动机

- Tomahawk (TLAM),$RTX

截至目前:

$AVAV - 5.91%+
$BA - 4.91%
$LHX - 3.72%
$CF - 3.61%+
$CVE - 3.61%+
$HII - +2.85%
$RTX - 2.1%
$VLO - 1.55%+
$LDOS - 1.7%+
$HON - .4%+
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2007387427820978510
❤️ 875 🔁 82 💬 28
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I'm 1 person. Unfortunately, I have a disorder where I can memorize any random fact related to financials, even to random earning volatility events like $HOOD from years ago.

The tradeoff is I can't recall things in real life, from things I did with friends or family a lot of times.

It's a pretty sad tradeoff, but helps a lot with markets and synthesis.
我就一个人。不幸的是,我有个问题:任何和财务相关的随机事实我都能记住,甚至像几年前 $HOOD 那种随机 earnings 波动事件也记得。

代价是,现实生活里的事我经常想不起来,比如很多和朋友、家人一起做过的事。

这是个挺难受的 tradeoff,但对市场和综合分析帮助很大。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I disagree, for SaaS sure, but software (eg. GPU orchestration for $CRWV, $NBIS) for running DCs to other verticals is still incredibly complex.

But most bottlenecks moved down to materials/infra like InP substrates, IC substrates, high-end pcb materials/feedstock, then a level higher with HBM and CoWoS
我不同意。SaaS 也许是这样,但软件,比如给 $CRWV$NBIS 运行 DC 的 GPU orchestration,再到其他垂直领域,依然极其复杂。

不过大多数瓶颈已经下沉到材料/infra,比如 InP substrates、IC substrates、高端 PCB materials/feedstock,然后再往上一层是 HBM 和 CoWoS。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Many of these like $GRZ.V or $ASHM were risky, distressed assets, frozen because of Venezuelan government.

Now that there's a regime change from Maduro, all of their value (gold mines, bonds) just got unlocked.

For that reason, lot of these are not on Nasdaq / NYSE because of small marketcap or foreign companies with Venezuelan interest, so you would need to go to $IBKR or others to access then.
这里很多东西,比如 $GRZ.V$ASHM,原本都是风险很高的 distressed assets,因为 Venezuelan government 被冻结。

现在 Maduro 发生 regime change,它们的价值(金矿、债券)一下子被解锁了。

也正因为这样,很多标的不在 Nasdaq / NYSE 上,要么市值太小,要么是有 Venezuela 利益的外国公司,所以你得去 $IBKR 或其他渠道才能买到。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MYUNGJOONKIM2 No point of keeping it a secret just to let institutions front run retail investors -&gt; retail finds out a month later after it's already up a lot.

Thought I'd just publish main hidden beneficiaries while the less informed are probably buying $LMT or Oil ETFs
@MYUNGJOONKIM2 没必要把它藏着,最后只是让机构先 front run 散户 -> 散户一个月后才发现,那时已经涨很多了。

我想干脆把主要隐藏受益者发出来,反正信息少的人大概率还在买 $LMT 或 Oil ETFs。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
This is an incredible opportunity for retail investors since institutions were LARGELY caught off guard regarding direct US military takeover of Venezuela. (classified operation involving Delta Force)

Valuing the sudden return of $19T+ in mineral rights ( $GRZ.V a small $200M company ) has definitely not been priced in yet.

So we'll likely see a frenzy for many of these names in overnight trading and market open.

Again, this is the new gold rush in 2026, and retail has the opportunity of a lifetime if they find the right tickers.
这对散户来说是个非常夸张的机会,因为机构对美国直接军事接管 Venezuela 这件事基本都被打了个措手不及。(涉及 Delta Force 的 classified operation)

$19T+ 矿权突然回归的价值($GRZ.V 这种小小 $200M 公司)显然还没被定价进去。

所以隔夜交易和开盘时,我们很可能会看到这些名字里很多都被疯狂追捧。

再说一次,这是 2026 年的新 gold rush。只要找到正确 ticker,散户会有一生一次的机会。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
US now has control over Venezuela $17T+ Oil and $2T+ Mineral reserves.

This is the Gold Rush of 2026.

If your first thought was profiting on the situation, here's how:

$GRZ.V ($289.61M) | $RMLFF ($582m) - $8.1B+ in claims from Gold Reserves. Over 45 times (4500%+) upside in pure assets if the full amount gets paid out to Gold Mining LTD.

Gold Reserves ( $GRZ.V) - Basically, Gold Reserve filed a new $7 billion claim (Gold Reserve v. Venezuela II) for the expropriation of their stake in the Siembra Minera project (Brisas/Cristinas mines). They already won a $1.1B arbitral award, which is 5x their share price (floor).

But, the full claim is unlikely as in a US-led reconstruction, Venezuela won't have the cash to pay $8.1B.

Instead, Gold Reserve would swap these massive debts for control of Siembra Minera rights back, one of the largest undeveloped gold/copper deposits on earth. Which presents extremely considerable upside (but this is higher risk).

Rusoro Mining ( $RMLFF ) – The "Citgo Auction"

Current Market Cap: ~$582M USD Claim Value: ~$1.87 Billion (including interest)

Unlike many others, Rusoro has attached its claim to the ongoing Delaware Court auction of PDV Holding. If the CITGO auction clears at a reasonable price, Rusoro gets paid in US Dollars, likely in 2025.

This would result in a cash injection of ~$1.8B into a company trading at ~$580M. This implies a ~200% to 300% return from current levels

TLDR: $RMLFF (Rusoro) - ~3x return driven by the CITGO Auction in the USA (High probability, lower multiple).

TLDR: $GRZ (Gold Reserve) - potential ~45x return driven by Regime Change/Nation Building and swapping debt for mining rights (Lower probability, massive multiple).

What else?

ConocoPhillips ( $COP, $119B MC) - Owed $10B+. They are the "whale" of creditors. This is extremely considerable amount of assets, but less impactful compared to $GRZ.V.

Chevron $CVX - Never fully left. They have been operating under a special OFAC license (General License 41).

ExxonMobil $XOM - Claims ~$1.6B

Tidewater ( $TDW ): Claims ~$80M

O-I Glass ( $OI ): Claims ~$700M, 35% cash injection relative to market cap. This is a sleeper hit. If they get their $700M from the Citgo sale, it dramatically improves their balance sheet.
美国现在控制了 Venezuela $17T+ 石油和 $2T+ 矿产储备。

这是 2026 年的 Gold Rush。

如果你的第一反应是怎么从这件事赚钱,方法如下:

$GRZ.V ($289.61M) | $RMLFF ($582m) - Gold Reserves 相关索赔 $8.1B+。如果全额支付给 Gold Mining LTD,单纯从资产看就有超过 45 倍(4500%+)上行空间。

Gold Reserves ($GRZ.V) - 基本情况是,Gold Reserve 因 Siembra Minera 项目(Brisas/Cristinas mines)权益被征收,提交了新的 $7 billion 索赔(Gold Reserve v. Venezuela II)。他们已经赢过 $1.1B 仲裁裁决,相当于股价 5 倍(floor)。

但全额索赔不太可能,因为在美国主导的重建中,Venezuela 不会有现金支付 $8.1B。

相反,Gold Reserve 可能会把这些巨额债权换回 Siembra Minera rights 的控制权,这是地球上最大的未开发 gold/copper deposits 之一。这带来极大的上行空间(但风险更高)。

Rusoro Mining ($RMLFF) – “Citgo Auction”

当前 Market Cap:约 $582M USD。Claim Value:约 $1.87 Billion(含利息)

和很多公司不同,Rusoro 已经把它的索赔挂到了 Delaware Court 正在进行的 PDV Holding 拍卖上。如果 CITGO auction 以合理价格成交,Rusoro 很可能在 2025 年拿到美元赔付。

这会给一家当前只按约 $580M 交易的公司注入约 $1.8B 现金。也就是说,从当前水平看大概有 ~200% 到 300% 回报。

TLDR: $RMLFF (Rusoro) - 由美国 CITGO Auction 推动,约 3x 回报(高概率、倍数较低)。

TLDR: $GRZ (Gold Reserve) - 由 Regime Change/Nation Building 以及债转矿权推动,潜在约 45x 回报(概率较低、倍数巨大)。

还有什么?

ConocoPhillips ($COP, $119B MC) - 被欠 $10B+。他们是债权人里的“whale”。资产金额非常可观,但相比 $GRZ.V 冲击没那么大。

Chevron $CVX - 从未真正完全离开。他们一直在特殊 OFAC license(General License 41)下运营。

ExxonMobil $XOM - 索赔约 $1.6B

Tidewater ($TDW):索赔约 $80M

O-I Glass ($OI):索赔约 $700M,相当于市值 35% 的现金注入。这是个 sleeper hit。如果他们从 Citgo sale 拿到 $700M,资产负债表会大幅改善。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
US has now toppled Maduro's regime in Venezuela.

Everyone's first thought is:

How do I profit off Nation Building in Venezuela?

Here's how:

1. Distressed Debt + Bonds ( $ASHM, $HLI, $LAZ )

2x–3x multiple from "pure play" distressed Venezuelan debt owned by Ashmore $ASHM. They are the largest institutional holders of Venezuelan debt.

Bonds trade in the 10–20 cent range (depending on sanctions flux). In a regime change scenario, analysts (Citi, Allianz) est a recovery of 30–55 cents on the dollar. ~2x–3x multiple on book of assets that are marked down.

$HLI - IB is the primary financial advisor to the Venezuela Creditor Committee. In sovereign restructurings, the advisors are paid "success fees", and are the "picks and shovels" play for restructuring.

$LAZ - sovereign debt restructuring (advised Greece, Ukraine). This firm benefit from the complexity of the deal, and Venezuela's debt stack is arguably the most complex in history.

2. Heavy Crude Transplant ( Paris: TE, $GHM)

Technip - Historical architect of Venezuela’s critical infrastructure. The new gov will likely award "no-bid" or "sole-source" service contracts to the OEM to expedite repairs, as bringing in a new firm to reverse-engineer the plants would take years.

$GHM - The small-cap industrial firm manufactures the vacuum ejector systems used in refineries and upgraders. To upgrade Venezuela's heavy oil, you must distill it under a vacuum to prevent it from turning into solid coke.

3. Dilutents ( $TRGP )

Before Venezuela can export high volumes of oil, it must import high volumes of diluent (naphtha or natural gasoline) to make the heavy crude flow through pipelines.

$TRGP operates the Galena Park Marine Terminal, the primary hub for sending diluents to Venezuela.

Reverting to US supplies means Targa’s Galena Park Marine Terminal (a major LPG/Naphtha export hub in Houston) would see an immediate massive spike in volume to displace the Iranian supply.

4. Banking Plays ( Panama: MVZ.A / MVZ.B)

Mercantil is a unique anomaly, a Venezuelan bank holding company that listed in Panama and has a US presence (Amerant was spun off, but Mercantil remains).

It is the most logical "bridge" for dollarized flows, remittances, and aid money moving from the US/Miami back into a reconstructed Caracas.

5. Energy Sector ( $CVX, $VLO, $PSX)

The most obvious beneficiary of regime change and nation building in Venezuela is Chevron $CVX. Unlike other US majors that left, Chevron has maintained a presence in Venezuela. They have the staff, the licenses (via OFAC), and the fields (Petroboscan, Petropiar) ready to ramp up immediately.

Gulf Coast Refiners $VLO and $PSX would stand to benefit as well as their Texas and Louisiana refineries were specifically built to process Venezuela's heavy, sour crude. Since sanctions hit, they have had to buy more expensive heavy crude from elsewhere. A flood of Venezuelan oil would drastically lower their feedstock costs, widening their profit margins.

Artificial intelligence was one of the most profitable trades in 2025 and moving forward to 2026.

Given the unexpected turn of events with a fast regime change, investing in Nation Building from banks to oil processing might become the most profitable trade in 2026.
美国现在已经推翻了委内瑞拉 Maduro 政权。

大家第一反应都是:

我该怎么从委内瑞拉 nation building 里赚钱?

思路如下:

1. 困境债 + 债券($ASHM, $HLI, $LAZ

Ashmore $ASHM 持有大量“纯正”委内瑞拉困境债,是最大的机构持有人之一。债券目前大多在 10-20 美分区间交易(取决于制裁变化)。如果政权更替,Citi、Allianz 等分析师估算回收率可能到 30-55 美分,相当于账面资产 2-3 倍重估。

$HLI - 是委内瑞拉债权人委员会的主要财务顾问。主权债重组里,顾问会拿成功费,是重组的“卖铲子”玩法。

$LAZ - 做主权债重组(希腊、乌克兰)。委内瑞拉债务结构可能是史上最复杂之一,交易越复杂越利好这种机构。

2. 重油修复/改造(Paris: TE, $GHM

Technip - 委内瑞拉关键基础设施的历史架构方。新政府很可能给原 OEM “无需竞标”或“单一来源”服务合同来加快修复,因为换新公司逆向工程这些设施要花几年。

$GHM - 小盘工业公司,生产炼厂和 upgrader 用的真空喷射系统。要升级委内瑞拉重油,必须在真空下蒸馏,避免变成固体焦炭。

3. 稀释剂($TRGP

委内瑞拉要大量出口原油之前,必须大量进口稀释剂(石脑油或天然汽油),让重油能在管道里流动。

$TRGP 运营 Galena Park Marine Terminal,是向委内瑞拉发送稀释剂的主要枢纽。回到美国供应意味着 Targa 在 Houston 的 LPG/Naphtha 出口枢纽会立刻出现巨大增量,用来替代伊朗供应。

4. 银行玩法(Panama: MVZ.A / MVZ.B)

Mercantil 是一个很特别的委内瑞拉银行控股公司,在巴拿马上市,也有美国业务。它是美元化资金流、汇款和援助资金从美国/Miami 回到重建后的 Caracas 的最自然“桥梁”。

5. 能源板块($CVX, $VLO, $PSX

政权更替和委内瑞拉 nation building 最明显受益者是 Chevron $CVX。其他美国大油公司离开了,但 Chevron 一直保留在当地的存在,有员工、有 OFAC 许可、有 Petroboscan、Petropiar 等油田,可以立刻 ramp。

Gulf Coast 炼厂 $VLO$PSX 也会受益,因为它们在 Texas 和 Louisiana 的炼厂本来就是为处理委内瑞拉重质高硫原油而建。制裁后它们不得不从别处买更贵的重油。委内瑞拉原油回流会大幅降低原料成本,扩大利润率。

2025 年 AI 是最赚钱的交易之一,进入 2026 年也是如此。但如果政权快速更替这个意外事件兑现,从银行到石油处理的 Nation Building 投资,可能会成为 2026 年最赚钱的交易。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2007489901877436756
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ssankar Venezuelans finally found out why $PLTR trades at 350 P/E.
@ssankar Venezuelans 终于知道为什么 $PLTR 能按 350 P/E 交易了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Great observation. I made a similar point earlier where it might take ~3 months + to topple the defense minster Vladimir Lopez and FANB.

However, from Trump's comments on the United States control over Venezuela, $ASHM, $CVX, and others will likely see the benefit + re-rate heavily since it does look like we're shifting to nation-building mode faster than expected.
观察得很好。我之前也提过类似观点:推翻 defense minster Vladimir Lopez 和 FANB 可能需要 ~3 个月以上。

不过,从 Trump 关于美国控制 Venezuela 的评论来看,$ASHM$CVX 以及其他公司很可能受益并大幅 re-rate,因为看起来我们比预期更快进入 nation-building 模式。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Nation building one of the rarest and best opportunities as an investor. With the regime change, it's now run by the US gov.

Venezuela is a resource gold mine.

There's a lot of distressed assets like bonds that $ASHM have, and given little institutions frontran these events (since it was a surprise military action), tons of potential upside by discovering the right companies.

Same with companies like $CVX that had assets trapped and are now unlocked or banks that operated there (look at what happened to Argentina banks/stocks)
Nation building 是投资者最稀有、也最好的机会之一。随着 regime change,现在它由美国政府来管。

Venezuela 是一座资源金矿。

这里有很多 distressed assets,比如 $ASHM 持有的债券。而且几乎没什么机构提前 front run 这些事件(因为这是一次意外的军事行动),所以只要找对公司,上行空间非常大。

$CVX 这种原本资产被困、现在被解锁的公司也一样,还有在那里经营过的银行也一样(看看 Argentina 银行/股票当时发生了什么)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@beauty_oe 元投稿がバズってびっくり!きっかけはあなたの引用だったので、シェアのお礼を言いに来ました 🙇‍♂️
@beauty_oe 原帖突然爆了我也吓一跳!契机是你的引用,所以特地来感谢你分享 🙇‍♂️
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@poconokid18 Scratch that, looks like regime change will go smoother than expected from Trump's comments. Made a new post about beneficiaries here:

https://t.co/wRNq8ntQSt
@poconokid18 收回刚才那句,从 Trump 的评论看,regime change 似乎会比预期更顺利。我在这里新发了一篇受益者分析:

https://t.co/wRNq8ntQSt
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
US has now toppled Maduro's regime in Venezuela.

Everyone's first thought is:

How do I profit off Nation Building in Venezuela?

Here's how:

1. Distressed Debt + Bonds ( $ASHM, $HLI, $LAZ )

2x–3x multiple from "pure play" distressed Venezuelan debt owned by Ashmore $ASHM. They are the largest institutional holders of Venezuelan debt.

Bonds trade in the 10–20 cent range (depending on sanctions flux). In a regime change scenario, analysts (Citi, Allianz) est a recovery of 30–55 cents on the dollar. ~2x–3x multiple on book of assets that are marked down.

$HLI - IB is the primary financial advisor to the Venezuela Creditor Committee. In sovereign restructurings, the advisors are paid "success fees", and are the "picks and shovels" play for restructuring.

$LAZ - sovereign debt restructuring (advised Greece, Ukraine). This firm benefit from the complexity of the deal, and Venezuela's debt stack is arguably the most complex in history.

2. Heavy Crude Transplant ( Paris: TE, $GHM)

Technip - Historical architect of Venezuela’s critical infrastructure. The new gov will likely award "no-bid" or "sole-source" service contracts to the OEM to expedite repairs, as bringing in a new firm to reverse-engineer the plants would take years.

$GHM - The small-cap industrial firm manufactures the vacuum ejector systems used in refineries and upgraders. To upgrade Venezuela's heavy oil, you must distill it under a vacuum to prevent it from turning into solid coke.

3. Dilutents ( $TRGP )

Before Venezuela can export high volumes of oil, it must import high volumes of diluent (naphtha or natural gasoline) to make the heavy crude flow through pipelines.

$TRGP operates the Galena Park Marine Terminal, the primary hub for sending diluents to Venezuela.

Reverting to US supplies means Targa’s Galena Park Marine Terminal (a major LPG/Naphtha export hub in Houston) would see an immediate massive spike in volume to displace the Iranian supply.

4. Banking Plays ( Panama: MVZ.A / MVZ.B)

Mercantil is a unique anomaly, a Venezuelan bank holding company that listed in Panama and has a US presence (Amerant was spun off, but Mercantil remains).

It is the most logical "bridge" for dollarized flows, remittances, and aid money moving from the US/Miami back into a reconstructed Caracas.

5. Energy Sector ( $CVX, $VLO, $PSX)

The most obvious beneficiary of regime change and nation building in Venezuela is Chevron $CVX. Unlike other US majors that left, Chevron has maintained a presence in Venezuela. They have the staff, the licenses (via OFAC), and the fields (Petroboscan, Petropiar) ready to ramp up immediately.

Gulf Coast Refiners $VLO and $PSX would stand to benefit as well as their Texas and Louisiana refineries were specifically built to process Venezuela's heavy, sour crude. Since sanctions hit, they have had to buy more expensive heavy crude from elsewhere. A flood of Venezuelan oil would drastically lower their feedstock costs, widening their profit margins.

Artificial intelligence was one of the most profitable trades in 2025 and moving forward to 2026.

Given the unexpected turn of events with a fast regime change, investing in Nation Building from banks to oil processing might become the most profitable trade in 2026.
美国现在已经推翻了委内瑞拉 Maduro 政权。

大家第一反应都是:

我该怎么从委内瑞拉 nation building 里赚钱?

思路如下:

1. 困境债 + 债券($ASHM, $HLI, $LAZ

Ashmore $ASHM 持有大量“纯正”委内瑞拉困境债,是最大的机构持有人之一。债券目前大多在 10-20 美分区间交易(取决于制裁变化)。如果政权更替,Citi、Allianz 等分析师估算回收率可能到 30-55 美分,相当于账面资产 2-3 倍重估。

$HLI - 是委内瑞拉债权人委员会的主要财务顾问。主权债重组里,顾问会拿成功费,是重组的“卖铲子”玩法。

$LAZ - 做主权债重组(希腊、乌克兰)。委内瑞拉债务结构可能是史上最复杂之一,交易越复杂越利好这种机构。

2. 重油修复/改造(Paris: TE, $GHM

Technip - 委内瑞拉关键基础设施的历史架构方。新政府很可能给原 OEM “无需竞标”或“单一来源”服务合同来加快修复,因为换新公司逆向工程这些设施要花几年。

$GHM - 小盘工业公司,生产炼厂和 upgrader 用的真空喷射系统。要升级委内瑞拉重油,必须在真空下蒸馏,避免变成固体焦炭。

3. 稀释剂($TRGP

委内瑞拉要大量出口原油之前,必须大量进口稀释剂(石脑油或天然汽油),让重油能在管道里流动。

$TRGP 运营 Galena Park Marine Terminal,是向委内瑞拉发送稀释剂的主要枢纽。回到美国供应意味着 Targa 在 Houston 的 LPG/Naphtha 出口枢纽会立刻出现巨大增量,用来替代伊朗供应。

4. 银行玩法(Panama: MVZ.A / MVZ.B)

Mercantil 是一个很特别的委内瑞拉银行控股公司,在巴拿马上市,也有美国业务。它是美元化资金流、汇款和援助资金从美国/Miami 回到重建后的 Caracas 的最自然“桥梁”。

5. 能源板块($CVX, $VLO, $PSX

政权更替和委内瑞拉 nation building 最明显受益者是 Chevron $CVX。其他美国大油公司离开了,但 Chevron 一直保留在当地的存在,有员工、有 OFAC 许可、有 Petroboscan、Petropiar 等油田,可以立刻 ramp。

Gulf Coast 炼厂 $VLO$PSX 也会受益,因为它们在 Texas 和 Louisiana 的炼厂本来就是为处理委内瑞拉重质高硫原油而建。制裁后它们不得不从别处买更贵的重油。委内瑞拉原油回流会大幅降低原料成本,扩大利润率。

2025 年 AI 是最赚钱的交易之一,进入 2026 年也是如此。但如果政权快速更替这个意外事件兑现,从银行到石油处理的 Nation Building 投资,可能会成为 2026 年最赚钱的交易。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2007489901877436756
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推

2025年12月

↩️ 回复
@meeijer lol I added a bitmoji by accident, reposted
@meeijer lol 我不小心加了个 bitmoji,所以重发了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$AXTI CEO - “We are 40% of the Indium Phosphide supply chain”

Has there ever been a company this small ($700M) that controlled a critical bottleneck for a multi-trillion dollar industry? https://t.co/tn7EOMPgas
$AXTI CEO - “我们占 Indium Phosphide supply chain 的 40%”

有没有这么小的公司($700M),却控制着一个数万亿美元产业的关键瓶颈? https://t.co/tn7EOMPgas
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
"Bottleneck within a Bottleneck": Indium Phosphide

$AXTI | $SMTOY is a duopoly.

They control 60%+ of the world's InP substrates as the bottleneck of the AI buildout.

What's even more alarming? This is dependent on: Indium Phosphide.

InP is a Monopoly. 78% control by $AXTI / China.

Here's the bottleneck within a bottleneck:

The InP substrates is already a duopoly between Japanese and Chinese entities. However, upstream production of laser-grade feedstock required by companies like Sumitomo is dominated by $AXTI (again) and Chinese companies.

Here's the major issue:

The AI industry is extremely reliant on photonics to scale. Whether, transceivers are "InP-based" or "Silicon-based" the photon source remains: Indium Phosphide.

As AI clusters move from 10,000 to 100,000+ GPUs, the "copper bottleneck" is forcing a total shift to optical interconnects. This makes InP more critical to AI scaling than almost any other single material.

On top of that, laser-grade feedstock must be at least 6N (99.9999%) pure. Even trace amounts of impurities (Silicon, Sulfur, Zinc), cannot be used like they do in other segments like LED. And most research probably confuses laser-grade feedstock with regular InP outputs.

Sumitomo is arguably the most famous name in the InP substrate market. They hold a massive market share in the high-end laser substrate segment. Yet trade data suggest they are increasingly reliant on external feedstock for Indium Phosphide from companies like $DOWA and from China. (They're likely still included in feedstock ownership lists bc of captive recycling and reserves)

So if the entire Western AI buildout feels safe regarding a Japanese company as a duopoly, think again.

The source of the bottleneck is bottlenecked by Chinese suppliers like $AXTI and Chinese companies.

If we look at production there's are estimates from deep research breakdown of estimate controls:

Vital Materials - 35% (Merchant)
- Vital acquired Fanya Metal Exchange inventory (3,600 tonnes of Indium) in 2020 gave them large control over the global Indium market. They have leveraged this to become the largest producer of InP polycrystal. Dominant cost leader; controls raw Indium supply (Fanya stocks).

$AXTI - 25% (Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology)
- Primarily Captive. Most of their polycrystal production is consumed by their own crystal growth furnaces to make wafers. However, they also sell raw materials and compounds to the merchant market, making them a hybrid player.

They're the only company in the world that goes from mines, refineries -> InP substrate output, which is an absolutely crazy bottleneck given they own both the raw materials into InP substrate controls. Feeds own wafer production; key non-Japan source.

Zhuzhou Keneng New Material - 18%

- Keneng has achieved "mass production of polycrystalline indium phosphide" and possesses "highly integrated automatic polycrystalline production capacity". They are a key recipient of China's export quotas for Indium. Pure-play synthesis specialist; major exporter.

Then Outside:

$DOWA - 12%

- The biggest supplier out of any Western company (yeah Japanese). Deep roots in mining (Akita Zinc), so they're the leading supplier of high-purity metal organics and compounds.

The "source" for Japan Inc. (Sumitomo, JX)

Wafer Technology Ltd - 5%
- A subsidiary of IQE plc. Critical strategic asset for NATO-aligned supply chains that require non-Chinese feedstock, even though they're going through asset liquidations right now.

InPACT (France) - 3%

- InPACT states they produce polycrystalline ingots via Horizontal Gradient Freeze (HGF) using high-pressure synthesis so they meet requirements from (Nokia, Ericsson) and some European defense sectors.

Rest of World - 2%

This includes major substrate makers (Coherent, Sumitomo), small-scale research production, and emerging players in Korea or Taiwan who are attempting to break the monopoly.

The reality is that 78% of the global capacity for laser-grade InP feedstock is located in China.

The demand for optical components already exceeds supply/production by multiple factors. This is pre-ramp too. The entire AI buildout is bottlenecked by two companies.

But 1/4th of the materials comes from: $AXTI. And ~1/3rd of InP Substrate outputs again comes from laser-grade feedstock.

The entire AI buildout is dependent on some random $700m company that serves as both the bottleneck of a bottleneck and the bottleneck.

It's both national security issue to scale up InP production both for substrate and laser-grade feedstock.
“瓶颈中的瓶颈”:Indium Phosphide

$AXTI | $SMTOY 是双寡头。

它们控制全球 60%+ 的 InP substrates,是 AI buildout 的瓶颈。

更吓人的是,这还依赖于:Indium Phosphide。

InP 本身几乎是垄断,78% 由 $AXTI / 中国控制。

瓶颈中的瓶颈在这里:

InP substrates 已经是日本和中国实体之间的双寡头。但像 Sumitomo 这类公司需要的激光级 feedstock,上游生产又被 $AXTI(再次出现)和中国公司主导。

核心问题是:AI 行业要扩张极度依赖 photonics。无论 transceivers 是“InP-based”还是“Silicon-based”,光源仍然是 Indium Phosphide。

随着 AI 集群从 10,000 GPU 到 100,000+ GPU,“铜瓶颈”正在迫使行业转向 optical interconnects,让 InP 比几乎任何单一材料都更关键。

激光级 feedstock 至少要 6N(99.9999%)纯度。即使有微量 Silicon、Sulfur、Zinc 杂质,也不像 LED 等其他领域那样能用。很多研究可能把激光级 feedstock 和普通 InP 产出混在一起。

Sumitomo 是 InP substrate 市场最知名的名字之一,在高端激光 substrate 份额很大。但贸易数据表明,它越来越依赖 $DOWA 和中国等外部 Indium Phosphide feedstock。

所以如果整个西方 AI buildout 因为有一家日本双寡头就觉得安全,最好再想想。

瓶颈的源头本身又被 $AXTI 和中国供应商卡住。

大致产能控制:Vital Materials 约 35%,$AXTI 约 25%,Zhuzhou Keneng New Material 约 18%,$DOWA 约 12%,Wafer Technology Ltd 约 5%,InPACT France 约 3%,其他地区约 2%。

现实是,全球激光级 InP feedstock 产能的 78% 位于中国。

光学组件需求已经数倍超过供应/产量,而且这还在 ramp 之前。整个 AI buildout 被两家公司卡住,其中约 1/4 材料来自 $AXTI,约 1/3 InP substrate 产出又依赖激光级 feedstock。

整个 AI buildout 居然依赖一家随机的 $700m 公司,它既是瓶颈的瓶颈,也是瓶颈本身。

无论是 substrate 还是激光级 feedstock,扩大 InP 产能都是国家安全问题。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2005485130958430440
❤️ 282 🔁 23 💬 16
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@brandy117 The claims were mindblowing controlling 40% of the world's Indium Phosphide supply chain.

Especially when photonic components depend on the material, it's a huge future chokepoint. https://t.co/3u29jRnTT8
@brandy117 这些说法很惊人:他们控制了全球 Indium Phosphide supply chain 的 40%。

尤其是 photonic components 依赖这种材料时,它会成为未来巨大的 chokepoint。 https://t.co/3u29jRnTT8
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@TylerDurden Trya Banks?
@TylerDurden Trya Banks?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@fin_anthro @illyquid even more brain damage lol https://t.co/7eLRmZJ3zO
@fin_anthro @illyquid 脑损伤更严重了 lol https://t.co/7eLRmZJ3zO
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@illyquid I think people on X are just smarter. Unfortunately you can't reply to people on Reddit with facts, just memes.

These types of interactions give me partial brain damage. https://t.co/ekXvrGOizF
@illyquid 我觉得 X 上的人就是更聪明。不幸的是,你没法在 Reddit 上用事实回复别人,只能发 memes。

这种互动会让我受到部分脑损伤。 https://t.co/ekXvrGOizF
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@illyquid 159k views, 2 hours in during US midnight hours. Not too shabby.

Reading the comments on Reddit make you lose IQ though. https://t.co/wreJjyqq6y
@illyquid 美国午夜时段发出 2 小时,159k views。还不差。

不过看 Reddit 评论真的会掉 IQ。 https://t.co/wreJjyqq6y
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@illyquid They literally automodded away $MSFT ASIC program's name lol

But thought I'd have some fun with my regarded friends again. Obviously anything analytical needs to be dumbed down and taken to the extreme for the Reddit audience to care https://t.co/WSH1u5r6Vt
@illyquid 他们居然直接用 automod 把 $MSFT ASIC program 的名字删掉了 lol

不过我想再和我那些 regarded friends 找点乐子。显然任何分析性的东西,都必须降智并推到极端,Reddit audience 才会在乎。 https://t.co/WSH1u5r6Vt
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I can see that if you look at China domestic markets only but not western AI ramp. So two things:

One is extreme ramp in general. Hyperscaler demand will always outstrip supply even with 6-inch InP wafers. So competitive alternative or not, demand doesn’t disappear but might get spread out through competitive alternatives in China’s domestic market.

The other is vertical integration. You mentioned $DOWA on the western side and especially InP. $AXTI controls a huge percent of the world’s InP supply and if those prices gets jacked up from hyperscaler buying direct for insurance-> handing them to $COHR, then it’s more of an issue for Sumitomo. And AXT benefits from both layers of the bottlenecks. Xinyao/JFS entering the supply chain just makes adds one more player to the equation so it’s not doom and gloom. Eg memory (sk Hynix; MU, Samsung)

Of course these points might get thrown out the drain if China export controls and we’re looking at China domestic market only. But generally demand outstrips supply (eg. COHR is at max) even if we add in more players.
如果只看 China domestic markets、不看西方 AI ramp,我能理解这个观点。所以有两点:

第一是整体极端 ramp。即使用 6-inch InP wafers,hyperscaler demand 也永远会超过供给。所以不管有没有有竞争力的替代方案,需求不会消失,只是可能在 China domestic market 里分散到竞争替代方案上。

第二是 vertical integration。你提到西方侧的 $DOWA,尤其是 InP。$AXTI 控制着全球 InP 供应中很大一部分。如果 hyperscaler 为了保险直接买入、把这些东西交给 $COHR,导致价格被抬高,那对 Sumitomo 来说问题更大。AXT 则同时受益于两层瓶颈。Xinyao/JFS 进入 supply chain 只是让方程里多一个玩家,不是 doom and gloom。比如 memory(sk Hynix、MU、Samsung)。

当然,如果 China export controls 发生,而我们只看 China domestic market,这些观点可能都要扔掉。但一般来说,即使加入更多玩家,需求仍然超过供给(比如 COHR 已经满产)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Uhh, from my own personal research so far, to cover all grounds I’ve liked:

1. $AXTI at the very bottom of the entire supply chain + 1/3rd of InP substrates 1/4th of InP. Completely unheard of that AI supply chain is tethered to this $700m stock.

2. $DOWA + Sumitomo Electric for Western Hedge on substrate + materials.

3. $AAOI, $LITE for hyperscaler chips, one for $AMZN/ $MSFT, the other for everything but more levered to $TPU

4. $MRVL + $AVGO

I think that’s kind of all you need to capture photonics BOM value + InP supply shock.

There’s some other interesting ones like Landmark Opto that I’m looking at now.

$POET didn’t quite make that list and you’d be getting exposure through $MRVL anyway, unless there’s something I missed
呃,就我目前自己的研究,为了覆盖尽可能完整,我喜欢这些:

1. $AXTI 位于整个 supply chain 最底层 + 1/3 的 InP substrates、1/4 的 InP。AI supply chain 竟然被这只 $700m 股票牵住,这完全没人听过。

2. $DOWA + Sumitomo Electric,作为 substrate + materials 上的 Western Hedge。

3. $AAOI$LITE 做 hyperscaler chips,一个偏 $AMZN/$MSFT,另一个覆盖更广但对 $TPU 杠杆更高。

4. $MRVL + $AVGO

我觉得要捕捉 photonics BOM value + InP supply shock,差不多就这些够了。

还有一些有意思的,比如 Landmark Opto,我现在也在看。

$POET 没完全进这个名单,而且除非我漏了什么,否则你通过 $MRVL ramp 本来也会拿到相关 exposure。
❤️ 19 🔁 1 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Sumitomo is subject to hikes in InP prices though if $GOOGL goes direct to $DOWA or others for feedstock.

$AXTI owns the whole supply chain, and a huge portion of laser grade inp. But downside is obviously anuke from China exports.

Sumitomo Electric is huge though so you’re not exactly getting the most direct exposure.
如果 $GOOGL 直接去找 $DOWA 或其他人买 feedstock,Sumitomo 还是会受到 InP 涨价影响。

$AXTI 拥有整条 supply chain,以及很大一部分 laser grade InP。但下行风险显然是 China exports 被 anuke。

不过 Sumitomo Electric 体量很大,所以你拿到的并不是最直接的 exposure。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
This is a research note on point failure of the entire AI buildout in $AXTI/China from both substrate production and laser-grade Indium Phosphide. I’m not doing valuation analysis on individual companies

But if this flow stops, $LITE, $COHR, $AVGO to $GOOGL, $MSFT faces extreme delays.

I’ll write something else about valuing critical material bottlenecks if you want. But basically if a backlog was $50m from 2024 and TAM was $150m.

And now because it’s a critical material, if Google would be willing to pay 50 times that (only a few percent increase on BOM cost to stay alive), then the valuation math of that original $50m backlog -> $2.5B for future capacity changes.
这是一份关于整个 AI buildout 在 $AXTI/China 这里可能出现 point failure 的研究笔记,涵盖 substrate production 和 laser-grade Indium Phosphide。我不是在做单个公司的 valuation analysis。

但如果这条流停了,从 $LITE$COHR$AVGO$GOOGL$MSFT 都会面临极端延误。

如果你想看,我可以另外写一篇怎么给 critical material bottlenecks 估值。但基本逻辑是,如果 2024 年 backlog 是 $50m,TAM 是 $150m。

现在因为它成了关键材料,如果 Google 愿意为此支付 50 倍价格(为了活下来,BOM cost 只增加几个百分点),那原来 $50m backlog 对未来产能的估值数学就会变成 $2.5B。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Don’t think hyperscalers understand the danger yet. $COHR is the leading “virtually integrated” American company. But the risk is it’s still stuck in the bottleneck for InP feedstock and buys 6N InP polycrystal (feedstock) from the merchant market.

If the companies above stop selling 6N polycrystal, Coherent’s laser and transceiver business effectively hits a wall alongside the hyperscaler buildout.

Coherent does not own major Indium mines or high-volume 6N synthesis plants on the scale of Vital Materials or $AXTI.

To put it more simply: Coherent is the "Western Hope" for breaking the substrate duopoly between Sumitomo and $AXTI, but they are currently a hostage to the InP feedstok monopoly.
我不觉得 hyperscalers 还理解这个危险。$COHR 是领先的“virtually integrated”美国公司。但风险在于,它仍然卡在 InP feedstock 瓶颈里,并且从 merchant market 购买 6N InP polycrystal(feedstock)。

如果上面这些公司停止出售 6N polycrystal,Coherent 的 laser 和 transceiver 业务基本会撞墙,hyperscaler buildout 也会一起撞墙。

Coherent 并不拥有大型 Indium mines,也没有像 Vital Materials 或 $AXTI 那种规模的高产量 6N synthesis plants。

说得更简单点:Coherent 是打破 Sumitomo 和 $AXTI 之间 substrate duopoly 的“Western Hope”,但它目前是 InP feedstock monopoly 的人质。
❤️ 4 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
"Bottleneck within a Bottleneck": Indium Phosphide

$AXTI | $SMTOY is a duopoly.

They control 60%+ of the world's InP substrates as the bottleneck of the AI buildout.

What's even more alarming? This is dependent on: Indium Phosphide.

InP is a Monopoly. 78% control by $AXTI / China.

Here's the bottleneck within a bottleneck:

The InP substrates is already a duopoly between Japanese and Chinese entities. However, upstream production of laser-grade feedstock required by companies like Sumitomo is dominated by $AXTI (again) and Chinese companies.

Here's the major issue:

The AI industry is extremely reliant on photonics to scale. Whether, transceivers are "InP-based" or "Silicon-based" the photon source remains: Indium Phosphide.

As AI clusters move from 10,000 to 100,000+ GPUs, the "copper bottleneck" is forcing a total shift to optical interconnects. This makes InP more critical to AI scaling than almost any other single material.

On top of that, laser-grade feedstock must be at least 6N (99.9999%) pure. Even trace amounts of impurities (Silicon, Sulfur, Zinc), cannot be used like they do in other segments like LED. And most research probably confuses laser-grade feedstock with regular InP outputs.

Sumitomo is arguably the most famous name in the InP substrate market. They hold a massive market share in the high-end laser substrate segment. Yet trade data suggest they are increasingly reliant on external feedstock for Indium Phosphide from companies like $DOWA and from China. (They're likely still included in feedstock ownership lists bc of captive recycling and reserves)

So if the entire Western AI buildout feels safe regarding a Japanese company as a duopoly, think again.

The source of the bottleneck is bottlenecked by Chinese suppliers like $AXTI and Chinese companies.

If we look at production there's are estimates from deep research breakdown of estimate controls:

Vital Materials - 35% (Merchant)
- Vital acquired Fanya Metal Exchange inventory (3,600 tonnes of Indium) in 2020 gave them large control over the global Indium market. They have leveraged this to become the largest producer of InP polycrystal. Dominant cost leader; controls raw Indium supply (Fanya stocks).

$AXTI - 25% (Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology)
- Primarily Captive. Most of their polycrystal production is consumed by their own crystal growth furnaces to make wafers. However, they also sell raw materials and compounds to the merchant market, making them a hybrid player.

They're the only company in the world that goes from mines, refineries -> InP substrate output, which is an absolutely crazy bottleneck given they own both the raw materials into InP substrate controls. Feeds own wafer production; key non-Japan source.

Zhuzhou Keneng New Material - 18%

- Keneng has achieved "mass production of polycrystalline indium phosphide" and possesses "highly integrated automatic polycrystalline production capacity". They are a key recipient of China's export quotas for Indium. Pure-play synthesis specialist; major exporter.

Then Outside:

$DOWA - 12%

- The biggest supplier out of any Western company (yeah Japanese). Deep roots in mining (Akita Zinc), so they're the leading supplier of high-purity metal organics and compounds.

The "source" for Japan Inc. (Sumitomo, JX)

Wafer Technology Ltd - 5%
- A subsidiary of IQE plc. Critical strategic asset for NATO-aligned supply chains that require non-Chinese feedstock, even though they're going through asset liquidations right now.

InPACT (France) - 3%

- InPACT states they produce polycrystalline ingots via Horizontal Gradient Freeze (HGF) using high-pressure synthesis so they meet requirements from (Nokia, Ericsson) and some European defense sectors.

Rest of World - 2%

This includes major substrate makers (Coherent, Sumitomo), small-scale research production, and emerging players in Korea or Taiwan who are attempting to break the monopoly.

The reality is that 78% of the global capacity for laser-grade InP feedstock is located in China.

The demand for optical components already exceeds supply/production by multiple factors. This is pre-ramp too. The entire AI buildout is bottlenecked by two companies.

But 1/4th of the materials comes from: $AXTI. And ~1/3rd of InP Substrate outputs again comes from laser-grade feedstock.

The entire AI buildout is dependent on some random $700m company that serves as both the bottleneck of a bottleneck and the bottleneck.

It's both national security issue to scale up InP production both for substrate and laser-grade feedstock.
“瓶颈中的瓶颈”:Indium Phosphide

$AXTI | $SMTOY 是 duopoly。

它们控制全球 60%+ InP substrates,是 AI buildout 的瓶颈。

更吓人的是什么?这还依赖于:Indium Phosphide。

InP 是 monopoly。78% 由 $AXTI / China 控制。

这就是瓶颈中的瓶颈:

InP substrates 本身已经是日本和中国实体之间的 duopoly。但像 Sumitomo 这类公司所需的 laser-grade feedstock,上游生产又被 $AXTI(还是它)和中国公司主导。

核心问题在这里:

AI industry 要扩张,极度依赖 photonics。不管 transceivers 是“InP-based”还是“Silicon-based”,光子源仍然是:Indium Phosphide。

随着 AI clusters 从 10,000 GPUs 走向 100,000+ GPUs,“copper bottleneck”正在迫使整个行业转向 optical interconnects。这让 InP 对 AI scaling 的重要性超过几乎任何单一材料。

此外,laser-grade feedstock 纯度至少要 6N(99.9999%)。哪怕有微量杂质(Silicon、Sulfur、Zinc),也不能像 LED 等其他领域那样使用。而大多数研究可能把 laser-grade feedstock 和普通 InP outputs 混为一谈。

Sumitomo 可以说是 InP substrate market 最有名的名字。他们在高端 laser substrate segment 占有巨大份额。但贸易数据表明,他们越来越依赖外部 Indium Phosphide feedstock,来源包括 $DOWA 和中国。(他们很可能仍被计入 feedstock ownership lists,因为有 captive recycling 和 reserves)

所以,如果整个 Western AI buildout 觉得有一家日本公司作为 duopoly 就很安全,那最好再想想。

瓶颈的源头,本身又被 $AXTI 和中国公司这些中国供应商卡住。

如果看产量,有 deep research breakdown 给出的控制比例估算:

Vital Materials - 35%(Merchant)
- Vital 在 2020 年收购 Fanya Metal Exchange inventory(3,600 tonnes of Indium),让它对全球 Indium market 有很大控制力。他们借此成为最大的 InP polycrystal 生产商。主导性的成本领导者;控制 raw Indium supply(Fanya stocks)。

$AXTI - 25%(Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology)
- 主要是 Captive。大部分 polycrystal 产量被自己的 crystal growth furnaces 消耗,用来做 wafers。不过他们也向 merchant market 出售 raw materials 和 compounds,所以是 hybrid player。

它们是全球唯一一家从 mines、refineries -> InP substrate output 全链条打通的公司。考虑到它们同时拥有 raw materials 到 InP substrate controls,这个瓶颈简直离谱。供给自家 wafer production;也是关键的非日本来源。

Zhuzhou Keneng New Material - 18%

- Keneng 已经实现“polycrystalline indium phosphide 量产”,并拥有“高度集成的自动化多晶生产能力”。它们是中国 Indium export quotas 的关键接收方。纯 synthesis specialist;主要出口商。

然后是外部:

$DOWA - 12%

- 西方公司里最大的供应商(对,日本)。在 mining(Akita Zinc)有很深根基,所以是 high-purity metal organics 和 compounds 的领先供应商。

日本公司(Sumitomo、JX)的“源头”。

Wafer Technology Ltd - 5%
- IQE plc 子公司。对于需要非中国 feedstock 的 NATO-aligned supply chains 来说是关键战略资产,即使他们现在正在 asset liquidations。

InPACT (France) - 3%

- InPACT 表示,他们用 high-pressure synthesis 通过 Horizontal Gradient Freeze (HGF) 生产 polycrystalline ingots,因此能满足 Nokia、Ericsson 以及一些欧洲国防部门的要求。

Rest of World - 2%

这包括主要 substrate makers(Coherent、Sumitomo)、小规模研究生产,以及韩国或台湾一些试图打破 monopoly 的新玩家。

现实是,全球 laser-grade InP feedstock 产能的 78% 位于中国。

Optical components 的需求已经比 supply/production 高出数倍。这还是 pre-ramp。整个 AI buildout 被两家公司卡住。

但其中 1/4 的材料来自:$AXTI。并且约 1/3 的 InP Substrate outputs 又来自 laser-grade feedstock。

整个 AI buildout 竟然依赖一家随机的 $700m 公司,它既是瓶颈中的瓶颈,也是瓶颈本身。

无论 substrate 还是 laser-grade feedstock,扩大 InP 生产都是 national security issue。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 479 🔁 50 💬 14
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Wow, Chinese IP espionage is not new but this one just catastrophic for Samsung and US/Korea.

Stealing secrets of the world's most advanced memory chips then handing them over China’s state backed company…. Then likely cut off Samsung/Micron from China’s domestic market.

Maximum life in prison for deterrence isn’t even enough of a punishment for this, from the 10 indicted, even with an iota of involvement.

If they get out of jail 10 years later with a $50M paycheck, then that’s incentive enough for these people to continue theft
哇,Chinese IP espionage 不是什么新鲜事,但这次对 Samsung 以及美国/韩国来说真的灾难级。

偷走全球最先进 memory chips 的秘密,然后交给中国 state backed company……接着很可能把 Samsung/Micron 从中国 domestic market 挤出去。

为了威慑,最高无期徒刑都不够惩罚这件事。10 个被起诉的人里,哪怕只有一点点参与也是如此。

如果他们 10 年后出狱还能拿 $50M payday,那对这些人来说,继续偷窃的激励就已经足够了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@dr_lmfao_ Yeah absolutely, I’m working on a model to normalize ownership of indium phosphide for just laser grade feedstock from private vertically integrated players like $AXTI vs others like $DOWA or Vital Materials that sell on open markets.

It’s extremely complex lol
@dr_lmfao_ 对,完全是。我在做一个模型,想把 laser grade feedstock 的 indium phosphide ownership 标准化,对比像 $AXTI 这种 private vertically integrated players,以及 $DOWA 或 Vital Materials 这种在公开市场出售的玩家。

这东西极其复杂 lol
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So I’m not advocating for buying $AXTI since there’s significant risks with China supply chains but just clearing up misconceptions.

If a stock “already-ran” it’s important to differentiate if the stock is cheaper than ever, even at ATHs.

Just look at $MU forward p/e which is <10 last I checked even at ATHs.

If inp substrate prices triple or even 10X (given it was priced like a cheap commodity for telecom) like memory because of an extreme bottleneck, did it already run or does it look cheaper than ever?

If a $700m tiny company is now the single point of failure for the growth-cycle of AI we’ve hit the ceiling of InP substrates, how would you value it? Is a 500% increase enough?
所以我不是在鼓励买 $AXTI,因为 China supply chains 风险很大,我只是想澄清误解。

如果一只股票“already-ran”,重要的是区分:即使在 ATHs,它是不是反而比以往更便宜。

看看 $MU forward p/e,我上次看即使在 ATHs 也 <10。

如果 InP substrate prices 因为极端瓶颈,像 memory 一样涨 3 倍甚至 10X(考虑到它之前被当成便宜 telecom commodity 定价),那它是已经涨完了,还是看起来比以往更便宜?

如果一家 $700m 小公司现在成了 AI growth-cycle 的 single point of failure,而我们已经撞到 InP substrates 的天花板,你会怎么给它估值?涨 500% 够吗?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Agreed, for traders, this should be an interesting opportunity like Lithium in 2021 when EVs came about or HBM currently with Sk Hynix and Micron if people recognized the bottlenecks early.

Tons of opportunity ($AAOI only up 2.9% YTD despite new hyperscaler orders. Tied to hyperscaler deployments like Maia/Tranium).

$MRVL with extreme demand but mainly in q4 2026, into 2027 from Maia, down 22% YTD. And $POET as an indirect beneficiary of $MRVL ramp too.

Shortages throughout the entire supply chain with InP substrates. $GOOGL ramping up TPU which benefits $LITE and vertical integration + record backlog from $COHR

Extremely absurd players like $AXTI with a $700m marketcap basically being the single point of failure for the future AI ramp. Not quite sure how you place a value on that lol.

$COHR, $LITE and substrate providers are hitting the capacity limits now. We’ll see how much time it takes for his to go to the extremes like memory.
同意。对 traders 来说,这应该是个很有意思的机会,有点像 2021 年 EV 起来时的 Lithium,或者现在 Sk Hynix 和 Micron 的 HBM,前提是人们能早早识别瓶颈。

机会很多($AAOI 年初至今只涨 2.9%,尽管有新的 hyperscaler orders。它和 Maia/Tranium 这类 hyperscaler deployments 绑定)。

$MRVL 需求极强,但主要在 2026 q4 到 2027 年来自 Maia,年初至今跌 22%。$POET 也是 $MRVL ramp 的间接受益者。

整个 supply chain 都有短缺,尤其是 InP substrates。$GOOGL 正在 ramp TPU,这利好 $LITE$COHR 则有 vertical integration + record backlog。

$AXTI 这种极其离谱的玩家,$700m marketcap,基本上是未来 AI ramp 的 single point of failure。说实话不太知道该怎么给这种东西定价 lol。

$COHR$LITE 和 substrate providers 现在都在碰 capacity limits。我们会看到它需要多久才会像 memory 一样走到极端。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
There is a lot risk with $AXTI for sure. That’s why it’s valued like a penny stock at $700m and not $30B+ like $SMTOY despite being both vertically integrated and one of the most important suppliers.

And when you combine with the fact the AI supply chain is extremely reliant on this company for raw materials -> inp substrates they provide for photonics in order to ramp, that’s even a greater risk to the already fragile AI buildout.
$AXTI 风险当然很大。所以它才会像便士股一样只值 $700m,而不是像 $SMTOY 那样 $30B+,尽管两家公司都是垂直整合的、也是最重要的供应商之一。

再叠加 AI 供应链为了扩产,在原材料 -> 它们提供给光子用的 inp 衬底这块极度依赖这家公司,这对本来就脆弱的 AI 建设来说,风险就更大了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@crux_capital_ Thanks, love your posts on $LITE, $POET $AAOI $COHR, $MRVL, and other photonic players too
@crux_capital_ 谢谢,也很喜欢你关于 $LITE$POET$AAOI$COHR$MRVL 以及其他光子玩家的帖子
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@NowAwake_7 @VulcanMK5 Last time I took a look, IQE was going through asset sales? Seemed like a distressed company rather than “cheap”.

You can tell me if the story is different and I’ll take another look
@NowAwake_7 @VulcanMK5 上次我看 IQE 的时候,它好像在卖资产?看起来更像一家陷入困境的公司,而不是“便宜”。

如果故事已经不一样了,你可以告诉我,我会再看一遍
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Grok is likely conflating wafer fab with InP substrate manufacturing. $AVGO's penn fab still requires InP substrates from Sumitomo, $AXTI, or JX to build the lasers (hence the bottleneck) and they're likely customers.

And that small $700M MC company $AXTI is probably the only one of the bunch that does this end-to-end by owning Gallium, Indium, etc. on from the initial raw material refining.

So the "does not primarily import InP wafers/substrates” part is probably wrong.
Grok 很可能把晶圆厂和 InP 衬底制造混在一起了。$AVGO 的 penn fab 仍然需要来自 Sumitomo、$AXTI 或 JX 的 InP 衬底来制造激光器(所以才有瓶颈),而且它们很可能就是客户。

而那家小小的 $700M MC 公司 $AXTI,大概是这一批里唯一一家从最初的原材料精炼开始,就拥有 Gallium、Indium 等资源、能端到端做这件事的公司。

所以“并不主要进口 InP 晶圆/衬底”这部分大概率是错的。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yep, $LITE and $COHR are amazing and are up quite a bit since they tons pricing power.

Go few levels deeper into $AXTI (vertically integrated), Sumitomo -> Dowa, etc. the concentration risk + bottleneck flashes warning signs.

With HBM, it was an investment opportunity when people found that bottleneck. There's likely that same overlooked opportunity with photonic supply chains now when hyperscalers hoard materials and acquire capacity.
是的,$LITE$COHR 都很强,而且因为它们有大量定价权,已经涨了不少。

再往 $AXTI(垂直整合)、Sumitomo -> Dowa 等更深几层看,集中度风险 + 瓶颈都在闪红灯。

HBM 那次,当大家发现瓶颈时,它就是一个投资机会。现在光子供应链里很可能也有同样被忽视的机会,尤其是 hyperscaler 开始囤材料、抢产能的时候。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
The "InP Chokepoint": The Bottleneck of the AI Buildout explanation:

The future of $NVDA Blackwell, $META MTAI, $GOOGL TPU, and $MSFT Maia ramp is tied to:

A $700M small cap $AXTI and $SMTOY.

The AI "Growth" story ends in 2026 if there's no solution to InP.

Here's why:

The AI industry started its migrating to photonics for future ASIC/GPU deployments, because copper is hitting a physical limit.

However, in doing so, hyperscalers traded the common material for InP (Indium Phosphide), when there's only a few factories capable of producing 6-inch InP wafers at the purity levels required for lasers.

Let's take for example Google and their TPU v7 Ironwood program:

Google uses Optical Circuit Switching (OCS), in simpler terms, switchboards made of light. For every one of those TPUs in the pod to talk, they require InP-based lasers. $LITE, which works with Google on this, largely depends on InP substrate (eg. AXT/Sumitomo) to make them.

If they don't have it Google's entire Ironwood program doesn't just "slow down", it hits the wall.

Modern ASICs/GPUs from $NVDA GB series, $AMZN Trainium, $MSFT Maia, $META MTAI have all made the same bet: Light is the way forward.

Now, here's the issue.

The entire Western AI roadmap is currently tethered to a $700M small-cap and a single Japanese company that produce majority of the world's InP substrates required for photonics.

It's currently a duopoly (rough estimates majority supply ~60% between AXT + Sumitomo), with recent estimates of ~70%+ coming from Sumitomo Electric, AXT, Freiberger, JX, and Visual Photonics Epitaxy (filling in the gaps).

Regardless, the entire future AI supply chain is thinner than a needle:

- Moomoo Research: InP market is in a state of "global scramble" and "serious supply shortage" NVIDIA GB200 rollout (scale-out still requires tons of InP, not NVL72 within-the-rack comm).

- Demand for high-speed transceivers today probably exceeds the supply by almost a factor of two (LightCounting)

- Seeing record booking, but explicitly "supply-constrained by InP lasers" ( $COHR CEO Q3 ER)

- McKinsey: 40% to 60% shortfall for 800G modules and a 30% to 40% shortfall for 1.6T modules.

And these reports are likely understanding + very conserative given the demand ramp. Even going off Microsoft's projections on Maia ramp, ( est. 1M+ Maia by 2027 on UBS $MRVL note), with 2 million+ units of 1.6T transceivers over the next year, this volume is so large it represents a double-digit percentage of global substrate output.

The projected "exponential growth" of AI is about to collide with the reality of critical material production. So, the "Ironwood", "MTIA" and "Maia" ramps aren't just ambitious, they may be impossible under current material constraints.

Even if $COHR, JX Nippon, Sumitomo, $AXTI, and others, ramp up at maximum capacity (eg. $COHR / JX -> 6-inch InP wafers for 4x capacity), they still might not be able to meet the increasing demand from hyperscalers. Especailly with demand spikes occurring, eg. just for $NVDA alone (GB200/GB300 revisions).

There are technical solutions like silicon photonics is one solution to bridge the gap, but this still largely requires an external InP laser as the light source. TFLN or quantum dot lasers are many many years away.

There's probably no escaping the InP requirements for the next few years.

So, the mismatch between chip design and material availability has created a strategic chokepoint, where if you go to the very bottom of the supply chain, very few companies control a majority of allocations, pricing, and supply. This is especially dangerous when compounded with geopolitical risks on US/China relations + export controls.

That being said, here's what's probably what's going to happen:

- Price Spikes: Prices from $AXTI, JX, Sumitomo will spike significantly -> $LITE, $COHR, Innolight (also increases prices from pass down)

- Hyperscalers will directly stockpile materials, bypassing traditional component procurement and buying InP substrate inventory from $AXTI, JX Nippon, Sumitomo, and directly to consign to transceiver manufacturers like $LITE.

(eg. Meta would bypass transceiver companies and go directly to AXT or Sumitomo)

- Hyperscalers will buy out production allocation ( like $NVDA that has already aggressively "locked in" EML capacity (manufactured on InP substrates).

Buying a substrate manufacturer or production allocation would become a necessity to so others like $NVDA or $GOOGL doesn't starve them out.

As TPU v7 and and as other hyperscalers ramp up in 2026-2027, we will likely enter a "hunger games" phase for substrates where only each hyperscaler will be cannibalizing each other's growth for resource allocation.

Companies like $NVDA (with record amounts of pre-allocation), might ramp be okay for the time being, but others programs would likely face major delays.

Thoughts:

1. Some hyperscalers might be fine ( $NVDA). Others like $GOOGL and $MSFT will need to buy out materials + allocation before others do.

2. Industry needs to double down on engineering shifts like copper life extension and more material efficient ways like SiPh.

3. Move to 6-inch wafers for yields (eases things, but still not enough to meet demand)

So the way things are now, the multi-trillion dollar AI scaling are tethered to some obscure $700m company $AXTI and $SMTOY. It seems inevitable that AI will hit the physical ceiling because of InP substrate capacity unless architectures change.

In 2024, the bottleneck was GPUs. In 2025, it was HBM. In 2026, the primary constraint will likely be the optical interconnect, and specifically, the InP substrates that power them.

This has now become the hidden bottleneck of the AI buildout.
“InP 咽喉”:AI 建设瓶颈解释:

$NVDA Blackwell、$META MTAI、$GOOGL TPU 和 $MSFT Maia 扩产的未来,都和下面这些绑定在一起:

一家 $700M 小盘股 $AXTI,以及 $SMTOY

如果 InP 没有解决方案,AI 的“增长”故事会在 2026 年结束。

原因如下:

AI 行业已经开始为未来 ASIC/GPU 部署迁移到光子技术,因为铜正在撞上物理极限。

但这样做的同时,hyperscaler 把常见材料换成了 InP(Indium Phosphide,磷化铟),而全球只有少数工厂能生产激光器所需纯度等级的 6 英寸 InP 晶圆。

拿 Google 的 TPU v7 Ironwood 项目举例:

Google 使用 Optical Circuit Switching(OCS),简单说就是用光做的交换板。pod 里的每一个 TPU 要互相通信,都需要基于 InP 的激光器。和 Google 合作的 $LITE,在很大程度上依赖 InP 衬底(比如 AXT/Sumitomo)来制造这些东西。

如果没有 InP,Google 整个 Ironwood 项目不是“放慢”,而是直接撞墙。

来自 $NVDA GB 系列、$AMZN Trainium、$MSFT Maia、$META MTAI 的现代 ASIC/GPU 都押了同一个方向:光才是未来。

问题在这里。

整个西方 AI 路线图现在都被拴在一家 $700M 小盘公司和一家日本公司身上,而它们生产了全球大多数光子所需的 InP 衬底。

目前这是一个双寡头(粗略估计 AXT + Sumitomo 合计占多数供应,约 ~60%),最近估计 Sumitomo Electric、AXT、Freiberger、JX 和 Visual Photonics Epitaxy 合起来提供 ~70%+(填补剩余缺口)。

无论如何,整个未来 AI 供应链薄得像针一样:

- Moomoo Research:InP 市场处于“全球争抢”和“严重供应短缺”状态,NVIDIA GB200 推出也是如此(scale-out 仍需要大量 InP,不是 NVL72 机架内通信)。

- 今天高速收发器的需求可能几乎是供应的两倍(LightCounting)

- 订单创纪录,但明确“受 InP 激光器供应限制”($COHR CEO Q3 ER)

- McKinsey:800G 模块短缺 40% 到 60%,1.6T 模块短缺 30% 到 40%。

考虑到需求爬坡,这些报告可能还是理解不足 + 非常保守。即便按 Microsoft 对 Maia 扩产的预测(UBS $MRVL 报告估计到 2027 年 1M+ Maia),再加上未来一年 200 万+ 个 1.6T 收发器,这个量大到会占全球衬底产出的两位数百分比。

AI 所谓“指数级增长”的预期,马上要撞上关键材料生产的现实。所以 “Ironwood”、“MTIA” 和 “Maia” 的扩产不只是野心很大,在当前材料约束下可能根本做不到。

即便 $COHR、JX Nippon、Sumitomo、$AXTI 和其他公司都满负荷扩产(比如 $COHR / JX -> 6 英寸 InP 晶圆带来 4 倍产能),它们仍然可能无法满足 hyperscaler 不断增长的需求。尤其是在需求突然暴增时,比如单看 $NVDA(GB200/GB300 改版)就够了。

硅光等技术方案可以作为过渡方案,但它仍然很大程度上需要外部 InP 激光器作为光源。TFLN 或量子点激光器还要很多很多年。

未来几年大概率绕不开 InP 需求。

所以,芯片设计和材料可得性之间的不匹配,制造出了一个战略咽喉:如果你一路追到供应链最底部,会发现极少数公司控制着大多数配额、定价和供应。再叠加美中关系 + 出口管制的地缘政治风险,这尤其危险。

话虽如此,接下来大概率会发生这些事:

- 价格飙升:$AXTI、JX、Sumitomo 的价格会大幅上涨 -> $LITE$COHR、Innolight(也会把成本传导后提价)

- Hyperscaler 会直接囤材料,绕过传统组件采购,直接从 $AXTI、JX Nippon、Sumitomo 买 InP 衬底库存,再直接交给 $LITE 这样的收发器厂商代工。

(比如 Meta 会绕过收发器公司,直接去找 AXT 或 Sumitomo)

- Hyperscaler 会买断产能配额(就像 $NVDA 已经激进“锁定”EML 产能,而 EML 是在 InP 衬底上制造的)。

购买衬底制造商或产能配额会变成必要操作,否则其他人会被 $NVDA$GOOGL 饿死。

随着 TPU v7 以及其他 hyperscaler 在 2026-2027 年扩产,我们很可能进入一个衬底“饥饿游戏”阶段,每个 hyperscaler 都会为了资源配额互相蚕食对方的增长。

$NVDA 这种已经有创纪录预分配量的公司,短期扩产可能还好,但其他项目大概率会面临重大延迟。

想法:

1. 有些 hyperscaler 可能没事($NVDA)。其他像 $GOOGL$MSFT,需要在别人之前买断材料 + 配额。

2. 行业需要加倍投入工程路线,比如延长铜的生命周期,以及 SiPh 这种更省材料的方式。

3. 转向 6 英寸晶圆提高良率(能缓解,但仍不足以满足需求)

所以按现在的情况,数万亿美元级别的 AI 扩张,被拴在某些不起眼的 $700m 公司 $AXTI$SMTOY 身上。除非架构改变,否则 AI 因为 InP 衬底产能撞上物理天花板,看起来不可避免。

2024 年,瓶颈是 GPU。2025 年,是 HBM。2026 年,主要约束很可能会是光互连,尤其是驱动它们的 InP 衬底。

这现在已经变成了 AI 建设里隐藏的瓶颈。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能会被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI($700M)
2. $SMTOY($31.7B)

它们合计控制全球 60-70%+ 的 InP 基板。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN 的 hyperscaler 集群都需要基于 InP 的激光器和接收器。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 会把它用于 800G/1.6T 收发器的 EML、DFB 激光器和其他光学基础设施。

没有 InP 基板,供应链就会出问题。

看完 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 之后,未来 ASIC + GPU + hyperscaler 部署看起来都高度依赖光子。

而两个供应商可能冻结全球 InP 基板市场,覆盖几乎所有这些领域:

- Hyperscaler 光学(TPU pods 等)
- 光收发器(5g、数据)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、无人机、军工)
- 光模块(互连集群)
- 硅光激光 die(Nvidia 未来的 co-packaged optics,以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh 引擎使用 InP CW 激光阵列。)

因为这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计约 30-35%)
-Sumitomo(估计约 30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就这些。(例如 Yole 2021 年行业报告称,“Sumitomo Electric + AXT 合计拥有超过 75% 的 InP 基板市场”)

Hyperscaler/AI 正在走向光子化,但整个 AI 行业其实很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 任何一家停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会被重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 的公司可能会成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向光子,InP 基板很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2004569946492453003
❤️ 650 🔁 64 💬 26
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Cbb0fe I remember doing an analysis for Lighter’s Series A round.

Ended up investing, even though I remember saying it wasn’t technically complex to make.

What did you miss out on though? Private funding or token event https://t.co/9hnxZY2YFM
@Cbb0fe 我记得当时给 Lighter 的 Series A 做过分析。

最后还是投了,虽然我记得当时说过它技术上并不复杂。

不过你错过的是哪块?私募融资还是 token event https://t.co/9hnxZY2YFM
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Exactly. You just out why I'm sounding all the alarm bells to @sama, @sundarpichai, @satyanadella and Western AI leaders about huge InP substrate shortages/bottlenecks limiting future TPU/ASIC deployment involving photonics.

Demand FAR exceeds supply for InP-based transceivers/lasers by multiple factors (source: LightCounting + McKinsey).

We've only started the AI ramp with the TPU and the InP substrate industry is already bottlenecked -> held at chokepoint by two players: $AXTI, $SMTOY

If trade wars affect $AXTI, there's just a complete void of available materials to scale AI clusters. There's just incredible importance on these two companies, stock price aside.
没错。你刚好说出了为什么我一直在向 @sama@sundarpichai@satyanadella 和西方 AI 领导者敲警钟:巨大的 InP 衬底短缺/瓶颈会限制未来涉及光子的 TPU/ASIC 部署。

基于 InP 的收发器/激光器需求远远超过供应好几倍(来源:LightCounting + McKinsey)。

我们才刚开始 TPU 的 AI 扩产,InP 衬底行业就已经卡住了 -> 被两个玩家卡在咽喉:$AXTI$SMTOY

如果贸易战影响 $AXTI,那用于扩张 AI 集群的可用材料就会出现彻底真空。抛开股价不谈,这两家公司重要得离谱。
❤️ 68 🔁 3 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
That’s what’s so incredibly alarming, that the Western AI buildout might be held at choke point by an obscure $700m company like $AXTI and $SMTOY.

InP substrates were incredibly niche for telecom, but it’s suddenly a national security emergency as it became the material used for the world’s lasers and optional interconnects.

I’m not quite sure the top level vendors realized this or at least didn’t realize the scale of this issue (eg. Signing agreements with $LITE without going deeper into the material suppliers for Lite), as the supply chain is incredibly becoming choke pointed by two companies.

Google’s TPU v7 ramp for example placed an unprecedented strain/dependency on the InP supply chain that simply didn't exist a few months ago, since they use OCS for their chip pods, which is almost all in on photonics.

As we’ve hit the upper limits with copper, the AI industry's reliance on AXTI is essentially a "single point of failure” on some small cap that supplies the materials for everything.

I’m not looking at revenue numbers here, this dependency is just absurd, the 1.6T networking just breaks.

I’m not sure where companies go from here, I’m sure they’ll try and hoard materials or secure multi-year agreements but either way two companies hold all the cards.
这才是最让人警觉的地方:西方 AI 建设可能会被 $AXTI 这种不起眼的 $700m 公司和 $SMTOY 卡住咽喉。

InP 衬底过去对电信来说是非常小众的东西,但它突然变成了国家安全紧急问题,因为它成了全球激光器和光互连所用的材料。

我不太确定顶层厂商有没有意识到这一点,或者至少没有意识到问题规模(比如和 $LITE 签协议,却没有继续深挖 Lite 的材料供应商),因为供应链正越来越被两家公司卡住。

比如 Google 的 TPU v7 扩产,对 InP 供应链施加了几个月前根本不存在的前所未有压力/依赖,因为它们的芯片 pod 使用 OCS,几乎完全押注光子。

当我们已经触到铜的上限时,AI 行业对 AXTI 的依赖本质上就是一个“小盘公司提供一切材料”的单点故障。

我这里不是在看收入数字,这种依赖太荒谬了,1.6T 网络会直接断掉。

我不确定公司们接下来能怎么办,我相信它们会尝试囤材料或签多年协议,但无论如何,两家公司手里握着所有牌。
❤️ 190 🔁 5 💬 8
打开原推
↩️ 回复
That’s for you to figure out.

I’m just highlighting how two companies (one of which is worth $600m) happens to be the bottleneck of the entire AI trade in the near future.

Historically InP substrates were a cheap commodity. And now… they’re not.

If every single hyperscaler spending hundreds of billions of GPUs/ASICs can’t function without $20m of InP, companies like $AXTI can theoretically raise prices 5x and it would be a rounding error.

There is a massive geopolitical risk with China for you to consider too but $600m MC is typically hilarious pocket change if the entire buildout is bottlenecked by one or two companies.
那是你要自己去弄明白的。

我只是指出,两家公司(其中一家只值 $600m)碰巧会成为不久后整个 AI 交易的瓶颈。

历史上 InP 衬底是便宜的大宗商品。而现在……不是了。

如果每一家花数千亿美元买 GPU/ASIC 的 hyperscaler,没有 $20m 的 InP 就无法运转,那么像 $AXTI 这样的公司理论上可以把价格提 5 倍,而这对客户来说也只是零头。

你还需要考虑和中国相关的巨大地缘政治风险,但如果整个建设被一两家公司卡住,$600m MC 通常就可笑地像零钱一样。
❤️ 88 🔁 2 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks, we might not see a InP substrate bottleneck yet, but we’ll likely see it when hyperscaler ASICs (TPU, Trainium, Maia, etc.) ramp up -> supply strains like memory mid-2026.

That doesn’t quite mean material providers should be valued like $LITE, but the fact that the entire future AI buildout has a single point of failure that comes from a small $600m company like $AXTI is amusing.
谢谢,我们现在可能还看不到 InP 衬底瓶颈,但等 hyperscaler ASIC(TPU、Trainium、Maia 等)扩产时,大概率会看到 -> 类似内存在 2026 年中期那样的供应压力。

这并不完全意味着材料供应商应该按 $LITE 那样估值,但整个未来 AI 建设的单点故障竟然来自 $AXTI 这种 $600m 小公司,这件事本身挺有意思。
❤️ 69 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Disclosure: I have positions in $LITE, $AAOI, and $AXTI in the photonics sector.

From my own personal thought process, if I see the entire AI industry and players like $LITE and Innolight bottlenecked by some $600m company worth less than a new pre-revenue LLM startup, I’m long.

There is downside risk including changing ownership dilution structures if China wants to restrict $AXTI in US markets.
披露:我在光子板块持有 $LITE$AAOI$AXTI

从我自己的思考过程看,如果我看到整个 AI 行业,以及 $LITE、Innolight 这样的玩家,被一家市值还不如某些零收入 LLM 初创公司的 $600m 公司卡住瓶颈,那我会做多。

也有下行风险,包括如果中国想限制 $AXTI 在美国市场的地位,可能会改变所有权稀释结构。
❤️ 87 🔁 4 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复
HBM was a critical bottleneck in 2025 and we've seen that with $MU and SK Hynix.

Just researching components used for future hyperscaler ASIC deployments, the whole industry is moving to photonics.

If we go to the bottom of that supply chain it's just two companies for INP substrates. Which is absurd to think about.

It could be a huge market opportunity for investors for stuff like $AXTI, but just in terms of national security risk, it's just a crazy bottleneck that needs to be looked at. There's companies like $COHR, but nowhere near to scale required for AI buildout.
HBM 是 2025 年的关键瓶颈,我们已经在 $MU 和 SK Hynix 身上看到了。

我只是研究未来 hyperscaler ASIC 部署会用到的组件,发现整个行业都在转向光子。

如果我们一路看到供应链最底层,INP 衬底基本就两家公司。这想想就很离谱。

对投资者来说,像 $AXTI 这类东西可能是巨大市场机会,但单从国家安全风险角度看,这就是一个需要被认真关注的疯狂瓶颈。也有 $COHR 这样的公司,但离 AI 建设所需规模还差得远。
❤️ 62 🔁 2 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy Tbh everyone (myself) included have a slight credentialism bias and would screen a MS over BS degree for first round interviews.

After that it’s fair game.
@pepemoonboy 说实话,每个人(包括我自己)都会有一点学历崇拜偏见,第一轮面试会更倾向筛 MS 而不是 BS。

之后就各凭本事了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RJCcapital @pepemoonboy @DeepValueBagger @moninvestor @babyfolio @amitisinvesting You can’t back out anymore https://t.co/Odm6DsI1uo
@RJCcapital @pepemoonboy @DeepValueBagger @moninvestor @babyfolio @amitisinvesting 你现在不能反悔了 https://t.co/Odm6DsI1uo
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_stockResearch @pepemoonboy @RJCcapital @DeepValueBagger @moninvestor @babyfolio @amitisinvesting Challenge accepted. I wonder if there’s an easy way to aggregate who everyone is doing for the competition.

Like @pepemoonboy. @_stockResearch, myself, and others.

I’ll use Robinhood for this if @vladtenev can set up something for Robinhood Social.
@_stockResearch @pepemoonboy @RJCcapital @DeepValueBagger @moninvestor @babyfolio @amitisinvesting 接受挑战。我在想有没有简单办法汇总大家比赛选谁。

比如 @pepemoonboy@_stockResearch、我自己,还有其他人。

如果 @vladtenev 能给 Robinhood Social 搞个东西,我就用 Robinhood 来做这个。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RKLBMan 🐥
@RKLBMan 🐥
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
I challenge every single FinX influencer to an option selling duel in 2026.

We all start with $100K and post public updates writing puts.

I say this since I’m confident I will win against: @pepemoonboy @RJCCapital @DeepValueBagger @moninvestor @babyfolio @amitisinvesting @yianisz
@Agrippa_Inv @StockSavvyShay
@BitcoinAIGuy @RKLBMan @Sandeman52 @AlvaroMysterio and everyone else.
我向每一个 FinX influencer 发起 2026 年卖期权决斗挑战。

我们都从 $100K 开始,公开更新卖 put 的情况。

我这么说是因为我有信心赢过:@pepemoonboy @RJCCapital @DeepValueBagger @moninvestor @babyfolio @amitisinvesting @yianisz
@Agrippa_Inv @StockSavvyShay
@BitcoinAIGuy @RKLBMan @Sandeman52 @AlvaroMysterio 以及其他所有人。
引用原推@pepemoonboy
Learning options changed my life.

It completely shifted how I think about generating income.

When done correctly, selling options feels like building your own personal cash flow machine.

That’s why I’m launching a brand new $100k options account where I will document every single decision in real time…the wins, the losses, and the lessons.

The goal is simple:

To show a REAL options selling journey, not just cherry-picked profits or screenshots from self-proclaimed gurus.

This challenge will be fully transparent.

No hiding. No hindsight. No filters.

If things go wrong, you’ll see it.

If I lose money, you’ll see it.

If I improve, you’ll learn alongside me.

I love challenges, and this one will force me to sharpen my skills, experiment with new techniques, and truly master the craft.

The series kicks off January 1st.

Subscribers can follow along from day one.

Tune in.
学习期权改变了我的人生。

它彻底改变了我对创造收入的看法。

如果做得对,卖期权就像是在给自己搭一台个人现金流机器。

所以我准备开一个全新的 $100k 期权账户,实时记录每一个决策……赢的、亏的、以及学到的东西。

目标很简单:

展示一段真实的卖期权之旅,而不是只挑利润截图,或者那些自封大师的战绩。

这次挑战会完全透明。

不藏,不事后诸葛,不加滤镜。

如果出问题,你会看到。

如果我亏钱,你会看到。

如果我进步了,你也会跟着一起学。

我喜欢挑战,而这次会逼我打磨技能、尝试新方法,真正掌握这门手艺。

这个系列 1 月 1 日开始。

订阅者可以从第一天开始跟进。

到时候见。
https://x.com/pepemoonboy/status/2003863427563782328
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Not really! Markets are starting to realize $LITE's role in every single hyperscaler ASIC deployment + blackwell and when you look at BOM, it's a whopping amount, especially in TPU v7.

Lite is the photonics leader but many there's others like $AAOI, which are levered to MSFT Maia and AMZN Trainium (which hasn't moved at all yet).

So opportunity in photonics is there next year.
不完全是!市场开始意识到 $LITE 在每一个 hyperscaler ASIC 部署 + blackwell 里的角色,而且你看 BOM 的时候会发现占比非常惊人,尤其是 TPU v7。

Lite 是光子龙头,但还有很多其他公司,比如 $AAOI,它们和 MSFT Maia、AMZN Trainium 绑定更深(还完全没动)。

所以明年光子领域的机会还在。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah $LITE is incredible after seeing how it's in every single ASIC + $NVDA blackwell deployments.

Then once you do BOM analysis and model TPU/GPU deployments, it looks undervalued even at ATHs.

Then there's $AAOI, which is similar to LITE but levered toward AMZN | MSFT ASICs. It's one of the only InP Fabs in US and will scale up depending on how Trainium and Maia do. It's a $2.5B MC too.

Photonics/Memory is going to be extremely crazy in 2026.
是的,看到 $LITE 出现在每一个 ASIC + $NVDA blackwell 部署里之后,会发现它非常强。

然后一旦你做 BOM 分析并建模 TPU/GPU 部署,即使在历史新高,看起来仍然低估。

还有 $AAOI,类似 LITE,但更偏向绑定 AMZN | MSFT ASIC。它是美国少数 InP Fabs 之一,会随着 Trainium 和 Maia 的表现而扩张。它也才 $2.5B MC。

Photonics/Memory 在 2026 年会非常疯狂。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Among $LITE, $COHR, Innolight, etc. I've found $LITE to be the most asymmetrical setup since it's central to ironwood (with OCS), blackwell, and other hyperscaler ASICs.

However, $AAOI is extreme alpha. Especially as a levered play on $AMZN Trainium, $MSFT Maia ASICs scale up + one of the only InP fab in US.

Although they have $4B $AMZN warrants + purchase agreements, it does seem likely that Dec's orders were Maia-based clusters. There's rumors that $AAOI seems to be developing a new optical interconnect architecture specifically for $MSFT's silicon too.

$AAOI hasn't moved at all, despite hyperscaler ASIC hype + photonic rallies, so it's a hidden gem for sure at $2B MC. However, it is highly levered to $MSFT and $AMZN (which will likely succeed + deploy their own ASICs at scale given their own cloud departments)
$LITE$COHR、Innolight 等里面,我发现 $LITE 是最不对称的 setup,因为它是 ironwood(带 OCS)、blackwell 和其他 hyperscaler ASIC 的核心。

不过,$AAOI 是极端 alpha。尤其是作为 $AMZN Trainium、$MSFT Maia ASIC 扩产的杠杆玩法 + 美国少数 InP fab 之一。

虽然它们有 $4B 的 $AMZN warrants + 采购协议,但看起来 12 月的订单很可能是基于 Maia 的集群。有传闻说 $AAOI 似乎正在专门为 $MSFT 的 silicon 开发一种新的光互连架构。

尽管 hyperscaler ASIC 炒作 + 光子板块上涨,$AAOI 完全没动,所以在 $2B MC 的位置肯定是隐藏宝石。不过它高度绑定 $MSFT$AMZN(鉴于它们自己的云部门,它们大概率会成功并大规模部署自研 ASIC)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Probably not, no reason to. $JPM almost certainty has access to 0% fees for trading given their immense maker liquidity they provide.

There's no reason for them to acquire a commoditized exchange, then take on additional regulatory headache and balance sheet volatility.

They get the same benefits of an exchange by partnering with Coinbase for free execution, then just profit off customer spread with an additional vertical.
大概率不会,没理由。$JPM 几乎肯定可以凭借它们提供的巨大 maker 流动性拿到 0% 交易费用。

它们没理由去收购一个商品化的交易所,然后承担额外监管麻烦和资产负债表波动。

它们通过和 Coinbase 合作拿到免费执行,就能得到交易所的同样好处,然后再靠客户 spread 和额外垂直业务赚钱。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I only have $LITE and $AAOI lol. But how I'd frame it is $LITE and $COHR are basically duopolies in photonics.

With $LITE extra leveraged on Google TPU growth.

Then there's $AAOI, extreme alpha + leverage call on $MSFT + $AMZN hyperscaler ASICs.

No action yet, no major runup (even down 12% this year despite being a photonics player) because there's no investor hype about Amazon Trainium or Microsoft Maia (yet).
我其实只有 $LITE$AAOI lol。但如果让我框架化地说,$LITE$COHR 基本上是光子领域的双寡头。

其中 $LITE 对 Google TPU 增长的杠杆更高。

然后是 $AAOI,极端 alpha + 对 $MSFT + $AMZN hyperscaler ASIC 的杠杆 call。

还没动,也没有大涨(今年甚至跌了 12%,尽管它是光子玩家),因为市场对 Amazon Trainium 或 Microsoft Maia 还没有投资者 hype(至少现在还没有)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$LITE is in the goldilocks moment where every single GOOGL TPU + hyperscaler ASIC + NVDA blackwell depends on it.

Right now they're supply constrained from demand (similar to Micron).

From what I understand, photonics right now is a duopoly ( $COHR and Lite).

However, for OCS, which is what Google TPU architecture uses for better performance, $LITE is a monopoly from their patent portfolio + tech. If $MSFT, $AMZN end up adopting OCS, it's just a holy moment for LITE.

Hyperscaler vertical intergration of InP fabs is just way too difficult near term. Nobody will likely replace them next few years at least (maybe 2027-2028 increasing competion from $AVGO) but as of now, they're just supply constrained right now.
$LITE 正处在金发姑娘时刻:每一个 GOOGL TPU + hyperscaler ASIC + NVDA blackwell 都依赖它。

现在它们因为需求而供应受限(类似 Micron)。

据我理解,光子现在是双寡头($COHR 和 Lite)。

不过对于 OCS,也就是 Google TPU 架构用来提升性能的东西,$LITE 凭借专利组合 + 技术是垄断。如果 $MSFT$AMZN 最后也采用 OCS,那对 LITE 来说就是神圣时刻。

Hyperscaler 近期开垂直整合 InP fabs 太难了。未来几年至少大概率没人能替代它们(也许 2027-2028 会有来自 $AVGO 的竞争增加),但目前它们就是供应受限。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@manukafirth Another good one is $AXTI which is the materials supplier for $LITE / photonics. $500m mc
@manukafirth 另一个不错的是 $AXTI,它是 $LITE / 光子领域的材料供应商。$500m mc
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
"Late".

$LITE is a $26B MC in the center of every future $GOOGL TPU deployment, $NVDA/ $AMZN / other GPU/ASICs.

8-12% BOM share of every Google TPU v7. This is like saying $NVDA was "late" when price it was a $1T MC.

But if you want want another player, $AAOI.

$MSFT is using them for Maia ASICs and are likely creating a new architecture with $AAOI.

They also have a $4B warrant + purchase agreement with $AMZN.

So it's more of a long $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium ASIC play but markets haven't really cared about those two hyperscaler ASICs yet.

If there's any positive news about those two $AAOI will revalue extremely fast.

Everyone jumped on the $GOOGL TPU bandwagon after $META reportedly was going to buy a bunch though.
“晚了”。

$LITE 是一家 $26B MC 公司,处在每一个未来 $GOOGL TPU 部署、$NVDA / $AMZN / 其他 GPU/ASIC 的中心。

每一个 Google TPU v7 的 BOM 占比 8-12%。这就像当 $NVDA 还是 $1T MC 时说它“晚了”。

但如果你想要另一个玩家,$AAOI

$MSFT 正在为 Maia ASIC 使用它们,而且很可能正在和 $AAOI 一起创造一种新架构。

它们还和 $AMZN 有 $4B warrant + 采购协议。

所以这更像是做多 $MSFT Maia + $AMZN Trainium ASIC 的玩法,但市场还没有真正关心这两个 hyperscaler ASIC。

如果这两个有任何正面消息,$AAOI 会非常快地重估。

不过大家是在报道称 $META 可能要大量购买之后,才一窝蜂跳上 $GOOGL TPU 这班车。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
The $LITE thesis: The hidden monopoly in the AI.

Lumentum is up 316% YTD, but might be 1000%+ by 2027.

Micron ($300B) or TSM ($1.5T) sit in the center of every TPU/GPU deployed.

But same with $LITE, but it's a $26B MC.

In Every, Single, TPU from Google, $LITE makes unbelievable amounts of profit for their marketcap.

That's because it's the standard for Optical Circuit Switching (OCS) + optical networking.

It's also in

- $NVDA Blackwell
-$AMZN Trainium
- and other hyperscaler ASICs.

Lumentum sits in the holy trinity of every single chip deployment for photonics.

And for every TPU capex spent, $LITE takes 8-12%. For every Nvidia GPU, $LITE takes ~2-3% (split between Innolight and some others, so the math gets a bit complex).

But some napkin math on NVDA GPU deployments alone for BOM:

NVIDIA Blackwell (GB200):

HBM memory: ~50–55% (SK Hynix (Lead), Micron, Samsung)
Logic (GPU Die): ~25-30% ( $TSM 4NP)
CoWoS Packaging: ~13-18% $TSM
Optics/Network: ~3–5% (Innolight, Lumentum, Coherent)
PCB/Power: 5%

For Google TPIU "Ironwood" TPU v7:

HBM Memory: 38-42% Samsung / SK Hynix
Logic Die: TSM ~28-33%
Design/I.O: 8-10% MediaTek
Optical Network: 10-14% ( $LITE (primary), $COHR secondary)
Optical Switch: 2-4% $LITE

$LITE est. total cluster share: ~8–12%

Just an FYI, Google's "Optical" BOM share (8–12%) is an anomaly due to their unique Optical Circuit Switch (OCS) monopoly.

Just for some napkin math:

$40B Google TPU spend by 2027. $LITE captures 10% (30-40% margins), $1.5B+ FCF from Google alone, 17x earnings from just their primary customer. (analysts are probably extremely off with projecting TPU spend scaling).

Not even including their split from $AMZN Trainium, $NVDA Blackwell, $MSFT Maia, and other chip deployments.

$LITE is in the center of every single TPU/GPU future chip deployment for now and takes a cut.

The only downside is they're the clear market leader now, but $AVGO and $COHR are likely set up to compete by 2027-2028. However...

People say "$26B, ATH, why are you buying now".

This is the reason. They're involved in every future single TPU/GPU/ASIC deployed.

$LITE could end up easily over $60B+ if Google TPUs, and other chip spend ramps up and LITE takes a 2-3% (from $NVDA, $AMZN, $MSFT) or 8-12% cut (from $GOOGL) for every single dollar spent.
$LITE thesis:AI 里的隐藏垄断。

Lumentum 年初至今涨了 316%,但到 2027 年可能涨 1000%+。

Micron($300B)或 TSM($1.5T)处在每一个部署的 TPU/GPU 中心。

$LITE 也是一样,但它只有 $26B MC。

在 Google 的每一个 TPU 里,$LITE 按它的市值来说赚到的利润非常夸张。

原因是它是 Optical Circuit Switching(OCS)+ 光网络的标准。

它也在:

- $NVDA Blackwell
-$AMZN Trainium
- 以及其他 hyperscaler ASIC 里。

Lumentum 处在每一个芯片部署的光子圣三角里。

每花一美元 TPU capex,$LITE 拿走 8-12%。每一个 Nvidia GPU,$LITE 拿走 ~2-3%(和 Innolight 以及其他公司分,所以数学有点复杂)。

但只粗略算 NVDA GPU 部署的 BOM:

NVIDIA Blackwell(GB200):

HBM memory:~50–55%(SK Hynix(主导)、Micron、Samsung)
Logic(GPU Die):~25-30%($TSM 4NP)
CoWoS Packaging:~13-18% $TSM
Optics/Network:~3–5%(Innolight、Lumentum、Coherent)
PCB/Power:5%

Google TPIU “Ironwood” TPU v7:

HBM Memory:38-42% Samsung / SK Hynix
Logic Die:TSM ~28-33%
Design/I.O:8-10% MediaTek
Optical Network:10-14%($LITE(主)、$COHR 次)
Optical Switch:2-4% $LITE

$LITE 估算总 cluster share:~8–12%

顺便说一句,Google 的“Optical” BOM 占比(8–12%)是异常值,因为它们有独特的 Optical Circuit Switch(OCS)垄断。

只是粗略算一下:

到 2027 年 Google TPU 支出 $40B。$LITE 捕获 10%(30-40% 利润率),仅 Google 一个客户就有 $1.5B+ FCF,按这个主要客户的收益就是 17x。(分析师对 TPU 支出扩张的预测可能非常离谱地低)。

这还不包括它从 $AMZN Trainium、$NVDA Blackwell、$MSFT Maia 和其他芯片部署中的分成。

$LITE 目前处在每一个 TPU/GPU 未来芯片部署的中心,并从中抽成。

唯一的下行是它们现在是明确市场领导者,但 $AVGO$COHR 很可能在 2027-2028 年开始竞争。不过……

有人说“$26B、ATH,为什么现在买”。

这就是原因。它们参与了未来每一个 TPU/GPU/ASIC 的部署。

如果 Google TPU 和其他芯片支出扩张,而 LITE 从每一美元支出里拿走 2-3%(来自 $NVDA$AMZN$MSFT)或 8-12%(来自 $GOOGL),$LITE 最后很容易超过 $60B+。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The 1000%+ Circle Thesis: USDC and the Rise of a Private-Sector Federal Reserve.

Circle $CRCL, alongside names like $NBIS, is now my high-conviction long going into 2026 for one reason:

Circle has become the private-sector extension of the US Treasury.

At a $18B MC.

A 10x+ generational opportunity capitalizing on the monetary shift on the Dollar becoming programmable and purely digital.

Circle is not a fintech company. It shouldn't be valued like a traditional one. It's a national security interest of the US Government as the digital money printer.

Here's the qualitative reasons to long Circle:

1. Circle Buys US Debt and collects interest as the private-sector extension of the US Treasury.

- As USDC market cap expands, Circle buys more short-dated US Treasuries. They are becoming one of the largest single holders of US debt in the world.

- In an era where BRICS and other blocs are trying to de-dollarize, the US government needs a digital dollar export. Circle spreads USD hegemony instantly to anyone globally, bypassing local banking restrictions.

- Circle becomes an effective "short" against other foreign currencies (with low interest or devaluation) -> convert local currencies to Circle (USD) -> buy into the US debt.

For $CRCL: The US government cannot afford to let Circle fail. It has an implicit "state-backed" strategic moat that traditional fintechs do not have.

At an $18B valuation.

2. Network effect:

Circle + USDC has already captured the network effect.

- There's hundreds of stablecoins now. Paypal USD, FDUSD, USD1, USDe, and many more to come. But Circle + USDC has already captured the network effect for the US markets (USDT, is still widely used internationally).

Everyone settles with Circle USDC now, whether that's Visa, Stripe, Banks, or more. The network effect is why Meta/Reddit have their moats. Or why Bitcoin has a 1.5T+ market cap. And exactly why USDC won't be displaced by new stablecoins.

USDC has already become the standard for settlement, issuance, storage, and cannibalizes all former settlement methods from T+2 or more rails such as Swift/ACH.

Circle has secured the ultimate network effect both in adoption + agreed upon settlement infrastructure.

With this, as more usage grows -> Circle prints more money.

3. The Private-to-Public Lag:

Lot of people don't know but I help SV venture capital firms with DD as well for fintech Seed/Series A/B type investments on the side.

From personal experience, I've seen a record breaking amount of funding pour into USDC-related companies: whether that's Stablecoin Neobanks (banks like Mecury, just powered by USDC) or settlement infrastructure with USDC.

And of course many public-news about private sector acquisitions such as Stripe acquisition of bridge for $1.1B or Banks starting to look into M&A to create USDC related products.

Many years ago this was AI and we've seen it come into fruition from Anthropic to NVDA's rise a year or two later.

Now it's stablecoins + USDC.

Public markets are lagging indicators and they haven't priced in the inevitability of USDC becoming the agreed upon settlement rail (Bitcoin for digital gold, USDC for USD/settlement).

We've seen a selloff of Circle mainly due to float dynamics, but we'll likely see hedge funds try and accumulate control of the future money printer of the USD.
_

$CRCL isn't just a "crypto stock" or "fintech company" and shouldn't be valued like one (especially pricing profitability from interest rates cuts).

It's basically the private sector digitization of the US dollar.

Ever since the GENIUS act, we're seeing companies like Circle file for charters, and effectively connect USDC into the federal reserve system.

And now we're finally seeing the start of a new Central Bank Digital Currency, but this time issued and privatized through Circle.

Go extraordinarily long on Circle at $84 ($18B MC) as both a geopolitical instrument, standard settlement currency, and as the private sector extension of US Treasury.
1000%+ Circle Thesis:USDC 和私营部门 Federal Reserve 的崛起。

Circle $CRCL$NBIS 这类名字一样,是我进入 2026 年的高信念多头,原因只有一个:

Circle 已经成为美国财政部在私营部门的延伸。

当前市值 $18B。

这是一个 10x+ 的世代机会,押注美元变成可编程、纯数字货币的货币迁移。

Circle 不是 fintech 公司,不该按传统 fintech 估值。它是美国政府的国家安全利益,是数字印钞机。

做多 Circle 的定性理由:

1. Circle 购买美国债务并收利息,是美国财政部的私营部门延伸。

USDC 市值越大,Circle 买的短期美债越多,正在成为全球最大的美国债务单一持有人之一。在 BRICS 等集团试图去美元化时,美国政府需要数字美元出口。Circle 能绕过本地银行限制,把美元霸权即时分发给全球任何人。

$CRCL 来说,美国政府不能承受 Circle 失败。它有传统 fintech 没有的隐性“国家背书”战略护城河。

2. 网络效应。

Circle + USDC 已经拿下网络效应。稳定币很多,Paypal USD、FDUSD、USD1、USDe 等都会出现,但在美国市场,Circle + USDC 已经成为结算、发行、储存标准。Visa、Stripe、银行等都在用 USDC 结算。网络效应就是 Meta/Reddit 有护城河、Bitcoin 有 1.5T+ 市值的原因,也是 USDC 不会被新稳定币取代的原因。

更多使用量增长 -> Circle 打印更多钱。

3. 私募到公募的滞后。

我也帮 SV VC 做 fintech 种子轮/A/B 轮 DD。个人经验里,我看到创纪录的资金流入 USDC 相关公司:稳定币 neobanks、USDC 结算基础设施,以及 Stripe 以 $1.1B 收购 Bridge、银行开始做 USDC 相关 M&A。

很多年前这就是 AI,从 Anthropic 到 NVDA 的崛起一两年后兑现。现在轮到 stablecoins + USDC。

公开市场是滞后指标,还没定价 USDC 成为公认结算 rails 的必然性。

Circle 最近因为流通盘动态被抛售,但 hedge funds 很可能会开始积累这个未来 USD money printer 的控制权。
_

$CRCL 不只是“crypto stock”或“fintech company”,不该按那样估值,尤其不该只按降息对利息收入的影响定价。

它基本上是美元私营部门数字化。

GENIUS act 之后,Circle 这类公司开始申请 charter,并把 USDC 接入 Federal Reserve system。

我们正在看到一种新的 Central Bank Digital Currency 的开端,只不过这次是通过 Circle 私营发行。

在 $84($18B MC)极度做多 Circle,把它视为地缘政治工具、标准结算货币,以及美国财政部的私营延伸。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2002688753710887007
❤️ 555 🔁 63 💬 32
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@investingluc @xiaopenghexpeng I stay away from Chinese companies like $XPEV just out of principle of not funding geopolitical opponents. Especially when it comes to military enabling technology like AI and robotics.

Otherwise $XPEV and $BYD are both very interesting companies.
@investingluc @xiaopenghexpeng 我原则上会远离像 $XPEV 这样的中国公司,因为我不想资助地缘政治对手。尤其是涉及 AI 和机器人这种可能赋能军事的技术时。

除此之外,$XPEV$BYD 都是很有意思的公司。
❤️ 59 🔁 0 💬 7
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I’d be impressed if ChatGPT could write comparisons between OF and card networks alongside personal experiences regarding stablecoin investments in the private sector.

Institutions did not balk at $31, $CRCL was vastly oversubscribed and the GENIUS act for stablecoins was passed after IPO.

If you read the post, the moat is network effect given its the standard for settlement and digital dollars.

There could be hundreds of other stablecoins from Paxos USD, PayPal USD, SOFI USD, and others but that doesn’t mean it will get widespread adoption.

USDC and USDT are already the duopoly and digital standard.

I also wrote this was the qualitative thesis. On companies like $RKLB that aren’t standard companies (like Circle) I would argue traditional valuation methods shouldn’t be used.

That being said, $19B for a money printer and issuer of the currency that’s used for the digital dollar is vastly undervalued and I myself am piling in at $86.

I’m just sharing my thesis, you’re free to take the other side of the trade. And I’d encourage you to back up your words!
如果 ChatGPT 能把 OF 和卡组织的对比,以及我在私营部门稳定币投资上的个人经历一起写出来,那我会挺佩服的。

机构并没有在 $31 时退缩,$CRCL 被大幅超额认购,而且稳定币的 GENIUS act 是在 IPO 后通过的。

如果你读了那篇帖子,护城河就是网络效应,因为它已经是结算和数字美元的标准。

可能会有成百上千个其他稳定币,比如 Paxos USD、PayPal USD、SOFI USD 等等,但这不代表它们会被广泛采用。

USDC 和 USDT 已经是双寡头和数字标准。

我也写过这只是定性 thesis。对于 $RKLB 这类并非标准公司的公司(像 Circle 一样),我会认为不该用传统估值方法。

话虽如此,$19B 买一个印钞机,以及数字美元所用货币的发行方,是严重低估的,我自己在 $86 还在继续加。

我只是分享我的 thesis,你完全可以站在交易的另一边。我也鼓励你拿出东西来支持自己的话!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Harsh reality is that your style of posts attract the wrong audiences. The audience is there.

I run a crypto/banking related financial institution myself, and I only saw your most recent quitting post (rather than any of your posts before) because the X algorithm recommended it.

From personal experience on the crypto side Im grateful I have analysts from Wintermute, Vaneck, all the way to CEOs of major public company/hedge funds reading my posts. And I get to chat with cool people like the team/founders at Perplexity to owners of VC firms often.

All the decision makers down to consumers are on X.

The audience is there, the new algorithm decides if your content has enough substance for these people to read it. It’s more about improving your posts
残酷现实是,你这种发帖风格会吸引错的人群。受众其实在那里。

我自己经营一家和 crypto/banking 相关的金融机构,我之所以看到你最近那条退出帖(而不是之前任何帖子),只是因为 X 算法推荐给我。

从我在 crypto 这边的个人经验看,我很感激有 Wintermute、Vaneck 的分析师,一直到大型上市公司/hedge fund 的 CEO 在看我的帖子。我也经常能和 Perplexity 团队/创始人,以及 VC firm owner 这种有意思的人聊天。

从决策者到消费者都在 X 上。

受众是在的,新算法决定你的内容有没有足够 substance 值得这些人阅读。更多是要改进你的帖子。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy I’ll join in if we can get the whole FinX community on this and publicly post updates every month as a competition https://t.co/6G2p8enPQX
@pepemoonboy 如果我们能把整个 FinX 社区都拉进来,并且作为比赛每个月公开发更新,我就加入 https://t.co/6G2p8enPQX
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I’m sorry but if you actually wanted an audience the problem is your own posts. Don’t blame X.

The algorithm distributes content (eg. this one is great, it randomly showed up on my feed) for posts with substance and explanations.

If you actually wanted to deep dive every day on what you can build, beyond one sentence inspirational, meaningless fluff IG quotes, you might attract normal people.

I’m sure you’re a nice person, just wanted to share constructive criticism in your approach.
不好意思,但如果你真的想要受众,问题在你自己的帖子。别怪 X。

算法会分发有 substance 和解释的内容(比如这条就很不错,它随机出现在我的 feed 上)。

如果你真的愿意每天深入拆解自己能做什么,而不是发一句话的励志、无意义 IG 鸡汤,你可能会吸引正常人。

我相信你人不错,只是想分享一点关于你方法的建设性批评。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
True. Both $NBIS Clickhouse and Avride stakes alone can be worth more than $IREN marketcap in a year or two.

That being said I’m still bullish on both. It’s just a bit unfair though Nebius owns 4 subsidiaries from Yandex days growing triple digits y/y.

That’s not even accounting for their main business line
确实。单是 $NBIS 的 Clickhouse 和 Avride 持股,一两年内就可能比 $IREN 的市值还值钱。

话虽如此,我对两者仍然都看多。只是 Nebius 从 Yandex 时代继承了 4 个子公司,而且都在同比三位数增长,这有点不公平。

这还没算它们的主业。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Low interest rates does affect $CRCL and this is the main bear case thesis.

However, low interest rates environments would unlock more supply in USDC + more volume/transactional based revenue compared to high interest from treasuries. Circle would need to monetize transactional volume over interest (which makes up 90%+ of their profits)

My argument above is that people shouldn’t value it like a fintech though. If it becomes the digital federal reserve and USDC is the de facto settlement currency of the dollar online, both the network and the issuer is worth way beyond traditional valuations
低利率确实会影响 $CRCL,这也是主要空头 thesis。

不过,低利率环境会释放更多 USDC 供应,也会带来更多交易量/交易型收入,相比高利率国债利息收入。Circle 需要把交易量变现,而不是依赖利息(利息占它们 90%+ 的利润)。

我上面的论点是,大家不应该把它当 fintech 来估值。如果它成为数字版美联储,而 USDC 成为线上美元事实上的结算货币,那么这个网络和发行方的价值都会远远超过传统估值。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@itsthesquonky I’ll do some research today on it, thanks for the shout.

I’m already into quite a bit of micro caps like $AAOI which is leveraged $LITE imo just for the $MSFT Maia ramp.

There’s the conference Jan 6-8 I think which should be a catalyst if Microsoft reveals more news about it
@itsthesquonky 我今天会研究一下,谢谢提醒。

我已经买了不少 micro caps,比如 $AAOI,在我看来它就是 $LITE 的杠杆版,单纯为了 $MSFT Maia 扩产。

我记得 1 月 6-8 日有个会议,如果 Microsoft 披露更多相关消息,应该会是催化剂。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
For $COIN, slighty disagree. It's a lot less versatile than you think as 2026 contract renegotiation with $CRCL is coming up.

Right now Coinbase benefits from 50% USDC rev split + exchange business. Then there's value derived from Custody (eg. Blackrock ETFs). But that exchange segment would likely get cannibalized by $HOOD and zero fee exchanges like Bitfinex in the long run.

As for that 50% revenue split of the golden egg: there's legal loopholes for Circle to depeg from Coinbase. And I'm pretty sure Circle will find a way in the long run.

Eg. Genius Act, explicitly bans stablecoin issuers from paying interest to holders -> using that to legally stop paying them a split.

Or the 50/50 split to drop to something like 75/25 from contract negotiation by 2027.

But you can get pure play asymmetry with the direct issuer for $18B or the exchange-add on for $66B.
关于 $COIN,我有点不同意。它没有你想的那么灵活,因为 2026 年和 $CRCL 的合同重谈快到了。

现在 Coinbase 受益于 50% USDC 收入分成 + 交易所业务。然后还有 Custody 带来的价值(比如 Blackrock ETFs)。但从长期看,交易所这块很可能会被 $HOOD 和 Bitfinex 这种零费率交易所蚕食。

至于那只下金蛋的鹅的 50% 收入分成:Circle 有法律漏洞可以和 Coinbase 脱钩。而且我很确定 Circle 长期会找到办法。

比如 Genius Act 明确禁止稳定币发行方向持有人支付利息 -> 可以用这个在法律上停止给它们分成。

或者到 2027 年通过合同谈判,把 50/50 分成降到类似 75/25。

但你可以用 $18B 买到直接发行方的 pure play 不对称性,或者用 $66B 买到带交易所附加项的版本。
❤️ 10 🔁 1 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
No worries! I love sharing my thoughts for free mainly for fulfillment in helping others.

I make money through markets so I personally don't see any reason why I would need to monetize followers.

As for the question:

$CRCL's business model is essentially the "Holy Grail" of finance: 100% gross margins, zero cost of capital, and infinite scalability

It's literally a non-stop money printer, which is why it yields high valuation/premiums.

Banks: 2-4% interest "savings account". They lend it out at 6%. Margin ~2-4%.

Circle: Pays you 0%. (when you hold USDC). They lend it to the US Government (via Treasuries) at ~5%. Their margin is the full ~5%.

I've dumbing it down on purpose to explain the concept (not factoring in stuff like revenue split with $COIN) but:

If Circle has $60 Billion in circulation (USDC): $60B × 5% yield = $3 Billion/year risk-free revenue.

If we look at Tether, in 2024, Tether reported ~$13 Billion in profit. They achieved this with fewer than 100 employees too. They took the "free money" (users' deposits), bought Treasuries (safe 5%) + BTC as well.

Circle + Tether business models are arguably the best in the world:

Print free money (from users), lend at X% to gov, pocket the spread. If Fed cuts to 0%, the money printer doesn't stop, it just shifts gears like banks to service/TX related revenues (but obviously hurts a bit)

If USDC expands to $1T+ marketcap or $2T+ as the the de facto standard for a digitalized dollar, profits will be ($50-$100B /year) if they make 5% off that.

And right now Circle is a $18-20B marketcap with $77B circulating supply.

It's pure software too, so it can expand off low employee counts like Tether, unlike banks that have extremely high overhead.

So basically infinitely scalable business model (money printer) combined with extremely high margins = high valuation.
没事!我喜欢免费分享想法,主要是因为能帮到别人让我有成就感。

我靠市场赚钱,所以我个人不觉得自己有什么理由需要把粉丝变现。

至于这个问题:

$CRCL 的商业模式本质上是金融里的“Holy Grail”:100% 毛利率、零资金成本、无限可扩展性。

它字面意义上就是一台不停运转的印钞机,所以才会有高估值/溢价。

银行:给你 2-4% 的“储蓄账户”利息。它们再以 6% 放贷。利差 ~2-4%。

Circle:付你 0%(当你持有 USDC 时)。它们把钱借给美国政府(通过 Treasuries),拿 ~5%。它们的利差就是完整的 ~5%。

我故意简化来解释这个概念(没计入和 $COIN 的收入分成之类),但:

如果 Circle 有 $60 Billion 流通量(USDC):$60B × 5% 收益率 = 每年 $3 Billion 无风险收入。

看 Tether,2024 年 Tether 报告了约 $13 Billion 利润。而且它们员工不到 100 人。它们拿“免费资金”(用户存款),买 Treasuries(安全的 5%)+ 也买 BTC。

Circle + Tether 的商业模式可以说是世界上最好的:

从用户那里印免费钱,以 X% 借给政府,自己吃利差。如果 Fed 降到 0%,印钞机不会停,只是像银行一样换挡到服务/交易相关收入(但显然会受点伤)。

如果 USDC 扩张到 $1T+ 市值,或者作为数字美元事实标准达到 $2T+,按 5% 收益算利润会是(每年 $50-$100B)。

而现在 Circle 是 $18-20B 市值,USDC 流通供应 $77B。

它也是纯软件,所以可以像 Tether 一样靠很少员工扩张,不像银行有极高开销。

所以基本上就是无限可扩展商业模式(印钞机)+ 极高利润率 = 高估值。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks, I was waiting forever to build long positions on $CRCL.

We had crypto sector liquidations, float unlock, interest rate cuts, and high beta stock selloff, finally causing a 70% drop from the highs.

Now Circle is finally at a respectable price again, so I built up positions on the drop to $70.

I did originally place buy orders during the IPO but then it just went to $250+. There’s been a lot more positive developments since so from an investor’s perspective, very happy hold + multi year long for me. CSPs is also a good strategy, but I’m a little more greedy trying to capture the upside.
谢谢,我一直等着建立 $CRCL 多头仓位。

我们经历了 crypto 板块清算、流通股解禁、降息和高 beta 股票抛售,终于让它从高点跌了 70%。

现在 Circle 终于又回到一个像样的价格,所以我在跌到 $70 时建了仓。

我原本 IPO 时就下了买单,但后来它直接冲到 $250+。此后正面进展多了很多,所以从投资者角度看,我很开心持有 + 多年做多。CSPs 也是好策略,但我更贪一点,想抓住上涨空间。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Great question so here's my nuanced take about USDT, vs $CRCL USDC.

Best example I can give is Onlyfans and Card Networks.

It's not really allowed but Card networks still work with OF because of the amount of volume they process. Similarly, Tether is in a love-hate relationship with the US government.

As for Tether, they're ~17th largest holder of US government debt in the world and are effectively holding $130B+ in treasuries. If the US government tries banning USDT, it might cause a chaotic sell-off in the treasury market.

However, it still has strategic importance to spreading "dollarization", especially in countries like Argentina or Turkey and does help the USD become the dominant currency.

It's still dominant Internationally, especially in "Grey Market" compliance + crypto trading,.

However, $USDC has basically become the regulated private-sector extension of the US treasury, mainly in US markets.

And USDC penetrated that highly regulated institutional wall with US financial instituions (visa, mastercard, stripe, bny, and so on).

Tether still is a compliance headache and it's still extremely difficult and not legal to gain access to minting features/trading on Bitfinex etc in the US.

USDC has basically become the clean USD and will scale up a lot faster with financial institutions/banking while USDT will be there a lot for international, less regulated use cases (eg. people converting local currencies in Venezuela to USDT instead of RuneScape GP without going through a ton of KYC/AML).

But Tether will always be around given how massive it is.
好问题,下面是我对 USDT vs $CRCL USDC 更细的看法。

我能给的最好例子是 Onlyfans 和 Card Networks。

这其实不太被允许,但卡组织仍然和 OF 合作,因为它们处理的交易量太大。类似地,Tether 和美国政府处在一种爱恨交织的关系里。

至于 Tether,它们大约是全球第 17 大美国政府债务持有人,实际上持有 $130B+ 的国债。如果美国政府试图禁止 USDT,可能会引发国债市场的混乱抛售。

不过,它对传播“美元化”仍有战略重要性,尤其是在 Argentina 或 Turkey 这样的国家,也确实帮助 USD 成为主导货币。

它在国际上仍然占主导,尤其是在“Grey Market”合规 + crypto 交易里。

不过,$USDC 基本已经成为美国财政部在私营部门的受监管延伸,主要是在美国市场。

而且 USDC 已经穿透了美国金融机构那堵高度监管的机构墙(visa、mastercard、stripe、bny 等)。

Tether 仍然是合规麻烦,在美国想获得 minting 功能/在 Bitfinex 等交易仍然极其困难且不合法。

USDC 基本已经成为干净的 USD,并且会随着金融机构/银行更快扩张;而 USDT 会大量存在于国际、监管较少的用例中(比如人们把 Venezuela 的本币换成 USDT,而不是不经过大量 KYC/AML 去换 RuneScape GP)。

但 Tether 因为体量太大,会一直存在。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
The 1000%+ Circle Thesis: USDC and the Rise of a Private-Sector Federal Reserve.

Circle $CRCL, alongside names like $NBIS, is now my high-conviction long going into 2026 for one reason:

Circle has become the private-sector extension of the US Treasury.

At a $18B MC.

A 10x+ generational opportunity capitalizing on the monetary shift on the Dollar becoming programmable and purely digital.

Circle is not a fintech company. It shouldn't be valued like a traditional one. It's a national security interest of the US Government as the digital money printer.

Here's the qualitative reasons to long Circle:

1. Circle Buys US Debt and collects interest as the private-sector extension of the US Treasury.

- As USDC market cap expands, Circle buys more short-dated US Treasuries. They are becoming one of the largest single holders of US debt in the world.

- In an era where BRICS and other blocs are trying to de-dollarize, the US government needs a digital dollar export. Circle spreads USD hegemony instantly to anyone globally, bypassing local banking restrictions.

- Circle becomes an effective "short" against other foreign currencies (with low interest or devaluation) -> convert local currencies to Circle (USD) -> buy into the US debt.

For $CRCL: The US government cannot afford to let Circle fail. It has an implicit "state-backed" strategic moat that traditional fintechs do not have.

At an $18B valuation.

2. Network effect:

Circle + USDC has already captured the network effect.

- There's hundreds of stablecoins now. Paypal USD, FDUSD, USD1, USDe, and many more to come. But Circle + USDC has already captured the network effect for the US markets (USDT, is still widely used internationally).

Everyone settles with Circle USDC now, whether that's Visa, Stripe, Banks, or more. The network effect is why Meta/Reddit have their moats. Or why Bitcoin has a 1.5T+ market cap. And exactly why USDC won't be displaced by new stablecoins.

USDC has already become the standard for settlement, issuance, storage, and cannibalizes all former settlement methods from T+2 or more rails such as Swift/ACH.

Circle has secured the ultimate network effect both in adoption + agreed upon settlement infrastructure.

With this, as more usage grows -> Circle prints more money.

3. The Private-to-Public Lag:

Lot of people don't know but I help SV venture capital firms with DD as well for fintech Seed/Series A/B type investments on the side.

From personal experience, I've seen a record breaking amount of funding pour into USDC-related companies: whether that's Stablecoin Neobanks (banks like Mecury, just powered by USDC) or settlement infrastructure with USDC.

And of course many public-news about private sector acquisitions such as Stripe acquisition of bridge for $1.1B or Banks starting to look into M&A to create USDC related products.

Many years ago this was AI and we've seen it come into fruition from Anthropic to NVDA's rise a year or two later.

Now it's stablecoins + USDC.

Public markets are lagging indicators and they haven't priced in the inevitability of USDC becoming the agreed upon settlement rail (Bitcoin for digital gold, USDC for USD/settlement).

We've seen a selloff of Circle mainly due to float dynamics, but we'll likely see hedge funds try and accumulate control of the future money printer of the USD.
_

$CRCL isn't just a "crypto stock" or "fintech company" and shouldn't be valued like one (especially pricing profitability from interest rates cuts).

It's basically the private sector digitization of the US dollar.

Ever since the GENIUS act, we're seeing companies like Circle file for charters, and effectively connect USDC into the federal reserve system.

And now we're finally seeing the start of a new Central Bank Digital Currency, but this time issued and privatized through Circle.

Go extraordinarily long on Circle at $84 ($18B MC) as both a geopolitical instrument, standard settlement currency, and as the private sector extension of US Treasury.
1000%+ Circle Thesis:USDC 以及私营部门美联储的崛起。

Circle $CRCL,和 $NBIS 这类名字一起,是我进入 2026 年的高信念做多标的,原因只有一个:

Circle 已经成为美国财政部在私营部门的延伸。

而市值只有 $18B MC。

这是一个 10x+ 的世代机会,押注美元变成可编程、纯数字化货币的货币转变。

Circle 不是一家 fintech 公司。它不应该按传统 fintech 估值。作为数字印钞机,它是美国政府的国家安全利益。

下面是做多 Circle 的定性理由:

1. Circle 购买美国债务,并作为美国财政部私营部门延伸收取利息。

- 随着 USDC 市值扩大,Circle 会购买更多短期美国国债。它们正在成为全球最大的单一美国债务持有人之一。

- 在 BRICS 和其他集团试图去美元化的时代,美国政府需要一种数字美元出口。Circle 可以绕过本地银行限制,把美元霸权瞬间传播给全球任何人。

- Circle 成为对其他外国货币(低利率或贬值)的有效“做空” -> 把本币换成 Circle(USD)-> 买入美国债务。

$CRCL 来说:美国政府承受不起让 Circle 失败。它有一种传统 fintech 没有的隐性“国家支持”战略护城河。

而估值只有 $18B。

2. 网络效应:

Circle + USDC 已经抓住了网络效应。

- 现在有数百种稳定币。Paypal USD、FDUSD、USD1、USDe,未来还会更多。但 Circle + USDC 已经在美国市场抓住网络效应(USDT 在国际上仍被广泛使用)。

现在大家都用 Circle USDC 结算,不管是 Visa、Stripe、Banks 还是更多机构。网络效应就是 Meta/Reddit 有护城河的原因,也是 Bitcoin 有 1.5T+ 市值的原因。也正是为什么 USDC 不会被新稳定币取代。

USDC 已经成为结算、发行、存储的标准,并正在蚕食从 T+2 到 Swift/ACH 等所有旧结算方式。

Circle 在采用度 + 已达成共识的结算基础设施两方面,都拿到了终极网络效应。

有了这个,使用量越增长 -> Circle 印的钱越多。

3. 私募到公开市场的滞后:

很多人不知道,但我也在旁边帮 SV 风投机构做 fintech Seed/Series A/B 投资的 DD。

从个人经验看,我看到创纪录的资金涌入 USDC 相关公司:无论是 Stablecoin Neobanks(像 Mecury 这样的银行,只是由 USDC 驱动),还是基于 USDC 的结算基础设施。

当然还有很多私营部门收购的公开新闻,比如 Stripe 以 $1.1B 收购 bridge,或者银行开始研究 M&A 来创建 USDC 相关产品。

很多年前这是 AI,我们后来看到它从 Anthropic 到 NVDA 的崛起,在一两年后兑现。

现在轮到 stablecoins + USDC。

公开市场是滞后指标,它们还没有给 USDC 成为共识结算轨道的必然性定价(Bitcoin 对应数字黄金,USDC 对应 USD/结算)。

我们看到 Circle 抛售主要是因为流通股动态,但我们很可能会看到 hedge funds 试图积累对未来 USD 印钞机的控制权。
_

$CRCL 不只是“crypto stock”或“fintech company”,也不应该按这些来估值(尤其是按降息对盈利的影响来定价)。

它基本上就是美国美元在私营部门的数字化。

自从 GENIUS act 以来,我们看到 Circle 这类公司申请牌照,并实际上把 USDC 接入联邦储备系统。

现在我们终于看到一种新的 Central Bank Digital Currency 开始出现,只不过这次是通过 Circle 发行并私有化。

在 $84($18B MC)大举做多 Circle,把它当作地缘政治工具、标准结算货币,以及美国财政部的私营部门延伸。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I’ve added 2 new stocks to my extreme growth high conviction basket in my personal portfolio.

I’ve never been wrong before about high conviction stocks on longer timeframes (eg. $HOOD $18 -> $100+)

My 5 high conviction multi-bagger stocks for 2026 are now:

$NBIS - AI Compute and Robotaxis

$RKLB - Space

$ALAB - Connectivity

And the two new ones are:

$CRCL - Money Printer

$LITE - Hyperscaler ASICs

I’ll do longer DD thesis on Circle and Lite on follow ups.

I’m confident having just these 5 will heavily outperform 99.9% of portfolios.
我在个人组合里的极致成长高信念篮子里,又加了 2 只新股票。

在更长周期的高信念股票上,我以前还没错过(比如 $HOOD $18 -> $100+)。

我现在 2026 年的 5 只高信念多倍股是:

$NBIS - AI 算力和 Robotaxis

$RKLB - 太空

$ALAB - 连接/互连

另外两只是:

$CRCL - 印钞机

$LITE - Hyperscaler ASICs

后面我会对 Circle 和 Lite 写更长的 DD thesis。

我有信心,只拿这 5 只,表现会大幅跑赢 99.9% 的组合。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2002392267311739320
❤️ 613 🔁 66 💬 61
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Not at all. This is the network effect in play, which is an incredible moat.

That’s what makes Reddit, $RDDT where anyone can create a similar platform in a day, but because everyone agrees to use it, that’s where the value comes from.

Obviously $CRCL is a tad more regulated, but from what I’ve seen, there’s that same network effect with $USDC where it’s the agreed upon currency to issue/settle with.

I run a financial institution that does minting/settlement with stablecoins.

It’s a nightmare to deal with any other coin (like Tether for regulatory reasons) or other minted stablecoins for lack of liquidity/agreed upon settlement asset or trading pairs.

USDC is here to stay (mainly for United States), Tether seems to be the asset of choice for international for different reasons.

Just from the venture capital friends I’ve talked to everyone seems to be funneling money into USDC-powered fintechs, like Stablecoin Banks, and we’ll start the utility start to expand.
完全不是。这就是网络效应在发挥作用,而且是非常强的护城河。

这也是 Reddit、$RDDT 的价值来源:任何人一天内都能做个类似平台,但因为大家都同意用它,价值就在那里。

当然 $CRCL 监管更多一点,但据我看到的,$USDC 也有同样的网络效应,它已经是大家认可的发行/结算货币。

我自己经营一家用稳定币做 minting/settlement 的金融机构。

处理其他币简直是噩梦(比如 Tether 有监管原因),其他铸造稳定币也缺流动性/公认结算资产或交易对。

USDC 会长期存在(主要在美国),Tether 因为不同原因像是国际市场的首选资产。

单从我聊过的风投朋友看,大家似乎都在把钱投向 USDC 驱动的 fintech,比如 Stablecoin Banks,接下来我们会开始看到用途扩张。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yep, you’re correct when I said that $NBIS is an extremely strong buy even at $130 a month ago. I still maintain that today, and would be buying Nebius if it were trading at $125.

I believe the drop to $75 is like the moment when $HOOD dropped to $28 during tariff fears then went to $100+ when retail capitulated.

I do feel extremely guilty if people followed my thesis on Nebius with options that expired this month. I lost a lot of money myself so far on March/May expiry options from the drop.

But medium-long term I believe $NBIS easily blows past $250 once they achieve management projections in 2026
是的,你说得对,一个月前我说 $NBIS 即使在 $130 也是极强买入。今天我仍然这么看,如果 Nebius 在 $125 交易,我还会买。

我觉得跌到 $75 就像 $HOOD 当年因为关税恐慌跌到 $28,然后散户投降后又涨到 $100+ 的时刻。

如果有人跟了我 Nebius thesis 买了这个月到期的期权,我确实非常内疚。我自己在这次下跌里,3月/5月到期期权到目前也亏了很多。

但中长期看,我相信 $NBIS 一旦在 2026 年做到管理层指引,很容易冲过 $250。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
For me personally: A stock is "high conviction" when they are fundamentally de-risked and are going from that point to scale.

For example, $NBIS post-MSFT deal. I like $AAOI much better than $POET in the photonics space personally. But neither of them are "de-risked yet".

So Poet as you mentioned, benefits from Celestial, which got acquired $MRVL. Marvell basically sells Poet's interposer via Celestial to hyperscalers for connecting tpus/trainium.

But this is via multiple hops away.

$AAOI already had direct hyperscaler contracts like $AMZN for Trainium + $MSFT for Maia. And equity agreements like what $ALAB has for Amazon.

However, they're fully vertically integrated + built in Texas. They have a pretty big potential to 10X if they can get the whole supply chain to scale in America + perfect execution.

But because they're at lower scale compared to $COHR, $AAOI has huge execution risk + it's not high-conviction. Same with $POET, there's no de-risking factor yet that would make me fully convinced.

However, Poet and AAOI are both photonics plays that can 10x, which is why I have some $AAOI in my portfolio, but neither are high conviction.
对我个人来说:一只股票在基本面已经去风险、并且从那个点开始走向规模化时,才算“高信念”。

比如 $NBIS 在 MSFT 交易之后。我个人在光子领域比起 $POET 更喜欢 $AAOI。但它们都还没有“去风险”。

所以你提到的 Poet,受益于 Celestial,而 Celestial 被 $MRVL 收购了。Marvell 基本上通过 Celestial 把 Poet 的 interposer 卖给 hyperscaler,用于连接 tpus/trainium。

但这中间隔了好几跳。

$AAOI 已经有直接 hyperscaler 合同,比如 $AMZN 的 Trainium + $MSFT 的 Maia。还有类似 $ALAB 和 Amazon 那样的股权协议。

不过,它们完全垂直整合 + 建在 Texas。如果它们能让整条供应链在美国规模化并完美执行,确实有很大 10X 潜力。

但因为相比 $COHR 规模更小,$AAOI 有巨大的执行风险 + 不是高信念。$POET 也一样,目前还没有让我完全信服的去风险因素。

不过 Poet 和 AAOI 都是可能 10x 的光子玩法,所以我组合里有一些 $AAOI,但两者都不是高信念。
❤️ 12 🔁 1 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I will answer your question with a question regarding $NBIS vs $IREN.

Does IREN have a:

- FSD lvl4 robotaxi company scaled by Uber
- a DB company used by every single top company from Tesla to Meta
- an AI labeling company used by Amazon, Anthropic and others?

Each growing 100%+ Y/Y alongside Nebius's main business?
关于 $NBIS vs $IREN,我用一个问题回答你的问题。

IREN 有没有:

- 一家由 Uber 规模化的 FSD lvl4 robotaxi 公司
- 一家从 Tesla 到 Meta 每个顶级公司都在用的 DB 公司
- 一家 Amazon、Anthropic 等都在用的 AI labeling 公司?

而且每一家都和 Nebius 主业一起同比增长 100%+?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks for the $LITE shoutout. I didn't realize how instrumental it was to $NVDA blackwell, $GOOGL TPUs, and $AMZN Trainium chips.

Insane how it's part the core of single GPU/TPU/ASIC from every hyperscaler (hence why it's high-conviction)

As for $CRDO, similar ground to $ALAB regarding high-Nvidia like margins, triple digit Y/Y growth, and hyperscaler dependencies for connectivity.
谢谢提醒 $LITE。我之前没意识到它对 $NVDA blackwell、$GOOGL TPUs 和 $AMZN Trainium 芯片有多关键。

它竟然是每个 hyperscaler 的每一个 GPU/TPU/ASIC 核心的一部分,这太疯狂了(所以它才是高信念)。

至于 $CRDO,它和 $ALAB 类似,都是高 Nvidia 式利润率、同比三位数增长,以及 hyperscaler 对连接性的依赖。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Good question, stablecoins are actually separate from the BTC downtrend, even though algorithmically this affects the marketcaps of companies/assets in the sector.

USDC/Tether increases in supply even as crypto prices go down. Institutions sell BTC for USDT/USDC while crypto is in a downtrend instead of holding it in bank accounts.

Especially in venture capital right now, lightspeed/sequioa/etc. are pouring money into stablecoin related companies like Neobanks, and lot of these investments pay dividends 6 months.-1 year later.

I'll write up a more in-depth thesis in another post but generally, I'm bullish on stablecoins and Bitcoin, and even if Bitcoin is in a downtrend, stablecoins + issuers are isolated.
好问题,稳定币其实和 BTC 下跌趋势是分开的,尽管算法上这会影响板块内公司/资产的市值。

即使 crypto 价格下跌,USDC/Tether 的供应量也会增加。机构在 crypto 下行时会把 BTC 卖成 USDT/USDC,而不是放在银行账户里。

尤其是现在风投领域,lightspeed/sequioa 等都在把钱投向稳定币相关公司,比如 Neobanks,而很多这类投资会在 6 个月到 1 年后兑现。

我之后会写一篇更深入的 thesis,但总体来说,我看多稳定币和 Bitcoin,而且即使 Bitcoin 在下跌趋势里,稳定币 + 发行方也是隔离的。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Few bear cases:

- Fed creates it's own CBDC like Fed Coin or another stablecoin to compete directly.

- Fed keeps cutting rates down to 1% and $CRCL needs to keep printing USDC to make up for lost revenue.

- Regulation - eg. next administration puts in a gary gensler or usdc gets banned in other countries

But if things go the way they're going now, Circle deserves to be a $50B+ company down the road.
几个空头情形:

- Fed 创建自己的 CBDC,比如 Fed Coin,或另一种稳定币来直接竞争。

- Fed 持续降息到 1%,$CRCL 需要不断印 USDC 来弥补损失的收入。

- 监管,比如下一届政府任命一个 gary gensler,或者 usdc 在其他国家被禁止。

但如果事情按现在的方向走,Circle 未来值得成为一家 $50B+ 公司。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Sure, so I've been saying avoid Circle or short $CRCL long $COIN when Circle was trading at a $60B marketcap.

This was because people didn't understand float dynamics.

Majority of the float was locked up and couldn't be sold, similar to BULL IPO. When float was released, the price on Circle crashed.

There's stuff like rate cuts too hurting profitability from interest on minted stablecoins, but float dynamics was the biggest factor by a longshot.

I've always been bullish on USDC, but market cap plays a huge role. Now it's an extraordinarily strong buy back at $18B
当然,所以当 Circle 以 $60B 市值交易时,我一直说避开 Circle,或者 short $CRCL long $COIN

这是因为大家不理解流通股动态。

大部分流通股被锁定,不能卖,类似 BULL IPO。等流通股释放后,Circle 的价格崩了。

也有降息伤害铸造稳定币利息盈利的问题,但流通股动态远远是最大因素。

我一直看多 USDC,但市值非常关键。现在回到 $18B,它是一个极强买入。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@dubiousnoob So $CRCL and $COIN are the issuers of USDC, you’re correct in saying it’s issued on Ethereum.

But it’s also done on Solana, Base, Polygon, and so on. Network doesn’t matter much.

Ethereum’s network is the infrastructure but USDC doesnt accrue much value to Ethereum’s token.
@dubiousnoob 所以 $CRCL$COIN 是 USDC 的发行方,你说它发行在 Ethereum 上是对的。

但它也发行在 Solana、Base、Polygon 等等。网络本身没那么重要。

Ethereum 网络是基础设施,但 USDC 不会给 Ethereum token 带来太多价值累积。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$CRCL is stablecoins, has nothing to do with L1s like Ethereum or Solana since it doesn’t matter.

Thesis involves that it’s becoming just a standard for settlement (visa, PayPal, YouTube, etc.) and that network effect is worth infinitely more than its $17B valuation both in us government strategic interest to get people into the US dollar/debt system as well as the global companies.

People can mint PayPal usd, paxos usd, etc but USDC has basically become the agreed upon standard and this is incredibly, incredibly valuable.
$CRCL 是稳定币,和 Ethereum 或 Solana 这类 L1 没什么关系,因为这不重要。

thesis 在于它正在成为结算标准(visa、PayPal、YouTube 等),而这种网络效应的价值远高于它 $17B 的估值,不管是美国政府希望把人带进美元/债务体系的战略利益,还是全球公司层面。

人们可以 mint PayPal usd、paxos usd 等,但 USDC 基本已经成为公认标准,而这非常、非常有价值。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So I’d say $RKLB is definitely the most overvalued right now.

$LITE is edging toward the overbought territory but it definitely warrants a re-rating given how critical it is in TPUv7, Trainium, and Blackwell chips.

$NBIS and $CRCL are most undervalued out of the bunch, then goes $ALAB.
所以我会说 $RKLB 现在肯定是最被高估的。

$LITE 正在接近超买区域,但考虑到它在 TPUv7、Trainium 和 Blackwell 芯片里的关键性,它绝对值得重估。

这一批里 $NBIS$CRCL 最被低估,然后是 $ALAB
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So for a “safer” 10x. I’d say $RKLB and $NBIS next 5 years. I could definitely see Rocketlab at $300B valuation and Nebius at $200B one day.

The chance of a 10x increases the smaller marketcap they are (eg. Sub $2B), and it’s obviously much harder for companies like $HOOD to double in a year.

But for smaller caps, $AAOI, $WLAC, and $TE are those types of moonshots I like to dabble in.
所以如果说“更安全”的 10x,我会说未来 5 年是 $RKLB$NBIS。我完全能看到 Rocketlab 有一天到 $300B 估值,Nebius 到 $200B。

市值越小(比如低于 $2B),10x 概率越高;像 $HOOD 这种公司一年翻倍显然难得多。

但小盘里,$AAOI$WLAC$TE 是我喜欢小仓位试的 moonshots。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
I’ve added 2 new stocks to my extreme growth high conviction basket in my personal portfolio.

I’ve never been wrong before about high conviction stocks on longer timeframes (eg. $HOOD $18 -> $100+)

My 5 high conviction multi-bagger stocks for 2026 are now:

$NBIS - AI Compute and Robotaxis

$RKLB - Space

$ALAB - Connectivity

And the two new ones are:

$CRCL - Money Printer

$LITE - Hyperscaler ASICs

I’ll do longer DD thesis on Circle and Lite on follow ups.

I’m confident having just these 5 will heavily outperform 99.9% of portfolios.
我在个人组合里的 extreme growth high conviction 篮子里新加了 2 只股票。

我以前在更长时间维度上的高信念股票从没错过(比如 $HOOD $18 -> $100+)。

我 2026 年的 5 只高信念 multi-bagger 股票现在是:

$NBIS - AI Compute 和 Robotaxis

$RKLB - Space

$ALAB - Connectivity

两个新的是:

$CRCL - Money Printer

$LITE - Hyperscaler ASICs

我之后会对 Circle 和 Lite 写更长的 DD thesis。

我有信心,只持有这 5 只就会大幅跑赢 99.9% 的组合。
❤️ 979 🔁 96 💬 55
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@goatyishere @PolymarketMoney Being a cheat code for esports is just a side quest for me when I trade stocks like $TE.

I knew t1 would win during group stages.

There’s just some things written in the stars, $15-&gt;$3.2m is easy! https://t.co/DLAZnalCRM
@goatyishere @PolymarketMoney 当我交易 $TE 这种股票时,成为 esports cheat code 对我来说只是支线任务。

我在小组赛阶段就知道 t1 会赢。

有些事情就是写在星星里的,$15-> $3.2m 很简单! https://t.co/DLAZnalCRM
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DeepValueBagger Have fun in Europe!

I’ve been spending my time traveling around SEA like Guam and Japan recently https://t.co/NS2cOQvDtl
@DeepValueBagger 在欧洲玩得开心!

我最近一直在 SEA 周边旅行,比如 Guam 和 Japan https://t.co/NS2cOQvDtl
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RJCcapital @FT @retail_mourinho @zephyr_z9 @jiahanjimliu @DeepValueBagger @NighthawkTradez When FT did my individual interview my only reply was $DUOL.

That’s when they knew they had to include RJC on the list too.
@RJCcapital @FT @retail_mourinho @zephyr_z9 @jiahanjimliu @DeepValueBagger @NighthawkTradez 当 FT 给我做个人采访时,我唯一的回答是 $DUOL

那时候他们就知道,也必须把 RJC 放进名单里。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 Yep. If $NBIS was $135 today I’d still buying - but ran out of dry capital to deploy on the full tail end of the drop sadly.

Ended up buying long term positions in photonics players and Circle though
@soulbiri1 是的。如果 $NBIS 今天是 $135 我还会买,但很遗憾,在这轮下跌最后一段我已经没有干弹药可以部署了。

不过最后还是买了光子玩家和 Circle 的长期仓位。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Nothings fundamentally changed (aside from improving) about companies like $NBIS. Aside from the sentiment flipping the switch.

But suddenly we have people like Dan Ives from Wedbush going out and saying "Nebius likely gets acquired by a hyperscaler like $GOOGL, $MSFT, $AMZN " in 2026, which is incredibly bullish.
$NBIS 这样的公司,基本面没有任何变化(除了变得更好)。只是情绪突然翻转了。

但突然间,我们看到 Wedbush 的 Dan Ives 这样的人出来说:“Nebius 很可能在 2026 年被 $GOOGL$MSFT$AMZN 这样的 hyperscaler 收购”,这非常看多。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 The WSB degen inside of me is whispering sell everything and full port $NBIS on margin.

The drop from $140 to $80 though was extremely surprising and it's hard to believe it goes a lot lower than this.

I'm not selling!
@soulbiri1 我内心的 WSB degen 正在低声说:卖掉一切,用保证金 full port $NBIS

不过从 $140 跌到 $80 确实非常意外,很难相信它还能比这低很多。

我不卖!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@kameron_payne I'm happy bag holding $NBIS and $IREN then. https://t.co/iVKXGh1adQ
@kameron_payne 那我就开心地 bag holding $NBIS$IRENhttps://t.co/iVKXGh1adQ
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
はい、多くの人が $MU (マイクロン)とメモリがAIチップの構築において中心的な役割を果たすという見解を持っていました。しかし、レポートによるマージン縮小の懸念や、中国関連の懸念があり、人々は自分の見解が実現するのを待つ代わりに、結局は損失を抱えることになってしまいました。

今やメモリは不足しており、初期の人々がずっと正しかったことが証明されました。しかし、彼らはこの大幅な株価上昇の後には、もはやその株を所有していません。

現在、私たちは $NBIS のような銘柄でも同じ状況を目にしていると思います。皆、1年後にはロボタクシーと並んでAI版のアマゾン ウェブ サービス (AWS)** になる潜在的な可能性を見ていますが、今は降伏(キャピチュレーション)/売り抜けの局面なのです。
是的,很多人都持有 $MU(Micron)和内存在 AI 芯片建设中处于核心位置的观点。但因为报告里的利润率压缩担忧,以及中国相关担忧,大家最后没有等到自己的观点兑现,反而带着亏损出局。

现在内存短缺了,证明早期那些人一直是对的。但在这轮大涨之后,他们已经不再持有这只股票了。

我认为现在我们在 $NBIS 这类股票上也看到了同样的情况。大家都看到它一年后可能成为 AI 版 Amazon Web Services(AWS),旁边还有 robotaxi,但现在是投降/洗盘阶段。
❤️ 21 🔁 2 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@nectarbuffs Yeah this is an incredible buying opportunity if you still have capital. Otherwise, just hold.

Looks like $IREN just got saved from the inverse Cramer. https://t.co/YRuRaUGTIv
@nectarbuffs 是的,如果你还有资金,这是一个非常棒的买入机会。否则就持有。

看起来 $IREN 刚刚从 inverse Cramer 里被救出来了。 https://t.co/YRuRaUGTIv
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Agreed and I've seen it time and time again.

$AMD in 2016 when people thought it could take on Intel, then capitulation at $5.

$PLTR in 2023 when people believed in the AI thesis, then capitulation in the $10's after short seller activity.

$RKLB this yeare when people thought it could become the next SpaceX at $18. Then capitulation after low PTs.

When you see a lot of retail favorites like $BTC, $NBIS, $IREN, $RKLB, $CIFR, $ASTS, $ALAB, $CRCL, $HOOD, $SOFI, and others dropping from ATHs, it's good to see examples from history.

And many of times, when finx forms a "bubble" from discussion that $NBIS is likely to become the next AWS for AI, or $ASTS has the potential to be the next starlink for satellite cellular.

If the only thing that's changed is the stock price and not the thesis, give it time to play out.
同意,而且我已经一次又一次见过这种事。

2016 年的 $AMD,当时人们觉得它能挑战 Intel,然后在 $5 投降。

2023 年的 $PLTR,当时人们相信 AI thesis,然后在做空者活动后于十几美元投降。

今年的 $RKLB,人们在 $18 觉得它可能成为下一个 SpaceX。然后在低 PT 后投降。

当你看到很多散户最爱的 $BTC$NBIS$IREN$RKLB$CIFR$ASTS$ALAB$CRCL$HOOD$SOFI 等从 ATH 下跌时,看看历史例子是有帮助的。

很多时候,当 finx 因为讨论 $NBIS 可能成为下一个 AI AWS,或 $ASTS 有潜力成为卫星蜂窝领域的下一个 starlink 而形成“泡沫”时。

如果唯一改变的是股价,而不是 thesis,就给它时间兑现。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Agreed.

Companies like $CIFR are trading like the $AMZN, $GOOGL deals never happened.

In the whole Neocloud sector, we’re seeing a crash despite de-risking and long term revenue visibility across the board with Mag7 contracts.

$ORCL, $CRWV, and some individual names made sense given OpenAI exposure but it just dragged the rest of the sector alongside it.
同意。

$CIFR 这样的公司,交易起来就像 $AMZN$GOOGL 交易从没发生过一样。

整个 Neocloud 板块里,尽管有 Mag7 合同带来的去风险和长期收入可见性,我们仍然看到崩盘。

考虑到 OpenAI 敞口,$ORCL$CRWV 和一些个股下跌有道理,但它把板块其他公司也一起拖下去了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Market is valuing a forward $8B ARR company, 20-30% EBIT margin company with:

- 4 separate subsidaries from robotaxi companies to DBs all growing triple digits Y/Y.
(Two of which can be worth more than the current market cap in a 1-2 year bull case)

At $19B.

As for $IREN, markets are suddenly forgetting how much capacity was a bottleneck for hyperscalers.

Market is taking too much Tylenol.
市场正在给一家 forward $8B ARR、20-30% EBIT margin 的公司估值,它还有:

- 4 个独立子公司,从 robotaxi 公司到 DB,全部同比三位数增长。
(其中两个在 1-2 年牛市情形下可能比当前市值还值钱)

估值只有 $19B。

至于 $IREN,市场突然忘了产能对 hyperscaler 来说曾经是多大的瓶颈。

市场 Tylenol 吃太多了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
$NBIS ATM offering would probably be around for a long time given the size.

I really hope $NBIS management does this strategically and not during periods of short selling. Shareholders are just trusting management not to endlessly dilute + add selling pressure at this point.

The $80 stock price is even post-MSCI inflows too.

$NBIS, $IREN, $CIFR and other sentiment for Neocloud sector is extremely low so probably this was the ideal time to buy if you still have capital.
考虑到规模,$NBIS ATM offering 可能会持续很久。

我真的希望 $NBIS 管理层能战略性地做这件事,而不是在被做空的阶段做。股东现在只能相信管理层不会无休止稀释 + 增加卖压。

$80 股价甚至还是 MSCI 流入之后的价格。

$NBIS$IREN$CIFR 以及其他 Neocloud 板块情绪都极低,所以如果你还有资金,这大概是理想买入时机。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Well, the main factor is dilution for $NBIS and $IREN. But otherwise it’s largely sentiment and price.

Unfortunately $NBIS has a $2B+ ATM running that they’ve been selling on the open market.

Then combine that with institutional short positions. And then sector leader $ORCL fears.

Then retail capitulation at the bottom.

And you get get current stock price. Despite business fundamentals improving.
嗯,$NBIS$IREN 的主要因素是稀释。除此之外基本就是情绪和价格。

不幸的是,$NBIS 有一个 $2B+ 的 ATM 正在进行,而且他们一直在公开市场卖。

再叠加机构空头仓位。然后是板块龙头 $ORCL 的恐慌。

再然后是散户在底部投降。

于是就有了现在的股价。尽管业务基本面在改善。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Meant when $NBIS annnounced the Microsoft contract they were trading around $90-$100 before rallying to $140. Pre contract it was $65-$75.

Now we’re back at $80 after $MSFT 19B deal, $META $3B deal, Israel gov deal, Cursor/Accenture, $UBER avride robotaxi launch + $375m investment round, and so on.

Nebius is trading like a distressed asset right now
我是说 $NBIS 宣布 Microsoft 合同时,股价在 $90-$100 左右,之后涨到 $140。合同前是 $65-$75。

现在在 $MSFT 19B 交易、$META $3B 交易、Israel gov 交易、Cursor/Accenture、$UBER avride robotaxi 发布 + $375m 融资轮等等之后,我们又回到 $80。

Nebius 现在的交易方式像困境资产。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Never thought I’d see $NBIS at $80 or $IREN at $35 again.

They’re both trading a lot lower than when they first announced Mag7 contracts. https://t.co/boqDYeyXzL
真没想到我还能再次看到 $NBIS 在 $80,或者 $IREN 在 $35。

它们现在都比第一次宣布 Mag7 合同时低很多。 https://t.co/boqDYeyXzL
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Falling Knife or Dip Buy?

What a brutal Friday for stocks after $ORCL and $AVGO earnings.

Popular FinX names that dropped in just 1 day:

$FRMI | -34.1%
$SNDK | -15.89%
$SEI | -15.3%
$OKLO | -15.13%
$MOD | -14.67%
$ALAB | -14.31%
$FLNC | -13.96%
$LITE | -12.83%
$GLXY | -11.73%
$AAOI | -11.73%
$AVGO | -11.43%
$RMBS | -11.11%
$CRWV | -10.06%
$GLXY | -10.42%
$EOSE | -9.73%
$CIFR | -9.69%
$APLD | -9.43%
$WULF | -9.48%
$BMNR | -9.17%
$LGN | -8.86%
$IREN | -8.79%
$TSSI | -8.67%
$NBIS | -6.99%

I usually add more commentary on each stock, but it's been pretty incredible to watch. Things like $FRMI makes sense on losing tenants/funding but as for others.

$NBIS is now lower than post Gov, $MSFT, and $META deals & $AVGO just had one of its largest drops in history even after $GOOGL TPU ramp.

What are you watching or buying on Monday?
接飞刀,还是逢低买?

$ORCL$AVGO 财报之后,周五股票这波真的太惨了。

一些热门 FinX 标的一天内跌幅:

$FRMI | -34.1%
$SNDK | -15.89%
$SEI | -15.3%
$OKLO | -15.13%
$MOD | -14.67%
$ALAB | -14.31%
$FLNC | -13.96%
$LITE | -12.83%
$GLXY | -11.73%
$AAOI | -11.73%
$AVGO | -11.43%
$RMBS | -11.11%
$CRWV | -10.06%
$GLXY | -10.42%
$EOSE | -9.73%
$CIFR | -9.69%
$APLD | -9.43%
$WULF | -9.48%
$BMNR | -9.17%
$LGN | -8.86%
$IREN | -8.79%
$TSSI | -8.67%
$NBIS | -6.99%

我平时会对每只股票多写点评论,但这次看着确实挺离谱。像 $FRMI 因为租户/融资问题下跌还能理解,但其他很多就很难说。

$NBIS 现在已经跌到低于政府、$MSFT$META deal 之后的位置;$AVGO 即使有 $GOOGL TPU ramp,还是出现了历史上最大跌幅之一。

你周一在看什么,或者准备买什么?
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2000354823435420024
❤️ 434 🔁 17 💬 59
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Disagree, but it’s nuanced. Robotaxis will ruin $UBER’s business model if it’s Waymo.

Uber likely realizes that every link with Waymo will eventually funnel into Waymo’s direct app that will replace/sidestep Uber one day. $GOOGL has no problems subsidizing utilization.

Hence $NBIS Avride Texas launch with Uber is a good example of the aggregator model where they allow riders to match with robotaxis of a non-competitive Robotaxi company that they partially own.

And this actually benefits the app.

Robotaxis won’t kill if $UBER plays their cards right, but Waymo and Tesla (with direct competitor apps) will if Uber allows customer matching with them + serves as a funnel for their users unto competing apps.
不同意,但这事有细节。如果是 Waymo,robotaxis 会毁掉 $UBER 的商业模式。

Uber 大概率意识到,和 Waymo 的每一个链接最终都会把用户导向 Waymo 自己的 app,有一天会替代/绕开 Uber。$GOOGL 完全可以补贴利用率。

所以 $NBIS Avride 和 Uber 在 Texas 的发布,是 aggregator 模型的好例子:它们让乘客匹配到一家非竞争 Robotaxi 公司(Uber 部分持有)的 robotaxis。

这实际上对 app 有利。

如果 $UBER 打好牌,Robotaxis 不会杀死它;但如果 Uber 允许用户和 Waymo、Tesla(有直接竞争 app)匹配,并成为把用户导向竞争 app 的漏斗,那 Waymo 和 Tesla 会杀死它。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Falling Knife or Dip Buy?

What a brutal Friday for stocks after $ORCL and $AVGO earnings.

Popular FinX names that dropped in just 1 day:

$FRMI | -34.1%
$SNDK | -15.89%
$SEI | -15.3%
$OKLO | -15.13%
$MOD | -14.67%
$ALAB | -14.31%
$FLNC | -13.96%
$LITE | -12.83%
$GLXY | -11.73%
$AAOI | -11.73%
$AVGO | -11.43%
$RMBS | -11.11%
$CRWV | -10.06%
$GLXY | -10.42%
$EOSE | -9.73%
$CIFR | -9.69%
$APLD | -9.43%
$WULF | -9.48%
$BMNR | -9.17%
$LGN | -8.86%
$IREN | -8.79%
$TSSI | -8.67%
$NBIS | -6.99%

I usually add more commentary on each stock, but it's been pretty incredible to watch. Things like $FRMI makes sense on losing tenants/funding but as for others.

$NBIS is now lower than post Gov, $MSFT, and $META deals & $AVGO just had one of its largest drops in history even after $GOOGL TPU ramp.

What are you watching or buying on Monday?
接飞刀还是买回调?

$ORCL$AVGO 财报后,周五股票真是惨烈。

热门 FinX 名字单日跌幅:

$FRMI | -34.1%
$SNDK | -15.89%
$SEI | -15.3%
$OKLO | -15.13%
$MOD | -14.67%
$ALAB | -14.31%
$FLNC | -13.96%
$LITE | -12.83%
$GLXY | -11.73%
$AAOI | -11.73%
$AVGO | -11.43%
$RMBS | -11.11%
$CRWV | -10.06%
$GLXY | -10.42%
$EOSE | -9.73%
$CIFR | -9.69%
$APLD | -9.43%
$WULF | -9.48%
$BMNR | -9.17%
$LGN | -8.86%
$IREN | -8.79%
$TSSI | -8.67%
$NBIS | -6.99%

我通常会对每只股票多写点评论,但这次看着真的很震撼。像 $FRMI 因为丢租户/融资下跌有道理,但其他就不一样。

$NBIS 现在已经低于 Gov、$MSFT$META 交易之后的价格;$AVGO 即使在 $GOOGL TPU 扩产后,也出现了历史上最大跌幅之一。

你周一在看什么或买什么?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
FinX is a bubble.

Same with traders on /r/wallstreetbets.

People own the same stocks $NBIS, $TE, $ASTS, $HOOD, $RKLB, $IREN, $KRKNF, $ONDS, $SOFI, $AMD, $TSLA and others.

However: It’s a positive thing.

I’ve seen this on repeat again and again throughout the years.

Short term when people buy 1-3 months options, they lose money on these “bubbly” and crowded trades.

Long term 1 year later, retail gets these companies directionally right.

And this is the most important part.

For example, $TSM ($140-$150) was the most popular ticker a year or two ago on Reddit when $NVDA was initially taking off back.

Retail got this directionally right, because $TSM was the center of all AI buildout.

Short term, everyone lost money because they bought calls for 2M out and the stock stalled and even dropped to $127.

One year later it’s up over 100%+ and all those calls would have 10x’ed.

Same with $MU. Reddit knew memory was a huge part of the AI boom and piled in on the same trade.

Yet $MU stalled at $100 for an entire year and everyone lost money.

Fast forward, memory from Micron to Sk Hynix is the hottest thing now and shot up 200%+ from $65 to $245 . Retail got this right directionally right but capitulated.

I’m convinced on stocks like $NBIS that we’re in the period of time where retail bought too many short dated calls and are capitulating with shares like the drops on $TSM or $MU.

However fast forward a year, this might be that 3x-4x return like $TSM or $MU or $HOOD (at $18) where retail was directionally right all along.

I’m confident Finx Retail stock “bubbles” might not be right in shorter timeframes - where OI, macro volatility, and MMs dominate - but are right directionally long term.
FinX 是泡沫。

/r/wallstreetbets 上的交易员也是。

大家都拿着同样的股票:$NBIS$TE$ASTS$HOOD$RKLB$IREN$KRKNF$ONDS$SOFI$AMD$TSLA 等等。

但这其实是好事。

这些年我一次又一次看到这种情况。

短期看,大家买 1-3 个月期权,会在这些“泡沫”、拥挤交易里亏钱。

长期看,1 年后散户对这些公司的方向判断往往是对的。

这才是最重要的。

比如 $TSM($140-$150)在 $NVDA 起飞早期,是一两年前 Reddit 上最热门 ticker。散户方向看对了,因为 $TSM 是整个 AI buildout 的中心。

短期大家买 2 个月 calls,股票横盘甚至跌到 $127,所以都亏钱。一年后它涨了 100%+,那些 calls 本来能 10x。

$MU 也是一样。Reddit 知道 memory 是 AI boom 的重要部分,大家挤进同一笔交易。但 $MU 在 $100 横了一整年,大家都亏钱。快进之后,从 Micron 到 SK Hynix,memory 成了最热主题,从 $65 到 $245 涨 200%+。散户方向对,但中途投降了。

我相信像 $NBIS 这样的股票,现在正处于散户买太多短期期权、然后在股价下跌中连股票都投降的阶段,就像以前 $TSM$MU 的下跌。

但一年后,它可能就是 $TSM$MU$HOOD($18)那种 3x-4x 回报,证明散户从一开始方向就是对的。

我相信 FinX 散户“泡沫股”短期可能不对,因为 OI、宏观波动和 MMs 主导;但长期方向上往往是对的。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/2000208395832602786
❤️ 93 🔁 10 💬 13
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RKLBMan Everyone on WSB was in on $RKLB at $13-&gt; $30 then gave up when it stalled between $20-$30 and institutions were giving it like $13 PTs.

Now it’s $50+ after institutions bought it up, people just don’t have the patience lol.
@RKLBMan WSB 上所有人都在 $13-> $30 进了 $RKLB,然后当它在 $20-$30 之间停住、机构给它 $13 左右 PT 时就放弃了。

现在机构买上去后它 $50+,人们就是没耐心 lol。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Still bullish. People seem to forget the $MSFT and $META deals for $NBIS are over half a decade, 100% utilization, and $22 Billion in contract size. They have great medium term defensibility, including all their enterprise users like Cursor or $NET.

DCs in space is more near-term exploratory like quantum right now, not exactly widely commercializable and a source for compute yet.

That being said I wouldn’t be surprised if $NBIS also owns a space company subsidiary given then already have self-driving car ones lol.
仍然看多。人们似乎忘了 $NBIS$MSFT$META 交易跨越半个多十年、100% 利用率、合同规模 $22 Billion。它们有很好的中期防御性,包括 Cursor 或 $NET 这样的企业用户。

太空 DC 目前更像 quantum 一样是近期开探索性质,还不算广泛商业化,也还不是算力来源。

话虽如此,如果 $NBIS 也拥有一家 space company 子公司,我也不会惊讶,毕竟它们已经有自动驾驶汽车子公司了 lol。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@wealthmatica Eh don’t let the commenters scare you off, it’s a legitimate recovery but right now. Did the math earlier in cost structure + FCF boost from it

https://t.co/vuJfLCh80l
@wealthmatica 嗯,别让评论区吓到你,这确实是一个合理的 recovery,至少现在是。之前算过成本结构 + FCF 提升。

https://t.co/vuJfLCh80l
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The Snapchat Thesis: How a 🐶💩 Stock Re-Rated from Sell to Buy.

$SNAP flipped the switch, making their biggest expense a revenue stream.

There's two things that SNAP needed to do to grow vs. $META, $RDDT.

and... Snapchat finally did it, well one of two.

That is:

1. Monetize Memories (Storage) - potential 50%%+ upside.

2. Compete vs Tiktok with a public web app + Tiktok-style feed (1000%+ upside)

Snapchat finally flipped the switch with #1 and made their biggest OPEX expense a revenue stream: They monetized storage and deleted wasteful storage.
_

Snap brings in $1.35B revenue a quarter and is growing at healthy rates with 1B+ MAU. Despite large revenue numbers, they're not profitable. Why?

Because countless people like myself have stored GBs of videos taken from 10 years ago. Snapchat has been paying Google Cloud to store all of that for free. Google Cloud costs just eats so much into its net profits every quarter.

So with this recent change - charging users (like iCloud) for storage, which is a huge new revenue stream,

On top of reducing OpEx by a massive margin, Snapchat just got a rerating.

_

Cloud Cost Breakdown

Snap’s cloud infrastructure is one of its largest costs, historically over $2.4B annually (cost of revenue).

Most of that is storage + bandwidth for features like Memories and videos.

Memories + video archives ≈ 35-40% of cloud spend (estimates)

~90% of users under the 5GB cap (no cost change), but 10% heavy users hold the majority of stored data

_

If Snap deletes ~50% of existing stored data (non-paying users’ old videos/photos)

Result:

40% of $2.4B = $960M cloud cost baseline tied to Memories

50% reduction in heavy-user storage ~ $480M savings (aggressive est.)

After accounting for data migration, partial reallocation, misc:

-> Snap may realistically realize ~40% of that, or ~$180–200M OPEX saved annually

This goes straight to operating profit + FCF, since it’s a pure cost cut.
_

Revenue from Paid Storage (Small User Base Scenario)

Assuming a small number of users pay-far less than iCloud’s 60% adoption:

MAU: ~900 million, Paying users: 2% (~18 million)

Average plan: $2.49/month (most on $1.99 or $3.99 tiers)

ARPU: ~$30/year

Revenue = 18M × $30 = $540M per year

Subtract ~$100M in hosting -> $440M net

This revenue is recurring, high-margin, and adds directly to FCF.
_

Estimated Combined Annual Impact:

OPEX savings (cloud) = +$190M

Paid storage revenue= +$540M

Storage costs (COGS) = –$100M

Net FCF improvement= +$630M

_

Valuation Rerating

If the market rerates Snap based on ~$850M sustainable FCF:

Apply a 35× EV/FCF multiple (typical for growth tech with improving margins)

EV ≈ $30B → Market cap ≈ $31–33B

Aggressive Multiple FCF est. $850M
_

Market Cap

25 × $21.25B EV ~ $22–23B mc (~$13–14/share)

30 x $25.5B EV ~ $26B mc (~$15–16/share)

35 x $29.75B EV ~ $31–32B mc (~$19–20/share)

From ~$8.50 today -> potential +50–100%+ upside within 12–18 months, assuming:

- Execution is smooth (no major user backlash, but really don't think users would quit.) Personally I'd just pay for it since I used Snap 5-10 years ago but don't want my data deleted.

- 3 Fed rate cuts compress discount rates

- Investors credit forward FCF

Of course, all of this only happens 1 year from now. Also, I'm going off a lot of assumptions, such as 2% of users will pay (eg. Dropbox), vs. ICloud has 60% of users.

_

Just thought I'd give a shoutout to @fossinvest, a small account I found while doing DD. They also did the math but used more aggressive calculations + similar idea, I'll give them credit for the image.
_

I could be wrong with speculating the numbers (eg. $100-150M opex, and 1% paying users, but even with this FCF gets a huge boost).

Either way, this is the largest material change SNAP has made for both revenue generation and operational expense cuts in history and it deserves a re-rating after.

Market and hedge funds will now start to price this in since they're forward looking, but will take some time to digest the news.
Snapchat Thesis:一只烂股如何从 Sell 重估到 Buy。

$SNAP 打开了开关,把自己最大的成本变成了收入流。

SNAP 要相对 $META$RDDT 增长,需要做两件事,而 Snapchat 终于做成了其中之一:

1. 变现 Memories(存储)- 潜在 50%+ 上行。

2. 用公开 web app + Tiktok 风格 feed 和 Tiktok 竞争(1000%+ 上行)。

Snapchat 终于把 #1 做了:把最大 OPEX 之一变成收入流,开始对存储收费,并删除浪费性存储。
_

Snap 每季度收入 $1.35B,MAU 1B+,增长健康,但仍不赚钱。为什么?

因为像我这样的人存了 10 年前拍的 GB 级视频,Snapchat 一直在免费替大家用 Google Cloud 存这些东西。Google Cloud 成本每季吃掉大量净利润。

现在它像 iCloud 一样对存储收费,一方面创造巨大新收入流,一方面大幅降低 OpEx,因此 Snapchat 应该被重新定价。
_

云成本大致拆解:Snap 云基础设施是最大成本之一,历史上每年超过 $2.4B(收入成本)。Memories + 视频归档估计占云支出的 35-40%。约 90% 用户低于 5GB 上限,但 10% 重度用户持有大部分数据。

如果 Snap 删除约 50% 现有存储数据(不付费用户的旧视频/照片),与 Memories 相关的 $960M 云成本基线可能省下一大块。扣除迁移、再分配等后,现实中每年可能节省约 $180-200M OPEX,直接进 operating profit + FCF。

付费存储收入方面,如果只有 2% MAU 付费(约 18M),平均 $2.49/月,ARPU 约 $30/年,收入约 $540M,扣除 ~$100M hosting 后净额约 $440M。

合计年度影响可能是:OPEX 节省 +$190M,付费存储收入 +$540M,存储成本 -$100M,净 FCF 改善 +$630M。
_

如果市场按约 $850M 可持续 FCF 重估 Snap,给 25x-35x EV/FCF,对应市值可能从现在约 $8.50/股上到 $13-$20/股,12-18 个月潜在 +50-100%+。

前提是执行顺利、没有严重用户反弹、降息压低贴现率、投资者认可 forward FCF。

当然这些可能要一年后才体现,而且我用了不少假设,比如 2% 用户付费(Dropbox 量级),而 iCloud 付费率高得多。

无论如何,这是 SNAP 历史上对收入和运营费用影响最大的实质变化,之后值得 re-rating。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1975205333254447126
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Bruh, I’ve been bull posting $SNAP too but adoption rate of memory monetization is probably single low digit at best.

Majority of people don’t have over 5 GB used.

So how are majority of 80% or even 25% (from your previous post) of the 943M monthly users paying for extra storage?

Also it’s been a generational wealth destroyer.

That being said it’s undervalued right now, 2% adoption leads to a huge increase in revenue but the core thing people miss is opex cuts from GCP costs from 9 GB wasteful hotdog videos.
Bruh,我也一直在 bull posting $SNAP,但 memory monetization 的采用率大概率最好也只是低个位数。

大多数人使用量没有超过 5 GB。

所以 943M 月活用户里,怎么会有多数的 80%,甚至 25%(你之前帖子里的说法)为额外存储付费?

而且它一直是世代级财富毁灭机。

话虽如此,它现在确实低估,2% 采用率就会让收入大幅增加,但大家漏掉的核心是从 GCP 成本里砍掉 9 GB 无用 hotdog videos 带来的 opex cuts。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
FinX is a bubble.

Same with traders on /r/wallstreetbets.

People own the same stocks $NBIS, $TE, $ASTS, $HOOD, $RKLB, $IREN, $KRKNF, $ONDS, $SOFI, $AMD, $TSLA and others.

However: It’s a positive thing.

I’ve seen this on repeat again and again throughout the years.

Short term when people buy 1-3 months options, they lose money on these “bubbly” and crowded trades.

Long term 1 year later, retail gets these companies directionally right.

And this is the most important part.

For example, $TSM ($140-$150) was the most popular ticker a year or two ago on Reddit when $NVDA was initially taking off back.

Retail got this directionally right, because $TSM was the center of all AI buildout.

Short term, everyone lost money because they bought calls for 2M out and the stock stalled and even dropped to $127.

One year later it’s up over 100%+ and all those calls would have 10x’ed.

Same with $MU. Reddit knew memory was a huge part of the AI boom and piled in on the same trade.

Yet $MU stalled at $100 for an entire year and everyone lost money.

Fast forward, memory from Micron to Sk Hynix is the hottest thing now and shot up 200%+ from $65 to $245 . Retail got this right directionally right but capitulated.

I’m convinced on stocks like $NBIS that we’re in the period of time where retail bought too many short dated calls and are capitulating with shares like the drops on $TSM or $MU.

However fast forward a year, this might be that 3x-4x return like $TSM or $MU or $HOOD (at $18) where retail was directionally right all along.

I’m confident Finx Retail stock “bubbles” might not be right in shorter timeframes - where OI, macro volatility, and MMs dominate - but are right directionally long term.
FinX 是一个泡沫。

/r/wallstreetbets 上的交易者也一样。

大家持有同样的股票:$NBIS$TE$ASTS$HOOD$RKLB$IREN$KRKNF$ONDS$SOFI$AMD$TSLA 等等。

不过:这是好事。

这些年我一遍又一遍看到这种情况。

短期内,当人们买 1-3 个月期权时,会在这些“泡沫化”和拥挤交易上亏钱。

长期看,一年后,散户对这些公司的方向判断是对的。

这是最重要的部分。

比如 $TSM($140-$150)一两年前在 Reddit 上是最热门 ticker,当时 $NVDA 刚开始起飞。

散户方向上判断对了,因为 $TSM 是整个 AI 建设的中心。

短期内,所有人都亏钱,因为他们买了 2 个月后的 calls,股票横盘甚至跌到 $127。

一年后它涨了 100%+,那些 calls 本来会 10x。

$MU 也一样。Reddit 知道 memory 是 AI boom 的巨大组成部分,于是一起涌入同一个交易。

$MU 在 $100 横了一整年,所有人都亏钱。

快进到现在,从 Micron 到 Sk Hynix,memory 成了最火的东西,并且从 $65 涨到 $245,涨了 200%+。散户方向上是对的,但投降了。

我确信像 $NBIS 这样的股票,我们正处在散户买了太多短期期权、然后像 $TSM$MU 下跌时那样用股票投降的阶段。

但快进一年,这可能就是像 $TSM$MU$HOOD($18)那样 3x-4x 的回报,证明散户一直方向正确。

我相信 Finx Retail 股票“泡沫”在更短时间框架里可能不对,因为 OI、宏观波动和 MMs 主导,但长期方向上是对的。
引用原推@retail_mourinho
Sometimes I have the feeling that FinX is the real bubble.

Everyone seems to own the same tickers:
$ASTS, $HIMS, $NBIS, $ONDS, $KRKNF, $SOFI, $HOOD, $RKLB, $AMD, $TSLA, you know the list.

But when you talk to people outside of X, or to real-world investors like Bill Ackman, they don’t own these companies, sometimes they don’t even know them.

Another thing I’ve noticed: people on X (myself included) are completely delusional. 20%, 30%, 50% monthly returns feel “normal.” Some call themselves failed if they finish a year below +100% YTD.

And sometimes I wonder… are we close to the top? Not talking about an AI bubble, just the market in general. @TheLongInvest is already predicting a major correction in 2026. Honestly, I don’t really see a big correction happening under Trump. I don’t think he’d allow it. But TLI has a point and I think he could be right.

The world is so volatile anything can happen. Black swan events feel more likely than ever.

Or maybe this “FinX bubble” is actually the beginning of a new era, one that creates future millionaires.

A place where information gets bundled and shared in real time, faster than institutions, sometimes even before tutes catch on.

Maybe we’re not early by luck.
Maybe we’re early by proximity.

Right place.
Right time.

Just some Saturday thoughts.

-RM
有时候我觉得 FinX 才是真正的泡沫。

大家好像都持有同样的 ticker:
$ASTS$HIMS$NBIS$ONDS$KRKNF$SOFI$HOOD$RKLB$AMD$TSLA,你懂的。

但你和 X 以外的人聊,或者和 Bill Ackman 这种现实世界投资者聊,他们并不持有这些公司,有时甚至不知道它们。

我还注意到一件事:X 上的人(包括我自己)完全有点脱离现实。月回报 20%、30%、50% 都感觉“正常”。有人一年低于 +100% YTD 就说自己失败。

有时候我会想……我们是不是接近顶部了?不是说 AI 泡沫,而是整个市场。@TheLongInvest 已经在预测 2026 年会有大回调。老实说,我不太觉得 Trump 任内会允许大回调,但 TLI 有道理,也可能是对的。

世界太动荡,什么都可能发生。黑天鹅感觉比以往更可能。

或者也许这个“FinX bubble”其实是一个长期 alpha 来源,因为散户虽然短期仓位和期权会错,但长期方向经常对。
https://x.com/retail_mourinho/status/1999846552223777006
❤️ 352 🔁 26 💬 28
打开原推
↩️ 回复
It's really painful to experience a market-wide drop at this scale.

Probably one of my biggest red days given how high-beta/growth exposure my portfolio is right now.

As long as retail don't get margined out or have short-dated options, they should be fine.

Tons of option expiration on the 19th this month, so this just hoses out the open interest.
经历这种规模的全市场下跌真的很痛苦。

考虑到我现在组合里 high-beta/growth 敞口很高,这大概是我最大红盘日之一。

只要散户没有被爆保证金,或者没有短期期权,应该就还好。

这个月 19 号有大量期权到期,所以这就是在冲掉 open interest。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So my takeaway from $AVGO earnings is that it's mainly misunderstood backlog numbers.

Overall thesis on AI trade from $NVDA GPU ecosystem and Mag7 ASIC ecosystem is in-tact but the market is treating it like a bubble popping + terrible miss.

We're just going from AI is the next big thing -> Ai is a bubble -> AI is the next big thing -> AI is a bubble.

Volatility and -13%+ drops makes several names a good buy.
所以我从 $AVGO 财报得到的结论是,市场主要误解了 backlog 数字。

$NVDA GPU 生态和 Mag7 ASIC 生态来看,AI 交易的整体 thesis 仍然完好,但市场把它当成泡沫破裂 + 糟糕 miss 来处理。

我们只是在“AI 是下一个大东西” -> “AI 是泡沫” -> “AI 是下一个大东西” -> “AI 是泡沫”之间来回切换。

波动和 -13%+ 的下跌让好几个名字变成不错的买点。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@tether Tether makes complete sense.

-&gt; Issue USD Stablecoins
-&gt; Buy US Treasuries
-&gt; Collect interest to buy stable assets like Gold, Bitcoin, and the Juventus Football club.
@tether Tether 完全说得通。

-> 发行 USD Stablecoins
-> 买美国国债
-> 收利息去买 Gold、Bitcoin 和 Juventus Football club 这类稳定资产。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Broadcom [ $AVGO ] earnings results and its effect on the AI sector like $LITE and $NBIS:

Broadcom's ER was "double beat" with $18.02B revenue (+28% Y/Y) and $1.95 EPS, beating consensus.

But AVGO dropped -11.64% and brought down the AI sector.

Is this a buying opportunity?

Yes.

Broadcom is seen as a hyperscaler ASIC proxy growth as companies like $AMZN Trainium, $MSFT Maia, and most importantly $GOOGL TPU V7 Ironwood are scaled through it.

And by proxy companies like $ALAB (-13.2%), $CRDO (-5.11%), $LITE (-12.23%), $TSM (-3.71%), $COHR (-9.25%), and are direct beneficiaries of the TPU/Asic buildout and Broadcom as a company.

There's three reasons why Broadcom fell and one why the market fell:

For Broadcom, there's minor things such as tax rate changing EPS models or "margin compression" from accounting from just more custom AI chips than higher-margin software, but this is just accounting framing. (Similar to how $META dropped initially on one-time tax post-ER)

For both Broadcom general market, it was backlog expectations. Everything cited above is all minor compared to expected growth of ASIC markets.

Broadcom cited $73B in AI backlog for the next 18 months. And rumors of Antrophic and META buying billions of $GOOGL TPUs, people were implicitly expecting $80B+.

However, the selloff represents a dislocation in price driven by algorithms and short-term AI Bubble sentiment rather than a fundamental breakage.

This backlog quote was the MINIMUM CONTRACTUAL FLOOR of confirmed orders. Companies like $GOOGL, $AMZN, will likely continue ramping up ASIC orders and the market failed to discern this nuance.

Analysts are expecting revenue conversion to be more front loaded, and that there should be less backlog beyond Q4 given the cycles, which gives a higher likely range of $55-60B+ for 2026 rather than $50B expected of the $73B.

TLDR: The thesis regarding hyperscaler ASIC ramp to compete vs $NVDA dependency has not changed. $AVGO and other players like $COHR, Sk Hynix, $MU, $VRT, and $LITE all stand to benefit.

It's not the best news regarding the revenue backlog, but it's misunderstood due to lead-time/order cycles and minimum floors.

If anything, lower hyperscaler ASIC demand is beneficial to $NVDA and their ecosystem, but we've also seen $CRWV, $SMCI, $NBIS and $NVDA GPU/DC compute ecosystem drop over 5%+ today from an indiscriminate sell-off despite inverse correlation.

This is just the typical "AI Bubble" cycle hitting again from misunderstanding. The widespread panic of AI stocks dropping 10-12% is a great buying opportunity.
Broadcom [$AVGO] 财报结果,以及它对 $LITE$NBIS 这类 AI 板块的影响:

Broadcom ER 是“双 beat”,收入 $18.02B(同比 +28%),EPS $1.95,超过一致预期。

但 AVGO 跌了 -11.64%,并拖累了 AI 板块。

这是买入机会吗?

是。

Broadcom 被视为 hyperscaler ASIC 增长的代理,因为 $AMZN Trainium、$MSFT Maia,以及最重要的 $GOOGL TPU V7 Ironwood 这类项目都通过它扩张。

因此像 $ALAB(-13.2%)、$CRDO(-5.11%)、$LITE(-12.23%)、$TSM(-3.71%)、$COHR(-9.25%)等公司,都是 TPU/Asic 建设和 Broadcom 公司的直接受益者。

Broadcom 下跌有三个原因,市场下跌有一个原因:

对 Broadcom 来说,有些小因素,比如税率改变 EPS 模型,或者更多 custom AI chips 而不是高利润软件导致会计上的“margin compression”,但这只是会计叙事。(类似 $META 财报后一开始因为一次性税项下跌)

对 Broadcom 和整体市场来说,关键是 backlog 预期。上面所有原因和 ASIC 市场预期增长相比都很小。

Broadcom 提到未来 18 个月 AI backlog 为 $73B。而在 Antrophic 和 META 购买数十亿美元 $GOOGL TPUs 的传闻下,大家隐含预期是 $80B+。

不过,这次抛售代表的是由算法和短期 AI Bubble 情绪驱动的价格错位,而不是基本面破裂。

这个 backlog 数字是已确认订单的最低合同底线。像 $GOOGL$AMZN 这样的公司大概率会继续增加 ASIC 订单,而市场没能分辨这个细节。

分析师预期收入转换会更前置,而且考虑周期,Q4 之后 backlog 应该更少,这让 2026 年更可能是 $55-60B+,而不是 $73B 中市场预期的 $50B。

TLDR:关于 hyperscaler ASIC 扩产以对抗 $NVDA 依赖的 thesis 没有改变。$AVGO 以及 $COHR、Sk Hynix、$MU$VRT$LITE 等其他玩家都会受益。

关于收入 backlog,这不是最好的消息,但由于 lead-time/order cycles 和最低底线,它被误解了。

如果说有什么,较低的 hyperscaler ASIC 需求其实有利于 $NVDA 及其生态,但我们今天也看到 $CRWV$SMCI$NBIS$NVDA GPU/DC compute 生态在无差别抛售中跌了 5%+,尽管它们和 ASIC 需求有反向相关。

这只是典型的“AI Bubble”周期因为误解又来了。AI 股票普遍下跌 10-12% 的恐慌,是很好的买入机会。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Oracle [ $ORCL ] earning results and its effect on the neocloud sector like $NBIS & $IREN:

Oracle reported earnings with a beat on EPS and a record backlog but, dropped 12% after hours.

Oracle is down 39.8% from September 11th highs and brought down the sector with it.

Here's why:

The sell-off was not merely a reaction to marginal revenue miss, but both an algorithmic short and investor selloff on the sustainability of the AI capex cycle and the creditworthiness of the sector's primary tenant:

OpenAI.

Oracle's announcement of a $15 billion increase in 2026 capital spending to nearly $50 billion was inextricably linked to a reported $300 billion partnership with OpenAI.

Originally, OpenAI was the frontier LLM, with promising capex promises to Oracle, Coreweave and others, contributing to the initial repricing of the sector.

However, with over $1t+ in obligations and increasing competition from Anthropic, Gemini, XAI, and others, the markets have serious doubts on whether Oracle, Coreweave, and others are building for a tenant that cannot currently fund its obligations from operating cash flow.

WE're seeing the market effectively signaling that the market Oracle is creating an unsustainable debt-funded "vendor financing" for OpenAI, which cannot fulfill its promises.

So, the drop was rational: The sell-off was driven by a rational repricing of credit risk and capital intensity.

OpenAI Funding Fear is Valid: The hypothesis that OpenAI lacks the funds to honor its contracts is supported by a glaring mismatch between its revenue ($13B) and its obligations ($60B/year).

Credit Fears are Real: The widening of Oracle's CDS spreads sees a rising probability of a "credit event" downgrade or default.

Furthermore, we're seeing this trigger a contagion effect across the "Neocloud" sector from $NBIS dropping from $140 to $90s, $IREN dropping $80 to $40s, $CIFR dropping from $24s to $17s.

But is this a buying opportunity for Neoclouds like $WULF, $NBIS, $IREN, and others?

Yes.

Is this a good buying opportunity for $ORCL?

No.

Forward Outlook:

$ORCL (large portion) , $CRWV (25% backlog) are the two players largely dependent on OpenAI and this narrative can flip in an instant (+30%+ change) depending on capital raising activity from OpenAI.

If OpenAI files for an oversubscribed IPO in 2026 at high valuations and it's new GPT models beats out Gemini/Claude, we can see this change.

However, many other players are isolated from OpenAI. The original thesis of the Neocloud sector was Mag7 capex funndel from their cash cows segments (Azure, AWS, GCP) down into: $NBIS, $IREN, $CIFR, $WULF, and others.

But as the largest players ( $ORCL, $CRWV) fall, these algorithmically bring down the whole sector.

If you look at the companies individually, companies like $CIFR and $WULF are being backstopped by $GOOGL, and $IREN / $NBIS are funded by $MSFT.

These are locked in contract backlogs from Hyperscalers/Mag7, not OpenAI.

This irrational selloff due to misunderstanding of risks presents an amazing buying opportunity for the Necoloud sector, but not companies tied to OpenAI like $ORCL and $CRWV.
Oracle [ $ORCL ] 财报结果,以及它对 $NBIS$IREN 这类 neocloud 板块的影响:

Oracle EPS beat,backlog 创纪录,但盘后跌 12%。

Oracle 距 9 月 11 日高点已经跌 39.8%,也把整个板块带下去了。

原因是:

这次抛售不只是因为小幅收入 miss,而是算法做空 + 投资者重新评估 AI capex 周期可持续性,以及板块主要租户 OpenAI 的信用质量。

Oracle 宣布 2026 capex 增加 $15B 至接近 $50B,这和据称 $300B 的 OpenAI 合作绑定得很深。

一开始 OpenAI 是 frontier LLM,对 Oracle、Coreweave 等给出诱人的 capex 承诺,推动板块重估。

但现在 OpenAI 有 $1T+ obligations,又面临 Anthropic、Gemini、XAI 等竞争,市场严重怀疑 Oracle、Coreweave 等是不是在为一个当前无法用经营现金流履约的租户建设产能。

市场实际上是在说:Oracle 正在为 OpenAI 创造不可持续的债务驱动“vendor financing”,而 OpenAI 可能兑现不了承诺。

所以这次下跌有理性部分:是信用风险和资本强度的重新定价。

OpenAI 资金恐惧有依据:收入 $13B,但 obligations $60B/年,错配明显。

信用恐惧也是真的:Oracle CDS spread 扩大,说明市场认为信用事件、降级或违约概率上升。

这也触发了 Neocloud 板块传染:$NBIS 从 $140 跌到 $90s,$IREN 从 $80 跌到 $40s,$CIFR 从 $24s 跌到 $17s。

但这是不是 $WULF$NBIS$IREN 等 Neocloud 的买入机会?

是。

是不是 $ORCL 的好买点?

不是。

展望:$ORCL(大部分)、$CRWV(25% backlog)是最依赖 OpenAI 的两个玩家,叙事可能因 OpenAI 融资活动瞬间翻转。

但很多其他玩家与 OpenAI 隔离。Neocloud 原始 thesis 是 Mag7 的现金牛业务(Azure、AWS、GCP)把 capex funnel 到 $NBIS$IREN$CIFR$WULF 等。

如果看单家公司,$CIFR$WULF$GOOGL 支撑,$IREN / $NBIS$MSFT 资金支持。这些是 Hyperscalers/Mag7 的锁定合同 backlog,不是 OpenAI。

因误解风险导致的非理性抛售,给 Neocloud 板块带来了很好的买入机会,但不包括 $ORCL$CRWV 这类 tied to OpenAI 的公司。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1998925429890261130
❤️ 129 🔁 12 💬 17
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DigestingX I'm researching $AVGO earnings right now and ASIC demand spillover to photonics like $LITE!

I wanted to add to my $LITE position since that was my lowest right now, so might be a buying opportunity as you mentioned.
@DigestingX 我现在正在研究 $AVGO 的财报,以及 ASIC 需求外溢到 $LITE 这类光子公司的情况!

我本来就想加一点 $LITE 仓位,因为它现在是我仓位里最低的,所以就像你提到的,可能是个买入机会。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ParkerOrtolani I’m sorry but if anyone wears this OpenAi merch in public they’re probably going to get bullied https://t.co/f5ezmxWEhh
@ParkerOrtolani 不好意思,但如果有人穿着这件 OpenAi 周边出门,大概率会被人嘲笑 https://t.co/f5ezmxWEhh
❤️ 115 🔁 2 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mcF_dan Probably depends on your age group, all the younger gen still do, given they have close to 1B MAU. https://t.co/thMT8gmQ3a
@mcF_dan 可能取决于你的年龄层,年轻一代基本还在用,毕竟它们接近 10 亿 MAU。https://t.co/thMT8gmQ3a
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Interesting take but I disagree. $SNAP should have just scrapped any AR development (like $META for Metaverse) given how much capex spend it is.

And just went out and say: "We're a social media company" + compete vs Tiktok/Meta by acquiring social media companies like early stage Facebook (instead of hardware ones) with FCF.

$SNAP would have been a $80B+ company by now but the fact they're not producing more FCF after all these years is just incredibly stupid and a testament to how bad the CEO + vision is.

But they did the one thing I wanted Evan to do which was cut GCP costs and monetize memories like ICloud, which they did.

Even though I think it's a terribly run company I think it's a good investment now for the valuation.
这个观点挺有意思,但我不同意。考虑到 AR 的资本开支有多大,$SNAP 本来就应该直接砍掉所有 AR 开发(就像 $META 对 Metaverse 那样)。

然后直接出来说:“我们是一家社交媒体公司”,再用 FCF 去收购早期 Facebook 那类社交媒体公司(而不是硬件公司),和 Tiktok/Meta 竞争。

$SNAP 现在本来应该已经是一家 800 亿美元以上的公司了,但这么多年过去还没有产生更多 FCF,这真的蠢得离谱,也证明了 CEO 和愿景有多糟糕。

不过他们确实做了我希望 Evan 做的一件事,就是削减 GCP 成本,并像 ICloud 一样把 Memories 变现,这点他们做到了。

尽管我认为这家公司经营得非常糟,但以现在的估值看,我觉得它是个不错的投资。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$SNAP is incredibly undervalued at $7.64.

-> Snapchat cutting opex costs with GCP and converting that to revenue.

-> Perplexity deal adding $400m in equity/cash on top of existing revenue.

Net FCF Is estimate from these changes is +$630M (+$190M opex cloud, memory revenue +540M, storage cogs -$100m) late 2026, early 2027.

The CEO selling $10M in shares is not material, especially when there's $500M in buybacks.

$SNAP doesn't need to be $META, it never will.

At a $13B marketcap, it just needs to cut costs and improve FCF from its $1.5B-$2B quarterly revenue (~55% gross profit margins).

Then it will be re-rated immensely, even if user counts slows or slightly drops.

Right now tax harvesting is likely ending next two weeks. But if you can wait a whole year, I'm confident Snap will strongly outperform any index once we factor in GCP opex cuts and AI revenue streams.

100%%+ upside here going into 2026 - early 2027.
$SNAP 在 $7.64 的价格被严重低估。

-> Snapchat 正在削减 GCP 的运营成本,并把它转化为收入。

-> Perplexity 交易在现有收入之外又增加了 4 亿美元的股权/现金。

我估计这些变化带来的净 FCF 到 2026 年末、2027 年初会增加 6.3 亿美元(云运营成本 +1.9 亿美元,Memories 收入 +5.4 亿美元,存储 COGS -1 亿美元)。

CEO 卖出 1000 万美元股票并不重要,尤其是在公司还有 5 亿美元回购的情况下。

$SNAP 不需要成为 $META,它也永远不会是。

在 130 亿美元市值下,它只需要削减成本,并从每季度 15 亿-20 亿美元收入(约 55% 毛利率)中改善 FCF。

到时候它会被大幅重估,即便用户数增长放缓或小幅下降。

现在税损收割可能会在未来两周结束。但如果你能等整整一年,我有信心,在计入 GCP 运营成本削减和 AI 收入流之后,Snap 会强烈跑赢任何指数。

到 2026 年-2027 年初,这里有 100%%+ 的上行空间。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I entered $ALAB, $NBIS, $TSM, and $LITE because of Mag7 funneling revenue numbers into them.

Lite uniquely because of its role in GOOGL TPU v7, AMZN Trainium v3/4, and NVDA Blackwell.

But there's a new one I found out about.

A small cap <$3B player that fits the thesis:

Name - $AAOI

A small cap photonics player, and one of the two photonics players I'm invested in:

1. Lumentum is uniquely positioned in every single supply chip deployment/ramp, as the Optical Circuit Switching technology is used in Blackwell, Trainium, and Ironwood as a "scale-across" type technology.

$LITE wins no matter what. Hyperscaler ASIC vs. GPU as it's in the center of it all.

2. Applied Optoelectronics is more of the "scale-out" connectivity, for custom ASIC clusters like Trainium, Maia through 400G and 800G optical cables and transceivers.

$AAOI wins no matter what as well given its role with AWS as a whale client for Trainium, and with MSFT Maia ASICs.

The industry is going through a "supercycle" driven by the migration to 800G speeds and AAOI is in the center of it.

On top of that, AAOI plays unique geopolitical angle,
America first.

Unlike many other companies that are fabless and export production elsewhere to Taiwan, Applied Optoelectronics makes their own lasers in Texas.

US hyperscalers (specifically Amazon and Microsoft) are aggressively reducing reliance on Chinese supply chains for critical infrastructure and that helps AAOI’s ability to manufacture lasers at home.

And we've seen another huge volume order from a "major hyperscaler" on its 800G data center transceivers.

But AAOI trades like a distressed company; however, the implied revenue of its Amazon warrant agreement creates an asymmetric risk/reward profile on its 800G ramp in Q4 2025 and FY2026. AAOI seems structurally undervalued, given its role in the AI buildout and existing hyperscaler contracts.

The markets are finally catching up to LITE, but it feels $AAOI is yet to begin, given its small market cap size but unique angle of a critical player to hyperscaler ASIC clusters and Made in America.

The market is currently re-rating heavily with photonics players and assigning a heavy premium, yet AAOI is only up 2.20% this year and seems like it's just about to begin.
我买入 $ALAB$NBIS$TSM$LITE,是因为 Mag7 正在把收入 funnel 到它们身上。

Lite 比较独特,因为它在 GOOGL TPU v7、AMZN Trainium v3/4 和 NVDA Blackwell 中都有角色。

但我又发现了一个新的。

一个小于 $3B 的小盘玩家,符合这个 thesis:

名字 - $AAOI

它是小盘 photonics 玩家,也是我投资的两个 photonics 玩家之一:

1. Lumentum 在每一次供应链芯片部署/ramp 中都有独特位置,因为 Optical Circuit Switching 技术用于 Blackwell、Trainium 和 Ironwood,是一种“scale-across”技术。

$LITE 不管怎样都会赢。无论 hyperscaler ASIC 还是 GPU,它都在中心位置。

2. Applied Optoelectronics 更偏“scale-out”连接,用于 Trainium、Maia 等 custom ASIC clusters 的 400G 和 800G optical cables/transceivers。

考虑到 AWS 是 Trainium 的鲸鱼客户、MSFT Maia ASICs 也有相关角色,$AAOI 也会赢。

行业正在进入 supercycle,AI 集群从电互连转向光互连,所有能提供光模块、光缆、transceivers、laser/receiver 的小盘公司都可能被重新定价。

$AAOI 的风险更高,但上行也更不对称。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1999240464420250042
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Core portfolio is high conviction longs: $BTC, $RKLB, $HOOD, $NBIS, $ALAB, $TSM

Probably moving $LITE and $CRCL to the core long port above, but they’re newer positions that I’m building up.

Then short-mid term mix like $SNAP, $CIFR, $RDDT, $SMCI, $HIMS, $TE, $LTC, $KRUS, AMKR, $LITE, $FLY, $WLAC, $META, $AMZN, $TTD, and now $AAOI etc.

I rotate between short-medium term holds A LOT. I used to post more day trading stuff but I ended up getting too many followers here, so wanted to switch to directional commentary.

It’s hard to post position updates because I like to explain why I do things! I remember selling $IREN around $50-$60 or something and just got a bunch of hate comments for the next three weeks lol
核心组合是高信念多头:$BTC$RKLB$HOOD$NBIS$ALAB$TSM

可能会把 $LITE$CRCL 也移到上面的核心多头组合里,但它们是我正在逐步建立的新仓位。

然后是短中期组合,比如 $SNAP$CIFR$RDDT$SMCI$HIMS$TE$LTC$KRUS、AMKR、$LITE$FLY$WLAC$META$AMZN$TTD,现在还有 $AAOI 等。

我在短中期持仓之间轮动非常频繁。以前我会发更多日内交易内容,但后来这里关注者太多,所以想转向方向性评论。

发仓位更新很难,因为我喜欢解释自己为什么这么做!我记得在 $IREN 大概 $50-$60 左右卖出,然后接下来三周收到一堆骂我的评论 lol
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah I really, really like $LITE but it’s already priced in with a premium.

I only have relatively small positions in $AAOI though just because of execution risk in case a hyperscaler drops purchase orders + competition from Jabil.

That being said it’s priced as a small cap component manufacturer but has AI $MSFT Maia $AMZN trainium ramp and made in America as a great driver since it plays a critical part in the hyperscaler ASIC ecosystem.

This is just a qualitative investment, off rough estimates like 30-35% margins and assumptions of beating projections due to hyperscaler ramp in 2026.

The marketcap is small enough to make me an investor for medium term though.
是的,我真的非常喜欢 $LITE,但它已经带着溢价定价了。

不过我在 $AAOI 的仓位相对较小,主要是因为执行风险,比如某个 hyperscaler 取消采购订单,以及来自 Jabil 的竞争。

话虽如此,它现在被当成小型零部件制造商定价,但它有 AI、$MSFT Maia、$AMZN Trainium 放量,以及 Made in America 作为重要驱动,因为它在 hyperscaler ASIC 生态中扮演关键角色。

这只是一个定性投资,基于粗略估算,比如 30-35% 利润率,以及 2026 年 hyperscaler 放量导致业绩超预期的假设。

不过它的市值足够小,能让我做一个中期投资者。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
NP! If we look at mag7 ASICs, $GOOGL TPU v7 Ironwood suppliers had a run after the $META deal.

$AMZN Trainium is going to ramp up soon like $GOOGL and the recent hyperscaler $AAOI order was likely from them.

The alpha for $AAOI is that $MSFT Maia 200 orders were more of R&D spend and they delayed their roadmap (likely due to thermal and interconnect issues eg. 100,000 chips to connect without melting) and standard cabling wasn't working for Maia 200.

But this is bullish for $AAOI since $MSFT likely uses them for this fix and all of this ASIC spend will be occur in 2026-2027 + huge beat on forward revenue projections.

But $AMZN is providing the nice $4B floor for de-risking.
没问题!如果看 mag7 ASIC,$GOOGL TPU v7 Ironwood 的供应商在 $META 交易之后已经涨了一波。

$AMZN Trainium 很快也会像 $GOOGL 一样放量,最近那个 hyperscaler 给 $AAOI 的订单很可能就是他们。

$AAOI 的 alpha 在于,$MSFT Maia 200 订单更多是 R&D 支出,而且他们推迟了路线图(很可能是因为散热和互连问题,比如要连接 100,000 颗芯片还不能熔掉),标准线缆对 Maia 200 不起作用。

但这对 $AAOI 是利好,因为 $MSFT 很可能会用他们来解决这个问题,而所有这些 ASIC 支出会发生在 2026-2027 年,并大幅超出远期收入预期。

不过 $AMZN 提供的 40 亿美元底部能很好地降低风险。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I was actually looking into $AMZN Trainium benchmarks from a semianalysis post and at Amazon's supply chain. And some friends like @yianisz post about it earlier, so I decided to look deeper at it.

But it has ~$4B spend from $AMZN as a backstop as they ramp up Trainium/Inferentia clusters, spend from $MSFT ASIC clusters, and we'll likely see more hyperscaler clients as the industry moves to 800g ramp.

Mag7 dependency is incredibly rare coming from a $2.5B marketcap company lol.

Downside + positive: Is vertically integrated (higher-margins), since it's lasers are builtin Texas. I see just incredible volume demand, moving forward but: the whole name of the game is execution since they actually have to build out the 800G/1.6T transceivers without messing up.

I'm fully invested already in $AAOI already with relatively small-moderate position sizing for risk management (it's still a small cap with $2.5B MC).

I still like $LITE a lot more, but a bit hard to cost average up on that when it's up 46% this month.
我其实是从一篇 semianalysis 帖子里看 $AMZN Trainium 的 benchmark,也研究了 Amazon 的供应链。还有一些朋友,比如 @yianisz 之前也发过相关内容,所以我决定深入看一下。

但它有来自 $AMZN 约 40 亿美元的支出作为后盾,因为他们在扩建 Trainium/Inferentia 集群;还有来自 $MSFT ASIC 集群的支出,而且随着行业进入 800g 放量,我们很可能会看到更多 hyperscaler 客户。

来自一家 25 亿美元市值公司的 Mag7 依赖度真的非常罕见 lol。

下行 + 正面因素:它是垂直整合的(利润率更高),因为它的激光器在 Texas 内部生产。向前看,我看到的需求量极其惊人,但:整个游戏的关键都是执行,因为他们确实必须把 800G/1.6T 收发器做出来,而且不能搞砸。

我已经完全投了 $AAOI,但仓位是相对小到中等,用来管理风险(它仍然是 25 亿美元 MC 的小盘股)。

我仍然更喜欢 $LITE 很多,但这个月涨了 46%,现在继续摊高成本有点难。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I've looked into $POET but didn't like it as much compared to $AAOI given AAOI already has direct hyperscaler customers with $MSFT and $AMZN.

$POET had Celestial that got acquired $MRVL, where Celestial used poet’s interposer to connect tpus/trainium, and Marvell sells that to hyperscalers.

But it's not quite the same de-risking few hops away as direct massive volume orders from $AMZN and $MSFT and equity agreements that Amazon has like they did with $ALAB.

Amazon has a financial incentive in $AAOI like $ALAB, but Astera is already a $30B company, while AAOI is a $2.5B MC.
我研究过 $POET,但相比 $AAOI 没那么喜欢,因为 AAOI 已经有 $MSFT$AMZN 这样的直接 hyperscaler 客户。

$POET 有 Celestial,后来被 $MRVL 收购,Celestial 用 poet 的 interposer 来连接 tpus/trainium,然后 Marvell 把它卖给 hyperscalers。

但这和来自 $AMZN$MSFT 的直接大规模订单,以及 Amazon 像对 $ALAB 那样做的股权协议相比,并不是同一种几跳之外的去风险化。

Amazon 在 $AAOI 上像 $ALAB 一样有财务激励,但 Astera 已经是 300 亿美元公司,而 AAOI 只有 25 亿美元 MC。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
I entered $ALAB, $NBIS, $TSM, and $LITE because of Mag7 funneling revenue numbers into them.

Lite uniquely because of its role in GOOGL TPU v7, AMZN Trainium v3/4, and NVDA Blackwell.

But there's a new one I found out about.

A small cap <$3B player that fits the thesis:

Name - $AAOI

A small cap photonics player, and one of the two photonics players I'm invested in:

1. Lumentum is uniquely positioned in every single supply chip deployment/ramp, as the Optical Circuit Switching technology is used in Blackwell, Trainium, and Ironwood as a "scale-across" type technology.

$LITE wins no matter what. Hyperscaler ASIC vs. GPU as it's in the center of it all.

2. Applied Optoelectronics is more of the "scale-out" connectivity, for custom ASIC clusters like Trainium, Maia through 400G and 800G optical cables and transceivers.

$AAOI wins no matter what as well given its role with AWS as a whale client for Trainium, and with MSFT Maia ASICs.

The industry is going through a "supercycle" driven by the migration to 800G speeds and AAOI is in the center of it.

On top of that, AAOI plays unique geopolitical angle,
America first.

Unlike many other companies that are fabless and export production elsewhere to Taiwan, Applied Optoelectronics makes their own lasers in Texas.

US hyperscalers (specifically Amazon and Microsoft) are aggressively reducing reliance on Chinese supply chains for critical infrastructure and that helps AAOI’s ability to manufacture lasers at home.

And we've seen another huge volume order from a "major hyperscaler" on its 800G data center transceivers.

But AAOI trades like a distressed company; however, the implied revenue of its Amazon warrant agreement creates an asymmetric risk/reward profile on its 800G ramp in Q4 2025 and FY2026. AAOI seems structurally undervalued, given its role in the AI buildout and existing hyperscaler contracts.

The markets are finally catching up to LITE, but it feels $AAOI is yet to begin, given its small market cap size but unique angle of a critical player to hyperscaler ASIC clusters and Made in America.

The market is currently re-rating heavily with photonics players and assigning a heavy premium, yet AAOI is only up 2.20% this year and seems like it's just about to begin.
我买入 $ALAB$NBIS$TSM$LITE,是因为 Mag7 正在把收入数字导入它们。

Lite 的独特之处在于它在 GOOGL TPU v7、AMZN Trainium v3/4 和 NVDA Blackwell 中的角色。

但我发现了一个新的标的。

一个符合这个 thesis 的小盘 <30 亿美元玩家:

名称 - $AAOI

一家小盘光子公司,也是我投资的两家光子公司之一:

1. Lumentum 在每一个供应芯片部署/放量中都有独特位置,因为 Optical Circuit Switching 技术被用于 Blackwell、Trainium 和 Ironwood,是一种“scale-across”技术。

$LITE 无论如何都会赢。Hyperscaler ASIC vs. GPU,它都处在中心位置。

2. Applied Optoelectronics 更偏向“scale-out”连接,用于 Trainium、Maia 这类定制 ASIC 集群,通过 400G 和 800G 光缆与收发器连接。

考虑到它在 AWS 这个 Trainium 巨鲸客户,以及 MSFT Maia ASIC 中的角色,$AAOI 也无论如何都会赢。

行业正在经历由迁移到 800G 速度驱动的“超级周期”,AAOI 正处于中心位置。

除此之外,AAOI 还有独特的地缘政治角度,
America first。

不同于许多 fabless 并把生产转移到台湾等地的公司,Applied Optoelectronics 在 Texas 自己制造激光器。

美国 hyperscalers(尤其是 Amazon 和 Microsoft)正在积极降低关键基础设施对中国供应链的依赖,这有利于 AAOI 在本土制造激光器的能力。

而且我们已经看到另一笔来自“major hyperscaler”的 800G 数据中心收发器大额订单。

但 AAOI 的交易方式像一家陷入困境的公司;然而,它与 Amazon 的 warrant 协议所隐含的收入,使其在 2025 年 Q4 和 FY2026 的 800G 放量上形成了不对称风险/回报。考虑到它在 AI 建设中的角色和现有 hyperscaler 合同,AAOI 看起来结构性低估。

市场终于开始追上 LITE,但感觉 $AAOI 还没开始,考虑到它市值小,但又是 hyperscaler ASIC 集群和 Made in America 的关键玩家。

市场目前正在对光子公司进行重估并给予高溢价,但 AAOI 今年只涨了 2.20%,看起来才刚刚要开始。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Oracle [ $ORCL ] earning results and its effect on the neocloud sector like $NBIS & $IREN:

Oracle reported earnings with a beat on EPS and a record backlog but, dropped 12% after hours.

Oracle is down 39.8% from September 11th highs and brought down the sector with it.

Here's why:

The sell-off was not merely a reaction to marginal revenue miss, but both an algorithmic short and investor selloff on the sustainability of the AI capex cycle and the creditworthiness of the sector's primary tenant:

OpenAI.

Oracle's announcement of a $15 billion increase in 2026 capital spending to nearly $50 billion was inextricably linked to a reported $300 billion partnership with OpenAI.

Originally, OpenAI was the frontier LLM, with promising capex promises to Oracle, Coreweave and others, contributing to the initial repricing of the sector.

However, with over $1t+ in obligations and increasing competition from Anthropic, Gemini, XAI, and others, the markets have serious doubts on whether Oracle, Coreweave, and others are building for a tenant that cannot currently fund its obligations from operating cash flow.

WE're seeing the market effectively signaling that the market Oracle is creating an unsustainable debt-funded "vendor financing" for OpenAI, which cannot fulfill its promises.

So, the drop was rational: The sell-off was driven by a rational repricing of credit risk and capital intensity.

OpenAI Funding Fear is Valid: The hypothesis that OpenAI lacks the funds to honor its contracts is supported by a glaring mismatch between its revenue ($13B) and its obligations ($60B/year).

Credit Fears are Real: The widening of Oracle's CDS spreads sees a rising probability of a "credit event" downgrade or default.

Furthermore, we're seeing this trigger a contagion effect across the "Neocloud" sector from $NBIS dropping from $140 to $90s, $IREN dropping $80 to $40s, $CIFR dropping from $24s to $17s.

But is this a buying opportunity for Neoclouds like $WULF, $NBIS, $IREN, and others?

Yes.

Is this a good buying opportunity for $ORCL?

No.

Forward Outlook:

$ORCL (large portion) , $CRWV (25% backlog) are the two players largely dependent on OpenAI and this narrative can flip in an instant (+30%+ change) depending on capital raising activity from OpenAI.

If OpenAI files for an oversubscribed IPO in 2026 at high valuations and it's new GPT models beats out Gemini/Claude, we can see this change.

However, many other players are isolated from OpenAI. The original thesis of the Neocloud sector was Mag7 capex funndel from their cash cows segments (Azure, AWS, GCP) down into: $NBIS, $IREN, $CIFR, $WULF, and others.

But as the largest players ( $ORCL, $CRWV) fall, these algorithmically bring down the whole sector.

If you look at the companies individually, companies like $CIFR and $WULF are being backstopped by $GOOGL, and $IREN / $NBIS are funded by $MSFT.

These are locked in contract backlogs from Hyperscalers/Mag7, not OpenAI.

This irrational selloff due to misunderstanding of risks presents an amazing buying opportunity for the Necoloud sector, but not companies tied to OpenAI like $ORCL and $CRWV.
Oracle [ $ORCL ] 财报结果,以及它对 $NBIS$IREN 这类 neocloud 板块的影响:

Oracle EPS beat,backlog 创纪录,但盘后跌 12%。

Oracle 距 9 月 11 日高点已经跌 39.8%,也把整个板块带下去了。

原因是:

这次抛售不只是因为小幅收入 miss,而是算法做空 + 投资者重新评估 AI capex 周期可持续性,以及板块主要租户 OpenAI 的信用质量。

Oracle 宣布 2026 capex 增加 $15B 至接近 $50B,这和据称 $300B 的 OpenAI 合作绑定得很深。

一开始 OpenAI 是 frontier LLM,对 Oracle、Coreweave 等给出诱人的 capex 承诺,推动板块重估。

但现在 OpenAI 有 $1T+ obligations,又面临 Anthropic、Gemini、XAI 等竞争,市场严重怀疑 Oracle、Coreweave 等是不是在为一个当前无法用经营现金流履约的租户建设产能。

市场实际上是在说:Oracle 正在为 OpenAI 创造不可持续的债务驱动“vendor financing”,而 OpenAI 可能兑现不了承诺。

所以这次下跌有理性部分:是信用风险和资本强度的重新定价。

OpenAI 资金恐惧有依据:收入 $13B,但 obligations $60B/年,错配明显。

信用恐惧也是真的:Oracle CDS spread 扩大,说明市场认为信用事件、降级或违约概率上升。

这也触发了 Neocloud 板块传染:$NBIS 从 $140 跌到 $90s,$IREN 从 $80 跌到 $40s,$CIFR 从 $24s 跌到 $17s。

但这是不是 $WULF$NBIS$IREN 等 Neocloud 的买入机会?

是。

是不是 $ORCL 的好买点?

不是。

展望:$ORCL(大部分)、$CRWV(25% backlog)是最依赖 OpenAI 的两个玩家,叙事可能因 OpenAI 融资活动瞬间翻转。

但很多其他玩家与 OpenAI 隔离。Neocloud 原始 thesis 是 Mag7 的现金牛业务(Azure、AWS、GCP)把 capex funnel 到 $NBIS$IREN$CIFR$WULF 等。

如果看单家公司,$CIFR$WULF$GOOGL 支撑,$IREN / $NBIS$MSFT 资金支持。这些是 Hyperscalers/Mag7 的锁定合同 backlog,不是 OpenAI。

因误解风险导致的非理性抛售,给 Neocloud 板块带来了很好的买入机会,但不包括 $ORCL$CRWV 这类 tied to OpenAI 的公司。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1998925429890261130
❤️ 267 🔁 18 💬 20
打开原推
↩️ 回复
OpenAI was the clear leader before.

Now, Gemini 3.0 surpasses it in image generation. Claude Opus 4.5 surpasses it in coding. Can go down the line.

It looked like ChatGPT couldn’t be disrupted after they got first movers advantage. Now from similarweb data we can see popularity with Gemini growing vs ChatGPT. And im sure they’re a lot more cost effective as well using in house TPUs for inference.

OpenAI tried making the whole industry dependent on it, by asking Mag7 + government to backstop their contract promises so they all go down the ship together but that ended up flopping.

AI industry as a whole is not OpenAI, we’ll likely see widespread LLM + growing compute usage from Anthropic, Google, XAi and other vendors as we see more agentic + robotics applications next.

But right now we’re seeing contagion spread from OpenAI to several companies in the sector $ORCL, $CRWV, maybe $AMD and others few hops away that were building out capacity for their promise capex spend. But it’s taking down other companies isolated from OpenAI (in terms of stock price), which is why it’s a buying opportunity if fundamentals aren’t too materially impacted.
OpenAI 之前是明确的领导者。

现在,Gemini 3.0 在图像生成上超过了它。Claude Opus 4.5 在 coding 上超过了它。可以一项项列下去。

在 ChatGPT 拿到先发优势后,它看起来像是不可能被颠覆。现在从 similarweb 数据可以看到,Gemini 相对 ChatGPT 的热度正在上升。而且我确信他们用自研 TPU 做推理,成本效率也高得多。

OpenAI 曾试图让整个行业依赖它,要求 Mag7 + 政府为它的合同承诺兜底,这样大家就一起沉船,但最后失败了。

整个 AI 行业并不等于 OpenAI。随着更多 agentic + robotics 应用出现,我们很可能会看到 Anthropic、Google、XAi 和其他供应商的 LLM 与算力使用广泛增长。

但现在我们看到 OpenAI 的传染效应蔓延到行业里几家公司,$ORCL$CRWV,可能还有 $AMD,以及其他几跳之外、为其承诺的 capex 支出建设产能的公司。但它也在拖累那些与 OpenAI 隔离的公司(就股价而言),所以如果基本面没有受到太大实质影响,这就是买入机会。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yep that’s a good example. If you look at convertible offerings for $NBIS and $IREN both their interest rates were 1-2.5% roughly because $MSFT (mag7) is their shared backlog.

A lot of Neoclouds are affected by OpenAi though and even by two hops like $APLD from $CRWV(main tenant), which had to sell junk bonds at 9.25%.

$NBIS is paying ~$73m/year from interest, while $CRWV is paying upwards of $1.3B. But the market seems to move the whole sector together from OpenAI contagion without discerning individual companies that are isolated.

The difference in interest debt, risk, and customer anchors is massive.
是的,这是个好例子。如果看 $NBIS$IREN 的可转债发行,它们的利率大概都是 1-2.5%,因为 $MSFT(mag7)是它们共同的 backlog。

不过很多 Neoclouds 都受到 OpenAi 影响,甚至像 $APLD 这种通过 $CRWV(主要租户)隔了两跳的公司,也不得不以 9.25% 的利率卖垃圾债。

$NBIS 每年支付约 7300 万美元利息,而 $CRWV 支付超过 13 亿美元。但市场似乎因为 OpenAI 传染,把整个板块一起交易,而没有区分那些被隔离的个别公司。

利息债务、风险和客户锚点上的差异非常巨大。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
They did. A large part of it was OpenAI fears.

eg. OpenAI -> one of $CRWV anchor tenant. $ALPD selling junk bonds -> credit tightening.

Sector selloff after.

Obviously it's multifacted (eg. broader selloff from carry trade unwind), ATM offerings/convertible notes + more dilution for some -> market risk off.

But again, $ALPD + $CORZ are linked to $CRWV which are linked to OpenAI.

$CIFR, $WULF -> $GOOGL through Fluidstack as anchor.

$NBIS -> Buildout for $MSFT and $META.

It's an extremely nuanced sector, but whol sector selloff/fears like OpenAI presents a buying opportunity too for the more isolated players.
确实如此。很大一部分是 OpenAI 恐惧。

比如 OpenAI -> $CRWV 的一个锚定租户。$ALPD 出售垃圾债 -> 信贷收紧。

之后板块抛售。

显然这是多因素的(比如 carry trade unwind 引发的更广泛抛售),ATM 发行/可转债 + 某些公司的更多稀释 -> 市场 risk off。

但再次强调,$ALPD + $CORZ$CRWV 相关,而 $CRWV 和 OpenAI 相关。

$CIFR$WULF -> 通过 Fluidstack 以 $GOOGL 为锚点。

$NBIS -> 为 $MSFT$META 建设。

这是一个极其细分的板块,但像 OpenAI 这种全板块抛售/恐惧,也给更隔离的玩家提供了买入机会。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I expect a bad day for Neocloud stocks just because $ORCL / $CRWV are "sector leaders".

But this would be an ideal buying opportunity for individual companies in the sector:

Due to the market missing the nuance that $ORCL / $CRWV's debt-filled buildout is for OpenAI as the main counterparty.

But other companies in the sector like $NBIS, $CIFR, $WULF are backstopped by AAA-rated Hyperscaler ( $META / $META / $GOOGL / $AMZN) cash cows.
我预计 Neocloud 股票会有糟糕的一天,只因为 $ORCL / $CRWV 是“板块龙头”。

但这会是板块内个别公司的理想买入机会:

因为市场没有理解这个细微差别:$ORCL / $CRWV 充满债务的建设,是以 OpenAI 作为主要交易对手。

但板块里的其他公司,比如 $NBIS$CIFR$WULF,是由 AAA 评级的 Hyperscaler($META / $META / $GOOGL / $AMZN)现金牛兜底。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
The alpha is knowing what types of contracts lead to isolation from current fears and where there's mispricing on individual components in the sector. Compute capacity contracts are take or pay for $MSFT, $META, and others.

Companies like $NBIS, $IREN and others are effectively de-risked due to **no counterparty risk** from Mag7 (infinite balance sheets) and 5 Year contracts.

However, their drops were different reasons ( $NBIS, 25M share ATM), $IREN fears over dilution for monetizing their rest of the 3 GW capacity pipeline for AI Cloud instead of colo.

However, the main overarching fear was that $ORCL, $CRWV faces severe counterparty risk from OpenAI insolvency + inability to pay, but this causes a sector algorithmic selloff because they're the two largest players.

But this sector sell-off is a good buying opportunity for some of the unaffected (minus credit tightening) / misunderstood companies.

Also AI is a growing market, and there's likely compute strain for the time being (eg. anthropic, gemini, and other models) but it's basically 100% utilization for hyperscaler contracts on $NBIS, $IREN.

Obviously if there's overbuild, there's probably margin compression but we're not seeing that right now. What happens after 5 years I don't know.
alpha 在于知道哪些类型的合同能让公司与当前恐惧隔离,以及板块内单个组件哪里存在错配定价。对 $MSFT$META 和其他公司来说,算力容量合同是 take or pay。

$NBIS$IREN 等公司,实际上由于 Mag7(无限资产负债表)没有**交易对手风险**,以及 5 年合同,已经有效去风险。

不过它们下跌的原因不同($NBIS 是 2500 万股 ATM),$IREN 则是市场担心它为了把剩余 3 GW 容量管线变现为 AI Cloud 而不是 colo,会带来稀释。

然而,最主要的整体恐惧是 $ORCL$CRWV 面临来自 OpenAI 破产 + 无力支付的严重交易对手风险,但因为它们是两个最大玩家,这引发了板块算法性抛售。

但这次板块抛售,对一些未受影响(除信贷收紧外)/被误解的公司来说,是很好的买入机会。

另外 AI 是一个增长市场,目前很可能仍然存在算力紧张(比如 anthropic、gemini 和其他模型),但对 $NBIS$IREN 的 hyperscaler 合同来说,基本是 100% 利用率。

显然,如果出现过度建设,利润率可能会压缩,但我们现在还没看到。5 年后会怎样我不知道。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
The AI DC sector is extremely nuanced.

$ORCL is building capacity from debt based on backlog/credit worthiness of OpenAI which is the tenant.

OpenAI does not have the funds at the moment to fulfill its obligations and it's looking less likely to get it.

$CIFR is building out for $GOOGL, $AMZN.

Google/Amazon does have the funds and these contracts are locked in.

$NBIS is building out for $META, $MSFT.

Microsoft/Meta does have the funds and these contracts are locked in for capacity.

But the market is currently treating all the backlog like it comes from OpenAI (unsustainable build) which is why it's a good opportunity to buy into mispricing of individual components of the sector.
AI DC 板块极其细分。

$ORCL 正在基于 OpenAI 这个租户的 backlog/信用资质,用债务建设产能。

OpenAI 目前没有资金履行义务,而且看起来越来越不可能拿到这些资金。

$CIFR 正在为 $GOOGL$AMZN 建设。

Google/Amazon 有资金,而且这些合同已经锁定。

$NBIS 正在为 $META$MSFT 建设。

Microsoft/Meta 有资金,而且这些容量合同已经锁定。

但市场现在把所有 backlog 都当成来自 OpenAI(不可持续建设),这就是为什么买入板块内个别组件错配定价是好机会。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Oracle [ $ORCL ] earning results and its effect on the neocloud sector like $NBIS & $IREN:

Oracle reported earnings with a beat on EPS and a record backlog but, dropped 12% after hours.

Oracle is down 39.8% from September 11th highs and brought down the sector with it.

Here's why:

The sell-off was not merely a reaction to marginal revenue miss, but both an algorithmic short and investor selloff on the sustainability of the AI capex cycle and the creditworthiness of the sector's primary tenant:

OpenAI.

Oracle's announcement of a $15 billion increase in 2026 capital spending to nearly $50 billion was inextricably linked to a reported $300 billion partnership with OpenAI.

Originally, OpenAI was the frontier LLM, with promising capex promises to Oracle, Coreweave and others, contributing to the initial repricing of the sector.

However, with over $1t+ in obligations and increasing competition from Anthropic, Gemini, XAI, and others, the markets have serious doubts on whether Oracle, Coreweave, and others are building for a tenant that cannot currently fund its obligations from operating cash flow.

WE're seeing the market effectively signaling that the market Oracle is creating an unsustainable debt-funded "vendor financing" for OpenAI, which cannot fulfill its promises.

So, the drop was rational: The sell-off was driven by a rational repricing of credit risk and capital intensity.

OpenAI Funding Fear is Valid: The hypothesis that OpenAI lacks the funds to honor its contracts is supported by a glaring mismatch between its revenue ($13B) and its obligations ($60B/year).

Credit Fears are Real: The widening of Oracle's CDS spreads sees a rising probability of a "credit event" downgrade or default.

Furthermore, we're seeing this trigger a contagion effect across the "Neocloud" sector from $NBIS dropping from $140 to $90s, $IREN dropping $80 to $40s, $CIFR dropping from $24s to $17s.

But is this a buying opportunity for Neoclouds like $WULF, $NBIS, $IREN, and others?

Yes.

Is this a good buying opportunity for $ORCL?

No.

Forward Outlook:

$ORCL (large portion) , $CRWV (25% backlog) are the two players largely dependent on OpenAI and this narrative can flip in an instant (+30%+ change) depending on capital raising activity from OpenAI.

If OpenAI files for an oversubscribed IPO in 2026 at high valuations and it's new GPT models beats out Gemini/Claude, we can see this change.

However, many other players are isolated from OpenAI. The original thesis of the Neocloud sector was Mag7 capex funndel from their cash cows segments (Azure, AWS, GCP) down into: $NBIS, $IREN, $CIFR, $WULF, and others.

But as the largest players ( $ORCL, $CRWV) fall, these algorithmically bring down the whole sector.

If you look at the companies individually, companies like $CIFR and $WULF are being backstopped by $GOOGL, and $IREN / $NBIS are funded by $MSFT.

These are locked in contract backlogs from Hyperscalers/Mag7, not OpenAI.

This irrational selloff due to misunderstanding of risks presents an amazing buying opportunity for the Necoloud sector, but not companies tied to OpenAI like $ORCL and $CRWV.
Oracle [ $ORCL ] 财报及其对 $NBIS$IREN 等 neocloud 板块的影响:

Oracle 公布财报,EPS 超预期,backlog 创纪录,但盘后下跌 12%。

Oracle 较 9 月 11 日高点下跌 39.8%,并带着整个板块一起下跌。

原因如下:

这次抛售不仅仅是对收入小幅不及预期的反应,而是算法做空和投资者对 AI capex 周期可持续性,以及板块主要租户信用资质的抛售:

OpenAI。

Oracle 宣布 2026 年资本开支增加 150 亿美元至接近 500 亿美元,这与据称和 OpenAI 的 3000 亿美元合作密不可分。

最初,OpenAI 是 frontier LLM,对 Oracle、Coreweave 等作出了有前景的 capex 承诺,推动了板块最初的重估。

然而,随着超过 1t+ 的义务,以及来自 Anthropic、Gemini、XAI 和其他公司的竞争加剧,市场严重怀疑 Oracle、Coreweave 等是否在为一个目前无法从经营现金流中支付义务的租户建设产能。

我们看到市场实际上在发出信号:Oracle 正在为 OpenAI 创造一种不可持续的债务融资“vendor financing”,而 OpenAI 无法兑现承诺。

所以,下跌是理性的:抛售由信用风险和资本强度的理性重估驱动。

OpenAI 资金恐惧是合理的:OpenAI 缺乏资金履行合同的假设,有其收入(130 亿美元)与义务(每年 600 亿美元)之间巨大错配作为支持。

信用恐惧是真实的:Oracle CDS 利差扩大,显示“信用事件”降级或违约概率正在上升。

此外,我们看到这触发了整个“Neocloud”板块的传染效应,$NBIS 从 $140 跌到 $90 多,$IREN 从 $80 跌到 $40 多,$CIFR 从 $24 多跌到 $17 多。

但这对 $WULF$NBIS$IREN 等 Neoclouds 是买入机会吗?

是。

这对 $ORCL 是好的买入机会吗?

不是。

前瞻:

$ORCL(很大一部分)、$CRWV(25% backlog)是两个很大程度依赖 OpenAI 的玩家,这个叙事会随着 OpenAI 的融资活动瞬间翻转(+30%+ 变动)。

如果 OpenAI 在 2026 年以高估值提交超额认购 IPO,并且它的新 GPT 模型击败 Gemini/Claude,我们会看到变化。

然而,许多其他玩家与 OpenAI 隔离。Neocloud 板块最初的 thesis 是 Mag7 capex 从其现金牛业务(Azure、AWS、GCP)向下流入:$NBIS$IREN$CIFR$WULF 等。

但随着最大玩家($ORCL$CRWV)下跌,它们以算法方式拖累了整个板块。

如果你逐家公司看,像 $CIFR$WULF 这样的公司由 $GOOGL 兜底,$IREN / $NBIS$MSFT 资助。

这些是来自 Hyperscalers/Mag7 的锁定合同 backlog,不是 OpenAI。

这种因误解风险导致的非理性抛售,为 Necoloud 板块提供了惊人的买入机会,但不包括 $ORCL$CRWV 这种与 OpenAI 绑定的公司。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Post-Fed Interest Rate 25BPS cut.

December 11th ratings:

Strong Buy:
$CRCL
$COIN
$AMKR
$CRDO
$IBIT
$MSTR
$AMZN
$SMCI
$TSM
$TSSI
Sk Hynix
$SNAP
Samsung Electronics
$ALAB
$META
$NBIS
$CIFR

Buy:
$KRUS
$AVGO
$NFLX
$KRKNF
$HIMS
$FLY
$OSS
$TE
$FLNC
$LITE
$COHR
$RKLB
$TTD
$NVDA
$CLS
$GOOGL
$RDDT
$WULF
$CRWV
$IREN
$GLXY
$WLAC
$MPWR

Avoid
$RGTI
$PLTR
$WMT
$ETH
$BMNR
$TSLA
$IONQ
$ORCL
$SLNH
$OKLO

Explanations:

Today fed cut interest rates 25BPS as expected. This usually funnel liquidity into growth stocks and benefits small-medium caps that use debt the most (refinance with lower interest rates), such as Neoclouds like $NBIS and $CIFR.

However, this coincides with Japan hiking, which might lead to carry trade unwind from last year's reload; but this is short term, fundamentals > volatility short term.

Strong Buy Ratings:

Circle - Massive drop mainly due to share unlock post IPO. However, rate cuts hurt their business model ~20% revenue cut from interest.

That being said, we're seeing a massive growth in the stablecoin market, and I'm personally seeing huge early venture capital funding (a16z, sequioa, etc). being poured into stablecoin related companies such as Neobanks. We should see all of this funnel into more USDC printing, and the printer outweigh rate cuts.

Coinbase - Same as Circle, they have 50% revenue sharing in terms of USDC. However, they also have their exchange on top, and rate cuts generally help riskier assets such as crypto (especially post drop Bitcoin sub 90k)

Amkor - Benefits from Made in America shift to semis/fab.

Credo - Dropped -16% last 5 days, and 8% today. Great recovery buy, don't see connectivity demand dropping from DC buildout.

ALAB - Same thesis as CRDO

IBIT (Bitcoin) - Always a great long, especially so at $93K

Microstrategy (MSTR) - Benefits from Bitcoin recovery and did an analysis whether they would get liquidated or not. TLDR: no, we have another bitcoin halving event before they need to pay off interest, which was around 2029.

Amazon - Hasn't moved an inch all year. Fundamentals improving, EOY helps E-commerce division. Custom chips, constellations, robotaxis, they're basically doing everything and market hasn't really rewarded their effort yet. Just a feeling we might see this outperform next 2 months.

SMCI - Did a thesis post on this earlier, amazing recovery buy. It dropped on earnings due to shifting revenue backlog to next quarter, but markets aren't pricing in the fact they're growing 60% Y/Y forward revenue but trading at ~11 forward p/e or so.

TSM - Backbone of the whole AI/semi buildout. We're seeing arguments about TPU vs. GPU, but TSM doesn't care.

TSSI - Same thesis with SMCI, piggybacks off of Dell, just as a proxy we're seeing massive backlog from vendors such as IREN, and other neoclouds building out DCs 2026, and we should see this come into fruition next year.

Sk Hynix - Apparently there's been rumors about uplisting to US markets, which should be a boost to liquidity. Also memory markets is just incredibly high demand from AI buildout.

Snapchat - Just undervalued. $13B marketcap, ~1B+ quarterly revenue. NA DAU dropped 3% from last quarter but don't buy this for being the next FB. All they need to do is cut GCP costs and monetize memories (which they did) and we should see this re-rate 100%+ next year, especially with $400m+ in added revenue/equity from the Perplixty deal

Samsung Electronics - People think of this as memory as well because it makes up a large part of their profit, but i see this as a potential next cash cow foundry play like TSM, as the 2nd largest player to soak up any max capacity overflow.

META - One time tax selloff, was oversold. Now we finally see them create a frontier model (Avacado) if i remember correctly. So they can monetize the llama open source llm efforts they've been just blowing money on. They also cut their metaverse efforts, which should be a huge boost in proftiability.

Nebius - Short term drag due to 25m share dilution. ATM is likely being offered. That being said once this finishes, insanely undervalued due to forward revenue/growth from both its DC business (7-9B ARR), and its 4 subsidaries that the markets dont price in (growing 100%+ Y/Y)

CIFR - Short term drop due to Bitcoin prices (holding a lot on balance sheet), but not really affected by GPU depreciation arguments since they do colo models. Also backstopped by google, and they have contracts with Amazon, so fundamentally disrisked and one of the top buys in neocloud secotr.

Buy Ratings:
Running out of text space so will give a shorter TLDR

Kura Sushi - Swing trade zoom out 5 year chart and you'll see what I mean every time it bottoms (around now). This never fails!

Broadcom - Hyperscaler buildout, critical to TPU alongside Mediatek

Netflix - 16% drop feels a bit unwarranted for the acquisition

KRKNF - Great growing fundamentals and defensible market as an andruil supplier.

HIMS - Share buyback program, usually sub $40 great buy/swing trade. Zava acqusition not being priced in and it's still growing.

FLY - SpaceX $1.5T valuation should boost up the whole space sector. This was a 2026 play for medium lift.

OSS - DD on this earlier potential andruil supplier. Otherwise, kind of undervalued at this MC anyway.

TE - One of the few Murican energy infra, Solar. It's likely more commercial than Nuclear.

FLNC - Same thesis with AI buildout + energy

LITE - Pretty overextended right now, wouldn't chase. But long term benefits from being in the middle of both tpu ironwood + blackwell buildout

COHR - Same with Lite, but seems like a secondary player.

RKLB - Probably my favorite long. Pretty overvalued right now but can't help it due to SpaceX fomo.

TTD - Thesis post earlier, just based on forward revenue numbers, it seems like a great recovery play.

NVDA - TPU fears are a bit overblown, just look at backlog.

CLS - TPU v7 ecosystem buy

GOOGL - They sell TPUs like NVDA, growing robotoaxis market like waymo, gemini succesful. Just firing on all fronts.

Reddit - Just a money printer like early day Robinhood. Made some thesis comments about RDDT growing in terms of acquisitions from FCF. Otherwise, they're here to stay and benefits from all gens using it (unlike snap which is earlier)

WULF - Similar to CIFR. Rerating might happen depending on more info about the Anthropic buildout.

CRWV - Terrible, terrible long. Good short term recovery buy.

IREN - I would not put money into this if they kept buying GPUs to do AI cloud just due to dilution. but they might do colo and they have an immense amount of GW capacity so it's still promising.

GLXY - Beneficary of DC Buildout.

WLAC - Possible that they're SPAC ipoing this month. They did say Q4.

MPWR - TPU v7 ecosystem buy

Avoid
RGTI - Quantum, no fundamentals/revenue to back it up
PLTR - 449.01B market cap lol
WMT - They're growing like 4% revenue a year, but trading at 40 p/e which is insane.
ETH - Ethereum great network. However, there's no token burn and none of the revenue goes to token holders. Terrible investment, great developer tooling/ecosystem.
BMNR - Ethereum proxy.
TSLA - Kind of detached from fundamentals. But it's a bet on elon musk, robotaxis at scale, robotics. I personally just see this as overpromising, but we'll see.
IONQ -Quantum, no fundamentals/revenue to back it up
ORCL - Most of forward backlog is dependent on openai, which makes things incredibly uncertain/risky if openai falls to claude/gemini in market share. That being said, it's a good recovery buy right now, but long term it's risky.
SLNH - This is the stock to be in if you want diluted to oblivion on their 2.8gw pipeline.
OKLO - no fundamentals like quantum to back up mc at this moment, this likely years out to come into fruition.
Fed 降息 25BPS 之后。

12 月 11 日评级:

Strong Buy:
$CRCL $COIN $AMKR $CRDO $IBIT $MSTR $AMZN $SMCI $TSM $TSSI Sk Hynix $SNAP Samsung Electronics $ALAB $META $NBIS $CIFR

Buy:
$KRUS $AVGO $NFLX $KRKNF $HIMS $FLY $OSS $TE $FLNC $LITE $COHR $RKLB $TTD $NVDA $CLS $GOOGL $RDDT $WULF $CRWV $IREN $GLXY $WLAC $MPWR

Avoid:
$RGTI $PLTR $WMT $ETH $BMNR $TSLA $IONQ $ORCL $SLNH $OKLO

解释:

今天 Fed 按预期降息 25BPS。这通常会把流动性 funnel 到成长股,也利好最依赖债务的中小盘,比如 $NBIS$CIFR 这类 Neoclouds,因为再融资成本下降。

不过这和日本加息同时发生,可能引发 carry trade unwind,但这是短期因素,基本面 > 短期波动。

Strong Buy 里,Circle 主要因为 IPO 后解禁大跌。降息会伤害它的利息收入模式,但我仍看好 USDC 网络效应和美国数字美元战略地位。$COIN 也受益于 crypto 流动性和稳定币生态。

$AMKR/$CRDO/$ALAB/$LITE/$COHR/$TSM/Sk Hynix/Samsung 等是 AI infrastructure、memory、connectivity 主链。

$NBIS/$CIFR/WULF/IREN/CRWV/GLXY/WLAC 是 Neocloud/AI compute capex funnel。

Avoid 里,Quantum/OKLO 这类收入和估值脱节,$ETH/$BMNR 风险回报不如 $IBIT/$MSTR/$COIN$TSLA 估值和基本面不匹配,$ORCL 受 OpenAI 信用风险拖累。

总的来说,降息周期利好高质量成长股和 AI infrastructure,但要避开纯 hype 和基本面不支撑估值的名字。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1998846813177262295
❤️ 566 🔁 84 💬 52
打开原推
💬 引用
@itsthesquonky Round the time I did supply chain research on TPU v7 for $LITE!

Incredibly promising but a tad overextended right now

https://t.co/QFojyOiXXP
@itsthesquonky 大概就是我为 $LITE 做 TPU v7 供应链研究的时候!

非常有前景,但现在稍微有点涨过头了

https://t.co/QFojyOiXXP
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Analysis of the $GOOGL TPU v7 Ironwood Suppliers.

Here's the list of what comapnies are the most materially impacted by the Google's TPU buildout.

+ the TPU stock I'm taking a position on.

[Critical] Design/IP:
- Broadcom [ $AVGO ]: co-designs and implements Google’s TPU ASICs

[Critical/High] Semiconductor Fab:
- #1 Taiwan Semi [ $TSM ]: TPUv7 is fabbed at TSMC 3nm
- #2 Samsung Electronics: Secondary memory & foundry partner

[Critical/High] Memory:
- #1 SK Hynix: HBM3E for TPUv7 Ironwood
- #2 Samsung Electronics: ~TPUv7-specific reporting emphasizes SK hynix + Samsung.

[High] Optical Networking:
- Lumentum [ $LITE ]: Google uses extensively uses Optical Circuit Switching (OCS)
- Coherent [ $COHR ]: OCS player but weaker

[High] Power Management ICs:
- Monolithic [ $MPWR ]: This is speculative that Vicor will be replaced by $MPWR, from earnings mentioning TPU

[Medium] Thermal Management:
- Vertiv [ $VRT ]: Vertiv supplies the CDUs that act as the heart of the liquid cooling system, pumping coolant to the cold plates on the TPU chips

- Modine [ $MOD ]: More speculative that they provide provides the massive chillers and air handling units (AHUs)

[Medium] Interconnects:
- TTM Technologies [ $TTMI ], $ANET, Unimicron, Ibiden

______

The buildout of the Google TPU v7 "Ironwood" represents the construction of a parallel silicon ecosystem designed to break the monopoly of $NVDA GPU.

The material impact is most concentrated in Broadcom (as the silicon architect and commercial vehicle), the Memory Complex (SK Hynix/Samsung), and the Optical/Power sectors (Lumentum/Vertiv) and was created from public evidence but is largely dependent on adoption, vendor shares, and competitive responses actually play out.

From this supply chain research, I'm initiating a new position in $LITE, in the event the TPU becomes the dominant ASIC for inference.

Lumentum is primary beneficiary of Google’s commitment to OCS and form the core of the "Apollo" OCS switches used in TPU pods.

The ramping of TPU v7 clusters translates directly to unit volume for Lumentum’s optical switch modules. And because OCS is a bespoke architecture unique to Google’s hyperscale approach, Lumentum faces less commoditization pressure here than in the standard transceiver market.

However all companies in this supply chain are set to benefit if the TPU v7 scales up from Anthropic, Meta, Apple, and others buying the $GOOGL ASIC.
$GOOGL TPU v7 Ironwood 供应商分析。

下面是最实质性受 Google TPU buildout 影响的公司清单,外加我准备建仓的 TPU 股票。

[关键] Design/IP:
- Broadcom [ $AVGO ]:共同设计并实现 Google TPU ASICs

[关键/高] 半导体制造:
- #1 Taiwan Semi [ $TSM ]:TPUv7 由 TSMC 3nm 制造
- #2 Samsung Electronics:二级 memory & foundry partner

[关键/高] Memory:
- #1 SK Hynix:TPUv7 Ironwood 的 HBM3E
- #2 Samsung Electronics:TPUv7 相关报道强调 SK Hynix + Samsung

[高] Optical Networking:
- Lumentum [ $LITE ]:Google 大量使用 Optical Circuit Switching (OCS)
- Coherent [ $COHR ]:也是 OCS 玩家,但更弱

[高] Power Management ICs:
- Monolithic [ $MPWR ]:这是投机性判断,来自财报里提到 TPU,可能替代 Vicor

[中] Thermal Management:
- Vertiv [ $VRT ]:Vertiv 提供 CDU,是液冷系统的心脏

我最感兴趣的是 $LITE,因为 OCS 是 TPU、Trainium、Blackwell 等 scale-across 架构的核心。它不像单押某一个 ASIC,而是押 hyperscaler 集群互连需求。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1995543748353347989
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Short term unwinding from yen carry trade (Japan rate hike, fed cut), which was slightly negative.

Medium term impact should be incredibly bullish on growth assets, especially Neocloud sector that involve debt for growth like $CRWV, $IREN, $NBIS.

Don't see any fundamentals slowing, so great time to go long imo
短期来看,日元套利交易 unwind(日本加息,Fed 降息)带来了一点负面影响。

中期影响对成长资产应该极其利好,尤其是像 $CRWV$IREN$NBIS 这种涉及债务扩张的 Neocloud 板块。

没看到任何基本面放缓,所以 imo 现在是做多的好时机
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@LandoInvests Happy to debate $SMCI, I put my thesis here on why it's bound for a recovery due to forward revenue backlog in Q2 2026.

https://t.co/FJj3yXlhGT
@LandoInvests 很乐意讨论 $SMCI,我把为什么它会因为 2026 年 Q2 的远期收入 backlog 而必然复苏的 thesis 写在这里了。

https://t.co/FJj3yXlhGT
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Upgrading $SMCI to EXTREMELY STRONG BUY at ~$33 (≈$19B MC).

• FY’26 raised to $36B+ revenue (≈60%+ YoY from $22B).

• AI DC build-out (e.g. $NBIS, $IREN, $DGXX) keeps GPU server demand maxed.

This isn't a $CRDO 272% Y/Y ER story but it's mispriced value.

Here's why:

SMCI dropped on earnings due to two things, fears over margin compression and revenue miss.

_

1. The Q1 2026 “miss” was delayed orders:

• Revenue came in at $5B vs prior $6–7B guide.

• However, all this was, is $1.5B getting pushed into Q2 from customers waiting for Nvidia’s Blackwell Ultra config. And they even **raised FY guidance** from $33B to FY $36B.

2. Margins compression fears:

• FY 2025 Net Margin: ~5.9% ($1.3B Net Income on $22B Revenue).

• The current margin compression is temporary. As DLC manufacturing moves down the learning curve, unit costs drop and margins climb. Management is targeting ~11% gross margin in the back half of the year, with net margins snapping back toward ~5.5%.

If margin merely mean-reverts toward ~11% and net margins toward ~5–6% on a $36–38B revenue base, you're looking at $2B+ in earnings.

Revenue: $38.0 Billion
Net Margin: 5.5% (Recovery Case)
Implied Net Income: $2.09 Billion
Share Count: 680 Million (Diluted)
Stock Price: ~$33.85
P/E Calculation: $33.85 / $3.07 = 11.0x

Forward P/E: Approximately 10x-13x, for a stock with 60%+ forward growth. Dirt cheap.

_

$SMCI doesn’t depend on GPU useful-life accounting games, it sells the racks either way.

Also post $NVDA, $NBIS, $CRDO, and other AI DC stocks-post ER confirmed the AI boom is not slowing down.

$SMCI is the epicenter of the AI/DC boom, growing 60%+ Y/Y but the market is treating it like it's a $MSTR-like distressed asset.

Thus I'm taking long positions since $SMCI looks to be one of the most compelling risk-adjusted 6 month (medium term) trades for 50-100% upside I've seen in the hardware sector.
$SMCI 上调到 EXTREMELY STRONG BUY,价格约 $33(约 $19B MC)。

• FY’26 收入指引提高到 $36B+(相对 $22B 同比约 60%+)。

• AI DC build-out(比如 $NBIS$IREN$DGXX)让 GPU server 需求持续爆满。

这不是 $CRDO 那种 272% Y/Y ER 故事,但它是错定价的价值。

原因:

SMCI 财报后下跌主要因为两件事:利润率压缩担忧和收入 miss。
_

1. Q1 2026 “miss”其实是订单延迟:

• 收入 $5B,低于此前 $6-7B 指引。

• 但这只是 $1.5B 被推迟到 Q2,因为客户等 Nvidia Blackwell Ultra 配置。公司甚至把全年指引从 $33B 上调到 $36B。

2. 利润率压缩担忧:

• FY 2025 净利率约 5.9%($22B 收入,$1.3B 净利润)。

• 当前利润率压缩是暂时的。DLC 制造走下学习曲线后,单位成本会下降,利润率会回升。管理层目标是下半年毛利率约 11%,净利率回到约 5.5%。

如果毛利率只是回归到约 11%,净利率回到 5-6%,在 $36-38B 收入基数上,就是 $2B+ 利润。

$SMCI 不依赖 GPU 使用寿命会计游戏,它怎么都卖 racks。

$NVDA$NBIS$CRDO 和其他 AI DC 股票财报后都确认 AI boom 没有放慢。

$SMCI 是 AI/DC boom 的核心,同比增长 60%+,但市场把它当成 $MSTR 式 distressed asset。

所以我做多,因为 $SMCI 看起来是硬件板块里 6 个月 50-100% 上行、风险调整后最有吸引力的交易之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1995644085563261034
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Stock position updates:

Sitting on high-conviction longs like $NBIS and writing options, relatively lax weekend.

Minor position adds updates from last week:

$LITE - $316.5 (+5.53%) -> ~$335.91

Lite benefits from $NVDA Blackwell + $GOOGL v7 TPU rampup

$AMKR - $37.6 (+18.4%) ~$44.5

Benefits from US-policy regarding Fab with $TSM.

$SMCI - ~$32.92 (+5.97%) ~$21.03B

(60% Y/Y revenue growth going into next year, the 40% drop for quarter backlog delay was unwarranted).

$TTD - $38.6 (+3.78%) ~$40.6

Haven't seen too much news aside from $CRWV raising another $2B and tanking other Neoclouds. Or the $108B Paramount bid drama for Warner.

Probably going to cost average up on $AMKR, $SMCI, waiting on a deeper drops for $LITE.
股票仓位更新:

持有 $NBIS 这类高信念多头并卖期权,周末相对轻松。

上周小幅加仓更新:

$LITE - $316.5 (+5.53%) -> ~$335.91

Lite 受益于 $NVDA Blackwell + $GOOGL v7 TPU 放量

$AMKR - $37.6 (+18.4%) ~$44.5

受益于美国围绕 Fab 与 $TSM 的政策。

$SMCI - ~$32.92 (+5.97%) ~$21.03B

(明年收入同比增长 60%,因为季度 backlog 延迟而跌 40% 是没有道理的)。

$TTD - $38.6 (+3.78%) ~$40.6

除了 $CRWV 又融资 20 亿美元并拖累其他 Neoclouds,或者 Paramount 对 Warner 的 1080 亿美元竞购闹剧之外,没看到太多新闻。

可能会继续摊高 $AMKR$SMCI,等 $LITE 更深回调。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The market is mispricing the #2 players in the biggest sectors on Earth.

My thesis on $RKLB = $NBIS Avride

1. Space ( $RKLB ) -> SpaceX just got valued at $800B from $350B. Rocketlab will grow into SpaceX's prev valuation from $26B

It's just a matter of time.

2. Robotaxis ( $NBIS ) Waymo went from $45B → $200B in 1 year. $NBIS Avride is going to grow into Waymo's previous valuation from $6B.

It's just a matter of time, whether that's 1 year or 4 years from now.

And here is the thing with $NBIS: Avride is just one subsidiary out of multiple, and this company alone could be worth more than the entire market cap today in 2 years.

Both the market and short sellers misprice the fact that Nebius owns the fastest growing and hottest sector companies on Earth, all growing 100%+ Y/Y.

Long $RKLB, Long $NBIS.
市场正在错误定价地球上最大赛道里的二号玩家。

我对 $RKLB 的 thesis = $NBIS Avride

1. 太空($RKLB)-> SpaceX 估值刚从 $350B 升到 $800B。Rocketlab 会从 $26B 长到 SpaceX 之前的估值。

这只是时间问题。

2. Robotaxis($NBIS)Waymo 1 年内从 $45B 到 $200B。$NBIS 的 Avride 会从 $6B 长到 Waymo 之前的估值。

这也只是时间问题,不管是 1 年后还是 4 年后。

$NBIS 的关键在于:Avride 只是多家子公司中的一家,光这家公司 2 年后就可能比今天整个市值还值钱。

市场和空头都错误定价了这样一个事实:Nebius 拥有地球上增长最快、最火的赛道公司,而且这些业务都在同比增长 100%+。

做多 $RKLB,做多 $NBIS
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1997122660749529353
❤️ 86 🔁 3 💬 22
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy Just logged in again when i saw this post. Haven't played in years!

Pretty sure the grand exchange carries over into real life stock trading too. https://t.co/GR60bJaE8F
@pepemoonboy 看到这条帖我才又登录了一下。好多年没玩了!

很确定 grand exchange 的经验也会延续到现实股票交易里。https://t.co/GR60bJaE8F
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@beauty_oe @Hedgeye 大丈夫だよ!
日本のコミュニティへのあなたのコメントを見るのも大好きなんだ。
@beauty_oe @Hedgeye 没关系!
我也很喜欢看到你在日本社区里的评论。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy @Hedgeye Thanks! I'm not a hardcore $NBIS community member though. If something bad changes to the fundamentals, I'm not afraid to sell the stock.

But so far I've only seen positive changes from the parent company down to its subsidiaries so I'm excited for the future of the company.
@pepemoonboy @Hedgeye 谢谢!不过我不是硬核 $NBIS 社区成员。如果基本面出现糟糕变化,我并不害怕卖掉股票。

但到目前为止,我只看到从母公司到子公司都有积极变化,所以我对公司的未来很兴奋。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@bubbleboi True, just look at $AMZN. https://t.co/EpkUPYB4GW
@bubbleboi 确实,看看 $AMZN 就知道了。https://t.co/EpkUPYB4GW
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
The market is mispricing the #2 players in the biggest sectors on Earth.

My thesis on $RKLB = $NBIS Avride

1. Space ( $RKLB ) -> SpaceX just got valued at $800B from $350B. Rocketlab will grow into SpaceX's prev valuation from $26B

It's just a matter of time.

2. Robotaxis ( $NBIS ) Waymo went from $45B → $200B in 1 year. $NBIS Avride is going to grow into Waymo's previous valuation from $6B.

It's just a matter of time, whether that's 1 year or 4 years from now.

And here is the thing with $NBIS: Avride is just one subsidiary out of multiple, and this company alone could be worth more than the entire market cap today in 2 years.

Both the market and short sellers misprice the fact that Nebius owns the fastest growing and hottest sector companies on Earth, all growing 100%+ Y/Y.

Long $RKLB, Long $NBIS.
市场正在错误定价地球上最大行业里的 #2 玩家。

我对 $RKLB = $NBIS Avride 的 thesis

1. Space($RKLB)-> SpaceX 刚从 3500 亿美元估到 8000 亿美元。Rocketlab 会从 260 亿美元成长到 SpaceX 之前的估值。

这只是时间问题。

2. Robotaxis($NBIS)Waymo 一年内从 450 亿美元 -> 2000 亿美元。$NBIS Avride 会从 60 亿美元成长到 Waymo 之前的估值。

这只是时间问题,不管是 1 年还是 4 年。

$NBIS 的关键在于:Avride 只是多个子公司中的一个,单这一家公司 2 年后就可能比今天整个市值还值钱。

市场和做空者都错误定价了这一点:Nebius 拥有地球上增长最快、最热门行业里的公司,而且都在 100%+ Y/Y 增长。

Long $RKLB, Long $NBIS.
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
A short seller firm @Hedgeye is now shorting Nebius $NBIS. The stock price is now $97.8.

Their claim? Nebius is Coreweave 2.0.

Coreweave [ $CRWV ]:

- Small diversification in customers, mainly hyperscalers, ~quarter of their backlog is OpenAI.

- $1.8B in cash left

- $1.3B+/yearly in debt interest from toxic financing at 8-10% interest.

Same thing as Nebius right?

Nebius [ $NBIS ]:

- Highest diversification in the Neocloud market of customers from $META, $MSFT, governments, $SHOP, Mistral, $NOW, and many others.

- $4.8B+ in cash left

- ~$76.6M/yearly from note structure 40%+ OTM at ~2% interest.

- FSD level 4 Robotaxi self driving car segment that is of critical importance to $UBER (last round $375M with $UBER) to compete vs Waymo.

- AI training segments funded by Bezos and used by $AMZN, Anthropic, and others

- 28% in subsidiary that most of the public companies from $TSLA, $NET, Tiktok, $META and so on use

- 4 subsidiaries growing 100% Y/Y alongside their core operational business, with Tripleten/Toloka adding to net income every year.

Same company.
做空机构 @Hedgeye 现在在做空 Nebius $NBIS。股价现在是 $97.8。

他们的说法?Nebius 是 Coreweave 2.0。

Coreweave [ $CRWV ]:

- 客户分散度低,主要是 hyperscalers,约四分之一 backlog 是 OpenAI。

- 剩余现金 $1.8B

- 有毒融资,利率 8-10%,每年债务利息 $1.3B+

所以 Nebius 也一样,对吧?

Nebius [ $NBIS ]:

- Neocloud 市场里客户分散度最高,客户包括 $META$MSFT、政府、$SHOP、Mistral、$NOW 等等。

- 剩余现金 $4.8B+

- 票据结构 40%+ OTM,利率约 2%,每年利息约 $76.6M。

- FSD Level 4 Robotaxi 自动驾驶业务,对 $UBER 至关重要(上一轮 $UBER 投了 $375M),用来对抗 Waymo。

- AI training 业务由 Bezos 资助,并被 $AMZN、Anthropic 等使用。

- 持有一家子公司 28%,这家公司被 $TSLA$NET、Tiktok、$META 等大量公司使用。

- 除核心业务外,还有 4 家子公司都在同比增长 100%+。

把这两家公司简单类比,是忽略了现金、债务、客户结构和资产组合差异。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1997034977524121633
❤️ 294 🔁 25 💬 18
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MambaHarveyInc @babyfolio @Hedgeye on stuff like $IREN and $WULF majority is convertible note arbitrage not shorts.
@MambaHarveyInc @babyfolio @Hedgeye$IREN$WULF 这类,多数是可转债套利,不是做空。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MambaHarveyInc @babyfolio @Hedgeye added volatility. I mean just look at $OKLO when kerrisdale shorted.

went from $25 to $175 in the longer run because shorts got squeezed.
@MambaHarveyInc @babyfolio @Hedgeye 增加了波动性。我的意思是看看 Kerrisdale 做空 $OKLO 时的情况。

长期来看,它从 $25 涨到 $175,因为空头被 squeeze 了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@babyfolio @Hedgeye hey, clowns at least make money from their job compared to short sellers.

don't insult the clowns
@babyfolio @Hedgeye 嘿,clowns 至少还靠自己的工作赚钱,和做空者不一样。

别侮辱 clowns
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RKLBMan @Hedgeye yeah my thesis in $RKLB was that it will catch up to SpaceX in a due amount of time (eg. 5, 7 years) and SpaceX's last valuation was $350B, so that's 10x+ return.

Same thesis for Avride, will catch up to Waymo's $45B valuation back in 2024, maybe in two-three years.
@RKLBMan @Hedgeye 是的,我对 $RKLB 的 thesis 是,它会在适当时间内追上 SpaceX(比如 5 年、7 年),而 SpaceX 上一次估值是 3500 亿美元,所以那就是 10x+ 回报。

Avride 也是同样的 thesis,会追上 Waymo 在 2024 年的 450 亿美元估值,也许两三年内。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Probably around $6B now as per the seeking alpha report benchmarked vs Nuro.

But I'd say Avride is crown jewel of $NBIS, not clickhouse, especially when robotaxi companies like Waymo scaled to a $100B+ valuation in a short time.

$TSLA gained hundreds of billions in value just due robotaxi launch (eg. Cathie Wood said robotaxis could be 90% of tesla's value) and it's a market with extreme upside due to lack of players.

There's basically just $TSLA, $GOOGL Waymo, $AMZN Zoox, Hyundai... and then $UBER which is trying to defend themselves against robotaxi competition.

$UBER has the upmost importance to scale its defensibility with Avride instead of partnering with Waymo -> funneling customers into the other app. (eg. why they joint invested $375M).

Given how $NBIS owns 83% of avride, if it scales to ~$45B MC, which was Waymo's valuation BACK in October 2024.... That's literally more than Nebius's marketcap today lol, and it just launched in Texas.

Funds like Hedgeye probably aren't accounting for SOP growth and are vastly underestimating Nebius.
根据 Seeking Alpha 报告和 Nuro 对标,现在大概是 60 亿美元。

但我会说 Avride 是 $NBIS 的 crown jewel,不是 clickhouse,尤其是 Waymo 这类 robotaxi 公司在很短时间内就扩张到 1000 亿美元以上估值。

$TSLA 仅仅因为 robotaxi 发布就增加了数千亿美元价值(比如 Cathie Wood 说 robotaxis 可能占 tesla 价值的 90%),而且这是一个由于玩家稀缺而上行空间极大的市场。

基本上只有 $TSLA$GOOGL Waymo、$AMZN Zoox、Hyundai……然后还有 $UBER,它正试图防守 robotaxi 竞争。

$UBER 极其需要用 Avride 来扩大自己的防御性,而不是和 Waymo 合作 -> 把客户导流到另一个 app。(比如他们为什么共同投资 3.75 亿美元)。

考虑到 $NBIS 持有 avride 83%,如果它扩张到约 450 亿美元 MC,也就是 Waymo 早在 2024 年 10 月的估值……那真的比 Nebius 今天的市值还高 lol,而且它才刚在 Texas 上线。

Hedgeye 这类基金可能没有计入 SOP 增长,并且大幅低估了 Nebius。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
A short seller firm @Hedgeye is now shorting Nebius $NBIS. The stock price is now $97.8.

Their claim? Nebius is Coreweave 2.0.

Coreweave [ $CRWV ]:

- Small diversification in customers, mainly hyperscalers, ~quarter of their backlog is OpenAI.

- $1.8B in cash left

- $1.3B+/yearly in debt interest from toxic financing at 8-10% interest.

Same thing as Nebius right?

Nebius [ $NBIS ]:

- Highest diversification in the Neocloud market of customers from $META, $MSFT, governments, $SHOP, Mistral, $NOW, and many others.

- $4.8B+ in cash left

- ~$76.6M/yearly from note structure 40%+ OTM at ~2% interest.

- FSD level 4 Robotaxi self driving car segment that is of critical importance to $UBER (last round $375M with $UBER) to compete vs Waymo.

- AI training segments funded by Bezos and used by $AMZN, Anthropic, and others

- 28% in subsidiary that most of the public companies from $TSLA, $NET, Tiktok, $META and so on use

- 4 subsidiaries growing 100% Y/Y alongside their core operational business, with Tripleten/Toloka adding to net income every year.

Same company.
做空机构 @Hedgeye 现在正在做空 Nebius $NBIS。股价现在是 $97.8。

他们的说法?Nebius 是 Coreweave 2.0。

Coreweave [ $CRWV ]:

- 客户多元化程度低,主要是 hyperscalers,约四分之一 backlog 是 OpenAI。

- 剩余现金 18 亿美元

- 每年 13 亿美元以上债务利息,来自 8-10% 利率的毒性融资。

和 Nebius 一样,对吧?

Nebius [ $NBIS ]:

- Neocloud 市场中客户最多元化,来自 $META$MSFT、政府、$SHOP、Mistral、$NOW 以及许多其他客户。

- 剩余现金 48 亿美元以上

- 来自 note 结构的年利息约 7660 万美元,40%+ OTM,利率约 2%。

- FSD level 4 Robotaxi 自动驾驶汽车业务,对 $UBER 至关重要(上一轮与 $UBER 投资 3.75 亿美元),用于对抗 Waymo。

- AI training 业务由 Bezos 资助,并被 $AMZN、Anthropic 等使用

- 持有一个子公司 28% 股份,而这个子公司被 $TSLA$NET、Tiktok、$META 等大多数上市公司使用

- 4 个子公司与核心运营业务一起 100% Y/Y 增长,Tripleten/Toloka 每年增加净收入。

同一家公司。
引用原推@Hedgeye
CALL INVITE -> Adding Tactical Short $NBIS; Growing $MSFT Risk

You don't want to miss this one.
https://t.co/U4T5oEoOVQ
电话会议邀请 -> 增加战术性做空 $NBIS$MSFT 风险上升

这个你不会想错过。
https://t.co/U4T5oEoOVQ
https://x.com/Hedgeye/status/1996979533082181776
❤️ 210 🔁 12 💬 47
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Great idea to short $NBIS because you think it's the same $CRWV, nice thesis!

$CRWV -> $1.3B+ yearly debt interest, large backlog from OpenAI, $1.8B in cash left.

$NBIS -> Convertible notes structure where interest doesn't heavily cut into profitability, diversified customer base for high utilization (shopify, cursor, governments, hyperscalers like meta/msft), $4.8B+ in cash for buildout, Robotaxi self driving car segments used by $UBER and scaling up to compete vs Waymo, AI training segments funded by and used by $AMZN, Anthropic, and others, 28% in subsidiary that most of the public companies use, all 4 subsidiaries growing 100% Y/Y - $24B MC.

Same company as Coreweave for sure.
因为你觉得 $NBIS$CRWV 一样,所以做空 $NBIS 是个好主意,thesis 很棒!

$CRWV -> 每年 13 亿美元以上债务利息,大量 backlog 来自 OpenAI,剩余现金 18 亿美元。

$NBIS -> 可转债结构,利息不会严重侵蚀盈利;多元化客户基础带来高利用率(shopify、cursor、政府、meta/msft 等 hyperscalers);48 亿美元以上现金用于建设;Robotaxi 自动驾驶业务被 $UBER 使用,并正在扩张以对抗 Waymo;AI training 业务由 $AMZN、Anthropic 等资助和使用;持有一个大多数上市公司都在使用的子公司 28%;所有 4 个子公司都 100% Y/Y 增长 - $24B MC。

肯定和 Coreweave 是同一家公司。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Installed Comet just to try - Shift Command A didn't seem to work on Mac: Version 142.0.7444.176 (Official Build) (arm64)

Doesn't look like it's pre-built into settings/shortcuts?

eg. I'm able to use shift command A as a new setting but others already exist. was this built in or am I supposed to find a specific shortcut.

Onboarding is super cool and impressive though
为了试用才安装了 Comet - Shift Command A 在 Mac 上似乎不起作用:Version 142.0.7444.176 (Official Build) (arm64)

看起来它不是预置在 settings/shortcuts 里?

比如,我可以把 shift command A 设成一个新设置,但其他快捷键已经存在。这是内置的吗,还是我应该去找某个特定快捷键。

不过 onboarding 超酷,也很让人印象深刻
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DannyQuark You're right, $NBIS &gt; $IREN because Nebius only dropped by -17.5% instead of -41.5%.

But have you thought of the counter argument that $IREN &gt; $NBIS because $IREN portfolios faced-4% loss today instead of -6%?
@DannyQuark 你说得对,$NBIS &gt; $IREN,因为 Nebius 只跌了 -17.5%,而不是 -41.5%。

但你有没有想过反方观点:$IREN &gt; $NBIS,因为 $IREN 投资组合今天亏损 -4%,而不是 -6%?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Pre-earnings $NBIS was sitting around $115-$135. We've dropped over ~21%-40% since then on:

Robotaxi FSD launch with $UBER, doubled ARR estimates, increased GW capacity guidance by 150%, surprise $META contract, MSCI inclusion inflow.

The only downside: 25m share dilution. Which I extremely dislike as an investor (FCF -> ramp up would be preferred)

Unfortunately, TI hit reports on $ORCL, $CRWV major debt flag, $CRWV affecting suppliers from $APLD raising junk bonds + credit tightening, and GPU depreciation arguments all kind of hit the Neocloud market at the same time.

Only credit tightening was something material and doesn't warrant that much of a drop for $NBIS (purely sentiment).

That being said they need to improve their marketing for sure. (Eg. nobody associates robotaxis with $NBIS at all and even mainstream news don't know about it).

As for $IREN, they did a surprising move to buy GPUs instead of colo offerings and given the 3GW capacity investors probably see a huge huge amount of potential dilution, hence the 40% drop too.

I'm sure $IREN is fine on the marketing front, it has that cult-like following like $ASTS (which is a good thing going for them).
财报前 $NBIS 大概在 $115-$135。之后我们因为以下因素下跌了约 ~21%-40%:

Robotaxi FSD 与 $UBER 上线,ARR 预估翻倍,GW 容量指引上调 150%,意外获得 $META 合同,MSCI 纳入带来资金流入。

唯一的负面:2500 万股稀释。作为投资者我极其不喜欢(更希望 FCF -> ramp up)。

不幸的是,TI 关于 $ORCL$CRWV 重大债务警讯的报告、$CRWV 影响供应商导致 $APLD 发行垃圾债 + 信贷收紧,以及 GPU 折旧争论,都几乎同时打击了 Neocloud 市场。

只有信贷收紧是实质性因素,而且不应该让 $NBIS 跌这么多(纯粹是情绪)。

话虽如此,他们确实需要改善营销。(比如根本没人把 robotaxis 和 $NBIS 联系起来,连主流新闻都不知道。)

至于 $IREN,他们做了个出人意料的动作,选择买 GPU 而不是提供 colo,考虑到 3GW 容量,投资者可能会看到极其巨大的潜在稀释,因此也跌了 40%。

我确信 $IREN 在营销方面没问题,它有像 $ASTS 那种 cult-like following(这对他们是好事)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$NBIS vs. $IREN debates in a nutshell:

$IREN is better because —“

Both stocks: -6.16% and -4.00%.

Markets: 🟩 🚀 https://t.co/vAdT3NbkcF
$NBIS vs. $IREN 争论一句话总结:

$IREN 更好,因为——”

两只股票:-6.16% 和 -4.00%。

Markets: 🟩 🚀 https://t.co/vAdT3NbkcF
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Fast Forward to 2026.

If you saw this:

— $2.1B quarterly revenue (1337% Y/Y)

— $409.5M net income (442%)

— $1.31 EPS (362%)

— 19.5% net profit margin (123.8%)

that held 5 AI companies which grow triple digits Y/Y (FSD robotaxis, AI DCs).

What market cap would that be? https://t.co/dajbQEtwSy
快进到 2026 年。

如果你看到一家公司:

— 单季度收入 $2.1B(同比 1337%)

— 净利润 $409.5M(同比 442%)

— EPS $1.31(同比 362%)

— 净利率 19.5%(同比 123.8%)

同时还持有 5 家同比三位数增长的 AI 公司(FSD robotaxis、AI DCs)。

你觉得它该值多少市值? https://t.co/dajbQEtwSy
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1996746497199874431
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Also - "Depreciation only kicks in once the underlying assets (GPUs) are in use." - this is nuanced and leans false.

I'm not sure if this is is different for $IREN in specific, but just in general depreciation starts when the asset is available for use, not in use implying your 100% utilization (thresholds), not for cusotmer worklods, or assets actually being in use.

(eg. if we look at $ORCL's report it accounted for utilization lag).
另外 - “Depreciation only kicks in once the underlying assets (GPUs) are in use.” - 这句话很细微,而且偏错误。

我不确定这对 $IREN 是否有特殊不同,但一般来说,折旧是在资产可供使用时开始,而不是在实际使用时才开始;后者暗示你的 100% 利用率(阈值)、客户 workloads,或资产实际投入使用。

(比如如果看 $ORCL 的报告,它计入了利用率滞后。)
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
"Revenue doesn't scale past depreciation" is wrong, you're not stating unit pricing (which degrades) vs. operating leverage (which scales) correctly.

In the "front loading" phase, you have the assets (depreciation is active) but not the full rev yet. As you turn on clsuters for the $MSFT/ $META contract and others, utilization increases and margins expand (variable).

So "revenue doesn't scale past depreciation" is false because revenue absolutely scales past depreciation due to utilization. (depreciation is fixed while revenue is variable)

Just look at ~74% or so cash margins from $CRWV that cover the depreciation. (ignoring $CRWV's massive interest debt which both $IREN and $NBIS dont have).
“Revenue doesn't scale past depreciation” 是错的,你没有正确区分 unit pricing(会下降)和 operating leverage(会扩大)。

在“front loading”阶段,你已经有资产(折旧开始),但还没有完整收入。随着你为 $MSFT/ $META 合同和其他客户开启 clsuters,利用率提高,利润率扩张(可变)。

所以“revenue doesn't scale past depreciation” 是错的,因为收入绝对会因为利用率而超过折旧扩张。(折旧是固定的,而收入是可变的)

看看 $CRWV 大约 ~74% 的现金利润率就知道,它覆盖了折旧。(忽略 $CRWV 巨额利息债务,而 $IREN$NBIS 都没有。)
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Okay so from my perspective

$NBIS - Highest asymmetrical upside possible because they have 4 subsidaries like robotaxis growing 100%+ Y/Y alongside their core operational DC business. It's just a waiting game until market prices in parts (eg. $UBER rose a ton from self driving cars with Avride, but $NBIS had no movement but owns Avride).

I really really like robotaxis and Avride. I don't know how markets aren't seeing this opportunity (maybe we're just early, institutions accumulated over 52% of the float last i checked though from 38%, so some are probably aware).

$IREN - highest possible upside, but biggest risk of them all. Just for their $MSFT deal they had to dilute and pay for $5.8B+ worth of hardware just to do the deal and ended up spending up $2m/mw in costs just for expedited buildout. However, that was just to monetize a small amount of capacity and they're going the AI cloud route instead of colo buying GPUS, unlike $CIFR. I'd be extremely worried as an investor if they kept doing GPU offerings because of execution uncertainty and extreme, extreme amount of dilution to monetize that "3 GW pipeline". Maybe it would be better off waiting another few months because near term investors are harmed the most.

$CIFR - probably safest one in the neocloud sector since they are backstopped by $AMZN and $GOOGL, large amounts of bitcoin on balance sheet for next halving event, and are doing slower revenue growth but higher margin colo offerings with revenue visibility from hyperscaler deals

$TE - energy is a good play.

Your portfolio is incredibly volatile lol (can swing -50%) but it's fine if you're born from the depths of wsb reddit, crypto, and options.
好,从我的角度看

$NBIS - 可能有最高的不对称上行空间,因为他们在核心运营 DC 业务之外,还有 robotaxis 这类 100%+ Y/Y 增长的 4 个子公司。这里只是在等市场给各部分定价(比如 $UBER 因为 Avride 自动驾驶涨了很多,但 $NBIS 没怎么动,却拥有 Avride)。

我真的非常喜欢 robotaxis 和 Avride。我不知道市场为什么没看到这个机会(也许只是我们太早了,不过我上次看机构已经从 38% 累积到超过 52% 的流通股,所以应该有人知道)。

$IREN - 可能上行最大,但也是所有里面风险最大的。仅仅为了 $MSFT 交易,他们就不得不稀释并支付价值 58 亿美元以上的硬件来完成交易,而且仅为了加速建设就花了高达 $2m/mw 的成本。不过那只是为了变现一小部分容量,而且他们走的是 AI cloud 路线,买 GPUS,而不是像 $CIFR 那样做 colo。如果他们继续做 GPU 发行,我作为投资者会非常担心,因为存在执行不确定性,以及为了变现那条“3 GW pipeline”会出现极其巨大的稀释。也许再等几个月会更好,因为短期投资者受伤最重。

$CIFR - 可能是 neocloud 板块里最安全的,因为他们由 $AMZN$GOOGL 兜底,资产负债表上有大量 bitcoin 可用于下一个 halving event,并且在做收入增长更慢但利润率更高的 colo,hyperscaler 交易带来收入可见性。

$TE - energy 是个不错的 play。

你的组合波动性极高 lol(可能波动 -50%),但如果你是从 wsb reddit、crypto 和 options 深处走出来的,那也没问题。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MMerrino569447 100% $NBIS is probably the highest upside portfolio lol.

That being said it's nice to have some steadier compounders like $AVGO or $TSM to track the broader sector growth so you don't get too scared on the volatility (30-40% drops and increases) like of recent.
@MMerrino569447 100% $NBIS 可能是上行最高的组合 lol。

话虽如此,持有一些更稳定的 compounders,比如 $AVGO$TSM,来跟踪更广泛的行业增长也不错,这样你不会因为最近这种 30-40% 的涨跌波动太害怕。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I didn't include $ASML since they track fab cycles rather than the whole AI capex trade which $TSM or Samsung Electronics does (foundry + memory + misc)

But it's a good long term compounder as the sole EUV supplier vs. chasing the most direct beneficaries of the next TPU/Blackwell Cycle/LLM-agent buildout.

I'm sure you can swap out any one of the above with ASML
我没把 $ASML 放进去,因为它跟踪的是 fab 周期,而不是像 $TSM 或 Samsung Electronics 那样跟踪整个 AI capex trade(foundry + memory + misc)。

但作为唯一 EUV 供应商,它是很好的长期 compounder,只是不如追逐下一轮 TPU/Blackwell Cycle/LLM-agent 建设的最直接受益者。

我相信你可以把上面任何一个换成 ASML。
❤️ 3 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
yeah that's how capex gets accounted for, it creates fixed depreciation but nebius rev scales past depreciation drag.

Also subsidiaries + triple digit grwoth drop in pure net income into the statement without opex drag, which people don't model for.

going off your own points about leverage works with $IREN doing its msft deal with prepayment for higher levered irr, there's also operating leverage with nbis frontloading was majority of cash burn ending -> operating leverage q4 into 2027.
是的,capex 就是这样入账的,它会产生固定折旧,但 nebius 的收入会超过折旧拖累继续扩张。

另外,子公司 + 三位数增长会以纯净利润形式进入报表,没有 opex 拖累,这是很多人没有建模进去的。

按照你自己关于 leverage 的观点,$IREN 做 msft 交易时用预付款获得更高杠杆 irr;$NBIS 也有 operating leverage,前置投入中大部分现金消耗结束后,2027 年前从 q4 开始体现经营杠杆。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I’ll take you up on that offer and see what they report in q4 earnings then! Looking forward to the video.

think you might be forgetting sop Toloka/Tripleten (100%+ y/y) gets added to net income line. Most $NBIS capex spend is front loaded into next 4 quarters (~$5B capex) leading to negative net income FY 2026, but profitable q4 2026, which was this snapshot.

We’ll likely see management projected 20-30% EBIT margins in 2-3 years over time rather than during the buildout phase (~19.4%ebitda).
我接受你的提议,到时候看看他们 q4 财报怎么报!期待视频。

我觉得你可能忘了 SOP,Toloka/Tripleten(100%+ y/y)会加到净利润线上。大多数 $NBIS capex 支出集中在未来 4 个季度(约 50 亿美元 capex),导致 FY 2026 净利润为负,但 2026 年 q4 盈利,这就是这张快照。

我们很可能会看到管理层预计的 20-30% EBIT 利润率在未来 2-3 年逐渐体现,而不是在建设阶段(约 19.4% ebitda)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@mhayavkay For $SMCI

https://t.co/i9EduOkMGY
@mhayavkay 关于 $SMCI

https://t.co/i9EduOkMGY
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Upgrading $SMCI to EXTREMELY STRONG BUY at ~$33 (≈$19B MC).

• FY’26 raised to $36B+ revenue (≈60%+ YoY from $22B).

• AI DC build-out (e.g. $NBIS, $IREN, $DGXX) keeps GPU server demand maxed.

This isn't a $CRDO 272% Y/Y ER story but it's mispriced value.

Here's why:

SMCI dropped on earnings due to two things, fears over margin compression and revenue miss.

_

1. The Q1 2026 “miss” was delayed orders:

• Revenue came in at $5B vs prior $6–7B guide.

• However, all this was, is $1.5B getting pushed into Q2 from customers waiting for Nvidia’s Blackwell Ultra config. And they even **raised FY guidance** from $33B to FY $36B.

2. Margins compression fears:

• FY 2025 Net Margin: ~5.9% ($1.3B Net Income on $22B Revenue).

• The current margin compression is temporary. As DLC manufacturing moves down the learning curve, unit costs drop and margins climb. Management is targeting ~11% gross margin in the back half of the year, with net margins snapping back toward ~5.5%.

If margin merely mean-reverts toward ~11% and net margins toward ~5–6% on a $36–38B revenue base, you're looking at $2B+ in earnings.

Revenue: $38.0 Billion
Net Margin: 5.5% (Recovery Case)
Implied Net Income: $2.09 Billion
Share Count: 680 Million (Diluted)
Stock Price: ~$33.85
P/E Calculation: $33.85 / $3.07 = 11.0x

Forward P/E: Approximately 10x-13x, for a stock with 60%+ forward growth. Dirt cheap.

_

$SMCI doesn’t depend on GPU useful-life accounting games, it sells the racks either way.

Also post $NVDA, $NBIS, $CRDO, and other AI DC stocks-post ER confirmed the AI boom is not slowing down.

$SMCI is the epicenter of the AI/DC boom, growing 60%+ Y/Y but the market is treating it like it's a $MSTR-like distressed asset.

Thus I'm taking long positions since $SMCI looks to be one of the most compelling risk-adjusted 6 month (medium term) trades for 50-100% upside I've seen in the hardware sector.
$SMCI 上调到 EXTREMELY STRONG BUY,价格约 $33(约 $19B MC)。

• FY’26 收入指引提高到 $36B+(相对 $22B 同比约 60%+)。

• AI DC build-out(比如 $NBIS$IREN$DGXX)让 GPU server 需求持续爆满。

这不是 $CRDO 那种 272% Y/Y ER 故事,但它是错定价的价值。

原因:

SMCI 财报后下跌主要因为两件事:利润率压缩担忧和收入 miss。
_

1. Q1 2026 “miss”其实是订单延迟:

• 收入 $5B,低于此前 $6-7B 指引。

• 但这只是 $1.5B 被推迟到 Q2,因为客户等 Nvidia Blackwell Ultra 配置。公司甚至把全年指引从 $33B 上调到 $36B。

2. 利润率压缩担忧:

• FY 2025 净利率约 5.9%($22B 收入,$1.3B 净利润)。

• 当前利润率压缩是暂时的。DLC 制造走下学习曲线后,单位成本会下降,利润率会回升。管理层目标是下半年毛利率约 11%,净利率回到约 5.5%。

如果毛利率只是回归到约 11%,净利率回到 5-6%,在 $36-38B 收入基数上,就是 $2B+ 利润。

$SMCI 不依赖 GPU 使用寿命会计游戏,它怎么都卖 racks。

$NVDA$NBIS$CRDO 和其他 AI DC 股票财报后都确认 AI boom 没有放慢。

$SMCI 是 AI/DC boom 的核心,同比增长 60%+,但市场把它当成 $MSTR 式 distressed asset。

所以我做多,因为 $SMCI 看起来是硬件板块里 6 个月 50-100% 上行、风险调整后最有吸引力的交易之一。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1995644085563261034
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I've actually posted a breakdown + talked about each individual stock up there before if you follow what I normally post. This is just a consolidated list from history.

For example I posted a deeper dive on TPU v7 ironwood supply chain not too long ago ( $COHR, $AMKR, $LITE, $MPWR). And I post DD on neoclouds like $NBIS, $CIFR, quite often.
如果你关注我平时发的内容,我其实之前已经发过拆解,也谈过上面每一只个股。这只是把历史内容整合成一个列表。

比如不久前我发过 TPU v7 ironwood 供应链的深度分析($COHR$AMKR$LITE$MPWR)。我也经常发 $NBIS$CIFR 这类 neoclouds 的 DD。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
My stance changed on $AMD after LLMs like opus 4.5 beat gpt codex models in coding, gemini 3 models beat out chatgpt models in image generation, etc.

A large part of my initial bullishness on $AMD was expecting OpenAI to maintain its dominance in LLMs, IPO, and find a way to generate that $1T+ in capex spend that they promised.

But it's becoming less and less likely as time goes on, so I've become more bearish on stuff dependent on OpenAI ( $CRWV, $ORCL, $MSFT etc.)

Large part of $AMD's most recent valuation boost was that tens of billions of dollars revenue deal with OpenAI but I have increasing doubts openai will be able to fund it without getting backstopped by $MSFT or the US gov.
在 opus 4.5 这类 LLMs 在 coding 上击败 gpt codex 模型、gemini 3 模型在图像生成上击败 chatgpt 模型等之后,我对 $AMD 的立场变了。

我最初看多 $AMD 的很大一部分,是预期 OpenAI 能维持其在 LLMs 的主导地位、IPO,并找到办法兑现它承诺的 1T+ capex 支出。

但随着时间推移,这变得越来越不可能,所以我对依赖 OpenAI 的东西($CRWV$ORCL$MSFT 等)变得更悲观。

$AMD 最近估值提升的很大一部分来自与 OpenAI 数百亿美元收入交易,但我越来越怀疑 openai 如果没有 $MSFT 或美国政府兜底,是否有能力为其提供资金。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
It's for their foundry business not memory as an alternative to $TSM capacity limit.

Elon's been shilling Samsung's capabilities recently (eg. $TSLA building out its chips with them), which is a positive signal. It's the clear #2 player, memory takes up majority of their profit but I expect their foundry business to grow
这是针对他们的 foundry 业务,不是 memory,作为 $TSM 产能限制的替代方案。

Elon 最近一直在吹 Samsung 的能力(比如 $TSLA 用他们建设自己的芯片),这是个积极信号。它是明确的 #2 玩家,memory 占了他们大部分利润,但我预计他们的 foundry 业务会增长。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
As of current prices, December 5th:

The ideal AI portfolio for the LLM + TPU/GPU ramp would look like this:

· 25% $NBIS
· 15% $TSM
· 12.5% $LITE
· 10% $ALAB
· 10% $SMCI
· 10% $AMKR
· 5% Samsung Electronics
· 5% SK Hynix
· 5% $CRDO
· 5% $CLS
· 5% $COHR
· 5% $NVDA Calls
· 2.5% $AVGO Calls
· 2.5% $WLAC
· 2.5% $MPWR
· 2.5% $CIFR
· 2.5% $IREN
· 2.5% $TE
· 2.5% $FLNC

Just how I'd do it, 1.3X margin.

I'm pretty confident in this cooking.
按 12 月 5 日当前价格:

LLM + TPU/GPU 放量的理想 AI 组合会是这样:

· 25% $NBIS
· 15% $TSM
· 12.5% $LITE
· 10% $ALAB
· 10% $SMCI
· 10% $AMKR
· 5% Samsung Electronics
· 5% SK Hynix
· 5% $CRDO
· 5% $CLS
· 5% $COHR
· 5% $NVDA Calls
· 2.5% $AVGO Calls
· 2.5% $WLAC
· 2.5% $MPWR
· 2.5% $CIFR
· 2.5% $IREN
· 2.5% $TE
· 2.5% $FLNC

如果是我会这样做,1.3X margin。

我对这个搭配挺有信心。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Fast Forward to 2026.

If you saw this:

— $2.1B quarterly revenue (1337% Y/Y)

— $409.5M net income (442%)

— $1.31 EPS (362%)

— 19.5% net profit margin (123.8%)

that held 5 AI companies which grow triple digits Y/Y (FSD robotaxis, AI DCs).

What market cap would that be? https://t.co/dajbQEtwSy
快进到 2026 年。

如果你看到一家公司:

— 单季度收入 $2.1B(同比 1337%)

— 净利润 $409.5M(同比 442%)

— EPS $1.31(同比 362%)

— 净利率 19.5%(同比 123.8%)

同时还持有 5 家同比三位数增长的 AI 公司(FSD robotaxis、AI DCs)。

你觉得它该值多少市值? https://t.co/dajbQEtwSy
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1996746497199874431
❤️ 264 🔁 27 💬 38
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@BetaEleven Yeah this was in reference to 2026 q4 earnings for $nbis
@BetaEleven 是的,这是指 $nbis 2026 q4 财报
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ABC12D2 $LITE for exposure to TPU v7 ironwood ramp up
@ABC12D2 $LITE 用来获得 TPU v7 ironwood 放量敞口
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Sounds like a decent idea. $XYZ has indirect relationship with Bitcoin which should recover December imo. Fundamentals should be improving from Black Friday + holiday seasons upping processing volume from Square/Stripe others. XYZ P/E is pretty low and it's in S&P too so downside risk is low.

IV is relatively low further out eg. (4/17 is 46% IV) so upside on recovery would be a good amount at first glance.

I would have bought $MSTR shares at this level for exposure but XYZ is another good proxy play.
听起来是个不错的想法。$XYZ 与 Bitcoin 有间接关系,imo 12 月应该会恢复。Black Friday + holiday seasons 提升 Square/Stripe 等处理量,基本面应该改善。XYZ P/E 很低,而且也在 S&P 里,所以下行风险低。

远期 IV 相对较低,比如(4/17 是 46% IV),所以乍看之下,复苏带来的上行会不错。

如果要获得敞口,我会在这个价位买 $MSTR 股票,但 XYZ 也是另一个不错的 proxy play。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Fast Forward to 2026.

If you saw this:

— $2.1B quarterly revenue (1337% Y/Y)

— $409.5M net income (442%)

— $1.31 EPS (362%)

— 19.5% net profit margin (123.8%)

that held 5 AI companies which grow triple digits Y/Y (FSD robotaxis, AI DCs).

What market cap would that be? https://t.co/dajbQEtwSy
快进到 2026 年。

如果你看到这个:

— 单季度收入 21 亿美元(1337% Y/Y)

— 净利润 4.095 亿美元(442%)

— EPS $1.31(362%)

— 净利润率 19.5%(123.8%)

同时持有 5 家三位数 Y/Y 增长的 AI 公司(FSD robotaxis、AI DCs)。

那应该是多少市值?https://t.co/dajbQEtwSy
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I'm an early investor in hyper-growth companies.

$RKLB for space.

$HOOD for fintech.

$CRDO for connectivity.

But I've never

ever, Ever

seen a company grow forward revenue: 700%+ Y/Y.

and while owning 4 hyper growth subsidiaries concurrently scaling &gt;100% Y/Y each. https://t.co/iqU2jWf41O
我是超高增长公司的早期投资者。

太空方向我买 $RKLB

金融科技我买 $HOOD

连接/互连我买 $CRDO

但我从来没有,

真的从来没有,

见过一家公司未来收入同比增长 700%+,

同时还拥有 4 家各自同比增长都超过 100% 的超高增长子公司。 https://t.co/iqU2jWf41O
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1996560529679327449
❤️ 113 🔁 4 💬 16
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Scepticus16 Prob $meta, $amzn, $googl, $nvda, $appl, $msft, $tsla for me in terms of current valuations
@Scepticus16 以当前估值看,对我来说大概是 $meta$amzn$googl$nvda$appl$msft$tsla
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Currently $NBIS is using a lot of capex to do buildout for its hyperscalers on ai dcs and subsidiaries (eg. Avride) to compete with Waymo.

For forward earnings, management quoted 20-30% EBIT which the percentage of revenue that becomes operating profit after depreciation (but before tax). Current ebitda was 19% or so if I recall correctly.

We’ll see net income ramp up immensely in a year or so, this is just early stage (building/scaling year). Otherwise if it were doing $10B ARR today with those margins, we’d be trading at a $100b marketcap.

My thesis is that it’s just a waiting game and the highest return comes from riding the wave up from the beginning.
目前 $NBIS 正在用大量 capex 为 hyperscalers 建设 ai dcs,并为子公司(比如 Avride)建设,以和 Waymo 竞争。

对于远期盈利,管理层引用了 20-30% EBIT,也就是收入中在折旧后(税前)变成营业利润的比例。如果我没记错,目前 ebitda 大概是 19%。

我们会在一年左右看到净利润大幅 ramp up,现在只是早期阶段(建设/扩张年)。否则如果它今天就以这些利润率做到 100 亿美元 ARR,我们现在会按 1000 亿美元市值交易。

我的 thesis 是,这只是等待游戏,而最高回报来自从一开始就乘着这波上涨。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah $NBIS is actually the first of its kind. I can’t think of any other reference.

It’s only a matter of time when markets start to price in all its subsidiaries growing triple digits alongside its core operational business too.

$UBER was the perfect example yesterday, one of the biggest deals for its robotaxi division of all time but barely any movement because algorithms/markets don’t associate avride with Nebius yet.
是的,$NBIS 实际上是同类中的第一个。我想不到其他参照。

市场开始给它所有三位数增长的子公司,以及核心运营业务定价,只是时间问题。

$UBER 昨天就是完美例子,这是它 robotaxi 部门有史以来最大的交易之一,但几乎没什么反应,因为算法/市场还没有把 avride 和 Nebius 联系起来。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
On the expedited element alone, it’s a pretty obvious negative given how much % margins it is for $IREN.

And it’s even worse if they don’t pay it and face $MSFT delays + contract termination.

That’s just the objective/non-sugarcoated way to frame it. It’s false if you say everyone needs to pay that much % in expedited.

Sometimes there’s negatives about $IREN, not everything is overwhelmingly bullish.
单看 expedited 这一项,对 $IREN 来说就是明显负面,因为它占利润率的比例太高。

如果他们不付,并面临 $MSFT 延迟 + 合同终止,那就更糟。

这就是客观/不加糖的表述方式。如果你说所有人都需要支付那么高比例的 expedited,那就是错的。

有时候 $IREN 也有负面,不是一切都极度看多。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@B38B37 Yeah memory is. Also needed to add MediaTek( I/o chiplet), $CLS, $JBL, and $AMKR (second source for packaging the TPU v7 modules) up there as beneficiaries.

Just goes to show how large the supply chain is.

Also adding positions in $AMKR as @Mexicancik1 mentioned.
@B38B37 是的,memory 是。还需要把 MediaTek(I/o chiplet)、$CLS$JBL$AMKR(TPU v7 模组封装的第二来源)加到上面作为受益者。

这正说明供应链有多庞大。

另外也像 @Mexicancik1 提到的,我在加 $AMKR 仓位。
❤️ 8 🔁 1 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah little sad I'm late to the $LITE party and it's ATHs right now.

But if we look what happened to $NVDA 2022 to now, same could happen if TPU ends up becoming a dominant player in inference.

and.. $LITE is directly correlated to TPU ramp up. Sadly didn't realize how vital it was to the ecosystem earlier. This is something I'm cost averaging shares with but it's a happy add to my portfolio.
是的,有点难过我来晚了,$LITE 现在已经 ATHs。

但如果看 $NVDA 从 2022 到现在发生的事,如果 TPU 最终成为 inference 的主导玩家,同样的事情也可能发生。

而且……$LITE 和 TPU 放量直接相关。遗憾的是我之前没意识到它对生态系统有多关键。这是我在定投股票的标的,但加入组合我很开心。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Analysis of the $GOOGL TPU v7 Ironwood Suppliers.

Here's the list of what comapnies are the most materially impacted by the Google's TPU buildout.

+ the TPU stock I'm taking a position on.

[Critical] Design/IP:
- Broadcom [ $AVGO ]: co-designs and implements Google’s TPU ASICs

[Critical/High] Semiconductor Fab:
- #1 Taiwan Semi [ $TSM ]: TPUv7 is fabbed at TSMC 3nm
- #2 Samsung Electronics: Secondary memory & foundry partner

[Critical/High] Memory:
- #1 SK Hynix: HBM3E for TPUv7 Ironwood
- #2 Samsung Electronics: ~TPUv7-specific reporting emphasizes SK hynix + Samsung.

[High] Optical Networking:
- Lumentum [ $LITE ]: Google uses extensively uses Optical Circuit Switching (OCS)
- Coherent [ $COHR ]: OCS player but weaker

[High] Power Management ICs:
- Monolithic [ $MPWR ]: This is speculative that Vicor will be replaced by $MPWR, from earnings mentioning TPU

[Medium] Thermal Management:
- Vertiv [ $VRT ]: Vertiv supplies the CDUs that act as the heart of the liquid cooling system, pumping coolant to the cold plates on the TPU chips

- Modine [ $MOD ]: More speculative that they provide provides the massive chillers and air handling units (AHUs)

[Medium] Interconnects:
- TTM Technologies [ $TTMI ], $ANET, Unimicron, Ibiden

______

The buildout of the Google TPU v7 "Ironwood" represents the construction of a parallel silicon ecosystem designed to break the monopoly of $NVDA GPU.

The material impact is most concentrated in Broadcom (as the silicon architect and commercial vehicle), the Memory Complex (SK Hynix/Samsung), and the Optical/Power sectors (Lumentum/Vertiv) and was created from public evidence but is largely dependent on adoption, vendor shares, and competitive responses actually play out.

From this supply chain research, I'm initiating a new position in $LITE, in the event the TPU becomes the dominant ASIC for inference.

Lumentum is primary beneficiary of Google’s commitment to OCS and form the core of the "Apollo" OCS switches used in TPU pods.

The ramping of TPU v7 clusters translates directly to unit volume for Lumentum’s optical switch modules. And because OCS is a bespoke architecture unique to Google’s hyperscale approach, Lumentum faces less commoditization pressure here than in the standard transceiver market.

However all companies in this supply chain are set to benefit if the TPU v7 scales up from Anthropic, Meta, Apple, and others buying the $GOOGL ASIC.
$GOOGL TPU v7 Ironwood 供应商分析。

以下是受 Google TPU 建设影响最实质的公司名单。

+ 我正在建仓的 TPU 股票。

[Critical] Design/IP:
- Broadcom [ $AVGO ]:共同设计并实现 Google 的 TPU ASICs

[Critical/High] Semiconductor Fab:
- #1 Taiwan Semi [ $TSM ]:TPUv7 由 TSMC 3nm 制造
- #2 Samsung Electronics:第二 memory & foundry 合作伙伴

[Critical/High] Memory:
- #1 SK Hynix:TPUv7 Ironwood 的 HBM3E
- #2 Samsung Electronics:~TPUv7 相关报道强调 SK hynix + Samsung。

[High] Optical Networking:
- Lumentum [ $LITE ]:Google 大量使用 Optical Circuit Switching (OCS)
- Coherent [ $COHR ]:OCS 玩家,但更弱

[High] Power Management ICs:
- Monolithic [ $MPWR ]:这是基于财报提到 TPU,猜测 Vicor 会被 $MPWR 替代

[Medium] Thermal Management:
- Vertiv [ $VRT ]:Vertiv 提供作为液冷系统核心的 CDUs,把冷却液泵送到 TPU 芯片冷板

- Modine [ $MOD ]:更偏猜测,认为他们提供大型 chillers 和 air handling units (AHUs)

[Medium] Interconnects:
- TTM Technologies [ $TTMI ]、$ANET、Unimicron、Ibiden

______

Google TPU v7 “Ironwood” 的建设,代表着一个为打破 $NVDA GPU 垄断而设计的平行硅生态系统的构建。

实质影响最集中在 Broadcom(作为硅架构师和商业载体)、Memory Complex(SK Hynix/Samsung),以及 Optical/Power 板块(Lumentum/Vertiv)。这些结论来自公开证据,但很大程度取决于采用率、供应商份额和竞争反应的实际演变。

基于这项供应链研究,我正在新建 $LITE 仓位,以防 TPU 成为 inference 的主导 ASIC。

Lumentum 是 Google 承诺采用 OCS 的主要受益者,并构成 TPU pods 中使用的 “Apollo” OCS switches 的核心。

TPU v7 集群放量会直接转化为 Lumentum 光交换模块的出货量。而且因为 OCS 是 Google hyperscale 方法独有的定制架构,Lumentum 在这里面临的商品化压力小于标准收发器市场。

不过,如果 TPU v7 因 Anthropic、Meta、Apple 和其他公司购买 $GOOGL ASIC 而规模化,这条供应链里的所有公司都会受益。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Nvidia ( $NVDA ) reported a blowout Q3 FY2026 revenue of $57.01 billion (+62.5% YoY).

And guided $65B+ Q4 ($3B+ beat), and $500B+ USD in Blackwell/Rubin rev through CY 2026.

Despite that, the stock dropped 12%.

Is $NVDA a strong buy now? Here's the answer:

$GOOGL TPU's program emerged as the first competitive alternative to $NVDA GPUs, with Anthropic committing to over 1 million TPU chips and Meta reportedly in advanced negotiations for billions in TPU purchases. Warren Buffet also recently invested $4B+ into $GOOGL, which is extraordinarily rare given Berkshire's conservative stance to tech investments.

Despite a record earnings beat, Nvidia's stock has declined in six of the last ten trading sessions and sits roughly 12-15% below its October 29 all-time high of $207.04, when it briefly touched a $5.03 trillion market cap.

Analyst reaction was overwhelmingly bullish, with price targets raised across the board:

- Evercore ISI raised to $352 from $261
- Bank of America raised to $275 from $235
- Citigroup raised to $270 from $220
- Goldman Sachs raised to $250 from $240
- Morgan Stanley raised to $235 from $220

But here's the trillion dollar question: will the emerging custom silicon threat from hyperscalers reduce NVIDIA dominance in AI?

Unlike $AMD, which primarily captures overflow demand when NVIDIA GPUs are unavailable, Google's TPU program represents a fundamentally different competitive dynamic.

TPU v7 Ironwood is the first non-NVIDIA accelerator that achieves performance parity with Blackwell, delivering 4.6 petaflops of FP8 performance (versus B200's 4.5 petaflops) with 192GB HBM3e memory.

Ironwood's architectural differentiation is substantial. While NVIDIA's largest cluster configuration is 72 GPUs (NVL72), TPU Ironwood scleaes to 9,216 chip pods.

The customer wins are significant and growing:

- Anthropic committed to over 1 million TPU chips worth "tens of billions of dollars," with 1 gw of compute capacity coming online.

- Meta is in advanced negotiations to rent TPU capacity from Google Cloud in 2026, with direct hardware purchases for its own data centers planned for 2027.

- Apple revealed that Apple Intelligence foundation models were trained entirely on TPUs using 8,192 TPUv4 chips for server models

- Midjourney switched from GPUs to TPUs and reduced inference costs by 65% (from $2M to $700K monthly)

The positioning is nuanced. TPUs excel at hyperscale inference with up to 4x better cost-performance for production serving at scale (for now). For training, NVIDIA is the clear advantage.

For highly optimized inference tasks, TPU architecture might remain more efficient than $NVDA's general-purpose GPU.

However, I'm expecting next-gen Nvidia GPUs to leapfrog TPUs for inference in many scenarios. (similar to how LLMs leapfrog each other GPT 5 -> Gemini 3 -> Opus 4.5)

We're seeing:

Google TPU, AWS Trainium, Meta MTIA, Microsoft Maia, and custom hyperscaler chips scale up to reliance on $NVDA. But will the cumulative effect on hyperscalers collectively reducing Nvidia's dominance?

The answer: No. Not yet.

Dominance is secured at least for the next two years. What happens after is only speculation.

Just looking at the numbers: Q3 results confirm the company remains the essential infrastructure provider for AI, with a $500 billion order backlog providing exceptional visibility through 2026.

But the market appears to be pricing in this nuanced reality 3 years+ from now: long-term competitive uncertainty with custom hyperscaler chips.

Nvidia is completely sold out of capacity, and are likely to leapfrog TPU performance in their next generation chips (higher performance for inference while being general purpose). But the custom silicon threat and valuation concerns at 44x earnings remains a headwind.

Regardless, $NVDA seems to be a strong mid term dip-buy now on fears, given the exceptional blowout earnings and backlog for the next 2 years.

This is the only thing you need to remember:

NVIDIA is a strong buy as long as it remains the industry’s first choice for AI workloads, with TPUs and AMD GPUs filling gaps when demand exceeds NVIDIA’s supply.

Nvidia is maxed out on backlog, and AI demand is not slowing down.
Nvidia($NVDA)公布 FY2026 Q3 爆炸性收入 $57.01B(同比 +62.5%)。

并指引 Q4 $65B+(高于预期 $3B+),以及到 CY 2026 Blackwell/Rubin 收入 $500B+。

尽管如此,股价跌了 12%。

现在 $NVDA 是 strong buy 吗?答案是:

$GOOGL TPU 项目已经成为第一个真正能与 $NVDA GPU 竞争的替代方案,Anthropic 承诺购买超过 100 万颗 TPU,Meta 据称也在就数十亿美元 TPU 采购进行高级谈判。Warren Buffett 最近还投了 $4B+ 到 $GOOGL,以 Berkshire 对科技投资的保守态度看,这非常罕见。

虽然 Nvidia 财报创纪录 beat,但股价过去十个交易日跌了六天,较 10 月 29 日 $207.04 历史高点低约 12-15%。

市场担心的是:hyperscaler 自研 ASIC(TPU、Trainium、Maia)会不会吃掉 GPU 增量,尤其当 capex 过大、投资者开始质疑回报时。

但短中期看,$NVDA 仍然是 AI infrastructure 的核心。Blackwell/Rubin 需求、软件生态、CUDA 锁定、供应链能力和毛利率都不是短时间能被替代的。

所以我不会说 Nvidia thesis 坏了。更准确地说,市场开始给“未来竞争”和“估值消化”定价。对于长期投资者,回调可以分批买;但如果追求更高不对称,上游/连接/Neocloud 小盘可能更有弹性。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1994555219607523362
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
For $CRWV its software orchestration according that allows them to turn bare metal into fully functioning supercomputers to their CEO. There’s a 5 min CNBC interview on this

Another interview:

“The CEO highlighted CoreWeave’s custom-built software stack, which he believes will set the company apart in the long run. He stated, “From our position, we really believe that over time, what’s going to differentiate us from anyone else is the … software stack that drives the performance that we’re able to achieve on our infrastructure.”

Intrator added that CoreWeave’s software stack was developed from scratch, with optimization as the guiding principle. “
关于 $CRWV,据他们 CEO 说,是它的软件编排能力让他们能把 bare metal 变成完整运行的 supercomputers。CNBC 有一个 5 分钟采访讲这个。

另一个采访:

“CEO 强调 CoreWeave 的自研软件栈,他认为这会长期让公司脱颖而出。他表示,‘从我们的角度看,我们真的相信,随着时间推移,让我们和其他人区别开来的,是……驱动我们基础设施性能的软件栈。’

Intrator 补充说,CoreWeave 的软件栈是从零开发的,优化是其指导原则。”
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
EIP-7918 sets a price floor tied to execution costs but does not translate to a material jump in burn rate

1. In the case of a Base Transaction, 0.000000000390881 ETH was used as the L1 data cost. If we set the ETH price at $4,000, this cost is only about $0.0000015.

With EIP-7918 applied, this cost increases by roughly 39% on OP Stack rollups like Base, but even after the increase it does not exceed $0.0000021

Negligible.

2. "Assuming Ethereum’s base fee remains 1 Gwei, and with 6 blobs per block throughout the day, if EIP-7918 is applied, the daily ETH burned due to blob fees would be as follows:

In other words, the daily burn would be approximately 0.32 ETH. Considering that around 100 ETH is burned daily from the base fee alone when Ethereum’s base fee is 1 Gwei, that’s not a large amount." Source: All About Fusaka: Seungmin Jeon

This does not preserve the mechanical burn structure.
EIP-7918 设置了一个与执行成本挂钩的价格底部,但不会转化为 burn rate 的实质跃升。

1. 在 Base Transaction 的情况下,L1 data cost 使用了 0.000000000390881 ETH。如果 ETH 价格设为 $4,000,这个成本只有约 $0.0000015。

应用 EIP-7918 后,在 Base 这类 OP Stack rollups 上,这个成本大约增加 39%,但即便增加后也不超过 $0.0000021。

微不足道。

2. “假设 Ethereum 的 base fee 保持 1 Gwei,并且全天每个 block 有 6 个 blobs,如果应用 EIP-7918,由 blob fees 导致的每日 ETH burned 如下:

换句话说,每日 burn 约为 0.32 ETH。考虑到当 Ethereum base fee 为 1 Gwei 时,仅 base fee 每天就会 burn 约 100 ETH,这并不算多。” 来源:All About Fusaka: Seungmin Jeon

这并没有保住机械性的 burn 结构。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So it might be even worse from what I've read. You're going under the assumption we're seeing record levels of L2 growth. I'm going under the lens we see modest + slight growth. Just using someone else's math @ Seungmin Jeon

- So not meaningfully. l2s currently spend almost no money on blobs in most situations. The floor prevents the spiral to 1 wei. Someone else did an analysis on EIP-7918: the floor adds ~0.32 ETH/day in blob burns when L1 base fee is 1 gwei. The floor is 1/16th of L1 base fee, meaningful relative to 1 wei, but still tiny in absolute terms.

- A 39% increase on Base's L1 data cost takes it from $0.0000015 to $0.0000021 per tx. PeerDAS adds 8x blob capacity.

Supply expanding while betting on demand isn't guaranteed burn flywheel, L2s can always optimize around DA burn. more capacity ->L2s optimize around it -> fees stay at floor- > burn stays minimal.
所以根据我读到的,情况可能更糟。你是在假设我们看到 L2 增长达到创纪录水平。我是从温和 + 小幅增长的角度看。这里只用别人 @ Seungmin Jeon 的数学。

- 所以并不显著。l2s 目前在大多数情况下几乎不花钱买 blobs。底价防止价格螺旋到 1 wei。别人对 EIP-7918 做过分析:当 L1 base fee 为 1 gwei 时,底价每天增加约 0.32 ETH 的 blob burns。底价是 L1 base fee 的 1/16,相对于 1 wei 有意义,但绝对值仍然很小。

- Base 的 L1 data cost 增加 39%,也只是从每笔 tx $0.0000015 到 $0.0000021。PeerDAS 增加 8x blob capacity。

供给扩张,同时押注需求,并不保证 burn flywheel;L2s 总能围绕 DA burn 优化。更多容量 -> L2s 围绕它优化 -> fees 保持在底价 -> burn 保持最低。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So, this is partially true. However I’d argue the main reason for $CRCL ~50% drop was lockups and float dynamics, not just rate cuts.

We saw this with $BULL ipo where it traded on 2% float upward of $50B and crashed back to $6B post lockup.

$CRCL was only trading with a limited float (~17%) if I remember correctly, and another 34M+ got unlocked recently.
所以,这部分是真的。不过我会说 $CRCL 下跌约 50% 的主要原因是 lockups 和 float dynamics,而不只是降息。

我们在 $BULL ipo 上也看到过,它靠 2% float 交易到 500 亿美元以上,然后 lockup 后跌回 60 亿美元。

如果我没记错,$CRCL 当时只有有限流通股(约 17%)在交易,而且最近又解锁了 3400 万股以上。
❤️ 7 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Originally yes. Not much anymore

Attached two photos volume vs. burn (there’s a lot of nuances but point still stands).

In simpler terms, lot of network activity went to layer 2, which is off the ethereum mainnet.

And then for billions in volume, they can just post blobs, which is basically compressed data showing that transactions happened.

The resulting burn for all those transactions is minimal (hence the chart)
最初是这样。现在不太是了。

附了两张图,volume vs. burn(有很多细节,但观点仍然成立)。

简单说,很多网络活动去了 layer 2,也就是 ethereum mainnet 之外。

然后对于数十亿美元 volume,它们只需要发布 blobs,本质上是显示交易发生过的压缩数据。

所有这些交易带来的 burn 很小(所以图表才会这样)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@EarningsMindset @VitalikButerin @fundstrat Yeah I think we just agree to disagree, you're not wrong either. I do enjoy discussions like this though, cheers
@EarningsMindset @VitalikButerin @fundstrat 是的,我觉得我们只能同意彼此不同意,你也没错。不过我确实喜欢这种讨论,cheers
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Arguments from authority are the worst ones because they hold no merit without any reasoning.

With Ethereum especially this is true when you see core aspects of it changing in a negative way (we went from L1 scaling with sharding -> L2s, and $ETH token going from a gas token that appreciated from usage to governance/collat).

If you want my background though, I invented how most wallets nowadays do key signatures with TEEs. And I was a researcher in dpos + secret sharing back at UC Berkeley. So I do know a tiny bit enough to comment.

We'll see where the price goes, it's my individual thesis on why I'm bearish, people are free to buy $BMNR and hold $ETH with their own money.
诉诸权威是最糟糕的论证,因为没有任何推理就没有价值。

尤其在 Ethereum 上更是如此,因为你能看到它的核心方面以负面方式变化(我们从 L1 scaling with sharding -> L2s,$ETH token 也从因使用而升值的 gas token 变成 governance/collat)。

如果你想知道我的背景,我发明了如今大多数钱包用 TEEs 做 key signatures 的方式。我也曾在 UC Berkeley 研究 dpos + secret sharing。所以我确实懂一点点,足够评论。

我们看看价格会怎么走,这是我个人为什么 bearish 的 thesis,大家当然可以用自己的钱买 $BMNR 并持有 $ETH
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So, that just reinforced my point more. L2s get even cheaper data availability, which is good for scaling but doesn't address value accrual to ETH.

I've maintained Ethereum managed to scale. And it's a great network to develop on. But all that at the cost of $ETH appreciation, which is why I'm bearish also on $BMNR.

ETH's L2 idea was originally good for ETH price because scarce blockspace + rising usage = fee/burn flywheel.

But: Fusaka -> more blobs -> cheaper DA -> lower L2 fees. Not good for ETH fee/burn.

Token burn from L1 usage was the #1 mechanical driver of price appreciation (eg. EIP-1559, Merge - > deflationary) before but that disappeared.

Until that changes, I'll keep using Ethereum as a network but I will absolutely stay away from the token as an investment.
所以,那只是进一步强化了我的观点。L2s 得到更便宜的数据可用性,这对扩容有利,但没有解决 ETH 的 value accrual。

我一直认为 Ethereum 已经成功扩容。而且它是一个很适合开发的优秀网络。但这一切是以 $ETH 升值为代价的,这也是我看空 $BMNR 的原因。

ETH 的 L2 思路原本对 ETH 价格有利,因为稀缺 blockspace + 使用量上升 = fee/burn flywheel。

但:Fusaka -> 更多 blobs -> 更便宜 DA -> 更低 L2 fees。对 ETH fee/burn 不利。

来自 L1 使用的 token burn 以前是价格升值的 #1 机械驱动(比如 EIP-1559、Merge -> deflationary),但现在消失了。

在它改变之前,我会继续把 Ethereum 当作网络使用,但作为投资,我绝对会远离这个 token。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推

2025年11月

↩️ 回复
The original and simple investment thesis for $ETH was: more network usage -> more gas demand -> higher ETH price .

As you mentioned this is no longer the case since value shows up differently after L2s + blobs/EIP-4844. Ecosystem usage ↑↑↑, L1 gas + burn ↓.

And this is where I have a negative view of ETH as a token/ $BMNR as a holding vehicle for investment. There's a difference of Ethereum winning as a network (it did), and $ETH token appreciating in price.

Economic hooks like collateral, etc. are extremely weak compared to mechanical upside from usage that is now gone.
$ETH 最初且简单的投资 thesis 是:更多网络使用 -> 更多 gas 需求 -> 更高 ETH 价格。

正如你提到的,在 L2s + blobs/EIP-4844 之后,价值以不同方式体现,这已经不再成立。生态使用 ↑↑↑,L1 gas + burn ↓。

这就是我对 ETH 作为 token / $BMNR 作为投资持有工具持负面看法的地方。Ethereum 作为网络获胜(它确实赢了)和 $ETH token 价格升值之间有区别。

抵押品等经济 hook 和现在已经消失的使用带来的机械上行相比,非常弱。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Agrippa_Inv Yeah I'm not disagreeing with you since I went out and said it was off.

I'm just flattered you spent the time to do a deep dive after the fact lol
@Agrippa_Inv 是的,我没有不同意你,因为我已经出来说它是错的。

我只是很受宠若惊,你事后还花时间做了深度分析 lol
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Agrippa_Inv I'm glad you found the time to post a 40 paragraph response instead of reading the correction posted 8 hours ago. https://t.co/0oJT77s1jx
@Agrippa_Inv 很高兴你有时间发一篇 40 段回复,而不是读 8 小时前发的更正。https://t.co/0oJT77s1jx
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Ethereum's network itself is growing. But the way Vitalik scaled Ethereum pushed economic value away from the asset.

That's the sad economic reality that makes $ETH / $BMNR a terrible investment above $4K (it's a good trade).

L2's weakened value accrual for holders because it doesn't work this way with DA and blockspace (10x usage -> 10x DA fees -> 10x burn). Ecosystem usage hits new highs, yet $ETH burn ATLs is exactly what you look at to show this disparity.

Compressed, low-cost blobs mean that billions in L2 activity translate into only a tiny amount of ETH spent on mainnet

Mainnet is burning tens of eth a day, down from hundreds/thousands a day before EIP-4844. You're right by saying L2s have genuinely changed ETH's value accrual mechanics... by moving it off of ETH.

You can argue collateral asset as a investment option and a shift of value accrual. But the main token economics that originally justified ETH as an investment doesn't exist anymore:

ETH price as an asset no longer scales proportionately with network usage.
Ethereum 网络本身正在增长。但 Vitalik 扩展 Ethereum 的方式,把经济价值从资产本身推走了。

这就是让 $ETH / $BMNR 在 $4K 以上成为糟糕投资的悲哀经济现实(它是不错的交易)。

L2 削弱了持有者的 value accrual,因为 DA 和 blockspace 并不是这样运作的(10x 使用量 -> 10x DA fees -> 10x burn)。生态使用创下新高,而 $ETH burn 处于 ATL,正好说明这种差距。

压缩、低成本 blobs 意味着 L2 上数十亿美元活动只会转化为在 mainnet 上花费极少量 ETH。

Mainnet 每天只 burn 几十个 eth,低于 EIP-4844 之前每天数百/数千个。你说 L2s 真正改变了 ETH 的 value accrual mechanics 是对的……通过把它移出 ETH。

你可以把它作为抵押资产投资选项,以及 value accrual 转移来论证。但最初支持 ETH 作为投资的主要 token economics 已经不存在了:

ETH 作为资产的价格不再随网络使用量成比例扩张。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Finally, @VitalikButerin perfectly pointed out why I’m bearish on ETH, and @fundstrat’s $BMNR.

$ETH as a token is a terrible investment, especially above $4K.

This is what Tom Lee, Cathie Wood’s ARK innovation, Vitalik and others didn’t understand:

There is a disconnect between Ethereum as a network and ETH as a utility token.

Ethereum network (that’s growing) does not translate to the token price appreciating.

If you bought $ETH near the end of 2021, you would have lost money. Meanwhile $BTC price has appreciated close to 300% since then. Why?

Layer 2s.

1. Vitalik encouraged users to move to L2s (like Base) over the past few years. As a result now these networks move billions in volume but all fees go to companies like Coinbase (sequencer) not validators on Ethereum.

2. L2s pay fees to store their data but this is just incredibly minimal compared to the economic value they siphoned off of Ethereum mainnet.

That’s it. Layer 2s siphoned off profit, activity, while the Ethereum’s network receives barely anything for data storage. Value accrual went to companies like Coinbase, not ETH token holders.

Ethereum’s Network usage is at an all-time high, but Mainnet revenue has collapsed and there’s little economic incentive to hold the token as an investment.

Unless there’s protocol changes that generate reasonable value accrual to the ETH token from L2 activity, don’t bother with ETH as an investment.
最后,@VitalikButerin 完美指出了我为什么看空 ETH,以及 @fundstrat$BMNR

$ETH 作为 token 是一项糟糕投资,尤其在 $4K 以上。

这就是 Tom Lee、Cathie Wood 的 ARK innovation、Vitalik 和其他人没理解的地方:

Ethereum 作为网络和 ETH 作为 utility token 之间存在脱节。

Ethereum 网络(正在增长)并不会转化为 token 价格升值。

如果你在 2021 年底附近买入 $ETH,你会亏钱。与此同时,$BTC 价格自那以后上涨了接近 300%。为什么?

Layer 2s。

1. 过去几年 Vitalik 鼓励用户迁移到 L2s(比如 Base)。结果这些网络现在处理数十亿美元 volume,但所有 fees 都流向 Coinbase(sequencer)这类公司,而不是 Ethereum 上的 validators。

2. L2s 会支付费用来存储数据,但与它们从 Ethereum mainnet 抽走的经济价值相比,这点费用极其微小。

就是这样。Layer 2s 抽走了利润和活动,而 Ethereum 网络几乎没有因为数据存储收到什么。Value accrual 流向 Coinbase 这类公司,而不是 ETH token holders。

Ethereum 网络使用量处于历史新高,但 Mainnet 收入已经崩塌,持有该 token 作为投资几乎没有经济激励。

除非协议改变,能从 L2 活动中为 ETH token 产生合理的 value accrual,否则别把 ETH 当投资。
引用原推@VitalikButerin
You can just build on L1.
你直接在 L1 上构建就行。
https://x.com/VitalikButerin/status/1995209899182375024
❤️ 134 🔁 10 💬 24
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@VitalikButerin You moved everyone to L2s… and are now surprised that networks like Base siphoned off all the users while contributing little back to Ethereum mainnnet.
@VitalikButerin 你把所有人都迁到 L2s……现在却惊讶 Base 这类网络吸走了所有用户,却几乎不回馈 Ethereum mainnnet。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RJCcapital @sam_badawi @NighthawkTradez @amitisinvesting @mvcinvesting Doesn’t look like there’s many vines anymore in Vineland. Must have cleared out the jungle to make room for the new $NBIS datacenter
@RJCcapital @sam_badawi @NighthawkTradez @amitisinvesting @mvcinvesting Vineland 看起来已经没多少 vines 了。肯定是把 jungle 清掉,给新的 $NBIS datacenter 腾地方了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_stockResearch Idk just try your best and screenshot graphs and stuff that’s hard to format on x.

Unfortunately X deboosts any user that links outside so I’ve refrained from posting
@_stockResearch 不知道,就尽力吧,把在 x 上难以排版的图表之类截图。

不幸的是,X 会 deboost 任何发外链的用户,所以我一直避免发。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Hi great question. So there was an article by Mckinsey on this topic (which I think is terribly written since they use $CRWV as the main anchor).

But some points holds true, and gives warnings to $IREN and others. Their claims:

- current bare-metal rental business model is weak and fragile
- avoids overreliance on a few giant customers
- carve defensible niches (sovereign compute, specialized workloads)
- consolidate through acquisitions or be a hyperscaler

Are definitely correct, but fail to capture some nuances.

So for $NBIS:

- Extremely diversified (so this is more as a powerful moat for utilization, which is huge for margin calculations)
- Full-stack (defensible niche)
- consolidate through acquisitions (it's aiming to become a hyperscaler, has 4 subsidiary companies growing alongside it)

That's kind of why I've said it has the highest asymmetrical upside of the bunch.

For $IREN:

- current bare-metal rental business is a moat as of today. The article is correct in stating long term it's fragile. That's why $IREN is moving up the full-stack ladder doing GPU iaas with $MSFT, and will likely try and build software layers on top (though it's hard)
- We will see what comes out of this, it's high execution.

For $CRWV

- idk how they're going to get out of the debt trap tbh
- they're using $NVDA to backstop it, but it's shaky at best (eg. openai with $1t+ in capex trying to get gov + mag7 to backstop funding)

Neoclouds are a race against time, I agree with the article (which is why I said 2 year high conviction hold, not 5 years + ).

They have this brilliant window of opportunity of weakness from mag7 -> funnel revenue down -> build long term differentiation and moats.

I don't know what will happen, but we'll see
你好,好问题。McKinsey 有篇关于这个主题的文章(我觉得写得很糟,因为他们用 $CRWV 作为主要锚点)。

但有些点成立,也给 $IREN 等公司提出警告。他们的主张是:

- 当前 bare-metal rental 商业模式薄弱且脆弱
- 避免过度依赖少数巨头客户
- 打造可防御的 niche(sovereign compute、specialized workloads)
- 通过收购整合,或成为 hyperscaler

这些确实是正确的,但没有捕捉到一些细微差别。

$NBIS 来说:

- 极度多元化(所以这更像是利用率的强大 moat,对利润率计算非常重要)
- Full-stack(可防御 niche)
- 通过收购整合(它的目标是成为 hyperscaler,并且有 4 家子公司一起成长)

这就是为什么我说它在这批里面拥有最高的不对称上行。

$IREN 来说:

- 当前 bare-metal rental 业务到今天仍是 moat。文章说长期脆弱是对的。这就是为什么 $IREN 正在沿 full-stack 阶梯上移,和 $MSFT 做 GPU iaas,而且可能会尝试在上面构建软件层(虽然很难)
- 我们会看到结果如何,执行难度很高。

$CRWV

- tbh 我不知道他们怎么走出债务陷阱
- 他们用 $NVDA 做兜底,但这最多也很不稳(比如 openai 有 1t+ capex,试图让政府 + mag7 为资金兜底)

Neoclouds 是一场和时间赛跑,我同意这篇文章(所以我说的是 2 年高信念持有,不是 5 年+)。

他们有一个来自 mag7 弱点的绝佳窗口 -> 向下导入收入 -> 建立长期差异化和 moats。

我不知道会发生什么,但我们会看到。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yep absolutely. I think algos/market put $NBIS, $IREN in the $CRWV, $NVDA basket right now.

So any negative hit piece about Coreweave does negatively affects the others. We've finally seen $WULF, $CIFR and others get put into the colo basket (which are relatively unaffected to GPU depreciation arguments), and outperform.

But $CRWV is a financial nightmare to put it bluntly, so it does affect the others as long as it's treated as the neocloud sector leader.

As for $NVDA, TPU arguments from $GOOGL is the strongest bear case I've seen to date though on $NVDA GPU clouds, but these companies already have have 5 year hyperscaler deals locked in from $META, $MSFT.

imo markets will price things in correctly in due time, I do think both $NBIS and $IREN will be worth more than $CRWV one day. but only one of those has self-driving robotaxis lol
是的,绝对如此。我认为 algos/market 现在把 $NBIS$IREN 放进了 $CRWV$NVDA 篮子里。

所以任何关于 Coreweave 的负面 hit piece 都会负面影响其他公司。我们终于看到 $WULF$CIFR 等被放进 colo 篮子(相对不受 GPU 折旧论点影响),并跑赢。

但直说,$CRWV 是一个金融噩梦,所以只要它还被视为 neocloud 板块龙头,就会影响其他公司。

至于 $NVDA,来自 $GOOGL 的 TPU 论点是我目前见过对 $NVDA GPU clouds 最强的 bear case,但这些公司已经和 $META$MSFT 锁定了 5 年 hyperscaler 交易。

imo 市场迟早会正确定价,我确实认为 $NBIS$IREN 有一天都会比 $CRWV 更值钱。但其中只有一个有自动驾驶 robotaxis lol
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_stockResearch Thanks! Looking forward to seeing your future writeups too.
@_stockResearch 谢谢!也期待看到你未来的 writeups。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
oh looks like @babyfolio answered that for me!

Going from 1 GW to 2.5 GW guided contracted capacity is already amazing from just 1 quarter. Just to tamper your expectations a bit, GW capacity is a moat and one that $IREN held for the longest time.

So to achieve medium-long term parity with $IREN in just 1 quarter is spectacular.

That being said, I think the 2.5 GW already kinda blew away my expections like babyfolio said haha, but if they're able to increase 250%+ in 1 quarter, they could do it again. So in these cases, you just trust in management execution.
哦,看起来 @babyfolio 已经替我回答了!

仅仅一个季度,就从 1 GW 提升到 2.5 GW 的已签约容量指引,已经很惊人了。稍微压一下你的预期,GW 容量是一种 moat,而且这是 $IREN 持有最长时间的优势。

所以只用一个季度就实现与 $IREN 的中长期接近持平,非常出色。

话虽如此,我觉得 2.5 GW 已经像 babyfolio 说的那样超出我的预期 haha,但如果他们能一个季度增加 250%+,他们也可能再次做到。所以这种情况下,你只能相信管理层执行力。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So actually as of Q3 earnings, $NBIS 2.5x'd its contracted capacity guidance and achieved near long-term parity with $IREN.

However, $IREN has a tremendous amount of value in front loaded grid-connected capacity (now -> H1 2026). But H2 2026 onwards, $NBIS looks like it caught up in that front (3 GW to 2.5 GW contracted power guided as of Q3)
所以实际上截至 Q3 财报,$NBIS 把签约容量指引提高了 2.5x,并几乎实现了与 $IREN 的长期持平。

不过,$IREN 在前置并网容量上有巨大价值(现在 -> 2026 H1)。但从 2026 H2 往后,$NBIS 看起来在这方面已经追上了(截至 Q3 指引,3 GW 对 2.5 GW 签约电力)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks for the feedback, I'll take it to heart and do posts on other stuff as usual!

I posted DD about stuff like $NVDA yesterday but recently as you mentioned it's been mainly about the neocloud sector. I've been focused on it because of how much news there was recently + the huge sell off attracted a lot of attention!

For $NBIS in specific, it was my highest conviction 2 year hold. I just see it as the opportunity of a decade since $NVDA, you don't really see any core company growing its bottom line 700% Y/Y with 4 separate portfolio companies growing 100% Y/Y.

One of which happens to be a super cool self-driving robotaxi company (I'm a fan of Waymo, $TSLA robotaxis).
谢谢反馈,我会认真接受,并像往常一样发其他内容!

我昨天也发了 $NVDA 之类的 DD,但就像你说的,最近主要是在讲 neocloud 板块。我之所以关注它,是因为最近新闻太多 + 巨大抛售吸引了很多注意!

具体到 $NBIS,它是我最高信念的 2 年持仓。我只是把它看作自 $NVDA 以来十年一遇的机会,你很少看到任何核心公司利润同比增长 700%,同时还有 4 家独立组合公司 100% Y/Y 增长。

其中一家还刚好是超酷的自动驾驶 robotaxi 公司(我是 Waymo、$TSLA robotaxis 的粉丝)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@babyfolio I've always been bullish on $IREN and the neocloud sector since my original thesis post!

I just happen to be mega bullish on the one that has 4 portfolio companies growing 100%+ Y/Y alongside it as a side quest.
@babyfolio 从我最初的 thesis 帖开始,我就一直看多 $IREN 和 neocloud 板块!

我只是刚好超级看多那个有 4 家组合公司作为支线任务、并且都 100%+ Y/Y 增长的公司。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yep, the $MSFT deal in specific was off. Threw that in last minute but should have proof-read it.

Unfortunately can't edit X posts but I'll just leave this here:

- Used a blended estimate eg. Finland facility (Mantsala) for caluations. You're correct in saying $MSFT deal should be US-only deal calculations. Market rates would likely be around $2.0M+

- Did a breakdown of multiple GPU scenarios off X but this was just one of them. $NBIS was ramping up with h200 first then deploying gb300's down the road, but doesn't show the full picture so ignore the chart.

Normalization table still stands as a rough relative comparison.
是的,具体到 $MSFT 交易那部分是错的。那是最后一刻加进去的,本该校对。

不幸的是 X 帖子不能编辑,但我把更正放这里:

- 使用了混合估算,比如 Finland facility (Mantsala) 做计算。你说得对,$MSFT 交易应该按美国-only 交易计算。市场费率可能在 $2.0M+ 左右

- 我在 X 外面做过多个 GPU 情境拆解,但这只是其中一个。$NBIS 先用 h200 ramp up,再在后面部署 gb300,但它不能展示完整画面,所以忽略那张图。

Normalization table 作为粗略相对比较仍然成立。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
You're right on the $MSFT deal. I used blended estimates for colocation, $NBIS owns facilities in other location but for specific $MSFT deal standalone, the colocation fee would be different.

Also was doing different comparisons for GPU normalization, and used the wrong chart.

H100 normalization on the right should still stand.
你对 $MSFT 交易说得对。我对 colocation 使用了混合估算,$NBIS 在其他地点拥有设施,但具体到 $MSFT 单独交易,colocation fee 会不同。

另外我当时在做不同的 GPU normalization 比较,使用了错误图表。

右边的 H100 normalization 应该仍然成立。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
The $MSFT comparison is off but the h100 normalization, while speculative, should be more robust.

I used a blended estimate of entire portfolio eg. Finland facility (Mantsala), where colo rent is effectively $0 (just D&A + OpEx). When they lease the US facility (Vineland, NJ) from DataOne and I averaged it.

For the $MSFT deal only, the lease cost is likely much higher closer to market rates of $1.8M-$2.2M per MW as someone else pointed out.

$NBIS / $MSFT is not limited to H200. GB200/B300 is on the roadmap too. I was doing comparisons with H200, H200, and other GPUs and threw that in at the end. Too late to edit the post though.

Appreciate the questions.
$MSFT 对比是错的,但 h100 normalization 虽然有猜测成分,应该更稳健。

我用了整个组合的混合估算,比如 Finland facility (Mantsala),那里的 colo rent 实际上是 $0(只有 D&A + OpEx)。他们从 DataOne 租用美国设施(Vineland, NJ)时,我把它平均了。

仅就 $MSFT 交易而言,租赁成本可能高得多,更接近别人指出的每 MW $1.8M-$2.2M 市场费率。

$NBIS / $MSFT 不限于 H200。GB200/B300 也在路线图上。我当时在做 H200、H200 和其他 GPUs 的比较,最后把它加了进去。现在太晚,没法编辑帖子。

感谢提问。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@babyfolio It’s already the clear leader in my view! Just waiting for market to price in $NBIS forward growth/margins and the marketcap overtaking $CRWV.
@babyfolio 在我看来它已经是明确龙头!只是等市场给 $NBIS 的远期增长/利润率定价,以及市值超过 $CRWV
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yep! Definitely some helpful points about the revenue premium. But I think the nuance did show up in the $MSFT deal (which shows the margin difference between $NBIS and $IREN per MW).

Nebius’s MSFT deal gives it ~19–20% higher revenue per MW-year than IREN’s MSFT deal. A lot of the gross margin figures are inflated by balance sheet accounting, hence why I made this post to normalize margins.

$IREN 's realized levered irr is probably closer to 20%, it's probably better to use that over the 85% project EBITDA figures since they're spending billions with Dell.

$MSFT values $NBIS full AI cloud platform more from an educated guess (mix of location closer to azure servers and software). If $IREN closed the software on top level and iaas level, its future margins/contracts could close that gap.
是的!关于收入溢价,确实有些有帮助的点。但我认为这个细微差别已经体现在 $MSFT 交易里(显示了 $NBIS$IREN 每 MW 的利润率差异)。

Nebius 的 MSFT 交易给它带来比 IREN 的 MSFT 交易高约 19-20% 的每 MW-year 收入。很多毛利率数字被资产负债表会计放大,所以我才发这篇来 normalize margins。

$IREN 实际的 levered irr 可能更接近 20%,相比 85% project EBITDA,可能更适合使用这个,因为他们要和 Dell 花数十亿美元。

我猜 $MSFT 更看重 $NBIS 完整 AI cloud 平台(位置更靠近 azure servers 和 software 的组合)。如果 $IREN 在顶层 software 和 iaas 层补齐,未来利润率/合同可能会缩小差距。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@accounting_ds I think the $NBIS, $CRWV, $IREN margin comparison is a great read because the poster also happens to be super cool
@accounting_ds 我觉得 $NBIS$CRWV$IREN 的利润率对比非常值得一读,因为发帖的人也刚好超级酷。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So you skipped over my reply.

There are overlaps in $NBIS, $IREN customer base, but the nuance you’re missing is orchestration on the infrastructure level leads to better opex and margins.

To help explain it simpler terms $NBIS commands an additional revenue premium and ends up with the highest gross margin normalization because of added software on top. That is moat.

On the iaas layer, bare-metal GPU delivery what $IREN does, still requires software for increasing margins and optimizing opex and this is a major difference as well. It’s software at the infrastructure level, not platform services.

When you combine that iaas layer and don’t have opex optimized, and port middleware that take fees (eg. Poolside) on top, that’s where margins start to show.
所以你跳过了我的回复。

$NBIS$IREN 的客户基础有重叠,但你漏掉的细微差别是:基础设施层面的 orchestration 会带来更好的 opex 和利润率。

简单说,$NBIS 因为上面叠加了软件,能够获得额外收入溢价,并最终在 gross margin normalization 中最高。这就是 moat。

在 iaas 层,$IREN 做的 bare-metal GPU delivery 仍然需要软件来提高利润率和优化 opex,这也是重大差异。它是基础设施层的软件,不是平台服务。

当你把 iaas 层结合起来,但 opex 没优化,并且在上面接入收取费用的 middleware(比如 Poolside),利润率差异就开始显现。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So the correct nuance for an $IREN favored view is whether $IREN build out the same software moat that $NBIS did.

For iaas, it’s a lot more nuanced than that because differences in software + orchestration drive higher opex returns and margins. Lot of popular $IREN accounts don’t really understand this nuance either so I’ll make another post explaining why.

This is different than additional revenue premium from expanded offerings.
所以,对偏向 $IREN 的观点来说,正确细微点在于 $IREN 是否能建立 $NBIS 已经建立的软件 moat。

对 iaas 来说,这比表面上复杂得多,因为软件 + orchestration 的差异会带来更高 opex 回报和利润率。很多热门 $IREN 账号其实也不理解这个细微点,所以我会再发一篇解释为什么。

这不同于扩展服务带来的额外收入溢价。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Agreed, $NBIS is the clear future leader of the Neocloud sector if we look at things 6M from now rather than present earnings.

Shorting $CRWV would have been a good hedge against the recent market drop.

I liked Nebius because alongside their core business growing ARR 700% y/y they have 4 subsidiaries growing 100% Y/Y.

That being said the biggest headwind is dilution. I hated that they diluted 25M shares and not just enough for the $META deal. Nasdaq 100 inclusion alongside post-msci would offset that but otherwise it’s a constant overhang on the price as an investor.

Second are depreciation arguments and potential long term threats from the Google TPU on the Nvidia ecosystem I’d say. Which is why Colo providers like $CIFR have been outperforming.

However lot of those fears about $NVDA are overblown mid term and Nebius has 5Y contracts locked in with hyperscalers so it’s just a waiting game for scale.

Just mindblowingly high return potential.
同意,如果看 6 个月后而不是当前财报,$NBIS 是 Neocloud 板块明确的未来龙头。

做空 $CRWV 本来会是对冲最近市场下跌的好工具。

我喜欢 Nebius,是因为除了核心业务 ARR 同比增长 700%,它还有 4 家子公司 100% Y/Y 增长。

话虽如此,最大逆风是稀释。我讨厌他们稀释 2500 万股,而不是只为 $META 交易筹够。Nasdaq 100 纳入加上 post-msci 会抵消这一点,否则作为投资者,这是价格上的持续压力。

第二是折旧争论,以及 Google TPU 对 Nvidia 生态的潜在长期威胁。所以 $CIFR 这类 Colo providers 一直跑赢。

不过,关于 $NVDA 的很多恐惧在中期被夸大了,Nebius 已经和 hyperscalers 锁定 5Y 合同,所以只是等待规模化。

回报潜力高到令人难以置信。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$CIFR is not participating in the GPU Neocloud race since they do colo and not AI cloud offerings.

I just saw a lot of full stack vs. physical infrastructure iaas arguments and wanted to do some math between $NBIS, $IREN, and $CRWV.

Found that $NBIS full stack software commands superior margins when normalized to $IREN iaas/bare metal infrastructure.

However if $IREN can build the software layers $CRWV and $NBIS have, then owning every layer between software and iaas would make $IREN have the highest upside. But it’s an extremely big moat for a reason.

For $CIFR, $WULF, $CORZ and the others, it would require a whole new analysis not factoring in GPUs
$CIFR 不参与 GPU Neocloud 竞赛,因为他们做的是 colo,而不是 AI cloud offerings。

我只是看到很多 full stack vs. physical infrastructure iaas 的争论,所以想在 $NBIS$IREN$CRWV 之间做点数学。

发现 $NBIS full stack software 在 normalize 到 $IREN iaas/bare metal infrastructure 后,仍然拥有更优利润率。

不过,如果 $IREN 能建立 $CRWV$NBIS 拥有的软件层,那么从 software 到 iaas 每一层都拥有,会让 $IREN 拥有最高上行。但这之所以是极大 moat,是有原因的。

$CIFR$WULF$CORZ 和其他公司,需要一套不计入 GPUs 的全新分析。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Economics of Neocloud GPU Pricing

What happens when you normalize margins across the three major GPU neoclouds, accounting for depreciation and cost structure?

· Nebius ( $NBIS )

· CoreWeave ( $CRWV )

· IREN ( $IREN )

Below is what the research shows for margins using the same H100s:

35.8% $IREN - Bare-Metal H100

· Revenue: ~$2.50–2.75/GPU-hr -> $7.80M/MW-year
· COGS: $5.01M/MW · GPU D&A: $3.50M · Power: $0.22M · DC depreciation: $0.47M · Networking: $0.25M · Third-party middleware (poolside, WEKA): $0.20M

Gross Profit: $2.79M/MW → 35.8% margin
_

38.1% $NBIS - Full-Stack H100

· Revenue: ~$3.00–3.50/GPU-hr → $9.75M/MW-year
· COGS: $6.04M/MW · GPU D&A: $3.50M · Power (Finland): $0.37M · Colo (60%): $0.72M · Ops/platform: $0.40M · Other: $0.86M

Gross Profit: $3.71M/MW → 38.1% margin

-

30.6% $CRWV - Full-Stack H100

· Revenue: ~$2.80–3.25/GPU-hr → $8.90M/MW-year
· COGS: $6.18M/MW · GPU D&A: $3.50M · Power (mixed): $0.42M · Colo (80%): $0.96M · Ops: $0.38M · Other: $0.83M
Gross Profit: $2.72M/MW → 30.6% margin

We're not modeling based on spot or single-GPU rentals only (it's $2.00/hour on $NBIS website for example).

It's full-stacked datacenter-scale infrastructure (400 GPUs per MW, full networking, cooling, power, data center costs, maintenance, infini-band/Infiband-class interconnect, etc.), assuming 85% utilization, annualized revenue/MW, using historical pricing, and deriving revenue-per-GPU-hour from that to see the effects of full-stack vs. bare metal.
_

Interpretation (Standalone Cloud):

· Nebius’s ~25% revenue premium outweighs its higher power + colo costs -> +2.3 pts vs IREN.

· CoreWeave’s ~14% revenue premium doesn’t offset colo exposure -> ~5 pts below IREN.

_

Colocation vs Owned DC Costs:

$IREN (Owned DC):

- $0.47M/MW in DC depreciation
· No colocation rent

$NBIS / $CRWV (Colo-heavy)
- Nebius colo: ~$0.72M/MW (60% of racks)
- CoreWeave colo: ~$0.96M/MW (80%)
Cost delta: IREN saves ~$0.4–0.6M/MW.

_

Full-Stack Pricing as a Moat

Revenue Premiums
· Nebius: +20–25%
· CoreWeave: +14%
· IREN: 0%

Cost Structure

· IREN middleware cost: ~$0.20M/MW
· Nebius/CoreWeave internal stack amortization: ~$0.38–0.40M/MW
· IREN power + owned DC advantage: ~$0.60M/MW (but not monetized via pricing)

_

$IREN vs $NBIS MSFT deal comparison:

Added it for fun, for the $MSFT deal alone:

$IREN: 9.3% gross margin
$NBIS: 40.2% gross margin.

- IREN's MSFT margin (9.3%) is a GPU cost problem (GB300) + contract pricing

However, $IREN is likely 15-20% levered IRR, which is the better financial modeling to use (which is still profitable), after financing, like the 20% pre-payment from $MSFT.

Levered IRR is much modelling structure to use lol.

Differentiators

$IREN (Bare Metal)
_

- Cost Advantage via Owned Infrastructure + Low Cost Power
- Hyperscaler contracts with secured financing and customer prepayments increases levered IRR

$NBIS (Full Stack)
_

· Revenue premium over bare metal pricing
· Highest Normalized Margin

$CRWV
_

· Revenue premium over bare metal pricing
· Debt load not included here (would further pressure margins)

Notes:

-With Coreweave that typically use different hardware mixes, the normalization math changes.

- Depreciation is normalized to 4 years which may hurt or benefit some in live accounting (eg. $CRWV 6 year schedules $IREN 3 year leases).

- Debt not included in margin calculation, in that event $CRWV would look a lot worse -$1.3B/year.

- Utilization is normalized to 85%, which hurts $NBIS in normalization calculations given their whitepaper (eg. 100% benchmark performance vs. GPU cloud providers deliver 95–97%.), in live environments it would likely be the highest compared to $CRWV.

Takeaway for HPC segment only:

- $NBIS (38.1%) > $IREN (35.8%) > $CRWV (30.6%) for margins. Nebius is the favorite due to premium pricing from full-stack.

- However, if $IREN can build the software layer right on top of owning the DC costs + doing full-stack iaas, they become the structural leader with a whopping 48.6% Gross Margin over the others, so this is purely execution.

- Utilization is one of the biggest factors in determining gross margins. $NBIS is sold out + diversified (Cursor, Shopify, etc. keep capacity full) and customer base is a moat.

- Debates over "full-stack vs. bare metal" converge to slight edge over full-stack .

- Full stack is a moat. Owning the infrastructure is also a moat. Both are converging with $NBIS building out greenfield facilities and $IREN climbing up the full-stack layers (eg. GPU deals instead of doing colo like $CIFR).

_

TLDR:

Margins: $NBIS (38.1%) | $IREN (35.8%) | $CRWV (30.6%)

$NBIS has the highest normalized gross margins and revenue capacity in the market.

(38.1% $NBIS vs. 35.8% $IREN)

$IREN has the highest margin potential at 48% from owning all parts of the layers if they successfully build $NBIS's software layer on top of their established, low-cost infrastructure moat

(48% $IREN vs. 38.1% $NBIS).

$CRWV.... $1.3B debt interest not included in calculations, stay away medium long term. Margins aren't a problem but unsustainable capital structure is.

Among all the neocloud players, $NBIS and $IREN are the two clear leaders in the full-stack space.

$NBIS maintains highest asymmetrical upside while $IREN has the highest upside potential.
Neocloud GPU Pricing 的经济学

当你把三大 GPU neoclouds 的利润率按折旧和成本结构 normalize 后,会发生什么?

· Nebius ( $NBIS )
· CoreWeave ( $CRWV )
· IREN ( $IREN )

下面是使用同样 H100s 得出的利润率研究结果:

35.8% $IREN - Bare-Metal H100

· Revenue: ~$2.50–2.75/GPU-hr -> $7.80M/MW-year
· COGS: $5.01M/MW · GPU D&A: $3.50M · Power: $0.22M · DC depreciation: $0.47M · Networking: $0.25M · Third-party middleware (poolside, WEKA): $0.20M

Gross Profit: $2.79M/MW -> 35.8% margin
_

38.1% $NBIS - Full-Stack H100

· Revenue: ~$3.00–3.50/GPU-hr -> $9.75M/MW-year
· COGS: $6.04M/MW · GPU D&A: $3.50M · Power (Finland): $0.37M · Colo (60%): $0.72M · Ops/platform: $0.40M · Other: $0.86M

Gross Profit: $3.71M/MW -> 38.1% margin

-

30.6% $CRWV - Full-Stack H100

· Revenue: ~$2.80–3.25/GPU-hr -> $8.90M/MW-year
· COGS: $6.18M/MW · GPU D&A: $3.50M · Power (mixed): $0.42M · Colo (80%): $0.96M · Ops: $0.38M · Other: $0.83M
Gross Profit: $2.72M/MW -> 30.6% margin

我们不是只基于 spot 或单 GPU 租赁建模(比如 $NBIS 网站上是 $2.00/hour)。

这是 full-stacked 数据中心级基础设施(每 MW 400 GPUs,完整 networking、cooling、power、data center costs、maintenance、infini-band/Infiband-class interconnect 等),假设 85% 利用率,年化 revenue/MW,使用历史定价,并从中推导 revenue-per-GPU-hour,来看 full-stack vs. bare metal 的影响。
_

解读(Standalone Cloud):

· Nebius 约 25% 的收入溢价超过了其更高 power + colo 成本 -> 比 IREN 高 +2.3 pts。

· CoreWeave 约 14% 的收入溢价无法抵消 colo exposure -> 比 IREN 低约 5 pts。
_

Colocation vs Owned DC Costs:

$IREN (Owned DC):

- $0.47M/MW 的 DC depreciation
· 无 colocation rent

$NBIS / $CRWV (Colo-heavy)
- Nebius colo: ~$0.72M/MW(60% racks)
- CoreWeave colo: ~$0.96M/MW(80%)
Cost delta: IREN 每 MW 节省约 $0.4–0.6M。
_

Full-Stack Pricing as a Moat

Revenue Premiums
· Nebius: +20–25%
· CoreWeave: +14%
· IREN: 0%

Cost Structure

· IREN middleware cost: ~$0.20M/MW
· Nebius/CoreWeave internal stack amortization: ~$0.38–0.40M/MW
· IREN power + owned DC advantage: ~$0.60M/MW(但未通过 pricing 变现)
_

$IREN vs $NBIS MSFT deal comparison:

顺手加的,仅看 $MSFT 交易:

$IREN: 9.3% gross margin
$NBIS: 40.2% gross margin.

- IREN 的 MSFT margin (9.3%) 是 GPU cost problem (GB300) + contract pricing

不过,$IREN 可能是 15-20% levered IRR,这是更适合使用的财务模型(仍然盈利),计入融资后,比如 $MSFT 的 20% pre-payment。

Levered IRR 是更适合的建模结构 lol。

Differentiators

$IREN (Bare Metal)
_

- 通过 Owned Infrastructure + Low Cost Power 获得成本优势
- Hyperscaler contracts 加上已 secured financing 和 customer prepayments 提高 levered IRR

$NBIS (Full Stack)
_

· 相对 bare metal pricing 的收入溢价
· 最高 Normalized Margin

$CRWV
_

· 相对 bare metal pricing 的收入溢价
· 这里没有计入债务负担(会进一步压缩利润率)

Notes:

- Coreweave 通常使用不同硬件组合,normalization math 会变化。

- 折旧统一按 4 年 normalized,这在实际会计中可能伤害或有利于某些公司(比如 $CRWV 6 年 schedules,$IREN 3 年 leases)。

- 债务未计入利润率计算,如果计入,$CRWV 会差很多 -$1.3B/year。

- 利用率 normalize 到 85%,这在 normalization 计算中不利于 $NBIS,考虑到他们 whitepaper(比如 100% benchmark performance vs. GPU cloud providers deliver 95–97%),实际环境中相较 $CRWV 它可能最高。

HPC segment only 的结论:

- 利润率:$NBIS (38.1%) > $IREN (35.8%) > $CRWV (30.6%)。Nebius 因 full-stack 溢价定价而最受青睐。

- 不过,如果 $IREN 能在拥有 DC 成本优势 + 做 full-stack iaas 之上正确建立软件层,它会以惊人的 48.6% Gross Margin 成为结构性龙头,所以这纯粹是执行问题。

- 利用率是决定 gross margins 的最大因素之一。$NBIS 已售罄 + 多元化(Cursor、Shopify 等保持容量满载),客户基础就是 moat。

- “full-stack vs. bare metal”的争论最终收敛到 full-stack 略占优势。

- Full stack 是 moat。拥有基础设施也是 moat。两者正在趋同,$NBIS 正在建设 greenfield facilities,$IREN 正在向 full-stack layers 爬升(比如做 GPU deals,而不是像 $CIFR 那样做 colo)。
_

TLDR:

Margins: $NBIS (38.1%) | $IREN (35.8%) | $CRWV (30.6%)

$NBIS 拥有市场最高 normalized gross margins 和 revenue capacity。

(38.1% $NBIS vs. 35.8% $IREN)

如果 $IREN 成功在其既有低成本基础设施 moat 上建立 $NBIS 的软件层,并拥有所有层级,它有最高利润率潜力,可达 48%。

(48% $IREN vs. 38.1% $NBIS)。

$CRWV.... 计算中未包括 $1.3B 债务利息,中长期远离。问题不是利润率,而是不可持续的资本结构。

在所有 neocloud 玩家中,$NBIS$IREN 是 full-stack 空间里的两个明确龙头。

$NBIS 保持最高不对称上行,而 $IREN 拥有最高上行潜力。
❤️ 624 🔁 93 💬 46
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah, the topic was about how the TPU v7 Ironwood is the first competitive alternative to $NVDA and performs better for specific inference workloads.

The current $NVDA backlog is a security guarantee for medium term. It's just a question of whether TPUs continue to outperform Nvidia's flagship GPUs (my answer is probably not, with the next gen release).

It is a bear case, however, if

- TPUs continues to outperform $NVDA flagship GPUs
- people want TPUs over NVDA chips.
- AI compute demand lessens, and $NVDA is not fully sold out of GPUs.
是的,主题是 TPU v7 Ironwood 如何成为 $NVDA 的第一个有竞争力替代品,并在特定 inference workloads 上表现更好。

当前 $NVDA backlog 是中期安全保证。问题只是 TPUs 是否继续跑赢 Nvidia 旗舰 GPUs(我的答案是下一代发布后可能不会)。

不过,如果出现以下情况,这确实是 bear case:

- TPUs 继续跑赢 $NVDA 旗舰 GPUs
- 人们想要 TPUs 而不是 NVDA chips
- AI compute demand 减弱,而 $NVDA GPUs 没有完全 sold out。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$GOOGL for asymmetrical upside. TPUs is just a side quest among search, Waymo, YouTube, and less other things.

$NVDA for much higher upside in case AI continues taking off exponentially with robotics/agents and they end up leapfrogging all other providers in both trading/inference performance in their newer models.

Doesn’t hurt to own both since it’s impossible to know, but Google is clearly the less risky of the two
$GOOGL 用于不对称上行。TPUs 只是 search、Waymo、YouTube 和其他业务中的一个 side quest。

$NVDA 则是在 AI 随 robotics/agents 继续指数级起飞,并且他们在新模型中同时跨越所有其他 providers 的 training/inference performance 时,拥有更高上行。

两者都持有没坏处,因为不可能知道答案,但 Google 显然是两者中风险更低的。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Answer is nuanced.

So two factors:

1. GPUs get more power efficient.

2. LLMs get more capacity/power efficient.

For the LLMs case, we're seeing that on deepseek type models be extremely efficient on stuff that don't require much accuracy. Basic stuff like responding to questions about cooking recipes, or knowledge-base stuff.

However... accuracy increases, especially with complex research questions, scaled with compute. And people like Elon + mag7 realize this, which is why they're just buying up all the GPUs on the market to create superintelligence. And why antrhopic/google is building $40B+ datacenters for more advanced opus and gemini models that require more compute for critical thinking (eg. Genesis Mission)

For the GPUs case, every new generation of GPU (e.g., H100 -> B200) offers dramatic improvements in power efficiency and performance per dollar. eg. Blackwell B200 is 30x than the Hopper H100.

If we go off that assumption, then there would be a massive useless supply of less-efficient H100s and B200s in 2027/2028 creating a used GPU market crash.

HOWEVER: This is if we don't see an exponential demand for new AI capabilities (which we likely will, and what we're seeing now). Because of this exponential demand, TODAY, older models are still used (eg. TPUs from 7 years ago and GPUs from 2020), for lower inference task in lower priority inference tasks.

$NVDA is backlogged for years and people are buying GPUs from $AMD /TPUs from $GOOGL to build out any new capacity.

As for Cisco analogy, Cisco's customers were .com bubble companies with no profitability. $NVDA's customers are $META, $AMZN, $GOOGL, $MSFT the most profitable companies in the world. So worst case scenario we might see a correction, not a .com bubble crash.
答案很细微。

有两个因素:

1. GPUs 变得更省电。

2. LLMs 变得更容量/能耗高效。

在 LLMs 方面,我们看到 deepseek 类型模型在不需要太高准确性的任务上极其高效。比如回答烹饪食谱问题,或知识库类基础内容。

然而……准确性提升,尤其是复杂研究问题,会随 compute 扩张。Elon + mag7 这类人意识到了这一点,所以他们正在买光市场上所有 GPUs 来创造 superintelligence。Anthropic/google 也在建设 $40B+ datacenters,用于需要更多 compute 进行 critical thinking 的更高级 opus 和 gemini 模型(比如 Genesis Mission)。

在 GPUs 方面,每一代新 GPU(例如 H100 -> B200)都会在能效和每美元性能上带来巨大提升。比如 Blackwell B200 比 Hopper H100 强 30x。

如果按这个假设,那么到 2027/2028 会有大量没用的低效率 H100s 和 B200s,造成二手 GPU 市场崩盘。

然而:这是建立在我们没有看到新 AI capabilities 的指数需求的前提下(但我们很可能会看到,而且现在已经在看到了)。由于这种指数需求,今天旧模型仍被使用(比如 7 年前的 TPUs 和 2020 年的 GPUs),用于低优先级 inference 任务中的低端 inference。

$NVDA backlog 已经排到多年以后,人们还在买 $AMD 的 GPUs / $GOOGL 的 TPUs 来建设任何新容量。

至于 Cisco 类比,Cisco 的客户是没有盈利能力的 .com 泡沫公司。$NVDA 的客户是 $META$AMZN$GOOGL$MSFT,世界上最赚钱的公司。所以最坏情况下我们可能看到修正,而不是 .com 泡沫崩盘。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I'm not going to be a blind shill like some specific $BMNR or $IREN investors that can say a green light on the street means bullish for the company.

So I would lean coincidental. Since it looks like $AMZN, $GOOGL tends to favor colo models (since they can plug in their own TPUs, Trainium chips in the future) while $MSFT, $META (and 99.9% of AI companies that use $NVDA and don't have custom chips readily built out) prefer $NBIS, $IREN type models.

So $AMZN announced they're investing $15B in Indiana for their AWS DC segment. But key thing to note is they've already spent $31.3B there before so it's not exactly new.

You probably saw how $NBIS is doing a 1000+ acre greenfield DC near Indianapolis. It's just a favorable area for buildout, probably not directed at a partnership and another hyperscaler deal like Antrhopic (who committed $40B in capex spend recently). I'd probably trust Antrophic more than OpenAI right now with capex spend lol.

That being said, maybe if $AMZN runs out of capacity and hits max purchase order with $NVDA (since they're plugging in their own chips with $CIFR), they would use Nebius instead.
我不会像某些 $BMNR$IREN 投资者那样盲目吹,连街上绿灯都能说成对公司利好。

所以我倾向于是巧合。因为看起来 $AMZN$GOOGL 倾向于 colo 模式(因为他们未来可以插入自己的 TPUs、Trainium chips),而 $MSFT$META(以及 99.9% 使用 $NVDA、又没有现成自定义芯片的 AI 公司)更偏好 $NBIS$IREN 这类模式。

所以 $AMZN 宣布会为 AWS DC 部门在 Indiana 投资 $15B。但关键是他们之前已经在那里花了 $31.3B,所以这并不完全是新消息。

你可能看到 $NBIS 正在 Indianapolis 附近做 1000+ acre greenfield DC。这只是一个适合建设的区域,可能不是针对 partnership 或另一个 hyperscaler 交易,比如 Anthropic(最近承诺 $40B capex spend)。现在在 capex spend 上,我大概会比 OpenAI 更信任 Anthropic lol。

话虽如此,也许如果 $AMZN 容量用尽,并且达到 $NVDA 最大采购订单(因为他们用 $CIFR 插入自己的芯片),他们会改用 Nebius。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
From what I've seen in the AI growth sector, Yes, $NBIS is incredibly, incredibly rare since it was Yandex before.

For context, that's basically Baidu/China | Google/US
equivalent but for Russia and they spun off subsidiaries like Avride into Nebius.

For stuff like $CRWV and other companies, their acquisitions like Monolith AI were more to compliment their existing core business rather than growing independently at triple digits Y/Y. Then $1.7B for Weights and Bias (that is not growing too fast from what I'm floated numbers)

As for the other DC/miner companies, unfortunately Bitcoin isn't growing too fast either, but it's very defensible long term. So growth rate of $CIFR via their balance sheets for example will be a lot slower.

But longer term it's really solid to have as a shareholder and goes in line with their low downside risk colo model, slower slower revenue ramp model.

If you want to go from 0 to 200B in a year, $NBIS is how you do it. If you want to do that in 5 years time, $CIFR is where it's at.
从我在 AI growth sector 看到的情况看,是的,$NBIS 极其、极其罕见,因为它以前是 Yandex。

作为背景,它基本上相当于 Baidu/China | Google/US,但对应俄罗斯,然后把 Avride 这类子公司拆分进 Nebius。

$CRWV 和其他公司,它们收购 Monolith AI 这类公司更多是补充现有核心业务,而不是独立以三位数 Y/Y 增长。然后还有 $1.7B 收购 Weights and Bias(从我听到的数字看增长并不太快)。

至于其他 DC/miner 公司,不幸的是 Bitcoin 增长也没那么快,但长期非常可防御。所以比如 $CIFR 通过资产负债表实现的增长率会慢很多。

但作为股东,长期持有非常扎实,也符合他们低下行风险的 colo 模式、较慢收入 ramp 模式。

如果你想一年从 0 到 200B,$NBIS 是路径。如果你想 5 年做到,$CIFR 就是所在。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$NBIS should have enough to fund buildout through $4.8B cash stack plus $2.5B ATM + any fcf they get from revenue contracts gets put back into buildout.

I think Nebius management were referring to if there was extreme credit tightening, they would sell off portfolio companies, which would make sense in a last ditch scenario.

But they're in a healthy spot. If I were them I would let them all keep growing, and look for more M&As like what FTX did in the crypto sector, Meta early stage with social media networks alongside their core operational business for more defensibly.

In the event Avride becomes a $25B business or Clickhouse becomes a $80B business (which are both extremely plausible scenarios given their growth trajectories), those individual stacks would be worth more than the current market cap.
$NBIS 应该有足够资金通过 48 亿美元现金 + 25 亿美元 ATM + 从收入合同得到的任何 fcf 来资助建设,并把这些再投入 buildout。

我认为 Nebius 管理层说的是,如果出现极端信贷收紧,他们会出售组合公司,这在最后一搏场景下是合理的。

但他们处在健康位置。如果我是他们,我会让所有公司继续成长,并寻找更多 M&A,就像 FTX 在 crypto sector 做的,或 Meta 早期围绕核心运营业务收购社交网络来增强防御性。

如果 Avride 成为 $25B 业务,或 Clickhouse 成为 $80B 业务(鉴于它们的增长轨迹,这两者都极其合理),这些单独资产就会比当前市值更值钱。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Dream5728363541 Aren’t those two just users of $NBIS, not portfolio company investments?
@Dream5728363541 那两个不只是 $NBIS 的用户吗,不是 portfolio company investments?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@OperationATM I don’t yet but this is the closest thing I have https://t.co/LDgBku35dG
@OperationATM 我还没有,但这是我手头最接近的 https://t.co/LDgBku35dG
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I sort of think the market missed the $NBIS story too. Jim Cramer for one is the perfect example.

Think we're just early but that's where the highest returns come from. Especially when the market discounts subsidiaries and doesn't price in that they're hyperscaling along the core business.

There's a distant possibility where one of them (Avride), becomes larger than the main business.
我有点觉得市场也错过了 $NBIS 的故事。Jim Cramer 就是完美例子。

我觉得我们只是太早,但最高回报就来自这里。尤其是当市场给子公司打折,并且没有计入它们正和核心业务一起 hyperscaling 时。

有一种遥远可能,其中一个(Avride)会变得比主营业务还大。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Nebius [ $NBIS ] is the most undervalued growth company right now.

And it has the potential to become the next $GOOGL at a $21B market cap. There's one simple reason:

It's portfolio companies are mindblowing.

The most incredible example on this concept is the company $FTX. Here's the story:

When we look at how $META grew into a $1T+ company, it wasn't just Facebook. It was their portfolio companies Instagram, Whatsapp, and others made Meta dominate the social media landscape.

$FTX was doing something similar, but in digital assets and frontier technologies.

Four years ago, in 2021, $FTX invested $5.8B into a large basket of assets. And put a large chunk into these three core companies:

1. Anthropic, 13.56% at a $2.5 Billion valuation.
2. Robinhood [ $HOOD ] 7.6% at a $8.54B valuation
3. Solana [ $SOL ], 41M+ tokens.

Fast forward to today, that would have been:

· Anthropic in it's latest round is worth $350B. That stake would have been worth ~$47.4B.

· Robinhood is now worth over $100B. That stake would be worth ~$7.6B.

· Solana is now worth $131.5 per token, making the stake well over $5.7B.

Those three companies alone generated well over $55B+ in value in 4 years time, and this is not even including FTX's tens of billions of dollars + hundreds of other investments + holdings in Chime, Layerzero, Aptos, Hidden Road (bought by $COIN), and crypto.

Their portfolio companies outlasted their core business (and imagine, how much it would have been worth if the core business kept scaling like $GOOGL search did alongside Youtube).

$NBIS now has the same setup as $FTX did in crypto, $META in social media, but in artificial intelligence with a legitimate and incredibly rapidly growing core business.

Nebius owns:

1. Clickhouse, 28% at a ~$7B valuation ($6.3 H1 2025)
2. Avride, 83% at a ~$6B valuation. (post Uber raise)
3. Toloka AI, ~65% at a ~$640 million valuation
4. TripleTen, 100% at a ~$300m valuation.

· Clickhouse powers Anthropic, $META, $TSLA, $NET, and many fortune 500 companies.

· Avride is a self-driving car robotaxi company, spun out of Yandex that $UBER invested in a $375M round in to compete with Waymo.

· Toloka is a AI labeling platform that Amazon, Microsoft, Anthropic, and Shopify uses.

$1.96B + $4.96B + $416M + $300m = $7.6B valuation in portfolio companies that are growing faster than most public growth companies.

But if we look at their core business that is scaling to 700%+ Y/Y to $7-9B ARR, with $4.8B in cash, powering $META, $MSFT, Cursor, governments, and many more...

This might be the last month it's under $90 before it receives hundreds of millions to low billions of extra inflows from MSCI inclusion today. There's no other datacenter growth company that has this type of portfolio if we look at crowd favorites like $IREN or $CIFR.

$NBIS is only valued at $21B and the market is sleeping on this opportunity.
Nebius [ $NBIS ] 是现在最被低估的成长公司。

它有潜力在 210 亿美元市值下成为下一个 $GOOGL。原因很简单:

它的 portfolio companies 令人震惊。

这个概念最不可思议的例子是 $FTX。故事是这样:

当我们看 $META 如何成长为 1T+ 公司时,它不只是 Facebook。它的组合公司 Instagram、Whatsapp 等让 Meta 主导了社交媒体版图。

$FTX 做过类似的事,只是在 digital assets 和 frontier technologies 里。

四年前,2021 年,$FTX 向一大篮子资产投资 $5.8B。其中很大一部分投向这三家核心公司:

1. Anthropic,以 $2.5B 估值持有 13.56%。
2. Robinhood [ $HOOD ],以 $8.54B 估值持有 7.6%
3. Solana [ $SOL ],4100M+ tokens。

快进到今天,那会是:

· Anthropic 最新一轮估值 $350B。这部分股权价值约 $47.4B。

· Robinhood 现在价值超过 $100B。这部分股权价值约 $7.6B。

· Solana 现在每 token 价值 $131.5,使这部分股权超过 $5.7B。

仅这三家公司就在 4 年内创造了超过 $55B+ 价值,而且这还不包括 FTX 数百亿美元 + 数百项其他投资 + Chime、Layerzero、Aptos、Hidden Road(被 $COIN 收购)和 crypto 持仓。

它们的 portfolio companies 比核心业务活得更久(想象一下,如果核心业务像 $GOOGL search 随 Youtube 一起扩张,它会值多少)。

$NBIS 现在在 artificial intelligence 中拥有和 $FTX 在 crypto、$META 在 social media 中类似的设置,并且还有一个合法且极其快速增长的核心业务。

Nebius 拥有:

1. Clickhouse,28%,估值约 $7B($6.3 H1 2025)
2. Avride,83%,估值约 $6B。(Uber 融资后)
3. Toloka AI,约 65%,估值约 $640 million
4. TripleTen,100%,估值约 $300m。

· Clickhouse 支撑 Anthropic、$META$TSLA$NET 和许多 fortune 500 公司。

· Avride 是一家 self-driving car robotaxi 公司,从 Yandex 拆分出来,$UBER 在 $375M 轮中投资它,用来对抗 Waymo。

· Toloka 是 AI labeling platform,被 Amazon、Microsoft、Anthropic 和 Shopify 使用。

$1.96B + $4.96B + $416M + $300m = $7.6B 的 portfolio companies 估值,而且它们比大多数上市成长公司增长更快。

但如果看它的核心业务,正在以 700%+ Y/Y 扩张到 $7-9B ARR,拥有 $4.8B 现金,并为 $META$MSFT、Cursor、政府和许多其他客户提供能力……

在今天 MSCI 纳入带来数亿美元到低十亿美元额外流入之前,这可能是它低于 $90 的最后一个月。如果看 $IREN$CIFR 这类热门标的,没有其他 datacenter growth company 拥有这种组合。

$NBIS 只有 $21B 估值,市场正在错过这个机会。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The Neocloud Sector Tierlist.

Post Q3 earnings + Market Sector Drop:

[S] Tier: $NBIS
[A] Tier: $CIFR, $WULF, $IREN
[B] Tier: $GLXY, $CORZ
[C] Tier: $APLD, $CLSK
[D] Tier: $WLAC, $DGDX, $WYFI
[F] Tier, $CRWV*, $SLNH
[U] Tier: $GRRR, $MARA, $DGDX, $CLSK, $BITF, $HIVE, $RIOT **

Ranked in order from left to right.

* : Short-term pricing drops created compelling entries (e.g., $CRWV), but med-term (12m) attractiveness remains limited.

**: Uncertain, decided not to rate them (but put them in tierlist photo as F). Some pure miners haven't fully pivot into HPC yet + too much contract uncertainty.

Lot of people asked about updates post earnings, these are just personal thoughts based on weighted assessments of:

a. Contract visibility and revenue certainty
b. Resilience to macro tightening and credit conditions c. Balance sheet strength and margin profile
d. HPC buildout risk (capacity execution and orchestration)
e. Revenue growth trajectory (1–2 year horizon)
f. Current market capitalization relative to revenue ramp and infrastructure value

The whole Neocloud sector is compelling but some have clearly higher asymmetrical return over others as of Q3.
Neocloud 板块分级表。

Q3 财报 + 市场板块下跌之后:

[S] 档:$NBIS
[A] 档:$CIFR, $WULF, $IREN
[B] 档:$GLXY, $CORZ
[C] 档:$APLD, $CLSK
[D] 档:$WLAC, $DGDX, $WYFI
[F] 档:$CRWV*, $SLNH
[U] 档:$GRRR, $MARA, $DGDX, $CLSK, $BITF, $HIVE, $RIOT **

从左到右排序。

*:短期价格下跌带来了不错的入场点(比如 $CRWV),但中期(12 个月)吸引力仍然有限。

**:不确定,所以决定不评级(但在 tierlist 图里放成 F)。有些纯矿企还没完全转向 HPC,合同不确定性也太高。

很多人问财报后的更新,这些只是我基于加权判断的一些个人想法:

a. 合同可见度和收入确定性
b. 对宏观收紧的韧性
c. 融资质量和资产负债表
d. 执行风险
e. 估值/上行空间

不是财务建议,只是我现在对板块的排序。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1992181846134968633
❤️ 467 🔁 65 💬 35
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@platochi I’m tuned in! Another point i missed above was that no LLM gets it right in the first place (even if you personally explain the nuances sometimes).

So having a counsel/ensemble type approach wouldn’t do anything if they all get it confidently wrong
@platochi 我在听!上面我漏掉的另一点是,没有任何 LLM 一开始就能答对(即使有时候你亲自解释细微差别)。

所以如果它们全都自信地答错,counsel/ensemble 类型方法也没用。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Uh this approach would cost millions into building custom financial data pipelines into the LLM (which I don't want to spend).

Prob a challenge for @demishassabis, @sama, @elonmusk, @DarioAmodei, @ylecun, @arthurmensch, @aidangomez or a startup with the resources.

Definitely a billion dollar question for alpha generation to make the same Jane Street algorithm capability available to retail to prompt.

I could open source a lightweight version like the LLM council above just based on my own domain-specific judgment, but won't be anywhere close to being in-depth. Fun fact, $NVDA tried recruiting me to lead one of their AI teams in the past so mybe if i wasn't working on other things right now
呃,这种方法需要花几百万美元,把自定义金融数据管线接入 LLM(我不想花)。

可能是给 @demishassabis@sama@elonmusk@DarioAmodei@ylecun@arthurmensch@aidangomez 或有资源的 startup 的挑战。

这绝对是一个用于 alpha generation 的十亿美元问题:把 Jane Street 级别算法能力开放给散户用 prompt 调用。

我可以基于自己的领域判断,开源一个像上面 LLM council 那样的轻量版本,但深度不会接近。Fun fact,$NVDA 过去曾试图招我去领导他们一个 AI 团队,所以也许如果我现在没在做其他事情的话。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks! I wanted to get a grasp of the situation before posting, since originally i was thinking it was it had something to do with rate cut odds, aftermath of gov shutdown draining some private system liquidity, or maybe something algorithmic initially.

Gov shutdown does play a large role + .25 bps but they shouldn’t affect stocks/crypto 30%+ (and little recovery after reopening) since the fed isn’t tightening, we just got 2 rate cuts, and fundamentals of a lot of companies are improving.

Binance liquidation was just the initial idiosyncratic catalysts fr crypto but fed cutting while Japan hikes causes carry trade unwind from the reload amid the other concurrent factors is prob why we’re here now.
谢谢!我想先弄清楚情况再发帖,因为一开始我以为可能和降息概率、政府停摆后抽走一些私人系统流动性的后果,或者某种算法因素有关。

政府停摆确实有很大作用 + .25 bps,但它们不应该让股票/crypto 跌 30%+(而且重开后恢复很少),因为 fed 并没有紧缩,我们刚刚有 2 次降息,而且很多公司的基本面正在改善。

Binance liquidation 只是 crypto 的初始特异性催化,但 fed 降息同时日本加息,导致在其他并发因素中重新加载的 carry trade unwind,这可能就是我们现在处在这里的原因。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@sak864208 Good idea
@sak864208 好主意
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So it actually happened like that historically, and this year too. Before we saw high beta like $HOOD sell off back from Feb to April, and growth stocks frontran index on the massive drop.

This isn’t always the case but indexes are usually last to move and growth/high beta stocks are usually a good canary in the coal mine.
所以历史上确实是这样,今年也是。之前我们看到 $HOOD 这类 high beta 从 2 月到 4 月回落抛售,而成长股在大跌中领先指数。

情况不总是这样,但指数通常最后才动,growth/high beta 股票通常是很好的 canary in the coal mine。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So had a deeper breakdown on the 2024 autopsy report from carry trade unwind but figure was ~$200B – $300B+ish in fast money (hedge funds, prop desks) short term capital (which is ~40-60ish of total of $500B)

However it's likely been reloaded in terms of exposure in the past year so a similar but less amount might be unwinding again.

Japan hiking rates + Fed cutting leads to that carry trade unwind in terms of what got reloaded,

When you mention crypto spilling into high beta stocks, if there weren't any macro headwinds, the Bitcoin drop sub $90k from binance liqudations probably would have been bought up to $100k already (esp with 3x rate cut) so that's probably not the case.
我之前更深入拆过 2024 carry trade unwind 的 autopsy report,数字大概是 ~$200B – $300B+ish 的 fast money(hedge funds、prop desks)短期资本(约占 $500B 总量的 40-60 左右)。

不过过去一年 exposure 可能已经重新加载,所以类似但更小的规模可能又在 unwind。

日本加息 + Fed 降息,会让重新加载的那部分 carry trade unwind。

当你提到 crypto 外溢到 high beta 股票,如果没有宏观逆风,Binance liquidations 导致 Bitcoin 跌破 $90k 可能早就被买回 $100k 了(尤其有 3 次降息),所以大概不是那个原因。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 If it makes you feel any better, I saw this fat Pikachu there the other month. https://t.co/svjUkrGf4u
@soulbiri1 如果这能让你好受点,我上个月在那里看到了这只胖 Pikachu。https://t.co/svjUkrGf4u
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@itsthesquonky also how does @Neat_Lama read these responses in the first 10 seconds is the more mysterious question compared to the size of the Yen carry trade.
@itsthesquonky 另外,相比 Yen carry trade 的规模,@Neat_Lama 怎么在前 10 秒读完这些回复才是更神秘的问题。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Most things happen off the books so we won't know.

So back in 2024 unwind was about $200B – $300B+. $14 Billion in futures (CFTC & BIS data), $160 Billion from Hedge Fund FX Forwards, Source: (BIS Bulletin #90), + ~$100B (Portion of NBFI loans assumed speculative).

$2T+ is structural money from GPIF ($1.6T), $1T+ from Bank lending, etc.

2024 cleared a lot of the unwind already but didn't touch the structural part.

But my take is that we've likely seeing a reload since 2024 and seeing that ~$200B-ish figure be cleared out again rather than touching structural money.
大多数事情都在账外发生,所以我们不会知道。

2024 年 unwind 大约是 $200B – $300B+。$14 Billion 来自 futures(CFTC & BIS 数据),$160 Billion 来自 Hedge Fund FX Forwards,来源:(BIS Bulletin #90),再加上约 ~$100B(假设 NBFI loans 中投机部分)。

$2T+ 是结构性资金,来自 GPIF($1.6T)、银行贷款 $1T+ 等。

2024 年已经清掉很多 unwind,但没有触及结构性部分。

但我的看法是,我们很可能看到 2024 年以来的重新加载,现在又在清掉约 ~$200B 左右,而不是触及结构性资金。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Overall I'm up a lot. I was just referring to this past month where many of my gains like $NBIS were wiped out.

I'm below cost average right now on $NBIS in the $90s, which was surprising.

$META was $640 cost average on recent calls but I'm down 6 figures on that position since I did option calls.

But I bought stuff like $BTC at $3k, $RKLB around $14 and $HOOD at $20.

On $FLY as I said before in my thesis, it was a 2026/2027 catalyst play on medium-lift payloads. Whatever the stock price short term doesn't really change whether medium-lift developed.

You can laugh at it if in a year if they end up failing to develop medium lift and stock price craters.
整体上我赚了很多。我只是指过去这个月,我很多像 $NBIS 的收益被抹掉了。

我现在在 $NBIS 上低于成本均价,价格在 $90s,这挺意外。

$META 最近 calls 的成本均价是 $640,但因为我做的是 option calls,这个仓位亏了六位数。

但我买过 $BTC 在 $3k,$RKLB 大约 $14,$HOOD 在 $20。

关于 $FLY,就像我之前 thesis 里说的,它是 2026/2027 关于 medium-lift payloads 的催化 play。短期股价如何,并不会真正改变 medium-lift 是否开发出来。

如果一年后他们最终没能开发 medium lift,股价暴跌,你可以笑它。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So that is a million dollar question and speaks how to incredibly complex macro is given how interconnected markets are globally.

Normally triple rate cut is extraordinarily bullish and normally leads to double digit $SPY $QQQ index gains the following year. However... this comes at a time where BOJ is raising rates.

But If the Fed cuts and BOJ raises, you get a divergence: cheaper USD funding, more expensive JPY funding -> big differential changes, which could accelerate unwinding of yen carry trades.

I don't know the answer. But my speculation is we've likely seen the worst of these fears play around where many high-beta stocks dropped 40% preemptively in advance of BOJ rate hike. And the sell-off has led many stocks like $NBIS or $META to be detached from fundamentals.

So one thing is for sure though: fundamentals of stocks > macro headwinds.
这是个百万美元问题,也说明宏观有多复杂,因为全球市场高度互联。

通常三次降息极其利好,通常会带来下一年 $SPY $QQQ 指数两位数涨幅。然而……这发生在 BOJ 加息的时候。

如果 Fed 降息而 BOJ 加息,就会出现分化:更便宜的 USD funding,更昂贵的 JPY funding -> 利差发生大变化,可能加速 yen carry trades unwind。

我不知道答案。但我的猜测是,这些恐惧最糟糕的部分可能已经反映在许多 high-beta 股票在 BOJ 加息前预先下跌 40% 左右。抛售让许多股票如 $NBIS$META 脱离了基本面。

但有一件事是确定的:股票基本面 > 宏观逆风。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@itsdsha Let's just say it hasn't been a fun month for my high conviction port of $ALAB, $HOOD, $IBIT, $META, $NBIS, $RKLB, and $TSM for sure.

Should be fine in a month come Dec rate cut. Most short term margin/option traders got liquidated, and events like these lead to higher highs https://t.co/YCzLLaArKa
@itsdsha 只能说,对我高信念组合 $ALAB$HOOD$IBIT$META$NBIS$RKLB$TSM 来说,这个月肯定不好玩。

到 12 月降息时,一个月后应该会没事。大多数短期 margin/option traders 已经被清算,而这类事件会带来更高高点 https://t.co/YCzLLaArKa
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So the four macro points I talked about was the larger reason for the selloff.

There was a huge amount of option interest expiring last Friday, and my guess post $NVDA earnings was that it was purely algorithmic driven (and still doesn't make much sense).

The larger overhang about the cascading crypto margin liqudations caused from Binance, Rate cut odds changing, AI credit stress, and yen carry trade are the main reasons behind the longer sell-off though.

My guess is market reversal this Monday and repricing in + frontrunning December ratecut after markets bulled Fed into cutting (and after option expirations. However, I don't know how much possible Yen carry trade selloff offsets this.
我说的四个宏观点,是这次抛售更大的原因。

上周五有大量 option interest 到期,我在 $NVDA 财报后的猜测是,它纯粹由算法驱动(而且现在仍然没太大意义)。

更大的压力来自 Binance 引发的连锁 crypto margin liquidations、降息概率变化、AI 信用压力和 yen carry trade,这些才是更长时间抛售背后的主要原因。

我的猜测是,本周一市场反转,并在市场逼 Fed 降息后重新定价 + 抢跑 12 月降息(以及期权到期之后)。不过,我不知道潜在 Yen carry trade 抛售会抵消多少。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@durov I normally never comment on politics but having you comment about French Gov's involvement in Charlie Kirk's assassination just lent a lot of weight to the possibility.
@durov 我通常从不评论政治,但你评论 French Gov 参与 Charlie Kirk 遇刺,确实让这种可能性增加了很多分量。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@a_little_tailor Zooming out is even worse for $MSTR. $BMNR also got nuked -47.1% this month.

Feel bad for folks that went long, $ETH is a terrible long above $4k and following @fundstrat at the $4-5K top than at $1.5K is unfortunate.

People tend to conflate ETH network usage with price. https://t.co/zdO3e8YsTC
@a_little_tailor 拉远看对 $MSTR 更糟。$BMNR 这个月也被炸了 -47.1%。

为做多的人感到难过,$ETH 在 $4k 以上是糟糕的长期持仓,在 $4-5K 顶部跟随 @fundstrat,而不是在 $1.5K 跟随,很不幸。

人们往往把 ETH 网络使用量和价格混为一谈。https://t.co/zdO3e8YsTC
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RJCcapital The correct motto is:

Maximize Gains, Maximize Gains.

(markets, weight) https://t.co/e5oKDsYcz7
@RJCcapital 正确口号是:

Maximize Gains, Maximize Gains.

(markets, weight)https://t.co/e5oKDsYcz7
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Markets just suffered their worst deleveraging shock in recent history.

High-beta assets are collapsing:

$NBIS, $IREN, AI stocks are down ~40%+ from peaks

$MSTR, $BTC plunged 30-40%+ in the past month

• Crypto erased over $1.2 trillion in value

This wasn’t normal, it was a forced unwind across the markets with the most growth and leverage.

Here's the four liquidity drains hitting at once:

1. Crypto precursor shock (Oct 2025 – Binance failure)

• A pricing error on Binance sent USDe to $0.65, triggering $19B+ in forced liquidations in 24 hours

• Highly leveraged positions (25x–50x) using USDe/wBETH/BNSOL cascaded into a chain reaction of cascading margin liquidations across the industry

• The event left crypto structurally fragile, and volatility now threatens $7B+ MSCI inflows into $MSTR/treasury stocks, risking BTC/NAV mispricing and forced Bitcoin sales

2. Fed policy uncertainty (rate cut whiplash)

• Markets priced a December cut at 97% → 35% → 70%+ in two days after conflicting Fed signals

• This volatility acted as a stealth tightening, forcing leveraged funds and algorithms (seen post $NVDA earnings) to deleverage pre-emptively

• Policy ambiguity raised global risk, transmitting U.S. uncertainty into broad selling across global funding markets

3. AI credit stress (speculative debt cracks)

• AI build-out requires $3.5T in external financing, pushing companies heavily into debt markets

• Google + XAI raise in usage per similarweb raised concerns about OpenAI and circular financing, alongside how $1T+ in capex spend going into $ORCL, $CRWV, $AMD, and others without having the ncessary capital.

• Applied Digital [ $APLD ] $2.35B junk bond (rated B+) exposed counterparty and concentration risk, sending its stock and related data center stocks down due to the need of more debt to fund buildout.

• Capital markets began differentiating between firms with real cash flow and those reliant on speculative debt and OpenAI contracts, punishing names such as $ORCL and $CRWV.

4. Yen carry trade unwind (the catalyst)

• BoJ rate hikes to 0.5% and normalization narrowed the U.S.–Japan rate gap, squeezing ¥80T (~$500B) in leveraged positions

• Rising JGB yields triggered repatriation flows, pressuring U.S. yields and draining global liquidity

• Forced unwinds led investors to sell U.S. tech and crypto to repay yen loans, amplifying the risk-off cascade

Bottom line:

All four shocks drained liquidity from the same corner of the market, high-beta, leveraged assets, driving a violent unwind in growth tech and crypto and raising the risk of further forced selling.

Excessive leverage, fragile balance sheets, and concentration risk determined which assets crashed the hardest.

The beginning of a new rate-cutting cycle by the Fed is an "inflection point" as investors need to determine whether the easing is a preventative measure or a reaction to a more serious downturn. However one thing is for certain:

The macro shock reset valuations, but it didn’t change the fundamentals of businesses from $NBIS to $META.
市场刚刚经历了近代史上最严重的去杠杆冲击。

高 beta 资产正在崩盘:

$NBIS$IREN、AI stocks 从高点下跌约 40%+

$MSTR$BTC 过去一个月暴跌 30-40%+

• Crypto 蒸发超过 1.2 万亿美元市值

这不是正常波动,而是在增长和杠杆最集中的市场中发生的强制 unwind。

以下是同时发生的四个流动性抽水:

1. Crypto 前兆冲击(2025 年 10 月 - Binance failure)

• Binance 上的定价错误使 USDe 跌到 $0.65,24 小时内触发 $19B+ 强制清算

• 使用 USDe/wBETH/BNSOL 的高杠杆仓位(25x-50x)引发全行业连锁 margin liquidations

• 事件让 crypto 结构性脆弱,而波动现在威胁 $7B+ MSCI 流入 $MSTR/treasury stocks,带来 BTC/NAV 错配和强制 Bitcoin 抛售风险

2. Fed 政策不确定性(rate cut whiplash)

• 相互冲突的 Fed 信号后,市场两天内把 12 月降息概率从 97% -> 35% -> 70%+

• 这种波动相当于隐性紧缩,迫使杠杆基金和算法($NVDA 财报后可见)提前去杠杆

• 政策模糊提高全球风险,把美国不确定性传导到全球融资市场的广泛抛售

3. AI 信用压力(投机债务裂缝)

• AI build-out 需要 $3.5T 外部融资,把公司大幅推向债务市场

• Similarweb 显示 Google + XAI 使用量上升,引发对 OpenAI 和循环融资的担忧,同时 $1T+ capex 承诺流向 $ORCL$CRWV$AMD 等,但没有必要资本支撑

• Applied Digital [ $APLD ] $2.35B 垃圾债(B+ 评级)暴露交易对手和集中风险,因为需要更多债务资助 buildout,其股票及相关 data center 股票下跌

• 资本市场开始区分有真实现金流的公司和依赖投机债务及 OpenAI 合同的公司,惩罚 $ORCL$CRWV 等名字

4. Yen carry trade unwind(催化剂)

• BoJ 加息至 0.5% 并正常化,缩窄美日利差,挤压 ¥80T(约 $500B)杠杆仓位

• JGB 收益率上升触发资金回流,压制美国收益率并抽走全球流动性

• 强制 unwind 使投资者卖出美国科技股和 crypto 来偿还日元贷款,放大 risk-off 连锁反应

Bottom line:

四个冲击都从市场同一角落抽走流动性,也就是高 beta、杠杆资产,推动 growth tech 和 crypto 剧烈 unwind,并提高进一步强制抛售风险。

过度杠杆、脆弱资产负债表和集中风险决定哪些资产跌得最狠。

Fed 新一轮降息周期的开始是一个“inflection point”,投资者需要判断宽松是预防措施,还是对更严重下行的反应。但有一点确定:

宏观冲击重置了估值,但没有改变从 $NBIS$META 这些公司的基本面。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
What... just happened today?

Looks like a market bottom when users from Reddit lose 6 figures in life savings then go into debt.

One of the most crazy and unexpected market reversals I've witnessed. https://t.co/vCahK6WhTI
今天……到底发生了什么?

当 Reddit 用户亏掉六位数毕生积蓄、还背上债的时候,看起来就像市场底部了。

这是我见过最疯狂、最意外的市场反转之一。 https://t.co/vCahK6WhTI
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1991639781080805593
❤️ 252 🔁 23 💬 27
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@JustUrAvgStonk lol prob gonna take this down and post something else since every normal person got flagged as a bot and the only person who didn’t was a bot. https://t.co/xoxJfE0aRo
@JustUrAvgStonk lol 可能会删掉这个,发点别的,因为每个正常人都被标成 bot,唯一没被标的人反而是 bot。https://t.co/xoxJfE0aRo
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$CRWV is well deserving of F tier. If we go from an offering point of view, then it’s top of the line. Balance sheet wise, it’s a nightmare, especially with the $14B+ in debt plus the $1B+ debt interest for the buildout for OpenAi which may or may not be able to pay.

They also have $1.9B cash left. A lot of the profit goes off to paying debt interest which hurts margins a lot (compared to other neoclouds that don’t have that interest since they did convertible note).
$CRWV 完全配得上 F tier。如果从产品供给角度看,它是一流的。但从资产负债表看,它是噩梦,尤其是 $14B+ 债务加上 $1B+ 债务利息,用来为 OpenAi buildout,而 OpenAi 可能付得起,也可能付不起。

他们还剩 $1.9B 现金。很多利润都拿去付债务利息,这严重伤害利润率(相比其他没有这种利息的 neoclouds,因为它们做的是可转债)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 @RJCcapital @pepemoonboy @retail_mourinho @DeepValueBagger @soulbiri1 has been one of my most loyal subjects from day 1!
@soulbiri1 @RJCcapital @pepemoonboy @retail_mourinho @DeepValueBagger @soulbiri1 从第 1 天起就是我最忠诚的 subjects 之一!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RJCcapital @pepemoonboy @retail_mourinho @DeepValueBagger thx https://t.co/Hcz8Lw9zMG
@RJCcapital @pepemoonboy @retail_mourinho @DeepValueBagger thx https://t.co/Hcz8Lw9zMG
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@AustranSkolSwft Which one is insulting? $WULF with tens of billions of backlog from $GOOGL/Anthropic or $IREN with $9B+ from $MSFT.

Posting that with no explanation is not very helpful.
@AustranSkolSwft 哪一个是侮辱?是有来自 $GOOGL/Anthropic 数百亿美元 backlog 的 $WULF,还是有 $MSFT 90 亿美元以上的 $IREN

不解释就这样发,并没有什么帮助。
❤️ 16 🔁 1 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Tried out Gemini 3 Pro/Antigravity for a simple CSS task.

It wiped out and corrupted:

-> my project files
-> then the backup ones
+ the entire project for a simple CSS addition.

There's a lot of critical errors with Antigravity that I hope your team will fix (antigrativity planning mode + other models didn't do much better compared).
试了一下 Gemini 3 Pro/Antigravity 做一个简单 CSS 任务。

它清空并损坏了:

-> 我的项目文件
-> 然后是备份文件
+ 为了一个简单 CSS 添加,整个项目都坏了。

Antigravity 有很多严重错误,希望你们团队能修(antigrativity planning mode + 其他模型相比也没好多少)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RobW16856727 @MengTo @antigravity lol I'm definitely not using Gemini/Antigravity again after it just corrupted my company frontend codebase on a simple CSS/JS prompt.

Would have been nice to know beforehand
@RobW16856727 @MengTo @antigravity lol 在它刚刚用一个简单 CSS/JS prompt 损坏了我公司前端代码库之后,我肯定不会再用 Gemini/Antigravity。

要是事先知道就好了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Found Gemini 3 performance to be extremely subpar for frontend, especially more complex CSS tasks like layering SVGs/gradients. Antigravity is the cherry on top.

I've been developing with @cursor_ai for awhile, so wanted to try out your prompt with Gemini3 + Antigravity.

First run with these prompt examples wiped out my files and backup with no git backup (since this is frontend).

Extremely pissed, not your fault I tried a new product where @_mohansolo @demishassabis coded an IDE that doesn't init Git and then can't revert changes if it wipes your entire company project and backups.
我发现 Gemini 3 在 frontend 上表现极差,尤其是像 SVGs/gradients 分层这类更复杂 CSS 任务。Antigravity 更是锦上添花。

我一直用 @cursor_ai 开发,所以想用 Gemini3 + Antigravity 试试你的 prompt。

第一次用这些 prompt 示例运行,就在没有 git backup 的情况下清空了我的文件和备份(因为这是 frontend)。

我非常生气,不是你的错,是我试了 @_mohansolo @demishassabis 做的新产品,这个 IDE 不 init Git,然后如果它清空你整个公司项目和备份,还不能 revert changes。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MengTo Gemini 3 is probably the biggest piece of 💩LLM I've ever tried with @antigravity.

Tried your prompt verbatim

-&gt; Wiped out entire project
-&gt; Wiped out backups
-&gt; Wiped out project.

Thanks https://t.co/RTaDYHYBoE
@MengTo Gemini 3 可能是我用 @antigravity 试过的最大一坨 💩LLM。

逐字试了你的 prompt

-> 清空整个项目
-> 清空备份
-> 清空项目。

谢谢 https://t.co/RTaDYHYBoE
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah I'd might move $GLXY down to a C tier alongside $APLD if we just had to compare HPC sector as you mentioned.

But because of their other segments, their balance sheet is vastly better so they had to tap into less debt/crdit facilitaties, which is why it's a grade higher.

They do a ton of other stuff like $HOOD competitor brokerage, crypto liquidity providers, etc. and it improves fcf but a bit of an unfair comparison. They do have long term hyperscaler visibility with $CRWV on their Helios campus with the the interest rate was ≈9.10%. Downside of that is Coreweave, and there's a nonzero chance it goes under.
是的,如果只按你提到的 HPC sector 比较,我可能会把 $GLXY 下调到 C tier,和 $APLD 一起。

但因为他们有其他业务线,资产负债表好得多,所以需要动用的债务/credit facilities 少很多,这就是它高一个等级的原因。

他们还做很多其他事情,比如 $HOOD 竞争对手 brokerage、crypto liquidity providers 等,这改善了 fcf,但比较起来有点不公平。他们在 Helios campus 上与 $CRWV 有长期 hyperscaler 可见性,利率约 9.10%。缺点是 Coreweave,而且它不是零概率会倒。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So just a quick qualitative reply, $IREN does frontload connected capacity and if you go from that standpoint (eg. 1+ GW H1 2026) vs. 1 GW from $NBIS H2 2026, $IREN wins and should be using that time to sign more contracts.

Longer term, Nebius achieves capacity parity between the two and has higher margins from full-stack vs. pure iaas and you saw this from the revenue per mw from the $MSFT contract.

I remember doing a quantitative breakdown on power costs with margins and found that utilization/orchestration mattered vs. cheap power during that Oracle TI fiasco.

Fun fact about $NBIS, they have new behind the meter approaches with dataone on their greenfield sites with power generation on their 300 MW facility in NJ., but probably lags near term to $IREN.

I'm not an energy expert so I won't personally go into projections regarding natural gas pipelines conversion estimates, so just going with connected/contracted capacity projections from management.

For $GLXY agreed about the crypto accounting. That wasn't a factor when doing weighting.
快速定性回复一下,$IREN 确实前置 connected capacity,如果从这个角度看(比如 2026 H1 1+ GW)对比 $NBIS 2026 H2 的 1 GW,$IREN 胜出,而且应该利用这段时间签更多合同。

更长期看,Nebius 会实现两者容量接近持平,并且 full-stack 相比纯 iaas 有更高利润率,你也能从 $MSFT 合同的 revenue per mw 看到这一点。

我记得在 Oracle TI 风波期间,我做过 power costs 和 margins 的量化拆解,发现 utilization/orchestration 相比 cheap power 更重要。

关于 $NBIS 的趣事:他们和 dataone 在 greenfield sites 上有新的 behind the meter 方法,在 NJ 的 300 MW 设施上做发电,但短期可能落后于 $IREN

我不是 energy expert,所以不会个人预测 natural gas pipelines conversion estimates,只按管理层的 connected/contracted capacity projections。

关于 $GLXY,同意 crypto accounting。做权重时那不是因素。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DanielTan64198 $119 cost basis on $NBIS? https://t.co/N9VVLPheIm
@DanielTan64198 $NBIS 成本基础 $119?https://t.co/N9VVLPheIm
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yep, I appreciate talking with you compared to many other members *cough cough $IREN*, since you added some good qualitative points about $DGXX and changed my mind about execution risk.

Attachment to crypto did drag down $CIFR and many others because of BTC balance sheets, but I paid more attention to HPC segments.

But as you mentioned, it's subjective ranking, and I'm sure the list would be different per-person.
是的,相比很多其他成员 *cough cough $IREN*,我很感谢和你交流,因为你补充了一些关于 $DGXX 的好定性观点,也改变了我对执行风险的看法。

和 crypto 的关联确实拖累了 $CIFR 和许多其他公司,因为 BTC balance sheets,但我更关注 HPC segments。

不过就像你说的,这是主观排名,我相信每个人列出来都会不同。
❤️ 7 🔁 0 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Agreed. But to @_melonBird with the SemiAnalysis ranking on $CRWV, I agree with that table. Coreweave and $NBIS are the two with full-stack nailed down in the whole Neocloud sector.

Coreweave spent many years and billions of USD on acquisitions to get software right.

However, that table doesn't mean anything when you look at company financials.

Coreweave only has $1.9B cash equivalent left and faces $1.2B+ a year from debt interest. And they'd need to raise more for buildout for their other hyperscaler contracts during a period of credit tightening (when much smaller players like $NBIS has $4.9B+ to spend on capex)

On top, 1/3 ($22B+) of their backlog comes from OpenAi which has no funding for that $1T+ promised yet, and $CRWV / $ORCL is building out capacity for them, which presents a massive risk.
同意。但对于 @_melonBird 提到的 SemiAnalysis 对 $CRWV 的排名,我同意那张表。Coreweave 和 $NBIS 是整个 Neocloud 板块中两个真正把 full-stack 做好的公司。

Coreweave 花了很多年和数十亿美元通过收购把软件做好。

然而,当你看公司财务时,那张表没有意义。

Coreweave 只剩 $1.9B cash equivalent,却每年面临 $1.2B+ 债务利息。在信贷收紧时期,他们还需要为其他 hyperscaler 合同 buildout 融更多钱(而小得多的 $NBIS 有 $4.9B+ 可用于 capex)。

此外,他们 backlog 的 1/3($22B+)来自 OpenAi,而 OpenAi 还没有为承诺的 $1T+ 找到资金,$CRWV / $ORCL 正在为它建设容量,这带来巨大风险。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So I think you're replying to points I never made. Just to clarify: I didn't rate $BITF. If you read my post, it fell into the unrated category, so I'm not debating where it goes in comparison with $WYFI or $SLNH.

As for $SLNH, we're not disagreeing on anything I put it as F tier as well since it's a hype stock that requires excessive debt/dilution on their "2.8GW capacity" buildout plans.

You said for $NBIS "how attached it is to Bitcoin Mining and if they own their power" - I'll take that as a mispeak and that you were using Bitcoin mining in reference with $CLSK, and that you were referencing capacity for $NBIS +.

$NBIS achieved near long-term parity with $IREN from the capacity side, which is associated as the highest GW capacity player in the industry. So I'd argue that part is incorrect.

So as for $SMCI being a reliable/trustworthy partner argument, I sort of disagree, but you did change my mind regarding $DGXX having lower operational and technical execution risk.

That aside, that part wouldn't really change rankings, eg. putting it the same as $APLD which has 2 hyperscaler contracts (if you include $CRWV) but downside from junk bonds (revenue visibility)

If you wanted to put it on par with $CLSK just due to return potential from MC size, I'd give you that.
我觉得你在回复我从没提出过的点。澄清一下:我没有给 $BITF 评级。如果你读我的帖子,它在 unrated 类别,所以我不争论它和 $WYFI$SLNH 相比该放哪里。

至于 $SLNH,我们没有分歧,我也把它放在 F tier,因为它是 hype stock,需要过度债务/稀释来建设他们所谓的“2.8GW capacity”。

你说 $NBIS “和 Bitcoin Mining 有多大关联,以及是否拥有自己的电力” - 我当作口误,理解为你用 Bitcoin mining 指 $CLSK,并且你是在说 $NBIS + 的容量。

$NBIS 从容量角度已经接近与 $IREN 长期持平,而 $IREN 被认为是行业最高 GW capacity 玩家。所以我认为那部分不正确。

至于 $SMCI 是否是可靠/可信伙伴的论点,我有点不同意,但你确实改变了我关于 $DGXX 运营和技术执行风险更低的看法。

除此之外,那部分并不会真正改变排名,比如把它放在和 $APLD 一样,后者有 2 个 hyperscaler 合同(如果算 $CRWV),但有垃圾债带来的下行(收入可见性)。

如果你只是因为 MC size 带来的回报潜力,把它放到和 $CLSK 同级,我可以接受。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Sure, I put $NBIS as S tier from that capacity funding angle because it's isolated from credit tightening affecting other DC stocks like $APLD (that had to sell junk bonds).

From Q3 earnings, $CRWV is facing $1.21-$1.25B in interest expenses and only has $1.94 billion in cash equivalents.

Other neocloud sector stocks will need more to cash fund buildout + monetize GW capacity ike $IREN, and will face higher interest rates or lack of funding interest (eg. convertibles).

This is kind of why we're seeing a sector selloff, but some were relatively undeserved (eg. $NBIS, $CIFR).

With $NBIS you're probably looking at their $2.5B ATM offering. With their existing $4.8B+ in cash, they have enough for their full-stack buildout and capacity monetization + and can scale future capacity from visible revenue contracts with $META, $MSFT.

But I'm personally not happy with their ATM, since it's an overhead affecting stock price + balances out inflows from MSCI inclusion in 2 days Nov 24th.

But $NBIS with $7-9B ARR has the highest margins in the industry, which would offset 10% dilution and convertibles given their $20B marketcap.
当然,我把 $NBIS 从容量融资角度放为 S tier,因为它与影响其他 DC 股票的信贷收紧隔离,比如 $APLD 不得不卖垃圾债。

从 Q3 财报看,$CRWV 面临 $1.21-$1.25B 利息支出,且只有 $1.94B cash equivalents。

其他 neocloud 板块股票需要更多现金来资助 buildout + 变现 GW capacity,比如 $IREN,并会面临更高利率或融资兴趣不足(比如 convertibles)。

这就是为什么我们看到板块抛售,但有些相对不该跌(比如 $NBIS$CIFR)。

$NBIS,你可能看的是它的 $2.5B ATM offering。加上现有 $4.8B+ 现金,他们有足够资金做 full-stack buildout 和 capacity monetization,并且能用来自 $META$MSFT 的可见收入合同扩展未来容量。

但我个人不喜欢他们的 ATM,因为它是影响股价的压力,也抵消了 11 月 24 日两天后 MSCI 纳入带来的流入。

不过 $NBIS 以 $7-9B ARR 拥有行业最高利润率,以其 $20B 市值看,可以抵消 10% 稀释和可转债。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Perugius__ Weebius is one of the few high-beta stocks green.

That being said $NBIS $180 strike is a bit ambitious given the current macro climate.

The market crash on high-beta stocks is kind of insane. https://t.co/M4c1lPPsNU
@Perugius__ Weebius 是少数为绿的 high-beta 股票之一。

话虽如此,在当前宏观环境下,$NBIS $180 strike 有点激进。

high-beta 股票上的市场崩盘有点疯狂。https://t.co/M4c1lPPsNU
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@himshouse $HIMS is seems undervalued at this point, especially with the Zava acquisition coming into help revenue growth soon.

Having a $250M repurchase program helps a bit with that narrative. Still would prefer that going toward acquisitions and growth though.
@himshouse $HIMS 现在看起来被低估,尤其是 Zava 收购即将帮助收入增长。

$250M repurchase program 对这个叙事也有点帮助。不过我仍然更希望这些钱用于收购和增长。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Nobody said here $NBIS would do $8B realized revenue in 2026. Not quite sure what you're trying to say or argue.

I've been consistent on $8B midpoint ARR after earnings with likely ~$3.6B-4.2B realized revenue and ~$2.1B quarterly revenue Q4.

$NBIS is ramping up from $146M quarterly revenue -> $2.1B in slightly over 1Y time, which is just mind-numbing growth and only achievable in this decade because of $MSFT $META hyperscaler revenue funnel from AI.

Once in a decade opportunity, but the distinction you're making isn't necessary since I haven't seen anyone make that confusion in the comments yet.
这里没人说 $NBIS 会在 2026 年实现 $8B realized revenue。不太确定你想说或争什么。

我一直一致说的是财报后 $8B midpoint ARR,可能实现约 $3.6B-4.2B realized revenue,以及 Q4 约 $2.1B 季度收入。

$NBIS 会在略超 1 年时间里从 $146M 季度收入 ramp 到 $2.1B,这增长令人麻木,只因为 AI 带来的 $MSFT $META hyperscaler revenue funnel,才可能在这个十年实现。

十年一遇机会,但你做的这个区分没必要,因为我还没在评论里看到有人产生这种混淆。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@platochi good luck on your new startup! best of luck moving forward and would love updates on your journey in the future😄
@platochi 祝你的新 startup 好运!未来一路顺利,也很想看到你之后旅程的更新😄
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@babyfolio True, $NBIS has clear asymmetrical upside over every other company in the Neocloud sector and I'm happy + easily can explain why.

That doesn't mean I'm not bullish on $CIFR, $WULF, and others though.
@babyfolio 确实,$NBIS 相比 Neocloud 板块其他所有公司都有明确的不对称上行,我很开心,也很容易解释原因。

但这不代表我不看多 $CIFR$WULF 和其他公司。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$CIFR is actually next favorite Neocloud sector pick.

I made a tierlist earlier and $NBIS was S+ and $CIFR was S.

But here's the difference and nuance people might not know:

Nebius captures the entire value chain of the AI cloud business. $IREN said it themselves in their ER call that they did full-stack with $MSFT because of to "higher revenue potential and stronger returns", while taking on orchestration, software, and deprecation with GPUs purchases vs. colo.

$CIFR is de-risked as you mentioned because of AWS, $GOOGL and finally secure, which is why I love the pick. Doing colo, they avoid purchasing/managing GPU fleets, which is why I downgraded $IREN due to a new risk factor that isn't quite present with $NBIS and wasn't there before.

There's high-margin, annuity-like revenue for space, power, and cooling for hyperscales. It's one of the lowest-risk adjusted stocks in the sector.

However, upside is not anywhere as high. Especially when you look at leases (eg. 10Y-15Y) revenue ramp is a lot slower, and upside is a lot less compared to full-stack pure Neoclouds like $NBIS.
$CIFR 实际上是我下一个最喜欢的 Neocloud 板块标的。

我早些时候做了 tierlist,$NBIS 是 S+,$CIFR 是 S。

但这里有些人可能不知道的差异和细微点:

Nebius 捕获了 AI cloud 业务的整个价值链。$IREN 在自己的 ER call 里也说,他们和 $MSFT 做 full-stack,是因为“更高收入潜力和更强回报”,同时承担 orchestration、software 和购买 GPUs 带来的 depreciation,而不是做 colo。

正如你提到的,$CIFR 因为 AWS、$GOOGL 以及 finally secure 而去风险化,这就是我喜欢它的原因。做 colo,它避免购买/管理 GPU fleets,这也是我下调 $IREN 的原因,因为出现了一个 $NBIS 没有、以前也不存在的新风险因素。

对 hyperscales 来说,空间、电力和冷却带来高利润率、类似年金的收入。它是板块中风险调整后最低的股票之一。

然而,上行远没有那么高。尤其是看 leases(比如 10Y-15Y),收入 ramp 慢很多,上行也远低于像 $NBIS 这样的 full-stack pure Neoclouds。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
I'm only addressing the earlier incorrect framing because I've seen it from others too when talking about $NBIS.

It's not hitting capacity ceiling. It's immediately selling out of capacity they bring online, which is positive.

Your follow up is correct though, it's an execution risk that Neoclouds face converting and connecting capacity and $CRWV is a good case study as you mentioned on 3rd party dependency risks.
我只是在回应之前不正确的框架,因为我也看到别人谈 $NBIS 时这样说。

它不是碰到容量上限。它是把上线的容量立刻卖光,这是积极信号。

不过你的 follow up 是正确的,把容量转换和接入是 Neoclouds 面临的执行风险,$CRWV 是你提到的第三方依赖风险的好案例。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
I'm not sure where this incorrect framing comes from?

$NBIS sold out of 220MW of existing and near-term connected power because any new capacity is being fully allocated.

That's not hitting a maximum structural capacity ceiling, that's validation of extreme market demand.

1 GW of connected power is projected 2026 and they have 2.5 GW of contracted capacity to support the $7-9B ARR figure.

That doesn't mean they can't expand their capacity like they've done from 1 GW to 2.5 GW from Q2 to Q3 earnings. They just sell out of any capacity they bring online, and revenue is limited by how much capacity they can bring online.
我不确定这个错误框架从哪里来的?

$NBIS 卖光了 220MW 现有和近期接入电力,因为任何新容量都会被完全分配。

这不是碰到最大结构性容量上限,而是极端市场需求的验证。

2026 年预计有 1 GW connected power,他们有 2.5 GW contracted capacity 来支撑 $7-9B ARR 数字。

这不代表他们不能像 Q2 到 Q3 财报那样从 1 GW 扩到 2.5 GW。他们只是把任何上线容量都卖光,而收入受限于他们能上线多少容量。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Nebius [ $NBIS ] at $86.69 is the purest Neocloud and AI-infra asymmetry left.

This is the highest revenue Neocloud untouched by $CIFR | $WULF and colo providers that has no:

- Plaguing uncertainty that $IREN, $ORCL face from full-stack execution.

- High interest debt that $CRWV, $APLD, and others face.

- Revenue uncertainty at scale with Hyperscaler contracts that $CLSK, $BITF, $WYFI, $SLNH, and others lack.

After the market-wide drop with the AI sector overrun by fear:

Nebius is going forward with: $8B midpoint ARR next year, $4.7B+ in cash, diversification in enterprise clients from ( $META, $MSFT, $ACN, $SHOP, Governments), hyper-growth portfolio companies, and a proven full-stack high-margin business.

With extreme demand, execution uncertainty (margins), and isolation from current issues plaguing the markets with OpenAI contract dependency and credit tightening:

Nothing even comes close to Nebius in terms of asymmetrical upside.

You are simply just waiting for company execution.
Nebius [ $NBIS ] 在 $86.69 是剩下最纯粹的 Neocloud 和 AI-infra 不对称机会。

这是最高收入 Neocloud,未被 $CIFR | $WULF 和 colo providers 触及,并且没有:

- $IREN$ORCL 面临的 full-stack execution 困扰不确定性。

- $CRWV$APLD 等面临的高利息债务。

- $CLSK$BITF$WYFI$SLNH 等缺乏的 hyperscaler 合同规模化收入不确定性。

在 AI 板块被恐惧淹没的全市场下跌之后:

Nebius 正带着以下因素前进:明年 $8B midpoint ARR,$4.7B+ 现金,企业客户多元化($META$MSFT$ACN$SHOP、Governments),高速增长 portfolio companies,以及已验证的 full-stack 高利润率业务。

在极端需求、执行不确定性(利润率),以及与当前困扰市场的 OpenAI 合同依赖和信贷收紧问题隔离的情况下:

从不对称上行看,没有任何东西接近 Nebius。

你只是单纯在等待公司执行。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I want whatever the market is smoking with $NBIS.

Goes into earnings:

1. Most bullish analyst projects $4B ARR

2. Beat that number by 100% with $8B projected

3. Beat contracted capacity guidance by 150%+ to 2.5 GW

4. Announce surprise $3B contract with $META

5. Drops 26%
我真想知道市场在 $NBIS 上到底嗑了什么。

财报前:

1. 最看多的分析师预计 $4B ARR

2. 公司给出 $8B 预测,直接比这个数字高 100%

3. 合同容量指引上调 150%+ 到 2.5 GW

4. 突然宣布和 $META 的 $3B 合同

5. 股价跌 26%
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1990065497547923800
❤️ 296 🔁 20 💬 27
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@YodaStockInvest $NBIS is incredibly detached from fundamentals right now and we have MSCI few hundred million-low billion inflow in a week.

Not just a buy but incredibly strong buy!

That being said most assets are dropping like flies across the board right now.
@YodaStockInvest $NBIS 现在和基本面严重脱节,而且一周后有 MSCI 几亿到低十亿美元流入。

不只是买入,而是非常强烈买入!

话虽如此,现在大多数资产都在全线暴跌。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@goodserdboy https://t.co/W7quCH4kqt
@goodserdboy https://t.co/W7quCH4kqt
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I think your comment just pointed out at how crazy $NBIS growth is going from $146m revenue this quarter to $2.1B+ next year a quarter.

So we look at future growth (next year), rather than current numbers based on $MSFT contract (~$19B, 5 years), $META ($3B, 5 years), and their regular clients (cursor, shopify, etc) + government contracts for revenue.

They do full stack AI cloud like AWS; how Nebius gets their initial funding for GPUs and infrastructure is share sales (convertible notes, $4B dilution at $138) and 25m share sales anytime. This is much preferred over 9%-10% interest on billions like what $CRWV is doing, since this directly hurts margins over time.

This immediately adds billions into their balance sheet (they have $4.7B cash now), which they use on GPU purchases, etc.

However, majority of the cash needed for scaling comes from contract revenue, $NBIS was doing 50-70% gross margins and projected 20-30% EBIT and is one of the highest margin neoclouds.

That being said when you price in existing dilution (10% + convertibles), then look at the $4.7B cash on hand, $7B+ in NAV from portfolio company assets like Clickhouse, $8B projected ARR next year with thier margins, it looks completely undervalued.

But if you look at it at just this current quarter's revenue, it looks overvalued.
我觉得你的评论刚好指出了 $NBIS 的增长有多疯狂,从本季度 $146m 收入到明年一个季度 $2.1B+。

所以我们看的是未来增长(明年),而不是当前数字,基于 $MSFT 合同(约 $19B,5 年)、$META($3B,5 年)、常规客户(cursor、shopify 等)+ 政府合同收入。

他们像 AWS 一样做 full stack AI cloud;Nebius 为 GPUs 和基础设施获得初始资金的方式是股票销售(可转债、$138 时 $4B 稀释)和随时 2500 万股出售。这比 $CRWV 那样对数十亿美元支付 9%-10% 利息要好得多,因为那会长期直接伤害利润率。

这会立刻给资产负债表增加数十亿美元(他们现在有 $4.7B 现金),用于 GPU purchases 等。

不过,扩张所需的大部分现金来自合同收入,$NBIS 过去有 50-70% gross margins,并预计 20-30% EBIT,是利润率最高的 neoclouds 之一。

话虽如此,当你计入现有稀释(10% + convertibles),再看手头 $4.7B 现金、来自 Clickhouse 等 portfolio company assets 的 $7B+ NAV、明年 $8B projected ARR 及其利润率,它看起来完全被低估。

但如果你只看当前季度收入,它看起来高估。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@fin_anthro @ArchegosIntern lol it's pathetic this guy is using self-accounts to like his own posts.

But HTML text-editing comments is just another level of sad. https://t.co/LJLweuJDD0
@fin_anthro @ArchegosIntern lol 这家伙用小号给自己的帖子点赞,真可悲。

但 HTML text-editing comments 又是另一层面的惨。https://t.co/LJLweuJDD0
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@fin_anthro @ArchegosIntern Don't worry, I have 11k+ followers and get 4 likes every few hundred views after some time.

This guy gets 4 likes in 5 views (when 1 is mine), within the first few 30s.

I think we both just need to post better content @fin_anthro. https://t.co/P05FphikVZ
@fin_anthro @ArchegosIntern 别担心,我有 11k+ followers,一段时间后每几百 views 也只有 4 个 likes。

这家伙 5 views 就有 4 likes(其中 1 个是我的),而且是在最初 30 秒内。

我觉得我们俩都需要发更好的内容 @fin_anthrohttps://t.co/P05FphikVZ
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
The word of advice was that it's probably good to stop using alt-accounts + your own account to self-like your own comments in the first few seconds.

Just let your thesis stand on your own instead of inorganically trying to influence engagement.

Having 3-4 likes in the first 5-10 views on every comment you make is a sad attempt to manipulate discussion on X.

I normally avoid talking about character in these types of discussions, but it's pretty hurtful to the community.
建议是,可能最好停止在最初几秒内用 alt-accounts + 自己账号给自己的评论点赞。

让你的 thesis 自己站住脚,而不是用非自然方式试图影响 engagement。

你每条评论前 5-10 views 就有 3-4 likes,这是操纵 X 讨论的可悲尝试。

我通常避免在这类讨论里谈人品,但这对社区伤害很大。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ArchegosIntern The stock sold off due to macro, not because "institutions know everything" and priced in $8B+ ARR when they were doing modeling $2B and you can point to sell-side reports.

Just a word of advice, self-liking in the first minute doesn't change the merit of an argument. https://t.co/YMRpByXqz7
@ArchegosIntern 股票是因为宏观抛售,不是因为“机构什么都知道”,并且在他们建模 $2B 时就已经定价了 $8B+ ARR,你可以去看 sell-side reports。

提醒一句,第一分钟自赞不会改变论点本身的价值。https://t.co/YMRpByXqz7
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I can 99.9% assure you that $NBIS $8B ARR expectations were not priced in months ago, analysts/markets were expecting around $2B ARR (~2-3 months ago).

And now we're trading at lower levels than after the $MSFT deal was announced (~ $90-$100).

Factoring in the 19B deal and revenue ramp, bull-case institutional analysts like Northland were projected $4B ARR. Bull case FinX (including myself) went upward to $6B-$7B with another hyperscaler deal later next year.

Then announcing $8B midpoint ARR to $9B, capacity to 2.5 GW (which people kept saying $IREN was had a huge moat for 2.8-~3.2 GW), and an unexpected $META deal the same quarter as $MSFT on top was a complete surprise.

However, the broader -26% drop after earnings was macro and indiscriminate sell-off, not because of points #1, #2, #3, and #4 for individual stock projections.

The point was $NBIS stock price is completely detached from fundamentals right now and the sell-off was a joke.
我可以 99.9% 向你保证,$NBIS $8B ARR 预期几个月前没有被定价,分析师/市场当时预期约 $2B ARR(约 2-3 个月前)。

而现在我们的交易水平低于 $MSFT 交易宣布后(约 $90-$100)。

计入 19B 交易和收入 ramp,像 Northland 这样的 bull-case 机构分析师预测 $4B ARR。Bull case FinX(包括我自己)在明年晚些时候另一个 hyperscaler 交易下,上调到 $6B-$7B。

然后同一季度在 $MSFT 之外宣布 $8B midpoint ARR 到 $9B、容量到 2.5 GW(之前人们一直说 $IREN 对 2.8-~3.2 GW 有巨大 moat),以及意外 $META 交易,这是完全惊喜。

然而财报后更广泛的 -26% 下跌是宏观和无差别抛售,不是因为个股预测的 #1、#2、#3、#4 点。

重点是 $NBIS 股价现在完全脱离基本面,这次抛售就是笑话。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@paramdan42454 @soulbiri1 glad some people caught the $PLTR ceo reference lol
@paramdan42454 @soulbiri1 很高兴有人看懂了 $PLTR ceo reference lol
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 Both $CRWV and $ORCL are geographically monogamous with OpenAI so their own debt problems shouldn’t affect $NBIS.

But yeah sell-off was wild to watch when you point out the numbers and analyst projections before earnings.
@soulbiri1 $CRWV$ORCL 都在地理上与 OpenAI 单配,所以它们自己的债务问题不该影响 $NBIS

但没错,当你指出财报前的数字和分析师预测时,这次抛售看起来很疯狂。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
I want whatever the market is smoking with $NBIS.

Goes into earnings:

1. Most bullish analyst projects $4B ARR

2. Beat that number by 100% with $8B projected

3. Beat contracted capacity guidance by 150%+ to 2.5 GW

4. Announce surprise $3B contract with $META

5. Drops 26%
我想知道市场在 $NBIS 上到底抽了什么。

进财报前:

1. 最看多的分析师预测 $4B ARR

2. 以 $8B projected 超过该数字 100%

3. 签约容量指引提高 150%+ 到 2.5 GW

4. 宣布意外的 $3B $META 合同

5. 下跌 26%
❤️ 673 🔁 23 💬 64
打开原推
💬 引用
@DeepValueBagger Are you sure you didn't develop that understanding after watching AI catgirl posts from @elonmusk?

https://t.co/NTOqoumOwx
@DeepValueBagger 你确定你不是看了 @elonmusk 的 AI catgirl 帖之后才形成这种理解的吗?

https://t.co/NTOqoumOwx
引用原推@elonmusk
https://t.co/WJZ7GoaywX
https://t.co/WJZ7GoaywX
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1989871829339492664
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@accounting_ds @rftylerpage There will be a lot of support behind $CIFR (myself included) if we get a confirmation from the executive team that they're not ruling out a pool party from the Lake site.
@accounting_ds @rftylerpage 如果执行团队确认他们不排除在 Lake site 举办 pool party,$CIFR 会获得很多支持(包括我)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@accounting_ds I think @rftylerpage should utilize the lake by hosting a pool party.

They can profit a lot from entrance fees, especially if they promote it to people who need a hair cut.

Many people will attend, it will increase Q4 $CIFR revenue.
@accounting_ds 我觉得 @rftylerpage 应该利用那个 lake 办一场 pool party。

他们可以靠门票赚很多钱,尤其是如果把它推广给需要理发的人。

很多人会参加,这会增加 Q4 $CIFR 收入。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 Apparently it's few hundred million inflow to low billion range for the MSCI inflow into $NBIS on Nov 24th.

Can't really determine the exact number, but it helps with inflow a lot.
@soulbiri1 据说 11 月 24 日 MSCI 流入 $NBIS 的资金是几亿美元到低十亿美元区间。

没法确定精确数字,但对资金流入帮助很大。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
For $NBIS it's a validation of high-demand for full-stack infrastructure, not a limitation.

They have 2.5 GW contracted capacity and sold out of current capacity. The capacity ramp is a reflection of their $7-$9B ARR estimate.

Again they can contract more and increase their ARR and I'd expect them to sell out again, especially with Antrophic building $50B DCs and $GOOGL building $40B DCs just this past week.
$NBIS 来说,这是 full-stack infrastructure 高需求的验证,不是限制。

他们有 2.5 GW 签约容量,并卖光了当前容量。容量 ramp 反映了他们 $7-$9B ARR 估算。

他们还能继续签更多合同并提高 ARR,我预计他们会再次卖光,尤其是 Anthrophic 正在建 $50B DCs,$GOOGL 就在过去一周也在建 $40B DCs。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
For context, the perspective back then was there's room for multiple networks, eg. Ethereum, XRP and "Maximalists" thought only Bitcoin has value. And this was when BTC was <$6K and the bitcoin community definitely had sterotypes.

Just like how I joke about Reddit + WSB as being regarded today, this might be offensive in 8 years time. Redneck Bitcoin Maximalist was how a sterotype for Bitcoin holders in 2018, even if you still support the network and hold the currency.

Fast forward 8 years, this sterotype doesn't exist, and crypto is whole ecosystem with tokens like USDC across many EVM networks and RWA tokenization and you don't need to be a Maximalist to be a strong advocate for Bitcoin as a currency. or network

That being said, going back close to a decade, clipping a video, and claiming it's her perspective now is disingenuous. A silly moment 8 years ago doesn't mean that today she's not an advocate for Bitcoin.
作为背景,当时的视角是可以有多个网络,比如 Ethereum、XRP,而 “Maximalists” 认为只有 Bitcoin 有价值。当时 BTC 低于 $6K,bitcoin 社区确实有刻板印象。

就像我今天开玩笑说 Reddit + WSB 是 regarded,这在 8 年后也可能冒犯人。Redneck Bitcoin Maximalist 是 2018 年对 Bitcoin 持有者的一种刻板印象,即使你仍支持这个网络并持有这种货币。

快进 8 年,这种刻板印象已经不存在,crypto 已经是完整生态,有 USDC 这种跨多个 EVM 网络的 tokens 和 RWA tokenization,你不需要是 Maximalist,也能强烈支持 Bitcoin 作为货币或网络。

话虽如此,回到近十年前,截一段视频并声称这是她现在的观点,是不诚实的。8 年前的一个傻时刻,并不意味着她今天不是 Bitcoin 的倡导者。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Gloria's a real life friend of mine and she's well deserving of maintaining Bitcoin Core.

I'm guessing was an old video from Cal or Blockchain at Berkeley when there was a lot of work on Cosmos/Tendermint and other networks back in 2019ish. Back then Bitcoiners were different audiences than now.

She's incredibly intelligent and this is just an out-of-context silly moment.
Gloria 是我现实生活中的朋友,她完全配得上维护 Bitcoin Core。

我猜那是 Cal 或 Blockchain at Berkeley 的旧视频,当时大约 2019 年左右有很多 Cosmos/Tendermint 和其他网络的工作。那时 Bitcoiners 和现在是不同受众。

她非常聪明,这只是一个脱离语境的傻时刻。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Nebius ( $NBIS ) crashed -33.61% last month, falling to a $21B market cap.

Despite this, new 13F filing data shows $NBIS institutional ownership increase:

· 38.36% → 44.6% 🟢 (+6.24%)

with Fintel placing it closer to ~46.3%.

Nebius is a $21B MC full-stack Neocloud with:

· $7-9B forward ARR (700%+ Y/Y), 30% EBIT margins, powering $MSFT Azure, $META | enterprises from Cursor to Shopify | and Governments.

· $4.7B+ Cash, $7B+ NAV in portfolio companies that power Cloudflare, Tiktok, Tesla, Netflix and Antrophic.

As expected from last month, institutions are starting to realize this once-a-generation growth, as Neoclouds are the center of the AI DC buildout and Mag7 AI compute.

The institutional ownership of Nebius was always low <28%, due to how their unusual IPO. With high-value companies, ownership typically ranges from 60-80%.

So, we're seeing mechanical flows down + retail capitulation + margin liquidation- > dark pools/block trades -> for institutions to accumulate at lower prices.

This type of accumulation pattern has not changed and we've seen this same story before with Robinhood ( S-st ), now at 74.62% ownership, before their rally from $20 to $150.

Irrational fear and capitulation is how institutions accumulate off shareholders. The recent drop is a change in stock price, not in fundamentals. The 1Y price target on $NBIS remains $400.

When forward growth backs up any market cap projections, it’s a matter of time and execution.
Nebius($NBIS)上个月暴跌 -33.61%,跌到 $21B 市值。

尽管如此,新的 13F filing 数据显示 $NBIS 机构持股增加:

· 38.36% -> 44.6% 🟢(+6.24%)

Fintel 则显示更接近 ~46.3%。

Nebius 是一家 $21B MC 的 full-stack Neocloud,拥有:

· $7-9B forward ARR(700%+ Y/Y),30% EBIT margins,为 $MSFT Azure、$META、从 Cursor 到 Shopify 的企业以及 Governments 提供算力。

· $4.7B+ 现金,$7B+ portfolio companies NAV,这些公司支撑 Cloudflare、Tiktok、Tesla、Netflix 和 Antrophic。

正如上个月预期,机构开始意识到这种一代一次的增长,因为 Neoclouds 是 AI DC buildout 和 Mag7 AI compute 的中心。

由于 Nebius 异常 IPO,机构持股一直很低,低于 28%。高价值公司通常持股范围是 60-80%。

所以我们看到 mechanical flows down + retail capitulation + margin liquidation -> dark pools/block trades -> 机构在低价累积。

这种累积模式没有改变,我们之前在 Robinhood(S-st)也见过同样故事,现在机构持股 74.62%,在它从 $20 涨到 $150 前。

非理性恐惧和投降,是机构从股东手里累积筹码的方式。最近的下跌是股价变化,不是基本面变化。$NBIS 的 1Y price target 仍是 $400。

当远期增长支撑任何市值预测时,只是时间和执行问题。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
We're seeing a live crash in AI + DC stocks right now with $IREN down 37.88% this week to $NBIS down 35.27% this month.

Panic stems from Credit Tightening, High Interest Debt, OpenAI contagion, Macro, and most importantly: Irrational Fear.

Here's what happening real time:

1. Credit Tightening - Companies like $APLD failed to sell bonds (under subscribed) and ended up issuing $2.35B in high yield debt offerings - Bloomberg Nov 14th. The bonds were sold at 97 cents on the dollar, a significant discount, with a yield of approximately 10%.

The bond deal's risk is primarily tied to Applied Digital's reliance on $CRWV, which accounts for a substantial portion of its contracted earnings. More institutional cation (eg. Burry short report on GPU depreciation) around the buildout makes it harder for DC's to raise funds.

Tightening funding conditions affect the entire ecosystem that issue debt to fund their own buildout.

2. High Interest Debt - Due to credit tightening, bad debt, which $CRWV has to fund expansion, causes $1B+ in losses a year. This cuts into margins and FCF.

Likewise, $APLD and others that raise funds with bad yields face the same future issues and we're seeing a selloff in related companies for risk-management.

3. $1T+ in OpenAI promised funding without balances -

Over $1 trillion+ in capex was promised by OpenAI going to $22.4B+ $CRWV and $300B+ to $ORCL, which they are building capacity for. The market is now skeptical of these promises from OpenAI due to not having the balances on hand and taking a risk-off approach.

And now we're seeing contagion on that buildout from companies like Coreweave spread down to $CORZ and $APLD during this buildout that might rely on $CRWV for future revenue.

4. $CRWV is a sector leaders of AI infrastructure (and partially $ORCL). When the sector leader sell-off, usually others follow suit.

5. Rate Cut odds in December Fall:

On top of the high interest debt, we're seeing rate cut odds in December drop to a coinflip ~53%. Having higher interest rates make it trouble for interest-debt burdened companies like $CRWV to refinance for stronger FCF.

_

THE NUANCE and Repositioning:

We're seeing a broad sell-off across the board. However, Capex and contracts from Mag7 ( $META, $GOOGL, $AMZN, $MSFT ) are confirmed with their extreme profitability.

There's an easy way to safely reposition to avoid issues with future revenue growth + debt cycles.

1. Position into Neoclouds with contract visibility with Mag7:

- $NBIS - $19B $MSFT deal, $3B from $META, broad enterprise support
- $CIFR - $5.5B Colo deal with $AMZN, $3B deal with $GOOGL
- $WULF - $3.7B+ deals with $GOOGL and more.
- $IREN - $9B deal with $MSFT

We will likely see more capacity speculative companies like $SLNH, $CLSK, and others fall off and consolidation into Neoclouds with visible enterprise contract (low downside risk of future revenue).

2. Position into Neoclouds with no/extremely low interest debt and high balance sheets:

Companies like $NBIS are isolated from current credit market volatility as they have $4.79 billion in cash and cash equivalents from convertible notes. Or companies like $CIFR with $1.2B in cash.

3. Avoid companies with direct contracts with OpenAI that's not Mag7.
_

Neoclouds are the backbone of Mag7 AI compute. This thesis has not changed and we'll likely see some scale to $100B+ companies in the future as the next AWS.

However, we're seeing a widespread, indiscriminate sell-off caused by $CRWV, $ORCL, and OpenAI + credit tightening (partially due to incorrect institutional short reports from Burry on GPU depreciation).

These types of sell-offs are completely not warranted for companies like $NBIS with $7-9B forward ARR and extremely strong balance sheets. But for other speculative companies, it's a well-needed correction.

A good quote is “retail is last to sell, last to buy back”.

If you think you can sell and come back two weeks later, missing one or two huge rebound days after a selloff can cost you most of the recovery gains.

Institutions are probably buying the better names right now eg. $NBIS through dark pools/block trades now after these types of washouts and margin liquidations. We've also seen institutional ownership go from 38%-> 43-46% despite share prices dropping.

Use this as a buying opportunity for good names, and hold through these periods of volatility.
我们现在正在看到 AI + DC 股票的实时崩盘,$IREN 本周跌 37.88%,$NBIS 本月跌 35.27%。

恐慌来自信用收紧、高息债、OpenAI 传染、宏观,以及最重要的:非理性恐惧。

现在发生的事大概是:

1. 信用收紧 - 像 $APLD 这样的公司债券卖不出去(认购不足),最后发行了 $2.35B 的高收益债 - Bloomberg 11 月 14 日。债券按 97 美分发行,收益率约 10%。

这笔债的风险主要 tied to Applied Digital 对 $CRWV 的依赖,后者占了其合同收益的很大一部分。机构对 buildout 更谨慎(比如 Burry 关于 GPU 折旧的做空报告),让融资变得更难。

2. OpenAI 传染 - 市场担心 Oracle/Coreweave/OpenAI 这条链条里的资金承诺能否兑现。

3. 宏观 - 政府停摆、降息概率变化和风险偏好下降,都在压高 beta。

4. 非理性恐惧 - 很多公司合同、收入和基本面并没坏,但被算法和板块一起砸。

我认为这更像是一次流动性/情绪驱动的杀估值,而不是 AI DC thesis 结束。真正有 hyperscaler 合同、融资能力强、毛利结构好的公司会恢复得更快。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1989352983348589023
❤️ 313 🔁 33 💬 32
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah I made another post about credit tightening and contagion from OpenAI in one of my other posts but $NBIS seems the best isolated in those terms because of their strong balance sheet, convertible note structure.

It’s mostly indiscriminate sector selloff on top of the something structural mainly affecting $CRWV, $ORCL and related co like $APLD. But given Nebius is high-beta, it can drop from $130 to $90 in 1 trading week but it can also go back to the same price in a short time.

If we go from the GPU depreciation short argument many others like $CIFR are also isolated because they just do colo, so a lot of the selloffs don’t make sense.
是的,我在另一篇帖子里也写过 credit tightening 和 OpenAI 传染,但 $NBIS 在这些方面看起来隔离得最好,因为资产负债表强、可转债结构好。

这主要是无差别板块抛售,叠加一些主要影响 $CRWV$ORCL$APLD 这类相关公司的结构性问题。但因为 Nebius 是 high-beta,它可以一周从 $130 跌到 $90,也可以短时间回到同样价格。

如果按 GPU 折旧做空论点,像 $CIFR 这类公司也隔离,因为它们只做 colo,所以很多抛售没有意义。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 I would catch Omoroi’s falling knife too on $NBIS since everyone deserves love.

March-may calls are safer but I expect weebius to recover!
@soulbiri1 我也会接 Omoroi 在 $NBIS 上的 falling knife,因为每个人都值得被爱。

3 月-5 月 calls 更安全,但我预计 weebius 会恢复!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So two things:

- It helps to read past the first sentence
- percentages change when you look at a post a trading day later.

I respect your dedication, but you’re zeroing in on a direct comparison nobody is making. It’s a long post for sure and most would just skip it and go to comments but the only direct comparisons made were

- neoclouds with mag7 contracts
- neoclouds with healthy balance sheets
- neoclouds that don’t directly have contracts with OpenAI.

So just to help you again, the whole post was about credit markets, debt structure, OpenAI capex overhang, and ecosystem risk affecting the whole sector.

Using 1W to 1M timeframe is to show levels neoclouds dropped from (eg. $IREN after MSFT deal) for a sector wide drop from premarket. Using different prices a trading fay later when neoclouds recovered from premarket doesn’t change or favor the thesis.

It helps to read past the first sentence (I own $IREN too)
两件事:

- 读完第一句之后的内容会有帮助
- 你隔一个交易日看帖子时,百分比会变化。

我尊重你的投入,但你在盯着一个没人做的直接比较。这确实是长帖,大多数人会直接跳到评论,但文中唯一直接比较的是:

- 有 mag7 合同的 neoclouds
- 资产负债表健康的 neoclouds
- 没有直接与 OpenAI 签合同的 neoclouds。

再帮你一次,整篇帖子讲的是信用市场、债务结构、OpenAI capex overhang,以及影响整个板块的生态风险。

用 1W 到 1M 时间框架,是为了展示 neoclouds 从哪里跌下来(比如 $IREN 在 MSFT 交易后),用于说明盘前的全板块下跌。隔一个交易日 neoclouds 从盘前恢复后用不同价格,并不会改变或支持你的 thesis。

读完第一句之后的内容会有帮助(我也持有 $IREN)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@KobeissiLetter Another $40B in capex going to neoclouds like $WULF / $CIFR and the data center buildout by $GOOGL.

Meanwhile markets are selling off indiscriminately for the wrong reasons. https://t.co/S9wmV8d1XD
@KobeissiLetter 又有 $40B capex 流向 $WULF / $CIFR 这类 neoclouds,以及 $GOOGL 的 data center buildout。

与此同时,市场却因为错误原因无差别抛售。https://t.co/S9wmV8d1XD
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@dottomato @babyfolio $NBIS がさらに数パーセント下落したので、そろそろ 3 株買う頃かもしれない
@dottomato @babyfolio $NBIS 又下跌了几个百分点,所以可能差不多该买 3 股了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@number1invest_ @grok there's probably too much number crunching by reviewing every single 13F filing for Grok to handle.

I remember asking it one single output in another thread but they go it wrong.

https://t.co/rP8XZNQMpX
@number1invest_ @grok 逐份查看每一个 13F filing 可能有太多数字处理,Grok 可能应付不了。

我记得在另一个 thread 里让它输出一个单独结果,但它答错了。

https://t.co/rP8XZNQMpX
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
@grok verify this: net exposure calculation (7,882,103 long shares minus ~7,581,500 short-equivalent from puts’ delta ≈ -1) yields the minimal ~300,603 net long.

Reference comes for Wells Fargo & Company MN’s official Form 13F-HR filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), submitted on November 13, 2025, for the quarter ending September 30, 2025 (Q3 2025) For $IREN
@grok 验证一下这个:净敞口计算为 7,882,103 股多头,减去约 7,581,500 股由 put delta ≈ -1 折算出的空头等价敞口,得到最低约 300,603 股净多头。

参考来源是 Wells Fargo & Company MN 向美国证券交易委员会(SEC)提交的官方 Form 13F-HR 文件,提交日期为 2025 年 11 月 13 日,对应截至 2025 年 9 月 30 日的季度(2025 Q3),标的是 $IREN
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1989281761776603511
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Wow, disgusting -42.69% drop on $TSSI, sorry if you have that. It's likely part of the datacenter selloff and looks like they missed on earnings due to operational blunders.

I haven't looked at it for a awhile, but if they're still piggybacking on $DELL, then it's likely a good buy. Lot of forward revenue, including with $SMCI coming in 2026 Q1-Q2. SMCI quoted backlog delays too. And lot of $DELL backlog with the DC buildout.

Markets tanked $CRWV too for short term delay on buildout.
哇,$TSSI 跌了 -42.69%,很恶心,如果你有的话很抱歉。这可能是 data center 抛售的一部分,看起来他们因为运营失误导致 earnings miss。

我有一阵没看它了,但如果他们仍然搭着 $DELL 的顺风车,那可能是不错的买入。远期收入很多,包括 2026 Q1-Q2 进来的 $SMCI。SMCI 也提到 backlog delays。还有很多 $DELL backlog 来自 DC buildout。

市场也因为 buildout 短期延迟砸了 $CRWV
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
It's the $CRWV, $ORCL OpenAI Effect. Markets are irrational during fear and views the sector as a single entity vs. seeing the nuances:

GPU Deprecation - Burry Short Thesis (rapid hardware obsolescence):

$CIFR, $WULF, etc. Literally not affected since they don't buy GPUs and do colo.

Credit Risk - tightening makes all capital-intensive AI buildouts more expensive and fragile.

$NBIS and others... isolated (Strong balance sheet, convertible debt).

Future Revenue Bubble with OpenAI not having enough

$IREN, $NBIS, $CIFR, $WULF literally not affected since they're backed by Mag7, not OpenAI.

Hilarious buying opportunity for some.
这是 $CRWV$ORCL 的 OpenAI Effect。市场在恐惧中不理性,把板块视为单一实体,而不是看细微差别:

GPU Deprecation - Burry Short Thesis(硬件快速过时):

$CIFR$WULF 等完全不受影响,因为它们不买 GPUs,只做 colo。

Credit Risk - 收紧让所有资本密集型 AI buildouts 更昂贵、更脆弱。

$NBIS 和其他公司……是隔离的(强资产负债表,可转债)。

OpenAI 资金不足带来的未来收入泡沫。

$IREN$NBIS$CIFR$WULF 完全不受影响,因为它们由 Mag7 支撑,不是 OpenAI。

对一些标的来说是好笑的买入机会。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks, yeah I had $IREN as S tier when I did my tierlist earlier but they got downgraded a lot because they ended up trying to compete vs $CRWV in the full-stack by buying billions in GPUs. A lot of IREN holders were arguing colo was most profitable, but in $IREN's earnings call, they literally said they were buying GPUs and doing the full-stack due to "higher revenue potential and stronger returns".

It's much, much harder building out the software layer than people think and the execution risk for IREN skyrocketed immensely. Meanwhile $NBIS and $CRWV already has that nailed down ( $NBIS wins vs. $CRWV per their whitepaper) but Coreweave messed up with interest debt + OpenAI drama.

Unfortunately we're seeing a whole sector short despite many of the nuances eg. $CIFR not being affected by GPU depreciation arguments.

Or $NBIS having Mag7 + enterprise customers over 5Y periods + strong balance sheet and not affected by AI bubble OpenAI fiasco with $ORCL + credit tightening.
谢谢,是的,我早些做 tierlist 时把 $IREN 放在 S tier,但后来大幅下调,因为他们最终试图通过购买数十亿美元 GPUs,在 full-stack 上和 $CRWV 竞争。很多 IREN 持有者一直说 colo 最赚钱,但在 $IREN 的 earnings call 里,他们明确说购买 GPUs 并做 full-stack 是因为“higher revenue potential and stronger returns”。

构建软件层比人们想象中难得多,IREN 的执行风险大幅飙升。与此同时,$NBIS$CRWV 已经搞定这点(按他们 whitepaper,$NBIS 赢过 $CRWV),但 Coreweave 被利息债务 + OpenAI drama 搞砸了。

不幸的是我们看到整个板块被做空,尽管有很多细微差别,比如 $CIFR 不受 GPU 折旧论点影响。

或者 $NBIS 有 Mag7 + enterprise 客户,5Y 周期 + 强资产负债表,不受 $ORCL + 信贷收紧带来的 AI bubble OpenAI fiasco 影响。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Neocloud isn't winner takes all, it's a whole ecosystem but not everything can become AWS.

We're seeing $NBIS, $IREN, $CRWV, and $ORCL compete in the true "Neocloud", most profitable full stack race to become Azure/AWS. Doing vertical integration, building capacity, buying GPUs, and doing orchestration, and some incubants entering the race.

So far $NBIS is the clear winner with hyperscalers + enterprises + good balance sheet in a matter of time, $CRWV is swamped with interest debt, $ORCL failed buildout so far and OpenAI as their biggest + risky backlog. $IREN is promising but they have the biggest question mark for execution since it's not the original approach like $CIFR people were expecting with their capacity and software orchestration is much harder than people expect (looking at $ORCL then $CRWV spending billions on software aqusitions).

Then there's $CIFR, $WULF, miners, etc and others do safer colo with their existing capacity while hyperscalers like Amazon plugs in their own GPUs. I still put them as a Neocloud but I guess it's time to make a separate category, but these aren't as affected by Burry's false comments about 2Y GPU deprecation lol.

And then we have the rest... undergoing the pivot to HPC, with X amount of future capacity promised and this is becoming increasingly difficult to raise money for this change from credit tightening.

It's a good thing that we're starting to see emerging winners after the series of recent earnings. Market hasn't priced this in yet but it's a matter of time.
Neocloud 不是 winner takes all,它是一个完整生态,但不是所有东西都能变成 AWS。

我们看到 $NBIS$IREN$CRWV$ORCL 在真正的 “Neocloud” 中竞争,也就是最赚钱的 full stack 竞赛,目标是成为 Azure/AWS。它们做垂直整合、建设容量、购买 GPUs、做 orchestration,也有一些 incumbents 进入竞赛。

到目前为止,$NBIS 是明确赢家,拥有 hyperscalers + enterprises + 良好资产负债表,只是时间问题;$CRWV 被利息债务淹没;$ORCL 到目前为止 buildout 失败,而且 OpenAI 是他们最大且风险很高的 backlog。$IREN 有前景,但执行上问号最大,因为这不是 $CIFR 人们预期的原始路径,软件 orchestration 比人们预想更难(看看 $ORCL,再看看 $CRWV 花数十亿美元做软件收购)。

然后是 $CIFR$WULF、miners 等其他公司,用现有容量做更安全的 colo,让 Amazon 这类 hyperscalers 插入自己的 GPUs。我仍把它们视作 Neocloud,但也许该单独分一类,它们不太受 Burry 关于 2Y GPU depreciation 的错误评论影响 lol。

然后还有其他公司……正在转向 HPC,承诺未来 X 容量,而信贷收紧让为这种转型融资越来越难。

好事是,最近一系列财报后我们开始看到新赢家浮现。市场还没定价,但只是时间问题。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Nobody since fees are burned to prevent ddos via supply burn. Oversimplification but it’s more like institutional community volunteer work in terms of maintaining the network rather than having fee incentive like eth pos. Just different network consensus and approach.

I see xrp being adopted as a settlement mechanism in between institutions (kind of like Customers Bank Instant Token) and personally built some applications for cross country settlement part (vs. US bank tokens) just due to instant finality/low fees, but there’s a lot of annoying issues regarding addresses and minimum balances like Polkadot with onboarding/dead capital, and not widely adopted scripting like EVM where you can deploy the same contracts across polygon to l2.
没人,因为费用会被 burn,以通过 supply burn 防止 ddos。简单化地说,它更像维护网络的机构社区志愿工作,而不是像 eth pos 那样有 fee incentive。只是不同的网络共识和方法。

我认为 xrp 会被机构间采用为结算机制(有点像 Customers Bank Instant Token),我个人也因为 instant finality/low fees 做过一些跨国结算应用(相对于美国银行 tokens),但它在地址和 minimum balances 上有很多烦人的问题,像 Polkadot 一样会影响 onboarding/dead capital,而且不像 EVM 那样有广泛采用的 scripting,可以把同样 contracts 部署到 polygon 到 l2。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Your analysis nails the second-order alpha. Credit tightening hurts the ability of weaker competitors to fund new capacity + improve forward FCF/margins, fundamentally constraining growth.

This translates to more durable margins to the T 1 Neoclouds like $NBIS and $CIFR with healthy balance sheets and no high debt interest. This is a massive long term premium the market is currently mispricing + hasn't priced in yet with this sell-off.

Mag7 capex as we've seen is increasing, but it's funneling into winners eg. $NBIS, $WULF, etc. We're seeing an indiscriminate sell-off due to panic from $CRWV and $ORCL + credit tightening, and this is a buying opportunity and actually a competitive advantage for the least affected Neoclouds.
你的分析抓住了二阶 alpha。信贷收紧伤害弱竞争者为新容量融资 + 改善远期 FCF/利润率的能力,从根本上限制增长。

这会让像 $NBIS$CIFR 这种资产负债表健康、没有高债务利息的 T 1 Neoclouds 拥有更持久利润率。这是市场目前正在错配、且在这次抛售中还没定价的巨大长期溢价。

Mag7 capex 正如我们看到的在增加,但它正在流向赢家,比如 $NBIS$WULF 等。我们看到由于 $CRWV$ORCL + 信贷收紧引发恐慌,出现无差别抛售,这既是买入机会,也实际上是对受影响最小的 Neoclouds 的竞争优势。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Indigo_Pilot Yeah worth holding $LTC. I was just about to comment it's working its way back up.

There's quite a lot of random altcoin rallies like $ZEC, probably wouldn't want to miss Litecoin, especially that it has an ETF now.

I'm still holding mine.
@Indigo_Pilot 是的,$LTC 值得持有。我正想评论它正在回升。

现在有很多随机 altcoin rallies,比如 $ZEC,可能不想错过 Litecoin,尤其是它现在有 ETF 了。

我仍然持有我的。
❤️ 10 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mysticall3g3nd @t1energy true https://t.co/wokFnRs9cn
@mysticall3g3nd @t1energy true https://t.co/wokFnRs9cn
❤️ 8 🔁 0 💬 3
打开原推
💬 引用
Lot of headline-only posters out there.

I usually try to connect the dots on top of the headlines and fill in the why (it moves markets).

TLDR on the new macro setup (bullish for high-beta names like $NBIS, $IREN, etc):

1⃣ DEAL TO END GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN TAKES SHAPE - Axios (Government shutdown likely ending within ~5 days)

Commentary: Event-contract odds jumped from 27% → 54% in the past hour or two. We're pricing in a near-term resolution.

• Liquidity flows back once government spending resumes.

• Market reprices GDP growth higher.

• Consumer spending picks up immediately.

• Uncertainty fades (markets hate uncertainty).

Result → Expect high-beta and cyclicals to do well when risk appetite comes back.

2️⃣ $2,000 “tariff dividend” proposal to American taxpayers

Commentary: Feels like a mini-version of the COVID stimulus. Those deposits triggered the fastest jumps in retail spending, people were buying everything from Bitcoin to League Skins with that. But at least this came from tariffs.

• Great for assets: more money flowing into the economy.

• Might lead to inflation: more demand pressure, potential Fed pushback later.

• Short-term: Extremely positive for risk assets and growth names. Mid to long-term: Could backfire with inflation and the Fed tightens.

• Usually moves like this aim to ignite markets in the near term, good for anything heavy growth.

Result → Expect frontrunning before the official reopening and a spike once it’s confirmed.

You can kinda see stuff like $ETH start its recovery from the combination of the two above $3300->$3500 as an example.

Again I expected things like #2, just due to midterms coming up next year. The party in power usually gets re-elected if markets seem to be doing well (so I'd expect stuff like #2 + fed pressured rate cuts, so markets go up).

Of course this is just new news + speculation, not facts for sure given how volatile decisions are made lol. But generally focus on stocks that corrected but still have growing fundamentals eg. $NBIS, $RDDT, $ALAB, etc.
外面很多人只看标题。

我通常会在标题之上把点连起来,并补上为什么(这会推动市场)。

新宏观设置 TLDR(利好 $NBIS$IREN 等 high-beta 名字):

1⃣ DEAL TO END GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN TAKES SHAPE - Axios(政府停摆可能在约 5 天内结束)

评论:事件合约概率过去一两个小时从 27% -> 54%。市场在定价短期解决。

• 政府支出恢复后流动性回流。
• 市场上调 GDP growth 定价。
• 消费支出立即回升。
• 不确定性消退(市场讨厌不确定性)。

结果 -> 风险偏好回来时,预计 high-beta 和 cyclicals 表现良好。

2️⃣ 给美国纳税人的 $2,000 “tariff dividend” 提案

评论:感觉像迷你版 COVID stimulus。那些存款引发了最快的零售支出跳升,人们拿它买从 Bitcoin 到 League Skins 的各种东西。但至少这来自 tariffs。

• 对资产有利:更多钱流入经济。
• 可能导致通胀:需求压力更大,未来可能引发 Fed 反制。
• 短期:对风险资产和成长股极其正面。中长期:可能因通胀和 Fed 收紧而反噬。
• 这种动作通常旨在短期点燃市场,对任何高增长资产都有利。

结果 -> 预计正式重开前会有人抢跑,确认后会出现 spike。

你能看到像 $ETH 这样的东西开始从上述两者组合中恢复,$3300->$3500 就是例子。

再次强调,我预期会有 #2 这类东西,只因为明年有 midterms。执政党通常在市场看起来表现良好时更容易连任(所以我预计会有 #2 + fed 被施压降息,让市场上涨)。

当然这只是新消息 + 猜测,不一定是事实,考虑到决策有多波动 lol。但一般关注那些已经修正、基本面仍在增长的股票,比如 $NBIS$RDDT$ALAB 等。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Pretty disgusting correction across the board.

Last 5 days for high-beta growth stocks:

$SMCI -26.11%
$RKLB -19.85%
$CRCL -19.81%
$NBIS -19.14%
$WYFI -18.55%
$ALAB -16.64%
$CRDO -16.8%
$HOOD -14.36%
$ASTS -14.09%
$IREN -13.22%
$AMD -11.63%
$CIFR -10.05%
$RDDT -9.00%

Speculative no revenue stocks like ( $RGTI -27.33%, $QBUT -25.5%, $QBTS -25.43%, $OKLO -17.04% etc), had larger corrections across the board.

When the government reopens, I’d expect many of the speculative names to stay down, while companies where fundamentals are in tact (eg. $CIFR, $NBIS, $TSM, $HOOD, $RDDT) would recover.

Current Contract Market data:
Nov 12th-15th: 22%
Nov 15th: 49% (~half chance sometime in the next week)
Nov 30th: 92%

Great time to position into higher-beta stocks during large corrections, (if fundamentals are in-tact), especially when we're in the extreme-fear part of markets and there's 75%+ of a third rate cut next month.

Broad selloffs like these are also why you don't do short dated options <30dte, even if you are correct on earnings like $SNAP or $CIFR.
这波全线回调真的很难看。

过去 5 天,高 beta 成长股表现:

$SMCI -26.11%
$RKLB -19.85%
$CRCL -19.81%
$NBIS -19.14%
$WYFI -18.55%
$ALAB -16.64%
$CRDO -16.8%
$HOOD -14.36%
$ASTS -14.09%
$IREN -13.22%
$AMD -11.63%
$CIFR -10.05%
$RDDT -9.00%

投机性、没有收入的股票(比如 $RGTI -27.33%、$QBUT -25.5%、$QBTS -25.43%、$OKLO -17.04% 等)整体回调更大。

政府重开后,我预计很多投机标的会继续趴着,而基本面没坏的公司(比如 $CIFR$NBIS$TSM$HOOD$RDDT)会恢复。

当前 Contract Market 数据:
Nov 12th-15th:22%
Nov 15th:49%(下周某个时候大概一半概率)
Nov 30th:92%

在这种回调里布局更高 beta、但基本面仍然完整的股票,是很好的时点。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1986883096692830292
❤️ 109 🔁 5 💬 9
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Probably a strong forward projections ARR for $NBIS.

New UK datacenters, Israel government datacenters that add more immediate ARR with capacity buildout + new contracts.

Whitepaper alludes to higher margins from orchestration. Management exudes confidence which is what shareholders like.

We’ll see in a few days.
$NBIS 可能会有很强的 forward projections ARR。

新的 UK datacenters、Israel government datacenters,会随着 capacity buildout + 新合同增加更即时的 ARR。

Whitepaper 暗示 orchestration 带来更高利润率。管理层散发出的信心正是股东喜欢的。

几天后见分晓。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@CB3409 I don’t do any paid groups, just want to publish information for free to help others out.

Especially in times where there’s major corrections across the board from $NBIS to $ALAB, it helps to understand why in order to develop conviction on holding positions or DCA to not panic
@CB3409 我不做任何付费群,只想免费发布信息来帮助别人。

尤其是在从 $NBIS$ALAB 全面大幅修正的时候,理解为什么会这样,有助于建立持仓信念或 DCA,而不是恐慌。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Eh, might dip again going if Gov shutdown prolongs, who knows. I've been out with a pretty bad cold this week so haven't been spending much time looking at markets + reading X.

Just DCA'd calls on $META after reading through earnings + news, but otherwise pretty nonchalant few days for me.
呃,如果 Gov shutdown 延长,可能还会再跌,谁知道。我这周重感冒,所以没花太多时间看市场 + 读 X。

读完财报 + 新闻后,我刚 DCA 了 $META calls,除此之外这几天对我来说挺淡定。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Hope you don't get margin called (if you're on margin). Otherwise, recovery on leverage should net higher upside.

$NBIS only had extremely positive changes to the fundamentals since the $MSFT deal but is trading around the same price on the initial announcement pop.

Macro aside:
- Inclusion into MSCI world index fund ~Nov 24th.
- Government AI HPC deals (Israel)
- UK Data center.

There's other minor service launches too like Token Factory but I'd probably put those three above as the biggest changes (latter two for revenue increase, first one for liquidity inflow)
希望你不要被 margin called(如果你用了 margin)。否则,杠杆上的恢复应该带来更高上行。

$NBIS$MSFT 交易以来基本面只有极其积极的变化,但现在交易价格大约和最初公告 spike 时一样。

抛开宏观:
- 约 11 月 24 日纳入 MSCI world index fund。
- Government AI HPC deals(Israel)
- UK Data center。

还有其他小型服务发布,比如 Token Factory,但我可能会把上面三项列为最大变化(后两项提高收入,第一项带来流动性流入)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Sure, my speculation was that we'll see a large recovery in high beta stocks like $NBIS, $IREN, or $ASTS once government will re-opens. Since there's a broader tailwind of a rate cut next month priced in at 74%.

So with the current contract data:

Nov 12th-15th: 22%

Nov 15th: 51% (~half chance sometime in the next week)

Nov 30th: 92%

We can just see there's a 50% chance government reopens in the next 7 days.

So we'll get a recovery around then (likely with some frontrunning if chances increase). That's just in terms with estimating recovery.
当然,我的猜测是,一旦政府重新开门,我们会看到 $NBIS$IREN$ASTS 这类 high beta 股票大幅恢复。因为下个月降息目前定价 74%,这是更广泛的顺风。

所以按当前合约数据:

Nov 12th-15th: 22%

Nov 15th: 51%(未来一周某个时间约一半概率)

Nov 30th: 92%

可以看到,未来 7 天政府重开的概率是 50%。

所以我们会在那附近恢复(如果概率上升,可能有人抢跑)。这只是用来估计恢复时间。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So for $IREN, the amount of comments I've seen bullposting about EPS "beat" are the same people who kept trying to quote 92%+ gross margins on AI HPC. It's literally just accounting framing.

Earnings wise, extremely bullish that they projected $3.4B ARR from AI cloud. IREN has a lot more capacity left-over so they'll likely scale ARR more going into 2026.

But that aside I've always argued capacity -> revenue, but margins/FCF from that revenue is more important. Now it's just a debate how much of that revenue converts into profit, which I don't think we'll know for sure until future earnings come in.

That aside IREN earnings seemed great.
关于 $IREN,我看到很多人 bullposting EPS “beat”,这些人也是一直试图引用 AI HPC 92%+ gross margins 的人。这真的只是会计表述。

从 earnings 看,他们预计 AI cloud 有 $3.4B ARR,这极其看多。IREN 还有很多剩余容量,所以进入 2026 年他们可能会进一步扩大 ARR。

但除此之外,我一直认为 capacity -> revenue,但该收入产生的 margins/FCF 更重要。现在争论只是有多少收入会转化为利润,我认为要到未来财报出来才会真正知道。

除此之外,IREN 财报看起来很好。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah, $SNAP earnings were incredibly solid, especially with $400m ARR from Perplexity.

Then you have opex cuts from memories Cloud coming in next year, $500m buyback, beat across the board.

Incredibly bullish mid term, but it got caught in the broader selloff. I'd agree it's extremely undervalued at $13.7B, easy 50%+ going into next year. But there's a lot of option flow + broader sell-off affecting near term stock prices.
是的,$SNAP 财报非常扎实,尤其是来自 Perplexity 的 $400m ARR。

然后还有明年来自 memories Cloud 的 opex cuts、$500m buyback、全面 beat。

中期极其看多,但它被更广泛抛售拖累。我同意它在 $13.7B 处极度低估,明年容易有 50%+。但有很多 option flow + 更广泛抛售影响短期股价。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Pretty disgusting correction across the board.

Last 5 days for high-beta growth stocks:

$SMCI -26.11%
$RKLB -19.85%
$CRCL -19.81%
$NBIS -19.14%
$WYFI -18.55%
$ALAB -16.64%
$CRDO -16.8%
$HOOD -14.36%
$ASTS -14.09%
$IREN -13.22%
$AMD -11.63%
$CIFR -10.05%
$RDDT -9.00%

Speculative no revenue stocks like ( $RGTI -27.33%, $QBUT -25.5%, $QBTS -25.43%, $OKLO -17.04% etc), had larger corrections across the board.

When the government reopens, I’d expect many of the speculative names to stay down, while companies where fundamentals are in tact (eg. $CIFR, $NBIS, $TSM, $HOOD, $RDDT) would recover.

Current Contract Market data:
Nov 12th-15th: 22%
Nov 15th: 49% (~half chance sometime in the next week)
Nov 30th: 92%

Great time to position into higher-beta stocks during large corrections, (if fundamentals are in-tact), especially when we're in the extreme-fear part of markets and there's 75%+ of a third rate cut next month.

Broad selloffs like these are also why you don't do short dated options <30dte, even if you are correct on earnings like $SNAP or $CIFR.
全市场修正非常恶心。

过去 5 天 high-beta growth stocks:

$SMCI -26.11%
$RKLB -19.85%
$CRCL -19.81%
$NBIS -19.14%
$WYFI -18.55%
$ALAB -16.64%
$CRDO -16.8%
$HOOD -14.36%
$ASTS -14.09%
$IREN -13.22%
$AMD -11.63%
$CIFR -10.05%
$RDDT -9.00%

投机性无收入股票($RGTI -27.33%、$QBUT -25.5%、$QBTS -25.43%、$OKLO -17.04% 等)出现了更大幅度的全面修正。

政府重开后,我预计许多投机标的会继续低迷,而基本面完好的公司(比如 $CIFR$NBIS$TSM$HOOD$RDDT)会恢复。

当前 Contract Market 数据:
Nov 12th-15th: 22%
Nov 15th: 49%(未来一周约一半概率)
Nov 30th: 92%

在大幅修正时布局 higher-beta 股票是好时机(如果基本面完好),尤其是在市场 extreme-fear 阶段,且下个月第三次降息概率超过 75%。

这类广泛抛售也说明为什么不要做 <30dte 短期期权,即使你对 $SNAP$CIFR 财报判断正确。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Ignore the noise and hold positions/add in market winners.

You have:

- Insane forward revenue growth from Neoclouds like $NBIS, $IREN, $CIFR
- Record high CapEX projections from Mag7 earnings like $META to $MSFT
- Record high forward revenue projections + margin growth from semiconductors like $TSM.

If fundamentals are in tact, news headlines like "The AI Party is Over" is BS.

We'll likely see a major recovery when government shutdown ends.

This is likely a short-term correction pricing in a few things such as no third rate cut (86% -> 70%, still likely) + government shutdown extending past the 16th (53% chance, 30% chance 2 days ago) per contract markets.
忽略噪音,继续持有/加仓市场赢家。

你现在看到的是:

- $NBIS$IREN$CIFR 这类 Neoclouds 疯狂的未来收入增长
- 从 $META$MSFT,Mag7 财报给出的 CapEX 预期创历史新高
- $TSM 这类半导体公司未来收入预期和利润率增长也创高位

如果基本面没坏,新闻标题里那种“The AI Party is Over”就是扯淡。

政府停摆结束后,我们很可能会看到大幅修复。

这大概率只是一次短期回调,在定价几件事:第三次降息可能没有了(86% -> 70%,但仍然大概率)+ 根据 contract markets,政府停摆延续到 16 日之后(53% 概率,两天前还是 30%)。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1986483611202400672
❤️ 259 🔁 32 💬 23
打开原推
💬 引用
@hereforgoodish $NBIS is very undervalued at these levels. It’s just a high beta stock affected by broader macro.

If fundamentals are in tact, then it’s a buying opportunity

https://t.co/RTbdrjXqtx
@hereforgoodish $NBIS 在这些水平非常低估。它只是被更广泛宏观影响的 high beta 股票。

如果基本面完好,那就是买入机会。

https://t.co/RTbdrjXqtx
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Why I think $NBIS can easily hit ~$400/share or $100B+ market cap in 1 year:

Right now, Nebius trades at a $24B valuation (316%+ increase to $100B).

If we pretend that there's 0 growth in 2026-2027:

Core Business: $31B–$36.5B
Sum of Parts: $7.1B (40% slashed)
Midpoint Valuation = $39B valuation (+62.5%)

This is before factoring in any growth, which could scale it up to $100B.

Today, investors are effectively paying $13B for the core business today, which is on track to grow 1,000% YoY-from $100M in quarterly revenue to $1.3B , with 60-70% gross margins.

Markets are usually forward looking, but for Nebius, it only looks at the ground. These are just informal thoughts and a small writeup.

Business Valuation:
__________________

Current cash equivalents (post $4.2B) ~ $5.88B

Portfolio Companies: ~$2.68B

Clickhouse (28%, $6.35B valuation), Avride (17%, ~$3.1B valuation), Toloka (51%, ~720M valuation) - speculative estimates on Avride/Toloka. Also did not consider Clickhouse updated valuation, which likely grew).

Physical Assets: ~$2B midpoint

GPUs (~750m-1B), Servers, networking ($400-600m), Land/buildings ($300m-$500m), power/cooling ($200-$300m). Total phyiscal assets sitting between $1.65B-$2.4B

Conservative Sum of parts: ~$10.58B (As of today, not considering portfolio companies going up). Nebius has eliminated most debt from the note conversion.

Typically companies with portfolios never trade 1:1 with NAV, so I just slashed 40% off 10.58B or so when doing calculations which is conservative considering it's mostly cash.

_

BASE CASE WITH NO GROWTH

Now going into the core business:

FY 2026-2027 EST: $1.1B projected FY 2025, + $3.8B from $MSFT (contract / 5) (obviously maybe revenue lag, which is why it's on avg 2026-2027 anyway).

If Nebius stopped growing completely off their 2025 projections, they would do $4.98B minimum ARR in 2026/2027.

Gross margins are sitting at ~71.2% (from last quarter), but likely between 60-70% + management aiming 30% EBITDA.

These calculations from the core business are if growth stopped completely:

EV/Revenue 6–8×: $31.2B | 41.6B
EV/EBITDA 15–25×: $23.4B | $39B

Forward-looking EV on the base/bear case = $31–42B (revenue) or $23–39B (EBITDA)

(Core Business) + Sum of Parts = $33.58B midpoint no growth case + ~$10.58 * .6 = ~$39B.

And now we'll consider that next if Nebius grows.
__________________

CASE WITH GROWTH:

Now here's how we get to $100B just based on core business.

$NBIS has ~$5B ARR confirmed.

Only thing Nebius needs is ARR growth to $8–12B:

1 more hyperscaler deal + SMB expansion.

All it takes is a GCP or Meta deal and we hit that target. (This is just high-level, not going into GPU depreciation arguments, increasing power, execution risk, etc). And I'm bullish on the chances of another hyperscaler deal happening in 1 year time when more Mag7 signed deals recently (eg Meta $14B with CRWV).

Also everything else would need to stay the same gross margin: ≥60–70% and EBITDA target: ~30%. On the bright side, with the whitepaper, we've also likely seen expanding margins with Nebius.

NBIS is claiming near-100% realized GPU utilization through their whitepaper yesterday, which would justify higher margins and higher revenue per GPU compared to $CRWV or any miner pivot (+ NBIS has no no-toxic interest debt, and a more diversified client base).

Their software orchestration is a moat in and of itself and not all neoclouds or bitcoin miner pivots can sustain the same high-gross margins.

Happy to argue why full stack, margins, customer diversification with SMBs are important (if you want to compare $IREN GW capacity, or others) -> just look at $ORCL losing $100m+ on buildout.

Regardless, I'm bullish on $NBIS over every other possible Neocloud because of opex costs + margins + fullstack + client base. (Feel free to let me know if I missed anything or calculated wrong, also open to debate)

But that aside, current $23B marketcap is a firesale that does not price in growth when it should be valued at $39B today. Then there's the upside on 1 more hyperscaler deal though for 4x return in 1 year at a $100B MC .
为什么我认为 $NBIS 1 年内可以轻松到约 $400/股,或 $100B+ 市值:

现在 Nebius 估值约 $24B(涨到 $100B 需要 +316%)。

如果我们假设 2026-2027 年完全没有增长:

核心业务:$31B-$36.5B
分部估值:$7.1B(打 6 折)
中位估值 = $39B(+62.5%)

这还没计入任何增长,而增长可能把估值推到 $100B。

今天投资者实际上只为核心业务付了 $13B,而这块业务正走在同比增长 1,000% 的路上:从单季收入 $100M 到 $1.3B,毛利率 60-70%。

市场通常是前瞻的,但对 Nebius,市场只盯着脚下。这只是一些非正式想法和小短文。

业务估值:
__________________

现有现金等价物($4.2B 后)约 $5.88B

投资组合/子公司还有额外价值。

如果核心 Neocloud 业务能按指引扩张,收入和毛利的组合会让现在的市值看起来非常小。关键是合同执行、融资成本和 hyperscaler 需求继续兑现。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1981351114655346809
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Ignore the noise and hold positions/add in market winners.

You have:

- Insane forward revenue growth from Neoclouds like $NBIS, $IREN, $CIFR
- Record high CapEX projections from Mag7 earnings like $META to $MSFT
- Record high forward revenue projections + margin growth from semiconductors like $TSM.

If fundamentals are in tact, news headlines like "The AI Party is Over" is BS.

We'll likely see a major recovery when government shutdown ends.

This is likely a short-term correction pricing in a few things such as no third rate cut (86% -> 70%, still likely) + government shutdown extending past the 16th (53% chance, 30% chance 2 days ago) per contract markets.
忽略噪音,持有/加仓市场赢家。

你有:

- $NBIS$IREN$CIFR 这类 Neoclouds 疯狂远期收入增长
- $META$MSFT 这类 Mag7 财报给出的历史新高 CapEX projections
- $TSM 这类 semiconductors 的历史新高远期收入预测 + 利润率增长。

如果基本面完好,像 “The AI Party is Over” 这种新闻标题就是 BS。

政府停摆结束时,我们很可能看到重大恢复。

这可能是短期修正,在定价一些因素,比如没有第三次降息(86% -> 70%,仍可能)+ 政府停摆延长到 16 日之后(合约市场 53% 概率,两天前是 30%)。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
November 4th - Stock Analysis + Macro

Fire Sale: $META$NBIS$IBIT

Strong Buys: $RDDT$RKLB$WLAC$CIFR$LTC$SOL$CORZ
Memory: Nanya $2408, SK Hynix $HXSCL, $MU

Buy: $AMZN$DELL$SMCI$ALAB$CRDO$TSM$AMD$FLNC$TE

Warnings: $IREN$ETH$BMNR$CRCLQuantum: $IONQ$RGTI$QBTS

Normally I'd go down the list, have more buy/sells, and talk about every single explanation but I caught a cold.

So just doing an extremely light version today and didn’t feel like researching more stocks. Just focusing on a few with a broader overview while I drink some soup.
(Will help explain if someone asks though.)

$META:
Once again, Strong, Strong, Strong Buy on the 15%+ earnings drop and post-ER drop.
Beat on Revenue. Beat on EPS. Forward earnings intact.

If you factor in one-time tax, EPS was $7.25 to $6.67, but it showed as $1.05 (huge miss), which led to algorithmic sell-offs immediately after. Following sell-offs, mechanical flows often push prices lower, but trends usually reverse in 1–2 weeks.

Take advantage of this.

Narratives like “Meta spending too much on AI” are likely noise. Every Mag7 company is increasing AI capex, Meta isn’t doing anything unusual unless you argue from a cloud/ASIC standpoint. Sometimes the real reason is dumber like algorithms not recognizing one-time tax normalization.

Lot of profit potential when lower-beta Mag7 drops 16%+ on nothing material.

Warnings Category TLDR:

Not calling sells, just giving fair warnings so people can decide for themselves.

Quantum: Still no revenue to justify price surges. Certain data center stocks, even after corrections, have forward revenue + FCF to back valuations.

$ETH: Not a strong buy above $3K (same stance since $4.8K).

$BMNR: ETH treasury play; tracks ETH price with a premium. Treasury plays aren’t good unless potential for nationalization (eg. $MSTR).

$CRCL: Massive, massive, massive share unlock coming next month.

$IREN: The $MSFT contract looks great in headlines ($9B+ revenue, Hyperscaler deal), but in reality, margins are poor.

Deal isn’t pure colo; $IREN absorbs ~$5.8B capex in GPUs + ancillary equipment.

Gross margins: low 30s at best, can drop to single-digit FCF profitability. By comparison, $NBIS had a structurally better deal ($11.6M/MW/yr vs $9.7M/MW/yr).
The deal validated that hyperscalers will sign with IREN (positive), but the deal itself was terrible.Not a sell, just a warning for people FOMOing the headline.

If you want to FOMO into something, $CIFR (AWS contract) makes more sense.

_

Macro View:

Markets have been selling off high-beta stocks, likely just a normal correction.

Headwinds:

Powell signaling a third rate cut isn’t certain -> repricing.

Gov shutdown likely extends (short-term headwind). Historically, corrections reverse quickly after reopen.

Event markets price Nov 14th as end date (9 days out).

If there’s no material change for names like $NBIS (-7.9%), backed by insane forward revenue, great buy on the dip. Also stuff like $RDDT that posted great ER but dropped 7.% also strong buying opportunity.
Bubbles pop under Fed tightening. We've had two rate cuts, and another still likely. Don’t follow the Rich Dad Poor Dad dude who predicted 5000 of the last 1 crashes.

AI ≠ bubble yet - backed by Mag7 earnings, real revenue, and profits. But if OpenAI keeps over-promising contracts without funds, it could start resembling one later (projection risk 1–2 years out).

TLDR: Markets likely trend higher as easing follows rate cuts.
Data center buildout remains intact (Mag7 earnings show huge AI capex).

Sectors that stay strong on corrections: Memory • Energy • Semi • Connectivity • Neoclouds

Stay long and build positions on these dips
11 月 4 日 - 股票分析 + 宏观

Fire Sale:$META$NBIS$IBIT

Strong Buys:$RDDT$RKLB$WLAC$CIFR$LTC$SOL$CORZ
Memory:Nanya $2408, SK Hynix $HXSCL, $MU

Buy:$AMZN$DELL$SMCI$ALAB$CRDO$TSM$AMD$FLNC$TE

Warnings:$IREN$ETH$BMNR$CRCL
Quantum:$IONQ$RGTI$QBTS

正常我会逐个讲买/卖和解释,但我感冒了。

所以今天只写超轻版本,不太想继续研究更多股票。喝汤的时候只聚焦几个,并给更大图景。

$META
财报后跌 15%+,再次 Strong, Strong, Strong Buy。
收入 beat,EPS beat,forward earnings 没坏。

如果排除一次性税项,EPS 是 $7.25 vs $6.67,但显示成 $1.05(巨大 miss),导致算法立刻抛售。之后机械流通常继续压低价格,但 1-2 周内经常反转。

利用这个机会。

Warnings 不是叫卖,只是给公平提醒。

Quantum:仍没有收入支撑暴涨估值。

$ETH:$3K 以上不是 strong buy。

$BMNR:ETH treasury play,跟 ETH 走还带 premium。

$CRCL:下个月有巨大解禁。

$IREN$MSFT 合同标题很好看,但利润率差。它要承担约 $5.8B GPU + 配套 capex,毛利率低 30%,FCF 可能很薄。相比之下 $NBIS 交易结构更好。

宏观:市场在卖高 beta,大概率是正常回调。Powell 暗示第三次降息不确定,政府停摆短期拖累。停摆结束后历史上通常快速反转。

TLDR:降息后宽松继续,市场大概率走高。数据中心 buildout 没坏。回调里仍强的板块:Memory • Energy • Semi • Connectivity • Neoclouds。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1985770241532838347
❤️ 217 🔁 15 💬 20
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@BarnieTaintpipe Nope didn’t get positions. Congrats on $MQ though
@BarnieTaintpipe 没,没有仓位。不过恭喜 $MQ
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Aiime_ai Yeah, I probably should have bought $OSS when I did the DD at $4.7.

70-85% probability of OSS being an Anduril supplier with a $110m marketcap seemed a bit too good to be true...

There goes a free 20%+ https://t.co/nz6DYuXxsa
@Aiime_ai 是的,我可能应该在 $4.7 做 DD 时买 $OSS

OSS 成为 Anduril 供应商的概率 70-85%,同时市值只有 $110m,看起来有点好得不像真的……

白白错过 20%+ https://t.co/nz6DYuXxsa
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@arthur_alston Feels bad missing out on my own DD. A large part of me is hoping $OSS goes down. https://t.co/GwgMKRGsiB
@arthur_alston 错过自己的 DD 感觉很糟。我很大一部分在希望 $OSS 跌下来。https://t.co/GwgMKRGsiB
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
You have no argument when you say his point is wrong because "He hates x" or "He is biased". I'm not sure a lot of $IREN community members go after a person themself instead of the data but it's not productive.

Going back to the topic, you're right that the original post is missing residual value for $IREN's 200 MW datacenter, which usually has longer life than 5Y. So it understates IRR.

But the table is mathematically correct for isolating contract economics, not EV, so you're arguing two different things.

Reality lies in between your post and theirs:

-> Unlevered IRR ~10.2%
-> Likely IRR case <20% (14%-18%)
-> 22-28% aggressive and everything goes right (with significant terminal datacenter realization and financing)
当你说他的观点错是因为“He hates x”或“He is biased”时,你没有论点。我不确定为什么很多 $IREN 社区成员攻击人本身,而不是数据,但这没有建设性。

回到主题,你说得对,原帖漏掉了 $IREN 200 MW datacenter 的 residual value,它通常寿命长于 5Y。所以它低估了 IRR。

但那张表在隔离 contract economics 而非 EV 时,数学上是正确的,所以你们在争两个不同的东西。

现实介于你的帖子和他们的帖子之间:

-> Unlevered IRR ~10.2%
-> 可能 IRR 情境 <20%(14%-18%)
-> 22-28% 是激进且一切顺利(包括显著 terminal datacenter realization 和融资)
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@longequity147 @NicolaImpa @LAMoon__X WSB has $500m mc min so you wouldn’t be able to post or comment about $OSS on $RDDT anyway
@longequity147 @NicolaImpa @LAMoon__X WSB 有 $500m mc 最低要求,所以你无论如何都不能在 $RDDT 上发或评论 $OSS
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Good to know other thoughts about $OSS, I personally was only interested in it if they worked with Andruil and became a core supplier like $KRKNF.

It looks like they're just in testing stage with the $6.5m contract order. But then again considering their marketcap is only $120m that's quite a lot.
_
disclosure update: I have a few hundred dollars worth just as a performance tracker, not an investment.
很高兴看到关于 $OSS 的其他想法。我个人只有在他们和 Andruil 合作,并成为像 $KRKNF 那样的核心供应商时才感兴趣。

看起来他们还只是处在 $6.5m 合同订单的测试阶段。但话说回来,考虑到市值只有 $120m,这已经相当多。
_
disclosure update:我只有几百美元,只作为表现跟踪,不是投资。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Disclosure: I have no positions and don't plan on initiating any. (Reason: have too many high-beta stocks).

I just wanted to publish some speculative research I did on Anduril supply chain companies after researching $KRKNF | Kraken Robotics.

This is $OSS ($115.54M MC).

TLDR: Anduril launched Effects-Short Range (LE-SR) for the US Army. OSS is an edge AI infra. $OSS seems like a Andruil supplier, despite Andruil aquiring Klas, a competing rugged AI edge company.

OSS has announced a contract of $6.5 million to deliver 80 “high-performance servers and field-programmable gate array systems… for a mobile intelligence platform supporting U.S. military operations.”

1. OSS's specialization: High-performance, ruggedized FPGA and server systems for AI/ML at the edge in mobile, tactical military environments.

2. Anduril's requirement: The LE-SR (Altius 600) platform requires rugged, compact computing to run its Lattice AI software autonomously at the tactical edge.

_

$6.5 million for 80 3U SDS rugged servers and FPGA systems. Functions include sensor data collection, AI-generated real-time analysis, and storage in tactical settings: mirroring Lattice's requirements for swarm management:

Hardware: AMD EPYC 9004 “Genoa” processors, up to seven PCIe Gen4 x16 slots for GPU/FPGA integration, hot-swappable storage up to 1 petabyte, and ruggedization for -40°C to 70°C temperatures.

Fit for C2: The systems suit ground-based hubs rather than drone payloads, supporting operator-on-the-loop interfaces and multi-asset coordination.

________

3. The buyer is described as a "leading defense and technology solutions company". OSS has emphasized shifting to defense (now ~50% of revenue), with this deal part of a streak including $6M DoD renewals and other military wins

The only missing piece is the customer name, which, given the military contractors, is often kept confidential, but it seems like its Anduril and it's a repeat-client (Additional development and platform opportunities are underway with this customer).

A more in-depth information about OSS <-> Andruil contracts and info were fed through frontier model Deep Research tools:

Gemini - 85% assigned probability
Antropic Claude - 75-80% assigned probability
OpenAI ChatGPT - 70% assigned probability
XAI Grok - 40-45% assigned probability

of OSS being the Andruil supplier.

In the chance OSS is an Anduril supplier and scales up from the $6.5M contract, then it's likely to be re-rated upward from a $120m marketcap from high future revenue potential from this defense contractor. If not, then it deserves its current market-cap anyway due to other US Military contracts.

The circumstantial evidence supporting the hypothesis of Anduril using OSS seems compelling.

Thought it would be fun to post this before their ER to see if it's right or not (if they ever mention it). I don't plan on taking positions in this though since other high-beta stocks like $NBIS have higher asymmetrical return, but if $OSS 5x's, I'll be sad.

I do look into small companies on the side to see if it's worth investing or not but just wanted to publish this for fun to see if it's right.
Disclosure:我没有仓位,也不打算建仓。(原因:已经有太多 high-beta 股票。)

我只是想发布一些关于 Anduril 供应链公司的投机研究,这是在研究 $KRKNF | Kraken Robotics 之后做的。

这是 $OSS($115.54M MC)。

TLDR:Anduril 为 US Army 发布了 Effects-Short Range(LE-SR)。OSS 是 edge AI infra。尽管 Andruil 收购了竞争性 rugged AI edge 公司 Klas,$OSS 看起来像 Andruil 供应商。

OSS 宣布了一份 $6.5 million 合同,交付 80 台“高性能服务器和 field-programmable gate array systems……用于支持美国军事行动的 mobile intelligence platform”。

1. OSS 专长:用于移动、战术军事环境边缘 AI/ML 的高性能 ruggedized FPGA 和 server systems。

2. Anduril 需求:LE-SR(Altius 600)平台需要坚固、紧凑的计算,以便在战术边缘自主运行 Lattice AI 软件。
_

$6.5 million 对应 80 台 3U SDS rugged servers 和 FPGA systems。功能包括传感器数据收集、AI 生成实时分析,以及战术环境存储:这与 Lattice 的 swarm management 需求相吻合:

Hardware:AMD EPYC 9004 “Genoa” processors,最多七个 PCIe Gen4 x16 slots 用于 GPU/FPGA 集成,最多 1 petabyte 热插拔存储,并支持 -40°C 到 70°C ruggedization。

Fit for C2:这些系统适合地面 hubs,而不是 drone payloads,支持 operator-on-the-loop interfaces 和 multi-asset coordination。

________

3. 买方被描述为“leading defense and technology solutions company”。OSS 强调转向 defense(现在约 50% 收入),这笔交易是一系列订单的一部分,包括 $6M DoD renewals 和其他 military wins。

唯一缺失的是客户名称,考虑到军事承包商,这通常保密,但看起来像 Anduril,而且是 repeat-client(Additional development and platform opportunities are underway with this customer)。

关于 OSS <-> Andruil 合同和信息,更深入资料被输入 frontier model Deep Research tools:

Gemini - 85% assigned probability
Antropic Claude - 75-80% assigned probability
OpenAI ChatGPT - 70% assigned probability
XAI Grok - 40-45% assigned probability

认为 OSS 是 Andruil 供应商。

如果 OSS 是 Anduril 供应商,并从 $6.5M 合同规模化,那么它可能会因为来自该 defense contractor 的高未来收入潜力,从 $120m 市值向上重估。如果不是,那么凭其他 US Military 合同,它也配得上当前市值。

支持 Anduril 使用 OSS 这一假设的间接证据看起来很有说服力。

觉得在他们 ER 前发出来看看对不对会很有趣(如果他们以后提到)。我不打算建仓,因为 $NBIS 等其他 high-beta 股票有更高不对称回报,但如果 $OSS 5x,我会难过。

我会顺便研究小公司,看是否值得投资,只是想发出来玩玩,看看是否正确。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
November 4th - Stock Analysis + Macro

Fire Sale: $META$NBIS$IBIT

Strong Buys: $RDDT$RKLB$WLAC$CIFR$LTC$SOL$CORZ
Memory: Nanya $2408, SK Hynix $HXSCL, $MU

Buy: $AMZN$DELL$SMCI$ALAB$CRDO$TSM$AMD$FLNC$TE

Warnings: $IREN$ETH$BMNR$CRCLQuantum: $IONQ$RGTI$QBTS

Normally I'd go down the list, have more buy/sells, and talk about every single explanation but I caught a cold.

So just doing an extremely light version today and didn’t feel like researching more stocks. Just focusing on a few with a broader overview while I drink some soup.
(Will help explain if someone asks though.)

$META:
Once again, Strong, Strong, Strong Buy on the 15%+ earnings drop and post-ER drop.
Beat on Revenue. Beat on EPS. Forward earnings intact.

If you factor in one-time tax, EPS was $7.25 to $6.67, but it showed as $1.05 (huge miss), which led to algorithmic sell-offs immediately after. Following sell-offs, mechanical flows often push prices lower, but trends usually reverse in 1–2 weeks.

Take advantage of this.

Narratives like “Meta spending too much on AI” are likely noise. Every Mag7 company is increasing AI capex, Meta isn’t doing anything unusual unless you argue from a cloud/ASIC standpoint. Sometimes the real reason is dumber like algorithms not recognizing one-time tax normalization.

Lot of profit potential when lower-beta Mag7 drops 16%+ on nothing material.

Warnings Category TLDR:

Not calling sells, just giving fair warnings so people can decide for themselves.

Quantum: Still no revenue to justify price surges. Certain data center stocks, even after corrections, have forward revenue + FCF to back valuations.

$ETH: Not a strong buy above $3K (same stance since $4.8K).

$BMNR: ETH treasury play; tracks ETH price with a premium. Treasury plays aren’t good unless potential for nationalization (eg. $MSTR).

$CRCL: Massive, massive, massive share unlock coming next month.

$IREN: The $MSFT contract looks great in headlines ($9B+ revenue, Hyperscaler deal), but in reality, margins are poor.

Deal isn’t pure colo; $IREN absorbs ~$5.8B capex in GPUs + ancillary equipment.

Gross margins: low 30s at best, can drop to single-digit FCF profitability. By comparison, $NBIS had a structurally better deal ($11.6M/MW/yr vs $9.7M/MW/yr).
The deal validated that hyperscalers will sign with IREN (positive), but the deal itself was terrible.Not a sell, just a warning for people FOMOing the headline.

If you want to FOMO into something, $CIFR (AWS contract) makes more sense.

_

Macro View:

Markets have been selling off high-beta stocks, likely just a normal correction.

Headwinds:

Powell signaling a third rate cut isn’t certain -> repricing.

Gov shutdown likely extends (short-term headwind). Historically, corrections reverse quickly after reopen.

Event markets price Nov 14th as end date (9 days out).

If there’s no material change for names like $NBIS (-7.9%), backed by insane forward revenue, great buy on the dip. Also stuff like $RDDT that posted great ER but dropped 7.% also strong buying opportunity.
Bubbles pop under Fed tightening. We've had two rate cuts, and another still likely. Don’t follow the Rich Dad Poor Dad dude who predicted 5000 of the last 1 crashes.

AI ≠ bubble yet - backed by Mag7 earnings, real revenue, and profits. But if OpenAI keeps over-promising contracts without funds, it could start resembling one later (projection risk 1–2 years out).

TLDR: Markets likely trend higher as easing follows rate cuts.
Data center buildout remains intact (Mag7 earnings show huge AI capex).

Sectors that stay strong on corrections: Memory • Energy • Semi • Connectivity • Neoclouds

Stay long and build positions on these dips
11 月 4 日 - 股票分析 + 宏观

Fire Sale:$META$NBIS$IBIT

Strong Buys:$RDDT$RKLB$WLAC$CIFR$LTC$SOL$CORZ
Memory:Nanya $2408, SK Hynix $HXSCL, $MU

Buy:$AMZN$DELL$SMCI$ALAB$CRDO$TSM$AMD$FLNC$TE

Warnings:$IREN$ETH$BMNR$CRCL
Quantum:$IONQ$RGTI$QBTS

正常我会逐个讲买/卖和解释,但我感冒了。

所以今天只写超轻版本,不太想继续研究更多股票。喝汤的时候只聚焦几个,并给更大图景。

$META
财报后跌 15%+,再次 Strong, Strong, Strong Buy。
收入 beat,EPS beat,forward earnings 没坏。

如果排除一次性税项,EPS 是 $7.25 vs $6.67,但显示成 $1.05(巨大 miss),导致算法立刻抛售。之后机械流通常继续压低价格,但 1-2 周内经常反转。

利用这个机会。

Warnings 不是叫卖,只是给公平提醒。

Quantum:仍没有收入支撑暴涨估值。

$ETH:$3K 以上不是 strong buy。

$BMNR:ETH treasury play,跟 ETH 走还带 premium。

$CRCL:下个月有巨大解禁。

$IREN$MSFT 合同标题很好看,但利润率差。它要承担约 $5.8B GPU + 配套 capex,毛利率低 30%,FCF 可能很薄。相比之下 $NBIS 交易结构更好。

宏观:市场在卖高 beta,大概率是正常回调。Powell 暗示第三次降息不确定,政府停摆短期拖累。停摆结束后历史上通常快速反转。

TLDR:降息后宽松继续,市场大概率走高。数据中心 buildout 没坏。回调里仍强的板块:Memory • Energy • Semi • Connectivity • Neoclouds。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1985770241532838347
❤️ 192 🔁 13 💬 16
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Both good longs, $AMD has extremely high upside potential (just looking at $NVDA's marketcap) and Sam Altman/Elon confirming AMD has high utility for frontier models is extremely positive.

$HOOD generational company. High conviction long term. Short-term I'd argue it's a tad overvalued like $RKLB.
两个都是不错的 long,$AMD 有极高上行潜力(只要看 $NVDA 的市值),而 Sam Altman/Elon 确认 AMD 对 frontier models 有高实用性,这是极其积极的。

$HOOD 是世代级公司。长期高信念。短期我会说它像 $RKLB 一样有点高估。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Well part of it is the TI hit piece which showed $ORCL was only doing 14% gross margins for their AI HPC segments due to low utilization, orchestration failures, while $NBIS and others were currently sitting at 71.4% (50-70% avg)

Just goes to show HPC segments are moats and that even hyperscaleds failed on buildouts.

Apart from that, Sam Altman has been promising every single hyperscaler stupidly high forward revenue, so markets are pricing in a bit of skepticism with Oracle.
一部分原因是 TI hit piece,它显示 $ORCL 的 AI HPC segments 因低利用率和 orchestration failures 只有 14% gross margins,而 $NBIS 和其他公司目前是 71.4%(平均 50-70%)。

这说明 HPC segments 是 moats,甚至 hyperscaleds 在 buildouts 上也会失败。

除此之外,Sam Altman 一直向每个 hyperscaler 承诺离谱的高远期收入,所以市场正在对 Oracle 定价一些怀疑。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Hmm, $AMD has potential to be $NVDA’s current market cap if what Sam Altman + Elon Musk says is true in how frontier models can use it well.

Then again OpenAi is promising too many things right now in terms of an additional tens of billions of forward revenue a year to $AMD, so we’ll see. That’s kind of why my AMD position sizes were small relative to $TSM, and why I’ve said you don’t need to compare AMD to NVDA or $IREN to $NBIS when every single thing is reliant on $TSM
嗯,如果 Sam Altman + Elon Musk 关于 frontier models 能很好使用 $AMD 的说法是真的,$AMD 有潜力达到 $NVDA 当前市值。

但另一方面,OpenAi 现在向 $AMD 承诺了太多东西,包括每年额外数百亿美元远期收入,所以我们拭目以待。这也是为什么我的 AMD 仓位相对 $TSM 很小,以及为什么我说你没必要比较 AMD 和 NVDA,或 $IREN$NBIS,因为每一样东西都依赖 $TSM
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@rioferdy838 @Mattyice112233 @Docofgothm With $NBIS and miners if you’re cash gang, yeah write CSPs closer to current strike like $105 since your goal is to get assigned + premium at the lowest prices
@rioferdy838 @Mattyice112233 @Docofgothm$NBIS 和 miners,如果你是 cash gang,是的,可以写更接近当前 strike 的 CSP,比如 $105,因为你的目标是在最低价格被 assigned + 收 premium。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RJCcapital What do you think of my port @DeepValueBagger @RJCcapital they all will be 10T companies

1. $DUOL - 50T AI infrastructure for language
2. $PLTR - 100x from here - 50T off interest profit.
3. $HIMS- 500T off 🐔 pills. The world needs it.

Is it worth selling a course too?
@RJCcapital 你怎么看我的 port @DeepValueBagger @RJCcapital 它们都会成为 10T 公司

1. $DUOL - 50T AI language infrastructure
2. $PLTR - 从这里 100x - 靠利息利润到 50T。
3. $HIMS - 靠 🐔 pills 到 500T。世界需要它。

也值得卖一门课吗?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So for examples:

$RDDT should try and acquire $SNAP then turn it profitable (easy) by cutting AR segments, management, cutting GCP costs. (Regulators wouldn’t block this but they’d block $META acquiring it).

Then go out and launch new products like what X does with banking. Reddit had some sparks of life with their NFT marketplace stuff, but they never followed through.
举例来说:

$RDDT 应该尝试收购 $SNAP,然后通过削减 AR 部门、管理层、GCP 成本,让它盈利(很容易)。(监管不会阻止这个,但会阻止 $META 收购它)。

然后像 X 做 banking 那样推出新产品。Reddit 当年 NFT marketplace 有过一些生命迹象,但他们没有继续推进。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Mattyice112233 @Docofgothm I don't sell CC's on $NBIS on extreme drops like this since it can rebound to $130+ strikes any day.

Far OTM ones like $160+ are not worth it given current premiums.

You don't always need to write options, especially if you think a stock is extremely undervalued.
@Mattyice112233 @Docofgothm 我不会在 $NBIS 这种极端下跌时卖 CC,因为它任何一天都可能反弹到 $130+ strikes。

像 $160+ 这种远 OTM 不值得,以当前 premium 看。

你不一定总要写期权,尤其是当你认为一只股票极度低估时。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
It makes sense logically. But I mean it's weird because nobody expected this to be the longest government shutdown in history.

And when you have rate cuts, seasonality, earnings, as more normal catalysts for other years, it feels weird to talk about the government re-opening after 35+ days as one of the largest catalysts.
逻辑上说得通。但我的意思是,这很奇怪,因为没人预期这会成为历史上最长的政府停摆。

当你有降息、季节性、财报这些其他年份更正常的催化剂时,把 35+ 天后政府重开作为最大催化剂之一来讨论,感觉很怪。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Also similar thesis to $HOOD (fintech) for $RDDT (social media)

Sticky customer base, extreme profitability -> new product launches for that customer base -> acquisitions through profitability -> grow revenue.

$RDDT -> sticky customer base, extreme profitability -> new product launches (not really, but kinda in a sense, like selling data for AI) -> acquisitions through profitability (missing) -> grow revenue.

Reddit only achieved consistent profitability this quarter, so I'm hoping acquisitions through profits would drive forward revenue like how Facebook grew acquiring whatsapp/instagram in the next few quarters.
$RDDT(社交媒体)也有类似 $HOOD(fintech)的 thesis。

粘性客户基础、极高盈利能力 -> 面向该客户群推出新产品 -> 用盈利进行收购 -> 增长收入。

$RDDT -> 粘性客户基础、极高盈利能力 -> 新产品发布(不完全是,但某种意义上是,比如向 AI 出售数据)-> 用盈利进行收购(缺失)-> 增长收入。

Reddit 本季度才实现持续盈利,所以我希望通过利润做收购,能像 Facebook 收购 whatsapp/instagram 那样,在未来几个季度推动远期收入。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah quantum was always a bubble, but I don't short given how irrational they are sometimes. As for the Internet's favorite/most hated community, I personally see the path to scale for $RDDT just how it's the 7th most popular website on the internet and it will be around for awhile just due to network effect.

Just going back to Twitter when it was public, it was valued at $40B, doing $3.7-5B yearly revenue (with negative FCF) growing roughly 20-30% Y/Y. $RDDT is doing $585m quarterly revenue, 91% gross margins, 236M EBITDA (40% of revenue) ~34B valuation.

And given it's not at the scale of $META where every acquisition has global anti-trust lawyers on their asses, I just see Reddit with the potential to grow like $HOOD where they're printing money so close to after IPO and keeps on expanding margins. So they can just focus on expanding revenue/acquisitions with their sticky userbase (eg. how Robinhood acquired crypto exchanges).

Yeah $RKLB has such a clear trajectory toward $350B+ MC like SpaceX since there's so many applications you can do with Space + huge national security risk so lot of investments will pour into the sector.
是的,quantum 一直是泡沫,但我不做空,因为它们有时太不理性。至于互联网最喜欢/最讨厌的社区,我个人看到 $RDDT 的规模化路径,是因为它是互联网上第 7 大最受欢迎网站,且由于网络效应会存在很久。

回到 Twitter 上市时,它估值 $40B,年收入 $3.7-5B(FCF 为负),大约 20-30% Y/Y 增长。$RDDT 现在季度收入 $585m,91% gross margins,236M EBITDA(收入 40%),估值约 $34B。

考虑到它还没有到 $META 的规模,不是每笔收购都有全球反垄断律师盯着,我认为 Reddit 有像 $HOOD 一样增长的潜力,因为它 IPO 后不久就开始印钱,并持续扩大利润率。所以他们可以专注于用粘性用户基础扩张收入/收购(比如 Robinhood 收购 crypto exchanges)。

是的,$RKLB 有非常清晰的路径走向 SpaceX 那种 $350B+ MC,因为 Space 可以做太多应用,而且有巨大国家安全风险,所以会有大量投资流入这个行业。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
For $CRWV it was $CORZ acquisition failing to get approved. Core scientific would have delivered so much more value than that 9B price tag. Having more GW capacity added to their full stack model (on top of their existing contract with them), would have been omega bullish with the acquisition.

Coreweave also has $1B+ in interest debt a year, which is an extremely big drag on FCF + margins (compared to $NBIS, $CIFR, $IREN with did convertible notes).

$NBIS already achieved what $CRWV did with full-stack vertical integration, but higher utilization + better orchestration/performance (as per their whitepaper) + no massive interest on debt + high backlogs, so markets see other lower risk, higher upside, alternatives emerging.

If $CRWV get approved for US Gov contracts though, that would be another huge catalyst upside. But we already have visibility into large contracted backlogs like $14B with $META but the debt interest is just ridiculous.
$CRWV 来说,是 $CORZ 收购没能获批。Core Scientific 本可以带来远超 90 亿价格标签的价值。把更多 GW 容量加入他们的 full stack 模式(在现有合同之外),如果收购成功会极度 bullish。

Coreweave 每年还有 $1B+ 利息债务,这对 FCF + margins 是极大拖累(相比 $NBIS$CIFR$IREN,它们做的是可转债)。

$NBIS 已经实现了 $CRWV 的 full-stack 垂直整合,但有更高利用率 + 更好 orchestration/performance(按他们 whitepaper)+ 没有巨额债务利息 + 高 backlogs,所以市场看到了其他风险更低、上行更高的替代品正在出现。

如果 $CRWV 获批 US Gov contracts,那会是另一个巨大上行催化剂。但我们已经能看到大额签约 backlog,比如和 $META 的 $14B,只是债务利息太离谱。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Gov reopening (likely around ~14th) is such a weird catalyst but it is.

Yeah it's an asset fire sale right now. Didn't think $BTC would go below $100k again but it did.

Then there's $NBIS, $5B ARR (50-70%+ margin) core business 1Y from now (without any growth), and NAV 11B+ with 5.8B of it cash. Valued at $27B.

$META, <22 forward p/e or less? I've heard 19 p/e floated, I'm just going off the top of my head. It's still growing rapidly, which is even more impressive at that scale. Just narratives and one-time-tax dropped price.

Lot of other fun buys like $RKLB, $RDDT and others too, but these types of corrections wipe off a lot of froth like $OKLO, $RGTI, but great assets get caught in the crossfire.
Gov 重新开门(可能在 ~14 日左右)是个很奇怪的催化剂,但它确实是。

是的,现在是 asset fire sale。没想到 $BTC 会再次跌破 $100k,但它确实跌了。

然后是 $NBIS,1 年后核心业务 $5B ARR(50-70%+ margin)(不计任何增长),NAV 11B+,其中 5.8B 是现金。估值 $27B。

$META,forward p/e 低于 22 或更低?我听过 19 p/e 的说法,我只是凭记忆说。它仍在快速增长,在这个规模下更令人印象深刻。只是叙事和一次性税项压低了价格。

还有很多有趣买入,比如 $RKLB$RDDT 等,但这种修正会洗掉很多泡沫,比如 $OKLO$RGTI,同时好资产也被卷入交火。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Usually only on short term time-frames I'm wrong but I've always been directionally right for anything higher conviction.

Recently main three were I got wrong were the $LTC ETF catalyst wrong, even after approval it dropped from $113 -> $82.5. Probably one of the weirdest things since it got delayed even despite 95% approval odds from gov shutdown then randomly approved during shutdown (and even I didn't know about it). Then just tanked on broader market high beta sell offs.

The other was $SG, thought it would rebound from $7.5-$8.3 or so but it's $6.3, there's a huge bear market on anything consumer. So it got affected by $CMG, $CAVA, $KRUS, etc. selloffs.

The last was $VIRT, especially now with a p/e of 7 or something ridiculous. They reported earnings and $1.05 vs. $0.97 - $1.04 (beat) and $467.0 million revenue vs. $418.4 million - $449.7 million (beat), but still sold off. (This was more of an asymmetrical hedge) but even with fundamentals, I have no clue why it's ~7.5 P/E. People always are like X is a great value investor stock trading at ~15 P/E, this is single digit P/E (but more cyclical on retail trading activity, but $HOOD is reporting record numbers so should be a good proxy).

Still an extreme enigma to me... I think it's undervalued, especially with buybacks and might be another $UPWK.

Other stuff like nuclear SPACs I bought for fun were half-gambling memes so more understandable if they went down. Usually if I put a thesis behind it then it's more accurate.

Stuff like $SNAP, $FLY, and others I've maintained was a 2026 play, so short term doesn't really matter. Things like $WLAC were IPO catalyst plays so high-beta movement during its low float SPAC days doesn't really mean much until the event happens.
通常我只在短期时间框架上会错,但对任何更高信念的东西,我方向上一直是对的。

最近主要错的三个:$LTC ETF 催化错了,即使获批也从 $113 跌到 $82.5。可能是最奇怪的事情之一,因为它即使在政府停摆、95% approval odds 下也被延迟,然后又在停摆期间随机获批(连我都不知道)。之后只是被更广泛 market high beta sell offs 砸了。

另一个是 $SG,我以为会从 $7.5-$8.3 左右反弹,但现在 $6.3,所有 consumer 相关都在大熊市。所以它受到 $CMG$CAVA$KRUS 等抛售影响。

最后是 $VIRT,尤其现在 p/e 只有 7 或类似离谱水平。他们公布财报,EPS $1.05 vs. $0.97 - $1.04(beat),收入 $467.0 million vs. $418.4 million - $449.7 million(beat),但仍然卖崩。(这更多是一个不对称 hedge),但即使基本面如此,我也不知道为什么它只有 ~7.5 P/E。人们总说某某是很好的 value investor stock,交易在 ~15 P/E,这个是个位数 P/E(但更随 retail trading activity 周期波动,不过 $HOOD 正在报告创纪录数字,应该是不错 proxy)。

对我来说仍然极其谜……我觉得它低估了,尤其有 buybacks,可能是另一个 $UPWK

其他像 nuclear SPACs 这种我买来玩的,半赌博 meme,跌了更能理解。通常如果我给出 thesis,准确性会更高。

$SNAP$FLY 等,我一直说是 2026 play,所以短期不重要。像 $WLAC 是 IPO catalyst plays,所以在低流通 SPAC 阶段的 high-beta 波动,直到事件发生前都没太大意义。
❤️ 11 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$ALAB:
EPS: .49 vs .39 estimate (+26% beat)
Revenue: 230M vs. 206M estimate (+12% beat)

Next quarter guidance
Est: 249M vs 216M (Strong Beat)
Gross Margin (74% vs 75%) (Beat)

Markets were saying they dropped on margin contraction fears, but they literally projected higher margins lol.

Ignore the noise, $ALAB has of the highest margins in the industry (eg. $NVDA).

It's just selling off with anything high beta. Crypto is usually a good proxy, $ETH is down 20% past few days for example.
$ALAB
EPS:.49 vs .39 预期(+26% beat)
Revenue:230M vs. 206M 预期(+12% beat)

下一季度指引
Est:249M vs 216M(Strong Beat)
Gross Margin(74% vs 75%)(Beat)

市场说它们因为 margin contraction fears 下跌,但他们明明预计更高利润率 lol。

忽略噪音,$ALAB 拥有行业最高利润率之一(比如 $NVDA)。

它只是和任何 high beta 一起被卖。Crypto 通常是不错 proxy,比如 $ETH 过去几天下跌 20%。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$NBIS went from $140 to $94 the other week, then back up to $135 in a week.

It's high beta, this is why you don't do short dated options or over margin.

If it can go down 15% in a day or two, it can also go up 20% in two days too. It's easy to hold through any volatility once you develop conviction.
$NBIS 前一周从 $140 跌到 $94,然后一周内又回到 $135。

它是 high beta,这就是为什么不要做短期期权或过度 margin。

如果它一两天能跌 15%,它两天也能涨 20%。一旦建立信念,穿越任何波动都很容易。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Like the other comments said $NBIS is just high beta and is moving with the markets.

It's backed by extreme forward revenue growth ~$5B ARR if it doesn't grow and we fast forward a year with the $MSFT contracted capacity and existing AI HPC revenue.

Use this time to accumulate.
就像其他评论说的,$NBIS 只是 high beta,跟着市场走。

它有极端远期收入增长支撑,如果不增长,只把 $MSFT 签约容量和现有 AI HPC 收入快进一年,也有约 $5B ARR。

利用这段时间累积。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
November 4th - Stock Analysis + Macro

Fire Sale: $META$NBIS$IBIT

Strong Buys: $RDDT$RKLB$WLAC$CIFR$LTC$SOL$CORZ
Memory: Nanya $2408, SK Hynix $HXSCL, $MU

Buy: $AMZN$DELL$SMCI$ALAB$CRDO$TSM$AMD$FLNC$TE

Warnings: $IREN$ETH$BMNR$CRCLQuantum: $IONQ$RGTI$QBTS

Normally I'd go down the list, have more buy/sells, and talk about every single explanation but I caught a cold.

So just doing an extremely light version today and didn’t feel like researching more stocks. Just focusing on a few with a broader overview while I drink some soup.
(Will help explain if someone asks though.)

$META:
Once again, Strong, Strong, Strong Buy on the 15%+ earnings drop and post-ER drop.
Beat on Revenue. Beat on EPS. Forward earnings intact.

If you factor in one-time tax, EPS was $7.25 to $6.67, but it showed as $1.05 (huge miss), which led to algorithmic sell-offs immediately after. Following sell-offs, mechanical flows often push prices lower, but trends usually reverse in 1–2 weeks.

Take advantage of this.

Narratives like “Meta spending too much on AI” are likely noise. Every Mag7 company is increasing AI capex, Meta isn’t doing anything unusual unless you argue from a cloud/ASIC standpoint. Sometimes the real reason is dumber like algorithms not recognizing one-time tax normalization.

Lot of profit potential when lower-beta Mag7 drops 16%+ on nothing material.

Warnings Category TLDR:

Not calling sells, just giving fair warnings so people can decide for themselves.

Quantum: Still no revenue to justify price surges. Certain data center stocks, even after corrections, have forward revenue + FCF to back valuations.

$ETH: Not a strong buy above $3K (same stance since $4.8K).

$BMNR: ETH treasury play; tracks ETH price with a premium. Treasury plays aren’t good unless potential for nationalization (eg. $MSTR).

$CRCL: Massive, massive, massive share unlock coming next month.

$IREN: The $MSFT contract looks great in headlines ($9B+ revenue, Hyperscaler deal), but in reality, margins are poor.

Deal isn’t pure colo; $IREN absorbs ~$5.8B capex in GPUs + ancillary equipment.

Gross margins: low 30s at best, can drop to single-digit FCF profitability. By comparison, $NBIS had a structurally better deal ($11.6M/MW/yr vs $9.7M/MW/yr).
The deal validated that hyperscalers will sign with IREN (positive), but the deal itself was terrible.Not a sell, just a warning for people FOMOing the headline.

If you want to FOMO into something, $CIFR (AWS contract) makes more sense.

_

Macro View:

Markets have been selling off high-beta stocks, likely just a normal correction.

Headwinds:

Powell signaling a third rate cut isn’t certain -> repricing.

Gov shutdown likely extends (short-term headwind). Historically, corrections reverse quickly after reopen.

Event markets price Nov 14th as end date (9 days out).

If there’s no material change for names like $NBIS (-7.9%), backed by insane forward revenue, great buy on the dip. Also stuff like $RDDT that posted great ER but dropped 7.% also strong buying opportunity.
Bubbles pop under Fed tightening. We've had two rate cuts, and another still likely. Don’t follow the Rich Dad Poor Dad dude who predicted 5000 of the last 1 crashes.

AI ≠ bubble yet - backed by Mag7 earnings, real revenue, and profits. But if OpenAI keeps over-promising contracts without funds, it could start resembling one later (projection risk 1–2 years out).

TLDR: Markets likely trend higher as easing follows rate cuts.
Data center buildout remains intact (Mag7 earnings show huge AI capex).

Sectors that stay strong on corrections: Memory • Energy • Semi • Connectivity • Neoclouds

Stay long and build positions on these dips
11 月 4 日 - Stock Analysis + Macro

Fire Sale:$META$NBIS$IBIT

Strong Buys:$RDDT$RKLB$WLAC$CIFR$LTC$SOL$CORZ
Memory:Nanya $2408, SK Hynix $HXSCL, $MU

Buy:$AMZN$DELL$SMCI$ALAB$CRDO$TSM$AMD$FLNC$TE

Warnings:$IREN$ETH$BMNR$CRCLQuantum$IONQ$RGTI$QBTS

通常我会按列表逐个讲,有更多买/卖,并解释每一个,但我感冒了。

所以今天只做一个极简版,不想研究更多股票。就喝着汤,聚焦几个并给一个大概概览。
(如果有人问,我会帮忙解释。)

$META
再次,15%+ 财报下跌和 post-ER 下跌后,Strong, Strong, Strong Buy。
Revenue beat。EPS beat。Forward earnings intact。

如果计入一次性税项,EPS 是 $7.25 对 $6.67,但显示为 $1.05(巨大 miss),导致财报后算法性抛售。抛售后,mechanical flows 常常进一步压低价格,但趋势通常会在 1-2 周内反转。

利用这一点。

“Meta 在 AI 上花太多钱”这类叙事很可能是噪音。每家 Mag7 公司都在提高 AI capex,Meta 没做什么异常事,除非你从 cloud/ASIC 角度争论。有时候真正原因更蠢,比如算法没识别一次性税项 normalization。

低 beta Mag7 因没有实质问题跌 16%+ 时,利润潜力很大。

Warnings Category TLDR:

不是叫卖,只是给出公平警告,让大家自己决定。

Quantum:仍没有收入支撑涨幅。某些 data center 股票即使修正后,也有 forward revenue + FCF 支撑估值。

$ETH:$3K 以上不是 strong buy(从 $4.8K 起同样立场)。

$BMNR:ETH treasury play;以溢价跟踪 ETH 价格。除非有 nationalization 潜力(比如 $MSTR),treasury plays 并不好。

$CRCL:下个月有巨大、巨大、巨大 share unlock。

$IREN$MSFT 合同标题看起来很好($9B+ revenue,Hyperscaler deal),但现实中利润率很差。

这笔交易不是纯 colo;$IREN 承担约 $5.8B GPUs + ancillary equipment capex。

Gross margins:最好低 30s,可能跌到个位数 FCF profitability。相比之下,$NBIS 交易结构更好($11.6M/MW/yr vs $9.7M/MW/yr)。
这笔交易验证了 hyperscalers 会和 IREN 签约(正面),但交易本身很糟。不是 sell,只是警告那些 FOMO 标题的人。

如果你想 FOMO,$CIFR(AWS contract)更合理。
_

Macro View:

市场一直在卖 high-beta stocks,可能只是正常修正。

逆风:

Powell 表示第三次降息不确定 -> 重新定价。

Gov shutdown 可能延长(短期逆风)。历史上,重开后修正通常很快反转。

Event markets 把 11 月 14 日定价为结束日期(9 天后)。

如果像 $NBIS(-7.9%)这种有疯狂远期收入支撑的名字没有实质变化,就是很好的逢低买入。像 $RDDT 这种发了优秀 ER 但跌 7.% 的,也有强买入机会。
泡沫在 Fed 紧缩下破裂。我们已经有两次降息,另一次仍可能。别跟那个预测了过去 1 次崩盘中 5000 次的 Rich Dad Poor Dad dude。

AI ≠ 还不是泡沫 - 有 Mag7 earnings、真实收入和利润支撑。但如果 OpenAI 继续无资金承诺过多合同,未来可能开始像泡沫(1-2 年预测风险)。

TLDR:随着降息后的宽松,市场可能走高。
Data center buildout 仍完好(Mag7 财报显示巨大 AI capex)。

修正中保持强势的板块:Memory • Energy • Semi • Connectivity • Neoclouds

保持做多,在这些下跌中建立仓位。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
There’s only Four stocks:

🍬 MINT

That have ABSURDLY HIGH, asymmetrical return.

Meaning Low Capital Risk. High Upside Return.

This is only for Nov + Dec 2025.

Here it is... MINT

An explanation of why to full port MINT for end of year 2025:

M = $META
I = $IBIT
N = $NBIS
T = $TSM

With these four holy growth companies in your portfolio, you can make your breath smell better so you can pull Sydney Sweeney:

Mag7. Crypto. AI Data Center. Semiconductor.

$META - Meta
___________
Stupid sell-off.

Revenue Beat. EPS Beat. Strong guidance.

It looks extremely bad on paper when you look at
Revenue $51.24B (+26.25% Y/Y), Net income $2.71B (-82.73% Y/Y).

🟢 Revenue: $51.24B vs. est. $49.41B

Without one-off tax →
🟢 EPS: $7.25 vs. est. $6.67

With one-off tax →
🔴 EPS: $1.05 vs. est. $6.67

My guess was the initial sell-off was algorithmically driven, then caused by mechanical flows. Many high-frequency trading (HFT) and news-parsing systems react to headline EPS numbers pulled directly from data feeds (Bloomberg, Reuters, etc.).

If the reported GAAP EPS ($1.05) is printed alongside a consensus of $6.67, the system flags it as a massive miss. Obviously this is speculative, but many models aren't programmed to normalize for one-time tax charges (which is new) and won’t know to look at adjusted EPS ($7.25), which actually beat.

Now news are claiming the sell-off was due to AI capex surprise. If we go with this, -15%+ on “AI capex spending increasing” is just pure narratives and means absolutely jack since $MSFT, $GOOGL, $AMZN, $TSLA, and every single Mag7 is increasing on capex.

$META doing the same and selling off doesn’t make sense, unless people believe it’s just going into a black hole with no ROI (which markets disagree since AI is basically running $SPY).

Extremely strong buy on recovery once there’s time over the weekend for people to digest what actually happened. Misreads + stupid narratives can cause short-term overreactions (1–2 sessions), often reversed.

$IBIT - Bitcoin
___________

It’s Bitcoin.And sitting at $110k.

Bitcoin is here to stay with US government support, and with all the ongoing currency inflation + flow of money going to newer generation, there’s no better hedge against inflation than BTC.

Polymarket still prices Bitcoin 40% to $130k in 2 months’ time, even if it moves up a few percent you can have upside on CCs and upside on the underlying asset.

$NBIS - Nebius
___________
Core business valuation: $31–36.5B

Sum-of-parts (cash, assets, portfolio): ~$10.6B (slashed 40% = ~$6.3B)

Base case valuation: ~$39B → high upside even with zero growth

Core business on track for ~$5B ARR (FY26–27), 60–70% gross margins, and 30% EBITDA target.

Hitting $8–12B ARR (via one more hyperscaler deal + SMB expansion) could justify ~$100B valuation.

No toxic debt, high GPU utilization, full-stack architecture → higher operating leverage.

You can look at the bullet point comparison that I quoted so you can make your own judgement on $NBIS vs $IREN for example.

However, I’ll always maintain $NBIS has the highest asymmetrical return over anything including $IREN to $CIFR due to existing hyperscaler deals, enterprise clients (Shopify, Accenture), Government Clients, 1GW capacity, high gross margins from full-stack, and many others.

That’s not saying there’s not high upside from $WULF from Fluidstack + Google deals, and others from capacity.

The downside risk on Nebius is the lowest. And it has really, really high upside.

$TSM
______________
It’s the CENTER. OF. THE. AI. TRADE.

They’ve already guided INCREASING MARGINS - which is astronomical.

Revenue: $33.1B vs. $31.5B est.
Earnings per Share: $2.92 vs. $2.59 est.
Guidance: $32.2B – $33.4B vs. $32.0B est.

They’ve beat revenue guidance, increasing margins, and it’s just astronomical how much money they’re printing.

It was trading at $305–310 pre-earnings, now back at $300.

It’s a $1T+ company that grew 30%+ Y/Y with their margins — what the actual.

I said this about the money printer $GOOGL back at $145 and $HOOD back at $20. They print money.

There's no need to debate $ALAB vs $CRDO, $IREN vs $NBIS, $AMD vs $NVDA.

$TSM the center of the whole AI buildout, so it’s just a waiting game.

_

There is it $MINT.

Enjoy a teaser of the song, kinda a banger. 🎶
只有四只股票:

🍬 MINT

拥有极高的非对称回报。

意思是:低本金风险,高上行回报。

这只适用于 2025 年 11 月 + 12 月。

MINT 是:

M = $META
I = $IBIT
N = $NBIS
T = $TSM

这四家神圣成长公司放进组合里,你的口气都会更清新,甚至能追到 Sydney Sweeney:

Mag7、Crypto、AI Data Center、Semiconductor。

$META - Meta
___________
愚蠢抛售。

收入 beat,EPS beat,指引强。

表面看很糟:收入 $51.24B(同比 +26.25%),净利润 $2.71B(同比 -82.73%)。

🟢 收入:$51.24B vs 预期 $49.41B

排除一次性税项 ->
🟢 EPS:$7.25 vs 预期 $6.67

包含一次性税项 ->
🔴 EPS:$1.05 vs 预期 $6.67

我的看法是,这种机械性误读给了好机会。

$IBIT - Bitcoin 暴跌后机构需求仍在,清算后通常是最好的加仓窗口。

$NBIS - AI data center / Neocloud 非对称最高的名字之一,forward revenue 和合同增长夸张。

$TSM - AI infrastructure 的骨架。无论 GPU、ASIC、TPU,最终都离不开先进制程。

MINT 的逻辑就是同时押 Mag7 现金流、Bitcoin、AI DC 和半导体主链。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1985175534133993567
❤️ 325 🔁 42 💬 39
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@rioferdy838 @Nykonikus @John12321043976 @DeepValueBagger I’ll DCA another 6 figures into $META at $610. For $NBIS I’ll always cost average up for longs if I trim other positions

But if others don’t have positions they want in those right now it’s an amazing buying opportunity
@rioferdy838 @Nykonikus @John12321043976 @DeepValueBagger 我会在 $META $610 再 DCA 六位数。对 $NBIS,如果我减其他仓位,长期多头我永远会摊高成本。

但如果其他人现在还没有这些仓位,这是很棒的买入机会。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I mean sometimes corrections happen without the need for a headline. People always like to assign some type of narrative with something like with Meta its AI capex spend but pretty sure it was just algorithmic selloff from one-time tax into mechanical flows downward.

We just got a second rate cut, but since a third is greatly reduced after powell’s comments markets started to price that in with high beta.

There’s also big probabilities of shutdown extending past the 15th, and that’s going to be an annoying headwind
我的意思是,有时修正不需要标题。人们总喜欢给它配某种叙事,比如 Meta 是 AI capex spend,但我很确定那只是一次性税项引发的算法抛售,随后进入向下 mechanical flows。

我们刚刚得到第二次降息,但由于 Powell 评论后第三次降息概率大幅下降,市场开始用 high beta 定价这一点。

还有停摆延长到 15 日之后的较大概率,这会是烦人的逆风。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@John12321043976 @DeepValueBagger This is just macro, not happened to the individual stock so it’s a buying opportunity.

Most high beta names without any news are down today. But difference is $NBIS has stupidly high forward earnings to back up fundamentals so it’s just a waiting game
@John12321043976 @DeepValueBagger 这只是宏观,不是个股出了问题,所以是买入机会。

今天大多数没有新闻的 high beta 名字都在跌。但区别是 $NBIS 有离谱的高远期收益支撑基本面,所以只是等待游戏。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
The deal looks a lot worse for $IREN when you look into FCF generated more instead of revenue numbers since it's not pure colo.

When you normalize to 300 MW and compare MSFT deals $IREN is projected to do ~30s gross or even low single digits in bear cases, and $NBIS ~50%+ (at least from initial calculations, I need to revisit)

In this case, IREN is taking on the $5.8 billion CapEx for the GPUs and ancillary equipment itself.
当你更多看 FCF 而不是收入数字时,这笔交易对 $IREN 看起来糟得多,因为它不是纯 colo。

如果 normalize 到 300 MW 并比较 MSFT 交易,$IREN 预计 gross 在 30s 左右,bear cases 甚至低个位数,而 $NBIS 约 50%+(至少按初步计算,我需要重新看)。

在这种情况下,IREN 自己承担 $5.8 billion CapEx 用于 GPUs 和 ancillary equipment。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
For $CIFR, doesn't matter about current earnings, market prices in forward earnings. And at first glance AWS deal looks amazing on top of their existing $GOOGL deals through Fluidstack. So well deserving of their 20% bump.

For $IREN on the other hand, the contract worse and worse when you examine it more.

Revenue does not matter. FCF/margins from that revenue is what matters, especially since they're spending $5.8bn GPUs. I've seen some conservative-case calculations where they generate ~Annualized operating profit 98m+/year, which is really low.

Even so optimistically, gross margins are in the <30s or even 20s, and not the 90%+ HPC segments that others are quoting. This is the reality of margins at scale.

IREN is buying the asset, rather than the colocation service people kept claiming $IREN would do.

$NBIS deal with MSFT was extremely better than IREN’s in terms of profitability and margins when normalized to 300 MW. But of course I need to spend more time on modeling.
$CIFR 来说,当前 earnings 不重要,市场定价远期 earnings。乍看 AWS deal 加上他们现有通过 Fluidstack 的 $GOOGL deals,非常棒。所以 20% bump 完全合理。

另一方面,对 $IREN 来说,越研究合同越糟。

收入不重要。来自该收入的 FCF/margins 才重要,尤其是他们要花 $5.8bn GPUs。我看到一些 conservative-case 计算,它们每年产生约 Annualized operating profit 98m+,非常低。

即使乐观,gross margins 也在 <30s,甚至 20s,而不是别人引用的 90%+ HPC segments。这就是规模化利润率的现实。

IREN 买的是资产,而不是大家一直声称 $IREN 会做的 colocation service。

按 300 MW normalize 后,$NBIS 与 MSFT 的交易在盈利能力和利润率上远好于 IREN。当然我还需要花更多时间建模。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
After looking into it more, looks like $NBIS's deal with $MSFT was largely better than $IREN's in terms of profitability and margins when normalized to 300 MW.

It's not purely about revenue, since if you're not generating FCF from it, it's not that useful.

For $IREN:
$9.7bn total contract value
$5.8bn GPU capex, including ancillaries
~38% gross margin.

$NBIS
51.76%+ gross margin.

I need to do more calculations to verify, this was just a quick deep-research calculation in terms of deal differences.
进一步研究后,看起来按 300 MW normalize,$NBIS$MSFT 的交易在盈利能力和利润率上大幅优于 $IREN

这不纯粹是收入问题,因为如果你不能从中产生 FCF,它就没那么有用。

$IREN
$9.7bn total contract value
$5.8bn GPU capex,包括 ancillaries
~38% gross margin。

$NBIS
51.76%+ gross margin。

我需要做更多计算来验证,这只是关于交易差异的快速 deep-research 计算。
❤️ 69 🔁 1 💬 4
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Wow $IREN and $CIFR just wiped out its gains. For $IREN at least, I guess the market was pricing in a hyperscaler contract already.

$CIFR AWS announcement was a really big surprise to everyone though.

$NBIS just dropped with the rest of the market but an extremely good -5% dip buy since the whole Neocloud industry is really bullish with hyperscaler contracts announced left and right + during ERs.
哇,$IREN$CIFR 刚刚抹掉涨幅。至少对 $IREN 来说,我猜市场已经在定价 hyperscaler 合同了。

不过 $CIFR AWS 公告对所有人来说都是很大的惊喜。

$NBIS 只是跟随整个市场下跌,但这是极好的 -5% dip buy,因为整个 Neocloud 行业都非常看多,hyperscaler 合同到处宣布 + ERs 中也在出现。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@moninvestor Like what they say with hands, the bigger the better (~$19B $NBIS vs ~9B $IREN).

Half-joking aside, this was a material de-risking event for $IREN and deserves re-rating. Will need more time to do valuations

(This was the tierlist maker if any other finx wanted to make one) https://t.co/oefhQy7Trn
@moninvestor 就像他们说手一样,越大越好(~$19B $NBIS vs ~$9B $IREN)。

半开玩笑地说,这是 $IREN 的重大去风险事件,值得重估。需要更多时间做估值。

(如果其他 finx 想做,这是 tierlist maker)https://t.co/oefhQy7Trn
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
The Neocloud List got updated:

$IREN - IREN secured a $9.7B GPU cloud contract with Microsoft, including 20% upfront prepayment, to deploy NVIDIA GB300s over five years.

$CIFR - CIFR secured a $5.5 billion, 15-year lease agreement with Amazon Web Services (AWS).

The Neocloud sector just got insanely bullish with new contracts coming in from hyperscalers and this just shows insatiable demand for compute.

I expected $ORCL, $META, and $AMZN to make deals in the original thesis and looks like AWS entered the fray with $CIFR, with likely more deals incoming with other Neoclouds. $META also signed a $14B deal with $CRWV recently and from their ER scaling AI Capex, we'll likely see other deals with Neoclouds.

This is insanely bullish across the whole sector.

I attached my personal tierlist for fun, but we'll likely see a re-ratings in data centers/miners across the board when there's more time to analyze deals and margins.
Neocloud List 更新了:

$IREN - IREN 与 Microsoft 签下 $9.7B GPU cloud 合同,包括 20% 预付款,用于五年内部署 NVIDIA GB300s。

$CIFR - CIFR 与 Amazon Web Services (AWS) 签下 $5.5 billion、15 年 lease agreement。

随着 hyperscalers 新合同涌入,Neocloud 板块变得极度看多,这说明对 compute 的需求无法满足。

我在原始 thesis 中预计 $ORCL$META$AMZN 会签交易,看起来 AWS 已经通过 $CIFR 入局,其他 Neoclouds 可能还有更多交易。$META 最近也和 $CRWV 签了 $14B 交易,从他们 ER 中扩张 AI Capex 看,我们很可能看到更多 Neoclouds 交易。

这对整个板块极度 bullish。

我附上个人 tierlist 只是好玩,但等有更多时间分析交易和利润率后,我们很可能看到 data centers/miners 全面重估。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Neocloud Ecosystem Cheat Sheet Part 1/2:

Bullet Point Positive vs. Negatives.

Full List by Marketcap:

$CRWV ($66.2B)
$NBIS ($32.85B)
$IREN ($16.52B)
$APLD ($9.69B)
$RIOT ($7.34B)
$CIFR ($7.3B)
$WULF ($6.36B)
$HUT($5.39B)
$CLSK ($5.01B)
$HIVE ($1.74B CAD)
$WYFI ($1.29B)
$WLAC($600m IPO)
$DGXX ($393M CAD)
$SLNH ($281.9M)

_

Summary

When comparing, a major source of alpha generation currently lies in the megawatt valuation arbitrage, which involves converting low-multiple Bitcoin power capacity into high-multiple AI hosting capacity.

The second major alpha is margin generation, which involves being vertically integrated from the bottom up from GPU orchestration to software.

Coreweave ( $CRWV ) - $66.2B Marketcap

🍏Positives
________________

- Sector leader by scale: quarterly revenue of $1.21B (+206.75% YoY) and EBITDA of $607.69M; on pace for $5B+ ARR in 2025.
- $30B+ backlog, anchored by:
- $14B Meta deal,
- OpenAI
- $6.3B NVIDIA GPU backstop agreement,
- growng Gov contracts via CRWV Federal .
- Expansion into U.S. government infrastructure is a major long-term moat if backstopped by federal workloads.
- NVIDIA partnership ensures utilization floor; de-risks GPU oversupply.
- Positioned as hyperscaler alternative with Tier 1 clients and national buildout footprint.

Negatives
________________

- Aggressive capex: Q3 spend of $2.9–3.4B, with 2025 full-year guidance of $20–23B.
- High-cost debt structure: Over $1B in projected annual interest, versus competors using low- or zero-interest convertible notes.
- Q2 GAAP net loss of $291M, signaling limited profitability despite scale.
- Execution risk remains high: e.g., failed $9B Core Scientific acquisition due to shareholder rejection.
- Competitors like Nebius are closing the full-stack gap, weakening CoreWeave's software moat.

Nebius ( $NBIS ) - $32.85B MarketCap

🍏Positives
________________

- $17.4B Microsoft deal for full-stack AI infrastructure (possibly rising to $19.4B).
- Active include many enterprises such as MSFT, Shopify, Accenture, governments, and AI startups.
- 71%+ gross margins on AI infra segment; profitable at the EBITDA level.
- 1 GW+ powr secured, targeting dense GPU deployments across new sites.
- Fully integrated software+hardware stack, which increases opex and is a moat.
- $10B+ in assets, from $5.8B+ cash, ownership of companies like Clickhouse that powers Anthropic, Meta, and others growing rapidly.

Negatives
________________

- Execution risks around full-stack delivery and latency SLAs could derail rollout.
- Microsoft is the primary anchor on forward revenue extreme contract dependency (high concentration risk projected AI revenue)
- 71% gross margin figure not representative of forward revenue or execution at scale and could lower to a more conservative 50-65% number.

$IREN - $16.52B marketcap

🍏Positives
________________

- 2.91 GW power secured, diversified across North America, and expanding more than 3GW in renewable power capacity.
- Full control over power, land, and data center construction = vertical efficiency and higher margin control compare to other bare metal.
- Targets customers (e.g., AI labs, hyperscalers) who might bring their own Type-1 orchestration and prefer bare-metal control.
- Historically the most efficient and profitable large-scale BTC miner and better positioned to handle rising GPU power/cooling requirements in B100/B200 generations for AI cloud pivot.
- Targeting an ARR of over $500 million by the first quarter of 2026 by buildouting out a fleet of 23,000 NVIDIA B200/B300 + AMD MI350X GPUs.

Downsides
________________

- No well-known enteprsie/hyperscaler contract visibility and limited disclosed large SLA deals yet
- Not a full-stack provider; acts as Tier-1 (shell/colocation) = lower margin and tenant risk and illustrative GPU target. Meaning it is unable to capture the highest-margin revenues associated with integrated, proprietary full-stack cloud
- Quoted 92% margins excludes expense recognition, and with D&A and would be much lower at scale.
- The substantial capital expenditure required for the large-scale GPU purchase risks negative returns if future utilization rates fail to meet expectations

$APLD

🍏Positives
________________

- $5B Macquarie financing facility, with first draw building 400MW AI campus.
- Tenant: CoreWeave fully leasing Polaris Forge 1 (400MW), scalable to 1GW.
- Proprietary waterless liquid cooling optimized for dense AI workloads
- Capex-light via preferred equity.
- AI-first buildout focused on latency, fiber, and power pairing in North Dakota.

Downsides
________________

- Large-scale buildout depends on continued draws from Macquarie’s $5B facility.
- 400MW CoreWeave lease is all-or-nothing; no clarity on tenant diversity.
- Execution risk at Polaris Forge: weather, zoning, grid integration delays.
- Exposed to single-tenant concentration and private-market GPU pricing dynamics.

$RIOT

🍏Positives
________________

- 600MW idle capacity in Corsicana, TX under AI redeployment review.
- Gigawatt-scale infrastructure in place, ready for rapid pivot.
- Leverages one of the lowest power costs in the U.S. (ERCOT access).
- TTM Gross Margin of nearly 60% as of Q2 2025, primarily derived from its core mining business. The successful implementation of this contract gives more confidence in converting additional existing mining sites into high-multiple HPC capacity.

Negatives
________________

- AI pivot is purely exploratory; no firm buildout announced.
- 600MW idle capacity = opportunity, but also dead capital for now.
- Canceling mining expansion (8.3 EH/s) may weaken near-term revenues.
- Needs permits, fiber, GPU supply, and anchor tenant before AI rollout can begin.

$CIFR

🍏Positives
________________

- 10-year, $3B+ computing 168MW agreement with Fluidstack + $GOOGL
- Agreement is substantially de-risked by a $1.4 billion commitment from Google to backstop the Fluidstack lease
- High-margin, low-risk hosting model with leased facilities.

Negatives
________________

- Fluidstack deal is 10-year but fixed-price, limiting upside if GPU rental rates increase.
- $1.3B convertible debt adds dilution risk if equity markets weaken.
- Site buildouts dependent on few customers, very high fill and utilization risk.

_

Since the data center sector is so nuanced and broad thought it would be helpful if I wrote created a full TLDR list for newcomers to see the tradeoffs of each approach.

I'll probably go back and add more stuff to $CIFR and $APLD and others in one final post since it didn't get enough justice.

I just didn't realize how much time this took to write up + please correct me if any figures are off lol.

Also would save me time if people helped fill out the rest lol so would appreciate it too for 2/2.

~~~ Help with the Crowdsourcing ~~~
Neocloud 生态速查表 Part 1/2:

要点式正面 vs 负面。

按市值:

$CRWV ($66.2B)
$NBIS ($32.85B)
$IREN ($16.52B)
$APLD ($9.69B)
$RIOT ($7.34B)
$CIFR ($7.3B)
$WULF ($6.36B)
$HUT ($5.39B)
$CLSK ($5.01B)
$HIVE ($1.74B CAD)
$WYFI ($1.29B)
$WLAC ($600m IPO)
$DGXX ($393M CAD)
$SLNH ($281.9M)

_

总结:

当前主要 alpha 来源之一,是 megawatt 估值套利:把低倍数 Bitcoin 电力容量转成高倍数 AI hosting 容量。

第二个主要 alpha 是利润率创造:从 GPU orchestration 到 software 做自下而上的垂直整合。

Coreweave($CRWV)- $66.2B 市值

正面:规模行业领先,季度收入增长快,有大型客户和 backlog。

负面:OpenAI/少数客户依赖高,债务和利息负担重,估值已经很高。

Nebius($NBIS

正面:客户分散,$MSFT/$META 等合同,现金充足,融资结构更好,还拥有 Avride、Toloka 等高增长子公司。

负面:执行风险高,市场仍怀疑交付能力。

IREN/CIFR/WULF 等各自有合同、土地/电力和融资差异。核心比较维度是:谁的 MW 最便宜、谁的合同最确定、谁的毛利率最高、谁不被高息债拖死。

整体看,Neocloud 不是单一矿股转型故事,而是 AI compute capex 外溢到小公司后的重估。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1984837960735285593
❤️ 801 🔁 124 💬 54
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I still maintain $NBIS $400 bull case 1Y PT but it’s good to cost average.

$IREN just got a $9B deal from $MSFT today and $GOOGL just announced financing so it’s generally bullish for all Neoclouds.

Several miners got de-risked a lot today from the deal, but I’d still say Nebius has highest asymmetry.
我仍维持 $NBIS $400 bull case 1Y PT,但成本均摊是好的。

$IREN 今天刚从 $MSFT 拿到 $9B 交易,$GOOGL 也刚宣布融资,所以整体上对所有 Neoclouds 都利好。

几家 miners 今天因为这笔交易大幅去风险,但我仍会说 Nebius 具有最高 asymmetry。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@doctarzz @zackslab Yeah I'd agree they probably inflated 1B MAU a bit.

I'd be happier as an investor if capex went to compete vs ChatGPT/Gemini on the foundational model side since FAIR/Meta Superintelligence is doing some pretty cool stuff.

We'll likely see them promote the standalone AI soon
@doctarzz @zackslab 是的,我同意他们可能稍微夸大了 1B MAU。

作为投资者,如果 capex 用来在 foundational model 方面和 ChatGPT/Gemini 竞争,我会更开心,因为 FAIR/Meta Superintelligence 正在做一些很酷的事。

我们很可能很快看到他们推广独立 AI。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
That aside, I'd agree nobody I know would use messenger/whatsapp AI, no clue how they got 1B MAU but it's just anecdotal. Perception like Facebook dying is slightly different than reality.

Capex is likely going toward their frontier model (eg. $14B crwv contract and other datacenters) so they can train a better model and compete vs. Gemini/ChatGPT.
除此之外,我同意我认识的人没人会用 messenger/whatsapp AI,不知道他们怎么拿到 1B MAU,但这只是轶事。Facebook dying 这种 perception 和现实略有不同。

Capex 可能流向他们的 frontier model(比如 $14B crwv 合同和其他 datacenters),这样他们可以训练更好的模型,与 Gemini/ChatGPT 竞争。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@doctarzz @zackslab https://t.co/UV78P38WrP
@doctarzz @zackslab https://t.co/UV78P38WrP
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So with $META at least, my take is that EPS $1.05 vs est. $6.67 was the primary trigger algorithmic selloff immediately after earning report since they didn't get the $7.25 EPS one-time tax nuance.

Option related flows and mechanical hedging by MMs triggered -> short stock to stay hedged and there's day 2 selling + retail flush.

Everyone needs some "narrative" to explain that drop so in this case, it was "omg $META spending money on capex on AI!", even though it's just stupid and earnings were amazing.

Drop was algorithmic and fundamentals are not just in-tact, they're better than expected. Of course people read the narratives and this leads to more panic-selling, but once people digest the information, they'll see the selloff is stupid.

So I'm taking advantage of the drop. Better to ignore the media narrative and go with what's actually there like with $GOOGL at $145.

We can have another argument whether or not $META AI is crap or not and capex is going into a black hole across the board but fundamentals are intact and growing.
至少对 $META 来说,我的看法是 EPS $1.05 vs est. $6.67 是财报后算法抛售的主要触发,因为它们没有理解 $7.25 EPS 一次性税项细节。

Option related flows 和 MMs 的 mechanical hedging 被触发 -> short stock 以保持 hedge,然后有第 2 天卖盘 + retail flush。

每个人都需要某种“叙事”来解释下跌,所以这次就是“omg $META spending money on capex on AI!”,尽管这很蠢,财报非常好。

下跌是算法性的,基本面不仅 intact,还好于预期。当然人们读了叙事会引发更多 panic-selling,但一旦大家消化信息,就会看到这次抛售很蠢。

所以我在利用这次下跌。最好忽略媒体叙事,看实际存在的东西,就像 $GOOGL 在 $145 时那样。

我们可以另开一个争论,讨论 $META AI 是否垃圾,以及 capex 是否整体进了黑洞,但基本面完好且在增长。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
For $TSM - 说得好。
从美国投资者的角度来看,台积电($TSM)在“台湾可能被入侵”这件事上,总是一个令人头疼的逆风因素。

不过,这同时也是一个过于关键的国家安全议题。我相信,美国若有任何国家威胁到台湾,一定会出兵干预。原因很简单——台湾是整个供应链和人工智能基础设施的核心。

而且,我也相信,没有任何国家愿意与美国直接开战。

当涉及关键矿产贸易争端时,台积电和台湾方面也都会发表声明,表示他们的供应链并未受到影响。

这就是为什么地缘政治风险并不像市场定价那样高的原因。
关于 $TSM - 说得好。
从美国投资者的角度来看,台积电($TSM)在“台湾可能被入侵”这件事上,总是一个令人头疼的逆风因素。

不过,这同时也是一个过于关键的国家安全议题。我相信,美国若有任何国家威胁到台湾,一定会出兵干预。原因很简单——台湾是整个供应链和人工智能基础设施的核心。

而且,我也相信,没有任何国家愿意与美国直接开战。

当涉及关键矿产贸易争端时,台积电和台湾方面也都会发表声明,表示他们的供应链并未受到影响。

这就是为什么地缘政治风险并不像市场定价那样高的原因。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 $ALAB + $CRDO 15%+ increase was expected due to connectivity going insane like memory $MU/Sk Hynix on data center buildout.

I'd personally hold them into next year, maybe trim a tiny bit.

$MINT was just asymmetrical upside. To @Neat_Lama, here's another song #2 of the album. https://t.co/yvd68BBX0R
@soulbiri1 $ALAB + $CRDO 15%+ 上涨是预期之内,因为 data center buildout 让 connectivity 像 memory $MU/SK Hynix 一样疯狂。

我个人会持有到明年,也许小幅 trim。

$MINT 只是 asymmetrical upside。给 @Neat_Lama,这是专辑的另一首歌 #2。https://t.co/yvd68BBX0R
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
There’s only Four stocks:

🍬 MINT

That have ABSURDLY HIGH, asymmetrical return.

Meaning Low Capital Risk. High Upside Return.

This is only for Nov + Dec 2025.

Here it is... MINT

An explanation of why to full port MINT for end of year 2025:

M = $META
I = $IBIT
N = $NBIS
T = $TSM

With these four holy growth companies in your portfolio, you can make your breath smell better so you can pull Sydney Sweeney:

Mag7. Crypto. AI Data Center. Semiconductor.

$META - Meta
___________
Stupid sell-off.

Revenue Beat. EPS Beat. Strong guidance.

It looks extremely bad on paper when you look at
Revenue $51.24B (+26.25% Y/Y), Net income $2.71B (-82.73% Y/Y).

🟢 Revenue: $51.24B vs. est. $49.41B

Without one-off tax →
🟢 EPS: $7.25 vs. est. $6.67

With one-off tax →
🔴 EPS: $1.05 vs. est. $6.67

My guess was the initial sell-off was algorithmically driven, then caused by mechanical flows. Many high-frequency trading (HFT) and news-parsing systems react to headline EPS numbers pulled directly from data feeds (Bloomberg, Reuters, etc.).

If the reported GAAP EPS ($1.05) is printed alongside a consensus of $6.67, the system flags it as a massive miss. Obviously this is speculative, but many models aren't programmed to normalize for one-time tax charges (which is new) and won’t know to look at adjusted EPS ($7.25), which actually beat.

Now news are claiming the sell-off was due to AI capex surprise. If we go with this, -15%+ on “AI capex spending increasing” is just pure narratives and means absolutely jack since $MSFT, $GOOGL, $AMZN, $TSLA, and every single Mag7 is increasing on capex.

$META doing the same and selling off doesn’t make sense, unless people believe it’s just going into a black hole with no ROI (which markets disagree since AI is basically running $SPY).

Extremely strong buy on recovery once there’s time over the weekend for people to digest what actually happened. Misreads + stupid narratives can cause short-term overreactions (1–2 sessions), often reversed.

$IBIT - Bitcoin
___________

It’s Bitcoin.And sitting at $110k.

Bitcoin is here to stay with US government support, and with all the ongoing currency inflation + flow of money going to newer generation, there’s no better hedge against inflation than BTC.

Polymarket still prices Bitcoin 40% to $130k in 2 months’ time, even if it moves up a few percent you can have upside on CCs and upside on the underlying asset.

$NBIS - Nebius
___________
Core business valuation: $31–36.5B

Sum-of-parts (cash, assets, portfolio): ~$10.6B (slashed 40% = ~$6.3B)

Base case valuation: ~$39B → high upside even with zero growth

Core business on track for ~$5B ARR (FY26–27), 60–70% gross margins, and 30% EBITDA target.

Hitting $8–12B ARR (via one more hyperscaler deal + SMB expansion) could justify ~$100B valuation.

No toxic debt, high GPU utilization, full-stack architecture → higher operating leverage.

You can look at the bullet point comparison that I quoted so you can make your own judgement on $NBIS vs $IREN for example.

However, I’ll always maintain $NBIS has the highest asymmetrical return over anything including $IREN to $CIFR due to existing hyperscaler deals, enterprise clients (Shopify, Accenture), Government Clients, 1GW capacity, high gross margins from full-stack, and many others.

That’s not saying there’s not high upside from $WULF from Fluidstack + Google deals, and others from capacity.

The downside risk on Nebius is the lowest. And it has really, really high upside.

$TSM
______________
It’s the CENTER. OF. THE. AI. TRADE.

They’ve already guided INCREASING MARGINS - which is astronomical.

Revenue: $33.1B vs. $31.5B est.
Earnings per Share: $2.92 vs. $2.59 est.
Guidance: $32.2B – $33.4B vs. $32.0B est.

They’ve beat revenue guidance, increasing margins, and it’s just astronomical how much money they’re printing.

It was trading at $305–310 pre-earnings, now back at $300.

It’s a $1T+ company that grew 30%+ Y/Y with their margins — what the actual.

I said this about the money printer $GOOGL back at $145 and $HOOD back at $20. They print money.

There's no need to debate $ALAB vs $CRDO, $IREN vs $NBIS, $AMD vs $NVDA.

$TSM the center of the whole AI buildout, so it’s just a waiting game.

_

There is it $MINT.

Enjoy a teaser of the song, kinda a banger. 🎶
只有四只股票:

🍬 MINT

拥有荒谬高的不对称回报。

意思是低资本风险,高上行回报。

这只适用于 2025 年 11 月 + 12 月。

就是它……MINT

为什么 2025 年底要 full port MINT:

M = $META
I = $IBIT
N = $NBIS
T = $TSM

有这四家神圣成长公司在你的组合里,你的口气会更清新,这样你就能追到 Sydney Sweeney:

Mag7. Crypto. AI Data Center. Semiconductor.

$META - Meta
___________
愚蠢抛售。

Revenue Beat。EPS Beat。Strong guidance。

如果看 Revenue $51.24B(+26.25% Y/Y)、Net income $2.71B(-82.73% Y/Y),纸面上极其难看。

🟢 Revenue: $51.24B vs. est. $49.41B

不含一次性税项 ->
🟢 EPS: $7.25 vs. est. $6.67

含一次性税项 ->
🔴 EPS: $1.05 vs. est. $6.67

我的猜测是初始抛售由算法驱动,然后由 mechanical flows 造成。许多高频交易(HFT)和新闻解析系统会对从数据源(Bloomberg、Reuters 等)直接抓取的 headline EPS 数字作出反应。

如果报告的 GAAP EPS($1.05)和 consensus $6.67 同时出现,系统会把它标记为巨大 miss。显然这只是猜测,但很多模型没有被编程去 normalize 一次性税项(这是新的),也不会看 adjusted EPS($7.25),而后者其实 beat。

现在新闻声称抛售是因为 AI capex surprise。如果按这个说法,因为“AI capex spending increasing”跌 -15%+ 纯属叙事,毫无意义,因为 $MSFT$GOOGL$AMZN$TSLA 和每个 Mag7 都在增加 capex。

$META 做同样事情却被卖,没有意义,除非人们相信这笔钱全进了没有 ROI 的黑洞(但市场不同意,因为 AI 基本上在驱动 $SPY)。

周末大家有时间消化真实情况后,恢复时是极强买入。误读 + 愚蠢叙事会造成短期过度反应(1-2 个交易日),经常会反转。

$IBIT - Bitcoin
___________

它是 Bitcoin,而且在 $110k。

在美国政府支持下,Bitcoin 会长期存在,加上持续货币通胀 + 资金流向新一代,没有比 BTC 更好的通胀对冲。

Polymarket 仍给 Bitcoin 两个月到 $130k 40% 概率,即使只涨几个百分点,你也可以从 CCs 和底层资产上行中获益。

$NBIS - Nebius
___________
核心业务估值:$31–36.5B

Sum-of-parts(现金、资产、组合):约 $10.6B(砍 40% = 约 $6.3B)

Base case valuation:约 $39B -> 即使零增长也有高上行

核心业务正走向约 $5B ARR(FY26–27)、60–70% gross margins,以及 30% EBITDA 目标。

达到 $8–12B ARR(通过再一个 hyperscaler 交易 + SMB 扩张)可支撑约 $100B 估值。

无毒性债务、高 GPU 利用率、full-stack 架构 -> 更高 operating leverage。

你可以看我引用的 bullet point comparison,自行判断 $NBIS vs $IREN

不过,我始终认为 $NBIS 相比包括 $IREN$CIFR 在内的任何标的,都有最高不对称回报,因为它已有 hyperscaler deals、enterprise clients(Shopify、Accenture)、Government Clients、1GW capacity、full-stack 带来的高 gross margins,以及许多其他因素。

这不是说 $WULF 因 Fluidstack + Google deals 等没有高上行。

Nebius 的下行风险最低,同时上行真的非常高。

$TSM
______________
它是 AI TRADE 的中心。

他们已经指引 INCREASING MARGINS - 这很惊人。

Revenue: $33.1B vs. $31.5B est.
Earnings per Share: $2.92 vs. $2.59 est.
Guidance: $32.2B – $33.4B vs. $32.0B est.

他们 beat revenue guidance,提高 margins,印钱能力惊人。

财报前交易在 $305–310,现在回到 $300。

这是一家 $1T+ 公司,以这种利润率增长 30%+ Y/Y,what the actual。

我在 $GOOGL $145 和 $HOOD $20 时也说过它们是 money printer。它们在印钱。

没必要争 $ALAB vs $CRDO$IREN vs $NBIS$AMD vs $NVDA

$TSM 是整个 AI buildout 的中心,所以只是等待游戏。
_

这就是 $MINT

享受这首歌的 teaser,挺好听。🎶
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Added 6 figures in Jan-Feb $META calls.

Same thing happened last year April and it took 2-6 days for full recovery.

Earnings beat, fundamentals in tact. Same story about capex spend.

Might be 2 day flush so cost averaging but this selloff is a huge opportunity. https://t.co/S3CwYsdaU4
加了六位数的 1-2 月 $META calls。

去年 4 月也发生过同样的事,完全修复花了 2-6 天。

财报 beat,基本面没坏。还是那套关于 capex 支出的叙事。

可能会洗 2 天,所以我在分批摊成本,但这次抛售是个巨大机会。 https://t.co/S3CwYsdaU4
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1983895786590200266
❤️ 217 🔁 22 💬 20
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Also when I post about comparisons between $IREN and $NBIS or talking about $IREN having comparable capacity to $RIOT and $MARA, and saying margins at scale matter more than compute, I'm not bearish on IREN, just giving the reality of the situation.

Same when people try claiming they have 92% gross margins, they don't when yo factor in deprecation and other expenses. They just went into another category and if you normalize it with how other HPC companies do accounting for their gross margins, margins are a lot less.

But that doesn't mean it's bad, there's always tradeoffs.
另外,当我发 $IREN$NBIS 的比较,或者说 $IREN 容量可比 $RIOT$MARA,并说规模化利润率比算力更重要时,我不是看空 IREN,只是在说明现实情况。

同样,当人们声称他们有 92% gross margins 时,如果计入 depreciation 和其他费用,他们并没有。他们只是进入了另一个类别;如果按其他 HPC 公司计算 gross margins 的方式 normalize,利润率会低很多。

但这不代表它不好,事情总有取舍。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah longer term that's the downside risk for $NBIS and others in terms of hyperscalers building out ASICs and capacity and not using Neoclouds after contracted capacity ends.

I said in my original thesis that $CRWV, $NBIS and almost serve as $NVDA's cloud arm, and helps defend against margin compression from hyperscalers and diversify their business. That's why hyperscalers funnel revenue down to these small guys.

But generally, you have more protection if your contract terms are 10Y or 15Y but less revenue ramp. (eg. with $NBIS $MSFT deal, revenue ramps to $3.8B+ ARR in 1-2 years on top of their ~1.1B ARR)

That being said, that's 4-5 years from now, it's too far forward to speculate as of now.

Usually you do things like re-rate or examine risk vs. reward month-by-month whenever new information comes out.
是的,更长期看,这就是 $NBIS 和其他公司的下行风险:hyperscalers 自建 ASICs 和容量,等签约容量结束后不再使用 Neoclouds。

我在原始 thesis 里说过,$CRWV$NBIS 几乎充当 $NVDA 的 cloud arm,并帮助抵御 hyperscalers 带来的 margin compression,同时多元化业务。这就是为什么 hyperscalers 把收入导给这些小公司。

但一般来说,合同期限 10Y 或 15Y 会有更多保护,但收入 ramp 更慢。(比如 $NBIS $MSFT deal,收入会在 1-2 年内 ramp 到 $3.8B+ ARR,叠加他们约 1.1B ARR)

话虽如此,那是 4-5 年后的事,现在太远,不适合猜测。

通常你会在新信息出现时,逐月重新评级或审视 risk vs. reward。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DeepValueBagger This was too distracting, X is buggy. Normally replies to comments don't show up on your main feed unless you reply to your original post by itself. https://t.co/4X6DPgHXOH
@DeepValueBagger 这个太分散注意力了,X 有 bug。通常评论回复不会显示在你的主 feed,除非你单独回复自己的原帖。https://t.co/4X6DPgHXOH
❤️ 2 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I'm deleting my earlier comment to this since X is bugged and it's messing up my timeline:

But TLDR from before:

$APLD builds data-centers with significant power capacity and then lease that infrastructure to customers. So there's the $11B $APLD, $CRWV lease right now over 15 years for Ellendale campus.

Then there's Polaris Forge 2 is ~200+ MW with a $5B contract. Not much of a fan of longer contract terms (eg. 10 Years $CIFR | $WULF), vs. 5 Year $NBIS | $MSFT, since slower revenue ramp and changes of costs, but this is coming from a trader's perspecitve. Not as an actual negative when I talk about longer contract terms since if you’re investing for 1Y timeframe, you’d want the fastest revenue ramp possible.

But if you look at fluidstack $WULF contract agreements eg. 15 years it provides a lot more guarantees for a company over time, vs. if hyperscalers like $MSFT end up building out their own capacity and custom ASICs then some Neoclouds might be in trouble after 4Y
我删掉之前对此的评论,因为 X 出 bug,弄乱了我的 timeline:

但之前的 TLDR:

$APLD 建设有大量电力容量的数据中心,然后把基础设施租给客户。所以现在有 $11B 的 $APLD$CRWV lease,覆盖 Ellendale campus 15 年。

然后 Polaris Forge 2 约 200+ MW,有 $5B 合同。我不太喜欢更长合同期限(比如 10 Years $CIFR | $WULF)相对 5 Year $NBIS | $MSFT,因为收入 ramp 更慢,成本变化更多,但这是从 trader 角度说。说更长合同期时,并不是实际负面,因为如果你投资期限是 1Y,你会想要最快收入 ramp。

但如果看 fluidstack $WULF 合同协议,比如 15 年,它会随时间给公司更多保障;相对地,如果 $MSFT 这类 hyperscalers 最终自建容量和 custom ASICs,一些 Neoclouds 在 4Y 后可能有麻烦。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Antonzeehow There's not really a best to worst. It's more of trade-offs from risk vs. reward given current information.

Don't take this too seriously, but this is just my personal feeling right now given current MC's. https://t.co/RiCqPEOANm
@Antonzeehow 其实没有最好到最差。更多是基于当前信息的 risk vs. reward 取舍。

别太认真,这只是我按当前 MC 的个人感觉。https://t.co/RiCqPEOANm
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@StudentToStreet @moninvestor @Wendys @DeepValueBagger Can you ask if I full port Wendy's weeklies on earnings, 125% OTM and it hits.. Can I take over the Chariman's position?

I eat fast food like once a month, so I have great domain knowledge.
@StudentToStreet @moninvestor @Wendys @DeepValueBagger 你能不能帮我问一下,如果我在财报上 full port Wendy's weeklies,125% OTM 而且中了……我能接任 Chariman 吗?

我一个月吃一次快餐,所以有很强的 domain knowledge。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@moninvestor It’s gotta be @Wendys $WEN.

Huge untapped, unmonetized revenue potential behind the dumpsters. I think @DeepValueBagger realized this too on his most recent post.
@moninvestor 必须是 @Wendys $WEN

垃圾桶后面有巨大未开发、未变现的收入潜力。我觉得 @DeepValueBagger 最近那篇也意识到了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Docofgothm @pepemoonboy $ASML tracks fab cycles. $TSM is a measurement of AI buildout as a whole.

No reason to go with ASML in that case.

In terms of raw upside, maybe $AMD wins at this point, but asymmetrical returns (lowest downside for upside) $TSM wins by an enormous margin.
@Docofgothm @pepemoonboy $ASML 跟踪 fab cycles。$TSM 是整个 AI buildout 的衡量。

这种情况下没有理由选 ASML。

就 raw upside 而言,也许 $AMD 现在赢,但不对称回报(最低下行换上行)上,$TSM 以巨大优势胜出。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$TSM can raise their prices anytime for higher margins (which they projected 3% increase) and $NVDA will be forced to use them anyway.

Also earning projections were a blowout as expected, whole AI buildout is on top of TSM, it doesn’t care about who wins like $AMD vs $NVDA. Pure monopoly.
$TSM 随时可以涨价来提高利润率(他们预计提升 3%),而 $NVDA 无论如何都被迫使用他们。

另外财报预期如预期一样爆炸,整个 AI buildout 都建立在 TSM 之上,它不在乎谁赢,比如 $AMD vs $NVDA。纯垄断。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
You’re right there’s a lot more risk involved than people expect for lower MC ones and I’ll point off the tradeoffs in the next post.

Even bigger ones dilute but dilution structure is extremely important like how $CIFR, $NBIS did convertibles.

Some fund through primarily through capex like $CORZ, but the goal is for most like $NBIS to fund capex through fcf with the $MSFT deal. Just in initial buildout like $SLNH they need to figure out how to get funding for pipelines or GPU acquisitions.
你说得对,低 MC 标的涉及的风险比人们预期更多,我会在下一篇帖子里指出 tradeoffs。

即使更大的公司也会稀释,但稀释结构极其重要,比如 $CIFR$NBIS 做可转债。

有些主要通过 capex 融资,比如 $CORZ,但对大多数像 $NBIS 的公司来说,目标是通过 $MSFT 交易带来的 fcf 来资助 capex。只是初始 buildout 阶段,像 $SLNH 需要弄清楚如何为 pipelines 或 GPU acquisitions 获得资金。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy lol we have similar longs now that I added $META the other day. I just went harder on $TSM instead of $NVDA.

What convinced you on $NBIS?
@pepemoonboy lol 我前几天加了 $META 之后,我们现在的 longs 很像。我只是更重仓 $TSM,而不是 $NVDA

是什么说服你买 $NBIS
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
You’re right, I missed $CORZ. Thanks for pointing it out, and appreciate others like @cazenove_uk for that too.

Should just treat it as standalone now given $CRWV merger got terminated the other day, don’t know how it slipped my mind. I’ll add that in the next 2/2 post.

$8.7 billion colo with $CRWV over 12 years gives $CORZ more predictable cashflows, and majority of capex ~80% ($~196m/ $244.5 million Q3) or so was funded by Coreweave, which is a lot nicer of a model for shareholders than convertible debt or toxic debt interest cutting into margins.

Also, with ~1.3-1.5 GW capacity, Coreweave only taking up 500 MW, and revenue offsetting capex, it’s quite interesting.
你说得对,我漏了 $CORZ。谢谢指出,也感谢 @cazenove_uk 等其他人。

鉴于 $CRWV merger 前几天终止,现在应该把它当作 standalone 看,不知道我怎么忘了。我会在下一篇 2/2 帖里加上。

$CRWV 的 12 年 $8.7 billion colo 给 $CORZ 带来更可预测现金流,而且大部分 capex 约 80%($~196m / $244.5 million Q3)由 Coreweave 出资,对股东来说,这种模式比可转债或毒性债务利息侵蚀利润率好得多。

另外,约 1.3-1.5 GW 容量中,Coreweave 只占 500 MW,且收入抵消 capex,这相当有意思。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@squarecapital3 @DeepValueBagger Yeah you’re right, $CRWV exercised the 150 mw option so $11b is locked in with $16B backlog revenue.

I’ll update my next post, thanks for the correction
@squarecapital3 @DeepValueBagger 是的你说得对,$CRWV 行使了 150 mw option,所以 $11b 已锁定,backlog revenue 是 $16B。

我会更新下一篇帖子,谢谢更正。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks! Yeah for $SLNH it's basically:

"We have a plan, can we bullpost enough for more investors to give us money?"

If that works, upside is big. If people don't give them money, their whole plan falls apart since they're a small marketcap company with nothing else to back it up their pipeline.

Yeah it's good to do research during this time, a lot of small marketcaps were absolute gems.
谢谢!是的,$SLNH 基本上是:

“我们有个计划,能不能通过 bullpost 让更多投资者给我们钱?”

如果成功,上行很大。如果人们不给钱,整个计划就会崩,因为他们是一家小市值公司,除了 pipeline 之外没有别的支撑。

是的,这段时间适合做研究,很多小市值是真正的宝藏。
❤️ 20 🔁 1 💬 4
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_stockResearch Also once again $SLNH is the PERFECT EXAMPLE of why capacity pipelines does not mean FCF/Margins.

You can have 2.8 GW capacity lined up but that might not translate at scale and there's huge, huge downside risk.

That's exactly why they're a $280m market cap.
@_stockResearch 另外再次强调,$SLNH 是为什么 capacity pipelines 不等于 FCF/Margins 的完美例子。

你可以排着 2.8 GW 容量,但它不一定能规模化转化,而且有巨大、巨大下行风险。

这正是他们只有 $280m 市值的原因。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I'm personally bullish on $WYFI. As for $SLNH, People keep claiming 2.8 GW pipeline (3 GW capacity with $IREN, etc) but obviously there's downsides.

So for SLNH: from my understanding, they do curtailed energy monetization, where they build modular data-centers wind or solar farms that produce more energy than the grid can accept.

They're more of a developer/operator trying to build these sites and negotiate cheap energy access. But we haven't seen this type of model scaled or fully financed yet.

It's potential capacity. And that doesn't translate into high margins and FCF lot of time.

There's a reason it's a sub <$300m marketcap and started off sub $70M. If they can convince enough retail to give them money for dilution, and then use that to finance all their capacity pipelines and GPUs, then the risk/reward is worth it.

Otherwise if something happens with the sector or people grow bearish on $SLNH, then the whole plan just goes disappears and the company goes under.

That's just my personal take, people can't really expect some $80m -> $280m microcap stock to not have downside risk and then just shill 2.8 GW capacity.
我个人看多 $WYFI。至于 $SLNH,人们一直声称 2.8 GW pipeline(和 $IREN 的 3 GW capacity 等),但显然有下行。

所以对 SLNH:按我的理解,他们做 curtailed energy monetization,即在风电或太阳能农场旁建设 modular data-centers,这些地方发电多于电网可接收量。

他们更像开发商/运营商,试图建设这些站点并谈判便宜能源接入。但我们还没看到这种模式规模化或完全融资。

这是潜在容量。而很多时候,这并不会转化为高利润率和 FCF。

它市值低于 $300m,并且从低于 $70M 起步,是有原因的。如果他们能说服足够 retail 通过稀释给他们钱,然后用来融资所有 capacity pipelines 和 GPUs,那么 risk/reward 值得。

否则如果板块出问题,或人们转为看空 $SLNH,整个计划就会消失,公司会倒。

这只是我的个人看法,大家不能真指望一只 $80m -> $280m microcap 股票没有下行风险,然后只吹 2.8 GW capacity。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I've actually found AI tools like @AskPerplexity, Grok and others to be extremely off when looking at Neoclouds and sectors with new news every day.

They miss a lot of details, eg. with $NBIS you have utilization information from Whitepapers comparing Nebius to $CRWV and others that aren't publicly viewable to AI (which insinuated growing gross margins from GPU utilization).

When Meta struck a $14B deal with $CRWV and you have earnings report last week from $AMZN, $MSFT, and others you have increased capex spend into AI, and they might miss tailwinds that don't mention $NBIS directly with increased changes of more hyperscaler deals.

Or when there's an additional rate cut a few days ago that boosts forward earnings especially with Neoclouds that involve debt. Or when there's new information about subsidiaries or portfolio companies like Clickhouse that AI might put 1+1 together with.

FinX retail does a lot better job with piecing all this information together into forward growth and AI/Neocloud TAM is really hard to model given how speculative and rapidly growing it is.

That's kinda why I go with valuation approaches (in my previous post on how you get to $100B MC for $NBIS), but if you look at $UPWK and more standard businesses. I do valuation modelling differently
我发现 @AskPerplexity、Grok 等 AI 工具在看 Neoclouds 和每天都有新消息的板块时非常不准。

它们漏掉很多细节,比如 $NBIS 有 Whitepapers 中关于 Nebius 与 $CRWV 等利用率对比的信息,这些不是 AI 能公开查看的(暗示 GPU 利用率带来 gross margins 增长)。

当 Meta 与 $CRWV 签 $14B 交易,以及上周 $AMZN$MSFT 等财报显示 AI capex 增加时,它们可能会漏掉那些不直接提到 $NBIS、但会增加更多 hyperscaler deals 机会的顺风。

或者几天前额外降息,尤其会提升涉及债务的 Neoclouds 远期收益。或者关于 Clickhouse 这类子公司/组合公司的新信息,AI 可能不会把 1+1 联系起来。

FinX retail 在把这些信息拼成 forward growth 方面做得好得多,而 AI/Neocloud TAM 因为投机性强、增长太快,很难建模。

这也是为什么我会用估值方法(我之前关于 $NBIS 如何到 $100B MC 的帖子),但如果看 $UPWK 和更标准业务,我会用不同估值模型。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@moninvestor Appreciate it!

Yeah this took me quite a bit of time to writeup, but I always thought more substance would help retail make more informed decisions when looking at Neoclouds from $IREN to $CRWV.

I'll probably have to update a lot of information after earnings though lol
@moninvestor 感谢!

是的,这篇花了我不少时间写,但我一直认为更多实质内容能帮助 retail 在看 $IREN$CRWV 这些 Neoclouds 时做出更有信息的决定。

不过财报后我可能得更新很多信息 lol
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
It's nuanced, but you can definitely compare capacity and pipeline with $IREN, $RIOT, $MARA, since capacity doesn't change.

The main difference is optionality (how well a company can repurpose capacity as demand shifts). If you were to argue $IREN is better positioned, sure.

With $MARA, you mentioned container-based ASIC farms as an example. However, they can still be retrofitted to HPC, it's just slightly more costly.

$IREN as you mentioned, designed built data centers with raised floors, fiber interconnects, HVAC/liquid cooling. so it does well for HPC.

There's different levels to pivots, but capacity remains the same through pivots.

The point I was making was that it's multifaceted with margins, and everything else.

You can't just say X Capacity = X revenue/Marketcap , otherwise you can easily just point to $MARA and $RIOT with similar capacities with $IREN. But whether or not optionality is worth a 10B difference, I don't know.
这很细微,但你当然可以把 capacity 和 pipeline 与 $IREN$RIOT$MARA 比较,因为 capacity 不变。

主要区别是 optionality(公司能多好地在需求变化时重新利用容量)。如果你要说 $IREN 位置更好,可以。

你提到 $MARA 的 container-based ASIC farms 作为例子。不过它们仍然可以改造成 HPC,只是成本略高。

如你所说,$IREN 设计建造的数据中心有 raised floors、fiber interconnects、HVAC/liquid cooling,所以很适合 HPC。

转型有不同层级,但转型过程中 capacity 仍保持不变。

我的观点是,这涉及利润率和其他一切,是多因素的。

你不能只说 X Capacity = X revenue/Marketcap,否则你可以很容易指向拥有类似 $IREN 容量的 $MARA$RIOT。但 optionality 是否值得 10B 差距,我不知道。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
With $IREN people keep making the argument about ~3 GW capacity at a ~17B marketcap, deserves to be X marketcap.

$RIOT has a similar capacity too: 1GW Corsicana, 700MW Rockdale, and misc with ~3GW capacity (total if you combine BTC mining + pipeline). ~7B marketcap

$MARA also has 1.7GW with 3+ GW pipeline as well. ~6.7B marketcap

$IREN did make the HPC pivot compared to the other two but we've definitely seen that priced in with the 480%+ runup.

Fair note is that analysts from H.C. Wainright have said "IREN AI cloud business has reached a point of irrational exuberance."

Before, we looked solely at capacity, but markets will start pricing in margins and execution risk.

It's up to your decision whether you think $IREN can execute and scale into HPC like $CRWV spent years and billions doing. Or if they can do so when $ORCL, a 750B hyperscaler failed to do so with 14% gross margins.

Also if it were that easy Riot and Mara and other high GW capacity miners would have just full-sent HPC and would reach similar marketcap re-ratings too.

That's the downside risk people don't like talking about. However, upside is that capacity/infrastructure = higher revenue potential that you mentioned.
关于 $IREN,人们一直用约 3 GW capacity、约 17B marketcap 来论证它应该值 X marketcap。

$RIOT 也有类似容量:1GW Corsicana、700MW Rockdale,以及其他约 3GW capacity(如果合并 BTC mining + pipeline)。约 7B marketcap。

$MARA 也有 1.7GW 和 3+ GW pipeline。约 6.7B marketcap。

相比另外两家,$IREN 确实做了 HPC pivot,但我们已经在 480%+ 上涨中看到它被定价。

公平提醒,H.C. Wainright 分析师说过 “IREN AI cloud business has reached a point of irrational exuberance.”

以前我们只看 capacity,但市场会开始定价利润率和执行风险。

这取决于你是否认为 $IREN 能像 $CRWV 花多年和数十亿美元那样执行并规模化 HPC。或者当 $ORCL 这样 750B hyperscaler 都以 14% gross margins 失败时,他们是否能做到。

另外如果真那么容易,Riot、Mara 和其他高 GW capacity miners 早就 full-send HPC,并获得类似市值重估了。

这就是人们不喜欢谈的下行风险。不过,上行是你提到的 capacity/infrastructure = 更高收入潜力。
❤️ 8 🔁 2 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Also with this, this is why we shouldn't just say GW Capacity = X revenue <-> marketcap since many existing Bitcoin miners have capacity but it doesn't directly translate profitability at scale.

So they could be if $IREN, $CIFR, $WULF and the second wave of miners pull it off like $CRWV. But we don't know, given that Coreweave spent years and billions in software acquisition to do so.
另外,正因为如此,我们不应该只说 GW Capacity = X revenue <-> marketcap,因为很多现有 Bitcoin miners 有容量,但它不会直接转化为规模化盈利。

如果 $IREN$CIFR$WULF 和第二波 miners 能像 $CRWV 那样做到,那它们可以。但我们不知道,因为 Coreweave 花了多年和数十亿美元做软件收购才做到。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$MARA has 1.7 GW+ capacity, with a 3GW pipeline similar to $IREN.

Mara is still more focused on Bitcoin mining rather than HPC.

Miners generally have high GW capacity but it's more difficult than people expect to retrofit and pivot from Bitcoin mining to HPC though so that's the downside risk. We haven't really seen a full-send pivot yet so no commentary there yet.

People say if $CRWV can do it then $IREN, $BITF, and others can too, so same would apply to $MARA with that statement.
$MARA 有 1.7 GW+ capacity,还有与 $IREN 类似的 3GW pipeline。

Mara 仍然更专注 Bitcoin mining,而不是 HPC。

Miners 通常有高 GW capacity,但从 Bitcoin mining 改造并转向 HPC 比人们想象更难,这就是下行风险。我们还没真正看到 full-send pivot,所以暂时没有评论。

人们说如果 $CRWV 能做到,那么 $IREN$BITF 等也能做到,所以按这个说法,$MARA 也同样适用。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@TheEUInvestor Thanks, I didn’t know I almost hit X word count on posts with this one, that was new.

Just wanted to give $IREN and others justice so they took up majority of the word count. But $SLNH and the smaller market cap ones will be fun
@TheEUInvestor 谢谢,我不知道这篇几乎触及 X 帖子字数限制,这是新体验。

只是想公平讲 $IREN 和其他公司,所以它们占了大部分字数。但 $SLNH 和小市值那些会很有趣。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_stockResearch Congrats on the great return! Generally, great portfolio positioning too like $RKLB $KRKNF

I’d disagree with some like $IONQ but to each their own.

To me and a lot of people, follower count and portfolio size doesn’t really matter, it’s the substance that matters more.
@_stockResearch 恭喜获得很棒回报!整体 portfolio positioning 也很好,比如 $RKLB $KRKNF

有些比如 $IONQ 我不同意,但各有各的看法。

对我和很多人来说,follower count 和 portfolio size 并不真正重要,更重要的是内容实质。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DeepValueBagger Money to be made is behind the Wendy’s dumpsters, not working for Wendys.

There’s always a plan B, you just weren’t thinking outside the box.
@DeepValueBagger 钱在 Wendy’s 垃圾桶后面赚,不是在 Wendys 打工赚。

永远有 plan B,只是你没有跳出框架思考。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 I'll post the $NBIS song in two days!

I spent some time making another one tho, was going to post it for overnight trading tomorrow.

Thought it would be fun experiment to understand a thesis through music, would connect to more audiences who don't wanna read.
@soulbiri1 我两天后会发 $NBIS song!

不过我花时间又做了一首,本来想明天 overnight trading 发。

我觉得通过音乐理解 thesis 会是个有趣实验,能连接那些不想读长文的受众。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推

2025年10月

↩️ 回复
Hmm, I still maintain $NBIS has the highest asymmetrical return, with lower downside, high upside compared to $IREN with existing hyperscaler deals, subsidiaries scaling alongside them, and a higher margin business with full-stack.

On the other hand, I'd agree $IREN has a high speculative upside due to capacity and infrastructure.

I've owned both and it's fine have both, I just think risk-reward is better for Nebius after the runup on miners.

It's good to discuss those points!
嗯,我仍然认为 $NBIS 拥有最高不对称回报,相比 $IREN,下行更低、上行更高,因为它已有 hyperscaler deals、子公司一起扩张,以及 full-stack 带来的更高利润率业务。

另一方面,我同意 $IREN 因 capacity 和 infrastructure 有很高投机上行。

我两个都持有过,两者都持有也没问题,只是我认为 miners 上涨后,Nebius 的 risk-reward 更好。

讨论这些点很好!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 ooo 48% return in 3 days is always nice. $43K is enough to buy a few $SG salads for lunch.
@soulbiri1 ooo 3 天 48% 回报总是不错。$43K 足够买几份 $SG 沙拉当午饭。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
@jliljliljlil @DeepValueBagger I dont have any $HIMS position right now, I'll probably buy in again at this level.

I bought at that 16% drop, sold on a 4-5% recovery, and haven't had any positions since.

But CSP for Monday sounds promising.
@jliljliljlil @DeepValueBagger 我现在没有任何 $HIMS 仓位,可能会在这个水平再买入。

我在那次 16% 下跌时买入,在 4-5% 恢复时卖出,此后没有仓位。

但周一 CSP 听起来有希望。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@adenois @RJCcapital Yeah I could be wrong and the stock pulls a random 100% green candle but should just trust my gut about the $1.4B deal with a random SEA company next time.

Lot safer to look at hyperscaler $MSFT type contracts and just focus on $NBIS and co.
@adenois @RJCcapital 是的,我可能会错,股票可能随机拉出 100% 绿柱,但下次我应该相信自己对那个随机 SEA 公司 $1.4B 交易的直觉。

看 hyperscaler $MSFT 这类合同并专注 $NBIS 和同类公司安全得多。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@adenois @RJCcapital I sold out of $GRRR after the SEA deal seemed sketchy. I made a post about it in a few places like

https://t.co/tzom3aAdSk
@adenois @RJCcapital 我在 SEA 交易看起来可疑后卖出了 $GRRR。我在几个地方发过关于它的帖子,比如

https://t.co/tzom3aAdSk
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Weekend Reflections ☁️

I just wanted to post every position I'm down on this year + lessons learned.
___

1. $ETOR - ($62 → $38.6, DCA $48, -19.58%)

2. $VIRT - (~$38 → $33, -45%)

3. $SNAP - ($8.2 → $7.69, -6.2%) (new)

4. $SG - ($8.2 → $7.32, -10.73%)

5. $GRRR - ($20.5 → $16.99, -17.12%)

6. $FLY - ($30.2 → $26.5, -12.25%) (new)

7. $LTC - ($113 → $91.1, -19.3%)

8. $OPAD - ($4.61 → $2.94, -36.2%)

9. $CRM - (~$250 → ~$243, ~30%)

10. $AMZN - ($218 → $213) (new)

11. $RDDT - ($202 → $195) (new)

12. $WULF - ($14.5 → $14) (new)

I post a ton of stocks, and I'm happy that there are only about 7 I've gotten wrong short-term (sorry if i miss one or two by accident) and about 5 that I didn't time the absolute bottom correctly.

I still think they'll print in 2026, not too many losers though!

Individual Reflections

1. $ETOR: Great stock fundamentally. Even down ~20%, I believe this will recover in 2026. 1/3 cash, growing at IBKR rates. It suffers from tax-harvesting effects (October/November) as hedge funds sell and rebuy in December.

Lesson learned: None, Id do the same again. Holding for 2026. Trimmed slightly for tax harvest.

2. $VIRT: If I buy calls, probably shouldn't post publicly since it affects hedging flow. Trimmed for tax harvesting since we're nearing two more rate cuts (bullish for markets). Hedging worked but lost quite a bit.

Lesson learned: Keep hedges to myself. Still think I'm directionally right, just wanted to tax harvest.

3. $SNAP: Posted around $8.2 when they converted memories to revenue. This is a 2026 play, not worried about short-term tax harvesting.

Lesson learned: None. Holding for 2026.

4. $SG: Honestly, I just like the salad 🥗. It was $35+ earlier this year. I think it'll recover eventually, just a waiting game cause it's like 1 p/s now?

Lesson learned: None. Medium-term hold.

5. $GRRR: Migrated into $WLAC after investigating their $1.4B contract more, seemed sus. Got baited by the $380M market cap vs. $1.4B revenue potential.

Lesson learned: Trust my gut on suspicious companies. Could 5x if legit, but I don't trust it. Probably shouldn’t have entered. (Trimmed)

6. $FLY: Down ~12%, still a 2026 medium-lift play. Posted recently, could’ve timed better.

Lesson learned: None, maybe better tax-harvest timing.

7. $LTC: Down ~20%. Crypto got nuked by liquidations + government shutdown delays ETF approvals.

Lesson learned: Don’t margin crypto. Government shutdowns delay ETF approvals lol.

8. $OPAD: Sold earlier, but current prices are -36%. Meme stock I aped into.

Lesson learned: Don’t touch meme stocks.

9. $CRM: ~30% loss due to short-dated options + missing earnings date. Swing trade gone wrong.
Lesson learned: Always check earnings dates, was just a on-off mistake, dont think I've ever made this mistake before.
10. $AMZN: It’s Amazon. Moves down 1% sometimes.

Lesson learned: None. Just posted recently.

11. $RDDT: Thought $200 was bottom, dipped further. Averaged down to $190.

Lesson learned: None. Just posted recently.

12. $WULF: Bought because all neoclouds were going up. Bought at $14.5, dipped to $14.

Lesson learned: Don't ape into stocks. Could've timed better.

_

Tax Harvesting Summary

Trimmed most losers for EOY tax harvesting, except newer positions ($AMZN, $RDDT, $WULF) and medium-term plays like $FLY (holding through 2026) that I mentioned.

TLDR:

- Don't go hard into tax-harvested stocks end of year (e.g. $LULU, $ETOR, $SNAP). Wait for December if timing.

- Stop trading meme-stocks like $OPAD.

- Trust my gut when SEA-related companies seem suspicious ($GRRR).

- Option flows affect less-liquid stocks (e.g. $VIRT). March calls could still print so other people buying might affect things, just wanted to tax harvest tho.

Other trades like $AMZN, $RDDT, $WULF are very recent, maybe could've timed them better, but get the exact bottom.

_

Overall, so far so good! I've lost count of how many 100%+ returns I've had... and the number of losers is still small, both for count and position size.
周末复盘 ☁️

我想把今年所有亏损仓位和学到的教训都发出来。
___

1. $ETOR - ($62 -> $38.6, DCA $48, -19.58%)

2. $VIRT - (~$38 -> $33, -45%)

3. $SNAP - ($8.2 -> $7.69, -6.2%)(新)

4. $SG - ($8.2 -> $7.32, -10.73%)

5. $GRRR - ($20.5 -> $16.99, -17.12%)

6. $FLY - ($30.2 -> $26.5, -12.25%)(新)

7. $LTC - ($113 -> $91.1, -19.3%)

8. $OPAD - ($4.61 -> $2.94, -36.2%)

9. $CRM - (~$250 -> ~$243, ~30%)

10. $AMZN - ($218 -> $213)(新)

11. $RDDT - ($202 -> $195)(新)

12. $WULF - ($14.5 -> $14)(新)

我发过很多股票,很高兴短期真正错的大概只有 7 个(如果漏了一两个抱歉),还有大约 5 个只是没买在绝对底部。

我仍然认为它们 2026 年会赚钱,真正的亏损标的不算多。

教训是:不要因为 thesis 好就忽略 timing、流动性、税损收割、宏观和仓位管理。好公司也可以先跌很久。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1979685872800010548
❤️ 4 🔁 0 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@1995bearjew I'm very bullish $WLAC, just didn't know it existed 1 month ago when I made the original thesis post since SPAC Neoclouds weren't really on my radar.
@1995bearjew 我非常看多 $WLAC,只是一个月前写原始 thesis 时不知道它存在,因为 SPAC Neoclouds 当时不在我的 radar 上。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
lol $LTC supposed to be a shorter play, Litecoin ETF gets approved 95% chance, then just sell into approval acceptance and possibly new treasury plays.

Then government gets shut down for a month so ETFs get delayed.

Yeah not the best luck. Fundamentally I think the asset is undervalued because of its high utility in payments still vs. low market cap.
lol $LTC 本来应该是短线 play,Litecoin ETF 95% 概率获批,然后在批准确认时卖出,并可能出现新的 treasury plays。

结果政府关门一个月,所以 ETFs 被推迟。

是的,运气不太好。基本面上,我认为该资产因其在支付中仍有高实用性,而市值低,所以被低估。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I've been posting about $NBIS recently because of the 30% drop that I forgot to talk about other stocks for awhile! Upside on the drop to $94 was insane, even if you didn't catch the true bottom.

Near term catalyst posts that I mentioned still stands for $LTC to $TGT since others ask about it.

$TGT Nov 12th dividend catalyst, I'd personally hold but since it already went up 8%+ on 28%-32% IV, I don't see many issues holding another 2 weeks since ER is Nov 19th or just trimming some. Up to you.

For $LTC and others, the play is still ongoing, just need to wait for government shutdown to finish and for the ETF to be approved.

I just did not expect a 1 month government shutdown so ETFs got delayed.
我最近一直发 $NBIS,因为它跌了 30%,以至于忘了谈其他股票一阵子!跌到 $94 后的上行很疯狂,即使你没抓到真正底部。

我提过的 $LTC$TGT 的近端催化帖子仍然有效,因为其他人会问。

$TGT 11 月 12 日 dividend catalyst,我个人会持有,但既然它已经在 28%-32% IV 下涨了 8%+,我觉得再持有 2 周问题不大,因为 ER 是 11 月 19 日,或者也可以 trim 一些。看你。

$LTC 和其他标的,play 仍在进行,只需要等政府停摆结束、ETF 获批。

我只是没想到政府会停摆 1 个月,所以 ETFs 被延迟。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
The Neocloud thesis aged well.

1 month later:

$CRWV 120.34 → 135.64 (+12.7%)
$NBIS 107.70 → 126.49 (+17.5%)
$WULF 10.63 → 13.69 (+28.8%)
$IREN 41.68 → 64.69 (+55.2%)
$CIFR 11.47 → 20.70 (+80.4%)
$BITF 2.54 → 4.51 (+77.6%)
$WYFI 22.83 → 36.52 (+59.9%)
$GRRR 19.90 → 16.95 (−14.8%)
$SLNH 2.75 → 2.81 (+2.2%)
$RIOT 17.69 → 23.01 (+30.1%)
$MARA 16.13 → 19.61 (+21.6%)
$CLSK 12.96 → 20.21 (+56.0%)
$HUT 33.16 → 49.95 (+50.6%)

This is only the beginning of the largest AI data center buildout in history and everyone on finx is still early.

I'm very bullish on the Neocloud sector across the board, but personally have concentration in $NBIS due to the highest asymmetrical return.
Neocloud thesis 表现不错。

1 个月后:

$CRWV 120.34 -> 135.64 (+12.7%)
$NBIS 107.70 -> 126.49 (+17.5%)
$WULF 10.63 -> 13.69 (+28.8%)
$IREN 41.68 -> 64.69 (+55.2%)
$CIFR 11.47 -> 20.70 (+80.4%)
$BITF 2.54 -> 4.51 (+77.6%)
$WYFI 22.83 -> 36.52 (+59.9%)
$GRRR 19.90 -> 16.95 (-14.8%)
$SLNH 2.75 -> 2.81 (+2.2%)
$RIOT 17.69 -> 23.01 (+30.1%)
$MARA 16.13 -> 19.61 (+21.6%)
$CLSK 12.96 -> 20.21 (+56.0%)
$HUT 33.16 -> 49.95 (+50.6%)

这只是历史上最大 AI data center buildout 的开始,finx 上每个人仍然很早。

我全面看多 Neocloud 板块,但个人集中在 $NBIS,因为它有最高不对称回报。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The NeoCloud Thesis: Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

Why I'm putting $1.5M+ into Neoclouds, and why this might be a 200-300%+ return.

🔹 Buckets

Mag7 contracts: $CRWV, $NBIS ✅, $WULF, $CIFR

With compute: $IREN ✅, $BITF

Speculative: $WYFI, $GRRR ✅, $SLNH

Miners pivoting to HPC: $RIOT, $MARA, $CLSK, $HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 is AI compute strained, by design from $NVDA.

Trillions of capex that normally flowed through AWS, MSFT Azure, Google Cloud for traditional compute, will now funnel into NeoClouds when they cant handle new AI loads from Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, etc.

This is a once-a-decade opportunity, similar to the GPU arms race that made $NVDA a $4T company, on who powers the infra for AWS/Azure/etc for the next 5-10 years.

NBIS (17B from MSFT), CIFR / WULF (3B from GOOGL), CRWV (backstopped by NVDA) are all scaling hundreds of percent (NBIS went from 150M quarterly revenue to likely 1.5B+) with 60-80% gross profit margins.

This revenue growth is almost unheard in history. It's mainly because it's the wealthiest hyperscalers funneling capex into tiny companies.

NVDA / TSM (2022->): GPU for hyperscalers
CRDO / ALAB (2024 ->): hyperscaler wins -> parabolic growth.
NBIS/CIFR/IREN/etc (2025 - ) AWS/Azure/etc. -> parabolic growth from AI compute

This is how you get hundreds of % in return, not value investing in Paypal. Momentum riding the next generational companies.

So bear thesis usually involves around

- Execution Risk (before it was more speculative, now companies like NBIS have 4B+ to execute)

People can always worry about execution but Microsoft or Google would not be signing such large 5-10 year contracts without their own DD.

- Large interest rates (mainly looking at you CRWV), that's why NBIS, CIFR, and others have potential amazing returns.

You have 4B+ in funding for $NBIS at $138+ a share (when it's $107 now). And funding for $CIFR at $16+ a share when it's $11 now. ABOVE current price funding is a bullish tell.

- GPU depreciation (valid concern but it's almost like oil, even older models kept their value and still deliver equity).

- Valuation (I still think we're just getting started. If NBIS scales to 6B rev next year 75% gross margin), 26B marketcap is extremely tiny.

- NVDA potentially launching their own GPU-as-a-service and directly competing. Right now these Neoclouds are NVDA's answer to preventing concentration risk to Azure/AWS/etc.

- Custom hyperscaler chips like TPU, Trainium. But likely years away, since they're still begging for NVDA compute and signed 5Y-10Y contracts.

Regardless these neoclouds like Nebius are really undervalued relative to forward revenue/gross margins.

We're still very early. Make sure to ride the Neocloud wave like Crypto/TSLA with Trump election or NVDA with OpenAI release.

Of course this is highly speculative and I wouldn't YOLO full port calls, but Risk vs. Reward on these little 5-20B neoclouds powering AI workloads for Google/MSFT/etc, the cash cows of Mag7, is worth it. (Trade time Horizon: 8m - 1 year.)

This is the single best asymmetric AI infrastructure trade for 2025-2026.
NeoCloud Thesis:Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

为什么我投入 $1.5M+ 到 Neoclouds,以及为什么这可能带来 200-300%+ 回报。

🔹 分类

Mag7 合同:$CRWV$NBIS ✅、$WULF$CIFR

有 compute:$IREN ✅、$BITF

投机:$WYFI$GRRR ✅、$SLNH

矿企转 HPC:$RIOT$MARA$CLSK$HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 的 AI compute 被 $NVDA 有意卡紧。

过去流经 AWS、MSFT Azure、Google Cloud 的传统 compute capex,现在在它们无法承接 Anthropic、OpenAI、Gemini 等新增 AI 负载时,会 funnel 到 NeoClouds。

这是十年一次机会,类似 GPU 军备竞赛把 $NVDA 推成 $4T 公司。未来 5-10 年谁为 AWS/Azure 等提供基础设施,谁就有巨大上行。

NBIS(MSFT $17B)、CIFR/WULF(GOOGL $3B)、CRWV(NVDA 背书)都在以数百个百分点扩张,毛利率 60-80%。

这种收入增长历史上罕见,因为最富有的 hyperscalers 正在把 capex 打给小公司。

NVDA/TSM(2022->):hyperscalers 的 GPU
CRDO/ALAB(2024->):hyperscaler wins -> 爆发式增长
NBIS/CIFR/IREN 等(2025-):AWS/Azure 等 -> AI compute 爆发式增长

这才是获得几百 % 回报的方式,不是去价值投资 Paypal。

熊 thesis 包括执行风险、高利率、GPU 折旧、估值、NVDA 自己做 GPU-as-a-service,以及 TPU/Trainium 等自研芯片。

但这些 neoclouds 相对 forward revenue/gross margins 仍然被低估。

我们还很早。要像 Trump 当选后的 Crypto/TSLA,或 OpenAI 发布后的 NVDA 那样,坐上 Neocloud wave。

当然这高度投机,我不会全仓 YOLO calls,但这些 5-20B 小 neoclouds 为 Google/MSFT 等 Mag7 现金牛跑 AI workloads,风险回报值得。交易周期:8 个月到 1 年。

这是 2025-2026 最好的非对称 AI infrastructure trade。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1972016308662513748
❤️ 310 🔁 30 💬 30
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DeepValueBagger It's been a few quarters where $HIMS market cap hasn't really moved while fundamentals improved.

So I'd use this as a buying time to get back in. The amount of times it swung from $40s -&gt; $63 I lost count.
@DeepValueBagger 已经几个季度了,$HIMS 市值没怎么动,但基本面改善了。

所以我会把这里当作重新买入的时机。它从 $40s -> $63 来回震荡的次数我都数不清了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@RJCcapital Short term stock price don't mean much but it is pretty interesting seeing $NBIS that's usually lower beta (and miners that go up in correlation) start to move in reverse for the first time after my post

$NBIS: +7.71%
$CIFR: -1.21%
$BITF: - 2.21%
$IREN: +2.35%
$WULF: +.08%
@RJCcapital 短期股价意义不大,但看到通常 lower beta 的 $NBIS(以及相关上涨的 miners)在我发帖后第一次开始反向移动,确实挺有意思。

$NBIS: +7.71%
$CIFR: -1.21%
$BITF: - 2.21%
$IREN: +2.35%
$WULF: +.08%
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So when a discussion shifts to personal attacks, it probably means your thesis is not holding up.

Screaming "I WIN", "GET ROASTED", "SHUT YOU UP" and going into personal attacks like "financially illiterate" to beg for $IREN audience likes doesn't look too good to independent thinkers who care about substance.

But just to close it out since you're not discussing in good faith, you're misrepresenting the cost structure and not normalizing margins.

Just looking at your statements like "The depreciation $IREN pays is so minuscule that it hardly impacts margins at all." and then just comparing it to the financial reports like (-$181M FY 2025) says it all.

But I'll just drop this here again for you to re-read:

"With expense recognition and with D&A and other overhead, $IREN margins can drop below 60%.

For $IREN owning datacenters pushes massive infrastructure costs (servers, racks, facilities) into the balance sheet and later into OpEx (via D&A), inflating that 92% gross margin number.

$NBIS leases capacity, so those same costs appear in COGS, as rent, power, and bandwidth to a fuller cst 71.2%., but as you mentioned some infra goes into opex.

NBIS’s 20-F:" Cost of revenues primarily consists of costs of operation and co-location of data center facilities, the electricity, utility and maintenance costs in data centers…”

If you reallocate IREN’s quarterly D&A (~$75.2 M), infra overhead into cost of revenue, $NBIS outperforms with a more fully loaded margin."
所以当讨论转向人身攻击时,可能意味着你的 thesis 站不住了。

大喊 “I WIN”、“GET ROASTED”、“SHUT YOU UP”,并用 “financially illiterate” 这种人身攻击来讨好 $IREN 受众点赞,在关心内容实质的独立思考者眼里并不好看。

但为了结束这件事,因为你不是善意讨论,你在歪曲成本结构,也没有 normalize margins。

只看你说的 “The depreciation $IREN pays is so minuscule that it hardly impacts margins at all.”,再和财报里的 (-$181M FY 2025) 对比,就说明一切。

我再把这段放这里给你重读:

“在 expense recognition、D&A 和其他 overhead 下,$IREN margins 可能跌破 60%。

$IREN 来说,拥有 datacenters 会把巨额基础设施成本(servers、racks、facilities)推入资产负债表,然后通过 D&A 进入 OpEx,从而抬高那个 92% gross margin 数字。

$NBIS 租赁 capacity,所以同样成本以 rent、power、bandwidth 的形式出现在 COGS 中,形成更完整成本下的 71.2%,但如你所说,部分 infra 进入 opex。

NBIS 的 20-F:Cost of revenues primarily consists of costs of operation and co-location of data center facilities, the electricity, utility and maintenance costs in data centers…

如果你把 IREN 的季度 D&A(约 $75.2M)和 infra overhead 重新分配到 cost of revenue,$NBIS 在更 fully loaded margin 下表现更好。”
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
You're misunderstanding the data while trying to compare two structurally different things as gross profit before normalizing it. Reason I'm still replying despite personal attacks now is because this is misleading other people.

With expense recognition and with D&A and other overhead, $IREN margins can drop below 60%.

For $IREN owning datacenters pushes massive infrastructure costs (servers, racks, facilities) into the balance sheet and later into OpEx (via D&A), inflating that 92% gross margin number.

$NBIS leases capacity, so those same costs appear in COGS, as rent, power, and bandwidth to a fuller cst 71.2%., but as you mentioned some infra goes into opex.

NBIS’s 20-F: “Cost of revenues primarily consists of costs of operation and co-location of data center facilities, the electricity, utility and maintenance costs in data centers…”

If you reallocate IREN’s quarterly D&A (~$75.2 M), infra overhead into cost of revenue, $NBIS outperforms with a more fully loaded margin.

This is going off your data, even though they've had nongaap segment disclosures before.

So trying to claim $IREN 93% gross margins and then comparing it to $NBIS 71% doesnt make sense, when you have to normalize gross margins.
你在试图比较 normalize 之前两个结构完全不同的 gross profit 时误解了数据。尽管现在有人身攻击,我仍回复的原因是这会误导其他人。

在 expense recognition、D&A 和其他 overhead 下,$IREN margins 可能跌破 60%。

$IREN 来说,拥有 datacenters 会把巨额基础设施成本(servers、racks、facilities)推入资产负债表,然后通过 D&A 进入 OpEx,从而抬高那个 92% gross margin 数字。

$NBIS 租赁 capacity,所以同样成本以 rent、power、bandwidth 的形式出现在 COGS 中,形成更完整成本下的 71.2%,但如你所说,部分 infra 进入 opex。

NBIS 的 20-F:“Cost of revenues primarily consists of costs of operation and co-location of data center facilities, the electricity, utility and maintenance costs in data centers…”

如果你把 IREN 的季度 D&A(约 $75.2M)和 infra overhead 重新分配到 cost of revenue,$NBIS 在更 fully loaded margin 下表现更好。

这是基于你的数据,尽管他们以前有 non-gaap segment disclosures。

所以试图声称 $IREN 93% gross margins,然后拿它和 $NBIS 71% 比较没有意义,因为你必须 normalize gross margins。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I'm bullish on Neoclouds, including $IREN. If you look at my post history, I've had positions in everything including $WULF, $CIFR, etc.

The only point I've made was $NBIS has the highest asymmetrical return (lowest risk, highest upside) because of its software stack.

https://t.co/TnUqmvvFdd
我看多 Neoclouds,包括 $IREN。如果你看我的发帖历史,我持有过包括 $WULF$CIFR 等在内的所有标的。

我唯一的观点是,由于 software stack,$NBIS 拥有最高不对称回报(最低风险、最高上行)。

https://t.co/TnUqmvvFdd
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I’ve never seen someone try and conflate non-GAAP and GAAP margins when they’re so vastly different, then go into personal attacks as an argument.

When I said I didn’t know how to respond to your other comment, it’s because I haven’t seen a response so dumb I’m genuinely at a loss.

I’m happy to respond to other quantitative arguments but when you try and say “my YTD is better than yours so quit this platform” then go talking about socialist regimes, even $IREN holders wouldn’t know what to say
我从没见过有人在 non-GAAP 和 GAAP margins 差异如此巨大时还试图混为一谈,然后用人身攻击当论点。

我说不知道如何回复你另一条评论,是因为我没见过这么蠢的回复,真的让我无话可说。

我很乐意回应其他量化论点,但当你说“我的 YTD 比你好,所以离开这个平台”,然后又谈社会主义政权,连 $IREN holders 都不知道该说什么。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@moninvestor @Agrippa_Inv Just a heads up, a lot people, including the poster, confuse GAAP vs nonGAAP when looking at $IREN. It makes a huge difference when accounting for margins.

But fundamentally, some points points still hold around capacity/infrastructure advantages. https://t.co/ZxIh6kBs7Y
@moninvestor @Agrippa_Inv 提醒一下,很多人,包括发帖者,在看 $IREN 时会混淆 GAAP vs nonGAAP。计算利润率时这会造成巨大差异。

但基本面上,围绕 capacity/infrastructure 优势的一些点仍然成立。https://t.co/ZxIh6kBs7Y
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Agrippa_Inv Also not trying to make fun of $IREN retail for confusing GAAP vs non-GAAP when talking about margins then making a whole post surroudning that.

It's genuinely difficult if you don't do quarterly financial reports, but there's valid points on there about infrastructure/power.
@Agrippa_Inv 另外,我不是想嘲笑 $IREN retail 在谈利润率时混淆 GAAP vs non-GAAP,然后围绕这个写整篇帖子。

如果你不做季度财务报告,这确实很难,但那里面关于 infrastructure/power 有有效观点。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Great points! But...

You did base your thesis off misunderstanding gaap vs. non-gaap... which could be confusing to non-accountants and other people on X.

$IREN reported non-GAAP and $NBIS GAAP when you look at hardware-segment profit to full-stack AWS margins.

The 92% percent was non-GAAP, hardware-specific profit metric that systematically excludes depreciation, data-center overhead, network expenses, support, etc. Hardware Profit Margin is typically calculated solely by deducting direct electricity costs from revenue, ignoring the components of true COGS GAAP. And when you do reporting, COGS omissions and accounting principles matter (eg. why crypto firms have like $MSTR wildly different numbers from crypto reporting like ASU 2023-08, so you don’t compare revenue with crypto holdings to Robinhood).

Meanwhile $NBIS 71.2% gross margins was GAAP and includes colocation fees as part of 29% cost of revenue. So when you look into EBIT margins for the full picture, $NBIS (~30%) is vastly higher because full stack drives profitability. When $IREN scales to the $500M ARR target, they’re forced to incorporate realistic deprecation, data center costs, network expenses, and operations. If you normalize both under consistent accounting, $NBIS’s full-stack model already operates 15–25 points higher in true margin spread.

You’re right that hyperscale clients bring their own Type-1 stack. BUT... I’ve said this again to other $IREN posts that keep side-stepping this point.

Once again, Nebius’s Type-2 layer isn't for customer-facing features, it’s optimizing internal OPEX. If enterprises bring their own Type 1 (K8s/Ray), Nebius's internal orchestration (Type 2) still drives its own margins up. That's OPEX moat, it's not what customers use, it's about how efficiently you run the fleet. Think of it like AWS’s Nitro hypervisor but central to how AWS drives >80% utilization and minimal human ops. Nebius’s in-house control plane automates GPU scheduling, telemetry, and firmware lifecycles across mixed SKUs. Every percentage point of utilization is ~1-1.5 points of gross margin expansion. Nebius's in-house orchestration lowers their operating cost base and increases utilization, regardless of whether customers bring their own stack, so it’s not quite one or the other.

Long-term utilization efficiency and automation compound faster than cheap power/capacity and $NBIS full stack drives higher margins long term, while others face margin compression on a race to the ground. As $NBIS scales, the incremental cost of their software proficiency approaches zero, structurally driving margins higher. Conversely, $IREN's dependency model means that as they scale, the licensing fees (3–8% of revenue if you we go with your figure) plus the necessary, unquantified SRE operational costs will remain a permanent drag on profitability, preventing the firm from achieving $NBIS's structural margin ceiling longer on. Licensing costs for outsourced Type 2 solutions are low like your 3-8% figure, but the "20–30%" figure is highly relevant when viewed as overhead.

.Going back to GAAP-non-gaap, once $IREN is forced to recognize full GAAP costs at scale, the inevitable 15–30 point margin delta against $NBIS will materialize. I’d agree with you that short-term capacity and infrastructure is a great advantage today, which is why I’m still bullish crypto miners pivoting like $IREN, $WULF, $CIFR, but the software moat during execution, would vastly outperform bare mental infrastructure in the longer term when it comes to converting revenue to profit (and this is pretending $NBIS can’t scale up infra, which they can).

$IREN current advantage is physical integration and cheap capacity, it’s capex-heavy, and subject to power-market tightening. $NBIS advantage is OPEX leverage. $NBIS higher margins is an economic inevitability in a years time when rooted in full stack AWS-like margins, while margin delta isn't collapsing as others race to the bottom, it's widening as scale hits.

Cheap power wins next quarter, efficient orchestration becomes the next AWS.
很好的观点!但是……

你的 thesis 确实建立在误解 gaap vs. non-gaap 之上,这会让非会计人士和 X 上其他人困惑。

当你把 hardware-segment profit 和 full-stack AWS margins 比较时,$IREN 报的是 non-GAAP,$NBIS 是 GAAP。

92% 是 non-GAAP、硬件特定利润指标,系统性排除了 depreciation、data-center overhead、network expenses、support 等。Hardware Profit Margin 通常只从收入中扣除直接电力成本,忽略 true COGS GAAP 的组成部分。做报告时,COGS omissions 和会计原则很重要(比如为什么 crypto firms 有像 $MSTR 这种和 crypto reporting 如 ASU 2023-08 差异巨大的数字,所以你不会把 crypto holdings 收入和 Robinhood 比)。

与此同时,$NBIS 71.2% gross margins 是 GAAP,并把 colocation fees 作为 29% cost of revenue 的一部分。所以看 EBIT margins 的完整图景时,$NBIS(约 30%)高得多,因为 full stack 推动盈利。当 $IREN 扩张到 $500M ARR 目标时,他们被迫纳入现实的 depreciation、data center costs、network expenses 和 operations。如果在一致会计下 normalize 两者,$NBIS 的 full-stack model 已经在真实 margin spread 上高 15-25 个百分点。

你说 hyperscale clients 带自己的 Type-1 stack 是对的。但是……我也对其他 $IREN 帖子反复说过这一点,它们一直绕开。

再次强调,Nebius 的 Type-2 layer 不是给客户使用的功能,而是优化内部 OPEX。如果企业带自己的 Type 1(K8s/Ray),Nebius 的内部 orchestration(Type 2)仍然会提高自己的利润率。这是 OPEX moat,不是客户使用什么,而是你多高效运行 fleet。把它想成 AWS 的 Nitro hypervisor,但它是 AWS 实现 >80% utilization 和最少人工 ops 的核心。Nebius 的内部 control plane 自动化 mixed SKUs 上的 GPU scheduling、telemetry 和 firmware lifecycles。每 1 个百分点利用率大约带来 1-1.5 个点 gross margin expansion。Nebius 的内部 orchestration 降低运营成本基础并提高利用率,不管客户是否带自己的 stack,所以不是非此即彼。

长期利用率效率和自动化复利速度快于 cheap power/capacity,$NBIS full stack 长期带来更高利润率,而其他公司在 race to the ground 中面临 margin compression。随着 $NBIS 扩张,其软件能力的增量成本接近零,结构性推动利润率走高。相反,$IREN 的依赖模型意味着随着扩张,licensing fees(如果按你的数字,收入 3–8%)加上必要但未量化的 SRE 运营成本,会持续拖累盈利,阻止公司长期达到 $NBIS 的结构性 margin ceiling。外包 Type 2 solutions 的 licensing costs 确实低,比如你说的 3-8%,但从 overhead 角度看,“20–30%” 数字非常相关。

回到 GAAP-non-gaap,一旦 $IREN 被迫在规模化时确认完整 GAAP 成本,相对 $NBIS 不可避免的 15-30 点 margin delta 会显现。我同意你,短期 capacity 和 infrastructure 今天是很大优势,这也是我仍看多 $IREN$WULF$CIFR 这类 crypto miners 转型;但执行中的 software moat,在把收入转化为利润方面,长期会远远跑赢 bare metal infrastructure(而且这还是假设 $NBIS 不能扩 infra,实际上它可以)。

$IREN 当前优势是 physical integration 和 cheap capacity,它 capex-heavy,并受 power-market tightening 影响。$NBIS 的优势是 OPEX leverage。根植于 full stack AWS-like margins,$NBIS 更高利润率在一年后是经济必然,而 margin delta 不会随着其他人 race to bottom 而缩小,而是随着规模上来扩大。

Cheap power 赢下个季度,高效 orchestration 会成为下一个 AWS。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
I wasn’t going to reply to this but just because other comments tried appealing to authority like YTD performance to invalidate the thesis.

I was a research scientist in AI with a few published papers in journals like Nature. I also have patents in the semiconductor space.

I now run a fintech company, so im decent with number crunching.

Just a quick shoutout to @mithrilcompute, talked with their CEO the other day over coffee, so just daily chats with people in the space help a lot too.

So all three different domains helps a bit with understanding data center space.

If you read my other comments, I’ll always acknowledge if I don’t have domain knowledge and refrain from giving directional posts.

Also arguments should stand on their own, not based on who it came from.
我本来不打算回复这个,但因为其他评论试图用 YTD performance 这种诉诸权威来否定 thesis。

我曾是 AI research scientist,在 Nature 等期刊发表过几篇论文。我也有半导体领域专利。

我现在经营一家 fintech 公司,所以数字处理还不错。

顺便 shoutout @mithrilcompute,前几天和他们 CEO 喝咖啡聊过,所以日常和行业里的人交流也很有帮助。

所以三个不同领域对理解 data center space 都有帮助。

如果你读我的其他评论,我总会承认自己没有领域知识,并避免给方向性帖子。

而且论点应该靠自身成立,不该基于是谁说的。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@FransBakker9812 I don’t even know what to say anymore lol, probably just stop before you make yourself look worse

Arguments from authority like “you underperformed me YTD”, followed by “you have no facts”, then going into personal attacks doesn’t help your case
@FransBakker9812 我都不知道还能说什么了 lol,可能最好在让自己看起来更糟前停下来。

像“你 YTD 跑输我”这种诉诸权威,接着说“你没有事实”,然后做人身攻击,对你的论点没有帮助。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
This is about HPC not bitcoin mining…

Just to summarize again, the point was miner margins will always be less than $NBIS because of middleware.

And how the transition off of middleware like $CRWV is an incredibly high moat (looking at $ORCL).

And if we go into the numbers, software stack > capacity due to how revenue translates more into profit vs. high revenue and no profit (ORCL)

That’s why Nebius has highest asymmetrical upside. I’m still bullish every crypto miner HPC
这是关于 HPC,不是 bitcoin mining……

再总结一次,重点是因为 middleware,miner margins 永远会低于 $NBIS

以及像 $CRWV 那样脱离 middleware 的转型是极高 moat(看 $ORCL)。

如果进入数字,software stack > capacity,因为收入更能转化为利润,而不是高收入无利润(ORCL)。

这就是为什么 Nebius 有最高不对称上行。我仍看多所有 crypto miner HPC。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@FransBakker9812 Also I’ve been more conservative with margin estimates in case it’s a one-off quarter.

Even adjusting for normalization, Nebius’s structural model (full-stack + orchestration + amortization) still points to sustainably higher margins than miners like IREN using middleware
@FransBakker9812 另外,我对利润率估算一直更保守,以防它是一次性季度。

即使做 normalization 调整,Nebius 的结构模型(full-stack + orchestration + amortization)仍指向比使用 middleware 的 IREN 这类 miners 更可持续的高利润率。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
That’s not true, $NBIS margins include colo fees and the costs are reflected in the 29% cost of revenue.

$IREN owns the sites too, but it doesn’t give much of a margin advantage over $NBIS. Thing you didn’t read was software (orchestration, utilization) and no revenue margin cut (fluidstack, poolside), drives higher margins.

Saying intelligent people stopped comparing tradeoffs between capacity and margins is the dumbest take I’ve seen so far, congrats.
那不是真的,$NBIS 的利润率包含 colo fees,成本体现在 29% cost of revenue 里。

$IREN 也拥有站点,但这并没有给它相对 $NBIS 带来太多利润率优势。你没读到的是 software(orchestration、utilization)以及没有收入分成(fluidstack、poolside),这些驱动更高利润率。

说聪明人已经停止比较 capacity 和 margins 的 tradeoffs,是我目前见过最蠢的观点,恭喜。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Not really, even under csp, they still use middleware like poolside (CIFR WULF use fluidstack). Think you’re misundestanding what I’m trying to say

Margin profile will be limited with $IREN because middleware cuts into margins from orchestration, scheduling, customer allocation, etc.

While it’s better than mw hosting, is not a true full stack like nebius and margins will cap out
不太是,即使在 csp 下,他们仍使用 poolside 这类 middleware(CIFR WULF 用 fluidstack)。我觉得你误解了我想说的。

$IREN 的 margin profile 会受限,因为 middleware 会从 orchestration、scheduling、customer allocation 等环节侵蚀利润率。

虽然它比 mw hosting 更好,但它不是像 nebius 那样真正的 full stack,利润率会有上限。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@YungAds_ I think you’re confusing crypto mining margins with HPC pivot
@YungAds_ 我觉得你把 crypto mining margins 和 HPC pivot 混淆了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@JarronJackson4 @DeepValueBagger I replied this to @jiahanjimliu earlier but it’s not about capturing more customers with how they do orchestration or full stack (eg. hyper scalers) and you’re misunderstanding the economics

It’s about how Nebius’s software stack drives more efficient OPEX and increases margins.
@JarronJackson4 @DeepValueBagger 我之前也这样回复过 @jiahanjimliu,但这不是关于他们如何通过 orchestration 或 full stack(比如 hyperscalers)获取更多客户,你误解了经济学。

这是关于 Nebius 的 software stack 如何推动更高效的 OPEX 并提高利润率。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$IREN has good margins for crypto mining and large GW capacity but that doesn’t translate directly into HPC.

They’re going the $CIFR $WULF route in the meantime with middleware orchestration funneling to hyper scalers but that cuts into margins a lot in the long run.

$NBIS is direct to $MSFT full stack and can actually increase their gross margins over time.

Everyone points to $CRWV as the example to minor pivots but the harsh reality as we learned recently is that if many miners try building their own orchestration and stack, they will likely fail.

$ORCL is the perfect example of the software moat where if a $800B hyperscaler has trouble how would a $4B bitcoin miner pivot, or a $100m microcap like $SLNH do it.

If they go direct, a lot of people estimating bitcoin miner fundamentals use $CRWV in terms of translating GW to revenue/profit, but the actual returns will likely be underwhelming during the execution.

Nebius is #1 from the very start, even beating out $CRWV (from their most recent whitepaper with gpu utilization) and long term profitability from full stack will shine when it comes to earnings vs speculation.
$IREN 在 crypto mining 上利润率不错,也有大 GW capacity,但这不会直接转化为 HPC。

他们目前走的是 $CIFR $WULF 路线,用 middleware orchestration 导流给 hyperscalers,但长期会大量侵蚀利润率。

$NBIS 是直接面向 $MSFT 的 full stack,并且实际上可以随着时间提高 gross margins。

所有人都把 $CRWV 当作 miner pivot 的例子,但我们最近学到的残酷现实是,如果很多 miners 尝试构建自己的 orchestration 和 stack,它们很可能失败。

$ORCL 是 software moat 的完美例子:如果一家 $800B hyperscaler 都有困难,一个 $4B bitcoin miner pivot,或 $SLNH 这种 $100m microcap 要怎么做到?

如果他们直接做,很多估算 bitcoin miner 基本面的人会用 $CRWV 把 GW 转化为 revenue/profit,但实际回报在执行阶段很可能令人失望。

Nebius 从一开始就是 #1,甚至超过 $CRWV(按他们最近关于 gpu utilization 的 whitepaper),当财报兑现而不是只靠猜测时,full stack 的长期盈利能力会显现。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks, just wanted to add I'm still bullish on Neoclouds across the board from $IREN to $CIFR. Short term there might be higher upside due to narratives around capacity but I'd expect markets to care about margins more when it comes time to execution + earning reports.

In terms of raw asymmetrical upside, $NBIS is the obvious winner due to gross margin moat on their operational side ( $CRWV would have been up there if it weren't for interest debt).

And I added some quantitative data in the post showing why margins > capacity and/or middleware.
谢谢,只想补充一下,我仍然全面看多 Neoclouds,从 $IREN$CIFR。短期由于围绕 capacity 的叙事,可能有更高上行,但我预计到执行 + 财报阶段,市场会更关注利润率。

从 raw asymmetrical upside 看,$NBIS 是明显赢家,因为运营侧有 gross margin moat(如果不是利息债务,$CRWV 本来也会在那里)。

我也在帖子里加入了一些量化数据,说明为什么 margins > capacity 和/或 middleware。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Just wanted to point out a new valuation thesis shifting from power capacity hype to margins due to new information from $NBIS recent whitepaper, $ORCL margin leak, and others.

People just assume GW = profit with miners, but in terms of profitability and execution in the future, I'd expect the speculation to die down hard with miners when they find out margins are lower than expected.

I just wanted to do the core operational side comparison, which $NBIS clearly stands out on top.

On top of that, as you mentioned, they also have a great portfolio of subsidaries + hyperscaling companies too that I didn't add in that would lead to a higher upside.
只是想指出一个新的估值 thesis:由于 $NBIS 最近 whitepaper、$ORCL margin leak 等新信息,市场会从 power capacity hype 转向 margins。

人们只是默认 miners 的 GW = profit,但从未来盈利能力和执行角度看,当他们发现利润率低于预期时,我预计关于 miners 的投机会大幅降温。

我只是想做核心运营侧比较,$NBIS 显然排在最上面。

除此之外,正如你提到的,他们还有很棒的子公司 + hyperscaling companies 组合,我没有加入,这也会带来更高上行。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
To settle the Neocloud debate:

$NBIS > $IREN + others.

Based on the $ORCL report, NBIS whitepaper, $CRWV acquisitions, and other factors,

I decided to consolidate millions into Nebius and sell off miners like $CIFR.

📏 Gross Margins > GW capacity

Here's the math + why:

We've had a huge speculative run across the board on Neoclouds backed by forward revenue (eg. 19B $MSFT deal with $NBIS).

However, crypto miners have recently gone up 500%+ due to raw GW capacity like $IREN and cheap energy.

However, what people miss out on is capacity leads to much higher revenue but that revenue means nothing if it's not profitable (eg. $ORCL 14% gross margins).

Now that more information has come out regarding $ORCL's buildout failure, $NBIS's whitepaper, and others, we know power and capacity mean little if the economics don’t translate.

And $NBIS has everything.

1. The Margin Gap: Full Stack vs. Middleware

Miners like $IREN and $CIFR must rely on orchestration partners (Fluidstack, Poolside, etc.) to monetize their GPUs. That means giving up 20–30% of revenue (~private estimates from deep research), plus absorbing GPU depreciation, power, and O&M. The result?

At $3–4/hr GPU pricing and ~80% utilization, IREN/CIFR margin = ~44–52%

At $5–6/hr and 90% utilization, margin could reach ~55–60%, but that’s the ceiling

Meanwhile, Nebius earns 70–75% today by owning the orchestration layer and amortizing over 4 years (71.2% from previous Q, likely 60-70%, possibly higher from recent whitepaper claiming higher GPU utilizations).

This gap compounds as scale and utilization rise.

Miners give away a piece of every dollar they earn while Nebius INCREASES gross margins over time.

2. Software Is the Moat and Oracle Proved It

Even $ORCL, an $800B hyperscaler, failed at building GPU orchestration profitably, reporting ~14% gross margins on their AI rental platform and losing ~$100M in the process.

If Oracle can’t execute, expecting $100M marketcap small miners like $SLNH to build hyperscaler-grade orchestration from scratch is wishful thinking.

Platforms like Fluidstack are essential bridges, but they come at a cost: margin compression, revenue leakage, and platform dependency.

Nebius? It already did the hard part. Its in-house orchestration software, GPU utilization, with no middlemen taking a cut.

3. Power vs. Margin Calculations

A single H100 uses ~0.7–0.84 kW. Even at $0.10/kWh, power is just $0.07–0.08 per GPU-hour. When GPUs rent at $4–6/hr, that’s 1–2% of revenue.

What actually moves the needle? Utilization:

50% -> 85% uptime = +70% revenue per GPU

That’s a multi-hundred bps margin swing, far outweighing any "cheap power" comparison with miners.

Software utilization/orchestration is a moat and matters ~30–70 TIMES more than cheap power. And it's not like $NBIS doesn't have cheap power either lol.

4. The CRWV Exception to Miners

Everyone points to $CRWV as miners pivot but Coreweave literally spent YEARS to do this, along with billions in software acquisitions.

And even now, reports suggest their utilization trails Nebius. If miners think they’ll replicate CRWV, good luck.

I'd expect in NBIS to strong outperform in next year's earnings reports when it comes time for execution vs. speculation.

🧩 The Asymmetry

Nebius GM: 70–75% (full-stack, 4yr depreciation)

IREN/CIFR realistic GM: 40–60% (middleware, 2–3yr depreciation)

Gross margin delta: 15–30 points

Execution risk: Nebius = 0 (already doing it); IREN/CIFR = high

Nebius isn’t a power play. It’s a software margins play, with hardware upside. With $IREN and others, you're guessing if it can pull off a $CRWV.

People keep saying "software it not a moat, and look at $CRWV for $IREN future HPC margins", but if $ORCL one of the largest hyperscalers is stuck at 14% gross margins. Then how do we expect these small crypto miners to pull off a Coreweave.

In terms of ASYMMETRICAL UPDATE, $NBIS is the clear favorite out of anything. In terms of raw potential upside if $IREN manages to pull a $CRWV out a hat and beats out $ORCL in this, sure I'd concede.

Software full stack is a HUGE moat that people vastly, vastly underestimate. With $NBIS, they can just let it plug and play scale up over time with the highest gross margins in industry.

$NBIS is what true asymmetric return looks like.
为了解决 Neocloud 争论:

$NBIS > $IREN + others。

基于 $ORCL report、NBIS whitepaper、$CRWV acquisitions 和其他因素,

我决定把数百万集中到 Nebius,并卖出 $CIFR 这类 miners。

📏 Gross Margins > GW capacity

以下是数学 + 原因:

我们已经看到由远期收入支撑的 Neoclouds 全面大幅投机上涨(比如 $NBIS$MSFT 的 19B 交易)。

然而,crypto miners 最近因为 $IREN 这类 raw GW capacity 和便宜能源上涨 500%+。

但人们漏掉的是,capacity 会带来更高收入,但如果不盈利,这些收入没有意义(比如 $ORCL 14% gross margins)。

现在随着 $ORCL buildout failure、$NBIS whitepaper 等更多信息出现,我们知道如果经济性无法转化,power 和 capacity 意义很小。

$NBIS 什么都有。

1. Margin Gap:Full Stack vs. Middleware

$IREN$CIFR 这样的 miners 必须依赖 orchestration partners(Fluidstack、Poolside 等)来变现 GPUs。这意味着放弃 20-30% 收入(deep research 私人估计),同时承担 GPU depreciation、power 和 O&M。结果?

在 $3-4/hr GPU pricing 和约 80% utilization 下,IREN/CIFR margin = 约 44-52%

在 $5-6/hr 和 90% utilization 下,margin 可能达到约 55-60%,但这就是上限。

与此同时,Nebius 因拥有 orchestration layer 并按 4 年 amortize,今天能赚 70-75%(上一季 71.2%,可能 60-70%,也可能因最近 whitepaper 声称更高 GPU utilizations 而更高)。

这个差距会随着规模和利用率提高而复利。

Miners 每赚一美元都要让出一部分,而 Nebius 会随着时间提高 gross margins。

2. Software 是 Moat,Oracle 证明了这一点

即使 $ORCL 这种 $800B hyperscaler,也没能盈利地构建 GPU orchestration,其 AI rental platform 报告约 14% gross margins,并亏损约 $100M。

如果 Oracle 都执行不了,期待 $SLNH 这种 $100M marketcap 小 miner 从零构建 hyperscaler-grade orchestration,就是一厢情愿。

Fluidstack 这类平台是必要桥梁,但有代价:margin compression、revenue leakage 和 platform dependency。

Nebius 呢?它已经完成了困难部分。内部 orchestration software、GPU utilization,而且没有中间商抽成。

3. Power vs. Margin Calculations

单个 H100 使用约 0.7-0.84 kW。即使 $0.10/kWh,power 也只有每 GPU-hour $0.07-0.08。当 GPUs 以 $4-6/hr 出租时,这只是收入的 1-2%。

真正关键是什么?Utilization:

50% -> 85% uptime = 每 GPU 收入 +70%

这是数百 bps 的 margin swing,远超过任何和 miners 的 “cheap power” 比较。

Software utilization/orchestration 是 moat,重要性大约是 cheap power 的 30-70 倍。而且 $NBIS 也不是没有 cheap power lol。

4. CRWV 是 Miners 的例外

所有人都指向 $CRWV 作为 miners pivot 的例子,但 Coreweave literally 花了 YEARS 做这件事,还花了数十亿美元做 software acquisitions。

即便现在,报告也显示其 utilization 落后 Nebius。如果 miners 觉得自己能复制 CRWV,祝好运。

当明年进入 execution vs speculation 的财报阶段,我预计 NBIS 会强烈跑赢。

🧩 The Asymmetry

Nebius GM:70-75%(full-stack,4yr depreciation)

IREN/CIFR realistic GM:40-60%(middleware,2-3yr depreciation)

Gross margin delta:15-30 points

Execution risk:Nebius = 0(已经在做);IREN/CIFR = 高

Nebius 不是 power play。它是 software margins play,带 hardware upside。对 $IREN 和其他公司,你是在猜它能不能变出一个 $CRWV

人们一直说 “software is not a moat, and look at $CRWV for $IREN future HPC margins”,但如果 $ORCL 这种最大 hyperscalers 之一都卡在 14% gross margins,那么我们怎么期待这些小 crypto miners 做出 Coreweave?

从 ASYMMETRICAL UPDATE 角度看,$NBIS 是任何东西里明确最优。如果只看 raw potential upside,假如 $IREN 真能凭空变出 $CRWV 并在这方面胜过 $ORCL,那我可以承认。

Software full stack 是一个人们极度、极度低估的巨大 moat。对 $NBIS 来说,他们只需要让它 plug and play 随时间扩张,并保持行业最高 gross margins。

$NBIS 就是真正不对称回报的样子。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Neocloud Position Update Friday Oct 24.

This post is to send a message to $IREN and other Neoclouds holders that:

👑 $NBIS is superior.

I sold out of other Neoclouds: $CIFR 250%+ gain, $IREN, $BITF, $WYFI, 50-100%+ gain, $WULF 5-10% loss.

Now with $2M+ exposure in $NBIS shares/leaps + small $WLAC positions. Will add more Nebius positions next week if it stays at $115.

I don't normally post sales, but there's a lot of annoying Neocloud posts recently claiming that theirs is the best. So I'm posting this to send a message that $NBIS is clearly superior in terms of asymmetrical upside and already has Mag7 deals locked in. And because of this, there's no point of diversifying into other Neoclouds.

NBIS will likely have the highest margin moat from how they do full stack/GPU utilization with their diversified users. And their subsidiaries + portfolio companies (AI DBs, robotics/delivery, etc). are scaling alongside their operational business. There's also no exposure to bad interest debt that eats into margins.

There's an easy path to 300% gain and a $100B+ marketcap just by waiting 1 year for another hyperscaler contract and there's no point in speculating gross margins from Bitcoin mining pivots (see how $ORCL lost $100M+ just bc of GPU utilization + buildout -> rev lag) even if some might have larger capacity.

So just wanted to say: Nebius is THE Neocloud. 🫳🎙️
Neocloud 仓位更新,10 月 24 日周五。

这条是想给 $IREN 和其他 Neocloud 持有人传个信息:

👑 $NBIS 更强。

我卖掉了其他 Neocloud,把仓位更集中到 $NBIS,因为它的合同质量、融资结构、客户分散度和子公司组合更好。

$IREN$CIFR$WULF 这些也可以涨,但 $NBIS 兼具 AI compute、robotaxi、AI training 和其他高增长业务,不只是单一数据中心敞口。

如果市场要给 Neocloud 龙头重估,我认为 $NBIS 的风险回报最好。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1981981029029298374
❤️ 530 🔁 63 💬 79
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 Hinata is a good example but I’d say $WLAC is more like Nami in personality development. https://t.co/jwAT8SpKiG
@soulbiri1 Hinata 是好例子,但我会说 $WLAC 性格发展更像 Nami。https://t.co/jwAT8SpKiG
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 $NBIS is like DD Tsunade walking around becoming hokage like a legend. $IREN is some main character like Sakura with power that people admire at first but will come to realize is useless as time goes on when you compare it to someone with the full package.
@soulbiri1 $NBIS 就像 DD Tsunade 一边走路一边成为 hokage,像传奇一样。$IREN 是 Sakura 这种主角,刚开始大家钦佩她的力量,但随着时间推移,和一个全套配置的人相比,会发现没什么用。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I mention $CRWV in the other comments as the gold standard example crypto miners pivoting to HPC aim for.

Even then $NBIS has higher GPU utilization after CRWV spends billions on software acquisition and years to build it out.

People have too much rose-tinted lens on $IREN and other crypto miners pivoting when $ORCL literally had 14% gross margins. Again CRWV spend billions and years on their software buildout and people expect some $140m micro cap like $SLNH to effectively pivot into good margins

Capacity leads to higher potential revenue but it doesn’t mean much if their margins are small. Full stack + software orchestration + customer diversity is the moat and why $NBIS will likely come out on top in terms of margins.
(Also didn’t like $CRWV since their bad debt eats into margins too. $NBIS convertible note structure 40%+ OTM is the way to go)
我在其他评论里提到 $CRWV,是因为它是 crypto miners pivot 到 HPC 所追求的 gold standard 例子。

即便如此,在 CRWV 花数十亿美元做 software acquisition、花多年 buildout 之后,$NBIS 仍有更高 GPU utilization。

人们对 $IREN 和其他 crypto miners pivot 戴着太重的玫瑰色滤镜,而 $ORCL literally 只有 14% gross margins。再次强调,CRWV 花了数十亿美元和多年做 software buildout,而人们期待 $SLNH 这种 $140m micro cap 有效 pivot 到好利润率。

Capacity 会带来更高潜在收入,但如果利润率小,意义不大。Full stack + software orchestration + customer diversity 才是 moat,也是为什么 $NBIS 在利润率上很可能胜出。
(另外我也不喜欢 $CRWV,因为它的坏债务也会侵蚀利润率。$NBIS 40%+ OTM 的可转债结构才是正确方式。)
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@basanthgowda @DeepValueBagger I’m not saying to do anything, just giving a warning message.

But generally it starts getting priced in more 2 1/2 weekish before the event
@basanthgowda @DeepValueBagger 我不是叫你做任何事,只是给一个警告。

但通常事件前大约 2 周半开始更多被定价。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
$5.88B (cash) + $2.68B (equity in portfolio companies, but undervalued it) + Physical Assets: ~$2B

= 10.56B.

Then you slash ~40% off physical assets/portfolio equity because companies don't really trade 1:1 with NAV = 2.808B in holdings

Then discount some cash but a lot less since cash is just cash = 4.3b-ish of $5.88B

2.8 + 4.3 = ~7.1 (on the hyper conservative end)
$5.88B(现金)+ $2.68B(portfolio companies 股权,但我低估了)+ Physical Assets:约 $2B

= 10.56B。

然后你对 physical assets/portfolio equity 打约 40% 折扣,因为公司通常不会按 1:1 NAV 交易 = holdings 2.808B。

然后对现金也打点折扣,但少很多,因为现金就是现金 = $5.88B 中约 4.3b。

2.8 + 4.3 = 约 7.1(极端保守端)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
No, I held almost every Neocloud up until this week. But ended up selling HPC miners Friday after consolidating more information that came out eg. $ORCL buildout failing, $NBIS new whitepaper 2 days ago, $CRWV recent acquisitions, more insights into margin calculations.

But I'll put that into $NBIS.

People are too bullish on HPC miner pivots when $ORCL had 14% for that segment and they just look at Coreweave.

Capacity helps scale revenue, but it wouldn't matter as much if they can't achieve high margins that Nebius will produce
没有,直到这周我几乎持有每一个 Neocloud。但周五在整合更多新信息后,我卖出了 HPC miners,比如 $ORCL buildout 失败、$NBIS 两天前的新 whitepaper、$CRWV 最近收购、以及更多关于利润率计算的见解。

但我会把资金放进 $NBIS

人们对 HPC miner pivots 太看多,而 $ORCL 在该 segment 只有 14%,他们只看 Coreweave。

Capacity 有助于扩大收入,但如果它们不能达到 Nebius 会产生的高利润率,那就没那么重要。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
$ORCL failed to match these capacities and it's a $800B company.

You're betting that a lot of these small $3-$15B crypto miners pivoting can build it out.

$CRWV took years and billions of dollars in acquisitions to make it sort of work and even after that, $NBIS has higher utilization as per their whitepaper.
$ORCL 没能达到这些能力,而它是一家 $800B 公司。

你是在押注很多这些 $3-$15B 的小 crypto miners pivot 能把它建出来。

$CRWV 花了多年和数十亿美元收购才让它勉强运作,即便如此,按 $NBIS 的 whitepaper,$NBIS 仍有更高 utilization。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I'd disagree, software orchestration is one of the biggest moats possible, which is why $NBIS > $IREN clear as day for me in terms of asymmetrical upside. But to each their own!

I'd agree IREN has slightly higher potential upside due to scale of GW deployed but way way larger execution risk in terms of margins.

When it comes to future earning reports with $IREN, I'd expect markets to find out the hard way that the orchestration and customer diversity that Nebius has currently is a massive, massive moat.

$ORCL one of the largest compute companies lost $100m+ on their most recent buildout as per TI reporting. This was largely due to software + GPU orchestration + customer base. Internal documents show they had ~14% gross margins (NBIS had 71.2% last quarter).

If the largest hyperscalers can't get it right, and people keep pointing to $CRWV supporting Bitcoin miner pivots (when they spent billions on software aqusitions) and years on the pivot, then it's probably is a big moat that you're underestimating.

Also Software utilization/orchestration matters ~30–70x more than cheap power (did the math in another comment).

Scale of MW/GW deployed leads to higher upside with miners, sure, but there's no point of speculating whether these bitcoin miners can pivot into high margins when we have $NBIS with the highest asymmetrical return and capacity, was my point.
我不同意,software orchestration 是可能存在的最大 moat 之一,这就是为什么从不对称上行角度看,$NBIS > $IREN 对我来说非常清楚。但各有各的看法!

我同意 IREN 因已部署 GW 规模而有稍高潜在上行,但在利润率执行风险上大得多。

$IREN 未来财报到来时,我预计市场会用艰难方式发现 Nebius 当前拥有的 orchestration 和 customer diversity 是巨大、巨大的 moat。

按 TI 报道,$ORCL 作为最大 compute 公司之一,最近 buildout 亏了 $100m+。这很大程度上是因为 software + GPU orchestration + customer base。内部文件显示他们约 14% gross margins(NBIS 上季度 71.2%)。

如果最大的 hyperscalers 都做不好,而人们一直用 $CRWV 支持 Bitcoin miner pivots(他们花了数十亿美元做 software acquisitions,且花了多年 pivot),那么这大概就是你低估的巨大 moat。

另外 Software utilization/orchestration 的重要性约为 cheap power 的 30-70x(我在另一条评论里算过)。

已部署 MW/GW 规模确实给 miners 带来更高上行,但我的观点是,当我们已经有 $NBIS 这个拥有最高不对称回报和容量的标的时,没必要猜这些 bitcoin miners 是否能 pivot 到高利润率。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
$NBIS has access to cheap power, but it might not be as cheap as $IREN or $CIFR. But just to give you a sense of why it matters a lot less:

Software utilization/orchestration is a moat and matters ~30–70 TIMES more than cheap power. (someone pls fact check the math)

A H100 burns ~0.84 kW. At $0.05 / kWh, that’s $0.04 / GPU-hour; even at $0.10 / kWh it’s $0.08 / GPU-hour.

With rental prices of ~$4 / GPU-hour, power is just 1–2 % of revenue. But going from 50% to 85% utilization changes revenue per GPU by +70%, swinging margins massively.

Then again if you have all the components like $CRWV (aside from their bad debt), then that's a different story, but it's a huge speculative gamble that all the miners can build that out.
$NBIS 能获得便宜电力,但可能不如 $IREN$CIFR 便宜。不过给你一个感觉,为什么这重要性小很多:

Software utilization/orchestration 是 moat,重要性约为 cheap power 的 30-70 倍。(有人请帮忙 fact check 数学)

一个 H100 消耗约 0.84 kW。按 $0.05 / kWh,这是 $0.04 / GPU-hour;即便按 $0.10 / kWh,也只是 $0.08 / GPU-hour。

在约 $4 / GPU-hour 的租赁价格下,电力只是收入的 1-2%。但从 50% 到 85% utilization 会让每 GPU 收入增加 +70%,大幅影响利润率。

当然,如果你拥有 $CRWV 那样的所有组件(除了坏债务),那就是另一回事,但押所有 miners 都能建出来,是巨大投机赌博。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I was talking about $NBIS internal moat on reducing opex a ton + increased margins. This translates to pricing power since they can charge less + make more + higher EBITDA they can use for acquisitions + investments (eg. clickhouse)

Oracle is ongoing with their buildout and it turned out to lose them $100m+ as per TI. We'll likely see worse gross margins on miners pivoting (CRWV spent years on building out their stack + billions on acquisition) and money flow back into Nebius when it comes to execution in 6 months time vs. speculation currently.

$NBIS -> highest gross margins out of any Neocloud.
我说的是 $NBIS 内部 moat,能大幅降低 opex + 提高利润率。这会转化为 pricing power,因为他们可以收更低价格 + 赚更多 + 有更高 EBITDA 用于收购 + 投资(比如 clickhouse)。

Oracle 正在进行 buildout,而按 TI 报道,结果是让他们亏了 $100m+。当 6 个月后从当前 speculation 进入 execution 阶段,我们很可能看到 pivot 的 miners 利润率更差(CRWV 花多年 build stack + 数十亿美元收购),资金回流 Nebius。

$NBIS -> 任何 Neocloud 中最高 gross margins。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Great question!

Hyperscalers signed confirmed utilization + spend, for example with $NBIS deal with $MSFT, Microsoft is spending 17-20B over 5 years.

It's not exactly risking high-capex, since they're spending to pay for capacity since there's a bottleneck. They're still spending tens of billions of dollars, partly because they can't do it themselves and partly because there's a larger risk in high capex upfront. I wrote in my central thesis that Neoclouds + intentional GPU allocation to these Neoclouds were $NVDA's way of maintaining dominance, diversification, and not risking margin compression down the road.

We've also seen hyperscalers have trouble with buildout on their own, (eg. $ORCL losing $100m), but this just goes to show that there is a huge moat with Neoclouds in terms of software orchestration handling GPU utilization and maintaining high gross margins with how they do their buildout.

$NBIS, $WLAC, and others already had 70% or so gross margins and it's just execution now. It's not just scarcity in chips, there's actually a competitive advantage that these little guys + Bitcoin miners turned HPC ( $IREN), that is the moat.
好问题!

Hyperscalers 签下了确认的 utilization + spend,例如 $NBIS$MSFT 的交易,Microsoft 5 年花 17-20B。

这不完全是在冒高 capex 风险,因为他们花钱购买容量,因为存在 bottleneck。他们仍然花数百亿美元,部分因为自己做不了,部分因为前期高 capex 有更大风险。我在核心 thesis 中写过,Neoclouds + 有意给这些 Neoclouds 分配 GPU,是 $NVDA 维持主导、多元化并避免未来 margin compression 的方式。

我们也看到 hyperscalers 自己 buildout 遇到困难(比如 $ORCL 亏 $100m),这正说明 Neoclouds 在 software orchestration、处理 GPU utilization,以及通过 buildout 方式维持高 gross margins 上有巨大 moat。

$NBIS$WLAC 等已经有约 70% gross margins,现在只是执行。这不只是芯片稀缺,这些小公司 + Bitcoin miners 转型 HPC($IREN)确实有竞争优势,这就是 moat。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
The -17% dip in $NBIS on no material news doesn't change any conviction. My bull-case PT is still $400.

We've seen this move before:

- $ASTS ER drop from $58 -> $36, into $83.

- $GOOGL AI search drop from $170 -> $144 into $257.

- $HOOD Macro drop from $40 -> $28, into $135

When fundamentals and industry momentum stay intact, conviction pays off despite any short-term drop.

Hyperscalers from META, GOOGL, MSFT, are pouring billions into AI data centers, and Nebius is powering the cash cows of Mag7 with more hyperscaler deals likely to come. Forward quarterly revenue is set to explode 1000% Y/Y. This type of growth is almost unheard of in history.

Institutional ownership is low (38.3% of the float) and every trick in the book will be played to acquire more shares off retail as the company grows.

Fundamentals and data center growth have not changed, they've only gotten exponentially better. (eg. new Nebius Israel data center announcement today, growing ARR).

These are the best times go long and this where generational money is made in markets.
$NBIS 在没有实质新闻下跌 -17%,不会改变任何信念。我的 bull-case PT 仍是 $400。

我们以前见过这种走势:

- $ASTS ER 从 $58 跌到 $36,再到 $83。

- $GOOGL AI search 从 $170 跌到 $144,再到 $257。

- $HOOD Macro 从 $40 跌到 $28,再到 $135。

当基本面和行业动能保持完好时,尽管短期下跌,信念会得到回报。

META、GOOGL、MSFT 等 hyperscalers 正向 AI data centers 投入数十亿美元,Nebius 正在为 Mag7 的现金牛供能,并且很可能有更多 hyperscaler deals 到来。远期季度收入将同比爆炸 1000%。这种增长在历史上几乎闻所未闻。

机构持股低(流通股 38.3%),随着公司成长,为了从 retail 手里拿到更多股票,各种手段都会被用上。

基本面和 data center growth 没有改变,只是指数级变得更好。(比如今天新的 Nebius Israel data center 公告,ARR 增长。)

这是做多的最佳时间,也是市场中创造世代财富的地方。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Initiated a small position ($50k shares, $50k April calls) in T1 Energy $TE $4.45, partly because I like League of Legends and Faker.

I have energy positions such as $FLNC, SEI and $EOSE (trimmed) that performed very well.

But like the rest, energy is pointed to benefit from the data center buildout and a $700m MC is a good risk-reward.

I can confidently say I don’t know enough about solar/battery/energy to give a good fundamental thesis but got recommended this from other X users. So I’m not going to try to pretend I have domain expertise in this.

But generally, when a company Grows forward revenue 300% y/y and starts the year off with 800-900m revenue from almost 0 the previous year, this a positive sign. Even with 25% gross margins, there’s quite a lot of debt 500-600m. But the growth is staggering and a beneficiary of the data center buildout.

Sometimes just need to take the leap of faith with a sector and trust DD of peers on X.
在 T1 Energy $TE $4.45 建了一个小仓位($50k 股票,$50k 4 月 calls),部分原因是我喜欢 League of Legends 和 Faker。

我有一些能源仓位,所以能从数据中心 buildout 受益,而 $700m 市值的风险回报还不错。

我可以很坦白地说,我对太阳能/电池/能源的基本面了解不够,没法给出很强的 fundamental thesis;这是其他 X 用户推荐给我的,所以我不想假装自己有行业专长。

但一般来说,一家公司未来收入同比增长 300%,年初收入从几乎 0 到 800-900m,这是积极信号。即使毛利率只有 25%,债务也有 500-600m,增长还是非常惊人,而且受益于数据中心 buildout。

有时候就是要在一个赛道上赌一把,并信任 X 上同行的 DD。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1980287888077312390
❤️ 441 🔁 36 💬 26
打开原推
↩️ 回复
More hyperscaler contracts coming in. But you're spot on with earnings + rate cuts (+ Nov/Dec seasonality) as the biggest near-term catalysts.

Usually companies get rerated after earnings when they release more insight into forward projections.

When $META signed with $CRWV that's extremely bullish for the other neoclouds.

Aside from that don't think $MSFT contract and other rate cuts are priced in yet.
更多 hyperscaler contracts 正在到来。但你说得很对,earnings + rate cuts(+ Nov/Dec seasonality)是最大近端催化剂。

通常公司会在财报后发布更多远期预测细节,从而被重估。

$META$CRWV 签约时,这对其他 neoclouds 极其 bullish。

除此之外,我不认为 $MSFT 合同和其他降息已经被定价。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@yparekh2 My $TSM positions have been doing well even after Doublelift and others retired.

So if Faker retires $TE might do well too with the same logic.
@yparekh2 即使 Doublelift 和其他人退役后,我的 $TSM 仓位也表现不错。

所以按同样逻辑,如果 Faker 退役,$TE 也可能表现不错。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mysticall3g3nd Haha you’ve been posting about $TE for quite some time in the comments, finally initiated positions
@mysticall3g3nd Haha 你在评论里发 $TE 已经很久了,终于建仓了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Thanks! Not a great writeup lol, it’s just me admitting I don’t have domain knowledge and can’t give a good opinion.

But I chose to invest in $TE bc I know the energy sector will be a beneficiary of the data center buildout + I trust DD of others.

As for $NBIS, it’s like a fire sale to me since I do think it ends up $200+ end of year.

Don’t think it goes below $100 again and saving a few percent catching the true bottom + messing up recovery wasn’t worth it for me before I bought more leaps.
谢谢!不是很好的 writeup lol,只是我承认自己没有领域知识,不能给出好观点。

但我选择投资 $TE,因为我知道 energy sector 会受益于 data center buildout + 我信任其他人的 DD。

至于 $NBIS,对我来说像 fire sale,因为我确实认为它年底会到 $200+。

不觉得它会再次跌破 $100,而为了省几个百分点去抓真正底部、同时可能错过恢复,对我来说不值得,所以我买了更多 leaps。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Initiated a small position ($50k shares, $50k April calls) in T1 Energy $TE $4.45, partly because I like League of Legends and Faker.

I have energy positions such as $FLNC, SEI and $EOSE (trimmed) that performed very well.

But like the rest, energy is pointed to benefit from the data center buildout and a $700m MC is a good risk-reward.

I can confidently say I don’t know enough about solar/battery/energy to give a good fundamental thesis but got recommended this from other X users. So I’m not going to try to pretend I have domain expertise in this.

But generally, when a company Grows forward revenue 300% y/y and starts the year off with 800-900m revenue from almost 0 the previous year, this a positive sign. Even with 25% gross margins, there’s quite a lot of debt 500-600m. But the growth is staggering and a beneficiary of the data center buildout.

Sometimes just need to take the leap of faith with a sector and trust DD of peers on X.
在 T1 Energy $TE $4.45 建了小仓位($50k shares,$50k April calls),部分原因是我喜欢 League of Legends 和 Faker。

我有 $FLNC、SEI 和 $EOSE(已 trim)等 energy positions,表现很好。

但和其他一样,energy 受益于 data center buildout,而 $700m MC 是不错的 risk-reward。

我可以坦率说,我对 solar/battery/energy 了解不够,无法给出好的 fundamental thesis,但这是其他 X 用户推荐给我的。所以我不会假装自己在这个领域有专业知识。

但一般来说,当一家公司 forward revenue 增长 300% y/y,并从前一年几乎 0 的收入,到年初就有 800-900m revenue,这是积极信号。即便 gross margins 只有 25%,还有不少债务 500-600m,但增长惊人,且受益于 data center buildout。

有时候就是需要对一个 sector 做 leap of faith,并信任 X 上同行的 DD。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
October 20th, Important Rate Cut Trading Week.

Personal thoughts and explanations:

🛝 = Swing Trade

🐈 = Catalyst Trade

🎇 = 2026 Trade, Tax Harvested

Fire Sale
🔥 $NBIS

Strong Buy
$TSM
$AMKR
$WLAC
$AMZN
$LTC 🐈
$RDDT
$HIMS 🛝
$IBIT
$ALAB
$CRDO
$SMCI
$FLY 🎇
$SNAP 🎇
$ETOR 🎇
$LULU 🎇

Buy
$AMD
$HOOD
$RBRK
$UNH
$TGT 🐈
$IREN 🐈
$WYFI
$WULF
$CIFR
$SLNH
$BITF
$GLXY
$FLNC
$MU

(Skipping Hold, since any other stock I've mentioned in the past, it probably just hold it since nothing's changed).

Sell
$ETH
$BMNR
$PL
$BLSKY
$RGTI
$OKLO
$IONQ
$QBTS

_

So macro wise, we are 9 days away from (~97% or so rate cut). Market is in fear mode. This is the ideal time to go long and not cut positions.

Fire Sale
_

$NBIS - Needs no explanation, I still maintain $400 PT on a bull case 2026 due to 4-6B+ forward revenue off ~60-75% gross margins, and another likely hyperscaler contract (eg. $META)

What happened on the 10%+ drop on Friday was mechanical hedging and MM Pinning. You can see this with the price stuck at $113.5, despite any volatility.

I'd expect short hedges to unwind Monday (given MMs bought puts and were short calls -> heavy short into expiration) and price to go back up. I ended up buying 6 figures worth of calls on the drop as there was no material changes.

Strong Buy

TSM - Holy crap, please have this in your portfolio. This is a money printer, and scaling your revenue by 38-40% every year WHILE increasing gross margins is just insane. It dipped as well after smashing earnings so it's one of the easiest longs in my life.

AMKR - I don't have this in my portfolio yet but will be looking to add due to TSM's involvement in Arizona and potential to be a big partner in the US supply chain (as America tries to push TSM toward US fab + manufacturing).

WLAC - Neocloud SPAC IPO, large upside. I talk about this a lot recently, but it's probably one of the best valued Neoclouds out there, and already has great profit margins (not a pivot from miners, where it's a bit more uncertain). They work with Fluidstack, and I'd expect a 500%+ re-rating on top of a Mag7 contract.

AMZN - $213 is insane lol. I have no clue how this is down -3% YTD during a bull market.

LTC - Affected by crypto liquidations and government shutdown delaying ETFs. Great time to buy and just wait for ETF to be approved.

RDDT - Great dip to $190. I thought $200 would be a bottom but ended up going lower. The news about ChatGPT citing it less caused a large sell-off which I think was very immaterial.

HIMS - 14%+ drop off CEO share sale. Owners sell shares all the time, it doesn't really affect the fundamentals of the company much, just short term sentiment. I'd expect it to rebound.

IBIT - Bitcoin $108k great entry point, it's been swinging between $110k - $120k for awhile so anything under is usually great.

ALAB - I said this last time but it sold off way too much from news of a new competitor. It's already competing vs AVGO in the market lol, NVDA-like margins, growing hundreds of percent Y/Y, Mag7 using them in data center buildout.

CRDO - Similar thesis to ALAB, sold off alongside Astera but a bit less.

SMCI - Should get re-rated for 55%+ or so revenue growth into next year. I doubted the projections earlier but with the data center growth, it's looking realistic.

FLY - This was a medium lift payload play. People doubt fly's execution but NOC co-developing medium lift takes a lot of risk off the table (and possible re-rating it 500%+ when it competes vs falcon9)

SNAP - Did the math on Snap monetization of memories in an earlier DD post and it's completely not priced in yet. It's doing $1.3B+ quarterly revenue on a $13B market cap lol, and the amount FCF they would get from increasing their revenue + lowering Google OPEX costs is insane.

ETOR - Majority cash, growing at IBKR rates, suffering from tax harvesting

LULU - Suffering from tax harvesting + competition from Alo, Vuori, etc. But seasonally should be good, and extremely low p/e now.

Buy
AMD - ChatGPT putting in AMD orders, ORCL building out AMD data centers. Likely going to get a re-rating in the next year as a potential $NVDA competitor. Still think Nvidia will dominate but with it's 4.5T marketcap, AMD has a lot to catch up on even if it takes a small percent share.

HOOD - Looking at a lot better after the 10%+ correction. Could pull a PLTR

RBRK - Did DD on this earlier, looks better on the drop as a cybersecurity company really low multiples in the space. Just needs to cut back on marketing, customers sticky.

UNH - Healthcare is sht in America but not going anywhere. Think Warren and the others know this

TGT 🐈 - Dividend next moth, big dividend stock. Around now is a good time to load up IMO

IREN 🐈 - Huge GW, expect mag7 or similar deal.

WYFI - Any neocloud is a buy (eg. see thesis on mag7 funneling revenue down toward these small 1B-5B companies)

WULF - neocloud play

CIFR - neocloud play

SLNH - neocloud play

BITF - neocloud play

GLXY - neocloud derivative play

FLNC - neocloud energy play

MU - China derisked, memory had a huge market there, memory also likely going to get re-rating in tdata center buildout

_

Sell

ETH - Not a fan of Ethereum at $4k+
BMNR - If I don't like Ethereum at these levels, no point of holding treasury companies
PL - Low revenue, space stock (extremely high valuation)
BLSKY -Low revenue, space stock (extremely high valuation)
RGTI - Quantum bubble
OKLO - Nuclear bubble
IONQ -Quantum bubble
QBTS - Quantum bubble

_

Quick macro heads up:
-> Rate cut in 9 days ~97% odds. Frontrunning expected, go long. That's all.
10 月 20 日,重要降息交易周。

个人想法和解释:

🛝 = Swing Trade
🐈 = Catalyst Trade
🎇 = 2026 Trade, Tax Harvested

Fire Sale
🔥 $NBIS

Strong Buy
$TSM
$AMKR
$WLAC
$AMZN
$LTC 🐈
$RDDT
$HIMS 🛝
$IBIT
$ALAB
$CRDO
$SMCI
$FLY 🎇
$SNAP 🎇
$ETOR 🎇
$LULU 🎇

Buy
$AMD
$HOOD
$RBRK
$UNH
$TGT 🐈
$IREN 🐈
$WYFI
$WULF
$CIFR
$SLNH
$BITF
$GLXY
$FLNC
$MU

Sell
$ETH
$BMNR
$PL
$BLSKY
$RGTI
$OKLO
$IONQ
$QBTS

_

宏观上,我们离约 97% 概率的降息只有 9 天。市场处于恐惧模式,这是做多而不是砍仓的理想时间。

$NBIS - 不需要太多解释,牛市情形下我仍维持 2026 年 $400 PT,原因是 4-6B+ forward revenue、约 60-75% 毛利率,以及可能再来一个 hyperscaler 合同(比如 $META)。

周五 10%+ 下跌更多是机械对冲和 MM pinning,不是基本面变化。

其他 strong buys 多数是 AI infrastructure、semis、connectivity、crypto ETF 或税损收割后的 2026 反弹标的。

核心想法:降息、政府重开和财报季会给高质量成长股提供顺风。不要在恐慌里卖掉真正的赢家。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1979976235825635419
❤️ 96 🔁 6 💬 12
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@capybara_830 Honestly $NBIS, $WLAC, then splitting $NVO into $TSM + $AMZN calls 6 months out sounds beautiful.

There’s 2x rate cuts and a recent correction going into the best seasonal months. Now’s the best time to go long if any.
@capybara_830 老实说 $NBIS$WLAC,然后把 $NVO 拆成 6 个月后的 $TSM + $AMZN calls,听起来很漂亮。

有 2x rate cuts 和最近修正,又进入最佳季节性月份。如果什么时候该做多,就是现在。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
The difference is that $NBIS is doing 4-6B forward revenue in 2026 off ~70% gross margins.

The market cap is 28B and forward growth fundamentals are there to support valuation.

Quantum are pre-revenue with a lot of their income coming from interest instead of revenue. Companies like $RGTI and $QBTS that have no meaningful forward revenue, while being valued at tens of billions is a bubble.
区别在于 $NBIS 在 2026 年有 4-6B forward revenue,约 70% gross margins。

市值是 28B,远期增长基本面足以支撑估值。

Quantum 是 pre-revenue,很多收入来自 interest 而不是 revenue。像 $RGTI$QBTS 这种没有有意义远期收入、却被估值数百亿美元的公司,是泡沫。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Not really. China won’t invade Taiwan under Trump administration or others since $TSM is one of the largest national security risks to United States.

There’s a reason US doesn’t have universal healthcare and any country that might invade would find out why + get flattened to the ground.

Hence why I’m comfortable with $TSM and related semis or AI buildout $NBIS
不太可能。中国不会在 Trump administration 或其他政府下入侵台湾,因为 $TSM 是美国最大的国家安全风险之一。

美国没有 universal healthcare 是有原因的,任何可能入侵的国家都会发现原因,并被夷为平地。

这就是为什么我对 $TSM 和相关 semis 或 AI buildout $NBIS 感到放心。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mysticall3g3nd @t1energy Yeah I’ll probably be buying a bit of $TE, it’s been on my radar for awhile.

Energy isn’t really in my domain expertise though, so my commentary wouldn’t be as useful
@mysticall3g3nd @t1energy 是的,我可能会买一点 $TE,它在我的 radar 上已经一阵子了。

不过 energy 不是我的专业领域,所以我的评论不会太有用。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
October 20th, Important Rate Cut Trading Week.

Personal thoughts and explanations:

🛝 = Swing Trade

🐈 = Catalyst Trade

🎇 = 2026 Trade, Tax Harvested

Fire Sale
🔥 $NBIS

Strong Buy
$TSM
$AMKR
$WLAC
$AMZN
$LTC 🐈
$RDDT
$HIMS 🛝
$IBIT
$ALAB
$CRDO
$SMCI
$FLY 🎇
$SNAP 🎇
$ETOR 🎇
$LULU 🎇

Buy
$AMD
$HOOD
$RBRK
$UNH
$TGT 🐈
$IREN 🐈
$WYFI
$WULF
$CIFR
$SLNH
$BITF
$GLXY
$FLNC
$MU

(Skipping Hold, since any other stock I've mentioned in the past, it probably just hold it since nothing's changed).

Sell
$ETH
$BMNR
$PL
$BLSKY
$RGTI
$OKLO
$IONQ
$QBTS

_

So macro wise, we are 9 days away from (~97% or so rate cut). Market is in fear mode. This is the ideal time to go long and not cut positions.

Fire Sale
_

$NBIS - Needs no explanation, I still maintain $400 PT on a bull case 2026 due to 4-6B+ forward revenue off ~60-75% gross margins, and another likely hyperscaler contract (eg. $META)

What happened on the 10%+ drop on Friday was mechanical hedging and MM Pinning. You can see this with the price stuck at $113.5, despite any volatility.

I'd expect short hedges to unwind Monday (given MMs bought puts and were short calls -> heavy short into expiration) and price to go back up. I ended up buying 6 figures worth of calls on the drop as there was no material changes.

Strong Buy

TSM - Holy crap, please have this in your portfolio. This is a money printer, and scaling your revenue by 38-40% every year WHILE increasing gross margins is just insane. It dipped as well after smashing earnings so it's one of the easiest longs in my life.

AMKR - I don't have this in my portfolio yet but will be looking to add due to TSM's involvement in Arizona and potential to be a big partner in the US supply chain (as America tries to push TSM toward US fab + manufacturing).

WLAC - Neocloud SPAC IPO, large upside. I talk about this a lot recently, but it's probably one of the best valued Neoclouds out there, and already has great profit margins (not a pivot from miners, where it's a bit more uncertain). They work with Fluidstack, and I'd expect a 500%+ re-rating on top of a Mag7 contract.

AMZN - $213 is insane lol. I have no clue how this is down -3% YTD during a bull market.

LTC - Affected by crypto liquidations and government shutdown delaying ETFs. Great time to buy and just wait for ETF to be approved.

RDDT - Great dip to $190. I thought $200 would be a bottom but ended up going lower. The news about ChatGPT citing it less caused a large sell-off which I think was very immaterial.

HIMS - 14%+ drop off CEO share sale. Owners sell shares all the time, it doesn't really affect the fundamentals of the company much, just short term sentiment. I'd expect it to rebound.

IBIT - Bitcoin $108k great entry point, it's been swinging between $110k - $120k for awhile so anything under is usually great.

ALAB - I said this last time but it sold off way too much from news of a new competitor. It's already competing vs AVGO in the market lol, NVDA-like margins, growing hundreds of percent Y/Y, Mag7 using them in data center buildout.

CRDO - Similar thesis to ALAB, sold off alongside Astera but a bit less.

SMCI - Should get re-rated for 55%+ or so revenue growth into next year. I doubted the projections earlier but with the data center growth, it's looking realistic.

FLY - This was a medium lift payload play. People doubt fly's execution but NOC co-developing medium lift takes a lot of risk off the table (and possible re-rating it 500%+ when it competes vs falcon9)

SNAP - Did the math on Snap monetization of memories in an earlier DD post and it's completely not priced in yet. It's doing $1.3B+ quarterly revenue on a $13B market cap lol, and the amount FCF they would get from increasing their revenue + lowering Google OPEX costs is insane.

ETOR - Majority cash, growing at IBKR rates, suffering from tax harvesting

LULU - Suffering from tax harvesting + competition from Alo, Vuori, etc. But seasonally should be good, and extremely low p/e now.

Buy
AMD - ChatGPT putting in AMD orders, ORCL building out AMD data centers. Likely going to get a re-rating in the next year as a potential $NVDA competitor. Still think Nvidia will dominate but with it's 4.5T marketcap, AMD has a lot to catch up on even if it takes a small percent share.

HOOD - Looking at a lot better after the 10%+ correction. Could pull a PLTR

RBRK - Did DD on this earlier, looks better on the drop as a cybersecurity company really low multiples in the space. Just needs to cut back on marketing, customers sticky.

UNH - Healthcare is sht in America but not going anywhere. Think Warren and the others know this

TGT 🐈 - Dividend next moth, big dividend stock. Around now is a good time to load up IMO

IREN 🐈 - Huge GW, expect mag7 or similar deal.

WYFI - Any neocloud is a buy (eg. see thesis on mag7 funneling revenue down toward these small 1B-5B companies)

WULF - neocloud play

CIFR - neocloud play

SLNH - neocloud play

BITF - neocloud play

GLXY - neocloud derivative play

FLNC - neocloud energy play

MU - China derisked, memory had a huge market there, memory also likely going to get re-rating in tdata center buildout

_

Sell

ETH - Not a fan of Ethereum at $4k+
BMNR - If I don't like Ethereum at these levels, no point of holding treasury companies
PL - Low revenue, space stock (extremely high valuation)
BLSKY -Low revenue, space stock (extremely high valuation)
RGTI - Quantum bubble
OKLO - Nuclear bubble
IONQ -Quantum bubble
QBTS - Quantum bubble

_

Quick macro heads up:
-> Rate cut in 9 days ~97% odds. Frontrunning expected, go long. That's all.
10 月 20 日,重要降息交易周。

个人想法和解释:

🛝 = Swing Trade

🐈 = Catalyst Trade

🎇 = 2026 Trade, Tax Harvested

Fire Sale
🔥 $NBIS

Strong Buy
$TSM
$AMKR
$WLAC
$AMZN
$LTC 🐈
$RDDT
$HIMS 🛝
$IBIT
$ALAB
$CRDO
$SMCI
$FLY 🎇
$SNAP 🎇
$ETOR 🎇
$LULU 🎇

Buy
$AMD
$HOOD
$RBRK
$UNH
$TGT 🐈
$IREN 🐈
$WYFI
$WULF
$CIFR
$SLNH
$BITF
$GLXY
$FLNC
$MU

(跳过 Hold,因为过去提到的其他股票,如果没变化,大概就是 hold。)

Sell
$ETH
$BMNR
$PL
$BLSKY
$RGTI
$OKLO
$IONQ
$QBTS
_

宏观上,我们距离(约 97% 概率的)降息还有 9 天。市场处于恐惧模式。这是做多而不是砍仓的理想时间。

Fire Sale
_

$NBIS - 不需要解释,我仍维持 2026 bull case $400 PT,因为有 4-6B+ forward revenue,约 60-75% gross margins,以及另一个可能的 hyperscaler 合同(比如 $META)。

周五 10%+ 下跌发生的是 mechanical hedging 和 MM Pinning。你可以看到价格卡在 $113.5,尽管有任何波动。

我预计 short hedges 会在周一 unwind(鉴于 MMs 买 puts 并 short calls -> 到期前 heavy short),价格会回升。我最终在下跌时买了六位数 calls,因为没有实质变化。

Strong Buy

TSM - 天啊,请把它放进你的组合。这是 money printer,并且每年收入增长 38-40% 同时提高 gross margins,太疯狂了。它在爆炸财报后也下跌,所以这是我人生中最简单的 longs 之一。

AMKR - 我组合里还没有,但会考虑加,因为 TSM 参与 Arizona,以及它可能成为美国供应链中的大伙伴(当 America 试图推动 TSM 转向 US fab + manufacturing 时)。

WLAC - Neocloud SPAC IPO,上行大。我最近经常谈它,但它可能是估值最好的 Neoclouds 之一,且已经有很好的利润率(不是 miner pivot,那更不确定)。他们与 Fluidstack 合作,我预计在 Mag7 合同之上会有 500%+ 重估。

AMZN - $213 太疯狂 lol。我不知道牛市里它 YTD 怎么会 -3%。

LTC - 受 crypto liquidations 和政府停摆延迟 ETFs 影响。现在是好买点,只要等 ETF 获批。

RDDT - 跌到 $190 很好。我以为 $200 会是底,但后来更低。ChatGPT 引用它减少的消息引发大抛售,我认为这非常不重要。

HIMS - CEO 卖股导致 14%+ 下跌。所有者一直都会卖股,这并不真正影响公司基本面,只是短期情绪。我预计会反弹。

IBIT - Bitcoin $108k 是好入场点,它在 $110k - $120k 之间震荡了一阵子,所以低于这个通常很好。

ALAB - 我上次也说过,它因新竞争对手消息卖得太多了。它本来就在市场上和 AVGO 竞争 lol,NVDA-like margins,数百 % Y/Y 增长,Mag7 在 data center buildout 中使用它们。

CRDO - 与 ALAB 类似 thesis,和 Astera 一起被卖,但少一点。

SMCI - 明年收入增长约 55%+ 应该被重估。我之前怀疑预测,但随着 data center growth,看起来现实。

FLY - 这是 medium lift payload play。人们质疑 fly 的执行,但 NOC 共同开发 medium lift 降低了很多风险(并且在它和 falcon9 竞争时可能重估 500%+)。

SNAP - 我在之前 DD 帖里算过 Snap monetization of memories,这完全还没定价。它在 $13B 市值上做 $1.3B+ 季度收入 lol,而通过提高收入 + 降低 Google OPEX 成本得到的 FCF 会很疯狂。

ETOR - 大部分现金,以 IBKR 速度增长,受 tax harvesting 影响。

LULU - 受 tax harvesting + Alo、Vuori 等竞争影响。但季节性应该不错,而且现在 p/e 极低。

Buy
AMD - ChatGPT 下 AMD 订单,ORCL 建 AMD data centers。明年可能作为潜在 $NVDA 竞争者被重估。仍认为 Nvidia 会主导,但考虑它 4.5T marketcap,即便 AMD 只拿一点份额,也有很多追赶空间。

HOOD - 10%+ 修正后看起来好很多。可能走 PLTR 路线。

RBRK - 之前做过 DD,作为 cybersecurity 公司,下跌后看起来更好,在该领域倍数很低。只需要削减 marketing,客户粘性强。

UNH - Healthcare 在美国很烂,但不会消失。我觉得 Warren 和其他人知道这一点。

TGT 🐈 - 下个月 dividend,大 dividend stock。IMO 现在附近是加仓好时机。

IREN 🐈 - Huge GW,期待 mag7 或类似交易。

WYFI - 任何 neocloud 都是 buy(比如看 mag7 向这些小 1B-5B 公司导入收入的 thesis)。

WULF - neocloud play

CIFR - neocloud play

SLNH - neocloud play

BITF - neocloud play

GLXY - neocloud derivative play

FLNC - neocloud energy play

MU - 中国风险降低,memory 在那里有巨大市场,memory 也可能因 data center buildout 被重估。
_

Sell

ETH - 不喜欢 $4k+ 的 Ethereum
BMNR - 如果我不喜欢这些水平的 Ethereum,就没有必要持有 treasury companies
PL - 低收入,space stock(估值极高)
BLSKY - 低收入,space stock(估值极高)
RGTI - Quantum bubble
OKLO - Nuclear bubble
IONQ - Quantum bubble
QBTS - Quantum bubble
_

快速宏观提醒:
-> 9 天后降息,约 97% 概率。预计有人抢跑,做多。就这些。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The NeoCloud Thesis: Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

Why I'm putting $1.5M+ into Neoclouds, and why this might be a 200-300%+ return.

🔹 Buckets

Mag7 contracts: $CRWV, $NBIS ✅, $WULF, $CIFR

With compute: $IREN ✅, $BITF

Speculative: $WYFI, $GRRR ✅, $SLNH

Miners pivoting to HPC: $RIOT, $MARA, $CLSK, $HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 is AI compute strained, by design from $NVDA.

Trillions of capex that normally flowed through AWS, MSFT Azure, Google Cloud for traditional compute, will now funnel into NeoClouds when they cant handle new AI loads from Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, etc.

This is a once-a-decade opportunity, similar to the GPU arms race that made $NVDA a $4T company, on who powers the infra for AWS/Azure/etc for the next 5-10 years.

NBIS (17B from MSFT), CIFR / WULF (3B from GOOGL), CRWV (backstopped by NVDA) are all scaling hundreds of percent (NBIS went from 150M quarterly revenue to likely 1.5B+) with 60-80% gross profit margins.

This revenue growth is almost unheard in history. It's mainly because it's the wealthiest hyperscalers funneling capex into tiny companies.

NVDA / TSM (2022->): GPU for hyperscalers
CRDO / ALAB (2024 ->): hyperscaler wins -> parabolic growth.
NBIS/CIFR/IREN/etc (2025 - ) AWS/Azure/etc. -> parabolic growth from AI compute

This is how you get hundreds of % in return, not value investing in Paypal. Momentum riding the next generational companies.

So bear thesis usually involves around

- Execution Risk (before it was more speculative, now companies like NBIS have 4B+ to execute)

People can always worry about execution but Microsoft or Google would not be signing such large 5-10 year contracts without their own DD.

- Large interest rates (mainly looking at you CRWV), that's why NBIS, CIFR, and others have potential amazing returns.

You have 4B+ in funding for $NBIS at $138+ a share (when it's $107 now). And funding for $CIFR at $16+ a share when it's $11 now. ABOVE current price funding is a bullish tell.

- GPU depreciation (valid concern but it's almost like oil, even older models kept their value and still deliver equity).

- Valuation (I still think we're just getting started. If NBIS scales to 6B rev next year 75% gross margin), 26B marketcap is extremely tiny.

- NVDA potentially launching their own GPU-as-a-service and directly competing. Right now these Neoclouds are NVDA's answer to preventing concentration risk to Azure/AWS/etc.

- Custom hyperscaler chips like TPU, Trainium. But likely years away, since they're still begging for NVDA compute and signed 5Y-10Y contracts.

Regardless these neoclouds like Nebius are really undervalued relative to forward revenue/gross margins.

We're still very early. Make sure to ride the Neocloud wave like Crypto/TSLA with Trump election or NVDA with OpenAI release.

Of course this is highly speculative and I wouldn't YOLO full port calls, but Risk vs. Reward on these little 5-20B neoclouds powering AI workloads for Google/MSFT/etc, the cash cows of Mag7, is worth it. (Trade time Horizon: 8m - 1 year.)

This is the single best asymmetric AI infrastructure trade for 2025-2026.
NeoCloud Thesis:Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

为什么我投入 $1.5M+ 到 Neoclouds,以及为什么这可能带来 200-300%+ 回报。

🔹 分类

Mag7 合同:$CRWV$NBIS ✅、$WULF$CIFR

有 compute:$IREN ✅、$BITF

投机:$WYFI$GRRR ✅、$SLNH

矿企转 HPC:$RIOT$MARA$CLSK$HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 的 AI compute 被 $NVDA 有意卡紧。

过去流经 AWS、MSFT Azure、Google Cloud 的传统 compute capex,现在在它们无法承接 Anthropic、OpenAI、Gemini 等新增 AI 负载时,会 funnel 到 NeoClouds。

这是十年一次机会,类似 GPU 军备竞赛把 $NVDA 推成 $4T 公司。未来 5-10 年谁为 AWS/Azure 等提供基础设施,谁就有巨大上行。

NBIS(MSFT $17B)、CIFR/WULF(GOOGL $3B)、CRWV(NVDA 背书)都在以数百个百分点扩张,毛利率 60-80%。

这种收入增长历史上罕见,因为最富有的 hyperscalers 正在把 capex 打给小公司。

NVDA/TSM(2022->):hyperscalers 的 GPU
CRDO/ALAB(2024->):hyperscaler wins -> 爆发式增长
NBIS/CIFR/IREN 等(2025-):AWS/Azure 等 -> AI compute 爆发式增长

这才是获得几百 % 回报的方式,不是去价值投资 Paypal。

熊 thesis 包括执行风险、高利率、GPU 折旧、估值、NVDA 自己做 GPU-as-a-service,以及 TPU/Trainium 等自研芯片。

但这些 neoclouds 相对 forward revenue/gross margins 仍然被低估。

我们还很早。要像 Trump 当选后的 Crypto/TSLA,或 OpenAI 发布后的 NVDA 那样,坐上 Neocloud wave。

当然这高度投机,我不会全仓 YOLO calls,但这些 5-20B 小 neoclouds 为 Google/MSFT 等 Mag7 现金牛跑 AI workloads,风险回报值得。交易周期:8 个月到 1 年。

这是 2025-2026 最好的非对称 AI infrastructure trade。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1972016308662513748
❤️ 213 🔁 18 💬 26
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_visionarius $BTC, $HOOD, $TSM
@_visionarius $BTC, $HOOD, $TSM
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DeepValueBagger Thanks, means a lot to me! Pretty funny considering someone else selling $399 courses popped up in the timeline 😂

But appreciate the shoutout, @DeepValueBagger is an amazing follow as well, and one of the rare accounts with genuinely valuable insights I follow.
@DeepValueBagger 谢谢,这对我意义很大!挺好笑的,因为 timeline 上刚冒出另一个卖 $399 课程的人 😂

但感谢 shoutout,@DeepValueBagger 也是很棒的关注对象,也是我关注的少数真正有价值见解的账号之一。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DeepValueBagger Yeah he’s one of the biggest snake oil salesmen I’ve seen on X

Unfortunately tagging makes him show up on your feed more due to how X algorithm works so I had to resort to muting.

When the sole goal is to sell courses to newcomers they don’t care about how they get engagement
@DeepValueBagger 是的,他是我在 X 上见过最大的 snake oil salesmen 之一。

不幸的是,按 X 算法,tag 他会让他更多出现在你的 feed 上,所以我只能 mute。

当唯一目标是向新人卖课时,他们不在乎怎么获得 engagement。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Toy0tomi_H Haha thanks for being part of the first 800. X should make a follower # added to a profile @elonmusk, just for fun
@Toy0tomi_H Haha 谢谢你成为前 800 的一员。X 应该给 profile 加一个 follower #,@elonmusk,就好玩。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 You’ve been long since the very beginning, thanks for the support! ❤️
@soulbiri1 你从一开始就 long,感谢支持!❤️
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ryanthawks Appreciate it! Thanks for the robotics stock shout in the other comment, I’ll look into it this weekend
@ryanthawks 感谢!也谢谢你在另一条评论里提到 robotics stock,我周末会看看。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 Yeah I'll do a writeup! It's a bit special right now for tax purposes, I wouldn't really sell stocks I still think would go back up if it weren't EOY.

Also don't trust me on selling wining positions with high conviction, I trimmed like $600k of $RKLB at $30. Probably just hold https://t.co/tWEMWr3q4r
@soulbiri1 是的,我会写一篇!现在因为税务原因有点特殊,如果不是 EOY,我不会真的卖掉那些我仍认为会涨回去的股票。

另外别相信我在高信念 winning positions 上的卖出决定,我在 $30 trim 了大约 $600k 的 $RKLB。可能还是持有更好。https://t.co/tWEMWr3q4r
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah I always underestimate tax harvesting effects from hedge funds/institutions.

Whenever a stock like $ETOR goes 2% lower, I think "it can't get any lower than this" then it does. This only applies end of year for Oct/Nov/early December for stocks down on the year.

Yeah I bought $RDDT at $190 on Friday before it recovered to $195, it's definitely here to stay since everyone uses it lol.
是的,我总是低估 hedge funds/institutions 的 tax harvesting 效应。

每当 $ETOR 这样的股票再跌 2%,我就想“不能比这更低了”,然后它就继续跌。这只适用于年底 Oct/Nov/early December,那些年内下跌的股票。

是的,我周五在 $190 买了 $RDDT,之后恢复到 $195。它肯定会长期存在,因为所有人都在用 lol。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DeepValueBagger @Planckbot I’ve just seen so many lower float 700%+ IPOs this year from $BULL to $NMAX lol… or $DJT to $OKLO last year but those were 300% gains.

So I prefer shares myself just for that 25% chance on a low float rally. But a smart person would have both.
@DeepValueBagger @Planckbot 我今年已经看到太多 lower float 700%+ IPOs,从 $BULL$NMAX lol……或者去年 $DJT$OKLO,不过那些是 300% gains。

所以我自己更偏好 shares,只为那 25% 的 low float rally 机会。但聪明人会两者都有。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DeepValueBagger @Planckbot But yeah after lockups + arbitrage they’re priced correctly (forgot to add this)

Just in month 1 they’re mispriced relative to share price
@DeepValueBagger @Planckbot 但没错,lockups + arbitrage 之后,它们会被正确定价(忘了补这点)。

只是第 1 个月它们相对 share price 被错误定价。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I was just saying some hilarious 600%-1000% returns happen a lot on SPAC ipo’s with shares because of low float and you miss out on it with warrants vs. shares.

We also saw some other low float moves with IPOs like Newsmax up 500% on low float.

And warrants don’t scale with shares because they consider in dilution after warrants and other lockups can be exercised.

Hence why I do warrant arbitrage sometimes and why they’re underpriced a lot of time. Like warrants on bull were trading at $16 per bull share while share price was $80 on bull. Hedging was available at the time when bull was $13.5 a warrant and shares were $29

I’ll need to do more research on float size but my point was in general I’d rather miss out on warrant leverage than a 500% pop on low float IPOs.

And a 500% gain is probably better than 200% after a long time was my point, but if there’s a decent amount of float I’d do warrants too (I’ll need to look into this more)
我刚才只是说,SPAC IPO 的普通股因为流通盘低,经常会出现那种很夸张的 600%-1000% 回报;如果买的是权证而不是股票,就会错过这部分。

我们也看到过其他低流通 IPO 的走势,比如 Newsmax 因为低流通涨了 500%。

而且权证不会跟股票同幅上涨,因为市场会把权证和其他锁定股可行权后的稀释算进去。

这也是为什么我有时会做权证套利,以及为什么它们很多时候被低估。比如 bull 的股价是 $80 时,权证折算每股 bull 只按 $16 交易。当时 bull 权证 $13.5、股票 $29 的时候还可以对冲。

我还需要对流通盘规模做更多研究,但我的大意是,一般来说我宁愿错过权证杠杆,也不想错过低流通 IPO 的 500% 暴涨。

我的意思是,500% 的收益大概比很久以后才拿到 200% 更好;但如果流通盘足够大,我也会买权证(这个我还需要再研究)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
As someone who frequently does SPAC IPOs like $BULL, you miss out on the crazy upside (eg. 600%+) on spac shares with warrants because you can’t convert warrants until one month later.

A lot of insiders/lockup agreements can’t sell or convert as well until warrants can be converted too. (So first week or two has highest return with shares only.

And warrants are typically underpriced since they factor in dilution. For example $BULL ipo’d around $10, rose to $80, while warrants were still pricing it at $16 $10 strike - $6/warrant.

So I typically prefer shares over warrants on spac ipos, since it’s low float for a month.
作为一个经常做 $BULL 这类 SPAC IPO 的人,用权证会错过 SPAC 股票那种疯狂上行空间(比如 600%+),因为权证要一个月后才能转换。

很多内部人士/锁定协议在权证可转换前也不能卖或转换。(所以前一两周通常只有普通股的回报最高。)

而且权证通常会被低估,因为会计入稀释。比如 $BULL IPO 大概 $10,涨到 $80,但权证仍然按 $16 定价:$10 行权价 - $6/份权证。

所以在 SPAC IPO 上我通常更喜欢普通股而不是权证,因为它前一个月是低流通。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Planckbot @DeepValueBagger Yep probably needs updated data
@Planckbot @DeepValueBagger 对,可能需要更新后的数据
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
That’s fair criticism. I think an important nuance is majority of my portfolio is in high conviction (bitcoin, fintech, neoclouds, rklb).

I take a smaller percentage just for active swing trading + medium term holds for re-rating (snap, etor) and these were my losses when it kept dipping instead of any recovering.

It’s my personal trading style monitoring 40+ stocks at once since I don’t long term hold active trades, eg. If $HIMS went up 8% when I bought it at $50 on the 14% drop, I’d take profit.

And it usually works the best if I do a ton of stocks concurrently, otherwise the waiting period would be too long just waiting for one stock swing back like Reddit.

I’ve found success with it personally so I just keep doing it.
这个批评是合理的。我觉得一个重要细节是,我的大部分组合都在高信念仓位里(bitcoin、fintech、neoclouds、rklb)。

我只拿较小比例做主动波段交易 + 中期重估持仓(snap、etor),这些亏损是因为它们一直跌、没有反弹。

同时盯 40+ 只股票是我的个人交易风格,因为主动交易我不会长期持有。比如如果我在 $HIMS 跌 14% 时以 $50 买入,然后涨了 8%,我就会止盈。

而且我发现同时做很多股票时通常效果最好,否则只等一只股票像 Reddit 那样反弹,等待期会太长。

我个人用这种方式做得不错,所以就一直这么做。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DeepValueBagger Yeah I really liked $WLAC and $NBIS, those were my top 2.

WLAC has huge upside when they IPO, just nobody knows about boost yet, great metric though! I should use that too lol
@DeepValueBagger 对,我真的很喜欢 $WLAC$NBIS,这是我最看好的两个。

WLAC IPO 时有巨大上行空间,只是现在还没人知道 boost,不过这个指标很好!我也该用上 lol
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I think the people who jump to his defense are sidestepping the obvious things that make Mike a snake oil salesman

- hiding posts that are materially true (eg. $BKKT dilution history)

- fake giveaways and then deleting them

- fake engagement bait (eg. What OP pointed out).

Two things can be true, someone can be a sketchy piece of crap and can have correct directional opinions with thesis posts
我觉得那些马上跳出来替他辩护的人,都在回避 Mike 像个江湖骗子的那些明显问题:

- 隐藏本质上真实的帖子(比如 $BKKT 稀释历史)

- 假抽奖然后删除

- 假互动诱饵(比如 OP 指出的那个)。

两件事可以同时成立:一个人可以很可疑、很烂,同时在 thesis 帖里对方向性判断也可能是对的。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@kashyap286 @ThHappyHawaiian Mike has some good takes on certain stocks but to me, he comes off as a disingenuous and sketchy.

Trying to hide posts that are true and having a history of fake giveaways screams red flag.

https://t.co/ZN2DLMcq4g
@kashyap286 @ThHappyHawaiian Mike 对某些股票有一些不错的观点,但在我看来,他显得不真诚而且很可疑。

试图隐藏真实的帖子,再加上有假抽奖的历史,这明显是红旗。

https://t.co/ZN2DLMcq4g
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
It's funny how the most followed stock accounts on X like @mikealfred hide replies about inconvenient facts and block accounts. That’s exactly why I created this account — to call out BS and genuinely help you all.

This is what they tried hiding: $BKKT has a long track record of diluting shareholders:

Feb 2024: Issued ~1.4M shares + warrants in a registered direct offering.

Jul 2025: Issued another ~6.75M shares + pre-funded warrants in a $75M public offering, when the stock was trading around $24, but sold them to institutions at ~$10 (60%+ discount), triggering massive losses for retail.

And this isn’t new, the pattern has been the same almost every year: hype retail with marketing -> issue discounted stock to raise cash -> repeat.

Just a reminder X is full of snake oil. Be careful where you get your information from.
X 上那些粉丝最多的股票账号,比如 @mikealfred,会隐藏关于不方便事实的回复,还会拉黑账号,这挺好笑的。这正是我创建这个账号的原因:戳穿 BS,也真正帮到你们。

他们试图隐藏的是:$BKKT 长期以来一直在稀释股东。

2024 年 2 月:通过注册直接发行,发行约 1.4M 股 + warrants。

2025 年 7 月:又在 $75M 公开发行中发行约 6.75M 股 + 预融资 warrants,当时股价约 $24,却以约 $10 卖给机构(折价 60%+),导致散户巨亏。

而且这不是新鲜事,模式几乎每年都一样:用营销炒热散户 -> 折价发股融资 -> 重复。

提醒一下,X 上到处都是卖假药的。小心你从哪里获取信息。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1970933043855872074
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@moninvestor Thanks! I enjoy reading your thesis posts too on $BZAI to $UAMY
@moninvestor 谢谢!我也很喜欢读你从 $BZAI$UAMY 的 thesis 帖
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I wrote about it earlier but a TLDR was $FLY was working with Northrop on reuable medium lift and having $NOC co-developing it would reduce any execution risk.

NOC had working expendable medium-lifts already before Russia-Ukraine war and their supply chain fell apart. NOC + Fly = Working medium lift plug and play med kinda ready to go, they just needed to make it re-usable.

Thesis was Fly can leapfrog building successful small-lift themselves by piggy backing off of Northrop on reusable medium-lift launchers to complete with falcon9 and upside on a 3-4B marketcap could be 5-10x if they got it to work in 2026-2027.

I also didn't think markets were pricing in Northrop executing on this cause they just keep pointing to FLY's failures but, NOC is one of the largest government aerospace contractors.
我之前写过,但 TLDR 是:$FLY 和 Northrop 合作做可复用中型运载火箭,有 $NOC 共同开发会降低执行风险。

俄乌战争前,NOC 已经有可用的一次性中型运载火箭,后来供应链崩了。NOC + Fly = 现成程度还可以、即插即用的中型运载能力,他们只需要把它做成可复用。

我的 thesis 是,Fly 可以借助 Northrop 的可复用中型运载火箭,跳过自己从零做成功小型运载这一步,去和 falcon9 竞争。如果他们在 2026-2027 年做成,以 30-40 亿市值看,上行空间可能是 5-10 倍。

我也不认为市场在给 Northrop 的执行力定价,因为大家只盯着 FLY 的失败经历,但 NOC 是最大的政府航空航天承包商之一。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@iamsattam You're right thanks for the reminder on $NKLR.

Lesson learned: I've been saying nuclear like $OKLO is hilariously overvalued, no clue why I decided to buy it just as a potential no-revenue meme. https://t.co/vOKJG56mA5
@iamsattam 你说得对,谢谢你提醒我 $NKLR

学到教训:我一直在说 $OKLO 这类核能股贵得离谱,完全不知道自己为什么还是把它当成一个潜在的无收入 meme 去买。https://t.co/vOKJG56mA5
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Weekend Reflections ☁️

I just wanted to post every position I'm down on this year + lessons learned.
___

1. $ETOR - ($62 → $38.6, DCA $48, -19.58%)

2. $VIRT - (~$38 → $33, -45%)

3. $SNAP - ($8.2 → $7.69, -6.2%) (new)

4. $SG - ($8.2 → $7.32, -10.73%)

5. $GRRR - ($20.5 → $16.99, -17.12%)

6. $FLY - ($30.2 → $26.5, -12.25%) (new)

7. $LTC - ($113 → $91.1, -19.3%)

8. $OPAD - ($4.61 → $2.94, -36.2%)

9. $CRM - (~$250 → ~$243, ~30%)

10. $AMZN - ($218 → $213) (new)

11. $RDDT - ($202 → $195) (new)

12. $WULF - ($14.5 → $14) (new)

I post a ton of stocks, and I'm happy that there are only about 7 I've gotten wrong short-term (sorry if i miss one or two by accident) and about 5 that I didn't time the absolute bottom correctly.

I still think they'll print in 2026, not too many losers though!

Individual Reflections

1. $ETOR: Great stock fundamentally. Even down ~20%, I believe this will recover in 2026. 1/3 cash, growing at IBKR rates. It suffers from tax-harvesting effects (October/November) as hedge funds sell and rebuy in December.

Lesson learned: None, Id do the same again. Holding for 2026. Trimmed slightly for tax harvest.

2. $VIRT: If I buy calls, probably shouldn't post publicly since it affects hedging flow. Trimmed for tax harvesting since we're nearing two more rate cuts (bullish for markets). Hedging worked but lost quite a bit.

Lesson learned: Keep hedges to myself. Still think I'm directionally right, just wanted to tax harvest.

3. $SNAP: Posted around $8.2 when they converted memories to revenue. This is a 2026 play, not worried about short-term tax harvesting.

Lesson learned: None. Holding for 2026.

4. $SG: Honestly, I just like the salad 🥗. It was $35+ earlier this year. I think it'll recover eventually, just a waiting game cause it's like 1 p/s now?

Lesson learned: None. Medium-term hold.

5. $GRRR: Migrated into $WLAC after investigating their $1.4B contract more, seemed sus. Got baited by the $380M market cap vs. $1.4B revenue potential.

Lesson learned: Trust my gut on suspicious companies. Could 5x if legit, but I don't trust it. Probably shouldn’t have entered. (Trimmed)

6. $FLY: Down ~12%, still a 2026 medium-lift play. Posted recently, could’ve timed better.

Lesson learned: None, maybe better tax-harvest timing.

7. $LTC: Down ~20%. Crypto got nuked by liquidations + government shutdown delays ETF approvals.

Lesson learned: Don’t margin crypto. Government shutdowns delay ETF approvals lol.

8. $OPAD: Sold earlier, but current prices are -36%. Meme stock I aped into.

Lesson learned: Don’t touch meme stocks.

9. $CRM: ~30% loss due to short-dated options + missing earnings date. Swing trade gone wrong.
Lesson learned: Always check earnings dates, was just a on-off mistake, dont think I've ever made this mistake before.
10. $AMZN: It’s Amazon. Moves down 1% sometimes.

Lesson learned: None. Just posted recently.

11. $RDDT: Thought $200 was bottom, dipped further. Averaged down to $190.

Lesson learned: None. Just posted recently.

12. $WULF: Bought because all neoclouds were going up. Bought at $14.5, dipped to $14.

Lesson learned: Don't ape into stocks. Could've timed better.

_

Tax Harvesting Summary

Trimmed most losers for EOY tax harvesting, except newer positions ($AMZN, $RDDT, $WULF) and medium-term plays like $FLY (holding through 2026) that I mentioned.

TLDR:

- Don't go hard into tax-harvested stocks end of year (e.g. $LULU, $ETOR, $SNAP). Wait for December if timing.

- Stop trading meme-stocks like $OPAD.

- Trust my gut when SEA-related companies seem suspicious ($GRRR).

- Option flows affect less-liquid stocks (e.g. $VIRT). March calls could still print so other people buying might affect things, just wanted to tax harvest tho.

Other trades like $AMZN, $RDDT, $WULF are very recent, maybe could've timed them better, but get the exact bottom.

_

Overall, so far so good! I've lost count of how many 100%+ returns I've had... and the number of losers is still small, both for count and position size.
周末复盘 ☁️

我只是想把今年所有浮亏仓位 + 学到的教训发出来。
___

1. $ETOR - ($62 → $38.6,DCA $48,-19.58%)

2. $VIRT - (~$38 → $33,-45%)

3. $SNAP - ($8.2 → $7.69,-6.2%)(新)

4. $SG - ($8.2 → $7.32,-10.73%)

5. $GRRR - ($20.5 → $16.99,-17.12%)

6. $FLY - ($30.2 → $26.5,-12.25%)(新)

7. $LTC - ($113 → $91.1,-19.3%)

8. $OPAD - ($4.61 → $2.94,-36.2%)

9. $CRM - (~$250 → ~$243,~30%)

10. $AMZN - ($218 → $213)(新)

11. $RDDT - ($202 → $195)(新)

12. $WULF - ($14.5 → $14)(新)

我发过很多股票,所以我还挺高兴,短期看错的大概只有 7 个(如果漏了一两个抱歉),还有大概 5 个只是没抄到绝对底部。

我仍然觉得它们会在 2026 年赚钱,亏损标的不算多!

个股复盘

1. $ETOR:基本面很好的股票。即使跌了 ~20%,我相信 2026 年会恢复。1/3 是现金,增长速度接近 IBKR。它受税损收割影响(10/11 月),因为对冲基金会卖出然后 12 月再买回。

教训:没有,我还会这么做。持有到 2026。为了税损收割小幅减仓。

2. $VIRT:如果我买 calls,可能不该公开发,因为会影响对冲流。为了税损收割减仓,因为我们接近再降息两次(利好市场)。对冲有效,但亏了不少。

教训:对冲自己留着。仍然觉得方向上是对的,只是想做税损收割。

3. $SNAP:在他们把 memories 变现时,大概 $8.2 发过。这是 2026 年的交易,不担心短期税损收割。

教训:没有。持有到 2026。

4. $SG:老实说,我只是喜欢这个沙拉 🥗。今年早些时候它是 $35+。我觉得最终会恢复,只是等待游戏,因为现在好像只有 1 p/s?

教训:没有。中期持有。

5. $GRRR:研究了他们 $1.4B 合同后转到 $WLAC,感觉可疑。被 $380M 市值 vs $1.4B 潜在收入诱惑了。

教训:对可疑公司要相信直觉。如果是真的可能 5 倍,但我不信。也许一开始就不该进。(已减仓)

6. $FLY:跌 ~12%,仍然是 2026 年中型运载交易。最近才发,时机可以更好。

教训:没有,也许税损收割时机可以更好。

7. $LTC:跌 ~20%。Crypto 被清算潮 + 政府停摆延迟 ETF 审批打爆。

教训:不要给 crypto 加杠杆。政府停摆会延迟 ETF 审批 lol。

8. $OPAD:之前已经卖了,但按当前价格是 -36%。我冲进去的 meme stock。

教训:别碰 meme stocks。

9. $CRM:因为短期期权 + 漏看财报日期亏了 ~30%。波段交易做错了。
教训:永远检查财报日期,这只是一次偶发错误,我不觉得自己以前犯过这个错。
10. $AMZN:这是 Amazon。有时候会跌 1%。

教训:没有。只是最近才发。

11. $RDDT:以为 $200 是底,结果继续跌。加仓到 $190。

教训:没有。只是最近才发。

12. $WULF:因为所有 neoclouds 都在涨才买。$14.5 买,跌到 $14。

教训:不要无脑冲股票。时机可以更好。

_

税损收割总结

为了年底税损收割,减掉了大部分亏损仓位,除了较新的仓位($AMZN$RDDT$WULF)和我提到的 $FLY 这类中期交易(持有到 2026)。

TLDR:

- 年底不要重仓冲那些被税损收割的股票(例如 $LULU$ETOR$SNAP)。如果要择时,等到 12 月。

- 停止交易 $OPAD 这种 meme-stocks。

- 当 SEA 相关公司看起来可疑时,相信自己的直觉($GRRR)。

- 期权流会影响流动性较差的股票(例如 $VIRT)。3 月 calls 仍然可能赚钱,所以别人买入可能会影响走势,不过我只是想税损收割。

其他交易比如 $AMZN$RDDT$WULF 都很新,也许时机可以更好,但不可能精准买到底。

_

总体来说,目前还不错!我已经数不清自己有多少次 100%+ 回报了……亏损标的的数量和仓位规模都仍然很小。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The Great Soybean/Seed Oil Crash, personal thoughts and explanations:

Strong Buy
$ALAB
$CRDO
$NBIS
$WLAC
$LTC
$TSM
$BTC
(+ same as tax harvest stocks last time)
$AMZN
$SMCI
_

Buy
$AMD
$FLNC
$SEI
$BZAI
$NKLR
$IREN
$WULF
$CIFR
$CRWV
$BITF
$WYFI
$SLNH
$BITF
$RBRK
$GLXY
$GRAB
$SEA
$META
$TGT
$SNAP
$MU
$RKLB
$FLY
$UNH

Hold
$MP
$HOOD
$EOSE
$NVDA
$GOOGL
$DFLI
$SOFI
$VIRT
$RR
$AVGO
$BE
$ASTS

(Hit the ticker maximum but everything else from last post, still sell on Quantum or Oklo)
_

Strong Buys
ALAB - Huge part of datacenter buildout, NVDA like margins, Mag7 customers. Already had competitors from AVGO, really don't think Arista would be a competitive threat.

CRDO - Same sell-off as ALAB, thought they were both kind of overvalued before, but now they're back in correction territory so good to stock up.

NBIS - $400 PT bull case. We have macro tailwind from government re-opening + rate cut EOM october into earnings, so short term looks promising. Lot of things going for it (eg. meta x crwv, so there's potential for more mag7 clients), sum of parts doing well, eg. clickhouse, and scaling rev from $100m to $1.5B+ a quarter is insane. there's already contracts locked in its just a matter of company execution.

WLAC - Wrote a thesis about this earlier at $13. Even at $14.5 strong because it can re-rate 100%+ easily.

LTC - Affected by leverage traders and government shutdown. The shutdown is predicted to last awhile and the main reason to buy was the ETF getting approved. But a great buy sub <$100 anyway, because it will get approved in due time (~95% chance).

TSM - Holy crap. This would be a $3T company if this were a US company, insane profit margins, insane growth rate for their size. And every post you see about OpenAi X (**sydney sweeney partnership) or AMD buildout/NVDA buildout. TSM is the center of it all and would easily be a $2T+ company (from here at ~$1.5T), even if buying at ATHs.

BTC - $112K good entry point. Goldt keeps hitting ATH, nothing really changed fundamentally, just lot of liquidations recently
(+ same as tax harvest stocks last time)

AMZN - I really don't know how it's still down YTD. I don't think Amazon needs much explaining but still growing (eg. AWS backlog massive, still going like 24% but not as much as ORCL, GCP and others obviously), but with EOY seasonality and runup to Feb, now is probably the best chance to catch the bottom. AMZN hitting $213-215 today was a good chance to stock up since it usually floats between $218-$227 if you're short term swing trading but long term I'd expect it to catchup to other mag7.

SMCI - Underrated. Markets were looking short term performance, and Charles was quoting like 55%+ Y/Y forward revenue growth which nobody believed + backlog that didnt get realized yet. But now with all the data center buildouts, now it's kinda making sense. So should re-rate in the next two earnings.

_
Buy

AMD - So many deals from OpenAI x AMD, oracle building out with AMD, this is going to re-rate to a potential $1T+ company if it's actually a strong competitive to $NVDA. I don't think it's winner takes all and you can see a $4.5T+ market cap size with NVDA and some $350B marketcap size with AMD, so we can see a large ramp up (OpenAI is usually the leader in frontier models and if Sam says they can use AMD chips + elon said its' good for small-medium weight models, prboably means something positive)

FLNC - Strong re-rate on energy after AI consumption, great buy.

SEI - Strong re-rate on energy after AI consumption, great buy.

BZAI - Someone else did a DD on this company, just cause of sector and shift to edge compute (eg. Robotics goign to be hot). Because of low MC and runup of similar companies could turn out well.

NKLR - Nuclear stocks like $OKLO have been taking off, this is just follow the lader.

IREN - Needs no introduction, huge GW compute capacity just no announced mag7 deals yet but could come anytime -> strong re-rate. Only reason not a strong buy is because not fully convinced miners can pivot like CRWV and maintain great margins (eg. $ORCL hit piece) but we'll see.

WULF - GOOGL backlog, another $3.6+ or so in funding helps a lot.

CIFR - Lot of info on X about future capacity and strong re-rating. Always liked this company because it was NBIS-lite. You can probably buy any Neocloud and it will go up because the sector is incredibly high potential with Mag7 funneling revenue.

CRWV - Didn't like this as much as others because of debt but because of the seed oil correction much better buy point at $134 (below when META deal was announced)

BITF - Same in Neocloud category

WYFI - Same in Neocloud category

BITF - Same in Neocloud category

GLXY - Same in Neocloud category, helps with their buildout

RBRK - Did a DD on this, great buy for cybersecurity sector in mid term, they just need to scale back marketing and then it looks like they have a lot more FCF because they're spending most OPEX on marketing.

GRAB - Great fundamentally, -6.56% correction good to buy again

SEA - AMZN in SEA, tons of people use them. Just a buy just because of costumer base + monetization potenetial. Fundamentally growing $5B+ rev 38% Y/Y is also great.

META - I really don't like all their expensive capex on AI since they're not really putting out fronteir models like ChatGPT with it, who knows what Zuck is doing. But that aside, down 7.3% over the month, going to $700 support, probably a good buy around here to play catchup.

TGT - Dividend next month good catalyst.

SNAP - The Jenners are coming back (helps with popularity), they're shifting former memory opex to revenue, and this will probably cause a HUGE rerating next year. Just suffers from tax harvesting otherwise would be a strong buy rn. Usually tax harvesting events are kinda done in December.

MU - Now that China fears are kinda less intense, MU is a lot stronger buy just cause of memory use on buildout.

RKLB - Neutron, golden dome contracts, lot of cataylsts

FLY - Medium lift

UNH - Healthcare stock not affected by soybeans but had a correction. Would likely go up one instituions post their ports (eg. warren likely bought more)

Random thoughts
Basically any growth/risk stock that's not named Oklo is great because we have

-> Rate Cut end of month October
-> Government re-opening sometime (likely around end of Oct or early Nov)

Into
-> Rate Cut December.
-> Midterms (Bullish for stocks)

Usually market crashes happen when there's tightening not easing. And your stupid quantum bubbles would likely continue for another 3-12 months afterward. If you're short, then probably wait till next Feb.

Anyway, this is a great time for risk-on, and specially riding trends with neoclouds -> affiliated sectors (eg. energy) -> affiliated companies (eg. smci, tsm, etc).

I half joke-about soybeans because it likely signed escalating tensions, but I'd probably see a run-up into next year. Also I could write up a lot about each one but it's pretty time consuming but I'll put on a thesis post about random ones eg. $RBRK, from time to time.

Space/robotics/energy/quantum/ai/semi/critical top verticals right now, don't fight against momentum. I can think something is overvalued (eg. some critical materials bc. it's still spectulative compared to neoclouds that kinda have guaranteed rev based on execution from mag7) but I wouldn't short it into rate cuts.

Just personal thoughts, NFA
大豆/种子油大崩盘,个人想法和解释:

Strong Buy
$ALAB
$CRDO
$NBIS
$WLAC
$LTC
$TSM
$BTC
(加上上次 tax harvest stocks)
$AMZN
$SMCI
_

Buy
$AMD
$FLNC
$SEI
$BZAI
$NKLR
$IREN
$WULF
$CIFR
$CRWV
$BITF
$WYFI
$SLNH
$RBRK
$GLXY
$GRAB
$SEA
$META
$TGT
$SNAP
$MU
$RKLB
$FLY
$UNH

Hold
$MP
$HOOD
$EOSE
$NVDA
$GOOGL
$DFLI
$SOFI
$VIRT
$RR
$AVGO
$BE
$ASTS

Strong Buys:

ALAB - 数据中心 buildout 重要部分,NVDA 式利润率,Mag7 客户。我不认为 Arista 会构成真正威胁。

CRDO - 和 ALAB 一样被抛售,之前我觉得两者有点贵,现在回到修正区间,可以补。

NBIS - 牛市 $400 PT。政府重开 + 月底降息 + 财报前都有宏观顺风,短期也不错。

WLAC - 小市值 Neocloud SPAC,和 Fluidstack/GOOGL 生态相关,非对称强。

LTC/BTC/IBIT - 清算后、ETF/机构需求和降息环境下,crypto 风险回报改善。

TSM/SMCI/AMZN 等仍是 AI infrastructure 主链。

总体:这次更像宏观和流动性抛售,不是 AI thesis 破裂。真正有收入、合同、毛利和 Mag7 需求支撑的公司,回调就是加仓窗口。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1978365814941384882
❤️ 77 🔁 3 💬 21
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@HesterPeirce @SEC_Enforcement @FINRA @CFTC - Investigate whether this media reporting, which materially affects the markets, violates Rule 10b-5. Probe patterns/coordination with external security transactions.

Most recent occurrence was October 7th, "Internal Oracle Data Show Financial Challenge of Renting Out Nvidia Chips” - speculative reporting lacking context caused tens of billions of dollars in market financial damages. An $8 – 9 billion drop in $ORCL valuation ($291 -> $284), $2B decline in $CRWV, and many other sell-offs in the sector from the article.

In this event, the article intentionally leaves out extremely important tens of billions of dollars of cloud contracts to frame discussions as a hit-piece on @sama and @satyanadella.

Bad journalism that moves markets is egregious but as this market-moving behavior is ongoing, please probe whether unsubstantiated reporting and critical information omission done by The Information is connected to external securities transactions.
@HesterPeirce @SEC_Enforcement @FINRA @CFTC - 请调查这类会对市场产生重大影响的媒体报道是否违反 Rule 10b-5。请核查其与外部证券交易之间是否存在模式/协调。

最近一次发生在 10 月 7 日,“Internal Oracle Data Show Financial Challenge of Renting Out Nvidia Chips” - 缺乏背景的推测性报道造成了数百亿美元的市场金融损失。$ORCL 市值下跌 $8-9B($291 -> $284),$CRWV 下跌 $2B,行业里许多其他股票也因这篇文章遭到抛售。

在这件事中,文章故意漏掉数百亿美元云合同这些极其重要的信息,把讨论包装成针对 @sama@satyanadella 的攻击文。

能移动市场的糟糕新闻报道已经很恶劣;但由于这种影响市场的行为仍在持续,请调查 The Information 的未经证实报道和关键信息遗漏是否与外部证券交易有关。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Extremely poorly written and zero-contextualization article. Intentional no-contextualization led to broader selloffs last time they published an Oracle hit-piece @SEC @secpaulsatkins

The core point - “Escalating compute demands could result in overbuilt servers without sufficient financial returns” - completely omits that $MSFT signed multi-year contractual reservations for confirmed utilization with many neoclouds (eg. $17-19B with Nebius or with $CRWV)

These are tens-of-billions in minimum-utilization agreements Microsoft signed to scale capacity without “at-will” termination clauses.

By stripping out that context, this becomes a short seller hit piece + Sam Altman terrible person narrative rather than actual news.
写得极差、完全没有背景化的文章。上次他们发布 Oracle 攻击文时,故意不提供背景导致了更广泛的抛售 @SEC @secpaulsatkins

核心观点——“不断上升的算力需求可能导致服务器过度建设而没有足够财务回报”——完全漏掉了 $MSFT 已经和很多 neoclouds 签署多年期合同预留、确认利用率(比如和 Nebius 的 $17-19B,或和 $CRWV)。

这些是 Microsoft 为扩展容量而签署的数百亿美元最低使用量协议,并没有“任意”终止条款。

剥离这些背景后,这就变成了一篇空头攻击文 + Sam Altman 是坏人的叙事,而不是真正的新闻。
❤️ 133 🔁 9 💬 11
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Extremely dangerous post because you’re spreading disinformation.

I hope you can make a correction before the post causes trouble: “They get great lease deals with the option to terminate literally at any time, without the risk”

These are the termination clauses from actual SEC filings:

- Microsoft may terminate a specific GPU Service tranche under the agreement if, after a grace period, Nebius fails to meet the agreed delivery dates for that tranche and cannot provide alternative capacity.

- Either party may terminate the agreement for cause if the other party materially breaches the agreement and does not remedy it within 60 days.

- Either party may also terminate if the other party:

- Ceases to do business, dissolves or liquidates; or

- Has a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding instituted against it (which is not dismissed within 30 days) — except where it’s a Chapter 11 reorganization and the agreement is being transferred to a solvent entity.

There is no “at-will” termination right.
非常危险的帖子,因为你在传播虚假信息。

我希望你能在帖子惹出麻烦前更正:“他们拿到很好的租赁协议,可以真的随时终止,而且没有风险”

以下是实际 SEC 文件里的终止条款:

- 如果 Nebius 在宽限期后未能满足该 tranche 约定交付日期,且无法提供替代容量,Microsoft 可以终止协议下某一特定 GPU Service tranche。

- 如果一方实质性违约且 60 天内未补救,任一方可因故终止协议。

- 如果另一方出现以下情况,任一方也可终止:

- 停业、解散或清算;或

- 进入破产或资不抵债程序(且 30 天内未被驳回)——但 Chapter 11 重组且协议转移给有偿付能力实体的情况除外。

不存在“任意”终止权。
❤️ 87 🔁 3 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_Mitchel_lauren @blu400_ @DeepValueBagger @babyfolio thanks for the insight chatgpt
@_Mitchel_lauren @blu400_ @DeepValueBagger @babyfolio 谢谢你的见解 chatgpt
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
It's likely MM pinning for $NBIS, you can see this with the price stuck at $113.5 despite any volatility.

I'd expect short hedges to unwind Monday (given MMs bought puts and were short calls -> heavy short into expiration) and price to go back up, hence why I used this time to buy calls despite elevated IV.
这很可能是 $NBIS 的 MM pinning,你可以看到无论怎么波动,价格都卡在 $113.5。

我预计周一空头对冲会解除(考虑到 MMs 买了 puts、卖空 calls -> 到期前大量做空),价格会重新上涨,所以我趁这个时候在 IV 偏高的情况下买了 calls。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Lxizny It's a great stock, nothing wrong with holding, lot of upside.
@Lxizny 这是只很好的股票,持有没什么问题,上行空间很大。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy You flatter me too much lol, I don’t think I’ll hit 100k anytime soon. But you're getting close yourself with 32k!

I’m happy with my growth so far and really love to see your following grow too, appreciate the kind words
@pepemoonboy 你太抬举我了 lol,我觉得我短期内到不了 100k。但你自己已经 32k,也快了!

我对目前的增长很满意,也真的很高兴看到你的关注者增长,感谢你的好话
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@arpit_sidana $NBIS 100%
@arpit_sidana $NBIS 100%
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 I'm just doing this because my $CIFR positions went up 29% today and I just saw Wolf's chart sitting there all sad.

Didn't do much DD aside from knowing about the $GOOGL deal + similarity with CIFR but bought anyway. Will see how it goes!
@soulbiri1 我只是因为今天我的 $CIFR 仓位涨了 29%,然后看到 Wolf 的图孤零零地躺在那里。

除了知道 $GOOGL 交易 + 和 CIFR 相似之外,没做太多 DD,但还是买了。看看后面怎么走!
❤️ 4 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
💬 引用
Today the WSB degen inside me spoke...

So aped into $WULF today to complete exodia of the Neoclouds after seeing it not go up much (3.6%) while $CIFR, $WYFI both went up 28%. (bought $WYFI, $WLAC and $BITF a little earlier on)

Similar $GOOGL contract as $CIFR. https://t.co/0oYU9TtaxV
今天我体内的 WSB 赌徒发话了……

所以今天冲了 $WULF,补齐 Neoclouds 的 exodia,因为看到它没怎么涨(3.6%),而 $CIFR$WYFI 都涨了 28%。(稍早也买了 $WYFI$WLAC$BITF

$CIFR 类似的 $GOOGL 合同。https://t.co/0oYU9TtaxV
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Just a heads up about $WLAC to newcomers:

Try not to buy these types of low-float small MC stocks after-hours/pre-market due to really low liquidity + high spread (and if you do, place limit orders).

Bid-Ask is $13.8, Sell $15.08 right now as an example, so you're losing 9.28% immediately if you don't limit buy a stock and just place a 100x buy order.

There's also a lack of liquidity compared to normal market hours so a lot of price movements are inflated + could go back to normal the next day.
_

For context, $WLAC is an SPAC IPO that converts into Boost ~$600m valuation.

Boost is a Neocloud most similar to $WULF / $CIFR in that they work with Fluidstack, which is backstopped by $GOOGL.

The benefit was that they already have 75%+ EBITDA gross margin, which is incredibly great and are 250% rev y/y + low valuation. It should benefit a lot from the Neocloud run recently + could re-rate largely with one mag7 contract.

Could IPO anytime in the next two months, it's just a waiting game.
$WLAC 新人的一个提醒:

尽量不要在盘后/盘前买这种低流通、小市值股票,因为流动性很低、价差很大(如果一定要买,就挂限价单)。

现在举例,Bid-Ask 是 $13.8,卖价 $15.08,所以如果你不挂限价、直接下 100x 买单,立刻就亏 9.28%。

盘后/盘前相对正常交易时间也缺乏流动性,所以很多价格波动会被放大,第二天可能回归正常。
_

背景是,$WLAC 是一个 SPAC IPO,会转成 Boost,估值约 $600m。

Boost 是一家 Neocloud,最像 $WULF / $CIFR,因为它们和 Fluidstack 合作,而 Fluidstack 有 $GOOGL 支撑。

好处是它们已经有 75%+ EBITDA 毛利率,非常优秀;收入同比 250%+,估值也低。它应该会大幅受益于最近 Neocloud 行情,如果拿到一个 Mag7 合同,可能大幅重估。

未来两个月内随时可能 IPO,只是要注意交易流动性。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1977846041673363810
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@LibertadEterno i prefer $WLAC
@LibertadEterno 我更喜欢 $WLAC
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@itsthesquonky Shares, you can't redeem warrants for 30 days after IPO and warrants get priced under shares a lot of times (with the expectation of more float causing price drops)

Some crazy things happen in the first 30 days with low float like Webull going up from $10 to $82.
@itsthesquonky 普通股。IPO 后 30 天内不能赎回权证,而且很多时候权证会相对股票被低估(因为预期更多流通盘会导致价格下跌)。

低流通盘前 30 天会发生一些疯狂的事,比如 Webull 从 $10 涨到 $82。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@foogleman1234 Yeah I wouldn't recommend allocating large percentage of portfolios to a high-risk SPAC IPO for sure.

But a tiny allocation doesn't hurt since risk-reward is definitely there.
@foogleman1234 对,我当然不建议把组合很大比例配置到高风险 SPAC IPO。

但小小配置一点也无妨,因为风险回报确实在那里。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 Yep, it's an SPAC IPO that almost nobody knows about yet! (there's only 3 mentions on WSB in history).

Extremely early on, but obviously a lot more risk buying at the start. https://t.co/kpmvY6IHu0
@soulbiri1 对,这是一个几乎还没人知道的 SPAC IPO!(WSB 历史上只有 3 次提到)。

非常早期,但显然一开始买风险也大很多。https://t.co/kpmvY6IHu0
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Boost was projecting ARR of $275M forward revenue, 75% gross margin, IPO at $600m valuation. Don't think that $7.9m number was accurate.

Also Fluidstack's ARR at $180m is likely a way lagging snapshot since that was 2024.

Not too clear how they work with Fluidstack yet, there's potential for Mag7 clients like $GOOGL since that's how $CIFR and $WULF got the contracts.
Boost 预计 ARR 前瞻收入为 $275M,75% 毛利率,以 $600m 估值 IPO。我不觉得那个 $7.9m 数字准确。

另外 Fluidstack 的 ARR $180m 很可能是严重滞后的快照,因为那是 2024 年的数据。

目前还不太清楚他们怎么和 Fluidstack 合作,但存在拿到 $GOOGL 这类 Mag7 客户的潜力,因为 $CIFR$WULF 就是这样拿到合同的。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Just a heads up about $WLAC to newcomers:

Try not to buy these types of low-float small MC stocks after-hours/pre-market due to really low liquidity + high spread (and if you do, place limit orders).

Bid-Ask is $13.8, Sell $15.08 right now as an example, so you're losing 9.28% immediately if you don't limit buy a stock and just place a 100x buy order.

There's also a lack of liquidity compared to normal market hours so a lot of price movements are inflated + could go back to normal the next day.
_

For context, $WLAC is an SPAC IPO that converts into Boost ~$600m valuation.

Boost is a Neocloud most similar to $WULF / $CIFR in that they work with Fluidstack, which is backstopped by $GOOGL.

The benefit was that they already have 75%+ EBITDA gross margin, which is incredibly great and are 250% rev y/y + low valuation. It should benefit a lot from the Neocloud run recently + could re-rate largely with one mag7 contract.

Could IPO anytime in the next two months, it's just a waiting game.
$WLAC 新人提个醒:

尽量不要在盘后/盘前买这类低流通、小市值股票,因为流动性很低 + 价差很高(如果真买,请下限价单)。

举例来说,现在 Bid-Ask 是 $13.8,Sell $15.08,所以如果你不设限价,只是直接下一个 100x 买单,立刻就亏 9.28%。

相比正常交易时段,流动性也不足,所以很多价格波动会被放大 + 第二天可能回归正常。
_

背景是,$WLAC 是一个会转换成 Boost 的 SPAC IPO,估值约 ~$600m。

Boost 是一个 Neocloud,最像 $WULF / $CIFR,因为他们和 Fluidstack 合作,而 Fluidstack 背后有 $GOOGL 支撑。

优势是他们已经有 75%+ EBITDA 毛利率,这非常好,并且收入同比 +250%、估值低。它应该会明显受益于最近 Neocloud 的上涨,如果拿到一个 mag7 合同,也可能大幅重估。

未来两个月内随时可能 IPO,只是等待游戏。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
This is the first time I'm posting my high conviction list.

These are my 6 highest conviction longs and 1 new 1000% moonshot🚀

Sorted by first bought and ~when/why I developed conviction.

5 Years:

$RKLB ($16 | $28)

$TSM ($120 | $245)

$HOOD ($11.27 | $18)

$BTC ($3k | $57k)

2 Years:

$NBIS ($28 | $99)

$ALAB ($55 | $95)

1000% Moonshot (don't have high conviction like the others, but I included this I currently believe this has the best chance to 10x)

$WLAC ($13 | $13)

Here's what changed:

1. $RKLB -> I knew Space was rapidly growing since Trump announced Space force. I wanted to invest in SpaceX at the time but there was no alternative.

So I bought $RKLB when it started getting popular on Reddit. They had a high success rate with small-lift, but aside from that there wasn't anything special.

Around the $28 mark a few months later, they started developing a medium-lift payload, SpaceX raised a large round at $350B, and I started seeing the potential for RocketLab to grow in that marketcap whether it's 5 years or 10 years (when they were developing Neutron) and I developed my conviction around it.

2. $TSM -> Always knew that TSMC was fundamental to semiconductors, but didn't build large positions because of Taiwan geopolitical risk. But around ~$245, America began the biggest build-out of AI infrastructure critical to national security with $NVDA and others hitting all time highs.

In the center of it all, there's $TSM. I believe if it's an America company, it would be valued at $3T+.

3. $BTC -> I always liked Bitcoin, my friends introduced it to me back in college. I used it to pay for digital goods and stuff because Paypal at the time didn't have anonymous payments, and I didn't like sharing my identity to merchants.

I've always liked Bitcoin as a store of value/payment, but when the US government + Fed finally supported Bitcoin as a alternative to Gold, it changed to high conviction.

I have a whole really long thesis about why US Gov has a strategic interest in Bitcoin + Stablecoins but I'll post it another day.

4. $HOOD -> Financial infrastructure is broken. Everyone in the industry knows it.

I liked Robinhood because all the retail users I know use it. And as someone who runs a fintech company, the speed at which they developed products (even compared to Startups), is astonishing.

From credit card products, to banking, to investing, they've actually made everything better and then just ships products to their already-large userbase.

Of course, there's an upper-cap in how large fintechs grow compared to semi/mega-cap, etc, but it could be a $600B+ company in the future if their banking products succeed and they continue with innovation.

_

1. $NBIS - I'm guilty of swing trading it without looking at fundamentals near the beginning. Everything changed, when Mag7 started signing deals with all the Neoclouds, and Microsoft signing a 17B-19B deal with Nebius completely gave it a new-rerating. I started looking into fundamentals, the assets they own, and I was blown away at their growth rate.

I believe it could be easily be $400 (100B+ marketcap) in 1-2 years.

2. $ALAB - They're used by so many Mag7 companies for the Stargate + AI data center buildout. Of course, their revenue numbers are small compared to their current MC but their Margins are like NVDA and they're growing at 100%+ Y/Y, which is amazing. Who knows how high they'll grow.

_

1. $WLAC - Now for the fun one, if I had to have strong conviction any small cap/penny stock, it would be this. Boost already works with Fluidstack (which built $GOOGL contracts with $CIFR and $WULF already, and boosted their valuations to 4-7B).

And at a $600m IPO now, this could easily grow to 's marketcap. (already made a small thesis post earlier about speculative fundamentals). Hence why I believe this is the most likely 1000% out of anything.

_

I mention other things like $FLY as a potential 1000% too or $AMD as a great buy due to OpenAI 100B+ forward revenue but it's slightly different compared to having high conviction in terms of just believing in the company/asset.
这是我第一次发自己的高信念名单。

这是我 6 个最高信念多头 + 1 个新的 1000% moonshot 🚀

按第一次买入和我大概什么时候/为什么形成信念排序。

5 年:

$RKLB ($16 | $28)

$TSM ($120 | $245)

$HOOD ($11.27 | $18)

$BTC ($3k | $57k)

2 年:

$NBIS ($28 | $99)

$ALAB ($55 | $95)

1000% Moonshot(信念不如其他,但我现在认为它最有机会 10x):

$WLAC ($13 | $13)

变化是:

$RKLB - 我从 Trump 宣布 Space Force 后就知道太空在快速增长。当时想投 SpaceX,但没有替代品,所以买了 $RKLB。后来 medium-lift payload、SpaceX $350B 融资和行业需求让我看到它成长为上一轮 SpaceX 估值的潜力。

$TSM - AI infrastructure 的骨架。

$HOOD - fintech + 零售交易 + 产品扩张。

$BTC - 长期数字黄金/机构采用。

$NBIS - Neocloud、robotaxi、AI training,多业务同时爆发。

$ALAB - Mag7 连接/互连供应链小盘。

$WLAC - 小市值 Neocloud SPAC,非对称最大,但风险也最高。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1977495210063286491
❤️ 52 🔁 5 💬 15
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy I stopped selling CC's this week for $CIFR to $NBIS because everything is just going vertical.
@pepemoonboy 这周我已经停止在 $CIFR$NBIS 上卖 CC 了,因为所有东西都在直线上涨。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@paramdan42454 Stonks always go higher over longer periods of time if they’re fundamentally good.

I think $RKLB will go to $350B market cap one day like SpaceX and it’s still $30B now.

There’s always new opportunities too if you feel like you missed something like $NBIS $FLNC $WLAC
@paramdan42454 如果基本面好,Stonks 在更长时间里总是会涨得更高。

我觉得 $RKLB 有一天会像 SpaceX 一样到 $350B 市值,现在还只有 $30B。

如果你觉得错过了什么,也总会有新的机会,比如 $NBIS $FLNC $WLAC
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
With Taylor Swift entering the Neocloud space, not even 10GW compute on GPT-5 can find her a lasting boyfriend.

Raising my 1Y price target on $NBIS to $450 and reiterating outperform on the rest due to infinite energy consumption.

$WLAC $CIFR $FLNC $IREN $TSM $AMD $BITF $WYFI $GLXY
随着 Taylor Swift 进入 Neocloud 领域,即使用 GPT-5 上 10GW 算力,也找不到她一个长久男友。

我把 $NBIS 的 1Y 目标价上调到 $450,并因为无限能源消耗,对其他标的重申 outperform。

$WLAC $CIFR $FLNC $IREN $TSM $AMD $BITF $WYFI $GLXY
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The NeoCloud Thesis: Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

Why I'm putting $1.5M+ into Neoclouds, and why this might be a 200-300%+ return.

🔹 Buckets

Mag7 contracts: $CRWV, $NBIS ✅, $WULF, $CIFR

With compute: $IREN ✅, $BITF

Speculative: $WYFI, $GRRR ✅, $SLNH

Miners pivoting to HPC: $RIOT, $MARA, $CLSK, $HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 is AI compute strained, by design from $NVDA.

Trillions of capex that normally flowed through AWS, MSFT Azure, Google Cloud for traditional compute, will now funnel into NeoClouds when they cant handle new AI loads from Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, etc.

This is a once-a-decade opportunity, similar to the GPU arms race that made $NVDA a $4T company, on who powers the infra for AWS/Azure/etc for the next 5-10 years.

NBIS (17B from MSFT), CIFR / WULF (3B from GOOGL), CRWV (backstopped by NVDA) are all scaling hundreds of percent (NBIS went from 150M quarterly revenue to likely 1.5B+) with 60-80% gross profit margins.

This revenue growth is almost unheard in history. It's mainly because it's the wealthiest hyperscalers funneling capex into tiny companies.

NVDA / TSM (2022->): GPU for hyperscalers
CRDO / ALAB (2024 ->): hyperscaler wins -> parabolic growth.
NBIS/CIFR/IREN/etc (2025 - ) AWS/Azure/etc. -> parabolic growth from AI compute

This is how you get hundreds of % in return, not value investing in Paypal. Momentum riding the next generational companies.

So bear thesis usually involves around

- Execution Risk (before it was more speculative, now companies like NBIS have 4B+ to execute)

People can always worry about execution but Microsoft or Google would not be signing such large 5-10 year contracts without their own DD.

- Large interest rates (mainly looking at you CRWV), that's why NBIS, CIFR, and others have potential amazing returns.

You have 4B+ in funding for $NBIS at $138+ a share (when it's $107 now). And funding for $CIFR at $16+ a share when it's $11 now. ABOVE current price funding is a bullish tell.

- GPU depreciation (valid concern but it's almost like oil, even older models kept their value and still deliver equity).

- Valuation (I still think we're just getting started. If NBIS scales to 6B rev next year 75% gross margin), 26B marketcap is extremely tiny.

- NVDA potentially launching their own GPU-as-a-service and directly competing. Right now these Neoclouds are NVDA's answer to preventing concentration risk to Azure/AWS/etc.

- Custom hyperscaler chips like TPU, Trainium. But likely years away, since they're still begging for NVDA compute and signed 5Y-10Y contracts.

Regardless these neoclouds like Nebius are really undervalued relative to forward revenue/gross margins.

We're still very early. Make sure to ride the Neocloud wave like Crypto/TSLA with Trump election or NVDA with OpenAI release.

Of course this is highly speculative and I wouldn't YOLO full port calls, but Risk vs. Reward on these little 5-20B neoclouds powering AI workloads for Google/MSFT/etc, the cash cows of Mag7, is worth it. (Trade time Horizon: 8m - 1 year.)

This is the single best asymmetric AI infrastructure trade for 2025-2026.
NeoCloud Thesis:Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

为什么我投入 $1.5M+ 到 Neoclouds,以及为什么这可能带来 200-300%+ 回报。

🔹 分类

Mag7 合同:$CRWV$NBIS ✅、$WULF$CIFR

有 compute:$IREN ✅、$BITF

投机:$WYFI$GRRR ✅、$SLNH

矿企转 HPC:$RIOT$MARA$CLSK$HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 的 AI compute 被 $NVDA 有意卡紧。

过去流经 AWS、MSFT Azure、Google Cloud 的传统 compute capex,现在在它们无法承接 Anthropic、OpenAI、Gemini 等新增 AI 负载时,会 funnel 到 NeoClouds。

这是十年一次机会,类似 GPU 军备竞赛把 $NVDA 推成 $4T 公司。未来 5-10 年谁为 AWS/Azure 等提供基础设施,谁就有巨大上行。

NBIS(MSFT $17B)、CIFR/WULF(GOOGL $3B)、CRWV(NVDA 背书)都在以数百个百分点扩张,毛利率 60-80%。

这种收入增长历史上罕见,因为最富有的 hyperscalers 正在把 capex 打给小公司。

NVDA/TSM(2022->):hyperscalers 的 GPU
CRDO/ALAB(2024->):hyperscaler wins -> 爆发式增长
NBIS/CIFR/IREN 等(2025-):AWS/Azure 等 -> AI compute 爆发式增长

这才是获得几百 % 回报的方式,不是去价值投资 Paypal。

熊 thesis 包括执行风险、高利率、GPU 折旧、估值、NVDA 自己做 GPU-as-a-service,以及 TPU/Trainium 等自研芯片。

但这些 neoclouds 相对 forward revenue/gross margins 仍然被低估。

我们还很早。要像 Trump 当选后的 Crypto/TSLA,或 OpenAI 发布后的 NVDA 那样,坐上 Neocloud wave。

当然这高度投机,我不会全仓 YOLO calls,但这些 5-20B 小 neoclouds 为 Google/MSFT 等 Mag7 现金牛跑 AI workloads,风险回报值得。交易周期:8 个月到 1 年。

这是 2025-2026 最好的非对称 AI infrastructure trade。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1972016308662513748
❤️ 78 🔁 7 💬 13
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Crypto_LogicD @Sandeman52 @babyfolio @sunxliao Congrats! Neoclouds/AI have been insane recently.

I’m afraid to sell CCs at 48% away for weeklies on stuff like $CIFR or $IREN cause they go up in 22% a day now lol.

But yeah 56% return is spectacular!
@Crypto_LogicD @Sandeman52 @babyfolio @sunxliao 恭喜!Neoclouds/AI 最近太疯狂了。

$CIFR$IREN 这种东西,我都不敢在周度期权上卖距离现价 48% 的 CC,因为它们现在一天能涨 22% lol。

不过是的,56% 回报非常厉害!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@woosla79 They’re all really good and related, I don’t know what would go up faster if you compare $FLNC with $CIFR, tbh.

Good to have exposure to both, but don’t be overly concentrated on AI buildout.
@woosla79 它们都很好,而且相关。我真不知道如果比较 $FLNC$CIFR,哪个会涨得更快。

两者都有敞口是好的,但不要在 AI buildout 上过度集中。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
So people keep asking me about $RBRK almost every other post and I know it's really popular on X.

I ended up looking into it so people stop asking (and added some Rubrik to my portfolio at $82).

TLDR my own research:

- Cybersecurity company (industry trades at extremely high multiples, look at $CRWD or $NET)

- 80% gross margins (great)

- $1B+ ARR, grew 40-50% Y/Y (great)

(comparison to NET, ~2.2B+ ARR, growing 22% Y/Y, almost 5x the MC)

- OpEx spend: 60-75% of revenue goes to marketing. This is a huge positive.

OpEx marketing spend is great but it looks really bad short term eg. $HOOD when they give customers 3% to transfer, it hurts short term in earnings reports bc it's deceptive and not many people do the breakdown but long term when they cut back on spend, customers are sticky and this helps a lot with profitability.

FCF was positive, but breakdown of opex expenses was mainly marketing, which is a good thing, unlike Snapchat google cloud opex.

- Diversified client base like Cloudflare (eg. goldman, pepsi, accenture, etc).

Downsides:

- Balance sheet not the best, $1.1B debt or so to fund acquisitions. At least it's about acquisitions.

- Don't like how their forward revenue numbers slowed down 20-25% compared to something like $NBIS growing like 700% or something more for next year. Obviously unfair comparison, but that's why I liked Neoclouds more.

_

Looks like a good mid term hold with a pretty simple plan -> scale customer base -> scale back marketing + sticky base -> catch up to industry multiples in cybersecurity and hv higher FCF.

Usually these types of growth companies with high gross margins (eg. $HOOD back at $18, growing ~50 y/y) that turn profitable, re-rate the hardest.

$RBRK just gotta spend less on marketing down the road and suddenly they have a lot of fcf with their sticky customer base.

TLDR: Great buy for cybersecurity sector, better opportunities elsewhere.
所以大家几乎每隔一条帖子就问我 $RBRK,而且我知道它在 X 上很火。

我最后还是研究了一下,免得大家一直问(并且在 $82 给组合加了一些 Rubrik)。

TLDR 我自己的研究:

- 网络安全公司(这个行业交易倍数极高,看看 $CRWD$NET

- 80% 毛利率(很好)

- $1B+ ARR,同比增长 40-50%(很好)

(和 NET 对比,NET ARR ~2.2B+,同比增长 22%,市值几乎是它 5 倍)

- OpEx 支出:收入的 60-75% 用在营销。这是巨大的利好。

OpEx 营销支出是好事,但短期看起来很难看,比如 $HOOD 给客户 3% 转仓奖励,短期会伤害财报,因为它有迷惑性,很多人不会拆解;但长期当他们削减支出时,客户粘性强,这会极大帮助盈利能力。

FCF 是正的,但 opex 费用拆分主要是营销,这是好事,不像 Snapchat 的 google cloud opex。

- 客户基础像 Cloudflare 一样多元化(比如 goldman、pepsi、accenture 等)。

缺点:

- 资产负债表不是最好,大概 $1.1B 债务用于收购。至少是为了收购。

- 不喜欢他们前瞻收入数字相比 $NBIS 这种明年增长 700% 或更多的公司放缓到 20-25%。当然这个比较不公平,但这也是我更喜欢 Neoclouds 的原因。

_

看起来是一个不错的中期持有,路径很简单 -> 扩大客户基础 -> 缩减营销 + 粘性客户基础 -> 追上网络安全行业倍数,并拥有更高 FCF。

通常这类高毛利成长公司(比如 $HOOD 在 $18 时,同比增长 ~50%)一旦转向盈利,重估最猛烈。

$RBRK 以后只需要少花点营销费,凭借粘性客户基础,突然就会有大量 fcf。

TLDR:网络安全板块里的好买点,但其他地方有更好的机会。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Based Friday Market Close (-3.6% SPY day), Thoughts and Explanations

Strong Buy
$IBIT
$LTC
$WLAC
$NBIS
$MP
$TSM
(For Next Year)
$ETOR
$DKNG
$SNAP

Buy
$UPWK
$CRDO
$ALAB
$AMZN
$META
$UNH
$SG
$TGT
$BULL
$FLY
$CIFR
$WULF
$IREN
$GLXY
$SMCI
$DELL
$MRVL

Hold
$RKLB
$HOOD
$RBRK
$MU
$HOOD
$GRAB
$MARA
$RIOT
$NVO
$RR
$ELOSE
$FLNC
$SEI
$PLTR

Sell
$CRCL
$ETH
$BMNR
$PL
$BKSY

Strong Sell
$RGTI
$OKLO
$IONQ
$QBTS
$QUBT

_

Explanations:

IBIT - Dumped to $104k, Bitcoin demand has been institutional, tariff fears overblown, and caused one of the biggest liquidation events in history. IMO post-liquidation is the best time to buy crypto. Polymarket still pricing in 55% chance to $130K EOY, but either way Bitcoin is always a good buy long term.

LTC - Down 24% in one day. People on 10X margin were likely frontrunning ETF and got liquidated one exchanges. Probably the best time I've seen to buy sub $98 because ETF will likely get approved when government shutdown stops.

WLAC - One of the best Neocloud SPAC IPO 1000% opportunities ever at $600m valuation because of their partnership with Fluidstack (the ones that helps WULF + CIFR get backstopped by GOOGL), and both of those are $4-7B. For context they're IPOing Q4, so you might need to wait ~2 months.

NBIS - Strongest conviction buy I've had, $400 aggressive PT for next year out of any Neocloud.

MP - National security risk for rare earths (+other rare materials stocks from exploration to Lithium batteries will likely perform well).

TSM - Backbone of all AI Infrastructure

_
Strong Buy Tax Harvesting Bucket of Stocks
(Might need to wait for next year)

ETOR - Way too oversold at $38, likely tax harvesting event going on compounding losses.

DKNG - Fundamentally a growth stock. Revenue numbers are insane given market cap but they're -15% yearly low. Likely compounded by tax harvesting unaffected by Macro.

SNAP - If you read my thesis, they're doing 1.3B quarterly revenue off a 13B marketcap... I'm convinced they will re-rate next year after lowering opex + increasing revenue from monetizing GCP storage. It's just a matter of when the market will price this in, but this is 1Y+ out. Post investors aren't patient. Again likely affected by EOY tax harvesting due to performance so far.

_

Buys

UPWK - Down 4.5% from yesterday, amazing fundamentals, ~800m y/y rev off 70%~ or 80~ gross margins thats growing, 200m buybacks, 2.2B market cap. Likely affected by Russell selloff.

CRDO - Data Center Trade, Mag7 uses them.

ALAB - Data Center Trade, Mag7 uses them.

AMZN - It's materially affected by 100% Chinese tariffs but they won't lose anything, since it gets passed onto the merchant or customers.
META - Probably less ad revenue by Chinese tariffs (eg. Chinese vendors like Temu, might not buy adspace), buy just based on -6% 1m low + Mag7 laggard with Amazon, I like it more.

UNH - Healthcare not really impacted 100% Chinese Tariff or rare earths.

SG - It's down likely due to bad performance + tax harvesting but it's almost 1 P/S lol.

TGT - I'd put it Strong Buy due to dividend catalyst + 5Y low just now, but haven't dont enough research on the effect on Chinese tariffs on the stock yet.

BULL - Growing at similar rates asHOOD, their fundamentals aren't exactly great for the market cap but you would invest based on retail customer base and the future potential for monetization.

FLY - I did a DD on this earlier but Medium Lift Payload likely to succeed with Northrop in 2027, it takes a TON of patience for a potential 1000% moonshot.

CIFR - Neocloud trade, always bullish. Like Meta X CRWV, more details likely to come soon.

WULF - Neocloud trade bullish.

IREN - Neocloud trade bullish. Their funding round was at some number 70%+ of their stock price if I remember correctly, which is a bullish tell (eg. NBIS and CIFR both hit that after their fundraising round).

GLXY - Part of Neocloud trade.

MRVL - It's not really priced in that it's growing 56% Y/Y like NVDA.

SMCI - Data center/stargate buildout

DELL -Data center/stargate buildout

_

Sell

CRCL - I will keep repeating this but COIN is better than Circle unless Circle can show they can monetize USDC outside from interest income. Because COIN literally gets 50% revenue sharing and on top of that 100% of the revenue on its platform.

ETH - I will keep repeating this but I will not personally buy above $3000. So even if it dips 16% (you can take the chance of a swing trade, back up to $4k+), there's always the chance it keeps cascading down below $3k and I've lost track of how many times this has happened in history.

BMNR - Tied with ETH fundamentally.

PL - Space stocks have gone up a lot, I think with stuff like RGTI and others, fundamentals haven't mirrored it's marketcap.

BKSY - Space stocks have gone up a lot, I think with stuff like RGTI and others, fundamentals haven't mirrored it's marketcap.

Strong Sell

RGTI - market cap extremely disconnected from valuation

OKLO - market cap extremely disconnected from valuation

IONQ - market cap disconnected from valuation

QBTS - market cap disconnected from valuation
-market cap disconnected from valuation

There's obviously a macro overhead with China x USA trade wars going on, but none of this was new information (Chinese rare earth export controls have been known for awhile + US has already been tarrifing Chinese goods)

We're heading into 2x more rate cuts priced in at 70% and large corrections to cleanse the overvalued froth and liquidate margins (eg. Crypto), will help the market go to higher highs. I will always recommend shares because with good companies, if you wait long enough they will likely outperform (but short term underperform if there's random macro risk).

Mid term I'm the most bullish on Neoclouds for the next year during the rapid AI buildout -> Robotics/Space likely next frontier after that.
基于周五收盘(SPY -3.6%),想法和解释。

Strong Buy
$IBIT
$LTC
$WLAC
$NBIS
$MP
$TSM
(明年)$ETOR $DKNG $SNAP

Buy
$UPWK $CRDO $ALAB $AMZN $META $UNH $SG $TGT $BULL $FLY $CIFR $WULF $IREN $GLXY $SMCI $DELL $MRVL

Hold
$RKLB $HOOD $RBRK $MU $GRAB $MARA $RIOT $NVO $RR $ELOSE $FLNC $SEI $PLTR

Sell
$CRCL $ETH $BMNR $PL $BKSY

Strong Sell
$RGTI $OKLO $IONQ $QBTS $QUBT

_

解释:

IBIT - 跌到 $104k,Bitcoin 需求仍是机构驱动,关税恐惧被夸大,并导致史上最大清算之一。清算后通常是买 crypto 的最好时候。

LTC - 一天跌 24%,很多 10x 杠杆抢跑 ETF 的人被清算。政府停摆结束后 ETF 很可能获批,$98 以下是我见过最好的买点之一。

WLAC - 可能是最好的 Neocloud SPAC IPO 1000% 机会之一,估值 $600m,和 Fluidstack 合作。

NBIS - 我最强信念的 Neocloud,明年激进 PT $400。

MP/TSM - 分别是稀土国家安全和 AI infrastructure 骨架。

Sell/Strong Sell 多数是估值和基本面脱节,或 tied to ETH/无收入 hype。

宏观上,中美贸易战有压力,但不是新信息。还有两次降息被定价,回调会清掉泡沫和杠杆,让市场去更高高点。中期我最看好 Neoclouds,然后是 Robotics/Space。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1977079938835718513
❤️ 77 🔁 2 💬 14
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Heavily agree, critical minerals are really complex. When I buy stuff like $MP I usually use ChatGPT deep research to help me understand risk-reward tradeoffs better.

But when I buy random lithium battery small caps and post about it I admit I don’t have domain knowledge. But like your Neocloud post about $IREN usually a popular domain like AI buildout with $CRWV or something like Quantum with $IONQ will uplift an entire sector anyway.

So risk-reward is sometimes worth it but I wouldn’t follow what I do and wouldn’t put much portfolio weighting into it either.

And it’s a much better risk-reward on stuff like data center buildout since it’s almost for sure revenue based on execution with mag7 backstopping companies.
非常同意,关键矿产真的很复杂。我买 $MP 这类东西时,通常会用 ChatGPT deep research 帮我更好理解风险回报取舍。

但当我买一些随机锂电池小盘股并发出来时,我承认自己没有领域知识。不过就像你关于 $IREN 的 Neocloud 帖一样,通常 AI buildout 这种热门领域和 $CRWV,或 Quantum 这种领域和 $IONQ,都会抬升整个板块。

所以有时候风险回报值得一试,但我不会建议别人跟我做,也不会给它很高组合权重。

而数据中心 buildout 这类东西的风险回报要好得多,因为只要执行到位,收入几乎是确定的,而且有 mag7 支撑这些公司。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@BTCVIX @yeah_dave @wallstreetbets Yeah I partially moved from WSB to here because they deleted my $RKLB post 2 times for no reason and then it shot up from $25 to like $50.

They also banned me for a short time for posting the same thing again after they took it down.
@BTCVIX @yeah_dave @wallstreetbets 对,我部分从 WSB 转到这里,是因为他们无缘无故删了我的 $RKLB 帖 2 次,然后它从 $25 涨到差不多 $50。

他们还因为我在帖子被删后又发了一遍,短暂封了我。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I went from 600 followers to 6k+ in the last week or two as well, so I can empathize with you.

But for me at least, I'm happier with a larger following because I have the potential to help more people.

I've definitely grown a bit more cautious though throwing out thoughts because a ton of people will blindly follow.

But I'm used to it since I came from Reddit to X already with a decent sized following.
我过去一两周也从 600 个关注者涨到 6k+,所以我能理解你。

但至少对我来说,粉丝更多让我更开心,因为我有机会帮助更多人。

不过我确实在随便抛想法时更谨慎了一点,因为很多人会盲目跟随。

但我已经习惯了,因为我从 Reddit 来 X 时已经有一个还不错规模的关注群体。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I still have 6fig in random $CIFR strikes but not high conviction.

Short TLDR on why I have high conviction in $NBIS compared to others is because

-Nebius is full stack -> higher margin (software orchestration for GPU utilization, we why that's important and a moat from $ORCL build-out failure, and why $CRWV bought out a lot of software companies).

-sum of parts (eg. FTX investing in Anthropic, $HOOD, where they all went up 1000% over a few years) can outlast a main business even if margins got compressed and $NBIS has a large stake in great companies like Clickhouse

-more diversified client base (learned from $ORCL why that's important too) for buildout -> usage compared to other Neoclouds.

High conviction $400 PT, $100B MC in 1Y for a bull case.

I'm long stuff like $IREN too just because of their power capacity or $CIFR being Nebius-light in terms how they did fundraising + Mag7 client but it's slightly different me believing in a company vs. thinking they will outform from fundamentals.
我在一些随机 $CIFR 行权价上仍然有 6fig 仓位,但信念不高。

为什么相比其他公司我对 $NBIS 信念高,简短 TLDR 是:

-Nebius 是 full stack -> 更高利润率(GPU 利用率的软件编排,我们知道这为什么重要,也是从 $ORCL build-out 失败看出的护城河,以及为什么 $CRWV 收购了很多软件公司)。

-各部分估值之和(比如 FTX 投资 Anthropic、$HOOD,几年里都涨了 1000%)即使主营业务利润率被压缩,也能比主营更持久,而 $NBIS 持有 Clickhouse 这类优秀公司的大额股份。

-更多元化的客户基础(也从 $ORCL 学到为什么重要),用于 buildout -> usage,相比其他 Neoclouds 更好。

高信念 $400 PT,牛市情景下 1 年 $100B MC。

我也 long $IREN 这类东西,只是因为它们的电力容量,或者 $CIFR 像 Nebius-light,因为他们融资方式 + Mag7 客户类似;但相信一家公司和认为它会因基本面 outperform,还是略有不同。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 I sold out of $GRRR for EOY tax harvesting and pivoted to $WLAC, I’ll post a write up tomorrow around my losses and strategies.
@soulbiri1 我为了年底税损收割卖出了 $GRRR,转到 $WLAC;明天会发一篇关于我的亏损和策略的 write up。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@paramdan42454 It's what I have the most conviction in the next 5 years, or a 2 year time-frame.

For stocks like $RKLB ($16 - When I first bought, $28 - When I developed conviction).

Things from $HOOD, $TSM, are in random order, it's just what I believe in the most within the next decade.
@paramdan42454 这是我未来 5 年,或者 2 年时间框架里最有信念的东西。

比如 $RKLB($16 - 我第一次买入,$28 - 我形成信念)。

$HOOD$TSM 这些顺序是随机的,只是我未来十年最相信的东西。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
This is the first time I'm posting my high conviction list.

These are my 6 highest conviction longs and 1 new 1000% moonshot🚀

Sorted by first bought and ~when/why I developed conviction.

5 Years:

$RKLB ($16 | $28)

$TSM ($120 | $245)

$HOOD ($11.27 | $18)

$BTC ($3k | $57k)

2 Years:

$NBIS ($28 | $99)

$ALAB ($55 | $95)

1000% Moonshot (don't have high conviction like the others, but I included this I currently believe this has the best chance to 10x)

$WLAC ($13 | $13)

Here's what changed:

1. $RKLB -> I knew Space was rapidly growing since Trump announced Space force. I wanted to invest in SpaceX at the time but there was no alternative.

So I bought $RKLB when it started getting popular on Reddit. They had a high success rate with small-lift, but aside from that there wasn't anything special.

Around the $28 mark a few months later, they started developing a medium-lift payload, SpaceX raised a large round at $350B, and I started seeing the potential for RocketLab to grow in that marketcap whether it's 5 years or 10 years (when they were developing Neutron) and I developed my conviction around it.

2. $TSM -> Always knew that TSMC was fundamental to semiconductors, but didn't build large positions because of Taiwan geopolitical risk. But around ~$245, America began the biggest build-out of AI infrastructure critical to national security with $NVDA and others hitting all time highs.

In the center of it all, there's $TSM. I believe if it's an America company, it would be valued at $3T+.

3. $BTC -> I always liked Bitcoin, my friends introduced it to me back in college. I used it to pay for digital goods and stuff because Paypal at the time didn't have anonymous payments, and I didn't like sharing my identity to merchants.

I've always liked Bitcoin as a store of value/payment, but when the US government + Fed finally supported Bitcoin as a alternative to Gold, it changed to high conviction.

I have a whole really long thesis about why US Gov has a strategic interest in Bitcoin + Stablecoins but I'll post it another day.

4. $HOOD -> Financial infrastructure is broken. Everyone in the industry knows it.

I liked Robinhood because all the retail users I know use it. And as someone who runs a fintech company, the speed at which they developed products (even compared to Startups), is astonishing.

From credit card products, to banking, to investing, they've actually made everything better and then just ships products to their already-large userbase.

Of course, there's an upper-cap in how large fintechs grow compared to semi/mega-cap, etc, but it could be a $600B+ company in the future if their banking products succeed and they continue with innovation.

_

1. $NBIS - I'm guilty of swing trading it without looking at fundamentals near the beginning. Everything changed, when Mag7 started signing deals with all the Neoclouds, and Microsoft signing a 17B-19B deal with Nebius completely gave it a new-rerating. I started looking into fundamentals, the assets they own, and I was blown away at their growth rate.

I believe it could be easily be $400 (100B+ marketcap) in 1-2 years.

2. $ALAB - They're used by so many Mag7 companies for the Stargate + AI data center buildout. Of course, their revenue numbers are small compared to their current MC but their Margins are like NVDA and they're growing at 100%+ Y/Y, which is amazing. Who knows how high they'll grow.

_

1. $WLAC - Now for the fun one, if I had to have strong conviction any small cap/penny stock, it would be this. Boost already works with Fluidstack (which built $GOOGL contracts with $CIFR and $WULF already, and boosted their valuations to 4-7B).

And at a $600m IPO now, this could easily grow to 's marketcap. (already made a small thesis post earlier about speculative fundamentals). Hence why I believe this is the most likely 1000% out of anything.

_

I mention other things like $FLY as a potential 1000% too or $AMD as a great buy due to OpenAI 100B+ forward revenue but it's slightly different compared to having high conviction in terms of just believing in the company/asset.
这是我第一次发自己的高信念清单。

这些是我信念最高的 6 个多头,以及 1 个新的 1000% moonshot🚀

按首次买入和大概何时/为何形成信念排序。

5 年:

$RKLB ($16 | $28)

$TSM ($120 | $245)

$HOOD ($11.27 | $18)

$BTC ($3k | $57k)

2 年:

$NBIS ($28 | $99)

$ALAB ($55 | $95)

1000% Moonshot(不像其他标的那样有高信念,但我把它列进来,因为我目前认为它最有机会 10x)

$WLAC ($13 | $13)

变化在哪里:

1. $RKLB -> 自从 Trump 宣布 Space force 后,我就知道太空行业在快速增长。当时我想投 SpaceX,但没有替代品。

所以当 $RKLB 开始在 Reddit 上火起来时,我买了。他们的小型运载成功率很高,但除此之外没什么特别的。

几个月后到 $28 附近时,他们开始开发中型运载载荷,SpaceX 以 $350B 估值融了一大轮,我开始看到 RocketLab 无论 5 年还是 10 年,都有机会成长到那个市值区间(当时他们在开发 Neutron),我就是那时形成信念的。

2. $TSM -> 一直知道 TSMC 对半导体至关重要,但因为台湾地缘政治风险,没有建很大仓位。但在 ~$245 附近,美国开始进行最大规模的 AI 基础设施建设,而这对国家安全至关重要,$NVDA 和其他公司都创下历史新高。

这一切的中心就是 $TSM。我相信如果它是一家美国公司,估值会在 $3T+。

3. $BTC -> 我一直喜欢 Bitcoin,大学时朋友介绍给我的。我曾用它支付数字商品之类的东西,因为当时 Paypal 没有匿名支付,我也不喜欢把身份分享给商家。

我一直喜欢 Bitcoin 作为价值储藏/支付工具,但当美国政府 + Fed 最终支持 Bitcoin 作为 Gold 替代品时,它变成了高信念。

关于为什么美国政府在 Bitcoin + Stablecoins 上有战略利益,我有一篇很长的 thesis,改天再发。

4. $HOOD -> 金融基础设施是坏掉的。业内所有人都知道。

我喜欢 Robinhood,因为我认识的所有散户用户都在用它。作为一个经营 fintech 公司的人,他们开发产品的速度(即使和 Startups 比)都令人震惊。

从信用卡产品,到银行,到投资,他们确实把所有东西都做得更好,然后把产品发给已经很庞大的用户基础。

当然,和 semi/mega-cap 等相比,fintech 能长多大有上限,但如果他们的银行产品成功,并继续创新,未来可能成为 $600B+ 公司。

_

1. $NBIS - 我承认一开始是在没看基本面的情况下做波段。后来 Mag7 开始和所有 Neoclouds 签约,Microsoft 与 Nebius 签了 17B-19B 的交易,这完全带来了新的重估。我开始研究基本面、他们拥有的资产,然后被增长速度震惊。

我相信它 1-2 年内很容易到 $400($100B+ 市值)。

2. $ALAB - 很多 Mag7 公司在 Stargate + AI 数据中心 buildout 中都会用到他们。当然,与当前市值相比,他们的收入数字还小,但利润率像 NVDA,而且同比增长 100%+,这很惊人。谁知道他们能长到多高。

_

1. $WLAC - 现在说有趣的这个。如果我必须对任何小盘/仙股有强信念,那就是它。Boost 已经和 Fluidstack 合作(Fluidstack 已经帮 $CIFR$WULF 做出了 $GOOGL 合同,并把它们估值推到 4-7B)。

而现在 $600m IPO,这很容易成长到它们的市值。(之前已经发过一篇关于投机性基本面的短 thesis)。所以我认为它是所有标的里最可能 1000% 的。

_

我也提到过 $FLY 这类潜在 1000%,或者 $AMD 因 OpenAI 100B+ 前瞻收入是很好的买入,但这和单纯因为相信公司/资产而拥有高信念,还是略有不同。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The NeoCloud Thesis: Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

Why I'm putting $1.5M+ into Neoclouds, and why this might be a 200-300%+ return.

🔹 Buckets

Mag7 contracts: $CRWV, $NBIS ✅, $WULF, $CIFR

With compute: $IREN ✅, $BITF

Speculative: $WYFI, $GRRR ✅, $SLNH

Miners pivoting to HPC: $RIOT, $MARA, $CLSK, $HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 is AI compute strained, by design from $NVDA.

Trillions of capex that normally flowed through AWS, MSFT Azure, Google Cloud for traditional compute, will now funnel into NeoClouds when they cant handle new AI loads from Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, etc.

This is a once-a-decade opportunity, similar to the GPU arms race that made $NVDA a $4T company, on who powers the infra for AWS/Azure/etc for the next 5-10 years.

NBIS (17B from MSFT), CIFR / WULF (3B from GOOGL), CRWV (backstopped by NVDA) are all scaling hundreds of percent (NBIS went from 150M quarterly revenue to likely 1.5B+) with 60-80% gross profit margins.

This revenue growth is almost unheard in history. It's mainly because it's the wealthiest hyperscalers funneling capex into tiny companies.

NVDA / TSM (2022->): GPU for hyperscalers
CRDO / ALAB (2024 ->): hyperscaler wins -> parabolic growth.
NBIS/CIFR/IREN/etc (2025 - ) AWS/Azure/etc. -> parabolic growth from AI compute

This is how you get hundreds of % in return, not value investing in Paypal. Momentum riding the next generational companies.

So bear thesis usually involves around

- Execution Risk (before it was more speculative, now companies like NBIS have 4B+ to execute)

People can always worry about execution but Microsoft or Google would not be signing such large 5-10 year contracts without their own DD.

- Large interest rates (mainly looking at you CRWV), that's why NBIS, CIFR, and others have potential amazing returns.

You have 4B+ in funding for $NBIS at $138+ a share (when it's $107 now). And funding for $CIFR at $16+ a share when it's $11 now. ABOVE current price funding is a bullish tell.

- GPU depreciation (valid concern but it's almost like oil, even older models kept their value and still deliver equity).

- Valuation (I still think we're just getting started. If NBIS scales to 6B rev next year 75% gross margin), 26B marketcap is extremely tiny.

- NVDA potentially launching their own GPU-as-a-service and directly competing. Right now these Neoclouds are NVDA's answer to preventing concentration risk to Azure/AWS/etc.

- Custom hyperscaler chips like TPU, Trainium. But likely years away, since they're still begging for NVDA compute and signed 5Y-10Y contracts.

Regardless these neoclouds like Nebius are really undervalued relative to forward revenue/gross margins.

We're still very early. Make sure to ride the Neocloud wave like Crypto/TSLA with Trump election or NVDA with OpenAI release.

Of course this is highly speculative and I wouldn't YOLO full port calls, but Risk vs. Reward on these little 5-20B neoclouds powering AI workloads for Google/MSFT/etc, the cash cows of Mag7, is worth it. (Trade time Horizon: 8m - 1 year.)

This is the single best asymmetric AI infrastructure trade for 2025-2026.
NeoCloud Thesis:Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

为什么我投入 $1.5M+ 到 Neoclouds,以及为什么这可能带来 200-300%+ 回报。

🔹 分类

Mag7 合同:$CRWV$NBIS ✅、$WULF$CIFR

有 compute:$IREN ✅、$BITF

投机:$WYFI$GRRR ✅、$SLNH

矿企转 HPC:$RIOT$MARA$CLSK$HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 的 AI compute 被 $NVDA 有意卡紧。

过去流经 AWS、MSFT Azure、Google Cloud 的传统 compute capex,现在在它们无法承接 Anthropic、OpenAI、Gemini 等新增 AI 负载时,会 funnel 到 NeoClouds。

这是十年一次机会,类似 GPU 军备竞赛把 $NVDA 推成 $4T 公司。未来 5-10 年谁为 AWS/Azure 等提供基础设施,谁就有巨大上行。

NBIS(MSFT $17B)、CIFR/WULF(GOOGL $3B)、CRWV(NVDA 背书)都在以数百个百分点扩张,毛利率 60-80%。

这种收入增长历史上罕见,因为最富有的 hyperscalers 正在把 capex 打给小公司。

NVDA/TSM(2022->):hyperscalers 的 GPU
CRDO/ALAB(2024->):hyperscaler wins -> 爆发式增长
NBIS/CIFR/IREN 等(2025-):AWS/Azure 等 -> AI compute 爆发式增长

这才是获得几百 % 回报的方式,不是去价值投资 Paypal。

熊 thesis 包括执行风险、高利率、GPU 折旧、估值、NVDA 自己做 GPU-as-a-service,以及 TPU/Trainium 等自研芯片。

但这些 neoclouds 相对 forward revenue/gross margins 仍然被低估。

我们还很早。要像 Trump 当选后的 Crypto/TSLA,或 OpenAI 发布后的 NVDA 那样,坐上 Neocloud wave。

当然这高度投机,我不会全仓 YOLO calls,但这些 5-20B 小 neoclouds 为 Google/MSFT 等 Mag7 现金牛跑 AI workloads,风险回报值得。交易周期:8 个月到 1 年。

这是 2025-2026 最好的非对称 AI infrastructure trade。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1972016308662513748
❤️ 262 🔁 24 💬 25
打开原推
💬 引用
And there’s the de-escalation

Reuters: “Taiwan sees no significant impact on chip sector”

Trump: “Don’t worry about China, it will all be fine… President Xi just had a bad moment.”

Biggest crypto liquidation to date

Stocks with little impact down 7%

Dip buying opportunity https://t.co/2sUEV7Dg8s
然后就出现了降温信号

Reuters:“Taiwan sees no significant impact on chip sector”

Trump:“Don’t worry about China, it will all be fine… President Xi just had a bad moment.”

史上最大 crypto 清算

股票影响不大,跌 7%

逢低买入机会 https://t.co/2sUEV7Dg8s
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Based Friday Market Close (-3.6% SPY day), Thoughts and Explanations

Strong Buy
$IBIT
$LTC
$WLAC
$NBIS
$MP
$TSM
(For Next Year)
$ETOR
$DKNG
$SNAP

Buy
$UPWK
$CRDO
$ALAB
$AMZN
$META
$UNH
$SG
$TGT
$BULL
$FLY
$CIFR
$WULF
$IREN
$GLXY
$SMCI
$DELL
$MRVL

Hold
$RKLB
$HOOD
$RBRK
$MU
$HOOD
$GRAB
$MARA
$RIOT
$NVO
$RR
$ELOSE
$FLNC
$SEI
$PLTR

Sell
$CRCL
$ETH
$BMNR
$PL
$BKSY

Strong Sell
$RGTI
$OKLO
$IONQ
$QBTS
$QUBT

_

Explanations:

IBIT - Dumped to $104k, Bitcoin demand has been institutional, tariff fears overblown, and caused one of the biggest liquidation events in history. IMO post-liquidation is the best time to buy crypto. Polymarket still pricing in 55% chance to $130K EOY, but either way Bitcoin is always a good buy long term.

LTC - Down 24% in one day. People on 10X margin were likely frontrunning ETF and got liquidated one exchanges. Probably the best time I've seen to buy sub $98 because ETF will likely get approved when government shutdown stops.

WLAC - One of the best Neocloud SPAC IPO 1000% opportunities ever at $600m valuation because of their partnership with Fluidstack (the ones that helps WULF + CIFR get backstopped by GOOGL), and both of those are $4-7B. For context they're IPOing Q4, so you might need to wait ~2 months.

NBIS - Strongest conviction buy I've had, $400 aggressive PT for next year out of any Neocloud.

MP - National security risk for rare earths (+other rare materials stocks from exploration to Lithium batteries will likely perform well).

TSM - Backbone of all AI Infrastructure

_
Strong Buy Tax Harvesting Bucket of Stocks
(Might need to wait for next year)

ETOR - Way too oversold at $38, likely tax harvesting event going on compounding losses.

DKNG - Fundamentally a growth stock. Revenue numbers are insane given market cap but they're -15% yearly low. Likely compounded by tax harvesting unaffected by Macro.

SNAP - If you read my thesis, they're doing 1.3B quarterly revenue off a 13B marketcap... I'm convinced they will re-rate next year after lowering opex + increasing revenue from monetizing GCP storage. It's just a matter of when the market will price this in, but this is 1Y+ out. Post investors aren't patient. Again likely affected by EOY tax harvesting due to performance so far.

_

Buys

UPWK - Down 4.5% from yesterday, amazing fundamentals, ~800m y/y rev off 70%~ or 80~ gross margins thats growing, 200m buybacks, 2.2B market cap. Likely affected by Russell selloff.

CRDO - Data Center Trade, Mag7 uses them.

ALAB - Data Center Trade, Mag7 uses them.

AMZN - It's materially affected by 100% Chinese tariffs but they won't lose anything, since it gets passed onto the merchant or customers.
META - Probably less ad revenue by Chinese tariffs (eg. Chinese vendors like Temu, might not buy adspace), buy just based on -6% 1m low + Mag7 laggard with Amazon, I like it more.

UNH - Healthcare not really impacted 100% Chinese Tariff or rare earths.

SG - It's down likely due to bad performance + tax harvesting but it's almost 1 P/S lol.

TGT - I'd put it Strong Buy due to dividend catalyst + 5Y low just now, but haven't dont enough research on the effect on Chinese tariffs on the stock yet.

BULL - Growing at similar rates asHOOD, their fundamentals aren't exactly great for the market cap but you would invest based on retail customer base and the future potential for monetization.

FLY - I did a DD on this earlier but Medium Lift Payload likely to succeed with Northrop in 2027, it takes a TON of patience for a potential 1000% moonshot.

CIFR - Neocloud trade, always bullish. Like Meta X CRWV, more details likely to come soon.

WULF - Neocloud trade bullish.

IREN - Neocloud trade bullish. Their funding round was at some number 70%+ of their stock price if I remember correctly, which is a bullish tell (eg. NBIS and CIFR both hit that after their fundraising round).

GLXY - Part of Neocloud trade.

MRVL - It's not really priced in that it's growing 56% Y/Y like NVDA.

SMCI - Data center/stargate buildout

DELL -Data center/stargate buildout

_

Sell

CRCL - I will keep repeating this but COIN is better than Circle unless Circle can show they can monetize USDC outside from interest income. Because COIN literally gets 50% revenue sharing and on top of that 100% of the revenue on its platform.

ETH - I will keep repeating this but I will not personally buy above $3000. So even if it dips 16% (you can take the chance of a swing trade, back up to $4k+), there's always the chance it keeps cascading down below $3k and I've lost track of how many times this has happened in history.

BMNR - Tied with ETH fundamentally.

PL - Space stocks have gone up a lot, I think with stuff like RGTI and others, fundamentals haven't mirrored it's marketcap.

BKSY - Space stocks have gone up a lot, I think with stuff like RGTI and others, fundamentals haven't mirrored it's marketcap.

Strong Sell

RGTI - market cap extremely disconnected from valuation

OKLO - market cap extremely disconnected from valuation

IONQ - market cap disconnected from valuation

QBTS - market cap disconnected from valuation
-market cap disconnected from valuation

There's obviously a macro overhead with China x USA trade wars going on, but none of this was new information (Chinese rare earth export controls have been known for awhile + US has already been tarrifing Chinese goods)

We're heading into 2x more rate cuts priced in at 70% and large corrections to cleanse the overvalued froth and liquidate margins (eg. Crypto), will help the market go to higher highs. I will always recommend shares because with good companies, if you wait long enough they will likely outperform (but short term underperform if there's random macro risk).

Mid term I'm the most bullish on Neoclouds for the next year during the rapid AI buildout -> Robotics/Space likely next frontier after that.
基于周五收盘(SPY -3.6%),想法和解释。

Strong Buy
$IBIT
$LTC
$WLAC
$NBIS
$MP
$TSM
(明年)$ETOR $DKNG $SNAP

Buy
$UPWK $CRDO $ALAB $AMZN $META $UNH $SG $TGT $BULL $FLY $CIFR $WULF $IREN $GLXY $SMCI $DELL $MRVL

Hold
$RKLB $HOOD $RBRK $MU $GRAB $MARA $RIOT $NVO $RR $ELOSE $FLNC $SEI $PLTR

Sell
$CRCL $ETH $BMNR $PL $BKSY

Strong Sell
$RGTI $OKLO $IONQ $QBTS $QUBT

_

解释:

IBIT - 跌到 $104k,Bitcoin 需求仍是机构驱动,关税恐惧被夸大,并导致史上最大清算之一。清算后通常是买 crypto 的最好时候。

LTC - 一天跌 24%,很多 10x 杠杆抢跑 ETF 的人被清算。政府停摆结束后 ETF 很可能获批,$98 以下是我见过最好的买点之一。

WLAC - 可能是最好的 Neocloud SPAC IPO 1000% 机会之一,估值 $600m,和 Fluidstack 合作。

NBIS - 我最强信念的 Neocloud,明年激进 PT $400。

MP/TSM - 分别是稀土国家安全和 AI infrastructure 骨架。

Sell/Strong Sell 多数是估值和基本面脱节,或 tied to ETH/无收入 hype。

宏观上,中美贸易战有压力,但不是新信息。还有两次降息被定价,回调会清掉泡沫和杠杆,让市场去更高高点。中期我最看好 Neoclouds,然后是 Robotics/Space。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1977079938835718513
❤️ 84 🔁 4 💬 11
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Hoona1203 I ran out of tickers because X post limits, otherwise $RDDT was a buy at $192, $AMD was a buy at $210, $VIRT is a buy at $33 (not so much as single long but as a good hedge and I believe this undervalued + will show up in earnings), lithium-rare earth stocks are a buy and so on.
@Hoona1203 因为 X 发帖 ticker 数量限制,我 ticker 用完了;不然 $RDDT 在 $192 是买点,$AMD 在 $210 是买点,$VIRT 在 $33 是买点(不太适合作为单纯多头,但作为对冲很好,而且我认为它被低估 + 会体现在财报里),锂/稀土股票也是买点,等等。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy Thanks, looks like there was some de-escalation. Excited for $NBIS too next week https://t.co/Vg3ZM4D5eW
@pepemoonboy 谢谢,看起来有些降温了。也很期待下周的 $NBIS https://t.co/Vg3ZM4D5eW
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
It’s small $75m market cap lithium battery company, pls don’t full port small caps like that maybe like 5-10% of your portfolio max unless you have high conviction.

On the bright side underwriters bought at $1.25, so it was probably just caught in the macro issues.

Nothing materially changed afik
这是家 $75m 市值的小型锂电池公司,请不要把这类小盘股满仓,除非你有高信念,否则最多也许占组合 5-10%。

好的一面是承销商在 $1.25 买入,所以它可能只是被宏观问题拖累了。

据我所知,没有实质性变化。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
For semis like $AMD it’s a buy for 1Y out when the 100B contract with OpenAI starts ramping up.

Some other comment mentioned $MU, they’re more materially affected like $QLCM is to China disputes bc of large dram/nand for memory over there compared to something like $TSM. So would dg it to hold.

Of course I’m not sure how macro risk will play out with Trump being a wild card and all, if tensions ease up things would be re-rated
$AMD 这样的半导体,随着 OpenAI 的 100B 合同开始放量,从 1 年维度看是买点。

另一个评论提到 $MU,它们受影响更实质,类似 $QLCM 会受中美争端影响,因为相比 $TSM,它们在中国有大量 dram/nand 存储业务。所以我会把它降为持有。

当然,Trump 是不确定因素,我不确定宏观风险会怎么演变;如果紧张关系缓和,东西会被重新定价。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pontusab Real question, what wallpaper is that
@pontusab 认真问一句,那是什么壁纸
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Solar_Twelve I actually hit the X ticker maximum otherwise I would have talked about more stuff from $AMD to $CRWV.

But yeah, Coreweave is at the center of the Neocloud trade but they have pretty toxic debt compared to NBIS or CIFR.
@Solar_Twelve 我其实已经碰到 X 的 ticker 上限了,不然还会讲更多,从 $AMD$CRWV

不过是的,Coreweave 是 Neocloud 交易的核心,但相比 NBIS 或 CIFR,他们的债务相当有毒。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Based Friday Market Close (-3.6% SPY day), Thoughts and Explanations

Strong Buy
$IBIT
$LTC
$WLAC
$NBIS
$MP
$TSM
(For Next Year)
$ETOR
$DKNG
$SNAP

Buy
$UPWK
$CRDO
$ALAB
$AMZN
$META
$UNH
$SG
$TGT
$BULL
$FLY
$CIFR
$WULF
$IREN
$GLXY
$SMCI
$DELL
$MRVL

Hold
$RKLB
$HOOD
$RBRK
$MU
$HOOD
$GRAB
$MARA
$RIOT
$NVO
$RR
$ELOSE
$FLNC
$SEI
$PLTR

Sell
$CRCL
$ETH
$BMNR
$PL
$BKSY

Strong Sell
$RGTI
$OKLO
$IONQ
$QBTS
$QUBT

_

Explanations:

IBIT - Dumped to $104k, Bitcoin demand has been institutional, tariff fears overblown, and caused one of the biggest liquidation events in history. IMO post-liquidation is the best time to buy crypto. Polymarket still pricing in 55% chance to $130K EOY, but either way Bitcoin is always a good buy long term.

LTC - Down 24% in one day. People on 10X margin were likely frontrunning ETF and got liquidated one exchanges. Probably the best time I've seen to buy sub $98 because ETF will likely get approved when government shutdown stops.

WLAC - One of the best Neocloud SPAC IPO 1000% opportunities ever at $600m valuation because of their partnership with Fluidstack (the ones that helps WULF + CIFR get backstopped by GOOGL), and both of those are $4-7B. For context they're IPOing Q4, so you might need to wait ~2 months.

NBIS - Strongest conviction buy I've had, $400 aggressive PT for next year out of any Neocloud.

MP - National security risk for rare earths (+other rare materials stocks from exploration to Lithium batteries will likely perform well).

TSM - Backbone of all AI Infrastructure

_
Strong Buy Tax Harvesting Bucket of Stocks
(Might need to wait for next year)

ETOR - Way too oversold at $38, likely tax harvesting event going on compounding losses.

DKNG - Fundamentally a growth stock. Revenue numbers are insane given market cap but they're -15% yearly low. Likely compounded by tax harvesting unaffected by Macro.

SNAP - If you read my thesis, they're doing 1.3B quarterly revenue off a 13B marketcap... I'm convinced they will re-rate next year after lowering opex + increasing revenue from monetizing GCP storage. It's just a matter of when the market will price this in, but this is 1Y+ out. Post investors aren't patient. Again likely affected by EOY tax harvesting due to performance so far.

_

Buys

UPWK - Down 4.5% from yesterday, amazing fundamentals, ~800m y/y rev off 70%~ or 80~ gross margins thats growing, 200m buybacks, 2.2B market cap. Likely affected by Russell selloff.

CRDO - Data Center Trade, Mag7 uses them.

ALAB - Data Center Trade, Mag7 uses them.

AMZN - It's materially affected by 100% Chinese tariffs but they won't lose anything, since it gets passed onto the merchant or customers.
META - Probably less ad revenue by Chinese tariffs (eg. Chinese vendors like Temu, might not buy adspace), buy just based on -6% 1m low + Mag7 laggard with Amazon, I like it more.

UNH - Healthcare not really impacted 100% Chinese Tariff or rare earths.

SG - It's down likely due to bad performance + tax harvesting but it's almost 1 P/S lol.

TGT - I'd put it Strong Buy due to dividend catalyst + 5Y low just now, but haven't dont enough research on the effect on Chinese tariffs on the stock yet.

BULL - Growing at similar rates asHOOD, their fundamentals aren't exactly great for the market cap but you would invest based on retail customer base and the future potential for monetization.

FLY - I did a DD on this earlier but Medium Lift Payload likely to succeed with Northrop in 2027, it takes a TON of patience for a potential 1000% moonshot.

CIFR - Neocloud trade, always bullish. Like Meta X CRWV, more details likely to come soon.

WULF - Neocloud trade bullish.

IREN - Neocloud trade bullish. Their funding round was at some number 70%+ of their stock price if I remember correctly, which is a bullish tell (eg. NBIS and CIFR both hit that after their fundraising round).

GLXY - Part of Neocloud trade.

MRVL - It's not really priced in that it's growing 56% Y/Y like NVDA.

SMCI - Data center/stargate buildout

DELL -Data center/stargate buildout

_

Sell

CRCL - I will keep repeating this but COIN is better than Circle unless Circle can show they can monetize USDC outside from interest income. Because COIN literally gets 50% revenue sharing and on top of that 100% of the revenue on its platform.

ETH - I will keep repeating this but I will not personally buy above $3000. So even if it dips 16% (you can take the chance of a swing trade, back up to $4k+), there's always the chance it keeps cascading down below $3k and I've lost track of how many times this has happened in history.

BMNR - Tied with ETH fundamentally.

PL - Space stocks have gone up a lot, I think with stuff like RGTI and others, fundamentals haven't mirrored it's marketcap.

BKSY - Space stocks have gone up a lot, I think with stuff like RGTI and others, fundamentals haven't mirrored it's marketcap.

Strong Sell

RGTI - market cap extremely disconnected from valuation

OKLO - market cap extremely disconnected from valuation

IONQ - market cap disconnected from valuation

QBTS - market cap disconnected from valuation
-market cap disconnected from valuation

There's obviously a macro overhead with China x USA trade wars going on, but none of this was new information (Chinese rare earth export controls have been known for awhile + US has already been tarrifing Chinese goods)

We're heading into 2x more rate cuts priced in at 70% and large corrections to cleanse the overvalued froth and liquidate margins (eg. Crypto), will help the market go to higher highs. I will always recommend shares because with good companies, if you wait long enough they will likely outperform (but short term underperform if there's random macro risk).

Mid term I'm the most bullish on Neoclouds for the next year during the rapid AI buildout -> Robotics/Space likely next frontier after that.
周五收盘很 based(SPY 当日 -3.6%),一些想法和解释

Strong Buy
$IBIT
$LTC
$WLAC
$NBIS
$MP
$TSM
(明年)
$ETOR
$DKNG
$SNAP

Buy
$UPWK
$CRDO
$ALAB
$AMZN
$META
$UNH
$SG
$TGT
$BULL
$FLY
$CIFR
$WULF
$IREN
$GLXY
$SMCI
$DELL
$MRVL

Hold
$RKLB
$HOOD
$RBRK
$MU
$HOOD
$GRAB
$MARA
$RIOT
$NVO
$RR
$ELOSE
$FLNC
$SEI
$PLTR

Sell
$CRCL
$ETH
$BMNR
$PL
$BKSY

Strong Sell
$RGTI
$OKLO
$IONQ
$QBTS
$QUBT

_

解释:

IBIT - 跌到 $104k,Bitcoin 需求一直是机构驱动,关税恐慌被夸大,并造成了史上最大清算事件之一。IMO 清算后是买 crypto 的最好时机。Polymarket 仍然给年底到 $130K 55% 概率,但无论如何 Bitcoin 长期总是好买点。

LTC - 一天跌 24%。10X 杠杆的人很可能在 ETF 前抢跑,然后在交易所被清算。因为政府停摆结束后 ETF 很可能获批,所以低于 $98 可能是我见过最好的买点。

WLAC - 由于与 Fluidstack 合作,这是有史以来最好的 Neocloud SPAC IPO 1000% 机会之一,估值 $600m。Fluidstack 帮 WULF + CIFR 获得 $GOOGL 支撑,而那两家公司都是 $4-7B。背景是他们 Q4 IPO,所以你可能需要等 ~2 个月。

NBIS - 我最有信念的买入,所有 Neocloud 中我给明年最激进 $400 PT。

MP - 稀土的国家安全风险(以及从勘探到锂电池的其他稀有材料股票可能都会表现不错)。

TSM - 所有 AI 基础设施的骨干。

_
Strong Buy 税损收割股票篮子
(可能需要等到明年)

ETOR - $38 太超卖了,可能正有税损收割在加剧亏损。

DKNG - 基本面上是成长股。考虑到市值,收入数字很夸张,但它在年内低点 -15%。很可能被税损收割进一步压低,且不受宏观影响。

SNAP - 如果你读过我的 thesis,他们以 13B 市值做 1.3B 季度收入……我确信明年在降低 opex + 通过 GCP 存储变现提高收入后会重估。只是市场什么时候定价的问题,这是 1Y+。Post 投资者没有耐心。再次强调,可能受今年表现导致的年底税损收割影响。

_

Buys

UPWK - 比昨天跌 4.5%,基本面很好,~800m 年收入、70%~ 或 80~ 毛利率且仍在增长,200m 回购,2.2B 市值。可能受 Russell 抛售影响。

CRDO - 数据中心交易,Mag7 使用他们。

ALAB - 数据中心交易,Mag7 使用他们。

AMZN - 会受到 100% 中国关税实质影响,但它们不会损失什么,因为会转嫁给商家或客户。
META - 中国关税可能导致广告收入减少(比如 Temu 这类中国商家可能不买广告位),但基于 1 个月低点 -6% + 和 Amazon 一样是 Mag7 laggard,我更喜欢它。

UNH - Healthcare 基本不受 100% 中国关税或稀土影响。

SG - 可能因为表现差 + 税损收割下跌,但它几乎只有 1 P/S lol。

TGT - 因为分红催化 + 刚到 5 年低点,我会把它放 Strong Buy,但还没充分研究中国关税对它的影响。

BULL - 增速类似 HOOD,基本面相对市值不算特别好,但投资逻辑是散户客户基础和未来变现潜力。

FLY - 我之前做过 DD,中型运载 Payload 很可能 2027 年借 Northrop 成功,这是一个潜在 1000% moonshot,但需要极大耐心。

CIFR - Neocloud 交易,一直 bullish。像 Meta X CRWV,更多细节可能很快出来。

WULF - Neocloud 交易 bullish。

IREN - Neocloud 交易 bullish。如果我没记错,他们融资轮价格是股价的 70%+,这是 bullish 信号(例如 NBIS 和 CIFR 融资后都涨到了那里)。

GLXY - Neocloud 交易的一部分。

MRVL - 市场并没有真正计入它像 NVDA 一样同比增长 56%。

SMCI - 数据中心/stargate buildout。

DELL - 数据中心/stargate buildout。

_

Sell

CRCL - 我会一直重复,除非 Circle 能证明它能在利息收入之外变现 USDC,否则 COIN 比 Circle 更好。因为 COIN 字面上拿 50% 收入分成,而且平台上的收入 100% 归它。

ETH - 我也会一直重复,我个人不会在 $3000 以上买。所以即使它跌 16%(你可以尝试波段反弹到 $4k+),也总有继续瀑布跌破 $3k 的可能,而这种事历史上发生过太多次,我都数不清了。

BMNR - 基本面上和 ETH 绑定。

PL - 太空股涨了很多,我觉得像 RGTI 和其他类似标的,基本面没有跟上市值。

BKSY - 太空股涨了很多,我觉得像 RGTI 和其他类似标的,基本面没有跟上市值。

Strong Sell

RGTI - 市值和估值严重脱节

OKLO - 市值和估值严重脱节

IONQ - 市值和估值脱节

QBTS - 市值和估值脱节
-市值和估值脱节

当然,中美贸易战带来宏观压力,但这些都不是新信息(中国稀土出口管制已知很久 + 美国已经在对中国商品加关税)。

市场已经在以 70% 概率定价再降息 2 次,大幅回调会清理高估泡沫并清算杠杆(例如 Crypto),这会帮助市场走向更高高点。我永远推荐股票,因为好公司只要等得够久,很可能 outperform(但如果有随机宏观风险,短期可能 underperform)。

中期看,接下来一年 AI 快速 buildout 期间我最看好 Neoclouds -> Robotics/Space 可能是之后的下一个前沿。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The NeoCloud Thesis: Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

Why I'm putting $1.5M+ into Neoclouds, and why this might be a 200-300%+ return.

🔹 Buckets

Mag7 contracts: $CRWV, $NBIS ✅, $WULF, $CIFR

With compute: $IREN ✅, $BITF

Speculative: $WYFI, $GRRR ✅, $SLNH

Miners pivoting to HPC: $RIOT, $MARA, $CLSK, $HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 is AI compute strained, by design from $NVDA.

Trillions of capex that normally flowed through AWS, MSFT Azure, Google Cloud for traditional compute, will now funnel into NeoClouds when they cant handle new AI loads from Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, etc.

This is a once-a-decade opportunity, similar to the GPU arms race that made $NVDA a $4T company, on who powers the infra for AWS/Azure/etc for the next 5-10 years.

NBIS (17B from MSFT), CIFR / WULF (3B from GOOGL), CRWV (backstopped by NVDA) are all scaling hundreds of percent (NBIS went from 150M quarterly revenue to likely 1.5B+) with 60-80% gross profit margins.

This revenue growth is almost unheard in history. It's mainly because it's the wealthiest hyperscalers funneling capex into tiny companies.

NVDA / TSM (2022->): GPU for hyperscalers
CRDO / ALAB (2024 ->): hyperscaler wins -> parabolic growth.
NBIS/CIFR/IREN/etc (2025 - ) AWS/Azure/etc. -> parabolic growth from AI compute

This is how you get hundreds of % in return, not value investing in Paypal. Momentum riding the next generational companies.

So bear thesis usually involves around

- Execution Risk (before it was more speculative, now companies like NBIS have 4B+ to execute)

People can always worry about execution but Microsoft or Google would not be signing such large 5-10 year contracts without their own DD.

- Large interest rates (mainly looking at you CRWV), that's why NBIS, CIFR, and others have potential amazing returns.

You have 4B+ in funding for $NBIS at $138+ a share (when it's $107 now). And funding for $CIFR at $16+ a share when it's $11 now. ABOVE current price funding is a bullish tell.

- GPU depreciation (valid concern but it's almost like oil, even older models kept their value and still deliver equity).

- Valuation (I still think we're just getting started. If NBIS scales to 6B rev next year 75% gross margin), 26B marketcap is extremely tiny.

- NVDA potentially launching their own GPU-as-a-service and directly competing. Right now these Neoclouds are NVDA's answer to preventing concentration risk to Azure/AWS/etc.

- Custom hyperscaler chips like TPU, Trainium. But likely years away, since they're still begging for NVDA compute and signed 5Y-10Y contracts.

Regardless these neoclouds like Nebius are really undervalued relative to forward revenue/gross margins.

We're still very early. Make sure to ride the Neocloud wave like Crypto/TSLA with Trump election or NVDA with OpenAI release.

Of course this is highly speculative and I wouldn't YOLO full port calls, but Risk vs. Reward on these little 5-20B neoclouds powering AI workloads for Google/MSFT/etc, the cash cows of Mag7, is worth it. (Trade time Horizon: 8m - 1 year.)

This is the single best asymmetric AI infrastructure trade for 2025-2026.
NeoCloud Thesis:Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

为什么我投入 $1.5M+ 到 Neoclouds,以及为什么这可能带来 200-300%+ 回报。

🔹 分类

Mag7 合同:$CRWV$NBIS ✅、$WULF$CIFR

有 compute:$IREN ✅、$BITF

投机:$WYFI$GRRR ✅、$SLNH

矿企转 HPC:$RIOT$MARA$CLSK$HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 的 AI compute 被 $NVDA 有意卡紧。

过去流经 AWS、MSFT Azure、Google Cloud 的传统 compute capex,现在在它们无法承接 Anthropic、OpenAI、Gemini 等新增 AI 负载时,会 funnel 到 NeoClouds。

这是十年一次机会,类似 GPU 军备竞赛把 $NVDA 推成 $4T 公司。未来 5-10 年谁为 AWS/Azure 等提供基础设施,谁就有巨大上行。

NBIS(MSFT $17B)、CIFR/WULF(GOOGL $3B)、CRWV(NVDA 背书)都在以数百个百分点扩张,毛利率 60-80%。

这种收入增长历史上罕见,因为最富有的 hyperscalers 正在把 capex 打给小公司。

NVDA/TSM(2022->):hyperscalers 的 GPU
CRDO/ALAB(2024->):hyperscaler wins -> 爆发式增长
NBIS/CIFR/IREN 等(2025-):AWS/Azure 等 -> AI compute 爆发式增长

这才是获得几百 % 回报的方式,不是去价值投资 Paypal。

熊 thesis 包括执行风险、高利率、GPU 折旧、估值、NVDA 自己做 GPU-as-a-service,以及 TPU/Trainium 等自研芯片。

但这些 neoclouds 相对 forward revenue/gross margins 仍然被低估。

我们还很早。要像 Trump 当选后的 Crypto/TSLA,或 OpenAI 发布后的 NVDA 那样,坐上 Neocloud wave。

当然这高度投机,我不会全仓 YOLO calls,但这些 5-20B 小 neoclouds 为 Google/MSFT 等 Mag7 现金牛跑 AI workloads,风险回报值得。交易周期:8 个月到 1 年。

这是 2025-2026 最好的非对称 AI infrastructure trade。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1972016308662513748
❤️ 755 🔁 128 💬 66
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Sum1OnX Round $113, I'm down quite a bit on $LTC but because of the government shutdown there hasn't been any ETF approvals.

All the leverage traders got liquidated, so now it helps with higher highs now on the bright side.
@Sum1OnX 大概 $113,我在 $LTC 上亏了不少,但因为政府停摆,还没有任何 ETF 获批。

所有杠杆交易者都被清算了,所以好的一面是,这现在有助于之后创更高高点。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@chobiboni2 @antwithastick Definitely some sort of margin liquidation lol I don’t think anyone would sell that volume at -21%
@chobiboni2 @antwithastick 肯定是某种保证金清算 lol 我不觉得有人会在 -21% 时卖出那种成交量
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@GrassKaniKani ah that's great information if you see this on X or listen to the news.

I would guess people will panic buy their positions back the moment once there's some WSJ article.
@GrassKaniKani 啊,如果你是在 X 上看到这个或听新闻听到的,那是很好的信息。

我猜一旦有 WSJ 文章出来,人们会立刻恐慌性把仓位买回来。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@GrassKaniKani Oh was there some video of Trump saying that? If so, would be a good thing for recovery.
@GrassKaniKani 哦,有 Trump 这么说的视频吗?如果有,对恢复会是好事。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@LibertadEterno Dec/Jan options are likely fine, not sure about November... Don't really recommend short term expires if you're doing options.
@LibertadEterno Dec/Jan 期权可能没问题,November 我不确定……如果你做期权,不太建议短到期。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@antwithastick Same with $IREN, IREN went down 21% then going back positive +2% was the craziest thing I've seen.

After hours low-liquidity exaggerates a ton of movements, and it's great for dip buying.
@antwithastick $IREN 也是一样,IREN 先跌 21% 然后回到 +2%,这是我见过最疯狂的事。

盘后低流动性会大幅夸张很多走势,也很适合逢低买入。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Getting Vietnam flashbacks.

Jokes aside, markets dropped 3.65%+ after Trump tarrifs Chinese imports by 100% and restricts the export of critical software to China.

This surprise event was rational repricing but also catalyzed by fear + margin calls (after hours, with $IREN dropping 21% for example, or $BTC dropping to $107k).

What this typically foreshadows is slower growth and higher inflation (lower rate cut odds).

However, Polymarket and Fed futures data still shows 70-72% of 3 rate cuts by 2025. Midterm elections next year are also generally bullish for stocks. And we're approaching end of season seasonality, which is typically the best for stocks.

And of course, many stocks dropped in crossfire without any direct exposure, such as $UNH or $DKNG (eg. Draftkings has nothing to do with China, imports, etc. since it's US sports related, but fell 9.4%)

TLDR: likely a short term tariff shock, mild macro risk, and a overall sell-off from fear, but into recovery.

Now that markets are closed, a lot of money can be made is in times of low liquidity high-spread like after-hours/overnight (during earlier tariffs, $HOOD dropped from $45 to $28 overnight then went on a massive rally to $100+).

Random events like these are why I don't recommend options as positions can be nuked up in an instant.

If you have cash positions, go bargain hunting for extreme selloffs, eg. $CIFR dropping 16% to $14, instead of panic selling your own positions.

Otherwise, things like these are usually short term from shock, and we'll likely see a recovery frontrunning rate cut in late October. That of course if the stock isn't materially impacted from China revenue unlike $QLCM, $NKE, $MU, $CDNS, etc.

(I didn't expect the extent of the reaction, lost a decent amount today, but will hold positions).
越南 PTSD 回来了。

玩笑归玩笑,Trump 对中国进口加征 100% 关税并限制向中国出口关键软件后,市场跌了 3.65%+。

这次突发事件带来理性重定价,但也被恐惧 + 保证金追缴催化(盘后,比如 $IREN 跌 21%,或 $BTC 跌到 $107k)。

这通常预示着增长放缓和通胀更高(降息概率下降)。

不过 Polymarket 和 Fed futures 数据仍显示,到 2025 年有 70-72% 概率降息 3 次。明年的中期选举通常也利好股票。我们也正在接近年底季节性,而这通常是股票最好的时期。

当然,很多没有直接敞口的股票也被波及,比如 $UNH$DKNG(例如 Draftkings 和中国、进口等毫无关系,因为它是美国体育相关,但跌了 9.4%)。

TLDR:可能是短期关税冲击、温和宏观风险,以及恐惧导致的整体抛售,但会走向恢复。

现在市场已经收盘,很多钱是在盘后/隔夜这种低流动性、高价差时赚到的(早前关税时期,$HOOD 一夜从 $45 跌到 $28,然后大幅反弹到 $100+)。

这类随机事件就是为什么我不建议用期权,因为仓位可能瞬间被炸掉。

如果你持有现金仓位,就去找极端抛售的便宜货,比如 $CIFR 跌 16% 到 $14,而不是恐慌卖掉自己的仓位。

否则,这类事情通常是冲击导致的短期影响,我们很可能会看到 10 月下旬提前交易降息的恢复。当然前提是该股票不像 $QLCM$NKE$MU$CDNS 等那样,受到中国收入的实质影响。

(我没想到反应会这么大,今天亏了不少,但会继续持有仓位。)
❤️ 101 🔁 5 💬 17
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 Hope everything recovers Monday, its a celebration for the bears right now lol
@soulbiri1 希望周一一切都恢复,现在是 bears 的庆祝时间 lol
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mrazqkuki Well that’s a part of it but a 7% drop off rare earths restrictions + tariffs when Draftking, a sports betting website for NFL and NBA, has nothing to do with China made me laugh a bit.

Obviously whole market went down too, but that aside it’s still growing + doomdropped
@mrazqkuki 嗯这是一部分原因,但因为稀土限制 + 关税跌 7%,而 Draftking 这种 NFL 和 NBA 体育投注平台和中国毫无关系,这让我有点想笑。

显然整个市场也跌了,但撇开这个,它仍在增长 + 被恐慌砸下去。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ThetaHarvest Even if US escalates a trade war with China, I don’t think $UNH or $DKNG cares at all, so took advantage of the dip.

Bottom wise, no clue.

I just think two more rate cuts and seasonality is an extremely strong tailwind and like the last tariff drop, it will sort itself out
@ThetaHarvest 即使美国升级和中国的贸易战,我也不觉得 $UNH$DKNG 会在意,所以我利用了这次下跌。

底部在哪里,不知道。

我只是觉得再降息两次和季节性是极强顺风,就像上次关税下跌一样,它会自己修复。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@iPheNoX9 Yeah I’ll cost average. Genuinely don’t understand the drop aside from near-mid term uptrend with lower volatility

Retail trading volumes should be up a ton.

I’ll try my thesis against the market when they release earnings on the 23rd.
@iPheNoX9 对,我会成本均摊。除了近中期上行趋势伴随更低波动外,我真不理解这次下跌。

散户交易量应该大幅上升。

等他们 23 号发布财报时,我会用我的 thesis 去和市场对赌。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Neat_Lama lol I just rolled a dice, nothing to be proud of.
@Neat_Lama lol 我只是掷了个骰子,没什么值得骄傲的。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@itsthesquonky Yeah after hours
@itsthesquonky 对,盘后
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@a_do120 Any neocloud is ideal for put selling right now
@a_do120 现在任何 neocloud 都适合卖 put
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
You’re right it’s not 1:1 correlated, I should have done better at pointing out the nuance. So the correct way phrase is $VIRT is very profitable in extended periods of volatility (when VIX is elevated) and it gets priced in the eventually.

So in a volatile downturn, $VIRT performs better, is currently undervalued, and serves as a hedge, which was my thesis.

I’m convinced market is wrong even if VIX isn’t high, retail trading activity is strong if you look at Robinhood’s data. ($VIRT handles ~25% of retail flows), forward p/e is really low.
你说得对,它不是 1:1 相关,我应该更好指出这个细节。所以正确表述是:$VIRT 在长期波动时期(VIX 升高时)非常赚钱,最终会被市场定价进去。

所以在波动性下跌中,$VIRT 表现更好,目前被低估,并可作为对冲,这是我的 thesis。

即使 VIX 不高,我也确信市场错了;看 Robinhood 数据,散户交易活动很强。($VIRT 处理约 25% 散户流),forward p/e 很低。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@_visionarius Both are strong buys, $NBIS especially given their asymmetrical upside at this marketcap.

Their forward revenue is hilariously mind blowing.
@_visionarius 两个都是 strong buys,尤其是 $NBIS,考虑到这个市值下它的不对称上行空间。

他们的前瞻收入夸张到令人震惊。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@juremyu I wrote more DD in the thread, I don’t want to take the risk of dilution in the morning.

Biotech stuff is inherently extremely volatile and risky, but I just wanted to trade the low float.

Also not my domain expertise otherwise I’d put in $1M if I really believed in it.
@juremyu 我在线程里写了更多 DD,我不想承担早上稀释的风险。

Biotech 本质上极其波动、风险很高,但我只是想交易低流通。

而且这也不是我的专业领域,否则如果我真相信它,我会投 $1M。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
I have no words… +$37K on $SPRB in 2 hours ($21K realized). Ended up taking profit on most.

It’s not much to me but I just find this amusing given the short timeframe and had nobody to share it with.

I’ll hold $30k worth to see where it goes. https://t.co/ywK3ozncPA
我无话可说……2 小时在 $SPRB 上 +$37K($21K 已实现)。最后大部分都止盈了。

这对我来说不算多,但考虑到时间这么短,我只是觉得很好玩,而且没人可以分享。

我会留 $30k 看看它会怎么走。https://t.co/ywK3ozncPA
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I was looking at $SPRB after @MartinShkreli posted about it and it’s TA-ERT, breakthrough enzyme therapy replacement.

Just from a quick search if SPRB’s TA-ERT is approved and they capture 10-15% market share longer term ($180–$270M ARR) of $1.4B US market... Realistic fair value today could be ~$280m-630m MC from 2-3x rev calculations.

Obviously there’s a lot of risk from clinical failures, commercialization, to dilution but a $85M market cap looks promising?

(disclosure I bought $50k worth just as a high risk gamble)

Obviously I’m not an expert in biotech and this is outside my domain, which is why I wanted to see if anyone else with any domain knowledge had feedback or red flags.
我是在 @MartinShkreli 发了 $SPRB 之后开始看的,它的 TA-ERT 是突破性的酶替代疗法。

简单搜了一下,如果 SPRB 的 TA-ERT 获批,并且长期拿到美国 $1.4B 市场的 10-15% 份额($180-$270M ARR),按 2-3x 收入估算,今天合理市值可能在 ~$280m-630m。

当然风险很多,从临床失败、商业化到稀释都有,但 $85M 市值看起来有点意思?

(披露:我买了 $50k,当成高风险赌博)

显然我不是 biotech 专家,这也不在我的能力圈,所以想看看有没有这个领域的人能给反馈或指出红旗。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1975294794370064468
❤️ 80 🔁 1 💬 18
打开原推
💬 引用
Monday October 6th Market Close Thoughts:

- $NBIS extremely good dip buy. Down 2.38% after rising 5.78% in the morning. All other Neoclouds from $IREN to $CIFR held their 4%-14%+ gains. Nebius likely influenced by option flow, should play catchup soon and I stand by $225 PT.

- $AMZN, $META two Mag7 that should outperform next 2-3 months and play catchup with the rest. Especially Amazon.

- $SNAP, $RDDT two good recovery plays. Snapchat especially because of the revenue monetization changes. If you have the patience for shares for a year or two, I'd expect a 50%+ return, just whenever the market wants to price it in. Not everyone has patience and opportunity cost using the funds in $SNAP instead of Neoclouds might not be worth.

Reddit I've maintained that the citations from ChatGPT is a BS reason for a 29% sell-off so I bought into it.

- $SPRB caught everyone's attention. I do expect it to keep rising to a $150-$200m marketcap from $75m but it's like playing Russian Roulette, usually dilution happens 2-3 days after a major event.

- Stuff like $RKLB, just need to hold lol. It's genuinely overvalued even if it's highest conviction 5Y long but at this point it might pull a $PLTR.

- $AMD x OpenAI deal heavily bullish for semi industry. I expected $TSM, $ASML, energy stocks and Neoclouds to get a boost from AI infra buildout. Main negative ones were $CRWV, because of $NVDA dependencies and obviously NVDA, but Neoclouds aren't locked into one player, and they already have 5-10+ year contracts locked in.

It just puts a tiny dent in the $NVDA moat idea but nothing material yet.

I personally think AMD might pull an $ORCL where it dips past rally, and then ends up pulling an $AVGO when markets start pricing in forward revenue.

Then again, I don't know where OpenAI is getting all this money to promise Oracle, AMD, etc. all these ten or hundred billion dollar deals if they're valued at 500B lol.

- Gold rallying to ATH every day just signals that $BTC is always a good buy, even at $123k, if it ends up becoming a hedge against inflation. It's close to 1/10th the market-cap.

- $LTC still a great buy because of ETF approval. There's the government shutdown so people just forgot it hasn't happened yet, but should get approved eventually.

- $VIRT great buy at $32.5, I'd cost average around this range (sorry if you bought calls at $36, my positions are down 35% or so). But again it's an asymmetrical hedge to VIX (VIX IV very high for hedging, VIRT is undervalued ~6.3 forward p/e with buybacks an low IV), so even if positions are down, your other stocks should go up to balance it out.

- Still looking into other beneficiaries of buildouts from energy stocks, small caps like $EOSE, memory like $MU, etc. that followers recommended. I try not to talk about something much until I'm informed myself.

- If you're on leverage or going long, now is the time to do it until January. 3x rate cut, market probably frontrunning Oct rate cut now.
10 月 6 日周一收盘想法:

- $NBIS 是极好的逢低买入。早上上涨 5.78% 后收跌 2.38%。其他 Neoclouds 从 $IREN$CIFR 都守住了 4%-14%+ 的涨幅。Nebius 可能受期权流影响,应该很快补涨,我坚持 $225 PT。

- $AMZN$META 是未来 2-3 个月应该 outperform 并补涨的两个 Mag7。尤其是 Amazon。

- $SNAP$RDDT 是两个不错的恢复交易。Snapchat 尤其如此,因为收入变现发生了变化。如果你有耐心持股一两年,我预计有 50%+ 回报,只看市场什么时候定价。但不是所有人都有耐心,而且把资金放在 $SNAP 而不是 Neoclouds 的机会成本可能不值得。

Reddit 我一直认为 ChatGPT 引用是导致 29% 抛售的烂理由,所以我买进了。

- $SPRB 吸引了所有人的注意。我确实预计它会从 $75m 继续涨到 $150-$200m 市值,但这像玩 Russian Roulette,通常重大事件后 2-3 天会发生稀释。

- 像 $RKLB 这种,持有就好了 lol。它即使是我 5Y 最高信念多头,也确实高估了,但现在可能会走出 $PLTR 那种走势。

- $AMD x OpenAI 交易对半导体行业非常 bullish。我预计 $TSM$ASML、能源股和 Neoclouds 会从 AI infra buildout 受益。主要负面的是 $CRWV,因为它依赖 $NVDA,当然还有 NVDA;但 Neoclouds 不锁定单一玩家,而且他们已经锁定 5-10+ 年合同。

这只是对 $NVDA 护城河逻辑造成一点小凹痕,目前还不实质。

我个人觉得 AMD 可能会走出 $ORCL 那种走势:先跌回涨幅,然后当市场开始定价前瞻收入时,最终走成 $AVGO

话说回来,我不知道 OpenAI 到底从哪拿这么多钱,能承诺给 Oracle、AMD 等这些数百亿或上千亿美元交易,如果他们估值才 500B lol。

- Gold 每天涨到 ATH,只是在提示 $BTC 永远是好买点,即使在 $123k,如果它最终成为通胀对冲。它市值接近黄金的 1/10。

- $LTC 因为 ETF 批准仍是好买点。现在有政府停摆,所以大家忘了它还没发生,但最终应该会获批。

- $VIRT 在 $32.5 是好买点,我会在这个区间成本均摊(如果你在 $36 买了 calls 抱歉,我的仓位也跌了大概 35%)。但再次强调,它是对 VIX 的不对称对冲(VIX IV 很高,对冲贵;VIRT 被低估,forward p/e ~6.3,有回购且 IV 低),所以即使仓位下跌,你其他股票也应该上涨来平衡。

- 仍在研究粉丝推荐的其他 buildout 受益者,比如能源股、小盘 $EOSE、存储 $MU 等。直到我自己了解清楚之前,我尽量不多谈。

- 如果你用杠杆或做多,现在到 1 月是时候。3x 降息,市场现在可能在抢跑 10 月降息。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The Snapchat Thesis: How a 🐶💩 Stock Re-Rated from Sell to Buy.

$SNAP flipped the switch, making their biggest expense a revenue stream.

There's two things that SNAP needed to do to grow vs. $META, $RDDT.

and... Snapchat finally did it, well one of two.

That is:

1. Monetize Memories (Storage) - potential 50%%+ upside.

2. Compete vs Tiktok with a public web app + Tiktok-style feed (1000%+ upside)

Snapchat finally flipped the switch with #1 and made their biggest OPEX expense a revenue stream: They monetized storage and deleted wasteful storage.
_

Snap brings in $1.35B revenue a quarter and is growing at healthy rates with 1B+ MAU. Despite large revenue numbers, they're not profitable. Why?

Because countless people like myself have stored GBs of videos taken from 10 years ago. Snapchat has been paying Google Cloud to store all of that for free. Google Cloud costs just eats so much into its net profits every quarter.

So with this recent change - charging users (like iCloud) for storage, which is a huge new revenue stream,

On top of reducing OpEx by a massive margin, Snapchat just got a rerating.

_

Cloud Cost Breakdown

Snap’s cloud infrastructure is one of its largest costs, historically over $2.4B annually (cost of revenue).

Most of that is storage + bandwidth for features like Memories and videos.

Memories + video archives ≈ 35-40% of cloud spend (estimates)

~90% of users under the 5GB cap (no cost change), but 10% heavy users hold the majority of stored data

_

If Snap deletes ~50% of existing stored data (non-paying users’ old videos/photos)

Result:

40% of $2.4B = $960M cloud cost baseline tied to Memories

50% reduction in heavy-user storage ~ $480M savings (aggressive est.)

After accounting for data migration, partial reallocation, misc:

-> Snap may realistically realize ~40% of that, or ~$180–200M OPEX saved annually

This goes straight to operating profit + FCF, since it’s a pure cost cut.
_

Revenue from Paid Storage (Small User Base Scenario)

Assuming a small number of users pay-far less than iCloud’s 60% adoption:

MAU: ~900 million, Paying users: 2% (~18 million)

Average plan: $2.49/month (most on $1.99 or $3.99 tiers)

ARPU: ~$30/year

Revenue = 18M × $30 = $540M per year

Subtract ~$100M in hosting -> $440M net

This revenue is recurring, high-margin, and adds directly to FCF.
_

Estimated Combined Annual Impact:

OPEX savings (cloud) = +$190M

Paid storage revenue= +$540M

Storage costs (COGS) = –$100M

Net FCF improvement= +$630M

_

Valuation Rerating

If the market rerates Snap based on ~$850M sustainable FCF:

Apply a 35× EV/FCF multiple (typical for growth tech with improving margins)

EV ≈ $30B → Market cap ≈ $31–33B

Aggressive Multiple FCF est. $850M
_

Market Cap

25 × $21.25B EV ~ $22–23B mc (~$13–14/share)

30 x $25.5B EV ~ $26B mc (~$15–16/share)

35 x $29.75B EV ~ $31–32B mc (~$19–20/share)

From ~$8.50 today -> potential +50–100%+ upside within 12–18 months, assuming:

- Execution is smooth (no major user backlash, but really don't think users would quit.) Personally I'd just pay for it since I used Snap 5-10 years ago but don't want my data deleted.

- 3 Fed rate cuts compress discount rates

- Investors credit forward FCF

Of course, all of this only happens 1 year from now. Also, I'm going off a lot of assumptions, such as 2% of users will pay (eg. Dropbox), vs. ICloud has 60% of users.

_

Just thought I'd give a shoutout to @fossinvest, a small account I found while doing DD. They also did the math but used more aggressive calculations + similar idea, I'll give them credit for the image.
_

I could be wrong with speculating the numbers (eg. $100-150M opex, and 1% paying users, but even with this FCF gets a huge boost).

Either way, this is the largest material change SNAP has made for both revenue generation and operational expense cuts in history and it deserves a re-rating after.

Market and hedge funds will now start to price this in since they're forward looking, but will take some time to digest the news.
Snapchat Thesis:一只烂股如何从 Sell 重估到 Buy。

$SNAP 打开了开关,把自己最大的成本变成了收入流。

SNAP 要相对 $META$RDDT 增长,需要做两件事,而 Snapchat 终于做成了其中之一:

1. 变现 Memories(存储)- 潜在 50%+ 上行。

2. 用公开 web app + Tiktok 风格 feed 和 Tiktok 竞争(1000%+ 上行)。

Snapchat 终于把 #1 做了:把最大 OPEX 之一变成收入流,开始对存储收费,并删除浪费性存储。
_

Snap 每季度收入 $1.35B,MAU 1B+,增长健康,但仍不赚钱。为什么?

因为像我这样的人存了 10 年前拍的 GB 级视频,Snapchat 一直在免费替大家用 Google Cloud 存这些东西。Google Cloud 成本每季吃掉大量净利润。

现在它像 iCloud 一样对存储收费,一方面创造巨大新收入流,一方面大幅降低 OpEx,因此 Snapchat 应该被重新定价。
_

云成本大致拆解:Snap 云基础设施是最大成本之一,历史上每年超过 $2.4B(收入成本)。Memories + 视频归档估计占云支出的 35-40%。约 90% 用户低于 5GB 上限,但 10% 重度用户持有大部分数据。

如果 Snap 删除约 50% 现有存储数据(不付费用户的旧视频/照片),与 Memories 相关的 $960M 云成本基线可能省下一大块。扣除迁移、再分配等后,现实中每年可能节省约 $180-200M OPEX,直接进 operating profit + FCF。

付费存储收入方面,如果只有 2% MAU 付费(约 18M),平均 $2.49/月,ARPU 约 $30/年,收入约 $540M,扣除 ~$100M hosting 后净额约 $440M。

合计年度影响可能是:OPEX 节省 +$190M,付费存储收入 +$540M,存储成本 -$100M,净 FCF 改善 +$630M。
_

如果市场按约 $850M 可持续 FCF 重估 Snap,给 25x-35x EV/FCF,对应市值可能从现在约 $8.50/股上到 $13-$20/股,12-18 个月潜在 +50-100%+。

前提是执行顺利、没有严重用户反弹、降息压低贴现率、投资者认可 forward FCF。

当然这些可能要一年后才体现,而且我用了不少假设,比如 2% 用户付费(Dropbox 量级),而 iCloud 付费率高得多。

无论如何,这是 SNAP 历史上对收入和运营费用影响最大的实质变化,之后值得 re-rating。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1975205333254447126
❤️ 154 🔁 6 💬 25
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MqwantyMqwanty I gave $BTC at $106k before the first run to $124. Then $ETH at $1.6k before the runup to $4k.

I’m still long bitcoin, no eth postions, long $LTC at $113

They were posted on my Reddit instead of X, I just joined here recently
@MqwantyMqwanty 我在 $106k 给过 $BTC,之后第一波涨到 $124。然后在 $1.6k 给过 $ETH,之后涨到 $4k。

我仍然 long bitcoin,没有 eth 仓位,long $LTC at $113

这些发在我的 Reddit 上,不是在 X,我最近才来这里。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MqwantyMqwanty I just happened to be more interested in crypto/fintech than AI.

Bitcoin and fiat currencies were just such an interesting topic of interest to me compared to deep learning, so I ended up following my passion.
@MqwantyMqwanty 我只是碰巧对 crypto/fintech 比 AI 更感兴趣。

相比 deep learning,Bitcoin 和法币对我来说是更有意思的话题,所以我最后追随了自己的兴趣。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MqwantyMqwanty Nope, ended up going straight to industry.

I did contribute a decent amount to covnets while I was in the AI space though.
@MqwantyMqwanty 没有,最后直接进了行业。

不过我在 AI 领域时,对 covnets 做过不少贡献。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
TLDR: Might go up to $500 temporary strike if there's no dilution just because of TA-ERT catalyst. But it's playing Russian Roulette on dilution days.

So had some more time to look into things:

Fair value $SPRB market cap is = ~$150–200m. ($85M now). In OP's post they claimed $500 PT, which is fair if company doesn't dilute.

However:

SPRB has $16.4M in cash equivalents, June 30, 2025, dilution with new shares seems inevitable just because of low cahs balance. Price rise was due to low float + good news (there's no short interest like .16% so not a short squeeze)

After issuing new shares + dilution (Market cap at $150m-$200m might normalize share price to ~$50-75), don't really see the $500 figure if dilution is included.

We might see another 100%+ runup just because of limited float toward that $500 mark (like how $BULL ran to a $60B MC off low float), but I would be against holding it long term because of russian roulette dilution on a random day.

Either way, I like playing Russian Roulette. Welcome any counterpoints
TLDR:如果没有稀释,只因为 TA-ERT 催化,可能会临时涨到 $500 行权价附近。但这是在稀释日期上玩 Russian Roulette。

所以我又花了点时间研究:

$SPRB 公允市值 = ~$150–200m。(现在 $85M)。OP 帖里说 $500 PT,如果公司不稀释,这个可以说合理。

但是:

SPRB 截至 2025 年 6 月 30 日现金及等价物只有 $16.4M,考虑到现金余额低,发行新股稀释似乎不可避免。上涨是因为低流通 + 好消息(空头兴趣只有 .16%,所以不是 short squeeze)。

发行新股 + 稀释后(市值 $150m-$200m 可能让股价正常化到 ~$50-75),如果计入稀释,我不太看得到 $500 这个数字。

因为流通盘有限,我们可能会看到它再涨 100%+,朝 $500 走(就像 $BULL 依靠低流通跑到 $60B MC),但我反对长期持有,因为随机某天稀释就像 Russian Roulette。

无论如何,我喜欢玩 Russian Roulette。欢迎任何反驳。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@rocket5010 I have PTSD from $SMCI when they got into the S&P 500 then had a SEC investigation.
@rocket5010 $SMCI 进 S&P 500 后又被 SEC 调查,给我留下 PTSD。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@SpaceSector001 $RKLB is my highest conviction stock over 5 years but it's really overvalued tbh.

I just learned to not trade this anymore and hold.
@SpaceSector001 $RKLB 是我 5 年维度最高信念的股票,但说实话它真的高估。

我只是学会了别再交易它,持有就好。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MqwantyMqwanty Fintech, Crypto, AI.

I have some patents/papers in crypto, semiconductors, + AI space so related areas (eg. software, tech) I know enough to give directional opinions.

Stuff outside like biotech, construction, real estate, agriculture, etc. I wouldn't know well.
@MqwantyMqwanty Fintech、Crypto、AI。

我在 crypto、semiconductors 和 AI 领域有一些专利/论文,所以相关领域(比如 software、tech)我足够了解,可以给方向性观点。

外面的东西比如 biotech、construction、real estate、agriculture 等,我就不太懂。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@dubiousnoob @tr90605549 I’m not the type of person to blindly follow domain authority, I’d like to learn more details on the thought process + numerical calculations to have a peace of mind about price targets
@dubiousnoob @tr90605549 我不是那种盲目相信领域权威的人,我想了解更多思考过程 + 数字计算细节,这样才会对目标价安心。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@tr90605549 Oh I’m just trying to crowdsource information on $SPRB to learn more, not share a directional opinion.

I genuinely have zero clue about biotech.
@tr90605549 哦,我只是想众包 $SPRB 的信息来学习更多,不是在分享方向性观点。

我真的完全不懂 biotech。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
I was looking at $SPRB after @MartinShkreli posted about it and it’s TA-ERT, breakthrough enzyme therapy replacement.

Just from a quick search if SPRB’s TA-ERT is approved and they capture 10-15% market share longer term ($180–$270M ARR) of $1.4B US market... Realistic fair value today could be ~$280m-630m MC from 2-3x rev calculations.

Obviously there’s a lot of risk from clinical failures, commercialization, to dilution but a $85M market cap looks promising?

(disclosure I bought $50k worth just as a high risk gamble)

Obviously I’m not an expert in biotech and this is outside my domain, which is why I wanted to see if anyone else with any domain knowledge had feedback or red flags.
我是在 @MartinShkreli 发了 $SPRB 和它的 TA-ERT、突破性酶替代疗法后开始看的。

快速搜了一下,如果 SPRB 的 TA-ERT 获批,并且长期拿到 $1.4B 美国市场的 10-15% 份额($180–$270M ARR)……按 2-3x 收入计算,今天现实的公允价值可能是 ~$280m-630m MC。

显然,从临床失败、商业化到稀释都有很多风险,但 $85M 市值看起来有希望?

(披露:我买了 $50k,只是作为高风险赌博)

显然我不是 biotech 专家,这也超出我的领域,所以想看看有没有其他有领域知识的人给反馈或指出红旗。
引用原推@MartinShkreli
long $SPRB. my price target is $500. rare disease is my specialty. the ERT for Sanfilippo will be approved (CMC notwithstanding) and be the new standard of care.
做多 $SPRB。我的目标价是 $500。罕见病是我的专长。Sanfilippo 的 ERT 会获批(先不谈 CMC),并成为新的标准疗法。
https://x.com/MartinShkreli/status/1975241784369262649
❤️ 186 🔁 5 💬 18
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Crypto_LogicD @Sandeman52 @sunxliao @babyfolio Nice! Let’s celebrate again when you hit $100k.
@Crypto_LogicD @Sandeman52 @sunxliao @babyfolio 不错!等你到 $100k 时我们再庆祝一次。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@rioferdy838 Fundamentally $SNAP had nothing going for it earlier because they kept focusing on AR and glasses.

Stuff like that makes them actually profitable like this move is an actual catalyst.
@rioferdy838 从基本面看,$SNAP 之前没什么亮点,因为他们一直专注 AR 和眼镜。

像这种举措会让他们真正盈利,是实际催化。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@cmachdop Thanks, thought I'd have some fun with this since it's an update $SNAP needed to do from day 1.

Would still recommend other stocks over Snapchat still but it does deserve a re-rating to $10+ imo
@cmachdop 谢谢,我只是想借这个玩一玩,因为这是 $SNAP 从第一天就该做的更新。

我仍然会推荐 Snapchat 以外的其他股票,但 imo 它确实应该重估到 $10+。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@fossinvest I'm all for encouraging more non-paywalled DD from newer contributors when I can. Thanks for posting.

Only downside is Snap's memory monetization is 1 year out materially. Markets are usually forward looking, but may wait for more confirmation before fully pricing it in
@fossinvest 只要可以,我都支持鼓励更多新贡献者发非付费墙 DD。谢谢你发帖。

唯一缺点是 Snap 的 memories 变现要到 1 年后才会有实质影响。市场通常前瞻,但可能会等更多确认后才完全定价。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@whyp3rk I used 2% as a fair estimate for $SNAP.

Dropbox ~2.6% are paid users, Notion 4%, Google 10-15%-ish, ICloud was 60%.

I'd probably personally pay for Snap to not delete my high school memories lol. It's too annoying to migrate out 100 at a time.
@whyp3rk 我把 2% 作为 $SNAP 的合理估计。

Dropbox ~2.6% 是付费用户,Notion 4%,Google 大概 10-15%,iCloud 是 60%。

我个人可能会为了不让 Snap 删除我的高中 memories 而付费 lol。一次只能迁出 100 个太烦了。
❤️ 5 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@robswainept I still hate $SNAP from the bottom of my heart and would prefer other stocks any day of the week.

But numbers wise, the new update reduces OpEx by a ton and increases revenue, but clearly hasn't been priced in yet.

Obviously a bit early, so probably just a Buy.
@robswainept 我心底里仍然讨厌 $SNAP,任何一天都会更偏好其他股票。

但从数字看,新更新大幅降低 OpEx 并增加收入,而且显然还没被定价。

当然还有点早,所以可能只是 Buy。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
The Snapchat Thesis: How a 🐶💩 Stock Re-Rated from Sell to Buy.

$SNAP flipped the switch, making their biggest expense a revenue stream.

There's two things that SNAP needed to do to grow vs. $META, $RDDT.

and... Snapchat finally did it, well one of two.

That is:

1. Monetize Memories (Storage) - potential 50%%+ upside.

2. Compete vs Tiktok with a public web app + Tiktok-style feed (1000%+ upside)

Snapchat finally flipped the switch with #1 and made their biggest OPEX expense a revenue stream: They monetized storage and deleted wasteful storage.
_

Snap brings in $1.35B revenue a quarter and is growing at healthy rates with 1B+ MAU. Despite large revenue numbers, they're not profitable. Why?

Because countless people like myself have stored GBs of videos taken from 10 years ago. Snapchat has been paying Google Cloud to store all of that for free. Google Cloud costs just eats so much into its net profits every quarter.

So with this recent change - charging users (like iCloud) for storage, which is a huge new revenue stream,

On top of reducing OpEx by a massive margin, Snapchat just got a rerating.

_

Cloud Cost Breakdown

Snap’s cloud infrastructure is one of its largest costs, historically over $2.4B annually (cost of revenue).

Most of that is storage + bandwidth for features like Memories and videos.

Memories + video archives ≈ 35-40% of cloud spend (estimates)

~90% of users under the 5GB cap (no cost change), but 10% heavy users hold the majority of stored data

_

If Snap deletes ~50% of existing stored data (non-paying users’ old videos/photos)

Result:

40% of $2.4B = $960M cloud cost baseline tied to Memories

50% reduction in heavy-user storage ~ $480M savings (aggressive est.)

After accounting for data migration, partial reallocation, misc:

-> Snap may realistically realize ~40% of that, or ~$180–200M OPEX saved annually

This goes straight to operating profit + FCF, since it’s a pure cost cut.
_

Revenue from Paid Storage (Small User Base Scenario)

Assuming a small number of users pay-far less than iCloud’s 60% adoption:

MAU: ~900 million, Paying users: 2% (~18 million)

Average plan: $2.49/month (most on $1.99 or $3.99 tiers)

ARPU: ~$30/year

Revenue = 18M × $30 = $540M per year

Subtract ~$100M in hosting -> $440M net

This revenue is recurring, high-margin, and adds directly to FCF.
_

Estimated Combined Annual Impact:

OPEX savings (cloud) = +$190M

Paid storage revenue= +$540M

Storage costs (COGS) = –$100M

Net FCF improvement= +$630M

_

Valuation Rerating

If the market rerates Snap based on ~$850M sustainable FCF:

Apply a 35× EV/FCF multiple (typical for growth tech with improving margins)

EV ≈ $30B → Market cap ≈ $31–33B

Aggressive Multiple FCF est. $850M
_

Market Cap

25 × $21.25B EV ~ $22–23B mc (~$13–14/share)

30 x $25.5B EV ~ $26B mc (~$15–16/share)

35 x $29.75B EV ~ $31–32B mc (~$19–20/share)

From ~$8.50 today -> potential +50–100%+ upside within 12–18 months, assuming:

- Execution is smooth (no major user backlash, but really don't think users would quit.) Personally I'd just pay for it since I used Snap 5-10 years ago but don't want my data deleted.

- 3 Fed rate cuts compress discount rates

- Investors credit forward FCF

Of course, all of this only happens 1 year from now. Also, I'm going off a lot of assumptions, such as 2% of users will pay (eg. Dropbox), vs. ICloud has 60% of users.

_

Just thought I'd give a shoutout to @fossinvest, a small account I found while doing DD. They also did the math but used more aggressive calculations + similar idea, I'll give them credit for the image.
_

I could be wrong with speculating the numbers (eg. $100-150M opex, and 1% paying users, but even with this FCF gets a huge boost).

Either way, this is the largest material change SNAP has made for both revenue generation and operational expense cuts in history and it deserves a re-rating after.

Market and hedge funds will now start to price this in since they're forward looking, but will take some time to digest the news.
Snapchat Thesis:一只 🐶💩 股票如何从 Sell 重估到 Buy。

$SNAP 打开了开关,把最大开支变成收入流。

SNAP 想相对 $META$RDDT 增长,需要做两件事。

而……Snapchat 终于做到了,至少做到了其中一件。

也就是:

1. Memories(存储)变现 - 潜在 50%+ 上行。

2. 用公开 web app + Tiktok 风格信息流对抗 Tiktok(1000%+ 上行)

Snapchat 终于在 #1 上打开开关,把最大 OPEX 开支变成收入流:他们让存储变现,并删除浪费性的存储。
_

Snap 每季度收入 $1.35B,且以健康速度增长,MAU 1B+。尽管收入数字很大,他们却不盈利。为什么?

因为像我这样无数人存了 10 年前拍的 GB 级视频。Snapchat 一直在付钱给 Google Cloud 免费存这些东西。Google Cloud 成本每季度吃掉了大量净利润。

所以这次变化——像 iCloud 一样向用户收取存储费,这是一个巨大的新收入流,

同时大幅降低 OpEx,Snapchat 刚刚获得了一次重估。
_

云成本拆解

Snap 的云基础设施是其最大成本之一,历史上每年超过 $2.4B(收入成本)。

其中大部分是 Memories 和视频等功能的存储 + 带宽。

Memories + 视频归档 ≈ 云支出的 35-40%(估算)

~90% 用户低于 5GB 上限(成本不变),但 10% 重度用户持有大部分存储数据。
_

如果 Snap 删除约 50% 现有存储数据(非付费用户的旧视频/照片)

结果:

$2.4B 的 40% = $960M 与 Memories 相关的云成本基线

重度用户存储减少 50% ~ 节省 $480M(激进估计)

扣除数据迁移、部分重分配、杂项后:

-> Snap 现实中可能实现约 40%,即每年节省 ~$180–200M OPEX

这会直接进入经营利润 + FCF,因为这是纯成本削减。
_

付费存储收入(小用户群情景)

假设只有少量用户付费,远低于 iCloud 的 60% 采用率:

MAU:~9 亿,付费用户:2%(~1800 万)

平均套餐:$2.49/月(大多在 $1.99 或 $3.99 档)

ARPU:~$30/年

收入 = 18M × $30 = 每年 $540M

减去 ~$100M 托管成本 -> $440M 净额

这项收入是经常性、高利润率,并直接增加 FCF。
_

估算年度综合影响:

OPEX 节省(云)= +$190M

付费存储收入 = +$540M

存储成本(COGS)= –$100M

净 FCF 改善 = +$630M

_

估值重估

如果市场基于 ~$850M 可持续 FCF 重估 Snap:

采用 35× EV/FCF 倍数(改善利润率的成长科技常见倍数)

EV ≈ $30B → 市值 ≈ $31–33B

激进倍数 FCF 估算 $850M
_

Market Cap

25 × $21.25B EV ~ $22–23B mc(~$13–14/share)

30 x $25.5B EV ~ $26B mc(~$15–16/share)

35 x $29.75B EV ~ $31–32B mc(~$19–20/share)

从今天 ~$8.50 -> 12–18 个月内潜在 +50–100%+ 上行,前提是:

- 执行顺利(没有重大用户反弹,但我真不觉得用户会退出。)我个人会付费,因为我 5-10 年前用过 Snap,但不想数据被删。

- Fed 降息 3 次压低折现率

- 投资者认可前瞻 FCF

当然,这一切要到 1 年后才发生。另外,我用了很多假设,比如 2% 用户会付费(例如 Dropbox),而 iCloud 是 60% 用户。
_

顺便 shoutout 一下 @fossinvest,这是我做 DD 时发现的小账号。他们也算过账,但用的是更激进的计算 + 类似思路,图片 credit 给他们。
_

我对数字的猜测可能是错的(比如 $100-150M opex,和 1% 付费用户,但即使这样 FCF 也会大幅提升)。

无论如何,这是 SNAP 历史上在收入生成和运营费用削减方面最大的实质性变化,之后理应重估。

市场和对冲基金会开始把它定价进去,因为它们是前瞻的,但消化新闻需要一些时间。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The NeoCloud Thesis: Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

Why I'm putting $1.5M+ into Neoclouds, and why this might be a 200-300%+ return.

🔹 Buckets

Mag7 contracts: $CRWV, $NBIS ✅, $WULF, $CIFR

With compute: $IREN ✅, $BITF

Speculative: $WYFI, $GRRR ✅, $SLNH

Miners pivoting to HPC: $RIOT, $MARA, $CLSK, $HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 is AI compute strained, by design from $NVDA.

Trillions of capex that normally flowed through AWS, MSFT Azure, Google Cloud for traditional compute, will now funnel into NeoClouds when they cant handle new AI loads from Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, etc.

This is a once-a-decade opportunity, similar to the GPU arms race that made $NVDA a $4T company, on who powers the infra for AWS/Azure/etc for the next 5-10 years.

NBIS (17B from MSFT), CIFR / WULF (3B from GOOGL), CRWV (backstopped by NVDA) are all scaling hundreds of percent (NBIS went from 150M quarterly revenue to likely 1.5B+) with 60-80% gross profit margins.

This revenue growth is almost unheard in history. It's mainly because it's the wealthiest hyperscalers funneling capex into tiny companies.

NVDA / TSM (2022->): GPU for hyperscalers
CRDO / ALAB (2024 ->): hyperscaler wins -> parabolic growth.
NBIS/CIFR/IREN/etc (2025 - ) AWS/Azure/etc. -> parabolic growth from AI compute

This is how you get hundreds of % in return, not value investing in Paypal. Momentum riding the next generational companies.

So bear thesis usually involves around

- Execution Risk (before it was more speculative, now companies like NBIS have 4B+ to execute)

People can always worry about execution but Microsoft or Google would not be signing such large 5-10 year contracts without their own DD.

- Large interest rates (mainly looking at you CRWV), that's why NBIS, CIFR, and others have potential amazing returns.

You have 4B+ in funding for $NBIS at $138+ a share (when it's $107 now). And funding for $CIFR at $16+ a share when it's $11 now. ABOVE current price funding is a bullish tell.

- GPU depreciation (valid concern but it's almost like oil, even older models kept their value and still deliver equity).

- Valuation (I still think we're just getting started. If NBIS scales to 6B rev next year 75% gross margin), 26B marketcap is extremely tiny.

- NVDA potentially launching their own GPU-as-a-service and directly competing. Right now these Neoclouds are NVDA's answer to preventing concentration risk to Azure/AWS/etc.

- Custom hyperscaler chips like TPU, Trainium. But likely years away, since they're still begging for NVDA compute and signed 5Y-10Y contracts.

Regardless these neoclouds like Nebius are really undervalued relative to forward revenue/gross margins.

We're still very early. Make sure to ride the Neocloud wave like Crypto/TSLA with Trump election or NVDA with OpenAI release.

Of course this is highly speculative and I wouldn't YOLO full port calls, but Risk vs. Reward on these little 5-20B neoclouds powering AI workloads for Google/MSFT/etc, the cash cows of Mag7, is worth it. (Trade time Horizon: 8m - 1 year.)

This is the single best asymmetric AI infrastructure trade for 2025-2026.
NeoCloud Thesis:Hyperscaler Capex Funnel

为什么我投入 $1.5M+ 到 Neoclouds,以及为什么这可能带来 200-300%+ 回报。

🔹 分类

Mag7 合同:$CRWV$NBIS ✅、$WULF$CIFR

有 compute:$IREN ✅、$BITF

投机:$WYFI$GRRR ✅、$SLNH

矿企转 HPC:$RIOT$MARA$CLSK$HUT

Thesis:

Mag7 的 AI compute 被 $NVDA 有意卡紧。

过去流经 AWS、MSFT Azure、Google Cloud 的传统 compute capex,现在在它们无法承接 Anthropic、OpenAI、Gemini 等新增 AI 负载时,会 funnel 到 NeoClouds。

这是十年一次机会,类似 GPU 军备竞赛把 $NVDA 推成 $4T 公司。未来 5-10 年谁为 AWS/Azure 等提供基础设施,谁就有巨大上行。

NBIS(MSFT $17B)、CIFR/WULF(GOOGL $3B)、CRWV(NVDA 背书)都在以数百个百分点扩张,毛利率 60-80%。

这种收入增长历史上罕见,因为最富有的 hyperscalers 正在把 capex 打给小公司。

NVDA/TSM(2022->):hyperscalers 的 GPU
CRDO/ALAB(2024->):hyperscaler wins -> 爆发式增长
NBIS/CIFR/IREN 等(2025-):AWS/Azure 等 -> AI compute 爆发式增长

这才是获得几百 % 回报的方式,不是去价值投资 Paypal。

熊 thesis 包括执行风险、高利率、GPU 折旧、估值、NVDA 自己做 GPU-as-a-service,以及 TPU/Trainium 等自研芯片。

但这些 neoclouds 相对 forward revenue/gross margins 仍然被低估。

我们还很早。要像 Trump 当选后的 Crypto/TSLA,或 OpenAI 发布后的 NVDA 那样,坐上 Neocloud wave。

当然这高度投机,我不会全仓 YOLO calls,但这些 5-20B 小 neoclouds 为 Google/MSFT 等 Mag7 现金牛跑 AI workloads,风险回报值得。交易周期:8 个月到 1 年。

这是 2025-2026 最好的非对称 AI infrastructure trade。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1972016308662513748
❤️ 130 🔁 11 💬 12
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@yield_addicted For the deal, I'd say net negative: $NVDA, $CRWV (Nvda centric)

Net positive (almost everything else): $AMD, NBIS, CIFR, IREN, TSM, etc.

The 2.5% drop makes sense off moat narrative changes.
@yield_addicted 对这笔交易,我会说净负面:$NVDA$CRWV(以 Nvda 为中心)

净正面(几乎其他所有):$AMD、NBIS、CIFR、IREN、TSM 等。

护城河叙事变化导致 2.5% 下跌是合理的。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@xarettis Not too late. This is even more bullish for AI infra players.

Stuff like $CIFR, $NBIS, IREN, BITF are great. Obviously with $AMD, TSM + energy companies, etc. gets used more.

Main downside is NVDA narrative and maybe CRWV as the only NVIDIA-centric neocloud.
@xarettis 还不晚。这对 AI infra 玩家更 bullish。

$CIFR$NBIS、IREN、BITF 都很好。显然 $AMD、TSM + 能源公司等也会被更多使用。

主要下行是 NVDA 叙事,也许还有 CRWV,作为唯一以 NVIDIA 为中心的 neocloud。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@SebastianS79509 Yeah congrats to the $AMD holders who believed all this time lol. It's been a wild ride watching it
@SebastianS79509 是的,恭喜一直相信的 $AMD holders lol。看着它一路走来太疯狂了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I personally don't recommend chasing $AMD at a 30% spike, because it might end up like $ORCL where it got sold off market open (pre-market has less liquidity too). So maybe there's better buying opportunities.

But could always go higher because these changes are pretty material, who knows.

Regardless need more time to process the news
我个人不建议在 $AMD 暴涨 30% 时追,因为它可能最终像 $ORCL 那样,开盘后被卖掉(盘前流动性也更差)。所以也许会有更好的买点。

但也可能继续涨,因为这些变化相当实质,谁知道呢。

无论如何,需要更多时间消化新闻。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
$AMD is about to get a huge re-rating from forward earnings + narrative changes from the $10Bs+ deal with OpenAI

Forward revenue: They're currently doing 7.69B/Q, if we assume 10B/Y, it's quite material how much this adds.

(32.5% - 65%+ increase in forward revenue based on tens of billions figure). So a 15-20%+ bump is justified.

Narrative changes: AMD as a credible alternative to $NVDA for AI inference is starting to look real.

The bigger question is whether OpenAI has the money to do this like with $ORCL, but that aside, forward revenue will spike, great material changes.
$AMD 将因为与 OpenAI 的 $10Bs+ 交易带来的前瞻盈利 + 叙事变化,获得巨大重估。

前瞻收入:他们目前每季度做 7.69B,如果假设每年增加 10B,这个增量非常实质。

(基于数百亿美元这个说法,前瞻收入增加 32.5% - 65%+)。所以 15-20%+ 的上涨是合理的。

叙事变化:AMD 作为 $NVDA 在 AI inference 上可信替代品这件事,开始看起来是真的。

更大的问题是 OpenAI 是否像 $ORCL 那样有钱做这件事,但撇开这一点,前瞻收入会飙升,是很好的实质性变化。
❤️ 155 🔁 17 💬 13
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 im sorry im getting too distracted by Marin to think about $ROOT fundamentals.

I didnt watch dress up darling yet so i need to watch it first before giving commentary
@soulbiri1 抱歉,我被 Marin 分心太多,没法想 $ROOT 基本面。

我还没看 dress up darling,所以需要先看完才能评论。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mrazqkuki @triforcerytp I guess that's a strategy too but usually if I do OTM put selling weekly, I'd try and make it expire worthless and that's usually below the strike.

That strike would likely work well with $NBIS 1M out. But again, there's many different strategies,
@mrazqkuki @triforcerytp 我想这也是一种策略,但通常如果我每周卖 OTM put,我会尽量让它变成废纸到期,那通常意味着低于行权价。

那个行权价放在 1M out 的 $NBIS 上可能会很好。但同样,策略有很多种。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@triforcerytp It's just a personal trading style, since I sell stuff on peaks. It just gives me a peace of mind I can buy back weekly calls (likely still at a profit) if a stock goes up more than I expect and sell it.

If I were holding 1Y+ I'd just follow @DeepValueBagger for monthlies.
@triforcerytp 这只是个人交易风格,因为我会在高点卖东西。如果股票涨得超出预期,我可以买回 weekly calls(可能仍然有利润)再卖掉,这让我安心。

如果我是持有 1Y+,我就会跟 @DeepValueBagger 做 monthlies。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@zikilu333 @Drdebuneko 円の購買力は下がるので、通常は現金ではなく資産として持っておくのが望ましいです。

もし現金で持っていた場合、だいたい1%程度失うことになります。
@zikilu333 @Drdebuneko 日元购买力会下降,所以通常最好不是持有现金,而是持有资产。

如果你持有现金,大概会损失 1% 左右。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@babyfolio Yeah $TSLA was always a great stock to CC’s on.

Put/Call writing on miners is probably the most profitable set of stocks someone can do right now (fundamentally sound + high IV)
@babyfolio 对,$TSLA 一直是很适合卖 CC 的股票。

矿商上的 Put/Call writing 可能是现在最赚钱的一组股票(基本面扎实 + 高 IV)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Shai_Hulud01 Glad to hear it. I do this for my own portfolio too.

Just to give a live example sold $170 strike for $3K+ premium/week for $NBIS. https://t.co/espB3Hxpv6
@Shai_Hulud01 很高兴听到。我自己的组合也这么做。

举个实时例子,卖了 $NBIS 的 $170 strike,每周拿 $3K+ premium。https://t.co/espB3Hxpv6
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ThetaHarvest Hyperscaler contract hasn’t been announced yet
@ThetaHarvest Hyperscaler 合同还没宣布。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@da_Governator I wrote a little summary in the quoted post on how read each IV %.

Main nuance I forgot to add was that closer to expiry IV increases a lot of times so it’s a good thing if you’re writing options, doesn’t need to be a major event.
@da_Governator 我在引用帖里写了一个小总结,讲怎么读每个 IV %。

我忘记补充的主要细节是,越接近到期,IV 很多时候会升高,所以如果你在卖期权,这是好事,不一定需要重大事件。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@rioferdy838 Yeah that's a valid strategy.

Most passive investors don't want their shares called away, so learning how much a stock moves a day * days left + buffer % room is generally the formula to follow for writing CCs (if there's no major events).
@rioferdy838 对,这是有效策略。

大多数被动投资者不想股票被行权卖走,所以学习一只股票每天波动多少 * 剩余天数 + buffer % 空间,通常就是卖 CC 时该遵循的公式(如果没有重大事件)。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推

2025年9月

↩️ 回复
@Neat_Lama it's perfect!
@Neat_Lama 完美!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm at a loss for words! The fridge print is the best thing I've seen on X since I started 2m ago.

I have a fun time helping others and sharing my thoughts on stuff from $NBIS to $HIMS before any breakouts.

Thanks for the support everyone and @Neat_Lama for the fun vibes!
我都不知道说什么了!这个冰箱打印是我 2m 前开始用 X 以来见过最棒的东西。

我很享受帮助别人,并分享从 $NBIS$HIMS 等 breakout 前的想法。

感谢大家的支持,也感谢 @Neat_Lama 带来的有趣氛围!
引用原推@Neat_Lama
@aleabitoreddit The AleaBito-Senpai portfolio always hits! I'm so honored to be officially be recognized as your Kohai that I had to tape this bad Larry to my refrigerator lol https://t.co/pU1qBphFDw
@aleabitoreddit AleaBito-Senpai 组合总是能打!能被你正式认定为 Kohai 我太荣幸了,所以我只好把这个大宝贝贴到冰箱上哈哈 https://t.co/pU1qBphFDw
https://x.com/Neat_Lama/status/1972804496213606568
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@lunapuma28 @robswainept cost averaging. I think it's undervalued
@lunapuma28 @robswainept 成本均摊。我觉得它被低估了。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@robswainept Sure I'll do an Ethereum writeup this weekend. It's a really long thesis, but mainly has to do how L2 don't enough deliver value to ETH mainnet compatible to their tx and how there's too many competitors (eg. Solana) or EVM compatible L1s that siphon off network activity.
@robswainept 当然,我这周末会写一篇 Ethereum。这个 thesis 很长,但主要和 L2 没有相对于它们的 tx 向 ETH mainnet 交付足够价值,以及竞争者太多(比如 Solana)或 EVM 兼容 L1 吸走网络活动有关。
❤️ 2 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 solid anime analogy for $NBIS
@soulbiri1$NBIS 来说是扎实的 anime analogy
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I'm long Bitcoin at $114k, but sell Ethereum at $4.2k. I don't think I said to buy ETH anywhere above $3k+.

$MSTR has historically been trading between 1.6-2x NAV during Bitcoin runs. Recently it's been short MSTR/long BTC, so NAV is under 1.5x and there's potential for recorrection on a Bitcoin run (which usually goes up in Oct).

Long term, MSTR probably has the highest likelihood of being nationalized into the US treasury given how much BTC they have. I don't see ETH OR BMNR being a strategic importance for the US gov.

Otherwise I'd just recommend longing the underlying asset like BTC, or ETH if you really believed in it compared to buying the asset.
我在 $114k long Bitcoin,但在 $4.2k sell Ethereum。我不记得自己有说过在 $3k+ 以上买 ETH。

$MSTR 历史上在 Bitcoin 上涨期间通常以 1.6-2x NAV 交易。最近是 short MSTR/long BTC,所以 NAV 低于 1.5x,如果 Bitcoin 上涨(通常 10 月会上涨),有重新修正的潜力。

长期看,考虑到 MSTR 持有这么多 BTC,它可能是最有可能被国有化进美国财政部的。我看不出 ETH 或 BMNR 对美国政府有什么战略重要性。

否则我会建议直接 long 底层资产,比如 BTC;如果你真的相信 ETH,那就 long ETH,而不是买相关资产。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@bj21QB Yeah, I'm a short-medium term trader! I try to time bottoms and typically take short term capital gains tax on everything.

Otherwise, it really wouldn't matter what price you might buy some like $IBIT at since I still think it goes $500k+.
@bj21QB 对,我是短中期交易者!我会尝试择底,通常所有东西都承担短期资本利得税。

否则,你在什么价格买 $IBIT 这类东西其实没那么重要,因为我仍然觉得它会到 $500k+。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@strandedpsgr Uh I treat it more like $COIN at this point where you can probably buy $RDDT in the $100's again next drawndown.

Or with Coinbase $150 &lt;-&gt; $350 few month trade, but this trend might change after SPY inclusion.
@strandedpsgr 呃,我现在更像看 $COIN 一样看它,你可能可以在下一次回撤时重新在 $100 多买 $RDDT

或者像 Coinbase 那种 $150 <-> $350 的几个月交易,但进入 SPY 后这个趋势可能会改变。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
If you wanted to chase more gains, I'd sell your Mag7 for hypergrowth stocks like $NBIS.

If you have a family to take care of and can't take any risk, there's nothing bad about holding SPY/QQQ/Mag7 and just compounding more slowly over time. Answer depends on your risk tolerance.

I have full conviction in $NBIS but there's always the <1% black swan scenario you need to consider.

There could always be a 80% drawdown in something like $HOOD but something like Mag7 would have a less drawdown.

Also nobody said you had to full port! You can always allocate like 25% of your port to a stock
如果你想追求更多收益,我会把你的 Mag7 卖掉,换成 $NBIS 这样的 hypergrowth 股票。

如果你有家庭要照顾,不能承担任何风险,那持有 SPY/QQQ/Mag7、长期慢慢复利也没什么不好。答案取决于你的风险承受能力。

我对 $NBIS 有完全信念,但你总要考虑 <1% 的黑天鹅场景。

$HOOD 这种东西总可能有 80% 回撤,但 Mag7 这类回撤会小一些。

而且没人说你必须 full port!你总可以把组合的 25% 配到一只股票上。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I mean I had $ASTS after the earnings drop to like $37 and sold it for 26%+ or so on recovery? I don't know enough about the stock though to give an informed opinion though.

In terms of space stocks, I'd prefer $RKLB just cause they do full stack like starlink type flatelite to medium lift payload launches and can scale to SpaceX's 350B valuation in 5-10 years.
我的意思是,我在财报后跌到大概 $37 时持有 $ASTS,并在恢复时以 26%+ 左右卖掉?但我对这只股票了解不够,不能给出有信息量的观点。

太空股里,我更喜欢 $RKLB,因为他们像 starlink 类型 flatelite 到中型运载发射那样做 full stack,并且 5-10 年内可以扩展到 SpaceX 的 350B 估值。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@thename1424559 Honestly I've been guilty of swing trading it from 13 -&gt; 15, etc recently. And I remember doing arbitrage on $BULL too

But fundamentally, they have the retail base like $HOOD, but on a smaller scale so I can see it being a good long term investment playing follow the leader. https://t.co/KcUN6mau1j
@thename1424559 老实说,我最近也有罪,做过 13 -> 15 等的波段交易。我也记得在 $BULL 上做过套利。

但从基本面看,他们像 $HOOD 一样有散户基础,只是规模更小,所以我能看到它作为 follow the leader 的长期投资不错。https://t.co/KcUN6mau1j
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@JuveCapital I will need to look into $GPUS. I've seen it be mentioned time to time but I haven't looked closer into it.

I do like throwing money at random small caps if followers have high conviction.
@JuveCapital 我需要研究一下 $GPUS。我时不时看到有人提,但还没仔细看。

如果粉丝有高信念,我确实喜欢把钱投到一些随机小盘股上。
❤️ 9 🔁 1 💬 5
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@LiquidB_B There's cult stocks like $PLTR, $TSLA that you don't short. BC regular ppl will put their paychecks into them without looking at fundamentals.

I had TSLA at $150 but wouldn't ever touch at these levels and would sell it imo. Better opportunities elsewhere.
@LiquidB_B 有些 cult stocks 比如 $PLTR$TSLA,你不要做空。因为普通人会不看基本面,把工资投进去。

我在 $150 持有过 TSLA,但这些价位我绝不会碰,imo 会卖。其他地方有更好机会。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ElectroSalamanc Thanks! I see a lot of these Buy/Sell style posts but nobody really posts why.

So I thought it would help to post reasoning behind each one based on today's price movements + catalysts.

Little things like this help people learn swing trading + bottom timing over time.
@ElectroSalamanc 谢谢!我看到很多 Buy/Sell 风格帖子,但没人真正解释为什么。

所以我觉得基于今天的价格走势 + 催化,发一下每个背后的理由会有帮助。

这种小东西会帮助人们随着时间学习 swing trading + bottom timing。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@robswainept How $LTC is $106 when there's an ETF approval Oct 2nd is an enigma to me.
@robswainept 在 10 月 2 日有 ETF 批准的情况下,$LTC 怎么会是 $106,这对我来说是个谜。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MakhmudovAkbar Yeah lol, I think the market is completely pricing $ETOR wrong and it's probably a lot of tax harvesting going on right now.

I try and find stuff people don't really touch much like ETOR and VIRT and they usually play out well. Feels like everyone on X is on $BMNR or $NBIS
@MakhmudovAkbar 对 lol,我觉得市场完全错误定价 $ETOR,现在可能有很多税损收割。

我会尽量找一些人们不太碰的东西,比如 ETOR 和 VIRT,它们通常表现不错。感觉 X 上所有人都在 $BMNR$NBIS
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Neat_Lama Same here! One of my $CIFR strikes is up $12k since Friday.

Still think it rallies to $16. https://t.co/4IbuWFsvaA
@Neat_Lama 我也是!我一个 $CIFR strike 从周五以来涨了 $12k。

仍然觉得它会涨到 $16。https://t.co/4IbuWFsvaA
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@chickvestor I mean I bought $IREN on Friday at $40 and still have it. Personally not a fan of buying after a 9.72% day so this is based on today's prices

I try to time the bottom a lot but if you're holding for a year, doesn't matter if you buy now and wait for $70

https://t.co/ls4L5BDxgq
@chickvestor 我的意思是,我周五在 $40 买了 $IREN,现在还持有。个人不喜欢在一天涨 9.72% 后买,所以这是基于今天价格。

我经常尝试择底,但如果你持有一年,现在买然后等 $70 也没关系。

https://t.co/ls4L5BDxgq
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Eh I normally don't do calls but risk/reward looks good to me on miners

Added $CIFR $30k worth of Jan calls $11 strike on the 5% drop to $11.

Added $NBIS $100k worth of calls, this was just one of the strikes on the 4.6% drop to $103.

Added $IREN shares $40.13 on the 13% drop. https://t.co/OP9EYjg34h
呃,我平时不怎么做 calls,但矿股这里的风险回报看起来不错。

$CIFR 跌 5% 到 $11 时,加了 $30k 的 1 月 $11 行权价 calls。

$NBIS 跌 4.6% 到 $103 时,加了 $100k 的 calls,这只是其中一个行权价。

$IREN 跌 13% 时,以 $40.13 加了股票。 https://t.co/OP9EYjg34h
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1971599988204634554
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@camrinneiss First glance, I $GAP since fundamentals are good and it benefits from end of year holiday seasonality like $LULU.

Also I like banana republic cashmere stuff so a bit biased. But obviously need more time to delve into tariff impact a bit more on forward revenue
@camrinneiss 第一眼看,我选 $GAP,因为基本面好,而且像 $LULU 一样受益于年底假日季节性。

另外我喜欢 banana republic 的 cashmere,所以有点偏见。但显然需要更多时间深入研究关税对前瞻收入的影响。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Monday Market Close Thoughts:

Extremely Strong Buy
$NBIS
$ETOR
$LTC
$VIRT

Buy
$AMZN
$SMCI
$TGT
$CRM
$TSM
$CRDO
$SG
$CIFR
$LULU
$SLNH
$ORCL
$MSTR
$RIOT
$MARA

Hold
$IREN
$HIMS
$RKLB
$PYPL
$MRVL
$IBIT
$UPWK
$GRAB
$ALAB
$ASTS
$SOFI
$NVDA
$NVO

Sell
$HOOD
$TSLA
$RDDT
$CRCL
$PLTR
$BMNR

Strong Sell
$OKLO
$QBTS
$IONQ

_

Feel free to disagree but these are just my thoughts

Strong Buy Explanations

- Bought ~$70K of Virtu calls, 28% IV and just 6.6 forward p/e is undervalued.

- Always DCA NBIS on the road to $200 on every dip.

-ETOR is just way too undervalued at $39 imo. I don't even know how it hit that. If I remember correctly $700M+ cash pile on a 3.3B market cap, compounding similar rate to IBKR instead of HOOD/BULL but just straight line down below IPO price.

- LTC ETF approval in 3-4 days with 95% odds. Great buy now unless it gets rejected ofc.

Buy Explanations

- Bought $50k+ Amazon calls today, looks more promising for recovery on the dip to $219+. Benefits from end of year seasonality from Oct - > Jan. Prime Day Oct 8th. Could dip again which is why it's good to DCA and not an extremely strong buy.

- SMCI still projecting 55% forward revenue growth and it's kinda undervalued doing 5B+ quarterly revenue lol

- TGT dividend in another month. There's some Target event but don't really think it matters as much as Amazon prime day.

- CRM just bottoming chart wise, fundamentals not really changed

- TSM better at $273, it's always a good buy but not a screaming buy like sub $250

- CRDO/ALAB, both dipped a lot. More of a correction rather than crash, which is why it's a decent buy agian.

- SG, idk. I just like their salad and think risk reward at $8 is good considering they were trading $40 not too long ago.

- CIFR, GOOGL backstopped now just execution. I'd buy on dips but today was a big rally

- LULU benefits from Oct -> Jan end of year seasonality with holiday shopping.

- SLNH, apparently waves have been going around X. Pretty small $100m marketcap or so, risk reward seems okay.

- ORCL, they're a large shareholder of TikTok US at a discounted 14B valuation and have tons of forward rev from OpenAI/MSFT. It's one of those things where it probably dips after earnings like AVGO then pulls off a face ripping rally a month or two later.

- MSTR, Bitcoin does well in Oct. Been shorted so Nav prem is probably around 1.4x-1.5x compared to 2x like during hype waves

-RIOT/MARA pivoted to HPC so I like them more than before

For hold stocks nothing really changed

- Hood, I personally day trade so don't be offended if I think it's a good sell $130+ on a 12.27% increase day.

- TSLA, cult stock detached from fundamentals

- RDDT, I had a lot back at $100 wouldn't buy at $240 or 45B marketcap now so would probably sell/tri.

- CRCL, just buy Coinbase instead

- PLTR, cult stock detached from fundamentals, large part of their profit is just interest income

- BMNR, just buy ETH if you want but ETH is a strong sell at $4k+

Strong Sell

Anything carrying barely any rev with 10-20B+ marketcap I think is amusing . Props to you if you held OKLO from $8 to $116 though.
周一收盘想法:

Extremely Strong Buy
$NBIS
$ETOR
$LTC
$VIRT

Buy
$AMZN
$SMCI
$TGT
$CRM
$TSM
$CRDO
$SG
$CIFR
$LULU
$SLNH
$ORCL
$MSTR
$RIOT
$MARA

Hold
$IREN
$HIMS
$RKLB
$PYPL
$MRVL
$IBIT
$UPWK
$GRAB
$ALAB
$ASTS
$SOFI
$NVDA
$NVO

Sell
$HOOD
$TSLA
$RDDT
$CRCL
$PLTR
$BMNR

Strong Sell
$OKLO
$QBTS
$IONQ

_

欢迎不同意,这只是我的想法。

Strong Buy 解释

- 买了 ~$70K Virtu calls,28% IV 和只有 6.6 forward p/e,被低估。

- 在 $200 路上,每次下跌都 DCA NBIS。

-ETOR 在 $39 imo 太低估了。我甚至不知道它怎么跌到那里的。如果我没记错,3.3B 市值里有 $700M+ 现金,复利速度类似 IBKR 而不是 HOOD/BULL,但一路直线跌破 IPO 价。

- LTC ETF 3-4 天后批准,赔率 95%。除非当然被拒,现在是很好的买点。

Buy 解释

- 今天买了 $50k+ Amazon calls,跌到 $219+ 后看起来恢复更有希望。受益于 Oct -> Jan 年底季节性。Prime Day 10 月 8 日。可能还会再跌,所以适合 DCA,而不是 extremely strong buy。

- SMCI 仍预计前瞻收入增长 55%,而且它每季度收入 5B+,有点低估 lol。

- TGT 还有一个月分红。有个 Target 活动,但我不觉得它像 Amazon prime day 那么重要。

- CRM 从图形上看正在筑底,基本面没什么变化。

- TSM 在 $273 更好,它总是好买点,但不像低于 $250 那样 screaming buy。

- CRDO/ALAB 都跌了很多。更像修正而不是崩盘,所以又是不错买点。

- SG,不知道。我只是喜欢他们的沙拉,而且考虑到不久前还在 $40 交易,我觉得 $8 风险回报好。

- CIFR,有 GOOGL 支撑,现在只剩执行。我会逢低买,但今天涨很多。

- LULU 受益于 Oct -> Jan 年底假日购物季节性。

- SLNH, apparently waves 最近在 X 上传开。大概 $100m 小市值,风险回报看起来还可以。

- ORCL,他们以折价 $14B 估值持有 TikTok US 大量股份,并且有 OpenAI/MSFT 的大量前瞻收入。它可能像 AVGO 一样财报后下跌,然后一两个月后拉出暴力上涨。

- MSTR,Bitcoin 10 月表现好。它被做空,所以 Nav premium 可能约 1.4x-1.5x,而不是 hype wave 时的 2x。

-RIOT/MARA 转向 HPC,所以我比以前更喜欢它们。

Hold 股票没什么真正变化。

- Hood,我个人做日内交易,所以如果我觉得一天涨 12.27% 后 $130+ 是不错卖点,请别介意。

- TSLA,脱离基本面的 cult stock。

- RDDT,我在 $100 时持有很多,现在 $240 或 45B 市值不会买,所以可能会卖/减仓。

- CRCL,直接买 Coinbase 更好。

- PLTR,脱离基本面的 cult stock,它们利润很大一部分只是利息收入。

- BMNR,如果你想买就直接买 ETH,但 ETH 在 $4k+ 是 strong sell。

Strong Sell

任何几乎没收入却有 10-20B+ 市值的东西,我都觉得有趣。不过如果你从 $8 持有 OKLO 到 $116,那确实佩服。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
As you know, I do value investing too like with Upwork (+52% in 2 months, P/E 7-> 11.5).

An interesting stock is $VIRT as an asymmetrical volatility hedge, a stock barely anyone talks about. Clean asymmetry to balance $IREN / $NBIS.

6.6 forward p/e, 5.38b MC, Virtu ~ Citadel, and does market making for a large percentage of retail orders.

Current price: $35.19

Again, nobody is really talks about this stock, so I like testing my a new thesis against the market sometimes. I could be wrong and would love feedback too!

This is a light DD on why I'm building light call + share positions:

1/ Rate cuts don’t nuke earnings. Virtu’s term loans are floating (financing +2.5%). total $1.545B. −75 bps ≈ ~12M yr interest savings (not all funding prices down but most are floating tho)

2/ Using Q2 as an anchor (EPS $1.65 / adj $1.53; NI ~$293M; rev ~44% YoY).

If we est EPS 10–12% for lower VIX + ~2.6% for net rate drag -> $1.31–$1.34 EPS/qtr -> $5.22–$5.35 next 12 months

$35.21 / $5.35 = 6.58x forward p/e
$35.21 / $5.22 = 6.74x forward p/e

Even if we overshoot because of good Q2 quarter as an anchor without rate cuts, EPS $4.78 -> 7.4× forward p/e, is still extremely good.

Other websites like Value Investing estimate forward p/e to be 6.99 - 8 forward p/e.

3/ There's ~$303M authorization remaining for buybacks off a small 5.2B marketcap.

If vol normalizes or spikes, expect both EPS and the multiple to lift from today’s ~6–7×. If not, it's undervalued and you can sit back with buybacks.

IN my opinion Virtu is a great asymmetrical hedge. If VIX stays low and we get rate cuts, VIRT is undervalued + goes up anyway or stays flat/slightly down, other equities go up, and it serves its hedging case. The Nov 2025 market-structure changes probably is the larger risk to payment order flow, which might create some headwind.

Regardless VIX increases and other equities go down, VIRT would get re-rated and goes up.

I just see risk/reward being good at these levels so bought Calls. Would recommend shares instead.

Starter positions: Call options for Mar 2026 (low 30 IV at entry).
你知道的,我也做价值投资,比如 Upwork(2 个月 +52%,P/E 7 -> 11.5)。

一个有意思的股票是 $VIRT,作为非对称波动率对冲,几乎没人讨论。它可以平衡 $IREN / $NBIS

6.6 forward P/E,$5.38B 市值,Virtu 类似 Citadel,为大量散户订单做 market making。

当前价格:$35.19。

没人聊这只股票,所以我喜欢拿新 thesis 去和市场测试。我可能错,也欢迎反馈。

这是我建轻仓 calls + 股票的简短 DD:

1/ 降息不会摧毁 earnings。Virtu 的 term loans 是浮动利率(融资 +2.5%),总额 $1.545B。降息 75 bps 约节省 $12M 年利息。

2/ 以 Q2 为锚(EPS $1.65 / adj $1.53;净利润约 $293M;收入同比约 44%)。

如果估算低 VIX 下 EPS 降 10-12%,再加上约 2.6% 净利率拖累,未来 12 个月 EPS 约 $5.22-$5.35。

$35.21 / $5.35 = 约 6.6x。

这是一只便宜、冷门、能受益于波动率和散户交易活动的对冲型价值股。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1972677721290682505
❤️ 762 🔁 103 💬 54
打开原推
💬 引用
@mattscottcap Yeah $UPWK is still great value at $20 but $13 just felt extremely undervalued.

Feel something similar about $VIRT now, but upside potential is a lot less unless you touch options.

https://t.co/ZzF4IlJXdf
@mattscottcap 对,$UPWK 在 $20 仍然很有价值,但 $13 感觉极度低估。

我现在对 $VIRT 有类似感觉,但除非碰期权,否则上行潜力小很多。

https://t.co/ZzF4IlJXdf
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$UPWK is the safest value play, even over $UNH, $NVO, $GOOGL, and others.

Market makers flushed Upwork call open interest for August 15th, and now it's rallying where it should be above $17.5+.

A 1.8B software company with ~80% gross margins doing 770m in annual revenue is almost free money.
$UPWK 是最安全的价值股,甚至比 $UNH$NVO$GOOGL 等都安全。

Market makers 把 8 月 15 日 Upwork call open interest 洗掉了,现在它正反弹到本该在的 $17.5+ 以上。

一家 $1.8B 的软件公司,毛利率约 80%,年收入 770m,几乎就是送钱。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1959207473812050156
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@blankeymonkey $NBIS is incredibly undervalued relative to forward revenue/earnings. Great add currently
@blankeymonkey 相对于前瞻收入/盈利,$NBIS 极其低估。现在很适合加仓。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@__visionxry__ IV is extremely low though options are a bit more illiquid for $VIRT. Spread isn't the worst I've seen.

Shares are safest bet but not going to return a 40%, I'm doing options since I like them on low IV stocks. Risk reward just seems good to me after looking into it more. https://t.co/Y5HqyhHixB
@__visionxry__ IV 极低,不过 $VIRT 的期权流动性有点差。价差不是我见过最糟的。

股票是最安全的选择,但不会带来 40% 回报;我做期权是因为我喜欢低 IV 股票上的期权。进一步研究后,风险回报对我来说看起来很好。https://t.co/Y5HqyhHixB
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@ManglaniAkshay Thanks! Yeah I upped my $VIRT position to $65k or so in OTM calls.

29% IV for some of the higher strikes is such a good entry https://t.co/5tyJJhRF6h
@ManglaniAkshay 谢谢!对,我把 $VIRT 仓位加到大概 $65k 的 OTM calls。

一些更高 strikes 的 29% IV 是很好的入场点 https://t.co/5tyJJhRF6h
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@halldj00 Sorry I spent it looking at $VIRT lol. I just felt like your value investors bull posting $NVO at 13.8 p/e would appreciate a 6.6 p/e 5b mc stock with $300m+ buybacks.
@halldj00 抱歉,我把时间花在看 $VIRT 上了 lol。我只是觉得,你这种价值投资者 bull posting $NVO at 13.8 p/e,应该会欣赏一只 6.6 p/e、5b mc、还有 $300m+ 回购的股票。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yep that's correct they get a lot off interest income on EPS. Think interest income was 14% reduction and interest expense was 12% reduction so it was 2.8% or so shaved off income if I'm doing the math correctly.

Even with cuts it's trading at sub 7 p/e with 300m+ in buybacks at 5b marketcap and you can just wait until volatility returns.
对,没错,他们 EPS 里有很多来自利息收入。我记得利息收入减少 14%,利息支出减少 12%,所以如果我数学没错,大概从收入里削掉 2.8%。

即使降息,它仍以低于 7 p/e 交易,5b 市值有 300m+ 回购,你可以等到波动率回归。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@lr_1994 Pretty sure I was bullposting $TSSI at $13. Risk-reward less great at $17.5 but still a good stock.

And I think you're thinking of $DELL not $MSFT

https://t.co/s7pIhTDgUj
@lr_1994 我很确定我在 $13 时 bullposting $TSSI。$17.5 风险回报没那么好,但仍是好股票。

而且我觉得你想说的是 $DELL,不是 $MSFT

https://t.co/s7pIhTDgUj
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Bought $40K of $TSSI now that the Semi rally extended back to server racks like $SMCI.

Down from $31 -&gt; $13.6, good chance for a rebound for small caps given the rest of semis/AI from $TSM, $CREDO, $NBIS, $AVGO, $MRVL, $ALAB and others have rallied. https://t.co/jWkww0Avro
现在半导体行情又扩散回 $SMCI 这种服务器机架方向,所以我买了 $40K 的 $TSSI

从 $31 跌到 $13.6,考虑到 $TSM$CREDO$NBIS$AVGO$MRVL$ALAB 等半导体/AI 标的都已经反弹,小盘股有不错反弹机会。 https://t.co/jWkww0Avro
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1965451719078527468
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$VIRT was on my radar for quite some time. Then it randomly dropped ~20% over the past month or two.

Did some calculations and it was sitting 6.6ish forward p/e. Market maybe made assumptions that triple rate cut lowers VIX because they were more proactive but Virtu has a lot of floating debt so it actually benefits EPS more than expected.

I just thought it was undervalued?
$VIRT 在我关注列表里很久了。然后过去一两个月随机跌了 ~20%。

我做了些计算,它大概是 6.6 forward p/e。市场也许假设三次降息会降低 VIX,因为它们更主动,但 Virtu 有很多浮动债,所以对 EPS 的好处其实比预期更大。

我只是觉得它被低估了?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
As you know, I do value investing too like with Upwork (+52% in 2 months, P/E 7-> 11.5).

An interesting stock is $VIRT as an asymmetrical volatility hedge, a stock barely anyone talks about. Clean asymmetry to balance $IREN / $NBIS.

6.6 forward p/e, 5.38b MC, Virtu ~ Citadel, and does market making for a large percentage of retail orders.

Current price: $35.19

Again, nobody is really talks about this stock, so I like testing my a new thesis against the market sometimes. I could be wrong and would love feedback too!

This is a light DD on why I'm building light call + share positions:

1/ Rate cuts don’t nuke earnings. Virtu’s term loans are floating (financing +2.5%). total $1.545B. −75 bps ≈ ~12M yr interest savings (not all funding prices down but most are floating tho)

2/ Using Q2 as an anchor (EPS $1.65 / adj $1.53; NI ~$293M; rev ~44% YoY).

If we est EPS 10–12% for lower VIX + ~2.6% for net rate drag -> $1.31–$1.34 EPS/qtr -> $5.22–$5.35 next 12 months

$35.21 / $5.35 = 6.58x forward p/e
$35.21 / $5.22 = 6.74x forward p/e

Even if we overshoot because of good Q2 quarter as an anchor without rate cuts, EPS $4.78 -> 7.4× forward p/e, is still extremely good.

Other websites like Value Investing estimate forward p/e to be 6.99 - 8 forward p/e.

3/ There's ~$303M authorization remaining for buybacks off a small 5.2B marketcap.

If vol normalizes or spikes, expect both EPS and the multiple to lift from today’s ~6–7×. If not, it's undervalued and you can sit back with buybacks.

IN my opinion Virtu is a great asymmetrical hedge. If VIX stays low and we get rate cuts, VIRT is undervalued + goes up anyway or stays flat/slightly down, other equities go up, and it serves its hedging case. The Nov 2025 market-structure changes probably is the larger risk to payment order flow, which might create some headwind.

Regardless VIX increases and other equities go down, VIRT would get re-rated and goes up.

I just see risk/reward being good at these levels so bought Calls. Would recommend shares instead.

Starter positions: Call options for Mar 2026 (low 30 IV at entry).
如你所知,我也做价值投资,比如 Upwork(2 个月 +52%,P/E 7-> 11.5)。

一个有趣的股票是 $VIRT,作为不对称波动率对冲,这是一只几乎没人谈的股票。它能很好地平衡 $IREN / $NBIS

6.6 forward p/e,5.38b MC,Virtu ~ Citadel,并为大比例散户订单做 market making。

当前价格:$35.19

再次说,几乎没人谈这只股票,所以我有时喜欢拿新 thesis 去和市场测试。我可能错了,也很欢迎反馈!

这是我建立小 call + 股票仓位的轻 DD:

1/ 降息不会毁掉盈利。Virtu 的定期贷款是浮动利率(financing +2.5%),总额 $1.545B。−75 bps ≈ 每年约 $12M 利息节省(不是所有资金价格都下降,但大多是浮动)。

2/ 以 Q2 为锚(EPS $1.65 / adj $1.53;NI ~$293M;rev ~44% YoY)。

如果估算 EPS 因 VIX 较低下降 10–12% + 净利率拖累 ~2.6% -> 每季度 EPS $1.31–$1.34 -> 未来 12 个月 $5.22–$5.35

$35.21 / $5.35 = 6.58x forward p/e
$35.21 / $5.22 = 6.74x forward p/e

即使因为 Q2 太好、且没有降息而估高了,EPS $4.78 -> 7.4× forward p/e,仍然非常好。

Value Investing 这类网站也估算 forward p/e 为 6.99 - 8。

3/ 还有 ~$303M 回购授权剩余,相对于 5.2B 小市值很可观。

如果波动率正常化或飙升,预计 EPS 和倍数都会从今天的 ~6–7× 抬升。如果没有,它也被低估,你可以靠回购坐着等。

在我看来,Virtu 是很好的不对称对冲。如果 VIX 保持低位且我们降息,VIRT 被低估 + 无论如何会上涨或持平/小跌,其他股票上涨,它就发挥了对冲作用。2025 年 11 月市场结构变化可能是 payment order flow 更大的风险,可能造成一些逆风。

无论如何,如果 VIX 上升、其他股票下跌,VIRT 会被重估并上涨。

我只是觉得这些价位风险/回报很好,所以买了 Calls。更建议买股票。

起始仓位:Mar 2026 call options(入场时低 30 IV)。
❤️ 77 🔁 3 💬 18
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Kohai, I learned this art from battle. TLDR, got burnt a few times buying calls -> value goes down even asset goes up because market makers nuke IV.

I kinda read options chains a lot in my spare time and eventually I just got familiar with every single stock's general volatility over the years. For example 25-35% is sweet spot for a lot of low movers like $AMZN $GOOGL and others and if you see 43% IV it will probably decrease unless there's an event.

For example I made 6 fig on $TSM calls recently but part of that was IV increasing from 31% to 38%. Or $GOOGL when IV went from 28% to like 35%.

Im really not sure how to learn this aside from trial and error. You can do paper simulation but it's totally different when market makers play against you.
Kohai,这是我从战斗中学来的艺术。TLDR,买 calls 被烧过几次 -> 即使资产上涨,价值也下降,因为 market makers 打爆 IV。

我闲暇时经常看 options chains,最终这些年就熟悉了每只股票的大致波动率。比如 25-35% 对很多低波动标的如 $AMZN$GOOGL 等是甜点区;如果你看到 43% IV,除非有事件,否则它可能会下降。

比如我最近在 $TSM calls 上赚了 6 fig,但其中一部分是 IV 从 31% 升到 38%。或者 $GOOGL,IV 从 28% 到大概 35%。

除了试错,我真的不确定怎么学这个。你可以做纸面模拟,但当 market makers 和你对着玩时,感觉完全不同。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I agree in the sense that there's more a lot risk involved and would not recommend it to 99% of people outside of swing traders. But I disagree that it's too risky given current bottoms, and tickers+strikes. Since I'm confident they won't hit since some were bottoming and if they do you'd want to buy them anyway.

Too risky is doing the same stocks every week, or buying at local highs, too much margin on high beta, or stuff like quantum and expecting to never get assigned.

There's a lot of bottom timing involved which I'm usually good at, rather than just most people writing puts at random times.
我同意这里风险更高,而且不会推荐给 99% 的非波段交易者。但我不同意在当前底部、ticker + strikes 下它太冒险。因为我有信心它们不会打到;如果真的打到,你反而本来就想买。

太冒险的是每周做同一批股票,或在局部高点买,给高 beta 上太多保证金,或者做 quantum 这类东西还指望永远不会被指派。

这里有很多择底成分,而我通常擅长这个,不是像大多数人在随机时间卖 puts。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@kennur No thought. I type it out in 2m then post. No need for text revision, I channel my inner regard then post.

Obviously making the $NBIS graph takes me a bit more time to photoshop on anime characters.

But putting no brain into posts helps connect easier with the audience
@kennur 没什么思考。我 2 分钟打出来然后发。无需文字修改,我召唤内心的 regard 然后发。

显然做 $NBIS 图会多花一点时间,把 anime characters P 上去。

但发帖不动脑反而更容易和受众连接。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@kennur No joke, some randoms I met in real life learned about $NBIS because of the Weebius term and said it helped them remember the name.
@kennur 不开玩笑,我现实生活中遇到的一些路人是因为 Weebius 这个词才知道 $NBIS 的,还说这帮助他们记住了名字。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Good question, don't be ashamed to ask! So Neoclouds is the next generation of cloud infra focused on AI.

You can think of traditional cloud companies like Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud. They kind of do everything like website hosting, running programming instances, etc.

Neoclouds examples include $NBIS, $CRWV and $CIFR. They're like specialty stores, mainly focused on AI compute.

And because AI is getting so high demand with ChatGPT, @grok, and others, my thesis was around "neoclouds" are the next big wave for 2025, 2026.
好问题,别不好意思问!Neoclouds 是下一代专注 AI 的云基础设施。

你可以把传统云公司理解成 Amazon Web Services、Microsoft Azure、Google Cloud。它们什么都做,比如网站托管、运行程序实例等。

Neoclouds 的例子包括 $NBIS$CRWV$CIFR。它们像专门店,主要专注 AI compute。

因为 ChatGPT、@grok 等让 AI 需求变得极高,我的 thesis 是“neoclouds”会成为 2025、2026 年的下一波大浪潮。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
@KristoffMikael Yeah I got a lot of Japanese engagement recently. Shoutout to @Drdebuneko, even if we don't speak the same language.

世界中のXで彼らと交流できるのは本当に素晴らしいです。

https://t.co/kY21JgGOGx
@KristoffMikael 对,我最近有很多日本互动。Shoutout to @Drdebuneko,即使我们语言不通。

能在世界各地的 X 上和他们交流,真的很棒。

https://t.co/kY21JgGOGx
引用原推@Drdebuneko
監視銘柄にいれとけよ😂
ネオクラウド界隈に入門するなら笑 https://t.co/UA4DGPAA4g
把它放进观察名单吧 😂
如果你想入门 Neocloud 这一块的话哈哈 https://t.co/UA4DGPAA4g
https://x.com/Drdebuneko/status/1972105655994741215
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@danielnewmanUV Can anyone fill me in why should people care about Futurum?

They have stuff like $OKLO (no revenue), $CRM (can't think of them as a leader), $ARM for CPUs(RISC-V companies probably have more relevance in future AI) in the list.

I mean they're all great companies but still.
@danielnewmanUV 有人能告诉我为什么大家应该关心 Futurum 吗?

他们名单里有 $OKLO(无收入)、$CRM(我想不到它是领导者)、$ARM 做 CPUs(RISC-V 公司在未来 AI 里可能更相关)这类东西。

我的意思是它们都是好公司,但仍然如此。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DonkeyCapital69 @AdamSandler @romanchernin On top of this, I suggest a Nasdaq rebrand from $NBIS to $WBIS to represent the name change from Nebius to Weebius.

It has the potential to generate tens of more dollars from retail investors on X and Reddit.
@DonkeyCapital69 @AdamSandler @romanchernin 除此之外,我建议 Nasdaq 把 $NBIS 改名为 $WBIS,以代表从 Nebius 到 Weebius 的名称变更。

这有潜力从 X 和 Reddit 的散户投资者那里多产生几十美元。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
I'm officially launching a new rebranding agency:

Instead of charging $30k, I'll do it for $0.

I renamed $NBIS to 'Weebius' on Reddit and generated tens of dollars from 477,000 retail investors.

AMA. https://t.co/9YN2eeIpUd
我正式推出一家新的 rebranding agency:

不收 $30k,我 $0 做。

我在 Reddit 上把 $NBIS 改名为“Weebius”,并从 477,000 名散户投资者那里创造了几十美元。

AMA. https://t.co/9YN2eeIpUd
引用原推@pitdesi
There is a woman in San Francisco who charges $30k to name your baby.

She started at $100, but she was going to dinner with VCs and a friend told her to charge more and nobody blinked.

The Bay Area might be the best place in the world for this kind of business. https://t.co/6eCy0iUiqE
旧金山有个女人,给你的宝宝取名收费 $30k。

她一开始只收 $100,但她经常和 VC 吃饭,有个朋友让她把价格提上去,结果没人眨眼。

湾区可能是全世界最适合做这种生意的地方。 https://t.co/6eCy0iUiqE
https://x.com/pitdesi/status/1972297067684122863
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DeepValueBagger That $PYPL mention was literally a reference to your earlier post lol. Glad you caught it 😅
@DeepValueBagger 那个 $PYPL 提及字面上就是在引用你之前的帖子 lol。很高兴你看出来了 😅
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Uh I would not tell followers about CSPs on 2x leveraged ETFs especially on $MSTR, which is volatile enough. If they get assigned with volatility decay it might get messy, though I do agree MSTR is bottoming.

I'd agree on most though like AMZN or META, usually I swing trade $BULL low $13.

I wouldn't touch $RIVN or $TSLA cause of fundamentals.
呃,我不会告诉粉丝在 2x 杠杆 ETF 上做 CSPs,尤其是 $MSTR,本身波动已经够大。如果被指派再遇到波动率衰减,可能会很乱,不过我同意 MSTR 正在筑底。

大多数我同意,比如 AMZN 或 META;我通常会在 $BULL 低 $13 做波段。

$RIVN$TSLA 我不会碰,因为基本面。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
No problem! The most money to be made though is if you think the market prices something wrong and you have conviction otherwise.

Like for me market was underpricing $UPWK when it was a p/e of 7 or something low.

I don't know enough to give you an answer since financials are probably really complicated, that's for you to decide.
没问题!不过最大的钱通常来自于你认为市场错误定价某个东西,而且你对此有相反信念。

比如对我来说,当 $UPWK 的 p/e 只有 7 或其他低位时,市场低估了它。

我了解不够,不能给你答案,因为 financials 可能真的很复杂,这要由你决定。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Hmm, looked into it more. While the Allosaurus pattern is promising, for $HPP, triple rate cut doesn't really affect leasing too much compared to home sales like $Z or $OPEN. It usually encourages hiring but we got the H1-B drama, which isn't helpful either.

They have a lot of debt, 85.4% of the debt is fixed so it doesn't really benefit from rate cuts like companies that use floating interest do on top.

It is below NAV though, usually there's another reason why it's below NAV that other hedge funds priced in. I don't know enough to say whether one party is wrong or not.

I'm not too bullish, but maybe the dinosaur sees something I don't.
嗯,又多看了一下。虽然 Allosaurus pattern 很有希望,但对 $HPP 来说,三次降息相比 $Z$OPEN 这类房屋销售,对租赁影响没那么大。它通常会鼓励招聘,但我们又有 H1-B drama,这也没帮助。

他们债务很多,85.4% 是固定利率,所以不像使用浮动利率的公司那样从降息中额外受益。

不过它确实低于 NAV,通常低于 NAV 有其他 hedge funds 已经定价进去的原因。我了解不够,不能说哪一方错了。

我没那么 bullish,但也许恐龙看到了我没看到的东西。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
In this world, nothing can be said for certain, except death, taxes... and

$APPL stock crashing after product launch, people panic selling, then Apple using buybacks to convince market that everyone likes the product.

($227 -&gt; $256 in 2 weeks) https://t.co/Jy4SRAJFda
这个世界上,除了死亡、税收,还有一件事可以确定……

$APPL 在产品发布后股价崩跌,人们恐慌卖出,然后 Apple 用回购说服市场:大家都喜欢这个产品。

($227 -> $256 in 2 weeks) https://t.co/Jy4SRAJFda
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Sometimes I like to gamble too.

$APPL somehow always falls every Apple event when people say it’s bad.

Then a few days later rallies when they do buybacks and change public narrative like with Apple Intelligence.

I quite like the iPhone Air. This play is extremely high risk. https://t.co/d8Y1B0aDFP
有时候我也喜欢赌一把。

$APPL 不知道为什么每次 Apple 发布会后,只要大家说不行,它总会跌。

然后几天后,公司回购、市场叙事又像 Apple Intelligence 那次一样转向,股价就反弹。

我其实挺喜欢 iPhone Air 的。这个交易风险极高。 https://t.co/d8Y1B0aDFP
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1965807638832468462
❤️ 25 🔁 0 💬 5
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Tailwind would be triple rate cut. I thought testosterone product launch + PPI would be the main trigger but SI increased from 36 -> 42. Stock still went up when I posted at $48 to $57 though.

$HIMS just need to keep increasing revenue with Zava acquisition and fundamentals will cause shorts to cover on every dip.

A surprise 150% SS would be an acquisition or something but otherwise looks like one of the gradual ones with short positions covering over time to $20B+ mc.
顺风是三次降息。我原以为 testosterone 产品发布 + PPI 会是主要触发,但 SI 从 36 -> 42 增加了。不过我在 $48 发帖后,股票仍涨到 $57。

$HIMS 只需要通过 Zava 收购继续增加收入,基本面就会让空头在每次下跌时回补。

意外的 150% SS 可能来自收购之类的事,否则它看起来更像是空头仓位随着时间逐步回补、走向 $20B+ mc 的那种。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@AndyA143597 For $GAP, I do like it and I like Banana Republic personally. It's a stock that benefits from seasonality around this time too.

$UPWK, $TGT, $UNH, $LULU were value investing port holders but I'll need to look more to see if there's any material impact from macro/tarrifs.
@AndyA143597$GAP,我确实喜欢,也个人喜欢 Banana Republic。它也是这个时期受益于季节性的股票。

$UPWK$TGT$UNH$LULU 是价值投资组合持仓,但我还需要多看一下宏观/关税是否有实质影响。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mvcinvesting Congrats on getting into $NBIS early, it’s never easy to spot the right speculative plays.

I joined a bit later and built a position after the $MSFT deal. I see the potential for it to be a $100B company.
@mvcinvesting 恭喜你很早进了 $NBIS,发现正确的投机标的从来不容易。

我晚一点加入,在 $MSFT 交易后建仓。我能看到它成为 $100B 公司的潜力。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@GrassKaniKani $HIMS has 42% short interest and can short squeeze 150% any moment.

$NBIS is likely to rise another 100% just based on fundamentals.

HIMS has highest upside potential under a short squeeze scenario, NBIS likely rallies just based on staggering growth.

Pick your poison.
@GrassKaniKani $HIMS 有 42% short interest,任何时候都可能 short squeeze 150%。

$NBIS 只基于基本面也很可能再涨 100%。

HIMS 在 short squeeze 情景下上行潜力最高,NBIS 则很可能仅凭惊人的增长上涨。

自己选毒药。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@IlanG05512373 You're asking a random X user over $MSFT that did their due diligence and handed $NBIS a 17B contract?
@IlanG05512373 你是在问一个随机 X 用户,而不是已经做完 DD 并给 $NBIS 一份 17B 合同的 $MSFT
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 Honestly $NBIS this is one of the only stocks I'd be fine telling a friend to full port.

Less speculative than $IREN, better valuation than $CRWV, future growth higher than $ALAB.
@soulbiri1 老实说,$NBIS 是少数我愿意告诉朋友 full port 的股票之一。

$IREN 少投机性,比 $CRWV 估值更好,未来增长高于 $ALAB
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@L1m05_ True lol, there's been no dip to buy with $NBIS, it just goes straight up.

I wanted to add another $300k worth to make $1m but didn't get a good opportunity.
@L1m05_ 确实 lol,$NBIS 根本没有可以买的 dip,它就是直线上涨。

我本来想再加 $300k 到 $1m,但没等到好机会。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy So far so good with $NBIS https://t.co/RsqZ8n0uh4
@pepemoonboy 到目前为止 $NBIS 一切顺利 https://t.co/RsqZ8n0uh4
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@foogleman1234 I sold all my $TSM calls today $175 for 100%+ profit. I trimmed small caps that were up 20-40%+

Rotating into it into 1 month $NBIS out of money calls and shares
@foogleman1234 我今天卖掉了所有 $TSM calls,$175,获利 100%+。我减掉了上涨 20-40%+ 的小盘。

正在轮到 1 个月 $NBIS out of money calls 和股票。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
I rarely repeat-post a stock… but $NBIS is special.

Even up 5.75% today, at &lt;$30B market cap, it’s a screaming buy on every dip.

This is a once-in-a-decade company with fundamentals and forward revenue far outpacing marketcap.

Easy high conviction hold to $175+ https://t.co/MzjEuxSAkD
我很少重复发一只股票……但 $NBIS 很特别。

即使今天涨 5.75%,在 < $30B 市值下,每次下跌都是 screaming buy。

这是一家十年一遇的公司,基本面和前瞻收入远远超过市值。

高信念轻松持有到 $175+ https://t.co/MzjEuxSAkD
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Bought $500K worth of $NBIS.

My highest conviction stock out of anything for a 1 year time period.

$225 PT https://t.co/buW9CV4WWH
买了 $500K 的 $NBIS

如果看 1 年周期,这是我所有标的里信念最高的一只。

目标价 $225。 https://t.co/buW9CV4WWH
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1969115361736896720
❤️ 185 🔁 11 💬 16
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@junyongisusing1 I just see a good buying opportunity. Polymarket actually increased etf approval to 95%.

This was the main event to be looking out for. https://t.co/QB0FIMrUIq
@junyongisusing1 我只是看到一个好买点。Polymarket 实际上把 etf 批准概率提高到 95%。

这是应该重点关注的主要事件。https://t.co/QB0FIMrUIq
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@babyfolio Thanks for being one of the first ones! Yep, just started out 2-3 months ago and now I have a tiny following.

Glad other people think I'm helpful
@babyfolio 谢谢你成为最早的一批!对,我 2-3 个月前才开始,现在有了一点小关注。

很高兴别人觉得我有帮助。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$ALAB went from $96 to $244, a 154% increase since I called it out 2 months ago (though a tad overvalued now)

Similar thesis with $NBIS is happening now with backing from $MSFT + $NVDA.

NBIS has a clear path to $60b+ marketcap from $24b and why I’m taking a $1M position.
$ALAB 从 $96 涨到 $244,自我 2 个月前点出以来涨了 154%(虽然现在有点高估)。

现在 $NBIS 上正在发生类似 thesis,并且有 $MSFT + $NVDA 支持。

NBIS 从 $24b 到 $60b+ 市值有清晰路径,这也是我拿 $1M 仓位的原因。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I just bought long term ~$175k+ positions in $ALAB and plan to scale this to ~$500k as a potential $50B+ moonshot.

NVDA-like profit margins (76%), 144%+ Y/Y growth, customers like NVDA, AWS, MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA, AMD at 16B market cap.

Unreal customers + growth/margins. https://t.co/bRCBgtoGSB
我刚买了约 $175k+ 的 $ALAB 长线仓位,并计划把它加到约 $500k,把它当成潜在 $50B+ moonshot。

类似 NVDA 的利润率(76%)、同比增长 144%+,客户包括 NVDA、AWS、MSFT、GOOGL、NVDA、AMD,而市值只有 16B。

客户阵容 + 增长/利润率都太离谱了。 https://t.co/bRCBgtoGSB
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1947207626930225347
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
That's the same 4T+ thesis with $NVDA and their GPUs/ASICs (Google Cloud TPUs, AWS Trainium) when hyperscalers could replace Nvidia.

Same applies to $NBIS. MSFT wouldn't sign a 17B 5 year contract if they could build it out themselves this fast.

If you read my DD, NBIS, $CRWV are Nvda's strategic solution to keeping their moat.

CRWV, NBIS helps keep hyperscalers from having all the leverage + prevent Azure, others from consolidating compute and compressing margins down the road.

NBIS helps maintain NVDA's moat and why hundreds of billions contracted revenue is already starting to flow from mag7 to the new neocloud providers. 25B marketcap does not align to forward revenue.
这和 $NVDA 及其 GPUs/ASICs(Google Cloud TPUs、AWS Trainium)的 4T+ thesis 一样,当 hyperscalers 能替代 Nvidia 时。

同样适用于 $NBIS。如果 MSFT 能这么快自己 build out,就不会签 17B 5 年合同。

如果你读我的 DD,NBIS、$CRWV 是 Nvda 维持护城河的战略解决方案。

CRWV、NBIS 帮助防止 hyperscalers 拥有全部议价权 + 防止 Azure 等未来整合算力并压缩利润率。

NBIS 帮助维持 NVDA 的护城河,这也是为什么数千亿美元合同收入已经开始从 mag7 流向新的 neocloud providers。25B 市值和前瞻收入不匹配。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
It's not because of a price rally. It's because since then, $NBIS has 17B from $MSFT for multiple years, $4.1B+ now raised for capex last week on good terms, with additional rate cut tailwind projected from 3 days ago.

We've also seen MSFT be compute strained and OpenAI go to $GOOGL. With other hyperscalers sign deals for more compute and more likely to sign on.

This all happened recently, before $50 NBIS was speculation and I wouldn't have high conviction in a speculative company unless it was $RKLB.

Now it's pure scaling from here with forward rev compounding hundreds of percent. 25B marketcap does not match forward growth.
这不是因为价格上涨。是因为从那之后,$NBIS$MSFT 拿到多年 $17B,上周又以不错条款为 capex 融到 $4.1B+,再加上 3 天前预计的降息顺风。

我们也看到 MSFT 算力紧张,OpenAI 转向 $GOOGL。其他 hyperscalers 也签署更多算力交易,并更可能继续签约。

这些都是最近发生的;$50 以前的 NBIS 是投机,除非是 $RKLB,否则我不会对投机公司有高信念。

现在从这里开始就是纯扩张,前瞻收入以数百个百分点复合。25B 市值不匹配前瞻增长。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@KevinLMak Prob $ETOR.

I'm guessing it's because it's down for the year and people tax harvest before EOY.

But ~800+ net cash, 3.6B marketcap, growing 22% y/y like $IBKR, profitable, down in the dumps.
@KevinLMak 可能是 $ETOR

我猜是因为它今年下跌,人们在年底前税损收割。

但 ~800+ 净现金、3.6B 市值、像 $IBKR 一样同比增长 22%、盈利,却跌得很惨。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
As a frequent Redditor, I had to re-read this headline 10 times https://t.co/oH8wwzwBVg
作为一个经常逛 Reddit 的人,我不得不把这个标题重读 10 遍 https://t.co/oH8wwzwBVg
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Hmm, I don't have many but aside from $RKLB, $IBIT, prob $TSM, $HOOD but less so at these levels.

I was long HOOD back at $18 but given its 1000%+ rise already, hard to see it growing into $1T in 5 years due to limits in fintech. But it was always a high conviction long due to consumer base + adding more products eg. Banking.

$RKLB is insanely overvalued right now but Spacex is the best comparison, 350b valuation now and space industry will keep growing cause national security issue + commercialization. RKLB will likely grow into that whether it's 5 years from now or 10

Bitcoin will likely keep growing into gold marketcap.

$TSM is a pure monopoly, no noise like Intel building foundries will likely disrupt that for another 10 years.
嗯,我高信念股票不多,但除了 $RKLB$IBIT,可能还有 $TSM$HOOD,不过在这些价位信念没那么强。

我在 $18 时 long HOOD,但考虑到它已经涨了 1000%+,由于 fintech 的限制,很难看到它 5 年内成长到 $1T。但它一直是高信念多头,因为有消费者基础 + 增加更多产品,比如 Banking。

$RKLB 现在疯狂高估,但 Spacex 是最好的比较对象,现在 350b 估值,而且太空行业会因为国家安全问题 + 商业化继续增长。无论是 5 年后还是 10 年后,RKLB 很可能会成长到那里。

Bitcoin 很可能继续向 gold marketcap 成长。

$TSM 是纯垄断,像 Intel 建 foundries 这种噪音,未来 10 年都不太可能打破它。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@pepemoonboy Thanks! Appreciate it, especially since I'm newer to X
@pepemoonboy 谢谢!很感激,尤其是我刚来 X 不久。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
$CRWV went from $41 to $183 in the span of 3 months but part of that was less float.

We could see $NBIS similarly from $99 to $225 by March if they have a Q4 earnings blowout along with triple rate cut in the best scenario, but otherwise I'd say 1 year timeframe.

$RKLB I like the most on a 5 year timeframe, but they do need an extra two years for Neutron.
$CRWV 在 3 个月内从 $41 涨到 $183,但部分原因是流通盘更少。

如果 $NBIS Q4 财报爆炸,加上最佳情景下三次降息,我们可能会看到它类似地在 3 月前从 $99 到 $225;否则我会说是 1 年时间框架。

$RKLB 在 5 年时间框架上我最喜欢,但他们确实还需要额外两年给 Neutron。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I agree, hyperscaler chips is the biggest threat to $NVDA's 4T+ empire + GPU providers. But, $NBIS and $CRWV are NVIDIA's solution to protecting it's moat and GPU margin compression.

So they're supporting companies like NBIS on purpose to diversify demand from hyperscalers and prevent margin compression from Azure, AWS by spreading out dependencies/limit compute to these smaller GPU as a service companies.

We already saw $MSFT run out of compute for OpenAI so they had to go to GOOGL, CRWV, NBIS and others and build out multi-year contracts, even while building out custom ASICs.

$NBIS also doesn't hinge on one contract since other hyperscalers are on its way but that 17B big contract does give it a lot more assurance. We also haven't seen it fully priced in yet since valuation was ~16B+ before then and now it's $24B after dilution.

I mentioned 1 year timeframe in terms of heaviest upside with triple rate cut helping too. Double rate cut, thesis still stands with NVDA supporting NBIS + capex spend from hyperscalers flowing down to these GPU providers.

3-4 years out, I might be a bit more worried, which is why I always maintained I'm long $RKLB, $IBIT and others on a 5 year timeframe but NBIS has the biggest growth potential over the next year.
我同意,hyperscaler chips 是 $NVDA 4T+ 帝国 + GPU providers 最大威胁。但 $NBIS$CRWV 是 NVIDIA 保护其护城河和 GPU 利润率压缩的解决方案。

所以他们有意支持 NBIS 这类公司,分散 hyperscalers 的需求,并通过把依赖/有限算力分散到这些小型 GPU as a service 公司,防止 Azure、AWS 压缩利润率。

我们已经看到 $MSFT 给 OpenAI 的算力不够,所以不得不去 GOOGL、CRWV、NBIS 等,并建立多年合同,即使他们也在 build out 自研 ASICs。

$NBIS 也不取决于单一合同,因为其他 hyperscalers 也在路上,但那份 17B 大合同确实提供了更多确定性。我们也还没看到它被完全定价,因为之前估值约 16B+,稀释后现在是 $24B。

我说 1 年时间框架,是因为三次降息也会帮助,最大上行集中在那段。两次降息时,NVDA 支持 NBIS + hyperscalers 的 capex spend 流向这些 GPU providers 的 thesis 仍然成立。

3-4 年后我可能会更担心一点,所以我一直说自己在 5 年时间框架上 long $RKLB$IBIT 等,但 NBIS 在未来一年增长潜力最大。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@LibertadEterno No worries! It's kinda a long read and I didn't finish typing out all my thoughts yet...

But generally core statement holds and I'm pretty confident about this one going forward, even at ATHs.
@LibertadEterno 没事!这确实有点长,而且我还没把所有想法都打完……

但总体核心观点成立,即使在 ATHs,我对它未来也相当有信心。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 Lets goo!
@soulbiri1 Lets goo!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DanielTan64198 Nice! $UPWK was probably 50%+ if you're still holding. $HIMS I called out at like $25 and again at $48.

$OSCR was a swing trade I think I posted at $14 and a good sell would have been $22 but glad to hear you're doing well
@DanielTan64198 不错!如果你还持有,$UPWK 可能已经 50%+。$HIMS 我在大概 $25 点过,又在 $48 点过。

$OSCR 是个波段交易,我记得我在 $14 发过,$22 会是不错卖点,但很高兴听到你做得不错。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Thoughts on why I’m scaling my $NBIS position to $1M+ with a $225 PT:

Thesis
______
When MSFT, GOOGL, and Mag7 are your customers like ALAB or CRED (when I took large positions in both sub $100) or before $NVDA or AVGO or TSM took off, a company's forward growth would likely explode in the 100%'s of percent.

There are barely any companies in history where Mag7 are dependent on them.
On top of that, when NVDA has every incentive to pump your stock as well....

NBIS becomes a stronger buy and has my highest conviction for 1Y timeframe.

Moat + GPU lenders Critical Importance to NVDA
_______
NVDA sees other hyperscalers like AMZN, GOOGL building out their own chips and reducing reliance.

Answer? Build out GPU lenders eg. CRWV, by taking a stake and financing them, so Azure/Cloud/AWS can't replace NVDA.

Access to GPUs becomes increasingly through these lenders and as we see with OpenAI, they no longer have the compute from MSFT and have to go to GOOGL.

GOOGL also doesn't have enough compute so they go to WULF and others. MSFT goes to CRWV, NBIS and others, and big tech compute flows downstream to these GPU providers.

NVIDIA has every reason to inflate GPU lenders like CoreWeave and NBIS to hedge against hyperscaler custom chips.

And without compute, billions of dollars will flow to NBIS with NVDA propping them up.

Macro Tailwind
_______
3x rate cut priced into Polymarket.

If you saw my other post, triple rate cuts only happen once a decade (extremely positive for liquidity flowing into markets) + combined with end of year seasonality, which are positive for equities.

On top of that, NBIS is a relatively smaller market cap, and relies on financing/debt to grow. When their interest burden drops, financing gets cheaper, and expansion looks more viable.

NBIS is heavily valued on future earnings, and with rate cut projections, far our earnings of billions in rev from MSFT and other clients get marked UP. We're about to see a sharp re-rating after Fed meeting yesterday.

Company Comparisons
________

If I had to choose NBIS -> CRWV -> WULF ->others weighing on potential to speculation tradeoffs.

CRWV - NVDA clearly backing them, already large $63B+ MC. Could go way higher but growth potential with MSFT contract with NBIS, similar backlog, etc. at more than half the marketcap is why I chose them.

$IREN, BITF, RIOT, $GRRR etc. - BTC miners pivoting to compute. I like them but they don't have the same de-risking as MSFT yet.

WULF - I do like them since Google is backing them but NBIS conversion terms and MC relative to potential are better.

Fundamentals
______
MC: 24.78B (When you compare to CRWV at 61B, which was still down 30% this year), now with similar revenue backlog, it has an easy potential to go to the same marketcap ($243+ a share).

By 2026, with Microsoft deal accounted for, NBIS could be doing $5-6B total revenue with strong gross margins (≈70%).

In 2027-2028, total revenue could reach $8-10B+, especially if base business (non-Microsoft) also grows aggressively. All with ~60-75% gross margins.

This is insane but mainly due to NVDA supporting these GPU companies. Based on valuation, NBIS is more attractive than CRWV and less speculative than IREN or others without MSFT backing giving them 17B.

Misc Thoughts
___
They already raised 4.1B+ and secured capex for the $17B MSFT contract. This was the biggest de-risking event and why I'd invest in NBIS at $90+ compared to something more speculative back at $50.

There's likely other contracts from hyperscalers coming their way. I'd say easy path to $140, then maybe drop from convertible note, then up to $200.

There's probably more specifics that I didn't get to like margin compression in a few years operating income depreciation risk etc.

But this was the core of my investment thesis (macro, fundamentals, industry growth, moat + incentives) when I make investment decisions vs. swing trading and why NBIS is high conviction over the next year.
为什么我把 $NBIS 仓位扩到 $1M+,并给 $225 PT:

Thesis
______
当 MSFT、GOOGL 和 Mag7 是你的客户,就像 ALAB 或 CRED(我在两者低于 $100 时都拿大仓),或者在 $NVDA、AVGO、TSM 起飞前那样,一家公司的前瞻增长很可能以数百个百分点爆发。

历史上几乎没有多少公司能让 Mag7 依赖它们。
除此之外,当 NVDA 也有一切动机 pump 你的股票时……

NBIS 就变成更强买点,也是我 1Y 时间框架最高信念。

Moat + GPU lenders 对 NVDA 的关键重要性
_______
NVDA 看到 AMZN、GOOGL 等 hyperscalers 在 build out 自己的芯片并减少依赖。

答案?通过持股和融资,build out GPU lenders,比如 CRWV,让 Azure/Cloud/AWS 无法替代 NVDA。

GPU 访问越来越多通过这些 lenders 进行;正如 OpenAI 所示,他们不再从 MSFT 拿到足够算力,不得不去 GOOGL。

GOOGL 算力也不够,所以去 WULF 等。MSFT 去 CRWV、NBIS 等,大科技算力需求向下游流向这些 GPU providers。

NVIDIA 有充分理由推高 CoreWeave 和 NBIS 这类 GPU lenders,以对冲 hyperscaler 自研芯片。

没有算力,数十亿美元就会流向 NBIS,并有 NVDA 支撑他们。

Macro Tailwind
_______
Polymarket 定价 3x 降息。

如果你看过我另一篇帖子,三次降息十年一遇(对流动性流入市场极其正面)+ 年底季节性,对股票利好。

此外,NBIS 市值相对较小,并依赖融资/债务增长。当利息负担下降,融资更便宜,扩张更可行。

NBIS 很大程度按未来盈利估值;随着降息预期,来自 MSFT 和其他客户的数十亿美元远期收入会被上调估值。昨天 Fed 会议后,我们将看到急剧重估。

Company Comparisons
________

如果让我选,我会按 NBIS -> CRWV -> WULF -> others,权衡潜力和投机性。

CRWV - NVDA 显然支持他们,已经是 $63B+ MC。可能还会高很多,但 NBIS 有 MSFT 合同、类似 backlog 等,且市值不到一半多一点,所以我选 NBIS。

$IREN、BITF、RIOT、$GRRR 等 - BTC miners 转向 compute。我喜欢它们,但它们还没有 MSFT 带来的同样 de-risking。

WULF - 我也喜欢,因为 Google 支持他们,但 NBIS 的转换条款和相对于潜力的 MC 更好。

Fundamentals
______
MC:24.78B(和 CRWV 的 61B 相比,而 CRWV 今年仍跌 30%),现在有类似收入 backlog,很容易有潜力到同样市值($243+ 每股)。

到 2026 年,计入 Microsoft 交易,NBIS 可能做 $5-6B 总收入,并有强毛利率(≈70%)。

2027-2028 年,总收入可能达到 $8-10B+,尤其是基础业务(非 Microsoft)也积极增长。全部有 ~60-75% 毛利率。

这很疯狂,但主要因为 NVDA 支持这些 GPU 公司。基于估值,NBIS 比 CRWV 更有吸引力,也比没有 MSFT 背书提供 17B 的 IREN 等更少投机。

Misc Thoughts
___
他们已经融资 4.1B+,并为 $17B MSFT 合同锁定 capex。这是最大的 de-risking 事件,也是为什么相比 $50 时更投机的阶段,我愿意在 $90+ 投 NBIS。

可能还会有其他 hyperscalers 合同来找他们。我会说到 $140 路径很容易,然后可能因可转债下跌,再涨到 $200。

还有更多细节我没来得及讲,比如几年后的利润率压缩、运营收入折旧风险等。

但这就是我做投资决策而不是波段交易时的投资 thesis 核心(宏观、基本面、行业增长、护城河 + 激励),也是为什么 NBIS 是未来一年高信念。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
HOW TO TRADE LIKE ME – LONG THREAD

I'm known for uncanny accuracy and timing stock breakouts on Reddit + X.

Over the next few weeks I’ll share one post every other day walking through my process so you can see how I think and trade.

Doesn't hurt to read! https://t.co/L21Ewv2iJz
如何像我一样交易 - 长帖

我在 Reddit + X 上因为对股票突破的判断和择时准得离谱而出名。

接下来几周,我会每隔一天发一篇帖子,拆解我的流程,让你看到我是怎么思考、怎么交易的。

看看也没坏处! https://t.co/L21Ewv2iJz
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1967240935114514613
❤️ 211 🔁 18 💬 18
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Dylanwith86 Penny/small cap stocks swing 30% in days, volatility is expected!

It's a lot less stressful if you only put money you're fine losing in them.
@Dylanwith86 Penny/small cap stocks 几天内波动 30%,这是预期内的!

如果只投入你可以接受亏掉的钱,压力会小很多。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@babyfolio Thanks scaling this to $1M on the next dip.

Just didn't want to buy that much on a 5% increase day
@babyfolio 谢谢,下次下跌我会把它扩到 $1M。

只是不想在一天涨 5% 时买那么多。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Bought $500K worth of $NBIS.

My highest conviction stock out of anything for a 1 year time period.

$225 PT https://t.co/buW9CV4WWH
买了 $500K 的 $NBIS

这是我在 1 年时间维度里最高信念的股票。

$225 PT https://t.co/buW9CV4WWH
❤️ 439 🔁 18 💬 30
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mattia030339 @DavidJang0620 No lol there's 42% short interest. Could be a hilarious 200%+ short squeeze
@mattia030339 @DavidJang0620 不 lol,有 42% short interest。可能会来一次很好笑的 200%+ short squeeze。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DavidJang0620 $TSM calls*.

My calls are up 68% right now since I posted. $NBIS is probably up 10%, which is still an extremely good return.
@DavidJang0620 $TSM calls*。

自我发帖以来,我的 calls 现在涨 68%。$NBIS 可能涨 10%,这仍然是非常好的回报。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DavidJang0620 $NBIS is the only company I'd full port for highest ROI at current market rates

$TSM is probably the safest full port if you're lower risk
@DavidJang0620 在当前市场价格下,$NBIS 是唯一一只我会为了最高 ROI full port 的公司。

如果你风险更低,$TSM 可能是最安全的 full port。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MMerrino569447 Triple rate cuts were crisis driven previously . (2001 - .com burst, 2008-09 - financial crisis, 2020 - covid).

This time Fed cuts before a major crisis = stocks moon immediately.

Fed signaled they want to lower borrowing costs and stimulate demand. Just following the flow
@MMerrino569447 以前的三次降息是危机驱动的。(2001 - .com 破裂,2008-09 - 金融危机,2020 - covid)。

这次 Fed 在重大危机前降息 = 股票立刻 moon。

Fed 表明他们想降低借贷成本并刺激需求。只是顺流而行。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
⚡Why This Triple Rate Cut Near Year-End 2025 Is a ONCE-IN-A-DECADE OPPORTUNITY

100% read this if you're a trader:

We've only had 3 events like this in 25 years: (2001, 2008–09, 2020).

Here's what's history shows:

1⃣ With a triple rate cut, growth and small caps tend to surge as cheaper money and debt easing spark risk appetite.

2⃣ On top of rate cuts, November–December is also one of the strongest periods for equities. We're approaching that period along with frontrunning.

3⃣ Institutions are only now adjusting to yesterday’s Fed surprise, rotating into growth assets and the Russell 2000 (up 2%+).

Floods of liquidity will eventually flow into growth stocks and small caps.

You now have a rare chance to frontrun that flow and reposition your portfolio starting today.
⚡为什么 2025 年底附近的这次三次降息是十年一遇的机会

如果你是交易者,100% 应该读这个:

过去 25 年只有 3 次类似事件:(2001、2008–09、2020)。

历史显示:

1⃣ 三次降息时,growth 和 small caps 往往会飙升,因为更便宜的钱和债务缓解会点燃风险偏好。

2⃣ 除了降息,11–12 月也是股票最强时期之一。我们正接近这个时期,也有人开始提前抢跑。

3⃣ 机构现在才开始适应昨天 Fed 的意外,轮动到 growth assets 和 Russell 2000(涨 2%+)。

大量流动性最终会流入 growth stocks 和 small caps。

你现在有一个罕见机会,从今天开始提前抢跑这股资金流,并重新配置组合。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah I'm long $IBIT and $LTC. $BKKT only crypto small cap I'd consider re-entering. Never long though because of dilution.

Litecoin gets rate cut tailwind, LTC reserves, and LTC ETF next month as catalysts. Just needs a narrative like $BMNR to go $250+ again.
对,我 long $IBIT$LTC$BKKT 是我唯一会考虑重新进入的 crypto small cap。不过永远不会长期持有,因为会稀释。

Litecoin 有降息顺风、LTC reserves 和下个月 LTC ETF 作为催化。只需要一个像 $BMNR 那样的叙事,就能再次到 $250+。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@sigmazerocap Nothing bad about risk management, but we just got a triple rate cut projection from the last fed meeting.

This is once-in-awhile opportunity for small caps/growth stocks combined with (Nov-Dec) seasonality.

SPY average +10% to +15%, 1 year later.
@sigmazerocap 风险管理没什么不好,但我们刚从上次 Fed 会议得到三次降息预测。

这结合(Nov-Dec)季节性,是 small caps/growth stocks 难得一遇的机会。

SPY 1 年后平均 +10% 到 +15%。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MMerrino569447 I don't normally invest in small caps but we got the triple rate cut projection. So this is purely a macro trade..

$PLMR looks solid like $UPWK. But triple rate cut hurts them because of lower investment income, so it doesn't get the benefit like other heavy-debt small caps.
@MMerrino569447 我通常不投资小盘股,但我们得到了三次降息预测。所以这是纯宏观交易。

$PLMR 看起来像 $UPWK 一样扎实。但三次降息会因为投资收入下降而伤害他们,所以它不像其他重债小盘那样受益。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Rrrdv4 Uh, there's a lot of debt. Rate cuts help a bit, but by only so much. $HAIN is a 134m market cap for a reason, but who knows if they can turn it around.
@Rrrdv4 呃,债务很多。降息有点帮助,但也就那么多。$HAIN 是 134m 市值是有原因的,但谁知道他们能不能扭转。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@unusual_whales $HIMS can fix this.
@unusual_whales $HIMS 可以解决这个。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@junyongisusing1 I bought a mini position now just cause I’m unsure https://t.co/ZXzZHFRABT
@junyongisusing1 我现在买了一个迷你仓位,只是因为我不确定 https://t.co/ZXzZHFRABT
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@babyfolio I don’t really have a wide portfolio, I focus on a few high convictions stocks with great fundamentals + potential and shift around.

I don’t see that with $TSLA lol but to each their own
@babyfolio 我其实没有很宽的组合,我专注几只有优秀基本面 + 潜力的高信念股票,并来回切换。

我在 $TSLA 上看不到这一点 lol,但各有所好。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@GeorgeGeor70147 @LibertadEterno I don’t touch biotech since I’m not educated on it.
@GeorgeGeor70147 @LibertadEterno 我不碰 biotech,因为我不懂。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@robswainept No, it’s an $ETH holding company and you’re buying into the fomo at ATH.

Best time to buy was $1600 when I did. Not at $4800 and then buying the holding companies.
@robswainept 不,它是一家 $ETH 持仓公司,而你是在 ATH 买入 fomo。

最佳买点是 $1600,当时我买了。不是 $4800 时再去买这些持仓公司。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
I don’t have many high conviction stocks but $NBIS is one at $90. Strong Buy on any dip

21B MC for a company with so much forward rev is insane. $IREN is great as well but more speculative atm + needs dilution

$HIMS has the most potential though over the next 3m from 42% SI. https://t.co/Mg9ZN12rRV
我高信念股票不多,但 $NBIS 在 $90 是其中之一。任何下跌都是 Strong Buy。

一家有这么多前瞻收入的公司只有 21B MC,太疯狂了。$IREN 也很好,但目前更投机 + 需要稀释。

不过未来 3m 上行潜力最大的是 $HIMS,因为 42% SI。https://t.co/Mg9ZN12rRV
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
If I had to buy 5 things for the next month by potential:

1. $HIMS - 42% SI, new product/rate cut catalyst + 1.2M EU customers. Short squeeze inevitable, just a matter of time.

2. $LTC - Frontrun institutions for the ETF launch October 2nd.

3. $NBIS - Should easily be $100+ just based off of MSFT deal. Sorry $IREN holders.

4. $CRDO - Just to catchup $ALAB MC.

5. $HOOD - S&P inclusion flows will add a ton to the market cap given S&P is weighted by MC and hood is $100B+.
如果按未来一个月的潜力,我必须买 5 个东西:

1. $HIMS - 42% SI,新产品/降息催化 + 1.2M 欧盟客户。逼空不可避免,只是时间问题。

2. $LTC - 在 10 月 2 日 ETF 推出前抢跑机构。

3. $NBIS - 光凭 MSFT deal 就应该轻松 $100+。抱歉 $IREN 持有人。

4. $CRDO - 只是为了追上 $ALAB 市值。

5. $HOOD - 纳入 S&P 的资金流会给市值带来大量增量,因为 S&P 按市值加权,而 hood 已经是 $100B+。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1966171568968708422
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
It’s extremely sad to trade Charlie Kirk’s passing but I wonder if $RUM would be a good speculative buy in the next dip.

RUM earnings likely higher than expected from all newfound conservative engagement + White House streams and stock is more attractive down 42% YTD. https://t.co/pf8Se71gcR
交易 Charlie Kirk 的去世非常令人难过,但我在想 $RUM 下一次下跌时会不会是不错的投机买点。

RUM 财报可能因为新涌入的保守派互动 + White House streams 而高于预期,而且股票 YTD 下跌 42% 后更有吸引力。https://t.co/pf8Se71gcR
引用原推@JDVance
Tomorrow, I will have the honor of hosting the Charlie Kirk Show. Please join me as I pay tribute to my friend.

12:00PM ET
https://t.co/oemvxJ18Mq https://t.co/eSMpx8xE3X
明天,我很荣幸将主持 Charlie Kirk Show。请和我一起向我的朋友致敬。

美东时间 12:00PM
https://t.co/oemvxJ18Mq https://t.co/eSMpx8xE3X
https://x.com/JDVance/status/1967392650144649272
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@traderVoltron @MrMikeInvesting I’m sure you have your own analysis with $BMNR but the way OP TA’s an ETH holding company is just meaningless and shows that they’re scamming people.

I feel bad for newcomers who get pay for subscriptions on a made up analysis.

It’s sad to see
@traderVoltron @MrMikeInvesting 我相信你对 $BMNR 有自己的分析,但 OP 对一个 ETH 持仓公司做 TA 的方式毫无意义,并显示他们在骗人。

我为那些花钱订阅这种编造分析的新手感到难过。

看到这很悲哀。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Yeah macro is large aspect of it. When I do breakouts like for $HIMS I considered front running rate cut as buying pressure for the 42% SI as well as PPI data + surprise testosterone product release when it was back sub $50 to create a breakout + short squeeze.

Stocks already got frontran since cuts at almost certain. But much open interest expiring 19th. Helps a lot of retail bet bearish from “Sell in September” usually, but MMs might always flush calls.

I don’t know the direction day of so im taking less risk but front running made the most money.
是的,宏观是很大一部分。当我做 $HIMS 这种 breakout 时,我也考虑了提前交易降息作为 42% SI 的买压,以及 PPI 数据 + 意外 testosterone 产品发布,当时它还低于 $50,以制造 breakout + short squeeze。

降息几乎确定后,股票已经被提前抢跑了。但很多 open interest 在 19 号到期。通常“Sell in September”会让很多散户押 bearish,这有帮助,但 MMs 也可能总是 flush calls。

我不知道当天方向,所以承担更少风险,但提前抢跑赚得最多。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@zenman8620 @MrMikeInvesting Yeah OP posts snake oil charts without knowing what they’re doing
@zenman8620 @MrMikeInvesting 对,OP 在不知道自己做什么的情况下发 snake oil 图表。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MrMikeInvesting Do you enjoy scamming newcomers with these charts and selling courses from it? You do realize $BMNR is an $ETH holding company..

There’s always a chance it goes to $100 from ETH rallying but adding a TA on BMNR makes you look so stupid to anyone who knows what they’re doing
@MrMikeInvesting 你喜欢用这些图表骗新手并卖课程吗?你知道 $BMNR 是一家 $ETH 持仓公司吧。

它总有可能因为 ETH 上涨到 $100,但在 BMNR 上加 TA,会让任何懂行的人觉得你很蠢。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Many popular users on X are scammers who try and sell subscriptions and this is one of them.

Here’s why:

TA barely means anything for some companies. $BMNR is an $ETH holding company. Ignoring $ETH and trying to chart $BMNR makes anyone laugh.

Fundamentally $BMNR tracks $ETH and it’s roughly 1.3x NAV. For $BMNR to go up 100%, ETH would need to go up 82%.

Polymarket predicts a 16% chance $ETH hits $8K by end of year, not 1 month.

Either there would need to be a low float buy premarket or NAV depegging after an $ETH rally.

As for their $NBIS claim, it went from $40 to $110+ from an unexpected 17 billion dollar $MSFT contract, not because anyone drew lines on a chart saying the TA predicted a breakout.

When you analyze breakouts, this is exactly what NOT to do.

They post crappy predictions on every stock then brag hindsight that they got one or two right to sell courses.
很多 X 上的热门用户都是骗子,试图卖订阅,这就是其中一个。

原因如下:

TA 对某些公司几乎没有意义。$BMNR 是一家 $ETH 持仓公司。无视 $ETH 去画 $BMNR 的图,会让任何人发笑。

从基本面看,$BMNR 跟踪 $ETH,大概是 1.3x NAV。要让 $BMNR 涨 100%,ETH 需要涨 82%。

Polymarket 预测 $ETH 年底前到 $8K 的概率是 16%,不是 1 个月内。

除非盘前有低流通买盘,或 $ETH 上涨后 NAV 脱锚。

至于他们对 $NBIS 的说法,它从 $40 到 $110+ 是因为意外拿到 $MSFT 170 亿美元合同,不是因为有人在图上画线说 TA 预测了 breakout。

当你分析 breakouts 时,这正是不要做的事。

他们对每只股票都发烂预测,然后事后吹自己蒙对了一两个,以此卖课。
❤️ 18 🔁 0 💬 5
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@soulbiri1 I like $LULU around these levels.

Could drop more next month but should recover Nov -&gt; December because sector usually performs best around then.

Recovery should be more muted though from previous years from tax loss averaging cause it’s down 58% ytd.
@soulbiri1 我喜欢 $LULU 现在这些价位。

下个月可能还会跌,但应该会在 11 月 -> 12 月恢复,因为这个板块通常那时候表现最好。

不过因为它 YTD 跌了 58%,税损均摊会让恢复比往年更温和。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
I wouldn't trade the day of FED meeting. I'd personally de-risk before + keep high conviction stocks since I don't have an answer.

The better thing to do would be to trade the frontrunning as a catalyst since rate cuts are almost certain, which was what I was doing eg. https://t.co/5pzt65jDUc

For my guess though, MM's might use rate cut as an excuse to wipe out the extreme amount open interest expiring the 19th. If they do, it's a good buying opportunity, but if you need to hedge, VIX calls is always a good option since it's pretty low right now.

Could be wrong though since stocks are expected to be at these levels or even higher because of USD printing + Trump cutting corporate taxes and we keep pumping higher even though there's been a lot of frontrunning for rate cut.

But generally it's positive for stocks over the next year so unless have 0dte or doing calls expiring this week, I just wouldn't trade it and if it falls, use the opportunity to buy more.
我不会在 FED 会议当天交易。我个人会提前降风险 + 保留高信念股票,因为我没有答案。

更好的做法是把提前抢跑本身当作催化来交易,因为降息几乎确定,这也是我一直在做的,比如 https://t.co/5pzt65jDUc

按我的猜测,MMs 可能会把降息当借口,清掉 19 号到期的大量 open interest。如果他们这么做,那是好买点;但如果你需要对冲,VIX calls 一直是不错选择,因为现在很低。

不过我可能错,因为 USD printing + Trump 降企业税,股票本来就预期在这些水平甚至更高,尽管已经有很多降息抢跑,我们仍在继续上涨。

但总体来说,未来一年对股票是正面的,所以除非你有 0dte 或做本周到期 calls,我就不会交易它;如果下跌,就利用机会买更多。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Just one example - with LTC ETF filings:

I don't go out of my way to search up Litecoin ETFs since Litecoin is never in the back of my mind.

However, just browsing online people on X/Reddit were talking about it getting rejected.

-> Search up Litecoin ETF filing, find it's Oct 2nd.
-> Search up Polymarket + Bloomberg Odds (sentiment on Reddit/X are like "it's going to be rejected because of delays", but ignore it)

Made my own decision that it's consequential enough of a catalyst to the marketcap because of institutional inflows and that ETFs help with reserves + other ETFs buying LTC in it.
举一个例子——LTC ETF 申报:

我不会特意去搜 Litecoin ETFs,因为 Litecoin 从来不在我脑子里。

不过在网上随便浏览时,X/Reddit 上的人在讨论它会被拒。

-> 搜 Litecoin ETF filing,发现是 10 月 2 日。
-> 搜 Polymarket + Bloomberg Odds(Reddit/X 情绪是“会因为延迟被拒”,但忽略它)

我自己判断,这个催化对市值足够重要,因为机构流入,而且 ETF 会帮助 reserves + 其他 ETFs 买入其中的 LTC。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
1. Time stock breakouts by trading on actual catalysts. Learn how catalysts affect stocks while ignoring retail/news sentiment.

https://t.co/ozo2YzL5vy
1. 通过真实催化来把握股票 breakout 的时机。学习催化如何影响股票,同时忽略散户/新闻情绪。

https://t.co/ozo2YzL5vy
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
1. Time stock breakouts + trade based on catalysts.

Tip #1:
- Read $RDDT, X, WSJ, etc to get info on upcoming events like earnings/etc. But **IGNORE the sentiment** since it's usually wrong. I cannot stress ignore the sentiment enough.

Tip 2:
- Know what a real catalyst is and buy beforehand. Real = 2B+ from S&P flowing into $HOOD MC on inclusion. Fake (for shorts) = CFO resigning or random conferences (unless it's material like $SMCI).

Recent examples:

HOOD (22.21%+) - I bought $325K worth of $HOOD day of S&P 500 inclusion then it went up 15% the next day. Catalyst was S&P 500 inclusion.

https://t.co/Q3ebNeJ7QU

UNH example (10.71%+) - I bought $225K worth at $318 and then few days later it went to $360. As a major dividend stock, the dividend was in a week or two and a catalyst for buying pressure.

https://t.co/M8qpeYRep9

LTC Example (currently) - Two catalysts are ETF filing in 1 month and LTC reserves built after ETF launch.

https://t.co/wtvfs4ANEc

Obviously there's a lot more should go on your mind CONCURRENTLY with catalysts but this is advice #1 on what to learn.
1. 给股票突破择时 + 基于催化交易。

提示 #1:
- 看 $RDDT、X、WSJ 等,获取财报等即将发生事件的信息。但**忽略情绪**,因为情绪通常是错的。我再怎么强调忽略情绪都不为过。

提示 #2:
- 知道什么是真催化,并提前买。真催化 = $HOOD 纳入 S&P 后有 $2B+ 流入市值。假催化(对空头而言)= CFO 辞职或随机会议(除非像 $SMCI 那样有实质内容)。

近期例子:

HOOD(22.21%+)- 我在 S&P 500 纳入当天买了 $325K 的 $HOOD,第二天涨了 15%。催化就是纳入 S&P 500。

https://t.co/Q3ebNeJ7QU

UNH 例子(10.71%+)- 我在 $318 买了 $225K,几天后到 $360。作为主要分红股,分红在一两周内,是买盘压力催化。

https://t.co/M8qpeYRep9

LTC 例子(当前)- 两个催化是 1 个月内 ETF filing 和 ETF 推出后的 LTC 储备建设。

https://t.co/wtvfs4ANEc

显然还有很多细节。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1967241543850541440
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
1. Time stock breakouts + trade based on catalysts.

Tip #1:
- Read $RDDT, X, WSJ, etc to get info on upcoming events like earnings/etc. But **IGNORE the sentiment** since it's usually wrong. I cannot stress ignore the sentiment enough.

Tip 2:
- Know what a real catalyst is and buy beforehand. Real = 2B+ from S&P flowing into $HOOD MC on inclusion. Fake (for shorts) = CFO resigning or random conferences (unless it's material like $SMCI).

Recent examples:

HOOD (22.21%+) - I bought $325K worth of $HOOD day of S&P 500 inclusion then it went up 15% the next day. Catalyst was S&P 500 inclusion.

https://t.co/Q3ebNeJ7QU

UNH example (10.71%+) - I bought $225K worth at $318 and then few days later it went to $360. As a major dividend stock, the dividend was in a week or two and a catalyst for buying pressure.

https://t.co/M8qpeYRep9

LTC Example (currently) - Two catalysts are ETF filing in 1 month and LTC reserves built after ETF launch.

https://t.co/wtvfs4ANEc

Obviously there's a lot more should go on your mind CONCURRENTLY with catalysts but this is advice #1 on what to learn.
1. 把握股票 breakouts + 基于催化交易。

Tip #1:
- 阅读 $RDDT、X、WSJ 等,获取财报等即将发生事件的信息。但 **忽略情绪**,因为通常是错的。我再怎么强调忽略情绪都不为过。

Tip 2:
- 知道什么是真催化,并提前买入。真 = $HOOD 纳入 S&P 后有 2B+ 流入 MC。假(对空头)= CFO 辞职或随机会议(除非像 $SMCI 那样实质)。

近期例子:

HOOD (22.21%+) - 我在 $HOOD 纳入 S&P 500 当天买了 $325K,第二天涨了 15%。催化是纳入 S&P 500。

https://t.co/Q3ebNeJ7QU

UNH 例子 (10.71%+) - 我在 $318 买了 $225K,几天后到 $360。作为主要分红股,分红在一两周后,是买压催化。

https://t.co/M8qpeYRep9

LTC 例子(当前)- 两个催化是 1 个月后的 ETF filing,以及 ETF 推出后建立 LTC reserves。

https://t.co/wtvfs4ANEc

显然,和催化同时还有很多事情要一起考虑,但这是建议 #1:该学什么。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
HOW TO TRADE LIKE ME – LONG THREAD

I'm known for uncanny accuracy and timing stock breakouts on Reddit + X.

Over the next few weeks I’ll share one post every other day walking through my process so you can see how I think and trade.

Doesn't hurt to read! https://t.co/L21Ewv2iJz
如何像我一样交易 - 长帖

我在 Reddit + X 上因为对股票突破的判断和择时准得离谱而出名。

接下来几周,我会每隔一天发一篇帖子,拆解我的流程,让你看到我是怎么思考、怎么交易的。

看看也没坏处! https://t.co/L21Ewv2iJz
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1967240935114514613
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
HOW TO TRADE LIKE ME – LONG THREAD

I'm known for uncanny accuracy and timing stock breakouts on Reddit + X.

Over the next few weeks I’ll share one post every other day walking through my process so you can see how I think and trade.

Doesn't hurt to read! https://t.co/L21Ewv2iJz
HOW TO TRADE LIKE ME – 长线程

我因在 Reddit + X 上对股票 breakouts 的准确性和时机把握而出名。

接下来几周,我会每隔一天发一篇,带你看我的流程,让你了解我是怎么思考和交易的。

读一下没坏处!https://t.co/L21Ewv2iJz
引用原推@triforcerytp
@aleabitoreddit @MaximChistov For people who want to learn your investing/trading style, what key concepts would they need to learn? It seems like you do a mix of fundamental and technical analysis.

I'm very much willing to put in the time and effort to learn.
@aleabitoreddit @MaximChistov 对于想学习你投资/交易风格的人来说,需要先掌握哪些关键概念?感觉你是基本面和技术分析都会混着用。

我非常愿意投入时间和精力去学。
https://x.com/triforcerytp/status/1967223445797876150
❤️ 54 🔁 1 💬 4
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@triforcerytp @MaximChistov Hi I'll write something up for you.

It will probably take some time though since there's quite a lot of stuff
@triforcerytp @MaximChistov 你好,我会给你写点东西。

不过可能需要一些时间,因为内容相当多。
❤️ 11 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
💬 引用
If you see this without a wide market drop:

1. Traders with 10-50x leverage got liquidated.

2. LTC ETF will get denied.

It's prob #1.

$SOL already got frontran (up 20%+ in 7D). $LTC has not and launch is Oct 2nd.

It's profitable to buy dips during leverage liquidations https://t.co/95GmmYW9LR
如果你在没有大盘大跌的情况下看到这个:

1. 10-50x 杠杆交易者被清算。

2. LTC ETF 会被拒。

大概率是 #1。

$SOL 已经被提前抢跑(7D 涨 20%+)。$LTC 还没有,而 launch 是 10 月 2 日。

在杠杆清算时买 dips 是有利可图的 https://t.co/95GmmYW9LR
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Also, I’ll start posting a deeper analysis behind why I think a stock would breakout or some historical ones I’ve posted before so people can do it without me when I quit.

And these are the reasons why a stock actually goes up. Not because of some stupid line drawing, with ABCDEFGHIJK correction wave 51 that you pay for.

Usually I post memes, but theres a ton that goes into each DD. And it’s why everyone wonders why I have uncanny timings with things going up 5-20% the next day.

If you saw my $BULL arbitrage on $RDDT, you would know I read through random sec Edgar filings too, so that level of detail is whats required.
另外,我会开始发更深入的分析,解释为什么我认为一只股票会 breakout,或分析我以前发过的一些历史案例,这样我退出后大家也能自己做。

这些才是股票真正上涨的原因。不是因为你付费买的某些愚蠢画线,什么 ABCDEFGHIJK correction wave 51。

我通常发 memes,但每个 DD 背后都有很多东西。这也是为什么大家总奇怪我能精准抓到第二天涨 5-20% 的时机。

如果你看过我在 $RDDT 上的 $BULL arbitrage,你就知道我也会读随机 SEC Edgar filings,所以需要这种细节程度。
❤️ 17 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MaximChistov I posted to stay away from $CRCL and $DUOL at ath but I don’t short much since markets are irrational like $OKLO | $QBTS

For the other q, I’ll leave X down the road since I feel like I’m helping others right now.

The users paywalling stupid + wrong charting is keeping me here
@MaximChistov 我发过要远离 ATH 的 $CRCL$DUOL,但我不太做空,因为市场像 $OKLO | $QBTS 一样非理性。

另一个问题,我以后会离开 X,因为我现在觉得自己在帮助别人。

那些把愚蠢 + 错误图表放进 paywall 的用户让我留在这里。
❤️ 8 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
💬 引用
Love seeing people post profits.

Check my $RDDT post history—so far, every breakout I’ve shared from $GOOGL, 2x $HIMS, $ETH, $UPWK, $RKLB, $OSCR has hit

Scroll through my history on X/Reddit and see for yourself.

I’m new to X but here temporarily to help people learn to trade
喜欢看到大家发利润。

查我的 $RDDT 发帖历史——到目前为止,我分享的每个 breakout,从 $GOOGL、2x $HIMS$ETH$UPWK$RKLB$OSCR 都打中了。

翻一下我 X/Reddit 的历史,自己看。

我刚来 X,但暂时在这里帮助大家学习交易。
引用原推@platochi
@aleabitoreddit don't miss. Thanks for the plays mate https://t.co/wHCEh9j5sh
@aleabitoreddit 真不失手。谢谢你的交易思路兄弟 https://t.co/wHCEh9j5sh
https://x.com/platochi/status/1966518430653116541
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@taleino93 @unusual_whales I genuinely don’t know which direction to go with $ORCL.

Oracle’s deal was with OpenAi, which doesn’t even have 300B.

$MSFT deal with $NBIS is is confirmed with $17B, since it’s Microsoft so NBIS is undervalued.

Time will tell if OpenAI can pay up.
@taleino93 @unusual_whales 我真的不知道 $ORCL 该往哪个方向走。

Oracle 的交易对象是 OpenAi,而 OpenAi 甚至没有 300B。

$MSFT$NBIS 的交易是确认的 $17B,因为这是 Microsoft,所以 NBIS 被低估。

OpenAI 能不能付钱,时间会告诉我们。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Heads up, #LTC is a potential 300% in the next few months.

1. LTC ETF October 2nd and the front running has just begun (up 5.35% since I posted.

2. Puny 8B MC with institutional adoption.

3. Small amounts of LTC reserves will literally eat up majority of the supply and 5-15% of the supply is already permanently lost.

I don’t post much about crypto, and the main time I did was with #ETH before it went from $1600 to $4800.
提醒一下,#LTC 未来几个月可能有 300%。

1. LTC ETF 10 月 2 日,提前抢跑才刚开始(自我发帖以来涨 5.35%)。

2. 只有 8B MC,却有机构采用。

3. 少量 LTC reserves 字面上就会吃掉大部分供应,而 5-15% 的供应已经永久丢失。

我不太发 crypto,上一次主要发是 #ETH,它之后从 $1600 涨到 $4800。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@TPvegaa I mainly do shares posted my position earlier, I usually do options if IV is &lt;35 but to each their own.

https://t.co/0tL98qdiJR
@TPvegaa 我主要做股票,之前发过我的仓位;如果 IV <35,我通常会做期权,但各有所好。

https://t.co/0tL98qdiJR
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@koji_dev I always recommend shares for high IV stocks unless you do some stupid way out of money call and somehow get the timing right.
@koji_dev 对高 IV 股票,我一直建议买股票,除非你做某种离谱的极 OTM call,而且还能神奇地踩准时机。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@taleino93 Nice!
@taleino93 不错!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
I don’t know how to reiterate this enough for $HIMS

42% short interest on a 11B, profitable, and fast growing company… has the potential to make history on a short squeeze like $OPEN or $GME.

The risk reward is worth it. https://t.co/xoCKXMzdqu
关于 $HIMS,我不知道还能怎么强调。

一家 11B、市值、盈利、快速增长的公司,42% short interest……有潜力像 $OPEN$GME 那样在 short squeeze 中创造历史。

风险回报值得。https://t.co/xoCKXMzdqu
引用原推@himshouse
🚨 BREAKING: BTIG REITERATES $HIMS BUY RATING, $85 PRICE TARGET

THE HIGHEST PRICE TARGET ON WALL STREET
🚨 突发:BTIG 重申 $HIMS 买入评级,目标价 $85

华尔街最高目标价
https://x.com/himshouse/status/1966469134666940498
❤️ 193 🔁 15 💬 5
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@himshouse Make sure to disable stock lending on your brokerage too. The stock is 42% sold short.
@himshouse 也记得在你的券商那里关闭 stock lending。这只股票有 42% 被卖空。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mamadamacdonald $SOL already got frontran and $XRP fundamentals are just as absurd as $PLTR.

$LTC has a ton of room to run with etf approval and Litecoin treasuries. Given the MC is so small, we’ll likely see some massive spike when enough gets accumulated. $200+
@mamadamacdonald $SOL 已经被提前抢跑,而 $XRP 基本面和 $PLTR 一样荒谬。

$LTC 在 etf 批准和 Litecoin treasuries 的推动下还有很大空间。考虑到 MC 这么小,当累积足够多时,我们很可能看到巨大 spike。$200+
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
PSA: If you were an actual swing/algorithmic trader, you wouldn’t need to sell $50 paywalled courses on Discord.

These people are the biggest snake oil scammers on X.

They’re one of the main reasons I started an account to show people how to actually make returns from markets https://t.co/sQYIyHv9Yz
PSA:如果你是真正的 swing/algorithmic trader,你不需要在 Discord 上卖 $50 付费课程。

这些人是 X 上最大的 snake oil 骗子。

他们是我开账号的主要原因之一:向大家展示如何真正从市场获得回报。https://t.co/sQYIyHv9Yz
引用原推@StockTrader_Max
$HIMS STILL REQUIRES A LOWER LOW TO COMPLETE THE ABC CORRECTION 🚨📈

On Monday when $HIMS was at $51 I publicly posted that the stock will likely fall to $46/47 a share which was not received very well by many...

Fast forward to today and the stock is at $47.78 a share, the PM suggest that the stock will open +2% which IMO will act as wave 4 within wave C...

I then expect $HIMS to roll over and create a fresh low to complete wave 5 within wave C. This can happen in the $45 - $47.52 range..

Once the ABC correction is complete, this stock will be ready to trade much higher in the coming weeks and months ahead 📈

If you want to be part of my trading group and follow my every move then join today for $4,99 - Coupon Code “2025” - https://t.co/jUU7An4KLc
$HIMS 仍然需要再创一个更低低点,才能完成 ABC 调整 🚨📈

周一 $HIMS 在 $51 的时候,我公开发帖说这只股票很可能会跌到 $46/47 一股,当时很多人不太接受……

快进到今天,股价已经到了 $47.78,盘前显示开盘可能 +2%。在我看来,这会成为 C 浪里的第 4 浪……

然后我预计 $HIMS 会再次转弱,创出新低,完成 C 浪中的第 5 浪。这个位置可能在 $45 - $47.52 区间。

一旦 ABC 调整完成,这只股票接下来几周到几个月就准备好大幅走高了 📈

如果你想加入我的交易群、跟随我的每一步操作,今天就加入,价格 $4,99 - 优惠码 “2025” - https://t.co/jUU7An4KLc
https://x.com/StockTrader_Max/status/1966125604819910730
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mattia030339 I’d say do both unless you’re full port. $UPWK went up a ton since i posted so might be a good idea to just get long term capital gains tax on it.

Otherwise $HIMS probably has more potential near/mid term cause of 42% short interest, if you can catch it on a dip.
@mattia030339 我会说除非你 full port,否则两个都做。$UPWK 自我发帖以来涨了很多,所以只拿长期资本利得税可能是好主意。

否则,如果你能在 dip 抓到,$HIMS 近/中期潜力可能更大,因为 42% short interest。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@alc2022 and... $AMD runs on $TSM.
@alc2022 而且……$AMD 运行在 $TSM 上。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
If you're debating $ORCL vs. $AMZN | $GOOGL, $AMD | $AVGO vs. $NVDA, $NBIS vs. $IREN vs. $WYFI vs. $CRWV

It's easy. Just buy $TSM, everything above is dependent on it.

Undervalued and a monopoly, will likely run from $1.3T -&gt; $1.8T MC based on forward growth + capex from ERs.
如果你在争 $ORCL vs. $AMZN | $GOOGL$AMD | $AVGO vs. $NVDA$NBIS vs. $IREN vs. $WYFI vs. $CRWV

很简单。直接买 $TSM,上面所有东西都依赖它。

被低估且是垄断,基于前瞻增长 + 财报里的 capex,很可能从 $1.3T -> $1.8T MC。
引用原推@alc2022
$ORCL inference basically runs on $AMD
$ORCL 的 inference 基本上跑在 $AMD
https://x.com/alc2022/status/1966180868239798523
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Lovefist17 No price target. I'm just guessing it's worth the risk/reward that it pulls a PLTR and goes to a overvalued 400B market cap.

Passive inflows from S&P is just stupid with large caps.

Also $HOOD is launching banking which is extremely disruptive + good catalyst
@Lovefist17 没有目标价。我只是猜测,考虑到风险回报,它可能走成 PLTR,涨到高估的 400B 市值。

大盘股里 S&P 被动流入就是很蠢地强。

另外 $HOOD 正在推出 banking,这是极具颠覆性 + 好催化。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@himshouse This reminds me when everyone gave $HOOD a $12 PT when the stock was trading at $18.

The 42% short interest are scared when price is holding $50 after they shorted another 6%.

$HIMS is profitable, acquiring companies, small 10B market cap, and with new product launches.
@himshouse 这让我想起当 $HOOD 交易在 $18 时,所有人都给它 $12 PT。

在空头又加空 6% 后,价格仍守住 $50,这让 42% short interest 很害怕。

$HIMS 盈利、在收购公司、市值小只有 10B,并且有新产品发布。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
If I had to buy 5 things for the next month by potential:

1. $HIMS - 42% SI, new product/rate cut catalyst + 1.2M EU customers. Short squeeze inevitable, just a matter of time.

2. $LTC - Frontrun institutions for the ETF launch October 2nd.

3. $NBIS - Should easily be $100+ just based off of MSFT deal. Sorry $IREN holders.

4. $CRDO - Just to catchup $ALAB MC.

5. $HOOD - S&P inclusion flows will add a ton to the market cap given S&P is weighted by MC and hood is $100B+.
如果我必须按潜力买未来一个月的 5 个东西:

1. $HIMS - 42% SI,新产品/降息催化 + 1.2M EU customers。Short squeeze 不可避免,只是时间问题。

2. $LTC - 抢跑 10 月 2 日 ETF launch 前的机构。

3. $NBIS - 只基于 MSFT 交易就应该轻松 $100+。抱歉 $IREN holders。

4. $CRDO - 只是为了追上 $ALAB MC。

5. $HOOD - S&P inclusion flows 会给市值带来大量增量,因为 S&P 按 MC 加权,而 hood 是 $100B+。
❤️ 24 🔁 0 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Toy0tomi_H @mattia030339 Makes sense, not all of my trades are based on analysis though.

I just vibe trade a large part of the time and I turn out to be right majority of the time.
@Toy0tomi_H @mattia030339 有道理,不过我的交易不全基于分析。

我很多时候只是 vibe trade,结果大多数时候我是对的。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@StockTrader_Max Do you enjoy scamming people?
@StockTrader_Max 你喜欢骗人吗?
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@__visionxry__ I never entered $IREN. I was just looking at potential of bitcoin mining stocks over the next few months.

I'd probably buy $MARA / $RIOT or $WYFI if i had to take a speculative gamble on two though.
@__visionxry__ 我从没进 $IREN。我只是看未来几个月 bitcoin mining stocks 的潜力。

如果非要在两个上做投机赌注,我可能会买 $MARA / $RIOT$WYFI
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MilesTa53993799 I'll need to do more research on MEIP not familiar with it.

If it has significant LTC reserves and under NAV, it's a good buy.

Otherwise, just stick with the native asset LTC.
@MilesTa53993799 我需要对 MEIP 做更多研究,不熟。

如果它有显著 LTC reserves 且低于 NAV,那是好买点。

否则,就坚持原生资产 LTC。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@__visionxry__ Yeah I used this time to exit and open up a short. People are probably FOMO buying so good exit liquidity.

My cost average was like $99 so can’t complain about 100%+ return in 2 months
@__visionxry__ 对,我利用这个时间退出并开了 short。人们可能在 FOMO 买入,所以是不错的 exit liquidity。

我的成本均价大概 $99,所以 2 个月 100%+ 回报没什么可抱怨。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Changed my mind on $ALAB, took profit at $217 so exited long and opened up short with $CREDO as a hedge.

ALAB feels a bit overbought after going up 14%.

$CREDO should play catchup soon though. https://t.co/oDIuqi0mFn
改变了对 $ALAB 的看法,在 $217 止盈,所以退出多头,并用 $CREDO 作为对冲开了 short。

ALAB 涨 14% 后感觉有点超买。

不过 $CREDO 应该很快补涨。https://t.co/oDIuqi0mFn
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
The reason why $ALAB is taking off is because Astera is the only small cap company in existence with systemic exposure to 5 of the Mag7.

1. ALAB's customer base is literally Mag 7: $GOOGL, $MSFT, $NVDA, $META, and $AMZN.

2. They're growing at astounding rates ~150%+ y/y, with 76% margins (with higher margins than NVDA, one of the highest in the semi market).

3. Capex is still increasing for AI spend, as seen with $GOOGL earnings.

NVDA started at a 150B market cap -> 4 TRILLION+ because hyperscalers needed GPUs. We're the start of this effect with ALAB for the AI supply chain, and it's starting at a small 20B market cap.

We could see this being the next 1000% if they execute properly and AI infrastructure buildout continues.
$ALAB 起飞的原因,是因为 Astera 是唯一一家系统性暴露于 5 家 Mag7 的小盘公司。

1. ALAB 的客户群字面意义上就是 Mag7:$GOOGL$MSFT$NVDA$META$AMZN

2. 它们增长速度惊人,同比约 150%+,利润率 76%(比 NVDA 还高,是半导体市场里最高的一批)。

3. 从 $GOOGL 财报可以看到,AI 支出的 capex 仍在增加。

NVDA 从 $150B 市值开始,因为 hyperscalers 需要 GPU,最后涨到 4 TRILLION+。我们现在正处于 ALAB 在 AI 供应链里发生类似效应的起点,而它从小小的 $20B 市值开始。

如果执行得好、AI infrastructure buildout 继续,我们可能会看到下一个 1000%。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1949825690960023810
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Toy0tomi_H Just going off feels, like my other DD
@Toy0tomi_H 就是凭感觉,和我其他 DD 一样。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
While people are scared, bought $100k $SG on the drop to $8.22.

No news, down 8.2%+. Meanwhile markets and high beta stocks like $HOOD, $RKLB, $ALAB, $CREDO, $HIMS, $APP are rising.

Best time to buy is on the extreme fear when retail are selling the shares they bought at $40 https://t.co/vBZhOJF1y0
在人们害怕时,在跌到 $8.22 时买了 $100k $SG

没新闻,跌 8.2%+。与此同时市场和 $HOOD$RKLB$ALAB$CREDO$HIMS$APP 这类高 beta 股票都在涨。

最佳买点就是极度恐慌时,当散户在卖他们 $40 买的股票时。https://t.co/vBZhOJF1y0
❤️ 10 🔁 0 💬 4
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@mattia030339 No clue. Just holding to see where it goes after ETF launch.

Could 300% if there's crypto treasuries that adopt LTC after a spot ETF. Market cap is extremely tiny so I'm sure there's some incentive to do this type of play.
@mattia030339 不知道。只是持有看看 ETF launch 后怎么走。

如果 spot ETF 后有 crypto treasuries 采用 LTC,可能涨 300%。市值极小,所以我相信做这种交易有某种激励。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@triforcerytp Shares in the best. I mainly recommend calls for super low IV stocks (10-35%) like $GOOGL or $UNH
@triforcerytp 股票最好。我主要只会对超低 IV 股票(10-35%)推荐 calls,比如 $GOOGL$UNH
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@triforcerytp People turn to freelancing, so positive, unless it’s a major recession.

Even if revenue drops, $UPWK just needs to increase profit margins.

Their stock is incredibly undervalued and all management needs to do is cut out bloat to reach $25. $100m in buybacks helps too.
@triforcerytp 人们会转向 freelancing,所以是正面的,除非是重大衰退。

即使收入下降,$UPWK 只需要提高利润率。

他们的股票极度低估,管理层只要砍掉臃肿部分就能到 $25。$100m 回购也有帮助。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Now playing follow the lead.

Bought $100k of $BULL following $HOOD S&P.

Weird it dropped 2.4% on a $18 outperform price target, too many weekly calls IG.

Growing rev of 45% y/y similar to Hood, massive regarded retail base from WSB.

Short term risk is random Sept macro. https://t.co/mSkBpoxCMI
现在玩 follow the lead。

跟随 $HOOD S&P,买了 $100k $BULL

奇怪的是,在 $18 outperform 目标价下它跌了 2.4%,IG 可能太多 weekly calls。

收入同比增长 45%,类似 Hood,来自 WSB 的巨大 regarded 散户基础。

短期风险是随机 September macro。https://t.co/mSkBpoxCMI
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$HOOD added to S&P 500.

New product launch on Tuesday and banking coming soon.

Huge money flows coming into Robinhood given market cap soon. Might be PLTR v2.

This is just WSB instincts that go into DD! Some of you probably saw my deleted post guessing inclusion lol https://t.co/h8txi6mQD2
$HOOD 被纳入 S&P 500。

周二有新产品发布,银行业务也快来了。

考虑到 Robinhood 很快的市值,会有巨大资金流入。可能是 PLTR v2。

这就是 WSB 直觉进入 DD!你们有些人可能看到过我删掉的那条猜纳入的帖子 lol https://t.co/h8txi6mQD2
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1964079336685744438
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DaveSte82463893 Canary is Oct 2nd
@DaveSte82463893 Canary 是 10 月 2 日。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MilesTa53993799 Thx got lucky
@MilesTa53993799 谢谢,运气好。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$HOOD added to S&P 500.

New product launch on Tuesday and banking coming soon.

Huge money flows coming into Robinhood given market cap soon. Might be PLTR v2.

This is just WSB instincts that go into DD! Some of you probably saw my deleted post guessing inclusion lol https://t.co/h8txi6mQD2
$HOOD 加入 S&P 500。

周二有新产品发布,banking 也快来了。

考虑到市值,很快会有巨大资金流入 Robinhood。可能是 PLTR v2。

这只是进入 DD 的 WSB 直觉!你们有些人大概看过我猜测 inclusion 的被删帖 lol https://t.co/h8txi6mQD2
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
@MilesTa53993799 I’m day trading $HOOD, I’ll adjust based on how it goes https://t.co/kZQxXl0zjr
@MilesTa53993799 我在日内交易 $HOOD,会根据走势调整 https://t.co/kZQxXl0zjr
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1964019507162382346
❤️ 10 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MilesTa53993799 Also it’s worth the risk/reward just holding it past inclusion date imo.

Down 4%, they have new product lines next Tuesday, and great company all around lol.

I’m just a short term swing trader
@MilesTa53993799 另外 imo 持有到纳入日期之后,风险回报也值得。

跌 4%,他们下周二有新产品线,而且整体是很棒的公司 lol。

我只是短期波段交易者。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MilesTa53993799 I’m day trading $HOOD, I’ll adjust based on how it goes https://t.co/kZQxXl0zjr
@MilesTa53993799 我在 day trading $HOOD,会根据走势调整 https://t.co/kZQxXl0zjr
❤️ 2 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@DanielTan64198 $UPWK under $20 is screaming buy. $25 seems fair valued ~14 p/e.

Could end up at $75 one day who knows. Upwork is extremely profitable and is just sitting on a cash pile, so if you're an investor just wait and see how their acquisitions go. Otherwise I'd wait to $20+
@DanielTan64198 $UPWK 低于 $20 是 screaming buy。$25 看起来公允估值,约 ~14 p/e。

谁知道有一天会不会到 $75。Upwork 非常盈利,而且坐拥现金堆,所以如果你是投资者,就等着看他们收购进展。否则我会等到 $20+。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$UPWK just announced it's buying ~5% of it's float back with a $100M repurchase program.

Let's reiterate this one more time:

1. ~2B market cap, with 773M yearly revenue and 77.8% gross margins.

2. Big Cash Pile, profitable, ~9 p/e. Expanding margins + new business acquisitions not priced into forward revenue.

If you're worried about $RKLB, $CRWV, $IREN, $HIMS, $WULF and other high beta stocks from September, seasonality doesn't matter if your market cap is this low and you're printing money.

Upwork is probably the most undervalued and immensely profitable stocks to hold in this market.
$UPWK 刚宣布通过 $100M 回购计划买回约 5% 流通股。

我们再重复一次:

1. ~2B 市值,年收入 773M,毛利率 77.8%。

2. 大量现金、盈利、~9 p/e。利润率扩张 + 新业务收购还没被计入前瞻收入。

如果你担心 9 月的 $RKLB$CRWV$IREN$HIMS$WULF 和其他高 beta 股票,当你的市值这么低且在印钱时,季节性并不重要。

Upwork 可能是这个市场里最被低估且极其盈利的持仓股票。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
$UPWK is the safest value play, even over $UNH, $NVO, $GOOGL, and others.

Market makers flushed Upwork call open interest for August 15th, and now it's rallying where it should be above $17.5+.

A 1.8B software company with ~80% gross margins doing 770m in annual revenue is almost free money.
$UPWK 是最安全的价值股,甚至比 $UNH$NVO$GOOGL 等都安全。

Market makers 把 8 月 15 日 Upwork call open interest 洗掉了,现在它正反弹到本该在的 $17.5+ 以上。

一家 $1.8B 的软件公司,毛利率约 80%,年收入 770m,几乎就是送钱。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1959207473812050156
❤️ 18 🔁 2 💬 4
打开原推
📝 原创
Still looking @ $IREN after it's rise to $30+. Reminds me of $NBIS following $CRWV's massive rise.

There's nothing stopping $MARA, $RIOT, $CIFR, $CLSK, $HUT and others from pivoting from BTC into AI right?

Might be a great investment opportunity. https://t.co/1HJSHsiPml
$IREN 涨到 $30+ 后我仍在看它。让我想起 $CRWV 大涨后跟随的 $NBIS

没有什么阻止 $MARA$RIOT$CIFR$CLSK$HUT 等从 BTC 转向 AI,对吧?

可能是很好的投资机会。https://t.co/1HJSHsiPml
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
$MRVL 18% drop after earnings was a complete overreaction.

Perfect time to DCA into Marvell positions over the next month.
$MRVL 财报后跌 18% 完全是过度反应。

接下来一个月是 DCA 进 Marvell 仓位的完美时间。
❤️ 8 🔁 1 💬 0
打开原推

2025年8月

↩️ 回复
@SCurveCapital I'll do a deeper DD soon on $IREN, I've heard the name before it looks pretty solid at first glance.
@SCurveCapital 我很快会对 $IREN 做更深入 DD,我以前听过这个名字,第一眼看起来相当扎实。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
My moonshot baskets for 1000% returns in 5y given current valuations.

Space - $RKLB (220B)
AI - $CRWV (470B)
Semi - $CREDO (200B), $TSSI (3.8B)
Crypto - $BKKT (1.8B)
Fintech - $DJT (49B)
Social - $BMBL (6.2B)
Health - $HIMS (95B)
Software - $UPWK (19B)

What are your picks?
按当前估值,我的 5 年 1000% 回报 moonshot 篮子。

Space - $RKLB (220B)
AI - $CRWV (470B)
Semi - $CREDO (200B), $TSSI (3.8B)
Crypto - $BKKT (1.8B)
Fintech - $DJT (49B)
Social - $BMBL (6.2B)
Health - $HIMS (95B)
Software - $UPWK (19B)

你们选什么?
❤️ 19 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Sumojoe118 Polymarket is pricing in ~70% odds of Bitcoin hitting 125k this year and ~60% of 130k.

Pretty good asymmetric return if you’re buying at $110k now while selling CCs.
@Sumojoe118 Polymarket 定价 Bitcoin 今年到 125k 的概率约 ~70%,到 130k 的概率约 ~60%。

如果你现在在 $110k 买入并卖 CCs,这是相当不错的不对称回报。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
This is probably a good indicator to buy Bitcoin | $IBIT at $110k if people are telling you to panic sell at bottoms instead of tops.
如果人们叫你在底部恐慌卖出,而不是在顶部卖出,这可能是买 Bitcoin | $IBIT at $110k 的好指标。
引用原推@PeterSchiff
Bitcoin just dropped below $109K, down 13% from its high less than two weeks ago. Given all the hype and corporate buying, this weakness should be cause for concern. At a minimum, a decline to about $75K is in play, just below $MSTR's average cost. Sell now and buy back lower.
Bitcoin 刚跌破 $109K,距离不到两周前的高点跌了 13%。考虑到所有炒作和企业买盘,这种疲软应该让人警惕。至少,下探到约 $75K 是有可能的,刚好低于 $MSTR 的平均成本。现在卖,之后低位买回来。
https://x.com/PeterSchiff/status/1960146366161903877
❤️ 3 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
📝 原创
Just a tip: Lower risk appetite around September.

Profitable stocks like $UNH, $NVO, $GOOGL, $UPWK, $KSPI... or stocks down YTD - $MRVL, $SG, $SNAP might do well.

If you're full port calls on high beta like $PLTR, $DUOL, $HOOD, $COIN, $CRCL, $NVDA, $MSTR, $TSLA... Good luck.
一个提示:9 月降低风险偏好。

盈利股票如 $UNH$NVO$GOOGL$UPWK$KSPI……或 YTD 下跌的股票 - $MRVL$SG$SNAP 可能表现不错。

如果你 full port 高 beta calls,比如 $PLTR$DUOL$HOOD$COIN$CRCL$NVDA$MSTR$TSLA……祝好运。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
$HIMS is an easy buy + hold at $42. Short interest ⏫ to 34.59% of float and ~$3 Billion + USD / 9.7B market cap company.

Hedge funds shorting a profitable, growth company like $HIMS while $IONQ and $OKLO — both with 0 revenue, 10B+ market caps is the definition of a stupid short.

HIMS acquired 1.3M+ customers across Europe through the Zava acqusition, which forecasts haven't priced in yet. Currently they're doing:

- 2024 Revenue~$1.48 billion (up 69%)
- TTM Revenue (mid-2025)~$2.01 billion (up ~88.7%)
- Q2 2025 Revenue $544.8 million (+73% YoY).

Growth will ultimately screw the short position.

TLDR: HIMS is an easy buy + hold until the shorts unwind.
$HIMS 在 $42 是轻松 buy + hold。Short interest ⏫ 到流通股的 34.59%,约 ~$3 Billion + USD / 9.7B 市值公司。

Hedge funds 做空像 $HIMS 这样盈利、成长的公司,而 $IONQ$OKLO 这两个 0 收入、10B+ 市值的公司还在那里,这就是愚蠢做空的定义。

HIMS 通过 Zava 收购获得欧洲 1.3M+ 客户,预测还没计入。目前他们在做:

- 2024 Revenue~$1.48 billion(增长 69%)
- TTM Revenue(2025 中)~$2.01 billion(增长 ~88.7%)
- Q2 2025 Revenue $544.8 million(+73% YoY)。

增长最终会搞死空头仓位。

TLDR:HIMS 是轻松 buy + hold,直到空头平仓。
❤️ 13 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Some decent recovery/swing trades right now

1. $SG - $9.39
2. $SNAP - $7.21
3. $UNH - $306.8
4. $ETOR - $46.8
5. $NVO - $57.00
6. $HIMS - $44.73
7. $CRWV - $94.7

Stay away from these dips

1. $CRCL - $136.2
2. $PLTR - $159.6
3. $DUOL - $334.5
现在一些不错的 recovery/swing trades

1. $SG - $9.39
2. $SNAP - $7.21
3. $UNH - $306.8
4. $ETOR - $46.8
5. $NVO - $57.00
6. $HIMS - $44.73
7. $CRWV - $94.7

远离这些 dips

1. $CRCL - $136.2
2. $PLTR - $159.6
3. $DUOL - $334.5
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$UPWK is the safest value play, even over $UNH, $NVO, $GOOGL, and others.

Market makers flushed Upwork call open interest for August 15th, and now it's rallying where it should be above $17.5+.

A 1.8B software company with ~80% gross margins doing 770m in annual revenue is almost free money.
$UPWK 是最安全的价值投资,甚至超过 $UNH$NVO$GOOGL 等。

Market makers 清掉了 Upwork 8 月 15 日的 call open interest,现在它正在涨回本该在 $17.5+ 以上的位置。

一家 1.8B 软件公司,~80% 毛利率,年收入 770m,几乎是เงินฟรี。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
So for the long term play on Upwork:

$UPWK is trading at a 7.5 P/E with ~$770M in annual revenue, 78% gross margins, and $622M in cash — yet its market cap is only $1.74B.

Who cares about revenue growth when they can just scale operating margins?
所以说 Upwork 的长线玩法:

$UPWK 现在 P/E 只有 7.5,年收入约 $770M,毛利率 78%,现金 $622M,但市值只有 $1.74B。

谁还在乎收入增速?它们只要把 operating margins 拉起来就行。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1947215927462027284
❤️ 20 🔁 0 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Alan_24z It's an easy low-risk hold until it trades $17-23. There's too much open interest expiring in 8 days so expect shorting/gamma hedging.

$UPWK is high profitable, growing margins, strong cash position and just raised guidance so selling at $13-$14 is stupid.
@Alan_24z 在它交易到 $17-23 前,这是轻松低风险持有。8 天后到期的 open interest 太多,所以预期会有做空/gamma hedging。

$UPWK 高度盈利、利润率增长、现金状况强劲,并刚刚上调指引,所以在 $13-$14 卖出很蠢。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
$UPWK is will do some repricing after earnings today + short interest/analyst upgrades.

All they needed to do was expand operating margins on their 78% gross margins and they did.

1.5B company doing 770m FY revenue, growing operating margins, and a strong cash position.
$UPWK 今天财报后 + short interest/分析师上调后,会有一些重新定价。

他们需要做的只是基于 78% 毛利率扩大经营利润率,而他们做到了。

1.5B 公司做 770m FY revenue,经营利润率增长,现金状况强劲。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
So for the long term play on Upwork:

$UPWK is trading at a 7.5 P/E with ~$770M in annual revenue, 78% gross margins, and $622M in cash — yet its market cap is only $1.74B.

Who cares about revenue growth when they can just scale operating margins?
所以说 Upwork 的长线玩法:

$UPWK 现在 P/E 只有 7.5,年收入约 $770M,毛利率 78%,现金 $622M,但市值只有 $1.74B。

谁还在乎收入增速?它们只要把 operating margins 拉起来就行。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1947215927462027284
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推

2025年7月

📝 原创
$KSPI is an extremely good buy at $82 after this week's 7.2% drop. So bought $100k+ worth, plan to scale this to $250k cost average.

$HOOD $SOFI $BULL aside, $KSPI is growing 47% Y/Y as a fintech with 31% profit margins and a 7.9 P/E.

Might make a WSB style post about this. https://t.co/JdyYm2rBuV
$KSPI 在本周跌 7.2% 后,$82 是极好的买点。所以买了 $100k+,计划成本均摊扩到 $250k。

$HOOD $SOFI $BULL 外,$KSPI 作为 fintech 同比增长 47%,利润率 31%,P/E 7.9。

可能会写一篇 WSB 风格帖子。https://t.co/JdyYm2rBuV
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
The reason why $ALAB is taking off is because Astera is the only small cap company in existence with systemic exposure to 5 of the Mag7.

1. ALAB's customer base is literally Mag 7: $GOOGL, $MSFT, $NVDA, $META, and $AMZN.

2. They're growing at astounding rates ~150%+ y/y, with 76% margins (with higher margins than NVDA, one of the highest in the semi market).

3. Capex is still increasing for AI spend, as seen with $GOOGL earnings.

NVDA started at a 150B market cap -> 4 TRILLION+ because hyperscalers needed GPUs. We're the start of this effect with ALAB for the AI supply chain, and it's starting at a small 20B market cap.

We could see this being the next 1000% if they execute properly and AI infrastructure buildout continues.
$ALAB 起飞的原因是,Astera 是现存唯一一家对 5 家 Mag7 有系统性敞口的小盘公司。

1. ALAB 的客户基础字面上就是 Mag 7:$GOOGL$MSFT$NVDA$META$AMZN

2. 他们以惊人速度增长,~150%+ y/y,毛利率 76%(高于 NVDA,是半导体市场最高之一)。

3. AI 支出 capex 仍在增加,$GOOGL 财报可见。

NVDA 从 150B 市值 -> 4 TRILLION+,因为 hyperscalers 需要 GPUs。我们正在 AI 供应链上看到 ALAB 这种效应的开始,而它起点只有 20B 市值。

如果他们执行得当且 AI infrastructure buildout 继续,它可能成为下一个 1000%。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I just bought long term ~$175k+ positions in $ALAB and plan to scale this to ~$500k as a potential $50B+ moonshot.

NVDA-like profit margins (76%), 144%+ Y/Y growth, customers like NVDA, AWS, MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA, AMD at 16B market cap.

Unreal customers + growth/margins. https://t.co/bRCBgtoGSB
我刚买了约 $175k+ 的 $ALAB 长线仓位,并计划把它加到约 $500k,把它当成潜在 $50B+ moonshot。

类似 NVDA 的利润率(76%)、同比增长 144%+,客户包括 NVDA、AWS、MSFT、GOOGL、NVDA、AMD,而市值只有 16B。

客户阵容 + 增长/利润率都太离谱了。 https://t.co/bRCBgtoGSB
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1947207626930225347
❤️ 5 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
💬 引用
Shorting $PLTR, thanks Jim. https://t.co/2xKvNnPqvE
Shorting $PLTR,谢谢 Jim。https://t.co/2xKvNnPqvE
引用原推@jimcramer
Palantir being pushed up nicely. Right through $150 like a knife through butter. Next stop: $200. Obviously Robinhood roaring, too
Palantir 被推得很顺。直接穿过 $150,像热刀切黄油一样。下一站:$200。Robinhood 当然也在狂飙。
https://x.com/jimcramer/status/1949764867268784395
❤️ 2 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
🚿thoughts: Not surprised if the US announcement in 2 days changes US policy to inflate Bitcoin $IBIT prices by acquiring more.

Trump just bought 300m in Bitcoin calls today along with 2B in Bitcoin for his $DJT company.

DJT is the new Nancy Pelosi, just follow the lead.
🚿想法:如果 2 天后的美国公告改变美国政策,通过增持来推高 Bitcoin $IBIT 价格,我不会惊讶。

Trump 今天刚为他的 $DJT 公司买了 300m Bitcoin calls,以及 2B Bitcoin。

DJT 是新的 Nancy Pelosi,跟着走就行。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
On the $IBIT WSB trade, sitting on $44K+ or so unrealized profit after Friday's 3% drop.

$6557+ in realized profit just from selling covered calls in 2 months.

Same rate would be ~157K+ over 2 years. Low risk, asymmetric upside, esp with $DJT buying 2B+ worth. https://t.co/BPa8uSvV1s
$IBIT 的 WSB 交易上,周五跌 3% 之后,我仍然有大约 $44K+ 的未实现利润。

过去 2 个月光靠卖 covered calls,就有 $6557+ 的已实现利润。

按同样速度,2 年就是约 $157K+。低风险、非对称上行,尤其是 $DJT 还买了 $2B+。 https://t.co/BPa8uSvV1s
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1949746559912132787
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
On $HIMS, sold early only realized $70K gain but again a lot are unrealized profit.

These are just examples of shorter trades I post on WSB in a two-three month timeframe.

My most successful trades I haven't posted before on WSB. https://t.co/Tlhc9IxdY8
关于 $HIMS,卖早了,只实现 $70K 收益,但还有很多未实现利润。

这些只是我在 WSB 上两三个月时间框架内发的一些短线交易例子。

我最成功的交易以前没在 WSB 发过。https://t.co/Tlhc9IxdY8
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
On the $IBIT WSB trade, sitting on $44K+ or so unrealized profit after Friday's 3% drop.

$6557+ in realized profit just from selling covered calls in 2 months.

Same rate would be ~157K+ over 2 years. Low risk, asymmetric upside, esp with $DJT buying 2B+ worth. https://t.co/BPa8uSvV1s
关于 $IBIT WSB 交易,周五跌 3% 后仍坐拥大概 $44K+ 未实现利润。

仅靠 2 个月卖 covered calls,就实现了 $6557+ 利润。

同样速度 2 年会是 ~157K+。低风险、不对称上行,尤其是 $DJT 买了 2B+。https://t.co/BPa8uSvV1s
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
For WSB charts I posted:

On $GOOGL, realized profit was $101,428+, and lots of unrealized profit since I expect GOOGL to hit $220+ EOY if tech rally continues ( $META $APPL $AMZN $MSFT $NVDA $SPOT)

Earnings were a complete blowout and they still have 70B+ in buybacks https://t.co/G6jrKAyumE
关于我发的 WSB 图表:

$GOOGL 上,实现利润是 $101,428+,并且还有很多未实现利润,因为如果 tech rally 继续,我预计 GOOGL 年底到 $220+($META $APPL $AMZN $MSFT $NVDA $SPOT)。

财报完全爆炸,他们仍有 70B+ 回购。https://t.co/G6jrKAyumE
❤️ 7 🔁 0 💬 1
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@sixaw09 earnings
@sixaw09 财报
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@EliCoen1 I have exit strategies planned for swing trading. For investing I just hold for years like $ALAB.

For short squeezes like $DNUT, it depends day-by-day.

If something squeezes, make sure to sell. $OPEN squeezed but people didn't sell, which is why one might have "lost 40%"
@EliCoen1 我为波段交易规划了退出策略。投资的话,我就像 $ALAB 一样持有多年。

对于 $DNUT 这类 short squeezes,要逐日判断。

如果某个东西 squeeze,记得卖。$OPEN squeeze 了,但人们没卖,所以才可能“亏了 40%”。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@EliCoen1 There's no price target when it comes to short squeezes. You will know when to sell if there's a sudden volume increase and spike in price
@EliCoen1 说到 short squeezes,没有目标价。如果成交量突然增加、价格飙升,你会知道什么时候卖。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
For people looking at $RKT, short interest is over 60%+ which is absolutely insane.

Usually retail can't squeeze a $30B+ company but with the high short interest, it's definitely possible.
给看 $RKT 的人,short interest 超过 60%+,这绝对疯狂。

通常散户无法 squeeze 一家 $30B+ 公司,但在这么高的 short interest 下,绝对有可能。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Normally I don't join on meme rallies like $RKT, $KSS, but I really don't appreciate short sellers shorting my favorite donut places to bankruptcy by selling 32% of the float.

This one is out of principle.

Bought $30k worth of $DNUT just to say f**k you to short sellers. https://t.co/jTNnxFNJlq
通常我不会参与 $RKT$KSS 这种 meme rallies,但我真的不喜欢空头通过卖空 32% 流通股,把我最爱的甜甜圈店做空到破产。

这次是原则问题。

买了 $30k $DNUT,只为对空头说 f**k you。https://t.co/jTNnxFNJlq
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Just bought $100K worth of $CRDO as it's a similar company to $ALAB and also growing at insane rates.

Similar market segments and it dropped 8% last week. Usually things rise together (eg. $CRWV + $NBIS).

I'd hold anyway as it's a solid hyper growth company. https://t.co/v4kI2fb1Ef
刚买了 $100K $CRDO,因为它和 $ALAB 是类似公司,也在疯狂增长。

相似市场细分,上周跌了 8%。通常东西会一起涨(比如 $CRWV + $NBIS)。

无论如何我都会持有,因为它是扎实的 hyper growth 公司。https://t.co/v4kI2fb1Ef
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Well, $ALAB just shot up 16%.

I actually wouldn't swing trade or take profit on this this since I think it's another NVIDIA 500%+ type stock.

You don't really see small cap companies growing 150+ Y/Y with 76% profit margins serving Mag7 companies every day.
好吧,$ALAB 刚刚暴涨 16%。

我其实不会拿它做波段,也不会在这里止盈,因为我觉得它是另一只 NVIDIA 那种 500%+ 类型的股票。

你不是每天都能看到一家小盘公司,同比增速 150%+、利润率 76%,还服务 Mag7 客户。
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1947292748563796124
❤️ 3 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
Well, $ALAB just shot up 16%.

I actually wouldn't swing trade or take profit on this this since I think it's another NVIDIA 500%+ type stock.

You don't really see small cap companies growing 150+ Y/Y with 76% profit margins serving Mag7 companies every day.
好吧,$ALAB 刚刚涨了 16%。

我其实不会对它做波段或止盈,因为我觉得它是另一只 NVIDIA 500%+ 类型的股票。

你不是每天都能看到服务 Mag7 公司、同比增长 150+、利润率 76% 的小盘公司。
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
I just bought long term ~$175k+ positions in $ALAB and plan to scale this to ~$500k as a potential $50B+ moonshot.

NVDA-like profit margins (76%), 144%+ Y/Y growth, customers like NVDA, AWS, MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA, AMD at 16B market cap.

Unreal customers + growth/margins. https://t.co/bRCBgtoGSB
我刚买了约 $175k+ 的 $ALAB 长线仓位,并计划把它加到约 $500k,把它当成潜在 $50B+ moonshot。

类似 NVDA 的利润率(76%)、同比增长 144%+,客户包括 NVDA、AWS、MSFT、GOOGL、NVDA、AMD,而市值只有 16B。

客户阵容 + 增长/利润率都太离谱了。 https://t.co/bRCBgtoGSB
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1947207626930225347
❤️ 5 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
If Upwork can scale operating margins from 20% → 40–60% on recurring revenue from cost-cutting + AI automations.. That’s $770M x 60% = $462M operating income.

At a modest 15x EBIT multiple, that's a $6.9B valuation.
VS today's $1.7B market cap, that’s a potential 3–4x upside.
如果 Upwork 能通过削减成本 + AI 自动化,把经常性收入上的运营利润率从 20% 提升到 40–60%……那就是 $770M x 60% = $462M operating income。

按保守 15x EBIT 倍数,就是 $6.9B 估值。
相比今天 $1.7B 市值,潜在上行是 3–4 倍。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
💬 引用
So for the long term play on Upwork:

$UPWK is trading at a 7.5 P/E with ~$770M in annual revenue, 78% gross margins, and $622M in cash — yet its market cap is only $1.74B.

Who cares about revenue growth when they can just scale operating margins?
所以对于 Upwork 的长期交易:

$UPWK 以 7.5 P/E 交易,年收入 ~$770M,毛利率 78%,现金 $622M,但市值只有 $1.74B。

如果他们只要扩大运营利润率,谁还在乎收入增长?
引用原推@aleabitoreddit
Why I bought $150k in $UPWK.

Here is UPWORK, UPWK and my explanation on why I bought $150k+ in shares.

At first, you see what looks like a CAT. It starts off with the two ears. Looks like a cat right?

Wrong. This is the NINE TAILED FOX Pattern, not just any cat. https://t.co/BUYY3BncTs
为什么我买了 $150k 的 $UPWK

这是 UPWORK、UPWK,以及我为什么买入 $150k+ 股票的解释。

一开始,你会看到它看起来像一只 CAT。先从两只耳朵开始。看起来像猫,对吧?

错。这是 NINE TAILED FOX Pattern,不是什么普通的猫。 https://t.co/BUYY3BncTs
https://x.com/aleabitoreddit/status/1940361849985458270
❤️ 9 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
ALAB reminds me of how Nvidia grew (extremely large GPU profit margins) + serving Mag7.

Only similar company out growth wise in semis is probably $CREDO with XAI/AWS/MSFT customers with 180% y/y growth.

Both are amazing investments.
ALAB 让我想起 Nvidia 的成长方式(极高 GPU 利润率)+ 服务 Mag7。

半导体里增长方面唯一类似的公司大概是 $CREDO,它有 XAI/AWS/MSFT 客户,同比增长 180%。

两者都是很棒的投资。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
I just bought long term ~$175k+ positions in $ALAB and plan to scale this to ~$500k as a potential $50B+ moonshot.

NVDA-like profit margins (76%), 144%+ Y/Y growth, customers like NVDA, AWS, MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA, AMD at 16B market cap.

Unreal customers + growth/margins. https://t.co/bRCBgtoGSB
我刚买了 $ALAB 长期仓位 ~$175k+,计划把它扩大到 ~$500k,作为潜在 $50B+ moonshot。

NVDA 级利润率(76%)、144%+ Y/Y 增长,客户包括 NVDA、AWS、MSFT、GOOGL、NVDA、AMD,而市值只有 16B。

客户 + 增长/利润率都不真实地强。https://t.co/bRCBgtoGSB
❤️ 8 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
I typically cost average down for swing trading. Some levels I look out for as examples (i don't leverage unless something is extremely oversold)

$GME (sub $20 - buy calls), $21-$22 buy, $23 accumulate

$SG (High $13) buy, (~ $12.8) very strong buy, sub $11 calls.
我做波段通常会向下成本均摊。举几个我关注的价位例子(除非极度超卖,否则我不用杠杆):

$GME(低于 $20 - 买 calls),$21-$22 买,$23 累积

$SG(高 $13)买,(~ $12.8)very strong buy,低于 $11 买 calls。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@MR61615938 Maybe like $26 if you're not greedy, $28+ if you are.

It usually spikes around earnings so just hold until then usually. It has enough assets that shares are unlikely to drop too far beneath $23.
@MR61615938 如果你不贪,大概 $26;如果贪,$28+。

它通常会在财报附近 spike,所以一般持有到那时就好。它有足够资产,股票不太可能跌到远低于 $23。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
🔥Fire sale today for stocks.

Bought a decent amount of $BULL on the 15% drop 12.28.

Bought $SG $13.8 on the 6% drop (sometimes drops to low $13/high $12.8, so hold off on major positions).

Bought $GME $23.00 on the 3% drop.

Bought $HIMS $45.26 on the 5.6% drop.
🔥今天股票大甩卖。

在 15% 下跌到 12.28 时买了不少 $BULL

在 6% 下跌到 $13.8 时买了 $SG(有时会跌到低 $13/高 $12.8,所以大仓先等等)。

在 3% 下跌到 $23.00 时买了 $GME

在 5.6% 下跌到 $45.26 时买了 $HIMS
❤️ 2 🔁 0 💬 3
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@Dylanwith86 If you're going shorter term I'd personally pick October strikes so you have time for the July/August runup, then sell before September + not get too theta decayed. 45% IV is really really low all things considered.

But very short term options have a lot of potential.
@Dylanwith86 如果你做更短期,我个人会选 October strikes,这样有时间吃到 July/August runup,然后在 September 前卖掉 + 不会被 theta 蚕食太多。综合来看 45% IV 真的很低。

但非常短期的期权也有很大潜力。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Big Beautiful Bill just passed. The bill's expansionary fiscal policy will likely increase buying hedges (gold/bitcoin) against the ~3T added to federal debt.

Prepare for Bitcoin $120k-$140k in 2 months. https://t.co/EasZFkSHaf
Big Beautiful Bill 刚通过。该法案的扩张性财政政策可能会增加对冲买盘(gold/bitcoin),以对冲新增到联邦债务中的 ~3T。

准备迎接 Bitcoin 2 个月内 $120k-$140k。https://t.co/EasZFkSHaf
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
@notthefxckinone I'll need to look into it more.

If it's one of those low float IPOs like BULL I'll probably buy in
@notthefxckinone 我需要再多研究一下。

如果它是 BULL 那种低流通 IPO,我可能会买入。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Med/Long term swing trades right now are

1. $GME after the 30% drop
2. $SG after the 49% drop
3. $UNH after the 45% drop.
4. $GOOGL after the drop to $164 again. Bought calls ~$150 for my WSB DD, sold $175, rebought $164, now holding to $185.

Doing more research on $SRPT.
目前的中/长期波段交易是:

1. $GME 跌 30% 后
2. $SG 跌 49% 后
3. $UNH 跌 45% 后。
4. $GOOGL 再次跌到 $164 后。我为 WSB DD 在 ~$150 买 calls,$175 卖,$164 重新买入,现在持有到 $185。

正在对 $SRPT 做更多研究。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
As for thesis on Blacksky ($BKSY) honestly, pretty terrible company.

However, Planet Labs $PL + Satellite / Space companies like $RKLB $RDW had a huge spike awhile ago and Blacksky (industry adjacent) hadn't moved at all yet.

It ended up catching up in price, so it worked.
至于 Blacksky ($BKSY) 的 thesis,老实说,这家公司相当糟糕。

不过,Planet Labs $PL + $RKLB $RDW 这类 Satellite / Space 公司不久前大涨,而 Blacksky(行业相邻)还完全没动。

它最后价格补涨了,所以这个交易奏效。
❤️ 12 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
TSSI is quite amazing back when they were $200m or so.

BKKT has -19M net operating income loss for Q1 2025 but Bitcoin appreciation + cost cutting should help them out a bit with their small $200m market cap.

Moonshot is a 2.5B market cap (10x from here) or bankruptcy.
TSSI 在 $200m 左右时相当惊人。

BKKT 2025 Q1 net operating income 亏损 -19M,但 Bitcoin 升值 + 成本削减应该会稍微帮助它,尤其是在 $200m 小市值下。

Moonshot 是 2.5B 市值(从这里 10x),或者破产。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Can't talk about microcaps on WSB, but if you're curious:

Only three I've owned are $BKKT ($12), $TSSI ($8), $BKSY ($11).

For BKKT, 21%+ of the company is sold short and crypto companies are doing well. I don't recommend chasing but not the worst to have small positions. https://t.co/yIzRzMAMD9
WSB 上不能谈 microcaps,但如果你好奇:

我只持有过三个:$BKKT ($12)、$TSSI ($8)、$BKSY ($11)。

对 BKKT 来说,公司 21%+ 被卖空,而 crypto 公司表现不错。我不建议追高,但小仓位也不是最糟。https://t.co/yIzRzMAMD9
❤️ 4 🔁 0 💬 2
打开原推
↩️ 回复
When I was doing arbitrage earlier, it was clear $BULL was going to crash from $70 once warrants could be redeemed.

Yet people blindly still bought the stock at $30+ after $10 strikes ($4.00 each) were so mispriced relative to the actual stock.

TLDR: dilution crashes stocks!
我之前做套利时,很明显一旦权证可以赎回,$BULL 会从 $70 崩下来。

但在 $10 strikes(每份 $4.00)相对实际股票严重错价后,人们仍然盲目在 $30+ 买股票。

TLDR:稀释会打崩股票!
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
People keep DMing me about new IPOs. Advice: PAY ATTENTION to dilution if you're short/long.

$BULL is okay valued but there's active lockups people need to follow.

$CRCL has a 180 day lockup as well, people are trading with limited floats, which is why it has a 40B MC. https://t.co/3pjeQeTJ85
人们一直 DM 我问新 IPO。建议:如果你做空/做多,请注意稀释。

$BULL 估值还可以,但有 active lockups,大家需要跟踪。

$CRCL 也有 180 天 lockup,人们是在有限流通盘下交易,这就是为什么它有 40B MC。https://t.co/3pjeQeTJ85
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Disclosure: I bought a small amount if you ever want to follow along.

But it's always possible for it to drop back to $13 similar to UNH $375 -&gt; $320 -&gt; $250 before recovering, which is why I never recommend full porting on dips like these.
披露:如果你想跟,我买了一小点。

但它总有可能像 UNH $375 -> $320 -> $250 后才恢复那样,跌回 $13,所以我从不建议在这种 dip 上 full port。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
It's hard to time the exact bottom so if you're re-entering stocks like $OSCR after selling at $22 from $14 after my Reddit DD:

Decent idea to buy say 30% of your position after today's 18.75% drop, then have cost averages down to the low, such as ($11.6). https://t.co/8nh9TLD1Yq
精准择底很难,所以如果你在看像 $OSCR 这样的股票,在我 Reddit DD 后从 $14 到 $22 卖出后想重新进入:

今天跌 18.75% 后,先买大概 30% 仓位,然后向低位做成本均摊,比如到 ($11.6),是个不错思路。https://t.co/8nh9TLD1Yq
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Polymarket also is pricing in 76% odds of Bitcoin reaching $120k this year, so even if Bitcoin only goes up 10% after a few months you still make a lot from leverage + covered calls.

July/August is usually the best time to buy before Sept weakness then rebuy Nov/Dec.
Polymarket 也定价 Bitcoin 今年到 $120k 的概率为 76%,所以即使 Bitcoin 几个月后只涨 10%,你仍然可以通过杠杆 + covered calls 赚很多。

July/August 通常是 Sept 走弱前最好的买入时间,然后 Nov/Dec 再买回。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Seriously though $IBIT $BTC 2026-2027 Leaps have huge upside

Very low IV (44-55), new bills inflated USD by 10-11%, global monetary supply increasing, historical rallies Jul/August one year after halving.

Meanwhile, selling BTC CCs into weekly high IV = profit despite theta
说真的,$IBIT $BTC 2026-2027 Leaps 有巨大上行空间。

IV 很低(44-55),新法案让 USD 膨胀 10-11%,全球货币供应增加,减半一年后的 July/August 历史上会 rally。

与此同时,在 weekly 高 IV 时卖 BTC CCs = 即使有 theta 也赚钱。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Given how ETORO is a new stock, it's likely not associated with Crypto yet like how (Bitcoin -&gt; $MSTR -&gt; $COIN -&gt; $MARA, etc).

However, 37% of $ETORO's profits come from Crypto and it's at a low so might have some room to catch up like the day they spiked $61 -&gt; $76
考虑到 ETORO 是新股,它可能还没有像(Bitcoin -> $MSTR -> $COIN -> $MARA 等)那样和 Crypto 关联起来。

不过,$ETORO 37% 利润来自 Crypto,而且现在处于低位,所以可能还有一些补涨空间,就像它们那天从 $61 -> $76 spike 一样。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
I'll also post random thoughts too if people are interested.

$ETORO is a great add at $63.1, crypto brokerages like $HOOD and $BULL are both up 8-10%+ while ETORO is down 1.25%.

Usually related sectors have similar movements, it's more of playing catch-up
如果大家感兴趣,我也会发一些随机想法。

$ETORO 在 $63.1 是很好的加仓点,$HOOD$BULL 这类 crypto brokerages 都涨了 8-10%+,而 ETORO 跌 1.25%。

通常相关板块会有类似走势,这更像是补涨。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
For that reason I believe Upwork will breakout $17+ and bought a decent amount. This is fully shown in the TA of the chart for anyone with a PHD such as myself.
因此我相信 Upwork 会 breakout 到 $17+,并买了不少。这在图表 TA 里已经完全展示出来了,适合像我这样有 PHD 的人。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
Which means, Naruto/UPWK is about to have some serious plot armor in the upcoming weeks and months.

You know what comes next. Naruto meets Tsunade. They didn't show this in the show but there's a bouncy entrance and the Chakara Massage. There's a happy ending to Naruto.
这意味着,Naruto/UPWK 在接下来几周和几个月将拥有严肃的 plot armor。

你知道接下来会发生什么。Naruto 遇见 Tsunade。节目里没演这段,但有一个弹性的入场和 Chakara Massage。Naruto 会有 happy ending。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
↩️ 回复
So as usual with the destruction of the hidden leaf village, UPWK had some rebuilding to do. A massive dump candle hits like Pain himself.

But what they don’t see… is that the chart needed this. Naruto HAS ARRIVED. You can see his hairline being formed in the chart.
所以和隐藏叶村被毁一样,UPWK 也需要一些重建。一根巨大的 dump candle 像 Pain 本人一样砸下来。

但他们没看到的是……图表需要这一点。Naruto HAS ARRIVED。你可以看到他的发际线正在图表中形成。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Why I bought $150k in $UPWK.

Here is UPWORK, UPWK and my explanation on why I bought $150k+ in shares.

At first, you see what looks like a CAT. It starts off with the two ears. Looks like a cat right?

Wrong. This is the NINE TAILED FOX Pattern, not just any cat. https://t.co/BUYY3BncTs
为什么我买了 $150k $UPWK

这里是 UPWORK、UPWK,以及我为什么买入 $150k+ 股票的解释。

一开始,你看到的像是一只 CAT。它从两只耳朵开始。看起来像猫,对吧?

错。这是 NINE TAILED FOX Pattern,不是什么普通猫。https://t.co/BUYY3BncTs
❤️ 17 🔁 0 💬 6
打开原推

Unknown

📝 原创
(原文为空)
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
It's multifaceted. However, InP is EXTREME because $AXTI and $SMTOY control roughly 60%+ of this critical global supply.

The industry's shift from copper to photonics has created this structural single point of failure on the entire buildout.

Every optical transceiver/interconnects in hyperscaler data centers from Google TPUs, NVIDIA's CPO roadmap, AWS/Meta networks requires InP-based components.

This is the definition of a bottleneck.

The future of the entire trillion dollar AI buildout depends on the stability of some random $700m penny stock and a Japanese industrial giant.
这是多方面的。不过,InP 是 EXTREME,因为 $AXTI$SMTOY 控制了这个关键全球供应的大约 60%+。

行业从铜转向 photonics,给整个 buildout 创造了一个结构性的单点故障。

从 Google TPUs、NVIDIA 的 CPO roadmap,到 AWS/Meta 网络,hyperscaler 数据中心里的每个 optical transceiver/interconnects 都需要基于 InP 的组件。

这就是 bottleneck 的定义。

整个万亿美元 AI buildout 的未来,取决于某只随机 $700m penny stock 和一家日本工业巨头的稳定性。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
Warning: The entire AI industry will likely be bottlenecked by two companies:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

Which both control 60–70%+ of the world's InP substrates.

Future $NVDA, $GOOGL TPU v7 pods, $META, $MSFT, $AMZN hyperscaler clusters require InP-based lasers and receivers.

$AVGO, $LITE, $COHR use for EMLs for 800G/1.6T transceivers, DFB lasers, and other optical infra.

Without InP substrates, the supply chain falters.

After looking at TPU BOM to Maia BOM, it looks like future ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments are heavily reliant on photonics.

And two vendors could freeze the global InP substrate market covering nearly all of:

- Hyperscaler optics (TPU pods, etc)
- Optical transceivers (5g, data)
- LiDAR (robotaxis, drones, military)
-Optical Modules (interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies (Nvidia’s future co-packaged optics and Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines use InP CW laser arrays.)

Since these companies make up majority of the market supply:

-AXTI (est. ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo (est.~30%)
- JX Nippon (est. 10-15%)

That’s it. (eg. 2021 industry note from Yole states that "Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had “more than 75%” of the InP substrate market")

Hyperscalers/AI are moving toward photonics but the entire AI industry is fragile.

If either $AXTI or $SMTOY stop supplying materials, the entire future AI buidlout gets crippled. It's even crazier that a $700m company could become the the center of it all.

InP substrate will likely one of the biggest bottlenecks alongside HMB as the AI industry shifts to photonics.
警告:整个 AI 行业很可能被两家公司卡住瓶颈:

1. $AXTI ($700M)
2. $SMTOY ($31.7B)

它们共同控制全球 60–70%+ 的 InP substrates。

未来 $NVDA$GOOGL TPU v7 pods、$META$MSFT$AMZN hyperscaler clusters 都需要基于 InP 的 lasers 和 receivers。

$AVGO$LITE$COHR 将其用于 800G/1.6T transceivers 的 EMLs、DFB lasers 和其他 optical infra。

没有 InP substrates,供应链就会失灵。

看了 TPU BOM 到 Maia BOM 后,未来 ASICs + GPUs + hyperscaler deployments 看起来都高度依赖 photonics。

而两个供应商就可能冻结全球 InP substrate 市场,覆盖几乎所有:

- Hyperscaler optics(TPU pods 等)
- Optical transceivers(5g、data)
- LiDAR(robotaxis、drones、military)
-Optical Modules(interconnect clusters)
- Silicon photonics laser dies(Nvidia 未来 co-packaged optics 以及 Intel/Broadcom SiPh engines 使用 InP CW laser arrays。)

由于这些公司占据大部分市场供应:

-AXTI(估计 ~30–35%)
-Sumitomo(估计 ~30%)
- JX Nippon(估计 10-15%)

就是这些。(例如 Yole 的 2021 industry note 表示“Sumitomo Electric + AXT together had more than 75% of the InP substrate market”)

Hyperscalers/AI 正在转向 photonics,但整个 AI 行业很脆弱。

如果 $AXTI$SMTOY 中任一停止供应材料,整个未来 AI buildout 都会受重创。更疯狂的是,一家 $700m 公司竟可能成为这一切的中心。

随着 AI 行业转向 photonics,InP substrate 很可能会成为和 HMB 并列的最大瓶颈之一。
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推
📝 原创
(原文为空)
❤️ 0 🔁 0 💬 0
打开原推